Purple, Gold and Blue
July 30, 2008 | 11:04
am
Forgot to put up the reminder, but it's on. Right now. Be there.
AK
« Previous Post | Lakers Blog Home | Next Post »
Forgot to put up the reminder, but it's on. Right now. Be there.
AK
The comments to this entry are closed.
| Advertisement |
|
|
I hope you guys talk about Paul Pierce's alleged comments referring to Kobe. Paul Pierce was reported saying that he is the best player in the NBA.
Posted by: never | July 30, 2008 at 11:09 AM
okey dokey!
Posted by: Charles | July 30, 2008 at 11:13 AM
Great, The Lakers stand "pat" again. Don't worry, we've got Radmanovic, Walton, Mihm and Odom to help maintain mediocrity!
Posted by: IzzyB | July 30, 2008 at 11:15 AM
Being the so-called "best player" don't mean jack **** if you're not a winner like Kobeef.
Kobeef got lucky as hell winning those championships as Shack's selfish sidekick and now "can't do it without shack".
Face it Lakernation, your guys is simply not a winner.
Plain and simple.
Admit it.
Pierce can say whatever he wants cuz he backed it up when it mattered.
http://www.hulu.com/watch/22789/nba-paul-pierce-blocks-kobe-bryant
ouch, that hurts.
Big o smile from LGC.
haahahaah
Posted by: Let's go C's! | July 30, 2008 at 11:27 AM
>Great, The Lakers stand "pat" again. Don't worry,
>we've got Radmanovic, Walton, Mihm and Odom to
>help maintain mediocrity
That word....I don't think it means what you think it means.
Posted by: FatSam | July 30, 2008 at 11:28 AM
Paul is a bum! He belongs on a soap Opra!
Posted by: mamba | July 30, 2008 at 11:32 AM
Paul Pierce until this year has been a Celtic failure! Kobe has taken a bunch of scrubs to the playoffs and finals with little help over the last 4yrs barring the Rudy T tenure which until injuries to LO. CB, KB were on course to make playoffs and 45-49 wins! for those who take the effort go and check it out.
Even Phil Jackson said that he could see this team winning 50 plus games prior to all the injuries look at team win loss stat from December and Jan!
So Paul Pierce should stop the over the top declarations.
Until KG and RA showed up Boston was one of the worst teams in the league! That clown couldn't get his team in a weak Eastern Conference so all those who buy in to this crap are as blind as the bat that flys by day!
Posted by: chuck23 | July 30, 2008 at 11:45 AM
Ok I tap out!
http://tinyurl.com/6mcsnv
Posted by: Charles | July 30, 2008 at 11:53 AM
Phil made that statement during 05 season he had been fired and was in Australia vacationing at the time.
Posted by: chuck23 | July 30, 2008 at 12:00 PM
On a more serious note --
The Celtics worry me. Did before the Lakers lost to them, do now. Losing Posey hurts them a little, getting a year older hurts them a little ... but they were more than a little better than the Lakers last year. The Lakers need home court to handle them ... which might be 70 wins. Which the Lakers can get to.
In the West? Well, Portland's going to be a force, but this isn't their year.
I won't discuss the Nuggets. Or the Clippers. Or the Warriors.
Suns got worse. Lost their best on the ball defender for a guy who's slower and older than dirt and can't stay out of foul trouble.
Mavs got worse, and JKidd is another year older.
Spurs got another year older. A healthy Ginobili makes them better, to be sure ... but it's not nearly the improvement the Lakers get by bringing back a healthy Bynum and Ariza.
The Jazz got no better except by getting older, which in their case is a good thing. But it doesn't compare to Bynum and Ariza.
Houston got better. Artest is superb ... but they didn't improve as much as the Lakers do with a healthy Bynum and Ariza. And they have worse injury problems than the Lakers, which is saying something.
New Orleans got better ... but adding Posey doesn't compare to adding a healthy Bynum and Ariza.
If the Lakers are healthy, they don't need new pieces. This lineup wins 70 games and walks through the playoffs to the Celtics, and beats them in six.
Posted by: FatSam | July 30, 2008 at 12:09 PM
Paul Pierce could, would and should.
Paul Pierce has a championship and Finals MVP award as teh top guy on the team.
Plain and simple.
What you foos don't understand is that winning is about doing WHATEVER it takes to win, including swallowing some pride Mr. "I can get off at anytime" Bryant to get free agents to join in on the effort.
Pierce and Kobeef-Selfishman were in the same boat last summer. KG and Allen had power to go whereever they wanted. KG and Allen wisely picked playing with Pierce over Mr. Selfish.
Pierce, Allen and KG won a title. End of story.
Kobe gets to watch somebody else win titles while Kobeef wins nada.
hahaahahahhhahhaa
Still laughing at you whinners wine and whine away.
hahhaahhh
Foos.
Posted by: Let's go C's! | July 30, 2008 at 12:12 PM
Mr. Chuck24 is typical of Lakernation and Kobeworshippers.
Blame everybody and talk bad about your own teammates.
Pathetic.
Lakernation is pathetic.
Posted by: Let's go C's! | July 30, 2008 at 12:14 PM
Dude, get your facts straight, Boston was two wins away from a finals appearance in 2001.
Do you remember 2001? Those were the days when you Fakers had a real team led by Shack, not Kobe.
ahahahahhh
Posted by: Let's go C's! | July 30, 2008 at 12:17 PM
You watch the gang banger and his sidekicks will slide right back into the team they use to be because when it comes down to it PP is a lazy 40 drinking banger
Posted by: pk-in-the-mesa | July 30, 2008 at 12:34 PM
AK, BK your attention is requested fellows. the PP remarks should not go unanswered or undiscussed. granted the guy must have been drunk or stoned to say he is the best NBA player.
Posted by: che | July 30, 2008 at 12:36 PM
>>>I don’t want to trade Lamar at this point
Okay, fair enough. So who do you get rid of next summer:
Kobe, Pau, Lamar or Drew?
Because assuming your proposed Bynum contract starting
at 12 million and a Lamar contract starting at 12 million
(assuming he'd take a pay cut), that would put the Lakers
at 81 million PLUS whatever they pay to Ariza, their
first round draft pick, or any other player they sign or
re-sign.
I'll reiterate this. Jerry Buss is not a billionaire like Mark
Cuban or James Dolan. He can't afford to spend 100 million
in salary plus another 30 million in luxury tax and have
the team lose 40 million dollars.
So which one do you cut?
Clearly you don't favor cutting Bynum.
Do you let Lamar just walk away for nothing to make the
cap space to pay Bynum?
Do you try to trade Kobe or Gasol for one good younger player
that costs half as much and some expiring contract?
It's true, you can ignore that issue for this season, but
unless they can convince Lamar to extend for closer to
what Battier makes, they're going to be in over their
heads in luxury tax and looking for a life boat.
The Battier trade would solve that issue because you
wouldn't have to re-sign Lamar next summer, you'd have
two players (Battier and ScolaORHayesORLandry)
playing for 10 million dollars instead of one player
playing for 12. And if it's Hayes or Landry, then you'd have
the same situation in 2010/11 -- two quality players for
1/3 less than Lamar is making now.
Posted by: Long Time Laker Fan | July 30, 2008 at 12:47 PM
never
The context to Pierce question was concerning the Olympics and is Kobe the best player in the World, not just the NBA.
It was a question and answer on-line session and that is the verbatim quote from PP.
It hit all the Spanish papers the next day. One reporter clarified PP's statement, but in his words not PP's said. Pierce feels he's the best in the world, because like MJ proving he was the best in the playoffs, Pierce did as well, and Kobe didn't.
Which sounds better, Ali saying "I am the greatest" or Paul Pierce saying "I'm the best"?
Posted by: Fatty | July 30, 2008 at 12:51 PM
Chuck23
Paul Pierce's comments do not even warrant a response from intelligent people.
My concerns are with the front office of the Lakers. Immediately after the Finals against Boston an embarrassed Phil Jackson spoke at the press conference honestly about what the Lakers needed. One of the few times he spoke from the heart and not some contrived jibberish.
He said the Lakers needed to get tougher (if they hope to win a Championship) ..........He gave us a criteria to measure the Lakers efforts this summer to bring another ring to L.A.
He talked about adjustments to the personnel because if was obvious during the Boston Series that the Lakers were manhandled.
During the exit meetings he didn't want to discuss mistakes in his judgements and how he was totally outcoached by Doc Rivers. Classic Coward Syndrome.
However, using the standard he gave at the press conference...............What have the Lakers done this summer to improve this team?
It appears all the other teams are improving their lineups with physical, quick athletic players. Detroit, Houston etc.
What are the Lakers doing?? They weren't aggressive going after Artest and now Houston has him.
Unless the Lakers add some more athletes and rid this team the likes of Chris Mihm, Luke Walton and anyone else that can't play DEFENSE............This Laker team has taken a step backwards.
Another wasted year for Kobe? If this is the case the good thing is it will Be Kobe's option year........and this will put pressure on the Laker Organization to get some athletes in here, dismantle the triangle offense, fire Phil Jackson and replace him with a younger energetic coach that knows how to teach defensive rotations...............Too bad we may have to suffer through a disappointing season to do next summer...........what we should be doing this summer.
Posted by: pfunk36 | July 30, 2008 at 12:54 PM
Okay, so Luol Deng has re-signed with the Bulls - 6 years
for 71 million dollars. That averages out to a little under
12 million a year. That's a slight increase in the per-year
of the contract he was offered last season, so in his case
holding out probably did get him more money.
And note that he signed a contract with performance incentives
that could bring the deal up to 80 million.
LakerTom, if you're using deals like Bogut and Okafor
and Deng as examples of a baseline for a potential Bynum
contract, then you should note that two of the three of those
players accepted a deal with performance incentives. If
they are setting the standard for contracts for big men, then
performance incentives are the new trade kicker.
Posted by: Long Time Laker Fan | July 30, 2008 at 12:56 PM
Let's Go C's,
I see that you have fell in love with this blog. It is understandable that the Lakers would attract so many visitors such as yourself.
Posted by: never | July 30, 2008 at 12:58 PM
FatSam
What you are saying is good ON PAPER. but never underestimate the negative effect of bad coaching and philosophy of one Phil Jackson.
Phil Jackson destroys momentum consistently with his rotations and substitution patterns.
Ariza was healthy AGAINST BOSTON..........and Phil would'nt play him..........opting to continue playing a hapless Luke Walton
What makes you think Phil's coaching will change in regard to his coaching methods next year?
Doc Rivers outcoached Phil during the Finals and proved to be more energetic, inspiring, and smarter than Phil with his adjustments.
Never underestimate the arrogance and idiocy of Phil Jackson and it's effect on the Lakers.
Posted by: pfunk36 | July 30, 2008 at 01:03 PM
It's good to know that Pierce thinks so highly of himself, and
ironic that he would make that comment during an interview
about the Olympic team.
The last time Pierce was able to make the national team was
2002. Pierce started all nine games for the team and
averaged 19.8 ppg. WOO HOO!!!!! BEST PLAYER IN THE
WORLD!!!!!
And led the U.S. team to a 6th place finish.
SIXTH.
KG and Ray Allen won gold. We know who the real leaders
were on the Celtics.
Posted by: Long Time Laker Fan | July 30, 2008 at 01:07 PM
Hello CRUE!!!
I may be butting into Utzworld's territory here, but I'm thanking the b-ball gods that Bill-ron signed with someone other than the Lakers - Amen to that! Now we can finally stop with the inane scenarios about how to get him & how much help he'd be - whew- what a relief.
On the other hand, Traylor??? Anyone with the nickname "Tractor" can NOT be a Laker - sorry, but we already had one wide load (Shaq) to deal with. C'mon FO - can't you do better than that?? Although we could use some back-up, I seriously don't think it's as urgent as some would believe. Standing pat for right now is not the worst thing in the world. Cupcake has time to see how camp and the first part of the season goes before we must make changes/additions/etc. (And yes, I believe he's back to being called Cupcake for letting Rony go - but that's just IMO....)
USA b-ball tomorrow - finally something to get excited about!
Posted by: justanothermambafan | July 30, 2008 at 01:19 PM
Oh - almost forgot - that fat Pierce troll - what a moron - what a joke - what an a-hole. Ugghh - can't believe he still claims to be from LA. He's giving the bangers a bad name.
Posted by: justanothermambafan | July 30, 2008 at 01:21 PM
Love?
Not love. This place has bunch of hot aired individuals who act pious and pretend the Lakers are sooooo much better than everyone else.
I especially like reading the Kobeworshipers who act like Starlet Bryant is loved by everybody when, in fact, Kobe Bryant is the Barry Bonds of basketball.
Notice anybody knocking down Bonds' door?
See anybody knocking down teh Laker door to play side-by-side with Mr. Selfish?
"I can get off at anytime" --Kobe
Posted by: Let's go C's! | July 30, 2008 at 01:43 PM
The only comment Pierce needs to make is show off his Finals MVP award.
hahahahahahahahaaa
Siging off,
Long Time Celtics Fan
Posted by: Let's go C's! | July 30, 2008 at 01:44 PM
>>>I don’t want to trade Lamar at this point
Okay, fair enough. So who do you get rid of next summer:
Kobe, Pau, Lamar or Drew?
Uh...you want my vote?
Posted by: troy | July 30, 2008 at 01:54 PM
"He said the Lakers needed to get tougher (if they hope to win a Championship) ..........He gave us a criteria to measure the Lakers efforts this summer to bring another ring to L.A.
He talked about adjustments to the personnel because if was obvious during the Boston Series that the Lakers were manhandled."
Guess who Phil was referring to when he made this statement. I don't think it was the tough as nails Kobe, or the stalwart Fish, or the braindead yet bangin Lamar, or the in your face Sasha.
I wonder who Phil was truly referring to when he lamented, in public, about how the Lakers lost because they weren't "tough" enough.
Hmmm....
Posted by: troy | July 30, 2008 at 02:01 PM
Although annoying as hell, I like the comment by Paul. He has swagger, and he backed up his statements by outplaying Kobe in both the regular season and in the championships last year.
We need players that can measure their nuts in public. I get so tired of Kobe being PC, Lamar stating the obvious, Fish being inspirational, Pau being a manlady.
I want a damn thug on this LA team, and so does Phil Jackson.
Posted by: troy | July 30, 2008 at 02:05 PM
What does everybody think about Adonal Foyle?
He's 6-10, 270 looking to make about $1.5 million.
Any thoughts?
GO LAKERS!
Posted by: Jon K. | July 30, 2008 at 02:05 PM
Adonal Foyle can rebound and block. He's a big guy. I read his bio from Wikipedia. He sounds pretty intelligent.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adonal_Foyle
GO LAKERS!
Posted by: Jon K. | July 30, 2008 at 02:08 PM
troy,
You don't get rid of any of them, Mr. Grumpy.
GO LAKERS!
Posted by: Jon K. | July 30, 2008 at 02:14 PM
Troy is an even kieled individual. The only one residing on this blog.
Fine line between confidence and arrogance.
To be honest with eveyones, the Finals MVP could have gone to KG, Pierce or Allen. Pierce seemed the most fitting since he's Mr. Celtic.
No "haha" out of respect for Mr. Troy.
Posted by: Let's go C's! | July 30, 2008 at 02:15 PM
LOL at Pierce making that statement. This guy needs a punch in the face so that he can realize that he is nowhere near KB24, skills-wise.
Oh, and by the way, do not forget folks to scroll down once you see Let's Go C's name underneath the comment. Don't you ever dare to comment back to him, the guy's a tool.
Posted by: JR. | July 30, 2008 at 02:18 PM
I'm not a proponent of trading LO, I think he's highly underrated. But if we were to get rid of him, I would go after the Hawks' Josh Smith. I know that he's got a history of being mercurial but he'd be much easier for PJ to coach than Ron Ron. He wasn't the first banana in ATL (Joe Johnson was) and he'd be okay being the second/third guy in LA. He'd get more respect from LA FO because they'd actually pay him (not the 14 mill that we give LO but maybe 10-11 in a sign and trade deal) and he'd be playing with a chip on his shoulder to prove his worth.
For some of you this may seem to be ridiculous, but I bet that's because you've seen so few of his games due to him playing on a mediocre east coast team. But the fact is that he was pivotal in the Hawks almost beating the C's and taking them to seven games.
If anybody saw this series they'd know that, yeah, JJ was on fire in ATL but if it wasn't for Josh Smith stepping up into KG's face and refusing to back down (which then inspired Zaza freaking Pachulia to do it later in the series) set a fire under his team.
In a lot of ways he's very similar to LO, 6'9'', lefty, streaky outside shooter, but the cool thing about his game is he plays insane help D (not as good as LO one on one, remember LO shutting down Marion in 06) and has already spent a lot of time at the 3 guarding other 3s so that wouldn't be a worry. And he's young so he could be around our young core JF-AB-TA for a while.
It'd be a risky move, I think. But if we are so dead set on beating the C's and making a toughness move, I believe this would be the best we could imagine.
Posted by: bmurph | July 30, 2008 at 02:27 PM
Great, The Lakers stand "pat" again. Don't worry, we've got Radmanovic, Walton, Mihm and Odom to help maintain mediocrity!
Posted by: IzzyB | July 30, 2008 at 11:15 AM
Winning the WC and getting beat in the Finals 4-2 by a more experienced team while missing the starting center is not mediocrity.
Everybody else in the NBA except the Lakers and the Celtics are running a chemistry experiment. I predict Houston to have an accident in their lab experiment.
Posted by: LakerinBC | July 30, 2008 at 02:41 PM
Hey JR,
Finals MVP baby!!!!
hahahahahahhh
But Pierce is nowhere near Kobe's level.
Finals MVP baby!!!!
"Where is Kobe" --Boston fans during historic 40-point blowout
"You're not Jordan" --Boston fans right before winning the championship.
ahhahaahahhahahh
Idiot.
Posted by: Let's go C's! | July 30, 2008 at 03:34 PM
Long Time Celtics Fan,
No worries. Enjoy your championship. Well earned, well deserved.
But I smell another two decade stretch of futility coming. Yours is no longer a franchise that knows how to remain among the elite.
Posted by: FatSam | July 30, 2008 at 03:36 PM
"Guess who Phil was referring to when he made this statement. I don't think it was the tough as nails Kobe, or the stalwart Fish, or the braindead yet bangin Lamar, or the in your face Sasha.
I wonder who Phil was truly referring to when he lamented, in public, about how the Lakers lost because they weren't "tough" enough".
TROY
That's the $64,000 question......isn't it? I think you may be giving Phil too much credit because I don't think Phil knows.
One of the side effects of arrogance is to never look to self as being part of the problem. Phil looks to CAST blame juxtaposed to ACCEPTING blame. I.E. Phil stated he was glad the Lakers didn't have the lead in game 5 because THEY wouldn't know what to do with it.
WRONG PHIL..........PHIL proved that HE couldn't COACH a team with a big lead. Never making any adjustments in game 4 in the second half and then of course blowing another lead in game 5 with the lineup of Mihm (who hadn't played in 2 years) Walton, Vuicic, and Farmar all in the game at the same time. Phil stated after that mindfart that "WE' will not try that lineup again.
When Phil reacted emotionally after game 6 he spoke the truth about what the Lakers needed and thus for the first time adding clarity, definition and a criteria by which Laker management could be judged.
Normally Phil stays away from defining anything publicly because if it doesn't work he doesn't want to be called on it.
This time Phil let the cat out of the bag about the Laker needs. But if you judge the Lakers' actions thus far this summer in accord with the criteria Phil gave for improving.............What are the Lakers doing?
Do THEY even know?
Posted by: pfunk36 | July 30, 2008 at 04:28 PM
pfunk36
The first thing that those who want to understand PJ must realize that he's a sick man! This man speaks in riddles or uses meaningless hypothetical jargin to come off as some sophisticated guru. When in truth this guy is one confused nut with no sense of direction and realizes that his gig is coming to an end fast!
In other words Phil better coach this season like a 12 million dollar coach should or prepare to be put on the fire pit! My fault he's already on it.
Posted by: chuck23 | July 30, 2008 at 05:33 PM
Long Time,
>>>>>If they are setting the standard for contracts for big men, then
>>>>>performance incentives are the new trade kicker.
You could be right but incentives are still the desert and not the meat of the deal. Nobody is going to accept them as a straight dollar trade off. In other words, I offer $70M and you counter with $60M + $10M incentives. They might give it 25% credit at most. Say $67.5M + $10M incentives. JMHO.
:-)
Tom
Posted by: LakerTom | July 30, 2008 at 08:27 PM
I just had another of my visions right now. This is a vision that Bynum may possibly end up coming off the bench next season. But this is perfectly okay with me. He'll be the most dominant 6th man off all time. Pau and Kobe play excellent together. DON'T MESS WITH THAT.
The vision that I just saw is of Luke Walton and Bynum playing significant minutes together. Kobe needs to give the helm to Bynum next year for the Lakers to dominate. I promise a dominant year next year with this formula. Bynum will start at the end of the 2nd and finish the 3rd and fourth with Gasol in the fourth possibly.
I'm 100 % that my vision is honest. This is called synergism and that's what Luke is to Bynum and the second unit guaranteed. If the Bynum and Gasol duo aren't playing well after 1 and 1/2 weeks (they won't play bad but neither will they dominate) they never will. I can't guarantee that they will play good together but I'm 1,000,000% sure that the formula I've talked about will be successful.
So if anyone in management is reading this and if the Lakers aren't dominating after 2 weeks they will NEED to bring Bynum off the bench and I promise DOMINATION like we have never seen before in all of Laker's history.
OMG if the Lakers do this next year OMFG!!!!!! WATCHOUT BOSTON!!!!!! SO SORRY BOSTON.
Posted by: johnny | July 30, 2008 at 10:44 PM
Finally Andrew Bynum is healthy and hopefully he can come back to the same form he had prior to his injury but Thar still doesn't do much to the Lakers weak bench its time for the Lakers to get rid of their over paid dead weight Luke Walton and free up more cap and not to mention important minutes for guys like Trevor Ariza .
Posted by: Cy Paris | July 31, 2008 at 02:34 AM
>>>Nobody is going to accept them as a straight dollar trade
>>>off. In other words, I offer $70M and you counter with
>>>$60M + $10M incentives. They might give it 25% credit
>>> at most. Say $67.5M + $10M incentives. JMHO.
Ah, but what if I offer 60 million plus 20 million in incentives?
The most someone could earn with your 70 million offer is
70 million. With my incentive laden offer, they could earn
80.
Posted by: Long Time Laker Fan | July 31, 2008 at 06:37 PM
FatSam
What you are saying is good ON PAPER. but never underestimate the negative effect of bad coaching and philosophy of one Phil Jackson.
Phil Jackson destroys momentum consistently with his rotations and substitution patterns.
Ariza was healthy AGAINST BOSTON..........and Phil would'nt play him..........opting to continue playing a hapless Luke Walton
What makes you think Phil's coaching will change in regard to his coaching methods next year?
Doc Rivers outcoached Phil during the Finals and proved to be more energetic, inspiring, and smarter than Phil with his adjustments.
Never underestimate the arrogance and idiocy of Phil Jackson and it's effect on the Lakers.
Posted by: pfunk36 | July 30, 2008 at 01:03 PM
=========================
I agree completely with you pfunk36.
We did have defensive players in Ira and Mbenga and in short spurts would have helped. But PJ did not use them and inserted Luke. Boston went on runs when ever Luke came in.
I also say don't forget the Stearns bets had a big hand in this.
Posted by: JustaLakerFan | August 02, 2008 at 06:30 PM
Although annoying as hell, I like the comment by Paul. He has swagger, and he backed up his statements by outplaying Kobe in both the regular season and in the championships last year.
We need players that can measure their nuts in public. I get so tired of Kobe being PC, Lamar stating the obvious, Fish being inspirational, Pau being a manlady.
I want a damn thug on this LA team, and so does Phil Jackson.
Posted by: troy | July 30, 2008 at 02:05 PM
=======================
My problem with this is that PP did not outplay Kobe in preseason or finals.
It was usually 4 on 1 trying to contain Kobe and usually 1 on 1 on PP. And in regular season who won MVP? Sure wasn't PP.
Posted by: JustaLakerFan | August 02, 2008 at 06:37 PM
The is for all of you,guy's you know that the Lakers, they give chance to the Celtics because the comisioner does not want to look bad, for al the coment the referi, make about all fix games.
The Celtics they are not, the real Champions.
Sorry Celtics fanzz you Just need to say Thank you Lakers for Yuo Help.
Thank you Koby also.
We all Know the Koby is the Best Player of the world.
Posted by: LAKERSCHAMP02 | August 08, 2008 at 05:29 PM