Lakers Blog

Round-the-Clock Purple and Gold
written by the Kamenetzky brothers.

« Previous Post | Lakers Blog Home | Next Post »

Joe Crawford: Inked

August 27, 2008 |  3:33 pm

As in "officially," I was just informed by the Lakers' media relations department.  Of course, there's a big difference between being a late second-round draft pick with a non-guaranteed contract and a late second-round draft pick who's actually on the team.  For the time being, I'm still thinking he won't be on the roster come opening day.  But this would be the first step in bucking the odds, so good for Crawford.

Trivia alert! Crawford's agent is Noah Croom, whose younger brother James and I graduated from high school together.  On a scale of 1-10, I'm guessing the blogosphere's collective interest in this tidbit rates around a point-seven.

AK


The comments to this entry are closed.

Comments

Jon K,

Thanks for checking in regardign my shoulder. The range of motion is getting close to 90%. Which is awesome considering a rotator/labral tear combined with Frozen Shoulder from being diabetic.

The strength is the issue. I cant lift more than 5 lbs over my head with my left. (Considering I can easily push 40 lbs with my right.) My therapist is saying that it will take a full 2 1/2 years to recovery with strength.

Best Regards Brother!

Can't wait for the TV commentary every time Joey Crawford ref's a game and the announcer says Joe Crawford enters the game for the Lakers.

And for some good 'ol Youtube for you Kobe Haters, let's see how Team USA did with LeBronze, Wade, Melo & CP3 in the 2006 Worlds:

http://tinyurl.com/5z237b

Greece went on to get whupped in the Gold medal game by the Spaniards.

4

AK,

"On a scale of 1-10, I'm guessing the blogosphere's collective interest in this tidbit rates around a .7."

Actually, AK, an instrument has not been invented that can measure my disinterest in that comment -- Kidding.

Here is how it will be in the west:

1. Lakers
2. Hornets
3. Rockets
4. Spurs
5. Trailblazers
6. Jazz
7. Mavs
8. Suns

Meeting Shaq in the first round on the way to a title -- how sweet it is.

HmrHed:
Somebody from the Northwest Division has to be seeded in the top 4, therefore NO, Houston and SA can't be 2,3, 4.

Here's my picks:
1. Lakers
2. Hornets
3. Rockets
4. Jazz
5. Spurs
6. Blazers
7. Mavs
8. Suns

HmrHed

I feel it might go this way

1. Lakers
2. Hornets
3. Rockets
4. Spurs
5. Jazz
6. Suns
7. Mavs
8. Trailblazers

But your line up would be a dream

HmrHed -

Jazz at 6th seed? That's low I think.

The rest sounds about right, although I think the Suns are better than the Mavs.

Plus what rdlee said. Good catch.

Charles,

Wow. Man, that's mixed news, but it's good there's a light at the end of the tunnel.

What supplements are you taking?

Anyhow, bro, I hope you're well soon and back to busting skulls on the mat.

GO LAKERS!

HmrHed,

Here's how it's going to be:

1) Lakers
2) Rockets
3) Jazz
4) Hornets
5) Blazers
6) Suns
7) Spurs
8) Mavs

Here's my picks:

1. Lakers
2. Hornets
3. Jazz
4. Spurs
5. Rockets
6. Blazers
7. Suns
8.Clippers

Here are my points of insecurity on my list:

3. Jazz: Will Deron Williams become a true competitor to Chris Paul's MVPesque performance at point guard? He'll need to.
4. Spurs: Great players. Great coach. But a bit old.
5. Rockets: I put them this low because of the Ron Artest factor. He ALWAYS screws things up. Also, Tracy McGrady is cursed. Still, my first instinct was to rank them #3.
7. Suns: The Suns might not make the playoffs. They might finish as low as 11th in the West. Still... with Nash and Stoudemire they should get in there.
8. Clippers: Everyone knows that the eighth seed is totally up for grabs. There's four teams fighting for that slot. I picked the Clippers because I'm hopeful and I like Baron Davis.

Go Clippers!

GO LAKERS!

Hmmm, rdlee, you're right -- that darn division winner rule -

Ok here it is.

1. Lakers (7 foot domination on the boards 24/7)
2. Hornets (CP3 MVP 2009?)
3. Trailblazers (Loaded)
4. Rockets (At least one blow-up by artest, but good D)
5. Spurs (Positive: Odd year -- Negative: Manu hurt)
6. Jazz (Overachieved last year)
7. Mavs (borderline mess)
8. Suns (old and fat)

Charles -- I'm high on the blazers.

Puddle -- I think the Jazz overachieved. I like DW, but I'm not convinced that Boozer is a premier player.

Why no news on Kobe having surgery? I though it was a 6 -week thing. If he has it tomorrow, that would put it out to Mid-October --

Hey random question for long-time Laker fans: between the time Van Exel was drafted in 94 (?), and the season's start, were there any signs that he would be THAT good?

I'm asking because I wonder what the chances are for a rookie guard who did nothing extraordinary even in summer league, to make an impact in the actual season

"unless Sasha becomes a starter, I really don't see a spot for Coby Karl on this team but... I'll admit, we do need someone to carry the bags of the pro's... so if that's how Coby makes the team, so be it... maybe he should take the #15 to remind him he's one step away..."

Coby will be the 3rd shooting guard on the roster. Coby has more experience plus a wee bit more talent then Joe Crawford playing in the Triangle Offense. Sun Yue will be the 3rd point guard on the team.

Laker Tom,

Disagree with Tony Parker comparisons. Jordan lacks the really gifted athleticism that TP has. Jordan's game may seem like Tony Parker's but his athleticism is not as good as Tony Parker's. That is almost the same as BJ Armstrong trying to be compared to Isiah Thomas, whose games were similar but BJ Armstrong lacked Isiah's Thomas' athleticism (on the positive side, he did lack Thomas' bad decision making in Management). I would say probably as good as BJ Armstrong is Jordan's game if not Luke Ridnour.

Sasha is less athletic plus doesn't have Barry's IQ but otherwise I do stand by the comparison of Brent Barry for Sasha Vujacic.

The same for Ariza as a less athletic, not so long arms, and not so good jumper Tayshaun Prince.

I know you think David Robinson may have been over rated but for me at least he ranks in the top centers of the NBA after Bill Russell, Wilt Chamberlain, Kareem Abdul-Jabbar, Hakeem Olajuwon, George Mikan, and Shaquille O'Neal. I've seen David play and while Drew doesn't have the jumper that the Admiral had, much of Drew's moves really do look like David Robinson's. Plus Drew has just began to really tap into his potential on defense which was a big trademark of David Robinson's (Defensive Player of the Year). Like I said b4, not as good as Robinson but the ceiling for Drew nearly there.

The Good, Bad, and Ugly (otherwise known as Kobe's World) ,

Don't even think about it. Hand checking allows you to keep your hands on your man, not allowing it gives an extreme advantage to your man to move around (Think about the way offensive lineup does against D-Line man).

"Because of the new rules where you can't handcheck, or put your hands on players, he's able to roam free up and down the court"-Reggie Miller on Kobe without Hand checking

Joe Dumars is one of the best perimeter defenders of the NBA and Jordan ranks near him in defense.

Here's what the Jordan Rules were about:

The Jordan Rules: The guiding principle is that a defender is never left to guard Jordan unaided. Jordan's position on the floor dictates whether the Pistons trap him with a second defender or have the second defender play "help and recover" (that is, run at Jordan to stop his dribble, but then scramble back to his own man; Salley is a master at this ploy). The closer Jordan is to the basket, the more the Pistons go with the trap. When he is above the sideline hash mark (28 feet from the baseline), they usually play help and recover. Even when Jordan is far from the basket, perhaps bringing up the ball as a point guard on a wide-open floor, Detroit runs a second player at him, someone like Salley or Rodman. This reduces the amount of open court that he has to work with and often forces him to give up the ball to a teammate. The Pistons always want someone else to handle the ball. Not sometimes. Always. When Jordan has the ball on the wing, the Detroit player guarding him forces him toward defensive help. Most often that means turning Jordan to the right when he's on the left side of the floor and to the left when he's on the right side. If Jordan happens to get isolated with one man and is in a potential scoring position, the Piston defender will try to force him to go left. They think he makes a stronger, more explosive move to his right. So does Jordan. When Jordan tries to run a pick-and-roll, Detroit traps him. That means that two men, the one guarding Jordan and the one guarding the Bull setting the pick, run at him. The Pistons do this with remarkable efficiency, partly because that second defender is usually the 6 ft. 11 in. Salley or the 6 ft. 11 in. Laimbeer. The tall trappers make it almost impossible for Jordan to deliver the ball to a teammate rolling toward the basket, and their aggressive charge toward Jordan usually forces him to retreat. When Jordan posts up near the basket, Detroit typically puts three men on him, with Dumars most often behind him, using his strong hips and legs to "body" Jordan away from the basket. When the entry pass comes in from the point guard, Thomas leaves that guard and double-teams Jordan. If that means the point guard is free, so be it. Meanwhile, another defender, perhaps Laimbeer or Salley, will have come over and planted himself in the lane, maybe on the baseline side, maybe toward the middle. Dumars will then turn Jordan toward that help. Jordan loves the baseline. "Even though there's less room down there, I can be more creative," he says. But by and large, the Pistons take it away from him. When Jordan comes off a screen set near the baseline -- his most frequent maneuver when he's playing shooting guard -- a host of Jordan Rules come into play. Dumars must follow him around the screen -- no matter if he has to go into the bleachers -- to prevent Jordan from making a backdoor cut and receiving an alley-oop pass for an almost certain dunk. The Piston -- usually Laimbeer -- guarding the Bull setting the pick will step out to make Jordan receive the ball farther from the basket. In addition -- and this is important -- that man will guard against Jordan's making a "tight curl" off the top of the screen and suddenly looping back into the middle to take a short pass on the dead run, a circumstance that is almost always disastrous for the defense. In most cases Jordan will have to step back and take the pass on the wing. Then Thomas will come over, creating a double team, and the process begins all over again. If Jordan puts the ball on the floor, at least two players stay on him, pushing him toward even more help. If he passes, the weakside defenders adjust to play two Pistons against four Bulls or one against three. As long as Jordan is out of the picture, they love those odds. EVERYTHING the Pistons did, other teams did when facing Jordan. Teams like the Boston Celtics ran zones in the 80's. Only a lazy defender would be called for illegal defense. Team passing can take a team out of a zone pretty quick.

"Kobe would be considered on-par with MJ defensively in that categorie."
I kinda agree.

Again, who was Michael guarding back then?
Clyde Drexler, Grant Hill (Hill was good in the 90's), Penny Hardaway, Reggie Miller, Glen Rice, Dominque Wilkins, Ron Artest, Kobe Bryant, Paul Pierce, Mitch Richmond, Michael Cooper, Gary Payton, Hedo Torkuglu, Rashard Lewis, James Worthy, Magic Johnson, Larry Bird, Joe Johnson, Tracy McGrady, Joe Dumars, Vince Carter, Eddie Jones, Brian Shaw, Ray Allen, Danny Ainge, Sam Cassell, Baron Davis, Steve Francis, Tim Hardaway, Ron Harper (before he joined the Bulls) and Allen Iverson.

These are not ALL of the players Jordan faced, however, these are merely the players whom Jordan defended against who are noteworthy from the Jordan era.

Hey Charles,

Have you read anything about cinnamon and diabetes? It's been shown to really help regulate blood sugar AND it's been shown to have a 150% higher anti-oxidant rating than that Acai Berry which everyone has been screaming about as a "super-anti-oxidant" (which it kind of is considering that it has 10 times the anti-oxidant level of blueberries per gram and blueberries are a pretty damned good source of anti-oxidants.)

Anyhow, cinnamon is really good stuff and you can buy it in capsules for cheap at places like Target and Wal-Mart and whatnot.

Maybe that might help with the diabetes thing. I know how much it sucks to be an athlete and then get slowed down by things like injuries.

GO LAKERS!

>>>Hey random question for long-time Laker fans: between
>>>the time Van Exel was drafted in 94 (?), and the
>>>season's start, were there any signs that he would be
>>>THAT good?

Other than the fact that he was the point guard and leading
scorer for a final four Cincinnati team, a 3rd team All-American,
and a Wooden Award finalist?

>>>Coby will be the 3rd shooting guard on the roster. Coby
>>>has more experience plus a wee bit more talent then Joe
>>> Crawford playing in the Triangle Offense. Sun Yue will
>>> be the 3rd point guard on the team.

I'm Long Time Laker Fan, and I approve of this message.

Taliq,

>>>>> h*ll back in the day, you spoke bad of jordan famarr and lakertom would come at
>>>>>you with knives, machine guns etc .. and that was ok cuz famarr is a laker and it's
>>>>>only right that someone on hurr be a diehard fan of his ...

LMAO, Taliq. A no doubt that fan means fanatic to you and me. But you have to remember that one of the big reasons for my fervor about Jordan was also getting rid of Smush. Not to say I don’t love our future Tony Parker. If we run more this year, as I have predicted, then Jordan will become even more critical a component in our team’s success.

But as anybody who blogs here knows, this year’s over-the-top fandom has been dedicated with great pride to the next great Lakers center – young phenom stud center Andrew Bynum, the Beast who is going to dominate the entire NBA next year at both ends of the court and help Kobe lead the Lakers to their first of a long string of NBA championships.

Take it easy on lakers_sth. He’s just expressing all of our frustration of not having much to talk about. I noticed since the blog convinced Jon K to ignore the trolls, he has been going crazy on AK again. I love you, Jon, but you really need to smoke something. Or something. LOL! It’s like Mrs. LakerTom said, without the trolls to assault, the bloggers would end up attacking each other. Tell us what you really think about GWB and Butler, Jon. LOL

Tom

Charles, buddy what did you do to your arm?

AK/BK or anyone who might know, what is the diffrence between tickets in the "lodge" section and Premire seats?

Where's BK been? I don't think I've seen him post in weeks.

Charles -

I hope you feel better, and I wish you a speedy recovery. If there's anything that I can do to help, please let me know.

AK -

I'm sorta interested - put me at a 7+ for the announcement. Any other quasi-famous people that you know from HS?

green weenie from beanie...

yah kobe is better than pierce....its such an easy observation....

i love it that you are too dumb to figure that out...you just love being the weenie....with no brains....

thats ok--we wouldnt expect anyone from the beanie to know any better...
have a good day weenie boy...

Charles - I recommend you follow Jon K's advise & try the cinammon. Otherwise all we'll hear about all year is how we need to have a "Get Charles to try the cinnamon" bandwagon!!! LOL!!!!

Jon K - all said in love, bro....

thekobebryantblitz,

closing our interesting discussion:

you wrote: It is my conclusion for this that he is better than Ariza at the time being. Ariza in the future maybe but not at the present when we need defense on them.

my response: When the Lakers signed Ariza, the GM of the
Lakers indicated that they picked up Ariza for his defense
and that Lamar could NOT handle the defensive duties
long term. [ and we disagree about Lamar's quickness ]

you wrote: Having good defense against Pick and Rolls requires technique along with lateral quickness.

my response: all right. that leads back into the early
pt I make. We have different opinions of Lamar's
quickness.

re: Evans. You wrote: The reason we got rid of Evans was purely out of financial reason.

my response: Mitch seems to disagree with you. His
words are to the affect of duplication of abilities and
lack of playing time.

re: my statement lies. damn lies & statistics. Perhaps it's
a cultural thing. Hanging out with engineers/math geeks
it is a known phrase: Lies, Damn Lies & statistics. the
statement points out that statistics can be used to prove
anything and therefore should be taken with a train load
of salt. If you search for it, you can probably find the
T-shirt.

re: my comment on D-wade, Lamar & Ariza. Early on in
this conversation I mentioned that against the quicker
SG's/SF's Lamar's lack of quickness would be a
problem. You have strongly argued that Lamar's length
is a strong asset on defense and that he's quick
enough to hang with quick SF's and SG's that I said
would be problematic for him. I specifically mentioned
D-Wade as an example of a quick SG/SF that he would
have a problem with. When this discussion first started,
a possible lineup had Kobe at SF and Lamar at SG.
When I argued that Lamar at SG was a horrible idea
based upon his shooting and lack of quickness, you
responded with stats & Bynum at C to make it work.
That is why we're talking about Lamar vs. D-wade.

you wrote: Of course, I have never said Lamar would be a lock down defender. I simply said he was a solid defender and much better than Trevor at the time being even if Trevor improves his defense at Small Forward. Lamar is solid enough to hang around above water on defending against the elite SF until Kobe at the end can guard them.

my response: all right. I have interpreted Mitch's words
and actions differently. He brought in a defensive
player at SF. Mitch didn't think that Lamar could play
defense at the level Mitch was looking for.

re: Lewis as Small Forward for Orlando.

http://tinyurl.com/5saorg lists him as SF.
Perhaps this is a situation similar to Lamar at SF?
Lewis played SF for the Sonics before Durant was
signed. My comment about Lewis as a SF was pulled
from an article.

re: Ariza and Hope and defense.

"I don't believe that I have said the Ariza's
defense is better than Lamar's."

Physically faster? Maybe. It takes more than being *FAST* or *QUICK* to be a great defender and Ariza is still *RAW* and even by training in the off season, Ariza still has a LONG way to go.

my response: You need to go talk to Mitch Kupchak about
this. Mitch is the one who brought in a defense oriented
SF when Lamar was already on the roster. Mitch has
said that Lamar can't play SF at the defensive level that
the Lakers are looking for. I appreciate your strong
defense of Lamar, but Mitch's actions don't *seem* to
lineup with your way of thinking.

re: working out over the summer.

duh all players do that except for lazy ones like Kwa-may. And even though he will improve (He will I have no doubt) it's not like his defense will be on par's with Kobe's or even Tayshaun Prince's. And let me say it again: Even though *HE WILL IMPROVE* it takes more than *ONE SUMMER* to really get the potential going.

my response to this: Smush's game didn't get better.
Brian Cook's game hasn't gotten better. Lamar's
game hasn't gotten better [ not counting recovering
from injury ] Devan George's game didn't get better.
While everyone works out over the summer, they don't
necessarily improve their game.

re: how long it takes to get the potential going. Mitch
signed Ariza because he was a defensively minded
SF. The potential is already going.

"It went off on a tangent about
shooting and you brought up Pippens shooting. "

Because you argued that Lamar can't play Small Forward because partly he can't shoot 3 pointers.

my response: that word partly is the problem. I made a
number of arguments against Lamar at SF. You've
focused on some not on others and the conversation
has wandered a bit. a synopsis is:

Lamar at SF is not the best play for the Lakers because:

1. He's not defensively minded.
2. His lack of quickness will hurt against "quick/athletic"
SF's.
3. His outside shooting is suspect.
4. The position doesn't play to one of his strongest
attributes, which is rebounding.

For any "one" of these arguments you can make an
argument which addresses the liability and supports
him playing the position. You haven't made an argument
which actually address all of them at the same time.
In my opinion. You've made arguments, using other
players, which support part of what you're saying but
doesn't address the complete package.

You have your view and I have my view. Cool.

This is what Mitch said and did: Mitch said: Lamar isn't
good enough defensively at the SF position. The Lakers
signed a defensively minded SF. Given how
long the Lakers were willing to wait for Bynum to
develop, as well as Sasha, one *MUST* believe that if
the Lakers really believed Lamar could play SF with
the defensive tenacity they're looking for, they would
have been willing to wait instead of signing a SF.

To me, actions speak louder than words. You can say
all of the wonderful things you want to about Odom, but
$$ has been spent to upgrade the positions that Odom
plays. Given that we signed Luke & Vlad before we
signed Pau & Ariza && we let Turiaf go ... I have a
really hard time understanding why our second best
PF wouldn't be playing off the bench vs. starting at SF.

The most efficient use of our personnel is:

C Bynum/Mihm
PF Pau/Odom
SF Ariza/Vlad/Luke
SG Kobe/Sasha
PG Fisher/Farmar

This actually puts a fairly good defensive unit on the
first team. The double-teams that Kobe attracts will
open things up for Ariza & Fisher. Teams *should* have
a hard time dealing with Bynum & Gasol together.

Bynum is a much better rebounder than Mihm. Lamar
would be the best person to help with the rebounding
needs. The second unit seems to pass the ball more
and run the floor more than the first. Lamar adds
a veteran's presence to the second unit. That should
calm them down and strengthen them. It allows him
to play the position that he's had the most success with.

If it's late in the game and we need points we go with:

Fisher/Famar [ depends on who's having a good night. ]
Kobe
Sasha
Pau
Bynum

With this lineup I see: 3 outside shooters. 2 bigs who will
dunk and will go left or right, pass & run. Both Farmar
& Sasha started dunking last year. No, they'll never win
the contest. However, they are changing their game and
getting better. Arguably our most intense unit. Kobe,
Fisher & Pau all have big game experience. Sasha &
Bynum are our most intense young players. [ Assuming
that Bynum picks up where he left off. ]

Feel free to disagree. We'll find out soon.

Cheers!

PEOPLE,

WHERE CAN I WATCH USA VS SPAIN FINAL QTR WHERE KOBE SCORED FREAKING 13 POINTS? OR ATLEAST THE HIGHLIGHTS. I COULDN'T FIND IT ANYWHERE

Yoo fools call me the hater?

hahahhahahh

Yoos the ones jealous that Bryant hasn't even come close to being in Pierce's league, let along Jordan.

Your foool star is the one comparing himself to Jordan and hasn't done a damn thing to live up to it.

Kobe is a modern day Dominic Wilkins.

ahhhhhahaahhahhaha

Kobe sucks!

Boston rules!

Lakers suck more!

justanothermambafan,

It's cool, brother.

I know I have a tendency to be like a Biblical Jeremiah at times, screaming my point when I think no one is listening to me.

GO LAKERS!

Charles,

Another good herb to help with diabetes is Chinese licorice. Not only a good detoxifier, but proven to help in the regulation of blood sugar.

It's cheap in Chinatown and makes good tea though you have to boil it for a bit. Try to buy the ones where the hearts are most yellow.

Be well.

GO LAKERS!

BTW, for those of you waiting for news on Kobe's surgery, I'm guessing its not going to happen just yet.

1) Travelling from China back to the US, Kobe's jet-lagged, he probably sleeps during the day and wakes up at night

2) If you've never been to China before, the diet and bacteria over there is quite different from here. Needless to say, almost every US athlete probably came back to the USA with diarhea aka "the runs".

3) Surgery when you're jet-lagged and having the runs is probably not a good idea. :)

Charles,

I think you need BM at Maalikaya.lol! (private j/k only Charles knows what it means.)

Kobe is a modern day wonder!!!!!

ahhhhhahaahhahhaha

Boston sucks!

Lakers rule!

Posted by: LGC | August 27, 2008 at 09:04 PM

exactly..beanie from weenie :)

green weenie from beanie...

yah--we know you love kobe..

thats why you talk about him all the time...

he's in your head, in your thoughts, in your dreams...

every post you have is about kobe..

you love him...! sucks to be you....
a weenie from beanie thats in love with kobe...

i am sure you are gonna bring him up again...
try the reverse pyschology thing where you bash him..
we know you love him...

have a good day green weenie :) lgccheerleader

Ok since we can't seem to agree on this and that I'll close my argument Hobbit and state my reasons on why it is best for Lamar to play Small Forward and Ariza coming off the bench.

Top 5 Reasons why Lamar should be starting Small Forward.

1) Lamar playing Small Forward gives us better defense which at the time being is a bit better than Trevor Ariza's. Is it lock down Bruce Bowen type? That is a no but based on prior experience Lamar has proven to hang around Lebron James and Josh Smith in the past and Trevor doesn't have that experience edge yet.
2) Trevor's energy is what is needed coming off the bench. It is my opinion that Lamar cannot provide the same kind of energy that Trevor brings that is needed for the bench to succeed. Phil Jackson even said himself "sometimes you do not put your best suited player on the floor, sometimes you have to put in your better overall player" This came from when deciding whether to start Gary Payton or Derek Fisher. Gary had more defensive skill than Fisher (too bad nothing of that sort came in the finals as Mr. Chauncey Billups rained jumpers on his head) even though Mr. Derek Fisher was more suited at the point guard spot than what Mr. Gary Payton could do in the triangle offense. Trevor is also suited better for the bench because he provides the bench with better defense at the small forward slot than Mr. Radmanovich could do, defense is severely needed on the bench and not having Mr. Trevor Ariza on the bench weakens the defense of the bench quite significantly.
3) Lamar is still superior no doubt than Trevor on offense. While we both disagree how he will do on defense, Lamar's offense is still needed. He is better than Trevor at the time being at penetrating the paint and into the rim and while not being a consistent shooter, Lamar does have a better jumpshot than Trevor at the time being with the results of training camp unknown till later.
4) Rebounding is needed for the bench no doubt but it is my opinion based on past games that Lamar will not fare as well on the bench both offensively and defensively if he is to be a backup Power Forward. Evidence in the past has shown that Lamar's defense on Power Forward is not quite as good as his defense at Small Forward. Furthermore being on the bench means he will have less opportunities on the offensive side of the ball since he will be keyed in more by defenders and both Hobbitmage and I have agreed in the past that Mr. Lamar Odom is not effective if the defense is keyed on him despite his superior passing skills.
5) Lamar on the bench does not solve the bench's greatest weakness: defense. As explained above Lamar Odom's defense is not as good as Power Forward than it is at Small Forward. Furthermore he should not be dependent as a reliable post defender as shown on the last season game against the Golden State Warriors in Oakland, California. Having him at back up Power Forward weakens the perimeter defense at the Small Forward position since it will most likely be a Mr. Vladimir Radmanovich who will be manning that spot, one who has been criticized in the past for his poor defense. Only an average defender, Mr. Alexandar "Sasha" Vujacic, can play any time of defense on the bench and having Mr. Lamar Odom at the Power Forward will take away defense that the bench has lacked even with the benefit of additional rebounding.

On the last thing that I would like to respond to a Mr. Hobbitmage:

"The double-teams that Kobe attracts will
open things up for Ariza & Fisher. Teams *should* have
a hard time dealing with Bynum & Gasol together."

*Should* is about as good as *hope* I do not in any way think it is *solid* and only the regular season will tell. Double teams on Kobe will open some opportunities but for people like Trevor, teams do not fear him on offense since so far that Mr. Trevor Ariza does not have a very solid offensive game and a suspectible jump shot which is not even on par with Mr. Lamar Odom's jump shot.

It is my conclusion that Lamar Odom should be starting Small Forward and when the bench comes out, switch to power forward in accordance to the situation on the court.

I was talking about the "Jordan Rules" where anytime a player put a finger on him the refs called a foul. The rules where he can blatantly push a player out of the way with his off-hand to insure a clear shot in a title game with no whistle blown. The rules that nobody has enjoyed before or since.
The rules that David Stern implemented because he needed to turn a struggling product into a multi billion dollar corporation (see WWF or E) Did anyone really think that Detroit Thug ball would last after the decline of the Lakers and Celtics. Jordan was the savior of the league. Stern knew it, everyone did, so what had to be done, was done.
This decade you had the Lakers early, now it seems that one of their Titles might be tainted (see ref scandal). With the Bad Boy image that has plaqued the league it needed the Spurs to win titles for the Good Guys. Ratings decline are now answered with the latest brilliant marketing scheme. All of a sudden 2 trades that should have been voided..... voila, Lakers and Celtics are in the finals. Just coincidence you say.........
Do you hear that X-Files theme song playing again.

That Detroit defense breakdown was over-the-top, but brilliant.

Hey Hobit,

When exactly did Mitch say lamar wasnt good enough on defense to play the SF position? I do not recall the interview. As far as signing Ariza is concerned, Lamar was our starting PF at the time and we didnt have Pau yet, so i think thats probably the reason, dont you think? As a matter of fact Mitch said he probably wouldnt have pursued the Gasol trade if Andrew had not have been injured. So anyway, our rotation will look something like this at least the 1st part of the season.

Center Andrew/Pau/Mihm
Power Forward Pau/lamar/Luke & Vlade at times
small Forward Lamar/Kobe/Trevor(luke&Vlade at times)
Shooting guard Kobe/Sasha
Point Guard Fish/Jordon/sasha at times

If you have noticed in our rotations, Phil likes at least one or two starters on the floor at almost all times. Now we will be able to have 2 or 3. I mean NOBODY in the NBA brings in 5 guys to replace the 5 starters. Some teams only use 8 or 9 guys. I really do not understand why this is such a hard concept. Lamar will split his time between the 2 positions, Kobe will split his time between 2 positions and Pau will split his time between 2 positions. I will even venture to guess that Lamar will play maybe 20 of 35 minutes a game at the Power Forward spot. So really all of the arguing about it is kind of pointless since the versitility of this team allows a lot of differnt looks, which Phil will use.

and one last thing tat has been bugging me from a few threads back when you said Lamar was "slow of foot". Dude anyone that can take a rebound, lead the break and finish on the other end is not slow, period.

MH

Charles,

I think you need BM at Maalikaya.lol! (private j/k only Charles knows what it means.)

Posted by: Edwin Gueco | August 27, 2008 at 09:22 PM

LOL. There are a lot more places better than Maalikaya. wink wink

AK,

I see the corruption here and I don't like it. I guess it's just coincidence that the dude running the Lakers Blog is also a HS classmate of the younger brother of the agent of a second round draft pick Lakers rookie!! Yes I know you've had the blog for a while, even before Crawford was drafted by Kupchak, but that shows just how deep this conspiracy runs.

If the Lakers ever trade Crawford does the Times have to include you in the deal? Do you have a no-trade blogging contract?

Looks like we're going to have a whole mess of Joe Crawford Blog Threads coming our way in the 08-09.

:-)

DP


Morning sausage links! (4 NBA links)

http://tinyurl.com/goldenarmor

LakersTom,

"But as anybody who blogs here knows, this year’s over-the-top fandom has been dedicated with great pride to the next great Lakers center – young phenom stud center Andrew Bynum, the Beast who is going to dominate the entire NBA next year at both ends of the court and help Kobe lead the Lakers to their first of a long string of NBA championships."

My over-the-top fandom starts and ends with Kobe. But yeah I'm a big fan of big baby though and right now his knee is the biggest story of the season. Though I'll breathe easier as well once I hear Kobe's done his surgery and a timeliine is provided for when he'll be able to play.

"Take it easy on lakers_sth. He’s just expressing all of our frustration of not having much to talk about. I noticed since the blog convinced Jon K to ignore the trolls, he has been going crazy on AK again. I love you, Jon, but you really need to smoke something. Or something. LOL! It’s like Mrs. LakerTom said, without the trolls to assault, the bloggers would end up attacking each other. Tell us what you really think about GWB and Butler, Jon. LOL"

Yeah I read Jon's comments on the last thread and as much as I enjoy calling out AK for his hater tendencies every now and then, I was also of the opinion that the dude must have impaled some of his mineral salts.

Anyway I think you gave the intro to my outro. There's really very little basketball news out there and thus probably makes more sense to just lay low till pre-season. Plus no matter how hard i try i can't find a grain of intellect in lgc's responses, you couple that with his 'broken record' routine and ya can't help but conclude that it's insane to engage d dude in a conversation.

Mamba24, here's my badge and gun. If I hold unto it I might use it on a fan like laker_sth. I'm gonna go enjoy my vacation on lake shore drive. See y'all when training camp starts.

I'm out like the olympics.

RUMORS: HERE COMES THE SUN
By Eric Pincus for HoopsWorld.com

http://tinyurl.com/6e3f53

Excellent article about Lakers contracts. Here is key excerpt:

>>>>>

Here Comes the Sun: The Los Angeles Lakers finally inked Chinese point guard Sun Yue to a contract this week.

Sun is getting the standard minimum two-year contract for a second-round draft pick; however his entire contract is fully guaranteed ($1.2 million - ~$442k and ~$736k). He was chosen by the Lakers with the 40th pick in the 2007 NBA Draft.

(A quick note - it's proper to refer to Sun Yue as Sun - as it's correct to use Yao for Yao Ming.)

The Lakers also signed second-round pick Joe Crawford (58th) on Wednesday. While Crawford will need to beat out guards Coby Karl and Dwayne Mitchell on make good contracts - Sun is a lock to make the roster.

Additionally forward Josh Powell signed a two-year deal with the team, also at the minimum ($1.8 million in total). Full details have yet to leak out but Powell is either non-guaranteed - or has partial guarantees. In other words, he's going to have to earn his contract.

According to the Miami Herald, the Lakers also have a standing minimum offer out to their own unrestricted free agent center DJ Mbenga. Instead of re-upping with the team, Mbenga is seeking a more lucrative situation (in both money and playing time).

The Lakers now have 16 players under contract with 12 guaranteed for at least the year. The depth chart projects to the following (with a number of players contributing at multiple positions):

PG: Derek Fisher/Jordan Farmar/Sun Yue
SG: Kobe Bryant/Sasha Vujacic/Coby Karl/Dwayne Mitchell/Joe Crawford
SF: Lamar Odom/Trevor Ariza/Vladimir Radmanovic/Luke Walton
PF: Pau Gasol/Josh Powell
C: Andrew Bynum/Chris Mihm

Arguably Powell has a solid chance of sticking along with one of the three young guards (Karl, Mitchell or Crawford). The team would still have a spot for Mbenga but there doesn't appear to be any room for former Los Angeles Clipper guards Shaun Livingston or Quinton Ross - even though either could be a valuable asset to the franchise.

The Lakers still have their two major exceptions (Mid-Level and Bi-Annual) but at this point don't appear to have any plans to spend them (at least over the summer).

>>>>>

Tom

Good Morning Fam,

Thanks to Jon K - Hmr Hed, Elle, Calliphilosopher, Justanothamambafromanothamotha, Senior Edwin Gueco and Grail. I appreciate the warm wishes. Really I do...

To Edwin and Grail. I was thinking "Air Force One."

Anybody in Souther California wanna get together for the weekend of September 6th or 7th? Lunch or Dinner and let's talk them Lakers.

Michael H,

aloha.

You asked about Lamar defense and the SF position.

I posted the url a couple of days ago. However ...

http://my.lakers.com/blogs/2007/11/20/details-on-ariza/

The pertinent quote from this link is:

Trevor Ariza brings a defensive presence at the three spot that no one currently on the Lakers roster can match. While Lamar Odom creates a mismatch on the offensive end for opposing teams, he sometimes has trouble guarding the quicker small forwards in the league, an area were Luke Walton also struggles.

[ crap! Did someone steal my line or did I steal theirs? :) ]

http://articles.latimes.com/2007/nov/21/sports/sp-lakerep21

The second link is a LA times article by Bresnehan with
direct quotes from Kupchak. These are the pertinent
quotes:

“Another factor and maybe the biggest factor … we like Trevor Ariza. He brings us a dimension we don’t have, which is a defensive player at that position. We don’t know how much he’s going to play initially, so I’m not going to go out there and say he’s going to be our lockdown defender. It may take him a while to get acclimated to what we do, but we don’t have a player like that.

“I wouldn’t say that Lamar [Odom] is the type of guy that can be that lockdown defender at that [small forward] position. Luke Walton also has struggled a little bit with athletic small forwards.”

re: Lamar being slow. :) For the umpteenth time, I
specifically addressed Lamar vs. the quicker SF's.

You wrote: If you have noticed in our rotations, Phil likes at least one or two starters on the floor at almost all times. Now we will be able to have 2 or 3. I mean NOBODY in the NBA brings in 5 guys to replace the 5 starters. Some teams only use 8 or 9 guys. I really do not understand why this is such a hard concept. Lamar will split his time between the 2 positions, Kobe will split his time between 2 positions and Pau will split his time between 2 positions.

my response: hmmm ... I find logic issues in what you've
said. Let's see if we can clear this up. I have not said
that Lamar would not split his time b/n the 3 & 4. I have
not said that Pau would not split his time b/n the 4 & 5.
I have not said that Kobe would not split his time b/n the
2 & 3. Are we clear about what I have not said?

Our esteemed poster, thekobebryantblitz, has strongly
argued that Lamar *MUST* be in the starting lineup and
that adequate places for him are the 2 & 3. He has
supported this view with numerous stats.

I have clearly stated: I am of the philosophy that
"Defense wins championships". I base that upon
observation. I base that upon the whipping we took
at the hands of the Celtics.

At this point in time, we're all smokin' crack and have
no idea what the heck we're saying. I think that's why
we're fans and not working for the Lakers as scouts.

However ... this is what Mitch has said and done.

--Lamar *CAN NOT* be a lockdown defender at the 3.
--we like Trevor Ariza. He brings us a dimension we don’t have, which is a defensive player at that position.
--signed Trevor Ariza, a defensive minded 3.

In the LA times article, Mitch talks about Ariza becoming
acclimated to the Lakers and how that would affect his
playing time. I would submit to you that Ariza has had
enough time to become acclimated.

Finally, nothing is certain. from a bleacherreport
article: http://tinyurl.com/6f2rbh

It’s the consensus view that Gasol with move to power forward and Odom to small forward. But Kupchak said that one option is for Odom to move to the guard spot and Kobe Bryant to small forward.

"It could be the longest and biggest frontcourt in the NBA in many, many years," Kupchak said.

"It is a team that would be very talented, very long and versatile, and I think training camp would be an important time to test out what (Phil Jackson) has done during the summer."

Do you smell smoke? I do. And where there’s smoke, there’s…yes, a trade looming.

The talk about moving Odom to guard is most likely a ploy to showcase Odom’s versatility. They need something to mask Odom’s inconsistency that he loomed very large during the playoffs.

my 2 cents: If the Lakers are serious about upgrading
their defense && Ariza has worked on his game
really hard this summer, Ariza will start at the 3. Lamar
is trade bait. He's inconsistent. He's a large expiring
contract. He's no longer the best PF we have. His
defense at the 3, per Mitch's words, is not up to snuff.

Looking forward to training camp.

Also from Eric Pincus

"Livingston and Ellis: According to the Contra Costa Times, the Golden State Warriors will be checking out point guard Shaun Livingston in Chicago on Thursday in a pre-scheduled workout. Of course this comes on the heels of $66 million dollar man Monta Ellis undergoing surgery for a torn deltoid ligament. Ellis will be out until at least 2009 - with a three to four month recovery.

Livingston has been working out with trainer Tim Grover and has recently been cleared to play full contact five-on-five basketball after nearly two years trying to recover from a devastating knee injury."

Eric Pincus ALSO sees that Shaun Livingston and Quinton Ross would greatly benefit the Lakers.

If Shaun Livingston is available and healthy, we should try to make things work somehow.

GO LAKERS!

Alright Jon K,

Here's my vitals. Born 11-27-68, 6:05 pm, 5'9" (though I look 6'1") 160 lbs. What else do you need for a reading?

Go Lakers

Wes

The players closest to being lock down defenders on the team are Kobe and Sash. Trevors a good defender but not great, he's quick which aloud him to get in alot of passing lanes for steals, but rarely did I see him lock down the guy in front of him.

Taliq

>>>>>My over-the-top fandom starts and ends with Kobe. But yeah I'm a big fan of
>>>>>big baby though and right now his knee is the biggest story of the season.
>>>>>Though I'll breathe easier as well once I hear Kobe's done his surgery and a
>>>>>timeline is provided for when he'll be able to play.

Kobe is still my favorite Laker, even though Drew is my current obsession. I mean, how do you choose between TWO franchise players? You just enjoy them both.

>>>>> Anyway I think you gave the intro to my outro. There's really very little
>>>>>basketball news out there and thus probably makes more sense to just lay low
>>>>>till pre-season. Plus no matter how hard i try i can't find a grain of intellect in
>>>>>lgc's responses, you couple that with his 'broken record' routine and ya can't
>>>>>help but conclude that it's insane to engage d dude in a conversation.

>>>>> Mamba24, here's my badge and gun. If I hold unto it I might use it on a fan
>>>>>like laker_sth. I'm gonna go enjoy my vacation on lake shore drive. See y'all
>>>>>when training camp starts.

>>>>>I'm out like the olympics.

Hey, enjoy your vacation on Lake Shore Drive. Spent lots of time visiting Chitown in my younger days and always enjoyed it – except in the middle of winter. LOL. Check in from time to time when you get bored with the good life. The trolls and haters will breath easier while you’re gone.

Tom

michael h

Your rotation post was very good.

There is much room for debate on how PJ will use the Lakers incredible depth. But Kobe gives you the key to all rotations in his post season comments.

DEFENSE!

Think D and the rotations and minutes become easier to figure out. Versatility in the line up will help overcome the inevitable injury problems, maybe better than any other NBA team.

Even if Mr. 81 goes down for awhile, this Lakers team can win at a decent percentage.

It will be a long season, (with plenty of back to backs), everyone will see lots of time. But one overriding theme according to PJ and Kobe will be Team Defense.

All the Lakers said they need the best record and will commit to winning the best seed. That will be a tall order with some tough competition. Add to that, the Celtics and Kwame led Pistons will have an easier go.

The Lakers are on a mission. Everyone seems to be on board. I think we do have a lot to debate in the next 4 weeks as to rotations and playing time, match ups with other teams, etc...
Who will have breakout years for the Lakers? Improving small things that could lead up to a dominant team?

Let's have some fun on the blog and be respectful of others opinions. Except for trolls, they don't count.....lol

 


Advertisement

About the Bloggers

Recent Posts
Poll Madness: The 10%* Edition |  November 11, 2009, 12:50 pm »
Lakers/NBA news for a Wednesday |  November 11, 2009, 10:22 am »
Andrew Bynum returns, Pau Gasol remains sidelined |  November 10, 2009, 4:18 pm »



Archives
 




Buy Tickets
Search for Tickets
 

LATimes.com now offers sports tickets to popular events around the world including NBA tickets, MLB tickets and NFL tickets to otherwise sold-out events.

Popular Events
As the Lakers get set to defend their title, Lakers tickets are going to be huge all season. Dodgers tickets and Angels tickets are also in high demand with another season of MLB baseball underway.

We've got plenty of LA sports tickets and college football tickets for sale, with MLB tickets and USC football tickets being the mosts popular sellers at the moment.
Powered by TicketNetwork