Nothing new to report
July 6, 2008 | 11:02
am
But hey, if there's official word of nothing new to report with Sasha Vujacic and/or Ronny Turiaf's free agency status, figured you would want to read it.
AK
(UPDATE: I just now realized that the Times article I was referring to hadn't been linked. It's been added. My apologies)



Nothing to see here. Move along.
Posted by: Absolute Truth | July 06, 2008 at 11:24 AM
It figures ... How long before either has to sign a contract? In other words when do their restricted free agency expire?
Posted by: Glenn | July 06, 2008 at 11:29 AM
You heard it here first!
Posted by: Benjamin | July 06, 2008 at 11:55 AM
Once Turiaf and Sasha are resolved - what does a scenario look like for the Lakers to add another player? If Sasha is offered a mid level and the Lakers match it, does that mean they can not shop at all. Naturally interested in Posey - also Pietrus from Golden State.
Any thoughts from any of you that understand the financial scenarios? I'd love to see the Lakers resolve the 3 spot with a defensive presence that can shoot.
Here's hoping
Posted by: dkw | July 06, 2008 at 12:00 PM
Well the LATimes are reporting that the lakers offered Sasha max 5 mil.
I love Sasha. But man that's close to the full MLE.
http://www.latimes.com/sports/la-sp-lakers6-2008jul06,0,1568111.story?track=rss
GO Lakers!
Posted by: Faith | July 06, 2008 at 12:29 PM
This post is too deep. I'm....speechless.
Posted by: ajax | July 06, 2008 at 12:38 PM
I am not a racist I am just a concerned Laker fan, that's all. If I have sounded like a racist on my previous remarks, I did not mean it that way. I did not think I was, but obviously some of you thought I was.
But the fact still remains we have too many soft players.
Lakers are a championship team, YES! But it does not mean you can not improve from your glaring weaknesses.
Every year NBA team improves, even Celtics will improve from this year to next. Lakers should not be contented on its current status and must find a way to improve the "SOFT" label tag.
So, I leave it to you guys, the discussion of why we are soft? and why the Celtics took advantage of it.
Posted by: Staples 24 | July 06, 2008 at 12:54 PM
Everyone heard that Bynum is cleared to practice, right?
Posted by: ajax | July 06, 2008 at 01:04 PM
No news is good news.
I hope both those guys come back. They have monster energy.
But they should make Sasha write, "I have no shot off the dribble moving to my left" 1000 times before resigning him.
GOOOOooOOOO LAKERS!!!
Posted by: JohnnyP | July 06, 2008 at 01:06 PM
oh, beans! i was wishing for something new cause baseball makes me wanna nap.
Posted by: rizzo | July 06, 2008 at 01:24 PM
Awesome.
Posted by: Caliphilosopher | July 06, 2008 at 02:18 PM
Vman,
"...although everyone's motives were suspect, when the smoke cleared, it probably worked out for the best"
True, and the bigger the bomb, the more lasting the peace. Remember though, this matador sentiment is easy to hold when it is not your team being moved, not this time anyway. (Not to be confused with the Los Angeles "Traitors" who were, are, and always will be the mighty Oakland Raiders)
I'm simply saying that not to voice unrelenting dissent or concern every time an owner is moved to piss in the pool we all must share suggests indifference at best, and tacit approval at worst. As fans, we do have the power to cause pause. At least we better have, or we are all fools. By the way, if news came down that the good doctor was considering a Laker move to, say, Las Vegas, we wouldn't hear the end of it from NBA fans, including the great fans in Seattle and Sacramento, and I think you already know this.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
"We are talking in circles, as is usually the case"
Which begs the question: Why do you do that? And why, of all people, are you talking to trolls? Bad piggy.
Sonnybelfast
Posted by: Sonnybelfast | July 06, 2008 at 02:46 PM
dkw, my understanding is that they can still offer the MLE to a free agent since Sasha is their own free agent.
But the problem is that the Lakers are so far above the luxury tax, at least above what Buss is willing to pay, that I doubt that they will go after someone else with their MLE.
Posted by: sclakerfan | July 06, 2008 at 03:06 PM
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NBA_
Collective_Bargaining_Agreement#
Early_Bird_exception
If I've read that correctly, resigning Sasha and Ronny have absolutely nothing to do with the mid-level or the salary cap.
Posted by: Lord Jeffrey Amherst | July 06, 2008 at 03:15 PM
Staples 24,
Were we soft when we beat the Jazz and Spurs? There's a difference between soft and not having a ton of bulk. I do think we need an infusion of toughness, but a lot of that will be remedied by adding Bynum back into the mix. And we'll fix even more of it if we can sign Posey to the midlevel.
I'd like to see this as our starting lineup next year:
C: Bynum
PF: Pau
SF: Posey
SG: Kobe
PG: Fish/Farmar
I think Lamar could be a great super-sub off the bench. A big man version of Ginobili. Ariza would be very good if he develops a consistent perimeter j.
Posted by: Xodus | July 06, 2008 at 03:31 PM
Xodus,
"Ariza would be very good if he develops a consistent perimeter j."
Me, too. (If I were six inches taller, faster, and a better ball handler.)
Posted by: exhelodrvr | July 06, 2008 at 03:43 PM
If there is nothing to report, then I got nothing to say.
Posted by: Fatty | July 06, 2008 at 03:54 PM
Xodus,
Whatever! Winning against Jazz and Spurs does not make the Lakers untouchables. It is winning by dominance in the playoffs and the NBA FINALS that makes me relax, not just a WCF. Get it?
The fact still remains we have so many soft players in our team and that should be addressed.
However you want to define SOFT is up to you. But to me SOFT is not getting it done and not dominating all thru out (Nov - June) and putting fears in everyone's mind.
That's the kind of toughness, I want in my Lakers.
I want my Lakers to be the best of all time, not just maybe the best or one of the best.
These Lakers has that type of opportunity when they got blessed with Bynum, got this Gasol gift and still able to keep Bryant at his prime. But Lakers Mitch K's job is not done yet.
You DO NOT waste this type of opprtunity to mix it with Mihm, Vlad, Walton, Sasha and Karl. This is a golden oppurtunity to make it happen and it is highly important that the Lakers get stronger, coz we found out last month, the BEAST in the EAST is no softie!!!
No more 5 MIL a year for soft players. Use it wisely. Use it strongly.
Posted by: Staples 24 | July 06, 2008 at 04:25 PM
Ex,
Don't forget your calves.
Posted by: Faith | July 06, 2008 at 04:42 PM
AK,
Best setup ever to a new thread. On a weekend that's all about chilling, that''s about all the news I can handle.
Posted by: Rick Friedman | July 06, 2008 at 05:01 PM
the lakers shouldn't go past 3 mil. for Sasha, if he wants more, let him walk, I think Colby Karl can replace him as a shooter, the guy has the skill.
You want some toughness, we should go after Eduardo Najera.
Posted by: Oscar | July 06, 2008 at 05:11 PM
Faith,
Calves, I've got. And decent hands. It's the hops, quickness, speed, height, and ball-handling that I'm lacking in. So my glass is only 80% empty.
Posted by: exhelodrvr | July 06, 2008 at 05:17 PM
Nothing new to the Laker roster either:
Definites...
C: Bynum Mihm
PF: Gasol
SF: Odom Ariza Radmanovic Walton
SG: Bryant Karl
PG: Fisher Farmar
Waiting on...
PF: Turiaf
SG: Vujacic
Probables...
C: Mbenga
PG: Sun
Development League:
PG: Crawford
So if you think about it, the lakers have these layers:
C: Bynum Mihm Mbenga
PF: Gasol Odom Turiaf
SF: Ariza Radmanovic Walton
SG: Bryant Vujacic Karl
PG: Fisher Farmar Sun
That's a potent line-up, TOP to BOTTOM.
Posted by: Happy Gilmore | July 06, 2008 at 05:42 PM
Ronny and Sasha's salaries will have no effect on a mid-level exception signing.
The mid-level exception allows any team in the league to sign a free agent for a moderate contract. This year the contract will be worth around 5.8M. The whole idea is that even teams with horrendous payrolls (see the Knicks) and that are over the salary cap will still be able to sign one new player.
Ronny and Sasha's salaries will be added to the salaries of other Laker players to determine the payroll this season. If that payroll is over what the league sets as the salary cap (prob something like 55-60M), the Lakers will have to pay a dollar for dollar tax on the additional salary. Because the Lakers are already over the salary cap even without Ronny/Sasha, Ronny and Sasha's salaries will cost the Lakers double what Ronny and Sasha make because of our salary cap situation
Their salaries do matter in the context of the salary cap.
Salary cap is less important for teams that are worth more (make more money) like the Lakers and the Knicks. It also helps when you have an owner that isn't frugal (perfect example is Mark Cuban) and is willing to spend a lot to win. Teams in larger markets tend to be willing to spend more (and also tend to be worth more money).
Jerry Buss looks at a final bottom line and seems willing to spend a lot for a team that goes deep in the Finals and possibly can win a championship. We're lucky in that respect. It's a very different situation with the Phoenix Suns that let go of Joe Johnson, Kurt Thomas and a large number of 1st round draft picks just to save money.
We're lucky not to be Phoenix fans.
Hope that helps.
Posted by: Benjamin | July 06, 2008 at 05:54 PM
Faith,
Do you really LOVE Sasha or do you just like him as a friend?
Posted by: Benjamin | July 06, 2008 at 05:54 PM
Happy,
Good post and recap of the roster:
C: Bynum Mihm Mbenga
PF: Gasol Odom Turiaf
SF: Ariza Radmanovic Walton
SG: Bryant Vujacic Karl
PG: Fisher Farmar Sun
I would add that Karl is probably the guy who will not be on the roster if the Lakers sign James Posey or if Joe Crawford turns out to be a better prospect, which is unlikely. So right now, Coby Karl is probably praying for Posey to re-sign with the Celtics.
Tom
Posted by: LakerTom | July 06, 2008 at 05:56 PM
WHY??? WHY??? WHY??? WHY all this love for Posey???
As far as I am concerned, this guy is a mercenary. He is a hired gun. Boston grabbed him away from Miami. He chose to sell his soul to the Dark Side -- the HATED celtics. Let him ROT in beantown. Let him STAY there!!!
I don't want him. IF he wants to find his way to Los Angeles, let him PAY the Lakers to come over to The Light, and play for the Royal Purple & Gold.
I say, let us develop our own players, build up what we have, or trade for guys who have NOTHING to do with Boston. I would rather trade for Artest than go after Boston's cast offs!
When - not if - the Lakers win the title next season, the last thing I want is for these idiotic C's trolls to come on here and claim WE won because we had a former Celtic on OUR team.
I hate the Boston Celtics. I hate the Red Sox. I hate the Patriots. I hate the Boston Bruins.
I hate EVERYTHING to do with sports in that part of the country -- especially that region's sports "fans" -- the WORST band-wagon jumping, front-running, fair-weather "fans" in the country!
Considering it's baseball season, in the words of KB24, "go Yankees!!!"
P & G R
Posted by: Purple & Gold Reign | July 06, 2008 at 06:04 PM
P & G R,
***********
“I hate the Boston Celtics. I hate the Red Sox. I hate the Patriots. I hate the Boston Bruins.
I hate EVERYTHING to do with sports in that part of the country -- especially that region's sports "fans" -- the WORST band-wagon jumping, front-running, fair-weather "fans" in the country!
Considering it's baseball season, in the words of KB24, "go Yankees!!!"
***********
I’m with you on Boston and its sports teams. The worst development of the 21st century was the lifting of the Curse of the Bambino, 21 years of sweet nothingness for the Celtics, and the cheating Pats lucking out with Tom Brady. I’m first and foremost a Lakers fan following by my lifetime loyalty for pinstripes and love for my hometown Niners.
Damn, the ump just blew a check strike 3-2 call that cost the Yankees two runs when Joba let another Indian single in two runs to give the Sox a 3-1 lead in the 5th inning. You know I as much as love the Yankees and baseball and the Niners and pro football, hoops is the game I played most and loved best and the Lakers the true sweetheart of my sports hopes and dreams. Baseball and football are just diversions until next season.
Personally, I’ll take Posey because we will add toughness, veteran savvy, and solid defense against Pierce to the Lakers side of the equation and subtract the same from the Celtics side. In the end, it will taste sweet regardless of what Celtic fans said because Posey chose us over them, just like Rick Fox did, and just like every key free agent in the future is going to do. They will all want to join the Lakers and Kobe and the Beast.
Tom
Posted by: LakerTom | July 06, 2008 at 06:42 PM
Hey JLF,
I saw your response on the other thread about
taking care of the family. A quick question for you:
What would you buy with 80 million that you couldn't
afford to buy with 60 million?
I ask this because I actually have a few friends who
are "stinkin' filthy rich". I couldn't see a change in
their lifestyle as they went from being worth 7 figures
to 8 figures. [ and no, I'm not talking about going from
9 mil to 10 mil. :) ]
Posted by: hobbitmage | July 06, 2008 at 06:49 PM
lol.
What Sasha and I have is something called undefined.
lol.
Posted by: Faith | July 06, 2008 at 06:56 PM
Happy,
Following up on your last post and updated roster listing based on latest news, I would not have a problem going to war next season with this roster OR with the depth chart that you have listed.
C: Bynum Mihm Mbenga
PF: Gasol Odom Turiaf
SF: Ariza Radmanovic Walton
SG: Bryant Vujacic Karl
PG: Fisher Farmar Sun
In the above scenario, Bynum, Gasol, Ariza, Bryant, and Fisher would start, with the onus on Ariza to show that he can defend the 3 and hit the Bruce Bowen corner jumper. Lamar would get starter minutes as 6th man and backup Ariza and Gasol at the 3 and 4. Mihm would become the best backup 5 in the league, Sun and Karl would be groomed as our future backcourt duo at the 1 and 2. There is a lot to love about this roster and something good to be said about every player on it, especially the versatility that we have with Gasol, Odom, and Kobe (and Sun down the road) able to play multiple positions.
We’re going to have a pretty exciting roster even if we don’t add any new free agents.
Tom
Posted by: LakerTom | July 06, 2008 at 07:03 PM
Staples 24,
So is every team that didn't win the title soft then? If this is the case that makes the Lakers the best of the soft teams, which puts us into a great position when we have fully healthy Bynum and Ariza
And you're just contradicting yourself. The Lakers with supposedly soft players won 57 games and made it to the finals, while the Memphis Grizzlies with what you call "dark black" players couldn't win 20 games.
Posted by: Xodus | July 06, 2008 at 07:12 PM
Faith:
“What Sasha and I have is something called undefined.”
You go, girl. Great answer for a charming, funny, smart, and basketball loving young woman and made Lakers fan whom Sasha would be lucky to meet some day, although I still think you were too soft on him and too hard on Drew for the report cards. LOL.
Your Sasha love reminds me of when the late great coach Al McGuire of Marquette responded to a complaint by his backup point guard who said was just as good as Ali, McGuire’s son who was starting for Marquette. Al told the kid he agreed but Ali was still going to start because he was his son. You had to love, Al Maguire, who later became probably the worst color commentator in the history of college basketball.
Tom
Posted by: LakerTom | July 06, 2008 at 07:17 PM
Xodus wrote:
“Staples 24,”
“Were we soft when we beat the Jazz and Spurs? There's a difference between soft and not having a ton of bulk. I do think we need an infusion of toughness, but a lot of that will be remedied by adding Bynum back into the mix. And we'll fix even more of it if we can sign Posey to the midlevel.”
“I'd like to see this as our starting lineup next year:”
“C: Bynum
PF: Pau
SF: Posey
SG: Kobe
PG: Fish/Farmar”
“I think Lamar could be a great super-sub off the bench. A big man version of Ginobili. Ariza would be very good if he develops a consistent perimeter j.”
These are my sentiments exactly. I feel with Bynum coming back (assuming there are no futher knee complications of course), and then adding a true defensive-minded SF like Posey who can shoot from distance as well at the 3. While bringing Lamar off the bench primarily as a back-up PF. This would be a truly outstanding roster and a NBA championship favorite for sure.
However I am also mindful of the pressing salary/luxury tax issues. The Lakers currently have 10 players under contract for a total team payroll of approx. $75 million with a luxury tax threshold estimated to be close to $70 million this year. Which of course will place the Lakers $5 million in the red already, to which they must payout a dollar for dollar penalty for an additional $5 million.
Add to this if Sasha and Turiaf are resigned. The Laker payroll may grow to around $80 million. Then considering Posey is looking for the maximum MLE of $5.8 million for 4-5 years. And factoring in Bynum’s desire (according to his agent anyhow) for the max. extension of $80 million for five years before Oct. 31. Could push the Lakers payroll to over $100 million with over $30 million in luxury taxes on top of it!
But, God bless Jerry Buss if he still nevertheless chooses to pay such a sum which looks like a mini version of the national debt.
Posted by: LoveTheLakeShow | July 06, 2008 at 07:19 PM
24,
Catching up on some reading, I couldn't help but notice some of your very challenging observations, and the responses to them. I personally know several white girls who aren't particularly athletic, and they are soft too. Real screamers. You may be onto something.
Everyone knows that guys like Steve Nash (who can dribble a ball with his bad back and feet better than most people can with their hands) and many other multiple sport crackers are not athletic. How could they be?
From now on, I propose that we use your word "soft" as code when referring to white players. After witnessing Forrest Griffin last night, I can certainly appreciate your point. I can't wait to hear reporters on ESPN the next time AK47 is in the news. "That boy is soft" (and definitely not athletic).
Even more, I look forward to hearing from the fool who invariably will respond to this post with a "in context" definition of the word "athletic".
Sonnybelfast
Posted by: Sonnybelfast | July 06, 2008 at 07:25 PM
Thanks for the info on the mid level exception. Appreciate that.
As for Celtics fans -
I'm a life long Laker fan, but grew up in New England. Many of my friends are so called Celtics fans. For the last 20 years all I've been hearing is UConn Huskies! and pro hoops sucks. Then the night of game six with five minutes to go my phone starts ringing. I'm thinking - how many titles have the Lakers won since the last Celtic title. I never even thought to call these guys and rub it in during all those years. Most the old Celtic fans I know are fair weather and the new Celtic fans are front runners. Maybe someone should remind them that this pathetic franchise has tanked two seasons in recent history to try and get Duncan and Ogden in the draft.
Last thought - I like Turiaf a great deal. I also like the idea of moving Odom to the bench as a sixth man - with or without the addition of a new player. That is in part because the experiment a year or so ago with him at 3 didn't go so well and I'm also worried crowding in the paint on the offensive end with him Odom, Bynum and Gasol on the floor simultaneously.
However, if Odom goes to the bench and backs up the 4 it moves Turiaf to 3rd string at that spot. I'd like to see him get the role as the backup 5 man. I believe he is a much better player - even at the 5 - than Mbenga or Mihm.
Posted by: dkw | July 06, 2008 at 07:35 PM
Tom,
The line-up you present to Happy does look good, with SF being the weakest, er, least strong link. Mitch has earned my trust and I look forward to seeing how things turn out.
Posted by: Laker Kev | July 06, 2008 at 07:47 PM
All this talk about contracts, and security for families, etc. - read this column by Rick Reilly on what A LOT of athletes spend their money on.
http://sports.espn.go.com/espnmag/story?id=3469271
Posted by: exhelodrvr | July 06, 2008 at 07:55 PM
sunny.
“Catching up on some reading, I couldn't help but notice some of your very challenging observations, and the responses to them. I personally know several white girls who aren't particularly athletic, and they are soft too. Real screamers. You may be onto something.”
Good to see you’re still alive even though the Kings are really dead for the next decade. Props for your great sense of humor and sharing it with us in good taste.
“From now on, I propose that we use your word "soft" as code when referring to white players.”
Now that was pretty funny and insidious. Now when somebody says “soft” on the blog, readers are going to think twice and wonder what they really mean. LOL.
And thank God our next president will not be soft.
Tom
Posted by: LakerTom | July 06, 2008 at 07:56 PM
BTW, just wanted to point out that I was wrong about the luxury tax threshold.
It is indeed lower 70M almost certainly this season.
Posted by: Benjamin | July 06, 2008 at 08:11 PM
>>>Well the LATimes are reporting
>>>that the lakers offered Sasha max 5 mil.
Actually, they didn't. What they reported is that the Lakers
haven't offered Sasha more than 5 million. They didn't say how
much they have offered (otrher than the qualifying offer).
After last summer's mediapalooza, the Lakers must have told
their players and their agents to keep all news close to the
chest, as I haven't heard anything about what actual offers
the Lakers made to Ronny or Sasha. I guess we'll find out
on the 9th when they can actually do the deal.
Posted by: Long Time Laker Fan | July 06, 2008 at 08:22 PM
Ex,
No one's going to tell me I don't need my private jet.
BTW, do you mind spotting me some change for gas?
Posted by: Xodus | July 06, 2008 at 08:37 PM
Xodus,
Can't - I never keep any change on me. That's what my posse is for.
Posted by: exhelodrvr | July 06, 2008 at 08:51 PM
Coby Karl is a crowd favorite, but I don't think he's that good. He's slow, his shooting percentage is pretty low, and my impression is that he's a "poor-man's" Luke Walton. Although I don't think Sasha is really worth $6 million a year in this type of market, there aren't that many players in the league that can shoot > 40% from 3 point line, so I think the Lakers have little choice but to try and re-sign him.
Posted by: sclakerfan | July 06, 2008 at 09:05 PM
It's been too long now without a Kwame item.
Once said I'd trade Kwame for Mark Madsen, question now is - Is it an even trade salary-wise? Madsen gets 2.63M for 08-09, how much will Kwame get this offseason?
My guess is the veteran's minimum making him untradeable straight up for Madsen.
Posted by: p ang | July 06, 2008 at 09:07 PM
Laker Kev,
“The line-up you present to Happy does look good, with SF being the weakest, er, least strong link. Mitch has earned my trust and I look forward to seeing how things turn out.”
C: Bynum Mihm Mbenga
PF: Gasol Odom Turiaf
SF: Ariza Radmanovic Walton
SG: Bryant Vujacic Karl
PG: Fisher Farmar Sun
Thanks but the props go to Happy. When I saw his updated roster with Trevor starting, Mbenga and Karl being added, and Lamar moving backing up 4 and moving to 6th man, I was impressed by how balanced the overall roster was when you examine it by position, by depth chart, or by quality of player, or by ability to play multiple positions.
Making Trevor a starter moving Lamar to 6th man make good sense, as does re-signing Mbenga, who is a more than capable third back up at center. Both the starting lineup and the mob crew are deep and talented, with great potential at the end of the roster with Sun Yue and Coby Karl as a long shot starting backcourt duo in the far distant future.
In the end, like you, I trust Mitch to make the best decision, whether it includes signing James Posey or not. He has my trust, too.
Tom
Posted by: LakerTom | July 06, 2008 at 09:08 PM
"poor-man's" Luke Walton"
Now that how to insult somebody!
Posted by: p ang | July 06, 2008 at 09:14 PM
p ang,
At least he didn't call him out for being "soft." LOL.
Tom
Posted by: LakerTom | July 06, 2008 at 09:28 PM
Sonny B
Damned right, rage against the dying of the light.
As in most things NBA, it stinks from the top. D Stern and the owners knew those Oky capitalists had no intention of keeping the Sonics in Seattle. We're told it looked good on paper when they first gave the franchise a cash injection but it was obvious they were headed out of town.
If I'm not mistaken there was a tax proposition to finance a stadium voted down but I'm surprised Steve Ballmer didn't dig into the loose change pocket and pull out a few hundred mil to keep the team near the Microsoft home office.
it's moves like these that put a team in Utah named the Jazz. Maybe we're soon to see the Seattle Hornets, the Kansas City (name goes here).
The Dodgers move expanded the game of baseball. It was a bad example. This was just good for Oklahoma City, bad for Seattle. I'm with ya if you want to start a riot.
Posted by: Vman | July 06, 2008 at 09:53 PM
Oscar - I agree about Najera. I think he'll wind up resigning with Denver though. We could use somebody with that mentaility though.
Posted by: dave m | July 06, 2008 at 10:14 PM