That explains a lot
I mentioned to a reader yesterday how I've asked around a bit in regards to Sasha Vujacic's situation and that oddly, nobody has heard a peep. Well, turns out The Face just switched agents again, going back to Rob Pelinka (Kobe Bryant's guy, for those who don't know) after previously leaving him for Bill Duffy. Not sure what prompted this or the other shake-ups, but there's a little known CBA ordinance stating that after five agent switches, you earn a free latte.* Maybe this is just about a coffee jones. At any rate, little news of deals coming in for a guy working out new representation makes sense, so there you (may) have it.
Also, Luke Walton is having surgery on Friday to remove bone spurs from his troublesome ankle. He'll be out of commission for about a month, but this will hopefully alleviate the continual pain he dealt with throughout 2008.
* - I may or may not have made that factoid up.
AK
UPDATE: An item of note from our friends at 710 ESPN, in support of the V Foundation (a very worthy cause): As part of the station's V Foundation Cancer Auction on Wednesday afternoon and evening, there are a few purple and gold items up for bid, including four tickets to the Oct. 7 game vs. the Jazz (second row along the baseline), a Pau Gasol autographed jersey and an autographed basketball. Some of the bidding is online, some can be done at the ESPN Zone in Anaheim. Click here for more information.

I prefer the CLS Mercedes that had Suicide Doors...
Posted by: Charles | July 15, 2008 at 10:13 AM
Sasha can change agents all he wants, it's not going to bring in any new offers. The GMs all know his status and if they want to make a play they will. Everyone out there knows that the Lakers will match up to a reasonable ceiling anyway so other offers would pretty much be an exercise in futility (unless Golden State decides that they still have too much cap space and just can't stand it, haha).
Posted by: dave m | July 15, 2008 at 10:29 AM
Great...
Ankle surgery. The apple doesn't fall far from the tree, huh? A prime example of the Walton genes for you. Yes Luke...he IS your father. I guess these ankle/foot problems will only be getting worse and more degenerative. What's next...back problems to match?
It's commonly known that an athlete with injury or weakness issues in a particular part of his/her body will overcompensate as a result. This produces repercussions in other areas, and nothing good comes of it.
Considering his age, how ridiculous would it be to think that we may have already seen The BEST of Luke Walton? Sheesh....
Could his over-priced contract seem any more ludicrous NOW in light of his fragile feet and ankles???
Sure, it's been said that a sucker is born every minute, but what GM would take Luke off our hands now? LOL...
Maybe someone can talk Luke into "retiring" so his contract can come off the books, and then he can return (ala Brett Favre) to play for another team. Anyone but the Lakers...please!
P & G R
Posted by: Purple & Gold Reign | July 15, 2008 at 10:35 AM
-Bill and Joe-
http://www.sacbee.com/100/story/1082869.html
Sonnybelfast
Posted by: sonnybelfast | July 15, 2008 at 10:38 AM
Bone spurs on his ankle???? So THAT's what Luke's problem is!!!!! WOW!!!! So this year is going to be Luke's BUST OUT YEAR and we'll all see exactly why the Lakers gave him such a huge contract!!!! Maybe now we'll see for a certainty that white guys CAN jump! YAY!!!! Things are looking up at the SF position!!! Watch out NBA - the Lakers are about to unleash the REAL Luke Walton on your collective butt's!!!!!!!!
............if only..............
Posted by: justanothermambafan | July 15, 2008 at 10:43 AM
Artest is slipping away if Lakers want to hold on Lamar. I also don't like absorbing Kenny Thomas and with the recent statement of Joe Maloofs, he's more incline to move Artest to Miami than their Western close competitor, Lakers. Maloof will never do business with the lakers, they played w/ Rambis last year and on the last minute went to Theuss.
Posey might be re signed by Celtics or move to Hornets. After the lakers expressed interest on him, a great number of teams enter a bidding war, I still believe he will end up with his former team b/c it hard to part away from memories of Championship.
Under this scenario, Lakers should consider again re-signing Ronny Turiaf's new contract. We need players who are defensive-minded mentality even if he earns 4.25M a year at the same time get Garbajosa. Lakers need interior defense, Drew is not enough and when he gets injured again or fouled out, who will defend the post?
In '09-'10, two contracts are going out Lo and Mihm but Farmar, Drew as well as Kobe will kick in.
Posted by: Edwin Gueco | July 15, 2008 at 10:44 AM
Luke Walton's surgery was a mere footnote to Mata-Real and Jefferson applying for the team. That should be the headline of a player with the team on his 5th season and he's practically the longest tenure to be b/c Lakers has a contract till 2013. I wish him well with the bone spurs removal and whatever psychological program he needs so that he is no longer the main topic of this blog in every game.
Is there any word on Jorge Garbajosa's injury, is there any link that says somethings of his recent games or rehabed from the surgery. I guess Vlade Divac and Ron Lester are aware of what is capable of at this time.
Posted by: Edwin Gueco | July 15, 2008 at 10:54 AM
I think Ron "Bill" Artest's latest email flurry may have blown his chances of coming to the Lakers. The guy has burned his bridges everywhere he goes, why would anyone expect anything different when he comes here? That latest flurry had to get the Laker front office's attention.
Luke "Bill" really? yeah, "Bill" Walton getting "bone spur" surgery is ominous... Chris "Bill" Mihm says hi on that one... so... this means Luke WILL NOT be working out this offseason which means the entire season next year will be another off year for Walton... nice... it's good to get paid...
How about Kenyon "Bill" Dooling? Gets offered a couple of million and is "insulted". These guys have lost touch with reality, you don't say you are insulted by an offer of millions of dollars and expect sympathy from the fans, you say it was less than you were hoping for and you were hoping to be compensated in the same manner as your peers on other teams are...
My interpretation of the Sasha "Bill" Vujacic situation is that I thought??? I heard the Lakers were offering about $5m/season, I don't know how many years but how much more would other teams really be willing to offer him? Would anyone really want to offer more and then have to give the Lakers compensation if the Lakers match the offer? Sasha... Bill... nobody wants to do max offers right now, take the $5m, that's darn good money...
Posted by: Kwaminus "Bill" Brownicus cracking his knuckles getting ready for a contract | July 15, 2008 at 11:01 AM
Goooooooooooooooooooooooood morning Blog!
Posting from work, eeek!
Hopefully it'll be a good day in Lakerland. I can see it now:
Mitch'll get a little more tan waiting on the beach for desperate teams offering some measely excuse of a trade for Lamar.
Lamar will have a great day designing some trendy threadsd to sport at next years PG interviews. Then he'll shoot 500 free-throws and work on his up-and-under move.
Luke will have shot 1,000 jumpers and worked on his funky white-boy post game. Then he'll grub down on some Waltonian fare.
Sasha will have sat by the phone all day, but the only person calling is his buddy Pau saying..take the 2.5...take the 2.5...then he'll work on getting a shot off AFTER he takes the ball to the rack.
Ronny will say, my heart is in LA, but the green is in the Bay. Then he'll do a little shimmy and call Andrew B.
Andrew B. will pick up on the other line and say, "Dang Ronny, you got a new heart and were playing again in like...6 months, dog. What's a fella got to do to get his knee back proper?
Trevor's sitting at home saying, I love LA!
Kobe's finger is magically regenerating in his newest shoe commercial. Like Wolverine regenerating!
Pau is playing badmitton on the beach saying, "Who's soft...OOOH! watch the birdie! Hey, lemme call Sasha V, "Take the 2.5....take the 2.5...."
Derek's at home with his family saying, I love LA!
PJ and JB are larking through a field of daffodils and poppies...well, Jeanie's larking and Phil's lurching.
Doc Buss is looking around his room saying...man, I know I put a playmate SOMEWHERE around here...Mitch?!
GO LAERS!!!!
Posted by: Jamie Sweet | July 15, 2008 at 11:02 AM
Hopefully Luke's bone spurs explains why he kind of "lost his step" this year. I've had a moderate case of bone spurs in the past (that was, of course, before I knew the miracle of Dit Da Jow). While not the worst/most painful injury in the athletic universe, it certainly wasn't fun. Sharp pains.
I hope Luke shows all the naysayers up next year.
Go Luke!
GO LAKERS!
Posted by: Jon K. | July 15, 2008 at 11:06 AM
The term jiggowatts is used in the movie "back to the future" for the flux capacitor.
Posted by: Dr. John Smith | July 15, 2008 at 11:08 AM
AK (aka "Andrew the K"),
I like the moniker "The Face" for Sasha (aka "The Machine"). Perhaps we could combine them to call him "Motorhead".
Then everytime he steps on the court the Lakers soundsystem could blare either The Who's "The Face" from Quadraphenia OR they could play Motorhead's "The Ace of Spades."
They would be rad.
"THE ACE OF SPADES! THE ACE OF SPADES!"
GO LAKERS!
Posted by: Jon K. | July 15, 2008 at 11:10 AM
Dr. John Smith,
That was so July 14, 2008 of you.
Posted by: Charles | July 15, 2008 at 11:13 AM
Hey AK,
Any news on Kobe''s finger? Any soreness, stuff that we should know. Perhaps an amputation for a bionic digit?
-bozz-
Posted by: bozz | July 15, 2008 at 11:15 AM
P&GR -
Luke needing surgery is not strong evidence for any heritable problems that could have passed to him from his father.
Also, just because you have a problem and need surgery doesn't mean that it is going to be degenerative.
I guess my biggest thing is to note that there is a difference between correlation and causation. Here's an easy example for you - the rise in temperature in Los Angeles and the rise in sales of ice cream. Both events are correlated, but we don't say that the rise in sales of ice cream caused the rise in temperature.
If you'd like to talk more about causation (probabilistic/bayesian, counterfactual, process theories), feel free to drop a line.
I hope Luke feels much more mobile after this operation. We're gonna need him for sure next year!
Posted by: Caliphilosopher | July 15, 2008 at 11:19 AM
You guys are still chatting up the jiggawatts?
Here's the source, y'all.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bnqtXOi1iaY
If you have never seen this movie...do it. It's more fun than an open casket funeral.
Posted by: Jamie Sweet | July 15, 2008 at 11:21 AM
I'm with you, Jon K, I hope that Luke shows up with his body ready next year.
Posted by: Jamie Sweet | July 15, 2008 at 11:22 AM
bozz,
Yes. Kobe has a new bionic finger powered by jiggawatts (not gigawatts--that's different). What do you think we've been talking about?
GO LAKERS!
Posted by: Jon K. | July 15, 2008 at 11:32 AM
Pre-Olympic Basketball
Team USA vs Canada
5:00 PM Pacific Lakers Standard Time
ESPN TV
Posted by: Fatty | July 15, 2008 at 11:33 AM
Open Letter to Chucky23
Hello sir..I would love to invite you to my restaurant Chucky and maybe we can get to know each other better.Iam really a nice dude with a quality personality.Could i ask you a couple of up front question's.Why the hate and venom directed at me over these last couple of years.Iam not a bad person, my teammates they love me to death.Anyway Chucky the invation open,you got the next move pal.
Posted by: Luke Walton | July 15, 2008 at 11:34 AM
AK or BK,
Have you seen any of the guys working out at the Toyota Center?
Posted by: Mob Wagoneer | July 15, 2008 at 11:34 AM
Oh, crap!! Now all the Luke haters will have to eat their words.
Oops - sorry, lost my senses for a minute. Forgot - they won't show any integrity on this issue.
Posted by: exhelodrvr | July 15, 2008 at 11:40 AM
Charles
Hello and good day to you sir,if u ever come down under i want to invite you down to my sheep ranch in queensland.And we can party hearty my friend.I make great home brew. lol
Posted by: Dr. John Smith | July 15, 2008 at 11:42 AM
Jon K.,
Haha, thanks for the info man. I though jiggawatts were what powers Jay Z. on those late nights when he's got a two hour set. Guess I thought wrong.
-bozz-
Posted by: bozz | July 15, 2008 at 11:49 AM
Caliphilosopher,
Who's your favorite philosopher?
What are your feelings about semiotics?
If Kobe Bryant was a classic philosopher, which philosopher would he be?
Marcus Aurelius, perhaps?
I mean, Shaq was the Big Aristotle, right? (By the way, I think Aristotlelian logic sucks.)
GO LAKERS!
Posted by: Jon K. | July 15, 2008 at 11:49 AM
Dr. John Smith
LMAO! A hearty welcome indeed! Thanks for the Sheep Rager invite!
Posted by: Charles | July 15, 2008 at 11:50 AM
I wish the Lakers were paying money to someone who's better at basketball than Luke Walton, because he's not good.
Posted by: "Pig" Miller | July 15, 2008 at 11:50 AM
Fatty,
Thanks for the heads up!
Posted by: Charles | July 15, 2008 at 11:51 AM
Ex,
You know what, if that what was really the cause of Luke's problems this year, then I'll gladly eat my words. Hell, I'll be the first to step up and do it.
Here's to a speedy recovery and a successful new season for Luke "THE ACE OF SPADES" Walton.
-bozz-
Posted by: bozz | July 15, 2008 at 11:52 AM
Fatty,
5PM?
To quote Judge Elihu Smails from "Caddyshack"
"{Gasp of relief.} Gooooood. Good. Good!"
Time to gets me a Fresca!
85 days and counting...
GO LAKERS!
Posted by: Jon K. | July 15, 2008 at 11:52 AM
- Lamar was coming off a serious shoulder surgery last season, but most fans will not give him a break because he has been inconsistent, injury prone and mentally fragile for so many years.
- Kobe played with a finger that required surgery and played through tendinitis in his knee all year, but nobody uses those injuries as excuses for Kobe.
- VladRad was out almost an entire year, but nobody is giving him any sympathy for his up and down play last season.
- Kwame Brown was seemingly always dealing with some type of injury, but nobody (except Mike T) ever made excuses for his inability to catch the ball.
- Yet, when it comes to Luke, people are ALWAYS MAKING EXCUSES for him. Every possible injury is overemphasized as an excuse for his horrible play. He's been a Laker for how long now?? 5 years? And during that time, he played decent ball for about 2 months (during his contract year at the beginning of the 2006-2007 season). If this ratio was equated to baseball, he would be batting less than .100. He does not deserve any more excuses, but I am sure the excuses will continue until his contract runs out in 2050.
Posted by: LAKER TRUTH | July 15, 2008 at 11:54 AM
I'd like to start the "RETIRE KWAME BROWN'S JERSEY" Bandwagon.
Who's with me?
GO LAKERS!
Posted by: Jon K. | July 15, 2008 at 11:55 AM
I'm a little erked with Sacramento. They have a risky player looking for a trade and a terrible contract they want to package with him. Am i the only one who thinks the Maloofs are getting a little pushy? They better take what they can get.
Personally, i think LA should cut Sac off at the pass. Package LO, Luke and Mihm for Marion and Haslem. That gets both LO and Marion off the market and leaves Sacramento wondering what to do with both Kenny Thomas (and his contract) and the agent-less renegade.
As a side note, i think Riley likes both Odom and Luke enough to actually do that deal.
Posted by: Benny Blanca | July 15, 2008 at 12:13 PM
I think the Lakers will match Ronnie's offer, and then use that contract in a sign-and-trade scenario.
Posted by: Very Nearly the Absolute Truth | July 15, 2008 at 12:20 PM
retire the jersey of the Kwaminus??? how about FILLING that jersey with Kwaminus "Bill" Brown himself! LOL!
Oh yeah, one other thing, Luke "Bill" Walton sucks. Thank you.
Posted by: Kwaminus "Bill" Brownicus cracking his knuckles getting ready for a contract | July 15, 2008 at 12:34 PM
Fatty,
You forgot to mention the date of the game.
July 25
Posted by: "Pig" Miller | July 15, 2008 at 12:42 PM
justanothermambafan,
".......if only........"
he wasn't soft.
Sonnybelfast
Posted by: Sonnybelfast | July 15, 2008 at 12:43 PM
Oops! Forgot to add. The game is Friday July 25th. Sorry, thought that was a given.
Enjoy the Fresca Jon K.
Posted by: Fatty | July 15, 2008 at 12:44 PM
Jon K. -
Good Afternoon to you, good sir! I'm flattered by the questions. I'll do my best to answer them succinctly.
>>>1) Who's your favorite philosopher?
When I first started, it was Kant. Unfortunately, that was before I made the concerted effort to try to read and understand his work (the fact that you can write a full page and only use 4 sentences and various technical terms that are spelled exactly the same as words that mean something completely different made him hard to read). Since I'm partial to philosophy of science, social science, biology, ethics (normative, meta, and a touch of applied), philosophy of mind, personal identity, rationality, and free will, it's hard to have a favorite. Coupled with the fact that I have met a number of prominent philosophers, it's even less clear. I
do know, however, with whom I would start a philosophy rec league team. I'm a 6'3" swingman (I play 1-5; remember, this is rec ball we're talking about), my friend Phil (6'1", solid defender), A friend of mine who is working on his PhD at Cal (6'7" SF - has NO problem bombing triples over people), Ted Sider (5'10" combo guard - put in his time [and probably still does] on the playgrounds in NYC), and a friend of mine who goes to Rugters (6'6" SF). I'm sure that we'd win our fair share, but we'd probably lose our fair share too. So, to make an EXTREMELY long answer somewhat shorter, I don't have a fave. Hempel, Quine, Sober, Salmon, Kitcher, and Goodman are all up there. Ernie Lapore is the one who I would LOVE to have dinner with (again); that man has the gift of gab.
>>>2) What are your feelings about semiotics?
Good question - I actually bought a book on it (Introducing Semiotics, part of the UK Introducing series), and I'll have to go over it again to give you a better answer. I think that I read it over the course of a week, but late at night (hence why I can't remember much about it). From what I can gleam, it's the study of signs (almost like a combination of philosophy of language [referents], psychology, and media studies). I can be spectacularly incorrect about it; I'll get back to you on this one. :-)
>>>3) If Kobe Bryant was a classic philosopher, which philosopher would he be? Marcus Aurelius, perhaps? I mean, Shaq was the Big Aristotle, right? (By the way, I think Aristotlelian logic sucks.)
If by classic you mean ancient, then I would go with that one (since the ancients did more than just philosophize).
I think (on prima facie grounds) that Mr. Bryant would be like Machiavelli - ruthless, contrarian, and fiercely calculating. And highly talented. Not a man that the rest of the league wants to eff with. More recently, I could see him being a cross between vintage John Searle and R. Jay Wallace......well, maybe just a part of him. I do know that Ron Artest would be Saul Kripke - both of those guys are CRAZY!
Shaq CLAIMED that he was the big Aristotle; unfortunately, I don't think that he ever touched the nichomachean ethics. Shaq is more like that random dude in your philosophy class who isn't a major but thinks that he knows what he says is intricately and unequivocally superior to what the Prof is saying. I'm not even CLOSE to giving that man some sort of comparison.
Aristotelian logic doesn't do much for me either. Syllogisms are neat to memorize, but pointless (in my opinion) to apply. I prefer my logics to be of the modal and deontic flavors (paraconsistent logic is also quite interesting, but I'll have to do more reading up on that. It seems to make sense, but it has it's own problems as well).
Hope all is well with you Jon K.! You're in the Cleev', correct? I might be up there in a few months for a bioethics conference (at Case Western, I presume). Keep your fingers crossed for the acceptance of my abstract!
- Caliphilosopher
Posted by: Caliphilosopher | July 15, 2008 at 12:57 PM
Michelle Cicely Tyson
Luke "Michelle Cicely BILL I'M ALWAYS INJURED" Walton
Sasha "Michelle Cicely WHAT IS BILL?" Vujacic
Lamar "Michelle Cicely DON'T MAKE ME SHOOT Bill" Odom
Kwame "Michelle Cicely - just call me Bill or Billie" Brown
Pedro "Bill Michelle Cicely WHITE VAN" Guerrero
Ah... you know...
Posted by: Kwaminus "Bill" Brownicus cracking his knuckles getting ready for a contract | July 15, 2008 at 12:57 PM
Blanca,
"...i think LA should cut Sac off at the pass"
If this means keeping Bill Bill out of purple and gold, me too. What are you waiting for?
Sonnybelfast
Posted by: Sonnybelfast | July 15, 2008 at 01:02 PM
Must sign Sasha.
Forget the fact he's improved his D and shot. That's important, but how many Lakers can generate the excitement he can? True entertainment value.
Pesky in your face defense. Nash hates him along with about 6-7 other guards.
He's been elbowed, tripped, knocked down, and yes choked!
And yet, he comes back for more.
He is easily our best flopper. (I don't feel Fisher is a true flopper) Twice, I thought he was dying on the court.
Who can generate more enthusiasm from the fans over just a name, The Machine? http://tinyurl.com/4pb6br
Never afraid to take the shot. As someone said. He can miss 20 shots in a row, and be ABSOLUTELY positive the next one is going down.
But seriously, this agent switch thing is a good sign. It shows me he's not going to be offered some wacko contract we can't match.
He will get a good deal, and it will be with the Lakers.
Posted by: Fatty | July 15, 2008 at 01:02 PM
Fatty,
Urgh.
85 days and counting...
GO LAKERS!
Posted by: Jon K. | July 15, 2008 at 01:08 PM
Very Near the Absolute Truth,
"I think the Lakers will match Ronnie's offer, and then use that contract in a sign-and-trade scenario."
No they won't, because that's against CBA rules. You can't match an offer sheet for a sign and trade.
Just an FYI to you and others (since there seems to be a lot of confusion about this).
AK
Posted by: Andrew Kamenetzky | July 15, 2008 at 01:12 PM
______________________________________
** RETIRE KWAME BROWN'S JERSEY & SIMULATANEOUSLY REHIRE KWAME BROWN Bandwagon **
_______________________________________
(01) JON K. - Owner and Reckless Driver
(02) Kwaminus "Bill" Brownicus cracking his knuckles getting ready for a contract - Co-Owner
(03) MICHAEL T. - Washing Kwame's Jersey As We Speak
GO LAKERS!
Posted by: Jon K. | July 15, 2008 at 01:12 PM
Laker Truth -
I think the reason why people are more apt to give Luke a break is a result of his attitude. He seems to care a lot about wanting to do well, he admits it when he's not doing well, he plays hard when he's out there, and his teammates seem to like him. I would argue that Lamar gets some of the same benefits because he's similar to Luke in this aspect. These two still get a lot of crap from Laker fans, so I'm not sure what you mean about making excuses.
The other players you mention don't fit into this category. Kwame didn't seem to care and didn't try hard. Laker Nation doesn't like guys who dog it. Vlade is the same way. And as far as Kobe is concerned - he doesn't need people sticking up for him because he's superhuman and can play through almost anything. But people are still quick to remind Celtics fans that Kobe played with a dislocated pinkie, so you're not entirely accurate there either.
Basically, people are quicker to forgive poor output if high levels of effort are exhibited. When poor output is a result of perceived nonchalance, fans are not as forgiving.
Posted by: puddle | July 15, 2008 at 01:15 PM
Luke Walton es un Uquencha Orcha! (soft power)
Posted by: Clayton Bixby | July 15, 2008 at 01:26 PM
Sasha news:
http://lakers.freedomblogging.com
/2008/07/15/vujacic-switches-agents-again/
Posted by: richtown | July 15, 2008 at 01:28 PM
whoops......Sasha news is good news is waht I was was trying to type
Posted by: richtown | July 15, 2008 at 01:29 PM
P&GR -
Luke needing surgery is not strong evidence for any heritable problems that could have passed to him from his father.
Also, just because you have a problem and need surgery doesn't mean that it is going to be degenerative.
I guess my biggest thing is to note that there is a difference between correlation and causation. Here's an easy example for you - the rise in temperature in Los Angeles and the rise in sales of ice cream. Both events are correlated, but we don't say that the rise in sales of ice cream caused the rise in temperature.
If you'd like to talk more about causation (probabilistic/bayesian, counterfactual, process theories), feel free to drop a line.
I hope Luke feels much more mobile after this operation. We're gonna need him for sure next year!
Posted by: Caliphilosopher | July 15, 2008 at 11:19 AM
____________________________________________
Caliphilosopher:
Many thanks for your delightfully smarmy-riffic reply.
Silly me for not realizing that you are apparently the (self-appointed) arbiter of what is or isn't "heritable." A humble thanks for setting me straight.
Of course there must be at least a PhD or M.D. preceding your surname...right? Why, we wouldn't even need to bother with a "second opinion" would we? Think of the money we can save by just consulting with you: Mr. Medical Answer Man.
You know Mr. Caliphilosopher (amusingly pompous handle btw), even IF you were a doctor specializing in precisely this field, it can be argued that medicine and the healing 'arts' are exactly that: more art than science. It has been stated that somewhere around 90% of ALL diseases and illnesses are either self-limiting or incurable. The practice of medicine operates (pun not intended) in the roughly 10% that remains.
Would you deign to argue this point too?
How can you definitively state that Luke's feet/ankle issues have NOTHING to do with the genes he inherited from his father? I can just as easily predict that he WILL continue to suffer an assortment of chronic lower leg problems -- just like his father did before his premature retirement.
As for the issue of surgery, haven't you heard the famoux oxymoron, "minor surgery?" Any process that involves cutting into a person's body is NEVER a procedure to be taken lightly or casually. Complications can and do occur, since the healing process (and timeframe) is dependant upon numerous factors, including the patient's underlying physiological condition.
As for your generous offer to discuss/debate, "causation (probabilistic/bayesian, counterfactual, process theories)," after I stopped laughing...the first thought that came to mind was that with a user name like Caliphilosopher, such conceit should have been banally predictable. Rather sad, actually. I think you still have a lot to learn in life.
In case you didn't get the memo, using multi-syllabic words does not prove your intelligence. Actually, its a sign of your own insecurity. So, spare us the attempt to sound important, and save those words for your Philosophy 101 class. Maybe you can dazzle your professor or impress some coeds who wouldn't know their elbow from their arse.
P & G R
Posted by: Purple & Gold Reign | July 15, 2008 at 01:33 PM