The Sun also rises?
The Daily News is reporting that the Lakers have agreed to terms with really tall Chinese guard Sun Yue, last year's second-round pick. Not a huge surprise, given that the team has expressed interest over the last few weeks in getting a deal done, but still some mighty intriguing news. More to come as we learn it. In the meantime, enjoy these clips of "The Best of Sun Yue," as opposed to messing around with "The Obscure B-Sides and Off Days of Sun Yue."
UPDATE (8:30 am): Here's the report from Elliot Teaford at the DN. Looks like a two-year deal, with everything getting ironed out in the next day or two if all goes well. Fans, of course, can get a look at Sun during the Olympics, starting Sunday when the U.S. faces China.
BK



Following is the quote from John Black in the LA Times:
"For us, he probably would play more at the two-guard simply because that's a less crowded spot for us," Black said. "The only two-guards we have are Kobe Bryant and Sasha Vujacic. Even though his most natural position is point guard, we're a little crowded there."
What is he talking about? If he is referring to a position that features an aging Derek Fisher and Jordan Farmar, who can best be described as "untapped potential" versus a position that featues the best basketball player on the planet and arguably our second best offensive weapon, he has got to be kidding. If Yue can play the point, give him the keys!
Posted by: Lincoln Laker | August 08, 2008 at 04:26 PM
Jon,
>>>>> I hate to be a glass is half-empty kind of person when it comes to
>>>>>anything regarding the Lakers, but to be honest with you, I wasn't
>>>>>impressed by what I saw with Sun Yue.
I’m surprised you don’t see a lot to like in Sun Yue, especially considering how much you invested in Shaun Livingston, who couldn’t shoot his way out of a paper bag. While the YouTube’s of Sun’s play are amateurish at best, they show me a player with the potential to become a game-changing point guard.
For one, Sun Yue is a true point guard at 6-9. He earned the nickname as the Chinese Magic Johnson due to his height and great passing ability, not because he had shown he could or might play point guard as well as the G.O.A.T. His size and versatility may be the answer to run the Lakers Triangle Offense.
As we saw with Magic, 6-9 size at the point is pretty much a great asset to possess. I think Sun shows much of that same potentially great court vision and passing ability you rave about so much with Shaun Livingston. Fortunately, Sun looks to have a much better outside shot than Shaun ever had.
More importantly, Sun Yue shows some of the defensive potential that was really Livingston’s greatest asset. Take another look at the YouTube’s, especially the ones where he showed his speed and hop catching up and blocking layups at the rim by Carmelo Antony of the Nuggets and Mike Conley of the Grizzlies, both clean blocks of dunks by the left-handed Sun.
Finally, with all the revisionary history that the media has put out since the Lakers were beaten by the Celtics in the Finals, you would think that the Lakers should be recruiting players from MMA rather than China, Europe, or South America. The physical trend in the NBA today is not a situation of guards versus centers but one of fast, long, and athletic players versus slow, bulky, plodding players.
Tom
Posted by: LakerTom | August 08, 2008 at 04:28 PM
Long Time,
Good points on Fish, BJ and Kerr, but if you read my post, I stressed the fact that the league is changing into a PG oriented league. The Bulls teams had Jordan and Pippen (who played the point) in their primes, and the Lakers had Kobe and Shaq in their primes, while playing in the triangle, a system that does not require a true PG. After Kobe's Lakers (hopefully) win 4 more rings, the next dynasty will be led by Bynum, along with an aging or retired Kobe, and most likely will be without Phil, Tex and the Triangle. The importance of an elite PG will be more important in the future than it is now or in the past couple dynasties. Unless we are fortunate enough to land another once in a generation Kobe-type player (unlikely) or Lebron, an elite PG to pair up with Bynum will be crucial to the success of the next dynasty. I just don't see Farmar fullfilling that role.
I don't undersatnd why you insist on bringing up Kwame to support your arguments. He is known as one of the biggest flops in draft history. For every #1 flop you bring up, I can bring up half a dozen success stories like Dwight Howard, Yao, Olajuwon, David Robinson, Kareem and Ewing. I understand that the draft can be a crapshoot, but please don't ty to minimize the value of college/high school performance and POTENTIAL by bringing up Kwame. Drafts and trades can be entirely based on potential. Potential is a crucial component to evaluating a player. Nobody said potential meant 100% success, but potential will drastically increase the probability of success. In other words, the probability of Derick Rose becoming a better starting PG than Farmar is high...very high. That's all I'm saying.
I hope I'm wrong, and Farmar turns out to be the next Chirs Paul or Deron Williams. I just don't see it.
Posted by: LAKER TRUTH | August 08, 2008 at 04:33 PM
Boston MANHANDLED the Lakers and now you think it didn't happened?
Give me a break.
Looking at your post I see this is Laker Tom.
Who else could justify the manhandling Boston did to the Lakers.
Just drop it.
mike t.
Posted by: Michael C. Teniente | August 08, 2008 at 04:37 PM
Let's go c's--
Is there a celtics blog that we can all go troll on? BTW, I just read that Kobe got a HUGE ovation in China. I wonder if thay gave a similar ovation to paul pie--oh wait, he's not on the olympic team, he's too busy driving drunk.
Posted by: James Deen | August 08, 2008 at 05:18 PM
If Atlanta doesn't match Memphis' offer to Josh Smith, then
Memphis will have effectively traded Pau Gasol for Josh Smith,
Marc Gasol, Javaris Crittenton, Darrell Arthur and another first
round pick.
Not a bad haul. Smith is about as good as Gasol, and they
will be paying him a lot less than Gasol made.
I think Atlanta will match, though. It's less than 12 million a
year, which was sorta the area where all the other big names
signed for.
Posted by: Long Time Laker Fan | August 08, 2008 at 05:35 PM
Long Time Laker Fan/LAKER TRUTH,
You two may be onto something.
GO LAKERS!
Posted by: Jon K. | August 08, 2008 at 05:44 PM
Jay Jay
Late in getting back to the blog, I just want to make a comment on your post about foreign players. Ever imagined 20 years ago the entrance of Euro players in NBA, they are the laughing stock of GM's and wondered why JW got Vlade Divac the the next generations of Euros followed suit. Going back to the sixties, China is not a powerhouse in Asia, it was the Philippines and South Korea ruled the Asian Games and I don't know if anyone here heard the player named, ShinDongPa one of the best asian players and Bobby Jaworski in the Philippines. They never got to the NBA level at that time.
Therefore, I hope you guys will treat Sun Yue as a great oppotunity of the Lakers to tap the developing market of the Giant Panda. Not long ago, the entrance of Yao Ming who was just tall and lanky sharp shooter was more akin to Murkesan, the giant, now gradually he's getting some respect as he masters to the rigors of NBA. Perhaps in China they have considered Sun as a PG, but as he goes farther he will be more of an SG and or SF in NBA because he is a good shooter and also a good feeder. I watched the pre-draft shown here, he could play D but don't expect him to be Perkins, Turiaf or Kwame, it not brawn but brains to connect those long jumpers. I see the Silk, Jamaal Wilkes from this kid than a Magic Johnson. For a 5 minutes of play every full moon w/ the non-chinese reigning Zen Coach, I think he is a good pick. His net returns as a player is a 100 times better in Jerry Buss coffers than playing a veteran Luke Walton. Everytime a player named Sun plays, you will be assured there a million Chinamen dreamin' and watching that someday they'll be the future Sun Yue.
Posted by: Edwin Gueco | August 08, 2008 at 06:02 PM
I agree with the people who say you don't have to literally be the best defensive team in the league to win a title, but you certainly need to be an upper echelon group. The Lakers were, relative to the league, a very solid team on that end of the floor for most of the season. In the Finals, they ran into a team that certainly "out physicaled" them (is that a word?), but I like that they didn't freak out and do anything drastic this summer. Come back with a (fingers crossed) healthy roster and a year's worth of experience getting that Finals run and see what happens. A healthy Ariza and Bynum certainly would have made a difference. Enough to win? Who knows. They were pretty close even without them. Nor can you assume that because "x" happened last season and was a problem, it'll play out exactly the same way this year. Matchups, needs, etc. change every year. The Lakers need to get a little tighter as a unit defensively without losing that which makes them so good as a whole.
As for Sun, there's no real downside to this one. I can't say I have high expectations that he'll be a part of the rotation, especially early, but given their other options to fill the guard spots, is he going to be any less useful than any of the FAs available (that they can afford, of course...)? Probably not. Hopefully he turns out to be a surprise. Certainly from a physical standpoint, he's a unique package.
BK
Posted by: Brian Kamenetzky | August 08, 2008 at 06:07 PM
Just to remind everyone....
“I don’t think Kobe (Bryant) is the best player. I’m the best player. There’s a line that separates having confidence and being conceited. I don’t cross that line, but I have a lot of confidence in myself.”—Boston’s Paul Pierce, during a question and answer session in Spain.
It actually happened.
GO LAKERS!
Posted by: Jon K. | August 08, 2008 at 06:13 PM
Long Time Laker Fan
Your break down of the finals is spot on. I have been posting the same thing. M T seems to think he can break down all 6 games by watching one. Pretty weak. And he doesnt seem to understand that Pau is now our PF not our center. And when guarded by Bostons PF K.G Pau went off for 19 pts 13 rbs and 6 assists. And I really do not know how Pau could be THAT soft when he pretty much controled KG for most of the series on the defensive end.
As for LAKER TRUTH, just remember if he had his way we would have started J.O and Troy Murphy this year and would have been a lottery team.
MH
Posted by: michael h | August 08, 2008 at 06:18 PM
Boycott the blog till lgc leaves.
You guys ain't down.
just playin K bros.
Posted by: Fire32 | August 08, 2008 at 06:24 PM
LakerTom,
Yeah, there are some structural elements which are similar between Sun Yue and Shaun Livingston, and I appreciate your optimism; however Shaun Livingston looked better than Sun Yue when he was in high school than Sun Yue looks now.
Shaun Livingston could also pass the ball like few people in the NBA. I've heard that Sun Yue sees the floor well. I hope that's true.
I guess I just don't have a lot of confidence in players from China. Wang Zhi-Zhi was supposed to be the bomb, but he didn't pan out. When Yao Ming came over he was supposed to be the heir apparent to Shaq, and don't get me wrong, he's a great player, but Bynum and Oden are going to be better than hiim next year.
So, I think we're taking a bit of a risk on Sun Yue, hopefully I'm wrong. You mention a lot of upside to Sun Yue, but I don't see it so much and I think you may be watching through rose colored glasses.
In any case, I'll be playing close attention to Sun Yue's play in the Olympic. Hopefully he impresses me.
GO LAKERS!
Posted by: Jon K. | August 08, 2008 at 06:26 PM
BK,
Nice analysis of the subjects at hand.
Unfortunately, now we have to find something else to talk about.
GO LAKERS!
Posted by: Jon K. | August 08, 2008 at 06:28 PM
I think chemistry and athleticism are also good defensive strategies which rest the hopes of Team USA today in the Olympics. If the chemistry of Bynum, Pau, LO, Kobe and Fish works, then the other options in the bench like Farmar, Sasha, Karl, Ariza and this kids Sun and Mitchell, I think that's enough to comouflaged the disappearing acts of Vladdy, Luke and Mihm for 48 minutes time. What we cannot understand why a 9-ringed Coach kept on playing people who are more of liabilities than the developing raw talents. I hope we can sign the last player, Mbenga as an insurance to Mihm, he may be slow but he's a martial arts player he can be trained to be Kwame's wall or bring in Turiaf's energy. Since the HOF coach lost the Finals, it's time for him to LISTEN and finally recognize talents than trying to do the impossible of expecting too much from scrubby players like before: in playing Smush as a starter for 80 games, in insisting on Kwame as a fundamental post player and now kept on plugging Walton to guard Ray Allen and Paul Pierce. Ironically, PP thinks he was the best player in the planet because he just drove by against the worst laker player during the Finals. lol!
Posted by: Edwin Gueco | August 08, 2008 at 06:42 PM
Long Time,
>>>>>You can't base your entire analysis of how well the Lakers
>>>>>played defense on 1 game of the finals. In the series as a whole,
>>>>>the Lakers made the Celtics offense play worse... just not as
>>>>>much worse as the Celtics defense made the Lakers offense
>>>>>play.
It’s good to have you on point. If anybody has the doggedness and tenacity to continue lofting logic bombs at Mike, it’s you. You wore me down, that’s for sure. And believe me, that is something that happens very often. The biggest thing I learned from playing basketball was that you can make up for a hell of a lot of talent by just caring more and playing harder. LOL. Sound familiar?
I’m almost feeling sorry for the poor guy already. It’s one thing to get cleverly insulted by Pig and the other “troll patrollers,” but to stand in front of the torrent of facts and waves of logic that you will unleash on Mike deserves to be turned into broadcast live to Lakers bloggers everywhere,
>>>>>Yeah, that's right. grind-it-out tough American guys are a
>>>>>guaranteed title. Guys like Charles Barkley and Karl Malone.
>>>>>Not skinny rail thin guys like Tayshaun Prince and Scottie Pippen.
I have been making that exact same point that the model player for this generation of NBA player is more Lakers than Celtics. The new NBA rules and trend clearly show that length, speed, quickness, and athleticism rather than size, strength, power, and physicality, is now the new NBA prototype. Kwame Brown ironically reflects some of that same changing of the guard sentiment, which makes it difficult for Mike to handle.
And how do you best utilize that length, speed, quickness, and athleticism when you have a shot blocker like Bynum? You surely do not play the Celtics pack-it-in-the-lane passive style of zone. Instead, you play an aggressive tight man-to-man defense that traps and presses to force turnovers and ignite fast breaks, knowing that Drew is protecting the rim.
It is also the reason IMO that Jordan Farmar still has a chance to become the Lakers starting point guard in the future. But when you talk about the length and speed and quickness, Sun Yue is truly intriguing at 6-9. We may not get to see much this year but it’s obvious to me that the Lakers are a lot more interested in Sun than his second round draft status would suggest.
Tom
Posted by: LakerTom | August 08, 2008 at 06:45 PM
Long Time,
>>>>>You can't base your entire analysis of how well the Lakers
>>>>>played defense on 1 game of the finals. In the series as a whole,
>>>>>the Lakers made the Celtics offense play worse... just not as
>>>>>much worse as the Celtics defense made the Lakers offense
>>>>>play.
It’s good to have you on point. If anybody has the doggedness and tenacity to continue lofting logic bombs at Mike, it’s you. You wore me down, that’s for sure. And believe me, that is something that happens very often. The biggest thing I learned from playing basketball was that you can make up for a hell of a lot of talent by just caring more and playing harder. LOL. Sound familiar?
I’m almost feeling sorry for the poor guy already. It’s one thing to get cleverly insulted by Pig and the other “troll patrollers,” but to stand in front of the torrent of facts and waves of logic that you will unleash on Mike deserves to be turned into broadcast live to Lakers bloggers everywhere,
>>>>>Yeah, that's right. grind-it-out tough American guys are a
>>>>>guaranteed title. Guys like Charles Barkley and Karl Malone.
>>>>>Not skinny rail thin guys like Tayshaun Prince and Scottie Pippen.
I have been making that exact same point that the model player for this generation of NBA player is more Lakers than Celtics. The new NBA rules and trend clearly show that length, speed, quickness, and athleticism rather than size, strength, power, and physicality, is now the new NBA prototype. Kwame Brown ironically reflects some of that same changing of the guard sentiment, which makes it difficult for Mike to handle.
And how do you best utilize that length, speed, quickness, and athleticism when you have a shot blocker like Bynum? You surely do not play the Celtics pack-it-in-the-lane passive style of zone. Instead, you play an aggressive tight man-to-man defense that traps and presses to force turnovers and ignite fast breaks, knowing that Drew is protecting the rim.
It is also the reason IMO that Jordan Farmar still has a chance to become the Lakers starting point guard in the future. But when you talk about the length and speed and quickness, Sun Yue is truly intriguing at 6-9. We may not get to see much this year but it’s obvious to me that the Lakers are a lot more interested in Sun than his second round draft status would suggest.
Tom
Posted by: LakerTom | August 08, 2008 at 06:49 PM
michael H,
....and if we had it your way, Kobe would've won the MVP award on a different team, Smush would've been re-signed, and Luke and Cook would play 30 minutes a game.
Posted by: SASHA | August 08, 2008 at 07:02 PM
Jon,
>>>>>I guess I just don't have a lot of confidence in players from China. Wang Zhi-Zhi
>>>>>was supposed to be the bomb, but he didn't pan out. When Yao Ming came over he
>>>>>was supposed to be the heir apparent to Shaq, and don't get me wrong, he's a great player,
>>>>>but Bynum and Oden are going to be better than him next year.
I know exactly what you mean. None of those guys was Bruce Lee. They are all talented but soft players in the end. And I don’t necessarily mean “soft” as not being physical but it’s more like they don’t try as hard or care about it as much. It’s not life or death to them as it is to us. It’s why I still am hesitant about Chien-Ming Wang. I don’t know how to express it other than to say it is too much control of emotions and not enough wearing your heart on your sleeve. It’s a big cultural difference. You always want to root for players who share your origins. Thank God for martial arts.
Part of it is also growing up with fighting as the natural way of settling disputes rather than insulting. We’ve talked about this before. How my son has had one fight in his entire life. He is pretty good on the court and won’t back down but he also won’t go to war the way I do or did. Truthfully, he has a better perspective of the situation than I have. Personally, I am addicted to the adrenaline high you get from the competition and have always taken it too seriously.
But back to China’s players, what can I say. You’re dead right. I once asked my dad why he didn’t marry a tall black women rather than a short white one. LOL. There but for fortune. Anyway, I do really see some very intriguing things in Sun that differ from the other guys. For one, he is a perimeter player whereas all of those other players were front court players. Two, his game is much more USA than China, what with the fancy behind the back passes, aggressive dunks, and a pretty impressive sequences of great Kobe-esque blocks at the rim against Melo and once when he had to run Mike Conley of the Grizzlies down from behind to block the shot.
Most critics were down on Sun’s shooting last year, now it seems that the critics are focusing on has ball handling, saying his shooting has improved greatly. It may take him some time to adjust to the speed and physicality of our style of basketball, but with that height and length and athleticism, Sun Yue could be the prototype point guard down the road for the Lakers.
Tom
Posted by: LakerTom | August 08, 2008 at 07:18 PM
Pig Miller,
One of the reasons we're not playing "our" game in international ball is because we got smoked doing so in the since 2000. That led to embarrassment and a feeling that we had to change how we were playing given that international rules allow any kind of zone which greatly changes the style of the game. The trapezoidal lane and shorter 3 point line also makes a big difference.
We're not afraid to play our game. We just really don't like losing.
Posted by: Benjamin | August 08, 2008 at 07:31 PM
Boston MANHANDLED the Lakers and now you think it didn't happened?
Give me a break.
Looking at your post I see this is Laker Tom.
Who else could justify the manhandling Boston did to the Lakers.
Just drop it.
mike t.
Posted by: Michael C. Teniente | August 08, 2008 at 04:37 PM
===============================
How quickly they forget. Yes the Celtics manhandled the Lakers but also note it was all done with full approval of the BETS. No way was this a fair and impartial series. Wake up and smell the coffee. That is the real truth. Greenies manhandle the Lakers no fouls. Lakers try to retaliate and play rough but only need to touch a greenie and get foul called. Truth is the truth.
Posted by: JustaLakerFan | August 08, 2008 at 08:28 PM
By the way, BK, Hemingway is a great author.
Posted by: exhelodrvr | August 08, 2008 at 08:33 PM
Suprised no one is talking about this story! Anyone thinks there is a legit chance this goes down next summer. If it did an end to any possible mini-dynasty!
"If Italy comes knocking with big money next summer, the NBA could lose its biggest star in Kobe Bryant. In lieu of a report that Cleveland star LeBron James would strongly consider playing in Europe for $50 million for one season when he becomes a free agent in two years, when asked by The Boston Globe about the report Bryant said he would take a similar deal by a pro team in Italy if offered when he becomes a free agent next summer. The Associated Press originally reported that Bryant could have interest in playing professionally in Europe. "I'd go. I'd probably go," said Bryant, during a USA Basketball press conference on Friday morning. "Like Milan or something like that, where I grew up or something like that? Peace out." Bryant continued: "Do you know any reasonable person that would turn down 50 (million dollars)?"
Posted by: Lakers85 | August 08, 2008 at 10:07 PM
Confession: It sent a chill down my spine to see Kobe marching with the other Olympic athletes into the stadium tonight. Psyched to watch Team USA v China early Sunday morning. Pre-season football, Olympic basketball, all in one weekend. Sweet!!!
Posted by: Rick Friedman | August 08, 2008 at 11:03 PM
>>>I don't undersatnd why you insist on bringing up Kwame
>>>to support your arguments. He is known as one of the
>>>biggest flops in draft history. For every #1 flop you bring
>>>up, I can bring up half a dozen success stories like Dwight
>>>Howard,...
Michael Olowokandi, Andrea Bargnani, Kenyon Martin, Joe Smith,
Derrick Coleman.
You're right. Virtually every #1 pick is guaranteed to be a
superstar hall-of-famer and franchise player.
Posted by: Long Time Laker Fan | August 08, 2008 at 11:31 PM
I wasn't cognizant of the olympic experience in 1992. But I imagine the "Kobe treatment" was similar for Magic and Jordan.
Atheletes from all over the world walking up and asking to take pictures with him. Not just "regular" fans, athletes.
Good shtuff. Go Kobe! Go Team USA!
Posted by: Faith | August 08, 2008 at 11:34 PM
Jay Jay,
wakeup, you can add college players into the group as well, but then again our college players who go pro, aren't "hindered" by having to play 4 years...eventually, those with the desire will adjust, those that don't....."D-League, here I come!!!!"....or outside of the US....unfortunately there they will be hindered with having to do math, to figure out the exchange rates of the money they are getting paid...they'll screw it up, and get it backwards and call their agents.....or bitch about it with their posses.
Posted by: humanomaly | August 08, 2008 at 11:43 PM
Oh, by the way, if you have Dish Network, be sure to check
out channel 99.
ALL 58 MEN'S AND WOMEN'S BASKETBALL GAMES WILL BE
SHOWN IN HD. MOST OF THEM LIVE!!!!!
sweeeet.
Of course, Live means overnight, but if you want to scout out
Sun Yue or see how the Gasol brothers do, or if you want to
watch a complete game without them cutting away in the
middle to show Greco-Roman Wrestling or Badminton, then
the Basketball Channel is the way to go.
Posted by: Long Time Laker Fan | August 08, 2008 at 11:45 PM
Sasha
You may be confusing me with another blogger. I was never for trading Kobe, never really thought it would happen. ya like a lot of guys I had trade senarios if it came to that but if you go back and read the things I wrote, I definetly didnt want him traded, As far as Smush, What? And Cook 5 to 10 minute guy. I mean where are you coming from Dude? Get your facts straight.
MH
Posted by: michael h | August 08, 2008 at 11:58 PM
SASHA,
Oh, thats right Laker Truth Likes to post under assumed names, right Mitchell?
MH
Posted by: MICHAEL h | August 09, 2008 at 12:00 AM
Chris the Catherine Zeta Jones of Backups Mihm,
regarding Sun's height, check out the you-tube video of the Laker pre draft workout, they measured him at 6'9" and 217....he's young still, so he could probably grow an inch still, and gain about 10-15 pounds easily. That would make him Magic size....I think Magic was listed at like 6'7" out of college....not sure....as for all the talk about Shaun Livingston, why bother, I think that's a closed chapter, end of story. What did he weigh when he got to the Clippers? 190 lbs?, if that!!!
Posted by: humanomaly | August 09, 2008 at 12:10 AM
BARRY, BARRY, BARRY....
Why do they hate thee, let me count the ways.
One, Rick Barry was a good (whatever...., some will say great) player, but he's never talked about in the same discussions as the other all time greats.....He probably hates the Lakers and Kobe even more because even Kobe's dad has more name recognition than DICK, oh, I mean't Rick (toupee, oops, touche)....
I actually liked Jon Barry, as a Laker....I guess he got screamed at too much by Kobe, and couldn't deal with it, and his daddy was probably telling him to not take it, but you know....Kobe always gets the last shot.
Everyone chill, the roster is set, now we just need to make them tougher. Maybe this year, instead of the "playdays" in the past (paintball)....maybe they should do "Fighclub"...but if they do, remember, the #1 rule of fight club is "there is no fight club"....so we won't have to know, go ahead Phil, just do it....(ooops, Sasha just ran out the door).....
Posted by: humanomaly | August 09, 2008 at 12:29 AM
Heya fellas,
long time reader first time poster here.
I was thinking about potentially cheap free agent pickups Lakes could make for another big body off the bench, besides DJ and Mihm ( who kinda reminds me of mike smrek for some reason)
These are the names I think are worth considering:
Juwan Howard solid guy, more offensively minded, $760K
Lorenzen Wright good back up, has been a starter, could be a bargain
Jamaal Magloire big body, decent skills, 30 yo, $230k
Melvin Ely young big man could learn a thing or 2 from Kareem, I don't think he's in NO's rotation, almost $1mil.
Kelvin Cato should clog up the middle a bit
Othella Harrington banger i guess
Doleac decent backup, made > $3m last year(no way we give him more than $300K)
would be nice, but less likely
David Harrison restricted FA, Indy prob wants to keep?
dik/zo
I'm sure this post belongs under an earlier topic, but I figured I would go with the newest post in case anyone wanted to comment
Posted by: madhatter | August 09, 2008 at 04:57 AM
LTLF,
You wrote this to Mike T:
The Lakers defense was fine. It held the Celtics 5% below
their regular season shooting percentage. The Lakers defended
Boston as well or better than any team that faced them in the
playoffs.
Where the Lakers failed was in letting Boston's defense
disrupt their offense.
-------------------
I'm going to disagree. 5% is not a significant degradation in
performance as opposed to the ~ 15 - 20% differential they
put on us. The Lakers defense failed in game 4 when they
gave up a 24 pt. lead. In game 6 where we got blown out.
I'm going to include game 2 because we couldn't reel them
in.
The Lakers didn't "let" Boston disrupt their offense. The
Celtics straight up "TOOK" the offense away. FYI:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minneapolis_Lakers#1947:_Minneapolis_Lakers
It should be noted that although the Showtime Lakers were famous for their scoring, they were also a great defensive team. Michael Cooper won the NBA Defensive Player of the Year Award in 1987.
Defense wins championships! That is why the Spurs won.
That is why the Detroit Pistons won. That is why the Bulls
won. That is why the Mavs lost.
Posted by: hobbitmage | August 09, 2008 at 06:49 AM
LTLF,
You're confusing stats with reality regarding defense.
If you have the best team in the NBA statistically speaking
and you play in the weakest division then your defensive
numbers can be skewed by the weak teams you're playing.
In football, there is the concept that there are 3 keys to
winning. Offense, Defense & special teams. I suggest
that there is a corollary in Basketball. Offense, Defense &
Free Throw shooting. In football, if you win 2 out of the 3
keys you generally win. I would suggest that the same
is true in basketball. If my offense is much better than
yours and my defense is almost as good as yours and I
make my free throws, I *should* win. If my defense is
much better than yours and my offense is almost as good
as yours and I make my free throws I should win. The
C's played defense in such a way as to minimize the
Lakers free throws. Thay played much better defense.
They made their free throws. They won.
I love the positive sentiment, but can we call a spade a
spade? The Lakers were soft and squishy like 3 week
old fruit and got punked on international TV. The C's
prevented Kobe from going to the whole by playing
TEAM defense. Everybody got back. The Celtic role
players broke our backs. Which means that it wasn't
superstar efforts like MJ's 55 pts against the Suns.
Posted by: hobbitmage | August 09, 2008 at 07:07 AM
Benjamin,
I guess what I was mostly ranting about was the way the rest of the world took our game, and changed the rules to their advantage, because their players were less skilled and smaller, so now we have to play the way they play in order to beat them. How's that fair? That's why I said I think we should make them play a series with changing rules in order to determine who's truly the better team.
In any case, we're gonna own the Gold again this year, so it doesn't matter.
Posted by: "Pig" Miller | August 09, 2008 at 08:11 AM
The NBA really needs to do something about the salary cap now. European teams will make the "Garnett Money" standard look like chump change. Bye bye Kobe, Lebron, etc...
Posted by: FrankBrickowski | August 09, 2008 at 08:25 AM
KOBE GONE???
K-Bros: WHY is this not our lead story???
http://sports.yahoo.com/olympics/beijing/basketball/
news;_ylt=AtP3LCc1H.RMVti9JhlvJ3.8vLYF?slug=aw-
kobeeuropenewser080908&prov=yhoo&type=lgns
WHAT DOES EVERYONE THINK?
Could this happen? Or is he just posturing? And given that he has (and always will have) the max possible contract with the Lakers what else could he want here??
Posted by: Jay Jay | August 09, 2008 at 08:36 AM
Those of you who are expected to scout Sun during the Olympics are going to be disappointed. He doesn't even start for the Chinese national team and doesn't play a lot of minutes.
Apparently he also made the all-ABA first team a year ago, but then the ABA is such a joke that I don't think it should count for anything.
Posted by: Dion | August 09, 2008 at 08:39 AM
The LA Times article said they might play Sun at shooting guard. Earlier this year another article said they might play Lamar Odom at shooting guard. The Lakers already have two good shooting guards (Kobe and Sasha) so why would they want to get another.
The only reason I can think is that they want to move Kobe to small forward full time. Think about it, in the Finals the biggest weakness was covering Paul Pierce. The only guy who could cover Pierce well was Kobe.
At the close out of games they put Kobe in the small forward spot. Phil's preferred lineup was Fisher/Sasha/Kobe/Odom/Gasol. The only reason they didn't start Kobe as a small forward is that they didn't have enough shooting guards, but if they get another shooting guard then they could make Kobe the starting small forward.
Or maybe not, what do I know.
- Gerrit
Posted by: Gerrit | August 09, 2008 at 09:11 AM
Does anyone know what time the mens basketball team game will be on. I know its CBS, but everywhere I looked it said 10am-6pm, so somewhere in between there, but does anyone know an exact time.
Posted by: Stars_R_Aligned | August 09, 2008 at 09:24 AM
Opening ceremonies last night? Very nice, especially for a genocide supporting country.
A couple of observations...
1. A LOT of the smaller countries had some VERY old athletes. I'm assuming they are the countries' elite bribing people just to get into the Olympics so they can brag "I was an Olympic athlete."
2. I was filled with horror watching Chris "The Brad Pitt of the NBA" Kaman walk with the German team.
3. It was an impressive ceremony that inspired the notion of a world without petty conflicts.
GO LAKERS!
Posted by: Jon K. | August 09, 2008 at 09:43 AM
Xodus,
You wrote: Everyone just wants to remember Game 6 and keep saying the word soft.
Ok. Give me one example of the Lakers playing "hard" ?
*I* recall Pau Gasol getting his chest caved in while getting the
ball "TAKEN" away in during Game 2 or Game 6. There was
no anger. There was no retaliation. Just a soft euro player
pleading with the ref to do something.
I'm not just remembering Game 6. I'm remembering Games
1,2 & 4. Soft and squishy like my
Posted by: hobbitmage | August 09, 2008 at 09:58 AM
to all of y'all who think the Lakers played adequate defense:
from: http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/playoffs2008/columns/
story?page=ScoutingLakersCeltics-Game6
Inexcusably, Radmanovic often approached Pierce standing straight up, not crouched in a defensive stance, giving him the green light to roast Radmanovic and get into the teeth of the defense. "Starting position" is preached hard to good defensive teams. Watch Boston to see the importance of this defensive strategy -- both in terms of individual stance and team positioning. If L.A. can make a major improvement in this area for Game 6, its defense should provide a tougher obstacle for Pierce.
The bigs for L.A. proved to be excellent ball-screen defenders in the San Antonio series, especially from the side, using quick feet to hedge and slow Tony Parker and Manu Ginobili. But Boston featured ball screens 30-plus feet from the rim after spreading and flattening the floor with its shooters. This has resulted in open space for Pierce, who uses that room to blow past Pau Gasol. Boston also likes to use whomever Gasol is guarding in these situations, dragging him from the paint and exposing his lack of foot speed in open-court situations. It's tough to trap a player such as Pierce so far from the basket, and if the Lakers do, the court is opened for too many shooters. On screens that far from the basket, asking the player defending Pierce to just go under the screen might be their best answer.
L.A. is having trouble with its basic defensive strategies in dealing with screens. On numerous occasions, players didn't switch during wing-to-wing screens (involving Pierce specifically), which allowed him easy layups and dunks. Boston will continue to try to get Pierce involved in as many screening actions as possible, hoping to ride his talent and the "zone" he is in to win a title. To counter this, L.A. must iron out its problems, making steadfast rules on any screening actions, particularly the ones with Pierce. Whether it is to switch, run a helper over early, go under the screen or trap, the Lakers must be consistent or risk giving up too many easy baskets. Remember, their margin for error on defense is razor thin to begin with, so when the strategy is to have two guys marking Pierce -- but more often than not, the execution results in no one guarding him -- only bad things can happen.
-----------------------------------------------------
"L.A. is having trouble with it's basic defensive strategies." i.e. cream puff soft.
Posted by: hobbitmage | August 09, 2008 at 10:12 AM
Jon K,
You didn't like the 2008 Tai Chi practicioners?
Posted by: hobbitmage | August 09, 2008 at 10:15 AM
Jay Jay,
Because, and I quote: "Even so, Bryant conceded that it would be “Almost impossible … very difficult …” to leave the Lakers, who are primed to make a run at multiple championships over the next several years."
Kobe's not going anywhere.
GO LAKERS!
Posted by: Jon K. | August 09, 2008 at 10:23 AM
i'm a long time lakers fan and i want kobe to be a laker for life. however, if you think about an nba superstar in his prime playing in europe? basketball is already one of the growing sports in the world but it would greatly help boost the popularity of basketball.
Posted by: kobe in europe | August 09, 2008 at 10:29 AM
LAT - "For us, he probably would play more at the two-guard simply because that's a less crowded spot for us," [Laker spokesperson John] Black said.
An NBA 2-guard with marginal-to-negligible 3pt range would need Wade-like strength + finishing ability around the rim -- or at least a knack for drawing and+1s -- and/or lockdown dchops.
So -- can the guy draw FTs? Because Sun Yue does *not* (at this point) have reliable college *or* NBA 3pt range, is built like most NBA Chinese players despite good hops + athleticism (e.g., your average Barbie doll has more upper body strength), would better fit an open court style (where he can fill the lanes on the break/in transition and dunk/dish to his heart's content), and defends "off his feet" (weakside shot blocking/changing) more than he does on.
Shorter: Sun Yue, project. But intriguing for somewhat good hops, running ability, decent handle at his height. Whatever it is.
Posted by: latopia | August 09, 2008 at 10:35 AM
Sonny B-
Funny line, but with an unprintable. Sorry I couldn't put it through.
BK
Posted by: Brian Kamenetzky | August 09, 2008 at 10:48 AM
hobbitmage,
It was impressive.
I just have trouble getting past the fact that China is responsible for so much suffering in Tibet, Xinjiang Province, Burma, and Darfur, as well as leading the environmental destruction of the planet.
And they're fricken Communists.
AND this Chinese Communist regimen is responsible for the destruction of hundreds of years of Buddhist and Taoist knowledge through Mao's wholesale destruction of China's temples and centers of learning.
So, everyone's all happy, smilely at these Olympics, but to me it's no different than watching an Olympics in Nazi Germany or the Soviet Union.
So... it's hard for me to look beyond that fact that this whole thing is just a big propaganda exercise for a despot Communist regime, even if it was pretty to look at.
The 1936 Olympics in Berlin also had very impressive opening ceremonies, by the way. Despotic regimes are very good at showmanship.
GO USA!
GO LAKERS!
Posted by: Jon K. | August 09, 2008 at 10:58 AM