Back to the motherland? Or at least the mother continent?
Those Sasha Vujacic negotiations aren't going all that well, it seems, and the LAT's Steve Springer reports that Sasha is prepared to take a deal in Europe if the Lakers won't pony up. How much of this is posturing, it's hard to say- I'm not in the room in which negotiations are taking place- but it's a credible threat, given Vujacic's roots and the recent decision by former Hawks forward Josh Childress to play in Greece.
Having lost Ronny Turiaf, to then lose Sasha would do some serious damage to the team's depth, a strength last season for sure. The pair would also need to be replaced, meaning they'll have to pay someone (with the unavoidable luxury tax penalties), and looking over the free agent lists, the possibilities aren't enticing. I'd encourage them not to get too stuck on a few million here, especially on a player who fills some very specific needs (outside shooting, aggressive-if-not-always-intelligent play defensively) and unlike Turiaf, played a lot of important fourth quarter minutes last season.
More from Janis Carr of the OC Register.
Stay tuned.
BK



Oh, and for those of you who don't like JR Smith, there are
several players who could probably be obtained for less money.
Kareem Rush - 39% 3-point shooting last season and has
played for the Lakers under Phil Jackson before
Fred Jones - 38% 3-point shooter last season.
Von Wafer - 15% 3-point shooter, but makes up for it in pure
entertainment value.
Posted by: Long Time Laker Fan | July 25, 2008 at 12:12 PM
Laker Tom,
Agreed. Ding How is just "that guy."
Posted by: Charles | July 25, 2008 at 12:13 PM
Pig,
>>>>>I'm with you on Pargo, but PJ like big guards and Pargo doesn't fit that bill.
>>>>>Kobe Carl does though, so maybe you get the best of both worlds. The NBA is
>>>>>becoming a Moneyball type of sport, where you can have only a couple of
>>>>>superstars and need everyone else on the team to be paid at a bargain according
>>>>>to their value. Hence you have either young players that have good talent and
>>>>>raw ability with little polish, or you have veterans lacking that youthful
>>>>>athleticism but have a polished game, and come at a bargain.
If we let Sasha walk, then it will almost like a unanimous victory for the Celtics style roster where the top 3 players rake in huge contracts forcing the team to fill the remaining roster spots with over-the-hill players willing to play for the veteran’s minimum.
One of the things that we all loved about this Lakers team was the fact that we didn’t just fill the rear end of the roster with those guys but with young players with good potential. While I recognize that our young bench guys did not play as well as the Celtics older and more experienced bench guys, I still contend that the key two factors that determined the series were the absence of Andrew Bynum and the fact that the Lakers weren’t as hungry after winning the Western Conference. They had already accomplished too much.
>>>>>I can't get over the constant state of fear and anxiety around here. I blew up
>>>>>at LakerTom earlier in the week because he's been lacking any new material
>>>>>lately, but at least his outlook is always good. Some of you cats have got to
>>>>>stop freaking out about role players like Sasha Vujacic. The Lakers will be fine.
Sasha will be signed. Ronny will be our only lost player and Garbo really our only lost prospect. The roster will still looks like the deepest in the league. We just need to find a backup power forward to replace Ronny:
C: Bynum Mihm Mbenga
PF: Gasol Odom (Open)
SF: Ariza Radmanovic Walton
SG: Bryant Vujacic Karl
PG: Fisher Farmar Sun
Tom
Posted by: LakerTom | July 25, 2008 at 12:16 PM
Wow this thread has taken some interesting turns.
A serious examination of Ding How. My take is that he's a very weird, very antiquated flavor of racist stand up poster until proven otherwise. Normally posters try to get a reaction and make people mad or look incredibly stupid. This guy is something else entirely. In this case, it's not very obvious comedy and it's not obvious trolling. Just a whole other species.
Coby Karl will become as useful as Sasha? Are we so strapped for cash that we want to take that chance for 2M? I think it also takes time which doesn't seem like the thing to screw around with given our big payroll and desire to win now.
I think we should offer Sasha something like 4.5M average contract, back-loaded with incentives fro 5 years. 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.6 4.7 with unlikely defensive incentives and Finals appearance incentives. In doing so we can minimize what we pay him while still giving Sasha and Pelinka a small sense of victory.
Charles,
I think we should sign Elton Brown. There was hype about him when we drafted him and it sounds like he's been very productive in the mean time. Good catch!
Mike T,
Interesting article related to HIPAA. I think you're probably reaching a little tying it into Bynum's case, but it's pretty understandable given how mysterious and surprising that injury has gone down. Good catch with the qualifying offer counting against the cap too.
LTLF,
You know I respect you a lot, but I think you're nuts if you want Ben Gordon on this team. Gordon's defense is weak and he can't play the 1 or 3. What are we going to do with the guy? And Deng had a bad season. It's really hard to tell for me if the guy's all potential and hype or the real deal.
Now Hinrich, we could use. How about Odom and Farmar for Hinrich and Deng if that works or add filler if we need to do so. Looked it up and Deng doesn't currently have a contract. Maybe we could get Deng for 7-8M? That would increase our luxury tax woes, but a depth chart of
PG Hinrich Fisher Yue
SG Kobe Sasha? Karl
SF Deng Ariza Rad Walton
PF Gasol Rad Brown
C Bynum Mihm Mbenga
would be pretty nice.
There's a huge problem here with Walton and Rad though. We paid them. They're hard to move. The FO is going to want to use them even if it doesn't make sense. The only way it works out is if we waive them, pay them some of it (maybe 1/2 their contracts which count double since we're going to be over the luxury tax) so they can play elsewhere for cheaper. I don't think the FO is prepared to do that yet.
I think it's a move wer're going to have to do eventually because given our team now, our contracts then were mistakes. At the time as LTLF does a nice job pointing out it did make sense.
I think our goal needs to be a few things:
1. Point guard development for the next few years, especially thinking about post-Fisher.
2. Improvement on D generally, on toughness and experience.
3. Improved play at the 3, particularly on defense.
4. A replacement for Turiaf at the 4. We're fine at the 5 if Mihm does what we expect.
5. Resign Sasha.
Ideally, we want to perform the above goals while minimizing personnel changes and cost to us. We also want to do so with the youngest possible players that we can have in place for years.
I would like us to get rid of Vlad before the season is over. If you don't try on D in the Finals, you shouldn't get to stay on the team. Buy him out for half his contract. I realize that will cost us 2.5M X 3. It will also save us 2.5M X3 X2 because of the luxury tax.
I'd like a move made for a better SF. I want Josh Smith, Gerald Wallace, Ron Artest, or Shane Battier. I think Shane Battier fits our needs the best due to his 3-point shooting, cheapness and his known stability (both mentally and physically). Smith can be a pain in the ass. Artest is nutty. Wallace is injury-prone. Battier can do less than any of these other guys, but that's totally fine. He does exactly what we need him to do and can probably be had the cheapest among these guys.
If we can find a way to get Tayshaun on the Rockets, that should pave the way for us to get Battier.
If we get a solid enough guy at the 4 (a banger), we should be cool. If we lose both Rad and Odom, I think we will need two such guys.
Posted by: Benjamin | July 25, 2008 at 12:20 PM
JR Smith = Problem Child
Also, that David Lee sure is a busy guy, acting as agent for Drew and pulling down boards for the Knicks. Neat!
Posted by: DrewPauKobe | July 25, 2008 at 12:23 PM
Jon K,
>>>I don't know if Coby Karl's defense is as good as Sasha's.
Okay, I have to get off my butt and capture a clip from the
summer league.
Basically, it shows Coby Karl blocking an OJ Mayo jump shot
then going down to the other end of the floor and lobbing an
alley-oop.
Sasha is better at this point, but I think Karl could be just as good.
Maybe even by next season's playoffs. Improving in the NBA
requires that you actually play in the NBA. Sasha had to
play some minutes to get to his current level of performance.
Coby has only been given scraps of minutes here and there.
One thing you have to remember is that before last season,
the Lakers weren't nearly as good as they were last year.
Sasha often shared the floor with guys like Brian Cook and
Smush Parker and Kwame Brown. And that's if he was
playing with the STARTERS. So if the team started
to slip, they'd put Kobe back on the floor and Kobe would
carry the team for awhile.
Coby Karl will have the advantage of playing with a much
stronger "bench mob: - Farmar, Luke, maybe even Lamar.
And when he's playing with the starters, it'll be guys like
Bynum and Gasol instead of Kwame and Cook.
It's a lot easier to play well when you're surrounded by
good players. And even if you don't play too well, they can
carry you if you're not completely incompetent.
Posted by: Long Time Laker Fan | July 25, 2008 at 12:23 PM
Richtown -
Sisco sounds like a good signing. The only thing is that he is a European player; he could easily ask for just as much money overseas due to his championship experience.
That's a pretty good idea though - he hustles, is long, and is a fantastic guy (A former Cal Bear).
Posted by: Caliphilosopher | July 25, 2008 at 12:25 PM
Some of this talk is unreal. People here actually say that Sasha should not be paid $5 million a year lest he become another Luke or Vlad, then go on to say that Coby Karl can easily replace Sasha.
Sasha is no Luke or Vlad. Sasha has done what neither Vlad nor Luke did before signing their contracts: prove their worth to the Lakers. Sasha was the Lakers best player off the bench and the best shooter on the whole roster. Luke and Vlad were never (and will never be) either of those things.
Coby is no Sasha. Coby Karl was in street clothes most of this year. How in the world people can think that a kid can go from the inactive list to the Laker's first shooter off the bench is absurd.
So far, this offseason has been terrible. The obvious (in my view) need to trade Lamar for Artest has not happened, the Lakers have lost their only reserve power forward, and now may be on the verge of losing their best shooter and best bench player. If it plays out this way, you can expect to see 82 games against zone defenses next year, with Kobe jacking up double digit 3's on a nightly basis. Nice work, Mitch.
Posted by: Leo | July 25, 2008 at 12:26 PM
Mike & Gino,
>>>>Finally someone gets it! These owners are not going to pay full MLE to
>>>>>players like Kapono, Walton and Rad anymore. That's a serious waste of
>>>>>money and has led to having roster problems. – Mike T.
You really mean finally somebody agrees with your point of view besides your alter ego? Just watch Sasha get re-signed. If he doesn’t, I will be wrong, for once (that was just for you, LOL), and will be man enough to admit it. But what are you going to say when Sasha re-signs for $5M? Or Kwame does not get signed? Oh, that’s right. You won’t be here. LOL.
Tom
Posted by: LakerTom | July 25, 2008 at 12:26 PM
Benny Blanca,
>>>>> On another note, i hope both LO and Kobe see how hard it is to keep a team
>>>>>together with the cap where it is. Both guys have an opportunity to spread
>>>>>and share the wealth with their teammates next summer. I'd like to think those
>>>>>two could take a pay cut to facilitate team success.
I second that motion, Benny. I actually think Kobe will end up opting out after the end of next year so that he can sign a new longer cap-friendlier contract with the Lakers. I also think that Lamar would be willing to also sign for less to keep the team together.
It’s either than or we end up having to mimic the Celtics plan of stocking the rear half of the roster with other team’s retreads playing for the veteran’s minimum. LOL.
Tom
Posted by: LakerTom | July 25, 2008 at 12:31 PM
But it's not the 4 million they're paying Luke, the 5 million
they're paying Fish, or the 6 million they're paying Rad
that's breaking their budget... it's the 21 million they're
paying Kobe and the 15 million they're paying Lamar and
Pau.
LTLF:
You are a nut.
I said it before and I will say it again:
The Lakers should have never signed Luke/VladRad.
Ronny and Sasha should have received their monies.
Posted by: passionate Lakers fan | July 25, 2008 at 12:31 PM
For years we've been talking about players needing to re-dedicate or dedicate themselves to defense.
Sasha did that. The man has a fan club for crying out loud. Lest we forget his clutchness. 60% 3 point shooting a couple of years ago IN the playoffs, tack on this year?
He deserves to be a laker.
Go Lakers!
Posted by: Faith | July 25, 2008 at 12:32 PM
http://games.espn.go.com/nba/features/traderesult
?players=63~1724~976~532~
1781~617&teams=10~10~13~8~13~10&te=&cash=
Shane Battier
Luis Scola
to Lakers
T-mac
to Detroit
Chauncey
Tayshaun
Odom
to Houston
That's my dream trade. It needn't be a 3-team trade except maybe to get over the hump of Odom matching Battier/Scola within 25 percent.
Odom doesn't have an expiring contract and there's no way in hell this trade goes down.
This trade gives us a good backup PF, a solid outside shooting, good defending 3 and signficantly reduces our luxury tax.
Detroit does their salary dump and gets to have fun on offense again.
Houston gets 3 solid new players, 2 with championships and one with great versatility. Two of these players significantly improve the Houston D.
Posted by: Benjamin | July 25, 2008 at 12:32 PM
OMG,
Shane Battier only costs 6.3M.
Posted by: Benjamin | July 25, 2008 at 12:33 PM
John,
>>>>> He was a number one pick, and does play a little defense.
>>>>>And we're only talking about him sitting the bench unless someone gets injured.
Not quite. Sitting right behind will be Mike T. doing voodoo dances and poking pins into his Andrew Bynum doll and sticking his foot out every time Drew runs by. LOL
Just say NO to Kwame. We don’t need or want him.
Tom
Posted by: LakerTom | July 25, 2008 at 12:36 PM
Any news on Shaun Livingston? He could be useful pick up.
I think anyone who is predicting that Coby Karl will have break out year and contribute as much as Sasha did last year is deluding themselves.
What are you basing this on? His wind sprints? He didn't wow anyone with his D-league play, or his summer league play and I remeber going to the Long Beach Pyramid and watching Devean George dominate Bonzi Wells in a Summer League game.
I wouldn't touch Devean George with a 10 foot pole now.
It takes years for most players to even start to impact the NBA landscape, this is due to an adjustment in the length of the season, the physical nature of the NBA game and the fact that ref's make calls on a slide ruler (stars get calls, nobodies don't).
Sasha just entered into his "Gets some calls" phase of his NBA career. He has just adjusted to the length and physicallity of the NBA season. This is why Farmar struggled near the end of the year again, it seemed like Phil played him less towards the end of the regular season because he looked pretty wiped out.
That being said, Coby Karl will not have a break out year. I think if he played 10-15 mpg, he'd be lucky to shoot 40%, total. His defence will be a liability. He's never won at any level. Why does this make him a significant contributor to our team, potentially?
Anyone?
Re-sign Sasha and we contend.
Rebuild and watch the drama REALLY unfold next summer.
Imagine this scenario: We lose our free agents this year, finish 3-5th in the WC lose in the first two rounds.
Kobe opts out.
Lamar heads east.
Fish retires.
Farmar signs elsewhere.
Who does that leave us with?
As of now, Pau Gasol, and we saw how well a team built around him did.
Re-sign Sasha so that we stay competitive until we lock Kobe up for his career.
Or next summer wil be disastrous.
Posted by: Jamie Sweet | July 25, 2008 at 10:12 AM
Best post so far (LTLF/Laker Tom: please take note).
Posted by: passionate Lakers fan | July 25, 2008 at 12:38 PM
LTLF,
The problem with your theory is that is Sasha walks, Coby won't get the extra minutes. There will be more Ariza, more Farmar, more Walton, and a small smattering of Karl. Maybe, maybe 5-7 minutes a game is my guess. And Ariza and Walton are not quality outside shooters, while we pretty much know what we're getting from Farmar at this point (which is sometimes great, and sometimes...eh). Don't get me wrong, I understand the dilemma in paying Sasha long term, but I'm not sure Karl gets so much of the extra burn if Sahsa leaves.
Posted by: DrewPauKobe | July 25, 2008 at 12:38 PM
Sasha=DFish.
Remember when DFish left? It felt like there was something missing in our team. A void.
I don't mean Sasha is that "leader" DFish is...he's not. But he is (much like Fish was back then) a valuable role player. Something that is vital to a championship team. And as we saw in 04, role players aren't necssarily replaceable/reversable.
DFish was also the third best scorer in our 3 peat team...much lke Sasha has shown at times this year.
Please don't let Sasha go. Don't compound a mistake by making another one. Find a way to lose the stiffs, retain Sasha. I have faith.
Posted by: Faith | July 25, 2008 at 12:39 PM
Benny,
>>>>>I don't want to bankrupt teams and owners, but we have to find a way
>>>>>so teams can loosen up check books without Such harsh penalty.
I think there will be a big push when the current CBA expires in 2011 to replace the MLE with a bigger exception (Average Salary +20%) so that free agency will work for those players worth slightly more than the current MLE. I seriously doubt that the league will do anything else regarding the salary cap or luxury tax limit. The could possibly consider changing the 1-year of college requirement and modifying the 21-year age requirement for foreign players to play in the NBA. But expect the salary cap and luxury tax to stay. In general, it’s a far better system for free agency than baseball or football have.
Tom
Posted by: LakerTom | July 25, 2008 at 12:43 PM
Andrew Z -
That's exactly my point (if you would have quoted more of my previous post) about learning and paying your dues. Sasha toiled away for 3 years at the end of the bench before he finally broke through.
Karl has had one year as a rookie, most of which was spent in the D-League. I'm not saying he can't pull a Sasha and become effective someday or that he can't be like any of the D-Leaguers I listed that became helpful contributers. I'm saying it's a really good chance he can't do it right away, this year, because it almost never happens that quickly.
Jordan Farmar did it when he went from D-League/NBA rookie to huge contributer, but he's the exception, not the rule. Plus, he was a 1st round draft pick and the Lakers knew he was talented. Karl is an undrafted kid who we just don't have time to experiment with next year. If he proves something in practice, give him some garbage time. If he proves something in garbage time, give him some real minutes. If he proves something there, increase his minutes. But you don't just go from never playing to filling in as the 6th man role overnight. There's no logical reason to put that kind of trust in Karl.
I still trust the Lakers will do the right thing here, even if I don't agree with it initially. I'm just getting a bad feeling about this whole Sasha thing.
Posted by: puddle | July 25, 2008 at 12:48 PM
a couple thoughts
#1 is that most on this blog are very generous with OPM ( Other Peoples Money) most people usually are, heck democrat's always are!!! and, Yes Mr. Buss does have money but there are limits to everything. The Laker's are most likely offering 4.2-4.6 million for 4 years or 3.8 to 4.2 for 5 years. That's good money for a role player, any way you slice it. #2 Dr Buss might know that storm clouds are on the horizon, The current recession/economic slowdown has not yet effected ticket sales and luxury box leases but it might soon.
Tom K
Posted by: tomK | July 25, 2008 at 12:48 PM
I agree that it is important that we resign Sasha, more important than resigning Turiaf, but Laker fans in general overexaggerate all these things. I don't think Kobe will want out if we lose both Sasha and Ronny and if we struggle at times next year. I think he learned his lesson this past season to shut up and play and not be the GM. Where else would he go where they would not have to gut their roster to get him and sacrifice that team's own chances of winning. Kobe knows this. Yes they have some bad contracts Walton, Vlad, and Lamar but every team in the league has 3 or 4 bad contracts. It something every team in the league has to deal with due to restricted and unrestricted free agency and luxury taxes, etc. Now if Kobe wants to opt out when he has the chance that is something different but I don't see him forcing a trade again. Sometimes as fans we need to step back and try to understand the finances of the game, especially when discussing possible trades and free agent signings. Not every trade or signing is possible because of salary caps even if it seems great on paper and realistic it may not be realistic at all and has no chance of becoming reality. Thinking on those terms like a GM or Owner rather than a fan would you really pay 17Mil for Turiaf when at best he gets 10-15 minutes a game and you already have Bynum, Gasol, Odom, and Mihm with bigger contracts and set playing times. Is Sasha really worth 5 mil on the open market? Maybe, but do you want to pay that much when you are already over the luxury tax limit paying top dollars to Kobe and Gasol and pretty soon Bynum. Winning at any costs is important but do you jeopardize future chances at winning for immediate results. Look at Miami they sold their soul in 2004 for one ring in 2006 and where are they now? Would we want the Lakers in lotto land in 5 years for big, overpaid contracts to win now? These are things we as fans have to take into consideration and put on our GM hats to go along with our fan hearts. Don't get me wrong I want Sasha back too and would hate to see him bounce to Europe, but I'am just saying...
Posted by: Lakers85 | July 25, 2008 at 12:53 PM
Long Time Laker Fan,
I know it was Summer League and all, but please give me an overall review of Coby Karl's play. I'd appreciate it.
GO LAKERS!
Posted by: Jon K. | July 25, 2008 at 12:54 PM
humanomaly,
>>>>>Oh, absolutely agreed, 100% Chinese here...and I guess he is a mystery
>>>>>until the season becomes a wash and then we'll have time to play detective.....
>>>>>have a great day, and all is good.
Ironically, I grew up in the back rooms of my father’s many Chinese restaurants all over Southern Wisconsin and Northern Illinois so I have a real feel for what it must be like for Ding How in Prattville, whether he is a real poster or not. LOL
When we win the championship next year, we’ll put Ding How to the test by requesting a free Chinese banquet for all Lakers Blogs posters, including round trip travel. And Ding How talks like my dad does when he ties to talk a cop out of giving him another speeding ticket, what he calls his Hop Sing mode: the old “No speakee English” card. LOL.
Tom
Posted by: LakerTom | July 25, 2008 at 12:54 PM
JR Smith would be nice. He's a sick athlete and a bitchin offensive player. He put in the effort on D against the Lakers so I believe he could become a serviceable defender.
He's definitely had issues. Trend seems to be getting better If we could snag him for 3M, I'll deal with any issues.
I think many of his issues relate to him entering the league very young and immature.
He lost a close friend last summer in an auto accident (he was driving). I'd be shocked if that didn't give him some perspective.
Worth a chance. I think Denver probably matches anything we offer him close to a full MLE.
Posted by: Benjamin | July 25, 2008 at 12:59 PM
Benjamin,
If all it takes to get Smith is 3 mil, Denver will match it. Without question. Remember, he's a restricted FA.
AK
Posted by: Andrew Kamenetzky | July 25, 2008 at 01:01 PM
#4
>>>>>LakerTom, I believe Ding How (not an Asian Brother by any means) is a
>>>>>racial pundit as well. Unfortunately, its of that 1940's era "Engrish" schtick.
>>>>>Unacceptable and not PC expect for maybe to people from where he is from.
>>>>>I take offense, but its a schtick that we've had to put up with over the years....
>>>>>Hop Sing (your fave), David Carradine over Bruce Lee, et al. Uncomfortably
>>>>>funny, like "hehehe, gotcha, now quit it."
>>>>>But with Ding How trying to be a "race impressionist" I'd honestly laugh more
>>>>>if he wrote in jive. That was the most memorable scene in Airplane! for me.
>>>>>May offend black people, but as long as he's got us Asian (Chinese really,
>>>>>but I'm offended nonetheless), why not offend everyone else now?
Nice comeback, #4. Yes, if Ding How is a racial pundit, he is then offensive. The way I look at it though is that you have to be able to laugh at yourself. It’s no different from a person with African-American blood being able to laugh at the “Jive” stuff in Airplane. I see that as the pretty much the same thing as being able to laugh at Ding How, although there’s a remote chance he is just another Lakers fan. LOL. Let’s see what our black Lakers bloggers think about the “jive” scene in Airplane. That and Kareem were the highlights of the movie for me.
As for David Carradine over Bruce Lee, Bruce was really my most fave. I grew up with Bruce Lee posters on the wall right next to my Wilt Chamberlain, Mickey Mantle, Joe Montana, and Magic Johnson posters. His son Brandon was my idol growing up as a kid with a Chinese father and white mother. His death hit me as hard as his dad’s or JFK’s or RFK’s. And after Bonanza, I promised never ever to be mistaken for a mild, mannered, intimidated, pseudo slave slope regardless of the circumstances. I basically punched out any other kid who called me Hop Sing, often leading to me getting my clock cleaned as I was a little runt back then. But nobody walked away from a fight with me without having paid a price and showing it. More Jet Li. More Sun Yue on the Lakers.
Tom
Posted by: LakerTom | July 25, 2008 at 01:14 PM
I hate doing this, but I'll engage.
Mike T.
"Working for the Lakers team doctors and was cleared for everything,"
His clearance to participate in all activity, coming via team doctors, is a clear statement of health. They are permitted to release that type of information. It's not specific, and hence is not in violation of HIPPA. You are extrapolating wild ideas about Bynum's health because of your deep seeded loathing that he somehow took the job from Kwame Brown unjustly. I understand that you think you're smarter than everyone else, but you don;t need to try and insult anyone who doesn't agree with you.
You've clearly ignored the facts in favor of your own wildly contrived conspiracy theories.
A troglodyte you are sir.
Posted by: "Pig" Miller | July 25, 2008 at 01:27 PM
Benjamin,
>>>You know I respect you a lot, but I think you're nuts if
>>>you want Ben Gordon on this team.
I don't. Some other poster requested that someone cook up
a trade for Gordon and Deng, so I did.
What the other poster didn't realize is that both the Bulls and
Gordon himself think he's more valuable than he really is.
Now Deng is another story.
Posted by: Long Time Laker Fan | July 25, 2008 at 01:30 PM
Benjamin,
>>>Now Hinrich, we could use. How about Odom and
>>>Farmar for Hinrich and Deng if that works or add filler if
>>>we need to do so.
It would take a lot of filler.
>>>Looked it up and Deng doesn't currently have a contract.
>>>Maybe we could get Deng for 7-8M?
LOL. The reason Deng isn't currently signed is that Chicago
is offering him something like 10 and he wants something
like 13. Last summer he turned down a 60 million over 5 years
extension.
Posted by: Long Time Laker Fan | July 25, 2008 at 01:34 PM
>>>Some of this talk is unreal. People here actually say that
>>> Sasha should not be paid $5 million a year lest he
>>>become another Luke or Vlad, then go on to say that
>>>Coby Karl can easily replace Sasha.
Almost.
Some of us say that the Lakers shouldn't increase their payroll
by TEN million a year to keep Sasha, when Coby Karl can
probably give 80% of what Sasha gives for less than one million
next season.
Posted by: Long Time Laker Fan | July 25, 2008 at 01:38 PM
JJ,
Welcome back. Excellent points about Kwame. Couldn’t agree more. Looking to see you around more often. Thanks for the post.
Tom
Posted by: LakerTom | July 25, 2008 at 01:45 PM
PassionateLakerFan,
>>>You are a nut.
guilty as charged...
But that doesn't change the fact that it's the huge contracts
that are clogging up the roster, not one MLE contract and two
less-than-MLE contracts.
Boston is the only other competitive team in the league with
3 huge contracts, and all 3 of the guys they pay that much are
virtual locks for the hall-of-fame. Kobe will get there. Pau
probably will. Lamar's not even close.
You know how many players make over 14 million for Detroit? None
You know how many players make over 14 million for San Antonio? One
>>>I said it before and I will say it again:
>>>The Lakers should have never signed Luke/VladRad.
hindsight is 20-20.
Tell me. Last summer and the summer before, what free
agent would you have had the Lakers sign? Were you one
of the ones insisting that the Lakers trade Odom and Bynum
for Jermaine O'Neal? Were you saying last summer that
the Lakers should waive Sasha?
When you go back and look at it after the season has happened,
it's easy to be judgemental. From the perspective of the actual
time, the Lakers' options were very limited.
>>>Ronny and Sasha should have received their monies.
And then next season you would be talking about how overpaid
one or both of them were.
Ronny did get his money. And Sasha will get his as well.
He may have to play in Europe to get it, but he will get paid
whatever the market will bear.
Posted by: Long Time Laker Fan | July 25, 2008 at 01:59 PM
>>>Remember when DFish left? It felt like there was
>>>something missing in our team. A void.
That void was Shaq. When someone with their own gravitational
field leaves a team, you feel a void.
Posted by: Long Time Laker Fan | July 25, 2008 at 02:07 PM
tomK,
>>>heck democrat's always are!!!
Oh, we're back to politics. Goodie.
I should point out that the last Democratic administration was
the first administration since Carter to balance a budget.
It's the Republicans who gave us a 9 trillion dollar national
debt, not the Democrats.
But I kinda agree with you... most bloggers here want to
spend like Bush on a pork belly project for an oil company.
Posted by: Long Time Laker Fan | July 25, 2008 at 02:12 PM
Jon K,
Coby played well in Summer League. And yes, I know it doesn't
mean that much, as it's only summer league.
But he usually guarded the opposing team's best or second best
player and contained them fairly well.
For example, Coby guarded Aaron Afflalo when they
played Detroit and held him to 15 points on 42% shooting.
In his next two games, Afflalo averaged 21.5 points on
59% shooting.
When they played Memphis, Coby guarded OJ Mayo most
of the time. Mayo kinda went off in the 3rd quarter, but for
the whole game Coby held him to 15 points. Mayo averaged
almost 19 points per game.
Against the Sixers, Coby mostly guarded Thaddeus Young.
Young scored 16 points against Coby, but averaged 19 for
the whole Summer League.
So, like I said, he wasn't locking anyone down or anything,
but he defended most of the "name" players in the summer
league pretty well. Nobody turned in a 30 point game on him.
On the offensive side, Coby usually ran the team, bringing
the ball up and initiating the offense. He led the team
in scoring but shot a pretty low percentage overall. In
a way, he reminded me of Farmar in last year's SPL. He
was out there playing the triangle and the short timers
they had filling out the roster were mostly playing the square
or the octagon or the dodecahedron, so it made him look
less effective than he would playing with good players who
know the triangle.
Coby was clearly the best player on the floor for the Lakers,
but that's not saying much. He played well enough to get
some press from NBA.com, but probably not well enough
that there are teams calling Mitch asking to trade for him.
I think Coby needs a bunch of minutes to get to where Sasha
was last season, but I definitely think he could get there.
Posted by: Long Time Laker Fan | July 25, 2008 at 02:31 PM
wow, what's this? "this afternoon"? This is from the OC Register:
Lakers GM Mitch Kupchak said he expects a “resolution” to the Sasha Vujacic contract situation later this afternoon.
“I hope it’s pro-Lakers,” he said.
Posted by: Kwaminus I don't fit in a Toyota Yaris Brownicus | July 25, 2008 at 02:31 PM
LTLF, I understand what you are saying, but I disagree with both concepts.
With respect to Coby Karl, there is simply no reason for anyone to place their confidence in Coby at this point. What is the basis for thinking that a kid who was lucky to make the team last year and who got no playing time is capable of providing 80% of Sasha's performance? Next to Kobe Bryant, is there another Laker player you would be more confident in if the game came down to a last second shot?
It seems to me that many here do not appreciate what Sasha did last year, especially for such an incredibly young player. I'm hard pressed to think of a better shooter on any Laker team in the last two decades. A starting lineup that includes Lamar Odom as a small forward is going to pose almost no threat at all from the outside if the Lakers don't have a serious shooter on the floor--and Karl is completely and totally unproven in that role, and anyone who thinks that he will fill that role is making a huge gamble.
As for the payroll issue, you don't put yourself on the doorstep of a championship, then let your team weaken by losing your best shooter and reserve player because of stupid contract decisions in the past. Nexty year Odom comes off the books, Mihm comes off the books, and the salary cap will increase again. It just makes no sense at all to sacrifice a tremendous young player like Sasha (this is not an old James Posey we're talking about, this is a 24 year old with a great stroke and fantastic confidence).
Were I Sasha and the Lakers were making the argument that I'm hearing on this board, next year I'd be playing for the Clippers (as a starter) or cashing my checks in Euros. A 24 year old is not going to (nor should he) vaule a chance to play for a championship over the chance to sign a big contract. At 24, Sasha will be convinced that he will have many more opportunities to play for a championship down the road (7 years from now he'll be Posey's age and he can hook up with a contender at that time if he needs to scratch that itch).
Posted by: Leo | July 25, 2008 at 02:39 PM
Why all this bashing on Odom, Luke and Rad? They are Lakers and the amount they get paid is not their fault, you wouldn't turn down an offer like they got.
Remember the Lakers knew they were getting a weak def. and rebounding player in Rad. Don't expect him to suddenly become this Rebounding / Defensive monster.
Luke obviously played hurt and it affected every part of his game. If he's healthy, I have no doubt he can become a very effective all around player.
Odom got his contract from Miami and they traded the crazy demands of Shaq's contract for Odom's. Think about what life would be like with Shaq and his ridiculous contract he wanted with the Lakers (30 MM+) instead of Odom's. We would be in even worse salary cap hell. Now the Suns have his 20 MM+ contract, which only allows them to sign a bunch of rookies.
Now with Bynum needing to be resigned with a potential max. contract for the 2009 season, unfortunately that means that Odom will be traded during the 2009 season or he will be allowed to walk after 2009.
Unless the Lakers can come up with some creative ways to increase their revenues by $20mm+, remember Buss is one of the few owner's left that does not have unlimited Cash Flow resources.
As far as someone taking Luke and Rad off of our hands, I doubt that would happen unless you packaged it with Odom or you wait until their last year of their contracts. So stop bashing Luke, Rad and Odom and start supporting them, it's not like we didn't get to the NBA finals with them. There are 26 other teams that would have loved to get to the finals. I'm sure the Lakers made an extra $10mm+ by going deep into the play-offs.
If you Love the Lakers, start supporting them. Or go root for the Clippers, with 0% chance of going to the Finals.
Posted by: AW | July 25, 2008 at 02:42 PM
Long Time,
"should point out that the last Democratic administration was the first administration since Carter to balance a budget.
It's the Republicans who gave us a 9 trillion dollar national
debt, not the Democrats."
Of course, the balanced budget was with a Republican controlled Congress, and the debt with a Democratic controlled Congress.
Posted by: exhelodrvr | July 25, 2008 at 03:47 PM
Long Time,
>>>>> But I kinda agree with you... most bloggers here want to
>>>>>spend like Bush on a pork belly project for an oil company.
Big difference between $2M per YEAR for Sasha out of Jerry Buss’ pockets and $12B per MONTH out of “our” pockets for the current “pork belly project for an oil company.”
Tom
Posted by: LakerTom | July 25, 2008 at 04:30 PM
What "pork belly project for an oil company" would that be?
Posted by: exhelodrvr | July 25, 2008 at 05:14 PM
ex,
You know very well what pork barrel we're talking about. Peace Have a nice day, ex. Good that we got Sasha back.
Tom
Posted by: LakerTom | July 25, 2008 at 06:49 PM
No, Laker Tom, I don't. The items your price range could fit within that I can think of would be Social Security, Medicare, welfare, the military, but none of them could be described as a pork belly project for an oil company.
Posted by: exhelodrvr | July 25, 2008 at 07:40 PM
sasha we need u!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: herman | July 25, 2008 at 07:58 PM
Tom,
Chinese restaurants in my family as well, I did notice when I told him to mind his grammar, that it improved almost incredibly, so that's a giveaway, like the buffet we'll "fast" at...ever since owning one, I can't eat in one!!!!!
Posted by: humanomaly | July 25, 2008 at 11:45 PM