Poll: What is the most divisive Lakers topic?
One of the great things about the L.A. Times Lakers blog involves the comment threads and how they serve as a never-ending tool for debate. For some Lakers fans, they can also be frustrating because there are just some topics that seemingly never get resolved.
It seems like the discussion revolving around Andrew Bynum is one of those. I haven't been able to break it down percentage-wise, but there is a definite split among fans who doubt he'll ever stay injury-free, those who point out that his injuries were all just coincidental, and those who say his effort in the postseason shows he'll be effective regardless of his health. Many of these fans make great points, but there seems to be some frustration that there isn't a resolution; each fan holds to his or her viewpoint no matter how well someone else presents an opposing argument.
Taking off from that conversation, I was wondering what other "Lakers topics" seem to be the most divisive. I'm not talking about things you'd argue over with a Celtics or a Heat fan; what do you think are some of the topics that most split Lakers fans?
Even though I think the split over the issue isn't as strong as in years past, it seems that the debate over Kobe Bryant and his scoring mentality still seems to be the strongest.
Some argue that he's always justified in taking over a game because of his skill set and that the other Lakers just need to adapt. There are some who believe that Bryant's scoring mentality alters team chemistry and alienates some of his teammates. And then there's a viewpoint, which I hold, that acknowledges the truth on both sides of the coin. I believe the situation has improved over the years, but it remains an issue every now and then. The reasons for that seem to ping-pong back and forth between Bryant and his teammates, creating the never-resolved chicken-and-egg debate.
Other topics that come to mind: Who is the Lakers' all-time greatest player, the Lakers' all-time greatest team, Lamar Odom's potential/inconsistency, Derek Fisher's leadership/inconsistent regular-season performance/playoff clutchness, whether the Lakers need to play with more urgency/need to pace themselves for the playoffs, and the bench's inconsistency/lack of opportunities.
I'm interested to know your take on what's the most divisive topic, so feel free to vote in the poll below. If you vote on "other," please explain in the comments section below. This should get the conversation going.
-- Mark Medina
Twitter.com/latmedina
E-mail the Lakers blog at mgmedin@gmail.com
Photo: The Lakers players, coaches and staff. Credit: Los Angeles Lakers








I have to go with other. I think GLOAT and GLT (greatest Laker team) are some hotly contested topics.
Posted by: rage777 | September 16, 2010 at 11:27 AM
rage 777 - You're right. I'm going to update the poll. Those two topics are definitely frequently discussed
Posted by: Mark Medina | September 16, 2010 at 11:50 AM
Hey all:
AB17 - sure love the opinions and easily the biggest topic which divides the blog fam quickly. However, the arguments are well thought on both sides. And we can go on and on and rehash the same things over and over.
I consider myself an "intelligent" poster even though some of the elders here may skip over PLG's thoughts. I am also +40 and while good observations (KBMVP888), I don't subscribe to them. I am not a basher, I am a realist.
I hope and pray (like LakerTom) that AB doesn't get injured. Because heading into his 6th NBA season and 5th as starter, I have HUGE expectations. As the third highest paid Laker, I have BEASTLY expectations.
Are my expectations over the top? Maybe.
Here's a couple interesting 2005 draft time articles. I include both sides of the coin:
Expert opinion: http://www.draftexpress.com/article/2005-NBA-Draft-Grades-1029/
Bynum family perspectives: http://www.thefreelibrary.com/BYNUM+HAS+GREAT+EXPECTATIONS+LAKERS+HOPE+NO.+10+PICK+CAN+DEVELOP...-a0133725974
I am optimistic, yet guarded. And I would argue that the Lakers are still in development stage with the AB17 "project", 6 years later which is a total bummer. I will concede the injuries but given the draft express comments about AB's knees and suggestion that knee surgery will be needed ....hmmmmm. Where there's smoke, there's usually fire.
Cheers - PLG
Posted by: PsychedLakerGirl | September 16, 2010 at 11:51 AM
Good evening from half of me (the other half is already sleeping over a couch failing to follow Family Guy on tv - yes, on e of the very FEW things I watch from time to time on tv...).
I read with EXTREME pleasure the articles of today, and gotta follow Caliphilosopher and tell Mark that .... wow man, that special writing about Lakers ads page was simply an utter brilliance (I enjoyed all the rest too, but that was really really REALLY awesome. Even my already sleeping brain cells cheered there. You woke up half of a dead body...;))
Beside advice every single one out there that to party till 3 am when the day after you gotta work IS WRONG (blame it on the age... I wish I could blame it on alcohol but I'm teetotal so it's kinda impossible...), and pointing out that to me the issue that will be the most controversial will be Lakers urgency to play in the regular season, vs a more relaxed pacing there (I believe so because the rest of debates usually strike in especially after a not well perceived performance in regular season, and so for me that vision is the egg that comes before the chicken that comes before the egg dilemma...), let me collect these poor forces today and welcome a new member.
"
I became a Laker fan the first time I saw Kobe play.
I was a 76ers fan back in the early 80's because I loved watching Dr. J play. I watched that under the backboard shot against Kareem and went nuts.
I hated the Celtics and liked Magic and Kareem but I loved Julius.
Then I stopped watching basketball for 17 years. Until one night I turned on the TV and there was a game on. Game 1 of the Finals once again with the Lakers playing the 76ers. And Kobe had the ball and did something incredible with it and I became a Lakers fan on the spot on that very first play I saw.
Because of Kobe.
I am a Laker fan for life now as I have been glued to the games ever since.
Because of Kobe.
This is my first post.
Hello.
Posted by: bassmouth | September 15, 2010 at 07:54 PM"
You can easily understand that I TOTALLY melted when I read this.
Very few could understand better than me the blasting emotion of witnessing Kobe's magic and get hooked like a magic glue from it.
I properly rejoiced reading that.
And suddenly (it helped also the beautiful pic of him smiling backing PJ) I just realized how much I long to see him play again.
When LakerTruth spells that sentence (true, and logic, but believe me it pains me like nothing else) namely "the last years of Kobe" I feel like I will feel this thrill for any incoming upseason for... not always.
I know, Lakers will remain always and that comforts my fan heart.
But you can have only a limited number of heroes.
I already had to say bye to Roberto Baggio and Paolo Maldini in football.
The day I'll say bye bye to Kobe... I will already count 3 sport heroes less in my life.
It's hard.
And that's why I want this Threepeat so badly.
I'm sure in all this PJ will lead us again the best that is possible to lead.
I totally agree with MM on him: he knows. He does what is really difficult to achieve: he teaches magic like it's chemistry.
And being a chemist... trust me: what Phil does seems maybe easy, but it's of a thin span from constantly exploding out, not in face of others, but in face of us.
And if it doesn't happen... it's also, and really much, ONLY thanxto him.
Great Powers are hard to balance out correctly.
Ask Miami Meat around May, and you will get how important is to have PJ as coach ;)
Have all a great day ahead, and catch you tomorrow... :)
Lotta Laker love, Z. :)
Posted by: ZairaAmaterasu | September 16, 2010 at 11:56 AM
MM,
Luke Walton has been the most divisive topic for years, but the Luke lovers have slowly become an endangered species.
You overlooked some other very important Laker topics:
- Now that Farmar's gone, who will be Luke's new BFF?
- Was Sasha's haircut the main cause for his struggles, ala Sampson?
- Should Phil sport a pornstache next year?
- Is Phil a gold-digger?
- Phil can collect rings, but will he ever give one to Jeannie?
- Does Bynum look like Tracy Morgan or does Tracy Morgan look like Bynum?
- Who would win a fist fight between Pau Gasol and Chuck Nevitt?
Posted by: LAKER TRUTH | September 16, 2010 at 12:01 PM
Andrew. Definitely Andrew. Laker Tom has taken on all comers - both Laker Nation members and trolls - since Drew's first injury and has withstood every naysayer and playa hater that has come to speak ill of Socks.
Posted by: utzworld - the BANNER HOLDER | September 16, 2010 at 12:07 PM
There was a troll that stole handles from Edwin and utzworld. I deleted those comments and banned that IP address. All is good
MM
Posted by: Mark Medina | September 16, 2010 at 12:17 PM
MM,
Thanks for the RCOTD.
Another handle jacker comment at 12:08pm. Please delete.
Posted by: LRob | September 16, 2010 at 12:17 PM
LRob I already deleted that comment as well.
Posted by: Mark Medina | September 16, 2010 at 12:18 PM
What about: Does Sasha Vujacic deserve Maria Sharapova, who may have the most beautiful legs in pro sports? I say no. And if you disagree with me you are a ___________ (fill in epithet of choice).
Posted by: Realist | September 16, 2010 at 12:18 PM
The blog itself. Can't live with it...can't live without it.
Posted by: slimtata | September 16, 2010 at 12:21 PM
The one issue that also causes many debates amongst Laker fans is Shaq's jersey being retired as a Laker. Many acknowledge his contributions, but is hard to ignore his detrimental behavior as well.
Posted by: Laker J | September 16, 2010 at 12:26 PM
LakerTruth:
Steve Blake
No
No
No
No
Bynum looks like Tracy Morgan
Pau would win easily over Nevitt, unless Nevitt has some martial arts background.
Posted by: rdlee | September 16, 2010 at 12:31 PM
@PLG… Excellent post. Thanks for the draft day links. I especially loved Drew asking Kobe about working out with him during the summer. As my latest post postulates, I think the injuries that Drew battled through have made him a more mature and focused player. It’s humbling to come into the league thinking you’re going to be an All-Star in two years and then having to struggle with injuries instead. I think in the long run it has made him a better player mentally and shown him how important it is to focus on what the team needs.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
TOM
Posted by: LakerTom | September 16, 2010 at 12:34 PM
the reason why I posted earlier today:
http://lakersblog.latimes.com/lakersblog/2010/07/lakers-expect-andrew-bynum-to-be-limited-in-training-camp.html
snippet:
Of course, Bynum historically hasn't exactly recovered from injuries as quickly as original timetables suggested. That means it wouldn't be surprising if he is limited. Before you lament this, keep in mind that Bynum is working with trainers in Vancouver and Los Angeles to improve his core strength, which will work as a preventative measure against injuries.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Having a stronger stomach/lower back would not have prevented any
injury that Bynum has suffered.
LakerTom,
you said you remembered this.
my response: ok.
you wrote: I wonder if there is any truth to that as an actual medical diagnosis. Perhaps we have some Lakers bloggers who are orthopedic surgeons who could chime in and educate us on this subject.
my response: http://www.mygazines.com/issue/3796/21
an M.S. degree in sports medicine from the university of utah in 1982.
Does that qualify him as an actual medical person qualified to give an actual
medical diagnosis?
Pysched Laker Girl,
you wrote: I consider myself an "intelligent" poster even though some of the elders here may skip over PLG's thoughts. I am also +40 and while good observations (KBMVP888), I don't subscribe to them. I am not a basher, I am a realist.
I hope and pray (like LakerTom) that AB doesn't get injured. Because heading into his 6th NBA season and 5th as starter, I have HUGE expectations. As the third highest paid Laker, I have BEASTLY expectations.
Are my expectations over the top? Maybe.
Here's a couple interesting 2005 draft time articles. I include both sides of the coin:
Expert opinion: http://www.draftexpress.com/article/2005-NBA-Draft-Grades-1029/
Bynum family perspectives: http://www.thefreelibrary.com/BYNUM+HAS+GREAT+EXPECTATIONS+LAKERS+HOPE+NO.+10+PICK+CAN+DEVELOP...-a0133725974
I am optimistic, yet guarded. And I would argue that the Lakers are still in development stage with the AB17 "project", 6 years later which is a total bummer. I will concede the injuries but given the draft express comments about AB's knees and suggestion that knee surgery will be needed ....hmmmmm. Where there's smoke, there's usually fire.
my response: Ditto.
Posted by: hobbitmage | September 16, 2010 at 12:34 PM
Looks like Bynum now does have a stronger chance for the All-Star Team:
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=5580307
If the voters from China don't make too much of an impact (well they do and voters in the US as well) and Bynum remains productive he could be the starter of the All-Star team.
That being said it's all or nothing. If Bynum does not become the starter unless Gasol becomes the starting center he will not be on the All-Star Game. If Gasol is the starting center Bynum then does have a chance for making the All-Star.
Again that's assuming if Yao doesn't get voted. If he becomes the starter than Gasol pending injuries will become the back up center for the All-Star Team.
Posted by: KB Blitz | September 16, 2010 at 12:37 PM
Thanks everyone for the love on the RCOTD.
AB is easily the most divisive since I've been actively participating in the blog the last 3 months.
Like Lewstrs said, I'm a glass half full type of guy also.
As far as KobeMVP888 poll...I'm in the 40+ demo and I willing to give Drew more time and don't care about the salary.
Like hobbit said - I can't ignore his injury history and do realize he's more prone to injuries than others.
Only God knows whether Andrew will have a relatively healthy career the rest of the way or a legacy full of injuries. If I was running the Lakers I wouldn't trade him just yet because of his potential upside and because his size/skill set is hard to duplicate. I'm not expecting him to be the beast LakerTom projects, but I do believe he can be a solid all-star center.
We have a lot of intelligent posters here that present compelling arguments to support their beliefs. Let's just remember to keep it civil. Oft times it not what you say, but how you say it.
Posted by: LRob | September 16, 2010 at 12:38 PM
I would say the Lakers tendency to turn it on during the post season. This is the one thing that has frustrated me the past 2 seasons, and I've been proven wrong on, so I need to shut up about it. Kobe over shooting isn't debated. But I would add Sasha V.'s lack of playing time to this list.
A better topic would be what is the MOST FRUSTRATING thing (or player) for Lakers fans (eg - Kobe overshooting, Lamar disappearing, Andrew's injuries, Phil not taking time outs, Laker cheerleaders on this blog, and so forth...)
Posted by: troy | September 16, 2010 at 12:43 PM
Thanks MM. So sad.
Posted by: utzworld - the BANNER HOLDER | September 16, 2010 at 12:57 PM
Ooooh, very clever MM. Turning diversity into opportunity, and in the process, create even more heated debates among the bloggers. Crafty, and I love it. To me, its definitely Bynum..... epic battles have been fought between LakerTom, Hobbitimage, Laker Truth.... bloggers have taken sides, families split apart, children given away (ok, I exaggerate). Personnaly, I so want to believe in Bynum but with each year he's not at full-capacity, my hopes begin to dim....
Posted by: Seely_Iggy | September 16, 2010 at 01:00 PM
LRob - deserved RCOTD...keep up the great work...
MM - since I've been aboard, the AB topic has to be most divisive...It's usually LO or Luke debates, but here it's definitely Andrew...
I myself can't understand why...I mean how come no one wants to discuss who is hotter...
Jeannie Buss or Sarah Palin...
Vanessa Bryant or Eva Longoria...
Louis Amundson or Jon K...
Let's get back to the important questions...;-)
Posted by: LEWSTRS | September 16, 2010 at 01:00 PM
@COFM99… “888 Thanks. Just pointing out the obvious points that every one is missing. People are so focussed on production right now but with Drew being injured and toughing it out last year, he grew far more than he would have had he been healthy. Drew's game will always be growing but it is his mental toughness and thought process that needed the most work. Playing injured last year turned young Drew in to a man in my eyes and it also helped him knowing where to be and not to be in the paint to avoid accidents due to having to watch out for his already injured knee. I say stop worrying about the now and look to the future. This team is loaded with or with out a healthy Drew so let him heal up and progress more and more for the future of this organization.”
~
LOL. Not “every one.” I haven’t noticed your posts before so if you are a new poster, welcome to the fray. If not, I will definitely be looking for your comments in the future. Great post. I agree 100% with your point about Drew’s being injured contributing to his maturity and selflessness as a player. I’ve made several posts in the last two days on a similar note postulating that injuries may actually have been a blessing in disguise as they have contributed to Drew developing a championship work ethic, team orientation, and character.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
TOM
Posted by: LakerTom | September 16, 2010 at 01:01 PM
I voted with the majority and picked AB. But as some said more issues like GLOAT and GLT generate a lot of discussion. Glad to see much less of the Kobe extremes love him or hate him stuff.
Posted by: JustaLakerFan | September 16, 2010 at 01:07 PM
Mark Medina,
Was my post regarding SASHA V. deleted? If so why?
Posted by: LAKER TRUTH | September 16, 2010 at 01:09 PM
@COFM99… “888 Thanks. Just pointing out the obvious points that every one is missing. People are so focussed on production right now but with Drew being injured and toughing it out last year, he grew far more than he would have had he been healthy. Drew's game will always be growing but it is his mental toughness and thought process that needed the most work. Playing injured last year turned young Drew in to a man in my eyes and it also helped him knowing where to be and not to be in the paint to avoid accidents due to having to watch out for his already injured knee. I say stop worrying about the now and look to the future. This team is loaded with or with out a healthy Drew so let him heal up and progress more and more for the future of this organization.”
~
LOL. Not “every one.” I haven’t noticed your posts before so if you are a new poster, welcome to the fray. If not, I will definitely be looking for your comments in the future. Great post. I agree 100% with your point about Drew’s being injured contributing to his maturity and selflessness as a player. I’ve made several posts in the last two days on a similar note postulating that injuries may actually have been a blessing in disguise as they have contributed to Drew developing a championship work ethic, team orientation, and character.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
TOM
Posted by: LakerTom | September 16, 2010 at 01:09 PM
I mean how come no one wants to discuss who is hotter...
Jeannie Buss or Sarah Palin...
Vanessa Bryant or Eva Longoria...
Louis Amundson or Jon K...
Let's get back to the important questions...;-)
Posted by: LEWSTRS | September 16, 2010 at 01:00 PM
Definitely Jeanie Buss and her basketball busts...
Vanessa has put on a little weight lately, but a few years ago, she was definitely hotter than Eva.
I've never seen Jon K, but anyone is hotter looking than Amundson.
Posted by: Seely_Iggy | September 16, 2010 at 01:09 PM
Funny Lew, LOL. BTW, Jon K., Vanessa, and Jeannie. Go Lakers!
Posted by: Laker J | September 16, 2010 at 01:10 PM
Posted by: CyberCosmiX | September 16, 2010 at 09:04 AM
Again like you said: Hype vs Reality in a previous post.
Do I want Bynum to succeed? Of course! That being said what Hobbitmage stated was not negative it was a previous post on the OC Register stating how the way Bynum was created was not negative then people complained that a non positive article was labelled as "bad" and toxic?
Seriously does everything have to be positve about Bynum and no negatives? Is it right for me to say that I think Bynum is better than Wilt because Bynum already has two rings and faced off against Howard/Celtics while Wilt had to battle a midge in 6'9 Russell and/or Reed-less Knicks?
That positive enough? You know posting that article wasn't negative. Neither my post which stated that so many of us were putting Bynum as the "one that scares defense" yet he hasn't gotten any All-Defensive votes even.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
KobeMVP888,
1) Gasol in my opinion not a Hall of Famer. Does he have a chance yes but Pippen was a shoe in for the HOF while Gasol hasn't done enough of what Pip did in his NBA career (since HOF doesn't count international accolades)
Retire his jersey? Maybe but I'd rather see Michael Cooper's and/or Byron Scott's jersey retired first.
2) Well those snoozer is one of the reasons why Kobe is right behind MJ in total defensive team awards AWARDED by coaches not the Media (that's the DPOY). As much as I respect your opinion you are also the one telling me to listen to the coaches more and those coaches have not even gave a vote for Andrew Bynum says something yet gives votes to Fisher and even Odom.
Say what you want but I'll leave it up for the voters to decide who really is the best in rated defense. Reason why Kobe has 8 First Teams right behind Jordan and Payton.
3) Why am I comparing Gasol vs Bynum? Simple since people always brings up Bynum-Gasol-Odom they always have to belittle Gasol and/or Odom to bring up Bynum. So it's only fair.
4) I said thank you Lord for Bryant and Gasol because even when they were pathetic in shooting they found a way to win even if Bryant again shot 40% in a Finals.
5) Yao/Lopez/Howard (Bogut is even more injury prone than Bynum though when healthy is actually better than him indefense, even Rosen ranks Bogut highly but rather goes on Bynum because of youth).
Then of course you can't go wrong with James/Wade/Melo/CP/Deron Williams or other established stars. Bynum's value as a role player (he's not a franchise player nor do I believe he will ever be at most a sidekick) makes him more valuable to keep unless there is a legit franchise player to trade him for (Gasol has manned him enough to handle the post).
Hey Tex Winter called Shaq "overrated" and called him out on his defense/footwork/not coachable etc. If a legendary coach like Tex can be Shaq negative there's nothing wrong to be pessimistic to the views of the ultra-optimists of Bynum is there? (All though I try to be more realistic than really negative about Drew).
Posted by: KB Blitz | September 16, 2010 at 01:11 PM
I don't think there is a single most divisive issue, though MM didn't list a time frame for his poll. I don't know if he meant recently, or going back in time a while.
Each of the choices listed have been a divisive topic topic every year, with the exception of the first two choices about the greatest Laker players. While those two have been discussed more recently, they haven't been divisive debates.
Those that have been here from near the beginning or those who have read back through the blog posts can find many arguments/debates breaking out every season.
Bynum, Fisher, Kobe and Odom's inconsistency will be debated and argued about until they are no longer Lakers. The Farmar vs Fisher debate that has been going on for years will finally now be over. The general play of the Lakers when they go on a losing streak or lose games to weak teams is also a perennial favorite.
Even just looking at this past season, does anyone remember the contentious arguments about Kobe shooting too much and when he was injured and the team went 4-1 without him?
And how about the arguments of Pau being soft and the poor play of LO and of course, a common one was the play of Fish. Each of them should rank right up there with Drew.
While this summers favorite debate has been about Drew, I expect this will change again once the season gets rolling along.
The debates, the arguments, they happen every year.
I expect this year will be no different.
It's what sports fans do.
Posted by: Art - FL Laker Fan | September 16, 2010 at 01:15 PM
From my brief time in this forum, it's obviously Bynum, but that is mainly because of the pulling and tugging and unpleasantries exchanged among a certain few bloggers. In reality, everyone wants Bynum to do well and stay healthy. The recent Bynum discussions have been quite enjoyable and far from divisive (thanks in particular to Laker Truth) until a certain blogger chimed in with his "Bynum mania" comment earlier.
In other forums I have been in, Derek Fisher was far and away the most divisive topic. Many younger, loyal Lakers fans have called him old, slow, over the hill, the worst starting point guard in the NBA, a poor defender (or doesn't play any defense), can't shoot, etc, etc, etc. The older fans tend to tolerate and understand Fish's shortcomings and understand that it isn't a matter of simply pure talent, but leadership qualities on and off the court and understanding the Lakers' schemes. Most important, they understand that Phil Jackson trusts him. We ALL know which side prevailed in that one in the playoffs this year!
Yes, Luke is also divisive because of his injuries, lack of athleticism and the salary issues, of course. Same with Sasha. But it is tougher to run to their defense than it is to Fisher's defense. I don't know what it is with younger fans, but they seem to be enamored more with raw talent and statistics without regard to things like team chemistry or the reality that there's a salary cap or the reality that almost every team makes mistakes overpaying players. Just like they are enamored with raw talent and stats, they have a tendency to come up with wild trade scenarios without having a clue about the CBA rules. This lack of understanding of the basics of trade restrictions, salary caps or the luxury tax threshold is also divisive.
Oh, and the one that cracks me up the most, is the crap heaped on Phil Jackson for his refusal to call timeouts and his rotations. I know we are all individuals with opinions, but I think it's about time that every Lakers fan simply defer to Phil Jackson on these issues. Yes, we know the Lakers, but nobody knows his team and what he wants out of them better than Philip Douglas Jackson.
Posted by: KobeMVP888 | September 16, 2010 at 01:17 PM
PLG,
Good post. I am well over 40 but agree with everything you said.
Well stated.
Posted by: Art - FL Laker Fan | September 16, 2010 at 01:19 PM
Heck while I'm on a Bay area Latin rock I will date myself and bring up Azteca too.
Posted by: JustaLakerFan | September 15, 2010 at 11:57 PM
----------------------------
I wasn't up on Azteca, but I definitely like them. After checking them out I realize I know a lot of their band members...Pete & Coke Escovedo and Lenny White. I still have one of my brothers Coke Escovedo albums to this day. And I have lots of Lenny White stuff.
I'll leave you with one more Latin soul group...Tierra. This was a good remake of the Intruders song. Actually it was a bigger hit for them than the original.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gB-OWd5RIns&feature=related
Posted by: LRob | September 16, 2010 at 12:52 AM
======================
LRob, Thanks for the link but yes I was aware of Tierra. I didn't mention them because they were LA products vs Bay area groups. Then I know you must be aware of other LA Latino groups such as El Chicano, Lil Willie G and the Midnighters, Cannibal and the Headhunters among others off the top of my head. I think Sapo was LA band but I could be wrong.
Thanks for the stroll down memory lane.
Posted by: JustaLakerFan | September 16, 2010 at 12:24 PM
I also mentioned Malo a band created by Carlos Santana's younger brother Jorge Santana on lead guitar.
----
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DkDX_SZorg8
Suavecito/Malo
Posted by: JustaLakerFan | September 15, 2010 at 11:11 PM
------------------
JustaLakerFan,
I love that song. Smooth latin fused soul. I have it on one of my compilation cds'. I think it was "Didn't I Blow Your Mind - Soul Hits of the 70's. I never knew it was Santana's brother. Thanks for the education. Were you a fan of War also?
Posted by: LRob | September 16, 2010 at 12:26 AM
===========================
Yes most definetly fan of War, the musicians of course. LOL
Posted by: JustaLakerFan | September 16, 2010 at 12:35 PM
====================
Also congrats on RCOTD.
Posted by: JustaLakerFan | September 16, 2010 at 01:20 PM
LRob,
Forgot to give you link to Jorge Santana's solo music.
LRob,
Check out Jorge Santana's solo stuff.
Sort of Latin, Jazz, and rock fusion.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PsUN7iMvMK8
----
Posted by: JustaLakerFan | September 16, 2010 at 01:22 PM
@HOBBITMAGE… Yes, I would agree that a degree in sports medicine would qualify. I presume you are talking about Gary Vitti. I did a little research myself on the web about the injury potential caused by wider hips and knock knees and you are correct that such characteristics surely can be a factor in some knee injuries, especially subluxation or dislocation of the knee cap, which was Drew’s first major injury as a Laker.
~
Several articles I browsed also stated that the problems caused by wider hips and knock knees usually involves injuries to young men who are still growing and the problem often lessens as player matures. Hopefully, that will be the case with Drew. Obviously, the Lakers were aware of this situation when they gave Drew the extension to his rookie contract. Presumably, that is why they ended up not giving him a max contract and why Drew’s agent agreed to less than the maximum. Let’s all hope the Lakers made the right decision.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
TOM
Posted by: LakerTom | September 16, 2010 at 01:30 PM
Good afternoon all,
Ben going over some of the latest threads and am very pleased to see decorum returned to the forum. As I've said before I've been dropping, just posting less.
But today I have decided to return in full force (not that anyone really cares, just thought I'd throw it out there)
REGARDING THE AB17 PROJECT
With news out of Houston that Yao will play NO MORE than 24 minutes per game (www.espn.com/nba) this clears the way for Bynum to, potentially, be the most dominant center in the Western Conference. A brief synopsis of the article reveals that Yao will practice but not scrimmage, will most likely not play in the second game of back-to-backs, and will not ever play one second over 24 minutes. Rick A and Darryl M are on board with the Rockets staff and all have said this move has ben put in place to try and keep Yao healthy for an entire season and playoffs (duh).
This could be the year. hobbitmage's medical references and Andrew's history of injuries being the biggest obstacle that Bynum will have to overcome. If he's healthy from beginning to end, I expect his numbers to track up across the board. Although, with such a stacked team everyone's numbers will dip slightly, my line of thinking is that Ratliff won't play more than 10-15 mpg and we'll see more of Bynum this year than in year's past.
I was popping around the web looking into whether or not a knee sprain could actually help the ligaments become stronger (like with your ankles), but couldn't find any direct correlation. Anyone have any knowledge/theories/old wives tales?
Lastly, I'd like to thank Mark Medina, since his return it really looks like the handle-stealing and insult hurling has been reduced to pre-championship levels and that the worst offenders aren't allowed to post any more. This is good.
Now what happened to those reader profiles? Those were fun and interesting.
Posted by: Jamie Sweet | September 16, 2010 at 01:32 PM
Hey guys. Just a heads up. Another post is being edited right now and should be up in a bit.
Laker Truth - Your Sasha post was deleted. It was inappropriate I thought.
MM
Posted by: Mark Medina | September 16, 2010 at 01:33 PM
Jamie Sweet - Welcome back! It's nice to see you on these threads. I appreciate the kind words about trying to restore order. I would say my execution is a mixed bag, but hopefully it's getting better. To answer your question about the Laker profiles - I planned to do those on the weekends when the news is scarce. Once the regular season starts, I plan to post more profiles when the team has a day off or there's really not too much going on. Figured it'd serve as a nice little treat sprinkled throughout the season.
MM
Posted by: Mark Medina | September 16, 2010 at 01:35 PM
A couple of quick comments;
1) Bynum is the most divisive topic on this forum but, ironically, it shouldn't be - because, as someone else already alluded to, and all things considered, there isn't another center in this league I would rather have on this team than him.
2) The second most divisive topic, as Laker J pointed out, is this business of whether or not Shaq deserves to eventually have his jersey retired - to which I say, absolutely NOT.
3) I just want to echo bassman and Zaira's feelings about Kobe - there is no other player in the league today that I would rather see take to the court. As Laker fans we are so blessed - I count my lucky stars each and every season we are treated to his offerings. Durant may get there one day, for for now - and for my money - Kobe is the one guy that I most anticipate when tuning into a basketball game...nobody else captures my imagination as much.
Posted by: Jefe101 | September 16, 2010 at 01:37 PM
Psyched Laker Girl
"I consider myself an "intelligent" poster even though some of the elders here may skip over PLG's thoughts. I am also +40 and while good observations (KBMVP888), I don't subscribe to them. I am not a basher, I am a realist."
======
I would never in a million years expect that 100% of the over-40 crowd or 100% of the under-40 crowd would agree on any topic, no less this one. My sons are in their young 20's and are big Lakers fans. The 21 year old agrees with me on Bynum, but his 23 year old brother lacks patience with Bynum and is in the other camp. I do think that if such a poll were taken, their would be more optimism from the over-40 crowd.
I also think that the term "realist" can take on many different meanings. It presumes that the opposing point of view is "idealistic." I think it's more of pessimism vs. optimism myself. Considering that neither one of us has a crystal ball and that we look at the same set of facts and view them differently does not make one "realistic" and the other "idealistic."
Last season there was a poster in another forum I was in who bashed everything the Lakers did from top to bottom (Kobe and Phil mismanaged the team; the Lakers played better without Kobe because he's selfish; we needed a point guard; the league has changed, has become more up tempo and the Lakers need to catch up with it; Odom should start and Bynum should be traded; etc) He not only considered himself to be a "realist," he kept reminding us that his views were FACT. In the end, we all have our values and our opinions. If we knew what was going to happen ahead of time, we wouldn't have these discussions. That's why they play the games.
Oh, and for the record, I read, respect and enjoy all your posts!
Posted by: KobeMVP888 | September 16, 2010 at 01:44 PM
It's not that you are saying false remarks about Bynum...I saw your criticism is backed up with statistics...
It's that you will scour the world, for anything negative about Bynum...I never said your comments were not substantiated...But why...Why do you get off on Bynum bashing...Did he steal your girl...did he key your car...why the hate...why no faith...why give up on the kid...why so desperate to trade him...
That's my point...why point out the negative...if you are only pointing out negative...then my conclusion is...you have a negative stand on the whole topic...substantiated or not...
A lot here will point out the positive...some will just leave it in the hands of the Laker Gods...me I will lean on his positive traits, his flashes of brilliance, his potential...
This is an open forum...you are free to post what ever you feel, and your opinions...I just choose to dwell on the positive...and will always keep the faith...even if looks bleak or dark...
We have members here who have happily jumped on the Blake and Barnes bandwagons...these guys haven't played one minute of Laker ball...yet they get the benefit of the doubt...but AB doesn't even get this...it's about his injuries, big hips, knock knees, no All Star votes, no Defensive team votes...etc...
I don't do 'Doom and Gloom' very good...I like Win and Grin...I've had a huge one on my face since 2008...(yes even we lost the Finals that year)
Posted by: LEWSTRS | September 16, 2010 at 01:54 PM
Mark Medina,
That post was an attempt at humor, and I have no idea what could possibly have been inappropriate. I've been posting under that handle for years. You actually gave Sasha V a ROCD. Please advise as to what was specifically inappropriate, so I can avoid being deleted in the future. Thanks.
Posted by: LAKER TRUTH | September 16, 2010 at 01:55 PM
Derrick Fisher is a good back up player and a good leadership for the locker room. I strongly feel that this summer signing Steve Blake really help to make the Lakers better. Steve can share the minutes with Derrick, and Phil should reduce Derrick minutes and save him for the final quarter. Does anybody remember few years back when Lakers again Phili Iverson , the Lakers used Tyron Lue instead of Derrick to match the speed. Fisher is good again player like Steve Nash and other veteran, but again guys have a lot speed tense to put a lot of burden on the last line of defense. I know Kobe is best in the business to defense any body, but it takes away his offence aggressiveness, and the Lakers need him to set the table.
GO>>>>>>>>>>>Lakers
Posted by: Jay Woo | September 16, 2010 at 01:58 PM
Hey guys we have a new post up
MM
Posted by: Mark Medina | September 16, 2010 at 02:00 PM
I would have to say that the Bynum debate has supplanted the Walton debate as the most discussed and debated topic on the boards among Laker fans. Luke Walton always kicked up the debate based on his ability, shooting, and defense, whereas Bynum's discussions revolve around his health, potential, and the prospect of a trade using him as an asset.
Posted by: tomK | September 16, 2010 at 02:07 PM
This won't be divisive. It's a thing of beauty!
http://lakersstore.com/
Posted by: KobeMVP888 | September 16, 2010 at 02:14 PM
@KOBEMVP… Cool hats but what caught my eye was the Lakers shot glass. Gonna need one of those during the season to hold the Grey Goose washing down those Percocets. LOL.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
TOM
Posted by: LakerTom | September 16, 2010 at 02:36 PM
I'm not a big cap guy...but I want one of the blue ones...
Posted by: LEWSTRS | September 16, 2010 at 03:04 PM
Several articles I browsed also stated that the problems caused by wider hips and knock knees usually involves injuries to young men who are still growing and the problem often lessens as player matures. Hopefully, that will be the case with Drew. Obviously, the Lakers were aware of this situation when they gave Drew the extension to his rookie contract. Presumably, that is why they ended up not giving him a max contract and why Drew’s agent agreed to less than the maximum. Let’s all hope the Lakers made the right decision.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
TOM
Posted by: LakerTom | September 16, 2010 at 01:30 PM
-----------------
LakerTom,
Gotta disagree on this one. AB's agent wanted max money for his client but AB stepped forward and said forget that, I'm hppy to take Lakers offer to get deal done. He wanted to join Lakers without hazzle and fight over money. Loved his attitude.
Posted by: JustaLakerFan | September 16, 2010 at 04:04 PM
I voted "other" because the clear answer is Luke Walton.
-
I think Luke is awesome.
-
What do we play for? RINGS!!!
-
Lakers Today... Lakers Tomorrow... Lakers Forever.
-
GO LAKERS!!!
Posted by: Jon K. | September 16, 2010 at 04:06 PM
Seely_Iggy,
-
"I've never seen Jon K, but anyone is hotter looking than Amundson."
-
They posted my profile last Friday. Think a guy who looks like Fabio who absolutely abhors being compared to Fabio.
-
What do we play for? RINGS!!!
-
Lakers Today... Lakers Tomorrow... Lakers Forever.
-
GO LAKERS!!!
Posted by: Jon K. | September 16, 2010 at 04:09 PM
I would have to say that the Bynum debate has supplanted the Walton debate as the most discussed and debated topic on the boards among Laker fans. Luke Walton always kicked up the debate based on his ability, shooting, and defense, whereas Bynum's discussions revolve around his health, potential, and the prospect of a trade using him as an asset.
Posted by: tomK | September 16, 2010 at 02:07 PM
--------------
tomK
Most likely because Walton was injured so less ammo to shoot at him. LOL
Posted by: JustaLakerFan | September 16, 2010 at 04:10 PM
Jon K,
You remind me more of Kevin Greene linebacker extreme of he Rams.
Not so much in looks but of attitude and living life to the fullest. I think Kevin Greene while with Rams lived in Newport Beach. Must be the water. LOL
Posted by: JustaLakerFan | September 16, 2010 at 04:38 PM
Most devisive?
It has to be which Kobe is better, Kobe #8 or Kobe #24?
A close second would be Boston Celtics pictures posted while MM was on vacation.
For a brief time I thought I was on the Boston Heralds Celtics blog.......
Posted by: Fatty | September 16, 2010 at 05:23 PM
They posted my profile last Friday. Think a guy who looks like Fabio who absolutely abhors being compared to Fabio.
Posted by: Jon K. | September 16, 2010 at 04:09 PM
Whoa..... so NOT what I was expecting. First and foremost, you're way younger than what I envision. And DEFINITELY much hotter looking than Amundson!!! Fabio indeed *lol*
Posted by: Seely_Iggy | September 16, 2010 at 08:03 PM
Wow I stand corrected. The most divisive topic is Andrew Bynum's injury (27.6%). In second place is Kobe Bryant's scoring mentality (16.7%). And in third place is the bench's inconsistency/bench's lack of opportunities (16.18%). I guess I stand corrected. After thinking about this, I think the reason why Bynum stands out among the crowd, even Kobe Bryant, is the fact that a lot of the argument involves a lot of uncertainty. Proponents of him still cling to the belief that better things are to come, DESPITE not seeing it yet. Critics of Bynum cling to the notion that he won't overcome his injuries BECAUSE they haven't seen it yet.
MM
Posted by: Mark Medina | September 16, 2010 at 10:31 PM
Hey Mark,
I didn't have time to read all of the comments. But I agree with one that I saw about Shaqs number being retired in L.A. I honestly don't want it or think it deserves to be up there with Magic & Kareem & Worthy & (soon)Kobe. I DO NOT want to see it there. He is a Celtic and that's it. That wasn't the deciding factor though for me, I already felt this way but that just sealed the deal bro.
He was great when he was here but that's it. It goes no further ...
Posted by: Lakerlove420 | September 17, 2010 at 05:42 AM
The debate re: Drew seems to occupy more space, and for quite a long time now, between certain bloggers.
The debate over Fish carries a more emotional ring to it from both pro and con, to the point of ugliness at times. What with Fish's long and illustrious history with the Lakers, his trials and tribulations (daughter's eye), numerous clutch moments, regular season shortcomings, and the way Kobe and Phil value him so highly, to me, makes the pro/con arguments seem waaay more divisive.
Just my take.
By the way, I'm a Drew and Fish booster.
Wildone
Posted by: wildone | September 17, 2010 at 09:50 AM