__________ verse, same as the ________
As it's been for every season in which he's worn the purple and gold, Lamar Odom heads into the season as one of the biggest names on the trade market, status he'll keep until the Lakers actually move him, or sign him to an extension. I don't see either happening fast, so in the meantime, get used to lists such as this one from Chad Ford at ESPN, discussing the big names already being bandied about in trade rumors.
He hits, of course, on the long-discussed Odom-for-Shawn Marion swap, one I've never been all that fond of. Despite myriad skills, I don't think Marion has the mental makeup to mesh well with the Lakers. He's not all that fond of playing third or fourth fiddle, and desperately wants a long-term, very lucrative extension. How is this a good fit?
Should the Lakers decide eventually to pull the trigger, I hope they consider doing it for role guys, not an A-lister. They have plenty of frontline talent. LO's value comes in part because, early-camp sniping aside, he's got high-level talent but doesn't demand shots. He doesn't even want them all that much. There aren't many star players (not calling Odom a star, but regarding getting one back in a deal) who would be content to slide into a 3A or 4th option role.
BK

BK,
Have you ever considered auditioning for the role of Lex Luthor?
Just curious.
GO LAKERS!
Posted by: Jon K. | October 15, 2008 at 01:38 PM
This trade talk about Lamar Odom is much ado about nothing.
Lamar's not going anywhere.
Lamar Odom = Laker for Life.
GO LAKERS!
Posted by: Jon K. | October 15, 2008 at 01:49 PM
Repost:
Lamar Odom & Vladimir Radmanovic
for
Vince Carter & Stromile Swift
What do you guys think?
Posted by: puddle | October 15, 2008 at 01:50 PM
Play it out first guys. Then decide to move LO.
Posted by: Charles | October 15, 2008 at 01:54 PM
People are sometimes down on Lamar Odom because he doesn't score 20 points a game and occasionally makes bonehead plays.
If we trade Lamar Odom, we'll get possible a better offensive player, but we don't need a better offensive player. We already have Kobe Bryant, Pau Gasol, Andrew Bynum and a bench full of players who like to score.
We need a player who takes care of intangibles, is a good team player who understands the system, rebounds, and has good to excellent ball-handling skills.
Who is that player I described?
Lamar Odom.
Who could we trade Lamar Odom for to get Lamar Odom's package of skills?
No one.
Lamar's not going anywhere.
Lamar Odom = Laker for Life.
GO LAKERS!
Posted by: Jon K. | October 15, 2008 at 01:55 PM
I visited the Trade machine after reading this article and only one trade looked realistic to me. Odom for Wally Szerbiak. This would be a straight salary dump if the uncertainty about Odom's role this season and contract next season was proving to be a distraction. If our SF corps is healthy I'd expect us to buy Wally out afterwards.
The fact is the team can't afford to pay Odom and Bynum. Bynum has more upside and they'll back him. If we can't pay Odom, we won't be able to pay some other guy or combo of guys either. Other teams might want to lay Larry Hughes or Vince Carter on us, but we'd be cash strapped for years if we did with guys who won't help. Guys we'd want, like Turkoglu (I'm sticking with the teams labeled interested in the story) + someone else, probably aren't avaiable and would STILL put us over operating revenue (~80 mil).
So the only thing that would make sense for the bottom line would be to expedite the removal of Odom's contract from the books. And we'd only make that move if he really does seem distracted and its hurting the team. We'd get the same advantage by playing him through the year and letting him walk as by waiving Wally, but if Odom pouts or doesn't want to play on the bench, then the team has to do what it will.
I like Odom and appreciate what he's given the team. I'd hate to see it go down like this. But this seems like a very plausible outcome given everything we know. Ideally, he'd accept whatever role we need him to take. He could still excel in a 6th man role. Antawn Jamison and Manu Ginobli have. He'd get starter minutes and potential suitors next year should understand the situation while appreciating his team first mentality. That's how I'd like it to go down. But I know Odom and that he can be deeply affected even if he's trying to do the right thing. If something needs to be done, this would be the move I'd expect.
And how bout those Cavs if they did swing that??
Posted by: J.D. Hastings | October 15, 2008 at 02:04 PM
I'd pull that Lamar for Marion trigger!
Posted by: warren with butterknives | October 15, 2008 at 02:05 PM
I for one don't understand the hurry to trade Lamar. The problem the Lakers have where LO is concerned, is a good one - where and how do we play this multi-talented player to ensure that we get the best from him, in terms of winning a championship. Every other team in the L would love to have Lamar Odom on their roster, and I have to believe that the Swiss knife will find his fit as the season goes along.
That the guy's also terrific trade bait is also a "good" problem. I predict that some other team will make the Lakers an offer they won't be able to refuse between now and the trading deadline.
Posted by: Glenn | October 15, 2008 at 02:07 PM
Trade Odom and VladRad for Marion.
The heat win because they get two players in the deal for marion, who they might lose for nothing if they just let him go. Odom could then be resigned to an extension at a lower rate than he has and would work well with Beasley/Wade. VladRad balances the contracts and gives them another shooter.
The Lakers can tell Marion that he has a chance to win a ring and increase his value. But don't have to give him an extension (just rent him for the year) and then let his contract come off the cap next year. Goodbye. He's perfect - defense minded, rebounds from the SF position, and can hit jumpers. Trouble is his head, but Odom has the same problem.
Lakers would have a talented player that fits their current squad better and can unload Vlad's crappy contract.
Posted by: sean | October 15, 2008 at 02:13 PM
I'm a fan of an Odom for Marion swap.
I don't like any other options nearly as much. I like David Lee, but we don't need a power forward and I don't think he can play the 3.
I think Gerald Wallace and Josh Smith are largely locked up. Artest isn't available. Maybe Battier might become available? Igoudala? Mike Miller?
If we can get Marion, get his Bird rights in the trade, and offer him a contract that allows us to match the market, we can resign him at a reasonable price.
I like Marion's game a lot. He's a role player, but a very high profile one that can do a lot.
Personality could be an issue, but I think he might appreciate a real chance at a title rather than PHX's canard of a chance. I also trust Phil to manage his personality just fine.
I can't think of a better player likely available should we decide to part ways with Odom. I put the chance of us doing that at pretty close to 50/50 right now. Odom needs to mesh well and perform and it's pretty unclear whether he's going to be able to do that.
Posted by: Benjamin | October 15, 2008 at 02:19 PM
interesting. I was checking on Bynum because his extension has to be done by the end of the month, I believe and check out the dates for his contract status the last 2 years. Guess we won't hear anything until the last minute.
TRANSACTIONS
10/29/07: The Los Angeles Lakers picked up the 2008-2009 team option on Andrew Bynum's contract.
10/31/06: The Los Angeles Lakers picked up the 2007-2008 team option on Andrew Bynum's contract.
Posted by: Stay Thirsty My Friends | October 15, 2008 at 02:25 PM
I'm with BK on Odom for Marion - doesn't make sense on many levels, I wouldn't do it - then again I am not the GM or the Owner. I still think rolling with the squad we have for an extended trial period is the way to go. See how the various lineups mesh. If there are issues, figure out who it makes sense to move - and I mean realistically not any of those great for the Lakers unloading Luke and Lamar or Vlad for multiple All-Stars etc. - you all know what I am talking about I hope. This is going to be a fascinating season for the Lakers. Full of a lot of hope and promise - a true title contender - not just a hope of die hard Laker fans wishing it to be so. (You know - kind of like Butler thinking the Suns are the best franchise in NBA history when they haven't won anything more than a Western Conference Title. I am sure that is a nice accomplishment, but not quite as good as winning the O'Brien Trophy.)
Cheers,
Eagleboy
Posted by: Eagleboy | October 15, 2008 at 02:39 PM
Maybe the best approach is simply to let Lam-Od go to the highest bidder, and then let the painfully slow twin-7-footers struggle to play transition D.
Posted by: BUTLER | October 15, 2008 at 02:41 PM
Just got back from the Lakers Open Practice. Season ticket holders filled about 4 sections in the lower bowl. The requisite schwag was a Lakers coffee tumbler. Here's a rundown of what went on.
Warmups:
Players started off by getting loose and shooting. Chip Schaeffer came out and stretched the guys. Alex McKechnie ran them through some cross court movements wearing stretch bands tied between their thighs and wrists.
Drills:
PJ got them going on fast break drills. Started off 4 on 4. PJ would pick a player and throw them the ball. That person's defender had to run to the baseline before retreating back on defense, creating a 4 on 3 situation. Then they went to 3 on 3. After that they broke up into 4 groups running basic triangle rotations in each corner of the court. The premise of this drill was to get all 5 players used to the basic movements of all 5 positions. Then they broke up into three teams (purple, white and green) and ran some half court sets.
During this time, B Shaw was answering questions from the STHs. My fellow STHs always surprise me. Fans come in all shapes and sizes and some of them are just plain weird. People were asking B Shaw what he thought about the NBA forcing players to do one year of college or what he thought Joe Crawford was going to bring to this team. Some fans were yelling at Lamar about coming off the bench. Another fan was asking how much the team practices D (and added he was asking because he's not seeing the results on the court). B Shaw said training camp has been about 80/20 more focused on D. He also revealed that PJ designated Rambis the "defensive coordinator" of the staff. The funniest question came from a fan who asked why Drew was wearing his shorts backwards (which he was).
Scrimmaging:
Purple was the starting unit (Kobe, Fish, Vlad, Drew and Pau). They pretty quickly got smoked by the Green team (Mihm, Giles, Ariza, Heath and Karl). The green team then lost to the Whites (Farmar, Crawford, Luke, Mbenga and Powell). When purple came back in, LO replaced Drew. Drew then replaced Pau when he lost his shoe. And Pau then moved to the white team. When it was all said and done, the Purple team woke up and won the final scrimmage created mainly by some great hustle defense capped off by a Kobe break-away dunk and alley-oop dunk on back-to-back posessions. They were banging pretty hard out there. Powell got popped in the head enough to have Vitti take him in the locker room. At one point, Kobe threw Jordan down on the floor while they were in transition.
At the end, the team ran their sprints (Kobe won and threw his hands up in the air again). The team only missed 4 free throws and practice ended.
Most of the beat reporters were there from the scrimmages on. Jim Hill was on hand as well.
Observations:
Certain players practice harder than others. If you wonder why Mihm's still on the team? He was probably the hardest working big out there. He hustled, played really aggresively and scored over Drew more than once. Mbenga as well. Although DJ shoots way too much. Ariza looked fantastic as did Farmar. Both were really active and "captained" their respective teams really well. Sun Yue showed really nice handles and a very smooth stroke. Both Powell and Giles were very active inside. The starters were really lax today. It was only at the very end where they played with intensity.
I can see why Drew's been criticized in practice. Mbenga, Mihm and Pau all took turns scoring over him relatively easily. One thing he does on defense which I noticed in games as well as today is, on rotations, if the ball goes to a wide open shooter, Drew will opt to find the nearest big and put a body on him rather than go out on the shooter (when he's the nearest player). When Drew does play the shooter or ballhandler, he gets burned b/c nobody rotates over to his big (helping the helper). The bottom line is, Drew needs to up his intensity big time at all times - not just save it up for games. I think they should run a rebounding drill where he has to repeatedly go up against Powell and LO for boards.
One big positive was how well the team seemed to get along. Everyone was chatting it up with everyone else. There were no lone wolves or any amount of tension whatsoever.
Posted by: lakers_sth | October 15, 2008 at 02:45 PM
Side note:
Shaq mouthing off. I love how bitter he sounds! HaHaHaHa
http://tinyurl.com/3ed7mq
Posted by: frank1rizzo | October 15, 2008 at 03:07 PM
Lakers_sth -
Awesome report. Thanks for taking the time to write that.
Posted by: puddle | October 15, 2008 at 03:12 PM
lakers_sth
Thanks for the update. Hopefully PSLakerFan can give us his observations.
Posted by: Charles | October 15, 2008 at 03:15 PM
lakers_sth,
Awesome write up. Thanks.
GO LAKERS!
Posted by: Jon K. | October 15, 2008 at 03:17 PM
>>Should the Lakers decide eventually to pull the trigger, I
>>hope they consider doing it for role guys, not an A-lister.
I completely concur.
My ideal scenario is that Lamar would agree to re-sign for something
more like 7 million per, which would make him worth paying
the luxury tax for. But I can't imagine the Lakers keeping
all three of Kobe, Bynum, and Gasol and paying a fourth player
10 million plus.
Marion's kind of an exception to that idea. If the Lakers
were resigned to the fact that they needed to let Lamar's
contract expire and not re-sign him to get the payroll down,
then trading for Marion kinda makes sense. While it's true
that he doesn't like being 3rd or 4th fiddle, he always played
hard with Phoenix, and would do the same for the Lakers,
especially with the twin incentives of contract year and
potential championship to inspire him. And Marion is an
excellent wing defender. Marion on Paul Pierce (or LeBron
or whoever they see in the finals) is much more reliable
defensively than Lamar or Luke or Rad or even Ariza.
But if they have to trade Lamar, I think the best they could
do would be to get back expiring contracts and 1 or 2 lower
paid role players, preferably signed for 2 or 3 years at the
lower salary.
For example...
-------------- Cleveland -------------------------------
Lamar for Anderson Varejao (~6 million), Eric Snow (expiring),
and Cleveland's first round draft pick. Cleveland gets
a two-way player, Lakers get an excellent defensive backup
PF/C and a chance to re-stock with a mid-late 1st rounder.
--------------
Lamar for Ben Gordon or Drew Gooden (expiring) plus
Tyrus Thomas or Joachim Noah (plus whoever to match
salary). That would give the Lakers two good role players
for 1 year and one very good young frontcourt backup for
another year or two beyond that.
--------------------- New Jersey ---------------------------------------
Lamar for Stromile Swift (expiring) plus some combo of
players from New Jersey. Jersey currently has over 50 million
in contracts for 2010-11. Granted, 6 of those deals are team
options for that year, but If they're hoping to recruit LeBron,
they need to drop some to make cap space, and it certainly
wouldn't hurt their chances to add Lamar as a starter.
A lineup of Devin Harris, Vince Carter, Lamar, Brook Lopez,
and a hole at SF looks made for LeBron.
And Lamar is from New York and lives there in the off
season, so it would be going home for him, in a way.
So what's in the combo platter? They have several role
players that make 4 million or less. Some subset of Yi Jianlian,
Eduardo Najera, Sean Williams, Jarvis Hayes, Josh Boone,
Ryan Anderson and Chris Douglas-Roberts.
Sure, none of those guys is as good as Lamar, but a few of
them would be upgrades to Lakers role-players. For
example, Josh Boone or Sean Williams or Yi would be
better than MBenga or Powell as a front court backup.
Chris Douglas-Roberts would be an improvement over
Coby Karl as a deep guard backup.
And the Lakers could employ two or three of those guys
for two or three years for less money than it would cost to
keep Lamar. When you have 3 starters making what
Kobe, Pau, and Drew will be making, getting 3 decent
role players for 7 million is a better value than getting
one Lamar.
Posted by: Long Time Laker Fan | October 15, 2008 at 03:23 PM
thanks for the breakdown, lakers_sth! any pics?
Posted by: Lakers Legacy | October 15, 2008 at 03:24 PM
Well said BK...and the thing is about trading him for role players
1) It never seems to work as well as it should trading one player for multiple guys
2) Do that and what happens with these guys - you have basically blown up the team...welll not blown upbut changed round significantly
No way...the bestwya to win this year is to keep Odom...in fact PJ and the press seem to have had it in for him from the start of camp....give the guy a break he's a vet and he deserves more respect.The sooner the lakers say odom is not going anywhere THE BETTER. Enough of this distracting garbage.We win or lose this year with the team we have (which is pretty good if anyone forgot) and we look to improve next year if necessary....I'd rather lose with the team we have than make a trade and lose.
Posted by: Kiwi | October 15, 2008 at 03:25 PM
Jon K,
>>>Lamar's not going anywhere.
>>>
>>>Lamar Odom = Laker for Life.
Okay, so let's consider how that could be possible. Which of
the following do you think will be the thing that happens that
allows Lamar to stay with the Lakers...
a. Kobe opts out and takes a contract for 8 or 9 million less per season
b. Buss agrees for the team to lose money for several years
c. Lamar agrees to accept an MLE level contract to stay
d. Mitch manages to dump off Luke and Rad and get back
players that play as well as those two, but for 1-2 million
per year.
e. Bynum agrees to sign for more like 7 or 8 million per instead of a max deal to help out his buddy Lamar.
f. Kobe opts out and accepts the deal in Greece, so the Lakers
have some money to throw at Lamar.
Those are the sort of things that would need to happen to
keep Lamar with the team beyond this season.
I hate to say it Jon K, but if you think the Lakers are going
to keep Kobe, Gasol, and Bynum, then I seriously doubt
Lamar is a Laker for Life.
Posted by: Long Time Laker Fan | October 15, 2008 at 03:30 PM
>>>I visited the Trade machine after reading this article and
>>>only one trade looked realistic to me. Odom for Wally
>>>Szerbiak.
And that doesn't make sense for the Lakers. Their front court
becomes very thin and they add depth at a position where
they're already deep. Lamar is more useful to the Lakers
this season than Szerbiak would be.
Posted by: Long Time Laker Fan | October 15, 2008 at 03:32 PM
Kiwi,
>>>2) Do that and what happens with these guys - you
>>>have basically blown up the team...welll not blown
>>>upbut changed round significantly
Look at the teams surrounding Kobe & Shaq. The other players
on the team changed significantly from year to year, and
not one of them was an all-star (a few aging past all-stars).
When Lamar was the second best player on the team, it
was critical to keep him. Now that he's the 4th best player
on the team, it's not nearly as critical. Kobe + Pau + Drew
plus any good set of role players gives you a pretty good
shot at a championship every year.
Posted by: Long Time Laker Fan | October 15, 2008 at 03:50 PM
lakers_sth-
Awesome stuff, thanks for the report.
----------------------------
Everyone else-
For those of you saying "I went to the trade machine..." and "LO for blank" would be nice. Hear me out. This team hasn't failed yet. Why trade a player until we know it won't work? Maybe when Odom, Pau, and Drew are on the court we will be unstoppable? Or we'll never know because we traded for X player.
I bet you guys were the ones saying to trade Drew for Kidd or get Marion or get this player or that player or lets get Jermaine "who?" Oneal. Let this team be. If Odom starts sucking then we get rid of him, but that aint happening.
Lamar = Laker for Life
GO LAKERS
Posted by: mrbarneydangles | October 15, 2008 at 03:52 PM
Long Time Laker Fan,
I think Lamar is going to take less money and a recent article in the Orange County Register on Lamar Odom seemed to imply that was a real possiblity of occuring. Lamar said something to the effect of "my agent is going to be really angry with me, but that's okay."
Lamar Odom = Laker for Life
GO LAKERS!
Posted by: Jon K. | October 15, 2008 at 04:00 PM
For those of you who think you need to keep the exact set of
players (i.e. Lamar) together to continue to be successful, consider
this...
The third best player on the 2000 Lakers was Glen Rice. He
was gone in 2001, but the Lakers managed to repeat.
The starting PF in 2001 (and a major contributor) was Horace
Grant. Ron Harper also played some critical minutes coming
off the bench behind Derek Fisher (more on this in a minute). Both were gone in 2002, but the Lakers managed
to repeat
The common threads besides Shaq and Kobe were role
players:
Derek Fisher started out as a young backup PG, but when
his abilities started to exceed Ron Harper, PJ made Fish the
starter and Harper the backup (which could happen with
Fisher & Farmar this year or next).
Rick Fox came over from Boston and accepted a contract
for less than he could have gotten elsewhere. If the Lakers
make the finals again this season, next summer you might
see a veteran or two going for the same sort of deal.
Robert Horry averaged about 6 points a game for them, but
played good defense off the bench and played his best when
it mattered
Brian Shaw and Tyronn Lue each played a couple of seasons
for them and had significant moments in the playoffs (remember
Lue coming in to guard Allen Iverson in the finals?)
Devean George (who wasn't as good as Luke or Vlad is
now, but made about the same) contributed some.
The Shaq/Kobe teams never had a third player as good
as Bynum, let alone a fourth player as good as Lamar. If
the Lakers trade him or if they let his contract expire and
don't re-sign him, they'll be fine.
Posted by: Long Time Laker Fan | October 15, 2008 at 04:05 PM
So BUTLER,
Did you notice that Shaq has already started ripping his
Phoenix teammates and he hasn't even left the team yet...
http://tinyurl.com/3ed7mq
Posted by: Long Time Laker Fan | October 15, 2008 at 04:10 PM
This is nothing against LO, but I'm getting tired of reading about him already.
Posted by: Xodus | October 15, 2008 at 04:12 PM
Thanks everyone. Did my best trying to put together that recap. Sorry I don't have any pics. They were pretty strict about cameras.
One thing I forgot to mention was how crowded the floor looked. I sat in the third row and what you notice immediately is that the players look really similar in height and the floor feels really congested, almost like they have no room to move around. It looks a lot different than the perspective from tv.
I have two big hopes after today. That Andrew gets some intensity about him. I know PJ is zen. Kareem and Pau are both mellow. Kobe turns it on when he wants to. The kid is going to have to turn the fire on himself. Last year, it came about as a result of the success he was having on the court. He needs to exceed that this year. He can't just be named The Beast, he has to embody it and right now he isn't.
My other big hope is that the coaches really do get their act together on improving the defense of the team. B Shaw and Hodges hang out with the players and would probably rather still be playing. Rambis is fairly mellow and I wonder how he'll take to being the "defensive coordinator". Cleamons is a drill sargeant but only at certain moments. Hamblen is old. Looking at the staff, it makes sense why the team acts a little more "relaxed" than people would like.
Posted by: lakers_sth | October 15, 2008 at 04:16 PM
frank1rizzo,
The Big Homicidal is back and ready for action!
I can hardly wait for the Suns implosion to begin! Awesome. Just awesome.
Really, I'm rooting for The Big Bitterness. Why? Because The Big Crazy is working like mad as double-agent to destroy the Phoenix Suns. He is doing what I would do if I could get a practice with the Phoenix Suns.
Get signed and then work my passive-aggressive butt off to destroy the Suns from the inside.
It's happening! It's really happening!
The Clippers are taking the Suns' playoff spot this year! During the offseason The Big Whiner is going to pout and put on 45 pounds and just drag the Suns down to the bottom of the Western Conference.
Vengeance. Sweet, sweet vengeance.
GO LAKERS!
Posted by: Jon K. | October 15, 2008 at 04:17 PM
Laker_sth,
Nice observations. One thing that does concern with AB. He's the guy whose best defense is most likely around the post where he can use one hand to handcheck. Otherwise on the outside he can't use his hands and against screen and rolls he got into foul trouble.
Long Time Laker Fan,
Out of all the options the best option is if Lamar accepts the Mid level exception and he has hinted he could take a lower salary to stay in LA. That being said all the other examples are either unlikely (Buss losing money for a few years) or not good (Kobe going to Greece).
-blitz
Posted by: thekobeblitz | October 15, 2008 at 04:22 PM
LTLF,
I think your analysis of LO staying a Laker is right on.
Jon K.
I was going to write you something similar, but LTLF has already got it. I would put the chances LO stays at 50% or less. You know how the business side works, and I'm curious why you think he is untouchable?
I think it is just a case of having more "Top" players than one team can afford.
Posted by: Eric M. | October 15, 2008 at 04:30 PM
Laker_sth--
Thanks for the report. I felt like I was there.
Posted by: Marty | October 15, 2008 at 04:34 PM
Video and blog reports are up from today's practice on the Lakers homepage
http://www.nba.com/lakers/multimedia/0708video.html
One last thing that completely slipped my mind was how good Luke Walton looked out there. Not rusty. Great shooting stroke. Great passing. I wonder if we'll see the Luke that started off great two seasons ago (after rooming with B Cook and Richard Jefferson all summer) rather than the very-little-impact version we saw last year.
Posted by: lakers_sth | October 15, 2008 at 04:38 PM
Since were trading for Wally S, why don't we complete the line up for Big Bird, Bert, Ernie and the Cookie Monster?
Posted by: Charles | October 15, 2008 at 04:42 PM
Long Time Laker fan sez:
"So BUTLER,
Did you notice that Shaq has already started ripping his
Phoenix teammates and he hasn't even left the team yet..."
Thanks for that, hadn't seen it. I agree with SHACK - neither Raja nor Nash could stay in front of Parker (a problem for many teams ala CP3).
The reason for Parker's freedom to drive was that Grant Hill had his hernia strained from an appendectomy, and couldn't play the spurs series. That killed the SUNS' perimeter D, as Grant had previously guarded Parker quite well in the reg season.
Now, the SUNS have Goran Dragic, who will be a work in progress, but has defended Parker very well in European league play.
Posted by: BUTLER | October 15, 2008 at 04:57 PM
I'm not sure the lakers will want to face teams like the Hawks or Clips this season.
Fast, athletic teams will have gasal and byenumb running ragged trying to keep up. Today's NBA doesn't really favor height at the expense of speed.
Posted by: BUTLER | October 15, 2008 at 05:01 PM
Charles,
I don't think Cookie Monster is leaving Houston to play in LA. Yao is going to need a back up this year.
Posted by: JSNV | October 15, 2008 at 05:01 PM
"The reason for Parker's freedom to drive was that Grant Hill had his hernia strained from an appendectomy, and couldn't play the spurs series. That killed the SUNS' perimeter D, as Grant had previously guarded Parker quite well in the reg season."
Actually, Grant Hill had a Yeast Infection complicated by Urinary Tract Infection. His Gyno recommended he not play so hard that series.
THE SPURS OWN THE SUNS!!! You don't need to make any excuses!! Thank GOD you drafted Robin Lopez, AKA Soft Anderson Verajao, the answer to Tim Duncan!!! hahahahaha, what a clown!!
Posted by: JSNV | October 15, 2008 at 05:09 PM
BUTLER,
What are your thoughts on Marion? How would you feel if he teamed up with the Lakers to stomp the crap out of your Suns?
Posted by: 1978 | October 15, 2008 at 05:17 PM
SBPimp
Get over your man crush on Fish
The debate is whether Fish is a great ball handler not if he started for the Lakers when Shaq was dominating.
Never and I mean never have I heard or read a reputable analyst paint fish as a great ball handler and I doubt you could find evidence to the contrary.
And by the way, WHO did Fish replace when he came back?????? Exactly. Of course the Lakers got better.
What a maroon
YOU EVER NOTICE
Posted by: YOU EVER NOTICE | October 15, 2008 at 05:19 PM
Trade suggestion:
Lamar Odom for Lebron James
Posted by: Amazing_Happens | October 15, 2008 at 05:25 PM
I was strongly opposed to trading Bynum for pretty much anyone, especially Jason Kidd. However, I am strongly FOR trading Lamar Odom while we can get something of value for him. Since we really don't have any slots open, one of the best, cheapest alternatives is trying to get a high draft pick for him and maybe somebody's bad contract which would expire after this season. Then, next year, Farmar gets a raise, Bynum gets more money, Kobe gets more money and we keep this core of Kobe, Gasol and Bynum together for another 3 years or so and see what happens.
If Odom stays, somebody else will have to go, there's just not enough money to pay all these guys, even if Odom comes down to $7m/year.
Posted by: Stay Thirsty My Friends | October 15, 2008 at 05:33 PM
Trade Lamar, Puke or/and Space Cadet = 2008-09 Champ
Who wants them anyway?
Lakers traded Kwamay Brown = 2007-08 NBA finals
Posted by: Joe | October 15, 2008 at 05:33 PM
BUTLER,
In case you hadn't noticed we don't care about your prognostications.
I mean you keep harping on about how we don't have big man depth when there is a good chance LO will be coming off the bench this season. How is that not depth?
And you're saying we're going to have problems getting back in transition when your starting center is one of the slowest players in the NBA.
Posted by: Xodus | October 15, 2008 at 05:39 PM
Come on now. Shaq and Kobe might be the best duo of all time. Shaq and Kobe are two of the most dominant players to ever player the game. Both were together in their primes. It didn't matter who you put around them. This ballclub is not constructed like that. I think it really matters who is around our core players. Kobe isn't getting any younger. Pau is nowhere as near as dominant as shaq used to be, and Drew still needs time to develop. We need lamar. Simple as that. Especially in this ultra competative west.
Posted by: TrueLakerFan | October 15, 2008 at 05:49 PM
"A lineup of Devin Harris, Vince Carter, Lamar, Brook Lopez,
and a hole at SF looks made for LeBron."
So you want to create another powerhouse in the East?
That's just what we need!
I like your Bull's senario better thank you very much...
Posted by: L.J. | October 15, 2008 at 05:50 PM
correction
I said Fish as a great ball handler, I meant passer of course, but the same goes for his ball handling skills.
YOU EVER NOTICE
Posted by: YOU EVER NOTICE | October 15, 2008 at 05:54 PM
mrbarneydangles,
'Hear me out. This team hasn't failed yet. "
---------------------------------------------------------
Then what do you call last years' Finals? If we had won the Championship last year NOBODY would be traded or be considered for a trade Period.
By failing last season, the Lakers players' waived those rights!
And don't even bring up the "No Andrew in the Finals" as an excuse. There was nothing that Andrew could have done to stop that bum-rush.
Posted by: 1978 | October 15, 2008 at 06:01 PM