Report Card- Derek Fisher
When the Lakers brought Derek Fisher back to LA, it was with the expectation that he would not only improve them at the point guard position from a talent standpoint- not exactly the tallest of orders, given he was replacing Smush Parker- but help add to and balance the leadership of (a then unhappy) Kobe Bryant in the locker room and on the floor. Fisher wasn't a player still needing to earn Kobe's respect and trust. He already had it.
Mitch Kupchak and Phil Jackson knew they weren't getting the Fisher who could run 30 or 35 minutes a night, as he often did during the Threepeat era, but hoped he could give them good minutes, and that between Jordan Farmar and Javaris Crittenton, the Lakers would be covered.
It's fair to say they got what they were looking for.
During training camp, Fisher told me that he saw his job, in part, as one of teaching the Lakers how to play with Kobe. It can be tough, he said, to run with a star of his drive and high expectations. "Kobe's a dominant basketball player, he's a dominant personality. You have to understand those things and still feel good about who you are as a player, and feel comfortable about going out there and doing the things you need to do," he said. "You still have your space. And that's what he expects from you as a teammate. He doesn't expect you to bend to his pressure. He needs you." Easier said than done, but Fish could lead by example.
Certainly having him around during the three ring media circus that was training camp and the early weeks of the season, with the constant trade talk and endless rumors, was invaluable. As the season went on, Fisher continued to provide leadership on and off the floor, a role that continued into the playoffs.
That Fisher could deliver the intangibles was a given. A larger question heading into the year was how much his play- his actual on-court production- would benefit the team. Remember, Fisher wasn't a top shelf starting point guard during his first stint in LA. Solid, but no superstar. Now three years later and into his 30s, some wondered how much impact have, and whether it would be enough. Again, Fish delivered. While he was no Chris Paul, Fish did what was expected of him, and (depending on your POV) perhaps more, registering career or near career highs in field goal percentage (43.6%), three point shooting (40.6%), free throws (88.3%), and scoring (11.7 ppg).
Defensively, while Fish would sometimes have trouble sticking quicker guards, he certainly constituted an improvement over Parker.
Like many supporting players, night to night Fisher's production would vary. He'd occasionally go cold from the floor (not surprising, since he's never been known as a true knock-down gunner), and suffered through a miserable February shooting slump. But breaking down his splits, it's clear that he was able to provide solid and steady production over all 82 games of the regular season. In the playoffs, Fish shot 45% from the floor, including 44% from downtown, while averaging just over 10 points a game. He struggled against Tony Parker and the Spurs, and like everyone else on the Lakers, wasn't able to exert his will against the Celtics, but overall played reasonably well in the postseason, especially when considering he was playing through a painful injury to his foot.
In the end, what Derek Fisher gave the Lakers this season isn't easily calculated simply by examining the stat sheet. But had his contributions stopped merely with leadership, it's easy to question if the Lakers would have made the run that they did. Relative to the rest of his career, especially, Fisher played well. Whether he's able to sustain it over the rest of his deal remains to be seen, but the Lakers certainly got their money's worth this year.
Grade: B+
BK



Artest
Hey I know he's a mad man. But let's not let, say, San Antonio pick him up!?
Duncan
Parker
Ginobili
Artest
The Brazilian who never shoots
That would be a tough starting lineup.
John
Posted by: john_in_houston | July 18, 2008 at 09:15 AM
Can we do a sign and trade - Sasha plus VladRad and Mihm for Ron Ron and Thomas? I like that and they might go for it.
Posted by: Jay Jay | July 18, 2008 at 09:16 AM
I am not an addict, I can quit Laker Blog ANYTIME I WANT!
Hey...hey man, do you think I could, y'know, just borrow your laptop for a second...I need to, uh, check my email.
Thanks.
WHAT?! Coby Karl got a D????? Oh man, I just gotta type my feelings, so many feelings. I just have to say something to Let's Go C's...he's such a pill. What's Kobe doing right now? Is Mitch calling to inquire about Kurt Thomas? All of these feelings...
Lakers...Lakers...Lakers...(drooling all over shirt)
Maybe we are addicts. I also hope we sign Ronny.
Posted by: Jamie Sweet | July 18, 2008 at 09:16 AM
Moves to Be Made
Sign Sasha.
Sign Kwaminus.
Sign Artest and Thomas.
Squad:
Fisher, Farmer, Sun Yi
Kobe, Sasha, Karl
Artest, Ariza, Luke
Gasol, Radmanovic, Thomas
Bynum, Mihm, Kwamster
And we roll into 3 or 4 titles if Gasol and Bynum stay healthy.
John
Posted by: john_in_houston | July 18, 2008 at 09:18 AM
Phunk36=Chucky23.........................Hay Phunk i mean chucky who is it. I know Phunk and chucky same identity. Give it up dude your hate for P.J., AK and BK and Luke Walton has something in common. And i believe its race based .You`r a racist and a bigot, give it up dude.
Posted by: Troll Patrol | July 18, 2008 at 09:24 AM
Fatty,
Your welcome.
PsychedLakerGirl,
Not so Psyched today huh?
Yes the Bynum knee worries me. But I had the same thoughts for Amare "Stat." At this point I feel it is a shell life issue. The Lakers should have all their big men develop with the Cap. What fun sessions with our 7 footers. Bynum was a great student to Kareem, that only played a Highschool amount of basketball games. He was drafted only on size and potential. But this kid listened. (Imagine if lazy ass Olawakandi listened) Anyways, at this point I play the waiting game with Bynum.
Posted by: Charles | July 18, 2008 at 09:26 AM
JLF,
>>>David herein referred to as agent- Drew already is
>>>one of the best centers and on par with Dwight and
>>>better than Amare so why not pay him now? And yes
>>>Drew can play at this level.
Mitch:
Well, let's see. Dwight played 82 games this season, averaged
20 points, 14 rebounds and 2 blocks, and made the All-Star
team. All of which are significantly
higher than
what Drew performed this year. And in their one head to
head meeting, Andrew scored 10 and had 6 rebounds, while
Dwight scored 17 and had 8 rebounds, and the Lakers lost.
Oh, and Dwight, who also came out of high school like Drew,
was in good enough shape his rookie season to play 32 minutes
a game for all 82 games and he has never missed a game due
to injury his entire career.
So what exact criteria makes you think that Andrew is
"on par" with Dwight?
And Amare played 79 games this season, and averaged
25 points, 9 rebounds, and 2 blocks. And he also made
the All-Star team and was the leading scorer for his team
in the playoffs.
Amare had 33 games last season where he had at least 20 points
and 10 rebounds. Drew has had 5 such games in his
whole career.
Dwight had 11 games where he had at least 30 points and 10
rebounds. Drew has never scored 30 points.
Nothing personal Andrew, but while your agent may say
that you are better than those two players, clearly the facts
don't bear it out and the rest of the league doesn't agree
with his assessment. If your agent were being honest with you
and with us, he would have compared your performance to players
like Andrew Bogut or Andris Biedrins. In your very best 4 or 5
games, you've played at a higher level than those two, but
averaged over each of your best months your numbers are
comparable to theirs.
Except for the fact that Bogut played 78 games last season
and Biedrins played 76.
Posted by: Long Time Laker Fan | July 18, 2008 at 09:30 AM
Jamie Sweet
The Machine will come.
Posted by: Charles | July 18, 2008 at 09:30 AM
I wonder if any of you will still be Ronny fans when he's playing ruff and doing dirty things to the lakers players becuase he will, don't kid yourself about that. I've always said that I like/love Ronny as a laker but on another team I would probably hate him.
I can't wait to read the blog after the first hard foul ronny puts on Gasol or Bynum and see how many ronny lovers will still be singing his praises.
Posted by: richtown | July 18, 2008 at 09:43 AM
PsychedLakerGirl,
I agree.
Our training staff has been drinking stupid juice for the last few years, so let's not make their job any more difficult by bringing on players that need bionic ankles and whatnot.
GO LAKERS!
Posted by: Jon K. | July 18, 2008 at 09:45 AM
JLF,
>>>[Then agent replies Mihm and Kwame are not the
>>>same talent level as Drew and their injuries are of no
>>>relevance to Drew’s injury status.]
And Mihm and Kwame were both paid considerably less
than we are offering Drew.
Though the injuries are unrelated, the consequences would
just as devastating to the Lakers if we blindly paid Andrew
the maximum that we think he would be worth if fully healthy
and then his injury persists and limits him to a much lower
level of play. In fact, since the size of Bynum's contract will
be much larger, the effects of a persistent injury would be even
more devastating.
>>>[I like to think of Drew as that unique player you
>>>described to be more like Kobe anmd play through
>>>various injuries.]
Yes, Kobe is remarkable, isn't he. Kobe was on the floor
for the playoffs playing through his pain. If Andrew was
a fast healer like Kobe, he would have been on the floor
for the playoffs. Since he wasn't, you can see why we're
concerned.
>>>[A fluke injury does not make Drew injury prone
>>>unless of course all Lakers are injury prone with
>>>LO’s feet]
Players step on other players feet all the time in this league.
Dwight Howard does it a hundred times a season, yet he's
never
had a "fluke" injury that's made him miss 1 game.
Andrew missed most of his senior year of High School with an
injury, then came into the league too out of shape to play more than
a few minutes per game. To his credit, he did get into shape
last summer and had a lot more stamina this season.
While you might say that this was just a freak accident and
that Drew will never have another bad injury in his career,
the evidence of the past four years tends to point in the opposite
direction.
If you honestly believe that Andrew will have no major injuries,
then he should have no problem making the modest incentives
and he will be paid what you are asking. So which is it?
Do you believe that Andrew will stay healthy and will be
paid the maximum? Or do you not believe that Andrew will
stay healthy?
Posted by: Long Time Laker Fan | July 18, 2008 at 09:46 AM
Fish is an A.
We don't get all the way to the Finals without him.
Hands down!
He was, and is integral.
The Finals was the Finals. But, he sure got us there (they all did).
--Fearless
Posted by: Fearless | July 18, 2008 at 09:46 AM
john_in_houston,
Absolutely! Send Ron Bill Ron Ron d'Artest to San Antonio!
I'm sure Ron Bill Ron Ron will THRIVE having Popovich constantly yelling and screaming at him! That's just what Ron Bill Ron Ron needs to focus himself!
Championship for the Spurs and Ron Bill Ron Ron! MVP for Ron Bill Ron Ron!
GO LAKERS!
Posted by: Jon "Bill" K. | July 18, 2008 at 09:49 AM
john_in_houston,
Absolutely! Send Ron Bill Ron Ron d'Artest to San Antonio!
I'm sure Ron Bill Ron Ron will THRIVE having Popovich constantly yelling and screaming at him! That's just what Ron Bill Ron Ron needs to focus himself!
Championship for the Spurs and Ron Bill Ron Ron! MVP for Ron Bill Ron Ron!
GO LAKERS!
Posted by: Jon | July 18, 2008 at 09:49 AM
Mamba,
You know what to do. Put me on the Fish for an A, or is it the an A for the Fish bandwagon?!
--Fearless
Posted by: Fearless | July 18, 2008 at 09:50 AM
Charles,
I'm not worried about Bynum's knee.
The Kraken will be Released. It's destiny.
GO LAKERS!
Posted by: Jon "Bill" K. | July 18, 2008 at 09:58 AM
Fearless,
We wouldn't have gotten past Utah if it weren't for Derek Fisher, let alone made it to the Finals.
If that's not an "A", I don't know what is.
However, I suspect that BK has been drinking fermented bass juice fresh out of his "Bass-o-matic" and it may be impairing his judgement a bit.
BK! Lay off the hard stuff when you're doing grading, okay?
GO LAKERS!
Posted by: Jon "Bill" K. | July 18, 2008 at 10:02 AM
Jon K,
But Kraken's don't have knees.
Posted by: Charles | July 18, 2008 at 10:12 AM
AK-BK
Time for a new thread that doesn't contain the word Fisher and the letter/symbol B+ in the same paragraph.
Love for Kevin. Not the that Kevin
http://tinyurl.com/5swejg
Posted by: Charles | July 18, 2008 at 10:18 AM
Charles,
Sure they do. Kraken have lots of knees. And they're replaceable, like the heads of the Hydra. For every knee a Kraken blows out is replaced by two new good knees. Clearly you are not up-to-date on your "Clash of the Titans" mythos.
Don't you remember seeing Bynum in the film?
GO LAKERS!
Posted by: Jon K. | July 18, 2008 at 10:23 AM
Long Time,
>>>>> So you've sat in on NBA players negotiating their contracts
>>>>>frequently, huh? That must be interesting.
Yes, let me tell you about the time I negotiated George Mikan’s first pro contract way back…
OK, while I have never sat in on an NBA player negotiation, I have been on both sides of the table negotiating business contracts worth millions of dollars and employment contracts worth hundreds of thousands. Incentives in NBA contracts are handled similarly to how incidentals are in a business contract or benefits are in an employment contract. They are dealt with after the principle terms of the deal have been reached.
Long Time, I am not saying your idea for an incentive laden contract for Drew is without merit. I understand the reasons you want to do it. In a perfect world, I would even agree with you that it would be a better way to compensate players. But in the real business world, the last thing you are going to do is to risk NOT getting Andrew signed to an extension by trying to sell him on a radical new type of compensation and contract. That is the business reality of the situation.
>>>>>Unique situation. Unique player. Unique contract offer.
Critical situation, Franchise player, NOT the time to monkey around.
Tom
Posted by: LakerTom | July 18, 2008 at 10:34 AM
Fearless,
"We don't get all the way to the Finals without him."
Well, the same applies to Bynum, Gasol, Vujacic, Bryant, Odom, Vlad, Walton, Brown, Turiaf, and Ariza, because all of them played important roles at least in getting home court advantage, which was a factor at least in the Spurs series.
So give them all A's!!
Posted by: exhelodrvr | July 18, 2008 at 10:35 AM
Most of us have had a personal interest in watching Kobe develop these last years and Andrew is the new kid on that block. It pumps up the fan experience.
But finance is a different department. There's sound historical reason to question the longevity of NBA big men.
At present Andrew's only a franchise player in that the kind of money that's on his table would kill the franchise if it turns out he has a knee, foot or hip "issue" that's revealed over a season. Why bet the max on a doctor's opinion when you don't have to. If he becomes Cap 2, you pay him accordingly... then.
Somewhere in Jon K's AB Bio Chrono reading I'm sure it says that Andrew won't tend to get so insulted by a cautious offer from the LA Lakers that he bolts for New York.
Posted by: Vman | July 18, 2008 at 10:48 AM
i was willing to let it go... but, no one seems to give AK and BK any credit.
Look, i like Fish as much as anyone. He's 3000% better than Smush and his terrible attitude. Fish played near his career highs in many categories and was a huge boost to team morale and growth.
But, i do have to say that he disappeared often. He was virtually a non factor in the finals and even Cassell made him look soft.
Fish is what he is. I don't even know if he's capable of being an "A" player. I like the grade he was issued.
On a side note, i don't think anyone on our team should have gotten an A. Hopefully they are all doing their part to come into next season prepared, committed to Defense and bringing their "A - GAME".
Posted by: Benny Blanca | July 18, 2008 at 10:49 AM
exhelodrvr,
To be honest with you, I think the players who we could say "We wouldn't have gotten to the Finals without him/them" are:
Kobe Bryant
Lamar Odom
Pau Gasol
Derek Fisher
That's it. I love this team dearly, but these four got us (nearly) to the Promised Land.
Everybody else could have been replaced with similarly competent players and we still would have excelled.
GO LAKERS!
Posted by: Jon K. | July 18, 2008 at 10:59 AM
Jon K,
"Everybody else could have been replaced with similarly competent players and we still would have excelled."
You can say that about every player on the team. You might not be able to find someone at Kobe's level, but you certainly could for everyone else.
Posted by: exhelodrvr | July 18, 2008 at 12:40 PM
exhelodrvr,
Probably correct.
I just think that Kobe, Lamar, Pau, and Derek brought unique gifts they have to this season and that those players really made a difference.
GO LAKERS!
Posted by: Jon K. | July 18, 2008 at 12:53 PM
Fischer looks good in that photo only because GNASH is allowing derek to be in His presence.
GNASH = 2 x MVP, which makes him twice as valuable as Jellybean Jr.
If fischer can develop his skills along the lines of a Sam Cassell, he could prove a worthy addition.
Posted by: BUTLER | July 18, 2008 at 01:16 PM
This is ridiculous. Odom gets an A and Fisher gets a B? Fisher deserves at least an A- and I would give Odom a C-. Night after night of hearing about how Odom creates match up nightmares, but never seeing him take advantage of ANY of them, definitely makes him tradeable to me.
Posted by: Derek | July 18, 2008 at 01:29 PM
JustaLakerFan,
Thanks for having my back with Long Time with your excellent comments about his presentation. It’s very much appreciated.
Tom
Posted by: LakerTom | July 18, 2008 at 01:50 PM
Good column by Mark Stein:
http://tinyurl.com/5cwsne
Posted by: exhelodrvr | July 18, 2008 at 02:53 PM
Plaschke stinks
Please dont do anymore videos, i have epileptic fits when i see you
Posted by: Pblaze | July 18, 2008 at 05:53 PM
Offering a max contract to a "potentially great" player who has not
yet exhibited full greatness and who was too out of shape to play
more than a few minutes a game one season and who was
injured for more than half of another season: THAT is gross negligence.
Posted by: Long Time Laker Fan | July 17, 2008 at 10:32 PM
----------------------------------
LTLF
Wow, assesment based on a rookie 17 yr old out of HS first yr with no love or support from PJ. 2nd yr , sophmore jinx and again no PJ love even though he was starting to show signs of his dominance. PJ set up conditioning excuse which Bynum accepted as constructive criticism.
But look at playoffs wih funs that yr and you will see he was demanding double coverage by funs but PJ refused to exploit that mismatch. No way you could convince me with those short minutes that he was winded. BS.
Again every Laker is injury prone by your standards sinces LO's foot caused injury. He hurt other players with his feet so all Lakers are injury prone and should be paid less. Get real now.
Posted by: JustaLakerFan | July 18, 2008 at 06:07 PM
Lets Go C's.....why are you still here? Do you like this blog? Are you in love with the Lakers? Clearly you have an obsession with this blog. The Finals are over..Celtics won...move on towards next year and quit reflecting on the past. Good Day.
Posted by: drew | July 18, 2008 at 07:14 AM
---------------------------
Drew,
I would suggest it is best not to address the Troll directly.
I say this so as not to encourage the Troll to respond directly. If a particular comment or post or in this case why it is still here try to address the community rather than the Troll.
For instance hey guys why is this Troll still posting here?
Tht way you make your point (wound the troll) and don't let it respond to you.
Just a suggestion to deal with it or don't reply at all.
Have a good one!
Posted by: JustaLakerFan | July 18, 2008 at 06:22 PM
JustaLaker,
"make him injury prone. "
Combine that with the significantly extended recovery time, the fact that he missed most of his senior year high school basketball season, and the fact that he has a wider-than normal pelvis for someone his size and is slightly bow-legged (from one of the medical reports) which makes these type injuried more likely, and the answer to your question, at this point, is yes. Which is why Bynum needs to prove himself physically before getting a max contract.
Posted by: exhelodrvr | July 18, 2008 at 07:45 AM
-----------------------
Ex,
I respectfully disagree. His body was different in HS and not fully developed. You can't compare an adolecence body to a mans body. Yes Drew is bigger and stronger than he was then and he is a young man not a teenager. His body is more developed now.
Knees? Really how can you say his knews affects his propensity for injuries? On what medical data do you base that on? Also even if there is a bit of credence to your point of view, does not advanced medical technolegies be utilized even as simple as a knee brace?
The long timr recovery was due more to the hope he would be able to come back in 6-8 weeks without surgery so he would be able to come back in time for playoffs. He did not heal and kept getting extended but not for his slow healing process rather that hoping his injury would heal sans surgery. It became apparant after all the lost time it was not going to be the case and with 20/20 hindsight arthoscopic surgery would have been the better option from the start.
Also I have said use training camp and preseason to prove if physically ready. Again with the max contract again.
I have said I hope they sign him to a contract in which both sides are mutually agreeable to value. Whether it be like Boguts contract or whatever. No matter how much or little so long as both sides are happy. That means max or less what ever both sides agree on.
Posted by: JustaLakerFan | July 18, 2008 at 06:41 PM
Justa,
"par with Dwight "
Not at this point he's not.
Posted by: exhelodrvr | July 18, 2008 at 07:47 AM
-----------------------
Ex,
Again I respectfully disagree. I think he is on par with Dwight right now and will pass him soon too.
Posted by: JustaLakerFan | July 18, 2008 at 07:39 PM
i was willing to let it go... but, no one seems to give AK and BK any credit.
Look, i like Fish as much as anyone. He's 3000% better than Smush and his terrible attitude. Fish played near his career highs in many categories and was a huge boost to team morale and growth.
But, i do have to say that he disappeared often. He was virtually a non factor in the finals and even Cassell made him look soft.
Fish is what he is. I don't even know if he's capable of being an "A" player. I like the grade he was issued.
On a side note, i don't think anyone on our team should have gotten an A. Hopefully they are all doing their part to come into next season prepared, committed to Defense and bringing their "A - GAME".
Posted by: Benny Blanca | July 18, 2008 at 10:49 AM
====================================
=======
Benny Blanca,
The grade was not meant to determine what type of player he is in the NBA... this whole grading thing is meant to evaluate a players performance during the 2007-2008 season... SPECIFICALLY!
For sure.. FISH is not an 'A' player as you would surmise... 'A' players are in the likes of KOBE, DUNCAN, GARNET, LEBRON... and few others... Fisher, would be classified as a B- player in my humble opinion. But it doesn't mean to say that a B- player cannot perform to the best of his abilities that would merit an "A" performance... hence the season grading system.
Performance is so so different form classification... they are of two distinct animal... your opinion and some of us here, confuses this two, that's why this blog get all sorts of bruhaha about a B+ grade...
AK and BK should remind everyone of this.. that the grading system is for the performance of the player in this particular season, not how a player stack up with all other players in the NBA.
Cheers!
Posted by: | July 18, 2008 at 07:47 PM
i was willing to let it go... but, no one seems to give AK and BK any credit.
Look, i like Fish as much as anyone. He's 3000% better than Smush and his terrible attitude. Fish played near his career highs in many categories and was a huge boost to team morale and growth.
But, i do have to say that he disappeared often. He was virtually a non factor in the finals and even Cassell made him look soft.
Fish is what he is. I don't even know if he's capable of being an "A" player. I like the grade he was issued.
On a side note, i don't think anyone on our team should have gotten an A. Hopefully they are all doing their part to come into next season prepared, committed to Defense and bringing their "A - GAME".
Posted by: Benny Blanca | July 18, 2008 at 10:49 AM
===========================================
Benny Blanca,
The grade was not meant to determine what type of player he is in the NBA... this whole grading thing is meant to evaluate a players performance during the 2007-2008 season... SPECIFICALLY!
For sure.. FISH is not an 'A' player as you would surmise... 'A' players are in the likes of KOBE, DUNCAN, GARNET, LEBRON... and few others... Fisher, would be classified as a B- player in my humble opinion. But it doesn't mean to say that a B- player cannot perform to the best of his abilities that would merit an "A" performance... hence the season grading system.
Performance is so so different form classification... they are of two distinct animal... your opinion and some of us here, confuses this two, that's why this blog get all sorts of bruhaha about a B+ grade...
AK and BK should remind everyone of this.. that the grading system is for the performance of the player in this particular season, not how a player stack up with all other players in the NBA.
Cheers!
Posted by: dice8up | July 18, 2008 at 07:52 PM
Any news on Turiaf?
it seems silent in laker land these days...
Posted by: dice8up | July 18, 2008 at 08:02 PM
Here's from ESPN.com News... on Ronny Turiaf... He is basically gone....
"Updated: July 18, 2008, 9:53 PM ET
The Los Angeles Lakers will not match the offer sheet given to Ronny Turiaf, meaning the forward will play for the Golden State Warriors next season, ESPN.com's J.A. Adande reported Thursday.
Golden State offered Turiaf a four-year, $17 million contract offer, which would have boosted Los Angeles' payroll past the luxury tax.
Turiaf averaged 6.6 points and 3.9 rebounds in 78 games with the Western Conference champions last year, starting 21 games. The three-year veteran also blocks shots and plays strong low-post defense, two of Golden State's biggest problem areas. "
GOod Bye Ronny... We will miss your dance move....
Posted by: dice8up | July 18, 2008 at 08:07 PM
Story is here:
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba
/news/story?id=3496084
Posted by: dice8up | July 18, 2008 at 08:08 PM
Laker Tom-
Actually, I was responding to this comment from JustaLakerFan:
Justa,
"par with Dwight "
Not at this point he's not.
Posted by: exhelodrvr | July 18, 2008 at 07:47 AM
-----------------------
Ex,
Again I respectfully disagree. I think he is on par with Dwight right now and will pass him soon too.
Which was posted earlier in the evening. Certainly don't want to put words in your mouth or mischaracterize your argument (it ticks me off when people do it, for sure).
Just to clarify.
BK
Posted by: Brian Kamenetzky | July 18, 2008 at 08:52 PM
JLF,
>>>David herein referred to as agent- Drew already is
>>>one of the best centers and on par with Dwight and
>>>better than Amare so why not pay him now? And yes
>>>Drew can play at this level.
Mitch:
Well, let's see. Dwight played 82 games this season, averaged
20 points, 14 rebounds and 2 blocks, and made the All-Star
team. All of which are significantly
higher than
what Drew performed this year. And in their one head to
head meeting, Andrew scored 10 and had 6 rebounds, while
Dwight scored 17 and had 8 rebounds, and the Lakers lost.
[Agent -Ah Mitch, I see you attended LTLF’s school of negotiating. Of course we know stats can be manipulated any which way to support your position. Yes as you clearly stated those were great accomplishments for a starting center! Lets see if you recall Drew got limited minutes playing behind Kwame Brown because his coach misused him, before he became a starter. And still posted great numbers in a limited time before his freak injury by LO’s foot. Sorry if PJ takes offence but the truth is the truth. And note you did clearly state that was ONE game. But as I pointed out stats can be manipulated as Kobe got 28 points that game. Kobe is the primary scorer on Lakers, where as Dwight is the primary scorer for Magic. Lets see also Dwight came into the league in 2004 and got consistent playing and starting time as Magic but Drew came in two years later and was youngest player in NBA history at 17 years old and did not get consistent playing time especially considering he was playing behind Kwame Brown and we all know how well he turned out.]
Oh, and Dwight, who also came out of high school like Drew,
was in good enough shape his rookie season to play 32 minutes
a game for all 82 games and he has never missed a game due
to injury his entire career.
So what exact criteria makes you think that Andrew is
"on par" with Dwight?
[Agent-Mitch please review your history and you will see Dwight is injury prone especially in playoffs. Let me refresh your memory.
http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080629/SPORTS03/80629040/1051/rss16
http://www.dwighthoward.com/dwighthoward122605.htm
http://www.prosportsdaily.com/forums/showthread.php?t=210597
http://www.protrade.com/content/DisplayArticle.html?sp=S655b45b6-1988-11dd-b19d-0b9859abb9ee
And yes Drew is on par with Dwight as in another game he played him basically head up and considering Dwight has 2 yrs experience on Drew is a big thing in Drews favor.]
And Amare played 79 games this season, and averaged
25 points, 9 rebounds, and 2 blocks. And he also made
the All-Star team and was the leading scorer for his team
in the playoffs.
Amare had 33 games last season where he had at least 20 points
and 10 rebounds. Drew has had 5 such games in his
whole career.
Dwight had 11 games where he had at least 30 points and 10
rebounds. Drew has never scored 30 points.
[ Agent- Mitch, Mitch Amare was totally dominated by Drew . So Amare had good numbers versus lesser players , big deal. And Dwight again has 2 years head start on Drew with more playing time and experience but Drew did score 28 points in a game so 2 points difference and agin considering Kobe is the primary scorer. ]
Nothing personal Andrew, but while your agent may say
that you are better than those two players, clearly the facts
don't bear it out and the rest of the league doesn't agree
with his assessment. If your agent were being honest with you
and with us, he would have compared your performance to players
like Andrew Bogut or Andris Biedrins. In your very best 4 or 5
games, you've played at a higher level than those two, but
averaged over each of your best months your numbers are
comparable to theirs.
Except for the fact that Bogut played 78 games last season
and Biedrins played 76.
[ Agent-Mitch you really must stop talking directly to Drew as I represent him. It is really getting insulting that you twist statistics and call them facts. Then you compare Drew to Bogut and Biedrens. Totally insulting. Well we can go a few ways on this if you wish, as I am sure you can sign and trade Drew for Bogut or Biedrens or of course Drew can play his last year as unrestricted FA and see what he is really worth without having to endure these demeaning comparisons. What do you think Mitch want to seriously negotiate or play around. Just let me know so as not to waste my clients time or mine. Thanks Mitch, let me know what you say. Maybe before October 31st.]
Posted by: Long Time Laker Fan | July 18, 2008 at 09:30 AM
Posted by: JustaLakerFan | July 18, 2008 at 09:01 PM
BK,
Thanks. I didn't see that until after I posted. I was probably ducking when the JustaLakerFan made that post, worried about Long Time sneaking up on me. JK. I am not that far sold on Drew but I'm not far behind. What I have seen from Drew is the potential to truly be the greatest center in the game in a couple of years.
Tom
Posted by: LakerTom | July 18, 2008 at 09:02 PM
JustaLakerFan,
>>>>> Agent -Ah Mitch, I see you attended LTLF’s school of negotiating.
>>>>> Agent-Mitch you really must stop talking directly to Drew as I represent him.
>>>>>What do you think Mitch want to seriously negotiate or play around.
>>>>>Just let me know so as not to waste my clients time or mine.
>>>>>Thanks Mitch, let me know what you say. Maybe before October 31st.
Like MasterCard claims, that was priceless. Long Time needs to go the JLF school of negotiating. LOL. After all, as Long Time himself says, it’s all about the “presentation.” Thanks for grabbing the baton and carrying on. You’re doing a better job that I did. Keep it up.
By the way, I really did not post this if anybody reads it. LOL.
Tom
Posted by: LakerTom | July 18, 2008 at 09:12 PM
JLF,
>>>[Then agent replies Mihm and Kwame are not the
>>>same talent level as Drew and their injuries are of no
>>>relevance to Drew’s injury status.]
And Mihm and Kwame were both paid considerably less
than we are offering Drew.
Though the injuries are unrelated, the consequences would
just as devastating to the Lakers if we blindly paid Andrew
the maximum that we think he would be worth if fully healthy
and then his injury persists and limits him to a much lower
level of play. In fact, since the size of Bynum's contract will
be much larger, the effects of a persistent injury would be even
more devastating.
[ Agent-Mitch as you know Kwames was a big contract and for a lesser player that he was paid considerably more than Drew. He was acquired by trading an allstar away in Caron Butler and Kwame never made all star status himself. I would hardly think of this in Drew’s case. Just as you pointed out he is a unique player which requires unique handling. I would say the max is reasonable but Drew could say in the interest of getting deal done look at Boguts contract as starting point and go from there. Mitch also as you say more devastating if you really doubt Drew’s value but then I don’t represent you but Drew and it may be more devastating to Drew so sign way below what he is worth. Do you really want to test the market? Insurance can cover concerns over injury.]
>>>[I like to think of Drew as that unique player you
>>>described to be more like Kobe anmd play through
>>>various injuries.]
Yes, Kobe is remarkable, isn't he. Kobe was on the floor
for the playoffs playing through his pain. If Andrew was
a fast healer like Kobe, he would have been on the floor
for the playoffs. Since he wasn't, you can see why we're
concerned.
[ Agent-Or if Lakers training staff and medical people not held Drew back in hoping he would get better on his own rather than doing arthroscopic surgery is not Drew’s fault. He abided by what the teams medical staff wanted. Please don’t hold that against Drew.]
>>>[A fluke injury does not make Drew injury prone
>>>unless of course all Lakers are injury prone with
>>>LO’s feet]
Players step on other players feet all the time in this league.
Dwight Howard does it a hundred times a season, yet he's
never
had a "fluke" injury that's made him miss 1 game.
[Agent –Actually Dwight did not miss a game to knee problems but did miss playoff games with sternum injury and hand injury. Does that mean Dwight has weak chest and hands?]
Andrew missed most of his senior year of High School with an
injury, then came into the league too out of shape to play more than
a few minutes per game. To his credit, he did get into shape
last summer and had a lot more stamina this season.
While you might say that this was just a freak accident and
that Drew will never have another bad injury in his career,
the evidence of the past four years tends to point in the opposite
direction.
[ Agent- Mitch honestly can you say that about any NBA player? There is no guarantee of being injury free and that depends on luck in most cases as in bad luck. All players have had injuries before, yes ALL players as it is in the nature of the game and the physicality of it. Next time I enter negotiations with you I will definitely consult my crystal ball as to give you a definitive answer. By the way what does yours say?]
If you honestly believe that Andrew will have no major injuries,
then he should have no problem making the modest incentives
and he will be paid what you are asking. So which is it?
Do you believe that Andrew will stay healthy and will be
paid the maximum? Or do you not believe that Andrew will
stay healthy?
[Agent- Now this is really getting insulting! I really can’t answer that in any way as I forgot I dropped and broke my crystal ball. Why does Drew have to prove what you said he has mostly proved before. Can you predict that Drew will have a have major injuries then why are we talking? Health seems to be the major issue with you of which I have said an insurance policy can protect your investment. Do you want to negotiate a contract or continue to banter over hypothetical situations which cannot be predicted?
If you want to get serious then let’s talk contract if not then quit demeaning my client. Come on Drew lets go and we will know by latest October 31st what they really think of you. If they don’t respect you then some other team will. Talk to you later Mitch.]
Posted by: Long Time Laker Fan | July 18, 2008 at 09:46 AM
Posted by: JustaLakerFan | July 18, 2008 at 09:40 PM
Most of us have had a personal interest in watching Kobe develop these last years and Andrew is the new kid on that block. It pumps up the fan experience.
But finance is a different department. There's sound historical reason to question the longevity of NBA big men.
[Yes but which can be protected by insurance]
At present Andrew's only a franchise player in that the kind of money that's on his table would kill the franchise if it turns out he has a knee, foot or hip "issue" that's revealed over a season. Why bet the max on a doctor's opinion when you don't have to. If he becomes Cap 2, you pay him accordingly... then.
[Why do you say that? If he plays injury free next year and gets his contract, then what happens? Did his hypothetical injury prone problem you suggest go away? Can he be injured the following year? Insurance can cover that but there is no way to predict the future! It is all a gamble and you make the best educated guess trying to cover all your bases. As the saying goes put up or shut up. Sign or don’t sign is the question. As I have said sign him to a contract that both sides are happy with. Just my humble opinion.]
Somewhere in Jon K's AB Bio Chrono reading I'm sure it says that Andrew won't tend to get so insulted by a cautious offer from the LA Lakers that he bolts for New York.
[Cautious, maybe, but not demeaning offers and comparisons to inferior players. And with so many unpredictable variables bantered around is foolish. Negotiate from good faith stance and see where the happy median is. Ort we can let Drew go ala Ronny Turaff if he does go. Hard choices to be made no doubt.]
Posted by: Vman | July 18, 2008 at 10:48 AM
Posted by: JustaLakerFan | July 18, 2008 at 09:54 PM
i was willing to let it go... but, no one seems to give AK and BK any credit.
Look, i like Fish as much as anyone. He's 3000% better than Smush and his terrible attitude. Fish played near his career highs in many categories and was a huge boost to team morale and growth.
But, i do have to say that he disappeared often. He was virtually a non factor in the finals and even Cassell made him look soft.
Fish is what he is. I don't even know if he's capable of being an "A" player. I like the grade he was issued.
On a side note, i don't think anyone on our team should have gotten an A. Hopefully they are all doing their part to come into next season prepared, committed to Defense and bringing their "A - GAME".
Posted by: Benny Blanca | July 18, 2008 at 10:49 AM
-----------------
Look at it this way. I also think D Fish deserved an A and he did play with injured foot requiring surgery. Waiting to hear on that soon too.
But the K brothers gave then the B+ grade which is their perogative and opinion. I don't think anyone is shy to state their opinion but in the end K bros have theirs and are entitled to it regardless whether any one agrees or disagrees. JMHO.
Posted by: JustaLakerFan | July 18, 2008 at 09:58 PM
Posted by: LakerTom | July 18, 2008 at 01:50 PM JustaLakerFan,
Thanks for having my back with Long Time with your excellent comments about his presentation. It’s very much appreciated.
Tom
--------------
Not a problem. We see eye to eye on this one!
Thanks for your post as also much appreciated on both your props to me and your stance to LTLF and others who share their POV. Nothing like a healthy debate I say. LOL
Posted by: JustaLakerFan | July 18, 2008 at 10:02 PM
Here's from ESPN.com News... on Ronny Turiaf... He is basically gone....
"Updated: July 18, 2008, 9:53 PM ET
The Los Angeles Lakers will not match the offer sheet given to Ronny Turiaf, meaning the forward will play for the Golden State Warriors next season, ESPN.com's J.A. Adande reported Thursday.
Golden State offered Turiaf a four-year, $17 million contract offer, which would have boosted Los Angeles' payroll past the luxury tax.
Turiaf averaged 6.6 points and 3.9 rebounds in 78 games with the Western Conference champions last year, starting 21 games. The three-year veteran also blocks shots and plays strong low-post defense, two of Golden State's biggest problem areas. "
GOod Bye Ronny... We will miss your dance move....
Posted by: dice8up | July 18, 2008 at 08:07 PM
-----------------------
That report was based on what Ronny's agent felt but not confirmed. I think too he will be gone but wish it was not the case. Oddly starange that all sides silent on this!
Posted by: JustaLakerFan | July 18, 2008 at 10:29 PM