Why Hedo Turkoglu's switcheroo could hurt the Lakers, or at least make fans nervous
I'm sure a few people thought about this reading the news that Hedo Turkoglu, reportedly set to sign with the TrailBlazers, has yanked the rug out and will instead head to Canada and the Raptors, but it could have a negative effect on the Lakers. Losing Turkoglu once again leaves Portland about $9 mil under the cap, and looking to spend. One potential target? Lamar Odom, who would be attractive to them for many of the same reasons as Hedo. Odom is a versatile forward who operates well in the pick and roll, and could help relieve Brandon Roy from some of his currently enormous ball handling/moving duties. Odom isn't quite as natural a fit as Hedo, since he tends to be more effective as a power forward (where the Blazers already have LaMarcus Aldridge) than at the three, but it still makes sense.
If the offers were in the same ballpark I'm confident LO would stay in LA, but had Portland disappeared from the free agent landscape there wouldn't have been many alternatives for Odom, other than teams using their mid-level exceptions.
Not if he wanted to win a few games, anyway.
Again, no reason to freak out. As ESPN.com's John Hollinger writes, "the most likely outcome of an Odom pursuit would be driving up the price for the rival Lakers." While that might not prevent LA from retaining him, spending more for LO than they otherwise might have could have an impact down the road, given the dollar-for-dollar penalties of the luxury tax. There's an upper limit to that payroll somewhere, right?
The good news, of course, is that Portland lost out on a piece that could have improved them in a lot of ways. Maybe they fill that need (or address another), maybe not, but for the time being the Blazers lose out. Which should make local fans happy... assuming it doesn't screw anything up for the Lakers.
BK



Bresnhan.made a comment that made me get a knot in my guts....What if Odom signs a 1 year deal then tests the market next year when teams have more cash...Bosh,Wade,Crab and the rest will command the most attention but that could shake the tree a little....
Im starting to get a little uneasy about Odom....Like really starting to stress,at a time when we should be resting and enjoying our title...Im not sure i can wait until the 8th...
Posted by: Thirty2 | July 04, 2009 at 03:59 AM
Or unless part of the reason Phill comes back is because Odom is already in play...
Posted by: Thirty2 | July 04, 2009 at 04:45 AM
If I were Portland, I'd take my chances with the 2010 offseason and get a PG. They aren't going to get Odom anyway. The Lakers can offer him the no-trade clause. Portland can't.
Posted by: Revgen | July 04, 2009 at 04:46 AM
I am a bit nervous. If Portland does a Golden State Fish deal or a Turiaf deal, and that is Lamar's choice, not much we can do. I like Bresnahan's take though that sign a one year deal and then a lot of teams have cleared space for next year. It will hurt having Lamar go then, but who knows, maybe the Lakers will have more cap space then. I think Lamar truly enjoys being here and he has way more years at a great salary then Trevor has up till now. So there is more lee-way there to go with his heart. I think his heart he wants to stay in LA.
BTW I am excited about Morrison. He agreed to the summer league and he really had a decent rookie year before getting hurt. I think he can thrive with Phil as a coach. I see him stretching the defense out some and playing some smart ball next year for the Lakers.
Posted by: LarryofLA | July 04, 2009 at 05:31 AM
new poster here. lakers fan and loud about it as most of us are. best guess: with ronron, pj, kobe (yes him) and most of the team back, lamar has more incentives than ever to stay. he shouldn't let the lee debacle get the best of his reason and go hurt us with a portland stint. imagine that portland team. though i think the blazer lineup seems redundant in a lot of ways. it's not like artest adding flavor and a new dimension to la.
the sheed signing also worries me as this. some say he's a washed up player. he could do a malone to la 04 but should the celtics and spurs teams, notable discipline teams grab him, it could lessen chances of a repeat. i say, send all veteran's minimum invites to all FAs who want to go grab a ring. ai seems to be heading to somewhere he is not or may just be needed. then there's the toronto FA list including gems like marion and carter. these guys could be our plan B. bad thing is, we don't have the MLE.
so lamar better be back or we're a tat less than last year unless mitch could pull off another steal. GO LAKERS!
Posted by: passerby | July 04, 2009 at 05:37 AM
Lamar loves being a Laker, he isn't going anywhere.
Posted by: Andrew | July 04, 2009 at 05:48 AM
I was thinking the same thing. I think Lamar was sitting and waiting to see if there was any cap room around the league.
Also in the cap room discussion we've been talking about how much LO and TA used to cost. Could you run down the contracts that actually automatically went up this year. I think Kobe's went up by $3 mill even though he didn't opt out so that's $3 mil more than last years budget, though LO was on the books for $14 mill and should be had for less but what about all the other contracts? I think us fans get caught up in wanting to sign someone we forget they've got 10 other guys they already have to pay.
Posted by: AndyN | July 04, 2009 at 06:28 AM
BK,
I was happy about the Blazer's loss for about 2 seconds before I thought about them going after Odom. I'll sleep a lot better once we have him signed.
Posted by: Laker Kev | July 04, 2009 at 06:39 AM
I felt ill when I found out about Hedo going to TOR because that meant that LO could potentially sign with them.
At one point I get the whole money thing, but how much money do you have to make in order to feel secure? Is it status? Is it that you can buy anything you want? I have to confess, I just can't relate.
Let's hope LO stays in LA. I know he wants to because he's reiterated it on several occasions.
Happy 4th of July everyone! Be safe.
GO LAKERS!
Posted by: longtimelakerlover@yahoo.com | July 04, 2009 at 07:45 AM
Laker organization needs another owner with deep pockets like a (George Steinbrenner) type.Isn't Jerry Buss`s liquidity tied up in real estate holdings,that has taken a heavy hit from the recession.Time for the Buss family to sell team to a rich conglomerate.I hate this cheapness and the priority should be on signing Odom to a deal.I f they let Lamar Odom sign with Portland the public backlash will be monumental.Come on Jerry stand up to the plate or relinquish the team to a more competitive entity that has the resources.
Posted by: Jose | July 04, 2009 at 07:55 AM
BK,
Doesn't the fact that Toronto will probably have to release Shawn Marion also complicate the free agent landscape? Any chance Portland pursues Marion instead of Lamar?
-Jeff
Posted by: Jeff | July 04, 2009 at 07:56 AM
i am confident lamar will be a laker. since you we don't have trevor, i know the lakers top priority right now is lamar. we can't lose two of our fourth quarter guys.
i just want to say i know lakers have fans all over the world, but for fans in la you don't know how big of a deal it was to have trevor. trevor lived the la dream (as he always was saying in interviews he didn't want to wake up). fans in LA loved him b/c he is good guy and was just happy to be a laker. he won championships for his high school and went to ucla. kobe is LA's adoptive son and we love. trevor and even jordan our LA's own. cleveland loves lebron not only b/c he is amazing but he is their own. a lot of trevor's fans can't even afford to go the games, but they came out to the parade. after kobe, trevor received the most love.
so to all the laker fans all over the world, maybe you guys just don't understand how much trevor meant to us. he played a big part of the championship title, but he is our own. i know from a business aspect the ron artest deal looks good on paper, but trevor meant a lot to all of us in LA.
Posted by: Diya | July 04, 2009 at 07:56 AM
I am very sure that Lakers management would sign LO. I'm ready for next season. When does it start? :):)
Posted by: M Alam | July 04, 2009 at 08:02 AM
We need Odom...
Now we may have to pay more...
But Buss needs to call the raise to fill his full house...
Call the raise if you want to win the hand and get another bracelet...I mean ring...
Posted by: sleepless in vegas | July 04, 2009 at 08:06 AM
Well, tactically the availability of Blazers to sign LO may cause a little pain for the Lakers to match the incremental offer but if they stretch this up the deadline, it hurts also the Blazers to get a replacement player. If you are the Blazers GM, would u sacrifice that opportunity, LO engineered the signing of fellow Queen's, RonRon, so his heart and mind are with the Lakers. LO is just playing the payday through Blazers or Raftors. Now that Hedo going to Toronto there must be some opportunities on players being renounced in Toronto.
Scoop!!!! Lakers are again competing for Nate Robinson of Knicks. I think they're revisiting the Farmar-Robinson scenario or just another safety move in case of SB signing snafu. Advice to SB & his agent - "don't follow the route of Trevor, you have gained a foothold of this City. Be patient with your grab of fortune. There is more fortune in waiting than going w/ Pacers for small raise. Once you go to Pacers, you're like Ronnie Turiaf joining a dead-end team".
Posted by: Edwin Gueco | July 04, 2009 at 08:31 AM
Wait a second BK.
"Odom is a versatile forward who operates well in the pick and roll, and could help relieve Brandon Roy from some of his currently enormous ball handling/moving duties."
When have you ever seen Lamar Odom in a pick and roll?
His jump shot is major inconsistent and is a predominantly left-handed player. Pick and roll hardly makes sense for lamar and it NEVER has.
Again, when does LO go to pick and roll? They answer is pretty much NEVER.
Funny how free agency adds all kind of skills to players games.
Posted by: Korey | July 04, 2009 at 08:33 AM
pizza eater or candy monster?!
they wanted a 3 that was more clutch than lamar. they have aldridge (whatever his name is) also they chased amare.
no beach in portland
no sun
too much rain
and no social life. or if it is, there is no megan fox or who ever u want to substitute
http://twitpic.com/96b7j
Posted by: ouchhhhhhhhh | July 04, 2009 at 08:40 AM
If Lakers get Nate Robinson, we'll be rocking and frolicking:
1 Fisher/Robinson/Brown
2Kobe/Sasha/Yue
3Artest/Walton/2nd draft pick
4Gasol/LO/Powell
5Bynum/Gasol/Mbenga
Fisher will be our sentimental PG starter but he can rest throughout the season and let Nate and Shannon compete for the starting role. I love it, I love it, now we are really talking of dynasty. You can imagine how the rock will move around, not stagnant or indecisive or bricking. I think even Luke will look great in this set up b/c there are so many capable players out there. Go Mitch, get him
Posted by: Edwin Gueco | July 04, 2009 at 08:42 AM
Love LO, especially at a reduced number but we're still the best team in the league without him.
He's been around long enough to understand what it means to be part of this circus. He doesn't have to live in the spotlight here, doesn't have to exhaust himself in meaningless mid season games. It's a vets paradise.
LO's a Laker.
Posted by: VMan | July 04, 2009 at 08:50 AM
If you are Kevin Pritchard, Blazers GM who would you prefer Lamar Odom or Shawn Marion? With Lamar, Lakers will match the offer by next week, with Shawn, he is for grab b/c Raftors has renounced him to clear cap space for Hedo. If Blazers make a tender offer to LO, Shawn Marion could be taken by another team.
Posted by: Edwin Gueco | July 04, 2009 at 08:58 AM
Not good, I think Portland will pursue Lamar alot harder than they did Hedo. It would add length to a already good Portland team and at the same time take away from the Lakers. It would make much more sense to try to match up in the paint. The Lakers only advantage is that Lamar has already had his big payday(unlike Trevor), and staying in L.A. and playing for a second ring is his decision. don't let it slip away L.O.
ante up anyone?
Posted by: ChicNstu | July 04, 2009 at 08:59 AM
Watched the SPorts Center after game 6 that starts out with "Ariza was the difference". The Laker Org has committed to Bynum to be that future difference.
David Lee bluffed and wound up with close enough to what he could have had here plus another ring.
Then again, Trevor has made a lot of strange decisions in his career, starting with UCLA. Love him, but he's a Rocket now and those 3s won't be as wide open.
Mitch and Co. moved decisively, with LO kickin' in a call, (again, a Laker) trading 'the difference" for hi drama. It won't be boring next year, and nice to be the bully on the block again.
BTW: ya think Kobe, who wanted Ron, has an educated, battle tested opinion about his game?
24 just got a few extra minutes of regular season rest.
Posted by: VMan | July 04, 2009 at 09:01 AM
Ahhhhh.
The Artest news starts to settle down and the blog can get back to trading away role players and fighting over Andrew Bynum. Feels like home again.
Bynum is the real wild card in all this. A healthy Bynum could make the Lakers a lot better, he could actually be the best off season pick up this year.
In my mind (a scary place indeed) health is the only question on Bynum. Drew Bynum, contrary to his image, is a hard worker. He came into this league out of high school, having never played a lot of ball, he was long, skinny and athletic with very little in the way of basketball skills. He could dunk.
He has worked hard to bulk up to the body he has now, and to develop the skills we see, especially that great footwork he has in the post. That is hours and hours in the gym. Bulk. Footwork. A variety of post moves, jump hook, turnaround, spin move, up and under. Shooting, around the rim (he has a soft touch) and the 15 foot jumper. Improved passing. Plus coming back twice from injury. Drew has worked hard.
Of course it didn't show in the playoffs. Drew probably came back too soon. He wanted to play and he wasn't ready. He didn't move his feet at all on defense (maybe his knee) and committed silly reach fouls. And he said some truly stupid things.
But Drew can learn, we have seen him learn, and he will improve his defensive technique after these playoffs. If he is healthy next year he gives the Lakers a skilled, huge presence on both ends of the floor. With Kobe and Psycho defending on the perimeter and Pau and Drew defending the paint, this could be a scary defensive team.
It comes down to health. If he is just a guy who got injured and not a guy who is injury prone, he could be huge upgrade next year.
Posted by: Tom Daniels | July 04, 2009 at 09:05 AM
Ouchhhhhh,
Candy doesn't taste good in rain and snow. No more beach outing for LO if he stays in Portland and Artest will be laughing at him. Hahahahaha LO in Portland that's like Judas selling the Lord for 30 pieces of silver.
Posted by: Edwin Gueco | July 04, 2009 at 09:14 AM
LarryofLA - I agree with the one-year scenario, it's a good compromise.
Jeff, I'm thinking the same thing about Marion.
Edwin - where was the latest Nate rumor? Very interesting.
Posted by: dave m | July 04, 2009 at 09:21 AM
I wonder what the home town discount amounts to.
Posted by: #4 | July 04, 2009 at 09:33 AM
Portland is not a rival. Enough said. They may think we're rivals but we're not rivals.
Posted by: never | July 04, 2009 at 09:36 AM
The only reason Portland would want Lamar Odom is to come off the bench as a backup for Lamarcus Aldridge. Portland won't pay Odom what he wants to be a backup.
Posted by: Nick | July 04, 2009 at 09:48 AM
GREAT OPPORTUNITY FOR THE LAKERS!!
Hear me out before you tell me I'm crazy..
We all know Houston would prefer a sign-and-trade of Ariza and Ron-Ron, but that's not been in our interest. But maybe it could be IF they give us something else we want.
Read this from the Houston Chronicle:
http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/sports/bk/bkn/6510520.html
If Wafer is on his way out, maybe we could have them sign him for about 2.5 mil and do a BIG sign-and-trade;
Artest and Wafer for Ariza and Sasha. That would
1) save Buss a couple million (to use for Lamar!)
2) get rid of Sasha's albatross of a contract, and
3) bring back Von Wafer as a backup for Kobe.
C'mon, you know how important Von Wafer Sightings have been to this Blog! And I think he fits better than Lose-his-swish with the Lakers overall plans.
CAN WE DO THIS??? MiTCH??
Posted by: Jay Jay | July 04, 2009 at 09:49 AM
if LO is not signed, blame it on sahasa and lukes contract.
i dont know why people like luke walton hes not good at all. the only thing he can do is pass the ball. luke been with the lakers for 5 years, and hasent did anything. you people act like luke should no get traded. i just don no, maybe beacause he the only white person on a wining team.
Posted by: rag123 | July 04, 2009 at 09:53 AM
Edwin
if the Gates of Heaven (Port-land) will open for Odom for 30 piece of silver, will see if he will sell Jesus (Kobe-see George Karl).
also it will be confusing to hear who will be the Ohhhh-Dumb at the Odom/Oden sound
on other sites, people r calling Turkeyglue greedy for going to Toronto in place of Portland or Orlando. Until someone brought up that Toronto is the 5th largest market in NA after Ny, La, Mexico City and Chicago and has a very large turkish community
i will say that Portland will be too provincial for a socialite like Lamar and i also heard that he hates?! Brandon Roy. so maybe Ariza will help us because of that little brawl with fernandez. at the same time we know that sports players should have a short memory.
Posted by: ouchhhhhhhhh | July 04, 2009 at 09:55 AM
Lamar has only known New York - LA - Miami his whole life.
He is a Big City boy. Going to Portland would be like going to Salt Lake City to him.
Portland has the money, but would be wiser to bring someone in that could help them more.
A team with over-the-MLE money is very rare these days. They are in a position of strength in this buyers market and can pik exactly who they want.
LO will make them better, bu they could do better unlees they are planning on trading Aldridge, unlikely, they would be jamming the 4 too much.
Just my thoughts...
Posted by: Fatty | July 04, 2009 at 09:55 AM
Korey-
I agree that the P and R with Lamar isn't a focal point of LA's offense (it doesn't have to be) but not that he's not effective in it, because he both handles the ball and passes so well. But that he's less consistent with the jumper is another reason he doesn't fit as well as Turkoglu- one I should have made far more clear (Reading again what I actually wrote vs. what I was thinking, there's definitely a gap. Good reason not to write late, I guess). You're exactly right. My big point, though, is that the Blazers are looking for a guy who can help facilitate and handle the ball to help take all the focus away from Roy. Odom would qualify in that, I think.
They could make a push for a guy like Ramon Sessions, too. Or make a trade. It doesn't have to be a big, but it can be.
BK
Posted by: Brian Kamenetzky | July 04, 2009 at 09:56 AM
Artest versus Ariza
a pretty lucid analysis
http://tinyurl.com/639tp3
Posted by: ouchhhhhhhhh | July 04, 2009 at 09:58 AM
Nick-
I think if Portland makes the push, they're dedicated to putting Odom at the three, and moving one of their SFs, and believe he and Aldridge (who does like to step away from the bucket and shoot) could play together. I agree, they wouldn't throw that money at him to be a backup.
Like I said, I don't think it's a huge threat, but it's one of the only ones out there.
BK
Posted by: Brian Kamenetzky | July 04, 2009 at 10:00 AM
Whatever decision the front office makes, good or bad, I just can't believe people are questioning Dr. Buss' commitment to the team. One of the most successful franchises in SPORTS history during his tenure. Paid for big time and small time players. Most stars retired as a Laker. Most times he paid for teams with 3 all stars and kept the role players. Our "rebuilding times" have been relatively short compared to other teams. Jerry and Mitch have made bad moves before but I don't think the finances have been an issue.
Posted by: AndyN | July 04, 2009 at 10:01 AM
Just my two cents on the most likely remaining moves.
Odom for a one year deal.
Brown gets resigned.
Farmar gets moved for a future draft pick.
Morrison stays - either regains his form or contract expires
Sasha stays - don't think we can get much in trade value right now.
Sun has his contract picked up.
This gives us 12 players which is the number Mitch wants to carry. It could possibly change if Chinemelu plays great in the summer league and camp.
Posted by: dave m | July 04, 2009 at 10:08 AM
Sorry, I meant to say that gives us 13 players (not 12).
Posted by: dave m | July 04, 2009 at 10:10 AM
Marion is free from Toronto so LO has competition.
Posted by: ouchhhhhhhhh | July 04, 2009 at 10:16 AM
Portland is not a rival. Enough said. They may think we're rivals but we're not rivals.
Posted by: never | July 04, 2009 at 09:36 AM
Agreed. They may see us as enemy #1, but we can honestly throw them in with the Suns, Kings, Jazz, and teams that hate us that haven't won anything of consequence. Take a number.
Interestingly, the Cavs are starting to get there too, IMO. They seem to hate us, but I don't really care for them until they get to the finals (and actually do some damage, not get swept).
Posted by: #4 | July 04, 2009 at 10:20 AM
Dave M,
"Nate Robinson bidding by Lakers and Magic...."
You can find it in the heading of Hoopshype.com. Here is the headline below:
"Hidayet Turkoglu is now headed to the Toronto Raptors after spurning the Blazers' offer ... Lakers and Magic in the mix for Nate Robinson? ... Stephon Marbury to Washington? ... Pacers interested in Luther Head and Shannon Brown ... Joe Dumars to meet with Avery Johnson this weekend"
Posted by: Edwin Gueco | July 04, 2009 at 10:24 AM
David Lee - NOT the agent does have interest from Portland. I don't think Lamar is that great of a fit for Portland. Cleveland would have been an amazing fit, you would have had Shaq, Lamar and Lebron at the 2 forward spots and a super thin bench but Cleveland can't swing the money that Portland can.
Portland doesn't look that good to me, they have some random, young talent but I don't think Oden is going to be that dominant, their bench is thin, I don't even think they are comparable to the Spurs or Denver even if they did get Odom.
Posted by: Dallas Raines' Hair | July 04, 2009 at 10:28 AM
The level of threat Portland presents is dependent upon Odom's needs and motivation. Does he really not care about coming off the bench? Odom is basically a bench player here, but for all intents and purposes, he's a starter. He and Pau are our biggest and best threat other than Kobe. He, Pau, and Kobe create lots of synergy.
In my line of business, we would describe the effect as multiplicative as opposed to additive. In more laymen's terms, Kobe/Pau/Lamar set the table for those the rest of the team. Ariza, Fisher, Shannon, and when he was hitting shots, Sasha, have all benefited from that effect.
I hope that is not lost upon Lamar. I also hope he knows that while he can be good in Portland, he can be great here. Playing off of Pau and Kobe will beat playing off of Roy and Aldridge anyday (the latter doesn't seem as tough in the playoffs).
The good news is that in one of the reports (Eric Pincus' I believe), Lamar was involved with wooing Ron Artest. And Artest took less money. So in that regard, he may already be committed to this organization, the agent and Mitch may just be working on the money details.
Posted by: #4 | July 04, 2009 at 10:32 AM
blitz,
Here’s my prediction: Andrew Bynum will remain injury free and make the All-Star team.
Here’s your prediction: Shannon Brown will become the Lakers starting point guard.
Let’s see who is right.
Tom
Posted by: LakerTom | July 04, 2009 at 10:34 AM
#4 was correct. So far it is only in this blog we're worried of Blazers b/c of the cap space. What the Oregonian blog is asking is McDyess b/c it inconceivable that Odom will leave the Lakers. It's the Candy....LO wants to promote candies. Where is the huge market for candies? Where are the advertisers located? where can you find the best dentists? Will he enjoy crunching candies along Oregon Coast's monsoon rains? Ask Phred hahaha!
As coup de grace statement, Ariza preferred the Rockets b/c they compete. I guess b/c it was the toughness of RonRon, without him on the Rockets they have no chance of extending to a 7 game. Therefore, that serves a good lesson for LO and SB, do you want to go to a dead-end team? If yes, then move on now b/c many F/A players want to join the Lakers possible, if LO drops out Rasheed Wallace or Marion enters the Laker's athmosphere. If Shannon balks with the Laker offer, Nate Robinson will surely go with the Lakers. Baby, nobody is indispensable in this world. There is a price for doing something and there is also a price for doing nothing. Make your lifetime decision that will determine your future in NBA.
Posted by: Edwin Gueco | July 04, 2009 at 10:40 AM
i'm not that worried about resigning LO. of course i'm hoping it happens, but honestly, i'm so drained from the whole Ariza/Ron-Ron-gate that i can't put any more emotions into whether or not LO gets resigned.
and honestly, i'm still pondering the Artest experiment. one major thing that no one is talking about is Phil Jackson's future with the team. everyone in the Pro-Artest camp is saying, "PJ can handle Ron, just look at how he handled Rodman." but the problem with this rationale is that who knows how many years PJ has left in him. okay, he said he's coming back next season. but we have Ron for 3 years. what if PJ retires after next season? and what if Shaw or Rambis is the replacement? now we're asking one of them to keep Ron in check.
i'm just hoping that playing with Kobe and having the chance to win multiple rings makes Artest less volatile, and not to mention less selfish with the ball.
dave m, i don't like your idea of trading Farmar, unless if we can get another PG or combo guard. remember, Fisher is getting pretty old, and there's no guarantee he'll play in all 82 games. in fact, i will put money on him having some sort of injury throughout the season. i don't think i'm being a pessimist here. just looking at his age, and being realistic. plus, PJ has got to limit Fish's minutes in order to keep him fresh for the Playoffs. if we get rid of Farmar (for nothing in return), that leaves major PG minutes for Brown. and i'm sorry, i just don't trust him enough yet for that sort of role. (not to mention he hasn't signed yet, so we're thrusting a huge role onto a guy we don't even have yet)
Posted by: leonardbast | July 04, 2009 at 10:40 AM
I think it ridiculous with all 3 of our FAs. Were they not actually at the parade? And then with 90K fans waiting for them for some 30 minute show to cheer them on??!!! They waited for HOURS to be in that hell hole, with no parking - to cheer on their players! That's some great fans!!!
They all said they want to be back...why didn't they sign on day 1 at the first hour? I know it's negotiating time but I feel that the Lakers are probably putting out "fair" offers - PLUS the chance to be on a dynasty!!! You'll live in a great city - get paid millions, play for the best organization in the NBA, be idolized by tons of fans chance to win muliple rings, play for the greatest coach ever- what is the damn problem? I can't believe we can't even sign SB?!!! Come on dude - are you kidding me? You have the chance to eventually become their starting pg!!! LO - I know many people LOVE you hrer - people like JonK and others - but I still think you can take a hike if you think you are the only guy who can do your job. Mitch will show you the door if you F around too much with this deal.
This team they are building is once in a freaking lifetime - all these players are, I Love LA - I love being a Laker - and then they go out looking for more money. Hmmmm....makes me wonder what their real priorites are. They're still going to get paid well by the Lakers - it's not like they're going to get minimum wages - crud! I'm getting pissed that they aren't banging on the door to sign away.
I hope Mitch is going to play hardball if they screw around anymore. He will somehow make this all work out for the Lakers. He has really grown as a GM and has been making killer decisions. I have total faith in him that even if LO walks he will build the dynasty....even if it takes a bit longer.
So what - they want to make more money and end up on the Clippers? Get some dang perspective!!!! Some of the best NBA players never got a ring in their career - I think these guys take it for granted how hard it is to win it all.
Sorry if I'm going off - it's just irritating already that we lost TA and possible LO and SB. BUT we got Artest and who knows what else Mitch has up his sleeve. Artest is beginning to look like the most sane player out of all of the FAs. I say get players who freaking WANT to be part of the Lakers!!!
Posted by: DaveW | July 04, 2009 at 10:41 AM
but going back to Artest, one thing that i like about his acquisition is that it could really improve our bench. PJ can tinker with the line-up, and have it so either Kobe or Artest is in the game at all times (or for most of the game). this way, Artest can get more touches while playing with the bench, cuz they don't have as many post-up options as the starters. we can have Artest playing with Odom, Gasol or Bynum, Farmar, Walton and Vujacic or Brown. that would be a devastating 2nd string. even throw in Powell or MBenga, and it's still devasting, cuz you have Artest to post-up. oh man, i'm salivating at the toughts of that!
Posted by: leonardbast | July 04, 2009 at 10:45 AM
"Here’s my prediction: Andrew Bynum will remain injury free and make the All-Star team.
Here’s your prediction: Shannon Brown will become the Lakers starting point guard."
Deal but here's my prediction about those things:
Andrew Bynum will be a reserve for the All-Star team due to injuries to other All-Star players. (That is assuming he beats out Artest/Gasol/Odom (assuming he is re-signed) and even takes shots away from Bryant)
Shannon Brown will not be the starter but receive much minutes. He will be the starting PG when Derek Fisher retires.
Posted by: KB Blitz | July 04, 2009 at 10:46 AM
LTLF,
Couple of small points.
First, fans wanting Rudy Fernandez from Portland need to understand that Rudy is a shooting guard, not a point guard. One of his problems at Portland is that he does not have a good handle or passing ability. What he does have is a terrific stroke, probably better than Sasha. He would fit as a replacement for Sasha but not for Farmar as he will never have the skills to play point. Basically, he is a turnover waiting to happen if you have him bring the ball up court.
Second, fans need to realize that the Lakers are probably going pay a huge penalty this year in luxury taxes. So don’t look for them to trade Adam Morrison for a point guard or other player because the only way the team is going to stay together and be able to afford upcoming raises for Pau, who will be the next Laker keeper looking for a contract, is to allow Morrison’s contract to expire. That’s why teams needing to cut pay are willing to trade for expiring contracts – they want to let them expire. That is what they are going to do with Ammo’s.
Hell, if we make a trade, it would FOR a player with an expiring contract. Bottom line: trade Ammo for another player, pay $10M next year; let Ammo’s contract expire, save $10M next year. That’s why Ammo will NOT be traded.
Tom
Posted by: LakerTom | July 04, 2009 at 10:52 AM