Lakers Blog

Round-the-Clock Purple and Gold
written by the Kamenetzky brothers.

« Previous Post | Lakers Blog Home | Next Post »

Top of the heap: Lakers 100, Portland 86

January 4, 2009 | 11:18 pm

   

Click below for the breakdown.

Three Good:

  • Kobe Bryant: 24 has been on quite a roll of late, and tonight was no exception. 26 points on an extremely efficient 11-19 from the floor, a figure distorted by a couple of misses late in the fourth. Over the last six games, Bryant is averaging a very robust 31 points, on 55% shooting.  Sunday night, he started hot while the Lakers struggled mightily to generate anything that looked even a little like a structured offense.  Most of the buckets were J's, but as things went on Kobe was able to get closer to the basket and do more damage near/in the paint. He influenced the flow of the game at both ends, making contributions not just on offense but also to what evolved into a very strong defensive effort for the Lakers.  Best of all, Kobe played a very reasonable 33 minutes, no small thing given L.A.'s schedule this week.
  • Pau Gasol: Like the rest of his teammates, he had a slow start, struggling to find space on offense. On the other end, the incredibly high, impossible-to-defend release of LaMarcus Aldridge caused some problems, but as the game went on, Gasol was his normal influential self.  19 points on 7-9 shooting, a pair of dimes and a steal in just over 28 minutes of play. He wasn't a beast on the boards (only five), but showed his trademark versatility, and quietly posted a good night. 
  • The Short Bench: With Trevor Ariza shifted to the starting lineup in place of the sesamoiditis-y Luke Walton, LA only used three reserves in meaningful minutes - the Bench Mob reduced to a mere Small Gathering - but all contributed with strong play. Sasha Vujacic hit four of the seven shots he attempted and was his usual pesky self on defense, despite being saddled with a case of tonsillitis.  Lamar Odom had a very positive influence on the proceedings, with 10 points, six boards, a pair of dimes, a steal and two blocks in just under 28 minutes of burn.  He finished a +19. The big story was probably Vlad Radmanovic, who struggled in his initial action at the end of the second quarter but came back strong after halftime, burying two big triples and playing an active game off the ball as the Lakers pulled away.  Not typically a guy who thrives in inconsistent minutes, Radmanovic played with a lot of energy, piling up 16 points in just over 18 minutes.  Especially impressive were the seven trips to the stripe, not a place Radmanovic generally frequents.  Should Walton's injury mean Radmanovic returns to the rotation, this is the sort of performance the Lakers will need out of him.

Two Bad:

  • The First Quarter: You know things are going poorly when a team shoots 55% over 12 minutes, and only scores 19 points, especially when said squad is afforded eight trips to the line. That's exactly what happened to the Lakers, who were limited to a rather shocking 11 field-goal attempts in the opening 12 because they turned the ball over nine times.  Nine times?  Nine. Times.  This against a single assist on the quarter.  That's a comical 1:9 A/TO ratio as a team.  Amazingly, Portland was only able to turn the mistakes into eight points, thanks to tight Lakers D/a tendency to miss wide open shots.  From there, though, the Lakers tightened up considerably, finishing with 13 giveaways on the night. 
  • Rebounding: The Lakers neither buttoned things up on the defensive boards - Portland managed to snag 15 offensive rebounds, including a few sequences where they had multiple cracks at the basket - nor attack the glass themselves, generating only seven offensive boards, five below their season average. 
  • Tactics: 1) For the life of me, I couldn't understand why the Lakers doubled down on Portland's Greg Oden on the block as much as they did. Oden is physically strong and loaded with potential, but at this point in his career isn't a strong offensive player, and the Lakers did themselves a disservice by giving him so much attention in the post.  All it did was open up lanes for his fellow Blazers to cut and create open shots elsewhere on the floor. When Andrew Bynum manned up on Oden, who finished 3-7 from the floor, he did fine. If anyone deserved a double, it was LaMarcus Aldridge, who's ludicrously high release on a smooth fall away J is virtually impossible for one player to defend. 

2) With Luke Walton out, I was surprised PJ didn't start Vladdy.  After the game, I asked Jackson about the decision, and he referred to "internal" reasons for the choice ... meaning "none of your business."  Interestingly, though, he said (and Trevor Ariza confirmed) that Ariza would have preferred to continue coming off the bench. Personally, I'd have let him.  I like the rhythm of Ariza making his first run with the reserves and think he fits better with that group than the more structured starting unit.  "I can see the way the game is being played, and see how I can change the game a little bit," Ariza said of his preference to begin the game in sweats.  "But tonight I had to [start].  We won, so that's all that matters."

Generally speaking, when players go down to injury I'm a proponent of changing the roles of as few players as possible to fill the hole. With Radmanovic, they can plug him back into a spot he has played in before without disrupting Ariza's allocation of minutes.  It's just one game and the Lakers could certainly change things up - Walton was walking with a noticeable limp when I saw him after the game, so my early money is on him missing at least a couple of games - but for tonight, I'd have made a different choice. 

One Big Issue:

  • Bynum: He didn't do much on offense (four points on four field-goal attempts), but was strong on the glass with 10 boards, and I was impressed with the physicality he showed against Greg Oden down on the block defensively. He aggressively fronted Oden repeatedly in the third quarter, working to deny passes and move Oden into uncomfortable spots. While statistically it won't go down as one of his best nights, to watch Bynum engage another player physically - to really work on defense - was encouraging. And beyond that, you can really see a good rivalry developing between both players that should be fun to watch for years to come. 

Quotes:

PJ:

  • On Bynum: "He did some things we normally don't see from Andrew that were spontaneous.  He fronted Oden in the third quarter, and a couple of times in the first quarter he prevented the ball from going in. I took him out early in the third quarter because I thought he wasn't aggressive to the ball, but I thought he came back and played well."
  • On Ariza: "He was really effective in the second half. We switched and put him on [Steve] Blake so that we could slow down their offense. That really made a difference in the third quarter. He did a great job defensively for us."

Blazers Coach Nate McMillan:

  • On the Lakers: "They are a good group, they are on a mission. They definitely know what they need to do to win. And right now everybody is healthy for that group. And Phil can push a lot of buttons. He has a lot of different combinations that he can go with as far as playing big and playing small. You know those guys are playing ball, all of them playing well."

BK

AUDIO


Post a comment
If you are under 13 years of age you may read this message board, but you may not participate.
Here are the full legal terms you agree to by using this comment form.

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until they've been approved.





Comments

PLG,
I can definitely follow you on that theory. The question is we would need to do deductive reasoning to find a basement team that has written off this season, is in need of a shooter for the next couple of years, can absorb Vlad's contract, and deploys a system that can cover up the fact that Vlad doesn't play defense well enough for the Lakers. But yeah, he's CLEARLY in the doghouse right now, and it's a matter of time.
This reminds me of EXACTLY 10 years ago when we got rid of Nick Van Exel, Elden Campbell, and Eddie Jones (more or less) for AC Green, Glen Rice, and Brian Shaw. When all of that went down back in '99 (even though the Van Exel trade was technically '98) a lot of folks questioned Jerry West. But as Phil was hired, it all came together and the rest is history. As some alluded to before, we need more veteran leadership off the bench; veterans who have defensive savvy, have solid fundamental skills, can put the ball in the basket when asked to, AND aren't punks on the perimeter/post.
Speaking on the announcers, I love Chick's objectivity and how he called the game. If Magic, Kareem, Shaw, Kobe, Worthy were not handling their business, he made it known. When I listen on League Pass to Lakers games in other markets, all you hear is of them bad mouthing the Lakers and praising their own team, even if it's the Grizzlies. You just want to say to the announcer "Hey homie, your team sucks, you're getting killed, ACKNOWLEDGE IT!!!"

Sun Yue is learning American trash talking before learning how to play well in NBA. He was quoted saying:

We don’t even speak on the court, except to warn for screens and remind each other of the offense,” Sun said. “A lot of players in America are like that, though…the trash talk.”

So, I asked Sun how long it would be before he started trash talking.

“I can’t imagine myself ever trash talking, like ‘Get off me. You can’t guard me.’ That’s not my personality,”

~~ By the end of this season, when Yue goes back to China, he's no longer the same meek person, Sun Yue. That's what he learned from American democracy - to trash talk. LOL! In a supervised environment China where threats, hunger, exploitation are used as disciplinary tactics, it is differs a lot in the American system. Here it is the excessive freedom, Sun Yue will either put up or shut up forever, it is sink or swim with his fellow imports and Laker teammates to gain respect. I am definitely sure, these chinese youths: Yao, Yi and Yue are constantly exchanging notes on such cultural change and ultimately, they will be different players when they go back to China. Unfortunately, if they trash talk in China, they'll be identified as rebel rausers and may be followers of falun gong or tibetans, therefore not allowed to represent China in the NBA. Don't you think they will not consider applying for a green card while playing in the NBA?

The Lakers have to get Andrew more touches on the offensive end.

On most teams, Andrew would be option 1 or 2 right now and he would be developing his low post moves. More important he would be developing judgment, handling the ball a lot, deciding when to pass out, learning to spot the double team, knowing when to go to the hole.

Equally, if not more, important, for big guys, and especially young ones, touches keep them focused and in the game. Even old dudes like Shaq need touches - the "big dog" has been barking for touches recently in Phoenix.

In an ideal world big guys would be happy running up and down the floor playing D and grabbing boards. That is simply not the case. They need the "love" from their teammates. The need the action and involvement. They are better all around players when they are in the flow of the offense.

It is not all selfish. Being in the flow is important to
getting in the rhythm of the game. Big guys don't bring the ball of the floor. They need to be fed the ball to get involved.

Oh, and scoring a little does help teh mental state as well.

Bynum will be more productive at both ends and will develop faster if he is part of the flow of the Laker offense. They need to look for him more and run some stuff for him. He doesn't need shot attempts as much as touches to get him in the flow.

Posted by: Tom Daniels | January 05, 2009 at 06:34 AM

=========================
Completely agree!

Tom D,
"On most teams, Andrew would be option 1 or 2 right now"

He would not be the number one option on ANY team at this point, and not the number 2 option on many, if any. He does not have an "offensive game" yet, and he does not have the athleticism of a young Shaq, or Dwight Howard, to get away without one. Teams have adjusted to what he was doing last year, (i.e waiting for lobs and put-backs) and to this point he hasn't made a counter-adjustment.

Posted by: exhelodrvr | January 05, 2009 at 08:24 AM

======================
AB has plenty of post moves. Watch making of the beast again. He is not mentally in the game now for whatever reason.

But he sure does have the skills, he just needs the confidence to use them. And for PJ to quit ragging on him and mind game crap. I still see it in actions but in press PJ talks more positive than before.

Eric M.,

Did you happen to catch Vladdy's post game interview where he expressed how it was "very frusterating" coming off of the bench. He just scored 16 points in 18 minutes and I was taken aback when I heard him voice is discontent.

I like Vlad, I've always stuck up for him, but for the first time ever, I got a "cancer" vibe from him. It was probably the most negitive thing that could have been taken out of this game.

I wondered what you (or anybody else out there who may have seen it) what your take was on it.


Posted by: warren with(those)butterknives | January 05, 2009 at 09:09 AM

======================
I don't see it as negative vibe rather than a player expressing his frustration for not playing. I would worry if he was ok with riding the pine.

Blitz,

"Bynum refused to blame his inconsistency on his surgically-repaired knee."

What do you expect him to say???? "Yeah I'm a puss, and I still don't trust my knee 100%".

That is another DUMB point. OF COURSE he says it has nothing to do with it!

PLEASE READ THE NEXT 2 SENTANCES SLOWLY!

I never said his knee was still hurt, or that mentally he was still not 100%. I said IT WOULD NOT SURPRISE ME IF IT TOOK TILL NEXT YEAR FOR HIM TO BE 100%. I REALLY DON't KNOW.

Your trying to say it is NOT a possibility, is what I take issue with. Anyone that has had a bad knee injury knows what I'm talking about.

Posted by: Eric M. | January 05, 2009 at 09:03 AM

============================
Now thats what I call human nature of a response LOL.

let it out Eric M

justa,
"AB has plenty of post moves."

That's not the issue. The issue is being able to use them smoothly. He isn't doing that yet.

LakerTom, I agree about Marcus Camby (once dubbed Marcus Camby/Welby, MD) in the NY Daily News for his propensity for always being associated with Dr's and or some sort of injury requiring medical attention) lol

Anyway, the way he's been rebounding, its no surprise the Knicks would try to lure him back. I always thought he belonged in a Knicks uni even after spending so many years in the mountains of Denver!

But yeah, he's a Major Beast on the boards, always has been.

Way to go Team!!!

BK: good reporting on the "none of your business" question. But I guess JustaLakerFan is right about keeping it in the locker room. However, can we start a blog theory?

Throwing this out there to the fam....my bet: Mitch is shopping Vlad and will pull a defensive bunny specialist from his magic hat of tricks....

While I would rather they sit tight and see where things go this month and (pray no) injuries, etc. As I watched the 2000 Portland game 7 - that team had defensive focused vets at the end of their career in the game for one thing..... I still think this 2008/09 team especially the bench mob has way too many shooter/scorer types and nobody like a Ron Harper, AC Green, Horace Grant. I am not the league personnel expert - but is there anyone out there that fits this bill?

We have a vet mid level exception...........food for thought.

Cheers all!

Posted by: PsychedLakerGirl | January 05, 2009 at 09:13 AM

========================
Laker blog theory is perfectly acceptable IMO as that is what blogging is about also.

I don't think Rad is being so much as I think PJ is exerting his boss position to get through to Vlad about his consistencey. Bringing it to the game always. Keeping it in locker room keeps it from turning into a media circus.

I would think Luke was being shopped and thus was getting more playing time. But I don't know as if it is in the press it is not Mitch like tactics.

Mitch works quietly and pulls off trades and surprises everyone.

Basicaly that is what I think and is my opinion only.

WarrenButterKnives/JustaLakerFan,

"Did you happen to catch Vladdy's post game interview where he expressed how it was "very frusterating" coming off of the bench."

I didn't see it, but I kinda agree with Justa. As long as it doesn't blow up into a HUGE drama, I like a guy who doesn't want to be on the pine.

I mean...You gotta feel for Vlady...He's like the first or second best 3-point shooter in the league and he gets benched for "Nice" LUKE. I'd be pissed too. lol

I like Vlady coming off the bench though. If he is hot...you ride him and give him 20+ minutes. If he is cold and lost as he sometimes is, then back to your defense/hustle player who now gets a rest since he is starting. When TA was coming off the bench, he sometimes wore down late in the 4th becuase he was having to play 14-18 straight minutes.

Plus....you start the 3rd quarter with intensity and defense. Last night we broke their will right from the start of the third, and TA had a big part in that.

justa,
"AB has plenty of post moves."

That's not the issue. The issue is being able to use them smoothly. He isn't doing that yet.

Posted by: exhelodrvr | January 05, 2009 at 10:24 AM

======================
I agree and he needs to break out of this phunk even it is snubbing his nose at PJ and doing it AB's way. Be aggresive on both ends. I think this is what PJ is trying to do with AB anyways and light a fire under him.

I just think a better approach is to build his ego and let him know he can dominate and to go do it.

But it is up to AB now to put up show his game.

Give the Laker Fans a lil credit.....without us..there would b no Lakers

Give the Laker Fans a lil credit.....without us..there would b no Lakers

it's been my thought that something happen to Vlad that Phil chose to discipline him by pulling him out of the starting lineup and inserting Luke. Perhaps he was lacking in some area of the game or would not adhere to something. It was very peculiar that Vlad who was playing good minutes suddenly was relegated to the bench and had several DNPs and several 5 minute games soon there after. I think Phil is slowly letting Vlad back into the flow of things, giving him more minutes once again, but sending a message that he is not entitled to that starting spot unless he earns it. I am almost certain that Phil would rather start Vlad and have Trevor come off the bench as Trevor fits better with the second crew and also allows Phil to keep a good wing defender on the court at all times. But in his "coaching" he did not allow Vlad to start. My two cents.

 


Advertisement

About the Bloggers

Recent Posts
Lakers 130, Warriors 97: Everything's Golden |  November 29, 2009, 11:14 am »
Programming Update: No Live Blog Tonight |  November 28, 2009, 6:04 pm »
In lieu of Laker links... Laker Laughs! |  November 28, 2009, 11:34 am »
Post-Thanksgiving Leftovers |  November 27, 2009, 4:24 pm »
Reading helps your digestion |  November 27, 2009, 11:23 am »



Archives
 




Buy Tickets
Search for Tickets
 

LATimes.com now offers sports tickets to popular events around the world including NBA tickets, MLB tickets and NFL tickets to otherwise sold-out events.

Popular Events
As the Lakers get set to defend their title, Lakers tickets are going to be huge all season. Dodgers tickets and Angels tickets are also in high demand with another season of MLB baseball underway.

We've got plenty of LA sports tickets and college football tickets for sale, with MLB tickets and USC football tickets being the mosts popular sellers at the moment.
Powered by TicketNetwork