Caught in the Web: Capturing reactions to Lakers' 91-84 Game 3 victory over Boston Celtics
Game stories
-- The Times' Mike Bresnahan highlights how Lakers guard Derek Fisher made big shots when it counted in the Lakers' 91-84 Game 3 victory Tuesday over the Boston Celtics.
-- The New York Times' Jonathan Abrams credits Fisher for maintaining his cool late in the game.--The Boston Globe's Julian Benbow argues Fisher's coast-to-coast layup served as the turning point in the game.
-- Upon further review, the Riverside Press-Enterprise's Matt Calkins calls Fisher "as dangerous as ever."
-- The Orange County Register's Kevin Ding chalks up the Lakers' victory to the team having more desire.--The Boston Herald's Mark Murphy faults the loss mostly to Ray Allen's poor shooting night.
-- The Daily News' Elliott Teaford also focuses on Fisher's late-game heroics.
Notebooks
--The Boston Herald's Murphy reports Doc Rivers' dissatisfaction with the officiating.-- The Daily News' Teaford looks at the Lakers' effort to get the ball inside.
Sidebars
-- The Times' Bresnahan explains Lamar Odom's turnaround game.
-- The Times' Lisa Dillman dissects Ray Allen's poor shooting night.
-- The Times' Broderick Turner credits Andrew Bynum for playing through the pain. Turner also details Pau Gasol's contributions.
-- The Times' Baxter Holmes explains why the Celtics' Big Three haven't all fared well in the same game of the NBA playoffs. Holmes also has a medical update on Tony Allen.
--The Boston Globe's Frank Dell’Apa reports Paul Pierce believes the Celtics will bounce back.
--Fox Sports' Mitch Lawrence looks at how Fisher finished the game.
--Sports Illustrated's Chris Mannix breaks down the keys to Game 3, and hands out report cards.
-- The Daily News' Jill Painter watches the Lakers game at a bar in Santa Monica where Celtics fans apparently exist. I can only imagine that Lakers fans are already bringing out their flames and pitchforks.--The Boston Globe's Gary Washburn dissects Allen's game.
Columns
-- The Times' Bill Plaschke believes Fisher added another chapter his legacy.
-- The Times' T.J. Simers says the Celtics stink.
-- The Times' Mark Heisler details Allen's tough shooting night.
-- ESPN.com's J.A. Adande explains what makes Fisher a great leader.-- The Daily News' Vincent Bonsignore asks Lakers fans to take a deep breath and exhale. Writes Bonsignore: "All is well again with the Lakers. At least for another 24 hours, anyway."
--The Boston Herald's Ron Borges suggests Pierce step it up a notch later in the series.
-- The Orange County Register's Ding explain the positive relationship between Fisher and Bryant.-- ESPN Boston's Chris Forsberg explains Allen's disappearing act.
--Fox Sports' Jeff Goodman doesn't think the Lakers played well, but it was still good enough to win.
-- ESPN Los Angeles' Arash Markazi believes the Lakers' success hinges on how well Odom plays.
--Sports Illustrated's Jack McCallum argues that fans shouldn't blame the refs for the questionable calls, but, instead, the rules.-- ESPN Los Angeles' Dave McMenamin credits the team contributions.
-- The Orange County Register's Jeff Miller argues the Lakers should resign Fisher this offseason.
-- The Riverside Press-Enterprise's Gregg Patton argues the Lakers' Game 3 victory could serve as a turning point toward their championship run.
--The Boston Globe's Bob Ryan marvels at Fisher's performance.
--Yahoo! Sports' Dan Wetzel details Allen's frustrations.-- The Orange County Register's Mark Whicker believes the Lakers' Game 3 win knocked the Celtics down to size.
--Yahoo Sports' Adrian Wojnarowski captures the emotions of Fisher's big night.Blogs
--ESPN Los Angeles' Andy and Brian Kamenetzky break down the performance.
--Forum Blue and Gold's Phillip remains impressed with Fisher's clutch shooting.
--Silver Screen and Roll's Josh Tucker believes the NBA needs to fix instant replay.
--Celtics Blog's Jimmy Toscano looks at why Boston's shots didn't fall.
--Lakers.com's Mike Trudell breaks down some numbers.
Tweet of the Day: "Will contract offer for next season be in Fish's locker postgame?" -- KevinDing (Orange County Register Lakers beat reporter Kevin Ding).
Reader Comment of the Day: " My breakfast this morning was crow and it was served on a silver platter. You know what I'm talking about. All season long I bagged on Derek Fisher and urged him to step aside from his starter's role. I was more focused on his aging body than the amazing Heart of a Champion that lurked inside. Before Tuesday's Game 3, that championship heart started beating louder as the playoffs progressed. But I continued to doubt that Fish could go the distance. When I read Plaschke's column that it was time for the Lakers to declare they would bring Fish back next year, I still had doubts. It was only 2 games into the series. Let's wait til the Finals are over, I thought. But in the 4th quarter, I could no longer justify my resistance. Fish didn't just play well, he took over the game. He took over the Lakers' offense. He saw Kobe's legs give out. He recognized that he was the Hope. He delivered. A championship team has multiple guys who can decide a game. Fish became the Decider, not just for a game ending magic bullet. When the tears welled-up in his post-game interview with Doris Burke, all doubt washed away. Kobe's trust in Fish is obviously about more than friendship. They are champions in tandem. A game like we saw last night can easily lead to irrational exhuberance. My heart leads me to hope we can raise the championship trophy on Boston's home court at the end of Game 5. My head still tells me it's Lakers in 6. Whichever it is, the crow consumed this morning will be a dish to be cherished." -- Rick Friedman
-- Mark Medina in Boston
twitter.com/latmedina
E-mail the Lakers blog at mgmedin@gmail.com
Photo: Lakers forward Ron Artest, left, forces Boston forward Glen Davis into a turnover during Game 3 of the NBA Finals on Tuesday. Credit: Wally Skalij / Los Angeles Times.








MM, nice picture on Artest stealing the ball. He learned those tricks of the trade when he was young in stealing hand bags. When the ref. gave the Lakers the possession, Artest knelt down and demonstrated how he does it with his magnificent hands. It is like watching those dancers and magicians at Venice Beach. I think he will end up there when he retires.
Posted by: Edwin Gueco | June 09, 2010 at 10:25 AM
This is exactly the way I have thought the Finals was going to be played out. I thought the Lakers were going to win games 1, 3, 5, and 6. My reason was because the Lakers got the long layoff before the start and home court, they would win game 1. I thought that Coach Rivers (being a great coach) would make the adjustments necessary to win game 2. And vice versa for Coach Jackson for game 3. I think PP will not get in foul trouble in game 4 and win it for them. Then Artest will step up in game 5. Then close-out Bryant will step up in game 6 at home and crush the Celtics in front of the raucous home crowd.
Posted by: rage777 | June 09, 2010 at 10:28 AM
Kobe's game
Don't know how many shots Kobe jacked up early in the clock. There were a few. But the bulk of his misses were at 22" after a great Celtic defense warped the triangle. Other than the shooting percentage, Kobe played 44 great minutes. Blocked shots, hustle plays, constant clutch makes, he consistently continues to be the most cost efficient superstar in the league.
When Shannon Brown and Ron Artest figure out where they're supposed to be in the triangle, Kobe won't need to fire up 34 foot fade aways. When Pau realizes he has to attack single coverage, we won't need a bailout.
Posted by: VMan | June 09, 2010 at 10:31 AM
I haven't seen Captain Jack post yet.
Did I miss it or did he abandon ship already?
Posted by: Mark G (this is really me) | June 09, 2010 at 10:37 AM
This is funny. Tony Allen said:
"I mean, he's always trying to draw the foul and he kicks his legs out a lot when he shoots those long threes … to get contact," Allen said. "I didn't give him no contact because I slipped. Thank God I slipped, because I probably would've fouled him, but I took a kick in the neck and I couldn't breathe for a hot second."
~~Celtics are very physical but when they absorbed the pain from a physical game, they tend to be dramatic as well. TA got 8 stitches on the jaw. Uummm, that's another redemption from KG's elbow or shoving from Perkins. Too bad, the good guy Tony got it accidentally.
Posted by: Edwin Gueco | June 09, 2010 at 10:47 AM
REGARDING THE 2-3-2 FORMAT . . .
Post-game dissection by McHale, Kenny Smith, and Barkley spent the first SEVEN MINUTES (check the tape) on officiating and 2-3-2 format, with the emphasis being how these two elements have disadvantaged the Boston Celtics. (I am utterly amazed at how Barkley has lost his insightful, witty, edge so quickly.)
I was shocked that it was Kevin McHale who was the first to finally give the Lakers their due! But the notion that the travel schedule and 2-3-2 format were a liability on the Celtics was raised and debated (as stupid as it is).
The 2-3-2 format can be debated for its merits and liabilities. But the fact is that the NBA has millions and millions of reasons ($$$$$$$$$) for maintaining this predictable format. They are NOT going to change it.
But here is the problem. The schedule is etched in stone for games to follow a Sunday/Tuesday/Thursday sequence, with Game 1 for years repeatedly scheduled on Thursday. It is such poor planning! This means...
--There is a TWO DAY BREAK between games 1 & 2 in the same city
--There is only a ONE DAY BREAK between games 2 & 3 which require travel
--There is another TWO DAY BREAK between games 3 & 4 in the same city
--There is only a ONE DAY BREAK between games 5 & 6 which require travel
If the NBA wants to stick with the 2-3-2 format, then they need to align games as follows and everyone would think they are brilliant!
Games 1 & 2 on Tue/Thu
Games 3,4,5 on Sun/Tue/Thu
Games 6 & 7 on Sun/Tue
This schedule utilizes the same days currently used, but conveniently provides the extra day only when travel is required. What is so difficult about doing this?
If the date set for starting on Tuesday squeezes one or both teams due to their conference finals going 7 games, then so be it.
Am I too old-school to see the problem with this?
Mike
Posted by: LakerMike | June 09, 2010 at 11:43 AM
@LakerMike:
I didn't see the post-game last night, but I had to chuckle a little at your description of it. I'm old enough to remember the days before 2-3-2, when it was 2-2-1-1-1.
IIRC, the Lakers-Celtics Final in '85 was the first to use 2-3-2, with the Lakers having home court for the middle 3. And back then, the Celtics howled that it screwed them, because they went to LA with the series 1-1 and had to play 3 straight on the road!
Things never change, I guess, in that you can always use the 2-3-2 format as an excuse when you're losing — especially if you support the Celtics. :-D
Crybabies.
Posted by: DougS | June 09, 2010 at 01:54 PM