The forecast: First place
Not sure that qualifies as actual "weather," but it does represent a preseason poll taken of various ESPN folks. The question: How do you picture the West shaking out next season? The general consensus: With the Lakers at the top, sporting 55 wins. Obviously, this opinion is based in part on the notion of Andrew Bynum being healthy. But hey, at least the "experts" believe in the potential for a return to the Finals (if not a trophy).
Interesting notes: Houston, with its newly Artest-ed lineup, sits at No. 3 with a bullet. Denver misses the playoffs, with Portland taking its ocho slot. Phoenix and Dallas move to making the postseason (I could see that happening, but I think Portland will finish higher than at least one, if not both). For those keeping track of L.A.-based squads, the Clippers garnered the "Spinal Tap" spot.
In the East, Boston is expected to remain where it left off at regular season's end. Philly jumps up a bit. Miami jumps up A LOT. The party, already fading upon Josh Childress' overseas departure and the teeth pulling required to retain Josh Smith, ends abruptly in Atlanta.
Also, an article from CBSSports.com's Gregg Doyel about the steady demise that is Shaq's public image.
AK



Kobe, GET THE SURGERY!! Don't be like Shaq and wait to get it done on company time. DO IT NOW!!
Posted by: rdlee | August 31, 2008 at 05:35 AM
Ya "C" what I mean? Dogging on Shaq.
Also, Kobe does not need "surgery". Pinky-gate was a scam to get sympathy votes for MVP. Starlet is an attention whore who craves to be like Jordan, but is nothing but a first class loser.
Ya remember the kid who's annoying as hell and trys way too hard to fit in? That's your Starlet. Look at Pierce, the guy goes about his business. Doesn't try and do too much, win a championship and Finals MVP honors.
Next season will be a repeat of the title.
ahahahahahhhaha
Posted by: Let's go C's! | August 31, 2008 at 10:40 AM
Hobbitimage,
What a 25-5 record doesn't tell you how dominant they were already? I can't find the split stats against the West, but in 52 games against the East they averaged 99.5 points per game on 47.2% shooting. Overall, they averaged 100.5 points per game on 47.5% shooting. So they weren't fattening up on either conference, they were beating up on EVERYONE. If anything they were better against the West since just those 30 extra games against the west brought their average points per game up a full point, while their points against stayed the same. So they were beating East teams by about 9 points but beating West teams by about 11(they gave 90 points in their 50 points against the East and 90 overall).
Is that enough to prove that the Lakers allowing 96.4 points on 42% shooting through 5 games enough to prove that it's good defense. Once again, good defense, not dominant, good. And seeing as how the Lakers offensive stats were down across the board and they gave up leads in Games 1, 4 and 5 (losing games 1 and 4) it's safe to conclude that the Lakers problem was running their offense effectively because Boston was so stifling on D.
Posted by: Xodus | August 31, 2008 at 11:32 AM
"The lakers lost tuiriaf, who defended the paint well."
Butler, Turiaf was horrible at defending the paint. After Pau's injury the Lakers had a 5-4 record while Pau was out (which is better than being 8-8 under Kwa-may Brown). Don't forget last offseason we didn't do crap except sign Fisher and get J-Critt. Then whalla we become a dark horse to win the WCF. There was tons of pressure last year for Bynum as well to prove that he wasn't worth to ship his butt out for Jason Kidd and well he proved it. This year he will again prove he can work well, he has proved it.
Green Weenie from Beenie,
Hey don't shoot the messenger but it was Michael C. Teniente that dissed Ray Ray and Will somebody stab Paul Pierce's defense and stated that Perkins was the shut down defender. Go stab him.
mrbarneydangles,
First of all, I hated that kid show Barney hehe. Second remember that video was taken in 2007 Pre-Draft. According to what he said, he had a horrible pre-draft but at the Olympics he did better. I admit Farmar is more better at stealing balls since Jordan tends to read the passing lanes well though he gambles way too much a bit for his own good. Jordan is without a doubt faster as he got a 3.17 in the 3/4 sprint while Sun got a 3.45 However at the Pre-Draft Camp in Orlando, Sun's lane agility was 10.68 which was the top 3 in the camp (so my thing about his lateral quickness may have been wrong). Plus he has the edge against Farmar because Jordan had a 11.07 sprint. Jordan's vertical is a bit misleading since Wade's vertical was lower yet Wade can be able to layup it better than Jordan could.
I'll do comparison of Jordan vs Sun
Vertical Leap (Both No Step and Max):
Jordan Farmar: 33.5 (No Step) 42 (Max)
Sun Yue: 32 (No Step) 34.5(Max)
Edge: Jordan Farmar
Speed (3/4) Sprint
Jordan Farmar: 3.17
Sun Yue: 3.50
Edge: Jordan Farmar
Quickness/Agility Drill
Jordan Farmar: 11.07
Sun Yue: 10.50
Edge: Sun Yue
Shooting (Close Range)
Edge: Sun Yue
Shooting (Mid/Long Range)
Edge: Jordan Farmar
Lay ups:
Edge: Equal. Jordan has few moves once he reaches the basket but Sun's layups while having more moves is still unpolished.
Driving to the basket:
Edge: Slight edge to Sun. Height and body size is an advantage and can post up better. Plus Sun has more quickness than Jordan has.
Steals ability:
Edge: Jordan Farmar, leads to fastbreaks better
Blocks ability:
Edge: Sun Yue, shot block skills help deter shots plus really good at help defense.
Overall Defense:
Edge: Sun Yue.
Decision Making:
Edge: Slight edge to Jordan Farmar. He knows the American game much better (NBA and NCAA experience). Sun Yue only has ABA for American experience and Olympics is much different from the NBA.
Overall Edge: At the moment Jordan Farmar over Sun Yue. However, once Sun gets more American experience, his decision making would probably improve and could give the slight edge over Jordan in the long term.
Posted by: thekobebryantblitz | August 31, 2008 at 11:46 AM
Hobbitimage,
But like I said in my previous posts Boston likely won't be as good defensively next year, because they were historically good last season and it's hard to be that good two seasons in a row when you've lost a key defender like Posey and the older guys who were fighting for titles their whole careers won't be as hungry.
Posted by: Xodus | August 31, 2008 at 12:01 PM
blitz & dangles,
Thanks for your comments regarding Jordan Farmar and Sun Yue. You both made excellent points to support your takes. I personally like both of these players a lot and think one of the strengths of this Lakers roster, besides its depth, is the untapped potential of the non-starters. That potential shows up in the depth chart of every position on the team in my opinion but is most important at point guard due to Derek Fisher’s age and mileage, which makes Jordan Farmar and Sun Yue critical components in the Lakers long term roster plans.
Right now, Jordan Farmar has proven that he is a more than capable backup point guard so he has to be given the edge over Sun Yue who hasn’t played in the NBA at all. I disagree with blitz regarding Jordan’s athleticism and still see him as fully capable of become a Tony Parker style and level of player for the Lakers. He is not quite as quick or fast as Parker, but is stronger and a better leaper, as shown by his rebounding edge. Jordan Farmar is the current favorite in my mind to become the Lakers starting point guard in the future.
Jordan does not need to develop a tear drop shot but just put the shot back in his arsenal. When he first joined the Lakers, it was really his signature shot but for some reason he abandoned it. Probably due to losing his confidence a bit when Phil continued to stick with Smush. Jordan also definitely needs to develop a jump stop to end drives into the paint. He is not quick enough to out-quick defenders to the rim like Tony, which is why he sometimes gets his gliding layups blocked. He needs to get into the paint and then do a jump stop on both feet, which will then give him several options. I also suspect Jordan needs to jump off both feet to utilize his 42” vertical, which is another reason to jump stop at the end of drives.
The key traits that qualify Jordan Farmar to become the Lakers starting point guard down the road are his Kobe-esque work ethic, strong leadership abilities, unwavering self-confidence, and mental toughness and ability to play big in big games. Those who count Jordan out as a potential future starter at the point underestimate Jordan or misjudge what our team needs. We can’t afford nor do we need a Chris Paul or Deron Williams at point guard. We need a smart player who runs the offense, hits the open shot, and plays good defense. Defense is the only question that Jordan needs to answer in order to become our future point guard. Having a shot blocker like Drew will help greatly but Jordan needs to be much tougher on defense.
And defense is one of the major reasons why Sun Yue may someday overtake Jordan and become our starting point guard. For a 6-9 player with long arms and excellent speed, quickness, and shot blocking instincts, Sun has the potential to become a lock-down defender at the point guard position. With his height and length, he does not have to play as tight on other point guards, which will help him stay in front of them. And when he gets beaten, Sun still has the ability to block the shot from behind. I disagree with dangles’ comment that blocked shots are no big deal for a point guard. Sun Yue’s height and length could dominate many NBA point guards and make it very hard for them to get a shot off. He has the body and instincts to become a Michael Cooper type player. But does he have the heart?
Offensively, Sun Yue can be the perfect point guard for the Triangle Offense at 6-9. He will have to prove he can be a reliable shooter, which I think he will. You cannot teach height and length and the ability to see over a defense makes delivering entry passes to the post easier as well as posting up smaller guards, which would be another area where Sun could show fans a touch of Magic. The key is that the guy is really already an excellent ball handler and passer, especially for a guy 6-9. And I like the idea that he finishes at the rim with 2-handed dunks rather than soft layups. He has a quick dunk motion similar to Pau’s that doesn’t lend itself to being blocked. He would be dynamite in the open court and I am sure he will want to open up his game in the NBA. He has a little hot dog, which I like.
The ONLY issue with Sun Yue IMO is whether he can play NBA style basketball having come from a program and environment in China that is nowhere near as aggressive. If Sun Yue can attack in the NBA like Jet Li, then he will become the Lakers starting point guard down the road. Just as defense is Farmar’s Achilles heel, mental toughness and personal competitiveness will be Sun Yue’s. I think he has a chance but it may be an uphill struggle. One of the main reasons I am eager to see Sun Yue play in the NBA is that I think we will see right away whether he is going to be able to cut it. If he gets intimidated and loses his confidence, he will not be kept after two years. If, on the other hand, he displays the mental toughness and competitive spirit needed to play NBA style basketball, then we are probably looking at the Lakers future starting point guard.
Tom
Posted by: LakerTom | August 31, 2008 at 12:08 PM
WHO LET THE DOGS OUT?
Watch your step, bloggers. BUTtLickER and Green Weenie from Beanie (GWB) have been out crapping all over the yard this morning. They should be all crapped out by noon so we can have some reasonable discussions. We need to get these trolls to wear diapers if they’re going to be allowed to doo their stuff. Troll pies everywhere! LOL!
Tom
Posted by: LakerTom | August 31, 2008 at 12:12 PM
blitz,
I forgot to thank for you the video. Appreciate the work. I had seen the video before but thought your timed comments were a great addition. I also pretty much agreed with your head to head comparisons of Jordan and Sun. Both have excellent potential.
What a lot of posters forget is how fortunate the Lakers are to have:
(1) A veteran starting point guard like Derek Fisher, who is the perfect back court mate for Kobe, shoots over 40% from beyond the arc, and is a respected team leader and
(2) A promising back up like Jordan Farmar, who has a great work ethic, outstanding leadership qualities, already contributes solidly as the leader of the bench mob, and has the potential to become a future starter.
(3) A promising back up like Sun Yue, who at 6-9 could become the perfect starting point guard for the Triangle Offense as well as the shut down defender the team has longed for at the point guard position.
I mean, would you rather have Rajon Rondo, Eddie House, and Tony Allen? I think not.
Tom
Posted by: LakerTom | August 31, 2008 at 12:27 PM
LakerTom,
I don't mean to pick your nits, but Fish shoots 37% from 3. :)
Posted by: Xodus | August 31, 2008 at 12:57 PM
LakerTom,
I'm wondering since we know you're a big Farmar guy, are you now in favor of Sun being out PG of the future over the Farm?
Posted by: Xodus | August 31, 2008 at 12:59 PM
KBBlitz,
Once again you've done your homework, and no need to be outed, by that what guy "who are you"?....I mean if we wanted to be Mulder & Sculley we woulda gone there, everyone is free to choose what he wants, as long as he stays within the guidelines (I use the analogy of a car going down the highway, it can keep going, if it is smacking the guard rails on each side now and the, it can still get there)...me I always wanted to be..........
.......now don't hunt me down now.....
.....a hitman...
......so I just live that life by enjoying the movies which depict them.....whatever, everyone have a nice day, night, life,.......
.....and I agree, about Jordan having the edge now, but there may come teams quickly that we will have to try to utilize his size against/with whatever....yaknow...and I'm confident that he will choke, they all do at the beginning, see Kobe's airballs, but don't get down and him, people do not play the race card, he is a ball player, on the court, we do not need to refer to him anymore by race, although, we will, I even will, let's roll the balls out and let'm go...
...When Worthy came along, I wondered, why did we need him, we had Silk, then I grew in awe of his extended dunks, his flip shots, in the lane he was unstoppable, and his first step (legs.....again) gave him the spacing to do as he pleased, then there was the broken leg, at the end of rookie year....geez, it kinda looks like a jinx, now I got the heebie jeebie, there was Mitch K's injury, Worthy, ...suppress the thoughts, good thoughts.......
Posted by: humanomaly | August 31, 2008 at 01:14 PM
Laker Tom,
the negatives you said about Jordan is exactly the reason why I say he can't get as good as TP, maybe Bibby is his ceiling. Jordan, while being faster than Sun, is certainly not as fast as Tony is which I believe is one of Tony's best strength. In San Antonio he has been called "Grease Lightning" because of his speed and using Tim Duncan's picks can get to the paint quite often very effectively. If he can use two feet to maximize his vertical that would be more effective but his layups still get blocked too much for my liking. Tear drops do a decent job scoring wise for Tony and if Jordan develops that he can actually be better than Tony in that he can tear drop at the same time do layups more effectively than Tony can do.
Like Tony, Jordan has strong leadership qualities which he develop during his time at UCLA and probably was the biggest factor in getting to the NCAA Finals. Jordan's jump shot though works against him as well and while I believe he will develop it, I don't know if it will be as effective as Tony Parker's is who can also be a spot up shooter. Jordan when I see him play doesn't seem to be the type to be a spot up shooter and instead prefers to set up his team mates like Sasha which is good but also lowers his overall offense. And Tony Parker has proved to be solid on defense since he was trusted to handle CP3 after Bowen was forced on Peja during Round 2 of last year and handled Steve Nash pretty well during times when Bowen wasn't on the court during Round One against the Suns.
The defense of Sun Yue really intrigued me though his shooting from perimeter leaves much to be desired. The passing skills from him is impressive also. Does he have the heart to succeed? From the Olympics yes he does. True that China lost and the offense was primarily around Yao Ming, Yi Jianlian, However Sun really showed nice highlights from showing his driving game which he shows he nice short range shooting to blocks which really are hustle and will, not to mention that infamous block on Dwight Howard. He didn't shoot really well in the Olympics but hey against team USA he was going against Kobe. He doesn't have impressive speed though Jordan is after all faster than him. His jump shot is comparable to Rondo or Lamar so teams would clog the lane to take advantage. Could he play defense? From the Pre-Draft and the Olympics he can really. We shall see once he comes to the NBA style of play.
Xodus, Fish is a career 37% from 3 point land career wise. Last year with the Lakers he shot 40.6%. He is a proven 3 point shooter
Posted by: thekobebryantblitz | August 31, 2008 at 01:17 PM
Laker Tom, I am still caustiously optimistic about Sun's performance in the NBA ( he hasn't played one single NBA game yet ) , Chinese players tend to be less aggressive and lack the fierceness ( as you 've said ) and muscles , hope Sun's height, quickness, defensive mindset or altheletism stand out, otherwise he'll struggle and not getting pt. As a Chinese Lakers fan living in LA , I 'll see the Sun ( Yue )'s fan club or support group coming up pretty soon when he lands in the Lakerdom.
Posted by: Shum | August 31, 2008 at 01:17 PM
Xodus,
>>>>>I don't mean to pick your nits, but Fish shoots 37% from 3. :)
Hey, Karl, thanks for the correction. You’re right. I got Vlade’s and Fish’s stats mixed up. Just a small senior moment. I should be OK by the time the season starts. LOL.
>>>>>I'm wondering since we know you're a big Farmar guy, are you now in favor of
>>>>>Sun being out PG of the future over the Farm?
I still love Farmar but am worried about his defense. I think he will be fine if the team runs on offense and presses and traps as much on defense as I am hoping. It’s Jordan’s half-court defense that still worries me. I love his offense, although he needs to bring back the tear drop and add a jump stop drive, and love his leadership and mental toughness. If he really can improve his defense, he would be NBA starter material for sure. If he doesn’t improve his defense, he could probably still start for the right team, including the Lakers.
As to Sun, I love the IDEA of him in that he is Chinese and I am half-Chinese and that he brings 6-9 height and long arms that give him great advantages over other point guards. He could be the perfect point guard for the Triangle and the defensive stopper we need at point guard. The big test, as I said before, is can he be mentally and physically tough enough to succeed in the NBA having come from a very passive environment on the Chinese team.
Who would I prefer win out? Both of them. I would like to see Jordan improve his defense and Sun prove he can play at the NBA level without being intimidated and pushed around. You’re always a better team when you have strong competition and two players who could be effective starters at a position. I do think that Sun Yue, due to his height and length, has a higher ceiling than Jordan as a potential player. Jordan, however, is a far surer thing to bet on since he already has shown he can play in the NBA at a high level.
My template for Lakers success includes an aggressive pressing and trapping defense with Drew patrolling the paint and protecting the rim designed to generate steals and turnovers and fast break opportunities. It’s a style that takes advantage of the team’s great depth and talent on the bench and also keeps their starters fresh and key players from getting burned out, overtired, and injured. The NBA season can be brutal when players log more than 40 minutes a game. Teams can always use two excellent point guards. Look at the problems that the Celtics and Suns have when their starters leave the game.
Tom
Posted by: LakerTom | August 31, 2008 at 01:25 PM
This irrational optimism about Sun Yue is bordering on Michael Teniente's obsession with Kwame Brown.
Time for a little good old dose of reality: WE HAVEN'T EVEN SEEN HIM PLAY ON AN NBA TEAM AGAINST NBA PLAYERS YET! Come on!
Can we PLEASE wait until he's played a handful of pre-season games before we start this discussion about whether or not he's the Lakers' point guard of the future? Please?
Jeez. This "Chinese Magic Johnson" moniker has made a lot of people lose their fricken minds.
GO LAKERS!
Posted by: Jon K. | August 31, 2008 at 01:46 PM
Kobe to appear on Oprah
http://tinyurl.com/5j6wxx
Hope I beat the K bros on this.
P.S. BK>AK
Posted by: thekobebryantblitz | August 31, 2008 at 01:48 PM
That last post mean BK is better than AK ha!
Posted by: thekobebryantblitz | August 31, 2008 at 01:49 PM
aloha Laker Tom
Since the triangle does not call for a traditional point guard, why does Sun have to replace Jordon at the point? In a few years why couldnt Sun and Jordon be your starting back court, with an aging but still effective Kobe moving to the 3?
MH
Posted by: michael h | August 31, 2008 at 01:58 PM
Jon K.
That's the obsession over Sun (I'm not obsessed just labeling facts) is similar to what I felt UCLA fans had over Kevin Love. Then comes Kevin Love and he becomes a great recruit. Not saying Sun Yue has the kind of hype Kevin Love had, and besides Jordan Farmar has the keys for the future. I'm not sold on Sun Yue to being an instant great point guard, he will probably play some time in D-League. Heck when Fish's time in the NBA is up, it will be interesting to see who will be more talented at the time. At the moment? Jordan is better offensively shooting wise and stealing wise and experience wise. Sun looks to be better defensively wise, posting up wise, and hustling wise (blocks require great hustle and will). Jordan has more speed, Sun has better quickness. Basically Sun is kinda the opposite of Jordan in many (not all ways). We will see preseason as to how it goes.
PS. Trojans whooped the Virginia Cavaliers. I'm no Trojan (leave that to AK) but heck better hope the magic of the Rose bowl gives UCLA an edge when they face the home town rivals.
Posted by: thekobebryantblitz | August 31, 2008 at 02:21 PM
BUTLER Sez:
The SUNS have added a potent group of playas this offseason, and were certainly not at full strength for the playoffs (Grant Hill). For all the hullaballoo over the lakers' success last season, they finished only 1 game ahead of the SUNS.
Yes, but let's be clear about the Western Conf last season. The SUNS finished 6th with a record of 55-27, while the lakers finished 1st at 57-25. That's a 1 game difference...
Two rookies! One unproven playa, One euro playa who hasn't seen NBA action yet, and MATT BARNES?!?!? I love your take,btw, of BARNES being a defensive stopper! hahahahahaha, dude is offensively minded and that's it....defensive stopper, LOL!
Oh, and 57-25 vs 55-27 is a TWO game difference my dear, you seem to not grasp that considering you posted "ONE GAME DIFFERENCE" not once, but twice.....cheers mate!
Posted by: I love kobe | August 31, 2008 at 02:26 PM
I'm the only one allowed to use the "hahhhhahhaah" bit. Patent pending #87-96811.
Posted by: Let's go C's! | August 31, 2008 at 09:04 AM
hahahhhahahahhahahahaha
Posted by: I love Kobe | August 31, 2008 at 02:29 PM
Rayray reporting
Hala Fellas. It's been bout 6 month I havn't been here. I assure you I've been watching and talking junk but at the espn blogs to haters. Now juss reporting to get things on record:
1) I konw I will not be able to watch the replay of the Finals games anytime soon. Their sitting there on the tivo but just can't. Maybe like the Suns Lakers game 6 of 06 I review it some and delete. That just hur....ted.
2) Back up PG. Yes our only issue (and I should add our only issue is a big time issue) is the lack of a chmpionship team back up point. JFarm ain't cutting it and I think we are out of luck on that department again.
3) rayray's Sun Yue scouting report. very good ball handling and speed for the size, very good shooter, highly underrated deffender, top noch shot blocker for his size. Smooth and very smart. Sun needs to get some muscle on but I won't be surprised if he surprises everybody.
4) 72-10 non championship back up point guard and all Jordy can play. He does great when he isn't being pushed and shoved and well pressure is low. And with Drew, Fish, LO and them two boys 72-10 is by no means out of reach.
See ya
Posted by: rayray | August 31, 2008 at 02:42 PM
Happy Sunday LakerNation,and to everyone I hope everyone is having a enjoyable Summer. I have not posted for a while,because I've been working a lot of over time.
Anyway I agree with Faith,and Out Law the number of wins dose not matter home court and where we are in the post season that's what counts.
Posted by: LakerFan | August 31, 2008 at 03:09 PM
thekobebryantblitz,
All this Sue Yue/Jordan Farmar comparisons I believe is premature.
As a Clippers fan, remember Chris Wilcox's tenure there? At the time a lot of Clippers fans were comparing Chris Wilcox to Amare Stoudemire and in some ways, on paper, Chris Wilcox was markedly superior to Amare Stoudemire.
However, as we all know (no disrespect to Chris Wilcox--I like him as a player) Chris Wilcox is no Amare Stoudemire and will never be that good. In the end discussion was moot.
I just think we need a PRE-SEASON before we should be engaging in an aggressive debate over who holds more promise for the Lakers mid and long-term: Jordan Farmar or Sun Yue?
It's just too early for the discussion.
So, when I see what seems like 100 posts on the subject matter in about a week, it just seems crazy to me.
People have been ripping on Michael Teniente's obsessive with Kwame Brown, but at least we've seen the guy play multiple NBA seasons for multiple teams. We've seen NOTHING of Sun Yue except for a a few Olympics games and some ABA statistics.
Isn't this discussion (especially the frequency of it) a bit premature?
GO LAKERS!
Posted by: Jon K. | August 31, 2008 at 03:30 PM
LakerFan,
Number of wins is tertiary to:
Championship
Home Court Advantage in the Playoffs
But it is important in:
Creating a psychological advanage over other teams
Building internal self-confidence as a team
Making a clear statement to the Haters
Everybody healthy? 65 win season.
GO LAKERS!
Posted by: Jon K. | August 31, 2008 at 03:34 PM
All the talk about Sun and other guards is interesting... to a point (pun, it's a pun...). I'm curious about the glut at sf though. Assuming that Odom starts at the 3 and that Kobe (as usual) puts in some time there, what will be the roles of Vlad, Ariza and Luke? I'm not sure how all three could crack a ten-man rotation for instance, unless either Vlad or Luke were to put in minutes at the 4.
Posted by: dave m | August 31, 2008 at 04:03 PM
dave m,
Vlad will probably switch to the 4 since we don't have much power forwards. His role will be like the role Brian Cook had with us: back up power forward who can shoot. In my opinion Radman will be better than Cook in this role because he can drive into the lane much better than Cookie could ever do.
Posted by: thekobebryantblitz | August 31, 2008 at 04:39 PM
Aloha, michael,
>>>>>Since the triangle does not call for a traditional point guard, why does Sun have
>>>>>to replace Jordon at the point? In a few years why couldn’t Sun and Jordon be
>>>>>your starting back court, with an aging but still effective Kobe moving to the 3?
No reason why that wouldn’t work, so long as both Jordan and Sun prove they are consistent shooters. The jury is still out on Jordan and he is probably a better shooter than Sun at this point. I’m also not so sure that point guard and small forward on this team aren’t positions that we sort of platoon the minutes. It makes sense since we really can’t afford to add one player who can do everything at those positions. In other words, with Drew, Pau, and Kobe locking up three positions and Lamar also playing starter minutes, we may see Phil carve up the time at point guard and small forward between two or maybe even three players, if Luke played like he did at the start of the year before and Sun Yue showed some of what we hope to see. This way we can shape the team on the floor to match up best against our opponent.
Of course, we still have to see more from Farmar and we haven’t even seen Sun Yue yet but they both have qualities that can help a team but it will be up to them to become the players. Right now, they will ride the pine until Fish starts to falter. I am hoping that Farmar makes a leap in his play and challenges Fish next year. And that Sun gets a few minutes here and there as we bring him along slowly by playing him in situations where he can have success and build confidence. At small forward, I want to see Ariza become a tough defender and Luke and Vlade come back strong. Might as well throw Chris Mihm returning to pre-injury form while I have my wish list open. And Kobe inspiring great defense like the Olympics.
MH
Posted by: LakerTom | August 31, 2008 at 05:00 PM
dave,
I disagree with blitz as I think Lamar at best would play at least half of his time at power forward and Vlade would stay at small forward. This could change against certain teams of course but I think Lamar will be the first backup when Pau leaves the game or backs up Drew. I don’t think we want the drop off that would come from Josh Powell, Vlade, or Luke playing the 4, not when we have a much better option in Lamar. Moving Lamar to 6th man and backup at power forward unclogs the jam at small forward and gives Ariza a chance to develop. If Vlade continues shooting at 40% for 3’s, he will also get small forward time. If Sasha is burning the nets, we may see Kobe spend a lot of time at the 3. We will probably play all of these combinations against various teams as our versatility is a big weapon. But bottom line, we need Lamar to play the 4 to really control the paint and dominate the boards for all 48 minutes of the game.
Tom
Posted by: LakerTom | August 31, 2008 at 05:06 PM
Jon,
>>>>>All this Sue Yue/Jordan Farmar comparisons I believe is premature.
>>>>>Isn't this discussion (especially the frequency of it) a bit premature?
I don’t think so. One of the legitimate questions for next year’s team is whether or not Jordan Farmar can really challenge Derek Fisher and become the Lakers starting point guard. Most of us are concerned that Jordan’s defense might not be up to the task, even with Drew. We all know Jordan has proven he can play at the level of a top backup but can he grow and become the future starter? That’s a question that interests us and is important.
Sun Yue on the other hand is mostly speculation based on his size and play in the Olympics, where he garnered excellent reviews from Kobe and Pau. We all know he hasn’t even proven he can play in the NBA but you cannot deny he is intriguing. He is an authentic 6-9 natural point guard who has outstanding ball handling and passing skills and a proven knack for blocking shots. How could you not talk about this guy? He may end up being a bust because the NBA is so different from China as far as playing environment. Then again, the Lakers front office saw enough to draft the guy last year and invest in a 2-year guaranteed contract for him. Had he not entered the draft until this year, he probably would have been a mid first round pick rather than an early second round pick.
Finally, what the hell else do we really have to talk about, Jon. LOL. That’s part of what it all comes down to. I’m just grateful to have someone to blog with. Hell, this morning I was so bored I even responded to BUTtLickER and GWB. Humanomaly is muttering to himself. Blitz has gone crazy with stats. So let us have our little fun thinking about what might or could happen. What is interesting is that there is a lot of blog-sync-think when it comes to Farmar and Sun. They are both guys well worth Lakers fans rooting for. They could be part of many Lakers championship teams. That’s better than talking about Shaq or politics, no?
Tom
Posted by: LakerTom | August 31, 2008 at 05:22 PM
Shum,
>>>>>As a Chinese Lakers fan living in LA , I 'll see the Sun ( Yue )'s fan club or
>>>>>support group coming up pretty soon when he lands in the Lakerdom
Thanks for the comments, Tom. I think we’ve already founded a Sun Yue fan club on the blog. Next step will be up to Sun to come to camp in great shape ready to work hard and play tough and prove he was a great pick. Of course, as we both know, like Yao and Yi, he will also have the hopes of China riding on his shoulders. Nothing like the pressure of a billion personal fans watching every move you make but I think Sun will be up to it.
Tom
Posted by: LakerTom | August 31, 2008 at 05:35 PM
"1) I konw I will not be able to watch the replay of the Finals games anytime soon. Their sitting there on the tivo but just can't. Maybe like the Suns Lakers game 6 of 06 I review it some and delete. That just hur....ted."
I've enjoyed watching both the SUNS-lakers game 6 and the Finals games. You can see some brilliant basketball played by both the SUNS and Celts - two of the most dominant clubs in the NBA eliminating the lakers, what more could an NBA fan ask for?
It's great to see how much confidence laker fans have in ear-mar and SUN yue...the lakers have no PG in the Rajon Rondo or even the Goran Dragic class, which will be an achilles heel vs. certain teams. Such as the SUNS.
I see byenumb as a Kenyon Martin type - loads of potential, but cursed with bad knees...
Posted by: BUTLER | August 31, 2008 at 05:36 PM
LakerTom,
Of course you don't feel that this discussion of Sun Yue is premature! You've posted like 70 posts on the subject.
I understand the importance of the point guard position next year because Derek Fisher (God bless him) is getting older and there are a bunch of extraordinarily gifted, young, fast point guards coming up in the league. So, I understand the importance of the general dialogue on the subject matter, but not the ebullient optimism towards Sun Yue.
Guarded optimism? Sure. He IS a Laker after all.
But, come on, let's wait until we've seen a handful of pre-season games before we start appointing him "The Chinese Magic Johnson." Come on. Let's be reasonable here.
By the way, LakerTom, so are you a Bruin? Do you follow college football?
GO BRUINS!
GO LAKERS!
Posted by: Jon K. | August 31, 2008 at 05:40 PM
LakerTom,
"Finally, what the hell else do we really have to talk about, Jon?"
Okay. Good point. Best argument yet.
GO LAKERS!
Posted by: Jon K. | August 31, 2008 at 05:41 PM
"However, as we all know (no disrespect to Chris Wilcox--I like him as a player) Chris Wilcox is no Amare Stoudemire and will never be that good."
Chris wilcox still needs to work his way up to gasal's level, much less AMARE'S!
AMARE holds the key to byenumb's potential return. The road of knee surgery is littered with big men such as Kenyon Martins, Darius Miles, and Chris Webbers. Only AMARE has successfully made it through. byenumb should create an altar in his home with AMARE emblazoned across it and light a candle each morning when the SUN arises and pray for guidance.
Posted by: BUTLER | August 31, 2008 at 05:45 PM
"As much as I get caught up in ranking teams, the reality is you also have to consider match-ups. And 2 months from today, we'll find out exactly how the Lakers match-up against a team that has had their number these past couple of seasons - Portland."
Portland has a hex on the lakers for 8 years running. LA will not win that matchup, not with the fantastic reports on Oden's workouts and the additions of Bayless and Rudy Fernandez.
Fernandez took kobee apart in the olympics, and Oden will be a punisher in the paint - he is obviously following AMARE'S lead in recovering from knee surgery.
Meanwhile, the SUNS will continue to have Portland's #...the lakers pray they will not face either portland or PHX in the postseason.
Posted by: BUTLER | August 31, 2008 at 05:49 PM
Laker Tom,
>>> One of the legitimate questions for next year’s team is whether or not Jordan Farmar can really challenge Derek Fisher and become the Lakers starting point guard.
Count me as driver and chief executive officer of the Jordan Farmar Should Start band wagon. For all the experience and leadership that D-Fish brings, he all too rarely energizes the starting 5, and plays more like a shooting guard than a point guard.
Farmar has exhibited excellent leadership skills with the Bench Mob, brings instant energy and speed to the equation, and most of all knows how to get the ball to Andrew Bynum. Farmar's ability to get Bynum involved in the game during the early minutes is the strongest argument I can think of to make this change NOW!
How many games can we all remember where the Lakers came out of the gate lethargic and lifeless? Way too many! JF's spunky attitude is just the antidote the Starting 5 needs to explode at the start and set the tone for the rest of the game.
I'm counting on Farmar to come back with added strength, a better shot, and better decision making on Defense. He doesn't necessarily have to play more minutes, but having him on the floor at the starting buzzer makes the Lakers a better team.
If Ariza also starts -- admittedly still a big IF -- Having D-Fish and Lamar come off the bench gives the Lakers a better second unit than many teams' first unit.
Call it a legitimate question, if you will. My question is, Why not?
Posted by: Rick Friedman | August 31, 2008 at 06:07 PM
Jon,
>>>>>By the way, LakerTom, so are you a Bruin? Do you follow college football?
I have been a UCLA football fan since the 1950’s, when the football team would spiral out of the huddle up to the line of scrimmage. I was a grade school half-Chinese kid living in a trailer and attending a 2-room rural school in a farming community in Wisconsin but I loved the Bruins uniforms and the way they broke out of the huddle. How stupid is that. From that moment on, I always rooted for powder blue and wanted to go to college at UCLA. My dad actually moved the family to SoCal so that I could go to UCLA. It was my parent’s dream.
As all Bruin football fans, we lived years of being USC’s bitch but we had some glorious times during the Tommy Prothro era with Gary Beban and the greatest Bruin-Trojan football game ever in 1966, when we came back from behind to beat USC 20-16. I loved Prothros’ trick plays. I have followed the team all my life but basketball had become my game and my passion and UCLA football teams continued to greatly disappoint with Donahue. Of course, now we have a proven cheat in Rick Neuheisel and are still USC’s bitch. LOL.
Strangely, I ended up going to Berkeley and Riverside and Cal State LA and lots of other schools but only went to UCLA for one year in a Masters program in Comprehensive Health Planning. I loved the campus, especially playing basketball in Pauley Pavilion, the place where I had grown up watching the 11:00 p.m. replays with Dick Enberg after every Bruin game. How could you not end up a basketball junkie watching those great Bruin teams. Like the Celtics of Russell and Havelicek in the NBA, John Wooden’s and UCLA’s triumphs in college basketball will never be repeated.
Tom
Posted by: LakerTom | August 31, 2008 at 06:30 PM
Rick,
>>>>>Farmar has exhibited excellent leadership skills with the Bench Mob, brings instant
>>>>>energy and speed to the equation, and most of all knows how to get the ball to
>>>>>Andrew Bynum. Farmar's ability to get Bynum involved in the game during the
>>>>>early minutes is the strongest argument I can think of to make this change NOW!
I think you may be right, Rick. I am hoping that Jordan comes back bigger and better this year just like Drew. If he can elevate his game one more level, he will be ready to take over the point guard spot. I want to see some more fire, stick-to-itiveness, and anticipation on defense – and the return of the tear drop and adding of the jump stop to his offense. He could make a big difference this year. One thing you can count on is that he has been working and will not back down no matter how big the game.
I’ll ride shotgun on that wagon, mamba.
Tom
Posted by: LakerTom | August 31, 2008 at 06:35 PM
BUTtLickER,
You are so full of it. Time to change your diaper, buddy. Don't you remember Bynum dominating Amare? Can't see through all the crap? Better call mom for help.
Tom
Posted by: LakerTom | August 31, 2008 at 06:38 PM
LakerTom,
I thought we were cool, outa da pakalolo?
"humanomaly is muttering to himself",
I apologize to the blog.
The good thing is we have two potentially good to excellent point guards. Admittedly Jordan is the proven one of the two as of this point. The one good thing point is we are able to compare them because they are approximately the same age, I looked it up Jordan will be... 22 come November...hmm looks like Sun is about 1 year older as he will turn 23 come November as well....I think we can use quality and the quantity. One thing to consider is how many more years will PJ go as head coach? Because maybe when he leaves maybe some of the triangle offense goes with him, depending on the coach that replaces him. Teams can play with 2 point guards, I believe they should have more than one guy that can initiate and dictate the offense, look at the Pistons bad boys teams, with Dumars and Isiah Thomas, I think they were both kinda point guards, both kinda not. With Jordan and Sun the size difference is what some wil focus on, In reality, both are at a disadvantage, Jordan has to play against bigger players ususally, and Sun will have to play against smaller players, probably. So both will be vulnerable.
Jon K., it is premature to place judgement, I believe it is speculation that is going on in this blog when people are talking about Sun. I think it is bringing in a little bit of excitement, actually, there were other things that happened this offseason as we all know, Josh Powell, the good news on Bynum, no news on Ariza that I am aware of. I believe Sun will benefit from the more controlled environment that the Lakers will lay out for him. I have no clue how he spends his off time, I saw in wikipedia that he's already been linked to have a "girlfriend", so, GWB gotta stop breathing so hard. I think that if he spends his time on the weights, the time shooting jumpers (such as I saw Sasha do whenever I went to games, he was always popping them off, extra shooting practice in warm up time, even though the rest of the team was in the locker room, but come game time he clanked them for years and the team tolerated that...and the patience has paid off, he found the bottom of the net). I look forward to a year where everyone will be in camp, together, except for maybe Kobe, but I hope he is at least there for continuity sake. Pau, Trevor, Powell, Sun, and maybe Mbenga all have not gone through the training camp preseson, whereas Kwame went thru what? 3 training camps?....
In regards to the talk of college football, I have always been a closet University of Hawaii closet fan. The bad part is that there games get broadcast, if they do, very late because of the time zone difference. June Jones left to go coach SMU, so we shall see. I found their offense and defense to be hyper and exciting to watch. The numbers, statistics of the last 2 signifcant QB's was astounding, I'm talking about Timmie Chang, and Colt Brennan. I know they will never be the ultimate #1 college team, but hey, I don't jump bandwagons or ships. And isnt't it wierd that Los Angeles does not have a professional football team, but we are blessed to have 1 and 1/2 professional basketball teams (1.2 Lakers+ 0.3 Clippers= 1.5 NBA teams, kbblitz I can do the math, but not as well as you, hats off.) When the Rams moved got moved to St Louis, thank you, Georgia, I tried to follow them, but the feeling wasn't the same. I felt betrayed, ok, I'm insecure, so be it.
Posted by: humanomaly | August 31, 2008 at 07:07 PM
First of all, I think Gregg Doyle is kind of a tool.
Secondly, it seems like Shaq is sort of going through athlete menopause. Bret Favre just went through the same thing, but he didn't leave stupid messages on someone's voice mail.
However, if that allegedly becomes a yes he did...
then the first thing he needs to do is see a therapist. He needs someone to help him become human again, because he has lost touch with reality.
Anyone who picks the Suns to finish higher than 8 may be severly bummed out. As gifted as Amare is physically, he won't hold a team together over crazy Shaq allegations, which will be a distraction during the regular season. Combined with incorporating a new, vastly different system and style, I don't think the Suns will win 45 games next year. Especially if Nash continues to slow down and Barbosa stays predictable.
I think the Clippers have a better chance of making the playoffs.
Mainly, I hope that Kobe gets some R and R, well desrevedly so. Put those dogs up and wonder how a man like Shaq can't exit gracefully from the game that loved him so and now just wants him to stop clowning around in.
Posted by: Jamie Sweet | August 31, 2008 at 07:19 PM
Laker Tom,
Let's talk about who should start and this blah blah blah. Frankly here's my take on the starting lineup. I understand why you don't want Powell or even Radman backing up Pau and Lamar will at times be a power forward. However he in my guess will start at Small Forward and end games at Small Forward with stints at Power Forward between. Our offense under Phil Jackson is different from the usual offense. In fact it has been the same thing with Jordan and the Bulls. Our point guard, Derek Fisher, is the kind of point guard who plays solid defense at the same time is a very good spot up shooter, just like John Paxson was for the Bulls. Whlie Derek can play the point, he's not the distributing kind of point guard that CP3, Deron Williams, or Steve Nash are. Because he isn't that type of Point guard, he lost his starting spot to Baron Davis in Golden State since he couldn't play like a traditional dish and drive point guard. That is why he is a perfect fit in the triangle offense since he can easily be a spot up shooter for Kobe, so Kobe can be the one who drives into the lane. The Power Forward position are used as defense and inside scoring while the center unless it has a really good center like Shaquille during his best years, is just suited for inside scoring. With Bynum being the post defender we have much better post defense and Pau can do better against one on one defending power forwards which he is better at doing. Plus Bynum can score inside while Pau can drive to the basket also.
The Small Forward position, arguably is the hardest position to master in the triangle offense. Kobe said himself it is very hard and new people like Ira couldn't grasp it within 1 month or so. Unless the Shooting Guard position is held by a spot up shooter and the point guard slot is filled with a dish and drive point guard, usually the best swingman (SG/SF) and driver to the lane to score should hold this position. In case that the SG is shooting ice cold, then it the job of the SF to be the outside threat. If the SG position is held by a person like Jordan or Kobe, then the Small Forward is the one who helps run the offense. During the 1st Bulls 3 peat, it was Pippen doing that and helping running the offense to get Jordan to score to to get Paxson wide open. When Jordan retired the 1st time, Pippen instead adopted the role of Jordan and the one who drove into the lane transformed into the SF slot with SG turning into a spot up shooting position held by Pete Myers and the point guard who replaced Paxson was BJ Armstrong, a classic drive and dish player. The next year, the Bulls struggled with Ron Harper becoming the shooting guard (a penetrating guard) and the departure of Horace Grant. While Grant's departure had the most significant loss to the Bulls, having BJ Armstrong a classic drive and dish PG, Ron Harper a penetrating the paint shooting guard, and Pippen who couldn't drive to the paint because BJ/Harper wanted to drive into the lane and neither were good spot up shooters. Even when Jordan arrived later that season, in the playoffs he couldn't be as effective since he had no one to spot up to (Pippen wasn't accurate from 3 point land). The next season, the Bulls let Armstrong go in the expansion draft and replaced him with Harper and Steve Kerr, another shooting type point guard.
Why did I tell the history of the Bulls when we are in a Lakers blog?? It's simple because it's related to what I'm talking about. Why did PJ let Walton play Small Forward when there are much better Small Forwards like Kapono etc. Because a passing small forward is needed in the triangle offense should the Shooting Guard be a penetrating guard. That's where Odom comes in. Lamar during the 2005-2006 season played a point forward role and in that he averaged 5.5 assists per game that year. The next year he went to power forward and abandoned the point forward role and since Walton could handle the ball handling duties (Smush shouldn't have been trusted to run the offense) Lamar went to power forward and because he's better at offense as a PF, he nearly attained all star numbers before injuries derailed his potential. However, because of injuries and poor play, the Lakers regressed and having Walton injured and making his defense even worst, Lamar being banged up, Smush being lazy, and Kwa-may being back to the bust from Washington, the Lakers struggled to the finish line but only made it there since Kobe had to attack way more times than usual.
The point Laker Tom, is that Lamar is better suited at the starting lineup as a Small Forward. He's a much better at defending at Small Forward than at Power Forward and has proved it in the past while Trevor is unproven. Lamar has been criticized as not being aggressive enough and that's one weakness as as power forward. As Small Forward in the triangle offense he can get his teammates more involved and won't be targetted as someone who should be attacked because Derek is the one who brings the ball up the court. Derek is also a leader so mentally at least, Derek will be the one running the offense while Odom/Bryant will be the oil running the engine. Removing Odom from the starting lineup and making him 6th man will no doubt improve the rebounding off the bench. However the two ideas of who should replace him are not so good either: Trevor and Sasha. While Trevor has shown some defense, at this point it's not as good starting wise as he got beaten by Grant Hill and Paul Pierce during the times he started at SF. Plus while he is a slasher, he isn't really a guy who can be counted on as a passer/playmaker. The other alternative that has been brought up is place Sasha at the 2 and Kobe at the 3. Sounds fine except for that Sasha while been improving is still a streaky shooter having some nights where he shoots lights out but then having others where he couldn't hit the fish in the bucket. Plus Sasha's defense I"m afraid to say is well, over rated and while being intense, his lack of ideal wingspan plus his low lateral quickness makes him easily ruined by pick and rolls. And this lineup of Fisher-Sasha-Kobe-Pau-Bynum won't probably be used by Phil except perhaps at end of games where Kobe will try to take over and he has 2 inside guys and 2 outside guys he can pass out to. The only way atm that Sasha can start is if Jordan starts and Kobe has another playmaker so he can attack the basket more. But starting Farmar loses defense and still Farmar is a bit too flashy.
Simply put putting Odom gives the bench only one effective thing: Rebounding. Defense? Lamar is not as good on defense as a power forward as he is at Small Forward. Lamar isn't really an all around scorer and while he does have his days, it's better off play making. Also putting Lamar as 6th man forces Radman to be the backup 3 and even more weakens the defense of the bench, which was arguably the weakest part of the bench mob. Plus you lose energy off the bench that Trevor brings that would feed of teammates and help the bench hold the fort down till the starters are ready or even end games. Lamar will be playing bit of time at power forward and help the rebounding but still will be behind Pau and is more talented overall for the Small Forward position than Trevor, Vladimir or Luke. Having Radman at the 4 also brings more offense off the bench which they lacked in the Finals and out of all the Lakers, the bench was the one who really got shut down by Boston's defense.
At the moment, Lamar is starting Small Forward.
Before I end my post here are lineups (not starting lineup just lineups on the floor) that could work in the triangle offense. 6th man means the backup SF/SG replacement if one of them has foul trouble.
Fisher-Bryant-Odom-Gasol-Bynum with Jordan as 6th man (Projected Starting Lineup, best possible defensive lineup)
Fisher-Bryant-Walton-Odom-Gasol with Ariza /Bynum as 6th man (Back court Defense with Front line offense)
Farmar-Vujacic-Bryant-Gasol-Bynum with Odom as 6th man (Alternative Lineup if Jordan improves so well Derek is on the bench)
Fisher-Vujacic-Bryant-Gasol-Bynum with Odom as 6th man (probably will be used to close out games)
Fisher-Vujacic-Bryant-Radman-Gasol with Odom or Bynum as 6th Man. (3 point shooters)
Farmar-Vujacic-Ariza-Odom-Mihm with Walton as 6th man (offense lineup with defense and rebounding)
Farmar-Vujacic-Walton-Radman-Mihm/Gasol with Ariza as 6th man. (Pure Offensive lineup of the bench)
Garbage time lineups
Yue-Karl-Walton-Powell-Mihm with Ariza as 6th man
Yue-Karl-Ariza-Powell-Mihm with Walton as 6th man.
My two cents.
Posted by: thekobebryantblitz | August 31, 2008 at 07:25 PM
What will be the most brutal moment of this upcoming season? Maybe when Phil sticks Sun Yue in the game in the 4th quarter with the game on the line and tells him to guard Chris Paul?
Come on...
I was looking at the lottery results and it looks like Andrew Bynum won the Mega! or at least somebody in Georgia... geez... $132m for somebody out there...
Posted by: Stay Thirsty My Friends | August 31, 2008 at 07:38 PM
humanomaly,
>>>>>I thought we were cool, outa da pakalolo?
We are cool, h. We’re the dreads of the dead threads, ghost bloggers gone astray.
Deliverers of the Lakers fortune cookies. Illegitimate literates. Spruce Goose Lovers.
We just could not keep Isaiah and Joe out of the lane. They just beat our guards off the dribble over and over. Then came the hamstrings. Then Magic’s HIV. Bummer.
You know, I hadn’t considered the possibility of a coaching change. I sort of thought that Phil would just keep going until he had 12 rings at least – another three peat. I mean, it’s gotta be tough to turn down $10M per year for doing what you love, especially when you are winning. Hell, we may have to pry him out of the job. LOL.
My guess is the Byron will come home to coach the Lakers when Phil leaves, which means no more Tex and no more Triangle so your point about our point guards may be right on. Basically, you have to be a combo guard to play in the Triangle anyway because of the need to force spacing by being a threat to shoot. I could easily see Farm and Sun playing together. Farm would just be the shooting guard, which he would actually love.
Hawaii football was cool under June Jones. I also loved when he had Jerry Glanville as his defensive coordinator. I loved Glanville as a coach and commentator. Very funny guy. And a great defensive coach. Go, Hawaii. Go, Obama.
Tom
Posted by: LakerTom | August 31, 2008 at 07:48 PM
Tom & blitz - okay, well if we were to go with either of your propositions (both of which I could see - either Vlad or Odom swinging between 3 and backup 4), then where does Luke come in? What about Trevor? Give me yout ten-man rotations. Just curious. Personally, I lean more toward the Cook scenario - I have a hard time seeing Odom move to a 6th man position after starting virtually every game of his career... I think coming off the bench might not suit his psyche. Vlad on the other hand, has had his problems with playing an all-around game at the 3 - he might do better back in his more traditional role - coming off the bench as a shooter with more opportunity to freelance.
Posted by: dave m | August 31, 2008 at 08:07 PM
Jamie,
As sweet as having the Suns win only 45 games that is too sweet even for Laker fans. I would say 50 wins at least since D'Antoni isn't there anymore.
Posted by: thekobebryantblitz | August 31, 2008 at 08:51 PM
Suns fans need to prepare for a possible dismal season due largely to Shaq's Mr. Hyde behavior! I have always considered him a big clown but this last fiasco takes the cake. I suspect a possible jail sentence could follow? But for sure Shaq will find it very difficult to play and remain focused at the same time. Kobe was able too during the Colorado hearings as well as during games while being booed by opposing fans. Shaq will definately crumble and retire!
Posted by: chuck23 | August 31, 2008 at 09:12 PM
Candid video of Team USA celebrating in the locker room after beating Spain for the Gold Medal:
http://goldenarmor.wordpress.com/
Posted by: Amazing_Happens | August 31, 2008 at 09:30 PM
GWB, green weenie from beanie LGCHick
you're the pathetic fool thinking the celts are going to rpt..hahaha---join the rest of the champions that don't (miami and det and san ant)
only the lakers have done it recently
and w/o posey..and the normal complaceny...you're team aint getting a rpt..
but we are winning it...since we have bynum now
hahahahahahahaa
see lgchick
opps--i mean green WEENIE from beanie...
Posted by: laker32 | August 31, 2008 at 10:00 PM
Really, I can't wait for the regular season to start.
Barring injury
Ariza will not start. No way. No how.
Farmar will not start. Farmar is extremely confident and a take charge kind of player but right now I don't think their are a lot of Lakers who will follow his lead. I think that both Sasha and Kobe find him kind of annoying. He does seem to have a good relationship with Bynum and as he matures perhaps he'll become a team leader. Right now the Lakers have 3 leaders Kobe, Lamar, and Fish and I'd put Luke ahead of Farmar in that category right now as well (not all leaders are necessarily good players).
Sun Yue, based on the three Olympic games I saw him play, will never start in the NBA unless he improves his outside shot, his defense. his strength and his aggressiveness. At this point, Coby Karl is a better shot, plays better defense, is more athletic and is more aggressive. (he also has a 6'11" wingspan which is very impressive for someone 6'5")
Barring catastrophe (injuries to key players) the Lakers will will win at least 62 games this year.
Posted by: giantsquid | August 31, 2008 at 10:27 PM