Lakers Now

Round-the-Clock Purple and Gold

« Previous Post | Lakers Now Home | Next Post »

Here's a list you don't want any part of

And thankfully, the Lakers avoided it.  From Henry Abbott over at ESPN's excellent True Hoop blog, the same sampling of dudes recently asked to predict 2009's NBA crown bearer (a list the Lakers not only made, but owned) also weighed in on which team they considered the most likely to implode. In a result I find not the least bit surprising, the Denver Nuggets topped the list at five votes. As someone who's witnessed their tense locker room during their 2006 first-round beatdown by the Clippers, their recent opening-round sweep defeat to the Lakers and just your garden-variety, regular-season Nuggets game, I've felt for the last few seasons that we're dealing with one collection of, to put it rather generously, "strong personalities."  At the Clippers' news conference to introduce Marcus Camby, the ex-Nugget confirmed the vibe I've gotten. Considering he was one of the dudes who often helped keep moods at a (relatively speaking) even keel, visions of Armageddon busting loose doesn't feel like a stretch to imagine.  Frankly, I consider scenarios involving a head-shaved, 400-pound Kenyon Martin talking about "the horror" more likely than these guys getting through the season without a serious dust-up.

Second place went to the Clippers (four votes), a squad that strikes me as the equivalent of a betting line Vegas takes off the board. A sensible spread is simply too hard to figure. I can picture this totally reloaded team buying into Mike Dunleavy's system in an effort to prove themselves. I can also see them turning into "Lord of the Flies." Or, I can picture them too indifferent by Game 20 to muster the energy needed for either of those outcomes. It's really just a crap shoot.  From there, you've got the Knicks and Suns with three votes, the Rockets, Nets and Mavericks with a pair apiece and the Pistons and Grizzlies each snagging a nod.

Irony alert! As Abbott noted, one year ago, the Lakers might have been this poll's leading vote-getter and are now considered among the more stable franchises. What a difference a string of W's make.

AK

 
Comments () | Archives (165)

The comments to this entry are closed.

This is great news! ESPN is picking the lakers to reach the Finals and the SUNS to "languish in self destruction"?

Now we really know the lakers won't make the Finals and the SUNS will be more powerful than anyone can possibly imagine!

Keep 'em comin!


AK,

"Frankly, I consider scenarios involving a head-shaved, 400 lb. Kenyon Martin talking about "the horror" more likely than these guys getting through the season without a serious dust up."

Just fricken awesome.

Brilliant! Brilliant, I say!

GO LAKERS!

C.J. Giles Very Brief Bio-Chrono Reading:

Physical: He's physically orientated which means he is positively motivated by comfort, security, structure, and money. He is negatively motivated by disorder, a lack of security, and stress.

Emotional: He's emotionally orientated which means he is positively motivated by appreciation, acknowledgement, and expression of his individuality. He is negatively motivated by anger, resentment, and feeling his unique qualities are being undervalued.

Mental: He's physically orientated which means he is positively motivated by knowledge, learning, and having his social/group role clearly defined by him. He is negatively motivated by ignorance, a lack of mental stimulation, not having his social/group role clearly defined, and feelings of intellectual insecurity.

Creative: He's mentally orientated which means he is positively motivated by issues of faith, belief, and creative focus. He is negatively motivated by a lack of faith, doubt, having nothing to believe in, and personal creative stagnation.

Summary of how the parts work together for C.J. Giles as a basketball player:

I wouldn't expect too much. His emotional type can make him explosive at times. His physical type can lend him to either be a workaholic (like Kobe) or lazy and from his past academic history, he probably tends towards being lazy. His mental type does not lead him to be an alpha-type personality, but he could be useful if properly mentored by a clear-communicating alpha-type. His creative type is very strong for competitors, but he has to get over the collective deficits of the ways his physical-emotional-mental worlds interact to make the best of that strength, which I think could be a particular challenge for him.

GO LAKERS!

JUST CHECKING IN

I have bad news, My hang nail injury suffered a setback while on the golf course today. It couldn't have come at a worse time either, I was taking everyones money (as usual) by my exceptional play and my golf buddies were getting a little irritated with me, but what do I care, I am the best.
Anyway, I drove it in the rough next to a tree and couldn't take my normal swing so I had to swing left handed. This caused extra friction on my hang nail which made it worse than before. Normally I just re-tape it but it didn't work this time. Suffice to say my doctor said I needed immediate surgery (band-aid) and to rest for up to 12 weeks.
This of course is very disheartening as my golf group was just beginning to jell as a team (albeit lighter in the pocket) and now they won't have their star player.
They seemed to take it well though as I heard laughter and hoorays in the locker room as I was taking a shower.
My golf coach offered his condolences and told me not to worry and to take all the time I needed to fully recover. He had a bounce in his step I've never seen before. Poor guy is just devastated by the bad news.
I'll continue to keep everyone up to date on my hang nail, don't worry when I get back we will be unbeatable.

Hey guys, can you stop all that hoop and hollering, I'm blogging about my injury!!!
Here's hoping the team does bad...err I mean great without me. I can tell they already miss me.
Boy there's a big celebration next door.

Till the next update, I have to start rehabilitation immediately so I can be with my team family.
Hey guys...let me in.... this isn't funny... open the door.

Okay, my three picks:

New York for all the obvious reasons. There's a lot of talk of them getting rid of Starbury but I say he must stay... just so he can pick D'Antoni apart like a child with a winged insect.

Phoenix - there just seems to be some kind of dark, gathering malfeasance over there. Could be epic.

Boston - going out on a limb here but how great would it be? Just picture it... peace and unity gone. Garnett and Pierce at war. Allen pouting. The Boston press howling, fans throwing stuff. I kind of like it. Let's get the ball rolling with some internet rumors. Anybody else hear that Pierce is in rehab right now?

Unleashed the Big Beast!

Bynum, Gasol, Ariza, Kobe, SunYue

ok I'm in now Long Time Laker Fan thanks for the invite

Bloggers

Here's something to make you say hmmmmmmm?

As Steve Nash helped re-define the MVP........Most sportswriters were saying the best player on the best team in the regular season should win the award............Right?

Riddle me this; Why did most writers in the ESPN poll pick the Lakers to win the title....................yet overwhelmingly picked LeBron to win MVP...........????

AK can you help me??

KBros et al,

Heard back from the old Bickster at AZ Republic,

"Made a passing, facetious remark for humorous effect. But don't count me in with the old guard. I love blogs and bloggers and the storm of creativity it all represents. No need to make this a red state-blue state thing."

I guess it's me that has the problem, and not him. I took his comments to seriously, apparently. At any rate, I'm glad to know that he's not one of the anti-blog old guard. That way of thinking is dying a quick death.

Keep it real Bloggers!

Dammit. I smeared my lipstick. Somebody get me LakerTom!

"As Steve Nash helped re-define the MVP........Most sportswriters were saying the best player on the best team in the regular season should win the award............Right?"

Nah, Kevin Garnett didn't win it despite being the best player (No way Paul Pierce was the best player on the Celtics) so there goes that argument. Analysts have been picking Lebron to win it before the seasons and they have been wrong 2 times already. Only the regular season will tell if Lebron, Kobe, or CP3 will win the MVP.

-blitz

WILL INJURED STARS BE ABLE TO SHINE AGAIN?
by Charley Rosen for FoxSports.com

http://tinyurl.com/47jp64

Charley discusses Yao Ming, Andrew Bynum, Greg Oden, Manu Ginobli, and Jermaine O’Neal. Here is the excerpt about Andrew Bynum:

>>>>>

ANDREW BYNUM, C, Los Angeles Lakers (knee)

Is the young man as fully recovered as he claims to be? Will he have the confidence to throw himself into the game, to make strong leaps in a crowd, to execute sharp one-footed cuts? Will the forced layoff impinge or advance his development?

The Lakers surprised most pundits by advancing into the finals without him, but to repeat this achievement (to say nothing of winning a championship) Bynum will have to prove that he's healthy, unafraid and capable of accelerating his interrupted learning curve.

The odds of Bynum's undergoing a full return to glory are 1:2.

>>>>>

Tom

Boston - going out on a limb here but how great would it be? Just picture it... peace and unity gone. Garnett and Pierce at war. Allen pouting. The Boston press howling, fans throwing stuff. I kind of like it. Let's get the ball rolling with some internet rumors. Anybody else hear that Pierce is in rehab right now?

Posted by: dave m | September 12, 2008 at 08:28 PM

Well, rehab is all the rage now so he could recover from that rumor, but have you heard that he is running a dog fighting ring from his basement?

LakerTom, Charles,

Here's another link to Bynum's last game.

http://tinyurl.com/42lxmg

LakerTom,

Good, you put up the links on Rosen that counters several posts of your posts about the Beast. While I envy your optimism in believing on self proclamations, at our age & time spent in watching kids grow up, I guess there has to be allowance to be wary with what they claim to be. To see is to believe and provide conclusion later based on our personal take than mortgaging the farm based on someone's hearsay. i think Bynum as a player is OK but at 20 years old, does he have the courage to jump w/o fear of being injured. On the other end, mean players will find ways to hurt Bynum or Kobe's achilles heels in order to paralyze the Lakers. Nowadays, there is no more room for idealism to say that bums and bad players are no longer around in this league. In fact, they professionalized their despicable intentions. A tough guy like Artest could have performed that role. Turiaf did that role last year and got suspended one game in the Utah series and he behaved like a lark afterwards. Mbenga was never utilized to provide as an armour security for our moneyed players: Kobe and Pau. Who will protect our triumvirate? It is Powell, Mihm or Odom, Luke, Vlad and so on...? Precisely, that is what we have expected from Mitch this summer to get athletic players who are at least 6'7" & above with muscular build that can shoot and bang as well. He got dunkers within farmar's height and our Made in China, Sun w/c is a long way to go before he becomes a banger.

Dave M & Elle,

Where did you get those news that KG and PP were at war? How about the dog fighting claimed by Elle? Can you please provide the links b/c I searched the Boston Globe and could not find any news of that magnitude. Are you aware that Ray Allen got married this summer? Finally, he is financially secured to raise a family. LOL!

Troll Man,

"Hey guys, can you stop all that hoop and hollering, I'm blogging about my injury!!! Here's hoping the team does bad...err I mean great without me."

Yeah right, you're the blogger with delusion of grandeur and thinks the universe revolves around you.

Pig,

What do you mean by anti-blog old guard?

Winning does cure everything. As it did with the Lakers in the early season last year. That was Buss's great hope after all the turmoil of last summer, that the team would start winning and Kobe would become invested in that, which he did.

Any team that feels like they have all the pieces to win, but haven't after a couple of years, is on the bubble to implode. When the expectation is a championship and you feel like you have the best team assembled, you start looking for reasons why it didn't happen and that can turn any organization against itself.

In that respect, I honestly feel like Dallas and PHX are the biggest contenders. For both teams, I'm not sure even winning in the regular season can cure their ills because it's just a big waiting game until June. It's been a real blow to those organization's pride when they realize that a squad built with Dirk at the core or Nash and Amare at the core haven't been able to get it done. You start looking at the pieces, the coaches, the philosophy, etc and wondering which aspect you have to "fix". God forbid you discover that you might have to build around someone else.

I'll go even further and say that there are teams that should implode. That stubborness is the only thing keeping some squads from getting better. I have always said that there aren't enough "true" franchise players to go around. If you don't have access to one you have to find another way to contend.

Every team is faced with this type of situation at one time or another. The real indicator of an owner's mettle is their track record in dealing with it. No matter what, the Lakers never seem to be out of the Championship conversation for too long. One of the many reason why it's great to be a Lakers fan.

TheBlitz sez:

"Nah, Kevin Garnett didn't win it despite being the best player (No way Paul Pierce was the best player on the Celtics) so there goes that argument. Analysts have been picking Lebron to win it before the seasons and they have been wrong 2 times already. Only the regular season will tell if Lebron, Kobe, or CP3 will win the MVP."

I think kobee won it only because no one could decide who was the best Celtic. In the end, it didn't much matter because the voters were shown the folly of their ways in the Finals. KG, Ray A, and Paul P all had their moments of glory and impact.

LeBrawn may be more valuable to his team than just about anyone not named Nash - the cavs have been awful outside him. the lakers have gasaul, odom and the coach who had MJ...which makes kobey's impact comparatively less than LeBrawn's...and you can't ignore the way LeBrawn has manhandled kobey whenever they match up.

"The odds of Bynum's undergoing a full return to glory are 1:2."

I wish bynumb well in his recovery, but the odds are probably correct, maybe the same for Oden.

As center, bynumb is of course subject to the worst beating of any of the other positions - that knee will be tested by bigger, stronger men who will force bynumb to bear their weight in the paint.

Besides the physical aspect, there is the mental part of rehab. bynumb hasn't played competitively for - what - 7 months now? In the back of his mind, he will be compensating for his fear of injury by being more cautious, and will be less interested in banging inside.

Then there's the presence of gasaul, who plays much differently as a PF than odomb. The learning process will coincide with learning how to play with a weakened knee.

In the end, bynumb will need to look up to AMARE for the hope he desperately needs.

You are the ancient Rolling Stones playing halftime at Super Bowl XL. You will tip the season with a 163-year-old starting lineup: Shaq (36), Amare (25), Hill (36), Bell (32), Nash (34).

Just for you Buttler, skoal :)

Repost

Hey Butler,

Who do you think has/will have a bigger contribution to the Suns, Shaq or Charles Barkley. And my second question is, if Shaq and Barkley had a race who would win?

Regards,

MJT

There are still a few spots open in the Fantasy Basketball
league.

Send me an email at fanleague08 at perry.com if you'd
like to join... I have to enter your email in the fantasy league
setup page and then it'll send you an invite to add a team.

Looks like the draft will be the last Sunday morning before
the season starts, so you'll have plenty of time to figure out
who you want to draft and plan your strategy.

Oh, and the draft order is randomly selected the morning
of the draft, so it's possible you could be the last person to
join the league but get the first pick in the draft.

Pfunk36,

"Here's something to make you say hmmmmmmm? As Steve Nash helped re-define the MVP. Most sportswriters were saying the best player on the best team in the regular season should win the award..Right? Riddle me this; Why did most writers in the ESPN poll pick the Lakers to win the title.....yet overwhelmingly picked LeBron to win MVP......???? AK can you help me??"


Well, the foundation for your question doesn't quite hold, because the MVP gets picked on regular season results, so whoever theoretically wins the title isn't a factor. More importantly, Nash winning his first MVP hasn't created any firm trends that "the best player on the best team gets the MVP." That happened with Nash's first trophy and Dirk in 2007. But Nash also won in '06 when the Spurs had the best record and Kobe won in '08 when Boston had the best record. And if you look the rest of this decade, only Shaq ('00) and Duncan ('02) won while playing as the best player/best record, meaning the mindset you cited was truly never in existence pre or post Nash.

Beyond that, it could reflect some thinking that a healthy Bynum might diminish some of Kobe's stats (for the "numbers" crowd). The panel also predicted the Cavs as an East elite and winning the Central, which certainly creates the requisite "upper echelon" record to compliment James' stats. Maybe they just think LeBron will have a more impressive individual season than Kobe, even if Kobe's on a better team. I really don't know, but I also don't find LBJ winning MVP such a mind blowing, eyebrow raising idea. It's not like the panel coughed up Jake Voskuhl's name. Even if you think Kobe is the better player (and I personally do), it's not like LBJ is so far behind in the rear view mirror that a legit discussion can't take place.

AK

>>>Most sportswriters were saying the best player on the
>>>best team in the regular season should win the award.

Not quite. Last season, that would have been Kevin Garnett.

The way it seems to go is that you have to be one of the top
3 or 4 players in the league AND your team has to be one of
the top 3 or 4 teams in the league.

But it's fuzzy, too. If there are 3 really good players on the
top team in the league, then you could argue that the
team's so stacked that none of them is all that valuable.
That and injury time is what kept KG from winning it last
season. And with Kobe-Gasol-Bynum-MonkeyKing that
may hurt Kobe's chances next season.

Certainly, Cleveland could be one of the top teams in the
league next season, and surely LeBron will be one of the
best players. But it's all a guess at this point. If Cleveland
ends up 5th in the East, then that kills LeBron's chances.

But it's all speculation at this point. You never know who
the real front runners are for MVP until about February.
Last year at this time, would you have guessed that Chris
Paul would nearly have taken it over Kobe?

Badfinger,

Is that your fav band? Huh...

Anyway, you sez:

"You are the ancient Rolling Stones playing halftime at Super Bowl XL. You will tip the season with a 163-year-old starting lineup: Shaq (36), Amare (25), Hill (36), Bell (32), Nash (34)."

The Stones still get lingerie tossed on stage, so not a bad comparison, though I think the SUNS' collective wives (SHACK notwithstanding) have forbidden extramarital sex.

Now, it's a valid argument, this age thing. But wasn't that what they said about the "old" Celts this past season? The lakers are younger by far...and lost by 39 in Game 6 to the grandpas.

And, let's not forget the SUNS have the best training staff in the league, a staff that is best equipped to keep the old fogeys healthy and limber.

I mean, what's better for the 2008 season - a 36-year-old healthy SHACK who averaged 14-11 last season with the SUNS, or a questionable 21-year-old bynumb who avgd about the same?

>>>Well, rehab is all the rage now so he could recover from
>>>that rumor, but have you heard that he is running a dog
>>> fighting ring from his basement?

LOL. You guys are bad. Trying to start rumors about Pierce.
That's just mean spirited and cruel.

And did you know that he's a member of Al Quaeda?

MJT asks:

"Who do you think has/will have a bigger contribution to the Suns, Shaq or Charles Barkley. And my second question is, if Shaq and Barkley had a race who would win?"

Well, Barkley was in his prime when he came to PHX. He had incredible games such as putting up a 44-25 Game 7 vs. Shawn Kemp and the Sonics.

SHACK of course is in the twilight of his career and isn't the best playa on the team, as Barkley was. AMARE is by far more potent at this stage.

But SHACK'S impact has been positive. The SUNS had to trade the Matrix because he would have left this summer anyway, and the SUNS were already paying him 17.5 mil, so to get a player who has championship exp and can shore up the SUNS' woeful interior rebounding and size issues, at 2.5 mil more per year was a good bet.

The trade changed everything about the SUNS, unfortunately in a way; but as brilliant as D'ANTONI was, the lack of defense ultimately kept the SUNS from winning the title (and some help from Donaghy, Stern, injury gods).

Though others see doom in PHX this season, already the mood is positive from what the playas have been reporting. Much like the Celts last season, the SUNS now have proven veterans with promising rooks and a deep bench. And a black ex-PG coach known for toughness with a defensive mindset.

I think if a MVP vote is close then the team with the better record wins.You've got to do something pretty special to win if theres another MVP candidate in your conference with a better record.If the hornets had won the west then Paul would have been the MVP last year,Nash did something special by holding the suns together after Amare went down.

Voters may see Kobe as too surrounded by talent next year but if the lakers get the top seed then unless lebron plays out of his mind and gets the cavs 50 plus wins and a top two finish in the east then it will go to him.Voters will be lining up to give Lebron the MVP next year to try to keep the best player argument alive.It feels like its preordained that its his season...kind of in the same way it became Kobe's season this year.its Lebrons to lose...

I'd pretty much bet my life that the mvp will go to one of those three players Bryant,Paul or Lebron....Kobe and Paul have to win the west but if Lebron gets say 52 wins and the winning west team hasnt won more than 65 games then it will be his.I dont see anyone else in a legitimate position to win MVP apart from perhaps Ginobli if the spurs can somehow win the west and the cavs falter.If the lakers do what I expect them to do and win over 65 games then it's Kobe's.

Xodus,

Thanks for the link. Karl, how can you expect me not to get overly exciting about Andrew after watching him? How can any Lakers fan not be smiling from ear to ear about Drew?

Here is a pretty funny video of Drew blocking Paul Pierce. I had not seen this before. Lakers fans will love this:

http://tinyurl.com/5v5pq5

Make way for the Era of the Beast. Contract extension to be announced next week.

Tom

Kiwi touched on an idea in the last thread...

What will Los Angeles Lakers fans do with a season without internal struggles, conflicting personalities, and off-court drama?

No Magic-Kareem tension...
No Magic-coaching staff drama...
No Van Exel...
No Shaq-Kobe drama...
No Smush Parker...
No Kwame Brown...

Just a group of players who listen to their coaching staff, get along, behave themselves, and win...

I personally believe that some fans will utterly freak out.

A lot of Lakers fans CRAVE drama. They crave the infighting. They crave that tension so they can complain about things and blame players for "ruining" things.

I don't think I'm THAT GUY. For me, if we have a good-vibe, drama free, everyone healthy season that ends in a Championship. THAT would be my ultimate season. I love the winning, but hate the drama.

I like a team where everyone gets along, everyone supports one another, and everyone enjoys--and shares in--the individual success of their teammates.

I think it could happen this year. I really do.

If there's any truth to Kobe's statement that he won't have the surgery because he doesn't want to miss the bonding process of training camp, then it really could happen this year.

If Andrew Bynum is embraced for his gifts, instead of looked upon with suspicion, it really could happen.

If Lamar Odom maintains his passive leadership roll and Derek Fisher his active, wise-man, leadership roll, it really could happen.

This could be the best season ever since we first beat the Celtics back in 1985.

It could truly be Great.

GO LAKERS!

Edwin, I heard the dog rumor from www.allcelticplayersarethedevilsspawn.com

Jon K.

you should also add these two things to that list:

No Brian Cook......

(Cook and him throwing his warm up jerseys on Phil's lap just because his playing time went lower because Lamar came back). And he was a terrible player beyond shooting 3 pointers and some offense.

-blitz

Great, the Blazers are probably going to sign Shaun Livingston. That's all we fricken need.

Urgh.

http://tinyurl.com/5ldzog

GO LAKERS!

Long Time Laker Fan,

Actually I heard that while Paul Pierce was on a crack-fueled bender in Las Vegas, he ran over a Girl Scout in his car, wrapped the body in an American flag, and then burned it in the desert where it started a major wildfire at East Mojave National Monument.

Then he went home and killed a puppy for fun.

GO LAKERS!

Pfunk36/AK,

I believe that MVP has as much to do with positive press, endorsements, and television commercials as it does anything else. Journalists are effected by hype almost as much as everyone else.

Now that Kobe has turned the corner in terms of receiving consistent positive press again, he'll be a favorite to win the MVP again. Why? Because the Lakers are going to rock this year and the Cavaillars (the OTHER spokesman for sports drinks and stuff like that) will be a fourth or fifth seed in the East.

GO LAKERS!

"i mean, what's better for the 2008 season - a 36-year-old healthy SHACK who averaged 14-11 last season with the SUNS, or a questionable 21-year-old bynumb who avgd about the same?"

No-brainer, 15 years younger, same stats?

"The Stones still get lingerie tossed on stage..."
Umm yaa, by women older than my MOM (and I'm 40)

Serious, this is your last chance, bud. With the age of your starting lineup, new coach, thin bench, uhh, good luck.

Badfinger says: Come and Get It

FANTASY SPORTS IS RUINING FANDOM…

First off, I am not one of those old farts like John McCain who doesn’t email, text message, or understand or embrace technology and the Internet. In my time, I have owned and run software development and web consulting firms, can write and debug business software applications, and currently work as the controller for a $15M sales hi-tech distribution firm specializing in digital signage, post production, streaming, AV, and broadcast hardware and software. My social networking is more Linked-In than FaceBook or MySpace, but I understand first hand how technology has rewritten the rules by which sports as a business today must play.

My problem is that this same technology has allowed so-called fantasy sports to flourish, contributing to the continued slow death of the die-hard fan. Along with modern free agency, the over-expansion of professional sports, the explosion of video games, and the intentional internationalization of sports, more and more fans are foregoing their loyalty to specific teams and players and instead becoming fans of the sport in general. While I love basketball and will watch almost any teams at any level play, I just do not get how Lakers fans can join a fantasy league and draft and root for Celtics, Spurs, Suns, or players from other teams that are rivals.

I joined a couple of fantasy leagues way back when and just could not understand how any Lakers fan could find pleasure and satisfaction by drafting and rooting for LeBron James or Amare Stoudemire or Kevin Garnett. When I watch games with my son or other Lakers fans who have fantasy teams, I just grit my teeth when I find them rooting for a guy on the other team to make a basket, get a rebound, or complete an assist EVEN when they are playing against the Lakers. To make it worse, sometimes these guys put money on their fantasy teams which just completely dilutes their once proud Lakers fandom.

I have now made a rule that nobody can watch games at my house with their blackberries or iPhones if they are in a fantasy league. And nobody is allowed to root for a player on the other team. My son complained stridently but I told him I would rather watch the game alone than have to see fans rooting for the Lakers on offense and then some a-hole on the other team when the Lakers were on defense. As far as I am concerned, fantasy sports suck. I actually believe they are one of the key reasons why we get so many crazy trade ideas and screwed up rosters proposed on the blog. It’s just more proof of the constant dilution of true fandom by fantasy sports. You won’t find me wearing a Lakers jersey and rooting for Paul Pierce. I don’t know whether I can say that about Long Time or the rest of the fantasy ballers. I just wish they would take off their purple and gold when they do that. Or make sure there are no children around.

JMHO.

Tom

Elle-
I have a membership there. When you sing up, you get a free pass to their sister sites--
www.redaurbachisthedevilhimself.com,
www.paulpierceisapansymcwuss.com,
and www.samcassellsfacekeepsmeupatnight.com.

Entertainment for all ages.

LakerTom,

I really enjoyed your post about fantasy sports.

I agree.

GO LAKERS!

Jon K says:

"This could be the best season ever since we first beat the Celtics back in 1985."
You are exactly right, it feels like we're on the verge of something big, with a young, proven, and supremely talented squad, with a BIG chip on their shoulder. I cannot wait to see it.

By the way, does anyone want to request a Bio-Chrono Reading for any Laker player or member of Laker management, coaching staff, or ownership?

GO LAKERS!

Fantasy football used to be fun. Now there are entire magazines devoted to finding obscure players. Years ago it was fun to find a sleeper in the draft or off waivers, now people BUY the information, they spend hours upon hours scouring the internet for tidbits they can use to pick up say a Kicker for week 5 when their starter has the week off.

It's just not fun anymore, it's an occupation, it's not about friends getting together for some fun and some bragging rights, it's about who has access to the best research. If some of these guys applied the same effort to the stock market that they do fantasy football, they'd be millionaires.

say goodbye to DJ Mbenga. I think he's getting some really bad advice, asking for more than the minimum. WHO is going to pay that? We got him off friggin WAIVERS last season, hello? Why does he think he was on waivers to begin with?

The Lakers signed this C.J. Giles who clearly fits the "project" label but... that's what Mbenga was so... what do we need Mbenga for if this guy will work hard and listen to Kareem? This guy should grovel at the feet of Kareem if he has any sense at all. Kicked off 2 teams? This is it. He makes the most of this chance or he probably blows any chance of making it in the NBA. How could he not improve having Kareem Abdul... FRIGGIN Jabbar teach him how to play? That's like having Paganini as your personal musical coach.

http://tinyurl.com/6bhanu

This is it. One more no-turning-back moment for Giles, who is 22 now and finds himself between his hometown of Seattle and the spot where his college career dead-ended in Corvallis, Ore. He's preparing to enter the NBA draft.

He stands 6 feet 11 inches, so tall and so skilled that he remains a marvel even in the mind of the man who kicked him off Oregon State's team in January.

"The most talented, athletic player I've ever coached," said Kevin Mouton, former Oregon State assistant and interim head coach. "Ever. In 16 years of coaching."


Because for the first time in too long nobody’s counting us out, and everyone seems to be counting us in, even pre-preseason has some hype to it - it’s all good!

Because for the first time in a long time I can fantasize a little and kinda stop and go – hey that’s not a fantasy, the odds are it could happen - it’s all good!

The great fantasy is that the Lakers could blow out the gate hard, and run away from everyone else all the way to the Larry O. Even more enticing and desirable for this fan, though, would be if the team just picked up where it left off last season, steadily improving, constantly learning to play better together, finding different ways to win, making every game a must see, can’t miss event.

Considering our fairy-tale Cinderella-like season last year, when it sure feels like we came from worst to first, I’m not sure even the Celestials had a better season, even if they did win the grand prize. Perhaps this season having climbed from the valley of despairing to the heights of inspiring, maybe it is time to take it to another level and believe that we can fly.

Over and out until the first pre-season game, guys and gals. I’m sitting back, just getting ready to enjoy the ride.

Jon,

>>>>>This could be the best season ever since we first
>>>>>beat the Celtics back in 1985.

>>>>>It could truly be Great.

I agree 100%, Jon. But I still think there will be a lot of drama. It comes with the territory (LA) and the expectations (championship). LOL.

Tom

LakerTom,

I agree with you on your post about fantasy sports. However, if that is what our youth want to happen, then that's how they want to spend their time. We belonged to baby boomers that experienced myriad of crazy things and would love to move on than devote time to fantasies. That does not necessarily mean we are out of touch with the youth. By mere blogging and exchanging opinions, we're putting across ideas, inputs and passion as a Laker fan, why do we have to go with the video of make believe.

I defenitely agree with LakerTom and Jon K on these matters. Blogging w/ the legion of K-Bros is already a task of bridging the old divide of Laker fans belonging to different eras. The same way w/ childish trolls hurling insults, putting up childish posts to attract attention, please, please be considerate with other laker fans in this blog who prefer to speak Lakers and once in a while the call of the times. Somebody here talked about himself in the golf links which is purely abuse of blogging, yet AK/BK did not censor it. They censored JonK, MikeT or Pfunk expression of passions and yet this gutless troll talking about himself which was never solicited got thru. This is just one of those fantasies posts. Please don't overextend it further and blame those who don't prefer fantasy sites.

Jeff,

www.samcassellsfacekeepsmeupatnight.com.
*snort* that my friend is classic.

"How could he not improve having Kareem Abdul... FRIGGIN Jabbar teach him how to play?"

So far only Andrew Bynum has truly benefited from Kareem's mentoring. Jerome James and especially Michael Olowokandi both had Kareem's tutalge and the former ended up being a mediocre player and the latter becoming the 3rd biggest bust in NBA History (only Kwa-may Brown and Chris Washburn are/were worst than the Kandi Man). Mbenga and CJ Miles are not expected to be even rotation players just role playing backups at best. Neither should be really considered "projects".

-blitz

Edwin Gueco,

"Somebody here talked about himself in the golf links which is purely abuse of blogging, yet AK/BK did not censor it. They censored JonK, MikeT or Pfunk expression of passions and yet this gutless troll talking about himself which was never solicited got thru."

Two things.

1) The "golf" post, while certainly random, seemed to be a joke/satire of sorts. While I didn't personally get it, there was no real "harm" intended (that I could see), so I don't see what the problem is.

1) On the overwhelming whole, Jon K's "censored" posts were threats of physical violence against other readers, which are obviously against the rules. Mike T has written posts that were almost purely personal attacks or too centered along topics (religion, politics) that we expressly asked not be discussed at length. And if memory serves, Pfunk36 has NEVER written a post that didn't go live, because he's always respected the blog rules.

You need to get your facts in order and in the proper context before talking about what we "censor." Or just leave that duty up to us- as it's our job- and don't worry about it. But either way, spreading misinformation creates a false impression that BK and I don't need to be correcting.

AK

AK/BK or anyone else who may know,

Is that Alan Houston/Luxury Tax Waiver option still available to teams or was it a one time thing?

I'd like to see the front office consider it with either of the Cap Space Killers (prolly Luke since he's more worthless and has the longer contract).

And if it's out there, I can see the Suns dumping the big albatross and his $20 mil in luxury taxes. I don't see them getting much value for his expiring deal without taking back a bunch more bad contracts in return. By next season they'll be lottery bound and that small market mentality always moves towards saving $.

Stay Thirsty My Friends,

I think C.J. Giles is just a training camp body. Do you something else to be true?

LakerTom,

How do you think there will be drama this year? Is C.J. Giles the guy to bring the drama?

GO LAKERS!

AK,

"On the overwhelming whole, Jon K's "censored" posts were threats of physical violence against other readers, which are obviously against the rules."

That's a complete load of crap and you know it!

Yes, I may have threatened physical violence against other readers a few times over the YEARS, but nearly every time it was meant tongue-in-cheek as a joke or as a humorously over the top comment. The fact is for the huge majority of these "violent" posts is that they were meant to be over-the-top as a means of poking fun at myself and my extreme passions for all-things-Lakers.

In fact, the VAST majority of the time I have been censored is simply because you thought my comments were in poor taste or because you felt my passions were too great in my expression and had NO expressions of violence whatsoever.

Don't give me this nonsense that triple digit number of posts which have been deleted over the years since the very beginning of this blog have been because I've been literally threatening other bloggers.

That is untrue and mischaracterization of myself and VERY uncool of you.

GO LAKERS!

Edwin Guerco,

Thanks for the defense.

I'm very surprised by AK's response regarding my posts because his response is simply untrue.

I feel the K Brothers and I have acheived a healthy degree of understanding regarding conflict of ideals when it comes to posting, but I am very disappointed with AK's response to your post. It is pure mischaracterization.

GO LAKERS!

thekobebryantblitz ???

Jerome James and Michael Olowokandi have both been shown to be mental midgets.

Kwame did, in fact improve when he was on the Lakers, there's no fixing his hands but Detroit certainly saw enough to make him a decent offer this summer. I don't think you can pin Kwame's bad hands on Kareem.

Bynum, it's fairly obvious how much Kareem's guidance has helped him. Look at his footwork. That's a lost art in the NBA. Bynum appears to be the ONLY ONE who realized the gift Kareem was offering him and actually took it and look what has happened. The one guy who listened to Kareem and put the work in has launched himself into a top 5 Center at the age of 20, I seriously doubt Bynum is anywhere near the player he is if somebody else is teaching him.

I don't see how you could possibly say CJ Miles is NOT a project. He sure isn't going to give us any useful minutes this year, that is by definition, a project. Most likely he'll be down in the DLeague or 15th man on the roster watching games in street clothes. Again, if that isn't a project, I don't know what is. When you talk about playing time for CJ Miles, you are skipping this season and talking about the next year. Again, what other definition of "project" do you need? and that's assuming he puts in the work that allows him to stick around.

Mbenga isn't really a project, he has no upside. He's somewhat of a wasted roster space if the choice is between keeping him or a CJ Miles. Why not go with the younger guy and see if he develops? The best test will be to see if he falls to his feet at the master KAJ. If this guy doesn't appreciate being taught by Kareem, I say cut him immediately, he's not going to make it.


Tom,

Right on bro, I feel the same way about fantasy sports. How can you root for some of these guys?? I'll agree that "fans" aren't what they used to be.

BTW, What is your take on the Niner's this year?? I know this isn't the right thread, but I would like to hear your insight.

dan

Jon K,

"Yes, I may have threatened physical violence against other readers a few times over the YEARS, but nearly every time it was meant tongue-in-cheek as a joke or as a humorously over the top comment. The fact is for the huge majority of these "violent" posts is that they were meant to be over-the-top as a means of poking fun at myself and my extreme passions for all-things-Lakers.

In fact, the VAST majority of the time I have been censored is simply because you thought my comments were in poor taste or because you felt my passions were too great in my expression and had NO expressions of violence whatsoever.

Don't give me this nonsense that triple digit number of posts which have been deleted over the years since the very beginning of this blog have been because I've been literally threatening other bloggers. That is untrue and mischaracterization of myself and VERY uncool of you."


First things first, I apologize if you felt mischaracterized. That wasn't my intention, but rather to respond directly to an incorrect comparison Edwin was making off misinformation. But I definitely wasn't trying to make you look bad, so I'm sorry if it came off that way.

Having said that, you continue to exaggerate about a "triple digit" amount of posts deleted. BK and I have barely deleted 100+ posts since the blog's inception, much less that many from you. If 100+ posts of yours were that out of bounds, you'd have been banned by now. End of story.

And we've also explained that these posts, whether meant as "over the top jokes" or not, came off more threatening than you perhaps intended (and were often received that way by those reading them), which is why they weren't kosher. It's taken you quite a while to accept that notion, which has unfortunately led to posts being deleted. And I do think that more of those "poor taste" jokes contained a violent element than you're giving credit.

Either way, the point of my response wasn't to paint you as a problem, but to explain to Edwin why his comparison wasn't merited. Your inclusion, at least from my perspective, was more incidental than my particular focus. But if you felt singled out, I apologize.

AK

Long time Laker Fan,

I sent an email can you confirm you got it?

Elle - he's also taken up pole dancing recently. Not something I want to picture but y'know, we don't make this stuff up, we just report it, right?

it's funny, we both switched to CJ Miles instead of C.J. Giles... hmmm... Miles/Giles/Trials... whatever... the Tall Dude!

AK,

I appreciate your apology, but, man, what you've said just isn't true.

And, yes, I have had over 100 posts deleted over the years. You may not remember it as such because it's been over a pretty long time and you have deal with a LOT more posts than mine alone from a plethora of bloggers, but I remember it.

It hasn't been a problem for about a year. By my estimation I've only had about 10-12 posts deleted over the last year, but it was a real problem before, particularly when there was a lot of bad blood between BK and I. There were occasions where I had five posts deleted in a day for what I felt was questionable logic. And that really would piss me off and would lead to a lot more posts getting deleted.

Believe me. I've had well over 100+ posts deleted over the years. I'm not making that up or saying that because I feel I'm being "persecuted" or anything like that. I'm saying that because I've had a hell of a lot of posts deleted--some deservedly so--but from my perspective the large majority of these deleted posts should not have been deleted.

So, please don't characterize me as literally threatening other bloggers with physical violence. Passionate trash talk and bizarre, sometimes over-the-top humor? Sure. Actually threatening bloggers with violence? Absolutely not.

I think you should know better than to use me as a scapegoat to defend your position.

GO LAKERS!

LakerTom,

It's OK not to post if you don't have anything to say. Your last post:
Bashed republicans;
Stated how "Talented" you are;
Put down anyone who plays fantasy sports;
Stated your intolerance for anyone that doesn't root as you do;

Intolerant, hateful, and a braggard. Very nice example. I would argue again that your chronic drug use over decades has left you less "Talented" than you think of yourself.

PS How do you like the latest polls?

AK,

Don't you think Jon K's threat was also satire on threats of harm and injury? How can he physically injure someone by blogging? How about this troll guy talking about his injury in the golf links, If someone get pissed off, don't you think that anger is not a form of harm as well? If you allow those kind of posts, then people here will talk of their mother-in-law, their dogs, their neighbor and anything under the sun etc. as long as they don't make any physical threats or insults. Is that the whole purpose of Lakers Blog? Talk of anything as long as it is not politics, harm, injury and your name is not on the watch list.

Dave M,
Did you hear that he is taking pole dancing classes to impress his "special friend" Sam?

Jon,

>>>>>How do you think there will be drama this year?
>>>>>Is C.J. Giles the guy to bring the drama?

It’s just the nature of the franchise, Jon, what with being in LA and having the game’s most controversial and polarizing super star in Kobe Bryant, its most impressive up-and-coming super star center in Andrew Bynum, its most revered or hated coach in Phil Jackson, and its most divisive and soap operatic ownership family in the Busses.

Every player on the team, from the Machine to the Monkey King, has a story that needs and will be told. Every NBA reporter, player, blogger, or fan has a story to tell, point to make, or ax to grind when it comes to the Lakers, Kobe, Phil, Jerry, Jim, or Jeanie. Writers cannot publish an article about pro basketball without somehow finding a way to include the Lakers in the story so that they will attract additional readers and attention.

Type “Lakers” into Google and you will get two to three times the links you would typing in any other pro basketball team name, including the “Celtics.” The Lakers Blog probably has 10 times the posters and readers of any NBA based blog in the blogosphere. Anyway, you want to look at it, the Lakers are the story, the engine that drives the NBA, and I don’t see that stopping soon.

We got Kobe’s opt out possibility at the end of this year, Drew’s critical extension that needs to be signed before October 31, Jim Buss’ eventual ascension to CEO of the Lakers down the road, and the issue of who coaches after Phil Jackson. Will Phil marry Jeanie and sign an extension? Will Drew provide the toughness and inside dominance the Lakers need? Will Kobe’s pinky be OK? Can Lamar play small forward? Will the Machine shoot as well as last year? Will the Monkey King win some playing time? Can Luke or Chris come back from injuries?

The Lakers are nothing but drama and there is no reason to expect that to change.

Tom

AK,

By the way, I'm hoping that the reason you've forgotten why so many of my posts have been deleted is because the majority of these deleted posts occurred during gametime threads when a hell of a lot of people were posting over a short period of time so I'm sure a specific post would be easy to forget amidst an onrush of other posts OR because BK deleted them and didn't mention it to you.

I don't know.

Anyhow, whatever. It's not really a problem anymore, but I do understand Edwin Guerco's comments. It is sometimes as a blogger difficult to understand how trolls (from our perspective) seem to get a free pass, but other passionate fans (and frequent contributors to the blog) seem to receive greater scrutiny.

Off to watch the Bruins march to victory!

GO BRUINS!

GO LAKERS!

Edwin Gueco,

"Don't you think Jon K's threat was also satire on threats of harm and injury? How can he physically injure someone by blogging?"

A) No, they didn't read like a "satire" on threats. B) We have no idea if the person the threat was lobbied actually lives close enough to Jon that something real could come of it and C) None of this even matters, because it's not up to us to try to get inside Jon's head and figure out whether this is "real," "satirical" or whatever. For a variety of reasons, those kind of posts aren't good for the blog's atmosphere. Thus, we've made it clear we don't want it.


"How about this troll guy talking about his injury in the golf links, If someone get pissed off, don't you think that anger is not a form of harm as well?"

No, because that person wasn't directing this anger at anyone in particular on the blog. There's a huge and obvious difference. Otherwise, we wouldn't even allow readers to post anger over a loss. The distinction is pretty simple.

"If you allow those kind of posts, then people here will talk of their mother-in-law, their dogs, their neighbor and anything under the sun etc. as long as they don't make any physical threats or insults. Is that the whole purpose of Lakers Blog? Talk of anything as long as it is not politics, harm, injury and your name is not on the watch list."

Again, I don't know how to make this more clear. Let BK and I worry about what goes live and what doesn't. I'm not trying to be dismissive, but this is one of those areas where we make decisions, you don't and that's that. The rules aren't terribly restrictive to begin with, so there really shouldn't be a problem.

AK

LakerTom,

"The Lakers are nothing but drama and there is no reason to expect that to change."

You may be right, but I hope you're not. For someone as passionate as I am about the Lakers, I really don't like the drama. I like team unity and victory.

GO LAKERS!

AK,

Or just leave that duty up to us- as it's our job- and don't worry about it. But either way, spreading misinformation creates a false impression that BK and I don't need to be correcting.


~~ That's also the problem with you. You are a hot headed moderator. You are being accuse of being unfair and here you try to paint someone as creating false impressions. You always put yourself on the supreme and superior over and above other bloggers like us, cannot receive stirring rebukes, cannot complain on blog rules, w/c you also violate once in a while. Read your rules and ask yourself if you are perfect and never violated them.

First a prayer for all involved in that horrific scene in Chatsworth -- -----

Now for something completely irrelevant by comparison:

MJT:

I'm sorry to tell you, but Butler is not in the business of answering anything coherent on this blog. If you really want him to answer your question, go ahead and look him up on the Suns blog under the handle "GrandCanyon" , referring to the space between his ears. Mr. Jab and Hide actually acts more civilized over there -- although that's not saying much.

Jon K,

"And, yes, I have had over 100 posts deleted over the years. You may not remember it as such because it's been over a pretty long time and you have deal with a LOT more posts than mine alone from a plethora of bloggers, but I remember it.

Respectfully, Jon, you have a tendency towards both over the top reactions and never letting go of an opinion once you've made up your mind. I'm pretty confident I'm correct about this total in question. But if you want to agree to disagree, then fine. Either way, as you've acknowledged, it's mostly from way back and isn't an issue anymore. At least not on our end.

"So, please don't characterize me as literally threatening other bloggers with physical violence. Passionate trash talk and bizarre, sometimes over-the-top humor? Sure. Actually threatening bloggers with violence? Absolutely not."

Look you already said earlier that you occasionally meant this stuff. But beyond that, it's not up to BK and I to try and figure out if these posts were "over the top humor," "bizarre," or real anger coming through. Whatever the case, they typically came off as serious anger being lobbied at somebody and always helped create an atmosphere that we repeatedly said we didn't want. That you would continually ignore this requests makes you the culpable party for the posts being deleted, not us.


"I think you should know better than to use me as a scapegoat to defend your position."

As I said, I wasn't trying to scapegoat you to defend my position. Edwin improperly used you as an example and I was simply trying to draw a distinction in clarifying the issue. I didn't consider you to be the point of discussion at all, nor was I trying to make you look bad.

AK

dave,

>>>>>It's OK not to post if you don't have anything to say.
>>>>>Your last post:
>>>>>Bashed republicans;
>>>>>Stated how "Talented" you are;
>>>>>Put down anyone who plays fantasy sports;
>>>>>Stated your intolerance for anyone that doesn't root as you do;

>>>>>Intolerant, hateful, and a braggard. Very nice example.
>>>>>I would argue again that your chronic drug use over decades has left
>>>>>you less "Talented" than you think of yourself.
>>>>>PS How do you like the latest polls?

LOL. I don’t think parroting what John McCain said about himself and technology was bashing on Republicans and my “bragging” was just to make a point that NOT all old farts over 60 are technically inept or handicapped. As to hateful, at least I didn’t physically threaten anyone.

Not to say that the post was one that I was particularly proud of or put any real thought into. It was just a rant I spit out on a boring Saturday morning with an hour to spare. LOL. Much like your response to me IMHO. Not much to post about these last boring days before the season starts. I could try NOT to post but my “addictive” personality just cannot stay away from the Lakers blog and “fantasy sports” has long been a personal “hot” topic for me.

Would I have had a more successful life without my “chronic drug use over decades?” Perhaps, but nowhere near as interesting or as much fun. I would also comment that my affection for the hemp has probably caused me less physical and mental problems over the years than faced by those who have a similar love for the grape or nectars of the gods that pervade our society.

As to the polls, as I said earlier, they are disappointing but it is still only the end of the third quarter. I expect a reversal in the next few weeks as the truth slowly percolates to the surface and reality sets in. Win or lose, there is no better system in any country in the world than ours.

Love your basketball posts even if your politics don’t make sense. Have a nice weekend. :-)

Tom

You know, if you've managed to keep count of the hundreds of posts that have been deleted maybe you should take that as a sign that you should get out the basement more often.

Edwin,

"That's also the problem with you. You are a hot headed moderator. You are being accuse of being unfair and here you try to paint someone as creating false impressions. You always put yourself on the supreme and superior over and above other bloggers like us, cannot receive stirring rebukes, cannot complain on blog rules, w/c you also violate once in a while. Read your rules and ask yourself if you are perfect and never violated them."


I have no problem with readers expressing dissatisfaction, nor do I consider myself supreme over anybody. We're more than happy to hear complaints, even if that's not a guarantee that we'll change something. But I do have a problem with you (or anyone) expressing dissatisfaction through misinformation, which is what you did.

For example, saying that I've deleted Pfunk's "expressions of passion" is not only false, but particularly problematic because a lot of readers know he and I have had a history of heated arguments. If they hear you say that I've deleted his posts, they might think I'm making this personal and that's not the case. For whatever differences Pfunk and I have had, he's always respected the blog rules, which is why, to the best of my recollection, he's never had a post deleted. I needed to correct your statement right away, and I didn't appreciate being put in that position.

You're also right that I've probably violated the rules in the past. I've never claimed to be perfect and I'm sure I've been hypocritical at times. But even acknowledging that, there are still rules to be enforced and it's up to BK and I to do that. I guarantee we don't do it with absolute perfection, but we still do our best. Either way, I felt like you were making a mountain out a molehill, as the expression goes, which is why I was saying, this really shouldn't be your concern.

AK

Pig,

What do you mean by anti-blog old guard?

Posted by: Edwin Gueco | September 13, 2008 at 08:20 AM

Edwin,

See: Marc Cuban.

Badfinger sez:

"Badfinger says: Come and Get It"

Since you dodged the question I brought up, I'll restate my challenge to you.

You suggested the SUNS are too old to win. And I responded by reminding you that they said the same thing about the Celts last season, but not after the "old" Celts tore the "young" lakers a new one (39 pts in Game 6).

So, is age really what laker fans are pinning their hopes on this season in terms of facing older teams such as the SUNS and spurs and Celts?

I would think after the lesson kobey and his young peers got in the Finals, the hope for an advantage based on age would be replaced by a hunger for defensive improvement. But memories are short on blogs...

Tom - that was eric, not me that posted that. I'm as liberal as they get.

Laker Tom and other anti-fantasy-league bloggers,

There is a very positive side to fantasy leagues. They get
you to pay attention to players on teams other than your
own once in awhile.

While it is nice to focus your cheering on your own team,
and the majority of my cheering does go to the Lakers,
participating in a fantasy league encourages you first to
investigate the tendencies of other players in the league,
and then to watch games involving teams other than your
own team. I don't feel that my watching more basketball
games makes me less of a Laker fan.

And when I'm watching a game with one of my fantasy
players on it, I couldn't care less whether they win or lose
the game, I'm just cheering for my players to get stats.
But I do pick up on the strengths and weaknesses of the
team a bit.

Laker Tom, let me ask you this. If you happen to flip on
a game next season where Golden State is playing
against Memphis (for example), would you cheer for
Ronny Turiaf? even a little bit? There's no real reason
for you to cheer for him, since he's not a Laker. And in
fact, he was "disloyal" to the Lakers - he could have re-signed
with them for the qualifying offer and stayed with the team.

But I know I will cheer for Ronny when I see him playing
against anyone but the Lakers. So why is it worse to
cheer for Danny Granger or Travis Outlaw or anyone
else?

And besides, it's not like your team is assigned to you. You
get to pick your team. Personally, I would never pick a
Celtic for my team, as it would make me sick to my stomach
to cheer for anyone in a Celtics uniform. But I don't really
"hate" most of the teams in the league, so I have no qualms
about cheering for Dirk Nowitzki or David Lee or someone
else if they're on my team.

And if they're playing the Lakers that night, then the
fantasy allegiance ends there. Last season when the Lakers
played the Knicks, you can bet I wasn't cheering for David
Lee.

Jon K - If you joined a fantasy league, you could probably
easily pick a team of all Lakers and Clippers. And if you
got a little bit of luck at the top of the roster you could have
a decent chance of winning - Kobe, Marcus Camby, Baron
Davis, Pau Gasol, Andrew Bynum, Chris Kaman and
Lamar Odom are all well respected fantasy players, and
you could plug in Sasha for 3's, Fisher and Farmar as
2nd & 3rd point guards, and have a pretty balanced team.
You're not likely to get every one of the top guys, but you
could certainly get 8 or 9 players of a 13 man roster from
the home teams and do pretty well in the league. Maybe
you could plug the holes with ex-lakers or players from
UCLA &/or USC.


>>>Long time Laker Fan,
>>>I sent an email can you confirm you got it?

I don't think I have. Or maybe it was picked up by one of
my spam filters. Could you send another one? And I'll make
sure to check the spam folder.

Oden and Bynum if both are 100% healthy could bring a new era of dominant big man in the league. I look forward to their match ups in years to come.

Portland will be the most formidable foe the Lakers will have to face in the next decade as well.

First, Blazers starting unit has star power and fully equipped at every position. Oden at Center, Aldrige at PF, Webster at SF, Brandon Roy at SG and Blake at PG. This matches up well with Lakers starting unit.

Bynum -Oden
Gasol - Aldridge
Odom - Webster
Kobe - Roy
Fisher - Blake

Just as the Lakers have a young talented bench, the Blazers also have it and maybe more..

Mihm - Pryzbilla
Vlad - Frye
Ariza - Outlaw
Sasha- Fernandez
Farmar - Bayless

And third, Lakers Coach is the best in the league with Pops and others but are they past their prime, while the Blazers has up and coming most talented Coach in the league in Nate McMillan.

Blazers is more set than the Lakers with no forseeable turnover in their future from stars, bench and Coaching staff in the next five to ten years.

Lakers will have the edge in the next two years against this team, but on the Third year Lakers without a Coach, without a Point Guard when Fisher retires, and BYNUM and KOBE feuds over whose team it is. Lakers will be in trouble.

Who will the Lakers brass choose then at the time. Can the Lakers make both Kobe and Bynum stay happy and focus just on winning? Will Kobe give way to Bynum like Shaq never did for him? Will it be more like David Robinson making way for Tim Duncan? Should Bynum wait patiently until Kobe hands it over to him, like Kobe never waited patiently until Shaq was ready to turn it over? Or was Shaq had no plans of turning it over to Kobe, that's why Kobe sensed it and responded with moving out if he can't drive his own team.

I just do not see Oden and Roy having a star status problem. I thinlk this two will set the example and become great leaders on their team. Nate also does not have the huge ego of Phil Jackson.

Lakers must take two Championships in 09 and 10, without a smooth turnover on Leadership (Superstar and Coach) it could end up fast on the third year. Hollywood drama style over again.

Let's hope it does not happen. Unless ofcourse you prefer drama over NBA FInals?

So the question is, who is the next Lakers Coach to bring Leadership and balance with and an emerging young beast in the paint Andrew Bynum and a Global Superstar starting the downhill of his career but still the most dangerous assasin in the game.

Lakers need to start planning.

dave,

Sorry about that. Got my dave m’s and eric m’s mixed up. Anyway, we’re all OK. Even eric and ex, who I know are McCain fans. Glad to hear you are on the “right” side, though. Bottom line, we are ALL loyal Lakers fans and Americans. LOL.

Tom

AK,

Think we need a game. Or at least a new thread. The blog is getting pretty antsy. You and jon are at it again. I’ve been at it with Pig and Jon and went after dave m thinking he was eric m. Elle’s been creating anti-Celtic websites and urging you to get out of the basement rather than rallying for women’s rights or sociologic causes. Even Edwin’s ready to lay it down. I think it’s time you released the news that the Lakers just signed Andrew Bynum to 1-year $50M contract and Phil has decided to start Luke Walton at small forward. LOL.

Tom

"Irony alert! As Abbott noted, one year ago, the Lakers might have been this poll's leading votegetter and are now considered among the more stable franchises. What a difference a string of W's make."

Very true.

Winning solves everything in professional sports.

Okay, seriously...

Ex, I'm not putting your post through because LT's McCain reference was clearly just a off-handed joke and the post itself wasn't politically-centric at all. It doesn't merit a response breaking down the truthfulness of a commercial campaign, which can take things WAY off track.

Having said that...

Laker Tom, we've expressed before that we don't want this blog becoming political, so there's really no need to try and slip a McCain reference in, even one that appears incidental. Against my better judgment, I allowed it to slide, because it felt harmless enough, but in retrospect, I shouldn't have. Nor should I have been in a position to make a judgment call about whether or not to delete an otherwise fine post because of an unnecessary reference or have to email you asking you to rewrite it. Please honor our request, which we've now made several times. Unless it has something to directly do with basketball or the thread's topic, there should be no mention of McCain, Obama, Palin, Biden or any of the election's other central characters or plot lines. We've made this very clear and are getting tired of saying so.

And if either of you (or any reader) happen to see something that perhaps shouldn't have slid through (BK and I can't catch everything), just let us know, let us address it, and leave it at that "bipartisan" solution.

If you have any concerns about the matter, please email me or BK.

AK

Laker Tom,

I don't know if you saw my post to you, but I wanted to know about your feeling on our Niners team this year. I enjoyed your analysist a couple of seasons ago, and I wondered what you think about this year. I don't want to turn this into a football thread, but may I just get a brief breakdown??

Thanks.

dan

Elle,

>>>Did you hear that he is taking pole dancing classes to
>>>impress his "special friend" Sam?

You misspelled "Satan"

For the record, I'm not asking AK to get out of the basement, I'm asking Jon K.

Anyhooo, I agree with you we are having a bad case of cabin fever, we need basketball now! I say we continue to make fun of the Celtics till October. Can we fun of Posey? Oh man the fun we could have coming up with names for his website, heehee.

>>>Did you hear that he is taking pole dancing classes to
>>>impress his "special friend" Sam?

You misspelled "Satan

You know I'm sad that Satan with all his money and power still can't afford to do something about that face, someone call Doctor 90210!

dan,

My apologies. I did see your earlier post but forgot to respond, probably because of how disappointed I am in our Niners. Even more so than my Yankees. I loved Mike Nolan when he was hired and only had one worry, which was that he was not an offensive guru who could continue the Niners great legacy at quarterback and on offense. I could not believe how things fell apart last year, especially the total ineffectiveness of the offense. And I thought Nolan’s handling of the Alex Smith situation was disastrous. Now Smith is gone and we’re out $20M+.

Bottom line, I would almost prefer this to be a disastrous season where we get a very high draft pick because we need a quarterback. I think the team will do better because Mike Martz knows how to score points. My biggest fear is to be trapped in mediocrity with no hope of playoffs but a good enough record to eliminate a chance to get a high draft pick. The only way out is if Brent Jones, Steve Young, and Larry Ellison buy the Niners from the Yorks. Otherwise, we’re in for a long and painful few years stuck with a terrible stadium and owner.

Thank God for the Lakers. Both baseball and football seasons are essentially over for me. How about you?

Tom

Just want to poke my head in for one soapbox moment.

AK/BK-

I just want to speak on behalf of myself, and hopefully the rest (if not the majority) of the blog- You two are doing an absolutely PHEONOMANAL job. It's hard enough to rein us in during the actual season, but to do your best to keep a lid on a bunch of very smart bloggers going absolutely stir-crazy during the offseason, trying to talk about ANYTHING to keep ourselves occupired. When tempers flare, you guys do your best to settle the moods, but you guys are inherently fair and just blogmasters. Not everyone can keep calm (or at the very least attempt to) the eclectic readership that participates on a daily basis, especially one that wants the season to start so very badly.

I raise a bottle of Heiniken to you, and I would like to ask the rest of the blog to join me in saying this- We thank you guys, even though we can be an arrogant to the point of wanting to find out where we live so you can come punch us in the face. You give us a place to vent, and even though we cross the line, you're like the cool parent that actually tries to explain to us what idiots we are instead of telling us to go to our room WITHOUT DESSERT.

Again, you guys have an awesome haven for us here- We got two months left, hang in there, AK/BK, hand in the fellow bloggers- with a season this long, the season itself will only be that more sweet.

Steps off of sopabbox.

::Starts slow clap::

LTLF & elle - so Pierce's new BFF is Satan? I just knew that dark forces were behind all this Vegas carousing and what-not. An epic battle awaits us. We have to be strong.

AK,

I think this link expresses the present level of our conflict.

http://tinyurl.com/6mddfs

GO LAKERS!

AK,

"As I said, I wasn't trying to scapegoat you to defend my position. Edwin improperly used you as an example and I was simply trying to draw a distinction in clarifying the issue"

Here's where you've got it wrong. Edwin Guerco did not use me improperly as an example. You improperly categorized my deleted emails as being honest threats of violence when they are not.

Here's the thing, AK. I know it's yours and BK's job to run this blog and as a result you two seem to feel the need to express an "alpha" role in your discussions with bloggers.

I get it. You guys are in charge. But it would be nice if we could have some imput as to how things run as a blog and discuss these matters.

You've often stated that the rules are clear and I'm not going to argue with you on that. The rules have become "relatively" clear over time, but they have not always been so. There's a reason why a lot of bloggers seem to overstep their bounds. It's not that we are challenging you guys, so much as we don't always know where the line is OR because you guys are so overwhelmed by posts that you can't take the time to read into the implied meaning of certain posts.

Whatever. I'm sorry to keep bringing this point up. I guess I've just been rubbed the wrong way by having so many posts deleted over time and being inappropriately used as a scapegoat today.

As long as I don't get any posts unreasonably deleted in the future I'll be fine. And I'll try to respect your sensitivities, despite myself.

GO LAKERS!

Edwin Gueco,

"Our made in China"...Sun....

OK,

24-Kobe-African American
16-Pau-Caucasian from Spain, that's in Europe,you know
9-Sun-Edwin covered that
7-Lamar-African American
17-Bynum-African American
18-Sasha-Caucasian from Slovenia
()Mitchell-not worth wasting my time on
()Josh? from Clippers-African American (a modern day version of a freed slave)
Walton-Caucasian, probably with mix of European heritage, I would guess somewhere in his blood there is Irish
(10)Vlad Rad- Caucasian from somewhere, (bad joke: Transylvania, which is not next to Pennsylvania, you knuckleheads, and if he has to exchange his USD$ for Euro's, when going home, then he's screwed,like the rest of us, just on a bigger scale)
Jordan-1/2 Caucasian-1/2 African American (I believe being of the Jewish faith does not enter into this recap of ethnic background. Judaism is a religion, not an ethnicity)
(2)Fish-African-American
(31)Mihm-Caucasian

I give up.....

SUN YUE, pronounce it "Sooon", btw, that's his last name, do some research.... on the court he is "a basketball player"...it would bug me, and maybe some other hypersensitive people, but I don't want to keep hearing "The Chinese player".....hey, you know what, there are alot of Asian players in MLB now, I wonder how many of them wear their MBZ emblems gold plated around their necks, that's a classy look...in other words, MLB should have banned jewelry from their players a long time ago. Yes, I remember the days of Norm Nixon and his gold chains, but I think it's a little more professional looking to not look like the 1st of Nordstroms, and yes I know, it's not Nordstrom stuff, it's custom.

As i look out of my front window, I see my white man neighbor mowing his lawn. I think I'll go get some gas from the Shell station down the street and see if I won the Lotto by asking the Korean man to check. Then, I'll go to the market and drive carefully in the parking lot because there are Asian women driving Mercedes Benzs' and Lexus'......pluralazation rules may have been violated, I (the Asian American man) apologize.

Have a great day, in the good ol' USA.

h.


AK/BK,
pls do us a favor and don't let Buttler posts anymore!!! he is just too annoying and getting ridiculous by the minute...his posts are just outrageous and we don't need that here....pls let Laker fans enjoy this blog!!

Sadly, these same people predicted a not so favorable Lakers season (in years past).

Sadly lol.

So I'm not a big fan of "pundits" per say. Especially since all those bandwagonners jinxed us lol.

Go Lakers!

Sometimes I slip in something political, too.

Funny list on who will implode. I would've thrown Cleveland on that list, too. I think after the Olympics LeBron is not going to settle for his team's lacadasical defense for too long. Big Z is winding down, his best years fading behind him. Delonte West? Please. Gibson? Same thing, these guys are all streaky shooters, which in and of itself isn't bad. But compound that with a lack of defensive intensity and you have a recipe for disaster in the beefed up East. They have no legit power forward, just a strange mish-mash of role players that need to be complemented by other guys on the court in order to maximize their effeciveness. They could definitely use a Lamr Odom type of player. A guy who creates his own niche by doing best what other do not. Same with Sasha and Luke and Ariza. They might not always have the stroke going, but they will stay in front of their men and rebound and in Luke's case he is similar in style of play to Lamar. He does his best to fill gaps.

Cleveland is geared to have the ball in one man's hands and to rebound. They are slow or risky defenders to a man and don't shoot well enough as a group to free LeBron up to the degree that Kobe is able to.

Because of the triangle.

Who's you're HOF coach now, PJ haters?

Peace.

AK,
If you go back through the posts, you will see that that is not the first time that that comment has been made. And seeing as it is in line with one of the campaign arguments, I have a hard time seeing how you can just call it "a joke". It was pretty clearly intended as a political statement.

The ESPN writers voting the Lakers as the 2009 NBA CHAMPIONSHIP favorites is just a way for all those haters to build up the Lakers for a mighty fall.

I don't wanna hear about the Lakers being the favorites with no Ronny Turiaf to spell Bynum and Gasol minutes in order to keep them from wearing down and/or getting injured in the long grind of an 82 game season.

Boston bullied dogged the Lakers.

We need to be humble, hungry and deflect all attention to Boston since they the champs or LeBron since he took the Celtics 7 games.

We need career yrs out of one of the guys we don't expect to play well.

Luke Walton, Jordan Farmar, Vlad Radmono, or Chris what a waste Mihm.

To LGC's and other trolls...

One of your own, Bill Simmons is actually giving Kobe props for his Olympic play and proclaiming him the best player in basketball. Here's the excerpt from his latest Mag column.

"Third, for most of the Games, Team USA had an alpha dog issue. Was this Kobe's team or LeBron's? Fast-forward to 8:13 left: Fernández's three cuts the lead to two; the crowd is going bonkers. Spain's bench reacts like a euphoric 15-seed during a March Madness upset, and the U.S. calls timeout. All along, my biggest fear had been a tight game and multiple USA guys saying, "I got it!" Instead, everyone deferred to Kobe, who made some monster plays to clinch it. Know that in the history of the NBA we have never had the best-player-alive argument resolved so organically. Incredible. Kobe, you have the Lord of the Flies conch. Use it wisely."

 
1 2 | »

Connect

Advertisement

In Case You Missed It...

Video

All Things Lakers »

Your database for all things purple and gold.

Find a Laker

Search a name

Select a season

Choose one of our lists



Categories


Archives
 

About the Bloggers


Bleacher Report | Lakers

Reader contributions from Times partner Bleacher Report

More Lakers on Bleacher Report »



Get Alerts on Your Mobile Phone

Sign me up for the following lists:


In Case You Missed It...