Mo LO
As mentioned in yesterday's practice report, talk again surfaced about the best role for Lamar Odom this season. Could, perhaps, that snug fit come as a sixth man off the pine? Phil Jackson used LO off the bench for much of yesterday's workout and after some sluggish possessions, the versatile forward acquitted himself nicely in unfamiliar territory. It should be stressed that Jackson hasn't committed to this concept, even while noting that a quality sixth man can play starter's minutes, which could very well be interpreted as a reassuring hint dropped. Thus far, Odom hasn't been thrilled with the notion of joining the bench mob, but he does dig the increased preseason opportunities to handle the rock.
As also mentioned in yesterday's practice report, the preseason has featured its fair share of bumbling and stumbling. Nothing to fret, but definitely worth noting.
Other items of potential interest
Like Elton John, Von Wafer is ... for the time being ... a Rocket man.
A look at the business of sports in today's not so sunshine-y economy
Josh Childress talks life as a Euro baller.
Monta Ellis will lose 30 games worth of pay for moped-gate.
The outdoor game between the Suns and Nuggets was more historical in rarity than quality of play. But at least it was cold as hell.
AK








Laker Tom,
You will be at our viewing party in spirit. Speaking of spirit(s), what shall we imbibe while raising a toast to you?
Posted by: Rick Friedman | October 12, 2008 at 02:16 PM
Lam-Od sometimes appears brilliant, a unique playa who has ball handling skills in a big frame.
His physical gifts have never been in question. It's his mind and heart that often fail him, and those things cannot be fixed simply by his coach's deft use of the media.
Trouble is, the lakers had some success last season with Lam-Od alongside gasal. So by trying to insert bynum now, even Lam-Od's contribution to the team cannot be counted upon to duplicate what we saw last season.
Keep Lam-Od, and the rest of the NBA will be happy.
For anyone who saw Robin Lopez last night, you finally have some evidence for what I've been saying all summer: Lopez will have an impact this season, and gives the SUNS a 2nd 7-foot option behind SHACK. Lopez can both guard the rim and get some easy put-backs, not to mention improve the overall toughness of the team.
Posted by: BUTLER | October 12, 2008 at 02:25 PM
I agree, Robin Lopez has looked great thus far and the Suns may have gotten a steal.
Posted by: Jay | October 12, 2008 at 02:46 PM
Delayed response to Hubo Blitz as my computer was down a week+
Yawn!! PJ still sucks and Kobe improved inspite of PJ"
Yup PJ is so much better! just as much Byron Scott (2 years missing the playoffs and letting Sacramento in 2005-2006 snatch the 8th seed slot) and Coach K (could only win BRONZE in 2006 World Championship despite having Lebron Wade Carmelo and even Elton Brand!).
[ I see you grasp little knowledge of basketball and try to make up for it by long rambling post stating falsehoods and calling them facts. If you knew about BB you would know that coach K had these players when they were thrown together and expected to gel. He had a roster of great players with no team concept. When the 3 yr commitment was made by players they played as a team and coach K using many of the previous players and adding Kobe won the Gold Medal. How many Gold Medals has PJ coached? I know you will probably come back with how many championships have coach K won? Well not the same. College coach cannot win championship in NBA but NBA coach can win in Olympics.
"The Lakers success deals with the players success rather than coaching success."]
Yawn boring. Too easy to sink but heck I like sinking arguments hehe. That would mean Pat Riley is also overrated (having Magic Man and The Cap) and would also mean Byron Scott is overrated (only had success with Jason Kidd and Chris Paul) if going by that argument. So there goes your precious coaches. And here's another torpedo (swisshh). If Laker success deals with players success then why did we miss the playoffs in 2004-2005?? (Hint: Phil Jackson wasn't coaching!). And if that is the case then the opposite would be true in that Laker failures should also be blamed more on the players instead of just the coach. So if you want to say that premise, then Kobe is more responsible for the 06 playoffs and 07 playoff defeats and the lost in the 08 Finals more than Phil being outcoached. LOL! Breaking down poorly fixed arguments is so fun fun fun!
[Are you that immature or do you practice at it? Pat Riley was blessed with great players and was an innovative coach. He actually did coach and not sit on his arse and do nothing like PJ. Pat Riley introduced the use of video tape replay to show players where they should be and other coaching details like shot mechanics etc. and not just draw X’s and O’s on a clipboard. This is now used by ALL teams. PJ introduced Zen and only 1 team uses it. You give way to much credit to PJ when the players win. Please stay in the bathtub when playing with your toy submarine shooting torpedoes. I think your last torpedo went astray and hit you in the arse. You have not broken anything down except for your nervous system.]
"Yup he sucked and got outcoached by Dcryatoni and Doc Rivers and did not make the playoffs one year."
Using that argument again Byron Scott got schooled by PJ not only with CP3 but also in the Finals when Byron had Jason Kidd. And nope you are sooooo misinformed. Not one year has Phil ever missed the playoffs during his coaching career, NOT ONE YEAR :D. And since you place defeats in equal to being schooled here's something: PJ outcoached George Karl, Jerry Sloan, Gregg Poppovich this year. (Owned Pop years back as well) and outcoached MANY other coaches. Byron Scott missed the playoffs 4 times in his career and lost against Gregg Poppovich on in turn got outcoached by yours truly Phil Jackson :). (Hint try harder).
"Without MJ, Pip, Shaq and Kobe he has zero, zip, nada championships."
Without Tim Duncan no rings for Popp. PJ schooled Riley during Benedict Riley's tenure with New York. Riley only won in LA (thanks to Magic and Kareem) and had a hall of famer and a good guard in Wade to win his other title in Miami. Take away Magic, Kareem, Shaq and Wade and Riley has ZERO championships. Take away Duncan and Pop will have ZERO championships. Take away Jason Kidd and CP3 and the "Will be in the Hall of Fame" Byron Scott is a laughable coach who can't even make the playoffs. So another argument thrown into quick sand, using your logic of course.
[Hint PJ wasn’t coaching cuz he got his arse fired. We in LA hire coaches to win championships and not just make playoffs. PJ has been a big loser in that department in recent history. Maybe you expect less in Colorado. So then you made my point for me. Yes without those players those other coaches probably don’t win championships either. But at least they coached. And Byron Scott made the playoffs with lesser talent and not as deep teams, something PJ cannot do. That is by your lost logic. ]
"Quit trying to put words in my mouth. I detest it when clueless bloggers try to make a point while creating falsehoods or misrepresentations of what other bloggers say or think. I remember you admitted to doing this when you said it was a trick you learned debatting Humanoly.
I gave credit for PJs career for having the fortune of coaching the right teams with the best players other wise he would never have won 9 rings.
Since you are trying to link me to PJ and Kobe with not giving PJ credit go to the horses mouth. Run to Mitch and demand they TRADE Kobe because he is uncoachable. A direct admission he can't and has not coached Kobe to succeed. Got it?
So stick to debatting points on what is said not what you perceive or it could get nasty. I take huge offense for anyone putting words into my mouth."
Wow Calm down, I thought my annoyance at Butler last night was bad you take the cake (sorry about last night btw Butler as much as I dont' want to apologize). Well here's one if you want to stick to debate points: I'm not Hugo Boss nor am I from Colorado nor did I put that trick about putting words in your mouth (show the exact quote please) and it was Hobbitmage not humanomoly that I debated. So that's already 4 incorrect facts you have there fella.
[ I don’t have to calm down as I am calm. I am stating adamantly for you to stop trying to put words in my mouth or it will get ugly. I am not yelling, cursing, name calling but just stating a fact. It was a reply in an email to me you stated that. I found it so do your own homework. Hint try Google. Also a true Laker fan never apologizes to a Troll. How laughable sorry Butler, hahahaha. So pathetic an action ]
Also "would probably make this excuse" does not equal "this is what JLF said" (try look at the difference please?) . And trying to use the "uncoachable" premise? Well look at the performance of Kobe without Phil Jackson in his one year without Phil (2004-2005). Already posted the stats so I won't bother but not only did Kobe have a his highest turnover year and his worst shooting year since his 2nd season in the NBA but also missed the playoffs and got only 3rd All NBA Team despite being the most "complete" player in the NBA. Next year Phil comes back and boom All NBA First Team and First All Defensive Team for KB. Cool huh?
[ Is that because Kobe did this by himself as he has before? Like the time he took a clipboard from Cleamons and drew up a play in PJ’s face (coached) that is what Lakers did. Remember PJ lost in the faceoff in front office to get Kobe traded. He won’t make that mistake again. He goes to FO and demands him or Kobe goes, guess who goes? Hint it ain’t Kobe. Kobe is his own motivator and works hard to improve and does not need PJ to motivate him. Give Kobe the credit not PJ. Very cool indeed.]
So no I don't get your arguments about Phil Jackson unless simply you just hate the man in general in that case I say that's your personal preference and well I can't object to that.
So please don't use arguments like "Phil got outcoached by D'Antoni" or similar crappy premise, I can easily blow them up like I just did now. And for dessert that Mbenga thing which you are so high on. That quote you quoted on me earlier was not from ME but from BUTLER so another WRONG fact you "try" on me. And speaking of Mbenga, I can't honestly say the Lakers would have done better or worst with more playing time for Mbenga (heck things can happen) in the finals. But heck here's a question who is better as a center Ronny Turiaf or Mbenga? If it was Ronny then you have your answer as to why Mbenga never played in the finals. If it's Mbenga then why did he foul out in less than 3 quarters against the Grizzlies (Ronny never fouled out in that game). The Grizzlies shouldn't be mistaken for a "good" team and yet Mbenga fouled in in 3 QUARTERS. I remember that you tried to justify this by saying "Chris Mihm also fouls alot" (yes I remember). Well Chris Mihm never fouled out in 3 quarters huh? Mbenga would have gotten owned by the Celtics. Say all you want that we would have done better with Mbenga, the fact is we would have LOST still. No but or ifs or that, A lost game is a lost game no matter how we want to sugar it up. Even putting in Newble or Mbenga the Lakers would have most likely still lost and losing is still losing!
I should end it here hehe. Good day.
-blitz
[You need to put your feet on the ground with your statements. I have stated many times why I dislike PJ ‘s methods and stated I like him as a person but not as coach. You are right you can’t object to that. However my take on the Celtics series is that Mbenga could have helped by throwing Greenie Weenies a curve. Things like that work. Just look at PP’s fake injury while the Lakers were in the game, and then that distraction changed the game and it’s outcome. As I stated we know for a FACT we know the Lakers lost NOT using Mbenga. For a FACT you or anyone else cannot say we would not have won. You can opine as such but the truth is we will never know. My opinion is that we would have won and would have likely won.
Yes you should end it there as your arguments were just rendered useless.]
Posted by: thekobebryantblitz | September 25, 2008 at 07:31 PM
JLF
Posted by: JustaLakerFan | October 12, 2008 at 02:56 PM
Wish I could go to party but have other commitment which I need to attend to.
Sorry.
Hope you guys do it again.
Posted by: JustaLakerFan | October 12, 2008 at 02:58 PM
what the lakers SHOULD do to make all their pieces fit . . .
Place Sasha at the starting 3 spot, to space out the offense and have fish run the point in the triangle . . .
3 post threats (kobe, pau, bynum)
3 outside threats ( kobe, sasha, fish)
3 ball handlers (kobe, fish, sasha)
---- this works . . . and would result in perfect balance of the triangle . . . -----
We put Lamar, Ariza, Farmar and whoever else as a running unit . . . .
this takes advantage of their run and gun mentality. . . . would provide decent defense with ariza to hold down the perimeter and anyone else from our stable of bigs to hold down the middle, but more importantly it allows us to use the open court skills that are neglected when in the triangle offense
Posted by: SA | October 12, 2008 at 03:13 PM
Rick,
>>>>>You will be at our viewing party in spirit. Speaking of spirit(s),
>>>>>what shall we imbibe while raising a toast to you?
You can toast me by drinking a shot of Absolut Citron Vodka after every AK17 dunk. It’s my favored concoction when circumstances force me to drink rather than smoke. LOL.
Have a great time guys and root our Lakers to their first win of the pre-season.
Tom
Posted by: LakerTom | October 12, 2008 at 03:50 PM
Jon K,
"How many years do you think it will be before the Kings are back in the playoffs because they're certainly not making it this year?"
The Sacramento Kings of Basketball will be in the playoffs next year, although I will not at all be shocked if they sneak in this year. We've got some great young talent. What we need is experience and the chemistry that develops with it. You never know. It's why they play the games.
Note to fantasy league'rs: Put Bobby Brown in your stable. He reminds me of Chris Paul with a purer shot.
Go Niners!
Go Dodgers!
And yes, Go Kings!!!
Sonnybelfast
Posted by: Sonnybelfast | October 12, 2008 at 05:15 PM
any links for tonights first preseason win!_=?
Posted by: Lakers4REalz | October 12, 2008 at 06:00 PM
anyone have a link for the game????
Posted by: The Big Fence Defense | October 12, 2008 at 06:10 PM
Any links?
Posted by: Xodus | October 12, 2008 at 06:43 PM
Any links to tonight's game?
Posted by: bonez | October 12, 2008 at 06:43 PM
Links to tonight's game pls
Posted by: nelson8 | October 12, 2008 at 06:44 PM
Here's a link that I found.
http://ziucchiradio.altervista.org/watch.php?id=351
Posted by: Xodus | October 12, 2008 at 06:45 PM
Here's a link that I found.
http://ziucchiradio.altervista.org/watch.php?id=351
Posted by: Xodus | October 12, 2008 at 06:48 PM
Try this one
http://ziucchiradio.altervista.org/watch.php?id=351
Game Day!!!
Posted by: HugoSpain | October 12, 2008 at 06:50 PM
Pau to Radman!!
Posted by: HugoSpain | October 12, 2008 at 06:53 PM
Enjoying it ... thanks Xodus
Posted by: nelson8 | October 12, 2008 at 06:54 PM
Radman is having quite a game so far. If he can play like this, we've found our SF starter.
Posted by: Neloho | October 12, 2008 at 07:02 PM
Xodus,
You're an angel. Many, many thanks for the link.
Posted by: Lakergurl | October 12, 2008 at 07:09 PM
Early on, the spacing looks a lot better w/ both Pau and Bynum on the floor. They were running more plays through Pau. Makes sense as he's the better passer. Drew needs to fight for better rebounding position on both ends.
Defensively, the Lakers are having trouble with Udrih the same way they did with Baron Davis. Drew doesn't like coming out onto the perimeter to guard Brad Miller and that's caused some wide open looks. Seems like they're trying to communicate out there but are just a step slow with it.
LO looks good with the second unit. He's making plays, rebounding and shooting. He's able to do more with those guys because they need him to.
Posted by: lakers_sth | October 12, 2008 at 07:10 PM
I've got to get this whole Charging v. Blocking thing cleared up. Anyone please tell me the rule. I always thought that if the defender was moving it's considered a block, and if he's stationary it's a charge. Did the rule change?
Posted by: "Pig" Miller | October 12, 2008 at 07:17 PM
I'm pleasantly surprised by Powell.
Posted by: Xodus | October 12, 2008 at 07:22 PM
josh powell!! sweet jump shot
Posted by: HugoSpain | October 12, 2008 at 07:22 PM
Lakergurl,
I don't think anyone has ever called me an angel. Thanks! haha.
Posted by: Xodus | October 12, 2008 at 07:23 PM
Josh Powell looks taller than 6' 9".
Interesting combinations of players on the floor.
GO LAKERS!
Posted by: Jon K. | October 12, 2008 at 07:38 PM
Lakers are getting killed biting on fakes and jab-steps which is leading to a lot of dribble penetration.
Kobe isn't having a great game. Powell is looking like a carbon copy of Ronny. Great rebounding instincts and mid-range game. PJ is having Pau get used to that PF spot by having Mihm out there with him.
Drew is having a quiet game. What's nice is, even though his shot really isn't falling, he isn't forcing the issue and making bad decisions. What he needs to be doing more of though is cleaning up on the boards and getting easy second opportunity baskets. That was a big part of how he contributed last year. Set plays are nice but he needs to take advantage of those opportunities when the defense isn't set and everyone is scrambling.
What's clear is that the team is a step slower than everyone they've faced on both ends. They're thinking way too much out there b/c they're still figuring things out.
Posted by: lakers_sth | October 12, 2008 at 07:48 PM
Xodus,
Thanks for the link.
GO LAKERS!
Posted by: Jon K. | October 12, 2008 at 07:49 PM
Dodgers on my television. Lakers on my computer.
Life could be worse.
GO DODGERS!
GO LAKERS!
Posted by: Jon K. | October 12, 2008 at 07:50 PM
I like Lamar's aggressiveness in this game. He should really continue this type of effort.
Posted by: Lakergurl | October 12, 2008 at 08:07 PM
I dont know if anybody has mentioned this yet..but for an aging vet who's logged tons of minutes in his career coming off foot surger...Fisher is looking mighty spry.
The Lakers need to get the ball to Bynum more...Bynum is a rhythm player who if he got the ball often could probably dominate
But the D looks terrible...the Lakers are just long bodies jumping all around giving up easy shots
Posted by: The Lake Show | October 12, 2008 at 08:12 PM
Jon K,
No problem.
Posted by: Xodus | October 12, 2008 at 08:14 PM
Socks with the swat
Posted by: Badfinger | October 12, 2008 at 08:25 PM
One guy we can let go it's Coby Karl... He is supose to be a shooter..
Posted by: LAL_Fan | October 12, 2008 at 08:27 PM
For all the talk about our bigs having problems, the real problem is that guys like Farmar, Coby Karl and others like to shoot way too much from beyond the arc and from the perimeter instead of feeding our bigs for higher percentage shots, epecially Andrew Bynum. It must be frustrating for a big man to rebound, run the floor, get good position and then watch as dummies like Farmar and Karl gun up jumpers. At least make people pay when your big sets you up for wide open shots. I really don't know if Farmar will ever be better than he is because he seems intent on settling for outside shots because he has average quickness and doesn't seem to set up others for easy baskets(never seems to rank high in the assists dept.) Coby Karl is just plain junk if you ask me because he's not that good of a shooter and he commits silly fouls. I think Crawford has more potential than either Farmar or Karl. I wish the Lakers could also keep Giles but I doubt they will.
Posted by: Nemaia Faletogo | October 12, 2008 at 09:13 PM
There we won a preseason games anyone (besides Butler don't get me wrong man, I'm used to what kind of things you'll say lol). wants to say now we will not even make the playoffs??
The Lakers have now a week off before facing off against FC Barcelona. Kinda cool since that was the team Pau Gasol was on before he got drafted by the Atlanta Hawks.
Positives:
2nd Half starting lineup, that lineup was nice and so was the starting lineup, having Radmanovic may solve the problem of Gasol-Bynum clogging the lanes.
Only 7 3 point attempts by the Lakers who are most likely to be on the team. That is good, less 3 pointers (that doesn't mean the team shouldn't make any attempts at 3 pointers) will usually (not always) translate into higher FG% from mid range and close to the basket.
Rebounding: All big guys (Bynum, Gasol, Odom) rebounded well especially for not usual minutes. That's exactly what they need to be getting. Consider Radman's rebounding to be an addition, he's not usually a rebounder. Sorry Mihm nor Mbenga doesn't count since neither of them should play more than limited minutes in regular season.
Defense and hustle: Limited the Kings to 37.2% shooting and stole the ball 13 times.
Andrew Bynum: More aggressive and had a reasonably good night.
Bad:
Turnovers. From the people who are most likely to be on the team (Bryant, Bynum, Gasol, Fisher, Odom, Ariza, Farmar, Mihm, and Powell) (Vujacic and Walton and probably Sun will be on the roster but wasn't dressed) (Mbenga, Karl, Crawford don't count since they may or may not make the roster) made 20 out of the 22 turnovers. That is way too many, granted it is Pre-Season and hence DOESN"T COUNT it's still too many and must clean up.
Hope that alleviates some people who says "We won't make the playoffs this year". No Butler lol I told you don't count, sorry man but you are a Suns guy so you don't count, hate to but heck if you want me to even consider NBA League pass you have to behave hehe and find a way to get me a house in Manhatten Beach. Westwood is nice but heck the beach is better!
Nice to see the guys from training camp to hold the lead. Just got a little nervous when they started to fire shots too early. Oh well.
BTW Coby Karl is a shooter, just didn't like some of his attempts. He's better either spot up or going from a pick or faking the shot and moving to fire a shot kinda like Sasha.
Lakers_sth I concur, Drew is nice in the post but teams will pick and roll with him too much (they got scouts in these games). Guys who can shoot from the perimeter like Miller and Okur might give Drew problems. I guess that's why Phil put Odom on Okur and Gasol on Boozer during last year's playoffs (heck it worked since Gasol gave Boozer a hard time especially, forcing Deron Williams to be the main threat at scoring).
"I've got to get this whole Charging v. Blocking thing cleared up. Anyone please tell me the rule. I always thought that if the defender was moving it's considered a block, and if he's stationary it's a charge. Did the rule change?"
Pig here's what the rules are on charges:
1) was still, or moving sideways or backwards but not forwards, when contact occurred
2)took a legal guarding position before the contact, that is, one with both feet on the floor
3)was hit on the torso (as opposed to the arm or leg)
4) respected the elements of time and distance
If it was about the foul on Trevor, then its clear. Trevor pushed his man using his body and initiated contact on the other guy's body while the King's player was moving backward. That's why Trevor got the foul if you are talking about the offensive foul on Ariza lol.
Prepare for a small break till FC Barcelona!
-blitz
Posted by: thekobebryantblitz | October 12, 2008 at 09:28 PM
Earl Boykins is playing in Italy now?
Posted by: warren with butterknives | October 12, 2008 at 09:43 PM
Nemaia,
"I wish the Lakers could also keep Giles but I doubt they will."
No way they will keep them without me around!
C.J. blew it bigtime!!!
Posted by: ABCESS TOO THe maxx | October 12, 2008 at 09:47 PM
:P
it was a good game for lamar, finally. he'd be fine with any unit.
anyways, good game from powell; farmar will do well thsi season. i can see his drive. then, i felt we were missing sasha he brings a lot of energy to the team. never mind luke. he's not missed.
and lastly, coach phil's new look makes him coach kurt's brother/father.
GO LAKERS!
Posted by: isang | October 12, 2008 at 09:54 PM
I love Fish but I have two requests from him.
1. That he stops shooting 3's in transition.
2. That he never attempts to drive to the basket in the halfcourt.
Posted by: Xodus | October 12, 2008 at 10:03 PM
If Vlad continues his path to improvement then I agree that he looks like the starting SF because he is the best fit to space the floor w/Bynum/Gasol.
Who would have thought? Most improved player this year - Vlad Radmanovic?
Finally, all the reasons Mitch signed him up 2 years ago would become reality.
If Vlad is having an off night, we still have 2 other players who can space the floor as a perimeter threat.
Sasha can come in instead of Vlad at the 3 or Kobe moves to the 3, and Sasha plays the 2.
Or Ariza can come in while Fisher becomes the primary spot up shooter.
In the meanwhile, Odom's move to the bench gives us a really good, running second unit that can change tempo on the opponent. There is simply no other NBA team with a second unit this good.
Farmar, Sasha, Ariza, LO and Powell (or Mihm or Mbenga) will be a running/slashing unit that does not have to play the half court tempo of the first unit's triangle. If the young players in this second unit continue to improve, they can even play versus the first unit of other NBA teams in stretches of the game, and tire them out - set them up for the knock-out punch of the Twin Towers and the Mamba doing the triangle.
Posted by: LakerinBC | October 12, 2008 at 10:31 PM
Hey Laker Fam -
Well, better game last night. Not so ugly as last time. I liked the activity level of Ariza and some of the other gang. Drew looks lost on the floor when Pau is out there. I noticed Pau was getting lots of touches and Drew not so much. I was happy when Drew was in with Fish later and they started working off each other. Drew doesn't seem to be the monster that he was last year in the paint. He did have a beautiful block which was more like he was last season. Hopefully he bounces back and gets it going. It is, after all, preseason.
GO LAKERS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: longtimelakerlover | October 13, 2008 at 05:45 AM
thekobebryantblitz,
Thanks for the review. I saw half the game and generally liked what I saw. Yes, we were rusty at times, but it was not the rustiness of a team of players who didn't "get it", it was the rustiness of a group of players who were becoming comfortable exploring the parameters of their potential interactions.
I was very impressed by what I saw with Josh Powell. He's a better addition that we thought. I was also impressed with Rad Vlad. He's playing less like a Space Cadet and more like the player we thought we'd get when we signed him.
Though I didn't see the whole game, I did get the impression that this was a team that was in the process of "gelling" together. We should expect improvement next game and each game thereafter.
In short, things are going to be better than fine.
When this team is able to remain relaxed, focused, and aggressive simultaneously, we are going to devastate opponents.
GO LAKERS!
Posted by: Jon K. | October 13, 2008 at 07:53 AM
By the way, nice article today about Lamar Odom. Sounds like Lamar Odom is relaxing into the notion of playing sixth man. Good and good for the team.
Lamar Odom = Sixth Man of the Year and Laker for Life.
GO LAKERS!
Posted by: Jon K. | October 13, 2008 at 07:55 AM
AK,
Now that Von Wafer is a Rocket, it seems the balance of power has shifted to Houston. How will anyone be able to compete with the Rockets with Von Wafer scoring 70 points a game?
There is no escape.
GO LAKERS!
Posted by: Jon K. | October 13, 2008 at 07:59 AM
Good morning Mamba24, Charles, Jon K, Pig, Toad & the rest of this fabulous Laker morning CRUE!!!!!!!!!!
Well FINALLY - a preseason win. Maybe now everyone can take a deeeeeep breath and realize the sky is NOT falling! LOL!
I saw quite a few positives in last night's game.
Drew's working out the rust a bit more - nice couple of blocks!
Fish doesn't look like he's lost a step since last season - hopefully his dedication to his training keeps him spry for the entire year. We'll need him come playoff time.
Josh Powell looks like he might be the next Laker - he's been pretty consistent.
Pau looks smooth - I hope that face-up jumper continues to fall all year.
TREVOR - man - what can you say. I'm really glad he's healthy. He is going to cause some serious problems for the opposition. I just love his ability to anticipate on defense.
Lamar - my boy LO - I love this guy. He showed last night that he can do what it takes to make this team successful. He wants to win so he'll suck it up & contribute like only he can. Lamar MUST be a Laker for life.
This week of practice should make a huge difference to how they come out next game. It seemed like they were a little less lost & a lot more excited and focused. This week should be interesting - can't wait to see Saturday's game!
GO LAKERS!!! (and GO DODGERS!!)
Posted by: justanothermambafan | October 13, 2008 at 08:08 AM
Mornin Fam,
Shout out to PSLakerFan, SimiLakerGirl, Rick Friedman, Lakerman420 for meeting up last night. It was fun!
Have a good one guys.
Posted by: Charles | October 13, 2008 at 08:38 AM
Hey guys,
How was the game last night? Didn't watch it because I was at the Dodger game. Sounds like Lamar did some good things? He came of the bench? That's good news. Like I said before, I don't care where LO plays as long as he's productive.
---------------------
Jon K-
I asked you in the other thread but haven't checked to see if you replied. Anyways, I know you've told me to go to Scotland Yard and I still haven't but have you been to Cavaretta's right next store? Amazing Italian subs.
--------------------
Charles, pslakerfan, and others-
How was the get together? Sorry I couldn't make it but I definitely want to meet all you in the near future.
Lamar = Laker for Life
GO LAKERS
Posted by: mrbarneydangles | October 13, 2008 at 08:43 AM
GO LAKERS!!! (and GO DODGERS!!) Posted by: justanothermambafan |
October 13, 2008 at 08:08 AM
LET MANY, BE MANY!
Posted by: MAMBA24 | October 13, 2008 at 08:48 AM
D@MN. D@MN, D@MN! VON WAFER ON
THE CLIPPERS! ABANDON SHIP LAKE SHOW
THE WRATH OF VON WAFER IS BAOUT TO BE UPON YOU.
Posted by: MAMBA24 | October 13, 2008 at 08:52 AM
Congrats on beating the Kings, laker fans! Welcome to the club..
The Kings sounded like they put up a good fight.
Meanwhile, we in SUNS-land are trying to come to grips with a more mundane approach to winning, courtesy of Terry Porter. If it's true that D wins titles, then the downside is having to watch some boring ball!
Posted by: BUTLER | October 13, 2008 at 09:04 AM
MAKE THAT VON WAFER ON THE ROCKETS LAKE SHOW
Posted by: MAMBA24 | October 13, 2008 at 09:06 AM
Xodus,
Yea Derek's game is better off not shooting in transition and driving to the basket (it's not one of his best skills, not even during his prime years).
I wonder why though people are saying Jordan should have like 29 minutes while Derek only limited to 20. Derek is still a much better defender than Farmar and so far is the better spot up shooter than Jordan is. Derek has NOT lost a step yet though in 2 years I expect him to do that. I expect Jordan to have increased minutes (like 22 maybe) but Derek still will get more minutes.
-blitz
Posted by: thekobebryantblitz | October 13, 2008 at 09:09 AM
{REPOST}
mrbarneydangles,
I have been to Cavarette's. It's great. That stretch on Sherman Way used to be my haunt when I lived in Woodland Hills. Good Indian, Chinese, and Italian food, Scottish and English beers on tap, fantastic Jazz played by wonderful musicians, upcoming bands and poetry readings and a pool hall all within forty yards of sidewalk.
It is the Valley and it is a bit gritty, but it has a certain charm to it because of that. I've watched a lot of Lakers games at Scotland Yard and listened to a lot of Jazz two doors down.
Man, I miss Los Angeles.
GO LAKERS!
Posted by: Jon K. | October 13, 2008 at 09:10 AM
AK,
Does Von Wafer know that he is a Laker Nation blog icon?
GO LAKERS!
Posted by: Jon K. | October 13, 2008 at 09:11 AM
>>>Drew doesn't seem to be the monster that he was last
>>>year in the paint.
He'll get back to that level. It's just that the guy hasn't played
at this level since January. It takes a few weeks to shake off
the rust and get the timing back.
I was bummed that the only alley-oop to Bynum got called back,
as Bobby Brown was fouling Farmar as he was making the pass
to Drew.
Posted by: Long Time Laker Fan | October 13, 2008 at 09:32 AM
I really liked Josh Powell's game last night. If he can play
like that every night, then he will be a more than adequate
replacement for Ronny. There won't be the dancing or the
over-the-top ebullience, but the rebounds, some defense, and
some scoring in 10-15 minutes off the bench will be there.
Posted by: Long Time Laker Fan | October 13, 2008 at 09:35 AM
“It’s preseason, man,” Bryant said. “Who the hell cares? Everyone knows Lamar will be there. Nobody’s tripping.” Las Vegas Sun
- Kobe, when asked about Lamar Odom
"Nobody's tripping"
- Obviously Kobe has not been reading the Lakers blog
Good morning Mamba24 and crew!
Posted by: Fatty | October 13, 2008 at 09:35 AM
Mamba24 - what???? VW on the clips? I thought he was w/Houston. One could only hope he'd join the merry misfits across the hall - that's entertainment!
Posted by: dave m | October 13, 2008 at 09:39 AM
NBA to lay off 80.
Facing a possible financial crisis, Stern decided to lay off 9% of his NBA staff.
What Stern really meant to say -
"Faced with budget constraints, I felt it necessary to take this step. It was either I take a 10% pay cut or I send 80 people out to drown in a weak economy. That decision was easy."
Posted by: Fatty | October 13, 2008 at 09:46 AM
Fatty my man you are in mid-season form. You didn't
even need any training camp. Lol!
Posted by: Mamba24 | October 13, 2008 at 09:54 AM
Hey Jon K,
You're in Cleveland right? Yea, I would miss L.A too. I'm out here in Cleveland for two weeks and I'm bored already!
Posted by: zen | October 13, 2008 at 09:56 AM
BUTLER ,
Your hilarious! Lopez will not be a factor. At best, he will be an average NBA talent. If you're lucky.
Posted by: zen | October 13, 2008 at 09:57 AM
Barcelona to play the Lakers on Saturday.
Asked if Barcelona had a chance to win against the Lakers. HugoSpain replied about his beloved team.
"If its futbol, sure we have chance. Yes, of course we can win. Oh basketball? Your kidding, right?! We are playing the Lakers? The Los Angeles Lakers?! I don't think we could beat the Lakers Girls, let alone the Lakers."
"If they spot us 20 points, the Lakers Girls that is, then we might be able to win."
- HugoSpain
Posted by: Fatty | October 13, 2008 at 10:09 AM
"BUTLER,
Your hilarious! Lopez will not be a factor. At best, he will be an average NBA talent. If you're lucky."
Brook Lopez will be an average NBA talent if he's lucky.
Robin has no chance of even that!
Phisically,
Robin is like Danny Devito as Arnold Schwarzenegger's twin!
Posted by: 1978 | October 13, 2008 at 10:18 AM
I'm glad to hear that Lamar is cool with coming off the bench.
I'm glad that Phil Jackson is our coach and he knows that Lamar in the starting lineup with this team wouldn't be the best situation for winning.
I'm glad that even without Lamar in the starting line-up, the Lakers still have the best starting 5 in the NBA.
I'm glad that with Lamar coming off the bench, the Lakers will have the best bench in the NBA.
I'm glad that Lamar will have the opportunity to gain recognition as the NBA's top 6th man.
I'm glad that Lamar is the ultimate team player.
Go Lakers!
Posted by: Rocky | October 13, 2008 at 10:21 AM
We are playing the Lakers? The Los Angeles Lakers?! I don't think we could beat the
Lakers Girls, let alone the Lakers." "If they spot us 20 points, the Lakers Girls that is, t
hen we might be able to win." HugoSpain Posted by: Fatty | October 13, 2008 at 10:09 AM
ROFLMAO
Posted by: Mamba24 | October 13, 2008 at 10:21 AM
zen sez:
"Your hilarious! Lopez will not be a factor. At best, he will be an average NBA talent. If you're lucky."
Tell that to nene, K-Mart and the other nug bigs who had their shots blocked by RL. In emphatic fashion.
And, he's got two good knees.
Posted by: BUTLER | October 13, 2008 at 10:24 AM
Jon K-
Thanks for the reply and sorry I didn't catch it in the other thread. Yea, I plan on going to Cavaretta's on a regular basis and I will check out a Laker game at Scotland Yard once the season gets going. Do you go to the Laker-Cavs games in Cleveland?
Lamar = Laker for Life
GO LAKERS
Posted by: mrbarneydangles | October 13, 2008 at 10:34 AM
thekobebryantblitz,
"wonder why though people are saying Jordan should have like 29 minutes while Derek only limited to 20".
Since I said this yesterday, I thought I'd explain my thinking. For the record, I love DFish.
Derek is older, and I think he would benefit from "Easy" minutes during the year, and be rested for the playoffs.
Farmar is an up-and-comer with young legs who "Needs" minutes to continue to develop. The more he plays, the better he'll be come playoffs.
One benefits from light minutes, one benefits from more minutes.
Just my opinion.
Posted by: Eric M. | October 13, 2008 at 10:35 AM
Some quick thoughts after watching the game last night.
My final cuts:.. Heath, Crawford, and Mbenga.
Reason-Mihm will be good enough to say goodbye to Mbenga-Crawford and Heath are nothing special and I still think Karl will be a surprise. He will improve in time just like Sasha.
The player I don't want to see cut is Giles. Something tells me he could become a good player.
LO to the bench is brilliant. I like Ariza starting but Vlade will work...I guess coach knows best.
I really like the chemistry between Farmar and Bynum.
I really don't think Fish should be starting to me that is a weakness and Farmar should start. If Farmar is unable to take that starting postion from Fish by mid season then we need a new point guard on this team. Fish should be coming off the bench. He is not a top PG!
Bynum looked better and really is my only concern this year. Bynum will decide if we win it all or it will be just another year.
Powell is very IMPRESSIVE!!! I can say we will not miss Ronnie as much has I thought we were going to.
Looking forward to the new season and if GOD keeps Andrew healthy this season we have a great shot at the
Championship.
Go Lakers and cheers to the blog.
BD
Posted by: BD | October 13, 2008 at 11:10 AM
The 5 top finalist for the Laker 2008 Pulitzer prize and most popular blogger.These writers extricated brilliant exposes and highly insightful posts.The winner will be named later in the week.
: Rick Friedman
Jon K.
Mamba 24
Faith
Laker Tom
Posted by: The King | October 13, 2008 at 11:34 AM
Eric M,
I agree with the Fisher vs Farmayr minutes played. If Farmar screws up, you just shorten the leash for that game and address it at tape time so he can get better.
Looking forward to a great season!
janaya
Posted by: janaya | October 13, 2008 at 12:57 PM
mrbarneydangles,
I think I will try to get tickets for the Lakers-Cavs game.
zen,
Cleveland is a decent place to live if you're a family man with a good job. The cost of living here is very low. You can literally get a nice four-bedroom home on an acre of land on a lake and near a golf course in a very high-end suburb like Hudson (which is where I'm at) for around $300,000. People get know each other and generally say "Hello" to each other when they pass in supermarkets and such. Some things here are nice. And if you're in a nice suburb, it's a bit easier to keep your kids from "growing up too fast" than it would be in a Los Angeles suburb, which is nice.
Unfortunately, I'm a single man who telecommutes and likes excitement and beautiful women. If you're looking for excitement and beautiful women, Cleveland is not the place for you. (Also when I last checked their basketball team isn't the Lakers, which is kind of a big deal for some people.) So, for me, I can't wait to get back to California, but if you want to be able to buy a nice house for your family in a nice quaint area and quickly build equity in that house, then the Cleveland area, well it might be the right place for some.
The King,
My vote's for Mamba24.
GO LAKERS!
Posted by: Jon K. | October 13, 2008 at 01:00 PM
Cool a vote, I hope Faith wins (sorry Laker Tom and Jon K. you two deserve it as much as Rick and Mamba does but Faith is the one who is more calmer and had faith in players like Sasha and even Kwa-may Brown. Though Brown never turned out to be the player we hoped for, at least she kept faith in him while he was a Laker and no one else save for Mike T. did have faith in Brown. Her faith in Sasha paid off and after getting rid of Mo Evans but sadly losing Trevor to injury, Sasha went on to be a great 6th man of the Lakers in 2007-2008. That is why I say Faith deserves that award for best blogger of 2008.
Eric M,
I could not agree more on that Farmar will receive more more minutes than last year and Fish will get some more time off to rest for the playoffs. I just don't think though in my opinion that Jordan will receive more minutes than Derek will until either next year or the year after.
BD,
Good analysis. Lamar will probably see the bench since putting his pride in check. Having Radman could help alleviate the problems of Gasol-Bynum in the middle. Trevor or Lamar may have jumpshots but neither of them will be the 40% consistent jump shooter Radman is. Radman seems to be focused not only on defense but also being part of the offense where 2 years ago he was completely lost.
-blitz
Posted by: thekobebryantblitz | October 13, 2008 at 01:14 PM
JLF sayez:
[Hint PJ wasn’t coaching cuz he got his arse fired. We in LA hire coaches to win championships and not just make playoffs. PJ has been a big loser in that department in recent history. Maybe you expect less in Colorado. So then you made my point for me. Yes without those players those other coaches probably don’t win championships either. But at least they coached. And Byron Scott made the playoffs with lesser talent and not as deep teams, something PJ cannot do. That is by your lost logic].
Nope PJ wasn't coaching because Jerry Krause refused to renew his contract because Krause was jealous of Jordan and Jackson. Pippen left the Bulls also because he didn't want to be with Jerry. Phil was not fired, get your facts straight. The same thing was true during PJ's first tenure. Buss wanted to go back to Showtime Lakers and have Kobe lead the way. Unfortunately not only were the pieces not right for Showtime (Chris Mihm as center??) but the team achieved a 32-50 record. If you think that is ok as long as Phil Jackson is gone, then all power to you, lets get to rebuilding like the Knicks or the Heat plus wasting Kobe Bryant's prime years even more. And make championships and not make playoffs? You really are making me laugh if you want to glorify Byron Scott how many championships does he have?? Nada, Zero, Zip according to your term. Byron Scott made it to the Finals only twice and he lost in a sweep by the Lakers and then the next year by the Spurs and Byron Scott using less talent? Let's see:
2000-2001 NJN under Byron Scott: 26-56 record.
The next year the Nets get Jason Kidd and makes the Finals. In 2003-2004 Byron Scott gets FIRED after 42 games.
2004-2005: Scott arrives in New Orleans and gets a sub par 18-64 season. Next year they draft CP3 but for the next two seasons don't even make the playoffs. In 2007-2008 the Hornets makes the playoffs and eliminates the Mavericks but lose in Game 7 to the Spurs despite being at home and blowing them out in 3 of the 7 games. Some winner huh?
Also I forgot to mention: Phil HAS won a championship. In the CBA without no MJ or Kobe or Shaq he won the CBA in his first season. Now you can say "it wasn't in the NBA" but under your standards PJ has won without them.
"We in LA hire coaches to win championships"
Besides Pat Riley and Phil Jackson and I'll include Paul Westhead who after Magic was drafted won championships? Rudy T (and Rudy T has 2 championships in Houston)? Del Harris? Mike Dunleavy? Kurt Rambis? Frank Hamblen? Only Pat Riley, Phil Jackson, Paul Westhead and Bill Sharman has had Laker teams win championships (LA Teams, Minneapolis doesn't count). What about the rest of the coaches? Clearly you argued against yourself JLF. Since there has only been 4 coaches that have won championships in LA.
[Yes without those players those other coaches probably don’t win championships either. But at least they coached. And Byron Scott made the playoffs with lesser talent and not as deep teams, something PJ cannot do. That is by your lost logic. ]
If you think Kwa-may Brown, Smush Parker, Brian Cook and Lamar Odom are better than Tyson Chandler, CP3, David West, and Peja Stojakovic then don't bother to argue with me. 2006-2007 the Lakers make the playoffs yet even with the the same roster as the next years the Hornets fail to miss the playoffs despite Golden State having a losing record (40-42). And again explain WHY in 2004-2005 we miss the playoffs and yet when PJ comes back we make the playoffs with an even WORST roster than the year before (Kwa-may Brown shouldn't be compared to Caron Butler in skill)? And they coached? Man that is really very weak to try to justify your argument. You have not answered any of the questions JLF just saying this and that which in a school would be marked wrong since your answers are unrelated to what the question is.
[ I don’t have to calm down as I am calm. I am stating adamantly for you to stop trying to put words in my mouth or it will get ugly. I am not yelling, cursing, name calling but just stating a fact. It was a reply in an email to me you stated that. I found it so do your own homework. Hint try Google. Also a true Laker fan never apologizes to a Troll. How laughable sorry Butler, hahahaha. So pathetic an action ]
Cool your calm now try this: an email? I don't send emails to other bloggers and only Long Time Laker Fan I have and that was for Fantasy Draft. LOL. And you found what? The tactic of words in your mouth? Nope no record to Humanamoly that I have done so and if anything it was Hobbitmage that I debated. So once again you are WRONG. In your words: do your homework again. And while Butler is a pain, at least sometimes he does speak reasonable from time to time though he is delusional a ton. I may be not so "fanatic" as some Laker fans, at least it doesn't cloud my judgment and say irrational things like "The Lakers won in spite of PJ' when the Lakers without PJ in 2004-2005 MISSED THE PLAYOFFS. Hey cmon, even Jon K. does defend Mike T. from time to time (and many Laker bloggers here not only dislike him but also call him a troll). So seriously do your homework because you are just posting so many inaccurate things.
[ Is that because Kobe did this by himself as he has before? Like the time he took a clipboard from Cleamons and drew up a play in PJ’s face (coached) that is what Lakers did. Remember PJ lost in the faceoff in front office to get Kobe traded. He won’t make that mistake again. He goes to FO and demands him or Kobe goes, guess who goes? Hint it ain’t Kobe. Kobe is his own motivator and works hard to improve and does not need PJ to motivate him. Give Kobe the credit not PJ. Very cool indeed.]
Again your are missing the point JLF. Withouth Phil Kobe didn't even make any teams save for 3rd teams. And yes Phil did try to have Kobe traded because Kobe many times went to split double teams and not run the offense in spite of having Shaq open (and vice versa, Shaq went inside too much instead of kicking out to Kobe). And give Kobe the credit? This one will hurt your argument more than it will hurt mine:
If you really want to give credit for Kobe then try this:
2000 Finals vs Reggie Miller: 36% FG for 14ppg
2004 Finals vs Tayshaun Prince: 38% FG for 22.6ppg
In both Game 1 and 4 Shaq had monster games yet Kobe kept firing away against Tayshaun Prince's defense (yet Kobe hit a game winner in Prince's face in 2007 FIBA). While there was other factors to the Lakers lost, Kobe kept firing for contested jumpers despite Shaq securing position in the post despite Kobe's promise to run the triangle offense in the visitor's locker room's bathroom at the Palace of Auburn Hills. Win Game 1 and 4 and the series ends back at Staples Center. Try giving credit for Kobe for that or can you?
And for another comparison to your premise that "Kobe did it on his own". Let's try seeing what awards Kobe got before Phil arrived.
Pre-Phil Jackson:
Kobe Bryant's achievements
*2 Time All-Star
1999 All NBA 3rd Team.
1997 Slam Dunk Champion
*-No All Star Game in 1999 but it's not unreasonable speculation Kobe would have been an All Star then.
Between PJ's 1st and 2nd term:
Kobe Bryant's achievements (despite having a potential All Star in Caron Butler):
2005 NBA All Star
3rd NBA All Team.
Kobe was 3rd in MVP voting in 2002-2003 (He should have won though Duncan wasn't a bad choice either), 4th in MVP in 2005-2006, 3rd in 2006-2007 and 1st in 2007-2008. All MVP votes came when he had Phil.
All other awards such All NBA Teams and All Defensive Teams, came when he was with Phil Jackson. Causation? Probably not, it's a fallacy to think that. Association? Definitely. Don't try to deny the association JLF, without Phil, Kobe as the main option hasn't done crap. I give Kobe his credit for what he has done, as to all players. Don't try to deny what Phil has done for Kobe as much as Kobe has done for Phil.
[You need to put your feet on the ground with your statements. I have stated many times why I dislike PJ ‘s methods and stated I like him as a person but not as coach. You are right you can’t object to that. However my take on the Celtics series is that Mbenga could have helped by throwing Greenie Weenies a curve. Things like that work. Just look at PP’s fake injury while the Lakers were in the game, and then that distraction changed the game and it’s outcome. As I stated we know for a FACT we know the Lakers lost NOT using Mbenga. For a FACT you or anyone else cannot say we would not have won. You can opine as such but the truth is we will never know. My opinion is that we would have won and would have likely won.]
You are entitled to your opinion and that's something I will never touch. But to say things like what you have said like "Phil got outcoached" that is not opinion. Otherwise you can count Pop getting outcoached by Phil and Pop has been the one who outcoached D'Antoni. There is no logic to that PJ got outcoached simply because he lost. And you want to compare Ira Newble and DJ Mbenga to Paul Pierce? Pierce would have owned both guys and while it is my opinion, many people would agree. And what does putting the Celtics on the curve mean? Faking injuries in Bean Town? I doubt the crowd would show much sympathy. What else maybe Flagrant Fouls? That's nice if you want the Celtics to get 2 free shots not to mention the ball back (and set their rage on the Lakers). Putting them on a curve is really vague and makes no sense. There isn't anything else that I could think of "putting on the curve". Be more specific.
The difference between what you have done and me? Simple, I've presented my opinion based on the players abilities. JLF, you've tried to set your viewpoints as facts like PJ's fault for not playing Mbenga and Newble and we lost because of it. Yes I know you said it was your opinion just NOW but you haven't done so in the past. I know that Mbenga while a good shot blocker is simply not the lock down defender as you imagine him to be. Blocking shots is one thing, allowing penetration is something else and not getting the rebound is another. Plus Mbenga and Ira doesn't have any offense. Turnovers killed the Lakers in Game 6 and you cannot argue that turnovers (getting stolen from and throwing bad passes) is helped what led to the big deficit in Game 6. The Celtics stole the ball 18 times and that led to 36 points and no team can defend if they let the other team steal the ball. That's why I've said that simply putting Mbenga and Newble does not mean we would have won, there would have been no offense against the Celtic Defense anyways. Put in Mbenga or Newble and who else will score? Sasha? Sasha shot only 42.5% in the Finals for 8 points per game and only had one good game (Game 3). Kobe? Again Kobe shot a low FG% (40.7) and shot ice cold for 4/6 games in the Finals. Lamar had tendinitis and was cold also in the Finals, Pau had only 1 great game and that stemmed from him being guarded by Perkins and guarding KG in turn (not an easy task), Jordan was ice cold until Game 5 and 6. So there would have been little offense anyways.
Again let's assume Phil put in Mbenga and Ira. Who would have they guarded? Mbenga on Perkins? That's pointless as Perkins isn't the main threat or put him on KG perhaps? Do you really honestly think Mbenga could even slow down KG plus defending the post at the same time? And what about Ira? Put him on who? Ray Ray or Pierce? If on Ray Allen, assuming he could stop Ray Ray completely, Kobe would have been forced to guard Paul Pierce which he could do but would sap his energy as he did in Game 6. Then think about the offense if Ira was playing, what would be his role? From what I know about Newble he's not even an offensive threat so there goes more double teams on Kobe, Pau, Odom, Fisher and more defense on them and would have most likely caused the other Lakers to score less. And if on Pierce, do you really honestly think Pierce would have been slowed the entire series? This guy not only torched
Trevor Ariza but also scored great on Bruce Bowen as well. Using Hobbitmage style, Newble couldn't even carry Paul Pierce's jackstrap, not to mention slow him down. Plus you still got a lack of offense as well. Kobe in the series has been the only one who could really guard Paul Pierce effectively, a healthy Trevor could of at time but he couldn't especially with him not being 100%.
And if Ira was such a great defender enough to alter the series why hasn't he been resigned or signed on by other teams? And if the same was to be said about Mbenga why did he chose to come back to the Lakers despite potentially receiving more playing time with the Heat when they needed a center better than Mark Blount? I have to say, Mbenga and Newble were little more than useful depth players and why they are not compared to TRUE defensive players who aren't All Stars like James Posey and Bruce Bowen (Bowen was never an All Star so he counts). Like I said your opinion is your own but don't try to say that we lost because we didn't put Mbenga or Ira, that is just as the same as saying we should have never traded Kwa-may Brown because he plays defense (which he can't and got lit up against KG back in Dec).
[Are you that immature or do you practice at it? Pat Riley was blessed with great players and was an innovative coach. He actually did coach and not sit on his arse and do nothing like PJ. Pat Riley introduced the use of video tape replay to show players where they should be and other coaching details like shot mechanics etc. and not just draw X’s and O’s on a clipboard. This is now used by ALL teams. PJ introduced Zen and only 1 team uses it. You give way to much credit to PJ when the players win. Please stay in the bathtub when playing with your toy submarine shooting torpedoes. I think your last torpedo went astray and hit you in the arse. You have not broken anything down except for your nervous system.]
Yawn again. You missed the point and tried to respond by saying what Pat Riley did? Now that is really laughable. In that response you haven't put one proven point that either proved me wrong or tried to support your original premise that:
["The Lakers success deals with the players success rather than coaching success."]
If you still want to go through that then give Kobe credit for Game 1 and Game 4 defeats in the 2004 NBA Finals because that is mostly related in what you wanted to say. And again, the Lakers never won another championship until Phil came and that was with a team that had Shaq, Kobe, Eddie Jones, and Glen Rice yet got swept by the Robinson-Duncan duo. If you really want to respond to this post then answer this then:
"If Laker success deals with players success then why did we miss the playoffs in 2004-2005?? (Hint: Phil Jackson wasn't coaching!). And if that is the case then the opposite would be true in that Laker failures should also be blamed more on the players instead of just the coach.So if you want to say that premise, then Kobe is more responsible for the 06 playoffs and 07 playoff defeats and the lost in the 08 Finals more than Phil being outcoached."
Answer that directly please and don't give me crap like Pat Riley bringing up Instant Replay please.
[ I see you grasp little knowledge of basketball and try to make up for it by long rambling post stating falsehoods and calling them facts. If you knew about BB you would know that coach K had these players when they were thrown together and expected to gel. He had a roster of great players with no team concept. When the 3 yr commitment was made by players they played as a team and coach K using many of the previous players and adding Kobe won the Gold Medal. How many Gold Medals has PJ coached? I know you will probably come back with how many championships have coach K won? Well not the same. College coach cannot win championship in NBA but NBA coach can win in Olympics.]
So I take all of them including Lebron were all ball hogs?? Well maybe Carmelo is a ball hog but saying Lebron doesn't have a team concept is really absurd, most analyst would laugh at that idea. Remember Coach K had to get a 3 year commitment out of them. With the exception of the 2004 Team All the other coaches didn't require "3 year commitments" and not only won but owned the competition. 1992 Dream Team were put together very quickly and blew out opponents being coached by Chuck Daly. 1996 Team did the same thing and was coached by Lenny Wilkins. 2000 team was coached by Rudy T. and while blowing out opponents barely escaped with 3 points in the final round. Larry Brown in 2004 could only get bronze. And Coach K. had far longer time to orgainze an Olympic team more than any of the 3 coaches who won the gold medal. Give Daly, Wilkins, and Rudy T. that time and they would have probably even done better. So no can't say Coach K. is better than PJ just because he won a gold medal in the Olympics. And Phil has no gold medals since he declined to coach any offers.
[I know you will probably come back with how many championships have coach K won? Well not the same. ]
Again you just went against yourself and spared me from typing so I have to say thanks. What you just said "Its not the same" basically defeats your original premise that Coach K is a better coach then Phil Jackson.
JLF, try something better and please get your facts straight. Your dislike of PJ's coaching is not helping your argument that Phil Jackson sucks as a coach. And don't try to revise Lakers history simply to strengthen your argument. And try to answer the questions instead dodging them mmmkay?
BTW I live in Westwood, CA.
-blitz
Posted by: thekobebryantblitz | October 13, 2008 at 03:59 PM
For all the talk about our bigs having problems, the real problem is that guys like Farmar, Coby Karl and others like to shoot way too much from beyond the arc and from the perimeter instead of feeding our bigs for higher percentage shots, epecially Andrew Bynum. It must be frustrating for a big man to rebound, run the floor, get good position and then watch as dummies like Farmar and Karl gun up jumpers. At least make people pay when your big sets you up for wide open shots. I really don't know if Farmar will ever be better than he is because he seems intent on settling for outside shots because he has average quickness and doesn't seem to set up others for easy baskets(never seems to rank high in the assists dept.) Coby Karl is just plain junk if you ask me because he's not that good of a shooter and he commits silly fouls. I think Crawford has more potential than either Farmar or Karl. I wish the Lakers could also keep Giles but I doubt they will.
Posted by: Nemaia Faletogo | October 12, 2008 at 09:13 PM
===========================
Share your views about too much outside shooting by JF and CK. I alsoliked Crawford and Giles.
Posted by: JustaLakerFan | October 13, 2008 at 08:58 PM
JLF sayez:
[Hint PJ wasn’t coaching cuz he got his arse fired. We in LA hire coaches to win championships and not just make playoffs. PJ has been a big loser in that department in recent history. Maybe you expect less in Colorado. So then you made my point for me. Yes without those players those other coaches probably don’t win championships either. But at least they coached. And Byron Scott made the playoffs with lesser talent and not as deep teams, something PJ cannot do. That is by your lost logic].
Nope PJ wasn't coaching because Jerry Krause refused to renew his contract because Krause was jealous of Jordan and Jackson. Pippen left the Bulls also because he didn't want to be with Jerry. Phil was not fired, get your facts straight. The same thing was true during PJ's first tenure. Buss wanted to go back to Showtime Lakers and have Kobe lead the way. Unfortunately not only were the pieces not right for Showtime (Chris Mihm as center??) but the team achieved a 32-50 record. If you think that is ok as long as Phil Jackson is gone, then all power to you, lets get to rebuilding like the Knicks or the Heat plus wasting Kobe Bryant's prime years even more. And make championships and not make playoffs? You really are making me laugh if you want to glorify Byron Scott how many championships does he have?? Nada, Zero, Zip according to your term.
{Sonny, don’t they teach anything in Colorado except have bumbling white girls try to sue superstar basketball players? Semantics sonny learn business etiquette. Not rehired because of disagreement with owner = FIRED. Getting let go because owner wants to go in different direction = FIRED. It does not matter what or who I wanted as coach but the owners obviously did not want P{J and he was FIRED. ]
Byron Scott made it to the Finals only twice and he lost in a sweep by the Lakers and then the next year by the Spurs and Byron Scott using less talent? Let's see:
2000-2001 NJN under Byron Scott: 26-56 record.
The next year the Nets get Jason Kidd and makes the Finals. In 2003-2004 Byron Scott gets FIRED after 42 games.
[ Kidd declining talent and got Byron fired and Kidd accomplished what? Nada. Byron went on to Hornets and built them into a contender with 2nd best record in WC. Kidd ended up in Dallas and what title?]
2004-2005: Scott arrives in New Orleans and gets a sub par 18-64 season. Next year they draft CP3 but for the next two seasons don't even make the playoffs. In 2007-2008 the Hornets makes the playoffs and eliminates the Mavericks but lose in Game 7 to the Spurs despite being at home and blowing them out in 3 of the 7 games. Some winner huh?
[Son again learn about basketball. Michael Jordan was not effective until his 3rd year as well as Kobe, Deron Williams etc. So he did not make playoffs with rookie. Now that is laughable. Gee did PJ make the finals with Farmar his first year, or Bynum? Some coach indeed.]
Also I forgot to mention: Phil HAS won a championship. In the CBA without no MJ or Kobe or Shaq he won the CBA in his first season. Now you can say "it wasn't in the NBA" but under your standards PJ has won without them.
[Whoa the ever dangerous and talented league the CBA. That has to clinch it for the greatest coach ever. ]
"We in LA hire coaches to win championships"
Besides Pat Riley and Phil Jackson and I'll include Paul Westhead who after Magic was drafted won championships? Rudy T (and Rudy T has 2 championships in Houston)? Del Harris? Mike Dunleavy? Kurt Rambis? Frank Hamblen? Only Pat Riley, Phil Jackson, Paul Westhead and Bill Sharman has had Laker teams win championships (LA Teams, Minneapolis doesn't count). What about the rest of the coaches? Clearly you argued against yourself JLF. Since there has only been 4 coaches that have won championships in LA.
[Don’t have to as I stated we hire coaches in expectation to win championships. That does not mean we always succeed. But when we don’t we replace the losers with winning coaches. And yes PJ has failed miserably in that department as he has brought the most credentials than the other coaches you mentioned. So yes his specific job was to bring championship home and his recent record shows he failed.]
[Yes without those players those other coaches probably don’t win championships either. But at least they coached. And Byron Scott made the playoffs with lesser talent and not as deep teams, something PJ cannot do. That is by your lost logic. ]
If you think Kwa-may Brown, Smush Parker, Brian Cook and Lamar Odom are better than Tyson Chandler, CP3, David West, and Peja Stojakovic then don't bother to argue with me. 2006-2007 the Lakers make the playoffs yet even with the the same roster as the next years the Hornets fail to miss the playoffs despite Golden State having a losing record (40-42). And again explain WHY in 2004-2005 we miss the playoffs and yet when PJ comes back we make the playoffs with an even WORST roster than the year before (Kwa-may Brown shouldn't be compared to Caron Butler in skill)? And they coached? Man that is really very weak to try to justify your argument. You have not answered any of the questions JLF just saying this and that which in a school would be marked wrong since your answers are unrelated to what the question is.
[Just as good since these players made the playoffs and went 3-1 over Suns and then lost 3 straight with PJ making no adjustments and lack of coaching. So not the best players but good enough to make playoffs.]
[ I don’t have to calm down as I am calm. I am stating adamantly for you to stop trying to put words in my mouth or it will get ugly. I am not yelling, cursing, name calling but just stating a fact. It was a reply in an email to me you stated that. I found it so do your own homework. Hint try Google. Also a true Laker fan never apologizes to a Troll. How laughable sorry Butler, hahahaha. So pathetic an action ]
Cool your calm now try this: an email? I don't send emails to other bloggers and only Long Time Laker Fan I have and that was for Fantasy Draft. LOL. And you found what? The tactic of words in your mouth? Nope no record to Humanamoly that I have done so and if anything it was Hobbitmage that I debated. So once again you are WRONG. In your words: do your homework again. And while Butler is a pain, at least sometimes he does speak reasonable from time to time though he is delusional a ton. I may be not so "fanatic" as some Laker fans, at least it doesn't cloud my judgment and say irrational things like "The Lakers won in spite of PJ' when the Lakers without PJ in 2004-2005 MISSED THE PLAYOFFS. Hey cmon, even Jon K. does defend Mike T. from time to time (and many Laker bloggers here not only dislike him but also call him a troll). So seriously do your homework because you are just posting so many inaccurate things.
[The only thing inaccurate was the name humanoly instead of hobbitmage but the rest is fact. I did my homework and proved you wrong and wantonly misinformed and lacking general basic knowledge about basketball and cohesiveness of how teams work together. And Butler is a Troll and if you find any of his comments reasonable then I rest my case on your knowledge of basketball. Fanaticism is not opining the obvious but to continue to babble in the bath tub playing with toy torpedoes. Grow up and learn some things before your expect credibility in your supposed facts.]
[ Is that because Kobe did this by himself as he has before? Like the time he took a clipboard from Cleamons and drew up a play in PJ’s face (coached) that is what Lakers did. Remember PJ lost in the faceoff in front office to get Kobe traded. He won’t make that mistake again. He goes to FO and demands him or Kobe goes, guess who goes? Hint it ain’t Kobe. Kobe is his own motivator and works hard to improve and does not need PJ to motivate him. Give Kobe the credit not PJ. Very cool indeed.]
Again your are missing the point JLF. Withouth Phil Kobe didn't even make any teams save for 3rd teams. And yes Phil did try to have Kobe traded because Kobe many times went to split double teams and not run the offense in spite of having Shaq open (and vice versa, Shaq went inside too much instead of kicking out to Kobe). And give Kobe the credit? This one will hurt your argument more than it will hurt mine:
If you really want to give credit for Kobe then try this:
2000 Finals vs Reggie Miller: 36% FG for 14ppg
2004 Finals vs Tayshaun Prince: 38% FG for 22.6ppg
[Big whoop. Does not mean PJ did this. Kobe has ALWAYS worked on his game to improve and if he had an off year does not mean PJ had anything to do with Kobes improvement. That is just your opinion and not based on any fact.]
In both Game 1 and 4 Shaq had monster games yet Kobe kept firing away against Tayshaun Prince's defense (yet Kobe hit a game winner in Prince's face in 2007 FIBA). While there was other factors to the Lakers lost, Kobe kept firing for contested jumpers despite Shaq securing position in the post despite Kobe's promise to run the triangle offense in the visitor's locker room's bathroom at the Palace of Auburn Hills. Win Game 1 and 4 and the series ends back at Staples Center. Try giving credit for Kobe for that or can you?
And for another comparison to your premise that "Kobe did it on his own". Let's try seeing what awards Kobe got before Phil arrived.
Pre-Phil Jackson:
Kobe Bryant's achievements
*2 Time All-Star
1999 All NBA 3rd Team.
1997 Slam Dunk Champion
*-No All Star Game in 1999 but it's not unreasonable speculation Kobe would have been an All Star then.
Between PJ's 1st and 2nd term:
Kobe Bryant's achievements (despite having a potential All Star in Caron Butler):
2005 NBA All Star
3rd NBA All Team.
Kobe was 3rd in MVP voting in 2002-2003 (He should have won though Duncan wasn't a bad choice either), 4th in MVP in 2005-2006, 3rd in 2006-2007 and 1st in 2007-2008. All MVP votes came when he had Phil.
All other awards such All NBA Teams and All Defensive Teams, came when he was with Phil Jackson. Causation? Probably not, it's a fallacy to think that. Association? Definitely. Don't try to deny the association JLF, without Phil, Kobe as the main option hasn't done crap. I give Kobe his credit for what he has done, as to all players. Don't try to deny what Phil has done for Kobe as much as Kobe has done for Phil.
[Again who cares what fat Shaq T. Prince or anyone else did. Did PJ coach Prince to do a good job on Kobe and should get the credit too? Kobe’s lack of acknowledgement came because of the fact you loved him or hated him. The writers etc refused to acknowledge Kobe over the years and the Colorado incident did not help. No matter what Shaq said or did he was just Shaq and no bad. Every thing Kobe said or did was under microscope and was judged to death about kobe being Kobe. So that has nothing to do with PJ or his lack of coaching have to do with Kobe getting his dues as time went on. Or did PJ influence the writers with his zen to get Kobe acknowledged. Stick to facts and don’t try to pin Kobe’s success on PJs tail.]
[You need to put your feet on the ground with your statements. I have stated many times why I dislike PJ ‘s methods and stated I like him as a person but not as coach. You are right you can’t object to that. However my take on the Celtics series is that Mbenga could have helped by throwing Greenie Weenies a curve. Things like that work. Just look at PP’s fake injury while the Lakers were in the game, and then that distraction changed the game and it’s outcome. As I stated we know for a FACT we know the Lakers lost NOT using Mbenga. For a FACT you or anyone else cannot say we would not have won. You can opine as such but the truth is we will never know. My opinion is that we would have won and would have likely won.]
You are entitled to your opinion and that's something I will never touch. But to say things like what you have said like "Phil got outcoached" that is not opinion.
[Yes it is an opinion. I never said for a fact so my statement qualifies as an opinion. Still trying to put words in my mouth I see.]
Otherwise you can count Pop getting outcoached by Phil and Pop has been the one who outcoached D'Antoni. There is no logic to that PJ got outcoached simply because he lost. And you want to compare Ira Newble and DJ Mbenga to Paul Pierce? Pierce would have owned both guys and while it is my opinion, many people would agree. And what does putting the Celtics on the curve mean? Faking injuries in Bean Town? I doubt the crowd would show much sympathy. What else maybe Flagrant Fouls? That's nice if you want the Celtics to get 2 free shots not to mention the ball back (and set their rage on the Lakers). Putting them on a curve is really vague and makes no sense. There isn't anything else that I could think of "putting on the curve". Be more specific.
The difference between what you have done and me? Simple, I've presented my opinion based on the players abilities.
[BS. You made points as if your opinions are fact.]
JLF, you've tried to set your viewpoints as facts like PJ's fault for not playing Mbenga and Newble and we lost because of it. Yes I know you said it was your opinion just NOW but you haven't done so in the past. I know that Mbenga while a good shot blocker is simply not the lock down defender as you imagine him to be.
[Again putting words in my mouth I see. Look son I never said Mbenga was a lockdown defender but he could have been useful in spurts to change complexion of the game. Yes it is PJ’s fault for not trying as his way for a FACT lost us the series. We for a fact will never kno because of PJ’s stubbornness and lack of trying to coach. Repeat of Sun series.]
Blocking shots is one thing, allowing penetration is something else and not getting the rebound is another. Plus Mbenga and Ira doesn't have any offense.
[Mbenga showed offense in end of regular season and yet as Kobe stated defense wins championships. We had offensive players so how about trying to use defense? That so hard for you to fathom?]
Turnovers killed the Lakers in Game 6 and you cannot argue that turnovers (getting stolen from and throwing bad passes) is helped what led to the big deficit in Game 6. The Celtics stole the ball 18 times and that led to 36 points and no team can defend if they let the other team steal the ball. That's why I've said that simply putting Mbenga and Newble does not mean we would have won, there would have been no offense against the Celtic Defense anyways. Put in Mbenga or Newble and who else will score? Sasha? Sasha shot only 42.5% in the Finals for 8 points per game and only had one good game (Game 3). Kobe? Again Kobe shot a low FG% (40.7) and shot ice cold for 4/6 games in the Finals. Lamar had tendinitis and was cold also in the Finals, Pau had only 1 great game and that stemmed from him being guarded by Perkins and guarding KG in turn (not an easy task), Jordan was ice cold until Game 5 and 6. So there would have been little offense anyways.
[ As I recall Kobe had a lot of turnovers so do we sit Kobe? Again you can’t say what woulkd have happened if PJ used either player or both, Mbenga or Ira. But again we know for a FACT we lost Not using them. You can’t argue that as that is fact and history.]
Again let's assume Phil put in Mbenga and Ira. Who would have they guarded? Mbenga on Perkins? That's pointless as Perkins isn't the main threat or put him on KG perhaps?
[I have posted this before but since you only look at your posts as factual I will reply again to this. I suggested we try Mbenga on Perkins and move him to top of key to open up lane for Kobe. Pau would take KG. Mbenga showed he could hit 15-18 footer so Perkins would have to come out to cover him and keep him honest.
Ira in his stint could have taken either PP or Ray Ray. In short stints he would not have to pace himself and play very aggressive. So simple yet not even tried. So forget the rest of your dribble below.]
Do you really honestly think Mbenga could even slow down KG plus defending the post at the same time? And what about Ira? Put him on who? Ray Ray or Pierce? If on Ray Allen, assuming he could stop Ray Ray completely, Kobe would have been forced to guard Paul Pierce which he could do but would sap his energy as he did in Game 6. Then think about the offense if Ira was playing, what would be his role? From what I know about Newble he's not even an offensive threat so there goes more double teams on Kobe, Pau, Odom, Fisher and more defense on them and would have most likely caused the other Lakers to score less. And if on Pierce, do you really honestly think Pierce would have been slowed the entire series? This guy not only torched
Trevor Ariza but also scored great on Bruce Bowen as well. Using Hobbitmage style, Newble couldn't even carry Paul Pierce's jackstrap, not to mention slow him down. Plus you still got a lack of offense as well. Kobe in the series has been the only one who could really guard Paul Pierce effectively, a healthy Trevor could of at time but he couldn't especially with him not being 100%.
And if Ira was such a great defender enough to alter the series why hasn't he been resigned or signed on by other teams? And if the same was to be said about Mbenga why did he chose to come back to the Lakers despite potentially receiving more playing time with the Heat when they needed a center better than Mark Blount? I have to say, Mbenga and Newble were little more than useful depth players and why they are not compared to TRUE defensive players who aren't All Stars like James Posey and Bruce Bowen (Bowen was never an All Star so he counts). Like I said your opinion is your own but don't try to say that we lost because we didn't put Mbenga or Ira, that is just as the same as saying we should have never traded Kwa-may Brown because he plays defense (which he can't and got lit up against KG back in Dec).
[Are you that immature or do you practice at it? Pat Riley was blessed with great players and was an innovative coach. He actually did coach and not sit on his arse and do nothing like PJ. Pat Riley introduced the use of video tape replay to show players where they should be and other coaching details like shot mechanics etc. and not just draw X’s and O’s on a clipboard. This is now used by ALL teams. PJ introduced Zen and only 1 team uses it. You give way to much credit to PJ when the players win. Please stay in the bathtub when playing with your toy submarine shooting torpedoes. I think your last torpedo went astray and hit you in the arse. You have not broken anything down except for your nervous system.]
Yawn again. You missed the point and tried to respond by saying what Pat Riley did? Now that is really laughable. In that response you haven't put one proven point that either proved me wrong or tried to support your original premise that:
[No you missed the point. I pointed out what Riles accomplished and showed PJ has not contributed a thing except for zen which is useless. If you can’t see the fact that Riles contributed then you missed te point.]
["The Lakers success deals with the players success rather than coaching success."]
If you still want to go through that then give Kobe credit for Game 1 and Game 4 defeats in the 2004 NBA Finals because that is mostly related in what you wanted to say. And again, the Lakers never won another championship until Phil came and that was with a team that had Shaq, Kobe, Eddie Jones, and Glen Rice yet got swept by the Robinson-Duncan duo. If you really want to respond to this post then answer this then:
[Simply stated going back to ancient history does not make a great coach for the Lakers now. Answer me this. Now since he has come back how many championships has he won????]
"If Laker success deals with players success then why did we miss the playoffs in 2004-2005?? (Hint: Phil Jackson wasn't coaching!).
[PJ got fired. Hint hint and there was a coaching turmoil with Tomjanovitch quitting and Winters, PJ’s protégé and triangle innovator, sucking up the sidelines. Ring any bells?]
And if that is the case then the opposite would be true in that Laker failures should also be blamed more on the players instead of just the coach.So if you want to say that premise, then Kobe is more responsible for the 06 playoffs and 07 playoff defeats and the lost in the 08 Finals more than Phil being outcoached."
[I just did and again PJ was clearly outcoached. Kobe had too much responsibility to carry the whole team and coach when PJ wouldn’t or couldn’t. Kobe had to draw up plays, tell players where to be on the floor and when Pau came talk to him in Spanish while coaching him on the floor while PJ sat on his arse.]
Answer that directly please and don't give me crap like Pat Riley bringing up Instant Replay please.
[ I see you grasp little knowledge of basketball and try to make up for it by long rambling post stating falsehoods and calling them facts. If you knew about BB you would know that coach K had these players when they were thrown together and expected to gel. He had a roster of great players with no team concept. When the 3 yr commitment was made by players they played as a team and coach K using many of the previous players and adding Kobe won the Gold Medal. How many Gold Medals has PJ coached? I know you will probably come back with how many championships have coach K won? Well not the same. College coach cannot win championship in NBA but NBA coach can win in Olympics.]
So I take all of them including Lebron were all ball hogs?? Well maybe Carmelo is a ball hog but saying Lebron doesn't have a team concept is really absurd, most analyst would laugh at that idea. Remember Coach K had to get a 3 year commitment out of them. With the exception of the 2004 Team All the other coaches didn't require "3 year commitments" and not only won but owned the competition. 1992 Dream Team were put together very quickly and blew out opponents being coached by Chuck Daly. 1996 Team did the same thing and was coached by Lenny Wilkins. 2000 team was coached by Rudy T. and while blowing out opponents barely escaped with 3 points in the final round. Larry Brown in 2004 could only get bronze. And Coach K. had far longer time to orgainze an Olympic team more than any of the 3 coaches who won the gold medal. Give Daly, Wilkins, and Rudy T. that time and they would have probably even done better. So no can't say Coach K. is better than PJ just because he won a gold medal in the Olympics. And Phil has no gold medals since he declined to coach any offers.
[I can and I did. You are totally clueless if you think a team of superstars can just be thrown together and play as a team. Again I am really getting tired of you putting words in my mouth. Show me where I said they are ballhogs! That was your way of stating a bs response and trying to attribute it to me. Stick to my points and not what you make up. Got It? So PJ declined offers so does that make him a coward. Seems the greatest coach of all time would want that feather in his hat. Unless of course he knows he can’t do it. Just saying.]
[I know you will probably come back with how many championships have coach K won? Well not the same. ]
Again you just went against yourself and spared me from typing so I have to say thanks. What you just said "Its not the same" basically defeats your original premise that Coach K is a better coach then Phil Jackson.
[How in your mind does this qualify as as me going against myself? Your words in my mouth again? Hell no.
JLF, try something better and please get your facts straight. Your dislike of PJ's coaching is not helping your argument that Phil Jackson sucks as a coach. And don't try to revise Lakers history simply to strengthen your argument. And try to answer the questions instead dodging them mmmkay?
BTW I live in Westwood, CA.
-blitz
[My facts are facts and my opinions are mine. Get yours sorted and straight. So Westwood ,CA is code for Denver, Colorado? Thanks for the info Hugo Blitz
Posted by: thekobebryantblitz | October 13, 2008 at 03:59 PM
JLF
Posted by: JustaLakerFan | October 13, 2008 at 10:35 PM
Hugo Blitz
I just posted a reply to you and noted I said Winters instead of Hamblin so don't get your panties in a bunch and cry get your facts straight.
Posted by: JustaLakerFan | October 13, 2008 at 10:47 PM