All Greek to Childress?
An interesting rumor going through the mill: Restricted free agent Josh Childress has apparently grown so frustrated with those running Atlanta's negotiating table that the swingman (kind of pointless to clarify, since he's a member of the Hawks' roster) is considering taking a three-year deal with Greece's Olympiakos squad. Some feel that Lon Babby putting out overseas feelers on behalf of his client is simply a hardball tactic to force a sign-and-trade deal, but there is concern his approach could be a trend preview. Those unhappy with either their situation or simply looking for more cash could take the Euro route (and I emphasize "Euro," which is currently stronger than the limp dollar and can enter your pocket tax free, as Moscow-bound Bostjan Nachbar reminds us).
Is that the case here? Until Childress actually needs an updated passport and a crash course at Berlitz, it's probably too early to say. And let's be real for a second. This situation is likely as much (and perhaps significantly more) the latest example of how horribly run an organization the Hawks remain as any potential sign of the times. Yes, the call to ball overseas is nothing new for NBA caliber players. Besides Nachbar, Juan Carlos Navarro recently jumped Memphis' ship to rejoin his old Spanish team. Then again, were best buddy Pau Gasol still a Griz employee, it becomes easier to at least picture Navarro remaining stateside and passing up the bigger money. Plus, these guys are all European to begin with, so playing in or near their various homelands could have a built-in appeal. And to be blunt, Navarro, Nachbar and other recent NBA defectors like Carlos Delfino can certainly play in the L, but their absence isn't exactly earth shattering. These are role players either unproven or easily replaced.
Childress, however, is an American player with a much higher profile, at least a peg or two above those guys. A former lottery pick (6th overall) who's averaged double figures in all four of his NBA seasons, just turned 25, and recently finished just 6th in the voting for Sixth Man of the Year. Plus. he's got an absolutely killer fro. All of these assets would generate interest around the league, making him the biggest player in many a moon to possibly take his act to another continent. If someone of Childress' stature would bolt, doors could be opened down the road. Should that end up the case, I could see NBA execs perhaps growing a bit nervous.
At the very least, it could prompt these suits to demand David Stern overhaul Atlanta's front office and weed out the clueless cats who might screw things up for everyone else. It's hard enough when the salary cap (not to mention the luxury tax) will inevitably lead to teams not being able to match lucrative European offers. GM's hardly need a scenario where cooperation, as opposed to money, creates a bothersome precedent.
AK



FIRST
Posted by: sohl | July 21, 2008 at 12:53 PM
Josh Childress = Best Fro in the NBA
Lamar = Laker for Life
GO LAKERS
Posted by: mrbarneydangles | July 21, 2008 at 01:01 PM
I hear Garbajosa is being offered more in Europe as well.
Wealth seems to be transferring hands. I wish it were transferring to my hands.
Go Obama!
Go Lakers!
Posted by: Rocky | July 21, 2008 at 01:03 PM
Oh well, now that other countries are paying and players are feeling spurned. It's another viable option to make money and play ball.
Posted by: Charles | July 21, 2008 at 01:04 PM
I think it would be absolutel awesome if he went to Europe for their offer. I think it would be bigger news than most make it out to be, and could be a sign of things to come.
Combine this with Brandon Jennings going to Europe instead of Arizona and you have a couple good examples of what is wrong with the current system.
Posted by: Andrew Z | July 21, 2008 at 01:10 PM
Because its a slow news day
http://youtube.com/watch?v=
_PDSuhyfY28&feature=related
Posted by: richtown | July 21, 2008 at 01:19 PM
Not only Josh Childress will be going to Europe to have a higher income. It started last year with Jasikevicious, Papaloukas and this year with Carlos Navarro, rumors with Delfino too. I'm sure Pelinka is presenting the options to Sasha with Khimki Moscow offer, theyalso want to get Garbajosa and so forth. NBA is the destination to win a ring and be recognized but Europe is the place where you can earn more. Blame it to the Bush Administration for this currency fluctuation.
Monday, July 21, 2008
1 Euro = 1.58524 US Dollar
1 US Dollar (USD) = 0.63082 Euro (EUR
So we are the Americans continue to export jobs, transfer technology, sell our NBA players and very soon sell our freedom too. Sad, sad, sad.
Posted by: Edwin Gueco | July 21, 2008 at 01:23 PM
Good Afternoon Family!
Andrew Z - I couldn't agree with you more. The amount of money he'd make out there is MUCH more (factoring in housing and taxes that are paid for by the team) than what he would make in the NBA. I had the pleasure of meeting Mr. Childress when I went to an athlete formal at Stanfurd, and he's quite a nice fellow. If it were me, I'd bolt - get a chance to see a number of different countries, and play TEAM basketball while getting paid handsomely for it. I can easily see him improving any team that he plays for - his skill set is pretty fantastic.
I hope more players take advantage of this situation - it probably would do enough to keep David Stern from pushing his NBA Europe plan.
Posted by: Caliphilosopher | July 21, 2008 at 01:34 PM
Edwin Gueco -
While Mr. Bush might be partly to blame for economic woes, I wouldn't put this squarely on his shoulders.
Where did you get the info on Sasha potentially leaving? I'm concerned; he could easily make more money in europe than here. Crazy how FIBA contracts have nothing to do with NBA ones! I wouldn't blame him for skipping town, however.
Posted by: Caliphilosopher | July 21, 2008 at 01:37 PM
Josh Childress (Stanford alum) rocks!
Posted by: hariyahu | July 21, 2008 at 01:39 PM
Hi All:
AK/BK - good job handling the craziness of the other "boys will be boys" thread. But it looks like all appeared to calm down when the LG's pitures were posted. Now on to something I can relate to.... $$$.
I definitely see this as a trend - sad to say. But given the US economic situation and sophistication of our banking/currency system, overseas players can now hedge their dollar currency contracts against the euro and stabilize their pay. So, there's no reason a US player can't do the opposite.
The can of worms will be which players have the financial savvy and proper representation to receive good advice.
It would be a shame for Josh Childress to leave for greener pastures (so to say) but he might do really well, get a lot of press and come back to the states being able to earn a much bigger payday. I still think there is enough talent in the US and I doubt there will be drastic measures by the League office. The bigger stars know their paydays are right here in the good ole USofA
GO LAKERS!
Posted by: PsychedLakerGirl | July 21, 2008 at 01:53 PM
People really underestimate the power of a good Afro. Seriously.
I think the "shave your head" presidence set by Michael "I'm Going Bald And I Don't Want People To Know" Jordan was a bad thing.
Hey! But it looks good on you, BK!
GO LAKERS!
Posted by: Jon K. | July 21, 2008 at 02:10 PM
Keep the political comments to yourself or this blog will really get out of hand.
Posted by: rdlee | July 21, 2008 at 02:11 PM
There's no way anyone in the NBA can match that offer to Childress. 7 mil a year for a guy of his talent is too much money for NBA teams to afford (esp. with salary caps, luxury taxes...)
This trend of players following the money abroad could lead to a more competetive Euro game. Maybe in several years we could be looking at "World Championships" similar to Soccer.
Posted by: Benny Blanca | July 21, 2008 at 02:12 PM
What's so wrong about players going overseas? Don't we all want the quality of other leagues to get better?
In time, FIBA should create a basketball club competition, a la the Champions League (biggest soccer event only below the World Cup), in which the best clubs in the world compete for a "champions cup." It would definitely help provide exposure for the elite teams in the NBA, such as the Spurs, that most in the world don't even know about.
Posted by: KCC | July 21, 2008 at 02:35 PM
Nachbar's issue is taxes not that the Euro is higher than the dollar.
You guys should check out Neil Boortz's book on the FairTax.
Posted by: THE original Ken | July 21, 2008 at 02:36 PM
Here's a little something to remind us all of what type of player we'll be getting back at the start of next season.
Andrew Bynum "The Sky is the Limit"
http://youtube.com/watch?v=XmgF6InSxPs&feature=related
The always popular, "The Making of the beast"
http://youtube.com/watch?v=9efsJwJxYEk&feature=related
Posted by: Xodus | July 21, 2008 at 02:37 PM
Does this mean that "euro briefs" are now worth more than our fruit of the looms? What is the world coming to?
Where's Sasha when we need him?
BHB
Posted by: BeverlyHills_Bernie | July 21, 2008 at 02:43 PM
Benny Blanca,
>>>7 mil a year for a guy of his talent is too much money
>>>for NBA teams to afford
Actually, 7 million a year for Childress is a fair deal.
But I think if some team offered Childress a deal for that
exact amount that Atlanta would match it. And unfortunately
for Childress, Memphis is the only team left with that much
cap space, and they aren't planning on spending it.
Posted by: Long Time Laker Fan | July 21, 2008 at 02:45 PM
I'm a pretty big fan of Childress. High effort, high shot percentage guy, does a little of everything. He doesn't really fit on our team since we have Lamar and Ariza.
Trading Lamar for Childress doesn't make sense either unless we can get an up and coming point guard too.
Before we assume Childress will make more money abroad, it's probably a good idea to also consider most of Europe has a considerably higher tax rate. That and increased expenses due to living in a new foreign country will significantly eat into his (or any transplant player's) earnings despite the weak dollar.
That said, one could crunch the numbers, maybe hit a European country with lower taxes (Switzerland?) and make extra money due to the weak dollar.
I like the trend in that it makes the game maybe a little more globally competitive.
I still don't like the fact that the world changed the rules to our game. I have a real problem endorsing a world championship because of that.
I also want the best talent here in the US which it obviously will be for the forseeable future.
It will be interesting to see if this situation is a ploy by the agent or something more serious than a big bluff.
I'll also be sad to see Childress go because he was one of my best waiver wire pickups all last season in fantasy basketball.
Let's hope the above situation ends up having nothing to do with Sasha. I continue to be concerned with the way the front office and Sasha are handling this situation. Obviously the interest from other NBA teams isn't there and obviously we want Sasha back, but for the right price.
Ugh. Can't wait for it to be over and settled.
Posted by: Benjamin | July 21, 2008 at 02:45 PM
And hell yeah, that fro is quite the intangible! Is there any other player in the NBA that can bring it like that?
Probably not since 1979.
Posted by: Benjamin | July 21, 2008 at 02:46 PM
Original Ken,
You are correct. I had originally written a few words referencing Nachbar and the taxes being covered, but I guess I accidentally took it out during my editing. Thanks for the pick up.
AK
Posted by: Andrew Kamenetzky | July 21, 2008 at 02:49 PM
I think that the european players who are returning the old continent aren't doing it just for money. They do came to the NBA for money, and now they are leaving after being systematically underrated by the franchises. Most of these players, such as Garbajosa or Nachbar or Jasikevicius, can make real money in europe and also being important players for their teams. Not just being the funny guy who speaks four esoteric languages and is seventh in the rotation and never will be the starter of a match.
This migration is probably due to the recent international competitions (olympic games, world championship) that has shown basketball in europe is stronger than they were initially thinking.
And finally, just remind you that in RUSSIA (Moscow is in russia), they don't have euros, they have rubles. And they are not near to become part of the european union (by far).
Posted by: Observer | July 21, 2008 at 03:04 PM
if anyone can verify this: I think a lot of these pro players actually have tax exemptions on their european salaries. In other words, the keep the entire salary and don't pay taxes on it.
another big reason for pro players to go to europe. And yes, I think it's the beginning of a trend where a lot of mid-level players are going to start going to Europe because the economic environment in the US is falling behind the Euros.
Posted by: sean | July 21, 2008 at 03:06 PM
such is life, anybody watch the ESPY's, I didn't on purpose!
Posted by: lakersrydeordie | July 21, 2008 at 03:08 PM
LTLF,
7 per for Childress? Committing 7 per to a guy like Childress is similar to what we did with Luke (IMO). Now, guys get overpaid all the time. And in the case of Childress, he's talented enough and versatile enough that maybe you don't mind paying him 7. I originally had him pencilled as a guy that would claim someone's full MLE.
Teams sooner or later have to become conservative with the contracts. Some of these guys (Luke/Rad) are not signing BIG contracts, but are signing contracts that are big enough to keep a team from improving. Guys like Childress are good, but how much payroll do you dedicate to bench players from a team that got a first round exit. There's only so many dollars to go around.
Posted by: Benny Blanca | July 21, 2008 at 03:14 PM
I played against childress when he was at mayfair ...nice guy and super athlete. single handedly knocked us out of CIF in the second round.
i'm not good at GM'ing or math, but it would be sweet if he could come back to the southland to play. clippers maybe as they could afford him?
cheers,
chick penberthy
Posted by: chick penberthy | July 21, 2008 at 03:17 PM
$ attracts Talent
But a player's reputation is his fortune. Euro, college and street ball reps still have to be proven on the NBA stage.
The dollar will come back, but years in Euro obscurity won't.
Sasha's been there, going back would be a set back.
Posted by: Vman | July 21, 2008 at 03:27 PM
Been waiting for players to start jumping to the Euro leagues. You can't just ignore the tremendous difference in what the dollar buys or doesn't buy these days. Not sure why somebody would say for sure it's a step down. Think about it, here, you're a role player, over there, you're the star of the team AND you get paid almost double what you would be getting here. I mean... going to Utar for a game is nice during the winter, you have to join a special "club" to simply buy a drink or... you could travel across Europe playing basketball making almost twice as much as you do here... LOL! How horrible...
Posted by: Kwaminus Big money goes around the world Brownicas | July 21, 2008 at 03:55 PM
clippers maybe as they could afford him?
Clippers don't have the cap space. At this point in time, the
Lakers could offer Childress more than the Lakers could.
Posted by: Long Time Laker Fan | July 21, 2008 at 04:11 PM
Ben Wallace has a pretty awesome 'fro when he picks it out.
I would rate his at the same level as Josh's.
Posted by: Anthony "Pig Bill" Miller | July 21, 2008 at 04:20 PM
Childress is worth $7 million a year. MLE is $5.8 or something like that right? If that's the salary for an average player, then Childress is worth $7 million.
Unfortunately for Childress, there are no teams out there other than the Grizz (and his own Hawks) with room to spend that kind of money. So you can understand his frustration when the Grizz won't spend it, the Hawks are slow to negotiate, and no other team has cap room. It's a wise move to look overseas. I'm sure he could get paid handsomely, or at least drive up his price and speed up the process with his hometown Hawks. I'd love for him to get pissed off and take the Lakers MLE.
WTF happened with Barnes btw? Vet's minimum? Wow. I thought he'd get at least half of someone's MLE and wouldn't have been shocked had he gotten a deal like Ronny's.
Posted by: puddle | July 21, 2008 at 04:29 PM
Jon K - you're killing me! I'm at work reading the thread & came across your 'fro comments & how the bald look is good for BK - LMAO!!! It's a good thing no one's here! You, sir, are too funny, and what's even funnier to me is that I don't think you even mean to be most of the time - LOL!
lakersrydeordie - I watched most of it last night, but turned it off to watch a movie right before they awared the male athlete & best team. Unfortunately for me, they had the repeat going when I worked out at lunch today so I caught Ray "I'M LOW CLASS" Allen get up to the mike after they announced the Celtic's won for Best Team, and say "another win in LA". Piece of crap. I hope he chokes on that fricken ESPY. I hope someone ties it around his neck like an anchor & drops him off a bridge or dumps him into the ocean or something. I HATE THE CELTICS. I can't wait for the Purple & Gold to clean their clocks this coming season, and wipe that smarmy smirk off his butt-ugly face. AARRGGHH.
Posted by: justanothermambafan | July 21, 2008 at 04:33 PM
LTLF,
i may be wrong, but i thought the clips had about 3 M / yr. left from the brand vacuum after they picked up camby. i'm pretty retarded on all this though. more of an X's and O's guy over a $'s and c's.
Posted by: chick penberthy | July 21, 2008 at 04:43 PM
Long Time,
>>>>>You might be about to get a precedent for your "Bynum will
>>>>>get so insulted he'll walk" theory. Word is Luol Deng has told
>>>>>the Bulls that unless they reach an extension with him before
>>>>>he leaves to join the Great Britain national team in two weeks,
>>>>>he will end talks and take the 1-year tender and leave next year.
I truthfully don’t expect that the Lakers will have any problems reaching an agreement with Drew for an extension before October 31. Mitch knows how to negotiate at this level and in this arena and would never say or present anything that Drew or his agent could conceivably interpret as an insult. And it is not a matter of just being careful not to insult your player, but more important to intentionally show your respect for him, especially in when Drew and his agent will be watching and analyzing every word and expression.
While I don’t think Drew is the type to take umbrage at most things, you have to remember what kind of ego and competitive spirit he must have, no matter how humble he may appear, to have gone out and accomplished what he has at only 20 years of age. Show him your respect, treat him like the franchise player that he is, and you will win more in negotiations than you ever would by hard balling or down playing how valuable and critically important Drew is to the present and the future of the Lakers.
>>>>>But note that although he turned down the 50 million dollar
>>>>>offer last summer, he did at least come back to the table this
>>>>>summer. If Bynum isn't happy with what the Lakers offer him,
>>>>>I'm sure he'll at least negotiate with them next summer, and
>>>>>I'm sure he'll get offered what he's worth.
Just remember that if the Lakers do not sign Drew to an extension this summer, he will become a free agent before the Lakers will be allowed to sign him to a new contract. And even if the Lakers tender a qualifying offer to him, which they obviously would, Drew is under no pressure to sign with the Lakers and the Lakers would have no leverage to keep him from just accepting the qualifying offer and joining the 2009/10 free agent class.
Tom
Posted by: LakerTom | July 21, 2008 at 04:44 PM
Reminds me of the movie "Love and Basketball."
Internationally he would be treated like he was Kobe...fawned on, overpaid, treated like a king. But here? He plays for the Hawks...it's any wonder why anyone plays here at all.
But the best is the best.
Go Lakers!
Posted by: Faith | July 21, 2008 at 04:46 PM
Sign me up for the Vlad Radmanovic to play in Europe bandwagon, also the Luke Walton Euro bandwagon too.
That will take care of the 2 biggest Laker contract problems and allow the team to sign up a couple of better players.
Posted by: LakerinBC | July 21, 2008 at 04:51 PM
haha I don't mean Kobe is overpaid. Dude is underpaid. But he is definitely the King of LA.
Go Lakers!
Posted by: Faith | July 21, 2008 at 04:54 PM
Xodus,
>>>>> Here's a little something to remind us all of what type of player
>>>>>we'll be getting back at the start of next season.
Thanks for the links, Karl. I had not seen “The Sky is the Limit” and seen “The Making of a Beast” so many times that it would have been worn out if it were not digital. LOL.
Tom
Posted by: LakerTom | July 21, 2008 at 04:58 PM
Sam Amick's latest take on the Artest situation:
>>>"The media trade buzz regarding Ron Artest quieted
>>>down later in the week, and with good reason.
>>>
>>>Numerous sources close to the team tell me there
>>>have been no Kings-Lakers discussions in the last
>>>week. The Lakers, for the time being, appear to be
>>>looking for trade options that don't include taking on
>>>Kenny Thomas' contract. While a third team could
>>>help fix that problem, there hasn't been one yet that
>>>fits the equation.
So if he's right, it sounds like maybe the Lakers would at
least consider trading Odom (pure speculation I think) but
not if it means getting Kenny Thomas back.
So what third team might want Kenny Thomas?
Someone with a larger, longer contract that they wanted
to unload. And he'd have to be on a team that's in or near
the luxury tax so they'd give up a decent player to dump
some salary. Or on a team that's dumping off stars to clear
cap space to try to sign LeBron.
So who falls into that category?
Chicago: Kirk Hinrich
Denver: Nene or K-Mart
Indiana: Troy Murphy or Jamaal Tinsley
Memphis: Antoine Walker or Marko Jaric
New Jersey: Vince Carter or Bobby Simmons
New York: Zach Randolph, Eddie Curry, or Jamal Crawford.
Or JJ & JJ (Jerome James and Jared Jeffries)
That's about it. Those are all the players I could come up
with whose teams might (however unlikely) take on Kenny
Thomas' contract to do a bigger salary dump. In some cases
(e.g. Zach Randolph or K-Mart), the Lakers would have to add
someone else into the deal to make salaries match (Mihm?
sign and trade MBenga?)
-------------
There's also one team that is kinda desperate for a point
guard right now, and might be willing to give up a productive
player for Thomas if Jordan Farmar was thrown their way...
Golden State. Consider this deal:
http://tinyurl.com/6d5zdj
Lakers get Ron Artest and Al Harrington
Golden State gets Jordan Farmar and Kenny Thomas
Sacramento gets Lamar Odom
Posted by: Long Time Laker Fan | July 21, 2008 at 05:16 PM
chick penberthy,
>>>i may be wrong, but i thought the clips had about 3 M /
>>>yr. left from the brand vacuum after they picked up
>>>camby.
They did... until they signed Kelenna Azubuike (assuming
Golden State doesn't match).
But since they had cap space, the Clippers won't get any exceptions
this year. So even if they could offer 3 million to somebody,
the Lakers could offer a full MLE which is closer to 6 million.
Posted by: Long Time Laker Fan | July 21, 2008 at 05:18 PM
Caliphilosopher,
Khimki Moscow was targetting Sasha, I don't know whether Insidehoops.com or hoopshype reported so with Childress, Delfino, Navarro, Garbajosa. I wish they will target VladRad and Luke LOL!
Kwaminus,
"Think about it, here, you're a role player, over there, you're the star of the team AND you get paid almost double what you would be getting here."
~~ Economic woes brought down the value of dollar because of unfavorable balance of trade, deficit spending, useless war plus the subprime mess. I'm not an Obama admirer but no candidate is worst than our present leader. Until we solved those three issues, dollar will have a hard time to recover, the same with the price of a barrel of oil. When we first traveled in Europe right after 9/11 1US dollar is equivalent to 1.12Euro. Last year, even cab driver in Scandinavia would not accept a green buck, you can ask this w/ our fellow european bloggers. However, you won't see an european brag about their edge in the currency, in fact they're sympathetic w/ our cause. They also suffer when the dollar is down.
Unfortunately, there are some Americans here who act superior being a Superpower nation, still rude and mean to anything that is outside of America, that's how some of us treat VladRad referred to as a space cadet by a macho Coach. (The parents or grandparents of these Serbians are known "Partizans" during WW II, they have pride with their heritage.) All I'm saying treat them with respect, admonish him in private but don't call him names in public media and expect to get away with it scotfree.
Posted by: Edwin Gueco | July 21, 2008 at 05:24 PM
trade bynum for marc gasol that should teach him and his agent not to be greedy. He wants the max which is 80 for 5 yrs. Not . He isnt a 20-10 guy so its just too much.
Posted by: jus10 | July 21, 2008 at 05:28 PM
Puddle,
I see what your saying about the MLE and "average" players. But that's also what Luke is getting paid. Is he average? or below average?
The MLE is based on average salaries, not average ability. Players like Jason Kidd, Jermaine O'Neal and Stephon Marbury skew the MLE and drive the MLE uppward above what an "average" player should make.
If you were to comprise a team of average players making the MLE (12 guys at 5.8 mil/year), you end up OVER the salary cap (69.6 mil) and have a TERRIBLE team.
Up and coming teams like the Hawks can't afford to be shelling out 7 mill per year for bench guys. They were a decent team this year (only 38 wins, or something), but nothing spectacular. They'll end up over the cap and not have enough talent to compete.
If they tie up both Joshes (childress and smith), they'll be at the cap, with the same exact team as last year. In a couple of years, they'll need to sign Extensions to Acie and Horford. They'll then be even FURTHER over the cap, with the same exact team they have now.
that won't get them a championship.
Sooner or later teams have to pass on resigning marginal talent (see Luke Walton / Brian Cook).
Posted by: Benny Blanca | July 21, 2008 at 05:29 PM
It never occurred to me that loosing high-profile athletes could be yet another unpleasant side-effect of a weak dollar.
Who knew!
--Fearless
Posted by: Fearless | July 21, 2008 at 05:43 PM
Let's cover a misnomer here...
The Euro might be worth more than the dollar in the exchange market, but it's important to remember that it is MUCH MORE EXPENSIVE to live in Europe. Easily more than the difference in the Euro to Dollar. I know this firsthand. It's still cheaper to live in the US, and thus a big contract in the US is worth more than a big contract in Europe.
The only way that the exchange is beneficial to anyone, is if you get paid in Euros, but live in the US. Maybe the Childress situation would fit into that, but he'd still have to rent an apartment, go grocery shopping and buy gas in Europe, and doing that is more than twice as expensive than it would be living in the US's biggest cities, so that salary would be eaten up pretty fast either way.
Posted by: Very Nearly the Absolute Truth | July 21, 2008 at 05:53 PM
LOS ANGELES LAKERS: THE MAKING OF A BEAST
The Making of a Beast begins this October when the Lakers open training camp and begin building what will be a physically dominating team with Andrew Bynum anchoring center and aggressive new strategies defensively and possibly even offensively.
Andrew Bynum will transform the Lakers from the soft team physically out-toughed and out-played by Celtics in the NBA Finals to the dominant team that will physically control the paint and boards on offense and defense and win the 2009 NBA Championship.
I have already posted how I think Andrew’s ability to patrol the lane and protect the rim against penetration will enable the Lakers perimeter defenders to play their men tighter and press and trap opposing players to create steals and turnovers and ignite fast breaks. I think this will be the Lakers defensive strategy for 2009 and comments from Kobe and the Lakers front office seem to confirm this. It could be an exciting defense.
But the Lakers may also be considering a change in their offensive strategy to make them an even more formidable team to defend in the half court. In addition to running more, look for the Lakers to make Andrew Bynum their primary offensive option in half court situations. This means more isolating and posting up Drew as well as more pick and rolls feeding him the ball at the rim. The goal, of course, is to play inside-out basketball.
Making anyone other than Kobe Bryant the offensive focus of the Lakers may seem to be almost treasonous at first thought if not misguided, but think about the pressure that it puts on the other team’s defense. Or if you still don’t get it, think about the Shaq-Kobe three-peat. And there is no other player in the NBA who is more dominant around the rim at this time in my opinion other than Andrew Bynum, both 1-on-1 and off lobs.
Go dig out all of the old stories about how Shaq dominated the paint because you may be able to recycle them next year and just insert Drew’s name. No center playing today has sweeter moves, softer hands, higher basketball IQ, or more rim-shattering power in the NBA today than Andrew Bynum. And nobody shoots a higher percentage from the floor. Andrew Bynum may not end up leading the Lakers in scoring next season but he will be the Lakers second leading scorer next year and not many points behind Kobe.
The net effect of focusing on Andrew will be to improve the team’s field goal percentage, increase the number of fouls drawn and free throws shot, improve the team’s 3-point field goal percentage by taking fewer and better 3-point attempts, eliminate fast breaks from long rebounds on outside shots, and provide the Lakers with a more physical demeanor on offense that will carry over to the other end and translate into tougher defense.
The irony, of course, is that what we really are getting with Kobe and Drew versus Kobe and Shaq is a center who will more than match Shaq in talent but also match Kobe in the motivation to win NBA championships and willingness to do the hard work to get there. This time, we get the duo that not only works but will last for more than 3 years. That’s what the Making of a Beast is all about. The Lakers are about to become a beast.
Tom
Posted by: LakerTom | July 21, 2008 at 06:14 PM
Benny Blanca,
>>>I see what your saying about the MLE and "average"
>>>players. But that's also what Luke is getting paid. Is
>>>he average? or below average?
Luke makes 20% less than the MLE. And (at least last season)
he's about 20% below an average player in the NBA.
Posted by: Long Time Laker Fan | July 21, 2008 at 06:46 PM
The MLE and lux penalties designed to help control NBA salaries could be biting the NBA in the butt. Limiting teams over the cap offer could seriously hurt many teams.
Even if you think its necessary to keep teams from run away spending, I don't. It absolutely will hand-cuff NBA teams wanting to bid against Euro teams.
The NBA monopoly is being broken and they are worried for sure. This is relatively minor this year. Wait for the next two years.
Posted by: Fatty | July 21, 2008 at 06:48 PM
Benny,
>>>Players like Jason Kidd, Jermaine O'Neal and Stephon
>>>Marbury skew the MLE and drive the MLE uppward
>>>above what an "average" player should make.
I wonder what the "median" salary in the league is, as opposed
to the mean.
Posted by: Long Time Laker Fan | July 21, 2008 at 06:50 PM