Another name off the board
(PROGRAMMING NOTE: Join us at 11 a.m. for Purple, Gold and Blue. Our guest today is 710 ESPN Radio "insider" Beto Duran. We'll discuss Ronny Turiaf's departure, Sasha Vujacic's hopeful return and anything else topical. Click the show widget on the side of the blog, or go straight to our show page by clicking here.)
Whoever may step in for Ronny Turiaf as a key big off the bench, it's not likely a player rooting for TCU. The Spurs just re-signed veteran C/PF Kurt Thomas, their last-minute 2008 acquisition from Seattle and resident "heady role player." Thomas is also the only Texas Christian University alum currently in the league, so Lakers fans hoping for both a new defensive minded front court guy and a new pal to watch the Horned Frogs do battle with at the local Hooters will simply have to settle for the former. Thankfully, those wings are just so tasty, you don't really need an eating buddy to enjoy them.
Mmmmm. Wings.
AK



>>>Sla-va Med-ve-den-ko.
BOZZ!!!!! You're a genius!! This will save the team. I'm sure Mitch is on
the phone right now.
(I bet the Lakers could get him AND Van Wafer if they work fast)
Posted by: Long Time Laker Fan | July 23, 2008 at 10:02 AM
bozz,
"Rocket Man!" I love it! Yes!
GO LAKERS!
Posted by: Jon K. | July 23, 2008 at 10:05 AM
Pig Bill,
How can we NOT panic with a lineup that includes Kobe Bryant, Pau Gasol, Andrew Bynum, Derek Fisher, Lamar Odom and very strong bench being coached by the best coach in professional sports?
I see nothing but doom (and Kwame Brown) on the horizon.
GO LAKERS!
Posted by: Jon K. | July 23, 2008 at 10:06 AM
Glad some of the conversation has turned to the 3.
To get WAAAAAAY ahead of ourselves, the question is, can the Lakers beat Boston with this lineup? Playing in the East, they'll have the best shot at home court again.
Can LO stop Pierce on the perimeter? Can Lamar space the floor on offense with Pau and Andrew on the block?
Odds are we're going to get the chance to find out.
Posted by: Vman | July 23, 2008 at 10:07 AM
LTLF,
Benjamin,
>>>There is a lot of trade talk here and I'm still a little confused
>>> why people aren't addressing our biggest weaknesses.
>>>
>>>We are weak defending at the small forward position an I
>>>don't think we have a decent backup at that position
>>>either.
Uh, hello! Due to the Detroit talking to Houston about a possible
T-Mac for Billups and Prince talk recently, I posted a plethora
of possibilities for a followup trade to that where the Lakers
acquire Shane Battier (if they have Prince, Battier is redundant).
It should be pretty obvious that I wasn't referring to you. I've pretty much agreed with everything I've seen you write and if I disagreed it was only a slight matter of degree.
Posted by: Benjamin | July 23, 2008 at 10:07 AM
Richtown,
"AK/BK, There have been "rumors" going around for a possible thomas/deng sign and trade for LO. Do you think that works for both teams? AS much as I like LO and would first like to see odom,bynum,and gasol on the floor at the same time next season- that trade option dosent sound to bad."
I've only heard of this in the vaguest of rumors floated without much sourcing, even unnamed, involved. Thus, I'm not giving it too much credence for the time being. For starters, it seems like an awful lot for Chicago to give up for LO, even taking into the account the value of a big expiring deal.
Also keep in mind that this trade won't happen unless the Lakers are willing to bring in Deng long term, which is a pretty big commitment. Not that it would never happen, but still, something to think about. And outside of potential defensive purposes, when it comes to the main concern about LO at the 3 (being unable to stretch the D with outside shooting), Deng isn't much better of an option. He rarely, if ever, takes 3's and his outside range, from what I've seen, isn't tons better than LO's.
For the time being, I'm not getting too wrapped up in this one.
AK
Posted by: Andrew Kamenetzky | July 23, 2008 at 10:14 AM
Lakafo0
>>>Odom for Okafor makes absolutely NO sense on so
>>>many levels I do not know where to begin.
I don't condone a Odom for Okafor trade...
but there are some ways in which it does make sense.
Lamar currently makes 14.5 million. Okafor's contract would start
somewhere around 12 million. Thus for next season, if you
include the luxury tax, that would cut 5 million off of the Lakers
expenses.
Lamar could play either SF or PF. Okafor could play either
PF or C. The Lakers are clearly deeper at SF than they
are at C. Okafor is a lot better than Mihm, but not better than
Bynum or Gasol.
Lamar may also want to continue to increase from that 14.5.
He may play like a mad-man this season to try to justify getting
a payday like Kobe and Pau get. And Bynum's big payday
comes season after next. The Lakers can't possibly build a
team around 4 players each making over 15 million.
On the other hand, even Okafor's 12 million per would be a big
burden added to Kobe & Pau & Bynum's contracts. So it's
only a temporary gain in that area.
And 12 million per for a backup PF/C is an awful lot, especially
when the two starters will make more.
Posted by: Long Time Laker Fan | July 23, 2008 at 10:17 AM
All this talk about who will play PF
People, we had a really good PF with a lot of upside, but we gave him away for nothing.
And I'm being asked to keep the faith in management here?
Listen, if "luck" didn't happen last season (Fisher, Gasol) then the result would be Kobe getting traded right now.
Who will play PF? Yep, Lamar. Some Gasol. Who knows how that will work, but I'll tell you this much
If you want Kwame back, you're asking for serious trouble.
You seem to think he'll get the vet minimum and just sit the bench. NO WAY.
That would be like Luke Walton sitting the bench.
Not going to happen while PJ is around. Kwame would be getting heavy minutes and bringing that negative lenovo to the bench crew... a crew that no longer has the defense of Turiaf.
Posted by: Tim-4-Show | July 23, 2008 at 10:19 AM
LO will never come off the bench in the NBA until after his 31 birthday, remember only 28 and will be a lot better this year!
Posted by: The guy you used to call Cupcake | July 23, 2008 at 10:20 AM
did you guys actually spend the night discussing trade scenarios for Okafor???
Hello???
That is just so off the wall bizarre... might as well discuss getting Ray Allen to back up Kobe... makes as much sense...
Posted by: Kwaminus I can teach you, but I have to charge Brownicus | July 23, 2008 at 10:22 AM
Jon K
I was looking at the scouting report of Atlla the Hun. Not bad, I really like his take no prisoners approach to battle. He really enjoys maiming, killing, and burning things. But he seemed to me, to be a guy more interesting in money, than just winning and going for the title. He easily was bought off by scared enemies.
Your Demon possession idea could work nicely. Especially with Kwame. The ample empty space he has between the ears might allow for multiple demons to fit, not just one.
Kwame possessed could be quite formidable. Glowing red eyes, smoke emanating from ears and nostrils could be very intimidating. Not to mention levitating shot blocking ability, and 360 degree defensive head turning to prevent back door cuts.
His elevated deep voice would communicate clearly above loud crowds. Plus the added benefit of power vomiting would discourage people from trying to penetrate the lane.
I understand he works for no money. Just the souls of those who sign his contract. No lux penalties, that's good. Mitch or Jim Buss should be willing signers.
The more I think about it, I like it. A demon possessed man-god who's in it for the pure love to kill and maim. Its not often you can find someone, something, who loves his job and the deep satisfaction you get from a job well done..
Kwame - A free agent signing from Hell. I like it. It shows the Lakers are willing to travel not only to the ends of the Earth, but to the depths of the Earth, to find that one special player to win it all.
Posted by: Fatty | July 23, 2008 at 10:24 AM
Semper Fidelis
Fire 32 confessed that he was posting as Butler.
Posted by: Mullti Posting Stormer | July 23, 2008 at 10:27 AM
Pig Miller,
"I think we should all panic"
The keys in the laker roster will be Mihm-Walton-Radman as well as Bynum and Ariza coming from their injuries. If the first three could only improve in their D, again emphatic about it Defense, then no need to move around players. We need players with great courage to bang bodies and fight for ball possession, unfortunately these guys are good in taking the ball for inbounds. Bynum abd Ariza are coming from injuries, will they be great in the next season? 75% of me says yes and 25% says we need more insurance in case they are not completely healed.
Undoubtedly, I will piss again the GHF people in the blog with pronostications and yet we were only two games away from winning the Championship. That's is the culprit why did we not win those two games. Had we not predicted: 1) Sweep 2) 4-2 3) 4-3, till we got 2-4 results. Today, so far we lost Turiaf but will add Yue and Karl. Will these two guys play in PJ mind games?
Perhaps, waiting game is killing us softly. Here is another idea why don't we just sit and relax and watch the Olympics, there is the avenue where we can spot players who can be great for the Lakers so just buy out their contracts from their leagues. Why settle for the NBA recyclers?
Posted by: Edwin Gueco | July 23, 2008 at 10:28 AM
Jon K.,
This season was definitely a massive improvement with many exorcised demons. I think good management wouldn't have let things get so out of hand.
Kiwi,
I think you overlooked the majority of my points. I didn't bring up lame deals that the Lakers didn't make that they weren't supposed to make. You'll notice I specifically didn't mention Jermaine O'Neal or Jason Kidd. In both deals the other teams asked for a little too much. In each deal we would have given up all of our trading pieces.
I think the worst thing that Lakers did was mishandle Kobe. There were serious trade deals involving bringing in Ben Wallace and Ron Artest for Kobe. That's how bad it was. It seemed pretty obvious that Kobe was unsatisfied and was complaining quietly behind the scenes long before the management decided to act.
With Kwame you're ignoring two things.
1. The deal could have been made earlier.
2. The deal only occurred by Mitch Kupchak's explicit declaration to the media because Bynum got hurt and we needed a guy to help this season. That's sort of backward logic for a guy that's been doing glacier speed moves to improve the team. Take on a 15M a year contract (with 3 1/2 seasons left) for a single season? That doesn't make any sense at all. Either Kupchak misspoke (which seems like the last thing in the world Sir Corporate would do publicly) or he's not terribly bright.
3. If you're going to make a move, it's always better to do it sooner. Give your guys as much time to gel together as possible. The hardest thing to do in this NBA seems to get the pieces with a close second being getting a coach that can produce. After that, the team needs to evolve together and that part takes time only after everything else is in place.
I'm not going to go into further detail with the rest of my points because I don't get the sense you gave my argument a serious look the first time. I hope this time you can appreciate what at least I believe are serious mistakes made by our management. Some mistakes I accept. Neither of the mistakes above are acceptable to me. I don't see other teams that are interested in contending for championships with money to spend making them.
I don't expect you to agree with me. I enjoy having a unique viewpoint and am more like to share my unique viewpoints because I think it's better for discussion and it's something I can add rather than create an echo chamber. But, I would appreciate you at least considering the merits of my viewpoint and not flippantly tossing it aside with pedestrian counter-arguments of only selected points.
I'm sure you're often happier with those rose-colored glasses, but I bet you're a lot more disappointed and surprised by what happens than I am.
There are obviously benefits to either approach. You probably like to feel good about things. I obviously don't like to set myself up for disappointment.
Posted by: Benjamin | July 23, 2008 at 10:31 AM
Jon K
Trevor is what I would call a "shiny" player, a good player who occasionally makes spectacular plays.
btw, although I think he's an excellent defensive player, that's based on his quickness and amazing ability to anticipate, not his toughness. I don't see him as particularly tough.
Jon, I didn't put Drew down. He was great last year and improved almost daily once he was a starter. I'm just not ready to compare him to the all-time greats yet. I may be by mid-season though.
Benny Blanca
Trevor is a slasher who made 5 of 15 treys last year, not much to go on there, and he's 21% from three over the span of his career. 21%; didn't see much of a jump shot from him myself. And if Trevor starts, we're down to 2 ball handlers in the starting unit; off the bench, he'll be with Sasha, Jordan and either Kobe or LO.
I like Trevor very much, and yes Jon, I am very positively biased toward Bruins (I think Love will be rookie of the year for instance; that's how biased I am.), but Trevor has hardly earned the right to start.
I also don't understand why Pau is getting a pass for his spectacularly bad finals performance. LO was very bad as were almost all the Lakers, but Pau and Sasha were definitely the worst offenders.
As far as LO being inconsistent, once the Lakers traded for Pau, LO was very consistent until the finals.
Posted by: giantsquid | July 23, 2008 at 10:34 AM
Championship Odds
btw, the Lakers are the odds on favorite to win the championship this coming season and that's without Drew's health being completely certain.
http://tinyurl.com/5u3jju
Posted by: giantsquid | July 23, 2008 at 10:41 AM
YOU FAIL TO ACKNOWLEDGE ONE KEY FACT ABOUT ARIZA
He was working on his jump shot with Hodges the moment he arrived. then when the injury happened, all he did was work on his outside jumper.
I think he shot close to 50% from the outside in the playoffs... not very many attempts mind you, but he may have improved with all that extra work he put in.
Posted by: Tim-4-Show | July 23, 2008 at 10:45 AM
bozz - reclaiming slav, the ukranian shooting 'bot would be priceless... unfortunately his back never fully recovered... he supposedly turned down some euro offers after atlanta. he needs to do some mind-healing on that spine and come back west... a lakers nation turns its lonely eyes to the loquacious one.
Posted by: dave m | July 23, 2008 at 10:49 AM
giantsquid
Rats! Those 5-2 odds stink if a person wants to make a lot of money on the Lakers line.
I was hoping the odds makers would read the blog, believe what's being said, and give us a 60-1.
I guess the money from my 2nd mortgage has to go for something else.
Posted by: Fatty | July 23, 2008 at 10:53 AM
Giantsquid,
"I didn't put Drew down. He was great last year and improved almost daily once he was a starter. I'm just not ready to compare him to the all-time greats yet. I may be by mid-season though"
I think those were very fair remarks for Drew and I hope the Drew people will understand why he is not yet as great as Mikan-Wilt-Kareem-Shaq. What we saw was a good first half with those dunks, blocks and good free %. We want to see consistency on the floor for 82 games and also 20 playoff games. That's the Laker standard. Unless and until we see exceptional talents unscatched, uninjured, unperturbed by all the intrigues and wranglings then, we cannot address greatness and fool proof optimism. Don't be carried with wild speculations and rosy projections unless they are backed up by facts. The fact of the matter, we need Andrew to give the Lakers a Championship, then we will include him as one of the Laker great centers that played the game.
Posted by: Edwin Gueco | July 23, 2008 at 10:55 AM
Maybe this is the reason why Sasha negotiation are on hold. According to Orange Register, lakers are looking on Luol Deng:
"In place of the Artest talk, the Lakers now are rumored to have joined a list of teams interested in signing Luol Deng, if the Chicago forward can’t settle on a contract extension with the Bulls.
Deng’s camp reportedly has made it clear that negotiations won’t continue past early August. Stay tuned." - Orange Register
Deng with Kobe that's a good offense in replcaing Sasha but we still have a big hole in the defense.
Posted by: Edwin Gueco | July 23, 2008 at 11:04 AM
Dave M,
" reclaiming slav, the ukranian shooting 'bot would be priceless... unfortunately his back never fully recovered... he supposedly turned down some euro offers after atlanta. he needs to do some mind-healing on that spine and come back west... a lakers nation turns its lonely eyes to the loquacious one. "
I'd be lying if I claimed that Slava being referred to as "the loquacious one" wasn't pure genius. Kudos.
AK
Posted by: Andrew Kamenetzky | July 23, 2008 at 11:07 AM
LTLF and Jon K.,
Thanks, mad props yo.
dave m,
True, but one can still dream though...
-bozz-
Posted by: bozz | July 23, 2008 at 11:08 AM
Not One Offseason Move Made Yet
Noone expected the Lakers to make a lot of moves this offseason, after reaching the NBA Finals and getting Andrew Bynum back from an injury for next season.
But no moves?
I am confident they'll sign Sasha.
But they've lost Turiaf and haven't replaced him. Nor have they made any moves to improve anywhere.
What's going on here?
Has the Buss shut off the funds due to luxury tax?
Or are we being coy and waiting till the last minute?
Or are we waiting for the trading deadline in February?
I was hoping for a team that comes out of the gate destroying everyone, like the Celtics did last year.
John
Posted by: john_in_houston | July 23, 2008 at 11:14 AM
Senor Edwin Gueco,
In compliment to your post, Wilt-Cap-Shaq were established greats when we got them, and blew off the gates when they started in the league. Bynum has been an astute student but definitely did not have the same effect as the aforementioned HOF's in their start.
Though it is way too early in his (Bynum) career, I believe he will pass Jermaine Oneal's ceiling and be a Demi-God if he remains healthy.
Posted by: Charles | July 23, 2008 at 11:15 AM
Speaking of defense and getting a good player in banging bodies, enjoy this video:
http://tinyurl.com/6rlgaq
Posted by: Edwin Gueco | July 23, 2008 at 11:16 AM
giantsquid,
>>>He's a 21% 3PT shooter, 65% FT shooter, has an A/TO
>>>ratio of 1 (which is terrible);
Last season with the Lakers, that was 33%, 68%, and
an A/TO of almost 2.
>>>He's an average rebounder
Of the Lakers SF's, he's the best rebounder of the 3. On
a per-48 basis:
Ariza - 9.3
Walton - 8.1
Radmanovic - 7.0
>>>and a mediocre ball handler.
It's actually not that bad. He's a lot better at slashing to the
hoop than Sasha, for example.
>>>He does play excellent defense. But in 4 years he's
>>>started a total of 32 games. Really, I don't get it.
Trevor Ariza came out of college too early. He came out
after his freshman season at UCLA (probably because
somebody told him he was a lock to be a draft pick). He
was drafted in the second round by the Knicks.
As a rookie second-round pick, he didn't get many minutes
at first. Late in the season, Larry Brown used him as a
starter a bit, but the kid was a rookie, so he only had limited
success.
Then the Knicks drafted David Lee, who immediately jumped
ahead of Ariza on the depth chart for obvious reasons.
Then Ariza got traded to Orlando, where he was behind
Grant Hill and Hedo Turkoglu on the depth chart. So once
again he didn't start. Then Orlando lost Hill but got Rashard
Lewis, so once again, Ariza was fighting for scraps of minutes.
That's why Trevor has never had many minutes on the floor
or much of a chance to prove himself. At first he was a
fairly raw rookie, and then he was behind two all-stars on
the depth chart. Who do you start Ariza ahead of: Turkoglu
or Lews?
>>>LakerTom's infatuation with Drew at least makes
>>>some sense.
But let's say both Kwame and Mihm had stayed healthy
and played really well (I know, that's a BIG stretch of the
imagination) and Drew was getting like 10 minutes a game.
He probably wouldn't have developed as quickly as he did.
One of the things you need to improve in the NBA is playing
time.
When Kwame went down in the 2006-07 season, it was
probably the best thing that ever happened to Andrew. It
threw him into the deep end and forced him to swim. And
he realized that he didn't have enough stamina to play a lot
of minutes at that level, so he went out in the summer and
worked hard to improve on his weak areas. If he had only
ever had to play 10 minutes a game, would he have bothered
to spend most of his summer working on that? I'm not so sure.
>>>Maybe Trevor will be this year's (more athletic)
>>>version of Sasha. Maybe he'll have a breakout year
That's exactly what those of us cheering for Trevor are
hoping. He sees that his 3-point shooting is mediocre. But
he's young. If he went out this summer and worked on his
outside shooting, maybe he could improve that 33% to 38%.
And that combined with his defense would get him minutes
over Luke or Rad (unless Luke gets his 3-point % back up to
50% of course).
Posted by: Long Time Laker Fan | July 23, 2008 at 11:20 AM
Turnover Machines
I was curious about how Drew matched up statistically with other centers (particularly in FG%). The first surprise I came across was Shaq never having had a season over 60% until he went to Miami. The second surprise was learning that Dwight Howard is a turnover ready to happen ( on a per shot and per assist basis). Much, much worse number than Kwame for instance. I thought about it a little and it realized that it wasn't that surprising since Dwight is probably double or triple teamed almost every time he touches the ball in the post.
I then decided to look into how Kwame stacks up against post players not likely to get doubled often.
In terms of turnovers, the following players have much worse numbers than Kwame has:
Dalembert, Magliore, Curry, Mutumbo, Harrison, and Mourning.
These are only the post players who have much worse numbers than Kwame and aren't likely to be doubled often with the exception of Curry whose numbers are so incredibly awful I decided to include him. I only included Zo after comparing his Miami numbers to his career numbers. Very little difference.
There are quite a few other post players who have numbers worse than or similar to Kwame's.
I'm not suggesting that the Lakers should sign Kwame (I don't think they should). Or that Kwame is better than these players. It just struck me as odd.
Posted by: giantsquid | July 23, 2008 at 11:40 AM
Staples
>>>>> Kwame gets signed 1 MIL to be a locker room guy and sits in the bench.
I don’t know, staples. He may be black but he’s really pretty soft. JK. And not the guy to get in a fight. Like Phil said, a pussy. Worse, he doesn’t share the desire to win and get better at his craft like the rest of the guys on the team. And like somebody else said, we don’t need Phil to have a project like Kwame or Smush anymore. Let him work on somebody like Ron Artest where there is a potential benefit to the team. With Kwame, there isn’t. He plays good 1-on-1 post defense but never blocks shots or rotates and helps other players. The biggest fallacy in Mike T’s arguments that Kwame “seals the lane” is that he only seals his man and does nothing to seal the lane against opposing guards who waltz right by him for uncontested layups. Kwame’s 1-trick defensive pony cannot also catch the ball or make a layup so we end up playing 4 on 5 offensively. Anyway, I am hoping the Lakers don’t go that route. I liked Kwame as a person but not as a player.
Tom
Posted by: LakerTom | July 23, 2008 at 11:41 AM
JORDAN FARMAR ON JIM ROME…
Just heard a great interview by Jim Rome with Jordan Farmar. Jordan talked about a whole range of different topics, including the NBA Finals, Kobe and Shaq, the trade of his buddy Ronny Turiaf, his recent trip to Korea and planned basketball camp in Israel for Israeli and Palestinian kids, and his opportunity to meet and introduce Barack Obama during a recent visit to the Southland.
Rome was so impressed by Jordan that he made a quip about Jordan running for office when his basketball and said he was going to call him senator from now on. The general impression by the clones was “Jordan Freaking Farmar.” What was interesting was that Jordan’s trip to Israel is not part of an NBA-sponsored charitable activity. It is something that Jordan actually created with a charitable group in Maine that had sponsored a camp in the USA for Israeli and Palestinian kids, which Jordan participated in last summer.
Farmar also talked about his multi-racial background, with a black father, white mother, and Jewish step-father, which has exposed him to three very different cultural histories and helped him understand that in the end, people are just people. As multi-racial man, I am extremely proud of Jordan Farmar for his admirable sense of responsibility and the motivation and drive to do something himself to help the world be a better place.
It’s kind of ironic that Jordan, as a multi-racial American who is half African-American, had a chance at a recent Southland political event to meet and introduce Barrack Obama, another multi-racial American who is half African-American – and a former point guard. Leaving politics aside, we should all be proud to see the progress we have made in giving Americans of every color, religion, cultural background, or sexual orientation a chance to participate in and impact society. That is something we all should be proud of.
There was a recent outstanding article in the New York Times about the impact that multi-racial individuals are having in this country and how the changes in the last census that finally gave Americans the ability to check more than one box when identifying their racial background have empowered an entire new generation of young Americans with multi-racial backgrounds, who are changed the way our country views race.
As for Ronny Turiaf, Jordan echoed the blog-sync-think that Ronny did what he had to do for more security for his family and the chance play more and has our best wishes. He didn’t want to get into the Kobe-Shaq thing, said that the Lakers had a great year but will have a bitter taste in their mouths about losing to the Celtics that won’t go away until the Lakers get back to the Finals and redeem themselves.
From a basketball standpoint, I hear a lot of grumbling on the blog that Farmar is not good enough to be our starting point guard in the future. Personally, I still love Jordan’s game and think he does have a shot to become an impact player similar to Tony Parker, who also gets abused by big aggressive guards like Deron Williams. Despite complaints about his defense, Parker’s ability to penetrate on offense has been a big part of the Spurs success and championships, with Parker even winning Finals MVP.
This will be a critical year for Jordan, just as the third year is for most players on rookie scale contracts, just as it was for Deron Williams and our own Andrew Bynum. I am hoping that Jordan really comes back a stronger and more confident player that takes his game to the next level. He needs to add a few pounds of muscle, improve his defensive aggressiveness by anticipating and using his quickness to beat players to the spot and draw a charge rather than getting meekly picked off on screens ala Smush Parker.
Offensively, I would like to see Jordan attack the rim more, especially learning how to use a jump stop to finish in the lane and take advantage of his quickness and 42” vertical leap, as well as bringing back his teardrop shot and raising his 3-point percentage to 40%. If Jordan can do these things, I think he can clear away the cobwebs of doubt that many fans have and show that he can be the team’s point guard of the future.
Tom
Posted by: LakerTom | July 23, 2008 at 11:47 AM
Laker Tom,
Incredibly well said. Jordan has gained a ton of respect from me this off-season. He went from being a cocky kid who sometimes didn't know his place, to a true ambassador of the game. And we have come a long way, but there's still progress to be made. Earlier on this thread I saw an epitaph starting with the letter "f" referring to a gay man. It's stuff like this that still needs to be addressed. Moving on...
Af far as Jordan on the court, you're right, he does need to bulk up a bit. But his speed, hops and mad crazy fire gives me some hope for the future. Remember, the triangle doesn't require a Chris Paul type of PG, and I think that JF could lead us to the promised land once Fish decides to hang 'em up.
-bozz-
Posted by: bozz | July 23, 2008 at 12:01 PM
Making the Lakers the favorite this upcoming year is a miscalculation. This team doesn't have enough of a veteran roster so it lacks leadership from a variety of places.
Where’s the leadership at SF, especially the defense in a league where talented SF's are a dime a dozen? Where's the leadership at PF? Lamar has never been know as a leader in any form, though he may be a great teammate that does posses enough plays to make a positive impact on the game, he's not someone you want with the ball at the top of the key with 5 seconds left of on the other guy at the top of the key with 10 seconds left. Where's the playoff valor from the center position? Heck where’s the IMPROVED stats in the post season, not diminished ones? Quality, battle tested vets get better during the playoffs, not recede from the pressure and the opposition’s play.
Can Gasol do better this year at PF? This Finals, how could Gasol and Phil not come up with a way to get Gasol either moving toward the paint for the give and go drive and sky dunk finish that he and Kobe had perfected during the year? (defenders sagging? Where’s the kick to Shash, which BTW, is HE remaining?). Or even worse, how could Gasol let the younger, less experienced, smaller (and far less pretty) Perkins keep him out of the paint, out of his shooting zone, out of his rebounding zone which basically left Pau out doing his bird dance and clogging the very lanes our guards were unsuccessfully trying to drive thru? How come Phil didn't have an answer to this?
Where was the leadership from the point guard position? Why was fisher so badly out played by Rondo? (I though Farmar was far superior and had his way with the defense.) Why didn’t we have an answer for the zone defense Rivers was bound to throw at us?
There’s no way we should be favorites this year, not after we were out played, out strategized, out harmonized out effortized by the Celtics.
Not until we see how Bynum responds to stronger, bulkier, smaller centers who so far have been successful at keeping him out of position, and not until we see how Pau can actually perform as a power forward who’s no longer playing with his back to the basket and will be counted on to bring a consistent outside jumper, and not until we see how Lamar Odom who makes his name snagging rebounds and scoring around the hoop performs an perimeter defender while bringing a dependable outside shots, and not until we add another shooter and reserve PF.
Wes
Posted by: Wes J. Nixon | July 23, 2008 at 12:01 PM
LTLF
As I mentioned 5 of 15 treys is very little to go by.
I was comparing him to LO in terms of rebounds. Luke is an average rebounder and Vlad is below average.
Sasha's a much better ball handler and far better 3pt. shooter than Trevor.
I agree that he came out of college too early.
Posted by: giantsquid | July 23, 2008 at 12:04 PM
Benjamin,
I apologise for my previous post in that on a reread it appears more blunt (and certainly nothing like as well written) than I would have liked.The truth was I rushed it and you deserved better.I certainly appreciate your unique viewpoint and your sharing it ...which is why I bothered to reply in the first place as it is certainly worthwhile discussion.
I'll reply soon...i'm more than happy to bash this one out!
Posted by: Kiwi | July 23, 2008 at 12:09 PM
Mullti Posting Stormer,
Fire32 confessed to posting as Butler?? I had no clue, but I saw a Butler post talking about Matt Barnes...dood give it a rest!!
In any case, tim-4-show apparently read somewhere that Ariza has been working with Hodges to improve his 3 point shot, I had been hoping for that but had no clue it was happening....that's the best news i've heard all summer!
Posted by: Semper Fidelis | July 23, 2008 at 12:14 PM
Benjamin & Kiwi,
>>>> Do you really know we nearly didn’t make the trade for Gasol?...or were the
>>>>>asking for Lamar or Bynum or Farmar until the deadline?
>>>>>You simply don’t know. You are making a lot of assumptions –
>>>>>a lot of them media driven.
>>>>>Remember sometimes the best deal are the ones you don’t make. – Kiwi.
I am sort in the middle between you two guys as far as confidence in the Lakers Front Office. I do see Benjamin’s point about the Gasol trade. I found it amazing to hear Mitch state, which he definitely did, that we would NOT have traded for Gasol if Drew had not gotten injured. That said to me that the team was planning on keeping Kwame as the primary backup to Drew, which would have been a terrible mistake in my mind. Our general manager should have been trying to move Kwame all along, knowing he was a detriment to winning and team chemistry. We all knew who Kobe meant, after the Gasol trade, when he said it was great to have somebody who could catch the ball and finish. And I won’t even get into the Smush thing since I long lobbied for his ass to be gone.
On the other hand, I definitely agree with Kiwi’s point that the best deals are often the ones you don’t make. Similarly, the patience to let our young players develop has really paid off. There is nothing more frustrating to a franchise than to let a young promising player go because he was not developing fast enough, only to have that player come back and haunt the franchise by becoming a great player. When Mitch says that we know the value of our players better than other teams, I tend to believe him. And while I have some questions still about the Front Office, the bottom line is that I have confidence that they will get the job done. I may not believe in them 100%, but I do believe in them.
No general manager is perfect, this is, except bloggers Monday morning quarterbacking games via their Tivo. LOL.
Tom
Posted by: LakerTom | July 23, 2008 at 12:19 PM
AK, thanks. Now if I could only gain traction on my Birdman vision-quest.
Posted by: dave m | July 23, 2008 at 12:26 PM
Semper Infedelis User,
"dood give it a rest!!" "Fire32 confessed to posting as Butler?? I had no clue"
Thats the same words that Pig and Outsidergua uses also! Dood!
"In any case, tim-4-show apparently read somewhere that Ariza has been working with Hodges to improve his 3 point shot, I had been hoping for that but had no clue it was happening."
Why else would Craig Hodges be on the coaching staff? That's been posted so many times by different people on the blog. For his weight on the bench? (Did you know Kareem is coaching Bynum?) You have no clue twice posted. At least you admitted it.
Posted by: Multi Posting Stormer | July 23, 2008 at 12:26 PM
The nba should increase their salary cap to $80 million. There are so many good bball players in the world that it makes no sense to not pay them to play in the NBA, which to me is the highest pro league for bball. With good players now opting to play oversees, it will take away NBA's value as the top pro league in the world. Teams are pretty much getting to the current salary cap easily, and losing quality players because of it, which is taking their competitive edge away.
The next thing the NBA needs to do is create a three tier salary max cap contract. The already have the rookie salary cap which I think is fair. Now they have to go further, and have a max money a guy can get when it comes to their second contract. The max for this second contract should be $12 million for a max of three years. When it comes to the third contract,teams can now offer a max of $20 million for five years. After the third contract a player will not have to follow this three tier salary max cap contract, they can get their true market value, but they cant exceed the max from their third contract.
Chris Paul, Deron Williams, Dwade, Chris Bosh, Lebron, and all these guys are already getting close to max money just from their second contract. That is too much money for kids. When the kids receive 4 year deals close to 20 million it takes away their hunger and initiative to work hard. A three year deal is good enough for teams to gauge weather a player deserves a max contract. The deal is short and sweet. 20 million and 12 million is a difference of 8 million. I think players will have the hunger to reach that $20 million level.
Posted by: wow | July 23, 2008 at 12:30 PM
LTLF
Other "average" rebounders per 48 min:
LeBron James 9.4, Ryan Gomes, 9.4, Josh Howard 9.3, Mike Miller 9.1, Kellena Azubuike 9.0. and Carlos Delfino 8.9
There are some surprises in this range (including others not listed here, but I've provided the link for you)
Other Lakers
LO 13.5, Gasol 11.2, Kobe 7.7 and Drew 17.0
http://tinyurl.com/6c8aqc
Posted by: giantsquid | July 23, 2008 at 12:31 PM
giantsquid,
>>>>> LakerTom's infatuation with Drew at least makes some sense.
LOL. I’ll take that as a compliment, I think.
Tom
Posted by: LakerTom | July 23, 2008 at 12:32 PM
Jon,
>>>>> Why is LakerTom so sweet on Andrew Bynum?
>>>>>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9efsJwJxYEk
>>>>>Watch. Learn. Remember. Get Ready.
>>>>>{Everytime I watch I literally start giggling like a village idiot.
>>>>>Bring on the Celtics!}
>>>>>GO LAKERS!
Thanks for the link to the Making of a Beast. What is really great about this video is that it reminds you of how Drew was playing entire games, not just of a few great plays per game but of a player who can totally dominate the paint on offense and defense.
Watch the video and you won’t worry at all about the Lakers toughness next year. Drew is truly going to be the biggest beast in the league. JMHO.
You CANNOT deny the potential greatness of Andrew Bynum is you watched this video or if you watched him play last year before getting injured.
Tom
Posted by: LakerTom | July 23, 2008 at 12:45 PM
ariza doesn't have an outside shot, he's not an option as a starting 3 over luke/vlad, or over lo.
the idea behind lo/pau/bynum in the front court would be to overpower teams with long passers. presumably one or two of them will warrant double teams against any opponent because of size, then their passing kicks in to get it to the other front court mismatch, or they could just settle for fish on the outside, or kobe anywhere. an opponent could try to go big to somehow slow this onslaught and give us an easy time on d; go small/range and try to outrun and outscore us, but give us free range in the paint; or just stay pat and get run ragged by passing/nightmarish matchups.
then you bring in the reserves, assuming they're still powered by sasha and jordan that are more small ball, which is of course why they got manhandled by the celtic bench. hopefully mihm is usable next season to at least give them some fresh legs at center(though i doubt he'll be as springy as a couple years ago), and luke/ariza and vlad/lo shift around. jordan/sasha/luke/vlad could theoretically destroy any team from the three on the one day/year when their strokes all coincide. but they can at least open things up pretty well to let bynum or gasol go to town if they're still in, or to give jf/sashas fledgeling penetration skills a chance to succeed.
where does sun fit in? he doesn't, he's not even first string in china and he has an ugly stroke, he'll ride the bench for most of the time here too. a vet minimum backup center/pf could fit in though, since our front line will not survive the whole season uninjured. our backcourt probably will, but thats mostly because they're straight up g's who will plat through it.
Posted by: db | July 23, 2008 at 12:46 PM
Tim,
>>>>> He was working on his jump shot with Hodges the moment he arrived.
>>>>>then when the injury happened, all he did was work on his outside jumper.
>>>>>I think he shot close to 50% from the outside in the playoffs...
>>>>>not very many attempts mind you, but he may have improved
>>>>>with all that extra work he put in.
I agree with your assessment of Trevor’s ability to shoot from 3-point range. Unlike guys like Smush and Kwame who never worked on their craft, Ariza appears to be dedicated to becoming a better player, which is a Kobe clone trait that I think is a critical requirement to be a Laker and teammate of Kobe’s.
Trevor’s focus on his shooting and work with Hodges reminds me of how Derek Fisher used his injury time his sophomore year to really work on his 3-point shooting. When he returned from injury, he immediately started draining 3’s and has been a high percentage 3-point shooter ever since.
There are countless stories of NBA players who learned to shoot better and became good 3-point shooters, including the Lakers own Magic Johnson and Derek Fisher. I am hoping we will see the same type of progress from Trevor this year, showing not only that he can play D like Bowen but also hit the crucial corner 3.
Tom
Posted by: LakerTom | July 23, 2008 at 01:01 PM
John,
>>>>> What's going on here?
>>>>>Has the Buss shut off the funds due to luxury tax?
>>>>>Or are we being coy and waiting till the last minute?
>>>>>Or are we waiting for the trading deadline in February?
I think the Lakers front office is not ready to trade Lamar Odom at this point in time. They let Turiaf go because it was too much money to pay a guy who was not going to have many minutes in the rotation anyway. They then tried to replace him with Jorge Garbajosa from Spain but lost him to a bigger bid from Russia.
Bottom line, the Lakers believe that getting a healthy Andrew Bynum back will make all the difference in the team’s toughness and ability to defeat the Boston Celtics, which is a point of view that I obviously also believe in. The Beast will make us tough.
>>>>>I was hoping for a team that comes out of the gate destroying everyone,
>>>>>like the Celtics did last year.
You may still get that. One of the Lakers goals for 2009 will definitely be to earn the best record to get home court advantage in the Finals against Boston. If Drew and Ariza and Mihm are all three fully recovered and ready to go October 1st, the Lakers will have a good chance to post the best record in the NBA. JMHO.
Tom
Posted by: LakerTom | July 23, 2008 at 01:09 PM
Long Time,
>>>>>When Kwame went down in the 2006-07 season, it was
>>>>>probably the best thing that ever happened to Andrew. It
>>>>>threw him into the deep end and forced him to swim. And
>>>>>he realized that he didn't have enough stamina to play a lot
>>>>>of minutes at that level, so he went out in the summer and
>>>>>worked hard to improve on his weak areas.
I agree 100%. In fact, I thought Phil played Kwame way too much, which was why Kwame’s injury was really a blessing in disguise. In fact, anything that got Kwame off the floor and onto the bench was great, as was the trade that sent his ass to Memphis.
>>>>>That's exactly what those of us cheering for Trevor are
>>>>>hoping. He sees that his 3-point shooting is mediocre. But
>>>>>he's young. If he went out this summer and worked on his
>>>>>outside shooting, maybe he could improve that 33% to 38%.
I think it is worth the Lakers considering to start Trevor and let Lamar come off the bench. Your point about guys needing playing time to show what they can do and to force them to grow is very valid. The payoff for the Lakers is great if Trevor can be become their version of Bowen or Battier, playing tough defense and burying 3-point shots from the corner.
Tom
Posted by: LakerTom | July 23, 2008 at 01:18 PM
I think we as the Laker Nation are underestimating the contributions of Trevor Ariza. I think he's ready to start. His jump shot needs work, no argument here, but it's been improving and in the playoffs, it actually looked pretty good.
He's got freaky athleticism, quick feet and long arms and is a very good rebounder for his position. He needs to improve at the free throw line since his athleticism is undoubtedly going to get him there frequently, but we're not going to find a better SF on the free agent market. Remember, he just turned 23 and hasn't even played a full season in Phil's offense, so there's tons of room to watch him improve.
For numbers geeks like me, here's the order of Lakers players' Player Efficiency Ratings, from highest to lowest...
1) Kobe (24.31)
2) Andrew (22.60)
3) Pau (21.68)
4) Lamar (16.94)
5) Trevor (16.09)
6) Jordan (15.43)
7) Sasha (15.06)
8) Ronny (15.05)
9) Fish (13.82)
10) Radman (12.69)
11) Luke (12.37)
Trevor, then, was arguably our 5th best player, especially when you factor in that these numbers do not account for defensive contributions, where he is most useful. The problem was that Phil played him more than 25 minutes only 8 times all season. But look at his averages in those 8 games...
28.5 MPG
61% FG
67% FT
11.5 PPG
5.75 RPG
2.75 APG
1.75 SPG
.5 BPG
1.1 TO/G (This one to me is incredible)
If you saw those stats without knowing the name behind them, wouldn't you be excited for the Lakers to sign him? The good news is, we already have and we just need to play him. I'm not saying he's going to be a 40 minutes a night starter, but he can be a great contributer at 25-30 a night.
Posted by: puddle | July 23, 2008 at 01:21 PM
LakerTom,
I feel every confidence that in 10 years people will be talking about that Mikan-Chamberlein-Jabaar-O'Neal-Bynum lineage of Great Laker centers.
GO LAKERS!
Posted by: Jon K. | July 23, 2008 at 01:28 PM
bozz,
>>>>>Incredibly well said. Jordan has gained a ton of respect from me this off-season.
>>>>>He went from being a cocky kid who sometimes didn't know his place, to a true
>>>>>ambassador of the game. And we have come a long way, but there's still progress
>>>>>to be made. Earlier on this thread I saw an epitaph starting with the letter "f"
>>>>>referring to a gay man. It's stuff like this that still needs to be addressed.
>>>>>Moving on...
>>>>>As far as Jordan on the court, you're right, he does need to bulk up a bit.
>>>>>But his speed, hops and mad crazy fire gives me some hope for the future.
>>>>>Remember, the triangle doesn't require a Chris Paul type of PG,
>>>>>and I think that JF could lead us to the promised land once
>>>>>Fish decides to hang 'em up.
Thanks for the props and comments. We sometimes forget how young some of our players are and how much potential they have. Nobody but the Jazz thought Deron Williams was in Chris Paul’s class until his breakout third year. Let’s hope for the same breakout year for Jordan next year.
One thing that I think will really accelerate Farmar’s value to the Lakers is if they shift gears again like last year and look to run even more, especially with Drew dominating the boards and the Lakers looking to score easy baskets in transition fueled by an aggressive pressing defense. It was the Lakers decision this year to push the ball in transition to take advantage of Farmar’s speed and ball handling that really gave Jordan the opportunity to take his game to a higher level. The more we run, the more important Farmar is to us.
Tom
Posted by: LakerTom | July 23, 2008 at 01:29 PM
Wes,
>>>>>There’s no way we should be favorites this year, not after we were out played,
>>>>>out strategized, out harmonized out effortized by the Celtics.
The difference is that the Lakers played the Celtics without their starting center and best interior defender, scorer, and rebounder. The odds simply reflect the fact that the Lakers are the better team on paper with Bynum in the lineup. Of course, we will still have to prove that in next year’s Finals, but the odds makers seem to be confident we will.
Tom
Posted by: LakerTom | July 23, 2008 at 01:34 PM