Kobe Bryant: Two guys, some observations, video, and a Question of the Day
I have no secret MRI, no stolen doctor's notes. Take a look at the numbers from this year and last, and the picture isn't totally clear. There are any number of things that could be impacting Kobe's performance other than physical injury- fatigue, a regular ol' slump, an evolving lineup, etc- but from my view (sometimes pretty close to the court) one thing seems relatively clear:
Kobe doesn't seem to be moving like Kobe.
A jumper that lacks pop, less time attacking the rack, more gambling on defense. Below is the video we recorded on the subject after last night's win, and after the jump there's more film from PJ, addressing the question of Kobe's current state. ("Bothersome," Jackson puts it, "a minor drop down from worrisome.") Kobe tells PJ he's fine, he tells the media he's fine (AK is going to ask him again at practice today)... but if Kobe was in one of these bad boys he'd still say with a little 24/7 therapy suiting up for the next game wouldn't be an issue. That's who he is. Still, our gig is to observe and discuss, so here we are.
Which leads to the QOTD: Have you seen anything that worries you about 24, or are we just plum loco?
(UPDATE: Kobe wasn't available for the media after practice, so I
couldn't ask about his health. One of us will try to inquire after
tomorrow's game. - AK)
BK








In the immortal words of the Black Knight...
"It's just a flesh wound."
Posted by: Long Time Laker Fan | December 11, 2008 at 01:15 PM
He's at a crossroads...will he continue to be the Kobe that the media loves to hate? Or will he take this sudden drop in production as an onus to dish the ball to the dudes in the middle...who have the POTENTIAL to average a MINIMUM 25/15 each if Kobe & the other 3 dudes trusted them more?
Posted by: utzworld - THE BANNER HOLDER | December 11, 2008 at 01:31 PM
In the words of those who observe these type of things:
After 12-13 years in the league...it takes it's toll. The knees aren't what they once were. And that makes anyone slower.
Come down!
Come down!
O' Great mighty one!
Time is a slippin'
The NBA's hand is a grippin'
Those knees are a trippin'
mike t.
Posted by: Michael C. Teniente | December 11, 2008 at 01:38 PM
Yes, I love Kobe but I am worried tha he shoots too much. I'd like to see Bynum take a larger role in the offense so we can really see whether we have a franchise player or not (by my estimation, he could be the best player in the league in 2 years if we just fed him the ball) He has amazing footwork, great length, nice touch and is a great pass who will only improve the amount of assists he gets if he were the focal point of the offense. Nobody is pushing for this yet, but from the small glimpses I have seen its only a matter of time before this should be ABs team.
Posted by: Danny | December 11, 2008 at 01:39 PM
You are totally, 100% correct. Gambling on defense, getting beat to the rack, taking too many jumpers, and no lift or arc on those jumpers. He is probably the no. 1 reason the defense has suffered lately. The 2nd unit's defense is/was more helter skelter, harrasing type defense but the first unit is more dependant on help and rotations. Most of the breakdowns lately seem to start with Kobe. Although he'll never admit it publicly I am sure he and his mates are aware of it. We panic but P.J. and Kobe and the rest of the team know it is a long season. No need to panic. I do however see an L.O. trade this year, before the deadline.
Posted by: billy in slo | December 11, 2008 at 01:43 PM
I think I heard there is something wrong with his pinky.
Like, the ligament is torn off from the bone.
Yeah, I think that's it.
Posted by: Amazing_Happens | December 11, 2008 at 01:56 PM
LAKERS NEED SIMPLY MAN-TO-MAN DEFENSE. TOO, MUCH SWITCHING AND DOUBLE TEAM GUYS THAT DON'T NEED TO DOUBLED. GOOD SMART MAN-TO-MAN. ON ONE INSTANCED IN PHX. GAME PAU GOT HIS THIRD FOUL HELPING IN A USELESS SITUATION. ON ONE OTHER PLAY TREVOR, OUR BEST ENERGY GUY JUST OPEN THE LANE FOR STEVE NASH RATHER THAN FOUL HIM OR AT LEAST TRY AND TAKE A CHARGE
Posted by: 30YRLKRFN | December 11, 2008 at 01:57 PM
Good question, guys.
I was just trying to formulate my thoughts into a cohesive comment about what I am seeing from Kobe these days. For me, League Pass is a Godsend. I have had it every season since 2003-2004. During that time, I have seen parts of just about every Laker game.
I have never seen Kobe play like this. He looks like a shell of the Mamba. He is not playing hard and it is affecting the whole team. I watched the last 6 mins. of the game at work last night, and was appalled to see how he was laughing and carrying on with Grant Hill.
There is a disconnect somewhere in Lakerland. Something is wrong between the coaching staff and the players. The team is not responding to the staff's prodding at them to address their multiple shortcomings.
This Laker team needs Kobe as its centerpiece. His greatness, combined with all the weapons that the rest of the team brings, makes this a group that can truly go all the way if they play the way we all know they can.
But, something is missing. Something is wrong. I just wish I knew what it is.
Posted by: bronxlakerfan | December 11, 2008 at 01:59 PM
TYPICAL........pj.
We lead the league in scoring........
are defense is getting sliced up by teams with losing records..........
An dude bench VLAD because why????? there is no movement in the offense.......WTF......you have to be kidding me.
THIS MOVE DIDN'T MAKE BASKETBALL SENSE.
TYPICAL pj instead of speaking the truth he bench VLAD as a cover-up.
I hate pj as a coach.
COMPTON
Posted by: COMPTON'S FINEST | December 11, 2008 at 02:02 PM
I haven't been this doubtful of Kobe since he made those airballs at Utah.
Posted by: never | December 11, 2008 at 02:15 PM
TOP TEN
Wednesday Dec. 10, 2008
Honorable Mention
The Lamar Anthem (forever acknowledged)
Posted by: Troll Man | December 10, 2008 at 04:13 PM
Scouting Report on Lakers:
During pre-game drills before games with Lakers no need to practice out-side shots. Just practice layups.
Posted by: BD | December 10, 2008 at 11:10 AM
DRUM ROLL............................
#10 TIE for all the following reactions to Luke starting
WTH is PJ doing?
Starting Luke!
Posted by: Faith | December 10, 2008 at 07:36 PM
Luke Walton is starting tonight.........PJ has lost his mind
Posted by: chuck23 | December 10, 2008 at 07:37 PM
phil jackson is mentally retarded its official!!!! walton over odom, radmonovic, and ariza??? is this guy high!!??
Posted by: ben | December 10, 2008 at 07:37 PM
In regards to the fact that luke is starting tonight I want to apologize to the blog! Obviously the anti-dementia drugs we are giving phil are not working and I will begin trying something else.
Posted by: phil's doctor | December 10, 2008 at 07:53 PM
Luke hasnt earned those minutes in my opinion
Posted by: Paul Lee | December 10, 2008 at 08:56 PM
#9 Somebody needs to tell Kurt Rambis that the rest of the league has figured out his little defensive "scheme" and he needs to implement a REAL DEFENSE.
Nuff said.
Lakerman420
Posted by: Lakerman420 | December 10, 2008 at 10:32 AM
#8 Jay Jay,
The idea that blacks own the game of basketball is a fast-disappearing myth based on the reverse racism of a few white guys and the wishful thinking of a few black guys in the 80's and 90's. That same myth has been a major factor in causing over-confident U.S.teams to get their butts kicked in international competition by mostly white teams who never received the memo that black people own the game of basketball...
Posted by: guity | December 10, 2008 at 05:52 PM
#7 So why would OKC give up their starting PG and a reliable
backup PF for a 1-year rental on Lamar? What's in it for them?
LTLF - Good question. Here is what's in it for OKC: Cap space. Since Westbrook figures to take the job from Watson at some point this year anyway, OKC gets Watson's $6.5 mil for next year. Odom might make them a little better for the rest of this year, which may mean that they don't finish with fewer than 9 wins. If OKC wants draft picks or maybe Sun Yue, that would be doable as well. In other words, this would be a scaled-down version of the Pau trade with Memphis.
Posted by: Jman449 | December 10, 2008 at 06:36 PM
#6 "You can't have two scoring big men. That's a faulty basketball philosophy." -Mike T.
Gee Mike T., have you ever heard of David Robinson and Tim Duncan????
Posted by: Korey | December 10, 2008 at 07:03 PM
#5 Losses tend to bring out the worst of the blog.
I don't like all the in-fighting amongst fellow bloggers.
Having said that, IF the Lakers are to have home court all throughout (best record in the L), they simply have to play better more consistently or they will fail that objective. It doesn't mean we should blow up the team or throw out the baby with the bath water. It doesn't even mean that the Lakers can't or won't win the title this year, it just means that Cleveland or Boston (or both) would have the home court in a series.
If this was 2006, we'd be stoked. But it's not. It's 2008, heading into 2009 after suffering the worst kind of playoff loss... to the Celtics and watching those jerks celebrate at our expense and the expense of the players we love.
There's absolutely nothing wrong with rooting or asking for higher effort and more of a mission-mentality from the same players we love so much.
Posted by: Tim-4-Show | December 10, 2008 at 01:47 PM
#4 I have been a Laker fan for 40 plus years!!!! I definitely am not a troll and you just can't take it when other fans speak opinions that are contrary to yours. Obviously no one knows for sure what will play out - I truly hope the Lakers will come together - but I really feel that this team is not tough enough to beat Boston. That makes me a troll? When the same thing happens to us (if we get to the finals) - then we've wasted another year while we know LO will disappear at critical times, Rad will throw up airballs, we'll get beat up by a PG that can penetrate, some hot team with 3 pt shooters will kill us, the physical play will demoralize us as we look for the refs to save us. I don't want that to play out again. We need some players who will take this by force!!! This it not the Showtime era - the players aren't even close. I'd love to eat my words at the end of the season. Come on Lakers!!!!!
Posted by: SgtRoss | December 10, 2008 at 10:59 AM
#3 Hey Eric,
20 games in you start to get a feel for the team. The Lakers have offensive prowess - we;ve seen that. We've now also seen a defense very similar to last season and a similar killer instinct. 20 games is almost 1/4 of the regular season.
The Lakers have issues. Maybe you don't understand the game well enough to see that. 17-3 means nothing in a title series with the Celtics. The Celtics will crush the Lakers today and at the end of the season if the Lakers don't find the resolve needed to make a stand on defense.
Posted by: 1969 | December 10, 2008 at 08:28 PM
#2 If the Lakers can some how hold the Suns to under 50 layups tonight Lakers should win.
Posted by: BD | December 10, 2008 at 06:06 PM
#1 Don't celebrate...this was really a Suns victory. Butler will telll us why in 3...2...
Posted by: utzworld - THE BANNER HOLDER | December 10, 2008 at 10:12 PM
Posted by: You Ever Notice | December 11, 2008 at 02:25 PM
I hope this is a sinister post, intended to inflame Kobe's competitive instincts and Laker highlight reels. Yes, his productivity is probably on the decline, but I think we should give more credence to the Mamba's mindset during this season. More so than ever, he is seemingly committed to the development of a team identity and the process of enabling his teammates under a team concept. He has found a way to re-channel his supreme confidence and killer instinct into a longer-term goal, not just by default, but seemingly consciously and proactively.
This 'adjustment period' can't be discounted or discredited. We don't really have, or won't have, a 'control' to test your points until we see the Lakers team depleted of offensive options and Kobe in 1 vs 5 mode. Do we really want to test your hypothesis?
They say the best of coaches cater towards the strengths/weaknesses of their personnel. It seems that Kobe has adopted a player-coach mentality this season, and like all things Kobe commits to, his focus is unwavering towards that end-product he and his team have bought into. Let Kobe be Kobe please. With great power comes great responsibility. Let's not actively work to enervate that responsibility. Can Kobe put up 50 a game with 3-4 Sportscenter highlights on the side? Maybe, probably. Will that be relevant when Kobe defers to an underdeveloped Radmanovic, Ariza, Odom, Vujacic, Bynum, when the Celtics trap/triple team him in the finals? No.
Kobe is like the Hulk when it comes to his ability. If I were him, with his ever-growing knowledge of the game, I'd be scared to see if I could still put up old numbers, for I know I'd be successful and no one could deny that. My teammates, on the other hand, in the long run, would probably be proverbially screwed.
Posted by: Vivek | December 11, 2008 at 02:26 PM
I'm not worried about Kobe, because I've just accepted it as fact that he's not what he once was. I know this makes me a heretic, but does anyone see a trend here?
Kobe's PERs:
2004-2005: 28.11
2006-2007: 26.13
2007-2008: 24.09
2008-2009: 23.68
There are three things I've noticed about Kobe last year and even more so this year.
1) He's having much more difficulty getting to the rim. This was particularly evident in the Boston series as he primarily operated from the outside. He says it's merely a case of him settling instead of attacking. But I've never known Kobe not to attack if he has the opportunity. I think the problem isn't that he won't, but that he can't like he used to. He's lost a half step on both offense and defense. A half a step slower Kobe is still better than 98% of the league, but he used to be better than 100% of the league.
2) He's losing the ball in traffic much more frequently. It seems he gets stripped or loses the ball at least 3 or 4 times a game. I don't know if this is his finger or what, but Cuttino Mobley must have stripped him 5 times in one game earlier this year.
3) He's relying too heavily on his pump fake. Because he's not able to blow by guys anymore, he's relying on getting the guy in the air and drawing the foul. It still works sometimes, but the scouting reports are catching up to him and guys are staying down and not biting as much as they once did. As a result, Kobe frequently pump fakes once, twice, three times before finally taking a contested and very difficult fallaway that is not in rhythm. Now, Kobe being Kobe, he still knocks them down more than any other player in the league, but it's not a high percentage shot. Just because he CAN do it doesn't mean he SHOULD.
As I said, the diminshed Kobe is still a top 5 player in the league. But I do worry that he doesn't realize he's not the same player he was, but still insists on playing the way that he did then.
Posted by: puddle | December 11, 2008 at 02:27 PM
It is bothersome to watch Kobe's performance lately. As a Lakers fan, I believe this team can and will win the championship, but at the same time, as Kobe probably understands, there is still a piece missing, the toughness factor. And sometimes, you just can't change personality. Besides Kobe, Fisher, Ariza, and maybe Gasol, it's hard to find anyone on the team with a tough mindset that overpowers the opponent. Kobe said before that the team has to go through more physical training, but I disagree, as long as the mentality is soft, the body is not going to be willing.
But still, I think Kobe is going to get back on track like he always does, especially when people are questioning his performance. Watching the games lately, I want to see the old Kobe back, not old as in his age now, but his former self, the one that destroys the opposing team by his sheer will. There is no bite with this mamba. Give the people what they want: take over games. And to think that he set the defensive tone in the Olympics, it's all the more strange not to see him pressing his teammates the way he just did over the summer. Could it be the pinkie, or is it mid-life crisis?
Posted by: Johnny | December 11, 2008 at 02:27 PM
MAMBA24
I pick C.
Which is A + a finals sweep over the Celtics
Posted by: You Ever Notice | December 11, 2008 at 02:27 PM
I'm not worried about Kobe but Im sure as hell concerned about you two!!! LOL ya loonies...seems like the pressures getting to everyone! LOL
We NEED more vids like this one
Posted by: Kiwi | December 11, 2008 at 02:29 PM
I think it's jacked up how Phil is treating poor Vladdy! I feel sorry for Vladdy, he's Phil's new whipping boy. I hear he did the same thing with Luc Longley back in the day.
Vladdy "scapegoat" Radmanavic
poor guy...
Posted by: warren with butterknives | December 11, 2008 at 02:29 PM
Mayor declares Kobe should take some time off for 2-3 leading up to the All-Star break. His legs look dead, seen mostly in his jumpshot form.
Posted by: Mayor of Kobe Town | December 11, 2008 at 02:35 PM
Long Time,
Here is my proposal for the trade, that you alluded to in the previous thread.
http://tinyurl.com/5lt969
You get back a player that only adds to your payroll for an extra season, and makes the Lakers better in the starting 5 immediately. Miller is a better defender than Vlad Rad, and a better shooter than Lamar. The rotaion might shorten by a player, but 9 guys is really as deep as it should get.
Collins can be a good position defender/calf model and will appease the need for a guy with a "steady base."
Posted by: "Pig" Miller | December 11, 2008 at 02:35 PM
According to the Lakers website, the team only watched film today, had some shooting drills and the scrubs played a little 3 on 3. Here's the recap of the media interviews:
"Before Phil talked, Andrew Bynum answered a few questions about his lack of fourth quarter playing time:
“I don’t understand why I’m not in at the end of the game,” he said, “It doesn’t make much sense to me, but it’s just something I have to deal with.”
That Bynum hasn’t been happy not playing late in games is no secret. Jackson’s response?
“When he shows the ability to play defense appropriately, he’ll probably be there,” said the coach. Jackson did clarify that Wednesday’s game had more to do with a tough matchup against the quicker Amare Stoudemire than Bynum’s lack of weakside defense, adding that Bynum is “doing really well, making great progress.”
PJ did also talk about putting Luke in to improve the passing with the starting unit.
Posted by: lakers_sth | December 11, 2008 at 02:39 PM
Huh - Lakers are moving to 710espn starting next season. Does that mean am570 is going to become the Clippers station?
Posted by: lakers_sth | December 11, 2008 at 02:40 PM
Yes, he has me concerned. Obviously this is a long season but I like some of the other comments people made before. Let's go for Lebron to pair him up with Kobe. Will have to get rid or Gasol or Bynum but the 7 footers are letting opponents just do layup drills anyway. I haven't seen a hard foul commited by one of our guys lately (or ever?) Dump LO, Rad, Sasha, Luke...the list goes on...take your pick. I don't know much about trades so don't harp all over me. Kobe is just not the dominating force he once was - nothing against Kobe - it's just no one can escape time. Face it, he's getting older. And like Bronxlakerfan mentioned about the Lakers laughing it up with the other teams. That is sick to me! I'm not saying to be bad sports - but come on - where is the fire to win and crush the opponent? They just want to be friends with everyone? If that's how it's going to be then go play in the WNBA!! (Even they play with more agression - "Malice at the Palace II".)
Posted by: SgtRoss | December 11, 2008 at 02:46 PM
It is interesting that PJ not only takes Vlade out of the starting line-up but also takes him out of the rotation totally.
Wow, he could have at least inserted him into the game somewhere down the line.
Whereas Phil's reasoning that the offense needed movement, I understand the Luke experiment but since we also needed some defense doesn't it make more sense to start Lamar?
Remember when all of us couldn't wait for the "Triple Towers" ?
Why has PJ refused to even try that line-up. If it fails it fails but you'll never know until you at least attempt it.
Nothing ventured nothing gained.
Enforcer please
BOSTON MUST NOT REPEAT
Posted by: You Ever Notice | December 11, 2008 at 02:53 PM
Dear brothers K,
please do many of us a favor and inquire as to why Andrew Bynum is not on the floor to close out games?
thank you,
a bewildered and confounded Laker fan
Posted by: Bizzle | December 11, 2008 at 02:57 PM
GO WIZARDS!
Tonight at least.
Posted by: rl | December 11, 2008 at 02:59 PM
The Lakers Blog were mentioned this afternoon on Ireland & Mason, they are wondering why there are many crappy posts about Luke Walton. These are the friends of Luke while the Blog are the enemies of Luke.
The Loose Cannons were also wondering why Vlad was benched? As usual, Steve Hartman will rile any laker fan, any opportunity he gets while the pasiones Vicdabrick is equivalent of Lakertom as Numero Uno fan of the lakers. Benching Vlad is OK, but not communicating to the player or explaining your action makes one wonder what's the message being transmitted? Vlad refused to comment b/c he did not know the reason what sins he has committed. According to LTLF, it has something to do with the explosion of Garcia, well Garcia exploded on any Laker guarding him. Most of his shots were delivered inside the posts, that's the territory of Bynum and Gasol. Well, it was not only Garcia who exploded but this Udrih, Bobby Jackson (as old as Jesse Jackson) can manipulate Farmar and Fisher, how about Salmons salmonizing Kobe? Back to PJ, what is the message on Vlad? When PJ leaves everyone guessing, there are rumors and speculations, is he trading Vlad or is he advertising Walton?
Posted by: Edwin Gueco | December 11, 2008 at 03:01 PM
The article does not say when this will be effective, but the Lakers radio broadcast is moving from 570KCAL to 710ESPN.
http://tinyurl.com/lakersradio
Posted by: Amazing_Happens | December 11, 2008 at 03:05 PM
COMPTON'S FINEST
>>>An dude bench VLAD because why?????
How about this:
His defense has been atrocious lately. Look at some of the guy's
he's guarded:
Danny Granger - 32 points
Thaddeus Young - 17 points
Caron Butler - 26 points
Francisco Garcia - 21 points
In the last 5 games, Vlad had 7 assists and 11 turnovers.
That means that if Vlad passes the ball, he's 50% more likely
to pass it to the other team than to get a teammate an assist.
And to top it off, Kobe and Fish weren't exactly pushing to
keep the ball moving around lately either.
Look at the result. Luke got 6 assists and only 1 turnover.
He got a couple of steals, played with more effort on defense
than Rad has lately, and managed to score 8 points, which is
about what Rad averages. And most of those assists were passes
into Bynum or Gasol in the paint for easy layups or dunks.
If Vlad would go back to playing hard on defense like he was at
the start of the season, then maybe PJ would have no reason
for benching him. Maybe this will light a fire under him and the
next time he goes out he won't slack off on defense and will be
a bit more careful with his passes.
Posted by: Long Time Laker Fan | December 11, 2008 at 03:21 PM
"I think I heard there is something wrong with his pinky.
Like, the ligament is torn off from the bone.
Yeah, I think that's it"
Comedy.
But, I have been saying he isn't moving right for weeks now. I've noticed when he walks there's the look of an old guy every once in a while. Forget which game it was but he didn't move right. I don't think it's so much his hand as another body part - knees, legs, feet - not sure. It makes sense if you think about how off his shot has been and the lack of elevation. Also the lack of defensive intensity. Hope he's ok.
Posted by: longtimelakerlover | December 11, 2008 at 03:21 PM
>>>I haven't been this doubtful of Kobe since he made those
>>> airballs at Utah.
LOL. Is that a reference to his first playoffs?
Posted by: Long Time Laker Fan | December 11, 2008 at 03:22 PM
It's just a slump. Nothing terrible. Give it a few weeks or so.
Remember, he pretty much played professional basketball year round last year. He should be in form around Feb. We just need to make sure to keep his minutes down.
Posted by: Caliphilosopher | December 11, 2008 at 03:25 PM
B U L L E T I N
Lakers Bolt KLAC, Move To 710 ESPN
LOS ANGELES LAKERS basketball is moving from its longtime home at CLEAR CHANNEL Sports KLAC-A/LOS ANGELES to crosstown ESPN RADIO Sports KSPN-A (710 ESPN) for the 2009-10 season.
Radio voices SPERO DEDES and MYCHAEL THOMPSON will continue to call the games.
http://tinyurl.com/5np9a7
(Source: ALLACCESS.com)
Posted by: Rick Friedman | December 11, 2008 at 03:31 PM
Kobe Bryant is still the M.V.P. but with a different meaning on the letters.... Most Valueless Player right now.
Posted by: dacsila | December 11, 2008 at 03:33 PM
With regards to Kobe:
Aging
Basketball fatigue NBA, Olympics, Preseason, '08-'09 Season
18-3 record
Auto-pilot on non essential games and active on celebrity teams only
Laziness and complacency b/c gasol, arisa and drew and farmar can do it
Winter pains on that torn ligament but refuse to tell
A combination of getting tired os playing during season, when playoffs determines the Championship, so just play for the show.
No more motivation, got rings, MVP, gold medal and it is only December
Kobe is now full grown professional, asserting his rights of playing based on his own pace.
It is so sad, while the rest of the population are gloomy with the future of the economy, our spoiled players in NBA can put off or put on their own switch because they are not ordinary people but for Kobe, Odom, Bynum there are no recessions out there. To these people in the unemployment lines, they could never find a job that will give them 20 million a year plus 200 million privileges on the side. This is the very reason why we should not adore one individual just because of his mighty power in basketball, they are human just like any one of us.
I asked Phil Jackson in the other thread, do you deserve to be paid 12 million dollars per annum, perhaps I would pose the same question to Kobe, do you deserve to be paid $ 260,000 per game?
Posted by: Edwin Gueco | December 11, 2008 at 03:35 PM
LOL,some people are overreacting. Kobe hasn't slipped at all. Those who say he has are lying through their teeth. The guy is playing less minutes for one thing. Secondly look at kobe's opponents production compared to his? It's not even close. He is taking a lesser role,and it helps because the lakers are 18-3. To the guy who says kobe is not playing well. Up until this two game slump he has had kobe was shooting a career high 47.7% from the field. The lakers team defense is horrible. That has nothing to do with kobe,because most of the times it's point guards breaking down our defense and getting into the lane. Even after playing in the finals and in the olympics kobe is getting 25,5,4. while shooting 46%. Quit being drama queens and be happy that we have a team that can still win,without kobe going for 35 a game.
Posted by: LOL | December 11, 2008 at 03:36 PM
AK/BK, you've hit the probervial nail. My boss and I were just talking about this very thing this morning. Not that it will happen but we think KB should sit out the next games until the road trip. Other than some sweet revenge against the Queens on Friday, the games are against pretty beatable teams.
Posted by: nofate | December 11, 2008 at 03:37 PM
Bizzle,
"Dear brothers K, please do many of us a favor and inquire as to why Andrew Bynum is not on the floor to close out games?"
It's addressed in my practice report coming later today.
AK
Posted by: kambrothers | December 11, 2008 at 03:37 PM
Wow, I actually live in Boston (diehard Laker fan though), so this is one of the few places I can go to get true Lakers info. I've watched every game this season (thanks NBA League Pass) . However, I am incredibly dissapointed with this entire topic - and anyone who dare bash KB24 right now. Our beloved Lakers are 18-3 and 4 games ahead in the West. Kobe is playing 34 minutes per game as compared to 39 mpg last season. His FG% is .458 this year compared to .459 last year. Points are down - but we're getting about 20 more points from the PF/C positions than we were last year (Pau < Kwame). Rebounds and assists are down by 1 from last year. You all know if Kobe was playing 5 more minutes each game he'd get that board and dime. To answer your orginal question, yes you are muy loco. There is nothing wrong with Bean - and the Lakers are 18-3. The sum of the whole is greater than the sum of its parts.
GO Lakers!
Posted by: Dan | December 11, 2008 at 03:40 PM
BK,
Well, throwing Kobe under the bus is one way to keep the hits coming on the blog. JK. I am not one bit worried about KB24. He is the greatest basketball player in the world. He is probably just suffering a few bad games due to all of the wear and tear he has endured what with playing in the Olympics right after the Finals and then back into training camp.
As for the Lakers, every one of the complainers would have stood in line to sign up to support an 18-3 start by the Lakers. The only Fools Gold around here is Mike T’s jock and bloggers who base their opinion of an entire season on a few games in early December and think you can implement an entire new defensive scheme and attitude in 21 games.
The Lakers came within 2 games of winning the NBA Championship last year without Andrew Bynum and Trevor Ariza. I am frankly embarrassed by the regular bloggers who are eagerly jumping on the Chicken Little Bandwagon like the fools who missed Mike T. Thank God that the Lakers front office, coaching staff, and players have more confidence in the team than the LA Times Lakers Blog, overflowing with posters who believe a temporary bump in the road to the championship is the big one finally hitting LA.
Wake up and smell the roses. If you cannot enjoy this team, there is plenty of room on the Clippers and Suns blogs for you to really express your loss and lack of faith in your team. Stop embarrassing yourselves with your dire proclamations and idiot trade proposals. As Mamba reminds you, we are the FREAKING LOS ANGELES LAKERS. Stop acting like Clippers and Suns fans! Trust that we will right the ship and win the NBA championship. If you cut your throats in despair after our horrible 21-3 start, you will miss the great finish.
Calm down and chillax, bloggers! As always, JMNSHO.
Tom
Posted by: LakerTom | December 11, 2008 at 03:41 PM
Hey guys,
I honestly hadn't said, "Hey wait a minute, what's wrong with the Mamba?". At least not until YOU brought it up... ha ha
I think Kobe is fine. He's not being The Mamba cause he doesn't have to. He's got a very very good team around him. He's actually putting up numbers that are in line with his overall career numbers. Check 'em out:
http://tinyurl.com/5hda4u
I see a drop in 3PT FG %. But outside of that. Pretty much right in line. Oh and he's doing it with 2.5 minutes less run per night when compared to his career average.
I would like to throw out there that maybe Kobe is a little off as he is adjusting to his role on this team. We still saw the Mamba crop up (probably a little too much) after the Pau deal last year. This year, you can probably count on one hand (okay, maybe two) the number of minutes he's gone straight Mamba so far this year.
I do not like the gambling on defense. I think we can ALL can agree on that. Listen to the Kam bros and leave the gambling for when you visit the Maloof bros Mr. Bean.
Posted by: magicman | December 11, 2008 at 03:49 PM
Kobe will be all right.
Kobe's kobe. He just needs to stop gambling on D as far as I'm concerned.
Love the top 10. Tied? Come on lol, jk.
Why does the blog hate Luke? Let me count the ways. No wait, I don't have time. It'll take years lol.
Posted by: Faith | December 11, 2008 at 03:50 PM
Looking at Kobe stats compared to last year, they are the same or better in most cat. except for 3 pt shots.
Compared to career, they are very good.
Assists and rebs are off slightly, but can be easily explained by less minutes.
Seeing as the K's have a ring side view and noticed something, I'd say I will be looking a little closely the next time they play.
But my guess is when shooting is off, the legs are tired.
Would the Lakers say something if they're was a problem and let other teams know? Not on their life.
Other coaches say to make Kobe a jump shooter and you will increase your odds of winning. Boston did it. That's the part of Kobe's game that is the most inconsistent.
Posted by: Fatty | December 11, 2008 at 04:00 PM
TEAM USA, LONG SEASON, GOOD TEAM OVERALL, HE IS SAVING ENERGY NOW, U LL SEE THE REAL KOBE IN SOME TIME !!!
Posted by: mamadou | December 11, 2008 at 04:05 PM
KLAC to ESPN? What...the...bleep?! That's like road games switching from KCAL to My13!
Oops...shouldn't have said that! Gives greedy people ideas!
Posted by: utzworld - THE BANNER HOLDER | December 11, 2008 at 04:06 PM
>>>According to LTLF, it has something to do with the
>>>explosion of Garcia, well Garcia exploded on any Laker
>>>guarding him.
No, what I said was that that was one small part of it. it was also
the explosions of Caron Butler, Thaddeus Young, and Danny
Granger, not to mention the fact that Vlad had more turnovers (11)
than assists (7) over the last few games.
Look. Luke's defense is at least as good as Vlad's. Vlad is
a better shooter, Luke is a better passer and runs the triangle
better. It's not like Phil benched Bynum to start MBenga here.
Luke is about the same talent level as Vlad. Neither of them is
ever going to be an all-star, but they each have some talents
that can help the team.
The team had had a stretch of playing down to their competition,
so Phil decided to try something new. Would you prefer he be
loyal to a fault to his starters and let them lose a few more games
to sub-500 teams?
Posted by: Long Time Laker Fan | December 11, 2008 at 04:14 PM
Charles,
"So which one holmes? Pau or Drew?"
Whichever one Cleveland wants in return for LBJ. I'd imagine they'd prefer to take Drew back in the deal because of his age. We'd then have Kobe, LBJ, and Pau as our Big Three. Plug in serviceable role players and youngsters like Boston has and we have a sure-fire dynasty.
Posted by: EJK | December 11, 2008 at 04:18 PM
I was watching a game at the Staples and I went to get a beer and hot dog at the concession stand. On the way there I went into the tunnel and it was dark as hell. I instantly got a weird feeling and got goosebumps, when all of a sudden I tripped on a wheelchair. In the dark I see this figure start to materialize and it was Pierce with a smile and chanting "Beat La, Beat LA" Of course I start to freak out and quickly tried to go through only to find a door shut at the end of the tunnel. I tried to open it but it wouldn't and I started banging on it. The door suddenly burst open, and it was Kevin Garnett pounding on his chest yelling "what you got to say now!" looking all prime evil. WTF is going on I thought, I need to get out of here. I turned the corner and there was PJ sitting on the bench. Meanwhile, I faintly hear the announcer saying the Celts were on a 20-2 run and has taken the lead. I see Pj again just sitting down, and I started yelling "call a time out PJ, call a damn timeout." All of a sudden I see Odom with a hot dog, which I try to grab from him. He ran away from me and all of a sudden a deafening whistle sounds, and it looks like Odom was called for a backcourt violation. Now I seem to be floating in the air and I can see Kobe shooting brick after brick, missing lay ups, turning the ball over and called for an offensive foul. I am totally freaking out and I want out of there now. In my panic, I hear this sooting voice, saying "Lew keep the faith, Lew keep the faith." It was Chick Hearn. "The Lakers will give you great joys, but it will at times break you're heart." Remember we are the good guys and we always come out on top at the end."
Then he started fading away and I was yelling "Chick, chick how do we fix our defense? Chick, chick...and then SLAP...it was my wife, "Wake up! Wake up, you're dreaming! I sat up in bed and though, WOW that was a trip...only true Laker fans have dreams like this.
Posted by: sleepless in lasvegas | December 11, 2008 at 04:22 PM
puddle,
"1) He's having much more difficulty getting to the rim.
2) He's losing the ball in traffic much more frequently.
3) He's relying too heavily on his pump fake."
As usual, great observations. It pains me also to see the decline in Kobe's game. All the wear and tear on his body accumulated over the years is probably catching up to him. That's why it's important to plan for the future. And I don't think Drew will be a franchise player that you can build around in the future.
Posted by: EJK | December 11, 2008 at 04:26 PM
Hi Hog;
No offense meant at all - just a little gentle ribbing, just a
bit. I'll cut it back, though - no one's feeling all that super
right now.
Don't micromanage the Lakers, fellow blogmeisters. It's
the ability to evolve as a unit that will serve this journey.
Ah Khallam Bey Vinanda - go pour yourself a tall one, Hog.
Posted by: Otis | December 11, 2008 at 04:29 PM
LakerTom
Obviously you are "glass half full" Laker fan
but the opinions of others are just as valuable if not more than just stating "We came within 2 games of beating the Celtics without Bynum and Ariza". Their play as of late has been inconsistent at best and probably not enough to change any outcome of an LA/Boston matchup.
So those who care to dig a little deeper into the Laker current problems I commend and respect you.
And LakerTom I would never request you to change or stop your love and faith in the Lakers.
Diversity is what makes this blog great
JMDRTKLCXSWDHO
Posted by: You Ever Notice | December 11, 2008 at 04:29 PM
>>>Garcia exploded on any Laker guarding him.
Garcia made 9 of his 21 points in the first 6 minutes of the game,
with Radmanovic "guarding" him. The worst of it was when
Garcia blocked Rad's 3-point shot. Rad stood there staring at the
shot, while Garcia ran out on offense and got a long pass for a dunk.
Once Vlad saw that his shot was blocked, if he'd have ran back on
defense, he probably could have prevented that fast break.
Vlad also managed to pass the ball to John Salmons who
went the other way for a layup in that same 6 minute
period.
In the fourth quarter, with Rad out for basically the whole quarter,
Garcia shot 3 for 7. With Rad guarding him, it was 5 for 6.
And yes, John Salmons went off for the game as well, but
it's not like you're going to bench Kobe and start Sasha. The
difference between Rad and Luke isn't very great. There's
nobody you could sub in for Kobe who would be even close.
Posted by: Long Time Laker Fan | December 11, 2008 at 04:30 PM
K Bros
I like your sense of humor on the video.
How many Mamba-combinations can we as a blog come up with? Mamba-standing, Mamba-some, Mamba-rific... Kind of like the shrimp-combos from my favorite film Forrest Gump.
Colorado loves the Lakers!
Posted by: Hugo Boss | December 11, 2008 at 04:30 PM
You ever notice,
"Remember when all of us couldn't wait for the "Triple Towers" ?"
Not all of us. Lamar's best position is PF, he is not good at perimeter defense against SFs, and he doesn't have a good outside shot. On this roster, the best way to use him is in some type of Bynum/Gasol/Odom PF/C rotation.
Posted by: exhelodrvr | December 11, 2008 at 04:36 PM
BK/AK,
Of course Kobe doesn't look like Kobe. He had no offseason since he played in the Olympics and he's hurt.
The guy needs some rest.
He may be a superhero, but even Batman is human.
Lakers Today... Lakers Tomorrow... Lakers Forever.
GO LAKERS!
Posted by: Jon K. | December 11, 2008 at 04:40 PM
Sorry to blow up everyone's preconceived notions of Luke Walton, but I have a few interesting statistics for you all. I know stats don't tell the whole story, but they tell a whole lot of it...
1) In 2007-2008, Luke Walton ranked in the top third in SF in steals per minute. That's right. The big, slow white dude (that one's for you Jay Jay) ranked ahead of Danny Granger, Corey Maggette, Shane Battier, Travis Outlaw, Luol Deng, Tayshaun Prince, Josh Howard and Richard Jefferson (to name a few). If you watch Luke play, he may not be the greatest one on one defender, but he's an extremely attentive help defender. This is reflected in the fact that...
2) In 2007-2008, the Lakers gave up 2.8 points per game fewer per 48 minutes with Luke Walton on the court than with him off it. That's right. The Lakers held their opposition to FEWER points while Luke was on the floor.
The problem isn't Luke's defense. The problem is that he can't shoot or make a layup. If he got that early 2006-2007 confidence he had to knock down that open 3 and also if he could show some more restraint around the rim, he could be a very useful player.
Posted by: puddle | December 11, 2008 at 04:40 PM
LTLF,
So how exactly is Luke going to solve our problem with defense? He is the most slow-footed laker that doesn't play center.
The offense is fine. We don't need a "Triangle expert", and I really don't see anything Luke can contribute to the defense. Trevor is our best defender. Luke and Vlad are about the same.
Posted by: Eric M. | December 11, 2008 at 04:42 PM
To divert from the Kobe talk for just a second. If anyone here is an avid ALL-STAR voter and happens to be a rooter of Andrew Bynum (not many of you are) Please head over to NBA.com and make it a habit to vote early and often. Right now, Bynum is fourth in the West Ballot for ALL-Star Center, barely behind Shaq, Okur and some else. He has 155,000 plus vote. It may be impossible for him to catch Yao but it is indeed possible for him to hawk Shaq and take that second spot.
Gasol has 260,00 plus votes and is further down in a deeper West forward ballot but he can and should catch up if we do our part.
I think Kobe's finger/legs are either bothering him more than we are let on and that is ok. Its the NBA people get and play hurt all the time. Something tells me that he is "Shaqing" it...in that lazy coattail mode until after the ALL-Star break.
If that is what Kobe is doing, it is good for the team because then the long season would make the rest of the team gel and Kobe would know exactly where he fits and asserts himself in the big-time.
As for Phil Jackson, that guy is suffering from something. He is contracting himself...he talks about pulling Bynum because of his defense, then its simple...leave him in the fire so he learns from being burned. He's just playing his stupid mind game with those guys and its not funy anymore. He is ultimately holding this team back and he needs to walk when the season is over...and for pete's sake get a player or two willing to stick to defensive principles or hand the defensive portfolio over to someone else.
From where I'm siting, Jackson is slowly loosing the ear of this team, they see what is starting to look like an erratic trend. And I think it is safe to say that if Odom isn't gone by trade deadline he won't be coming back next season. That much is set in stone. Two places we are still weak defensively---Point Guard and Small Forward. Farmar is pretty much secure but we've got to get better than Vlady (on his space cadet nights lol) and Odom/ Luke Walton who is really a bench player.
Not everyone has a perfect game but Odom has more basketball blunders per possession than anyone on the team. But yah, Kobe IMO is fine.
Posted by: rhon.salmon | December 11, 2008 at 04:43 PM
There is nothing wrong with Mr. Kobe Bryant. Amazing and Godly gifted people, Like Mr. Bryant has human like qualities but in the realm of earthly existence there is always reasons for a change.
Over the 15 years that I have observed Mr. Bryant, I have found that he was born to be the greatest of his era in the basketball professional sport. He knows, he sees, he plays hard, he makes sure that his positive stamina is over the limit functional, he never stops for injuries-except broken ankles, legs, arms, shoulders, etc., he is defensive and offensive with expertise excellence and most of all, he can win a game by himself.
At 62 years old, I have lived through many great people in all occupations in their era, Mr. Bryant is the greatest in the world in his era.
I never question the actions of the great ones for I or anyone else can make a determination for what they do.
So, it is best to sit back and watch, observe and enjoy because people like Mr. Bryant never lose their gigantic scope on their God given tasks until they say, "I am through!"
Posted by: kyrann may-haynes | December 11, 2008 at 04:44 PM
"Pig" Miller,
>>>Here is my proposal for the trade, that you alluded to in
>>>the previous thread.
>>>
>>>http://tinyurl.com/5lt969
I like Mike Miller and I don't even mind Jason Collins that much.
I'm sure Mike T would appreciate the size of his calves.
I'm guessing you're assuming here that Minnesota would be
doing this as a salary dump (to dump Miller's salary). Is that
correct? I can't see any way that Lamar would be willing to
re-sign with the Timber-losers.
The other thing here is that ugly salary issue again. Miller
will make 9 million next year. Toss that onto the existing bonfire
of Laker salaries for next season and you're up to over 84 million.
How much more is Buss willing to spend? If he was willing
to spend 82 million, he could have kept Ronny Turiaf this season.
So when it gets to 84 million, I don't think he'd be willing to add
6 or 7 million more (doubled) to keep Ariza.
So which would you rather have? Ariza or Mike Miller?
Posted by: Long Time Laker Fan | December 11, 2008 at 04:45 PM
Kobe needs to take a page from the Magic Johnson school of leadership. He has more talent than God, but his leadership skills are still questionable in my opinion. It's his team, up to him to get everyone on the same page, playing with the same mind set. He's the leader, he must lead vocally and by action. Call guys out who are dogging it and having lack of focus on the court, praise them when they play well. Team needs to rally behind 24, but they need to want to play hard for and with him. He shouldn't need to take more than 20 shots a game, but he needs to start averaging 7-8 assists. That is the formula for a Laker championship. He could do more by doing less heavy lifting. He's got all kinds of options out there. Read the floor and dissect these teams Kobe. I've yet to see that in the last 10 games.
Posted by: mikefloss | December 11, 2008 at 04:46 PM
There is nothing wrong with Mr. Kobe Bryant. Amazing and Godly gifted people, Like Mr. Bryant has human like qualities but in the realm of earthly existence there is always reasons for a change.
Over the 15 years that I have observed Mr. Bryant, I have found that he was born to be the greatest of his era in the basketball professional sport. He knows, he sees, he plays hard, he makes sure that his positive stamina is over the limit functional, he never stops for injuries-except broken ankles, legs, arms, shoulders, etc., he is defensive and offensive with expertise excellence and most of all, he can win a game by himself.
At 62 years old, I have lived through many great people in all occupations in their era, Mr. Bryant is the greatest in the world in his era.
I never question the actions of the great ones for I or anyone else can make a determination for what they do.
So, it is best to sit back and watch, observe and enjoy because people like Mr. Bryant never lose their gigantic scope on their God given tasks until they say, "I am through!"
Posted by: kyrann may-haynes | December 11, 2008 at 04:47 PM
>>>So how exactly is Luke going to solve our problem with
>>>defense? He is the most slow-footed laker that doesn't
>>>play center.
Did you watch the game last night? Luke did a pretty good job
of staying with his man. He's not a lock down defender or anything,
but compared to the endless stream of open jumpers and layups
that Rad has been giving up lately, Luke did a good job.
Also, part of good defense is running effective offense. Rad had
11 turnovers in the last 5 games. That means about twice a
game, Rad would throw the ball to the other team and they'd
run out for a fast break. Luke is much better than Rad at protecting
the ball and making effective passes. If your team is able to get off
a good shot, they have a better chance of actually getting back on
defense.
Don't get me wrong here, I think Ariza would be much more
effective on the defensive end with the starters, if that's what
your getting at, but Ariza's pretty turnover prone as well, with
11 turnovers (to match Rad) in the last 5 games before last night.
Posted by: Long Time Laker Fan | December 11, 2008 at 05:01 PM
>>>The offense is fine. We don't need a "Triangle expert",
Really?
The offense that scored 16 points in the 4th quarter against Indiana,
19 points in the 4th quarter against Washington, and 21 points
in the 4th against Sacramento may be "fine" with you, but it kinda
sucked from my viewpoint.
Posted by: Long Time Laker Fan | December 11, 2008 at 05:04 PM
You Ever Notice,
Thanks for your comments. I totally agree that diversity is what makes this blog great. And I have absolutely no problem with bloggers complaining about certain players play or Phil’s strategies and decisions. Hell, I have been all over Andrew for his poor positioning on defense and for Phil for not leaving him in at the end of the day. I have no problem with what I consider to be constructive criticism.
It’s when bloggers make their dire predictions of Lakers failure against the Celtics and Cavs (who have never proved anything) based on a few games in the first quarter of the season and disregard our 18-3 start and the extensive history that says that Kobe is the greatest player in the game and Phil the greatest coach in the game. When the blog starts to agree with Mike T’s hair-brained defensive theories and the copycat media who claim the Lakers are too soft, then I feel it is time to speak up.
What happened to all that trust and faith that everybody had in the Lakers front office, coaching staff, starters, and bench mob? I just want people to maintain some reasonable perspective rather than dropping their pants and running around screaming that the sky is falling. Criticism and concern are perfectly acceptable. Despair is totally ridiculous.
JMDRTKLCXSWDHO.? Let’s see, Just My … Humble Opinion? LOL.
Tom
Posted by: LakerTom | December 11, 2008 at 05:06 PM
It's a shame that the Bobcats don't have any desirable players on their roster. Or else I'd want Mitch to be calling MJ every hour, everyday.
Posted by: EJK | December 11, 2008 at 05:07 PM
Jon's K. Advice to the Los Angeles Lakers and Our Coaching Staff:
1. Please organize two group dinners each week: 1) For the team at a new restaurant each week. 2) For the coaching staff at Phil's house. Phil could cook.
This action will open up communication, mutual trust, and team unity. God knows we could use some more of it this season.
2. Lamar Odom needs to be put back into the starting line-up at SF. He can help with ball movement like Luke, but better supports the offense of Pau and Andrew. Also, Ariza and Luke work better with The Bench Mob than Lamar. I was all down for Lamar as Sixth Man of the Year, but he works better with the players in the starting lineup. It's that simple.
3. We need to limit Kobe's minutes somewhat. As much as I like to believe that The Black Mamba was actually given super-human powers after surviving the bite of a radioactive black mamba which had been sent after him by an ancient African witch doctor, I (we) have to face the truth: Kobe Bryant is a gifted athlete and like any athlete he has physical limitations. Kobe had a very long season last year followed immediately by playing in the Olympics immediately following by training camp. He needs rest. We either need to limit his minutes or for a month give him one game off each week.
4. Give Luke, Powell, and Mihm consistent minutes each and every game, even if short-term it seems to be counter-productive. Mid and long-term it will benefit the team by keeping everyone involved (thus promoting communcation) and giving members of the first team more rest to keep them fresh.
5. Phil needs to engage the team in group meditation to keep them clear-headed and focused. He's done it before. Well, it's time to do it again.
6. Phil needs to bring in ex-players who are defensive giants (including Michael Cooper, Scottie Pippen, Ron Harper, and others) to have a seminar on the "spirit of defense." Kobe would, of course, speak as well. It seems like the players are trying to "get it" on defense. Well, the quickest way for them to "get it" is to understand the psychology of great defense and how great defensive players are motivated to play great defense. Sometimes players can communicate this mentality better to other players than coaches can.
7. Everytime the Lakers win tacos for Laker Nation, Phil Jackson needs to also give the players some kind of gift, perhaps by paying for their weekly dinner or giving them something special (including time off) in practice.
I hope someone out there associated with the Lakers will consider my words. I think they are reasoned.
Lakers Today... Lakers Tomorrow... Lakers Forever.
GO LAKERS!
Posted by: Jon K. | December 11, 2008 at 05:09 PM
Long Time Laker Fan,
Please. Please. No talk of trades.
Let's no do anything to make Michael Teniente a prophet.
Lakers Today... Lakers Tomorrow.... Lakers Forever.
GO LAKERS!
Posted by: Jon K. | December 11, 2008 at 05:12 PM
I do not think Kobe has health problems, I think he is still adjusting to finding a role on a team with lots of options when he is not dominating the ball and creating a ton of shots for himself. He had similar problems in Beijing. He is simply not a spot up shooter, not a cutter, his skills are more 1 on 1 skills (or 1 on 3 even). He didn't shine (offensively) in Beijing until the gold medal game where he took over and "Kobe'd up."
It is Bynum' health I wonder about. Last year the Lakers could lob the ball anywhere in the lane and Bynum would go get it, and then create a dunk opportunity. He looks a lot more earth bound to me this year, less springy, less aggressive. Am I crazy. (yes, I am, but am I wrong?)
Posted by: Tom Daniels | December 11, 2008 at 05:13 PM
Eric M,
>>>I really don't see anything Luke can contribute to the defense.
Well, the biggest thing is really a lack of turnovers. He turns
the ball over a lot less than Ariza or Rad.
>>>Trevor is our best defender. Luke and Vlad are about the same.
I agree with that wholeheartedly.
So let's say you start Ariza. That means there's only one
real outside threat (Fish), so opposing defenses can pack
in the lane and double and triple Bynum & Gasol (and
Kobe if he tries to drive into the Lane).
And then the bench mob is playing Luke or Rad instead of
Ariza, so the defense takes a hit there instead of with the starters.
I've got nothing against starting any one of Ariza, Walton,
Rad, or Odom at SF. I think each offers certain benefits
and certain drawbacks.
For a while at the start of the season, they were very
effective with Rad starting. Then something went wrong
and the team started playing down a notch. So PJ tried
to shake things up a bit by starting a player who has started
many games for the team.
Maybe they'll get into a groove with Luke in the starting
lineup, win 20 straight, and he'll keep that spot all the way
through their sweep of the Cavs in the finals. Or maybe PJ
just did it to light a fire under Rad, and he'll go back to starting
Rad next game and Rad will go back to playing harder on defense.
It wouldn't surprise me if PJ experiments a little more and
tries Ariza &/or Odom as the starting SF spot.
Posted by: Long Time Laker Fan | December 11, 2008 at 05:13 PM
1969,
"Maybe you don't understand the game well enough to see that. 17-3 means nothing in a title series with the Celtics"
I don't think we would beat the Celtics right now. our defense seems to have fallen apart. So I agree with you.
Why so nasty?
Posted by: Eric M. | December 11, 2008 at 05:16 PM
I know these Lakers are deep, but I have a nagging feeling they would learn to play together on both ends better and learn the system better if Phil shortened the rotation and played the starters more minutes, and doled the rest of the minutes to key reserves - especially Odom and Farmar.
Posted by: Tom Daniels | December 11, 2008 at 05:16 PM
What? Me worry? There's nothing to worry about!
Things are just bothersome.
Let's be clear on that.
Lakers Today... Lakers Tomorrow... Lakers Forever.
GO LAKERS!
Posted by: Jon K. | December 11, 2008 at 05:16 PM
LTLF,
I second what Eric M told you, OK Vladrad was not doing the job on his assignment, do you think Luke can guard those players you mentioned. We are not in defense of Vlad but put it in proper perspectives, the whole team are very inconsistent on their defense. There are times when they excel on their steals, then another segment they are watching a lay up from a lousy turnover. I saw these scenes with Sasha, Farmar, Vladdy, Kobe, Lamar a complete bystander, where is the defense?
LTLF, all we do is exposed what is glaring flaw out there. In your case, if we follow your posts, Lakers will be changing or trading players in every game because you never run out of ideas of trading someone. Then you back it up with your fuzzy statistics.
Posted by: Edwin Gueco | December 11, 2008 at 05:22 PM
I still think we're one all star guard away from the downtown double-decker summer bus ride. Jason Richardson would have fit pretty nicely beside Kobe...one thinks.
One also thinks that after this year we're gonna be a LESS talented team than we are right now. I don't think we're gonna be able to give both Odom and Ariza the money they want/deserve, so one of them is probably walking. So this is our best chance to find that final championship piece while we still have salaries to play with without being totally handicapped by the salary cap. We'll probably never be in as good of a position to add talent to an already talent team. This is out time right here.
Once we let Odom walk, however, that salary cap space instantly evaporates. That void his expiring contract and presence creates does not get filled. It's already reserved, staked and claimed by the bloated contracts of Vlad and Walton.
There has to be a guy like Chauncy Billups who can condense and solidify our outrageous surplus of talent (cant play 10 guys at once) and make our starting rotation better than that other Championship contenders.(say, like, the Celtics who are arguable better than us at 4 of five positions [I'm yet to see Bynum out play Perkins]).
Sorry, but as we are, with our starting center and point guard both in diapers (one for babies one for adults), I think the Celtics score a 9th round TKO; another 6th game knockout.
Have we looked like championsat the end of games when we need to be world beaters? I don't think so, and I just think we have a chance to stinningly great. But we're not even in sniffing distance yet.
Love you Lamar, Love you Farmar, but I have visions of the golden treasure a smart GM could get for you. Are you kidding me? Lamar's great attitude, all around skills and Farmar’s hops and potential? That's a pretty sweet combination that should get us an red-hot, desire filled aging all-star who wants one last chance at a ring and is willing to eat lava to get it. A Ray Allen type, (sorry for using such foul language), is what we need. One thinks.
Wes
Posted by: wesjoenixon | December 11, 2008 at 05:24 PM
"There is nothing wrong with Mr. Kobe Bryant. Amazing and Godly gifted people, Like Mr. Bryant has human like qualities but in the realm of earthly existence there is always reasons for a change."
what a butt kisser. i hope this person is joking.
all this kobe talk is reminding me of a conversation i had with a certain blogger whom i won't name, but i made the argument that star players begin the decline at age 30. i belive mr. bryant is now 30 and will begin to be a shadow of his former self.
i once heard the comment that once star players age, they can bring it once in a while, but not every single night. mr. bryant falls into that category now.
i will give some credit to mr. bryant with being a better teammate this year (and last year for the most part), but i sometime see the old ballhog bryant come out when the lakers are losing. case in point in sacramento when the lakers were down 15, ballhog bryant began jacking up bad shots in the 4th quarter.
lakers better begin to play some defense or they'll have problems in the playoffs.
Posted by: KL | December 11, 2008 at 05:27 PM
I think some of this probably has to do with his having a long season last year, playing the Olympics and then having to start this season.
With that said, he has A LOT of tread on his tires and its hard to fight that. He settles for more jumpers than he used to and I think some of this has to be the beginning signs of decline and that makes me sad. He's still better than most of the league, but I can't even say he's the best player in the NBA right now. The way Lebron is playing right now, he seems to be operating on a whole other level.
Posted by: Xodus | December 11, 2008 at 05:37 PM
Puddle,
You wrote this: Kobe's PERs:
2004-2005: 28.11
2006-2007: 26.13
2007-2008: 24.09
2008-2009: 23.68
There are three things I've noticed about Kobe last year and even more so this year.
1) He's having much more difficulty getting to the rim. This was particularly evident in the Boston series as he primarily operated from the outside. He says it's merely a case of him settling instead of attacking. But I've never known Kobe not to attack if he has the opportunity. I think the problem isn't that he won't, but that he can't like he used to. He's lost a half step on both offense and defense. A half a step slower Kobe is still better than 98% of the league, but he used to be better than 100% of the league.
2) He's losing the ball in traffic much more frequently. It seems he gets stripped or loses the ball at least 3 or 4 times a game. I don't know if this is his finger or what, but Cuttino Mobley must have stripped him 5 times in one game earlier this year.
3) He's relying too heavily on his pump fake. Because he's not able to blow by guys anymore, he's relying on getting the guy in the air and drawing the foul. It still works sometimes, but the scouting reports are catching up to him and guys are staying down and not biting as much as they once did. As a result, Kobe frequently pump fakes once, twice, three times before finally taking a contested and very difficult fallaway that is not in rhythm. Now, Kobe being Kobe, he still knocks them down more than any other player in the league, but it's not a high percentage shot. Just because he CAN do it doesn't mean he SHOULD.
As I said, the diminshed Kobe is still a top 5 player in the league. But I do worry that he doesn't realize he's not the same player he was, but still insists on playing the way that he did then.
my response:
I find it AMAIZNG that you and others tend to have a
myopic vision of things. He's averaging 5 pts less than
he was 4 years ago. You mean that he's averaging
5 pts less per game than when he had Smush Parker
for a PG, Kwame Brown and Chris Mihm for Centers,
& a useless Brian Cook for a forward? While he's
averaging b/n 5 & 7 minutes less per game?
You speak of him not getting to the rim. You mean
after winning TWO scoring titles in a row and single
handedly beating the Raptors he's not getting to the
rim anymore? Might it be that the ENTIRE NBA has
tilted their defense to stop him from penetrating? I
still have two of the Lakers vs. Celtics games on the
disk. It was interesting to see the WALL that the
Celtics built to stop Kobe from getting to the rim. If you
go back and look at the Lakers vs. the Pacers you'll
see the same thing.
You speak of him not attacking. You mean that he's not
attacking AFTER HIS COACH TOLD HIM TO BE A
FACILITATOR??? He's not attacking after HE'S BEEN
CALLED A BALLHOG? He's not attacking after being
PUBLICLY RIDICULED BY BARKLEY, MAGIC & others
for not making SMUSH PARKER, KWAME BROWN, &
BRIAN COOK better players?
On DirecTV, channel 601, they play classic games.
Recently, I had a chance to watch the 2000/2001
Lakers play the Kings. Oddly enough, I didn't see him
going to the hole very much & he passed the ball to
his teammates. A lot like he's doing right now!
Did you pay attention to Team USA basketball? Did you
notice that he didn't shoot very much during the games?
Did you pay attention to what the coaches said about
him? To paraphrase: During practice, KOBE DESTROYED
THE OPPOSING TEAM!
As you're noticing the decllining numbers, are you
paying attention to LeBron James? I quote: " I'm on
record as saying this before, and I'll say it again. Kobe
is the best player in the NBA." Perhaps, he doesn't hold
any weight with you. How about a quote from Larry
Bird? And I quote: "There's only one player on Team
USA who would have played on the dream team and
that's Kobe Bryant."
So let's see if I got this right ...
1. He turned 30 in august.
2. He's won 2 scoring titles and an MVP in the last 3 yrs.
3. He won an Olympic Gold.
4. His teammates have been upgraded.
and you'e saying he's lost a half step?
Posted by: hobbitmage | December 11, 2008 at 05:41 PM
"I am frankly embarrassed by the regular bloggers who are eagerly jumping on the Chicken Little Bandwagon like the fools who missed Mike T."
~~No wonder you represent the Big Turkey on the blog, you have way of saying in riling people who are diametrically opposed to your way of thinking. What will happen in this blog if there is no balance in the opinions. We will all be "Yes Men/Women" too. Yes, we missed two games to Championship, didn't you predict it was supposed to be 4-0, didn't you predict we have now the beast worth 80 million for 5 years? Didn't you predict we will be unbeaten after the Pistons b/c you don't see any competitve team out there. That's rational thinking, anything short of it is irrational and Chicken Little philosophy.
Posted by: Edwin Gueco | December 11, 2008 at 05:41 PM
I'm all for finding that last Championship piece via a trade, and the more I think about it, the more I realize that this team can handle any player, any situation, and baggage that comes its way. I don’t think there’s a player in the NBA that this team can’t transform into a fit soldier. The world knows Kobe is the big dog on the block, they know he (and the whole team now, thanks to Kobe's lead/example) won't tolerate slackers, that winning is everything.
I'm even starting to look Starbury's way. What's the worst that can happen if we sign him? He takes minutes away from Fisher if he's good, he sit's on the bench if he's bad, and he gets cut if he pisses Phil off.
Honestly. I have no idea if Starbury can still play, but if he can, if he has enough pride left to be a quite soldier on an already loaded team--if he can give fits to the Celtics like Rondo has given us fits, I say maybe, if he ever gets free, give him a look.
I just don't want to be the bills and lose every year to the Celtics, who have a starting 5 that right now look uneatable to me.
Thinking out loud.
Wes
Posted by: wesjoenixon | December 11, 2008 at 05:44 PM
exholdvr,
you wrote: Not all of us. Lamar's best position is PF, he is not good at perimeter defense against SFs, and he doesn't have a good outside shot. On this roster, the best way to use him is in some type of Bynum/Gasol/Odom PF/C rotation.
my response: kobeblitz isn't going to like this. lol
Posted by: hobbitmage | December 11, 2008 at 05:49 PM
I noticed that Kobe's game began to drop-off since last year. It was more noticeable after he injured his pinkie. His 3-points have been failing before the injury. His mid-range used to turn into free-throws but now more into turnovers. That was why he had so many technicals last year – because he was frustrated. The injury started to affect his freethrows and he never recovered. I noticed that he usually missed his first freethrows and then adjusted himself to basket the second. In fact, in technical freethrow situation, he missed more than he made. His defense was troublesome when he began to “roam”. He would leave his assignment and went to assist his teammates. Normally he went for a steal instead of a trap, which usually resulted in leaving his own man alone to score. I don’t know if it was Phil’s idea or his to “roam” because Kobe is still a great one-on-one defender. He did it in the Olympics. He was a bad shooter in the Olympics but he defended well. He is more effective to play one-on-one and lock down the best players in the opposing teams.
I want to add that it is not given that Kobe will re-sign with the Lakers next year. It all depends on the outcome of the playoff. Kobe is playing for the ring. If he fails to get one this year, and see that another year will be another year with the same system and same coaching, he will walk. And Phil seems to setup Kobe as the fall guy. Phil has already shielded himself away 72-10 wins, as if to say that he is not responsible for such hype. If Lakers do not get the ring, Phil will make Kobe looks like he is uncoachable, Kobe is not buying into his system, … There will be a blowout between Phil and Kobe and obviously Phil wins the argument and Kobe walks.
That is why I am saying that it is very important to hold Phil accountable for his coaching. Is Luke the answer to Lakers’ problem? If not, what is he doing to remedy the situation?
A good coach will find a way to maximize all his available players, like Byron Scott. He made a much less talented team into a contender. A bad coach forces everyone into his own system even though it is not practical. Kobe did not flourish in Phil’s system. Last year, there was two Kobe’s. The first half is the facilitating Kobe. He gave up his scoring to help his teammates. The second half is the scoring Kobe. He started shooting and driving. There was no in between. This year, there were a few games that Kobe did not play the 4th quarter. After that, he started becoming aggressive even in the first quarter. I don’t see how Kobe being a scorer and facilitator at the same time. If Lakers need a facilitator, it should be a non-scorer like Lamar, or a point guard. Phil is asking a scorer not to score. For what? So, at best, a less talented player score 2 points instead of Kobe. Luke being the facilitator make better sense but why Luke, not Vlad, not Lamar, not Sasha or even Powell. They all have better quality than Luke. I don’t have 9rings, I have no right to question!
Contrary to most people, I don’t think Lakers’ half-court offense is that great! Lakers score by fastbreak. When they were forced to play half-court, they stagnated. They couldn’t make the inward pass. If they did, there were too many “trees” between the players and basket. They had to shoot mid-range and Lakers don’t have consistent jumpers. So, it does not matter what Phil says and wants to do. If Lakers play Phil’s games, it looks ugly and may lose. If they play the wrong way by fastballs, by steals, by playing no defense, they win a lot of games but no championship. I wish I’m wrong. We will see the result in the playoff.
Posted by: PJKDoubter | December 11, 2008 at 05:51 PM
The reason that I think that Kobe is different is that there are too many instances where he is not playing hard. The Kobe that I have been watching all these years never coasted until a Laker victory was assured. Good or bad, he always played hard.
Posted by: bronxlakerfan | December 11, 2008 at 05:54 PM
Random thoughts. Or as LakerTom would say JMHOFXIRYE
Kobe's doing a Big Game James thing? Coasting in the regular season. Will he wake up in time for the playoffs?
Farmar after all this time still has not learned the triangle. He's like the annoying little brother. The one that goes "Can I play, can I, can I? Nyah nyah, I played more than 3 minutes."
Dfish is clutch, just can't make a layup to save his life.
Ariza can't play a crunchtime till he raises his free throw percentage. Teams will learn they can hack a shaq him.
Bynum can't pass from the post but he does make more FT than Shaq. I bet KAJ can beat him one on one.
LO is going the way of Cedric Maxwell. Mchale (AB/Pau) showing up made him expendable.
Pau is the best low post option.
Only 3 players can call out the team to account, Kobe, Pau and Dfish. None willing. Hence this team has no leader.
Did anyone actually read Mike T's laker breakdown at his site? And if one did, would he do it again?
Posted by: p ang | December 11, 2008 at 06:15 PM
This group of players has been together for 21 games, and overall they are also very young. It would be absolutely amazing if they were to be consistently playing at a very high level at this point. Give them a little time.
Posted by: exhelodrvr | December 11, 2008 at 06:17 PM
wesjoe,
"I don’t think there’s a player in the NBA that this team can’t transform into a fit soldier."
Then why trade for someone?
Posted by: exhelodrvr | December 11, 2008 at 06:34 PM
None of this, at least from my end, is to ask the question "is Kobe declining?" Trust me, that would be it's own post (or three). My poitn is he doesn't look like the guy I'm expecting, in part because I DON'T think he's in decline. That's why I think fatigue/injury could- COULD- be a factor. He just doesn't seem to be moving liek the guy we're used to seeing.
As for the question of burying Vlad, I think he didn't play last night for the same reason that Walton doesn't play when Vlad starts- because it's hard to fit another guy into the rotation. If Vlad comes off the bench, his minutes come from someone- Ariza, LO, etc. depending on what kind of lineup PJ wants to run. That's tough.
He was pretty clear after the game that Vlad wasn't in the doghouse, or being punished. They want so see something else in the lineup to get them running the offense properly, and Walton's skill set is more suited to it. Not debating who is the better player, just explaining why Vlad didn't play, as I see it.
BK
Posted by: kambrothers | December 11, 2008 at 06:47 PM
The Lakers have four young players in their rotation who are going through mini-slumps and/or recovering from injuries, all at the same time. Vujacic, Bynum, Farmar, and Ariza.
Vujacic didn't have a pre-season, and is trying to get his shot back while only playing a few minutes at a time. Last night was a return of his old form.
Bynum is still coming back from his injury, figuring out his offensive game, and (I think) having a little bit of an attitude problem. He is rounding into form, though, and showing steady improvement.
Ariza's shooting has been off lately; we'll find out if this is a slump or a return to earth. If the former, great. If the latter, then he will adjust his game and not shoot quite as much.
Farmar, as the PG on the bench mob, has to dealing with the dropoff of these players (as well as Odom going into one of his periodic offensive funks.) It's not a surprise he is trying to do too much on his own, and his game is not developed enough yet for that.
Who knows what will happen with Odom, but I expect all four of the other players to settle down and find their grooves. When that happens, things will be fine.
Posted by: exhelodrvr | December 11, 2008 at 06:47 PM
Wow Exhelo,
I was just thinking of typing the same thing. Word for word, comma for comma, period for period, etc...
Thanks for saving me the time so I can watch the Food Channel with my daughter.
Fatty - Still waiting for AB's Sky Hook so we can shut up Tim-4-Shows constant complaining.
Posted by: Fatty | December 11, 2008 at 07:00 PM
Ex,
>>> The Lakers have four young players in their rotation who are going through mini-slumps and/or recovering from injuries, all at the same time.
A very wise post. The real concern is with the starters, who -- except for Pau -- are not delivering in the way the way the team needs right now. The same for Lamar, who, given the chance, is not the leader on the floor he is in the locker room.
Therefore, the central question remains: Can this team, as constituted, play at the level required to win a Championship? If not, what are the options?
As a fan, I only have questions. I don't have the answers. But answers are needed, and the time to get them is now.
Thanks for a great post.
Posted by: Rick Friedman | December 11, 2008 at 07:13 PM
Just as long as he doesn't start doing the rope-a-dope.
Posted by: dave m | December 11, 2008 at 07:15 PM
Exhelo,
I think you know what I mean. You can transform a player into a role player but you can’t add talent that's not already there. That's why we may need a trade. The Lakers have great bigs but need better smalls. Right now we have Lamar, thus the ability to get a quality small. I don't care, BTW, one bit about Buss spending money. I care that there's an option open if indeed we want to spend money to improve the team. Right now that option exists and because we're so far over the cap, a similar financial situation may be years away.
Also, Lamar is keeping Bynum out of games in the forth. All I'm saying, is that if we could get a guy like Billups or Andre Miller or Mike Bibby or Steve Nash for Lamar, I'd do it. Baby.
Wes
Posted by: wesjoenixon | December 11, 2008 at 07:17 PM
Puddle,
"If you watch Luke play, he may not be the greatest one on one defender, but he's an extremely attentive help defender"
~~ I watched Luke at a close range at Staples where you pay $ 250 per seat, got from a STH friend. I watched Luke attentively on a 42" Phillips Plasma. I watched Luke on DVR replay after replay in 2007-08 what I see Puddle is the same LW. Opposing players just passed him by with herky jerky half-jump movements and watched other players dunked on him. Then, he clapped on the ball hard, as if it was the ball's fault. huh!
Well, he was alert, ready for the imbound pass. I guess that is the reason why many bloggers here turned "postal" when they see Luke's shadow.
Wait a minute, I'm not done yet, after the game when you listen to player interviews, guess who is the lead man, a guy who has many things to say about other teams. Who else? It is my fave, Mr. Luke Walton. I don't mind his Dad's loud aggrandizement of himself, he deserved it and proven during his Blazer's & Bruin's years. But the son, he is good-looking dude, I'll just stop there. LOL!
Posted by: Edwin Gueco | December 11, 2008 at 07:19 PM
plum loco...plum loco...
AK/BK, please bring this question up back up midseason or towards the end of season when the trends will play itself out...
Posted by: Korey | December 11, 2008 at 07:32 PM
Fatty,
"so I can watch the Food Channel with my daughter."
Can you record that for me?
Posted by: exhelodrvr | December 11, 2008 at 07:34 PM
ex,
>>>>>The Lakers have four young players in their rotation who are going through
>>>>>mini-slumps and/or recovering from injuries, all at the same time.
>>>>>Vujacic, Bynum, Farmar, and Ariza.
>>>>>I expect all four of the other players to settle down and find their grooves.
>>>>>When that happens, things will be fine.
Well said, ex. Still “exhelo” succinct but more meat to ponder. But you are right that these guys are still young and relatively inexperienced. Throw in an entirely new defensive system and a struggling Kobe Bryant and Lamar Odom and you get a very inconsistent team.
We all need to be patient and realistic about how long it will take for these guys to develop into championship players. As a team, last year’s Lakers arrived a couple of years earlier than many experts expected. It is not impossible that the difficulties we are seeing now could end up in this year’s team also not being ready. That is the question that the rest of this season will answer. I think we will see a championship team emerge as the season progresses.
But there are good reasons to be confident that the Lakers will develop into a strong defensive team by the end of the year. First, Drew and Trevor, their best two defensive players after Kobe, are still very young and raw defensively and, as you pointed out, both recovering from injuries that kept them out the second half of last season. What is also obvious is that both players have physical skills, size and length, and desire to become All-NBA defensive players.
Second, no matter how poorly the Lakers have played on defense the last few games, the coaches and the players realize that they have to be a better defensive team if they really want to take the championship away from the Celtics. We have a defensive coach and system now. And I believe a defensive commitment. The problem is that you can’t just implement a totally new defensive system and attitude in 21 games. That will be a season-long challenge.
I would say that the one position that does worry me a little is point guard. I feel comfortable that we will have fine defense at center with Drew, power forward with Pau and Lamar, small forward with Trevor, and shooting guard with Kobe (when he wants to), but point guard will be the position that will need great team defense to help defend. Sun Yue could be the answer but not anywhere in the near future which means that Jordan better pick up his game.
Like you, I still love this team. We just need to get it together on defense. The key to me is still Drew. He is the key to the defense and is playing hesitantly and getting caught in between. Once he figures out that the place to protect the rim is at the rim, our defense will take off. Drew needs to become the Big Intimidator who swats away or alters every layup attempt.
Anyway, to me the worst possible thing that can happen with this team this year (other than injury, of course) is that they are still a year too young to beat the Celtics because once they do beat the Celtics, another Lakers Dynasty will be born and the Celtics will fade away like the
Kings and Suns, knowing that their championship windows were just slammed shut.
JMNSHBO! Just My Not So Humble Biased Opinion…
Tom
Posted by: LakerTom | December 11, 2008 at 07:38 PM
Guys, I really think we can get Caron Butler or Chris Bosh, seriously. Washington fired their coach, Gilbert Arenas is out for the season, and they are getting their butts handed to them right now. I think they will be trying to rebuild and looking to offload some contracts. That Lamar Odom's expiring contract is looking real attractive right now. As for Bosh, Toronto's coach was also fired and they're having a crappy season. I think they are trying to rebuild and they can rebuild right away with Odom's matching salary with Chris Bosh. You heard it here first.
Posted by: never | December 11, 2008 at 07:42 PM
"When the blog starts to agree with Mike T’s hair-brained defensive theories and the copycat media who claim the Lakers are too soft, then I feel it is time to speak up."
Let me see. The copycat media? That would imply that the media is reading me. That idea just eats you up, doesn't it? LOL!
Laker Tom wants the media to take him serious. He wants the media to "read" him and pat him on the back. He put so much effort in his post...this has to be eating at him to the point where he has to "speak up." LOL!
I mean, what is wrong with this guy? The defensive flaws in the Lakers are obvious and here Laker Tom is saying: It isn't so! It isn't so!
Now you understand that when he said the Lakers would average 120 points a game this season...he was serious. Just like he doesn't see the Lakers' defensive problems...he's serious!
Gee, the copycat media?????
Everything is pointing to the problem and everyone is wrong except for him. Again, he's serious!
mike t.
Posted by: Michael C. Teniente | December 11, 2008 at 07:43 PM
The Celtics are killing the Wizards 122-88.
Let me see. A defensive team just scored 122 points on the Wizards.
The Lakers, an offesive team, scored 106 points.
Defense demoralizes team and creates points. Offense creates energy for teams to compete.
The Celtics give up 88 points to the Wizards. The Lakers give up 104 points to the Wizards.
Defense leads to offense. Offense leads trying to outscore teams.
mike t.
Posted by: Michael C. Teniente | December 11, 2008 at 07:51 PM
Copycat!
Copycat!
You're nothing but a big old fat COPYCAAAAAAAAT!
LOL!
mike t.
Posted by: Michael C. Teniente | December 11, 2008 at 07:56 PM
Copycat!
Copycat!
You never would have...
Thought of that
Except for the fact
That you're but a big old fat
Copycat!
LOL!
mike t.
Posted by: Michael C. Teniente | December 11, 2008 at 08:02 PM