Lakers Blog

Round-the-Clock Purple and Gold
written by the Kamenetzky brothers.

« Previous Post | Lakers Blog Home | Next Post »

Ron Ron for LO? Or both? Or stand pat?

July 7, 2008 |  9:04 pm

Some of y'all have been discussing Kurt's recent Forum Blue And Gold post about the notion of swapping Lamar Odom for Ron Artest, a plan of attack he's not particularly down to follow.  Kurt breaks down the stats that, in his opinion, make the Lakers better off sticking with Lamar Odom, but there's another angle that dawned on me after perusing his nitty-gritty.  Given that Ron Ron is, to put it kindly, something of a flake, and at his unpredictable worst is capable of, to put it kindly, wrapping up his team in a considerable amount of drama, it would behoove the Lakers to surround the small forward with as many positive influences as possible. 

Ironically, their #1 available asset might be Lamar Odom, who grew up with Artest and probably knows him better than anyone else with the franchise.  That background might help LO reach his old pal, or at the very least, keep him from going goony bird and messing up a rather unified locker room (with all due respect to the combined presences of Phil Jackson, Kobe Bryant and Derek Fisher, don't even pretend it can't happen).  Along those lines, it could make sense for the Lakers to go out of their way to keep Lamar in the mix, assuming such wishes are even possible.

Thus, I began wracking my brain (and ESPN's trade machine) to come up with a scenario to retain LO while dealing for Artest.  I immediately skipped the solution most fans would drum up, dealing/packaging either Vlad Radmanovic or Luke Walton, since there's no logical reason the Kings would take on either's salary.  I don't care how disgruntled Artest may grow in Cow Town; Sacto would be better off buying him out or even suspending him for the entire season and watching him walk "for nothing" than screwing up their looming cap flexibility with role players.   On the flip side, the Lakers ain't offering Kobe Bryant, Pau Gasol, Andrew Bynum, Fisher (or, in this scenario, Odom) and have no other matching salaries, so here was the one deal I could come up with that might (and I emphasize "might") entice the Lakers' divisional rival. 

Trevor Ariza, Chris Mihm and Jordan Farmar for Artest.

Every outgoing Laker contract is expiring (always a plus), and in Ariza and Farmar, the Kings get to take a look at two young players, the former a super athlete who showed some promise last season and the latter who could, at worst, make a nice backup to Beno Udrih and, at best, possibly take over if he ends up a one season wonder.  But here's the problem.  The Lakers would be left with just seven players under contract, meaning they can't do this unless Sasha Vujacic and Ronny Turiaf are resigned (as the replacements would either be guys like Joe Crawford and DJ Mbenga or dudes on a split up MLE, likely not a powerhouse lot).  Even with those two in the fold, losing Ariza (increased backup minutes for Vlad and/or Walton, both of whom struggled last season), Farmar (who doesn't really have a replacement) and even Mihm (if theoretically healthy) could hurt the rotation more than Artest helps it. 

Thus, after all the brainstorming, we're back to the original drawing board proposal: Artest (and probably Kenny Thomas) for LO, valuable in his own right, great for team chemistry and perhaps a stabilizer to prevent Artest from destroying it.  So between that notion and the points brought up by Kurt, would you  stillmake the swap?   As I already said in LO's report card, I'm of the opinion that Odom should be retained until we see what's doing with the NBA's longest front court.   I'd have been willing to add Ron Ron as a free agent (had he pulled the opt out), but under the current circumstances, I'd likely pass. 

But I'm wondering what you think.

AK


The comments to this entry are closed.

Comments

I'm sure by now bloggers have already read all the Brand twists and turns but I thought I'd include this tidbit from one of the Times articles:

"Technically, Brand took a bigger offer from the 76ers, $82 million to the Clippers' $75 million. However, with Sterling giving his basketball people a blank check, the Clippers were going to dump enough players to get to $81 million.

That offer was never relayed to Brand. The Clippers say at the end, agent David Falk stopped returning their calls."

Justalakerfan,

same here! lol.

Faith,

I think we just disagree on the level of talent the Sixers have. I like Iggy and Miller, Dalembert is a very good defensive center, Willie Green and Yound are promising. And they added another promising piece in Marresse Speights from Florida (though I think he's probably a year or two away).

Lakerbake,

>>>>>Hey LakerTom who I credit for being positive all last summer
>>>>>during the LAKERNATION summer of hell.

>>>>>Here is the genie out of the bottle, quiet as it's kept,
>>>>>KENDRICK PERKINS outplayed ANDREW BYNUM
>>>>>both times last yr in the regular season.

>>>>>I hope that Bynum works himself back with a vengeance and
>>>>>commands a Celtic and League wide Double team.
>>>>>That along with more defense will make us CHAMPIONS at last.

>>>>>He needs to make Gasol and Odom CLEAR after thoughts.
>>>>>The DOUBLE TEAM he commands will make that clear.
>>>>>We would be a game planning nightmare for coaches.

I think I told you earlier that the two Lakers games I missed all year were the two against the Celtics – family and business obligations. Did Perkins really outplay Bynum? Or was it more of the same that saw the Celtics team outplay the Lakers team? Or was it Tom Thibodeau’s defense using the refs and the rules to defend against the Lakers?

At any rate, I am confident Andrew is not only going to just come back as good as he that he is going to come back even better after sitting and watching and yearning to play for half of the year and all of the playoffs. He will come back as an unstoppable beast on offense, defense, and the boards.

In the games I saw during the two months before Drew was injured, there was no doubt in my mind that Drew was the physically dominant force on offense and defense in every game, whether we won or lost. He had learned how to stay on the court, how to block shots, and how he could soar above the rim to grab any rebound or lob pass he touched.

And nobody in the league, including Shaquille O’Neal finished with more power or authority or physicality than Drew did. Not Amare, Duncan, Jermaine, Kaman, Camby, Chandler, or any of the other NBA centers and power forwards he abused and dominated. So you will have to forgive me when I hear that the Lakers are soft and need help. I would love to take a bet on how Perkins does against Drew this year. How about it? jk.

To me, that’s just the story du jour by the idiot sports center newsmakers and analysts who never played the game and don’t really know what they are talking about – a simple answer to a much more complex question. A couple of plays or breaks here or there or one more player and one less having a good series and it would be the Celtics hearing the questions and listening to the overreactions that always follow championship series.

Tom

LakerTom,

>>>>>Mitch does a great job of dealing with player egos and >>>>>as a result, players have only good will for him and the >>>>>team right now.

This strikes me as a little bit revisionist history. Mitch couldn't keep Shaq and Kobe happy and had to lose Shaq. Mitch couldn't make Shaq work hard.

Mitch almost lost Kobe by telling him he'd surround him with championship caliber talent and then surrounding him with Odom, Walton, Kwame Brown and Smush Parker.

Mitch couldn't deal with Smush Parker's ego.

Mitch couldn't deal well with Gary Payton either. Payton screwed us over by not showing up to his physical and forcing us to alter our trade at the time.

Mitch didn't deal well with Brian Cook's ego, nor with Kwame Brown's ego. Both played far below their potential.


Mitch gets a lot of credit for things he's done well like drafting his whole career and trades this season. But, I really think it's almost surreal to suggest he deals well with player egos. I see absolutely no evidence to suggest that's one of his skills.

In that regard he is no Jerry West. Few people are. The logo commanded a unique respect you just can't get from other former players.

LakerBake,

You've got me seriously fired up to acquire Gerald Wallace.

I'M READY RIGHT NOW!

WHERE DO I SIGN??!!

ex,

“You think that they think that the Lakers roster, at the time of the Finals, was better than the Celtics roster?”

Yes, I do. Both before and after the series. Bynum would have been the difference. I thought I remembered you agreeing with that. Has the overreaction and usual wide pendulum swing of the sing-the-same-story press changed your mind, too. Or did an old man just remember wrong? LOL. Best regards, ex.

Tom

LakerTom, sclakerfan, others,

The question of Celtics versus Lakers rosters is an interesting one.

I think one confounding area is the major changes in the Celtics from the beginning of the season to the end.

Rondo stepped up big time. There had been significant talk about him not being good enough and that, decent as he was, they needed to find a replacement with superior talent.

Perkins improved as well.

The whole team's defense, with Garnett's insane fire at the lead and under the tutelage of brilliant tactician Tom Thibadeau improved and changed the team big time.

PJ Brown and Cassell came in to provide very solid relief minutes.

Posey stepped up big time too though his improvement he was more expected than anyone else.


It's important to not confuse this Finals Celtics team with the one that started the season (good as they looked like they'd be).


So, main matchup of Kobe/Odom/Gasol versus Allen/Pierce/KG. I like the Celts here. Kobe is better than Allen, significantly so. Pierce is similarly superior to Odom. KG is a lot better than Gasol. And I think Gasol is quite good. I think Fisher-Rondo is close. I think any of our SFs versus Perkins makes Perkins a huge favorite. Wouldn't have been the case if Ariza had had a healthy month. I realize I'm cross-matching here.

The Lakers bench looked bad in the playoffs on road games. I didn't watch a lot of the Celtics bench, but after they improved it with PJ Brown and Cassell, I think it was similar to the Lakers.


Once the Finals actually rolled around, LakerTom explained it perfectly. We were outplayed and outmuscled with our starters. The Celtcs veterans showed our inexperienced guys what was up.

We played worse than I expected. And how the Celtics suddenly got it together after going 7 games in their first two series, I'll never know.


Okay, back to not thinking about that. Let's think about improving the team and enjoying watching us kick ass all next season.

Great ticket prices went up...again. To heck with it, if I ever have kids they just wont go to college.

JustaLakerFan,

Thanks for your support for the Lakers absolute need to sign Bynum this summer.

>>>>> Now for those of you that said don’t sign him, no problem,
|>>>>>just let him become restricted FA we can match offer.
>>>>>Well there is a problem in first if
>>>>>we have to match offer then the cost may be more.

The even bigger problem is that if the Lakers do not sign Drew this summer, they will not have another opportunity to sign him until he becomes a restricted free agent after next year, the 2008/9 season. That is why the priority is to sign Drew this summer.

And Drew will NOT go to go out and get offers for Lakers to match once they tender a qualifying offer to make him a restricted free agent. Instead, he will accept the qualifying offer and play out the 2009/10 season so that he can become an unrestricted free agent at the end of that season when many NBA teams will have cleared maximum cap space to be able to sign LeBron James, Dwayne Wade, or Chris Bosh, all of whom have options to become unrestricted free agents for the first and only time in their careers at the end of the 2009/10 season. It is like the ultimate time to become an unrestricted free agent.

Don’t think that Drew’s agent and the Lakers’ front office don’t realize this. That is why the Lakers will do whatever is needed to sign Drew to an extension before the October 31st deadline. It’s their only real option. Anybody who thinks otherwise is wrong.

Tom

THE DAILY CENT

haha Ron Artest actually thinks he had a shot to make the American basketball team? haha hell will freeze over before that happens.Nobody is going to take a chance on some guy who could potentially start smacking some little fan from Japan around.Can you imagine?

Ron Artest will be a laker before he's an Olympian - and that is not going to happen either.

As for the clippers? Sterling is just bad at his job - too little too late.Brand wanted to be with people who know what they are doing.

Signing Bynum to a max contract would be a massive overeaction

The lakers will match the Turiaf offer

Kobe needs to think about taking a pay cut

Lets not forget that this lakers team - as badly as the finals went - got the top seed...got through the playoffs winning important games when they needed to.everyones just taking those victories for granted.If you can accomplish what they did this season in the west then you are good enough to win a title....just had a bad finals against the wrong team at the wrong time.

Benjamin: Sensitive, aren't we? Lighten up francis.....
I lived on the East coast when Artest was playing for Pacers and saw him play quite a few times at MSG and in Indy. Yes the Pacers had good individual players but they were not good teammates. It happened to OUR beloved Lakers with 4 legit all-stars. And I still seethe about it every time I see my Lakers 03-04 basketball signed by all of them.

My bottom line on Artest is that IMO he is just not ready to be a teammate, sacrifice and really take his game to championship level. He still wants the cash. And now look at Brand - same thing.

While I don't like talking about the C's - you have to admit, there were a lot of guys that were willing to make the sacrifice, got their minutes, cut their $ and do what it took to get the O'Brien. That's what impressed me more than anything.

It's great to have the cash but I bet if you ask PJ Brown what's better - he'd take the trophy any day.

Justa,
Brand was on the last year of a big contract, already making big money. Bynum would agree to play for only 4 M, knowing that the Lakers would be able to offer him more money than anyone else. Bynum would never have had a big contract at that point.

Completely different scenario.

Wth respect to Laker Tom I will reply to this.

LakerTom,

>>>>>Mitch does a great job of dealing with player egos and >>>>>as a result, players have only good will for him and the >>>>>team right now.

This strikes me as a little bit revisionist history. Mitch couldn't keep Shaq and Kobe happy and had to lose Shaq. Mitch couldn't make Shaq work hard.

[Mitch? No that is the coaches job. (remember the previoss sentence) Coach took sides which made matters worse.]

Mitch almost lost Kobe by telling him he'd surround him with championship caliber talent and then surrounding him with Odom, Walton, Kwame Brown and Smush Parker.

[odom is fine and is championship role player, Luke is PJ's boy, Kwame Brown most everybody thought he was the answer including Pippen (I know a secret), and Smush who was a PJ project.]

Mitch couldn't deal with Smush Parker's ego.

[ That is coaches job. That sentence again.]

Mitch couldn't deal well with Gary Payton either. Payton screwed us over by not showing up to his physical and forcing us to alter our trade at the time.

[So when is that Mith's fault. For that fact Payton screwed the entire organization including the coach who is frontline of management dealing with players.]

Mitch didn't deal well with Brian Cook's ego, nor with Kwame Brown's ego. Both played far below their potential.

[That's the coaches job]


Mitch gets a lot of credit for things he's done well like drafting his whole career and trades this season. But, I really think it's almost surreal to suggest he deals well with player egos. I see absolutely no evidence to suggest that's one of his skills.

[ The fault with that is you blame Mitch for PJ's short commings. Mitch did make a mistake alright he hired PJ. Ooops that was J. Buss]

In that regard he is no Jerry West. Few people are. The logo commanded a unique respect you just can't get from other former players.

[ You also forget how many other teams kept trying to hire Mitch away from Lakers. And yes few people can replace a legand and that is because the legand is a legand. Think UCLA on how many coaches have come and gone since John W. But Mitch has done a great job. ]

Posted by: Benjamin | July 08, 2008 at 11:07 PM

Justa,
Brand was on the last year of a big contract, already making big money. Bynum would agree to play for only 4 M, knowing that the Lakers would be able to offer him more money than anyone else. Bynum would never have had a big contract at that point.

Completely different scenario.

Posted by: exhelodrvr | July 09, 2008 at 11:19 AM

I agree with you on "at this point". I am saying the pathway is there to leave. Next yr play for the qualifinging contract for 1 year. Then he will become unrestricted and can go anywhere he wants regardless of what the Lakers offer.

Lakers 2008 = Soft.

Get rid of Lamaronny Waltmonivich and fill their positions with thugs. Mamba, AB, Pau, Fish, JF and Sasha can handle the actual basketball while the thugs take care of the tuff.

BTW, a foul is not a foul when you play for a team from the no-talent Eastern Conference. Think of it like the DH rule in the American League. The National League doesn't have the DH and the Western Conference doesn't have the mugging allowed rule.

Also, Boston plays an illegal D every time down the floor.

Minor changes aren't gonna cut it. No tuffness and no D equals another finals loss in 2009.

OK, can't we think a little more long term here. How about waiting one season and then Artest is a free agent just as Lamar's contract ends? Then he can be signed for nobody and still have some room to resign Odum (kinda like the Brand, Davis thing was supposed to go down) but maybe we also resign him. Any trade now for Artest now is for ONLY ONE SEASON. A little patience here.

OK, can't we think a little more long term here. How about waiting one season and then Artest is a free agent just as Lamar's contract ends? Then he can be signed for nobody and still have some room to resign Odum (kinda like the Brand, Davis thing was supposed to go down) but maybe we also resign him. Any trade now for Artest now is for ONLY ONE SEASON. A little patience here.

Ron Artest for Odom is a good deal for L.A, on the finals LAkers looked boys among man, We all know that Artest is not soft remember the "BRAWL" in detroit oh you guys forgot. Artest will just bring toughnest to the LAKERS , Odom gave us all that he has in him.

Mitch if you can read this!!! pls pls pls get rid of walton , minh and radmanovic. I know signing walton for 5 million a year was a big mistake. That money should belong to turiaf. If you can get artest without gettin rid of lamar do it. because i really dont see any toughness in pau, but i do see it in lamar. so pls pls pls

Mitch if you can read this!!! pls pls pls get rid of walton , minh and radmanovic. I know signing walton for 5 million a year was a big mistake. That money should belong to turiaf. If you can get artest without gettin rid of lamar do it. because i really dont see any toughness in pau, but i do see it in lamar. so pls pls pls

No how about Luke Walton, Chris Mihm and Vlade for Ron Artest not Farmer and Trevor, that would be crazy for the Lakers to do but they really need to make this trade somehow and to me those four have to go Luke, Vlade, Odom and Mihm.

If the Lakers can get Artest for LO they will do it in a second, they tried to dump LO's salary in the Gasol trade but couldn't give him away

 


Advertisement

About the Bloggers

Recent Posts
Lakers 130, Warriors 97: Everything's Golden |  November 29, 2009, 11:14 am »
Programming Update: No Live Blog Tonight |  November 28, 2009, 6:04 pm »
In lieu of Laker links... Laker Laughs! |  November 28, 2009, 11:34 am »
Post-Thanksgiving Leftovers |  November 27, 2009, 4:24 pm »
Reading helps your digestion |  November 27, 2009, 11:23 am »



Archives
 




Buy Tickets
Search for Tickets
 

LATimes.com now offers sports tickets to popular events around the world including NBA tickets, MLB tickets and NFL tickets to otherwise sold-out events.

Popular Events
As the Lakers get set to defend their title, Lakers tickets are going to be huge all season. Dodgers tickets and Angels tickets are also in high demand with another season of MLB baseball underway.

We've got plenty of LA sports tickets and college football tickets for sale, with MLB tickets and USC football tickets being the mosts popular sellers at the moment.
Powered by TicketNetwork