Rasheed Wallace to Boston as the arms race continues
Reports out of Boston (and wherever these sorts of things are filed) have Rasheed Wallace joining the Celtics with a two year, mid-level deal. They're also making a strong push for Grant Hill. Wallace, who can still fill it up from both the post and the arc and defend at the other end, ought to be a nice fit in Boston. He may be getting up in years and suck up T's like the Dyson DC25 Animal does pet dander, but Sheed can still play and seems eager for more jewelry.
Plus, KG is far nuttier these days than Wallace, so this could be a chance for Sheed to blend into the wallpaper a little.
If you're keeping score...
- Cleveland picked up Shaq from Phoenix for peanuts. They're rumored to be in the Shawn Marion business as well, or alternatively could make an offer to Linas Kleiza.
- The Lakers (they won a big trophy in June) signed Ron Artest, and are, knock on wood, expected to bring back Lamar Odom.
- San Antonio acquired Richard Jefferson for... what's a synonym for peanuts? Nor by most estimates is he expected to be their only addition.
- Orlando picked up Vince Carter, and though they lost Hedo Turkoglu and Marcin Gortat are expected to make a few moves around the edges, too.
- Cold feet may have sent Hedo from Oregon to Toronto, but Portland still has nine mil in cap space they seem intent on using.
- Denver has been linked to Hill as well, and added Ty Lawson to add depth behind Chauncey Billups. Lawson may be a rook, but ought to be a pretty polished one.
Bottom line? Teams believing they have a shot to contend next season are pulling out the stops, and seem ready to keep the pedal down as the summer rolls on. When it's all said and done, the 2009-2010 season could be one with a pretty stark caste system, where the have-nots are particularly sad (and unusually plentiful), but the haves could be fantastic.
It's good to be a have.
BK



sheed to the celts...give them plenty of guys with long wingspans......their already tough D got tougher...
but hopefully, sheed will disrupt their chemistry by taking ill-advised 3's....and complain over playing time...
Posted by: laker32 | July 05, 2009 at 11:11 PM
Pretty tired hearing so many pro players say it's not about the money - they want to win the ring. Now Kidd is going to stay with the Mavs. Now if winning a championship is the most important thing - why would he stay there? No way mavs are going to make the finals....so it's all about the money. Trevor? LO? Shannon?
I wish these guys would just be honest and come out and say...I don't care about winning - I just want a ton of money. At least I'd respect their honesty.
To me - the only one that has really put his money where his mouth is, is "our" RonRon. Give him tons of credit for actually doing what he says he's going to do. I think he is going to work out great for the Lakers!!!
Posted by: dexter | July 05, 2009 at 11:18 PM
Wow, is bahston in some kind of geriatric league?
By the time the next years playoffs start:
Allen will be 34
Garnett will be 34
Paula will be 32
Rasheed will be 35
Hill will be 37 (if they get him)
Lucky for them Rondo is young... though he will probably be gone by training camp.
Posted by: HBMatt | July 05, 2009 at 11:22 PM
Want some, take some, get some.
Lakers still on top.
Posted by: never | July 05, 2009 at 11:28 PM
Celtics is defintely the team to beat now. Without Rasheed I already thought they were. That Rondo guy looks like can play 48 minutes a game and does not get tired.
BEAT CELTICS!!! GO LAKERS!!!
Posted by: Staples 24 | July 05, 2009 at 11:29 PM
Personally, I think Sheed would have done better with the Spurs but that's just me.
Posted by: dave m | July 05, 2009 at 11:34 PM
Laker fans,
Don`t stop now...Keep trying to convince yourselves that the Artest/Ariza exchange was a good move by Mitch Cupcake.
Who knows, you might actually start believing it!
Rasheed = Crazy Good
Ron Ron = Crazy Bad
Posted by: RED`S LOVE CHILD | July 05, 2009 at 11:34 PM
Nice pick up, but will it get them past Orlando in the 2nd round?
Not so sure of that.
Did they make the move because of the uncertainty of KG coming back 100%?
Their big stars are 4 years older on avg. than the Lakers big stars.
Injuries do appen, especially when you get that old in the NBA (see KG last year)
Posted by: Fatty | July 05, 2009 at 11:35 PM
Did the Celtics bring Sheed in as insurance for Kg and his Knee?.....
Long Time Laker Fan....You gave him a hiding on the last thread...nice work....I still think that with a healthy Jameer Nelson(remember he did not play against the Celtics) the Magic will win the east....And that will be the end of the big three in Boston...It will be blowups from next post season..
Ray Allen first,then the rest will follow....
Posted by: Thirty2 | July 05, 2009 at 11:38 PM
It's a lot more fun to have superteams rather than boring parity.
Posted by: AEvangelista | July 05, 2009 at 11:42 PM
Waiting for Lamar negotiation news.... if he comeback, i love our chance for back to back.. but if he is not.. then we need MAJOR improvement from our bench...
sasha, farmar, and morison will be the X Factor.. either via trade or better play..
GO LAKERS
Posted by: kobe.4.mvp | July 05, 2009 at 11:57 PM
This is one of those great debate aquisitions. Not unlike Artest. Sheed brings plenty of upside, but also downside that has the potential to drag the team down. Lots of Alpha males in that bunch over there. Not as many deferrers -- a la Pau and Lamar. Which is why I think that the Cs are more likely candidates for combustion/implosion than the lakers.
Doc did a good job holding Marbury in check, but Rondo has shown increasing and to add another egocentric whiner tio the bunch . . . should be quite an interesting locker room.
Besides, the age on that team -- especially after a grueling East campaign -- should wear on them physically and emotionally.
Still, it makes them long and more potent on offense (as if they needed it). Certainly helps them against the Cavs; less sure about the Magic. And I don't think they match up particularly well versus the Lakers (assuming Lamar returns).
Posted by: t_sensei | July 05, 2009 at 11:58 PM
That was "Rondo has shown increasing tendency to stray beyong "controllability"...
Sorry, it got garbled in transmission
Posted by: t_sensei | July 05, 2009 at 11:59 PM
There are reports we're trying to get Nate. Would there be any possible way we could sign him? We can only offer him the vet minimum or the bi-annual exception correct?
Posted by: cinz | July 06, 2009 at 12:12 AM
I like the idea of a sign-and-trade deal with the Knicks, Odom for David Lee. If the Knicks are worried about a long-term commitment to Lee, then perhaps Odom could find a bigger payday in his hometown with a one year deal, and hope to hit the jackpot next summer. Seems like there is plenty of room to manipulate this exchange especially since Farmar and Robinson could be thrown into the mix as well.
Lee seems like just the piece the Lakers need, a tough PF who rebounds to back up Gasol. Of course, he may not want to be a backup at this point in his career but hopefully the prospect of a championship and a career with the NBA's best franchise would sway him.
Posted by: aztronut | July 06, 2009 at 12:34 AM
Sheed is good and I'd be curious if he can actually get motivated and if he gets motivated what he'll do.
Grant Who? He's still in the league?
I feel pretty good where we're at in the arms race SO LONG AS WE SIGN ODOM.
If the team with the most cap space is Portland with 9M and that team still can go after Shawn Marion, David Lee, Linas Kleiza and maybe a couple others, I feel pretty good about us signing Odom.
We should be able to offer at least 8, right? Should Odom insist he get that extra mill? Doesn't he want to make mrbarneyjangles and Jon K.'s dreams come true?
Posted by: Benjamin | July 06, 2009 at 12:44 AM
The blogs are no longer listed on the left hand of the web page. It's kind of hard to get to the Laker, Dodger, Angel, etc. blogs now. Not a good redesign.
Posted by: Walt | July 06, 2009 at 01:26 AM
It's good to be a have!
Posted by: Davey | July 06, 2009 at 01:48 AM
Staples 24/RLC/131-92,
Thanks for your "insightful" thoughts Staples 24 regarding the bench (not sure if you are a troll or very concerned Lakers fan).
Fort the rest, congratulations for your team acquiring Sheed and possibly Grant Hill. Good for them.
Listen, every team hunting for a title should always look to improve in any way. There is still plenty of time to reshape rosters from now through next year's trade deadline. It should be a great upcoming year for basketball fans alike.
In response your "tainted" claims RLC...The Celtics were "one and done" as predicted by most. Fluke maybe? Unfortunate circumstances maybe? Be careful when you use the word "tainted" when it comes to winning on the championship level.
Here's the deal to your perceived claims folks...Despite the loss of KG prior to the playoffs, the Celtics "should" have made it all the way to the Finals with supposedly future hall of famers Ray Allen and Paul Pierce at the controls and an improved supporting cast (as you mentioned). Hmmm...Count them...Two future hall of famers! Obviously, a 101-82 Game #7 loss to Orlando in the ECF at "home" was proof that "anything's possible."
The "big" problem was that the 2008 Finals MVP Pierce forgot the importance of playing through "adversity" when it counted the most. He thought that Orlando (which I know crossed his mind) was going to just lie down and succumb to their much "superior" team and Game #7 home court advantage. Result?...a loss plain and simple.
Believe me, he needed KG as a security blanket in 2008 to boast his game and found out that life was chaotic on the floor soon after if you take someone like him for granted. Well, he didn't get the job done as a leader by digging "deeper" into his TRUTH. In this case, the truth did hurt and set him free for the summer.
You see, this is what happens when one "assumes" that other teams will shy away from their "defending champions" tag. I'm sure he learned his lesson watching the Lakers claim the title he thought would last forever. Therefore, why should anyone fear the Celtics or any team for that matter? It is what it is. Teams win, teams lose...Teams improve, teams falter.
The bottom line: The Celtics "failed" to defend their crown this past year. No excuses! Don't insult the Celtics team that way by explaining their situation of "what if's." Frankly, no one cares.
At this point, talk is certainly cheap including theories about "tainted" championships. Remember, it was no fluke that Orlando tailed your team up in Boston not long ago, to put it mildly.
BTW, the last time I checked, the 2008-2009 Lakers are the NBA Champions that tailed the same Orlando team that tailed your Celtics! Hmmm...It is what it is...a Lakers championship hands down!
Good luck in shamrock city and do try to have a nice summer like we Lakers fans are doing.
Laker pride through ALL and ANY ADVERSITY!
Posted by: Let's Go L's! | July 06, 2009 at 01:51 AM
RA, -sheed, KG, and maybe Over the Hill?
the new and fresh Boston Geriatrics
looks like the organization got their senior citizen discount
Posted by: ouchhhhhhhhh | July 06, 2009 at 03:33 AM
quote:
"Damn, Boston's got themselves a Jail Blazer. Nice addition. "
Posted by: ouchhhhhhhhh | July 06, 2009 at 05:06 AM
the Lakers clearly need to bring Odom back,now that the Celtics have reloadedAll this movement in the East is to get passed Orlando,which Cavsand celtics should do now that the Magic lost turkVince carter will not make the Magic better than last year!None of these team improvement make these team better than the Lakersshaq couldn't even get Phoenix into the playoffsLe Bron is a one manoperationplus cleveland can't coachLakers are still the favorites!!
Posted by: stevefron new york | July 06, 2009 at 06:51 AM
BK,
"He may be getting up in years and suck up T's like the Dyson DC25 Animal does pet dander"
Truly inspired mania.
What do we play for? RINGS!!!!
Lakers Today... Lakers Tomorrow... Lakers Forever.
GO LAKERS!!!!
Posted by: Jon K. | July 06, 2009 at 07:22 AM
I am already excited about the coming season... :)
Good thing Sheed wants to be in Boston... I want the Lakers to face them in the Championship if for no other reason but to avenge last years beating...
Go Lakers!!!
Posted by: dice8up | July 06, 2009 at 07:23 AM
How is it that the City of LOS ANGELES has a problem paying for a parade for the LOS ANGELES Lakers, but somehow it's okay for the city to pay for some stupid narcissistic celebration of a celebrity (Michael Jackson) who hasn't done anything of substance for a decade and has lived a lifestyle that has celebrated delusion, irresponsibility, and bizarre behavior?
It just makes no sense and is somewhat sickening.
The guy made two amazing albums ("Off The Way" and "Thriller") and they're trying to turn him into a demi-god. His legacy is over-hyped.
The media really makes a moral person sick sometimes.
What do we play for? RINGS!!!!
Lakers Today... Lakers Tomorrow... Lakers Forever.
GO LAKERS!!!!
Posted by: Jon K. | July 06, 2009 at 07:39 AM
Leprechauns should be worried with their Eastern counterparts before competing with the Lakers. With the addition of Rasheed, are they going to reach the ECF? Joe Dumar will not let Rasheed go if he thinks there is still juice in him, Piston opted for Gordon than go same old Rasheed. Indeed, it is true Leprechauns are getting old, they kept on beefing up their line up with old mercenaries that were in the grand plan of Red Auerbach. Ah, this is no longer the fifties, sixties when Leprechauns dominate 8 teams besides that, Powe and Davis might skip Boston. Wow, they don't know what to do with Rondo to love him or ship him. He is the "Farmar" of the Celtics, sometimes great but uncontrollable and worst, pouting when he doesn't get his way.. However, these (Rondo, Davis, Powe, Posey, PJ Brown) were the blue collars that catapulted Celtics to prime not a technical-prone Wallace, or those high salaried prima donnas. Defense wise, Celtic players are bland and awkward to compare them with our newly acquired pit bull, RonRon? You say KG and Perkins will kill the Lakers, well, they are both lollipops and roses to the real deal. KG's framework is unstable, too bony; and Perkins ugly face is the only thing that is scary, his body is too flabby. Combined bony and flabby no deal with our muscular pit bull, they will risk their career with RonRon! LOL!
Posted by: Edwin Gueco | July 06, 2009 at 08:14 AM
laker 32:
"sheed will disrupt their chemistry by taking ill-advised 3's....and complain over playing time..."
I didn't know Artest's nickname was sheed......
Posted by: Jay Jay | July 06, 2009 at 08:15 AM
So the Celts got Sheed. Nice pick up in my opinion.
We know Sheed. We faced him against the Jail Blazers and again with the Pistons. The Celts will be formidable, no doubt. I pick them as the favorites in the East.
That's good news! The thing that Boston fails to understand is that The Lakers are not the same team they defeated for the ring. The Lakers are much tougher now, have a healthy Bynum and have an upgraded team defense. They are actually lucky they didn't face us in the finals this year. The Celts would have lost even WITH KG!
We will defeat them in the finals this next year because OUR defense was already much improved and we have now added a Pit Bull. You ever been up close and personal with a Pit Bull? LOL
Pit Bulls are awesome dogs! But you get the sense that "My Gawd, I hope this dog never goes off! It is a beast! You see Boston, when you use all that length and you start to push and pull our guys for that little something extra, our Pit will quickly subdue you. Pit Bulls don't like other people being agressive. They attack when OTHERS get out of line. It's an automatic response thing.
All things being equal, The Lakers have a real nice team. They have all year long to learn how to play together and to PERFECT the style and mentality they will use to defeat Boston in the finals. We will have our wars against San Antonio, Denver and Portland and you will have Clevland and Orlando. But we will meet in the finals. Let's figure it's destined. That's too bad for you. I guess you really wanted your shot at us and went out and got Sheed to help you. But trust in this, this time you will be defeated.
We have too many weapons and we have too much to prove. You actually helped us because you embarrassed us last time. We know we will meet you and therefore we will play all year preparing for you. But this time, you lose. We all know this in LA. You all know it in Boston.
Repeating as Champions is a hard thing to do. You have to guard against complacency and others upgrade. Well, you upgraded because you needed to in order to improve your chances against us. However, the thing that is at work here is we do not need motivation this year. We know we have all year to prepare to meet YOU. It would be sweet to defeat Clevland and I dunno about defeating Orlando again (no drama there really). But we want YOU Boston.
Hell, we have a small window of opportunity to do it because who knows when you will be good enough to meet us again! We had to wait for 20 years to see you again the last time.
So in closing, if your guys hold up through the long season, we will see you at the finals. Please don't think for a second that LA thinks you are a superior opponent. We have surpassed you. Last time we were assembled in the second part of the season and we hadn't developed the nasty close out mentality that we needed, YET.
I can't wait to see you. I can't wait to see your CRUSHED faces on national TV. You know this is true. You won't admit it to me and you will no doubt pop off about my comments, but you know.... LOL.
See you soon.
JohnnyV
Posted by: JohnnyV | July 06, 2009 at 08:16 AM
For those worrying about Ron Artest learning the Triangle, don't worry he already know's it. The system he played under the Bulls was not like the Triangle, it was the Trinagle. That should at least clear up one fear.
Posted by: Bull2Laker | July 06, 2009 at 08:17 AM
Seriously, I am a bit worried. The difference is that their crazy is a bench player they can bench if he disrupts the chemistry. Thanks to Trevor's departure, our crazy is a starter who we need to play 30 minutes a game.
I'm hoping he can accept his role as defensive stopper and not the center of attention. If so we're unbeatable. If not, we could lose our championship chemistry.
Again we MUST re-sign LO now!
Posted by: Jay Jay | July 06, 2009 at 08:19 AM
LAKERS VS. CELTICS
It’s actually great news that the Celtics signed Rasheed. Unfortunately, they are such an old team that this may be the last year that they compete but nothing could match an LA vs. Boston Finals with Kobe, Drew, Pau, and Ron vs. KG, Pierce, Allen, and Rasheed.
It takes great opponents to bring out the greatness in a team. We will have it for at least a year and nothing would be sweeter than getting revenge for last year next year, especially while LeBron opts out to go to New York and Shaq goes fishing. Bring it on. We can handle either Boston or Cleveland. Lakers will win 70 games and repeat as champs.
Tom
Posted by: LakerTom | July 06, 2009 at 08:24 AM
"Rasheed = Crazy Good
Ron Ron = Crazy Bad
Posted by: RED`S LOVE CHILD | July 05, 2009 at 11:34 PM"
As usual, Red is delusional. Crazy Pills is crazy, but Sheed is a T waiting to happen, and is not quite as young as he once was. Neither is the rest of your squad, and KG is not a complete go since we don't know how his knee is. He won't know either, until he really plays. I think Boston will be good, but we will be better. We are the reigning champions, you know. Won in 5 games and on an opponent's floor. You might not like it, but you can't take that away. Yes!
I think Boston's scared.
Also, just want to know how it feels to have Red's record broken? And all that crap about Phil and ready made teams won't fly here. You think Red won with a bunch of losers? It's sweet to break that record, and will be sweeter still when we break your 17 titles. And we will. Crazy Pills and all.
GO LAKERS!!!!
'08-'09 NBA CHAMPIONS!!!!!!!
Posted by: longtimelakerlover@yahoo.com | July 06, 2009 at 08:25 AM
Good morning Mamba24 & the Laker morning CRUE!!
Wow - I wasn't able to tune into the blog for a couple of days and when I do I find that we are going to have a complete and utter fruit-loop lunatic on our team. I am almost completely without words.
I was one of the foremost anti-Bill people on here. I even asked for a very special bandwagon from Mamba24 on the topic. I personally still believe this is a horrible miscalculation and I'm very upset about losing Trevor.
All that being said, if Bill is going to be a Laker I will cheer for him as loud as anyone else in the Purple&Gold. I want hiim to succeed beyond my wildest dreams. I just REALLY hope his whack-job-ness (yes that's a word) will not come back to bite us in the ass.
PLEASE - get LO and SB signed right away. I fear for my sanity if they go away from the Lakers like Trevor did.
TREVOR - I MISS YOU BUDDY. Can't you change your mind? Or fire your agent? Something? Anything? THIS IS NOT RIGHT. IT'S A TRAVESTY.
Posted by: justanothermambafan | July 06, 2009 at 08:37 AM
Now we have only two remaining F/A's to be signed. Whatever Lakers will offer in salary for next season, it will be double as reported on LAT. This has been my contention before when I was accused by LTLF as anti-white players on the 2nd tier. At that time, I put it on the blog which do you prefer to have in luxury tax environment: Odom, Brown, Ariza (at that time) plus MLE Artest vs. their counterparts in the 2nd tier, these are more or less their "averaged salaries" for next year: Walton 5M Vujacic 5M, Farmar 2M (salary extension in 2010), Morrison 5M. Which do you prefer paying luxury taxes? It may be unkind to our players who were with us during the Championship but it's business, you've got to make a choice and decisions that is good for the team and also your bottom line.
You can't have both ways because it will cross the 100 million mark, don't you think it make sense in clearing up space on the 2nd tier to sign up the best players? Well, we already lost Ariza, now we on a balancing act on Odom and Shannon. We have to sign both and I don't mind dumping some of those 2nd tier players, not all that I have enumerated to avoid huge tax bite.
Posted by: Edwin Gueco | July 06, 2009 at 08:39 AM
Celtics still need to resign Big Baby and Powe.
the same question that people pose to the Lakers for adding Artest can also be posed to the Celtics (after getting Wallace), are there enough basketballs or shots to accomodate all of these shooters? and will Wallace accept being the 4th or 5th option on the Celtics?
i think it's pretty clear that the Lakers are the team that is the best equiped to handle adding more talent, because they have the best coach and the triangle offense. the offense dictates that the person with the best and most open shot gets to shoot the ball. doesn't matter if you're kobe bryant, gasol, artest, fisher or even luke walton.
it's a shrewd move for the Celtics. but i don't think either Rasheed or Garnett can handle Dwight Howard or Shaq in the low post. they're gonna have to double them. the Celtics probably have a tougher road to the finals than the Lakers.
Posted by: leonardbast | July 06, 2009 at 08:43 AM
Sheed is an excellent fit for the Celtics. And no, I don't agree at all that he's an Alpha dog--in fact, I think it's the opposite, that he thrives in environments where others are leaders (e.g., Chauncey in Detroit). Remember Game 7 in 2000, when Blazer Sheed started short-arming shots like Chris Webber? That's what you get when Sheed has to lead. But in a veteran environment with an Alpha like Pierce and veterans like Allen and KG, Sheed will fit fine. KG was the same in Minnesota: when he had to carry all the weight and make the big shots, he cracked under pressure. But when he moved to Boston, he was free to be the crazy do-it-all guy who no longer had to be expected to take the final shots--that would be for Pierce and Allen.
Anyway, even though it's a good fit, he's still too old, and I'd be surprised if Boston made it out of the East. I wish they would, because I'd love to see Artest punk KG, and the Lakers carve 'em up for the repeat Championship.
Posted by: Joseph | July 06, 2009 at 08:52 AM
Artest's defense and agressiveness is gonna rub off on the other Lakers players. we're gonna be scary next season. imagine if Artest can get Bynum, Gasol or Odom pumped up on the defensive end?
i like that quote from Rodman, where he said he was gonna teach Luc Longley how to lay someone out on the floor. i hope Artest can pass some of his knowledge down to Bynum on how to guard someone in the post, make the other guy's life a living hell without getting cheap fouls.
Posted by: leonardbast | July 06, 2009 at 08:56 AM
JohnnyV,
>>> Hell, we have a small window of opportunity to do it because who knows
>>> when you will be good enough to meet us again! We had to wait for 20
>>> years to see you again the last time.
LMAO. Excellent post with some fine smack, Johnny. Thanks.
Tom
Posted by: LakerTom | July 06, 2009 at 08:56 AM
This Boston Celtic's Game brought to you by AARP.
There is a rumor that the Celtic's are going to sign that old white guy in the walker in that commercial with Charles Barkley, Magic and Dr J.
There so old none of them need to wear mouth guards, they just take OUT their teeth.
Posted by: tomK | July 06, 2009 at 09:02 AM
Jay Jay, how is it that Rasheed Wallace is a bench player? Wallace is an upgrade over Perkins, at least on the offensive end. would they really bring Sheed off the bench? it would be a great move if Doc could convince him to do so, but i see Sheed getting really upset at that and his production will fall-off, like AI last season. (we're talking about a guy that has been a major go-to guy and starter his entire career, and then you ask him to come off the bench? it would be like Cavs asking Shaq to come off the bench, behind Ilgauskus, lol!)
Posted by: leonardbast | July 06, 2009 at 09:03 AM
tomk,
>>> There is a rumor that the Celtic's are going to sign that old white guy
>>> in the walker in that commercial with Charles Barkley, Magic and Dr J.
LMAO. Good shot, Tom. I love that commercial. Doc should try some acting because he delivers the punch line perfectly. “It’s called Old School, Magic. You get to play the NBA legends when they’re old.” My favorite T-Mobile commercial.
Tom
Posted by: LakerTom | July 06, 2009 at 09:10 AM
>>>We can only offer him the vet minimum or the bi-annual exception correct?
That is correct. Same could be said for Shannon Brown.
Unfortnuately, if all we offer is Biennial or vet minimum, then
New York will match. Nate is a restricted free agent, and I'm sure
they'd love to get him that cheap.
Posted by: LongTimeLakerFan | July 06, 2009 at 09:11 AM
KG getting hurt last year was not like some bolt out of the blue. Injuries come with the territory when you build your team around 30-somethings with tons of mileage. Adding Rasheed just makes the C's that much more likely to suffer another key injury.
I can't wait to hear the Celtics fans whine next year about how they WOULD'VE won were it not for the injury to [fill in the blank]. If you build your team that way, you can't complain about it.
Posted by: oldlakerfan | July 06, 2009 at 09:13 AM
>>>I like the idea of a sign-and-trade deal with the Knicks,
>>>Odom for David Lee.
Hmmm. Interesting idea. Odom's salary would be going down,
so he wouldn't be BYC, so they'd only have to deal with the BYC
issue in the other direction.
Here's the problem.
If Buss is reluctant to pay Lamar 10 million, then why is
he going to pay David Lee 10 million?
It's not about Lamar the player. It's about the money.
Posted by: LongTimeLakerFan | July 06, 2009 at 09:14 AM
leonardbast -
No I don't think they'll start Sheed. Their starting lineup already has enough stars that need the ball, and Perkins is a great fit there. Its their bench that is weak, and they'll need it a lot with KG, Allen, and Pierce advancing into their mid thirties and needing more rest. Then when Sheed comes in he can be well rested and a primary option, much like Lamar is for us.
Posted by: Jay Jay | July 06, 2009 at 09:14 AM
Not to be a total suckup, but this blog rules. If you check the Portland or Cleveland or Orlando NBA blogs, it's not a pretty sight, I assure you. Inch and a quarter brows ain't in it.
Is it the number of unemployed screenwriters in L.A. that raises the level of discourse herein?
Posted by: Reilly Diefenbach | July 06, 2009 at 09:16 AM
leonardbast,
The Celtics plan to use Rasheed off the bench ala Bill Walton. That means these are the matchups that we will see if the Celtics make it to the Finals to play us, with the Celtics not having an edge at ANY position in my book:
Kobe vs. Rondo – Advantage Lakers
Fish vs. Allen – Advantage Celtics
Artest vs. Pierce – Even Steven
Pau vs. KG – Even Steven
Drew vs. Perkins- Advantage Lakers
Lamar vs. Rasheed – Advantage Lakers
LAL Bench vs. BC Bench – Advantage Lakers
Phil vs. Doc – Advantage Lakers
Looks like a sweep to me if the Celtics don’t stand us up.
Lakers in 4, winning Game 4 in Boston to rub it in.
Tom
Posted by: LakerTom | July 06, 2009 at 09:17 AM
Leprechauns should be worried with their Eastern counterparts before competing with the Lakers. With the addition of Rasheed, are they going to reach the ECF? Joe Dumar will not let Rasheed go if he thinks there is still juice in him, Piston opted for Gordon than go same old Rasheed. Indeed, it is true Leprechauns are getting old, they kept on beefing up their line up with old mercenaries that were in the grand plan of Red Auerbach. Ah, this is no longer the fifties, sixties when Leprechauns dominate 8 teams besides that, Powe and Davis might skip Boston. Wow, they don't know what to do with Rondo to love him or ship him. He is the "Farmar" of the Celtics, sometimes great but uncontrollable and worst, pouting when he doesn't get his way.. However, these (Rondo, Davis, Powe, Posey, PJ Brown) were the blue collars that catapulted Celtics to prime not a technical-prone Wallace, or those high salaried prima donnas. Defense wise, Celtic players are bland and awkward to compare them with our newly acquired pit bull, RonRon? You say KG and Perkins will kill the Lakers, well, they are both lollipops and roses to the real deal. KG's framework is unstable, too bony; and Perkins ugly face is the only thing that is scary, his body is too flabby. Combined bony and flabby no deal with our muscular pit bull, they will risk their career with RonRon! LOL!
Posted by: Edwin Gueco | July 06, 2009 at 08:14 AM
"Joe Dumar"? Who is that? "Piston opted for Gordon than go same old Rasheed"? I didnt know they played the same position!
"Wow, they don't know what to do with Rondo to love him or ship him. He is the "Farmar" of the Celtics, sometimes great but uncontrollable and worst, pouting when he doesn't get his way" ... LMAO ... Comparing Farmer to Rondo ... I bet Joe Dumar the GM of the Piston would rather have Rondos!
Please gives us more insight on Joe Dumar and the Piston .... or better yet stick to the Pit Bull! Very stable individual and well spoken ... jjust like your post!
BTW what has the Pit Bull ever won? How many years are you stuck with this lunatic? Breaking up a Championship team to sign this idiot might come back to bite you in the a$$!
Posted by: 131-92 | July 06, 2009 at 09:18 AM
"The guy made two amazing albums ("Off The Way" and "Thriller") and they're trying to turn him into a demi-god. His legacy is over-hyped.
The media really makes a moral person sick sometimes."-Jon K
That's pretty outrageous to say those things. The fact that you think Micheal Jackson's only contribution was 'two amazing albums' shows that you don't understand the positive impact Micheal Jackson has made on the whole world.
People like to focus on the alleged molestation charges of which he was found NOT GUILTY. It's not surprising that people would try to extort him out of millions of dollars. Being as weird as he was, mainstream America would totally buy into those accusations, and many have.
The guy was truly a gentle hearted human being. I wish people would focus on that aspect of him rather than focusing on the fact that he was different.
The guy had personal issues, no doubt about it. It does not diminish his legacy. The positive impact that he's made on millions upon millions of people throughout the whole world far outweighs any accusations that have been made.
I wonder about the morals of people who would take money instead of justice when someone allegedly molested his/her child. That should make a moral person sick.
Sorry AK/BK, I had to...
Go Lakers!
F the C's!
Posted by: Rocky | July 06, 2009 at 09:19 AM
'Sheed won't be a problem chemistry-wise for the Cs. He's proved to be a team guy for the Pistons since '04.
The problem is the rest of the team. Going back to last Xmas game, when you have your starters yelling at each other, that's trouble.
And Rondo's going to be a cancer. Trouble for the Cs is they can't win without him. He has All-Star potential so the fact there are even rumors the Cs are trying to trade him is a red flag.
Posted by: Scott | July 06, 2009 at 09:25 AM