Strange atmosphere, this planet Houston
This line from "Superman II" always pops into my head whenever someone mentions Houston (pronounced "Who-ston" by the evil General Zod, who mistakenly
believes that the name for the entire planet Earth). But now, the line
may accurately describe the city, since Ron Artest will soon be counted
among its citizens. After much speculation as to where Artest would eventually land (a trade itself was a given), the Kings and Rockets agreed upon a deal, with ex-King Bobby Jackson, Rockets first round pick Donte Greene and a 2009 first rounder heading to Sacto. The deal won't become official until August 14th, as Greene can't be moved until 30 days after signing his NBA contract.
In my mind, the deal makes sense for both sides. From the rebuilding Kings' perspective, former fan fave Bobby Jackson equals six mil coming off next season's books and they get a couple of youngsters (now and down the road) to help prep for the future. As for Houston, it obviously goes without saying that Ron Ron doesn't come without a risk risk. But should he behave for Coach Rick Adelman (whom he always talks about loving when they were paired in Sacramento and everyone remain healthy (another big time "if" for this team), Artest adds some firepower to the already profilic scoring combo of Yao Ming and Tracy McGrady (still refered to by Mom as "Yao's friend") and makes an already good defensive team even better.
The West, she is always interesting.
AK

looks like Houston is the lakers new biggest threat in the west if everyone stays healthy. big if.
Posted by: greek dude | July 29, 2008 at 08:11 PM
AK,
KNEEL BEFORE ZOD!
Wow. Dude, you are a dork. (I mean that in a very positive way.)
GO LAKERS!
Posted by: Jon K. | July 29, 2008 at 08:16 PM
That's it? That's all Sacto got? A has-been and a few low firsts. That strikes me as a really stupid deal. Why not just keep Ron-Ron into the season and see if a bidding war erupts? If worse came to worse, couldn't they have gotten this deal in February?
It's not like Sacto has to worry about the distraction of having Artest for part of the season ruining their title hopes.
Posted by: Jman449 | July 29, 2008 at 08:17 PM
It seemed clear after the season that Mitch was going to stand pat. I agree, why mess up a good thing? With Bynum and Ariza back and everyone else gaining experience in the triangle and with each other, we are favorites to win it all.
We shouldn't remake our whole team just because we got blown out by Boston in Game #6. If we'd messed with the chemistry too much this off-season we might not get that far. I figure we just need to add a third string center (in case Mihm can't cut it) and maybe a swing man/small forward who will sit on the bench in case of an emergency. I'm OK with Mbenga, Coby Karl and Mata-Real filling out the roster.
Posted by: rdlee | July 29, 2008 at 08:18 PM
DID THE KINGS BEAT THE LAKERS TO RON ARTEST?
by Mark Heisler for the LA Times
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/
olympics_blog/2008/07/did-the-kings-b.html
This is a strange article as it is posted in the Olympics Blog section of the LA Times (along with a comment section conveniently filled in with my Lakers Blog name and email address). At any rate, just Heisler basically saying the Kings gave Artest away to spite the Lakers. Just a weird place to post article.
Tom
Posted by: LakerTom | July 29, 2008 at 08:23 PM
Can someone please tell me how the hell Houston is getting Artest for a Has been and a pick? I' mean how is this possible. I'm sure the Lakers could have offered more than this. The Maloofs hate us, that is for sure. They still traded him within the Western Conference. What does this do to the west? I:m still in shock and very upset.
CrzyFan
Posted by: CrzyFan | July 29, 2008 at 08:24 PM
Still not worried.
Lakers win it all next year.
Eat my shorts Mike T.
Posted by: "Pig" Miller | July 29, 2008 at 08:25 PM
what an outstaning move by the rockets. not only they get Ron Artest (in my opinion the best defender in the NBA) they also get rid of an aging bobby jackson who absolutely brought them nothing. In Artest they bring in a veteran who can defend better than shane battier and who's also a better offensice player. the rockets can now trade battier (20m+ for the next 3 years contract) and get an offensive player who can come out off the bench and provide a much needed scoring boost.
hats off to the rockets management
this makes Houston a very dangerous team next season! wow
Posted by: mike | July 29, 2008 at 08:27 PM
help or hurt?
I say it hurts. Houston is arguably one of the better defensive teams in the league, they needed offense. And although Artest can be a beast in the paint...I don't see this "odd couple" coexisting all that well for a long time lol.
We dodged a bullet I'd say. Go Lakers!
Posted by: Faith | July 29, 2008 at 08:28 PM
That was all it took? Dang...
Posted by: bonez | July 29, 2008 at 08:28 PM
CrzyFan,
Because Ron Ron Bill Artest is a certifiable lunatic who spreads psychological disease everywhere he goes.
I will totally take Bobby Jackson over the lunatic anyday of the week.
GO LAKERS!
Posted by: Jon K. | July 29, 2008 at 08:30 PM
From Steve Kerr over in Phoenix:
"I think it's a big deal to have Shaq for the whole year next season. We'll be able to establish our defense and what we're trying to accomplish in October rather than trying to do it on the fly in February. Hopefully with a full year under his belt Shaq can really make the adjustment. I thought he played well for us last year; unfortunately our season ended a little earlier than we had hoped, but we'll be better this year because of that experience and the fact that he'll have a training camp with us."
The Suns are going defense. With Shaq to clog the lane and Amare to provide the offensive punch this team can be scary, too.
Now you have Houston putting a vice grip on their 3 spot. Another player to watch in Houston is Joey Dorsey. This kid could be a Charles Barkley type player.
Watch out.
mike t.
Posted by: Michael C. Teniente | July 29, 2008 at 08:38 PM
Bonez (and others surprised by what Sacto accepted),
"That was all it took? Dang..."
I'm not sure it was as much about "all it would take" as what Sacto was being offered. I doubt too many teams are going to offer a lot in value, between Sacto dealing from a position of total disadvantage and Artest's risks. The number of teams in the mix drop even further when you take into account that no team would bring in Ron kicking and screaming. You wouldn't just "take a flyer" even if you knew he was unhappy about it. Unless Artest wants to be a part of your team (as much as this guy ever really knows what he "wants"), he's basically out of the question.
Add up all those factors and I'm guessing the offers coming Sacto's way weren't terribly impressive.
AK
Posted by: Andrew Kamenetzky | July 29, 2008 at 08:39 PM
If the Kings picked up Dorsey the deal wouldn't be that bad for the Kings.
mike t.
Posted by: Michael C. Teniente | July 29, 2008 at 08:41 PM
"We dodged a bullet I'd say."
Agreed. First, it'd be unusual for intradivision rivals to work a trade that could materially improve the other.
That said, Artest has not been an "elite" defender (DRtg < 100) since his IND daze where he had Jeff Foster + Jermaine O'Neal to cover his back. That Artest also played somewhere south of < 240lbs, unlike the SAC version which ballooned to 250.
At 250 -- or even 240 --there's no way Ron Ron would reprise the 3-position "shutdown" defender LAL fans imagine he was at IND. None.
Will The Con Artest help HOU? Early, maybe. As Artest usually tries to make a good first impression after screwing up -- until his mind, as it inevitably does, begins to wander. And wonder. What if I ... and what if they ... and who really REALLY loves me more?
Posted by: latopia | July 29, 2008 at 08:45 PM
Although I wanted Artest, I wouldn't give up Lamar for him. I really don't know who will dominate this season, east or west. My gut feeling is that the Lakers are going to falter, and Kobe will suffer his first serious injury since the Shaq days. I hope to gawd I'm wrong.
This is going to be the most interesting NBA season in several years...
Posted by: troy | July 29, 2008 at 08:45 PM
Pig,
That was 4-7-5.
Try "I'm still not worried" or "We're still not worried"
Posted by: exhelodrvr | July 29, 2008 at 08:53 PM
With Artest going to Houston, does this now mean that the Lakers will stand pat? The Lakers front office has been so ridiculously silent and circumspect, I almost wonder if a big shoe is going to drop without warning.
None of the Laker youngsters burned up Summer League, which could leave one to believe there may be some roster movement we don't anticipate.
IMHO, last season's roster could have benefited from one more seasoned veteran. Luke and Vlad are redundant in a way that offers no depth to the bench. Mihm must be considered a question mark until he proves otherwise in training camp. Viewed as a whole, the current roster only works IF -- let me repeat, IF -- everyone is healthy. In today's NBA, that's a huge "IF."
The Lakers got lucky last season when Bynum went down by being able to acquire Gasol. Even Mitch Kupchak doesn't believe there's a high probability that lightning will strike twice.
Something's up, Laker Nation. I just don't know what it is.
Posted by: Rick Friedman | July 29, 2008 at 08:53 PM
The Suns? They're down and out. The Shaq experiment is the worst yet.
Defense or not, it's still up in the air if he can be remotely close to Shaq of old, not to mention health problems.
Posted by: Faith | July 29, 2008 at 08:56 PM
"It seemed clear after the season that Mitch was going to stand pat. I agree, why mess up a good thing?"
rdlee - you can't stand pat in this league. In order to get to the mountain top, you need to continuously get better. Mitch must think that having Bynum and Ariza healthy are tantamount to improvement. While I agree that getting Bynum back equals an addition, it remains to be seen if Gasol can be a championship calibre PF in the west, and I'm rather certain that Odom can't play the SF. He has to be the back-up PF. Time will tell. Losing Turiaf was not a good thing. In the meantime, our SF position is a glaring weakness, and pg is fragile. My gut instincts tell me that we won't have the same productivity at pg as we had last year. Unless we address at least one of these weaknesses, I am less than confident of a return trip to the finals.
Posted by: Lincoln Laker | July 29, 2008 at 08:58 PM
The elite teams are going defense.
I have no idea what to make of the Lakers. All I really know for sure is that they won't be making it past the WC this coming season. They're just too soft.
mike t.
Posted by: Michael C. Teniente | July 29, 2008 at 08:59 PM
Seriously sac queens,
They did not include Kenny Thomas in deal. Wow!! Anyways,
best thing for Lakers to do is trade Vlade and 2009 first round pick to houston for Shane. This is best and all possible deal for us. I think Houston will take it since it can not play Ttracy, Ron and Shane at same position and they need shooting power forward once Scola can take a break. Both have 3 years remaining and they get first round draft pick. For us, we have too much log jam at that position anyways and I think Shane is best defender we can have. Guy gives 100% day in day out and never stops playing defense.
Come on this is much better deal for us than getting Artest.
Posted by: Ajay | July 29, 2008 at 09:00 PM
I would have traded Odom for Artest. Artest is mentally tougher than Odom. Artest is the type of player who would have challenged Kobe when Kobe got in his face. Odom is nothing near that.
mike t.
Posted by: Michael C. Teniente | July 29, 2008 at 09:01 PM
Some one brought up a valid point...Shane Battier is expendable to the rockets now. Why pay a guy 20mil+ when you've just picked up a guy who does all the same things better at a cheaper price. I don't know about y'all but I think I would try to swing an Ariza plus whoever makes the money work deal for Battier.
He's a proven lock down defender, can hit the open 3, and has a good attitude so he won't hurt the teams chemistry. If Houston does decide to keep both of them though they could be a major problem for us. Imagine Kobe having to face a double team from Artest and Battier!!!! Battier not an all-star but he's prolly just the player our team needs.
Posted by: Weave-Man | July 29, 2008 at 09:03 PM
Or how about Houston keeps Battier and then they have either Artest or Battier to be on the court all the time when Kobe is on the court.
They would wear Kobe down. Then Yao would stay on Bynum and prevent that alley-oop pass Bynum scores on. And I think that Joey Dorsey is going to be an impact player, too.
The guy is a beast in the paint.
mike t.
Posted by: Michael C. Teniente | July 29, 2008 at 09:12 PM
Seriously sac queens,
They did not include Kenny Thomas in deal. Wow!! Anyways,
best thing for Lakers to do is trade Vlade and 2009 first round pick to houston for Shane. This is best and all possible deal for us. I think Houston will take it since it can not play Ttracy, Ron and Shane at same position and they need shooting power forward once Scola can take a break. Both have 3 years remaining and they get first round draft pick. For us, we have too much log jam at that position anyways and I think Shane is best defender we can have. Guy gives 100% day in day out and never stops playing defense.
Come on this is much better deal for us than getting Artest.
Posted by: Ajay | July 29, 2008 at 09:13 PM
Damn, the Rockets are good... real good...
Welcome to the Western Conference shootout...
Lakers might not make it out the 1st round if given the wrong matchup and bad motivation...
Lakers must be ready for next year...
Enuff 70 win talk... let's win the division and get the #1 seed....
Posted by: Korey | July 29, 2008 at 09:13 PM
Standing pat with our younger players IS getting better, especially with Bynum back and hopefully healthy. San Antonio won three of their titles by basically standing pat making a few minor tweaks. Even our threepeat didn't include major shake-ups. The year we made the biggest changes (Payton and Malone) didn't yield a title.
Everybody likes to talk trades in the off-season but the best trades are the ones NOT made (Kidd, JO, C-Webb, Gordon/Deng, Miles/Blake). About the only ones I'd be open to is for Josh Smith or Shane Battier but I doubt they will be moved.
Posted by: rdlee | July 29, 2008 at 09:19 PM
Its easy to see why the Kings didnt get more for Ron Ron. With each flip flop on wanting to stay or go, with each moan about not becoming a free agent. With each e-mail to ESPN, Ron Ron just continued to reinforce why teams were affraid of him. It got so bad that the Maloofs told him to shut up. They knew what would happen if he continued to whine and it did.
Mh
Posted by: michael h | July 29, 2008 at 09:21 PM
Ron Artest to Houston?
We need to thank the Maloofs for screwing up the Rockets.
There is a reason why the Kings did not even talk to Ron about an extension.
There is a reason why they dumped him before camp.
There is a reason why NO team was offering the Kings anything of value for Ron and a reason why the Kings gave him away.
Houston made a rent-a-player deal. Ron will be an unrestricted FA and be gone. It will cost Houston in the end 2 picks for the 'try Ron Ron deal'.
My guess is Houston trades his expiring contract mid-season to save there season.
Posted by: Fatty | July 29, 2008 at 09:25 PM
Man, this is a great trade for Houston. Which is terrible for us. They already gave us fits last season and adding a player like Artest, if he keeps his head on straight and accepts being the third option, the Rockets will be our primary challenger for western conference supremacy. I mean we've still got an awesome big 4 with Kobe, Bynum, Pau and LO, but the west is going to be a dogfight once again.
The team in the west that really needs to make a move is San Antonio. They're going to be one year older and the only young blood they've brought in is Roger Mason.They might only be the 4th or 5th best team in the west.
Posted by: Xodus | July 29, 2008 at 09:42 PM
Ron Ron the Psycho
Will Ruin another team
He and Mike make two
Posted by: "Pig" Miller | July 29, 2008 at 09:50 PM
Standing pat and putting it on the shoulders of your younger players is NOT a good idea in a tight Western Conference that the Lakers won by only ONE game.
But for those who are complaining about the Kinks giving away Artest, I have two words for you - Memphis Grizzlies. Remember the Pau Gasol trade? What goes around, comes around.
Mitch, the ball is in your court. The Angels didn't stand pat and they were winning the West by 11 games not one.
Posted by: lotecq | July 29, 2008 at 09:59 PM
rdlee
"San Antonio won three of their titles by basically standing pat making a few minor tweaks"
Exactly my point. Minor tweaks is all we need. I'm not suggesting a big trade, but we have weaknesses that Boston exposed. I would feel better if we addressed them. I'm going to tread lightly here, because I do think Mitch redeemed himself by the moves he did not make, then the Gasol deal. We are oh so close, and a minor tweak might make all the difference in the world.
Posted by: Lincoln Laker | July 29, 2008 at 10:01 PM
i guess everyone is split on whether the artest pickup was good for houston,
i personally think its a win-win for houston.....they are taking a slight gamble on artest, if he doesnt work out, they didnt give up their big 2...and didnt even have to unload battier...
i look at it as something like if the lakers could of acquirred him w/o giving up odom....thats kinda how i feel houston pulled this off...their GM did a great job...cause if he self-destructs..big deal, they werent going to win anything too big with that current makeup
Posted by: laker32 | July 29, 2008 at 10:06 PM
I believe Donte Green was drafted with the pick the 1st of the 2 1st round picks that the Lakes sent to the Grizz for Pau....see, sometimes we need to put a name to the number or "commodity"....Sometimes late 1st rounders can be pretty good, so someday the "gift" of the Pau trade may not seem like such a freebie, not like the the obviously fixed McHale/Celtics deal...those players may eventually become equal, in "value", however it was the principal of how the deal was done. It was done with the purpose of Kevin McHale making the deal to aid a team that he does not work for. That deal IMHO reeked of corruption and decepton, however, no one stepped forward to do anything about it. That is the deal that the Popovich proposed trade committee should scrutinize, but they don't need to, because it's so obvious. Maybe McHale and Ainge should both get a 1 year suspension and draft picks taken away from those teams, like McHale got for his Joe Smith under the table agreement. Those are just general thoughts, I had to put out. Look, all these blogs are starting to talk about Pau's holes in his game. Stop it, be positive. Hey, I like his game, and I think if used right we will have a team that is a big "machine" (which happens to have a little "machine" (shi shi) as one of its parts).
Tom, the way I think is disjointed I know, sorry to those who want thesis quality writings. By the way, where's Ding Ho and Kevin Ding??? I didn't see a blog by ding or an article by Kevin recently....vacation? Just reachin still....Chinese restuarants, fast food,....what do you want to talk about next, cars? After the earthquake when I was finsihing my tires, I found that one of my tires has bulges, I had hit a pothole too hard, so there goes $300 plus....
Joke of the day: "hahahahahhahahaa".....that's my impersonation of let's go c's....oh, by the way I have to do it while dreaming of Sasha....
Posted by: humanomaly | July 29, 2008 at 10:09 PM
>>>Now you have Houston putting a vice grip on their 3 spot.
>>>Another player to watch in Houston is Joey Dorsey. This
>>>kid could be a Charles Barkley type player.
If they actually sign him.
And even if they do, he'd likely be 4th on the depth chart
behind Scola, Hayes, and Landry (if they re-sign Landry).
With the current roster, Houston has no backup center and
only one player other than Yao over 6'9" on the roster
(that would be 6'10" Steve Novak who very rarely plays).
I'll wager they'll sign a backup center before they'd sign
a fourth PF under 6'10" (though Dorsey at 6'9" would be
the 3rd tallest person on the team).
Posted by: Long Time Laker Fan | July 29, 2008 at 10:14 PM
Solomon Islands July 28th - 6.0 Magnitude, nobody knew and nobody cared.
Chino Hills July 29th - 5.4 Magnitude, everyone was concerned and everyone is scared of the big one.
It's all about location, location, location!
Rick Friedman,
"The Lakers front office has been so ridiculously silent and circumspect".
I will change one word from that phrase: Circumcized. Yes, indeed they let Posey got away, Artest got away w/o planting a mole of communication that he should have opted out, Okafor was not even an alternative, Matt Barnes moved to Suns for a measly veterans minimum so the Front Office has been newly circumscized by the turn of events. All they got back is Sasha at 5M. Will they stand pat? I think so there are no more worthy of signinga as a defensive mentality player. Perhaps, that's the story of next season STAND PAT Kobe's healthy again, LO will play his best on his contract year, Pau will have preseason training and Bynum will have two strong knees.
Posted by: | July 29, 2008 at 10:27 PM
Sorry I forgot to put my name on the previous post to Rick F.
AK/BK what do you mean by the new notations of "bookmark, digg and submit" near your name?Should we be concerned on any privacy issues being compromised on our side?
Posted by: Edwin Gueco | July 29, 2008 at 10:31 PM
Mike T,
Yea that's it! The Lakers made the finals this year because they were "too soft".. Teams rarely make the finals two years in a row so your prediction is lame.
Being "soft" is not the Laker's problem..I've told you this all a long. The Lakers played defense too and it will only get better.
The Lakers problem is a 3rd scorer..Someone who can score at will.
Kwame Brown is all damm muscle and he couldnt take us out of the first round..But you won't answer that comment will you?
Kwame Brown sucks. If the Lakers had Ginobli or a 3rd scorer like that, we would have won it all!
If the Lakers are too soft, then all the other teams besides Boston are too soft too! The Lakers can't beat anyone except Boston right now,
Posted by: zen | July 29, 2008 at 10:43 PM
"Robert" Jackson is a $6 million a year player, donte a rookie,
and 1st round pick....the Lakers could have (note COULD have, not should have constructed a similar deal......like vlad rad makes 6 mill, Jordan Farmar could have been the equivalent of that rookie, and the Lakers could have give their next available 1st round pick. They could have made a $6 million dollar "player" out of combining Walton plus any of the following Trevor, or Mihm or Fisher....I'm glad that the Lakers sat tight and did not deconstruct to get 'Bill".....they are a much more stable team by keeping all the players with small contracts it would have taken to get him. Why didh't Sacramento shove those junk players on Houston???? Thank GAWD we did not take them on...
Houston got Artest solo, we would have gotten "Bill & Ted's Not So Excellent Adventure"......Score another one for Mitch, the Executive of the Year for 2008-2009!!!!!
Let's go dings!
Posted by: humanomaly | July 29, 2008 at 10:48 PM
>>>Or how about Houston keeps Battier and then they have
>>>either Artest or Battier to be on the court all the time
>>>when Kobe is on the court.
And meanwhile Bynum outplays their center and 6'11" Lamar
Odom and 7 foot Gasol make mincemeat of their 6'6" to 6'9"
"power forwards"...
Oh, and by the way, think about these numbers...
56, 70, 56
57, 48, 55
47, 71, 66
That's the number of games that Artest, Yao, and McGrady
have played in over the last three seasons.
Anyone want to give odds on who goes down first? Or
maybe the odds that each of the 3 plays more than 60
games? How bout the odds that all 3 are healthy during
the playoffs?
Posted by: Long Time Laker Fan | July 29, 2008 at 10:49 PM
humanomaly,
>>>>>Tom, the way I think is disjointed I know, sorry to those who
>>>>>want thesis quality writings. By the way, where's Ding Ho and
>>>>>Kevin Ding??? I didn't see a blog by ding or an article by Kevin
>>>>>recently....vacation? Just reachin still....Chinese restuarants,
>>>>>fast food,....what do you want to talk about next, cars?
>>>>>After the earthquake when I was finsihing my tires, I found that
>>>>>one of my tires has bulges, I had hit a pothole too hard,
>>>>>so there goes $300 plus....
I’ve been a BMW guy for the last 25 years. I currently have 2000 740i with sport package that I bought when it had 40K miles and love it, although the friggin’ cup holder is broke and I refuse to pay $350 for them to remove the dash and replace it. Damn Germans never understood about Americans and their coffee and soft drinks. And the super low profile Michelin tires that look so cool cost a fortune to replace, only last 24 months, and have so much rubber on the road that they almost neutralize the power steering. LOL.
I’m still trying to get used to the look of the new 7 but I love my Beemer. I’ve had a Porsche 911, Lexus 400 SC, Mercedes 450SL, and in my very young days a hot1966 Pontiac GTO 389 3X2 barrel carbs, tri power muscle car that could hit a 100 mph in a 1/4 mile. We are what we drive, aren’t we? LOL. Of course, I left out the many VW Beetles, Hondas, Toyotas, Chevys, and a great red Triumph TR6 that wouldn’t shift into reverse for 2 years that I drove all over the Pacific Northwest and Canada. But most men have interesting car histories, much more so than women who don’t have their egos fastened to a machine, except for Faith with Sasha, of course. LOL.
Tom
Posted by: LakerTom | July 29, 2008 at 10:53 PM
I'm not sure if this has already been brought up but this is what Paul Pierce said when asked if Kobe's the best player in the world.
"I don't think Kobe is the best player. I'm the best player. There's a line that separates having confidence and being conceited. I don't cross that line but I have a lot of confidence in myself."
Kobe's conceited?!
GO LAKERS!!!
Posted by: gokobego | July 29, 2008 at 10:55 PM
Another Mike T. gem:
"Artest is mentally tougher than Odom."
By "mentally tough," do you mean a guy willing to go into the stands because someone throws a plastic cup of beer at him after an on-court scuffle? That's some serious mental fortitude right there.
Does grabbing boards equal mental toughness? Yeah, it does. It means getting in there and doing the dirty work amongst flying elbows and knees.
Lamar: 10.6 rpg
Artest: 5.8 rpg
Yeah, Lamar shaved a star on the side of his head. It was strange. Artest shaved the words "Tru Warier" on his head. Mental toughness? No. Mental breakdown? Yes.
I'm sure you would have traded Odom for Artest, Mike T. But you also have a love affair with Kwame Brown. Is he "mentally tough," too? In all honesty, it's mentally tough to take you seriously, because you're a mental midget. No offense to little people, either.
Go Lake Show!
Posted by: The Outlaw | July 29, 2008 at 10:58 PM
Insomnia sucks. I'm still working on the sonnet (what? who cares? I do) but here's a Limerick
Twas once a man named Teniente
His pasta? He likes it el dente
His longings have salves
In a man with stout calves
He dreams of being with Kwame, en flagrante.
IT IS ALL ABOUT THE LOVE
GO LAKERS
Posted by: phred | July 29, 2008 at 11:17 PM
Mike T...
Our own little Golum. Was he really River Folk once?
Wes
Posted by: | July 29, 2008 at 11:25 PM
Ajay and other fellow lakers fans,
the lakers cannot trade their 09 1st rd drft choice. The lakers need to have a first round choice for at least every other year and we gave up the 08 and 10 1st rd choices for gasol. The lakers would have to give up mihm and vlad to houston for a straight up trade but i don't thing the money would still match for just those 2. Also i doubt that houston would even trade Shane becuase artest will be a free agent next year and could sign with another team then they would be out 2 great defenders with nothing of value in return. I think that most us are spoiled with the gasol trade and think that we can always make a trade that one sided and thats just not going to be the case
Posted by: richtown | July 29, 2008 at 11:32 PM
Thank you. No more Lamar for Artest gibberish. I think the deal definitely makes Houston a much better team, but not an elite team. Don't forget that Houston has Mcgrady, who has never gotten out of the 1st round. Thats a pretty crazy curse for someone of his talent. Anyways, couldn't be happier that Lamar will ultimately stay with the Lakers for at least this season. All you doubters will be proven wrong by Lamar's great upcoming season. Just like all you people that wanted to trade Bynum for Kidd or JO. You are crazies just like Ron Artest haha jk.
Lamar = Laker for Life
GO LAKERS
Posted by: mrbarneydangles | July 29, 2008 at 11:32 PM
"San Antonio won three of their titles by basically standing pat making a few minor tweaks"
Exactly my point. Minor tweaks is all we need. I'm not suggesting a big trade, but we have weaknesses that Boston exposed. I would feel better if we addressed them. I'm going to tread lightly here, because I do think Mitch redeemed himself by the moves he did not make, then the Gasol deal. We are oh so close, and a minor tweak might make all the difference in the world.
Posted by: Lincoln Laker | July 29, 2008 at 10:01 PM
Yes, BUT, we didn't win a title. The last team to win a title after losing in a Finals the previous year was a long time ago, the 1985 Lakers.
Usually the idea is "if ain't broke, don't fix it." In our case, it's broken by definition since we lost.
Posted by: Benjamin | July 29, 2008 at 11:57 PM