Mitch talks a little Sun Yue
On the Lakers' website, Mitch Kupchak discusses the Chinese point guard, a 2007 second-round draft pick looking to make the team this season and begin his Lakers career. Much of the interview centers on the contractual/legal complications involved with bringing Sun overseas, which folks may or may not find interesting. But there are a few details worth noting:
1) The Grizzlies apparently wanted Sun tossed into the deal that brought Pau Gasol to L.A. The Lakers, desiring to keep at least one of their overseas draftees, limited Memphis' bounty to Marc Gasol.
2) Yue's English is pretty good, a MAJOR plus for a player looking to find a comfort zone on and off the court. It's never easy starting a new job. Think about being the new dude at the office when everyone else is speaking Swahili. Mitch contrasted Yue's situation to that of Slava Medvendenko, who came America understanding no English at all. On one hand, Yue's ability with the local tongue does rob fans of classic interviews such as this one. But if you're thinking strictly along practical purposes, Yue is armed with a serious advantage. (While digging up the Bill MacDonald-Slava exchange, I stumbled across a couple of gems from the 2001 and 2002 championship parades. Chick never could get that whole "Medvendenko" thing down pat. I miss Chick.)
3) Aside from "Monkey King,"
you can feel free to call Yue "Q-Tip." I'm assuming it's a reference
to the lad's spiky hair, but who knows, maybe he's a seriously
ginormous fan of A Tribe Called Quest. (On
a semi-related note, I saw ATCQ about 9-10 years ago at The House of
Blues and Shaq ended up stage diving. I've never been more grateful not to be in the front row of a concert.)
Enjoy.
AK



If the last seat on the bench won't make or break the season, would you influence your GM to suit Sun Yu and add to your fan base and bottom line? Dumb question.
Posted by: Vman | September 23, 2008 at 09:44 AM
KL,
Be serious, was MJ giving his teammates confidence when he was punching Steve Kerr's lights out or when Bill Cartwright was threatening to break his legs if he kept up his verbal abuse?
Your ability to revise history is astounding.
Posted by: Xodus | September 23, 2008 at 09:51 AM
By the way, I will admit that Jordan was the greatest of all time the day you can point out to
me how he started at center in Game 6 of the Finals during his rookie season and scored
42 points and grabbed 15 rebounds. Until then, I think we all know who is the greatest.
Posted by: SBPimp | September 23, 2008 at 09:32 AM
OUT FREAKING STANDING!! KUDOS
Posted by: MAMBA24 | September 23, 2008 at 09:55 AM
fearless/utz
"Shaq is 3 for 5 as the number one guy. 3 for 4 in LA, and 0 for 1 in Orlando."
you're 99.999999% correct. i forgot.
i don't count 2004, that's when kobe tried to be the #1 which caused us another championship.
in either case, i was wrong and appreciate the correction.
utz, nice to chat with you again. you're a stand-up blogger and i appreciate you keepin it real for us.
Posted by: KL | September 23, 2008 at 09:55 AM
KL,
BTW, you say you want to be able to post without being called names, but you ONLY post when you have something negative to say. It would be one thing if you talked about other Laker or NBA-related topics but you're all Kobe, all the time. I mean it's a little over the top and ridiculous. I mean, you talk about him more than the rest of us.
None of us know what you think about Andrew Bynum's extension or if LO should come off the bench, but we definitely know that you think Kobe is a douche. Are you a Laker fan or a Kobe-hater?
Posted by: Xodus | September 23, 2008 at 09:57 AM
Steven V,
I don't know if I've ever seen a weaker argument for Kobe comparing himself to MJ than seeing KL link to an article where the writer is the one pushing the MJ comparisons, not Kobe.
This is is probably weaker than KL's assertion that the NBA salary cap is something that can be easily circumvented if you REALLY want to. Kinda like how Santa is real to the kids who REALLY believe in him.
Posted by: Xodus | September 23, 2008 at 10:00 AM
Humanomaly : you could easily read my mind, I really do have the sense of pessimism and am fearing the failure for Sun, he only has 2 years guaranteed, he will disappear quickly if he is not up to what we expected of him.
Posted by: Shum | September 23, 2008 at 10:13 AM
"By the way, I will admit that Jordan was the greatest of all time the day you can point out to me how he started at center in Game 6 of the Finals during his rookie season and scored 42 points and grabbed 15 rebounds. Until then, I think we all know who is the greatest."
CAN I GET AN AMEN??
I am sick and tired of all this "Jordan was the Greatest" crap, comparing Kobe to Jordan, blah blah blah. Magic could start at AND DOMINATE at all 5 positions, not to mention elevate his teammates, ressurect Kareem, save the NBA (along with Bird), win titles for Pat Riley and do it all with a meggawatt, infectious smile and an obvious joy for the game. If Kobe wants to be anyone, he should be Magic. Oh, and Butler? Nash is not worthy to hold Magic's towel and fetch his gatorade, let alone be mentioned in the same breath as "Greatest Point Guard of All Time".
Posted by: Badfinger | September 23, 2008 at 10:22 AM
A Tribe Called Quest is almost as awesome as Chick Hearn.
Forget Sun Yue. Sign Stephon Marbury!
Posted by: Jesterguru | September 23, 2008 at 10:32 AM
"You’ve made my point. The laker team wasn’t for kobe to take. Period. End of story. Your view is what started the “family feud” when survey said: kobe traded championship opportunities for individualism. You’re typical of kobe apologist who’ll make excuses for kobe. You have every right and I have every right to disagree."
Nope it was Kobe's team for take, had Kobe not stepped up his game we would probably not have made the playoffs we would have not made the playoffs and we could have easily blamed Shaq even more for that late surgery and Kobe for not stepping up. Unfortunately you just doesn't want to see numbers when we were 11-19 and Shaq was struggling and Kobe stepped up and we went 39-13 to finish 50-32 when we should have at least gotten 4th seed to get home court advantage. But I won't argue too much with you seeing as you somewhat changed from last year. If you want to label me as an apologist go ahead, I'll just have you as someone who still stuck in the past.
It's a matter of opinion.
"how quickly we forget the crying like a little girl last summer."
I could say all men regardless of age does that but I don't want to get into philosophy here. Wasn't it Shaq who dissed Ricky Davis and the Miami Heat and was the one who called D-Wade "Wunderboy". The one who demanded touches this season while playing for the Heat and was suddenly fine with not having touches when traded to the Suns? Sounds like a complainer Shaq is. Don't get me wrong Kobe complained too and called Jerry Buss an "idiot". He did apologize to MItch and Andrew (privately)and is back on good terms with Buss as much as Shaq probably did apologize to the Heat and Pat Riley (privately).
"I never said this. All I said is this blog of kobe apologist tries to re-write history."
Uh huh. NO one disputes Shaq being the leader from 2000-2002. Kobe played second fiddle in those days and also played a co lead role in 2002. Kobe took over in 2002-2003 and with Shaq not complaining at first got the Lakers to a 38-14 run in January after 12-18 start with Shaq still out of shape from having the surgery too late. 2003-2004 both tried to be Alpha Dog (along with Payton) and it was instrumental in losing the title. That is not revisionism, that is fact.
And that quote from Sports Illustrated? Steve V is right, that doesn't compare Kobe to Jordan. I could say I have the same mentality as Jordan in trying to win, I do not mean I am Jordan. That is a fallacy to think that Kobe says he's the same as Jordan. He has always said Jordan and him are different, it's the fans that compare him to Jordan.
I understand that most stuff here in the blogs specifically the off season bores you (yea it does to me too). I just don't think that picking at old wounds is the stuff to keep the blog entertained.
-blitz
Posted by: thekobebryantblitz | September 23, 2008 at 10:34 AM
This is is probably weaker than KL's assertion that the NBA salary cap is something that can be easily circumvented if you REALLY want to. Kinda like how Santa is real to the kids who REALLY believe in him."
Xodus good point.
-blitz
Posted by: thekobebryantblitz | September 23, 2008 at 10:37 AM
Nah I still think Kareem is the greatest Laker and that includes being greater than Magic Man
-blitz
Posted by: thekobebryantblitz | September 23, 2008 at 10:39 AM
xodus,
chill dude, i'm just having a conversation. i'll knock off the kobe topic for a while okay?
as for AB, the dude shown glimps of what he can be, but the guy only played 1/4 of the season and i haven't seen him in the playoffs. this blog seems to be annointing Young Bynum as the next shaq. now that's lame, wouldn't you agree?
as for LO, i've never really liked him because he's too inconsistent. one day, LO is Scottie Pippen, the next day, LO's Chuck Nevitt (remember him?).
it's been fun chatting though.
Posted by: KL | September 23, 2008 at 10:40 AM
AMEN!
CAN I GET AN AMEN??
I am sick and tired of all this "Jordan was the Greatest" crap, comparing Kobe to Jordan,
blah blah blah. Magic could start at AND DOMINATE at all 5 positions, not to mention elevate
his teammates, ressurect Kareem, save the NBA (along with Bird), win titles for Pat Riley and
do it all with a meggawatt, infectious smile and an obvious joy for the game. If Kobe wants to
be anyone, he should be Magic. Oh, and Butler? Nash is not worthy to hold Magic's towel and
fetch his gatorade, let alone be mentioned in the same breath as "Greatest Point Guard of All Time".
posted by: Badfinger | September 23, 2008 at 10:22 AM
AMEN AGAIN!!
Posted by: MAMBA24 | September 23, 2008 at 10:45 AM
"chill dude, i'm just having a conversation. i'll knock off the kobe topic for a while okay?"
Same here
-blitz
Posted by: thekobebryantblitz | September 23, 2008 at 10:52 AM
KL,
I'm not, not chilled. It's just annoying that you say we keep slurping Kobe when you're the one that brings him up time and time again. Kobe is rarely a topic of conversation anymore until someone with an anti-Kobe agenda brings him up.
As for Bynum, I agree that proclaiming him the next great center is premature. I think he's going to be very good but I don't believe in giving a guy a hefty extension without him earning it. He played at an all-star level from Dec. 1st to his injury but that's not enough of a track record.
LO, I think could be very valuable to the team or completely expendable with all of our talent. It'll be interesting to watch.
BTW, don't take anything I wrote personally. I just think we need to get to the point where we're like fine KL doesn't like Kobe but there are so many other interesting things to talk about with the team and league that we could be discussing
Posted by: Xodus | September 23, 2008 at 11:17 AM
Badfinger,
You definitely have my support with the "Magic was the greatest PG of all time" campaign, but convincing me that he was greater than Jordan because of 1980 game 6 is a stretch. First off, it was a great feat, especially for a rookie, playing in the Finals, and out of position. I don't want to cheapen that, because no other player has done it....but....I can't even tell you who the starting center for Philly was that game!! It's not like he dominated a big name center like Moses Malone. But still, it was FANTASTIC, but every superstar has his FANTASTIC moment(s): Russell, 11 titles (eight straight), Wilt: 100 points, Jordan: 2 3-peats, Cap: Most points, etc. Of course the G.O.A.T. is never an easy thing to agree upon, especially with so many types of players, but if you compare individual and TEAM achievements, I don't think Magics' lis is as distinguished as Jordans, but that's just my opinion of course. Peace.
Posted by: JSNV | September 23, 2008 at 11:21 AM
Humanomaly,
>>>I never did this, but I always wanted to take exact
>>>geographical location of Los Angeles, and find out what
>>>is truly on the exact opposite side of the world.....
Well, let's consider that.
The approximate Lat-Long of Los Angeles is 34 degrees N, 118 degrees West.
The opposite side of the world would thus be 34 degrees S, 118 degrees East.
So if you dug a hole from Los Angeles straight through the
center of the earth (ignoring the fact that you and your equipment
would be burnt to a crisp by the magma at the core), you'd
come out somewhere near the western end of the southern
coast of Australia (near Albany). The closest major city to
"the opposite side of the world" from Los Angeles, would be
Perth, Australia.
Posted by: Long Time Laker Fan | September 23, 2008 at 11:21 AM
Jesterguru - sign Marbury?? Surely you jest!
Tom - Just wanted to pay my respects for the support you've given to Sun. None of us know how the kid will do but there's nothing wrong with being enthusiastic and you've articulated your points well.
Everyone else... whats with all the Kobe vs Jordan vs Shaq vs whatever? Man, I say let's get with the here and now. I'm more interested in who's gonna snag most of the sf minutes... it's Odom vs Ariza vs Luke vs Vlad (and don't forget Kobe!). Talk about a crowded field.
Posted by: dave m | September 23, 2008 at 11:26 AM
KL,
>>>"Have you considered that Jordan gave his
>>>guys confidence? "
Oh, I see. It was Jordan's magnanimous presence on the court
that caused most of the team to shoot over 50% for the playoffs.
So what happened the two years before that when they
lost in the conference finals? Why wasn't his radiant glow
causing everyone on the team to shoot 50% those years?
Why can't you just accept that Jordan's teammates improved
with experience deep in the playoffs and with playing together,
and eventually they started playing at a higher level. Any
explanation other than that is just pandering to MJ.
Watch and learn. Farmar will play better this year. Sasha
will play better this year. Gasol will play better this year.
Odom will play better this year. You can give Kobe credit
if you'd like to be consistent with your worshiping of MJ,
but it's just that you need experience at a level of performance
to perform well at that level.
High school players take time to adjust to the college
game. College players take time to adjust to the pro
game. And pro players take time to adjust to the later
rounds of the playoffs. A handful of players like MJ and
Kobe and Magic and LeBron can jump to the next level
and excel, but the majority of players stumble their first
time at the higher level, but can improve with more
experience at that level.
Posted by: Long Time Laker Fan | September 23, 2008 at 11:32 AM
blitz,
I agree that Cap does not get the recognition as "Greatest Laker." I'm pretty sure it has mostly to do with not ALWAYS being a Laker, evem though it is the team he spent most of his career with and had the most success with. Also, Magic was definitely more charismatic, especially with the media, and much more attractive with his flashy style of play. Kobe also draws that same love from the fans because of his ability to make spectacular plays (dunks and around the basket), but really, his focus on fundamentals (shooting, defense, the "boring" stuff) is what is solidifying his legacy.
Posted by: JSNV | September 23, 2008 at 11:40 AM
KL,
"you're 99.999999% correct. i forgot."
Am I correct!? Did I read that correctly? Did you actually give me props?!
Made my day. :0
BTW, Shaq and Kobe are now on even footing. Shaq started out 0 for 1 and so has Kobe. Remember, even Sarge had to call Shaq out for giving Ologuwan too much respect when he was in Orlando.
There are only an extremely small number of superstars that were successful their first time around. Magic being one.
My apologies to Ologuwan for misspelling his name. Spell-check doesn't help me out with that one.
BTW, just to match Shaq, Kobe has to go through about 8 years of drought with players of capability then win three in a row. It is much easier for Kobe to match Shaq, than for Kobe to ever match Jordan. But, he is in the right place right now to possibly do both.
And, my point on being a Kobe apologist (a point for which I do not deny), is that the league is much harder to dominate now than it ever was. Mostly because of dumb rules set down by the higher ups, like that crazy zone defense (except in the paint) thing. In last year's finals, Boston played a very loose box-and-one defense that got looser and more "man-ish" as the rest of the Lakers shots stopped falling.
By that last game, it was almost a quadruple team. Kobe did pass to his team mates like he's supposed to. They just couldn't shoot. Happens sometimes.
We also know that Boston had a great defensive scheme, but the scheme didn't account for *ALL* of the Lakers troubles. They collectively lost their trouches all at the same time.
I don't think that's going to happen next time. But, then again, I am an admitted Homer.
--Fearless
Posted by: Fearless | September 23, 2008 at 11:56 AM
xodus
"BTW, don't take anything I wrote personally. I just think we need to get to the point where we're like fine KL doesn't like Kobe but there are so many other interesting things to talk about with the team and league that we could be discussing"
agreed. this version of KL is different. i hope you realize that i don't anything on this blog personally.
LTLF,
"Oh, I see. It was Jordan's magnanimous presence on the court that caused most of the team to shoot over 50% for the playoffs."
you can't argue the results even if Jordan was a prick and punched out his teammate. Maybe Kerr was popping off? Lebron made a household name of "Gibson". Do you remember Bron Bron telling Gibson to "step into the shot"? it makes a difference helping guys with confidence. b-ball is as much about confidence as it is about skills, agreed?
"Why can't you just accept that Jordan's teammates improved with experience deep in the playoffs and with playing together, and eventually they started playing at a higher level. Any explanation other than that is just pandering to MJ."
thanks in large part to jordan. do you remember how the "experienced" Bulls performed in 1994 and 1995 without Jordan?
Two words: Hakeem the Dream!
One Phrase: "Never underestimate the heart of a champion"
"Watch and learn. Farmar will play better this year. Sasha
will play better this year. Gasol will play better this year.
Odom will play better this year. You can give Kobe credit"
i've already given credit. i'll be happy to give more credit based on the results of the 2009 season.
"A handful of players like MJ and Kobe and Magic and LeBron can jump to the next level and excel, but the majority of players stumble their first time at the higher level, but can improve with more experience at that level."
agreed.
Posted by: KL | September 23, 2008 at 11:56 AM
Jeterguru -
You should be banned from the blog for the very idea of suggesting signing Stephon Marbury.
Ok, just kidding about the ban. But seriously, let that guy be a cancer somewhere else (Dallas? GS? Phoenix? Miami?).
It's a shame - I was once a huge Steph apologist. But the guy is the ultimate loser. Loser in Minnesota, loser in New Jersey, loser in Phoenix (save for one season - after which he was traded because he was a loser), loser in New York. Loser in Italy or wherever his crazy arse goes.
Posted by: puddle | September 23, 2008 at 11:57 AM
blitz,
"This is is probably weaker than KL's assertion that the NBA salary cap is something that can be easily circumvented if you REALLY want to. Kinda like how Santa is real to the kids who REALLY believe in him.""
for the record, i've conceded this point. i'm not sure if we had a chance to spar last year when i was "KLBeast", but i'll be happy to admit wrongdoing when convinced. i'm sure someone on this blog can vouch for me.
Posted by: KL | September 23, 2008 at 11:58 AM
Magic Johnson was the Greatest Laker Ever. There's a reason why his statue is outside of Staples Center. If he didn't get HIV and have it shorten his career as it did, there would be absolutely no reason to debate this fact.
For God's sake, he was a point guard who nearly averaged a triple double and he could DOMINATE at times playing CENTER! That just doesn't happen.
GO LAKERS!
Posted by: Jon K. | September 23, 2008 at 12:04 PM
>>>.I can't even tell you who the starting center for Philly
>>>was that game!!
It was Chocolate Thunder. Darryl Dawkins. He averaged
20 points, 6 rebounds, and 2.3 blocks for the finals that year.
Philadelphia also had Julius Erving and Maurice Cheeks, so
they weren't lacking in star power.
And Magic didn't play center for the whole game. He played
some forward and guard as well. And lest you think he carried
the team, remember that Jamaal Wilkes had 37 and 10 in
that game and Michael Cooper had 16, so Magic had some
help.
And Mike T would never IMAGINE that the Lakers could
have won the game, since they gave up 107 points... it's
just that they scored 123.
It truly is one of the great games in NBA history. I highly
recommend watching it.
Posted by: Long Time Laker Fan | September 23, 2008 at 12:08 PM
KL,
"thanks in large part to jordan. do you remember how the "experienced" Bulls performed in 1994 and 1995 without Jordan?"
The 1994 Bulls went 55-27 and were a few plays away from making it to the Eastern Conference Finals. Any team that can win 55 games without it's best player is an absolutely awesome team.
Posted by: Xodus | September 23, 2008 at 12:17 PM
LTLF,
As Chick would always say, Magic played all five positions that day. It is truely one of the greatest games ever played. And, if you count that point-forward thing he used to do from time to time, you can say he played six positions that day.
Amazing.
--Fearless
Posted by: Fearless | September 23, 2008 at 12:17 PM
KL and Xodus,
Just to throw in my side comment to your on-going discussion (you don't mind, do you?), I didn't hate Shaq until he dissed Buss with his, "Pay me my F-ing money" thing.
I disliked him after the, "Company Time" bit.
I was ambivilant about the, "I play myself into shape" nonesense.
I loved him when he came.
The souring of Laker fans to him is of his own doing. Regardless if any person thinks the things said out of hatred are true or not, they are well deserved.
--Fearless
Posted by: Fearless | September 23, 2008 at 12:24 PM
KL,
>>>Two words: Hakeem the Dream!
brilliant. Now I know why your opinions are so biased... you
can't even handle counting up to the number of fingers on
one hand. :-)
Posted by: Long Time Laker Fan | September 23, 2008 at 12:26 PM
LTLF,
That game was incredible. INCREDIBLE. Magic even busted a Kareem skyhook.
If any of you Lakers fans haven't seen that performance, you simply MUST watch it. Period. Do it. Do it now.
Go Lake Show!
Posted by: The Outlaw | September 23, 2008 at 12:30 PM
Fearless,
>>>As Chick would always say, Magic played all five
>>>positions that day. It is truely one of the greatest games
>>>ever played. And, if you count that point-forward thing
>>>he used to do from time to time, you can say he played
>>>six positions that day.
Not only that, but I was at the game and Magic sold me a
program at halftime!!!!
(just kidding :-)
Posted by: Long Time Laker Fan | September 23, 2008 at 12:33 PM
Greatest Lakers Ever:
1. Magic Johnson
2. Jerry West
3. Kareem Abdul-Jabaar
4. George Mikan
5. Kobe Bryant
6. Wilt Chamberlain
7. Elgin Baylor
8. James Worthy
9. Shaquille O'Neal
10. Gail Goodrich
GO LAKERS!
Posted by: Jon K. | September 23, 2008 at 12:33 PM
Where would I be able to watch this game?
also what is it rated? You see, I have a daughter and I know back then there was alot of skin and little shorts.
Posted by: Magia32 | September 23, 2008 at 12:38 PM
Oden on Bynum: http://tinyurl.com/53okwl
"NBA.com: You’re making your regular-season debut against the Lakers and their own returning center, Andrew Bynum. What do you know about his game?
Greg Oden: I learned a lot about him last year before he got hurt. I started watching some film on him and I saw how he was playing and moving and doing really good. He’s coming off an injury too. Hopefully he’s around the same place that I am. I know that he’s a good player and it’s going to be a difficult challenge for me."
Oden is hopeful they're in the same place. LOL. Can't wait.
Posted by: lakers_sth | September 23, 2008 at 12:43 PM
fearless,
i hope all is well with you in the financial market. it's very, very scary right now, however great opportunity for guys (and gals) who know what their doing.
but i digress.
"Am I correct!? Did I read that correctly? Did you actually give me props?!"
what are you talking about? you're one of the few bloggers i've always given respect and props.
"BTW, just to match Shaq, Kobe has to go through about 8 years of drought with players of capability then win three in a row. It is much easier for Kobe to match Shaq, than for Kobe to ever match Jordan. But, he is in the right place right now to possibly do both."
i'll be the first to acknowledge my erroneous conclusions about [bleep], but first he's gotta lead a championship team.
"In last year's finals, Boston played a very loose box-and-one defense that got looser and more "man-ish" as the rest of the Lakers shots stopped falling."
agreed. "box and 1" was my specialty when i played organized ball. not that hard, you just have to be willing to take a lot of punishment and no credit. bruce bowen is my hero.
"I don't think that's going to happen next time. But, then again, I am an admitted Homer."
you're not a homer, but you're man enought to not take things on this blog too seriously.
good to chat with you again.
Long live the Dow (or should I say Federal Reserve and Dept of Treasury?)!
Posted by: KL | September 23, 2008 at 01:00 PM
please god... let something interesting happen... let Bynum huck a cake at Farmar who ducks and the cake hits Jeannie Buss in the face... something... we're crawling to the finish line here...
Posted by: Stay Thirsty My Friends | September 23, 2008 at 01:00 PM
People measure things in different ways and weight what constitutes greatness slightly differently.Superstars legacies are judged by a mixture of individual statistics and acolades ,leadership,team success,great games and clutch plays.Given that all great players have most of these to varying levels championships has become the great distinguisher to a level that is actually probably a bit unbalanced but even so nobodies career has incorporated all of these in the way Jordans has.
The thing that truly seperates him from magic and Bird is complete and utter dominance.Over an 8 year period he lost one playoff series...and he consistently rose to the occasion every time he absolutely needed to.
However good you think his Bulls teamates were.. it was so often Jordan willing them to victory when it really counted.Their complete and utter dominance over the league makes him rightly remembered as superior to the other great players of the modern era.The celtics and lakers of the 1980's just never dominated in that way...and remember jordan did it with two different teams essentially.
As much as you want to say that Jordan had luck and circumstance etc on his side...his legend hasnt been created by a marketing machine or by selling shoes.Go back and watch some of those playoff games and you'll remember just how incredible this guy was.He was simply off the charts and will probably never have an equal.
Posted by: Kiwi | September 23, 2008 at 01:03 PM
Oden vs. Bynum what a great matchup!! What a great way to kickoff the season. Oh there is that other guy playing too, Kobe something, I can't remember, but he's supposed to be pretty good too!! Can't wait!!
Posted by: JSNV | September 23, 2008 at 01:05 PM
Xodus...
It always amazes me that people talk about how the bulls did without Jordan and often imply that they were bad.
Its like everyones completely forgotten the success of that '94 bulls team or that Pippen was all NBA.That season is actually used more of the time in arguments to enhance Jordans legacy rather than tarnish it.So great point...
However I would say that its slightly unfair to use it against Jordan too much becasue that team was reloaded around Pippen,Grant and BJ Armstrong (they all had career seasons which they couldnt later emulate on any non-Jordan teams).
Toni Kukoc arrived and was a big contributor,Steve Kerr...and You'd be quite happy to see Pete Meyers defending in a lakers jersey.It wasn't the same team Jordan left.
They also had Phil Jackson who can nearly get 50 wins out of almost anyone ( dunno about you but what a job on the '06 lakers!!!! what a roster!!!)
The fact remains that its not about the bulls 55 wins or pushing the knicks to 7 games...its about the fact that Jordan had that extra little piece of whatever that time and again got them over the hump.People can rationalise and throw statistics around and give their opinions all they like but in the end that is what its all about.
Usually in sports theres legitimate arguments that can often never be properly and definitively answered - magic vs larry,Lebron vs Kobe.How much was Shaq and how much was Kobe?...Jordan simply made sure there was no argument.
Posted by: Kiwi | September 23, 2008 at 01:27 PM
I don't think Magic ever DOMINATED at center after that game, especially after the influx of centers in the mid-late-eighties. I can't recall him ever dominating a Hakeem, Ewing, Robinson, or Moses... If Magic is the greatest Laker, then it's more because of his part in captivating an audience and revitalizing the league as opposed to just his performance on the floor. Kareem dominated in multiple eras but was never the most beloved of players like Magic and Jordan. However, much like the debates we have with Kobe, public perception versus his performance on the court doesn't always balance out.
As far as Darryl Dawkins is concerned, Kareem seemed to be having his way just as easily, averaging 33,14,3, 5blks. He apparently also sulked that he wasn't the Finals MVP, so that doesn't help him in the popularity contest, but his numbers are still pretty freaking awesome, plus he was the MVP for the season that year too.
Posted by: JSNV | September 23, 2008 at 01:29 PM
kiwi,
very good writeup, but you still suck (kidding, 100% kidding). :-)
remember the 1998 finals when it seemed like the Jordan Bulls were going to finally lose to the Jazz and jordan made that amazing steal, then the infamous cross (um push too) on russell?
that's pure determination and will. classic.
Posted by: KL | September 23, 2008 at 01:31 PM
Sun should have a year as a D-Fender. He should do it because:
A - He needs to get a handle on the NBA 3-point line (in FIBA it's about 6 feet in)
B - He needs to get a read on NBA-style defense so that his exsquisite ball-handling and athleticism don't cause him to rack up offensive fouls or just get bullied off the ball.
C - He needs to work on his mid-range jumper and I've never seen him use a tear drop.
D - He should consider having a few post up moves with his back to the basket.
He should be on the Lakers because:
A - Farmar needs someone breathing down his neck in order to light a fire under his A#$.
B - Fish might get hurt.
C - Sun is long and if we put him and Kobe and Lamar and Pau and Bynum out there...that's like a whole team of Tayshaun Princes.
D - Post up moves for guards are LAME.
Which is more true, Laker blog? I think all points are realistic, but which gives the team the best chance to OWN the league?
In other news, it was GREAT to watch Brett Favabean get walloped by San Diego. He wouldn't have looked as good if he wasn't completeing all those dump passes five yards out. I hate Brett Farvre.
Also, we're almost there people, almost there...
Posted by: Jamie Sweet | September 23, 2008 at 01:33 PM
Actually I think the starting 5 for the Sixers was Caldwell Jones - didn't C.T. play power forward?
Don't forget that this was the first of the Showtime championships. The L.A. Lakers had never won a chip without Wilt. Dr. J. had just come over from the ABA, and everyone was picking the Sixers to win it all. Magic came out of nowhere and dropped 42 15 and 7 on their heads.
For me, this discussion is similar to the Barry Bonds vs. Babe Ruth debate. OK, yeah - Bonds was a great (cheater) hitter. But until he was the best left-handed pitcher of his generation ON TOP OF THAT, don't talk to me about "greatest player ever." Jordan won a lot. Jordan scored a lot. Jordan never played all five positions in the single most important game of his career to date and dominated the team that was supposed to win AS A ROOKIE.
End of debate.
Although I have to admit, Jon K - putting Shaq just ahead of Gail Goodrich is cold. Funny, but cold.
Posted by: SBPimp | September 23, 2008 at 01:38 PM
Kiwi,
Very well put. I was never a Jordan fan, but once he hit that stride in 91 that was it! He had a very talented team no doubt, but to say he didn't mold that team, especially Scottie, isn't fair. In fact, that 94 season's success should be a tribute to Jordan's legacy as well. Not only does he comeback to play a quarter season, get his team further than (1994) but posts two 72-10 seasons and a 3-peat. Was his team talented without him? Clearly, but what other player puts his team over the top like that?
Posted by: JSNV | September 23, 2008 at 01:51 PM
Greatest Lakers Ever?
1. Shaq O'neal
2. Shaq O'neal
3. Shaq O'neal
4. Shaq O'neal
5. Shaq O'neal
JUST KIDDING!
1. Magic
2. Shaq
3. Kareem
4. Worthy
5. Cedric Ceballos (kidding) grrr...Kobe
Disclaimer: My reference is from 1986. No offense to pre-1986 players.
Posted by: KL | September 23, 2008 at 02:07 PM
Shum,
>>>>>Laker Tom, you know I'm a double your % Chinese, but am always cautiously
>>>>>optimistic about Sun being able to make the team; and who knows it can go
>>>>>either way, and I'll be very frustrated if the teammates (esp. those American
>>>>> teammates who also compete with him to make the team) don't embrace him
>>>>>because he's a Chinese, it would affect his performance. Bottom line is he has
>>>>>to earn their respect in order to survive, but he is a smart guy, he is likable in
>>>>>LA (with a gigantic Chinese community backing him up), he will be fine. BTW,
>>>>>I just learned that you live in the Bay area, not in LA (or you used to live here)?
Good to hear from you, Tom. As we all know, I am aggressively optimistic about Sun Yue becoming an NBA player. As for fitting in with the Lakers, I don’t really expect that to be a problem for Sun and expect the Lakers players to easily embrace Sun as a part of the team. But no doubt that he will have to earn his playing time and teammates’ respect. The NBA is not the CBA or the Olympics but I think Sun Yue has already shown that he has NBA-level ball handling and passing skills despite his authentic 6-9 height. I agree with you that Sun is a likeable and smart guy who should excel in the freer style of the NBA versus Team China.
I was born in southern Wisconsin and lived in the backrooms of Chinese restaurants there and in northern Illinois until we moved to Southern California when I was 12 years old. I went to junior high and high school in Monrovia in the San Gabriel Valley and lived all over the Southland from Laguna to Long Beach to Sierra Madre so I think of myself as having grown up in SoCal. I moved to Mill Valley north of San Francisco in the 80’s for business purposes and now consider myself to be Bay Area guy, although I still miss some things about LA. One way or another, I will always be a Cali guy.
Tom
Posted by: LakerTom | September 23, 2008 at 02:14 PM
Michael C. Teniente isn't going to like this one bit.
http://tinyurl.com/4jfqw9
Nope. Not at all.
GO LAKERS!
Posted by: Jon K. | September 23, 2008 at 02:27 PM
Mitch Kupchack talks about training camp.
http://tinyurl.com/4c9kry
Pretty interesting stuff.
Doesn't sound like DJ Mbenga is coming back, so a spot may be opening for C.J. Giles or Jelani McCoy.
Sounds like they might be opening up two spots as well.
GO LAKERS!
Posted by: Jon K. | September 23, 2008 at 02:48 PM