Lakers Now

Round-the-Clock Purple and Gold

« Previous Post | Lakers Now Home | Next Post »

Sizing up what Celtics-Thunder trade means for the Lakers

59347990

Even through all the injury uncertainty, the Lakers have maintained a long and steadfast view that they shouldn't trade center Andrew Bynum for one reason.

Size. It's an advantage few teams have in the NBA and it's a huge reason why the Lakers have been through three consecutive Finals appearances. Heck, even when Bynum played a limited role during the Finals against Boston last season because of torn cartilage in his right knee, he altered and blocked shots, intimidated players from driving into the lane, provided close shots and rebounds, and gave an occasional breather to Pau Gasol.

It's debatable in these parts whether that perspective is correct. Size has played an instrumental part of the Lakers' consecutive championships. But there's the continuing uncertainty whether they'll truly get the investment in return. The latter mind-set is something the Celtics showed when they traded center Kendrick Perkins and backup guard Nate Robinson to the Oklahoma City Thunder for forward Jeff Green and center Nenad Krstic. The reasons for the Celtics' breaking up their 2008 championship roster mostly points to the fact that Perkins recently turned down a long-term contract and would become a free agent after this season. Still the Celtics are barely a season removed from Coach Doc Rivers' downplaying the Lakers' 2010 title because Perkins tore the medial collateral and posterior cruciate ligaments in his right knee, causing him to miss the final three quarters of Game 6 and all of Game 7. "They still have not beaten our starting five," Rivers said of Boston, which in ironic fashion secured the 2008 NBA Finals while the Lakers featured an absent Andrew Bynum and a limited Trevor Ariza.

So how does this change Boston moving forward?

"I can't speculate about that," Lakers Coach Phil Jackson said. "They know what they want." But he did throw in a tongue-in-cheek dig: "They go down as never having lost a playoff series."

This at least becomes clear: Rivers can't lament Perkins' absence should the Lakers beat the Celtics in the Finals. The Lakers have their own issues, though they've softened since putting together a two-game winning streak. But this remains clear: The Lakers would match up much better against the Celtics in the NBA Finals without Perkins in the lineup. He may have been limited in the Lakers' 109-96 loss Jan. 31 to the Celtics, posting two points, six rebounds, four fouls and three turnovers in 27 minutes. Perkins also couldn't match Bynum in the Lakers' 92-86 victory Feb. 10 in points, scoring 12 to Bynum's 16. And Boston still stayed the top team in the Eastern Conference despite his absence until the first Lakers-Celtics matchup.

But as the Lakers and Celtics very well know, the playoffs area different story. Perkins provided a valuable presence for Boston because he is a capable defender. Of course, the Celtics still have size with Krstic, Shaquille O'Neal and Jermaine O'Neal, while Kevin Garnett and Glen Davis will continue their usual role at power forward. Lakers Hall of Famer Magic Johnson tweeted, "Look out for Shaq-he'll be big in the play-offs for the C's." And The Sporting News and Pro Basketball Talk's Kurt Helin explain in  detail the big-picture implications the Celtics considered when making this move.

But Boston is surely taking a huge risk. Shaq has been frequently limited with an inflamed Achilles' tendon that the Boston Globe's Julian Benbow reports is "showing no signs of improving." Jermaine O'Neal remains sidelined from right knee surgery. And who knows how well Krstic will fit in? With the 2010 NBA Finals presenting a competitive series that hinged on two evenly matched teams looking for any edge possible, the Lakers just gained an advantage without Perkins there should they meet again. This time, however, Rivers can't lament his absence.

"That's right," Jackson said, smiling.

But the Lakers shouldn't be smiling too much because Oklahoma City instantly becomes a tougher opponent for them should they meet in the playoffs. Kobe Bryant expressed uncertainty on what Perkins' role will entail with the Thunder. But should Perkinsprovide the same role with the Thunder as he did with the Celtics, the Lakers are in for one tough series. They already had their hands full dealing with the youth and athleticism that the likes of Kevin Durant, Russell Westbrook and Serge Ibakabring in the open court. If the Thunder are able to strike a balance between using that athleticism and finding production from Perkins when other teams slow down the pace, the Lakers should be in for one tough test.

It's good the Lakers stood pat and made no moves before the trading deadline. They already have the distinguishable skills they need in Bryant's scoring and the size Gasol and Bynum bring. But as the Lakers learned today, one playoff opponent just became stronger at the expense of another.

--Mark Medina

Twitter.com/latmedina

E-mail the Lakers blog at [email protected]

Photo: Lakers center Andrew Bynum and Boston center Kendrick Perkins battle for possession during the first quarter Thursday night. Credit: Charles Krupa / Associated Press

 
Comments () | Archives (103)

The comments to this entry are closed.

Guess what, this Laker starting five has never lost a playoff series either. If you take it back a year further and substitute a healthy Ariza for Artest, they are still undefeated. The 2008 Celtics took out a short handed and undersized Laker team missing Andrew Bynum and having a one legged Trevor Ariza. How do you win a championship when you are forced to start Vladimir Radmonoivic

@ Bil turner...its simple logic...getting injured while playing=LOSING...its a part of all sports...when a marathon runner twists his ankle on mile 14...did he lose the race or not?? He started and failed...just like C's staring five did twice in a seven game series.

laker neuropathologist:

if the marathon runner only lost a race when he twists his ankle you can say:

this marathon runner never lost a race (when not injured)

so the celtics five never lost a playoff series (when not injured)

the sentence "the starting five never lost a starting series" means we have never seen the celtics five lose a playoff run when all 5 were playing through the playoffs...

celtics chemical engineer

 
« | 1 2

Connect

Advertisement

In Case You Missed It...

Video

All Things Lakers »

Your database for all things purple and gold.

Find a Laker

Search a name

Select a season

Choose one of our lists



Categories


Archives
 

About the Bloggers


Bleacher Report | Lakers

Reader contributions from Times partner Bleacher Report

More Lakers on Bleacher Report »



Get Alerts on Your Mobile Phone

Sign me up for the following lists:


In Case You Missed It...