If Josh Howard's marijuana confession didn't make the Mavs nervous
August 1, 2008 | 3:40
pm
Last night's little incident might. Hopefully, Howard's interest in this particular hobby wasn't combined with his other apparent hobby. Either way, this makes for an awkward situation, especially considering Howard was only in North Carolina for a basketball camp sponsored by his charitable foundation. I'm guessing he's no longer driving the carpool when the kids go out for post-game ice cream.
I anxiously await everyone's trade machine proposals.
AK



To the Poster Let's Go C's,
This is the second time I posted in question for your true motives on the blog.
"If you whinners can't take the heat, please don't dish it out."
It's single n for whiners. Besides why are you complaining about whining by whining?
Sounds like you can't take the heat. Why even bring up the dishing out part if you can handle it.
"Yoos got a bunch of brown-nosers who do nothing but agree with one another."
Actually the blog group had a mixed opinion on Artest. And there you go again, drawing attention and misspelling, complaining about brown nosing when all you do is brown nose about the Celtics.
"All I'm doing is pointing out the obvious."
You don't state anything obvious. You type "What's with this banning business?" and "Funny article." And then you finally read the article and type "Upon further reading of the article, it's not quite so funny."
Obviously, not stating anything obvious.
I'll tell you, you are in the same pool of that troll. Why would you be so inclined to type the same put down and berate the very blog that you are forcing to belong in? Every time your current user name is used; understand that you are NOT respected. You feel like it is fun, but everybody is over it.
Fire32 learned his lesson (or the user for that period as Fire32) Why can't you? Regardless if you are a kid, retired, or working at home; it is no longer competitive and respectful. Bragging about the championship for a few days is acceptably Nouveau Riche, but your blog style lacks candor and is uncouth-fully dangerous for your mental health.
Charles
Posted by: Charles | August 01, 2008 at 03:55 PM
Hopefully this wakeup call will keep him from getting killed. Or from killing someone else.
I got a wreckless driving ticket when I was 17 and in return for a reduction of the length of my license suspension (and the reduction of my fine) they made me go to an L.A. Country Morgue for 8 hrs, an L.A. Country ER for 6 hrs, do 40 hrs of community service as a janitor at Taft High School, and write a 1000 word essay on what I had learned. Even with that, I still had my license revoked 2 months and paid $200+ for the ticket.
Here's betting Josh gets off easier. I learned from my mistake. I hope Josh learns from his.
Posted by: puddle | August 01, 2008 at 04:03 PM
What? Oh, uh, what?
Posted by: RespectMyAuthoritah | August 01, 2008 at 04:04 PM
I'm tired of idiots.
GO LAKERS!
Posted by: Jon K. | August 01, 2008 at 04:11 PM
How about we trade Howard for Mark Madsen and John Celestand?
Posted by: Charles | August 01, 2008 at 04:16 PM
Please don't feed the trolls.
re: Josh Howard. Someone once told me once, the NBA is almost 80 percent into drugs. It's just some that get caught. Like LO.
I hope he can turn it around.
Go Lakers!
Posted by: Faith | August 01, 2008 at 05:19 PM
-Playing with scissors-
http://shanghaiist.com/2008/08/01/
yaos_comments_on_artest_and_chinas.php
Sonnybelfast
Posted by: Sonnybelfast | August 01, 2008 at 05:38 PM
Sonnybelfast,
He's Houston's problem now. It should be interesting to watch in the sense that watching a train wreck happen is interesting to watch.
GO LAKERS!
Posted by: Jon K. | August 01, 2008 at 06:08 PM
Jon K.
Me too. As much as I'd like to see people like LGC banned from this place, I cannot make that call. I also agree with guity on the point that with the freedom of speech we have to take the good with the bad. Let's just ignore the idiots, and eventually they'll go away.
Starve the Troll!
Posted by: "Pig" Miller | August 01, 2008 at 06:21 PM
Faith,
I try not to feed the trolls. I may talk about them, but after my first insult I never address them directly again. They are not worthy of direct communication.
GO LAKERS!
Posted by: Jon K. | August 01, 2008 at 06:26 PM
"Pig" Miller,
I respect your position. Still how long has this moron been vomiting out collective insults on this blog? I mean, AK says he'll block people for personal attacks, but this guy is personally attacking the blog. He's personally attacking this community.
I'm for freedom of speech and generally I'm pretty libertarian about things, but there are natural limits too.
Eventually a parasite has to be put in a cage or have his teeth knocked out in a good old dose of instant karma.
Whatever.
Urgh. The last thing I want to have to deal with over the next 70 days of the Long Bataan Death March of the offseason is everyday avoiding this moron's posts and accidentally getting sucked into posts by bloggers I like to read who are directly responding to the idiot.
Anyway, things usually have a way of working themselves out. Laker Nation is strong and the Kamenetsky Brothers have their reasons for letting the poster child for Down's Syndrome repeatedly post, but I'd sure rather things work this way out quickly rather than slowly.
Fastest track? Ban the inbred moron.
GO LAKERS!
Posted by: Jon K. | August 01, 2008 at 06:36 PM
I know that freedom of speech should be respected but bloggers like LGC's should really be blocked. He doesn't really have anything to say that contributes to discussion and is non-apologetic about any of his comments. He could makes his opinion heard like the most of us do. Obviously he's here to disrupt the blog, so I don't see what would be so wrong with banning him. I'll just put it this way: if someone at work is constantly annoying you, if he wanted to enter your home you would block the door, and not let him in. That's the same thing here because this blog is sort of like a blog is like a home for Laker info and discussion.
Posted by: laker hopeful | August 01, 2008 at 07:31 PM
"Freedom of speech" refers to government censorship, not private organizations like this blog, so that is not an issue. The K brothers filtering posts would NOT be an impingement on freedom of speech.
Posted by: exhelodrvr | August 01, 2008 at 07:40 PM
Ex,
I agree. It's definitely not a "free speech" thing. We just don't think a ban for something like this is necessary. In the end, someone has to make a judgment call. We do our best.
AK
Posted by: Andrew Kamenetzky | August 01, 2008 at 07:45 PM
You guys are doing all right, I think, AK.
As for the Howard thing, it's amazing ot me just how many idiots there are in the world. Human intelligence is very overrated.
Posted by: Michael A | August 01, 2008 at 07:50 PM
Jon K.
The Bataan Death March was a very historic event in history between the Americans and the Filipinos. Glad to know that it(history) hasn't been lost.
Three Stars and a Sun!
Brylle
Posted by: Brylle | August 01, 2008 at 08:13 PM
AK
To your post on the previous thread. I agree that he isn't specifically attacking one person, but the community as a whole. I read the article today and realized the only way to truly make people like LGC go away is to do as you say and ignore them, but I also think that as ex says, you have the right to get rid of people who are obviously attempting to antagonize the blog purposefully. He is, and perhaps should so be. In the end, you and Brian make that call, and I respect that. I'll simply do as you say and not acknowledge their existence in the hopes they leave on they're own.
Thanks for running a solid show.
Do you guys write your own headlines?
Posted by: "Pig" Miller | August 01, 2008 at 08:16 PM
Pig,
I hear what you're saying. We just think there's a difference between antagonizing readers on a personal level (and nothing else) and irritating them by talking smack about their team. The latter is basically sports culture. We may have the right to remove those people, but we don't think it's necessary. And in some ways, it would be kind of embarrassing if we did. I would like to think Laker fans (and I consider myself a die hard) have a little tougher skin, especially when you're talking about someone babbling unsubstantial nonsense.
And yeah, we do the headlines. Hope you enjoy.
AK
Posted by: Andrew Kamenetzky | August 01, 2008 at 08:22 PM
Of course freedom of speech isn't government mandated in this case -- it's just a great concept to live by, and will make the blog a better place in the long run. In the end, AK, I hope you have a better reason for doing what you are doing, because "We just don't think a ban for something like this is necessary" doesn't really explain a heck of a lot.
Posted by: Guity | August 01, 2008 at 08:26 PM
Guity,
This is a more detailed repost in a different thread. Hope this explains it better.
"Jon K/Pig/Rick Friedman (and others discussing the "ban" topic),
First, thanks to Rick for the article. I haven't read it yet (I've been buried in "Manny mania" since yesterday), but I will. I doubt, however, that it'll lead to us deciding to ban "Let's Go C's" or someone like him.
Why? In a nutshell, because we don't think he's crossing a line. He's just crowing about Boston and against the Lakers 24/7. He's allowed to do that and I don't consider that out of bounds.
It's one thing for another reader to go out of his way to be disrespectful to others on a personal level, where it's as more about attacking other readers than it is talking smack against the Lakers. If it's about the latter, in our minds, that's simply part of sports' culture. Everyone bags on the team they hate and if they have bragging rights (as LGC currently does, like it or not), they often get more obnoxious. Keep in mind, "intelligence" isn't a requirement for smack talk. It's nice when that's part of it, but as anyone who's ever heard Jim Rome's show knows, intelligent smack talk is more the exception than rule.
Like BK and I have said many times, why on Earth is anybody bothering talking to (and more importantly, "about") someone like Let's Go C's, who's obviously not seeking out an intelligent debate? He hates Kobe, has his mind set and typically backs his reasons with absolute nonsense. Why waste your time trying to reason with that? Why does the opinion of someone with that mentality even matter to you? And for the love of all that is holy, why even acknowledge it?
Just stop.
And when I say "stop," I don't mean throwing out chants like "Starve the troll" or "Don't feed the trolls." That's literally the opposite of ignoring someone. That's actually going out of your way to acknowledge them, which is totally counterproductive. Literally act as if the "troll" isn't there at all. Scroll past the posts, go about your business and don't sweat such nonsense.
Mind you, I'm not a fan of LGC's posts. As I said, I think 99% of them are poorly thought out and reveal a total lack of basketball history or knowledge. He gets old at times, appears to need a life and definitely is one note. But at the same time, is he REALLY the only reader that ever pounds an agenda into the ground or rubs other blogosphere members the wrong way? If we looked to eliminate everyone who fell into that category, there might be nobody around, including me and BK.
Bottom line, there's a simpler and obvious way around this issue. Just go about your business as if he's not there and enjoy the smart posts. Or, if you must address guys like him, do it with a grain of salt. But either way, just stop taking it so seriously, because this isn't even close to worth it."
AK
Posted by: Andrew Kamenetzky | August 01, 2008 at 08:29 PM
AK,
>>>>>Bottom line, there's a simpler and obvious way around this issue.
>>>>>Just go about your business as if he's not there and enjoy the smart posts.
>>>>>Or, if you must address guys like him, do it with a grain of salt.
>>>>>But either way, just stop taking it so seriously,
>>>>>because this isn't even close to worth it.
You know, I had great post all prepared and then had so many problems on the blog (using Firefox) that I finally decided to reboot my laptop, found out that Word had frozen as well as the Blog, and lost my usual long post. I’d like to say my post was in the same vein as yours, but that hasn’t been my usual tone lately as I’m going through one of those senior cranky phases when I tend to flip off anybody who looks even slightly deserving of it in my opinion.
At any rate, you showed your true colors and why the forum that you and BK have crafted has been able to attract so many loyal and extraordinary Laker fans as fellow bloggers. Your entire post on the ban subject was intelligent, articulated extremely well, and smartly peppered with enough smack of your own toward LGC to sate the blood thirst in most of us at least for now.
Splendid job of thinking and executing. Thanks for lightening and brightening my day.
Tom
Posted by: LakerTom | August 01, 2008 at 08:45 PM
AK
"If we looked to eliminate everyone who fell into that category, there might be nobody around, including me and BK."
OK, that's close enough to what I'm trying to say: I'll shut up now...
Posted by: guity | August 01, 2008 at 08:48 PM
A to tha mutha f'n K homeboy
A to tha mutha f'n K
Mutha f'n K
I don't mean to get too 'ghetto' up in here, but that's Cypress Hill in reference to AK. Laying down the law, reasonably. I agree with the decision 100%.
Go Lakers!
Posted by: Rocky | August 01, 2008 at 08:48 PM
Well, not to butt in to this conversation, but as I said, I have no problems with Lets Go C's. I guess I can just take the chiding more than other bloggers. You see, I went to 3 straight NBA Championship parades, and had a blast at each one. That's something the Celt fans can't say (in modern NBA times). So, we Laker fans still have the upper hand. When we appreciate the collective achievements of our Lakers, the arrogance stays in tact.
You fans who hate LGC, don't let him break you down. Laker fans are strong enough to withstand a little smack talk from time to time.
Posted by: troy | August 01, 2008 at 09:26 PM
Benjamin,
>>>>>The guy is his own worst enemy and he does get what he deserves.
>>>>>But, equating him to guys like Steve Francis and Stephon Marbury
>>>>>is probably going too far. He's problematic, but he's not on their level.
>>>>>He's not a cancer.
Excellent post. You’re right that Artest is not a cancer. He is more like a potential nervous breakdown where the patient escapes reality or is it that reality escapes the patient. LOL. Ron’s problems are also primarily off the court and usually more bizarre than cancerous. Ron obviously has a loose screw in there somewhere. I wouldn’t have minded his becoming a Laker but as you noted, I tend to look for anything even slight that gives me a reason to dump on players who might have spurned the Lakers. Such as KG and Ron Ron. Of course, you realize that if we somehow did trade for him, I admit I would have no problem getting behind him.
While I’ve been manic in defending the existing roster on the blog, especially Drew, Pau, and Lamar, I have been pretty relaxed when it came to possible moves by the Lakers. I basically think it would be incredibly stupid not to wait and see what we really have with this team all healthy before making a move such as trading Lamar. Obviously, the Lakers front office agrees. Tempted though they may have been, once again the Lakers have resisted several opportunities to trade Lamar Odom. My hunch is that we may see this as another great move by Mitch, much as his refusal to trade Andrew Bynum has to be viewed in retrospect.
Collateral damage! That’s what the damage to Mitch’s short-lived fame and fortune as an NBA general manager suffered as a result of the Celtics beating the Lakers in the Finals. First. the proverbial they steal the NBA Exec of the Year award from him and give it to Danny Ainge, then they cut the guy’s stint in the bright lights short and blame him for too many soft Euros and white guys. Fortunately, Mitch has always played for the long term and had the patience and intelligence to create a plan, modify it when needed, but basically stick to it. Mitch knows that the plan you elect is often not as critical as how well you execute and implement it.
Do you not see the ironic similarities to the Lakers refusal to trade Lamar Odom for Ron Artest this year to their refusal to trade Andrew Bynum last year? In both cases, the Lakers front office thought they were better off sticking with the player they had, which they valued more than other teams. They were right with Bynum. They may be right about Odom. The smart move is to find out before making a big mistake and trading him. The truth is that every player on the team, including Kobe, is going to benefit hugely by the return and dominant post play of Andrew Bynum. Take what you had last year and then boost it 50% to get an idea of this year. That is monster the domino effect that the Beast will have on the Lakers roster next year.
Tom
Posted by: LakerTom | August 01, 2008 at 09:27 PM
AK,
I totally agree with what you just said regarding that INCOMPETENT-ILLOGICAL-NOT WORTH ANYONE'S TIME fool LGC, we are here to talk about the Lakers if he keeps butting in and you don't like what he said leave it at that. Since when does his Opinions or what he say important or mean anything at al to anyone herel. He wants to make a fool of himself that's his problem. Fools like him are nothing but little IRRITANTs in life if you choose to let it bother you you will just ruin your day.
Go Lakers Forever!!!!
Posted by: Frankie | August 01, 2008 at 09:46 PM
JOSH HOWARD IS AN IDIOT…
That’s what the blog thinks so I was pretty sure there wouldn’t be many trade proposals. LOL. Although I understand why history would make betting on the blog generating some crazy trade proposals for Howard a reasonable expectation. The thing is that most of us would have a hard time imaging a guy with Howard’s motivational issues somehow working out on a Kobe Bryant driven team. As talented as the guy is, he truly has some mental challenges to work out and the Lakers are not one of the teams that would be interested in the guy.
I do, however, feel the need to make a comment about how foolish, costly, and short-sighted treating marijuana as an illegal drug much the same as cocaine and heroin and not the same as alcohol, which really would address the heart of the issue without the far right’s Killer Weed mentality. And this is not in any way to condone the irresponsible and stupidity of Howard in risking his career smoking weed offseason in violation of his contract and then dumbly talking about it in an interview DURING the freaking playoffs. And now the reckless driving, which is just an criminal justice euphemism for reducing a drunk driving charge.
But I know many elderly patients like myself who depend on marijuana for its medicinal benefits as much as its recreational benefits. Before my father went blind from glaucoma, the only way he could even see clearly was to smoke a joint. And I’ve had friends dying from cancer whose only effective defense against ungodly pain was the THC extracted from pot. Two things that I find completely out of place and time and common sense are our inane war on marijuana and refusal to advise kids about safe sex and contraception. Two big reasons why a long-time, hard-core fiscal conservative and once hawk changed parties many moons ago.
Tom
Posted by: LakerTom | August 01, 2008 at 09:48 PM
"Keep in mind, "intelligence" isn't a requirement for smack talk."
AK, you are my hero.
Posted by: Elle | August 01, 2008 at 09:57 PM
PS, AK, will you be my besty friend?
Posted by: Elle | August 01, 2008 at 10:03 PM
I'm back Jack.
Geez, I didn't know Lakerfans were so soft skinned. Yoos all collectively are so whinny is hard to stomach. When you all win, it's "we're the best" or "Kobe is the best" and when you lose it's "it's the refs fault" or "the other team cheats".
Then, when a Team like the Celtics actually play basketball the right way, team baksetball, checking the egos at teh door, you Fakers discount their efforts and say things like "the refs gave it way" or "hte Celtics are cheaters"
What's up with that?
Finally about this "banning business": What not simply ignore my writeups?
Problem solved. Ignore my writings and be on your way.
"It's paaty time" Boston Fans after beating down Mr. I Can Get Off at Any Time.
Posted by: LGC | August 01, 2008 at 10:08 PM
I'll have you know one reason I'm back is I saw all of the smack taling about Paul Pierce and how "Pierce is not at Kobe's level".
Now intelligent Faker fans would admit that was a stupid thing to say.
Baksetball is not about who's better as a single unit. It's about a unit of 5 guys.
Tean Celtic beat down Mr. "I can get off at anytime" because the mentality of Starlet is "I" can get off at anytime.
The mentality of you whinny little girls (and guys) is singular. Linear. One sided.
I'll say again: Paul Pierce and Mr. Starlet were in the same place last summer.
Your boi decided to badmouth everyone including the general manager (cupchack) and teammates (Brynum).
My boy keeped his mouth shut and expressed quietly a desire to win now.
KG was on the market and was turned off by your boi acting the foo on radio ant TV.
Ray Allen will not play with Kobe becase Ray Allen knows how selfish Mr. Selfish is.
Bam Boom Bang, the "Big Three" was born. The Big Three all checked their egos at the door and made a commitment to play together and lift the spirits of teammates.
Boom Bam Bang, Celtics win in dramatic fasion. Historic fashion. Kobe and the Fakers were exposes as fakers.
Now, does is constitute as "intelligent" writing?
OMG, I'm souding like that one guy who rambles on and on and on and on and on.
hahhahahhahahah
"Celtics Win!" --Red smiling in heaven with a stoggie
ajajajjajajajjaja
Posted by: LGC | August 01, 2008 at 10:25 PM
"I read the article today and realized the only way to truly make people like LGC go away is to do as you say and ignore them, but I also think that as ex says, you have the right to get rid of people who are obviously attempting to antagonize the blog purposefully."
The problem is that most of you think that the blog belongs to you and whoever agrees with you. The bottom line is this: You have no rights to say this person stay or goes.
The idea you would speak in terms of rights just goes to show how you people seem to think that there's a common thought that exist here. How dumb is that?
Your rights? The only right you have is to scroll past what you don't want to read. AK was right when he said: just ignore who you don't like. But little some smarty kid you say things like: Starve the trolls like your making some big point. And it's all based on not wanting to hear something you, it seems, fear to hear.
Kobe doesn't hog the ball! The man was shooting like crazy a couple of years ago and people acted like: No he's not! I'm mean how stupid is that?
mike t.
Posted by: Michael C. Teniente | August 01, 2008 at 10:54 PM
At the risk of getting in between this...
Sometimes you just can't help it. It's that annoying. It's like someone playing that game where they repeat what you say. You just can't help but say "STFU."
At a certain point, enough is enough.
Posted by: Faith | August 01, 2008 at 11:00 PM
All this highfaluting talk is nonsense.
Let's get down to reality.
Let's Go C's! has got to go. Period.
We are playing the high road at the expense of the blog. It's that fricken simple.
If I hear one fricken stupid more discussion about freedom of speech or other nonsense (especially when I have had hundreds of posts erased over the years) I'm going to lose my fricken mind.
Ridiculous.
This guy is a parasite and he needs to go. It's that simple.
If the Kamenetsky Brothers don't have the balls to block him, well, shame on them. We'll deal with it, but it's obviously stupid.
The guy is worthless and anyone who argues otherwise for the sake of some imaginary ideal is a fool. Period.
GO LAKERS!
Posted by: Jon K. | August 01, 2008 at 11:23 PM
A friendly advice to all Laker bloggers here, go back to talking about basketball and the Lakers, lets just leave Satan & Red where they are. . . . . . in hell, and Bloggers like LGC where they belong in a Mental Ward. My last comment for the day.
Thanks and Go Lakers
Posted by: Frankie | August 01, 2008 at 11:47 PM
When you are the best player in the world... I dont mind it... but when you tell me you are the best player in the world without me asking... something is wrong with you... You need attention.. just like a spoiled child does... he thinks he is the best boy there is, so he tells everybody he is the best player in the world...
That's the picture I see in Paul Pierce...Why would he tell the world he is the best basketball player... Are the fans that idiot to decide which one is?
Magic never said that in his days.. nor MJ did.. nor Kareem.. nor Bird.. nor Oscar... nor Wilt.. nor Russell... and all the great ball player we love from both side of the NBA...
Now Why would a player like Paul Pierce tell the world he is the best player there is? He is not even the best player in the team.
Very simple... the guy is INSECURE...period.. no argument...
LDC can what say what he wills... but people knows...
Did Kobe says he is the best player in the world.. no nadda... I tell you all who says and said something like that... and his name is like a FAT hippo... they just can't accept they can't shine and are not shining as bright as the BEAN is...
I feel pity for these guys...
Posted by: dice8up | August 02, 2008 at 01:11 AM
He said it himself. They were the better team... and no one disputes that... KG could have won the Championships with RAY alone... How many all stars play along side another all stars in the league? not to mention 3 perenial all stars... if they had switch places.. would he have won the Western Conference.. I doubt it.. he didn't even get his team near the playoffs 3 years before this year...
Why would he suddenly say that he is the best player in the world?
Lebron is better than him... Carmelo is better than him.. in team achievements... What did he won until he had KG and RAy, and Posey? Zero...
I really feel for the guy.. I really do... He needs some love...
Posted by: dice8up | August 02, 2008 at 01:18 AM
AK - One point on getting rid of repetitive, low intelligence posters. Did we not have a similar situation last year with another poster, who you did get rid of?
That is to say, after literally hundreds of posts that in essence are internet graffiti clogging the site, can you logically deduce that there is nothing worthwhile forthcoming and move on? Why let it escalate to the point that it did last year before pulling the plug?
Is there any way to confirm that this year's graffiti artists are not the same as last year's? The posts are similar in tone and some of the "arguments" put forward.
Let me say that I appreciate your stewardship of this site and I agree that if some kind of debate is being advanced, even by those with no credibility or intelligence, you are right in allowing the posts to appear. I am only referring to the same juvenile "hit" posts repeated over and over for months. Last year, you made the right call. Please do so again this year.
Posted by: Jman449 | August 02, 2008 at 01:23 AM
LakerTom,
"Do you not see the ironic similarities to the Lakers refusal to trade Lamar Odom for Ron Artest this year to their refusal to trade Andrew Bynum last year?"
I hope to see that. I want a breakout year from Lamar this year, just like I have every other year from him.
People might look at that response and say "ouch!" It hurts me too people.
We pretty much agree on Artest.
AK,
You have spoken, so we're stuck with LGC. Okay. Possible quota so he (or the team) isn't 20 pct of all posts on a thread? That would make it a lot more tolerable. You delete repeat posts, how about deeply redundant posts?
Posted by: Benjamin | August 02, 2008 at 03:31 AM
I dont want to look like I'm advocating drug use or stupid driving.
But I think Josh Howards respects the game,works hard,improves and will be a great player for a long time to come.He is naive and needs to grow up but I think its more this and a case of 'boys will be boys' than an example of a serious attitude problem.Other than these incidents from a team/basketball standpoint and generally froma legal stand point his slate is pretty clean and he said he doesn't smoke during the season....again no excuse for such dangerous driving and the authorities and public opinion can treat him as they like but lets keep it in perspective as far as his career is concerned.
For these reasons I doubt the mavs will trade him...and certainly not via a firesale but if they do I'd be absolutely FOR obtaining him.Its bad for their image but I see no reason to trade him.
Speaking of the NBA's problem children.I feel extremely sorry for Ron Artest.I never wanted to trade for him as I felt (unlike Howard) he is a guy that is simply not worth it.
However he was clearly excited about the Houston trade and for Yao to bring up the brawl was unfair.To his credit Artest has responded maturely (apart from the ghetto culture comments which display where he's coming from)....it will be interesting to see how it plays out.I think Artest has the best intentions but is ultimately a victim of himself.It doesn't mean I want him in a lakers uniform but I wish him well.
Posted by: Kiwi | August 02, 2008 at 04:58 AM
Certainly seems after all this big 3/stats dont matter/Ray can take the last shot talk that Peirce has decided to give himself a larger chunk of the credit now its over.Hopefully this irritates his teamates.
He's never been in the argument as far as the very best players are concerned.He got lucky - right place, right time,right role on the right team and managed to play well enough at the right time to get the MVP (like Chauncy Billups)
Pierce's body of work does not suggest he's had a great attitude nor has he consistently performed at an elite level.These comments are just off-putting especially considering the situation and his history.It's easy to be a good guy when your team is winning but the truth is Pierce has let bad celtics teams be bad for years and not done much about it particularly.Garnett changed the culture so its said? well whose culture was it before that?
Pierce is not even the 20th best player in the league let alone the best.You could make an argument he was somewhere in the top 15-20. But that hes not a top ten player is simply FACT.Theres obviously too many people telling him how great he is.
It will be forgotten that he didnt actually play THAT WELL in the finals compared to most other finals MVP's.He wasn't carrying the kind of load that the Kobe's,Wades,Jordan's,Duncans,Nowitzki's and other recent finalists have.It was a different kind of team and a different kind of victory....and chucking that gatorade cooler over Rivers was just annoying....nearly as annoying as the look on his face when he came out of the locker room after his 'injury' in game 1 bouncing around self importantly.So he hit a couple of threes in the third quater of game 1? big deal.
Paul Pierce is an egotistical jerk.Let it be said here now and forevermore
Posted by: Kiwi | August 02, 2008 at 05:21 AM
The only trade I would be in favor of for Josh Howard would be a blatantly one-side trade in our favor, e.g., Walton & Radmanovic for Howard.
Posted by: Laker Kev | August 02, 2008 at 07:42 AM
The blog need to go forward, it has a big umbrella for all kinds of posters. This is Los Angeles, the bastion of Jeffersonian democracy. Do we want to imitate a progressive country? For them to hold a successful Olympics, dissenters were jailed, their families have been warned, factories and cars running on the streets have been minimized, the citizenry are respecting the Yantze river again as a perception of pollution-free Green China for just two freakin' weeks. Is this what we want to achieve in this blog?
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/25983709
Posted by: Edwin Gueco | August 02, 2008 at 08:30 AM
Who is Dwayne Mitchell? He was invited to join the Lakers, how long will be the duration? Maybe, until the preseason let's see. Another 6'5" guard, there is a bottleneck in that area, why not find a low post defender? A player who can run w/ Sasha, 45% shooting, 70% FT 5R 3A 1 T/O for 5 minutes per game. Is that difficult to find in Europe and in the D'League?
http://lakers.freedomblogging.com/2008/08/01/
lakers-sign-dwayne-mitchell/
Posted by: Edwin Gueco | August 02, 2008 at 09:00 AM
Hey Jon K,
Let's just let it go. We can't help that there are posters who believe they are omniscient and above the rest of the people here. We also can't help that people come and make the rest of us collectively stupider by their presence, so let's have conversation without worrying too much about them. Like children, they will get bored if you don't mind them.
Posted by: "Pig" Miller | August 02, 2008 at 09:01 AM
Well, well I changed my mind on this Dwayne Mitchell. He is another Trevor Ariza and let us ship out Farmar haha! not really, how about shipping our favorite cargo, Luke? Watch Mitchell on his power slam:
http://tinyurl.com/5n69fx
Posted by: Edwin Gueco | August 02, 2008 at 09:08 AM
AK/BK: so much for trying to change the subject with the Josh Howard thread....
When can we start talking about MVP and the Olympic team and how Doberman is killing it on defense right now?
GO LAKERS!!
Posted by: PsychedLakerGirl | August 02, 2008 at 09:15 AM
I agree, no ban on LGC even if I don't make that decision. As long as he's not sticking a knife down anyone's throat, just scroll past his post. Hopefully he will remind us why we are lakers fan, and should cheer loudly for them. Competition never kill nobody. Let him bask all he wants, just remember there is always next season. If the lakers don't get the celtics, the cavs will. Heck the Hawks might just snap their neck off.
Im pretty sure many people want to beat up Pierce. I won't be surprised if Paul gets into a fight this coming season. For a guy that just won one championship, hes talking way too much. The guy did not get stab for no reason. He probably was throwing his gang signs in the air. Plus, the Celtics have a big target on their backs, and knowing their players they will fall. None of their big three are winners, mostly chokers, and they will show it this upcoming season.
So let LGC or whatever get his shine. It will not last long at all.
Posted by: wow | August 02, 2008 at 09:16 AM
Looks like the Clippers have signed Brian Skinner, so there goes that idea.
They've also let go Nick Fazekas. The guy's 6' 11" and I really liked what I saw of him last year. I doubt the Lakers will pick him up, but the should have a look at him.
Hey, no one responded to my suggestion about the Lakers looking at Adonal Foyle. Are there any thoughts out there about the idea?
GO LAKERS!
Posted by: Jon K. | August 02, 2008 at 09:36 AM
Who is Dwayne Mitchell?
Posted by: Lakergurl | August 02, 2008 at 09:43 AM