But at least it was money well spent for the Knicks
They of the league-leading 19,723,946 dollaroonis owed in 2007-08 luxury tax. Because really, what 27th-place team doesn't look to spend just under an extra mil per win? Oh, Jimmy Dolan and Zeke Thomas! You lil' scamps!
For those wondering, the Lakers were #7 with a bullet, their tab coming in at just over five mil (or as BK and I call it, "one month's pay"). Something to think about as decisions will be made on potentially Golden State-bound Ronny Turiaf, Sasha Vujacic, James Posey, Brent Barry, Kurt Thomas or any other free agent the Purple and Gold are currently eyeing.
AK



But Dolan is a baller.
Posted by: Charles | July 09, 2008 at 03:22 PM
I think Ronny's gone...I just don't see us matching or topping that. I just hope we can keep our chemistry flowing. I think we'll make a huge mistake by making too many moves.
JK
Posted by: Josh K | July 09, 2008 at 03:24 PM
"..James Posey, Brent Barry, Kurt Thomas "
I would go for Brent Barry. You're not gonna get Posey no way. Experienced three point shooter, thats your veteran guy that you need on the bench for the Lakers.
Posted by: DS | July 09, 2008 at 03:28 PM
Repost from previous thread:
Why are people talking about trading everyone & his brother???? These kids made it to the FINALS for pete's sake. Don't be blowing up the team - we'll get there again next year (this coming season) and perform better and have a greater chance to win. C'mon now - use your powers of reason, people. This team needs a tweak or two - not a fricken' overhaul.
Posted by: justanothermambafan | July 09, 2008 at 03:37 PM
I'm thinking...
Barry was insurance for Sasha leaving.
Thomas was insurance for Turiaf leaving.
Posey we just wanted because we need 3 point shooting and suck at defending the 3.
We've got Fish, Vlad, and Sasha. Why do we need a beat up old veteran (played in only 31/82 games last year) in Barry that still doesn't know how to draw a foul at the end of a WCF playoff game?
I'm not sure Barry is a good defender. I'm not sure that he can play the 3. I'm not sure that Barry is in any way an upgrade over Sasha or even, dare I say, Vlad, partly because at least Vlad can play the 3.
I'm open-minded here, but I've been confused about our pursuit of Barry the whole time.
Am I missing something?
Posted by: Benjamin | July 09, 2008 at 03:42 PM
At this point, with the ridiculous amount Golden State is offering, it's better to just let Ronny go, even though I'd hate to see a great guy like him go.
What's up with GoldenState always taking our players? Well, not always, but they did the same to D-Fish and I guess now because they can't have Davis back or Brand or Maguette, they're just not satisfied until they get one LA player.
Posted by: PeanutButterSpread | July 09, 2008 at 03:42 PM
Laker Legacy - JSNV
WTF? What took you guys so long to post? I know, J*Davey was that bad live this time.
Posted by: Charles | July 09, 2008 at 03:45 PM
justanothermambafan,
It's something to pass the time.
It's fun.
We didn't win the Finals, so we still need to improve. It's not certain a healthy version of our current roster can do that.
A smart sports franchise is aggressive and always trying to improve. You rest and do nothing, other teams make trades to get better than you.
That said, anything other than a minor overhaul unless we can secure All-Star, young talent doesn't make a ton of sense to me either.
Our little issues with toughness, team defense, and defense at the 3 are important too. And we could use a little more outside shooting.
We keep our current roster and all these things could improve. I'm a little concerned with toughness and team D. I think Bynum improves us, but maybe not enough in toughness and team D. I don't know if Ariza helps enough either.
We'll see. Part of the fun!
Posted by: Benjamin | July 09, 2008 at 03:46 PM
This team needs a tweak or two - not a fricken' overhaul.
Posted by: justanothermambafan | July 09, 2008 at 03:37 PM
That's the nature of sports forums. Everyone talks about trades because what else is anyone going to talk about?
The only things a group of guys who don't know each other that well, talk about are: sex, cars and sports.
Are we going to start discussing breast sizes of favorite movie stars? I think that new BMW 135i is pretty hot.
Posted by: LakerinBC | July 09, 2008 at 03:46 PM
While it can certainly be argued that at least the Lakers are winners. I wouldn’t shake my head too much in the Knicks direction for their current outrageous financial situation. Considering that for example. Even for the Lakers to bring back last year’s unit, will put them in roughly the same or greater boat of similar luxury tax expense numbers.
To match Turiaf’s offer, give Sasha at or close to the $5 million/yr. he is requesting. And grant Bynum his $80 million extension. The Lakers’ payroll may balloon to approx. $95 million. Placing them almost $25 million into the luxury tax stratosphere.
Not to mention that Kobe can otp out for more money after next season, thus possibly negating any potential saving from Lamar’s expiring contract should we convince him to resign for less money next year.
Good luck to Jerry Buss managing this. Or more like the fans who are certain to largely have the lux. tax burden past on to them in the way of ever increasing ticket prices….
Posted by: LoveTheLakeShow | July 09, 2008 at 04:01 PM
Our luxury tax situation actually isn't as bad as I thought it was. 5 mil ain't even close to putting a dent in Dr. Buss' bank account and considering the extra scratch we made by going as far as we did, we're in great shape. Especially when you compare our 5 mil. to the mere 27 that the Knicks are dishing out every year for naught.
They pretty much make any sports fan feel good about their team. haha.
GO LAKERS!!!
Posted by: gokobego | July 09, 2008 at 04:03 PM
For all those that were bashing Buss and Mitch last year and to start this season - how bad would the Lakers be if they had Zeke and Dolan?????
Eagleboy
Posted by: Eagleboy | July 09, 2008 at 04:04 PM
Laker in BC -
Well, we can always talk about meta-ontology. That's pretty exciting, and I'm quite up for it.
Posted by: Caliphilosopher | July 09, 2008 at 04:12 PM
BOGUT, BUCKS AGREE ON 5-YEAR EXTENSION
by Charles F. Gardner for jounalsentinel.com
http://www.jsonline.com/story/index.aspx?id=770905
Bogut’s extension is just for $60M, not $72M as originally reported. The differences are incentives in the package. Bogut was drafted #1 in 2005 when Drew was #10. I would predict that the Lakers will sign a similar deal with Drew, $60M to $65M for 5-years, which will be a nice discount from an $80M max contract.
Tom
Posted by: LakerTom | July 09, 2008 at 04:22 PM
RONY to the WARRIORS - A NorCal Perspective
As most of you regulars know I live up here in NorCal now, which means I get to see the Lakers live twice a year.
After more than two years up here and meeting and talking to a lot of Golden State fans I have learned that the basketball culture is exactly the opposite of the one in LA . We expect championships and view a year or three of failure as a bridge between championship runs. They expect failure up here and are resigned to any short term success (like when they upset the Mavs year before last) as being a temporary blip on the way to new failure. Which is what is happening again as they let Baron get away and overpay Maggete as a poor substitute.
That being said, overpaying Rony is par for the course. But I gotta give them one thing - he's the kind of fluid big man that will fit well into Nellie's system and get playing time. After all they played Harrington at the 5 behind Beidrins last year and he’s about 6-8. Now all Rony has to do is decide if 4 mil a year for a sure loser is better than 1 mil for a potential champion. I won’t blame him if , like D-Fish years ago, he chooses what’s best for him and his family. And I WILL cheer for him when he comes off the bench – even against the Lakers!
As for his future here, with Drew, Pau, and Lamar at the big spots he wasn’t gonna get much playing time anyhow barring an injury. I think Mbenga and Mihm will do fine as 5 backups, and both Luke and Rad can slide to the 4 against smaller opponents if necessary. So farewell Rony. I hope you invest your money wisely, and I hope some day you find your way back to us like Fish did….
Posted by: Jay Jay | July 09, 2008 at 04:35 PM
Ok...ok....sorry I asked. It's just that everyone seems to forget how far we went & that there is still so much upside to the team as-is. We start trading off pieces here & there & there's no telling what we get. Talent alone doesn't get it done - just ask anyone who didn't make the finals this year but looked good on paper. Chemistry & youth are our greatest assets - I would hate to see that fall by the wayside just because some veteran or so-called great (or even good) player is available. What the Lakers have in this team is special. It's a dynasty in the making. I think we can't afford to lose sight of that because we were a few points shy of a championship this year. We're already waaayyyy ahead of schedule.
Posted by: justanothermambafan | July 09, 2008 at 04:38 PM
Bogut's deal is good for the Lakers. He was picked 9 spots in front of the BEAST, and hasn't endured any significant injuries (I think). That provides a good baseline for the kind of deal Andrew will be getting. Despite what LakerTom and some others say, his market value isn't at the franchise player level yet. I would love to see what the kid might command on the open market this year. My guess is about 10 mil per at the most. My gut feeling is that he'll receive an extension at somewhere around that.
Posted by: "Pig" Miller | July 09, 2008 at 04:38 PM
Yeah, on the Elton Brand deal, it sounds like David Falk, his
agent stopped returning the Clippers calls when they eventually
did up their offer to match Philadelphia's.
The Clippers got Falked.
Posted by: Long Time Laker Fan | July 09, 2008 at 04:40 PM
Well, we can always talk about meta-ontology. That's pretty exciting, and I'm quite up for it.
Posted by: Caliphilosopher
Dude - I don't even know what that is! I guess I'll stick to debating why we don't need an overhaul.....LOL!
Posted by: justanothermambafan | July 09, 2008 at 04:41 PM
LakerTom,
>>>I would predict that the Lakers will sign a similar deal
>>>with Drew, $60M to $65M for 5-years, which will be a
>>>nice discount from an $80M max contract.
I'm totally in agreement with you there. And I think like Bogut's
contract, it will have incentives to bring it up much closer to a
max contract. Bogut wasn't insulted by the incentives. If you
believe in your own abilites, then you believe you will make
reasonable goals.
Posted by: Long Time Laker Fan | July 09, 2008 at 04:48 PM
Turiaf, Sasha, and Farmar are a good part of the heart of the Lakers. You can talk yourself blue about their skills, but you won't begin to describe the chemistry, court sense, enthusiasm, comraderie, selflessness, commitment, etc. that these guys bring to the table. This is the reason the Lakers were so successful this season. I say Turiaf is worth every penny of his match, and it shouldn't be looked at that he is causing the luxury tax...it's not his salary that taking it over the top.
I can just see someone like Ron Artest coming in and screwing up the entire team.
Posted by: Chuck | July 09, 2008 at 04:53 PM
BOGUT DEAL SETS FLOOR FOR BYNUM EXTENSION
Andrew Bogut’s 5-year extension for $60M from the Milwaukee Bucks effectively sets the floor for the Lakers upcoming extension for Andrew Bynum. Bogut was drafted #1 in 2005 by Milwaukee while Bynum was picked #10 in the same year by the Lakers. Look for Bynum and the Lakers to agree to a $65M to $70M 5-year contract before the October 31 deadline. That would be a discount of $10M to $15M off a max deal.
The Bucks, like the Lakers, did not want to see Bogut become a free agent two years from now at the end of the 2009/10 season, which he could have done if they had not signed him to an extension before October 31. They also recently traded Yi Jianlian and Bobbie Simmons to New Jersey for Richard Jefferson and hired Scott Skiles as coach.
NBA agents are licking their chops at the free agent cap space that will be available after the 2009/10 season, when Bogut and Bynum could become unrestricted free agents, as that is also when LeBron James, Dwayne Wade, and Chris Bosh among others become free agents. It is expected that there will be more cap space available at the end of the 2009/10 season than any time in the last 10 years in the NBA.
Tom
Posted by: LakerTom | July 09, 2008 at 04:57 PM
Lakers current salary obligation 75,000,000
Add Sasha, Ronny, and others 11, 000,000
Total if all signed 86,000,000 +15 mil (lux tax) =
Say it the way Dr. Evil would say it........
THAT'S OVER ONE HUNDRED MILLION DOLLARS!!!!
Dr Buss needs our help. The season ticket holders will do their part. Please watch all the in-game commercials and buy the advertised products.
Posted by: Fatty | July 09, 2008 at 05:05 PM
LakerTom,
I wouldn't count on that "discount." Yeah Bogut was picked #1 and has more "experience" but Andrew has way more upside - he's more like the star of the next generation Lakers. Bynum will get the max.
P.S. To the clipper "admirers" don't feel too bad, mates. This is who the clippers are. I too was even caught up in the excitement of the clippers back in the early 90's. They are a 3rd class organization and the way they run their business is disgracefull. That is why I always stuck with the Lakers. We have the best owner, the best Gm, best coaching staff, and the best team if all the pieces are in place.
Posted by: THE original Ken | July 09, 2008 at 05:07 PM
First Smush, now Kwame, the Heat just seem to not get enough of crappy former Lakers. Oh, and didn't Pargo play for the Lakers too? At least he's decent.
http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/rumors/post/
Kwame-Brown-could-be-free-agent-target-for-Heat;
_ylt=Ao1t14x7Rc48JtoEIN9QftOLvLYF?urn=nba,92885
Posted by: laker hopeful | July 09, 2008 at 05:15 PM
LAKERS’ LUXURY TAX SITUATION FOR NEXT YEAR…
With the luxury tax threshold set at $71.2M, we can start to make some estimates of what next years luxury tax situation will be for the Lakers.
First, we currently have 10 players under contract for next year with total salaries for the year of $75.3M, which means that we are already over the threshold by $4.1M with 5 more contracts to add. Andrew Bynum, by the way, is one of those 10 players and any extension he receives would not begin until after this year, when Lamar Odom’s contract is scheduled to come off the books.
So let’s assume that we re-sign Sasha for the current MLE for x-years, starting at $5.6M. Let’s also assume we re-sign Mbenga and Karl also for $1.0M each and Sun Yue for $2.0M and Joe Crawford for $1.0M for next year. That would bring our 15 player total to $85.9M, or put us $14.7M over the threshold, leaving us owing that amount for tax.
If we assume that we sign James Posey for the x-years for full MLE or $5.6M instead of Crawford, that would raise our total payroll for 15 players for next year to $90.5M, which would mean we over the luxury tax threshold by $19.1M, which means that our luxury tax bill next year would then be for that amount.
Thank God we have an owner like Jerry Buss. No way with this situation that we match Golden State for Ronny. I still think we have to match Sasha, though.
Tom
Posted by: LakerTom | July 09, 2008 at 05:18 PM
so im looking at the summer leauge schedule
www.nba.com/summerleague2008/teams.html
hoping to see some names. Coby Karl is there and crawford is there, but one person i wanted to see was sun yue. is there any info on him that anybody has other than youtube? im curious about his abilities and what type of person he is and what he brings to the table. its about a month til the olympics, lakers should be able to pry sun yue for nine days of playing!
hope to hear from you guys
Posted by: andand | July 09, 2008 at 05:18 PM
so im looking at the summer leauge schedule
www.nba.com/summerleague2008/teams.html
hoping to see some names. Coby Karl is there and crawford is there, but one person i wanted to see was sun yue. is there any info on him that anybody has other than youtube? im curious about his abilities and what type of person he is and what he brings to the table. its about a month til the olympics, lakers should be able to pry sun yue for nine days of playing!
hope to hear from you guys
Posted by: andand | July 09, 2008 at 05:23 PM
How about this?
The Warriors offered a 4 year contract at 17 million just so the Lakers will match it. That way the Warriors see the Lakers go into salary cap hell. LOL!
The Lakers are like the Unites States of America. All around the world no one likes the USA. Just like all around the NBA no one likes the Lakers.
That contract the Warriors offered isn't bad on any other team but with the Lakers it just clogs up a roster spot for a long 4 years.
mike t.
Posted by: Michael C. Teniente | July 09, 2008 at 05:23 PM
You guys talking about Bogut's contract being a good baseline for Andrew's new deal are crazy. Where Bogut went in the draft compared to Andrew is 100% irrelevant.
Bynum's progress (since that draft) is what took a very sketchy Laker team at the beginning of this season and made them a championship contender (per Kobe) and the top record in the Western Conference. THAT is what is relevant to Bynum's new contract. What on earth has Bogut done as a professional?
Anyone who thinks that Bogut's new deal is anything but the clincher for Andrew demanding (rightly) and getting (if the Laker's have any sense) a max value extension is borrowing some of Lamar's weed....
Ask the Clippers how wise it is not to lock up a big man that you were counting on for the future. Treat the big guy right, or he might find another option closer to home on the east coast (that sounds famiiliar, no?)
Posted by: Leo | July 09, 2008 at 05:27 PM
Mike T,
"How about this? The Warriors offered a 4 year contract at 17 million just so the Lakers will match it. That way the Warriors see the Lakers go into salary cap hell. LOL!
The Lakers are like the Unites States of America. All around the world no one likes the USA. Just like all around the NBA no one likes the Lakers. That contract the Warriors offered isn't bad on any other team but with the Lakers it just clogs up a roster spot for a long 4 years."
What's also interesting is the flip side of what you're talking about, which is the Lakers having 7 days to make up their minds. Even if the Lakers know for certain they won't match the offer, they can use up the entire week before turning it down, just so the Warriors can't use that four mil elsewhere (since it's tied into their offer to Ronny). Granted, it may not hurt Golden State as much as some other teams, since they gained a fair amount of cap room after Davis left. But still, it can all become one big game of chess.
AK
Posted by: Andrew Kamenetzky | July 09, 2008 at 05:32 PM
LakerTom,
>>>Andrew Bogut’s 5-year extension for $60M from the
>>>Milwaukee Bucks effectively sets the floor for the Lakers
>>> upcoming extension for Andrew Bynum.
I partially agree with you.
Bogut's contract is a good bellweather for what the Lakers will
offer to extend Bynum. They are both centers chosen in the
Lottery from the same draft. Both teams believe the player
has shown some good performance but hasn't reached their
full potential. They had very similar stats -- Bogut scored
about 1 point more per game, Bynum got about 1/2 more
rebounds per game.
But Bogut has stayed healthier than Bynum and ended his
season on the floor, not in surgery.
I don't see Bogut's contract as a floor for Bynum's as you do.
But I think it will be "in the neigborhood" -- somewhere around 55-65M base salary with incentives to bring the total
over 70.
Posted by: Long Time Laker Fan | July 09, 2008 at 05:32 PM
If the Lakers don't match, he will be missed. He'll definitely be the most popular player that isn't a Laker among Laker fans.
Posted by: DavyJonze | July 09, 2008 at 05:36 PM
LakerTom,
>>>and Sun Yue for $2.0M
Why would the Lakers sign a second round pick to more than
some of the Lottery choices?
Try Sun Yue for 1M and you're more on target.
Posted by: Long Time Laker Fan | July 09, 2008 at 05:38 PM
>>>Mbenga and Karl also for $1.0M
Karl is already under (team option) contract for 0.7M.
They could sign MBenga for the minimum.
Posted by: Long Time Laker Fan | July 09, 2008 at 05:40 PM
Long Time,
No reason for us to disagree at this point. We both want the same thing: Drew locked up.
I can’t see the Lakers offering less than Bogut or Drew’s agent accepting less. I would like to see a deal for $65M for 5-years. That would be $15M below max and a good deal for both sides. Let’s see what happens. My fingers and toes are crossed.
Tom
Posted by: LakerTom | July 09, 2008 at 05:40 PM
andand,
>>>but one person i wanted to see was sun yue. is there
>>>any info on him that anybody has other than youtube?
If you want to watch Sun Yue play basketball this summer,
watch the Olympics. He'll be playing for the Chinese team.
Last I heard, he's the backup PG. He's a better pure point
than the starter, but the starter is a better scorer than Sun.
Posted by: Long Time Laker Fan | July 09, 2008 at 05:42 PM
LTLF,
I agree. I think 5 years and 50-55 million dollars is a very fair offer for Bynum at this point.
Posted by: Xodus | July 09, 2008 at 05:44 PM
Hello everybody. It has taken me quite awhile to get over the NBA Finals. I was pretty upset about it. But after finally looking through the different exit interivews and all of that, the Lakers seemed to be a team that was defeated before Game 1 of the Finals. Even Phil Jackson thought that the Lakers sort of overacheived, and so did Kobe. Perhaps they overacheived, but maybe Boston was that good. I mean, they do have three perrenial All-Stars as opposed to the Lakers one. Gasol is solid but if you guys paid attention to me at all, I believe Gasol was played out of position by the end of the playoffs due to need. Gasol was worn down by the bigger stronger Celtics.
I mean just looking at the PHYSICAL difference between Boston and Los Angeles, and the Celtics were just bulkier. The Lakers had size, but the Celtics had more strength. You cant make Pau into Dwight Howard. Thats not his game. PJ tried, but it didn't work. That being said, don't be suprised if Pau Gasol drops 24 a game for Spain and leads them to Gold. Its not that he cant play, just not the way PJ needed him to play.
That being said, Andrew Bynum remains the key to the Lakers' future. If he becomes a physical presence, the Lakers will be fine. Bynum, Gasol and Odom will be solid. They are all great passers and the offense will still work.
That being said, the Lakers bench needs improvement. Farmar, Sasha and Ariza are all keepers, and after that there really isnt anybody that has to be kept. What the Lakers do need tho is some more veteran players who are willing to take a back seat for the season but then come in right away in the playoffs for key moments. Usually old guys looking for a ring and quite frankly, and easier season (see PJ Brown, Sam Cassell) are perfect.
Some players for this can be Kurt Thomas, Dikembe Mutombo, etc. James Posey is a solid player, but I dont know if he wants to be the backup SF to Odom.
The Lakers, though, if they want to be creative, can look to undrafted free agents with size and strength to play the interior. They could use a couple guys who just move bodies around. Bynum, Gasol and Odom are genreally good at not fouling if they dont have to be enforces. So the Lakers need guys who can make good hard fouls and just physically wear down their opponents.
Remember though, the Lakers came within 2 games of the title. And while the West got better, all the Lakers including Farmar, Kobe, Gasol, Bynum, Sasha, Odom will all get better. Remember Odom played like crap at the beginning of the season because of a shoulder injury. Kobe had a knee and hand that wore his shooting out in the finals. Fisher had a torn tendon in his foot.
Guys like Sasha and Farmar are on the brink of being veterans. Often times in the Finals, those two were not just sparks, but played big minutes in the waning moments of the games. Kobe will perfect his facilitator role
The Lakers are in good shape. The only reason it hurts so much was because it was the Celtics.
As for Turiaf, while Im sad to see him leave, good luck to him. He has to take his money especially because of a previous health ailment. Anybody would take that deal. Plus he knows in LA he wont get a chance to play. Although eventually Brandon Right or Anthony Randolph will take his place. But good luck Ronny!
Posted by: The Lake Show | July 09, 2008 at 05:45 PM
Long Time,
Wait! How did you go from "complete" agreement with me to "partial" agreement in the next post. LMAO. Don't worry. It's OK to agree with me once in a while. Nobody will hold it against you - for long that is. LOL.
Tom
Posted by: LakerTom | July 09, 2008 at 05:49 PM
The Posey situation.
It occurs to me that if James Posey doesn't sign with the Celtics,
I don't really care who he signs with.
The other teams reported to be talking to his agent are Cleveland,
the Lakers, New Orleans, Washington, and Houston. Of those,
New Orleans would be the only one that likely impact the Lakers
future by adding Posey, but just getting him OFF of the Celtics
increases the Lakers odds against them if they play them again
in next years' finals.
Go Posey! Go for the cash! Take that full MLE offer from
Cleveland and have a ball.
Posted by: Long Time Laker Fan | July 09, 2008 at 05:53 PM
AK,
Say we lose Ronnie, what's your short list for the big men you think are the best still available.
Any chance at the Clipse getting Okafor?
Posted by: Najja aka Bonus | July 09, 2008 at 05:56 PM
Kwaminus,
>>>>>Lacrosse Team...
>>>>>Carlos Boozer...
>>>>>Elton Brand...
>>>>>this is... DUKE...
Interesting observation. I hope that doesn’t bode well for Coach K and Team USA. I always thought that ACC players from Duke and North Carolina were overrated and overhyped by the east coast media anyway. MJ was the one big exception. And the school’s rep has definitely taken some justified hits. Bruin fans “have” to hate Duke and North Carolina. After the east restructure the Final 4 to assure ACC participation and stop the UCLA dynasty, Duke and Carolina stole countless recruits from the streets of LA and from the Bruins. LOL.
Tom
Posted by: LakerTom | July 09, 2008 at 06:05 PM
thanks LTLF. im looking forward to seeing him there. i didnt know he wascoming off the bench. hmmm? kinda makes me wonder how his shot is and ball handling skills are. i guess just have to wait andsee
andand
Posted by: andand | July 09, 2008 at 06:07 PM
Agent David Falk seems to be a persona non grata in the Laker organization. If he's the player's agent (Brand) the team won't even look his way.
No concrete base, just my conspiracy theory. Since the fiasco with Glen Rice.
LakerTom,
One day without any Bynum salary post, PLEASE!
Posted by: p ang | July 09, 2008 at 06:10 PM
"Lacrosse Team...
Carlos Boozer...
Elton Brand...
this is... DUKE..."
Oh, you mean that the truth is going to come out and it will turn out that Boozer and Brand were actually in the right the entire time?
Posted by: exhelodrvr | July 09, 2008 at 06:21 PM
AK,
yeah, that seems like a little chess game. In my opinion, it's the Lakers who come out of it a little on the bad end of the situation. Turiaf just isn't a physical enough player to help this Lakers squad.
His energy would be perfect in Golden State and, as someone mentioned, Don Nelson fast paced version of basketball would suit Turiaf well because he would play a little center. But anyway you cut it...it doesn't add up to a championship for the Warriors but it's a decent pay day for Turiaf.
The Lakers need roster spots. I have a feeling the Lakers are going to do something but they're waiting for some dominos to fall. Namely the James Posey deal. Once a couple of more players sign with teams I think the Lakers will make some kind of move. What that move is....I don't know.
mike t.
Posted by: Michael C. Teniente | July 09, 2008 at 06:40 PM
>>>Wait! How did you go from "complete" agreement with
>>>me to "partial" agreement in the next post. LMAO.
Look at your numbers. In one, you proposed that you expected
the Lakers to sign Bynum for something like 60-65M. I'm guessing 55-65, so we overlapped.
In your subsequent post, you stated that Bogut's deal was a
floor for Bynum's and you changed your numbers to $65-70.
I agree with you that Bogut's deal is relevant to setting market
value for Bynum's deal, but I don't think that offering Bynum
slightly below Bogut would be an insult, which you do.
We're only apart by 10 million at the moment.
How about if I throw in performance incentives to bring the
deal up to a potential 75 million (3 million more than Bogut)?
Done deal?
Posted by: Long Time Laker Fan | July 09, 2008 at 06:55 PM
The Original Ken - yeah, but they had World B. Free.
Posted by: dave m | July 09, 2008 at 06:59 PM
AK,
Aside from the 7 days delay of any Warriors move, Lakers scouts, Lester and Mitch should prepare some mega trade that will involve Turiaf's 4.2M plus Laker players. Turiaf's new value becomes a filler, an ideal if we could get Ben Gordon + one player or Paul Millsap + Utah players. We just have to protect Kobe, Drew, Pau, LO.
LakerTom,
You are so generous to Sun Lue, he's a rookie and u gave him 2M that's 14M yuan. The kid has not seen that much money in his life.
Bogut's value is not equivalent to Drew. It is still based on the demand and supply. Perhaps, Bogut's contract can be referred as a benchmark but not a good gauge on the sudden rise of Bynum's values. Let's put it this way, is there a team out there willing to offer Bynum 80M for 5 years? if there is then that is his value, if there is none Lakers could decrease it to 50M. It will all depend on his performance on the first two months.
That projection of 90M is just right but too much for the 85 yr old playboy and poker player to handle, he's not AEG Enterprises. Lakers is the only fortune left from the Buss empire. This is a tough job for Mitch. Therfore, don't think like LakerTom, the super optimistic fan but think as a Jerry Buss, the poker player.
Posted by: Edwin Gueco | July 09, 2008 at 07:00 PM