Mitch Kupchak on the Lamar Odom negotiations, plus a little more Ron Artest
After the day's festivities with Ron Artest had concluded, Lakers GM Mitch Kupchak
answered some questions regarding LA's final free agent
concern of the summer, Lamar Odom. The negotiations haven't exactly zipped along, but
as I wrote the other day, nothing about the landscape has changed to indicate Odom is on his way out. The feeling Wednesday around the training facility in El Segundo was that the Lakers wouldn't have a) signed Artest or b) used their
mid-level to do it, leaving them no viable avenue in free agency to
replace Odom should he change ZIP codes, without believing a deal could be made.
That Odom and Artest are friends dating back to childhood doesn't hurt, either.
Kupchak said he didn't have a gut feeling about the end result, but as he has all along used the word "hopeful" to describe his outlook. "I can't be any stronger," he noted, "and I'm not sure how strong a word that is. But I am hopeful. I think we have a chance now."
Q: Because of Ron, or because overall things have settled in (with the market)?
That answer will obviously prick up some ears. Whether it's posturing, a statement of financial fact or a little of both, Kupchak is saying that had the team been forced to go above a mid-level to re-sign Trevor Ariza (as was reportedly the request of Team TA), they'd have lost the ability to bring back the other guys. Given the size of the team's projected payroll, I tend to believe it.
Do you feel the talks have dragged on a little?
Can you talk about why this one has taken a little longer? Is it a question of the market settling down? Some other dominoes needing to fall?
Call it a hunch, but I believe taken in context his categorization of
Schwartz as "quiet" is a compliment, relative to the fractious, swiftly
public Ariza talks.
How much did LO's negotiations come up when talking to David Bauman (Artest's agent) or Ron?
Hopefully it doesn't come to that. Again, among the people Andy and I talked to people at the press conference, including some with a good feel for the situation, nobody seemed to think a deal wouldn't get done. Maybe not tomorrow or Friday, but reasonably soon.
A couple more Kupchak Kwotes...
On Shannon Brown: "We want to see him with another training
camp, because he came here and got a lot of minutes on the fly, which
is hard to do considering what we do offensively. And with a veteran
group, it's not that easy. So that was encouraging. And we saw him
make progress as the season progressed, and he's also young. I think
he's 23. That's as good a gamble as you can get in a young guy."
On bringing back Josh Powell and DJ Mbenga: "You're not going to get a better player at the back end of your bench than those two guys."
Regarding Artest, it was interesting to speak with Bauman after the press conference to talk about the process that brought the Tru Warrior to LA. Bauman said could have explored different and viable ways to get Artest more money, but on the other hand, noted how in this year's market those who don't have a chair "when the music stops" could be S.O.L.
Someone will be left out in the cold. Had Artest gambled and lost he'd be facing perhaps a one-year deal for at or maybe even less than the mid-level, or a longer deal on a bad team.
That wasn't an outcome Artest wanted. "He had said that if I can't go (back) to Houston, I want to win," Bauman told the media. "When we realized the Lakers spot was open and may not be open for much longer, we quickly came to a conclusion. My job as his agent is not just to get him the most money but the right fit. In this case, the right fit wasn't for the most money. I could have spent several weeks exploring sign and trade options with Houston. Once the Hedo (Turkoglu) situation went south with Portland it kind of re-invigorated those talks, but at the end of the day this was the right fit."
Bauman seemed confident Artest could recoup any potential profits he left on the table via off-court opportunities, but to me that's not really the point. It appears both agent and client recognized the good deal in hand financially (as Artest said in his press conference, "if you can't live on $33 million, you can't live,") and professionally (it's become clear over the last few days to anyone with access to the Internet that Artest has wanted to be a Laker for a while and is highly motivated to win some jewelry) rather than get caught up in a hypothetical-but-certainly possible better offer in the bush.
In the end, everyone is happy, including the Lakers.
One final note: The deal is for a full mid-level. Five years, with Artest holding the option for the fifth, worth just under $34 mil. There was confusion in reporting across various media outlets. Like most fans, I preferred the terms originally floated by many of 3/$18 because it eliminated virtually all elements of risk to signing Artest. It goes without saying, yet here I am saying it anyway, there's more potential for sadness near the end of the deal for a guy who will be in his mid-30s when the contract expires. Fortunately, the relatively reasonable financial terms mean if Artest's play goes downhill or he's not a great fit as time passes, the penalty isn't crippling. Not ideal, but certainly not a game changer.
I can see how those two "extra" years would make people nervous, though.
But assuming for the sake of argument Artest acclimates well and embraces his role with the Lakers- obviously if things don't click from the get-go it opens up a whole mess of issues- the good news is he's fastidious about working out and because his game isn't above the rim, shouldn't be expected to decline all that rapidly. Even if he loses a half/full step defensively as the years go on, Artest is such a big, strong body that he'll always be influential on that end in one form or another. There's a good chance as years pass he'll remain productive relative to his cap number.
Of course, that's not what motivated the Lakers to sign him. This move is about the here and now, and squeezing out a few more rings over the next few seasons. Clearly not everyone is on board with the decision, but while my concerns about Artest have little to do with his temper (he's not going to start another brawl or tear LA's locker room apart) and everything to do with his transition to a far more complimentary role on offense, what I saw from him Wednesday was impressive. For all his quirks- and there are many- it's hard to find people who will call him a bad guy, or question his work ethic.
If his stated desire to win a ring is an act, it's an Oscar worthy one. Artest is hardly in denial about past behavior, copping among other things to being too emotionally immature as a young player and, in a bit of candor rare for a pro baller, being a "bad teammate" in Indiana, or his desire to prove to people that he's grown as a man. The Lakers are an established squad with a strong coach and a very clear pecking order Artest understands and appears to respect.
Put it all together, and the risk is calculated and the reward strong. I'm more than willing to focus on the positive rather than wait for things to come off the rails. If they do I'll admit I was wrong, but until then why assume the worst?
BK
(Photo, Ron Artest and Mitch Kupchak- AP)






"Yeah, I don't think if we had gone down the other avenue and been in a position where we had to agree to something that we think didn't make sense then I'm not sure we'd be in a position to bring everyone back. So I think now we have a chance."
That answer will obviously prick up some ears. Whether it's posturing, a statement of financial fact or a little of both, Kupchak is saying that had the team been forced to go above a mid-level to re-sign Trevor Ariza (as was reportedly the request of Team TA), they'd have lost the ability to bring back the other guys. Given the size of the team's projected payroll, I tend to believe it.
so...if ron artest hadn't existed, at the end of the day we'd rather have TA than Odom?
is that what mitch is saying? No, i don't think so, but then again, I believe LakerTom. Oh, nevermind
Posted by: phred | July 09, 2009 at 01:29 AM
Good post BK, thanks for the updates.
Ron strikes me as the yin to Kobe's yang. Kobe is calculated and ever conscious of maintaining his image. Ron is enigmatic, unpredictable and shockingly forthcoming. Kobe is about precision and out-thinking the opponent. Ron plays off the cuff and overpowers opponents. But together they're fiery competitors who work hard and want desperately to win.
I'm starting to like Ron "The Billdog" Artest more and more.
Posted by: puddle | July 09, 2009 at 01:44 AM
Freelance camera man Ryan Miller talking about how his footage of LeQueen getting dunked on was confiscated.
http://tiny.cc/zV59u
Posted by: RevPnG | July 09, 2009 at 02:06 AM
Welcome T (thriller) - Dawg Ron!!
Posted by: Lil_jef_pinoy | July 09, 2009 at 02:39 AM
The Laker's greatest luxury tax would be not to win 2 to 3 additional Championships with Kobe's career at peak. LO is worth an additional $7 million in luxury tax. Without him the Laker bench would be clobbered by the Celtics, Spurs, Cavs, Blazer, Magic, & Portland benches. LO is unselfish, plays the 4,3 & even 2 positions, is one of the best rebounders on the team, good passer, great speed for a big man and decent defender. Hope Mitch & Dr. Bus realize that 2 to 3 championships could be financially more rewarding than an additional $7 million in luxury tax. While Kobe sacrifices a lot, giving up a couple of million a year to keep LO may buy him twice that amount in endorsements with 3 additional championships!
Posted by: Ross | July 09, 2009 at 03:02 AM
"The Billdog."
Now that's funny...
Posted by: longtimelakerlover@yahoo.com | July 09, 2009 at 03:22 AM
I hope we keep him...remember at the start of the season it was mentioned that Odom didnt work out over the summer?...I do...At the time i thought he should have,but going by the way he finished off the season first with Denver(injured game 5) and then in the finals it was pleasing...I think he would be that cog that would allow a faster group to contend with high octane systems...
Pau,Odom,Ron,Kobe and Farmar or Brown....For the slower systems Bynum plays the 5 and Pau the 4.....we need the guy...Even for guys like Sheed and Dyce playing as the 6th man to counter that spark...Or foul trouble like saw during the finals........
Posted by: Thirty2 | July 09, 2009 at 03:29 AM
BK
it is interesting that Lakers always took risks compared to other teams. no pain, no risks, no game, no gain.
i just picked up a book "the politics of subversion". i feel that the lakers players r a little bland in interviews. fish represents the union, kobe is PC as the nba and nike person, gasol is too analytical and pedantic, TA was like dead, and odom shy. finally we have a very good player who will be interviewed almost daily, and even if he cares sometimes, has the freedom to throw ironical or sarcastic jabs and make people laugh. " if you can't live on 33 mil, you can't live".
i like this subversive touch that iRon brings especially that is backed up by work ethic and professionalism.
it's fanny that Californians who live in an earthquake region r worried about a Ron Artest outburst or technical. also a little comedy and drama is welcomed by Hooywood. a basketball movie with a more intricate subject is long overdue. and life will transcend reality in his case.
do players get any percentage from jersey and other items sold with their name?! iRon will become a great seller. and Dr. Buss knew that.
IN ARTEST WE TRUST!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
LGL 2010 CHAMPS
Posted by: ouchhhhhhhhh | July 09, 2009 at 03:32 AM
puddle
great angle on the TWO Warriors!!!!!!!!
Posted by: ouchhhhhhhhh | July 09, 2009 at 03:34 AM
Marion signed for 39/5 years @ 7.8 each
this year he was payed 17.9 MIL. it is correct. i consider Marion a bigger choker than LO. he totally disappears in the playoffs.
interestingly, he was also a Shaq-value exchange for Miami.
he took a loss of 10.1 mil just to play and 4 teams messed around to make it possible. Cuban made it possible.
proportionally to Marion and based on economy, the NBA market and the NEED for LO, LO will have to take a loss that will bring him down to 6.1 from 14. maybe the Marion trade with a huge loss in salary, compared to artest from only 7.4 to 6, will signal LO that this is an unlucky period in the NBA and his personal career to cash in.
at this moment, LO looks like the older ugly sister/bride who is refusing any prospective groom that is showing up. and when she decides that it is time to take anyone, there r no more visitors left.
Posted by: ouchhhhhhhhh | July 09, 2009 at 03:34 AM
do the lakers really want an unhappy, pouting LO?!
i'm sure he thought that his versatility trumpeted by the media made him the man, after he joined the Lakers. (his midget brain on sugar- no hate or sarcasm)
after 2 years he conceded that to Kobe. and bynum came along but got hurt and LO was still fantasizing. but Gasol came along and LO sledded as the #3-4 option. after one more year he accepted his place on the bench but still had minutes. by this time his brain was crรจme brรปlรฉe. and ouchhhhhhhh, Ron Artest, his own friend from child-hood is digging his grave. the lowest point of his career. #4-5 option. but Fisher was the hero of the Game 4. LO never made or won a game in his life. another ouch.
well, now there is that 7'1. what will it happen if he will recover?! or if he gets back to let's say 15pt-8-10 reb.and he understands his ROLE? LO will be option #5-6
but there is no option 5, 6, 7 on any team. or they just don't count them as options. pretty depressing for LO. with the presence of iRon he just became a REAL BENCH player. life can be a beach. and he likes beaches and walks in Malibu.
looking at the Lakers-Clippers dynamics, the Clipper's Franchise player is nothing but a Lakers bench warmer. If you don't believe me, please revisit the Jimmy Kimmel show with the Lakers after the Finals and pay attention to the "homage" Jimmy made to the Lakers step sister team in the NBA - that little wood carriage and the mule. (for some reason, it's how i remembered it)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z9OkMq8oShg part 1
clippers @ 0:30 http://tinyurl.com/nngc97 part 2
how will LO approach his preparation and game with an entourage of Fish, Kobe, Artest, Gasol, Brown and others.
will LO be the X-factor with his "intangibles" or just the ex-factor?
Posted by: ouchhhhhhhhh | July 09, 2009 at 03:36 AM
Call me a rat because I'm about to be the first one off the Lamar ship.
I hope the Lakers haven't offered him over 6 million a year, because though he's talented, he's muy inconsistante. If we offered him 8 million a year and he's still holding out for more, he's dumb and reckless.
If he signs a one year deal to get more next year, I say we combine his expiring deal with Morrison's and bring in a player we can count on. How much money does the guy want, and how much smarter does Artest seem than Lamar right now. Maybe it's the lack of 10 pounds of peach gummy rings a day.
No, Artest has his head in the right place, Lamar needs to take his head out of hisโahemโand sign with LA.
Or leave for the same money we offered, just like his buddy Ariza. Donโt let the door and my foot hit you on the way out Lafarce Odom.
Wes
Posted by: wesjoenixon | July 09, 2009 at 04:39 AM
Yeah, I'm still trying to figure out the rhyme or reason for some people thinking the Lakers intentionally low-balled Ariza to get Artest.
They're essentially saying that Mitch is lying when he said his first priority was to bring the team back intact. That position gets even more confusing when you realize that even though the Lakers really wanted Artest over Trevor, they still spoke with Trevor's camp and essentially said he was worth no more than the mid-level to them. So people holding to the conspiracy theory have to believe that the Lakers would have turned down signing Ariza for the mid-level if his agent agreed, because if they didn't then they must really have wanted Ariza. But then that doesn't fit with the conspiracy theory, so that can't be it.
Posted by: Mike | July 09, 2009 at 06:37 AM
K Team,
Does the NBA allow teams like the Lakers to be creative in structuring contracts? Is it possible to back load a contract paying more towards the end of a contract to meet the requirements of a strong contributor like LO? Certainly, the Lakers will have more money available when contracts for players making less contribution expire.
Jim Mulry
Posted by: Jim Mulry | July 09, 2009 at 06:51 AM
I read Plaschke then I listened to Ron.
Plaschke is a hater taking Ron's words out of context.
I am going to enjoy Ron's comments during the season immensely. Not a dull momemt.
Baywood
Posted by: Baywood | July 09, 2009 at 07:20 AM
You mean Yang to Kobe's Yin? Since Yang means hot, it tends fit better with Arest and Yin means more cold and calculated which fits Kobe more :-)
Posted by: panlion | July 09, 2009 at 07:22 AM
No excuse for the Lakers not to bring in LO, now.
We underpaid last year for the money we ended up making. We were 5th and way under NY, Dallas and Cleveland:
As expected, the Lakers paid $7.19 million in luxury taxes from last season, fifth-highest among NBA teams. New York paid $23.7 million, followed by Dallas ($23.6 million), Cleveland ($13.7 million) and Boston ($8.2 million). Portland ($5.9 million) and Phoenix ($4.9 million) also paid luxury taxes
Posted by: Baywood | July 09, 2009 at 07:22 AM
I apologize for being so relatively off-topic , but my access to the blog has been pretty spotty lately, and as a student and teacher of Shakespeare, I just couldn't let this one go.
Kobefan in Cupertino, where do you get off blasting Jon K for not including Cardenio and Love's Labor's Won in his 37 plays of Shakespeare?? Neither play exists today, and people can only guess at their contents, or if they ever existed in a performable state at all. There could have been many, many other plays of Shakespeare that have been lost, but you don't count those as part of the canon.
Two Noble Kinsmen has only very recently been widely accepted as being co-authored by Shakespeare, so the real, official number of extant Shakespeare plays in the canon is 38, but for most of history, 37 has been the correct number.
Just because you found a list somewhere on the internet doesn't mean you have to take it as an opportunity to assert your supposed intellectual dominance over someone else. I found your responses to Jon K.'s posting incredibly rude and pseudo-intellectual. You obviously have an imperfect understanding of the subject yourself, so where do you get off assailing Jon K.?
My access to the blog has been restricted somewhat because I am discovering that caring for two babies at once is much more than twice as hard as caring for one baby. The boys are a month old now and doing well... they will be just old enough to take to the parade next June.
In response to an earlier inquiry, I like Thriller for the Artest nickname. It would be tight to hear the first few chords over the sound system. Also, they could play Vincent Price's laugh at the end of introductions - that would be tight.
Peace to the whole Laker nation. Can we take some advice from the late Mr. Jackson and...
...start with the man in the mirror?
...be careful what you do?
...heal the world, make it a better place for you and me?
Posted by: SBPimp | July 09, 2009 at 07:23 AM
I am concerned about the length of the contract, particularly given the projections for future salary caps and luxury tax levels. Decisions made over the past few years (which I can understand to some degree) have tied up scarce dollars in bench players. I hope that two or three years from now the Lakers aren't stuck with the same problem with Artest's contract.
The burden has really shifted now to Lamar. Is he ok with about $6m a year? And if not, do the Lakers think they can win another championship if it turns out they traded Odom and Ariza for Artest? That would put a lot of pressure on Bynum.
Salary cap sucks...
Posted by: teamn | July 09, 2009 at 07:30 AM
Five years could be an issue, I certainly hope not. My sense watching Artest this last few days and learning more about his history is that as long as things are going well (Lakers are winning , he is getting attention for playing his role, life in LA is all he expects), this will work. If times get tough, I think that is when Ron gets discontented about his pay, his role, Gasol's shoes, whatever.
Five years also ensures he will play multiple years with his next coach (I see Phil wanting to coach two more years if all goes well), and this makes selecting Phil's successor more difficult.
This also means we have bought the aging Ron Artest. This will change what Ron will have to learn from Phil and Kobe. As you age, you need different skills. Let's call them Luke Walton skills. Ron will have to become a smarter player, a better passer, better at positioning himself on the floor. These kind of skills helped Harper and Shaw and Fox stay productive as their athletic ability waned.
He certainly has the tools to do all these things, it just a matter of him buying into them. If he does, this will be a great deal.
Posted by: Tom Daniels | July 09, 2009 at 07:50 AM
It's time for LO to put down the Jolly Ranchers and re-up..
Portland is going for Millsap, Bass, or Lee, and I could'nt really see Lamar dealing to well with all the rain and the whiny clingy Portland fans....Even the attractive MLE options are dwindling...
With LO signed we are absolutely better than last year...Artest will be better against Pierce or Lebron - Orlando will not get by Boston or Cleveland.
And regarding David Lee's post Artest spin....If the Lakes never offered a contract - how was their offer so insulting?
Posted by: Sean | July 09, 2009 at 07:53 AM
Re the notion expressed in the one prior thread that Powell can replace Odom, well, when Powell comes close to being the player in the videos below, then kindly wake me for the end of our world, as that's what it'll be, apocalypse.
First video up, the early years, and kindly note the slam on Kobe starting around 1:12:
http://tinyurl.com/ma47wm
And see Lamar going end to end there, and so as Pat Riley understood, Lamar is the only soul who came into the league who could be Magic Johnson. And I don't know whether Lakers fans appreciate the matter or not, but the in-house match up would be:
Kareem - Bynum
Rambis - Gasol
Worthy - Artest
Magic - Odom
Scott - Kobe
Who would you put your money on, straight up? I can't say, but I'd dearly love to see Worthy versus Artest and Magic versus Lamar [the other three matchups have the potental for a gross abuse, so not so intriguing].
For the second and last highlight reel to demonstrate once and forever that Josh Powell will never be Lamar [and kindly note the move that Lamar puts on Yao starting at :38, and what was it Chick once said, something about the popcorn machine?]:
http://tinyurl.com/lmc28x.
As I said, when Powell does that, wake me for the end of our world. And sorry that some of you clearly don't remember the Lamar pre-Lakers era [see video 1 again]. And if you're looking for consistency, and at a high level, try Feb. 08. Or for the microcosm of the month, try Feb. 8, 08 at Cleveland. Now back to sleep for me, since Powell is never going to have a Feb. with 15, 6, 6, 17, 18, 19, 20, 7, 17, 14, 8, 9, 19 rebounds.
Posted by: CognitiveDissonance | July 09, 2009 at 08:08 AM
"My job as his agent is not just to get him the most money but the right fit."
If only Trevor had such an agent.
Posted by: km | July 09, 2009 at 08:09 AM
Re Plaschkeโs article on Ron and Kobe clashing like Shaq and Kobe. I get his point โ that both Shaq and Ron have some of the same qualities. However the biggest point Plaschke is missing โ and probably the most important quality Kobe looks for โ is the difference in their work ethic. Like the K Bros. have pointed out โ there are legit concerns over Artest being able to co-exist, but Kobe seems a lot more likely to get along with those that work hard and do what it takes to win. I am not aware of anyone that has questioned Thriller 37s work ethic or indicated that he was a locker room โcancerโ. So what he barked at the young PGโs in Houstonโฆso what, I have seen Kobe bark at players on his team โ even Pau โ my choice for second best player on the team.
If this pairing of Ron with the core squad (including Odom) works well โ watch out. Artest can take a load off of Kobe, defensively and offensively. Ron being surrounded by such a strong cast of players will mean teams cannot afford to focus on him like the Lakers did in this years playoffs โ especially once Yao went down. The Lakers forced him to do things he was not capable of. Does anyone honestly see Kobe and Pau becoming the second or third option to Ron?
Can a team afford to double team Kobe, Pau, Lamar, Bynum and Artest? With Pau, Bynum and Odom behind him โ he can be more aggressive on the perimeter. On the other end he can shoot the 3 well enough or take his man down on the block at times. I like the comparison with Rick Fox. I was never that big of a Fox fan, but he provided good tough defense and could knock down the three well enough to keep teams honest. I would say Artest is a better player than Fox overall and certainly more capable of handling guys like Melo or LBJ.
None of us know how this move will play out, but I like the gamble. I think Ron will fit in, the Lakers will win โ win a lot โ and Ron will be happy. Guys like Ron donโt like to lose and I would say some of his issues have been a result of being on teams that werenโt winning, with guys that donโt give it their all night in and night out. Reminds me of Kobe โ Smush, Cook, Kwame โ all guys that didnโt put it all on the line. Kobe seems to respect that Sasha works hard โ he sucks โ but he works hard. It seems to me that the Lakers have surrounded Kobe with dedicated workers โ not always the best talent but guys that work hard. By all accounts Ron works hard so I say (as Mitch does too) give the guy a chance to work in with the group before passing judgment. And as for Plashke mentioning Kobeโs reference to this squad being different not better โ it is as honest an assessment as you can get. It is different โ the Kobe, Shaq, Malone, Payton team was great on paper but how did that work out for them? He has been there before and knows that what looks great on paper doesnโt always work out in reality. Kobe is looking for a challenge and this will be a new challenge โ making adjustments to a system that worked this year for the championship. I, like some others on the blog like the โfreshnessโ of this challenge โ it pushes everyone outside the comfort zone of what worked and trying to find a new way to accomplish the same goal.
As John K always says โWhat do we play for? We play for rings!โ Amen Brother. Amen.
Eagle Boy
Posted by: Eagleboy | July 09, 2009 at 08:25 AM
"My job as his agent is not just to get him the most money but the right fit."
Take notes David Lee.
Posted by: Pig | July 09, 2009 at 08:29 AM
i am ecstatic that we landed artest. his toughness and ability to create his own shot will be assets next season. not to mention, we finally have a legit tough guy we have been lacking since shaq and big shot rob left years ago...
yet i still feel pretty down about ariza heading to houston. poor kid looked like a lost soul in his houston press conference yesterday. as if he's asking himself, "how did it get to this point?"
i actually hope ariza improves his game (creating his own shot, dribbling), and has a great career...maybe he eventually fires lee and returns to staples...who knows?
check out the ariza press conference:
http://www.chron.com/common/special/07/templates/listpop.html?mcVideo=28890968001
props to ronron37 aka thrilla (please quit using thriller).
and best of luck to trevor.
it's all about tha show, c'mon lake show! get odom signed...
Posted by: tha show | July 09, 2009 at 08:37 AM
Hopefully, with a new $33M contract in hand, Ron Arrest will be able to feed his "best friend"!
Feb. 5, 2007 : Placer County Animal Services seize Ron-Ron`s Great Dane, because the dog was not being fed. Fortunately, the animal was placed in protective custody with a local veterinarian.
Posted by: RED`S LOVE CHILD | July 09, 2009 at 08:38 AM
Props to Ron's agent Bauman.
"When we realized the Lakers spot was open and may not be open for much longer, we quickly came to a conclusion. My job as his agent is not just to get him the most money but the right fit. In this case, the right fit wasn't for the most money. I could have spent several weeks exploring sign and trade options with Houston. Once the Hedo (Turkoglu) situation went south with Portland it kind of re-invigorated those talks, but at the end of the day this was the right fit."
Posted by: Charles | July 09, 2009 at 08:43 AM
Omg i dont understand how are people upset about this?
Ron Artest will finally be Kobes scottie.
With Pau n Bynum up front Artest guarding the best player on the other team they should breeze through.
I love ariza he was the glue to the Lakers but Carmelo wont be blowing us up in next years playoffs n Kobe wont have to go down to rim to "wrestle with a bear"
Posted by: newjerseysteve | July 09, 2009 at 08:45 AM
Mitch: "Maybe it's helpful for (Lamar) to see other players sign, and sign for whatever they signed for and maybe it's easier to see where you fit in with that group"
TODAY's Signings -
Marion 7.8 mil per year
Varejao: 7.1 mil per year (plus incentives)
Sorry Lamar - yes emotionally and for what you've meant to us you deserve 10 mil a year. But everything is worth only what the market will bear - just try and sell your house and you'll see what I mean. So I think in that light an offer of 7.5 mil a year is more than fair. Maybe 7.5 mil going to 8 mil if we win another Ring.
Pony up Jerry, accept it Lamar, and let's GET ER DONE!
Posted by: Jay Jay | July 09, 2009 at 08:47 AM
Eagleboy,
great take.
as for the kobe, shaq, malone and payton experiment: it actually got them to the finals...which wasn't a complete disaster, still a disappointment.
i still think the lakers could have beat the pistons that year, despite malone's injured ankle and payton's damaged ego...too bad a still immature kobe chose that finals to be his coming out party and jacked up too many perimeter shots...while an ignored shaq was still very effective down-low.
kobe wanted to go outside-in, when the lakers bread n butter was inside-out.
live and learn i guess...
welcome ronron37 aka thrilla
Posted by: tha show | July 09, 2009 at 08:49 AM
While I think the big question with Artest will be the chemistry issues, there's one BIG incentive for him to be on his best behavior:
The Lakers just won a championship with Ariza. They'll be under a microscope all next season. If Artest messes things up, he'll forever have the reputation of the player who messed up a championship-caliber team and ruined Kobe's chance for a repeat (in the process PO'ing a billion Chinese fans).
Artest knows this--he may be crazy but he's crazy like a (Rick?) Fox. That doesn't mean he won't rack up Ts or get tossed out of the occasional game, but I doubt he'll do anything that will actually hurt the Lakers in the long run.
In a way, he'll be like Starbury for the Cs last year, who came in with the reputation as a cancer (some people here almost literally cackled when he joined) but played good soldier for them. Of course, Artest will be far more effective than Starbury, but the attitude will be the same. Maybe another example is 'Sheed joining the 03-04 Pistons, which spurned similar predictions of a meltdown. We all know how that turned out.
That being said, chemistry is more than a player just not melting down on the court. Last year's team had a team mentality (even if sometimes it was "As a team, we're not showing up today"). The biggest question is how Artest affects this.
We'll see.
Posted by: Scott | July 09, 2009 at 08:52 AM
>>> Jerry Buss is a tight wad and morally insidious gambler.
Jose.
Tightwad?
Do you even have a tiny inkling of a clue what you're saying?
Buss is one of the least affluent owners in the league. Paul
Allen is worth 20 billion. Mark Cuban is worth 1.8 billion.
Glen Taylor (owner of the Timberwolves) is worth 2.1 billion.
But despite that, Buss is already paying the HIGHEST TOTAL
PLAYER SALARY IN THE LEAGUE!
And he's made an offer to pay Lamar as well. An offer that
will likely put him at risk of losing money on the team for next
season.
Jerry Buss is the least cheapskate owner in the league. In fact,
he's a freakin' philanthropist who has time and again spent
the money it takes to build a championship team.
If you don't like Buss then go cheer for the Clippers and get
that weak stuff out of the Lakers blog.
Posted by: LongTimeLakerFan | July 09, 2009 at 08:54 AM
Wes,
"Call me a rat because I'm about to be the first one off the Lamar ship. "
so be it ... effing rat ... now walk the plank or our swords strike u on the way out
The Odom watch continues ... we remain hopeful
Posted by: Taliq | July 09, 2009 at 08:54 AM
puddle,
>>> Ron strikes me as the yin to Kobe's yang. Kobe is calculated and ever
>>> conscious of maintaining his image. Ron is enigmatic, unpredictable
>>> and shockingly forthcoming. Kobe is about precision and out-thinking
>>> the opponent. Ron plays off the cuff and overpowers opponents.
>>> But together they're fiery competitors who work hard and want
>>> desperately to win.
Outstanding take, puddle. Thanks.
Tom
Posted by: LakerTom | July 09, 2009 at 08:58 AM
First Griffin wears Lakers purple on draft night, now Ariza as a rocket and wearing Laker purple. I guess that is his way of saying his agent messed up and he would rather still be a Laker.
Eagle Boy.
Posted by: Eagleboy | July 09, 2009 at 09:05 AM
It was reported sign up or decide early within 3 days, Lakers have to trade players and/or get F/A minimum salary of $1M. Hey, that $1M used to be the role of Shannon Brown and looked what we have found. I still go with LO with his ambidextrous ability to go to the hoop and great in rebound. It would be a waste if he'll go for another team while his childhood friend is here in his backyard. But his asking price of 10M is way off with the new rules today, the prevailing economy and the current situation of the Lakers. Please LO come back to earth and be realistic with your asking price. On both camps, they are in Limbo making a balancing act of preparing for the deadline signings. If Lakers will delay in making decisions, they will miss the good F/A that are still available. If LO will wait for 10M lotto that he's aspiring, he might sign up later on with another team at MLE b/c Lakers has replaced him, it another Trevor travesty. It is no brainer that LO has to decide today or tomorrow but don't extend it up to weekend.
Posted by: Edwin Gueco | July 09, 2009 at 09:11 AM
Good Morning Charles....Good Morning Everybody....
well I am still wondering what Mitch's plan B is if indeed we can't get Lamar signed...
Millsap? Brandon Bass? Mitch has a challange ahead of him, the first part of course is signing Lamar, and if that doesn't happen, he needs to come up with a viable alternative with options that are rapidly shrinking daily...
I would think he is working on some trade senerios as well in the meantime...
Mitch has really stepped up and improved, becoming one of the leagues best GM's, hopefully he will continue that welcome trend...
I can't take much more of this waiting around--at least summer league is starting soon...
"floating down the stream of time, from life to life with me, makes no difference where you are, or where you'd like to be..."
"actually I'm a gynaecologist..but this is my lunchhour"
AS ALWAYS, AS EVER, YET ANOTHER GREAT DAY (AND CHAMPIONSHIP SEASON) TO BE A LAKER FAN !!!
GO LAKERS !!!
Posted by: Floyd | July 09, 2009 at 09:14 AM
Future LA LAKERS player in training:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pzCdimrNHbI&feature=related
Posted by: NBA Scout | July 09, 2009 at 09:17 AM
Ron Artest is not hoodalized but glamorized by his new home. He is the equivalent of loquacious and comedian Shaq. I'm not worried with Kobe and LO, it is the other Lakers like Bynum, Walton, Farmar and Vujacic and most probably Pau who have to accept RonRon. They are the finesse players who are not used to rough and tumble defense or aggressive offense. Here is another strong character teammate who could affect the dynamics of their games. With Kobe and Ron, there is no room for softness or lackadaisical type of games, it either kill or be killed their objective is to win, hobnob with celebrities. It is the maestro, PJ who will orchestrate the vacuum of the unknowns. We need LO to act as the shock absorber of Artest in his new team and new turf of personalities. Is this an improvement? Absolutely. This has been the dream of long time Laker fans who have been interned with scrubs and inconsistency over the years. We can't let PG's or good forwards to dominate the post, you have to pass Artest first, before you are fouled by Bynum. LOL!
Posted by: Edwin Gueco | July 09, 2009 at 09:29 AM
CognitiveDissonance,
>>>Kareem - Bynum
>>>Rambis - Gasol
>>>Worthy - Artest
>>>Magic - Odom
>>>Scott - Kobe
HUH????? That's so far off it's not even close.
I could see maybe
Kareem - Gasol
but there is no correlation with the other players you mentioned.
>>>Kareem - Bynum
When Kareem was Bynum's age, he had absolutely dominated
college basketball before coming to the NBA. Bynum will never
EVER reach the cumulative accomplishments of Kareem, though
if he works really hard and manages not to break anything,
he might have a peak season that equals one of Kareem's
average seasons.
>>>Rambis - Gasol
Gasol is a clear All-star of the team. Rambis was an energy
role player - rebounds, defense, screens. Rambis - Odom
would be closer to the truth, except that Odom scores a bit
more and Rambis played hard EVERY night.
>>>Worthy - Artest
Worthy was a finesse player, was top 10 in field goal % most
of the time that he was in the league - his career field goal %
was 52% - 39th best in league history. He was perhaps the
best wing man on fast breaks EVER. Artest wins through
brute strength. He overpowers his man on both ends of
the floor. And he's not nearly the shooter that Worthy was.
>>>Magic - Odom
You absolutely must be joking with this one. If Odom had
1/2 the drive and skill that Magic had, then the Lakers would
have beat the Suns in 2006 and 2007. Odom is a talented
player, but he has a tendency to vanish some nights. Odom's
not in the top 100 all time. Magic is top 10
>>>Scott - Kobe
Scott is an underrated player. He was an excellent jump
shooter, with a career shooting % of 48%, which is amazing
for a guard. He was great at filling the wings on Magic's
fast breaks, and he was a good defender as well. I would
say B Scott is on the short list of "best players never to make
an All-Star team". For the 1987-88 season, Byron led the
Lakers in scoring. That's a team with James Worthy, Magic,
Kareem, and Mychal Thompson on it (not to mention Mike
Smrek).
But Byron's a low percentage chance of making the HOF,
unless he coaches a team to a title, which would probably
enhance his body of work enough to get him there.
Kobe is not only guaranteed first ballot hall of fame, he's
arguably already in the top 10 NBA players of all time.
And his game is much much much more diverse than Scott's.
Kobe has every offensive move ever invented in his arsenal,
and he uses them all fluidly. And he's a tenacious all-NBA
defender as well.
To be more concise, though they play different roles, Kobe
is more like Magic, and Lamar is more like Scott.
The Kareem-Gasol analogy doesn't stand up to body of work,
but they play a similar role in the team - excellent post scorer,
but with enough range to hit open jump shots. Thin lanky
frame, but good defensive fundamentals and size allow them
to guard stronger players.
I guess the point I'm getting at is, forget trying to force a
current team into the mold of some team from the past.
It doesn't work. Though Kobe's game is similar to Jordan's,
there will never be another player at the level of Scottie
Pippen.
Each championship is unique, like a freakin' snowflake.
Posted by: LongTimeLakerFan | July 09, 2009 at 09:29 AM
Laker fan,
If you think your in salary-cap hell now ... just wait till you give Kobe his raise. The greatest playa in the history of the NBA is gonna want his. Something along the lines of 5 yrs @ 30mill. You now 24 isnt gonna give you a hometown discount. And to make things worse Pau who is making 17mill now will need a new contract. Its safe to say he is gonna want about the same or walk.
Kobe 30
Pau 15
Bynum 15
Dribble Dribble 7
LOL 7
Luke 6
Thats roughly 80mill and you still need 8 more players! 8 x 3(avg)= 24mill more for a total of 104. Which means your bench is gonna be just that ... a bench. If the estimate is correct that the luxury tax is gonna be at 65mill then ... that makes you 40mill over and dollar for dollar another 40mill. All that for a bunch of old ... what is it you call the Celtics?
I know what your thinking Laker fan ... what about the Celtics? Well after next year we have 30 mill in expiring contracts between House,T. Allen, Scal and Ray Ray. Safe to say if Ray Ray stays at around the MLE since he asked Rasheed to come and sign for that it would make sense he would do the same. So we save 20+ there. Which give us sending money for the big free agent class.
The following year Paula, as Laker fan affectionally calls him, has an expiring contract of 21mill, which if he accepts the around MLE should give us another 15mill of cap space to spend.
Finally the year after that KGs contract of 21mill is due to expire and if he accepts the MLE that an additional 15 mill to spend.
All this at a time when Rondo, Perk and Baby (looks like the most anybody is gonna be able to offer him is around 3-4 mill and I think we match it at that level)are getting into the prime of their careers. I know the Big 3 will be really really old but Im guessing they can come off the bench and gives us 20 solid minutes to go with our core and any free agents Danny picks up along the way with our 50million extra spending money and flexability.
So good luck to your dynesty in salary cap hell and enjoy Dribble Dribble. What can be more enjoyable than an aging Dribble Dribble thinking he can still hit that 3 ball as he dribbles the clock down.
Posted by: 131-92 | July 09, 2009 at 09:31 AM
I think Lakers will go up to $8 mil for LO because LO is better than Marion (better fit for the Lakers at least), and simply the Lakers will be weaker than last year if they gained Artest but lost LO and TA at the same time.
With the Spurs getting Jefferson and McDyess, Cavs Shaq, Celtics Sheed and Orlando VC, the Lakers main competitors have improved whereas the Lakers would have become weaker.
I am sure Team Lamar is just waiting to see if any better offers come up and trying to argue that LO s/d get more than Marion.
If Bynum becomes of one of the two best centers in the league next year, it can make up for losing both LO and TA but LA will just be one injury out of the conference finals as Boston was this year.
Posted by: LakerinBC | July 09, 2009 at 09:36 AM
Red's Love Child -
Don't worry, Artest learned his lesson. Next season, when Garnett starts yapping at someone on the Lakers, Artest will make sure Kevin eats his words.
Posted by: exhelodrvr | July 09, 2009 at 09:42 AM
Two facts that should govern this debate over LO's value:
1. "Value" is determined by the market. Like it or not, LO became a free agent in a time of economic uncertainty, when $10 million contracts just aren't very available. Comparing LO's salary to, say, Luke Walton's is not appropriate. LO is three times the player Luke is; but he isn't "worth" $15 million. You are worth what the market says you are worth, and if the market said LO is worth $10 million, he'd have signed somewhere by now.
2. As valuable as he was this year, it is more than reasonable to assume that LO's value to the Lakers will be significantly lower next year. For one thing, the Lakers will essentially be adding an allstar caliber center to the starting lineup in the form of a healthy Andrew Bynum. Second, the Lakers just radically improved at the small forward spot. Everyone liked Ariza, but he is NOT close to the player that Artest is. For starters, he can't guard big small forwards like Carmelo, which forced Kobe to expend tremendous energy on defense. That isn't going to happen next year. As such, the Lakers' margin for error next year is much greater. They'll be far better offensively and defensively, which makes LO's value off the bench less than it was last year.
LO, you are a $7 to $8 million player. Give the Lakers a hometown discount and come back to win championships for $28 million over the next 4 years.
Posted by: Andrew Bernard | July 09, 2009 at 09:49 AM
Kupchak has now all but admitted that he chose not to bring Ariza back, not the other way around. Ariza is a fine young player but will never be the player Artest is now.
Posted by: bill babishoff | July 09, 2009 at 09:50 AM
No excuse for the Lakers not to bring in LO, now.
We underpaid last year for the money we ended up making. We were 5th and way under NY, Dallas and Cleveland:
As expected, the Lakers paid $7.19 million in luxury taxes from last season, fifth-highest among NBA teams. New York paid $23.7 million, followed by Dallas ($23.6 million), Cleveland ($13.7 million) and Boston ($8.2 million). Portland ($5.9 million) and Phoenix ($4.9 million) also paid luxury taxes
Posted by: Baywood
Yea but were going UP while the salary cap and Luxury tax threshold are going DOWN, not a good place to be as this Depression worsens. Things can get ugly real quick, just ask GM, or Chrysler or AIG or Leman Brothers etc.etc.etc. Buss wants another title but needs to be smart.
Posted by: tomK | July 09, 2009 at 09:50 AM
Edwin,
I'd say that LO is exactly the opposite of "ambidextrous"
Just to illustrate how the economy and landscape of the leauge has altered the free agent market, just look at Allen Iverson - he's still a very good SG. The guy works hard out there, and even just two years ago was still considered a franchise level player...
And he's going to sign for $5 million. A former MVP, a hall of famer, playing for $5 million on a team going no where. This guy put up 51 pts against the Lakers not that long ago.
LO's resume looks nothing like this, and yet he wants twice as much money??
I'll tell you what LO - let's do this, your market value is 5.8 million, Buss will give you 1.2 extra as a token of our appreciation plus I will personally throw in a twix candy bar to top off the deal.
Now get it done.
Posted by: Tim-4-Show | July 09, 2009 at 09:53 AM
It looks like Portland is out of the Odom picture. Word here in UT is Portland is going as hard as they can after Ronnie Millsap.
Posted by: Marty | July 09, 2009 at 09:53 AM
It is true that we are a good team and can repeat if LO returns, I just feel that we have to reinforce the 2nd unit. It is also true and possible that Sasha, Farmar and A-Morr will improve this summer and could bring back the fangs of the bench mob. Undoubtedly, it is just an inconvenient truth that there is uneasiness among Laker fans when these players are on the floor. You would never know what to expect. Luke is a known player, he is defined as a good passer and knows the triangle, any other intangibles he could offer are purely icing in the cake. We need solid back ups: who will not give back scores, who will not be intimidated, who will not disappear in games, who will make good decisions instead of fanciful plays, in other words tough players who could sustain the force created by starters. Well, we will have Shannon, Josh and turtle Mbenga and probably our D' League players Chinemalu and Sun Yue, still not enough. This could be our Achilles heel, everytime they slipped we have to rely on Kobe, Artest & Pau to spell the difference. Oh I forgot the beast Bynum, will he offer a foul prone player good only for few minutes or a frequent injured player, good only for half season? I think that is the mojo of the owners and the Coach this season, they are aware that defending the title would be a harder task. Lakers should not just be satisfied that we won, we won but how can we win again?
Posted by: Edwin Gueco | July 09, 2009 at 09:54 AM
Is it just me, or is the league starting to look more like the 80s
again?
Back in the 80s, there were a handful of top teams who had
most of the best players. There were 5 to 7 haves, and a lot
of have nots.
The salary cap & luxury tax made a bit more parity for awhile,
but at the moment, there are 6 to 8 teams that are willing to push
into the luxury tax to try to get as many top players as possible -
Lakers, Celtics, Orlando, San Antonio, Dallas, and Cleveland
are at the top of the league and are still trying to add pieces.
Denver, Utah, New Orleans, and Phoenix came close to getting
to that level, but they all seem unwilling to throw down huge
bucks to keep their talent and acquire more. We'll see if Denver
tries to acquire any more players or if Utah matches an offer
for Paul Millsap to stay near the top. But New Orleans and
Phoenix are clearly on the way down in order to get their
books back in order.
Oh, yeah, the 80s also featured either the Lakers, the Celtics,
or both in all but 1 finals. At least the Lakers are still there.
Posted by: LongTimeLakerFan | July 09, 2009 at 09:55 AM
Artest is crazy, but I like anyone who really wants to play for the Lakers. Artest is that guy. Ariza is not. Ariza really wants to get paid. I also don't think Kobe is that guy either. You don't demand a trade from the Lakers, the greatest franchise in all of sports. You don't throw a series clinching playoff game because your feelings are hurt from being labelled "selfish". You don't rag on your teammate to any fan in a mall parking lot and you don't berate your teammates on the court (and then make a fictitious movie with Spike Lee trying to paint a different picture). If it weren't for LeBron's last couple of months, censoring that video yesterday, I'd say Kobe is still the league's king primma donna and most difficult person to root for.
Call me crazy, but I am counting on Artest to instill a little Laker pride in Kobe. Ok, that is crazy. At least I don't see Kobe putting down this teammate in the middle of a game on national television. That's a start
Posted by: calughee | July 09, 2009 at 09:59 AM
Red's Luv Child,
>>>Hopefully, with a new $33M contract in hand, Ron Arrest
>>> will be able to feed his "best friend"!
haha. Good one RLC.
We all know that Kevin Garnett brought his "best friend" over
when he moved from Minnesota:
http://tinyurl.com/m4mp6z
He also brought his wife. Actually, it shows that KG is a better
judge of character than Kobe. He found a "thing on the side"
who isn't psycho and doesn't accuse him of rape to try to extort
some money out of him.
Posted by: LongTimeLakerFan | July 09, 2009 at 10:02 AM
johnny v,
caustic tone? if you're looking for G rated material go join a disney fan club. this is a blog dude so you aint gonna hear everything you like
jon k,
lay off luke? the man makes the midlevel? this is highway robbery. this IS easily kupcakes BIGGEST BLUNDER as our GM and its costing us huge now and it even cost us ariza and may cost us lamar...so no we should not lay off in fact there should be an outrage and i'm miffed as to why he gets a complete free pass around here.
lakertruth,
thx for setting the record straight. everyother laker blog or 9 out of 10 laker fans i talk to agree... its unanimous anywhere else so why is this even an argument?? this is really the only place in the world where luke gets any love. it baffles me but of course i'm not surprised i'm up against darth vader and the evil empire
Posted by: yellofever | July 09, 2009 at 10:05 AM
Edwin Gueco,
>>>If Lakers will delay in making decisions, they will miss
>>>the good F/A that are still available
Actually, it's past that point for the Lakers. I doubt any of the
quality free agents (Brandon Bass, Paul Millsap, David Lee,
etc.) would agree to sign for the veteran's minimum, and that's
all the Lakers could offer.
In terms of a high quality free agent, it's probably Lamar or
nothing at this point. If that happens, maybe they could
try to talk Dallas or Utah into a sign & trade to acquire
Bass or Millsap to fill Lamar's role, though I'm not sure the
Lakers have anything they would want. Morrison would
have to be part of the deal to get the salaries to match. But
beyond that, maybe Farmar? Powell? Draft pick?
No, forget that. Lamar is going to look at the $$ that guys
like Marion are getting and reality will start to set in. Then
once Portland makes it's play for Paul Millsap and the cap
space big bucks dries up, Lamar will come in and sign for
the reasonable contract the Lakers are offering.
Posted by: LongTimeLakerFan | July 09, 2009 at 10:12 AM
"The Laker's greatest luxury tax would be not to win 2 to 3 additional Championships with Kobe's career at peak. LO is worth an additional $7 million in luxury tax. Without him the Laker bench would be clobbered by the Celtics, Spurs, Cavs, Blazer, Magic, & Portland benches. LO is unselfish, plays the 4,3 & even 2 positions, is one of the best rebounders on the team, good passer, great speed for a big man and decent defender. Hope Mitch & Dr. Bus realize that 2 to 3 championships could be financially more rewarding than an additional $7 million in luxury tax. While Kobe sacrifices a lot, giving up a couple of million a year to keep LO may buy him twice that amount in endorsements with 3 additional championships!"
Posted by: Ross | July 09, 2009 at 03:02 AM
***
Ross - great perspective. Kobe's probably got 2-3 more years at his current level of production, perhaps more now with Ron guarding the best 2/3/4 on the opposing team. I've read many times that each playoff game at home brought in approximately another $4,000,000 for the Lakers, so just making it to the 2nd round more than covers their luxury tax. I've never seen what the organization makes on their licensing percentage, but that's got to be an incredible amount. With Lamar coming back for another 5 years (assuming those are the years he'll get) all of these numbers are reasonable expectations for the Lakers (if the information I've read is correct.)
Missing the critical LO component could certainly be the more expensive luxury tax over the next few years.
Posted by: Chris | July 09, 2009 at 10:12 AM
Lamar has played really hard over the years as a Lakers and I will always remember that. He does tend to have 'walkabouts' on the court from time to time.
I want him to stay but only if he stays with a good attitude. You know what 'life ain't fair' for a whole lot of Americans who do not know if they can keep their homes and can not find work. If he gets mid-level money instead of the 10 million he wanted; deal with it like any sane human being should; this is more money in one year than most people make in one or two or three LIFETIMES of work.
And if he goes I am actually ok with it. Pau does many of the things Lamar does and has become a really good rebounder. I will miss Lamar if he goes but my tolerance for 'whining' for more money by pro atheletes is at an all time low.
Posted by: LarryofLA | July 09, 2009 at 10:14 AM
SBPimp,
Thanks.
What do we play for? RINGS!!!!
Lakers Today... Lakers Tomorrow... Lakers Forever.
GO LAKERS!!!!
Posted by: Jon K. | July 09, 2009 at 10:14 AM
Tim-4-show,
Absolutely agree, AI knows his limitation just like Shaq on his twilight of their careers. I said ambidextrous, I was referring to his slashing ability of going for the left and right in the post and his athleticism of mixing rebounds and follow ups. The way I see it, LO has reached a decision to come back in his Las Vegas get away room, it is his agent who preventing from making that decision. Agents will always paint rosy pictures of what are the possibilities? They don't give real stories but wheel and deal up the nth hour, they differ in style but their objectives are all similar. They always say, we'll work what is best for our client but the truth, they want to increase their commissions a couple of thousands more. If he gets LO 10 million, that $1M commissions instead of $ 800 grand, so they really work for the 200 grand incremental out there. They will exploit every rumor from every team before getting back to their team. Like David Lee, do you think these agents are loyal to teams and to their clients? Nope, they are loyal to their opportunity to make more money out of their clients.
Posted by: Edwin Gueco | July 09, 2009 at 10:16 AM
It looks like Portland is out of the Odom picture. Word here in UT is Portland is going as hard as they can after Ronnie Millsap.
Posted by: Marty
Marty,
What about Paul Brewer? Smiley Face.
Posted by: Charles | July 09, 2009 at 10:16 AM
>>>If LO will wait for 10M lotto that he's aspiring, he might
>>>sign up later on with another team at MLE b/c Lakers
>>>has replaced him
I can't imagine that happening. The Lakers can't come close
to obtaining someone at Lamar's talent level with what they
have left to spend. Once Lamar acknowledges that 10 million
is an unreasonable figure in the current marketplace, he'll
come to his senses and sign.
People who sell their house do it all the time. They over
price the house, not recognizing market conditions. Then
if they're actually motivated to sell, they recognize that it's
overpriced, adjust the price and get a sale.
Just like the current housing market, the NBA free agents
market is currently a buyer's market, with ALL teams offering
much less than they were just a few years ago.
Posted by: LongTimeLakerFan | July 09, 2009 at 10:16 AM
BREAKING NEWS ... Professional ballplayers have a little strange on the side!!!
Even Phil got him some!
Posted by: 131-92 | July 09, 2009 at 10:17 AM
Eagleboy,
"Can a team afford to double team Kobe, Pau, Lamar, Bynum and Artest?"
The short answer is "no."
That is the delicious deliciousness of this situation.
Seriously, what is the opposition going to do? At any given moment (even with The Bench Mob in), we're going to have 1 to 4 players that demand a double-team on the court.
How do you deal with that? You can't.
What do we play for? RINGS!!!!!
Lakers Today... Lakers Tomorrow... Lakers Forever.
GO LAKERS!!!!
Posted by: Jon K. | July 09, 2009 at 10:19 AM
Regarding Luke - the guy is good at what he does, and subpar the rest of the way.
My hope is that with Kobe AND Thriller around (sorry tha show, that's his name)... Luke will actually work on a few of those weaknesses.
Let's face it, the Lakers can't dump his contract for a VERY long time.
Our 2nd unit is going to look pretty darned good if these guys work their game this summer -
PG - Farmar/Fisher/UPS (TBD)
SG - Vujacic/UPS
SF - Ammo, Luke
PF - Lamar, Powell
C - Mbenga
I'm trying to think of how this field would do if they play up to their potential. Alone I doubt there's any starting five out there they could beat, but take any one of our starters for one of these guys and maybe they could hang... not too shabby at all.
Posted by: Tim-4-Show | July 09, 2009 at 10:22 AM
82-101,
>>>Ray stays at around the MLE ... The following year Paula...
>>>accepts the around MLE ... after that KGs contract ...
>>> he accepts the MLE that an additional 15 mill to spend.
WHOOPEEEEEE!
Wow, I'm glad for you 82. Your doctor must have given you
some awfully good meds that make you delusional enough
to believe that any of the "big 3" would take the MLE. What
is that you're on, a cocktail of Prozac, Thorazine, and mescaline?
Posted by: LongTimeLakerFan | July 09, 2009 at 10:25 AM
82-101,
>>> What can be more enjoyable than an aging Dribble
>>> Dribble thinking he can still hit that 3 ball as he
>>> dribbles the clock down.
Last year's stats:
Ron Artest:
3-point field goal % - 40%
Paula Pierce:
3-point field goal % - 39%
So I guess an aging "Dribble Dribble" is better than an
aging "Paula" in terms of being able to still shoot the 3-pointer.
Posted by: LongTimeLakerFan | July 09, 2009 at 10:28 AM
yellofever,
You freaking out about a contract made years ago under very different circumstances is odd to say the least, especially blaming Luke for it is weird.
Sure, I wish we weren't paying Luke as much money, but I'm not freaking out about it.
What do we play for? RINGS!!!!
Lakers Today... Lakers Tomorrow... Lakers Forever.
GO LAKERS!!!!
Posted by: Jon K. | July 09, 2009 at 10:30 AM
Can we please sign Lamar Odom now please?
What do we play? RINGS!!!
Lakers Today... Lakers Tomorrow... Lakers Forever.
GO LAKERS!!!
Posted by: Jon K. | July 09, 2009 at 10:34 AM
Calughee,
"You don't demand a trade from the Lakers, the greatest franchise in all of sports."
This is the wake up call that brought new dawn of Lakers. We got out of the serious plague in hoping that Smush, Kwame, Cookie, Walton and the young Bynum would do wonders. We were in trenches at that time when this occurred. We know, perhaps in your case you are a fan of other teams trying to second guess Kobe after Shaq's departure. I looked at it from a different angle, because of Kobe's rants Lakers in general got a wake-up call of their sheer existence as a viable franchise. It could have been a career ending for Mitch, a premature departure of Kobe, a sale of franchise to AEG, a disintegration of the Lakers as a dysfunctional family. We could have been in the role of the Celtics to be an insignificant team for the next two decades. That was a pivotal year for the Lakers, Mitch made miracles in changing the landscape w/ the addition of Gasol, Ariza, last year; cost saving moves that discovered SB and the Laker Championship attraction that wooed Artest. If Kwame and Smush were still here, do you think we will still be here blogging or just swearing in every post like Zakee? LOL!
Posted by: Edwin Gueco | July 09, 2009 at 10:36 AM
"lay off luke? the man makes the midlevel? this is highway robbery. this IS easily kupcakes BIGGEST BLUNDER as our GM and its costing us huge now and it even cost us ariza and may cost us lamar...so no we should not lay off in fact there should be an outrage and i'm miffed as to why he gets a complete free pass around here."
Hey Vlad Rad made the mid-level and Brian Cardinal and Marko Jaric and with the exception of Vlad since anti-luke dudes would definately only focus on his overrated shooting, ALL are worst than Luke. No one treats Luke as a superstar here only as a good rotational player and you're crying over spilled milk.
Do I think he's overpaid? Yes but more in the sense of number of years. If it was a 3 year contract from when he signed nobody would be crying except YOU!
this is really the only place in the world where luke gets any love. it baffles me but of course i'm not surprised i'm up against darth vader and the evil empire
Posted by: yellofever | July 09, 2009 at 10:05 AM
Oh now you are crying? Get over it. You don't control the Lakers and neither are the coach and that makes almost everyone here damn glad.
Keep crying and I bet we'll see you with Clipper Darrell one of these days.
Posted by: KB Blitz | July 09, 2009 at 10:36 AM
yo lamar please quit stalling...remember what ron ron said "if you can live off 33 MIL than you can't live"
for 7-8MIL how can you pass up coming off the bench and being a 4-5th option for the defending champs... dude ron ron is here and he gonna have yo back... LA loves you and you're a hero. go anywhere else and you'll immediately become a 2nd option be under constant media scrutiny, feel lots of pressure from your new fan base and you may never live up to expectations. DUDE ITS A NO BRAINER!
Posted by: yellofever | July 09, 2009 at 10:39 AM
yellofever & lakertruth,
>>>lay off luke? the man makes the midlevel? this is highway robbery.
Well, at least you could get your facts straight. Luke does NOT
make the midlevel. Luke's contract started at 4 million, almost
2 million per year BELOW the midlevel.
Luke is a slightly below average NBA player who is making
slightly less than the average NBA salary. He is appropriately
compensated and is a good role player.
The contract Trevor was offered (or not offered if you want
to believe David Lee's semantics) was almost 2 million more
per year than what Luke makes. Trevor was offered more
for 5 years than Luke will make in 6 years.
Trevor is just a hair above average NBA player and he was
offered a contract a hair above the league average (if you take
into account the 10% raises).
Go ahead and hate on Luke if you want, but at least be aware
that he is paid less than you are claming (about 1/3 less) and
he produces more than you care to admit.
Posted by: LongTimeLakerFan | July 09, 2009 at 10:41 AM
"Hopefully, with a new $33M contract in hand, Ron Arrest will be able to feed his 'best friend'!"
Meanwhile, I'm placing bets on how long it'll take Sheed to get ejected from his first game. Y'all better win or else Rondo better watch for flying towels to the grill.
When KG's knee blows out the same night that Sheed is dished out his 16th tech (which, by my guesstimation, should happen the week before Christmas), will you cry? Or will you simply trade Rondo, Sclabrine & Perkins to Cleveland for Shaq?
Posted by: utzworld - THE BANNER HOLDER | July 09, 2009 at 10:43 AM
Oh, and I'll throw in that Luke is loyal to the Lakers.
Trevor, despite his claims of loyalty, let his agent blind him with
promises of more money and steer him away from the Lakers.
David Lee claims this wasn't about money, that it was all about
respect. That's a flat out blatant lie. It was all about money. Lee
wanted more than the Lakers were willing to pay, so he disregarded
the Lakers financial situation, the reality of the financial situation
in the rest of the league, and whatever loyalty Trevor had to the
Lakers.
The Lakers did not lose Trevor because of Luke's contract.
The Lakers lost Trevor because Trevor (or his agent) decided
that money was more important than loyalty.
Posted by: LongTimeLakerFan | July 09, 2009 at 10:45 AM
$8 million for LO is plenty, considering that he only played hard in 25 games out of 100 and is still good for 1 to 2 charging calls per game and 58% free-throw shooting. Heaven forbid we need him in the playoff clutch.
Posted by: Brian Bardfield | July 09, 2009 at 10:45 AM
People have no idea what you're talking about.
Before the season ended, everyone (including Lamar) knew he was going to get less. I don't see where people are getting that he's asking for 10 million per. If anything, I would assume that he's willing to take 7 or 8, but MItch is trying to get him for less.
Lamar has been nothing but a good soldier while he was here. He was stoic during the worst Laker team of recent memory, he came off the bench when we asked him to, he played hurt and came up big when we needed him against the Suns in the playoffs.. Lamar has shown himself time and time again to be a warrior and a true Laker, and all you fools want to do is hate on him, spin little stories about how he's looking for more money and should be gone. I guarantee you, if Mitch offered Lamar 8 million a year he would have signed the second after they introduced Artest.
These things take time. Have some perspective and respect the players who brought us this glorious championship.
Posted by: SBPimp | July 09, 2009 at 10:49 AM
you know, I was pretty rough on Eric Pincus a couple of years ago. It seemed like he was making up stories out of thin air but he's been red hot for about the last year or so. He's got convo's with Kobe and Mitch the last 2 days on his Hoopsworld site, so got to give him some props.
Posted by: Dallas Raines' Hair | July 09, 2009 at 10:52 AM
Mr. 82-101:
"I know what your thinking Laker fan ... what about the Celtics?"
I'm thinking Orlando will take y'all out in 5 games in the 2010 Eastern Conference Semis...if the Bulls don't take you out first. Lest we forgot how the NBA Rookie of the Year made y'all his personal female dog. :)
Perhaps you should be concerned about your own backyard instead of being all up in our grill. I still struggle to understand yours and Red's obsession with Laker Nation. Could you, in light of Phil blowing Red's record in the dust, feel your 2 championship lead slipping through your slimy, fish-smelly Lepercon fingers?
We may be Hollywood...but you don't see us speding time at Celtics Blogs. You're not worthy.
Posted by: utzworld - THE BANNER HOLDER | July 09, 2009 at 10:57 AM
our 2nd unit is STUDLEY:
PG - Shannon Brown
SG - Sasha
SF - Luke Walton
PF - Lamar (hopefully) and Powell
C - Gasol or Bynum, depending on Substitution pattern
that unit could START and play 30+ minutes for about 1/2 the teams in the league. Then you bring back the starters:
PG - Fish
SG - Kobe
SF - Artest
PF - Gasol
C - Bynum
or
PG - Fish
SG - Kobe
SF - Artest
PF - Odom
C - Gasol
that's... that's tough, man... like water dripping from a faucet, there's no break for opposing teams...
Posted by: Dallas Raines' Hair | July 09, 2009 at 10:59 AM
LTLF,
KG has sinced dumped the cheerleader.
Fortunately, she didn`t go all "Kazemi" on him!
Posted by: RED`S LOVE CHILD | July 09, 2009 at 11:00 AM
i hope we hurry up and sign lamar this waiting is killing me. i am going to be really upset if we can't sign him b/c of shannon's contract. don't get me wrong i like shannon but i would rather have artest and lamar or artest and trevor ( felt so bad for him in the houston press conference. he was the complete opposite of ron. he tried to act happy and excited but no one believes it)
i just don't understand why we were so quick to sign shannon since we already lost trevor we should have signed lamar immediately.
please lamar re-sign today. i don't think i can handle my two favorite lakers (not named kobe) leaving.
Posted by: laila | July 09, 2009 at 11:03 AM
Let's compare....now vs. then....
Kobe, Pau, Lamar, Bynum and Artest (all at peak except Bynum who needs to breakthrough)
vs.
Kobe, Shaq, old Karl Malone, old Gary Payton.........(Shaq was peaking, and Kobe was young, and was not as good or wise as he is now)
Posted by: humanomaly (aka "The Anti-Crust") | July 09, 2009 at 11:15 AM
Good morning CRUE!!!
phred - you said "I give justamambafan about two more interviews" before I become an Artest fan.
Ok, ok - sheesh - I will now say I AM A BILL FAN! Although I will be calling him Thrilla. I will be optimistic. I will not look for the dark cloud. I will even bite my tongue when he does something stupid during a game (and y'all KNOW he will)! I will cheer for him as loud as I do for any other Laker. Happy? LOL!
However -
LAMAR WATCH 2009 is still in effect.
COME ON - I'm anxiously awaiting the good news!
Posted by: justanothermambafan | July 09, 2009 at 11:17 AM
Red;
A nothing post - disgrace.
Posted by: Otis | July 09, 2009 at 11:19 AM
" LO is worth an additional $7 million in luxury tax. Without him the Laker bench would be clobbered by the Celtics, Spurs, Cavs, Blazer, Magic, & Portland benches. "
What if LO doesn't get his 10 million - will that affect him mentally? Lamar holding out for so long has me worried that he will not feel satisfied without getting 8 figs. For example, with Thriller it is clear how he thinks about MONEY. From the extended negotiations here with LO, it is NOT CLEAR what he thinks about money. LO could have came out like Thriller did and made a statement ABOUT money. Since he has not, maybe for LO is more about the money. That is what has me worried. So we might not get the LO we had last playoffs if he has to get mid-upper mid 7 figs. His play has been inconsistent over the years anyway, maybe money is gonna screw his head up. I'm worried about this and starting to get a bad feeling.
Doug
Posted by: Doug | July 09, 2009 at 11:23 AM
LO: He's not going anywhere because 1)no one else is even interested, 2) because he fits what we do, and we'll pay him. The wait is simply negotiating tactics by Mitch. Did you notice how he talked about LO taking time to realize what the market is like out there, and that he would like to know what LO has decided? Sounds like the final offer is out there, and it's up to LO to accept. The longer the wait, the more likely he'll be back.
Thriller: I love how excited he is about being a Laker. It'll be great having another Rick Fox, only better.
Ariza: At his Houston press conference he really did look lost, he tried to smile but it didn't last. Also, notice what color tie he's wearing - PURPLE (as opposed to the executive's tie - RED). If things aren't going well in Houston, couldn't we trade him for Sasha or Morrison?
Scottie
Posted by: AKA Scottie | July 09, 2009 at 11:24 AM
Longtime,
Last year's stats:
Ron Artest:
3-point field goal % - 40%
Paula Pierce:
3-point field goal % - 39%
So I guess an aging "Dribble Dribble" is better than an
aging "Paula" in terms of being able to still shoot the 3-pointer.
Posted by: LongTimeLakerFan | July 09, 2009 at
Last Years stats:
Kobe Bryant:
3-point Field Goal % - 35%
Brian Scalabrine:
3-point Field Goal % -39%
So I guess Scalabrine is better than Kobe in terms of being able to shoot the 3-pointer!
LOL ... please no more stupid stats ... you are embarassing yourself or take some of your medicine!
Whatever the Big 3 sign for is less than they are making now. Unlike your salary cap hell Lakers which have a payroll that will be going up while the cap goes down. We will have caqp space and flexability to sign free agents. (Lebron?, Wade?) Kobe will take up 60% of your cap space ... GOOD LUCK! Enjoy Dribble Dribble.
Posted by: 131-92 | July 09, 2009 at 11:27 AM
Laker fans (and eavesdropping Celtic trolls)
As Broussard said yesterday, "Lamar Odom will return to the Lakers." Mitch correctly stated that this is an emotional time for Lamar. He is an emotional person, and that means he needs more time to process losses than others do.
His contract expired at at a lousy time, and he's lost his chance of making around $10 million a year. He'll work his way through this and resign with us.
Considering the crap he's had to deal with and get through in his life (which he has succesfully done), I don't see him coming back as embittered or pouting.
You know he was watching Thrilla's press conference yesterday, and I think the words, "If you can't live on 33 million, you can't live." won't be lost on LO.
Posted by: Laker Kev | July 09, 2009 at 11:48 AM
Banner Folder,
LOL ... you type so much and say so little. Good luck in salary cap hell. Your payroll goes up and the cap comes down. Not a good combination. Just like in the housing market .... it was ok to overpay for homes as long as prices went up. When prices went down it all came apart. Same with overpaying for players (Bynum,Walton,Sasha) everything was ok while the cap went up ... now that the cap is coming down ... LOL.
Kobe, Paul(if you can resign him), Dribble Dribble and LOL put you over the cap by themselves. You can laugh, call names, type all you want but thats the reality of the situation. So unless they allow contract modifications your STUCK! And you better hope TV rev doesnt drop cuz thats like having bought an overpriced house with a neg arm!
JB is in it to make money ... not give it away! So good luck signing LOL and enjoy Dribble Dribble!
Posted by: 131-92 | July 09, 2009 at 11:49 AM
I have NO DOUBT that Lamar will be signed.
But if anybody should be given an incentive laden contract, it's Lamar. Here is my suggested breakdown for Lamar's contract (please don't attack this proposal LTLF, I know it's not realistic).
- $6 million per year base salary for three years
- $2 million per year for coming into camp in shape
- $2 million per year anytime Bynum misses more than a third of the season
- $500K for kicking the candy addiction
- $500K for being our Jack Haley for his long time pal, Ron Artest
Potential yearly salary is between $6 million to $11 million. Everyone wins.
Posted by: LAKER TRUTH | July 09, 2009 at 11:58 AM
LongTimeLakerFan,
Luke's contract is 6 years 30 mil ... if you don't think that's overpaid wow ... http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=2922663
Luke/Bynum/Sasha are overpaid but the fact is a lot of players in the nba get overpaid due to the GM archiles heel known as potential ... hence why Ariza wasnt crazy for asking for 8mil ... he just happened to do it in a bad economic year where GMs aren't very keen on paying for potential
What was particularly worrying about Luke's contract is Mitch offered it so early in the game ... for someone who's game you defined as average at best he should have waited to see if any other GM was crazy enough to make a comparable offer
What's done is done though ... if we lose Odom, many would be correct in saying if Mitch had done a better job with some of the earlier contracts we wouldn't be in this position ... but then again we're just coming off a championship year so I'd be hard pressed to criticize anyone in the laker organization for any decisions made ... I mean it'd be like wanting to go back and gripe about losing Caron Butler ... it's all water under the bridge
Personally my biggest gripe about Luke in the past was the major minutes he was getting ... when the guy averages more than 10 minutes a game, I felt it was taking minutes from Lamar/Ariza and that just ticked me off ... the moment PJ relegated him back to the middle of the bench I was much at ease
With regards to the future ... if Odom comes back then what Luke gives us is a servicable small forward we can put out there whenever Ron/Odom aren't on the same page with PJ ... he's a nice option to have cuz he does deliver some nifty passes more often than naught ... besides that I ain't keen on the rest of his game ... basically let's just live Luke alone ... he might be making more paper than he should, but thankfully he ain't eating up major minutes and he's just a cool guy, hollywood needs a player like him to keep it classy lol
Posted by: Taliq | July 09, 2009 at 12:02 PM
If the Lakers resign Odom, can they realistically run this line-up at all?
- PG: Odom
- SG: Bryant
- SF: Artest
- PF: Gasol
- C: Bynum
If Fisher takes season lightly, why not play these guys together for 10-15 minutes a game during the season?
Posted by: Maxwell | July 09, 2009 at 12:04 PM
82-101,
>>>So I guess Scalabrine is better than Kobe in terms of
>>>being able to shoot the 3-pointer!
Well, since you mention it, yes. Jackie Moon is a bit better than
Kobe at hitting 3-pointers.
It's funny how you make it like it's an issue that Ron Artest
might hog the ball and take a 3 late in the shot clock, but
when I point out to you that Paul Pierce does the same thing
(and hits the 3 at a lower percentage than Artest), then you
try to steer away from the issue.
Posted by: LongTimeLakerFan | July 09, 2009 at 12:09 PM
How pathetic this Red's Love Child to show up here, on Lakers Blog again? Heโs also probably pretty insane, ignoring the fact that current Boston roster perfect picture for โgeriatric wardโ? Why they did not sign Grant Over the Hill, I have no clue. And after next season all those vets will be signing for no more than MLE or even BAE. How about for veteranโs minimum? Talking about living in โfantasy campโ. I guess he had pretty long summer to smoke something.
Posted by: LAL_Fan | July 09, 2009 at 12:10 PM
Edwin,
Speaking about our bench... There is no other choice but improvement. Farmar will be playing for new contract, and with Shannon breathing down his neck, he's better improve or.. Sasha, I'm pretty sure he can not play any worse than playoff and I dare him to prove me wrong. Adam did not play at all so he will be improving also. With Shannon I'm pretty sure we can count on significant improvement, he looks like a hard worker to me and also will be playing for possibility to opt and sign more rich contract or get extension from the Lakers. Our bench need to get back to the "Bench Mob" mentality when they not only able to hold a lead but also push it further while playing tough D and providing starters with well deserved rest.
Posted by: LAL_Fan | July 09, 2009 at 12:19 PM
unfortunately for lamar's wallet...his market value looks to be in the 7-8 million per season range.
then again...
fortunately for lamar's wallet...he was being overpaid 7 million above his true market value the past couple of seasons.
to me, it all evens out. lakers should make a fair offer, 7-8 million per, and get the deal done.
fortunately for the lakers...the free agent market might allow them to have a big FIVE of kobe, thrilla37, lo, pau and socks. amazing.
fortunately for me, my father raised me to be a laker fan.
c'mon lake show
Posted by: tha show | July 09, 2009 at 12:21 PM
boston's done. it was a one year window.
they were donated ray allen and kevin garnett...and managed to get a title out of it. good for them.
their squad resembles the senior pga tour. done and dusted.
cleveland and orlando are the teams in the east.
as for the west...i'll let you guess.
lake show forever...
* and titles when there was 6-8 teams in the league mean NOTHING.
Posted by: tha show | July 09, 2009 at 12:26 PM
131-92
I have one stat for you
Kobe - 4 rings
BIG 3 combined - 3
How about this stat?
Posted by: LAL_Fan | July 09, 2009 at 12:30 PM
Cap Space?
Your entire asinine response to World Champion Laker Nation revolves around CAP SPACE? Sounds like someone's ready to take a dive for the next 3 years or so.
What the eff happened to you, Mr. 82-101? You used to be so beautiful.
Posted by: utzworld - THE BANNER HOLDER | July 09, 2009 at 12:31 PM
The Greenie Weenie trolls don't deserve any attention from the blog faithful. Those guys are obvious chumps who still haven't woken up from their foggy green dreams. The Celtics were a one-and-done championship team. They won't make it back to the Finals for another 22 years.
SBPimp: Damn, it's good to see you back on the blog. I'm sure the twins are keeping you REALLY busy. Little Baby Outlaw (not so little) is tons of fun... and I can't imagine having two. Congratulations. All my best to you and your family.
Lamar will sign soon, maybe by the end of the day. Next year's Lakers team is going to be a MONSTER.
Go Lake Show!
Posted by: The Outlaw | July 09, 2009 at 12:34 PM