The forecast: First place
Not sure that qualifies as actual "weather," but it does represent a preseason poll taken of various ESPN folks. The question: How do you picture the West shaking out next season? The general consensus: With the Lakers at the top, sporting 55 wins. Obviously, this opinion is based in part on the notion of Andrew Bynum being healthy. But hey, at least the "experts" believe in the potential for a return to the Finals (if not a trophy).
Interesting notes: Houston, with its newly Artest-ed lineup, sits at No. 3 with a bullet. Denver misses the playoffs, with Portland taking its ocho slot. Phoenix and Dallas move to making the postseason (I could see that happening, but I think Portland will finish higher than at least one, if not both). For those keeping track of L.A.-based squads, the Clippers garnered the "Spinal Tap" spot.
In the East, Boston is expected to remain where it left off at regular season's end. Philly jumps up a bit. Miami jumps up A LOT. The party, already fading upon Josh Childress' overseas departure and the teeth pulling required to retain Josh Smith, ends abruptly in Atlanta.
Also, an article from CBSSports.com's Gregg Doyel about the steady demise that is Shaq's public image.
AK



LakerTom
You played on the Pauley court. Geez I attended UCLA 9 yrs in total and never knew you could do that. I did go to watch practices occasionally though.
I played in the Men's Gym which I think was preferable anyway. The pickup games played there were unbelievable. I once came within about 4 inches of walking straight into Magic as he was leaving the gym and I was entering (this was the yr Vlade Divac joined the team. Man, was Magic constantly on his butt).
Posted by: giantsquid | August 31, 2008 at 10:35 PM
Michael H,
Aloha,
you wrote: But how do you get, that Lamar is not a good defensive player out of that?
my response: Mitch's comment was that we did not have
a defensive player at the 3. I believe that quote is verbatim.
you wrote: You stated in a prior thread that you would settle for nothing less then a defender at the 3 that was at least as good as the best guy on our current team,
my response: Actually, I don't think that is "quite" what I
said. I believe I said that I wanted a defensive minded
person at the 3, because the Lakers *NEED* to improve
on defense. Lamar is *NOT* defensive minded.
you wrote: Lamar will be fine against most guys
my response: Actually, if you go back to the beginning
of this conversation with thekobebryantblitz, you'll see
that I said Lamar would be fine against *MOST* guys.
I *specifically* stated that against the quicker SF/SG's
he'd have a problem because he's slow. Not slow for
a big man, but slow. For a comparison: Kobe vs. Lamar.
AI vs. Lamar. If you go back two years ago you'll notice
that we had problems with Atlanta and the Trailblazers.
Two young teams who are quick and athletic. Those
are the types of players that Lamar will have problems
with at the 3.
thekobebryantblitz,
you seem to be stuck on the statistics thing. perhaps
this will help you. http://tinyurl.com/zbykb
Xodus,
you wrote: What a 25-5 record doesn't tell you how dominant they were already?
my response: Not really. My reasoning goes like this.
They played the majority of their games against the
East. The East is weaker. The more times you see an
opponent the better you can prepare for him and beat
him. The clearest example of this is the NY Giants vs.
the New England Patriots. Within a 6 week period the
Giants played the pats twice. They lost the first and
won the 2nd in the superbowl. Going back to
basketball, the Lakers did not beat the Celtics during
regular season. They did win twice in post season.
Yes, the Lakers got better with Gasol. They also had
a better feel for the Celtics. Does that make sense to
you?
I still don't see how knocking 5% off of the season
average can be considered good defense by the Lakers.
you also wrote: But like I said in my previous posts Boston likely won't be as good defensively next year, because they were historically good last season and it's hard to be that good two seasons in a row when you've lost a key defender like Posey and the older guys who were fighting for titles their whole careers won't be as hungry.
my response: Are you actually saying that "Kevin
Garnett" will not be as hungry next year? Perhaps
you're saying that Kevin Garnett will *NOT* be able to
motivate his team as well next year?
Posted by: hobbitmage | August 31, 2008 at 11:27 PM
The Blitz sez:
"There was tons of pressure last year for Bynum as well to prove that he wasn't worth to ship his butt out for Jason Kidd and well he proved it. This year he will again prove he can work well, he has proved it."
TKBB, the difference between this year and last year - and listen to me because AMARE went out for a year when the SUNS, as the lakers are now doing, were amassing their new found powers - is that byenumb not only has to work hard with kareem on those post moves, but adjust his game to injury. The fear of a 2nd knee failure will affect his mentality. It doesn't mean less effective, not necessarily.
The lakers saved byenumb for the future by getting pau. Now the lakers must - by the will of the fans and the need to determine whether this workhorse is worth a big contract - send that knee onto the court to bang and pound and bear another, larger man's full attack...
Oden. Yao. SHACK. Kwame. Perkins. Nash.
The knee, it's all about that $111 million knee.
*SHACK plucks a reptile from a nearby glass bowl, yanks on the chain connected to his slave woman in a hot space bikini. Laughs. Crumples up a Getty Images photo of bynumb, laughs harder.*
Posted by: BUTLER | August 31, 2008 at 11:27 PM
I Love Kobe sez:
"Oh, and 57-25 vs 55-27 is a TWO game difference my dear"
WooOOOOOOOOOOO000ooooooooooooooooo!
Well now, I stand corrected! The lakers were a whopping TWOOOOOOooooooo games ahead of the SUNS to gain that #1 spot!
Dominant, just dominant.
Posted by: BUTLER | August 31, 2008 at 11:32 PM
"Suns fans need to prepare for a possible dismal season due largely to Shaq's Mr. Hyde behavior! I have always considered him a big clown but this last fiasco takes the cake. I suspect a possible jail sentence could follow? But for sure Shaq will find it very difficult to play and remain focused at the same time. Kobe was able too during the Colorado hearings as well as during games while being booed by opposing fans. Shaq will definately crumble and retire!"
Frankly, the SUNS needed a little "Mr. Hyde" in a large body. Their ability to defend the paint prior to SHACK cost them numerous times. SHACK gives the SUNS a beastly character, bestial and powerful.
What do I care what SHACK does in his off time? But since you asked, in Phoenix SHACK has reunited with his beautiful wife and children. He gives time and money to local Indian tribes that are dirt poor.
So SHACK is nasty, yes. We need him to be nasty.
But he's not nasty in an Artest type of way. SHACK feeds his dogs.
I have to say, that hip hop chick of his has some legs. SHACK, he's not unhappy.
Posted by: BUTLER | August 31, 2008 at 11:41 PM
Anyone else see Bill Maher's show tonight on the elections?
He announced in his "New Rules" segment, this rule:
"Don't put the gold medal in your teeth, it looks stupid. Plus, the medal was made in CHina and it has lead in it."
photos of kobee and three other olympians were shown, all of them biting their medals and basically looking stupid. Ha ha!
Posted by: BUTLER | August 31, 2008 at 11:52 PM
Blog admin: If FakerTom is allowed to call some of us names (in fun of course), I should be allowed to give back some playful banter back. Please allow my post.
LadyTom said: Time to change your diaper, buddy. Don't you remember Bynum dominating Amare? Can't see through all the crap? Better call mom for help.
Andrew Olowokandi dominating Amare? You're as dumb as you look "buddy".
Kandiman #2 hasn't done jack poop since joining the league and you Fakers are annointing him as the next best thing.
How dumb are you?
ahaahahahaaaaah
Not to mention that Olowokandi is a center and Amare is a forward.
Have you ever played basketball in your life "buddy"?
Doubt it; otherwise you wouldn't spend all day, everyday, spewing your "hot air" bull poop.
Celtic rule the basketball world.
"Top of the world" KG
Posted by: LCG | September 01, 2008 at 12:01 AM
Dave M,
My rotation if it were up to me would be to start out with
Fisher-Bryant-Odom-Gasol-Bynum
assuming no foul trouble and we have the lead at near the 3 min mark of the 1st Quarter I sit down Fisher and Odom and move Kobe to the 3 and put in Jordan and Sasha till the end of the quarter.
2nd Quarter--Start out with Farmar, Vujacic, Radmanovic at the 4 and either put Gasol if the game is close or Mihm if we have a comfortable lead. The Small Forward slot is decided by how the 1st Quarter ended. If it ended on a high note, then Walton is put in to increase offense and expand the lead. If ended on a nervous note, put in Ariza to add to the bench mob. Should the lead be expanded to double digits will keep the line up intact until the 8 minute mark then sit Gasol/Mihm and bring out Bynum. If Radman is struggling then substitue him out for Odom. If not keep Radman. 5 min mark comes, if the game is close or we need to catch up, put back in starting 5. If additional scoring is needed, then put lineup of Fisher-Vujacic-Bryant-Gasol-Bynum till the end of quarter.
Halftime
Start out with starting 5: Fisher-Bryant-Odom-Gasol-Bynum. Unless there is matchup problems then keep starting 3-5 till min mark. If lead is close or is in deficit then substitute out Fisher for Farmar and Kobe moves to the 3 and Vujacic goes to two. If opposing center is more power forward (small lineup) then sit Bynum and play Gasol at center and move Odom to the 4. If lead is big then sit down Fisher, Gasol, and Bryant. If offense is need put Walton at the 3 and Odom at the 4. Bynum stays at 5 and Sasha and Jordan comes out till end of quarter.
4th Quarter: Start out with offense. Jordan, Sasha, Ariza, Radmanovic and Gasol if the lead is slim or Mihm if we have a comfortable lead. If lead is still close substitue back in starters until 4 min mark. If lead expands play Mihm until 6 min mark. When 6 min mark comes see scores, if lead has shrunk put Fisher-Vujacic-Bryant-Gasol/Odom-Bynum/Gasol. If lead is certain and we will win the game, then put in Sun Yue for Farmar, Karl for Vujacic, Powell for Radmanovic, Walton or Ariza depending on who got the lesser of playing time and Mihm. Play until game ends.
Substitutions for certain situations.
If Odom at foul trouble put Kobe at 3 and get Sasha.
If Gasol at foul trouble, move Odom at the 4 and Walton at the 3.
If Bynum at foul trouble, move Gasol to the 5, Odom to 4, Kobe to 3, Vujacic to 2.
If Sasha is incapable of defending or shooting ice cold, substitute Kobe at the 2 and either put Ariza or Walton at the 3.
If Jordan is incapable of defending and Derek needs rest or can't come in, Sun Yue only alternative unless near the end of games when Kobe can guard the torching point guard.
If Walton struggles, easy put in Ariza and vice versa. If Radman struggles put Odom at the 4 until Gasol comes back in.
If Mihm is still playing pathetic.........just substitue Bynum and Gasol at certain times.
Sun Yue gets playing time if Jordan and Derek is really struggling defensively. Powell gets playing time only if bigs having trouble. Mihm gets some playing time but if he just continues to struggle then rotate Gasol and Bynum and leave him to garbage minutes. Karl is suitable back up for Vujacic.
Those are rotations if it were up to me.
Posted by: thekobebryantblitz | September 01, 2008 at 12:01 AM
"
LadyTom said: Time to change your diaper, buddy. Don't you remember Bynum dominating Amare? Can't see through all the crap? Better call mom for help.
Andrew Olowokandi dominating Amare? You're as dumb as you look "buddy".
"
BUTLER = LGC... lakertom addressed the diaper changing to butler but lgc responded. haha
case closed
Posted by: LA undercover | September 01, 2008 at 01:43 AM
BUTLER Sez:
"WooOOOOOOOOOOO000ooooooooooooooooo!
Well now, I stand corrected! The lakers were a whopping TWOOOOOOooooooo games ahead of the SUNS to gain that #1 spot!
Dominant, just dominant."
Wasn't pointing out the LAKERS dominance, which you obviously acknowledge btw, thanks! I was merely just showing your lack of math skills
Posted by: I love Kobe | September 01, 2008 at 02:01 AM
BUTLER,
Your reply was rather "interesting" to say the least. Your tone seems to indicate that SHAQ is the only GODSEND the NBA has ever had and, therefore, should be IMMUNE to any criticism as a result.
Believe me my friend, I'm at peace with the Lakers PAST and have accepted it with an open mind and heart as well as through OBSERVATION over the years. Do not confuse my passion as a Laker fan with sesitivity. Without PASSION, why be a fan of anything or anyone?
Speaking of accepting the past, let's take a closer look at your annointed "savio"r named Shaquille O'Neal: For many years after his time in LA, Shaq has made many inferences about the PAST, especially by way of taking cheap UNNECESSARY shots at Kobe, a player who HELPED him win 3 RINGS in the PAST.
Listen, Kobe was at fault for a lot of things that happened between them as well. Trust me, he's been dealing with his own negative PAST for quite some time and has dealt with it rather well considering the overwhelming obstacles by focusing on HIMSELF and OTHERS in a positive and different light. As a result of his willingness to become a better TEAMMATE and PERSON, he won the 2008 Season MVP award and Olympic Gold Medal this year. It's called MATURITY! Shaq NEEDS to rediscover the importance of MATURITY!
I'm just extremely DISAPPOINTED with his actions as a person when discussing ANOTHER player OPENLY. However, as a player, I have no such disappointment. If anything, I will be forever grateful for his 3-title run with LA as a PASSIONATE fan. Unfortunately, he has opened up too many "cans of worms" on too many occasions. That is UNACCEPTABLE personally and professionally as far as I'm concerned. It is what it is! He is an AMBASSADOR for all on and off the court (through his desire to lead and caring for children, supposedly). He put himself in that position LONG AGO!
Let's put this into perspective: If I recall, SHAQ was the one who approached Kobe during pre-game warmups and extended his hand as an act of truce a couple of years ago (that game was nationally televised by the way). That very moment, I thought, was critical in allowing both Shaq and Kobe to bury the past filled with a lot of SUCCESS along with a few FAILURES along the way. As a result of his actions done in good faith, Shaq eventually won the title that year (2006) with Miami and we pretty much know the rest of the story... However, history REPEATED itself once again by way of Shaq's uncontrollable body part affectionately called the MOUTH. He's BETTER than that! Let it go baby!
With the recent comments made by Shaq concerning Kobe, he CONTRADICTED everything about who he is as a PLAYER and PERSON. It's no secret that Shaq promotes himself by the expense of others publicly. That's why a lot of his faithful fans then and now are turned off by his continued antics. Wouldn't you? He put a negative cloud over himself by making UNWISE decisions when making comments. He has made it PERSONAL not only with Kobe, but also the fans who supported him for many years like myself. Rather than TALKING nonsense, he needs to focus on leading Phoenix to the promiseland instead. Obviously, he is not at PEACE with his PAST!
In the end, Shaq has to understand that it's not about getting EVEN with ANYBODY at this point in time. Rather, it's about getting the Suns to reach a high level of play with an aging Steve Nash.
As long he continues to allow thoughts of Kobe CONSUME him (which is very OBVIOUS), he will not help the Suns win SQUAT! It's crystal clear that Kobe consumes SHAQ's very thoughts on and OFF the court. I find this amusing coming from a man that claims he is better than some NBA legends such as Kareem and Ewing. Unreal! He REALLY needs to stop TALKING and start DOING both ON and OFF the court. It's about appreciating life then and now, being good to others DESPITE differences and ridding yourself of demons that ultimately stud your growth as a person and professional.
SHAQ is NO DOUBT a great player in his own right and will be a sure fire Hall of Famer. I will always consider him a Laker no matter what contrary to the fact.
Despite knowing that he will someday be regarded as one of the best that ever played the game, Shaq CONTINUES to use the PAST through the media and truly believes it's FUNNY to bring others down (of course WE know who OTHERS is) without the thought of negative consequences. Character and leadership should not only be found on the court of play, but also outside as well (as I've stated before with EMPHASIS). SHAQ should know, he was ONCE a sheriff's deputy in both Florida and Arizona. Don't kid yourself with that REALITY.
Once he learns how to shape up in terms of his using the media PROPERLY without using OTHERS as cheap bait for his amusement (as I said earlier with EMPHASIS), maybe people would find him GENUINE again. Unfortunately, he chose to make his PERSONAL beds in both LA and Miami without the chance of MAKING them IMPORTANT AGAIN. It is safe to say that both "beds" are not suitable for him to "rest" on any time soon. Get my drift dear friend? Trust me, what makes you think it won't happen in Phoenix! It's called a pattern of HISTORY, or the PAST!
The Suns will be their own WORST enemy unless Shaq changes his attitude about life and PEOPLE. He too is not getting any younger. Like you said, it's going to be one heck of a season coming up with MUCH IMPROVED teams all around via acquisition and internal growth. For that reason, Boston will not repeat. Agree? As much as our Lakers were exposed, so will Boston. Letting James Posey walk will haunt them without a doubt!
Despite our opposite views, I am also excited to see what lies ahead as both a Lakers and basketball fan. If I recall correctly, Kobe and co. played WELL against the Suns this past season and won the season series 3-1. Could it be a sign of things to come? The season can't arrive soon enough...
If there is one thing for SURE, we will both be watching SHAQ and Kobe do their thing with their respective teams. Hopefully, both will play at a high level consistently for the purpose of making their teammates better for all the RIGHT reasons. For whatever RIGHT reasons it may be, we shall see...we shall see...
In the end, it's all about winning CHAMPIONSHIPS! Our Lakers DEFINITELY know a thing or two about in their glorious history (of course with Shaq in mind). On the other hand, with the Suns, it remains to be seen...Good Luck! They're going to NEED IT! Their window is closing fast. It's now up to a MATURE Shaq to reopen it with a rekindled SPIRIT he once had for the FUTURE and an APPRECIATION for the PAST! Unfortunately, the Lakers just might get in his way...
Laker pride through ADVERSITY baby! Peace!
Posted by: Let's go L's! | September 01, 2008 at 04:18 AM
2009
Yes I see the suns and mavs falling off next year too. Both
barely making the playoffs. The teams to beat in the west will surely be the Hornets, the Rockets the Spurs and of course the Lakers.
Everyone will be gunning for the Lakers this time. So we'll see what they're really made of. And like many have been saying, it will take defense to win it for us next year if we win it. If Kobe comes out and plays the type of D he played in the olympics, then the rest of the Lakers will follow suit, and we will be one of the top defensive teams in the NBA and we will win the title.
Just concentrate on offense again like last year and we'll go far but not over the top, like last year.
Yes I say it's time for Kobe to, instead of resting on D and conserving his energy for offense, to make defense his priority, forget about conserving his energy for offense, and let the triangle and Phil, and Bynum and Pau carry much of the offense for him. You know Kobe will still get his numbers. He has too much pride to not do it. But like Michael Jordan did in order to win titles Kobe will have to go out and set the tone defensively. If Kobe decides to do this, look out the rest of the NBA.
Like Riley said of MJ, noone will win a title until MIchael retires. Well I think they'll say the same about Kobe if he makes that decision.
John
Posted by: john_in_houston | September 01, 2008 at 08:06 AM
thekobebryantblitz & Laker Tom-
Thanks for your replies. You guys brought up more good points. I didn't even think about Jordan's mental toughness. However, something can be said for Yue playing in the Olympics.
Anyways, all this PG talk brings me to another question. How many more years do you think Fish has left as the Lakers starting PG? I give him this year and next year, thats it. I don't know his contract situation though, I'm sure that will play in to it.
Lamar = Laker for Life
GO LAKERS
Posted by: mrbarneydangles | September 01, 2008 at 08:27 AM
giantsquid,
Nice to see another Bruin on the blog.
Let me quote you:
"Ariza will not start. No way. No how.
Farmar will not start. Farmar is extremely confident and a take charge kind of player but right now I don't think their are a lot of Lakers who will follow his lead. I think that both Sasha and Kobe find him kind of annoying. He does seem to have a good relationship with Bynum and as he matures perhaps he'll become a team leader. Right now the Lakers have 3 leaders Kobe, Lamar, and Fish and I'd put Luke ahead of Farmar in that category right now as well (not all leaders are necessarily good players).
Sun Yue, based on the three Olympic games I saw him play, will never start in the NBA unless he improves his outside shot, his defense. his strength and his aggressiveness. At this point, Coby Karl is a better shot, plays better defense, is more athletic and is more aggressive. (he also has a 6'11" wingspan which is very impressive for someone 6'5")"
Amen.
You are right on target with that analysis.
I don't like to be a naysayer, but let's try to see things as they are, as opposed to how we'd like them to be.
GO BRUINS!
GO LAKERS!
Posted by: Jon K. | September 01, 2008 at 08:31 AM
Let's go L's sez:
"I will be forever grateful for his 3-title run with LA as a PASSIONATE fan. "
SHACK was indeed a member of the great laker center club.
"With the recent comments made by Shaq concerning Kobe, he CONTRADICTED everything about who he is as a PLAYER and PERSON. That's why a lot of his faithful fans then and now are turned off by his continued antics. He put a negative cloud over himself by making UNWISE decisions when making comments. He has made it PERSONAL not only with Kobe, but also the fans who supported him for many years like myself."
Look, if you and other laker fans are so peeved because a superstar made disparaging comments about an ex-teammate, where were you when kobee insulted and criticized byenumb last summer? I think this is about jealousy of SHACK, not an insult to your morals.
Posted by: BUTLER | September 01, 2008 at 09:29 AM
mrbarneydangles,
"How many more years do you think Fish has left as the Lakers starting PG?"
This year will probably be his last year as a starter.
He COULD start next year, but would have his minutes heavily diminished.
GO LAKERS!
Posted by: Jon K. | September 01, 2008 at 09:50 AM
Blitz - your rotation sounds pretty spot on... until the latter stages. With Ariza, the rotation is already at 11 players. Add Sun, Powell and Karl and you're at 14. I'm also not sure there would be quite as much shifting around - still, generally speaking, it sounds good.
As I mentioned before, I see Vlad with reduced minutes and more of a freelance shooters role this season - given license to go in and jack them up when needed. The real question marks for me are Luke and Ariza - it's hard to see how they'll both get substantial minutes - see 10-man rotation below:
Bynum, (Pau)
Pau, (Odom), Vlad
Odom, (Kobe) Luke, Ariza
Kobe, Sasha
Fisher, Farmar
Rounding out the active roster and getting limited minutes - Mihm and Powell. I figure Karl, Sun and whoever makes the 15th slot will be inactive most of the time, barring injuries.
Posted by: dave m | September 01, 2008 at 10:32 AM
Jon K,
>>> Farmar will not start.
So, I guess you're not joining the Jordan Farmar Should Start bandwagon.
>>> I think that both Sasha and Kobe find him kind of annoying.
In your post, you make representations based only on opinion, not on any proven facts. Neither Kobe nor Sasha are on the record in any way that they find him annoying. On-court flare-ups are only in the heat of the moment and prove absolutely nothing.
>>> He does seem to have a good relationship with Bynum.
Here, you are right, and that is precisely why Jordan should start. Farmar will get the ball to AB, which is a must-have ingredient to Laker success early in games.
With both Kobe and Jordan focusing on getting Bynum involved, opposing defenses will be more spread out, creating opportunities that the Lakers need in the opening minutes.
>> Right now the Lakers have 3 leaders Kobe, Lamar, and Fish and I'd put Luke ahead of Farmar in that category
Kobe and Fish are leaders for sure. Lamar? You must be kidding. He is the most passive of all the Lakers, with the possible exception of Pau. Luke? His diminished minutes in the season ahead leave him only to fill the role of Ronny, as a cheerleader from the Bench.
Farmar is only 21 years old. He is already the acknowledged leader of the Bench Mob. Putting him in a starter's role will accelerate his maturation. Kobe and Fish came into the league at the same time. Both need to play fewer minutes during the regular season to preserve their bodies for the Playoffs. The team as a whole must evolve if the Lakers are to achieve the Championship we are all waiting for. Advancing Farmar to a starter's role is a necessary step in this direction.
Posted by: Rick Friedman | September 01, 2008 at 10:39 AM
Thank God, Hurricane Gustav has mellowed and did not damage the city of the Hornets and Saints as of this time. Hopefully those thin and newly constructed levees will hold on to the mighty force of the river-ocean and strong winds.
Lakers' defense should learn something from the hurricane force and the City of the Hornets is purely dependent on those low wall levees. Just by observation, this is a tactless job by the Army Engineers to be given a meager budget to prevent the ocean waters from occupying low level areas. Our high science class taught us the principle that water will always seeks its own level. The same analogy with the Lakers. Sasha, Farmar, Lamar and Pau were good at the Western Conference but could not prevent the overflow of strenght of the leprechauns. It doesn't mean that they are weak, only they lacked the supporting cast to support a formidable defense.
At the beginning of 20th Century, USA faced the same challenges in controlling the forces of water and make it beneficial to mankind. They contructed locks and ladders in so many low lying areas for navigation, dams and elevated banks anticipating the overflow. They throttled the force of Colorado river which formed the Grand Canyon for centuries by constructing the Hoover Dam. From that time on, the Colorado river became a beneficial riverflow in the Western states. I believe that is what New Orleans need, the bolders of stones found here in the Western mountains, elevated banks to support those levees, trees whose roots will support the land and pumps to recycle rain water to store it for the need of drought areas. The same analogy with the Lakers. While we have the great offensive players in Kobe/Pau/Bynum, we seemingly lack blue collar defense from Farmar, Sasha, Lamar, Pau to prevent the surging athleticism of other teams. There has to be a good supporting cast that will supplement those thin bodies, however we have put all our chips on Walton, VladRad and Mihm, I don't think they are the formidable dams, boulders and elevated banks that I'm referring at. I hope I am wrong. LOL!
Well, the super analysts in this blog will teach us that we have added Sun, Powell, Dwayne, Ariza, Karl and Crawford. Oh yeah, instead of boulders, we added pellets of limestones who have limited experience, rough in edges but have the potentials of becoming boulders if they're expose and utilize effectively. The same story with those levees in N/O, the hurricane often visit this place why not prepare for Katrina, Fay, Gustav and Hanna and more are coming. Why do we have to pour all the budget in Baghdad or in Kuwait and nothing left for our hapless states? On the Lakers, all we have is Faith on our front men and power forward levees.
Posted by: Edwin Gueco | September 01, 2008 at 10:49 AM
Something else to factor in, I think Phil has treated the first month or two like an extended training camp since his second stint began. Strange rotations, lots of minutes for questionable players (see Brian Cook and Kwame Brown). Now, I believe that he was trying to help the younger players and re-enforce the idea that the real season begins in April. But this year, I think we will see this team focused on trying to have the best record in the league in order to ensure HCA throughout the playoffs. Look for more of a solid rotation and look for Kobe to play less at the beginning of the year in an effort to save him for the playoffs.
We all know that Kobe is super-human and will say, "I'm fine, it's all good, I have an army of folks making sure I am ready to hoop it up, etc." But seriously, he'll need to average maybe 20 - 25 minutes a game for the first month which will mean one of three things:
1 - More Vujacic (Karl, Crawford, Sun depending on in game situations) at the 2 with the rest of the starters.
2 - We could see more Ariza at the 2 this year.
3 - Fisher and Farmar on the court with Walton (Ariza), Odom, Gasol.
I think Radmonavich is going to have a very short leash this year. On a team where defence will need to take a step or two forward this year, he is the low man on the pole. He can shoot, but so can other guys who play better D.
Happy Labor Day!
Posted by: Jamie Sweet | September 01, 2008 at 10:55 AM
Let's Go L's sez:
"Despite our opposite views, I am also excited to see what lies ahead as both a Lakers and basketball fan. If I recall correctly, Kobe and co. played WELL against the Suns this past season and won the season series 3-1. Could it be a sign of things to come? The season can't arrive soon enough..."
When the lakers played vs. PHX in those first 3 games, the SUNS suffered from a lack of post D. No Kurt Thomas meant trouble. Hence the SHACK acquisition. That lone game when SHACK played - his very 1st game with the SUNS - was quite close. This season both teams will have more experience together to allow us a more accurate judgment.
"If there is one thing for SURE, we will both be watching SHAQ and Kobe do their thing with their respective teams. Hopefully, both will play at a high level consistently for the purpose of making their teammates better for all the RIGHT reasons. For whatever RIGHT reasons it may be, we shall see...we shall see... "
Agreed. I would like to see the SUNS and lakers playing great ball. Like I've said, SHACK has exceeded expectations so far. Miami fans and lala fans warned us of how lazy and fat SHACK would be - yet he ran in D'ANTONI'S system, he played more minutes than anyone guessed, he averaged a double-double and vastly improved the SUNS' rebounding.
If the SUNS did not have SHACK, I would be fearful of this coming season with Oden, byenumb, Yao, Chandler, the Jazz all trying to kill the SUNS in the paint. As it stands, the SUNS have as big a frontcourt as anyone now, and have spent the summer bringing in needed depth.
The Celtics will be tough again, Posey or no Posey.
Here's what's good about the SUNS - Steve Kerr is in charge. That dude is crazy smart. DId you ever listen to him as an analyst? He was as sharp as a tack. I've great confidence in him to make the SUNS better.
But we'll see. Til then, September can't pass quickly enough!
Posted by: BUTLER | September 01, 2008 at 11:02 AM
Hay LadyTom: It's your "buddy" GWB (Great White Baller). Yoos afraid to respond to my post to you about Andrew Olowokandi?
C'mon FakerTom, yoos good at rambling on about a bunch of nothing. What about your boy Kandiman#2 who's played in 15 consecutive games averaging 13 ppg and 10 rpg IN HIS CAREER THE PAST 4 YEARS.
Kandiman's better than Shaq? Better than Kareem? Kandiman better than the all-time great Russel?
C'mon ole wise-butt one, please tell me how, as all wise of the Faker fans, can allow that kind of nonsense to procees without challenge?
C'mon Mr. Smart Guy.
ahhaaahahahahahahahhahahahahahh
Posted by: LCG | September 01, 2008 at 11:11 AM
Rick Friedman,
In my post I'm quoting and commenting on Giantsquid's post, thus the quotation marks, but, yeah, I do agree with what Giantsquid said.
Hey, I really like Jordan Farmar and think most people have underestimated his potential, but I think he needs a year or two to mature. I think his maturity is his critical weakness at this time.
GO LAKERS!
Posted by: Jon K. | September 01, 2008 at 11:11 AM
Has anyone heard ANYTHING about Kobe's surgery? Anyone?
GO LAKERS!
Posted by: Jon K. | September 01, 2008 at 11:17 AM
Hobbitimage,
You conveniently ignore the stats that you asked me to provide that prove that the Celtics were just as, if not more dominant against the West than they were against the East. In case you missed it, in 52 games against the East the Celtics averaged 99.5 ppg on 47% shooting. For the season they averaged 100.5 ppg on 47 percent shooting. Their was virtually no change in their defense. And since they averaged 100.5 points per game over all that means in their 30 games against the West they averaged about 101 or 102 ppg, meaning they PLAYED BETTER AGAINST THE WEST, no matter how you look at it..
It doesn't matter if the Lakers got used to what the Celtics were doing (which I don't buy much since the last time they played was in Janurary, 6 months before the Finals). If that's the case it means that the Lakers saw what the Celtics did the first two times and adjusted to it and thus improved their defense against them. That's how you win in sports, you scout them based on your own experiences and tape from other games.
If you can't see how knocking 5% off a team's average than I don't know what to tell you, because you're choosing not to believe it. The Celtics for the season gave up about 41% FG and the Lakers allowed 42% through 5 games of the Finals. Is that difference between 41% and 42% the difference between great defense and bad defense? That makes no sense and there's no way to prove it other than continuing to rail that the Lakers played poor defense with no evidence outside of Game 6.
It's only human nature to relax a bit after winning a championship. That's why it's so hard to repeat. People constantly say it's harder to repeat than it is to win the first because it takes an incredible level of focus. And when you played at as high a level as the Celtics did on defense last season it's hard to duplicate. Even if they win the championship again next season they're not likely to be as dominant as they were last season. Like I wrote earlier, they were the 3rd best defensive team (in terms of efficiency) since 1970 and were the only non-Bulls team to have a point differential over 10 points.
We'll be better defensively next season with Bynum and Ariza healthy. There was a stretch in December and January where we were playing magnificent defense and we were in the top-5 in the league in defensive FG% and rebounding. Those numbers went down after Bynum got hurt, but with guys like Bynum, Pau and LO in the frontcourt and Kobe in the backcourt we should be one of the top rebounding teams in the league and play excellent defense.
Posted by: Xodus | September 01, 2008 at 11:21 AM
BUTLER,
We were only two games ahead of the Suns, but that was after suffering two poor stretches when Bynum went down and when Pau went down. The Suns on the other hand, were healthy the entire season.
Posted by: Xodus | September 01, 2008 at 11:23 AM
Jon K:
I heard that Kobe has seen Dr. 90210 (Dr Rey) and the prognosis is Starlet will need a face lift.
"Pinky" my butt!
Ain't no insury, just a hoax to get sympathy votes. It's so obvious except to Fakers to are enamored with the self-proclaimed "Dobermamba".
ahahahahah
Posted by: LCG | September 01, 2008 at 11:24 AM
Hey Fakernation, please explain to me the news where the doctor said Starlet need "immediate" surgery back like 10 months ago. Surgery otherwise the "pinky" was going to fall off.
How lame.
Posted by: LCG | September 01, 2008 at 11:26 AM
Xodus,
You're one of the decent fakers who's not a complete faker.
Tell me somehting. Yoos said something very important as follows: "It's only human nature to relax a bit after winning a championship. That's why it's so hard to repeat."
Please tell me why this blog of supposed "Laker fans" do the people constantly bag of Shack? Wasn't he the last guy that brought yoos repeat championships?
Why does the "Laker" fan talk smack about is former stars and why does the former star talk smack about your current starlet? I'm perplexed that the behavior of the "Laker" fan.
Celtic fans don't do this kind of crap. Why does the Laker fan do this?
Can anybody give me a reasonable explanation?
I jus don't gets it.
Posted by: LCG | September 01, 2008 at 11:31 AM
Finalist 2008 award "TROLL AND GOOFBALL AWARD"
1.Let's go C's!
2.BUTLER
3.Michael C. Teniente
The winner will be announced later in the week.
Posted by: Greg | September 01, 2008 at 11:31 AM
hey green weenie from beanie...LGChick,
we dont have to explain nothing to you..because you're too slow to figure it out...thats why--duh...
haveanother weenie day out there in beanie....
lgchick...
hahahahahahahahahhahaahahhahahahaah
Posted by: laker32 | September 01, 2008 at 11:45 AM
Man, I thought that the start of college football (and the NFL next week) would quell my need to watch NBA basketball, but it hasn't. I'm still having cold sweats and I've got clammy palms....
...I'm Karl and I'm an NBA addict.
haha.
Posted by: Xodus | September 01, 2008 at 11:52 AM
Xodus,
"We were only two games ahead of the Suns, but that was after suffering two poor stretches when Bynum went down and when Pau went down. The Suns on the other hand, were healthy the entire season."
The lakers had their injury issues, but so did the SUNS. Grant Hill was hurt for about 15 games if I recall, with an appendectomy and a groin injury that ultimately kept him from being a factor in the postseason.
And let's not forget, the lakers got the huge boost of acquiring Pau without giving up a thing in return. The SUNS had to completely change their style with SHACK while giving up the Matricks.
This season will be even more competitive in the West than last...I think the Hornets are going to be really good. And HOU could be great. SA will probably be right there in the playoffs.
Posted by: BUTLER | September 01, 2008 at 11:52 AM
Let's Go C's,
Hopefully, you're ready to have a legitimate conversation and not just throw blind insults. If you are, then as much as we may be annoyed by you we'll respect you.
The reason we hate Shaq (or SHACK) is because he's the big bridge burner. Whenever he leaves a town he feels like he has to rip everyone that stayed behind. Trust me, if you read Orlando Magic and Miami Heat blogs and message boards (and I have) they hate Shaq as much as we do. Heat fans may hate Shaq more than we do since he only had 1 1/2 good seasons for them before his contract started killing them.
Shaq said Riley was the best coach he ever played for (a shot at Phil Jackson) and then as soon as he was traded to Phoenix he started ripping Riley and Ira Winderman (the best Miami Heat beat writer) of the Fort Lauderdale Sun-Sentinel divulged information that he was calling Wade "Wonder Boy" behind the scenes and calling Antoine Walker "Ruben Studdard" because of his weight (which screams of hypocrisy since Shaq is consistently overweight).
Another reason we hate him is because the media lets him off the hook for everything. He makes racist comments about Yao Ming and everyone just laughs, he says Nash sullied the MBA MVPs and no one says a word, he drops profanity laced freestyles about Kobe in a club and people just say "that's Shaq." It's annoying as hell. No one, not even MJ himself, has as much of a free pass as Shaq.
But like I said there has to be something to it if all 3 franchises he's played for all hate him. And I suspect it won't be long before Phoenix fans despise Shaq.
Posted by: Xodus | September 01, 2008 at 12:02 PM
BUTLER,
But the Suns didn't really miss a beat when Grant went down. I'm not saying it's not a loss but didn't you guys just plug in Diaw, who's been in your system for years now?
And it's the Suns fault for trying to integrate a player whose style of play is completely different from their philosophy.
There's also the fact that the Suns were a combined 1-7 against the Lakers and Hornets (and the only win was in a game when Kwame Brown singlehandedly gave you guys the game), and you guys lost most of your games against most of the other good teams in the league as well.
Posted by: Xodus | September 01, 2008 at 12:06 PM
Edwin - an analogy between dams, levees, boulders and Lakers - that was awesome.
Posted by: dave m | September 01, 2008 at 12:06 PM
Hobbit,
you haven't done a good job either at trying to convince me about Ariza's so called defensive purpose. I laid it out plain and simple so if you want to disagree about facts when he started against the Suns and the Celtics that is perfectly fine. All you have brought is "according to my observations" etc, which are just as weak as someone who really twists statistics. Frankly speaking, your argument is weak and you a haven't backed it up with one solid thing except a little article that was posted by Mitch Kupchack at the beginning of the season. And you also have tried to back the argument with a little "I think if we started Jordan we could have done better against the Suns blah blah blah". Well with the way Smush was acting it was only natural that Jordan started over Smush even though Jordan had hit the rookie wall. Basically you are saying to develop our young guys over veterans just like Laker Tom suggested earlier on. Um........like I said earlier on Ariza hasn't really shown to Laker management that he will be the small forward of the future or to NBA experts that he is the future Bruce Bowen. If he had wouldn't have they at least talked about an extension like they have for Andrew? Plus you let your young guys prove that they can be effective from the bench and from there are shown to be effective in the starting lineup. In the beginning of the 07-08 season Phil started Kwa-may Brown and made Andrew from the bench despite all the "off season work outs". Andrew did a great job from the bench and when Kwa-may Brown went down Bynum took the reigns and began to nearly have an all star season. Even when Kwa-may Brown recovered from injuries Bynum still started because he proved (to PJ) he was starter material. Ariza hasn't proved to PJ that he is a starter *now* and when Walton came back from injury he took the reigns from Ariza.
Odom as a defender:
http://tinyurl.com/64kw3l
http://tinyurl.com/5bmpyu
Even AK said he was an underrated defender.
http://tinyurl.com/6h5fc7
Odom is our starting Small Forward
mrbarneydangles,
I would say Derek has 2 more years. He will definitely start next season and will probably start the next one as well. After this season we will see how Jordan improved. If he still hasn't improved that jump shot then perhaps Derek will keep the reigns till his contract expires. If Jordan has improved tremendously and most notably that jump shot then by the season after the upcoming one Jordan could really challenge Derek for the keys of the offense.
Rick,
"Putting him in a starter's role will accelerate his maturation."
Not true unless his maturation comes first off the bench. Too many people are acting like our youngings are already 27+ year old! With the exception of Andrew who took the reigns from Kwa-may Brown Jordan has NOT YET proved to be able to take the reign from Derek who is very respected. He is also not the perfect fit with Kobe unless Kobe is at the 3 and Sasha at the 2. When Kobe plays the 2, he needs to have his point guard be an outstanding shooter aka Derek Fisher just like MJ needed to have a good point guard shooter like John Paxson and Steve Kerr. Jordan got beaten up in the finals just almost as bad as Luke and Ronny! (ie Rondo dancing over him and the Boston's defense in total disrespect of his abilities.) Count me off the Jordan Farmar starting bandwagon!
"With both Kobe and Jordan focusing on getting Bynum involved, opposing defenses will be more spread out, creating opportunities that the Lakers need in the opening minutes."
Derek gets Bynum involved too plus he is a good outside shooter so teams don't simply clog the lane and close the passing lanes to Andrew and instead force Kobe to shoot contested jumpers. I don't know how Jordan starting in the opening minutes will *open* the floor up since teams don't fear his outside shot like they do to Derek. If Jordan starts then you have no choice but to start Kobe at the 3 and Sasha at the 2. Plus Jordan's defense is really poor at the time being aside from steals. Remember what happened in the playoffs? Iverson had his way with him, Deron Williams beat hiim up as just as bad as the Celtics later on did and we were lucky to have him against TP since he was a better match for Tony. If it was New Orelans that won over San Antonio then CP3 would have killed him just as bad if not worst than Deron Williams would. Jordan is solid right now but he's not at the stage where I count him as a quality starter.
Dave M,
Luke and Trevor will be splitting minutes in according to the situation. If the bench is hot, Walton's passing will help that. If the bench is cold and needs defense, then Ariza's energy and defensive skill will help instead. I do not forsee Kobe playing the 3 unless it's at the end of 2nd/4th quarters or if Lamar is in foul trouble and Trevor is incapable of hanging on to his man. Sun and Karl are rounding up the 3rd PG/SG and will see limited playing time unless certain things happen. Mihm and Powell will still see limited playing time but if they can show in preseason they can handle it then their times might increase. Basically the Preseason is a good indicator of how the reserves do.
Greg, I would make Butler number 3 or even number 4 now at least he's talking more basketball than "fan" basketball. It's Mike T. is interesting in nothing more than the Lakers failing because they gave up his boy Kwa-may Brown. GWB, well he still has the number 1 on that award I guess.
Edwin,
I know you that this offseason may seem "dull" but even many Lakers predicted that not much will happen. Last year's offseason addition/subtraction had minimal impact except for Derek Fisher. Then boom here comes a 57-25 win record and the Pau Gasol-Kwa-may Brown deal. Our team is getting developed and the Celtics are getting older with their big 3 while our oldest is no other than Derek Fisher. With Andrew and Trevor back will it make us better than the team that made it to the finals? Yup. Is our bench guys going to be better? yup. Will we better overall than last year's team? You bet. Is our bench mob ready to supplament Kobe and the rest of the starting 5? Like many guys who wants to start our young guys (except for Bynum) over the veterans: NO! Haha!
Cheers!
Rasheed must BLEED!
Posted by: thekobebryantblitz | September 01, 2008 at 12:13 PM
LGC,
Assuming you are looking for a serious conversation, everything Xodus said about Shaq burning bridges and trashing people on the way out is 100% accurate. I actually addressed some specifics in a recent post, if you're looking for examples.
http://tinyurl.com/6s2qze
Dude has to be the league's worst "ex-teammate," hands down.
In general, Shaq is just aging in very ungraceful fashion. He clearly can't handle the idea of not being the player he used to be or not being able to automatically garner the accolades that used to come his way. Or the attention, which he very clearly craves and now seems dead set on manufacturing.
Regardless of your feelings on Kobe (which are obviously long since made up, so debating them is pointless), these points against Shaq are pretty iron clad. And really, they're entirely separate issues, which means that trying to make it a "Kobe vs. Shaq" thing just misses the point entirely. One has nothing to do with the other.
AK
Posted by: Andrew Kamenetzky | September 01, 2008 at 12:27 PM
Aloha Hobbit,
Maybe there was another article that you forgot to post but the article you posted by Mitch said Lamar was not a lock down defender, period. And I have never stated that he was. Perhaps for you lock down defenders are plentiful and means good defender. For me Lock down defenders are few and far between and means GREAT defender. I quess thats where our differences lay.
MH
Posted by: michael h | September 01, 2008 at 12:49 PM
Xodus sez:
"BUTLER,
But the Suns didn't really miss a beat when Grant went down. I'm not saying it's not a loss but didn't you guys just plug in Diaw, who's been in your system for years now?
And it's the Suns fault for trying to integrate a player whose style of play is completely different from their philosophy.
There's also the fact that the Suns were a combined 1-7 against the Lakers and Hornets (and the only win was in a game when Kwame Brown singlehandedly gave you guys the game), and you guys lost most of your games against most of the other good teams in the league as well."
Well, the SUNS did miss a beat by not having Grant in the postseason. His absence meant a lack of perimeter D which Marion would normally have covered. It cost them the series with SA.
Kerr has remedied that over-reliance on HILL by acquiring Matt Barnes, Goran Dragic, Sean SIngletary and Robin Lopez. Throw in 2nd-year SG Alando Tucker, who didn't play under D'ANTONI, and who won Big 10 player of the year honors over Greg Oden, and the depth is much improved for the coming season.
The losses against the West's top teams led to SHACK, and this offseason's acquisitions.
One record which the SUNS did have over the other west teams was against the Celtics. The lakers went 2-6 against the Celts, while the SUNS went 1-1.
Posted by: BUTLER | September 01, 2008 at 12:51 PM
kobebryantblitz,
Farmar is actually a solid shooter. He shot 37% from 3 last season, what I think he does need to improve on is defense and shot selection. He started settling for 3's a bit last season instead of using his quickness and agility to finish at the basket or use his floater (which he used more in college).
Posted by: Xodus | September 01, 2008 at 12:56 PM
Jon K,
>>> Hey, I really like Jordan Farmar and think most people have underestimated his potential
I'll settle for that. I somehow missed Squid's post somewhere above. Thanks for clearing it up and thanks for your response.
Go Lakers!
Posted by: Rick Friedman | September 01, 2008 at 01:05 PM
AK sez:
"Dude has to be the league's worst "ex-teammate," hands down.
In general, Shaq is just aging in very ungraceful fashion. He clearly can't handle the idea of not being the player he used to be or not being able to automatically garner the accolades that used to come his way. Or the attention, which he very clearly craves and now seems dead set on manufacturing."
By the same token, SHACK in PHX has been described by the SUNS as a "fantastic teammate" who livens up the locker room and leads by example on the court (as long as we're not talking FT'S).
So far, SHACK has shown a willingness to play hard. That's all I care about, not his off-court antics. We'll wait to see if he burns the PHX bridge, but Lord knows he wants to win another title badly to put him up with the greatest playa of the last 10 years, Tim Duncan.
Given the bad blood between SHACK and the lakers, it will make for great basketball drama this season. We in PHX love it that the laker fans and even the LA organization hate on SHACK so much, because it can only help fuel the competitive fire in SHACK whenever he plays LA.
"He clearly can't handle the idea of not being the player he used to be or not being able to automatically garner the accolades that used to come his way. Or the attention, which he very clearly craves and now seems dead set on manufacturing."
Didn't SHACK announce that D-Wade was Miami's main man, the best playa on that team? No way does Miami win a title if SHACK plays like a selfish dude. He did his part for the team and they succeeded.
I think SHACK is just fine being past his prime - he's accepted his role as rebounder in PHX instead of top scorer. What he does so well is a result of his huge personality - gives confidence to the team, gives them an inside beast, gives them some swagger that only a egotistical big man could.
Posted by: BUTLER | September 01, 2008 at 01:08 PM
kobebryantblitz
>>> Jordan got beaten up in the finals just almost as bad as Luke and Ronny!
Actually, the entire Laker team didn't live up to its potential in the Finals. By participating in the Finals, JF now has experience that Bynum doesn't have due to his injury.
>>> Derek gets Bynum involved too plus he is a good outside shooter
Taking nothing away from D-Fish, he is very streaky. Farmar's career 3 pt % is 0.358. D-Fish is 0.373. Very comparable. In the Finals, JF was 0.529 and Fish was 0.405
The perceptions of JF shared by many here like you fall short of the reality. As stated above, Jordan is only 21 years old. He already brings a lot to the party and is ready for the opportunity to join the Starting 5.
Go Lakers!
Posted by: Rick Friedman | September 01, 2008 at 01:25 PM
Rick Friedman
There is such a thing as off-court leadership.
Lamar Odom: A low-key leader for the Lakers
10:21 AM Mon, May 19, 2008 | Permalink
By Kevin Ding The Orange County Register
http://tinyurl.com/6py86g
“We miss him,” forward Luke Walton said. “Lamar’s the one who picks everybody up.”
http://tinyurl.com/625no2
Beyond that, his influence as an emotional leader shouldn't go overlooked. Many a Laker has pinpointed time in Hawaii eating killer team breakfasts, lunches and dinners as the kick off for the celebrated bond this season. Guess who decided to hire a private chef specifically because he thought a Helter Skelter summer needed a little smoothing? Finding better people in the NBA than Lamar is a tough quest and I do think that character is an asset.
http://tinyurl.com/6h5fc7
Posted by: giantsquid | September 01, 2008 at 02:09 PM
Butler,
Let me know if you notice anything missing here.
In the 61-year history of the National Basketball Association, half of the league’s champions have been produced by two teams — the Boston Celtics and the Minneapolis/Los Angeles Lakers.
By defeating the Lakers in the 2008 Finals, the Celtics wrapped up their 17th title overall, their first since 1986. (Winning eight in a row from 1959-66 helped pad those totals.) The Lakers, meanwhile, won the last of three straight championships in 2002, accounting for the most recent of their 14 titles.
Only 16 teams have actually claimed the league’s most coveted trophy. Only 10 have won more than once.
In other words, it’s a pretty exclusive club.
17 — Boston Celtics (1957, 1959, 1960, 1961, 1962, 1963, 1964, 1965, 1966, 1968, 1969, 1974, 1976, 1981, 1984, 1986, 2008)
14 — Minneapolis/Los Angeles Lakers (1949, 1950, 1952, 1953, 1954, 1972, 1980, 1982, 1985, 1987, 1988, 2000, 2001, 2002)
6 — Chicago Bulls (1991, 1992, 1993, 1996, 1997, 1998)
4 — San Antonio Spurs (1999, 2003, 2005, 2007)
3 — Philadelphia/Golden State Warriors (1947, 1956, 1975)
3 — Syracuse Nationals/Philadelphia 76ers (1955, 1967, 1983)
3 – Detroit Pistons (1989, 1990, 2004)
2 — Baltimore/Washington Bullets (1948, 1978)
2 — Houston Rockets (1994, 1995)
2 – New York Knickerbockers (1970, 1973)
1 — Miami Heat (2006 )
1 — Milwaukee Bucks (1971)
1 — Portland Trailblazers (1977)
1 – Rochester Royals (1951)
1 — Saint Louis Hawks (1958)
1 — Seattle Supersonics (1979)
Butler what are we missing here?
BD
Posted by: BD | September 01, 2008 at 02:20 PM
Just a little OTHER team news, it looks like a picture of the new Oklahoma City Thunder has been released.
Appears they took a picture from some factory, you can see the picture after you hit Continue reading.
http://thundertalk.net
Logo looks a little boring to me.
Posted by: Bynumite | September 01, 2008 at 02:21 PM
Squid,
>>> Guess who decided to hire a private chef specifically because he thought a Helter Skelter summer needed a little smoothing?
Hey, if Lamar will treat me to a free meal prepared by a private chef, I'm in, too! Seriously, I'll accept that Lamar brings unique value to the Lakers. I'll also accept that there are many kinds of leadership. A team can't have too many leaders if they're all pulling in the same direction in a variety of roles.
Posted by: Rick Friedman | September 01, 2008 at 02:23 PM
Xodus,
Jordan did shoot 37% point land but came at a cost of 3.7 attempts. Fisher on the other hand shot similar amount of times from 3 point land and get a better percentage of 40.6%. Don't say that Jordan is a better shooter than Fish is though I do admit Jordan penetrates the paint better than Derek does. I agree that Jordan's defense is no where as good as Derek's is and that is a major factor in not starting him.
Rick F.
"By participating in the Finals, JF now has experience that Bynum doesn't have due to his injury."
Err don't know what you were trying to say with this statement. It's true neverthless but what does it relate to compared to starting over Derek Fisher??
"Taking nothing away from D-Fish, he is very streaky. Farmar's career 3 pt % is 0.358. D-Fish is 0.373. Very comparable. In the Finals, JF was 0.529 and Fish was 0.405"
Fisher is streaky at times no doubt about it. The same thing can be said of Sasha. And comparing career numbers? 2 years of 3 pointers and comparing it to Derek's career numbers is just plain wrong. Once Jordan has a career long as Derek's then compare career numbers. In the finals, most of his 75% shooting (3/4) came in Games where we had a big deficit and the Celtics put in their reserves. Game 2 when we had a big deficit and nearly rallied and Game 6 when we were blown out of the water. The other times we had the game close Jordan shot barely 30% on threes.
And that's it offensively wise. Jordan doesn't have the defense to start at like Derek has. Sure he steals quite a bit but against Allen Iverson and Deron Williams especially he got really pushed around. That even hurt his offense and he averaged 1.7 points for the Utah series! Jordan has only average lateral quickness and average length and in UCLA he got lit up by other point guards. Jon K would agree with me as well since they had to bring Collison many times and put Farmar on Shooting guard to make up for the weak defense Jordan has. In fact, against Pick and rolls the Suns ran, it wasn't uncommon for Jordan to get picked off by Amare. You can say this and that about experience in the Finals but unless there has been a big improvement in the summer, Derek has the keys for the offense.
And that's the point of being 21 years old. He's still young. He's no Deron Williams, no CP3, not even Rajon Rondo yet. Jordan is terrific at the moment from the bench and leads the bench for sure. He's not quite ready for full time NBA starting job. One trip to the Finals doesn't equal he should get the starting job. And the bench mob is still young which goes against them as well. How else could Boston's bench, mostly filled with old crafty veteran players like PJ Brown and Sam I am Cassell (with the exception of Leon Powe and Big Baby) manage to outplay the so called bench mob? Jordan and the rest of the bench needs more experience in the NBA and there is no way he should start simply because he has one finals under his belt.
-blitz
Posted by: thekobebryantblitz | September 01, 2008 at 02:24 PM
Rick
"On-court flare-ups are only in the heat of the moment and prove absolutely nothing.
>>> He does seem to have a good relationship with Bynum.
Here, you are right, and that is precisely why Jordan should start."
I find it odd that you think a good relationship can be perceived based on on-court interactions but a bad one can't.
Posted by: giantsquid | September 01, 2008 at 02:27 PM