Nuggets 105, Lakers 79: Postgame Chat
November 13, 2009 | 10:11
pm
For those of you who had to stop watching at halftime, congratulations. You did the right thing. At that point, it was a 58-56 Denver lead at the break in a competitive, well played game. In the third, the Nuggets blew the doors off, outscoring the purple and gold 29-8, the Lakers doing themselves no favors by turning the ball over too much and struggling to move the ball offensively. From there, it was basically a matter of how fast they could get to the team plane. Final score, 105-78.
Couple thoughts:
- I do think fatigue was a factor, as was psychology. The Lakers played last night, didn't get into Denver until about 4 am. It's a brutal place to finish a back-to-back. As we noted in the game chat thread, the Nuggets were highly motivated to win this one after the Lakers knocked them off in the Western Conference Finals last year. These are not excuses, but explanations. The Lakers didn't play well, Denver did, and the Nuggets deserved to win.
- The Nuggets were effective defending Kobe in the post, whether with ball denial or well timed double teams depending on 24's location on the floor. It was bound to happen at some point. The Lakers, tough, didn't respond well. Instead of moving the ball and punishing the Nuggets for overplaying Kobe, they too often tried to squeeze in entry passes that weren't there. Expect other teams to look at tonight's game as a potential blueprint on how to handle Bryant's mid-range game. The Lakers will need to adjust.
Chat box below.
BK



Hahahaha, Now if that don't teach us to be a bit more humble, and stop this nonsense that we are the greatest thing around, I dont know what will. Hard work and not just showing up are how you win championships, we have lost two games this season by getting blown out. Bench still has its weak spots, teams see the Lakers with a target on our backs this year, and are ready for us. Tonight better be a wake up call,, so stop deluding yourselves.
Posted by: Jamie Sweet | November 13, 2009 at 10:20 PM
Not a surprising loss given the explanations.
The good part is that George Karl and the Nuggets had a good game plan and execution versus Kobe Dreamshakes post game.
The Nuggets had a good counter so the Lakers need a better counter punch. Good to get this early in the season and spend all season long perfecting the attack for the playoffs.
The bad part is the Lakers have so far lost the games against the two best teams faced so far: Dallas and Denver. These 2 are clearly better all-around teams than the Suns. So we do miss Pau the most when facing the top teams, no surprise there. Even though we like to talk about dominance in the blog, the fact of the matter may be that all the top teams this year are not that far apart.
Posted by: LakerinBC | November 13, 2009 at 10:21 PM
Anyone else still worried about our bench, in games like these, especially with a few starters obviously fatigued, our bench again lets us down, while the Nuggets bench dominated. Any suggestions on a good pick up before the trade deadline.
Posted by: phred | November 13, 2009 at 10:34 PM
Well - let's see if we can avoid discussions about blowing up the team because of this loss (unless of course it involves LBJ for Ammo straight up)
Wait for Pau, wait for June. Patience.
Posted by: 805LakerLove | November 13, 2009 at 10:48 PM
Hey- Did my doppleganger show up in the game chat? was he witty and charming and offering incisive and perseptive analysis of the game? Did he drive pfunk to tears more than once with brilliantly timed application of Luke Walton stats that directly revealed how full of it he is in his obsesional um, obsession?
well, why not?
Sigh. can't get good dopplegangers these days.
Posted by: phred | November 13, 2009 at 10:52 PM
yuck...
The good thing is Denver really thinks they did something tonight. The bad thing is so did we when we beat Phoenix.
Boston lost too so, I guess no biggie.
Hey, I know Kobe's the man and he gets to eat first but,.. well shouldn't Bynum have gotte more shot attempts? Even though it was crazy out there and I have no idea what his stats were, he kinda looked money to me if he woulda kept shooting. They were fouling kinda hard and playing that scrappy jungle ball out there so ... actually now that I think about it, I'm kinda glad he didn't shoot too much (he might hurt his other elbow). But real talk, when Kobe is getting doubled like that the Lakers should a)play inside out ball and b)kobe should hit the open guy or the cutter when double teamed.
The lakers were obviously tired and I agree with BK, you coulda turned it off at halftime. My 10 year old daughter, who knows nothing about basketball said at halftime "they are going to lose tonite." Why would they even schedule some sh$ where a team doesn't get in for the next game until 4 in the morning. Stern this coulda been a great game but instead it was HORRIBLE. I guess no excuses right? Hey, can I give a shout out to my homie from Spain "We need you dawg, come back home!"
And to my homie Thrilla, way to keep your composure tonight. Carmelo is going to be a beast that the lakers are going to have to reckon with one day. As for now, enjoy an early November win Thuggets, because when June rolls around you'll be watching us play in the finals AGAIN.
Posted by: jayden24 | November 13, 2009 at 11:05 PM
All that Laker crowing yesterday about beating Phoenix after Phoenix came off a six game eastern conference road trip and lost to the Lakers in a second game of a back to back was more than a little bit stupid.
Posted by: The Green Asterisk | November 13, 2009 at 11:19 PM
Oh the Nuggets put quite a thumping on you prozak fueled(Artest,Morrison,Luke) wanna be movie stars(LO,Bynum,Pao,Kobe,scrap metal Farmar,Purple Lakers.
Posted by: James Ween Sterns | November 13, 2009 at 11:23 PM
Wah, Wah, Wah, Lakers had to play a back to back against two good teams; you can't play all your road games against the Clippers.
Posted by: The Green Asterisk | November 13, 2009 at 11:27 PM
Tonight's outstanding performer: Andrew Bynum. 19pts on 8-13 FGS, 15 Boards, 1 block and several altered shots. Should've been given the ball more in the low post to take some heat off of Kobe. Lakers either ignore him in the post or finally get it to him when the game is out of reach. With Pau out, Drew has become the second option and the Lakers needs to use him as such. It's possible that the third quarter could've been different had we began it by going into Drew in the post to punish the Nuggets frontline.
What's really sad is that when Pau returns, it's possible that Drew will see even less of the ball than he already is. Hopefully Pau will establish good chemistry with Drew and feed him when he's got good position. Except in assists, Drew's numbers so far this year are comparable to Pau's numbers last year. Utilizing Pau and Drew more will only keep Kobe fresher and stronger throughout the season and the playoffs.
Posted by: Nemaia Faletogo | November 13, 2009 at 11:29 PM
Green,
"All that Laker crowing yesterday about beating Phoenix after Phoenix came off a six game eastern conference road trip and lost to the Lakers in a second game of a back to back was more than a little bit stupid."
And so is coming on another teams' blog when your team lost as well, to an inferior opponent I might add. Oh yeah, and we were on a back to back as well, I guess they should've just automatically put us down for a loss since, you know, by your educated analysis a back to back ensures you will lose no matter what.
I guess you're just trying to build some self esteem after such a disappointing loss. And I'm also guessing you're trying to justify the fact that we beat down the team that gave you guys your first loss. Oh well, carry on.
Posted by: Trojan | November 13, 2009 at 11:37 PM
What about somebody wakin up in the core of italian night to follow the second half ONLY? Dumbass prize of the month, I guess ( unless one isn't into masochism, of course...). Anyway I saw this avalanche coming. I just did not expect in such manner... Or size. It's clear nobody can provide Pau's smart reading of a game, especially needed when the opponents Are capable, like Denver has been ALSO in the recent finals - nobody forgets how did hurt that internal slap, right? - to choke Kobe all spaces. There Are several reasons to' this demise, and although some certainly not worrying like the logistical quality of the specific traveling to Denver or the lacking of drive compered to' Nuggets ( who needed to' get back on track) some are more subtly suggesting we are in need of a check. Artest failed his first real test. Bynum's skills at game understanding are scarce. And his energy without brain doesn't help the team as much as we need. Bench is starting to' make me schizo. Really. Kobe without Pau feels nobody is smart enough to get him and collaborate till the point he avoids to do ALL by himself. And like today, disappearing for all of the half game I painfully witnessed. I'm sure this will be' a useful wake up call. But I fear Denver. Last finals they were great against us. And this year they look even more accomplished against us especially. They know how to' create us troubles. Let's hope this punch in the face will teach us on how not to make their job so friggin easy.
Posted by: ZairaAmaterasu | November 13, 2009 at 11:40 PM
I watched the first half, but asleep on my couch at half time. I am so glad I did!
Posted by: Mr.W | November 13, 2009 at 11:53 PM
Denver wanted it more tonight, understandibly so. We've been here before and know what to do.
Posted by: never | November 14, 2009 at 12:29 AM
funny thing was the same thing happened last year when the lakers beat phoenix by 40, then went to Denver and got blown out.
Posted by: jacqueline | November 14, 2009 at 12:47 AM
I'm not concerned in the least about tonight's performance. It was a hiccup in what's to be a long schedule. The Nuggets had something to prove, the Lakers had minds and feet that quit on them for a game. All this Artest vs. Anthony will show itself as the season moves on. It'll be a good rivalry at the least. Just imagine a 5 or 7 game series and the Lakers have the psychological edge as well as the talent, coaching staff and will to make them pay for this loss. Just wake up tomorrow, brush this game off, and hope the Lakers stay healthy so they can kick the Celtic's asses!!
Posted by: Son Vo | November 14, 2009 at 01:29 AM
I'm glad I didn't see this game. I don't want to witness the Lakers quit a second time this early in the season. First Dallas, now this. Eight points in the 3rd quarter? Are we playing Phoenix circa 2006? Is Kwame our center, Smush our PG, Luke our starting SF?
AK/BK, can you tell the tech guys that that more recent lakerblog posts can't be accessed by the front of the sports page? It has the game chat link, but not the most current (this) link.
That's it.
Here's one to soothe the pain of last night's effort:
http://tinyurl.com/ykrwvvu
Wes
Posted by: wesjoenixon | November 14, 2009 at 05:43 AM
LeBron is really showing his nearsightedness when it comes to NBA history. So, he's giving up Jordan's number to honor himas the "best ever" and taking the number of Bill Russell, arguably a greater champion than even Jordan. There's only 5-6 players that are considered better than MJ, and Russell, Mr. LeBron, is one of them. 11 rings to 6. For God's sake man, take the number of someone else, someone less conspicuous. Ugly.
Wes
Posted by: wesjoenixon | November 14, 2009 at 06:47 AM
O the shame! O the embarrassment! Heads must roll after such a humiliating defeat by a major Western Conference rival!
No, I'm not talking about PhilJax. I'm talking about the Lakers' Travel Department.
I'd be tired, too, if after giving my all the night before, I didn't get to my hotel till four o'clock the next morning. The best way to manage my energy is to get to sleep the same time every night and getting up the same time every morning. Sleep patterns matter.
I know it's customary in the NBA for the team to fly to the next city after a game. I also think it's insane.
It would have been better to lodge the team Thursday night at a hotel near Staples Center, then board the team bus to the airport at, say, 7:30 the next morning. The plan leaves LAX Friday morning at, like, 8:30 or 9 am. The team watches game film on the plane. They arrive in Denver, fresh, at 1:00 local time.
Think about it. Kobe didn't get to sleep until the time he normally wakes up. Does anyone really think that's an optimal situation for any athlete?
The Lakers started the game strong. They just couldn't maintain it. By the end of the first half, shots were falling short. By the second half, there must have been a dozen offensive possessions where the shot clock was down to the final seconds (or later). Between sleep deprivation and lack of oxygen, the Lakers just weren't themselves.
It's one thing to say, that's just the way it is in the NBA. But how about just stepping back and asking, what about common sense?
Posted by: Rick Friedman | November 14, 2009 at 06:47 AM
No excuses your team played lousy.Lakers will be scary when Pau comes back and they meld into a cohesive unit.
Posted by: Gren weenie | November 14, 2009 at 07:09 AM
Has anyone seen Ron Artest and his "great" defense this year., Carmello and JR Smith made us look more like Chumps than Champs, must be an 'Imposter" we have here.
Posted by: phred | November 14, 2009 at 07:32 AM
Jamie Sweet,
you wrote: teach us to be a bit more humble.
my response: I'm not sure about the fans, but I think the players themselves
are fine.
In general, I'm ok with the loss. Reasons:
1. Bynum had a good game. 19 pts & 15 rebounds against another potential all-star.
Not bad.
2. We're playing without the 2nd best player on the team & we were
competitive against a top tier team with top talent for 1 half.
3. Farmar did not have a bad night. The rest of the bench couldn't buy a
shot.
4. The adversity of losing against the Celtics and the adversity of facing
the rockets are what gave us the toughness to beast Denver and Orlando
last year.
5. Didn't we lose a game to Denver, in Denver, during the playoffs?
6. Better to find out how Denver defends against Kobe in the post "now"
rather than in the playoffs.
7. Do you expect UPS to go 1-8 again? I don't.
A fantastic learning opportunity. Phil will not waste it. The goal is not to
have the best regular season record. The goal is to win the championship in
June. We learn now, so that we can crush later!
Posted by: hobbitmage | November 14, 2009 at 07:44 AM
I hope the Lakers don't blame this just on fatigue. The new-and-improved Nuggets that played the Lakers tough in the playoffs last year may not have been a fluke a la the Hornets after all, as many predicted. Need to take them seriously and study the game tape, as you know other teams will.
A lot of talk about the elite teams getting better this year but that hasn't translated into as much a disparity in the win-loss records as expected so far. Not so good for those who bought into a 73+ win season for the Lakers, but good for the league as a whole.
Posted by: Scott | November 14, 2009 at 08:06 AM
Excuses, Excuses...not what you expect from a championlship caliber team. Even if the Lakers get past all the "improved contenders" in the West this year, the Celtics will be drinking champange in June.
Posted by: David Harris | November 14, 2009 at 08:17 AM
I remember us beating the crud out of the Spurs every time we played them after they eliminated us from the playoffs. They'd win a ring and then we'd get our revenge by beating them at the start of the following season. Then, they'd eliminate us again in 4 or 5 games, win another ring, and we'd beat them the 1st game of the following year.
Oh well.
If we can't get Gasol back, can we get more pictures of his hot girlfriend?
http://tinyurl.com/yh24on5
http://tinyurl.com/ykkvodv
Wes
Posted by: wesjoenixon | November 14, 2009 at 08:47 AM
Momma said there'd be games like this...
Hard to fathom how a team of great basketball players not wearing Clipper jerseys can score 8 points in a quarter. Can't happen but it did, like Rick Rolling.
Anybody really worried about Denver? They're the same team we didn't have any problem with last year.
There are some good teams in the association. We'll need Pau to beat 'em. Laker Tom will have to settle for 80 - 2 and counting.
Posted by: VMan | November 14, 2009 at 09:14 AM
...second game of back to back, after chasing Phoenix around the night before, and then moving a mile up in altitude...that would have been a tough game to win...could have, but did not....for those who want to be critical, go flat line....look 9 of the next 10 games are at home....Let's see how we sit after that....afterall, the key to being a champion is winning your home games and the a good percentage of your road games (in the playoffs, assuming the Lakers will finish tops in win percentage...however, with the way a few of the other top teams got off to quick starts that's going to be questionable)...
Byron Scott, available...hmmm....time for Byron to come home....in a capacity that would not rock Phil's world.....
Posted by: humanomaly | November 14, 2009 at 09:24 AM
They took the Lakers/Kobe out of their game, and the Lakers/Kobe let them and/or didn't adjust. It will be a learning experience.
Posted by: exhelodrvr | November 14, 2009 at 09:39 AM
phred & K-bros.... the imposter situation's really odd... no way to deal with it by emailing? Contacting the other guy?
I agree with Rick that the travel situation sucked but to be honest, we've had it better than a lot of other teams this year... we've mostly played at home and have a favorable schedule ahead. Sometimes a team just hits that passing gear and before you know it, the game's gone. It happened last night. Denver's a good team and they owned the 3rd. Maybe Sasha should have gone and picked a fight with Melo, haha. Because there wasn't any x's and o's or time outs that would have changed anything. We definitely should have kept feeding Bynum but I don't think that by itself would have changed the outcome. Now, maybe if Sasha had gotten hit in the throat around the 6 minute mark of the 3rd? Maybe that would have gotten the rest of the guys fired up.
Posted by: dave m | November 14, 2009 at 10:05 AM
Wah, Wah, Wah, Lakers had to play a back to back against two good teams; you can't play all your road games against the Clippers.
Posted by: The Green Asterisk | November 13, 2009 at 11:27 PM
I noticed you did not mention your CELTICS , they lost to Atlanta AT HOME, and the were not on the 2nd half of a back to back, they were not playing at 5,000 ft. and they were NOT missing their all star power forward.
Posted by: tomK | November 14, 2009 at 10:44 AM
Good Morning Laker Fam,
Denver had a similar game against us last year in Denver and a lot of people started crowing about them being our biggest threat. I don't think so. Sure, they're better with the addition of Afflalo and Lawson(nice slam on Mbenga and Powell last night), but wait and see what happens when it matters most. I predict that Denver won't make it past the second round of the playoffs this year, killing the rivalry talk. Yes, they did thump us last night, but they were blown out by the Hawks, should've lost to the Bulls and then lost to the Milwaukee Jennings, so excuse me if I'm still not impressed(by the way, that Jennings kid is pretty good).
62% FG percentage last night for Andrew Bynum. I repeat, 62%. So why doesn't this man get more touches when the game is still close? Another poster on here that stated that Bynum doesn't know how to read the game and that his energy is wasted if he doesn't use his brain is a flat out idiot!!! Right now, other than possibly Dwight Howard, who would we rather have playing center for us other than Andrew Bynum??? Please don't say Chris Kaman(nice stats, but the Clippers are still losers). While the Lakers miss Pau, they shouldn't forget about their other effective big man in the post, especially when the perimeter player's shots are falling short. At least give Drew more opportunities to punish and challenge the Nuggets in the post, thereby slowing the game down a little, allowing us to dictate the pace. No doubt some will argue various points I've made, but it's hard to argue with 8-13 from the field for 19pts, 3-3 FT, 15 boards(11 def., 4 off.), 1 block and others altered, 1 foul. I do have a problem with the no assist to kill any argument on that.
Andrew had great position many times last night and was open on several occasions only to have his mates look at him and swing the ball the opposite direction, miss him when he was open, shoot jumpers or force the ball into him after the double had come over. Using Drew more also gives Kobe rest offensively. 62% is young Shaq like. Easier, high percentage shots.
Posted by: Nemaia Faletogo | November 14, 2009 at 11:01 AM
Losing on the road is just part of NBA experiences, Nuggets could also face the same consequence when they come to Staples. I warned yesterday the b2b and playing at mile high Denver was a tough challenge, in fact this was the game thatMiller and Kenny Smith predicted at the first loss of the Lakers. However, it was preempted by the loss with Mavs on their 2nd game.
On the other hand, all teams undergo the same pattern. They travel, play b2b games and come to Denver. There has tobe one reason why they lost the game? They stopped competing, no more defense and offense remained stagnant with Kobe. The rest of his teammates were secondary in offense. As such it is hard to compete when they deviated from the triangle and started to go one-on-one in shooting from afar, in not switching for defensive assignments and in missing those cheapy shots. After three quarters, Phil just got tired of watching and treated the 4th quarter as teaching lesson from everyone. As they term in war strategies, you need to retreat first before you can plan for future attacks. it was a game the starters were dependent on surge of the subs. It did not happen that way, the subs were also waiting for the clue on the starters. Therefore, they fell behind to insurmountable lead that it was better to call it a night than risking further injuries on Kobe, Drew and the rest of the starting unit.
In the Phoenix game, we call the Lakers of today as the new Showtime. After a setback in last night's game, it was downtime. Well, the defeat keeps all the bloggers in check that before blowing our horn on favorite players, be sure our horn is super clean and unclog from that air of contentment similar to the chemical elements of helium in a balloon..... that we can just fly up, up and away. In other words before celebrating 81 -1 at the thick of the fight, try to consider we could lose 2, 3 or even 10 games along the way. Our balloon may not withstand the atmospheric pressure and will come down to earth. If we prepare ourselves for such events or scenarios, we will be OK when we fly high again.
Posted by: Edwin Gueco | November 14, 2009 at 11:14 AM
I can't think anyone would think the Lakers would win this game, the team didn't hit the sack until 5am and flying to boot. I saw KBs face on the bench in first half and even he looked very very tried. In fact I don't know why Phil even played the First unit in the second half, I would have played reserves that would have piss in the Nuggets faces.
Posted by: pk-in-the-mesa | November 14, 2009 at 11:16 AM
The spread on the game was Denver -4.
You can bet the barn that there was heavy bets placed on the Lakers from around he world -- all from suckers of Laker diehard.
There wasno chance Denver wod have lost this game as the referee's did their part.
If you look at the video, you can clearly see the hesitation with which the zebras were giving LA proper calls. The whistle on Denvers offensive aide of the ball was undeniably fast.
The box score doesn't tell the story. The mugging in thr third quarter the refs allowed perpetuated a landslide which then lead to the lopsided score.
Phil, for his maturity, recognized this and appropriately benched Kobe for the entire forth.
The bets were in.
There was money to be made.
And the bookies still reign supreme.
Interesting game.
David Stern is a loser.
But one must understand, this is a business afterall.
And with players getting payed millions to ball, they're all implicit in the scam.
Truth be told
Posted by: Truth be told | November 14, 2009 at 11:24 AM
Analyzing this game I see the achilles heel of the Lakers
Kobe seems to be the only player who establishes great position in the low post which leads to the ball being thrown to him way to many times. when this happens his teammates tend to stand around leading Kobe to take a bad shot. Now Bynum is the best person to recieve the ball down low and at times was in position to recieve the ball but didn't. Kobe for all his skills cannot see the court as well as the 7 foot beast and a double team on Kobe is more likely to result in a bad possesion than it would be if Bynum or Gasol had the ball down low.
Not a knock on Kobe, but it's really bad coaching to use this strategy too many times. Denver used a simple trap scheme and Kobe's shot was off resulting in an easy Nugget victory.
The Thuggets were also rewarded by the referees last night and the Lakers were not given the same respect. The Lakers can play thug ball too and when they did it was foul foul foul. It's too bad for Artest that the refs are treating him like a Laker player instead of an tough NBA defensive presence.
The Bench was a major disappointment, and Fish's poor performance is now the norm. He can't shoot, pass, hit a layup, lead a break, or defend. Fish is dead weight and if something doesn't change, change the person making the decision to keep him in the lineup.
Nine Rings once again was asleep at the wheel, I sometimes dream of having a coach who actually coaches in the moment, plays the players who are hot, pulls the the ones who aren't. A coach who looks for combinations that work instead of putting in players at their prescheduled times. I only pray this is his last season.
Posted by: Troll Man | November 14, 2009 at 11:26 AM
I don't buy the idea that we made a mistake not getting the ball to Bynum more. Andrew Bynum is being paid 12 million dollars a year for a reason. He needs to demand the ball more. Stop blaming some nebulous entity for Andrew not dominating. The buck starts and stops with him.
Wes
Posted by: wesjoenixon | November 14, 2009 at 11:44 AM
I don't buy the idea that we made a mistake not getting the ball to Bynum more. Andrew Bynum is being paid 12 million dollars a year for a reason. He needs to demand the ball more. Stop blaming some nebulous entity for Andrew not dominating. The buck starts and stops with him.
Wes
Posted by: wesjoenixon | November 14, 2009 at 11:44 AM
Wes,
I respectfully disagree with you. Watching the games, I've seen many times Andrew calling for the ball in the post when he has great position only to have some of his mates swing the ball to the other side of the floor where Kobe is posted up. I'm surprised that you can't see him demanding the ball with his arm outstretched, sometimes reposting and still not getting the ball. The main culprits for this are Fish, Brown, Luke and Sasha. Kobe, Ron, LO and Farmar at least make attempts to get him the ball.
Remember last year during certain games in the regular season and then in the playoffs, especially in the series against Denver how both PJ and Pau lamented the fact that Pau wasn't getting enough touches in the post despite being super efficient??? Pau even said in that Denver series that he didn't understand why he wasn't getting more touches when he's so effective down low. All you have to do is go back and read the articles last year and you discover how disappointed PJ and Pau were about that. Fast forward to the present and you'll see that it's happening to Bynum right now. It's nothing nebulous at all when many of us on here can see clearly that his mates just don't get him the ball enough. To keep mentioning his contract is just becoming redundant because from my vantage point, Drew seems to be dominating and could be a more dominant force if his mates involve him more. As it was with Shaq, high percentage shots and high FG percentages are undeniable proof that the big man deserves more touches.
It's not to say that we shouldn't go to Kobe a lot in the post, but Kobe shouldn't have to shoulder the offensive load alone just because Pau is out when Drew has been putting up Pau like numbers and we have LO, Artest and Fish who has had two games of zero points which is unacceptable to me from our starting PG.
Sure Andrew has a lot to still prove and needs to stay healthy and play well to justify his contract, but for now he's our second option and most automatic offensive weapon next to Kobe which is why we should utilize him more. Mark Jackson said during last night's game that Bynum should just have his bags packed for Dallas because Mark Jackson believes that Bynum will be the starting center for the West in the All-Star game.
The one area that I would really like to see Andrew improve upon is his passing out of the post. His defense is improving and he seems to be getting over the mental hurdle of last year's knee injury. All I'm saying is that we need to utilize both Pau and Andrew more in the post because they're a load for anyone.
Posted by: Nemaia Faletogo | November 14, 2009 at 02:57 PM
To make it easier for him, can't we just give Kenyon Martin a metal chair and ladder?
Posted by: STLKOBELAKERSFAN | November 14, 2009 at 07:46 PM