Bigtime Reader Comment of the Day, plus NBA news
If you missed it, Monday evening reader NBA4ever left a very interesting take on the Lakers without Pau Gasol:
"...Andrew Bynum might be the Laker’s second leading scorer but he is not a 2nd option. Pau Gasol is the second option, the team flows so much more efficiently going into him. Bynum is too indecisive when he gets the ball in the post, and then once he makes up his mind he can’t make the adjustments. He will score more than Gasol because of Gasol, he will score from the attention given to Gasol and Gasol's ability to make the right play. We already have seen we can win with a limited Bynum, but we can’t without Gasol. Once Gasol comes back I think Bynum will become even more of a force..."
It's not a dig at Bynum, rather a recognition Gasol's role in the offense. Moreover, it gets at something about basketball commentary that probably should change. Too often, fans and media associate "first option" or "second option" with scoring. Here, though, NBA4ever points out that being an effective "option" in an offense, particularly one like the Lakers use, involves more than simply putting the ball in the basket. Argue about the semantics if you'd like, but there's no question Pau facilitates opportunities for himself and others in ways Bynum can't at this point in his career. Gasol's ability to either score or find open man out of any portion of the post is a fundamental to the team's success on that end of the floor. The same principle applies to Kobe Bryant. Take away his incredible court vision and ability to pass surgically out of double teams, and he's another high volume shooter/scorer in a league with a lot of those types.
A really good one, sure, but not an MVP.
The Lakers just need to get Bynum and Gasol on the floor together extended period of time. Lost in all the commotion over Ron Artest's integration into the offense is that LA's ultra-talented starting bigs still need to learn to work effectively with each other. Bynum's injury last season meant, for all practical purposes, the two only spent about half a season working together, and for much of that time Bynum was getting his sea legs back after his injury the season before. There's still a great deal of room to grow with that tandem.
Anyhoo, I thought it was a great comment. It was a light day for Lakers news and most of what was said shows up in Monday's practice report, but what's available ahead of tonight's tussle with the Thunder in Oklahoma City (5 pm, KCAL), plus more from around the NBA, is below:
- Pau underwent an MRI Monday on his injured hamstring, but accompanied the team on the short trip.
- Magic Johnson isn't surprised at Isiah Thomas' strong reaction to Magic's new book.
- Chris Paul is getting frustrated writes Adrian Wojnarowski of Yahoo! Sports. With Rajon Rondo, with his own franchise.
- Only six extensions for the NBA Draft Class of 2006, two of which were smaller money deals. This is a record low.
- Among those left wanting: Milwaukee's Joe Alexander, taken eighth that season and the rare high lottery pick who, forget the extension, didn't even have his option picked up.
- AI seems uncomfortable coming off the bench. Those of you who had "one game" in your "How long before Allen Iverson seems to chafe in a bench role with the Grizzlies" pool, congratulations!
- Tyrus Thomas is struggling in Chicago.
- If this isn't the first time a prominent NBA player's Facebook status talks about rabies shots, it can't be more than, say, the third.
- Tim Donaghy's prison stint is coming to an end.
BK
(Photo: Andrew Bynum and Pau Gasol, credit Getty Images)



Andrew still hasn't gotten the coach's message to put more energy into Defense. That's where the team needs him to be most aggressive. When Andrew accepts that, he'll finally be ready to take his place among the All-Stars.
Posted by: Rick Friedman | November 03, 2009 at 10:08 AM
Excerpts from Tim Donaghy's book are out and it's ugly. The guy is a sniveling, back-stabbing weasel, but I wouldn't be surprised if some or most of what he says is true. For those who haven't read it, here are the highlights:
As much as refs say they "call it like they see it", Donaghy states this is totally untrue. The refs had bets between them to see how long they could go before calling the first foul of the game, for example. He talks about how there absolutely is such a thing as a "make-up call".
Refs had favorite teams and favorite players, as well as teams and players they hated. Tommy Nunez, for example, has made calls in San Antonio's favor because of the large Hispanic community there. Steve Javie will ring up Allen Iverson with crazy T's and palming violations because he's got a personal beef with him.
Dick Bavetta was known to be a "company man" who would do whatever it took to make the league more money, whether it was letting star players get star treatment or doing his part to make blowouts close by calling bad fouls on the team with the lead or whether it was making questionable calls to help extend a playoff series. If anyone comes out looking REALLY bad in this book, it's Dick Bavetta.
The Lakers, Donaghy claims, got the benefit of the calls in several instances. Kobe would get the benefit of the doubt against Raja Bell. The Lakers got the favorable calls against the Kings in game 6 of the 2002 WCF. This was after, supposedly, the league sent down a mandate to the refs saying that the Lakers were not getting enough fouls called correctly in their favor to that point, and that it needed to change. Hence, states Donaghy, the huge FT disparity in the 4th quarter of that game.
All in all, no game, no player, no call can ever be seen in the same light whether you're buying what he's selling or not. I personally think that even if some of it is embellished and even if there are a few discrepancies, it will be incriminating enough and believable enough to cast a seriously dark shadow over the NBA. If David Stern is going to make this right, he's going to have to make NBA referreeing the most transparent, accountable profession in the world and do a nearly complete overhaul of the current system.
I won't be holding my breath.
Posted by: puddle | November 03, 2009 at 10:31 AM
Another 85 degree day in LA...Guess it's time to hit the pool get a mai-tai and re-read the article about Lebron coming to LA to play with Kobe and close my eyes and dream for the rest of the day.....I love LA!
BD
Posted by: BD | November 03, 2009 at 10:34 AM
By the way, if you want to read it yourself, you can find it here:
http://tinyurl.com/ykmdxby
Posted by: puddle | November 03, 2009 at 10:34 AM
Sounds good to me. Good call NBA4Ever!
Posted by: Mamba24 | November 03, 2009 at 10:34 AM
When Andrew accepts that, he'll finally be ready to take his place among the All-Stars. Posted by: Rick Friedman | November 03, 2009 at 10:08 AM
Good morning Rick, how you doing? You know I have this feeling that Andrew will be ready to take his place among the All-Stars sooner than any of us think.
Posted by: Mamba24 | November 03, 2009 at 10:37 AM
Good morning Mamba, LakerTom, Jon K, Justa, and everyone. Hope you're all having a good day so far. I know I am, cuz its game day!
BTW, great post NBA4ever. IMO, the triangle is supposed to have everyone be an option for the spacing to work correctly, ones with the ball and one's without. Kudos on getting mentioned in the post.
Posted by: #4 | November 03, 2009 at 10:41 AM
Mamba24, thanks for the busting out the Shannon Brown bandwagon yesterday. 'Twas badly needed. Let's see if the vibes get to the coaching staff tonight!
Posted by: puddle | November 03, 2009 at 10:43 AM
Good Morning Everyone...
NBA4ever had it spot on..Gasol will make Bynum better..
Re Rondo...The guy is a fantastic player..But....He just does not seem very mature at all..
Posted by: Thirty2 | November 03, 2009 at 10:45 AM
This team went to back to back finals with Pau as the 2nd option. If anything, Pau deserves more touches. Why would anyone in their right mind want to turn him into a third option?
Posted by: LAKER TRUTH | November 03, 2009 at 10:45 AM
Andrew Bynum is not Pau Gasol. That is not a slight. There are few players in the entire world that are on Gasol's level. If you ask me, the offense runs better through Pau than any other player on the Lakers roster (including #24). Try not to shoot for that one. It is one of the reasons Pau's minutes were so high last year. The whole thing just works better when he is out there.
Even still the Lakers can get by without him for a while. Let him rest up. Also, this is a chance for Andrew to really dig in. He can't learn how to pass out of double teams unless he spends time on the floor actually seeing the doubles. That kind of stuff does not come in practice. Many of us fans have harped on Bynum's development. Well, there is only so much kareem can teach him. This give Andrew the time on the floor to actually learn the smaller more important things.
This kind of on the floor learning could pay huge dividends come May and June.
Posted by: T.Rogers | November 03, 2009 at 10:55 AM
Hey #4 how you doing Bro. I'm just cooling out witing for the game to start. Today is seminar day so no work for me, just laying back waiting for a big win.
Mamba24, thanks for the busting out the Shannon Brown bandwagon yesterday. 'Twas badly needed. Let's see if the vibes get to the coaching staff tonight! Posted by: puddle | November 03, 2009 at 10:43 AM
Whats' up puddle? Yeah I combined the old and new bandwagons. Hence you and LakerTom are co-owners, hope that was alright.
Mamba24
Posted by: Mamba24 | November 03, 2009 at 10:59 AM
All in all, no game, no player, no call can ever be seen in the same light whether you're buying what he's selling or not. I personally think that even if some of it is embellished and even if there are a few discrepancies, it will be incriminating enough and believable enough to cast a seriously dark shadow over the NBA. If David Stern is going to make this right, he's going to have to make NBA referreeing the most transparent, accountable profession in the world and do a nearly complete overhaul of the current system. I won't be holding my breath. Posted by: puddle | November 03, 2009 at 10:31 AM
Actually what he's saying is what most of us expected all along. As long as their is some kind of consistency that's cool. Even if you are going to consistently call for the other team, just be consitent with it. I'm pretty sure it's no great blockbuster to the players. That's why Michael Jordan would pal around with them so he would get the calls. Of course since he was the League Franchise he was going to get the calls anyway. Whatever, Good posts brother and thanks for alerting us to the article, I probably would have missed it.
Mamba24
Posted by: Mamba24 | November 03, 2009 at 11:06 AM
"I combined the old and new bandwagons. Hence you and LakerTom are co-owners, hope that was alright."
Absolutely. I had forgotten that there had been a previous Shannon Brown bandwagon, but I'm glad to rev up that engine again.
Posted by: puddle | November 03, 2009 at 11:16 AM
mornin' #4, mamba, puddle, rick, thirty2, everyone...!
Looking forward to the game & live chat tonight. NOTHING better than GAME DAY when you're a Laker fan!
NICE, NBA4ever...!
puddle - regarding the overhaul - yah, holding your breath would be a complete waste of time. Not gonna happen. When Stern does something like this that would actually BENEFIT the game instead of changing rules to change the game into something else, I will.. well, I don't know what I'd do... probably die of a heart attack. Seriously - what a tool.
I'm getting a bit worried about the State of the Hammy. I hope it's not as bad as it's starting to look & sound. Good to have Pau resting, but we need to create some chemistry with him & Thriller.... I'm not panicked, just concerned.
GAME DAY BABY!!
GO LAKERS!!!
Nothing but another title will suffice.
Posted by: justanothermambafan | November 03, 2009 at 11:17 AM
Absolutely. I had forgotten that there had been a previous Shannon Brown bandwagon, but I'm glad to rev up that engine again. Posted by: puddle | November 03, 2009 at 11:16 AM
Puddle, you're the salt of the earth, thanks.
Mamba24
Nothing but another title will suffice. Posted by: justanothermambafan | November 03, 2009 at 11:17 AM
This is true but let's not stop at one more. After all this is going to be a dynasty! LOL. Just messing with you JAMambaFan! I like the new sloggan, I put it in The Roll Call
Posted by: Mamba24 | November 03, 2009 at 11:24 AM
NBA4ever.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
I agree that it makes more sense for the Laker to run the ball through Pau in the high post to take advantage of his passing and playmaking ability. That doesn’t mean we don’t hit Drew or Kobe or any Laker who can post up and seal his man deep in the paint, just that going through the Spaniard is the best way to run the Triangle Offense. It’s that pass into the post to a center like Pau that sets the table for the rest of the team. Pau facing his man up at the free throw with Drew ensconced in the paint.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
phred,
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
You are right that Drew and Pau need to learn to work better together. Realistically, they have not really had that much time on the court when both were at their peak. And I definitely don’t prefer that Pau is injured and unable to play. I was basically just making lemonade out of the lemons. If any player could benefit from sitting for a couple of weeks, it would be Pau.
-
Like any great team, the Lakers can win any game even without Kobe Bryant and maybe even a championship without Andrew Bynum or without Pau Gasol. But they run best with all cylinders working in harmony, something we still have not had the pleasure of seeing. Their chemistry, rotations, and general karma are best when none of the major pieces are missing – meaning in my mind Kobe, Drew, Pau, or Lamar at this point – and hopefully Ron Artest as the season develops.
-
As for the record and home court, I don’t think that is going to matter to this team. If they have Kobe, Drew, and Pau at their best, they will dominate the NBA playoffs. Ron Ron will become Lamar II.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Tom
Posted by: LakerTom | November 03, 2009 at 11:25 AM
NBA4ever that was a great post and I agree with most of your assessment in that additional scoring threats makes it easier for the team to score. But I think you are being a little hard on Bynum because that statement cuts both ways. In order to define an option the player in question actually be a scoring threat and pose a concern to the opposing team. As such Bynum could be as much help to Gasol as Gosal is to Bynum, as proven last year when Bynum went out injured. Gasol complained about not getting enough touches but if you look at the tape Gosal touched it and passed it back out because there was no one else to divert attension and the defence from him.
As for the question of Bynum's defence, it is easy to blame the last man standing but the truth is that defence is a team action. I agree that Bynum has a lot to learn but it is misguided to place the blame solely on him when our guards are constantly getting burned up top. Defence demands that he rotate up to help but who helps the last man standing between the opposing player and the hoop? Farmar refuses to play defence consistantly, Vujacic can stop commiting careless fauls, and Fish (love Fish)is showing his age. Time to make a move to improve as a team Himrich.
Posted by: Marco | November 03, 2009 at 11:31 AM
Gooooood morning Blog-O-Maniacs!
Been away for a spell as I was in Indio for Halloween and far away from all computing devices in my life. I was rocking out to the Phish. Happy (belated) Halloween, Laker Lovers.
Excellent take on what Gasol means to this team, I missed Thursdays loss, but I watched replays of Sunday's game and the team looks slightly out of sync. Odom has played well, Bynum is playing well, Kobe...well c'mon, and the bench has been decent (especially Powell), but our pick n roll D and our flow on offense seems lacking to me, even in wins.
Bynum is a more adept defender and offensive force 10 feet and in from the rim. He does have his little free-throw line jumper that I'd like to see him to continue to work on. But if you bring him out into the thin air of the perimeter, he lacks the foot speed to meaningfully defend the pick n roll. He's trying, he just can't get back under the rim fast enough to disrupt the pass or alter the shot.
Powell is hitting his shots and doing fine on the glass, but he's more of a proto-typical power forward from the days of yore. He reminds me of Horace Grant. Artest is having trouble with his shot, but is playing fine defense and I would say he's trying too hard to fit in. He reminds me of how Odom played his first year with Kobe. Very tentative, thinking too much. That will dissipate with time.
Odom looks great, he's as aggressive as he was in the playoffs, might be a bit 3 pointer happy, but if he's hitting them it makes his drives that much more lethal. Walton is playing in his game, Farmar is still forcing the issue and Brown is looking like he did in the Finals. He's backing up FIsh and the three of them are a Hydra of a PG.
But without Gasol, this team looks like a lot of one-on-one guys or spot up shooters waiting for someone to get them the ball. This could be because Lamar generally starts out on the perimeter and makes something happen off the dribble, same as Kobe and we're lacking that crisp interior passing that Gasol provides. He also is a good outside shooter, so if he comes out of the post, his man has to follow, so it opens up the lane for all of our guys who can get to the rack. Bynum doesn't go out that far, therefor making it easier to cover a secondary player for the opposing center.
I think that Jackson has made the most out of Gasol's wealth of skill and talent and that without it, it's like taking the nitrous out of your funny car, it just don't run the same. This is nothing against any other player on the squad, it just illuminates how valuable and under-rated Gasol is.
I hope he comes back soon.
Posted by: Jamie Sweet | November 03, 2009 at 11:38 AM
lol at rondo gettin under pauls skin and rayray apologizing could you imagine gasol apologizging for kobe lol.
Posted by: Mamba0824 | November 03, 2009 at 11:39 AM
"Like any great team, the Lakers can win .......maybe even a championship without Andrew Bynum or without Pau Gasol"
Without Bynum, Lakers have already won a championship and made it to back to back finals. Gasol is a necessity, Bynum is a luxury.
Posted by: LAKER TRUTH | November 03, 2009 at 11:40 AM
AN EXCELLENT POST BY NBA4ever AND LETS HOPE..........
these annoying repetitious posts singing Bynum's glory are put on the the back burner as we have heard all possible mutations on how good Bynum is going to be....
Cheers and wishing Pau a speedy recovery.
Posted by: lakerfan | November 03, 2009 at 11:43 AM
OK OK SO I WAS REMISS, NBA4EVER, LAKERTOM, PUDDLE, MARCO, I HAVE TO SAY IT...
OUT FREAKIN STANDING!!!
mAMBA24
Posted by: MAMBA24 | November 03, 2009 at 11:47 AM
K Brothes - am I reading this correctly? How in the world can LeBron play in LA?
Wouldn't:
1) Bryant have to take a major cut? ( he is signed through next year, right?)
2. LeBron have to play for the MLE? (which ain't happening)
Cleveland is the most likely landing spot for him because they can offer him the most money? Correct??
Posted by: Giant Green Bald-Headed Lunatic | November 03, 2009 at 11:48 AM
Puddle et al re Tim Donaghy-
I’m going to phrase this as a question because I don’t know the facts for certain- Didn’t Tim Donaghy testify about alleged game fixing under oath? Didn’t the media and the NBA already have access to what allegations he made? And does it seem likely that any new ‘revelations’ in his book would either constitute an admission of perjury during his trial or be new ‘facts’ he has manufactured since then in order to increase book sales? I think this is part of what Random House was thinking about when they cancelled the publication, but if anybody knows the answer to these questions, I would appreciate hearing them.
Posted by: phred | November 03, 2009 at 11:52 AM
NBA Power Rankings (I know, meaningless at this point)
http://tinyurl.com/ylblqx4
1. Orlando
.
.
5. Lakers
Also, a 2009-2010 Lakers Season Preview written by (ahem) myself. Comments or critiques welcome.
http://tinyurl.com/yfq9gpo
And while I'm at it, how to play the point guard position in basketball by me again:
http://tinyurl.com/yl3z5jh
If you get a chance, give them a read, and let me know what you think. I'm trying something new. I wish the internet was around when I was getting 750s on the english section of the SATs....I'd probably be doing something alot different!
Thanks all!
Posted by: #4 | November 03, 2009 at 12:00 PM
Bynum's offensive game is strong and getting stronger, without a doubt. My concern is his inability to get position for rebounds. He is rarely seen boxing out the opposition, instead relying only on his length to reach over them. A player with his size and strength should be able to get better position than he does.
Posted by: ShowtimeTake2 | November 03, 2009 at 12:15 PM
LBJ playing in LA went out the door when he signed the extension with the Cavs a few years back.
But, let's assume that LBJ actually WANTED to come here and would do everything to make it happen except take a massive paycut.
The Cavs, without LBJ, have no marketing power at all. The franchise's value itself is most likely dependent on LBJ. I don't know, 100 mill maybe? How much would the value drop if they had no superstar? My guess, in Cleveland, a substantial amount.
Therefore, the Cavs have all the incentive in the world to keep him. If they're going to cut costs, it would be on the other players, not LeBron.
So, assume MAX DOLLARS, even in this economy, for LBJ.
Now, subtract out the MLE and you're going to have a difference of??? I don't know, 20 million a year? Someone else would know the exact amount.
What would have to happen is that LBJ would have to make up this difference in added endorsement or business ventures - that he could NOT do right now. That's quite a bit of value
I'm convinced the "winning" aspect is no where near the "money" aspect when it comes to his motivators right now. I just don't see how he'd be able to make up that dollar amount in ADDED endorsements/business. I just don't see it.
But put the man on the Lakers with this team, and you may as well hand us 10 O'Briens
Posted by: Tim-4-Show | November 03, 2009 at 12:30 PM
The only way it happens would be if Magic Johnson made him a partner... then you could say he's likely to earn back the difference in business ventures that he would not be able to do otherwise
Posted by: Tim-4-Show | November 03, 2009 at 12:32 PM
Allen Iverson is sort of like the US economy. He was great, he still has some life left in him, but let's face it, it just isnt' the same - and his attitude is that he'll be on top forever when he's actually in massive decline.
Most of that decline, at the present, is because of his own attitude (something totally controllable).
My thought is that he'd be an awesome bench player - pretty much for any team out there, but unfortunately he proves himself to be incapable of accepting such a role, no matter how well suited he might be for it.
It's too bad - the guy is still very good (in the right role) - what a waste.
Posted by: Tim-4-Show | November 03, 2009 at 12:39 PM
Since this is the Lakers 50th anniversary and Fox Sports West recently ran the Lakers 1972 championship game, I decided I cannot stay quiet on this any longer. Why is the final 4 minutes or so of this game not shown? Every showing of this video ends abruptly this way (including the copy in the DVD set). We do not see the final minutes of the game, nor do we see any of the ensuing celebration. For those of us who felt the pain in the 1960’s of losing in the finals time after time, the 1972 team has a special place in our hearts. How is it possible that such an important event in Lakers history is missing this footage?
Posted by: Tom England | November 03, 2009 at 12:51 PM
Lakerfan and Lakertruth;
I didn't write my post to sing Bynum's praises, but take a realistic view of the teams offence and options. That said there is a reason why Pau is the second option and that is because as great as he is(and he is a great player) he is not enough to be a first. He has already proven that with the Grizlies, and is not likely to ever be a trully dominent player that can lead a team, so he is just another piece in the puzzle. Back to Bynum I don't know how good a player he will end up being but I see some promise. If the Lakers can develope him into even being a relavent low post threat, that can only help the team. Doesn't he deserve the benefit of the doubt, and the right to develope his game without all the couch potatoes second guessing his progress or raising the flag of over-rated.
Posted by: Marco | November 03, 2009 at 01:15 PM
Marco and the rest of Bynum will be better than Gasol Bandwagoners:
So Gasol, who has argueably been the best Power Forward of the league during last year and took a major role in winning the Ring with the Lakers, already reached his max of being a second option BECAUSE he did not play as a true first option in Memphis BUT we can give some credit and hope to Bynum to be the number one option in the Lakers because he still did not prove us wrong. I don't get it.
I can almost guarantee that I have seen more Grizzlies games that anyone on this blog so PLEASE stop blaming at Gasol on Grizzlies performance. GASOL is the best player to ever play for the Grizzlies so far and most likely will have his Jersey hanging from the FEdEx Forum someday. Gasol got to the Grizzlies being a 21 year old lanky international rookie when the Grizzlies were just transferred from Vancouver to Memphis. From day one Gasol was supposed to be a number one option on a a very poor roster (please name one player that you would have added to the Lakers squad). Gasol was the only one to take the team to the playoffs.
Gasol is the second option on the Lakers, OK. Is there any player in the league that would be our first option with Kobe on the roster?
Gasol will never be superstar like Kobe Bryant, LBJ or MJ but he could get to the same level of Dirk, Garnett or Duncan.
Gasol proved that he can be a first option playing for Spain where he is among other titles, World Champion in 2006 and Olympic Silver medallist in 2008 (almost beat the US team on the Olympics).
Gasol also proved that he could adapt quickly to the team and to the triangle. This is not easy and I seriously doubt that any top player would be able to take that role and benefit the team better.
Posted by: Ganapia | November 03, 2009 at 03:45 PM
This isn't a Bynum banwagon, I don't know what the kid will do in the future, if anything at all. All I am saying is give the guy some space. As for Pau no one is blaming him for the poor play of the Grizzlies. There is no doubt that he was the best player on that squad, all I am saying is that Pau is not a dominent force. As good as he is, no one expects him to take over a game and lead his team in, Kobe or no Kobe. Fisher is more likely to show true leadership and lead them in if there was no Kobe. Pau is an elite player and may have a lot to contribute to the success of this team but he is along for the ride like most of the roster. Giving him more credit than that is unfounded. It's like calling Lebron a King? What kind of King has no RINGS?
Posted by: Marco | November 03, 2009 at 04:54 PM
The whole reason I wrote the post about Bynum not being a #2 option was in reaction to the game against Dallas. He seems to stop then immediately make a move to the basket or pass; he doesn’t wait for the play to develop. He seemed to clog the lane and didn’t allow for Kobe or Lamar to drive, whereas Gasol spreads the floor better when he’s in there. That doesn’t mean I don’t think that we shouldn’t post him up frequently. I just see how much more efficient our offense flows with Gasol.
I think the game tonight proved exactly what my point was. In the first half Bynum was 8 for 10, almost all of them were easy baskets from passes set up by teammates and off of put-backs. He is a more dominant player than a skilled player, his game feeds off of playing with skilled players. I am a huge Bynum fan!
My main argument for Gasol would be when Kobe goes out of the game you can go to him more consistently. In this game tonight we saw that, but we also saw why there is no question once again why Artest was the better choice. Artest was that go to guy for us in the 4th quarter while Kobe rested, and then he shut down and intimidated Durant on defense.
Marco
In no way was I “being a little hard on Bynum”, like BK said “It's not a dig at Bynum, rather a recognition Gasol's role in the offense”. Bynum is dominant this young because of the team he plays on. I don’t think Bynum could of carried those Grizlies like Gasol did then, and he certainly couldn’t compete with Gasol at this stage in his career if he was on those teams now.
Posted by: NBA4ever | November 03, 2009 at 10:25 PM
Hello NBA4ever I can appreciate your point of view and understand Pau important contributions to the team. I did not think that you were personally hard on Bynum as much as others on this blog. And as I stated I am not on a Bynum bandwagon, I just think the pundents need to give the guy a little space to grow before they start trashing the kid and I do mean kid(21yrs.old). As for Pau, most people seem to forget that Pau is 29yrs.old and when he came to the NBA he had already played 3yrs. as a pro in Europe. If you want to compare Andrew's progress as a pro To Pau's, then lets go back to his first 3yrs. as a pro in Europe so we can compare Apples to Apples. Then you can tell me how well Pau would have carried a team as a young pro. He may have been given Rookie of the year in 2002 but that was by no means his first dance.
Posted by: Marco | November 04, 2009 at 09:32 AM