Most... talented... draft class... EVER
PROGRAMMING NOTE: The season may be over, but Purple, Gold, and Blue isn't. Today at 11 am. Hit the show widget on the side of the page, or enter the NowLive.com chat board by clicking here.
In the spirit of Thursday's upcoming draft, SI's Chris Mannix speculates how each team would select from a pool of players currently in the NBA. Same order (Chicago first, Miami second, Minny third, etc.). Very different results. And check out which team just happens to have the most players selected. Not to reveal any head-spinning spoilers, but one of them is Kobe Bryant.
How the hell does Eddy Curry not make the cut?
AK



What about Herman Munster? He has a great attitude.
Posted by: exhelodrvr
Good one bro, But man, The system just ain't made for them (frankensteins that is)
Posted by: Fire32 | June 25, 2008 at 07:12 PM
In fairness to Team USA, some players that would have been selected didn't want to play. I believe that was the case with Amare. Maybe it was with Battier too?
Miller didn't play that well in 07 and Carmelo played great in 06 and 07. Melo actually played great on both ends so I don't think we can kick him off the team.
I'll tell you one thing though. It's criminal that we don't have more good shooters on the team. We've got Redd. Kobe is an impressive shooter. Melo has shot well in international competition and does have a decent jumper too.
But, we should have Ray Allen, Mike Miller, Jason Richardson, Rip Hamilton, Chauncey Billups and maybe even Kapono on the team. Kapono's shooting is awesome, but overall I don't know that he has that much to offer.
The international game with its zone defenses is best won by good shooting. It's like basketball strategy 101.
Posted by: Benjamin | June 25, 2008 at 07:18 PM
Ooooh, the Pacers traded TJ Ford and Rasho Nesterovich for Jermaine O'neal (pending medical exams both ways).
Now we can finally go for Jamaal Tinsley, the league's best mixture of talent and unpredictability at point!
Posted by: Benjamin | June 25, 2008 at 07:31 PM
rdlee ,
“As much as I like your optimism, what evidence do you have that Andrew w/o Pau would handle the Celtics? We lost both games rather handily with Bynum w/o Gasol. Andrew was definitely coming on but we don't KNOW if he would have made all the difference vs. the Celtics. This is a young up and coming player, not a proven All-Star.”
Come on, rd. How can I have any evidence? It’s just my opinion based on how Drew was playing the month before he got injured. Truthfully, the two games I missed this year were the Celtics games where Drew apparently did not play well but both games were before Drew really started coming into his own. Unless we get some form of time machine to take Drew from this year back to last year, we will never know. That’s why Mike T. still believes we would have won if hadn’t traded Kwame.
As an aside, while Drew is not a proven All-Star, he was selected ahead of all but 16 current NBA players on Chris Mattix’s mock draft that is the subject of this thread. In fact, Drew was selected before Tracy McGrady, David West, Carlos Boozer, Brandon Roy, Manu Ginobli, Steve Nash, and Rick Hamilton – all of whom have been all-stars.
Again, it is just my opinion but Andrew Bynum is probably the #3 center in the league today behind Yao Ming and Dwight Howard. If you don’t believe that, then try and make a list of the centers who you think are better right now. I guarantee you the Lakers will not trade for any of the guys on your list. We are entering the Era of the Beast.
Tom
Posted by: LakerTom | June 25, 2008 at 05:17 PM
Well, it doesn't take any imagination to see that having both Gasol and Bynum would have made the Lakers tougher to beat. Would it have made the difference? I think so.
The first three losses we took were all games that went down to the wire. Assuming that Bynum made no progress as a player from his last 20 games, it's not hard to project that he would have been getting at least 10 and 10.
Defensively, he would have represented an improvement with his shot blocking. Bynum's prescence also would have helped Gasol.
Bottom line: With an extra 10 and 10, some extra defensive prescence and a little more from Gasol, I say we win at least 2 out of those 3 games. That's all we needed.
Posted by: Jman449 | June 25, 2008 at 07:36 PM
Thanks for the birthday wish Mr Charles.
As a less frequent member of the blog bunch these days, it's nice to get a shout out in the off season.
Laker TOm
"it is just my opinion but Andrew Bynum is probably the #3 center in the league today behind Yao Ming and Dwight Howard."
I agree. That's a realistic appraisal of Andrew at this point. Howard is a bit more "beastly" but he's basically a dunker. Andrew's array of shots is already better.
He was handled in the 2 Boston games this year but he always played great against KG at Minn. Without Pau, Boston was able to double and frustrate him, which won't be an option with next year's lineup. He's got the talent, the team, and the coaches to go as far as his drive will take him.
Posted by: Vman | June 25, 2008 at 07:37 PM
"That’s why Mike T. still believes we would have won if hadn’t traded Kwame."
Acutally, what I believe is this: The Lakers wouldn't have won with Kwame Brown as the center because they didn't play defensive philosophy basketball. The defense Kwame applied when he was healthy was something he did on his own. But that still wasn't enough because PJ would always pull Kwame, which tells me that PJ wasn't concerned with playing defensive philosophy basketball.
It would have been difficult for the Lakers to win it all even if, under PJ, the Lakers played defensive philosophy basketball because the owners created too many holes for the center to cover. I mean signing Mihm, Walton and Karl was just too many roster spots that held weakness in their defensive game for the center to cover.
Had the owners let Mihm and Walton walk they could have signed a couple of defensive specialist to make Kwame's defensive abilities more effective. But by signing Mihm and Walton, the owners were commiting to a finesse philosophy/brand of basketball.
The only way the Lakers win with Kwame's defensive abilities is that the Lakers commit to a defense first attitude. The way the Lakers were going about it was as if they were trying to sprinkle defense in their approach to winning. In other words: We'll use Kwame when we play Houston or San Antonio and we need to slow down the big men. That approach is just silly.
The Lakers should have kept Kwame and had the first unit become a serious defensive team. With Kobe Bryant, Odom and Fisher the offense would have been there off of transition, which the defense would have provided. But, again, there were still problems because the 2nd unit was too weak defensively with Farmar, Sasha, Walton, Mihm and others.
The roster has too many defensive holes for a defensive center to cover them all.
mike t.
Posted by: Michael C. Teniente | June 25, 2008 at 07:44 PM
Laker Tom
I watched every game last summer of Fiba Americas and I have an opinion. lol
Kidd and Kobe made Lebrons and Melo better, much better. Many times they found them completely open on the wings, with defenders hustling to reach them, leaving the defender off balance for either of them to easily go to the hoop. When the pivot man came to rotate, a quick pass to a cutter led to some awesome dunks by Team USA bigs.
D Wade - I have no idea why he was selected, makes little sense.
Losing Amare will hurt us. Howard has no legit back up. We may pay a price for that. Howard and Amare put fear into all the teams trying to penetrate, real fear. Bosh and Boozer will not.
Kobe will set the tone. His D was absolutely incredible. He completely shut down the other teams best perimeter player. The world's refs do not give special treatment to point guards like in the NBA. Kobe was able to use his hands to check and he was loving being able to check these guys down.
Benjamin -
Love to see you have such a good understanding of international play. The rules is one thing, but the NBA's bad and biased refs have really hurt some of our stars play on the world scene where traveling is called and a foul is a foul. They don't see a name on the jersey, just a number.
Posted by: Fairweather Fatty | June 25, 2008 at 07:49 PM
This has got to be NY. Mayo wants a big market and the Knicks want him badly.
------------------
* The Miami Heat have found a taker in their quest to trade the No. 2 draft pick, a source familiar with the situation told Pro Basketball News. The source did not indicate which team would be the Heat’s trading partner, or what other draft picks or players are involved.
* The supposed deal will reportedly be announced during or shortly after the draft. According to the source, the Heat will select USC guard O.J. Mayo and trade him. Kansas State forward Michael Beasley is expected to fall to No. 3 -- although not to Minnesota, which is expected to trade down.
Posted by: TaosHum | June 25, 2008 at 07:55 PM
I absolutely fricken love this blog!
80% of the people on this blog are fantastic.
10% are morons.
10% are Trolls and Haters.
Still, pretty damn good percentages to me.
Sign Quinton Ross. Draft well. Keep our strengths.
Championship.
GO LAKERS!
Posted by: Jon K. | June 25, 2008 at 08:12 PM
Odom off the bench makes the most sense from what I see. The first unit needs a 3 point threat to spread the floor, so you would have Fisher or Farmar as one, then the SF would be the other, allowing Kobe to either play outside or drive the lane. So Radmanovic, if he could up his defensive skills at all, would be the most likely starter. Walton can shoot the 3 but he can also go into a tailspin and he's also injury prone so I just don't see Phil depending on him as a starter.
You get towards a few minutes left in the first quarter, Odom could come in at PF, Bynum and Fisher could rest, Gasol moves up to C, and you now have this year's lineup with Farmar at PG.
If Radmanovic gets in foul trouble, this is where Luke would come in for his 3 point shooting to keep the floor spread OR Ariza develops his 3 point shot over the summer.
Second quarter, Kobe, Gasol and Radmanovic sit if Radmanovic wasn't already in foul trouble, Sasha, Ariza and the backup Center comes in, say Mihm. Again, you've got pretty good spacing with Farmar and Sasha hovering outside, Ariza will have to find a midrange game, Odom would be the anchor of the unit and we'll see if Mihm can get some of his offensive game back.
Then the starters would rotate back in. Where does Walton fit in this scenario? What about Turiaf? I'd like to keep Turiaf as injury protection but some other team may just make him a good offer.
I like MBenga as a person but... come on... dude is a stiff, he may get a little better but... hopefully Mihm will be ok otherwise... this is why I'd be all for bringing back Kwame. The 2nd unit would be pretty solid, we wouldn't need Kwame to score at all. MBenga isn't an offensive threat either - he just hasn't been studied yet by players around the league so whatever cute little shot he comes up with will eventually be STUFFED. I'd rather have Kwame's giant calves back there putting some wear and tear on the other team's starting Center. Then Bynum could come back in and whale on him.
That's a 10 deep lineup right there, and if we still have Luke, he would be the 11th in case there are any injuries.
Posted by: Kwammas Brownus the III | June 25, 2008 at 02:49 PM
Wow a long post to say little.
Do you really believe Luke Walton can shoot 3's? Yeah right like every time he came in his defender played off him and ignored his shooting ability as he could not hit the ocean with a rock.
Mbenga is better than Mihm as he is bulkier, faster, less foul prone and cheaper. Definitely not a stiff.
Kwame Browns hands of stone who missed passes and when got them he botched up dunk.
Yes we are deep and we were last year but that did us no good as PJ refused to use the bench and played Luke like a sixed player instead of 10th or 11th. No matter what the tools they do us no good if not used.
Posted by: JustaLakerFan | June 25, 2008 at 08:18 PM
what about SUN YUE!! he could be a great off the ball defender.
Posted by: Aman | June 25, 2008 at 03:34 PM
---------------------
I say leave him in china to develop more. Why add to payroll when PJ will only sit him on bench and he will get little to no run? J. Buss already spent a lot on players that PJ refuses to play, why add another?
Posted by: JustaLakerFan | June 25, 2008 at 08:21 PM
With Kwame, 1st round
Without Kwame, Finals.
Enough already.
Posted by: p ang | June 25, 2008 at 08:44 PM
Wow, this offseason is mighty boring. Big news is JO to Toronto. Should anyone care? I sure don't. I wish the Lakers had a few more picks just to make things interesting tomorrow. However, it will be entertaining to see what moves the other teams make. Last years draft made the C's. Wonder if anyone will step up like that this year? Anyways, hopefully the Lakers stay out of the news for bad reasons. I guess a quiet offseason is 100x better than last offseason.
Odom = Laker for Life
GO LAKERS
Posted by: mrbarneydangles | June 25, 2008 at 09:19 PM
I read on ESPN.com that Marc Stein thinks that we will make an effort to get Artest, which in principle, I'm ok with, but not if we can't get him with the MLE, which is unlikely, and also definitely not if the Kings demand we take Kenny Thomas and his albatross of a contract and give them Odom. After having a week to convalesce, I really think the best spot for Odom is 6th man, and that could be a tremendous option if we can track down a starting small forward. I am coming to grips with the notion of giving Vlad Rad another year - he showed flashes of brilliance, particularly in the 1st quarter, which is what we really need if we bring LO off the bench. That will keep LO out of foul trouble and take even more pressure off of him- which makes him more effective. We also need to resign Sasha - even if someone offers him the MLE, we need to match it. He is a critical piece to the puzzle. We then need to use our MLE for a tough guy on the front line - I still like Kurt Thomas with that deal.
Posted by: Lincoln Laker | June 25, 2008 at 09:21 PM
Mike T.
Welcome Back Bro....I always gotta give a shot out to one of the original bloggers.. But you gotta admit Bynum had developed into a strong interior presence on both ends of the court.
On the defense of end he would clean up the boards the other team would get only one shot attempt. On the offensive of end he was beginning to get Offensive rebounds. I just think we need to sign another defensive player. I think Phil should have use Newble a little more. We signed him for SF heavy built like pierce. Luke was giving us nothing on either end of the court.
Posted by: Paul Lee | June 25, 2008 at 09:22 PM
LakerTom,
Team USA has only one legitimate Center, Dwight Howard but two other guys who are really PF can play C like Boozer and Bosch. It could have been more balanced if Ray Allan, Amare and KG joined the team, unfortunately they prefer to have their rest period in Summer than represent USA in the Olympics. What the team needs is perimeter D because international teams love the 3 pt. shooting that could be the reason why there are more guards in that line up with Wade, Kobe, Deron, Chris and Kidd. Kidd will be the veteran among the veterans.
Finally, Larry Bird got rid of Jermaine O'Neal who have not helped the Pacers advanced in the Eastern Conference. They started to go down when Ron Artest, Jackson and Harrington were traded who excelled during the time of Coach Carlyle. Next season, the Pacers will become the Grizz' of the East on a rebuilding mode.
With regards to comment of Mike T. he may be right on Laker softness in the post while the refs. were not calling those rugged fouls being committed wantonly by PJ Brown, Perkins, Posey and KG, they were blatant fouls pulling the hands of Gasol, LO including Kobe a lot of pushing and shoving in the post. They called it sealing the paint. PJ never trusted his reserves to return the favor like Mbenga and Newble or even Ariza, he instead played Sasha, Farmar and Walton for too long minutes to do defensive tasks on players much taller than them. Indeed, defense really wins Championship that's why playoff basketball has different flavor than the 82 games. Next season, hopefully we have Bynum if the whole team does not play D., he will just be worthless b/c he will foul out in stopping every player driving or dunking in the paint. Someone compared this to Showtime Lakers of '84 and won with the same personnel in '85 that's a stretch in comparison to compare Kareem/Magic/Worthy/Scott/Cooper to the '08 Lakers... give me a break! It is best not to compare any eras because players have changed, situations are now different, even the attire on shorts belongs to different generation, let us just stick to this era.
Posted by: Edwin Gueco | June 25, 2008 at 09:24 PM
If I may add further, yes we need defense but not Kwame Brown. He is an atrocious player without any fundamental knowledge of shooting, catching, dunking or even a decent lay up. There is a thin red line of difference between the lay up of Kwame and Walton, both have low percentage of making them. If Kwame was not traded, Lakers would have been in the lottery pick this season and Kobe opts out next season.
Posted by: Edwin Gueco | June 25, 2008 at 09:31 PM
exhelodrvr - dr. miguelito loveless (very hard man to defend against).
Posted by: dave m | June 25, 2008 at 09:49 PM
Do You See What I See,
No I don't see what you see. Why trade anyone? The Lakers were a mystery "foul" on Paul Pierce at the end of game 2, and a failure to hold on to a 24 point lead away from winning the whole thing, without Andrew Bynum. And Ariza, was not 100%, and did not get alot of minutes. You think any team will be at the Lakers level next year? Not even close. Just stop with all the trade Lamar BS.
Posted by: laker hopeful | June 25, 2008 at 10:10 PM
Dear Let's Go C's!
I agree with Laker Tom.
I think you should start calling me some names, also.
I'm pretty sure there are a lot of other "ladies" here, too.
Calling us names hurts our feelings. So does burning our tongues with our hot non-fat soy lattes.
Just wondering, where do Boston types go for their vacations? Cape Cod? Martha's Vineyard? Maine? I have no idea.
I live in Laguna Niguel. Google it. Look at some pictures. It's pretty nice. We root for the Lakers here. It's the best of both worlds - Mediterranean climate, and all those championships, with more on the way.
Enjoy your summer...
And Go Pats!
Posted by: karyanr | June 25, 2008 at 10:17 PM
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡ENOUGH KWAME BROWN TALK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
As your fellow blogger, I encourage from time to time, in a respectful manner, to question one's logic. No subject shall ever be taboo to me, ...unless it includes the name above. Anyone who talks about Kwame Brown returning in some way, shape, or form to the Lakers organization will not be tolerated by me. Your post will be ignored and you will be deemed a fool. Bring up Kwame returning to the Lakers to me, in person, and...I COLLECT YOUR F'ING HEAD!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w2tD3uDqEUg
Posted by: ajax | June 25, 2008 at 10:45 PM
laker hopeful
just playing armchair GM like a lot of us like to do. It's a lot of fun and it would be great to see a blogger have a trade right.
you must have missed the post when I said standing pat was an option, but there is no fun in that this time of year.
by the way, I see SA, Portland, Utah, NO, and Houston making moves to get better and be quite formidable
Posted by: Do You See What I See | June 25, 2008 at 10:57 PM
Jon K.
Quinton Ross??? are you being facetious? or have you seen something that stats don't show?
Career Stats
4.8 ppg
2.5 rpg
1.2 apg
43% fg
28% 3pt fg
please expound
Posted by: Do You See What I See | June 25, 2008 at 11:12 PM
Am I the only one that thinks Larry Bird must be kicking himself right about now?
He had a choice: Bynum or Lamar.
Instead, he has TJ Ford
As Michael Cooper would say in the Sizzler commercial "I gotcha Larry. I gotcha"
Now what about Frankenstein McHale? That guy could have had BOTH Bynum & Lamar.. but does he care?
Nope.
All he really wanted was a Celtics championship, and getting it at our expense only made him feel vindicated further...
I hope those in Minnesota hang him out to dry.
As Generic_One (favorite Seattlite on Lakersblog) would tell you....
Never trust a Zombie.
Posted by: Tim-4-Show | June 25, 2008 at 11:31 PM
what a shame....Let's go c's doesn't exist anymore, let's all ignore him. BTW, I thought Cheers was a crappy show. .....I heard you should never call a woman the "c" word, I think we misinterpreted his "c" all along....
Look for the "c's to draft Jabba the Hut, they already have a uniform that fits him, it's the spare for any of their finely tuned athletes.
The c's are gone, "let's go c's" take em away, please, go back to your own world. By the way, isn't it appalling to you that the big Thicket lives in SoCal???? That would make him....like a....traitor. Thanks though for the tea party a while back, ....why don't you call your team the Boston Teabaggers (oops!).....we owe it all to Boston. Call Shaq, he may want to comment, he's an expert in that area. The End, I'm done with that loser.
Posted by: humanomaly | June 25, 2008 at 11:55 PM
This blog is AWESOME.
Fool, Fakers and Freaks.
Boston is where the real fans are. You don't see Bostonians hate on its legends and stars. Half of this blog hates your Starlet Bryant.
Your Starlet Bryant hates on his teammates, GM and owner. Your Starlet Bryant cares about being the Boss rather than win.
Your former 3-times Finals MVP hates your Starlet Bryant and calls him out years after his UGLY departure.
Your Starlet Bryant pretends to be Jordan, but disappears in the Finals, all the while making a history by getting blown out by 40-points AND droping the worst collaps in NBA Finals history.
BIGGEST COLLAPS IN FINALS HISTORY!!!!!
AHAHAHAHAAHHAHA
And you Fools, Fakers and Freaks sit hear pretending that all you need is Yound Bynum, who's played 15 good games averaging 14 points and 10 rebounds, as the savior.
Hey, Shaq O'neal averaged 14 and 10 in Phx and the Fat Guy is 100 years old.
hahahaaahahah
Pathetic.
Posted by: Let's go C's! | June 25, 2008 at 11:59 PM
Let's go C's!/Butler!,
Shame on you for your "lady" comments towards us Laker fans, especially LakerTom. We're just all shook up!!! You're just envious because of the fact that he has a great command of the English language and ability to convey key points of discussion that are SENSIBLE to all bloggers. Jealously is a bad, bad thing!
Apparently, you did not read my special message to you on the DJ Mbenga/Chris Mihm blog and others. It will surely put you in your proper place my dear lady. If you have already, what's up doc! Cold feet? Respond if you so dare!
Guess what honeybunches of oats, I'm a new "lady" in town. I plan to be around! Get used to it! BTW, you might want to buy a bar of soap to wash your badgeless hubby to be Shaqster's own rear end. Tragic indeed!
Nothing but luv adversary! Laker pride through adversity baby! Peace!
Posted by: Let's go L's! | June 26, 2008 at 12:25 AM
Raise your hand if you are a KNOW NOTHING LAKERS FAN- who has never played basketball and goes to Lakers games to "look for celebrities"!!!!
What a bunch of horrible sports fans in LA.
I know- "there is so much to do in LA we don't follow sports."
NO- you are just terrible sports fans- and metrosexuals to boot.
Posted by: Larry Bird | June 26, 2008 at 06:55 AM
ajax,
Nice Kill Bill reference! Too bad we can't get O-Ren or The Bride on our team, that would shore up the "softness" problem that people claim we have.
-bozz-
Posted by: bozz | June 26, 2008 at 07:19 AM
I don't know why so many are crowning Andrew Bynum as our savior. The kid is very talented, that is for sure. But, and this is a big but, he hasn't played more than 30 games in a season throughout his whole life! That's a huge question to answer, when we expect to play 100 games each year. I think Lakerfans are doing themselves a disservice relying on Bynum alone to bring home the championship. I remember during the regular season Kendrick Perkins had no problems shoving around Bynum.
We need to be able to matchup with the Celtics. Even with Bynum, we cannot match up with the Celtics best player and main force; Paul Pierce. We need someone who can take Pierce out of his game. To me, that someone is Shane Battier, a 6'9, strong defender who can spread the floor by shooting the 3 very well. Plus he's a class individual, team player, championship pedigree. He'd be a great Laker, better than Rick Fox. Most importantly, he has what it takes to control Paul Pierce 1 on 1.
Battier makes about 7-8 million a year which is a bargain. I think he'd be the perfect guy to take that SF position, even better than Lamar.
Mitch Kupchak, get on the phone and try to get Battier w/o trading Lamar if possible.
Garnett/Gasol---check
Allen/Kobe-------check
Pierce/Battier----check
Defense wins championships! We have plenty of offense.
Go Lakers!
Posted by: Rocky | June 26, 2008 at 07:31 AM
Michael C. Teniente,
For a person with absolutely no credibility, you continue to surprise.
Even though I disagree with your assessment about whether or not the Lakers would have advanced with Kwame Brown, I did find your argument to be eloquent.
GO LAKERS!
Posted by: Jon K. | June 26, 2008 at 07:48 AM
Artest, 28, visited the Lakers' locker room during the NBA Finals and has spoken glowingly of Kobe Bryant in the past, but he told the Mason and Ireland Show on KSPN-AM (710) that it "looks like I'm going to be a King next year" before saying he would "never" take less money to play for a championship contender.
"Not in a million years," he said. "Actually, not in 10 million years."
Haha. Do you guys still want this guy in a Lakers uniform? Wow, I'm glad he has put that rumor to rest and he is staying in cow town. I knew this guys was trouble. We don't need players apathetic towards a championship.
Posted by: Lakafo0 | June 26, 2008 at 07:48 AM
Do You See What I See,
This is a case where stats are misleading. If you know anything about Quinton Ross, you'll know that he's the Clippers defensive stopper and is almost always put on the most difficult defensive matchup.
In addition, Quinton Ross in college was a scorer. (I think he averaged 20+ points a game when he played at SMU.) He completely changed his game for the benefit of his team, making him a selfless player.
AND he is a renowned hard-worker.
AND the Clippers have been paying him only $750,000 a year despite that he starts 50% of the time for the Clippers for the last few years.
AND he's not going to resign with the Clippers. All present indication is that his agent and the Clippers are worlds apart right now.
AND he game play forward or guard.
SO, we need a flexible, defenisve-minded player at a reasonable cost who will work within the Lakers gym-rate, hard-work ethic.
Quite frankly, there ain't nobody better suited in the NBA for that role than Quinton Ross. Period.
GO LAKERS!
Posted by: Jon K. | June 26, 2008 at 07:55 AM
Forget about Artest. He's a lunatic and he's already said he won't sign with a contender for less money. He's out of the running.
Think Quinton Ross.
Defensive specialist. Hardworker. Selfless player. Affordable.
GO LAKERS!
Posted by: Jon K. | June 26, 2008 at 07:56 AM
By the way, L.A. Times states that Shaq's six rap albums sold a total of 20 copies last year... all of which were bought by Butler.
GO LAKERS!
Posted by: Jon K. | June 26, 2008 at 07:57 AM
lets go C's
i'm telling you again, your cavs lost...get over it.,.its pathetic...trying to pretend to be a celtics fan...we know u are a cavs fans ......,,you disillusional fool....
better get king james some help....
Posted by: laker32 | June 26, 2008 at 07:59 AM
By the way, Laker Nation?
Please starve the Troll.
Starve the Troll.
I mean, come on. We our compromising our collective dignity by even addressing that this moron exists.
GO LAKERS!
Posted by: Jon K. | June 26, 2008 at 08:00 AM
Good morning Mamba24, Charles & the morning CRUE! Good morning Laker Nation!
Probably no time to post today, but my heart is here. I've noticed there are a lot of trolls ID'd and wounded, but not too much starving going on. PLEASE - STARVE THE TROLLS! Maybe they will go back home to mama to get fed & leave us alone for awhile.
Then again, stupid is as stupid does.
OR - it could be that the purpose of their lives is merely to serve as a warning example to others.
Have a great day Laker Family!
Posted by: justanothermambafan | June 26, 2008 at 08:03 AM
From Mike Bresnehan of the LA Times:
"Artest, 28, visited the Lakers' locker room during the NBA Finals and has spoken glowingly of Kobe Bryant in the past, but he told the Mason and Ireland Show on KSPN-AM (710) that it "looks like I'm going to be a King next year" before saying he would "never" take less money to play for a championship contender.
"Not in a million years," he said. "Actually, not in 10 million years."
------------------
Don't want Artest. He isn't championship material. He isn't hungry enough.
http://tinyurl.com/4499oa
--Fearless
F the F'ing Celtics
Posted by: Fearless | June 26, 2008 at 08:04 AM
Draft Day!
I'll have an Anchor Steam followed by a Pilsner Urquell.
GO LAKERS!
Posted by: Jon K. | June 26, 2008 at 08:26 AM
Forget about Artest. He's a lunatic and he's already said he won't sign with a contender for less money. He's out of the running.
Think Quinton Ross.
Defensive specialist. Hardworker. Selfless player. Affordable.
GO LAKERS!
Posted by: Jon K. | June 26, 2008 at 07:56 AM
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jon K-
I couldn't agree more. We don't need a "big piece". Its not like we got really old this offseason or anything. I think Artest would be the worst thing we could do. Talk about chemistry issues. I've seen Quinton Ross play but have never really payed attention to him. I'll take your word. He would especially prove helpful if we somehow lose Sasha. We need defense and Quinton seems defensive minded. Plus, I think Lamar on the bench is dumb. Keep him with the first unit for sure. He always plays the first few minutes of the second quarter with the second unit anyways.
Lamar = Laker for Life
GO LAKERS
Posted by: mrbarneydangles | June 26, 2008 at 08:27 AM
laker32,
Cavs fans are crazy delusional.
I was at a Cleveland bar recently and I overheard the following statement. And I quote...
"Man, I don't know why everyone thinks Jordan is such a big deal. LeBron has accomplished everything Jordan has AND MORE... except for the championships and all."
Delusional.
GO LAKERS!
Posted by: Jon K. | June 26, 2008 at 08:30 AM
JustALakerFan
>>>Odom off the bench makes the most sense from what I see.
I mostly agree with this. If Lamar spends all summer working on his outside jumper and comes
into camp hitting 40% of his 3's, then I might change my mind. But having him as a wing player
and shooting 27% (or whatever he shot) from 3 allows defenses to sag off of him and clog the
lane. Thus, I'd rather have the starting SF be either a better defender (Ariza) or a better shooter
(Radmanovic).
Now PJ just has to convince Lamar that he'll be the next Manu Ginobili. :-)
I think Lamar could be a stabilizing presence with the bench mob. The bench mob is more of
a running team and Lamar can keep up with them.
>>>>what about SUN YUE!! he could be a great off the ball defender.
>>I say leave him in china to develop more. Why add to payroll when PJ will
>>only sit him on bench and he will get little to no run? J. Buss already spent
>>a lot on players that PJ refuses to play, why add another?
I'm kinda torn on this one.
You're probably correct that Sun Yue wouldn't get a lot of minutes playing with the Lakers.
But the difference between Sun Yue and someone like MBenga or Newble is that those guys
were "rentals", while Yue would be a young player that they're grooming for the future. Newble
was brought in for depth in case Ariza never made it back. And MBenga was brought in to
give
depth at center where they already had Bynum and Mihm out. I never expected either of
those guys to see any big minutes.
Farmar didn't get a lot of minutes his rookie season, but as his game matured, he's gotten
more and more minutes and become a solid contributer to the team. If Sun Yue comes to
the Lakers and works as hard on his game as Farmar does, the same will be true for him.
Even if they leave Sun Yue playing for Chinese teams for 3 more years, he's still not going
to come to the Lakers and start his first season. Why not let him come in and start to learn
the triangle and learn how to play the NBA rules instead of international rules.
On the other hand, I'm with Jon K that someone like Quentin Ross would be much more useful
to the Lakers right now than Sun Yue. A defensive guy off the bench.
But I will point out that Sun Yue has good size and speed and is a good shot blocker. He
could conceivably play PG, SG, or SF for the Lakers, depending on how he develops.
Posted by: Long Time Laker Fan | June 26, 2008 at 08:45 AM
Charles,
What about Herman Munster? He has a great attitude.
But if he were a Celtic, he would probably be the 12th man on their all-time ugly team.
Posted by: exhelodrvr | June 25, 2008 at 05:11 PM
Sir Ex,
They already have Scala-weeine for 3 years at $15 million. Thanks for the reply.
Posted by: | June 26, 2008 at 08:46 AM
Let's go C's,
I know you have posters of MAAHKY MAHK and NEW KIDS ON THE BLAAHK on your wall!!! Pathetic!!! Take those down and put up REAL MEN like SHACK or GNASH!! HAHAHAHA!!
CELTIKS STINK!!!!!
Posted by: BOOOTLER | June 26, 2008 at 09:07 AM
Hi All - good morning!
Where's pig? We need him to help eat these lame trolls. It's kind of annoying but I am now scrolling thru to the regulars.
Even on draft day there is not a lot of news. I am more interested to see what the Clips and Warriors will do since the Lakers are going to have a VERY quiet Summer.
GO LAKERS!
Posted by: PsychedLakerGirl | June 26, 2008 at 09:07 AM
Let's go C's,
Stop listening to that NEW KIDS on the BLAAHK album and listen to REAL MUSIC that's made by artists like SHACK!!!
BAAAHSTON is TERRIBLE in the summer that's why kaygee lives in L.A.!!! What a traitor that your leader can't even live in BAAAHSTON!!!
CELTIKS STINK!!!!!
Posted by: BOOOTLER | June 26, 2008 at 09:10 AM
Edwin Gueco,
>>>Someone compared this to Showtime Lakers of '84 and won with the same personnel
>>>in '85 that's a stretch in comparison to compare Kareem/Magic/Worthy/Scott/Cooper to
>>>the '08 Lakers...
You have the benefit of looking back at those players after they have already won several
championships and produced long and productive careers. Can you see the future? Do
you know what the eventual legacy of Jordan Farmar, Andrew Bynum, Sasha Vujacic,
Trevor Ariza, Kobe Bryant, Pau Gasol, Derek Fisher, and Lamar Odom will be?
In 2020, people may look back and see them as the group that lost their composure in `08
against the Celtics and never regained it. Or they may look back at them as the next Laker
Dynasty after the Shaq and Kobe dynasty.
But if you didn't have the benefit of knowing how anything of the Showtime stars' careers
turned out and you compared their outlook after the 1984 finals to the outlook of the current
Lakers, you would see the obvious parallels. Best offensive team in the league. Just beaten
by a hard-nosed (sometimes cheap shot taking) Boston team. Media calling them soft. The
only question is whether this year's Lakers will rebound, make it back to the finals, and
overcome that label like those `84 Lakers.
By the end of the `84 season, Magic, Kareem, and Cooper were the only Lakers on that team
who had really proved themselves at the championship level.
Worthy averaged 14.5 points and 6.3 rebounds that season. He hadn't made an all-star
team yet or achieved anywhere near the level of success we now know him capable of.
I'd say peoples estimation of Gasol's skills are roughly equivalent of the way Worthy was
viewed at the time (of course 20 people are going to call me an idiot comparing Gasol to
Big Game James, but I'm talking Worthy in `84 here, not Worthy with 10 more years of playing,
4 championship rings, 7 all-star appearances, and 1 finals MVP. All of that happened years
later.
It was Byron Scott's rookie season. And he performed well for a rookie, averaging 10.6 points. He was a confident player, some would even say cocky.
Michael Cooper was a great 6th man, and known as a defensive stopper, but much of his
reputation was to come in subsequent years guarding Bird or DJ in the finals.
But anyone who was a Laker fan at that time will tell you that the story running in the media
at that time was that the Lakers were soft, and they'd never be able to beat the stronger
Celtic defense. It was when they played the Celtics (and Philadelphia and Detroit) in several
NBA Finals and won several championships that those players you mentioned EARNED their
reputation of one of the greatest teams ever assembled.
But after the `84 finals, people were saying they were a "finesse" team who would never
be able to match the Celtics strength and intensity.
They were wrong.
Posted by: Long Time Laker Fan | June 26, 2008 at 09:13 AM
The Quinton Ross posts are making me laugh.
Ross is a poor-man's Trevor Ariza, and possibly even more gangly and skinny than Trevor - he would only further add to the growing list of swing men on the Lakers who aren't strong enough to guard bigger SFs.
Posted by: Absolute Truth | June 26, 2008 at 09:14 AM
Let's go C's,
You should move here to SHACK'S AZ!! That's where the sorry CELTIKS will be all next season anyway!! GNASH will embarass paula and kaygee the traitor!!!
Move to SHACK'S AZ!!! There's some GOOD VIBRATIONS for you there!!! FEEL IT, FEEL IT!!!
hahahahahahaha!!!
CELTIKS STINK!!!!!
Posted by: BOOOTLER | June 26, 2008 at 09:16 AM