| Main |

Swimming in cash

If you've ever wondered whether 111 mil really does offer you the ability to have just about anything, the answer appears to be a pretty resounding "yes."  Because that's a serious swimming hole Agent Zero has got going.   Multiple fish tanks.  Grotto.  A "basement" area of sorts that somehow connects to the pool.  Probably a few of them inflatable dinosaurs.  Quite the setup, to say the least.

Unfortunately, and I hate to mention this after the fact, but when my pool was built, the large stone brought in to serve as a "mountain" cost only $200,000.  I'm not sure who Gilbert's "stone guy" is, but he could have gotten a better price than half a million. 

I'm just saying.

AK

Comments

Dude, if I had $111 million dollars, I'd totally get a bunch of fish tanks.

One of which would be filled with pirana whom I'd feed a "troll only" diet.

GO LAKERS!

I was a bit annoyed by Gilbert Arenas painting a picture of himself on his basement wall. That's pretty lame.

It kind of reminds me of Ben Stiller from "Dodgeball." I'm a bit surprised he isn't wrestling a bull to the ground in the painting.

GO LAKERS!

You could film a low budget Dr. Dre video there.

Nice. I heard he was having an aquarium with 3 Bull sharks inside. ??? Who the harck wants 3 sharks?? Yeah they might be nice to look at, fun to feed. But damn.. to be able to feed 3 sharks for the rest of their lives.. you HAVE to be making 111 mil haha.

Gilbert just outdid himself.

DEREK,

Probably more expensive than feeding would be cleaning those tanks. Have you ever had a nice salt water tank before? They're great, but they're a pain in the ass to keep clean.

GO LAKERS!

Are the Lakers really trying to bring Tractor Traylor in for a workout?

ok returned from camping at disclosed private area. i rested from stressors of former ceo spokesperson los angeles lakers times blogs. since i resign last week from position several have contact me to return to leadership position. i am still thinking my move and will get back shortly. in mean time i see kwame signature with pistons artest trade to houston. does that mean we will resignature didier benga. i think we can resignature for cheap. i could also offer free buffet to him when plays in atlanta hawks game. one free buffet for him rest of lakers half discuount. ok let me know.
i also notice this blog page has become too slow. if i return to spokesperson position i will fix.

ding how in prattville

I give Arenas 1 year before he's in the news for either raping or beating up some woman.

Young, Black, Boisterous, Rich athletes not named Tiger who think spending money is like drinking water attract scandalous women and overzealous DAs like flies to shi-nola.

That 111M is spread out over several years. Factor in the time value of money. Taxes. Money for various hangers-on and relatives. Lawyers. Agent Zero did save a chunk acting as his own agent. That savings probably paid for part of the pool. Yet that 111M is really more like 30M. Gilbert better not have too many half million dollar fish tanks.

troy,

I don't think your post was cool at all. From what I've heard Gilbert Arenas (unlike LeBron James) is actually a pretty decent human being.

GO LAKERS!

"I give Arenas 1 year before he's in the news for either raping or beating up some woman.

Young, Black, Boisterous, Rich athletes not named Tiger who think spending money is like drinking water attract scandalous women and overzealous DAs like flies to shi-nola."

I think troy gets the nod for most prejudicial comment of the day for that one.

After his new contract, I would estimate that Arenas has a net worth of about $35M (his new contract plus what he may be worth now). He does not seem to be a compulsive gambler like Barkley so that's good.

However spending 1.5 M on fish tanks would be the equivalent of a guy with a net worth of $350,000 spending $15,000 on fish tanks. I don't think any financial advisor would consider that a smart move.

"Pig" Miller

Howdy sir. That was a bit Utah-Bostonian of a comment.

Hey Charles.

His or mine?

Pig,

His. Sorry.

Charles.

No sweat.

Jon K,

Seriously, man. I have never owned or maintained a saltwater tank before, just freshwater. Freshwater tanks can get very nasty; I can only imagine how much cleaning a gigantic shark aquarium would require.
With all the food they would eat, just the shark doo-doo alone would be a pain (understatement of the century).

Glibert must be hiring stunt men to swim with the sharkies and clean their tanks.

Lakers:

Can't wait until 2008-2009 season starts. Heck, I can't wait until preseason starts so we can see Bynum back on the court in great shape.
As far as houston goes, they still don't scare the Lakers. I think it makes them better but not better than Lakers, Hornets, and I think the Spurs and Jazz could still compete with Houstons present lineup.

One thing is for sure though, the Wild west just got a little more wild. I LOVE IT!

Why? Because it's going to make it even more EPIC to watch the LAKERS go though the toughest conference in NBA History (2nd yr in a row) and I'm hoping the Celtics somehow get to the Finals AGAIN so we can return the favor.

I'm personally itching to see Kobe go at Pierce all game long for his bogus comments about Kobe. Probably more exciting will be Bynum dunking on KG and Perkins and PJ Brown time after time.


I love this game!

GO LAKERS

-d

Pig,

There's a reason why Troy gets a nod of respect from Let's Go C's!

GO LAKERS!

You could film a low budget Dr. Dre video there.

Posted by: Charles

Hahaha.... or a high budget Lloyd Banks video

How corny is that mini-mural in the garage? Suit + Basketball+ Pitbull in front of the capital/white house = big dweeb with a mean jumper. Let that be a lesson to all you aspiring players, a big pool with a grotto doesn't make you hugh hefner.

I don't know if I'm going to post here anymore. Just coming to the LAT Lakers Blog site freezes up my browser for a good 30 - 45 seconds and I can't change to another window because THE WHOLE COMPUTER goes into lockdown so I have a blank screen during this time. God forbid I have to trade a stock or do something else during that time... see ya...

The question will be, what are his finances like 5 years after he retires from basketball?

It seems like everyone is preoccupied with how we should make the Lakers into a team designed to beat the Celtics. That's the wrong idea. You create a team to play the strategy you put forth, and make other teams beat you.

The Lakers went to the freaking Finals.

No need to trade, or sign, anyone of significance. Just sit back and enjoy the ride boys and girls.

Ka-ching!

Jon K.

My point is that it's difficult for young men, especially black men, to flaunt alot of money, have parties given to you by P. Diddy, by arrogant and really "out there", and not eventually attract an opportunistic woman with an agenda.

I use Kobe as an example. Perfect gentlemen, but he got stuck in his own limelight and it cost him (still is).

Don't you agree?

K bros,

Is something being done about what Chrissy Mihminus is referring to? I have the same issues and don't come on nearly as often anymore because of it.

Pig Man,

You Fakers better design a team to beat the C's. I'd luv to beat you all down AGAIN next season.

"To of the world!" KG

How about conving from free agents that Mr. Selfish is not as selfish as his reputation?

"I can get off at any time" KB23 <--That's right, "23" for Mr. Wannabe Jordan.

haahhahhhhhahhahahha

Still enjoying the Laker beatdown at the hands of the C's.

hahaahahaahh

I have no problems with 3-C's or anybody on this blog.

He balances out the cheerleaders who only want to see things one way.

On this blog, you have your cheerleaders, who will never criticize anything about the Lakers; you have your anti-Lakers bloggers, who hate the Lakers and seek to criticize their short comings at every turn; and you have your analyst bloggers (like me and a few others) who see the good and the bad of the Lakers and offer insightful comments on their progress/regression.

A nice balance is what makes this blog so dynamic and entertaining.

Jon K: What happened to "starve the troll".

Being a Laker Hate Monger doesn't mean I can't reason. Troy made a decent point.

I do disagree with his opinion that Mr. Selfish is a "gentlemen". I actually think Kobeef's kind of a prick. At least his public image.

P

>>>No need to trade, or sign, anyone of significance. Just sit
>>> back and enjoy the ride boys and girls.

I'll reiterate. That's fine for one year. Consider next summer.
Looking at salaries for 2009-10, you have:

Kobe - 23 million
Pau - 16.5 million

Bynum - ?
Odom - ?

Rad - 6.5 million
Sasha - 5 million
Fish - 5 million
Luke - 4.9 million
Farmar - 2 million

If you're keeping score, that's about 62 million for the 7
players we know about. Assume the luxury tax will be
in the neighborhood of 70 million.

So either one of Odom or Bynum's extensions will put the
Lakers into luxury tax. If each of them extends for contracts
starting around12 million, that makes it 86 million for 9
players. And that doesn't count money paid to re-sign
Ariza, Mihm, Sun Yue, or to sign anyone else.

And note that Bynum's agent is currently running his
mouth off insisting that Bynum should get a max contract.
Not to mention that Odom may not be as easy-going as I
assume in that 12 million dollar offer.

Even if you get 4 other players at minimum contracts,
you're talking about 90 million in salaries and around 20
million in luxury tax. With that much salary and luxury
tax, the Lakers would lose money even if they won the
championship every year (and thus got revenues from the
extra playoff games).

So which of the following do you choose to believe:

1. Jerry Buss will let the team lose money for several years
in a row in order to keep the current core of players together.

2. Lamar Odom will accept less than 10 million per year
for his extension

3. Andrew Bynum will accept less than 10 million per year
for his extension

4. Kobe will opt out of his contract and re-sign for a contract
that starts at 8 to 10 million less (i.e. 15 to 17 million).

5. The Lakers get rid of either Odom, Bynum, or Gasol before
the 2009-10 season.

Which is it?

I know it's nice to go the garden path and say that doesn't
matter and we should just pay attention to this season,
but the truth of the matter is that it is much easier to
fix the salary problems for 2009-10 if they start now, unless
the solution is just to not even try to re-sign Lamar Odom
and let him leave for the cap space to afford Bynum.

Chrissy Mihminus/Long Live Chick,

I wasn't aware of the problem until just now. I can put in an email to the people at the mother ship, but to be honest, if it's a tech issue, BK and I are of little help, in terms of us personally correcting it. That's outside of both our department and skills.

AK

1.5 million dollars is still cheaper than SHAQ's whore.

And who’s to say you can’t move a mountain??? For 500K we’ll even put it in your backyard!

I have been encountering the same problem get this crap fixed right now! AK/BK

The Lakers still have that one roster spot to fill.That spot is for a big body...I would like to see Mitch wait for the games to get under way before signing a player like Traylor...The last Olympics uncovered some good talent so why not wait and see how the games go ...

My 2 cents

LTLF,
Probably 2 or 5.

Assuming Bynum stays healthy, Lamar's future will depend more on how Ariza/Vlad/Walton perform than on how he performs.

You should take off some of the new stuff you added, blog takes forever to load now.

My computers are having problems with the Lakers blog, too. But when I use Safari it works pretty good. When I use Firefox it seems to work pretty good. But Internet Explorer seems to be freezing up for about a minute before it loads.

mike t.

Thanks for the info LTLF.

There's going to have to be some compromise from Jerry Buss, Kobe, and Bynum to get it done.

It looks like Lamar going to have to go. Sad but true. We need to get someone for him if this experiment doesn't work. But if the triple tower deal does work, we have to keep him and get nothing back for him.

Or, maybe we keep him and he has a terrible year statistically. But the team is dominant. Then maybe we could convince him to sign for less. That would be the best case scenario in my opinion. haha

Internet Excreter sucks.

Use Firefox or Safari.

I read today that the Lakers are giving a try out to tractor Traylor. Hey if we sign him he can give some really good tax advise to our young guys.

MH

What's wrong with the blog?

I'm on Safari.

I don't like this DIGG shite. Or this google ad dreck. K's, I know it's not your bailiwick, but I figure that I should speak up here and now before this damn blog turns into some kind of nascar vehicle equivalent site like yahoo!

troy, that one went in the greatest hits file. as in, I can't believe this blog attracts d-bags this big file.

there. That's me being cheerful today.

oh, wait.

There twas once bloghead named C's
who had some strange new disease
what came out of his mouth
oft originated farther south
So he spent all his time on his knees.

that's terrible, but it took all of 22 seconds, so I could feel worse.

on a much healthier note-

I've seen the math done before, maybe someone could do it again for us. When you look at the FA's available next year and the year after, and the projected salary cap numbers, there is no way that LO could demand anything close to 13 mil/yr.

I don't have any privileged insight into his or Dr Buss's mind, but it even seems reasonable to me that if the Lakers are firing on all cylinders at the deadline next year they could sign odom to a longer extension that would provide him some security, maybe something in the six year 50-60 mil range, just to pull some numbers out of my let's go C's. no reason for dire predictions. not that that has ever stopped anyone before. but the FA market is not going to encourage too many more deals like LO's current one.

THE LOVE NEEDS A POCKET CALCULATOR SOMETIMES JUST TO KEEP TRACK

GO LAKERS

Kbros,

I have the exact same problem. Waiting for LA Times Lakers Blog while nothing happens and I time out. Better talk to the tech guys because the media guys have loaded so much crap on the page it is choking and freezing. I’ve just quit several times because of it. And trying to keep separate tabs for each thread really screws you. The Times needs to put some money into the blog rather than just loading it up with click opportunities. Totally crass.

Tom

Hey everyone,

BK and I weren't aware so many people were having trouble lately with the site. I'll definitely send an email to the tech people. Obviously, the amount of ads housed is completely beyond our control, but we can let them know they may be causing problems.

AK

Long Time,

>>>>>1. Jerry Buss will let the team lose money for several years
>>>>>in a row in order to keep the current core of players together.

1. Jerry Buss will let the team earn less money for a few years in a row
in order to keep the current core of players together.

>>>>>2. Lamar Odom will accept less than 10 million per year
>>>>>for his extension.

2. Lamar Odom will accept less than 12 million per year for his new contract.

>>>>>3. Andrew Bynum will accept less than 10 million per year
>>>>>for his extension.

3. Andrew Bynum will accept less than 12 million per year for his extension.

>>>>>4. Kobe will opt out of his contract and re-sign for a contract
>>>>>that starts at 8 to 10 million less (i.e. 15 to 17 million).

4. Kobe will opt out of his contract and re-sign a new contract
for $140M for 7 years that starts at $18M.

>>>>>5. The Lakers get rid of either Odom, Bynum, or Gasol before
>>>>>the 2009-10 season.

5. The Lakers trade Lamar Odom for two lesser paid players, one of whom
has an expiring contract to reduce salary.

>>>>>Which is it?

1 thru 4, naturally. :-)

Tom

AK,

>>>>>I wasn't aware of the problem until just now. I can put in an email
>>>>>to the people at the mother ship, but to be honest, if it's a tech issue,
>>>>>BK and I are of little help, in terms of us personally correcting it.
>>>>>That's outside of both our department and skills.

I would think, considering what a challenging person you are to best in a debate, the fact that YOU & BK are why this blog out-rocks all the other LA Times blogs, and the direct relationship between visitors and clicks and ad revenue, that you might use some of your professional skills to “convince” the geeks at the Times that this is a serious issue. We’re not asking you to pull a “Kobe” on them and threaten to quit, just to let them know that it is a serious problem that many loyal contributors and readers of the blog are having. I suspect they might be amenable to your arguments, don’t you think? Thanks.

Tom

Benjamin,

>>>>>I don't think I'll ever understand the blind devotion to a super talented,
>>>>>incredibly built player that is such an incredible underachiever and
>>>>>represents the worst of laziness and lifestyle-pursuers that is far too
>>>>>much of the NBA – About Lamar Odom.

I would have thought you were talking about Kwame Brown and not Lamar Odom had this been an isolated quote not one taken out of your Odom post. The “worst of laziness and lifestyle-pursuers?” While I sure am not one to criticize anybody for hyperbole and exaggeration, I respectfully think you’ve gone way over the top on this one. You’ve take the perfect description of Kwame Brown, who is a wimp, and applied it undeservedly to Lamar Odom, who was nothing less than a true warrior for the Lakers this year.

Lamar Odom may not have a top scorers’ mentality. Pau Gasol may not be the toughest guy on the block. Jordan Farmar may be too small and light. Vlade Radmanovic may not do anything but bury 3’s. Sasha may not have the best shot selection. But to keep painting these same guys who almost won us a championship as losers to be traded is a severe overreaction to the Celtics beating the Lakers without their starting center and 2nd best player. Give the Lakers front office a little trust for the great job they have done.

Now it’s the news that Ron Artest is going to Houston that has the Chicken Little Gang all in uproar because we “could” have traded Lamar to get Artest, who people forgot was apparently not wanted that badly by anybody but the Rockets – including the Lakers, who felt that for now Lamar Odom was a more valuable piece of the team’s puzzle. Why? Because he is a better all around player than Artest in every way but 1-on-1 defense, at which Lamar is no slouch, or did you not remember him shutting down Boozer.

I can understand why bloggers might be concerned about whether Lamar could play small forward or whether the triple towers would work. Or prefer to have Ron Artest, Shane Battier, or Josh Smith instead of him. But to paint Lamar Odom with the same brush as Kwame Brown is patently unfair and an insult to Lamar, one of the elite rebounders in the league and a player without whom the Lakers would never have reached the NBA Finals.

You know how much I respect your opinion so please don’t feel I am singling you out. I am really addressing this to all of those fans who keep painting good players in simplistic black and white when the reality of all these players and what they contribute is really complex gray – and far more good than bad. What happened to patience, common sense, appreciation, and loyalty. You would think all of you were Clipper fans rather than Laker fans.

And you complain about me talking about how great Andrew Bynum is going to be next year – when none of you will remember wanting to trade Lamar at this time next year. Instead, you’ll be celebrating a championship and the new cap-friendly contract that Lamar Odom just signed to be a Laker for Life.

Stop the Chicken Little stuff and appreciate how damn lucky we are. Please.

Tom

Laker Tom,

"I would think, considering what a challenging person you are to best in a debate, the fact that YOU & BK are why this blog out-rocks all the other LA Times blogs, and the direct relationship between visitors and clicks and ad revenue, that you might use some of your professional skills to “convince” the geeks at the Times that this is a serious issue. We’re not asking you to pull a “Kobe” on them and threaten to quit, just to let them know that it is a serious problem that many loyal contributors and readers of the blog are having. I suspect they might be amenable to your arguments, don’t you think?"

I appreciate the nice words about my debate skills and I'll definitely emphasize that this could turn into a serious issue (if it continues). But given the amount of layoffs the Times has been issuing these days, there is only so far an argument against potential revenue can go. Not trying to be defeatist, just realistic.
AK

1 2 3 4 5 6 Next »
Post a comment
If you are under 13 years of age you may read this message board, but you may not participate.
Here are the full legal terms you agree to by using this comment form.

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until they've been approved.






Our Bloggers
Andrew and Brian Kamenetzky
Andrew and Brian Kamenetzky are contributing writers to ESPN The Magazine and ESPN.com, and co-authored Fishing on the Edge, the autobiography of 2003 Bassmaster Classic champion Mike Iaconelli, bass fishing's bad boy. While both grew up in St. Louis without NBA basketball, Andrew became a die hard Lakers fanatic after moving to L.A. to attend USC. That he managed to find a job requiring him to obsess over his favorite team, the same activity that prompted him to waste time while working other jobs, is pretty incredible. As for Brian, his baptism into pro hoops fandom has been provided by the "All Lakers, All The Time" citizens of Los Angeles. Beats the hell out of covering the Bucks.
Follow us on ... »


Follow @latimeslakers for exclusive updates.

All LA Times Blogs

All The Rage
All Things Trojan
Babylon & Beyond
Blue Notes - Dodgers
Booster Shots
Bottleneck Blog
Comments Blog
Countdown to Crawford
Daily Dish
Daily Travel & Deals
Dish Rag
Extended Play
Funny Pages 2.0
Gold Derby
Greenspace
Hero Complex
Homeroom
Homicide Report
Jacket Copy
L.A. Land
L.A. Now
L.A. Unleashed
La Plaza
Lakers
Money & Co.
Movable Buffet
Olympics: Ticket to Beijing
Opinion L.A.
Outposts
Readers' Representative Journal
Show Tracker
Soundboard
Technology
The Big Picture
The Daily Mirror
Top of the Ticket
Up to Speed
Varsity Times Insider
Web Scout
What's Bruin
Your Scene Blog
RSS Subscribe to this Blog What is RSS?
July 2009
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  


Buy Tickets
Search for Tickets
 

LATimes.com now offers sports tickets to popular events around the world including NBA tickets, MLB tickets and NFL tickets to otherwise sold-out events.

Popular Events
With the NBA playoffs approaching, Lakers tickets are this month's hot item. Dodgers tickets and Angels tickets are also in high demand with another season of MLB baseball underway.

We've got plenty of LA sports tickets and college football tickets for sale, with MLB tickets and USC football tickets being the mosts popular sellers at the moment.
Powered by TicketNetwork
ADVERTISEMENT


ADVERTISEMENT