A result Robert Louis Stevenson might have authored, were he a sports novelist
Why? Because this 115-111 fall to the Warriors closely resembled the plot line of "Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde," one of his classic and timeless works. Split personalities to the strongest of degrees. The first half was the Mr. Hyde" persona, the one completely out of control and often beyond hideous to look at. Scary as all get out, too. The second half, however, was all about the more refined Dr. Jekyll. And like that quack when he wasn't drinking his bad seed elixir, the Lakers were sophisticated, refined, efficient, crowd pleasing and earning the town's respect during that time period. Kobe Bryant and Lamar Odom were the biggest purple and gold Jekyll's down the stretch, making some huge plays to transform what appeared to be a blow out into a seriously contested showdown. And for a while, a happy ending appeared in the works, despite all odds. But in the end, this game and the novella shared one distinct element in common.
Things don't end well for Jekyll, Hyde or the Laker box score.
The breakdown is below.
THE GOOD
The second half discipline: After spending the opening 24 minutes attempting to pass themselves off as a Run n' Gun Warriors Xerox (one where the machine needed a LOT more ink to produce a useful copy), the Lakers settled down and began forcing their will upon Golden State. More looks inside. More ticks allowed on the 24-second clock before firing (which typically produced better and more successful shots). More defense (The Warriors were held to 26% from the field). More care of the ball (only four turnovers). Had the Lakers adopted this mindset from the jump, or at least by a few minutes into the second quarter, there's no doubt in my mind they'd have come out on top. Phil Jackson would seem to agree. "We had a large gap to make up in that third quarter. Probably took a lot of energy to get there, but we just couldn't make a stop down the stretch."
Lamar Odom: A career-high 22 boards (13 of which came on the offensive side) reflects a night where LO, even by his own high standards, was all about cleaning the glass. But after a first half featuring 2-6 shooting and four turnovers, LO really came on strong. The faulty shooting continued throughout the evening (6-19), but he kept attacking and visited the stripe seven times, where he earned a 100% mark. He tapped back a Luke Walton miss to tie things up 101. One of his four blocks nixed a Baron David layup what would have put Golden State up by 6 with under two minutes to go. All in all, LO was all over the place down the stretch and typically making good things happen. I understand why fans worried that Pau Gasol's injury would simultaneously hurt LO, given how Odom hasn't consistently succeeded when thrust into a "second option" role. I think it's fair to say that, all in all, the dude has stepped up not just tonight, but since that unfortunate game in The Big Easy.
Kobe Bryant: Let's be honest. Bryant's first half was hardly Mamba-riffic. 4-12 shooting. A trio of turnovers. The same propensity to huck some quick (and bad) shots as his supporting cast. But man alive, did Kobe play himself some sick ball after the halftime Gatorade and orange slices. 9-18 shooting (3-7 from distance) for 27 points. Nine rebounds. Five assists. A clean turnover clip. A three ball sunk to bring the team back within one with just under a minute left. Another three ball to bring them back within one with just under 30 seconds left. Just the kind of monster performance that's keeping Kobe in the thick of the MVP race (and if you read Don Nelson's comments below, you'll see some Bay area support coming his way).
Kobe's behind the back-spin-regain the handle-wrap around to Ronny for the "and one" dunk that tied things up at 95: If you actually read this description, need I really explain why this fell into the "good" category?
THE BAD
Everything in the first half: I'm not saying this to either make use of hyperbole or avoid being specific. I'm just being blunt. Little, if anything, happened in that first half would remotely qualify in my mind as even "mediocre," much less good. The events taking place left little to be desired. Horrible, rushed shots with zero ball movement in any direction, much less inside. Fourteen turnovers trying to ride with Golden State's break-neck pace, a few of which were actually startling (Walton with careless turnovers on consecutive possessions, Ronny Turiaf leading Sasha Vujacic about six rows into the stands on another). 25 points scored by the Warriors off those turnovers. Defense that wasn't great to begin with, but made worse by continually remaining on their heels as a result of the pace on display (18 Golden State fastbreak points). Way too much Monta Ellis in the paint. The Lakers got completely caught up in Golden State's tempo and abandoned their game in the process. No Laker that stepped on the court wasn't guilty on some level.
When asked about the issues in the first half, both PJ and LO reflected upon what I just talked about, the inability not to play in Warrior fashion. "I wasn't happy that we didn't get the ball inside the right way and do the things that make us a team that has always hurt (the Warriors). We just got away from it. We got a little helter skelter trying to run with their tempo a little bit too much. The second unit got a little wacky out there and lost their poise." Lamar Odom concurred that the Purple and Gold opted for rapid jumpers over a methodical, balanced effort. Any by the time they did something about it? "It's too late," admitted Lamar with a shake of his head.
Interestingly enough, Kobe had a different take. From his perspective, the problem wasn't the Lakers trying to play like the Warriors, but rather the way the Warriors were guarding them. "We're pretty dedicated to our style of play. That first half took us a little getting used to, in terms of how quick their hands are. They're really, really, quick, so you really have to be careful with the basketball." I'll agree with Bryant on that particular sentiment, but I'm going to have to politely disagree when he assessed it as his team having more problems with the Warriors' defense than their O.
Ronny Turiaf passing up a few too many inside: All in all, Ronny played himself a nice game (and has by in large done a very good job filling in for Pau Gasol). But there were a few occasions during the game where he passed up a pretty good look inside to pass out. The results weren't good and, in one case, led to a three-second violation called. As the back-to-back career assists (6) hit by Ronny against Utah and Seattle, Turiaf is clearly capable of finding an open man. But sometimes you need to take what's in front of you and on these occasions, Ronny appeared either gun shy or just intent on making one too many passes.
There was also a heated exchange at one point between Turiaf and Jordan Farmar, which didn't exactly make The Zen Master pleased as punch. He was willing to chalk up these "disturbances" in team play to youth and kids not always knowing "how to keep their mouth shut and take advice and not retort immediately." In and of itself, not a panic button situation. But also not the composure you're seeking out during a comeback.
The guarding of Stephen Jackson with a minute or so to go: Back to back Jax from behind the arc. The first three ball came after some miscommunication between Fish and Walton after both pursued Monta Ellis heading towards the rack after a switch. I can't confidently say for sure who was at fault on the play (Walton's explanation is below), but somewhere, a breakdown took place. Jackson's next three was just Fish providing a guy red hot from distance way too much space. Dude ain't afraid to take a big shot like that and if you offer it, the ball's going up.
The effects of Easter: I'm not knocking the holiday itself, of course. But it's safe to say, the observance of this holy day didn't necessarily meld with focused round ball. "It was Easter Sunday," lamented Jackson. "I didn't have a shoot around this morning. Sometimes you just have to honor that day. It was one of those things where they just weren't focused when they came."
LUKE WALTON
On what happened on the defensive end of Stephen Jackson's first three-pointer during the final minute
"He (Ellis) went away from the pick and then they reset it, and to me it looked like Derek kind of got hit and was a step behind, so I called out "switch," and Derek was playing the centerfield. Then (Ellis) knocked me off balance, and then at that point Derek came to him to pick him up, because I was backpedaling. I was in the key at that point, and that's when (Ellis) kicked it out. I didn't see if there was anyone back there that could have rotated to Stephen (so he tried to close). There's different ways to defend it- you can switch, you can plug and recover to your own guy, you can show and recover- it kind of depends on the personnel and how much time is left on the shot clock. At that point, I felt that I saw that Derek on the other side of the screen, so that's why I tried to pick (Ellis) up. We practice on all of those scenarios."
On it often being hard to hear
"It is sometimes, but you yell as loud as you can and hope that your teammate can hear you."
On what could have happened if Walton didn't lose his balance (which PJ said after the game he thought was an offensive foul)
"Then he would have stayed on Jackson. I felt I did a good job of stopping the initial penetration. I had my body squared up to him and then I felt like shoved a little with his forearm, and that's when Fish probably made the judgment, "Well, he's wide open from 15, so let me run at him and make him make the extra pass."
WARRIORS COACH DON NELSON
On Kobe's validity as an MVP candidate
"He's my vote for MVP. He's the best of the best and deserves the award more than, I think, anybody else and I hope he gets it. He's a marvelous player, makes everybody else better. There isn't anything that he doesn't do. He's a pretty sensational player. I have enjoyed watching him all these years and I have enjoyed coaching him in one All-Star game when he got MVP."
AK



Hey Blog,
The Lakers lost last night simply for lack of effort in the first half, and they learned a lesson because of it. Jordan and Sasha were trying to compete with GS by playing their game, and were torched in the first half because of it.
The Laker defense was fabulous in the second half, save a couple of possessions. The end of the game was especially disappointing because of the Lakers not forcing the Warriors into taking shots closer to the bucket. In both of the possessions where Jackson hit threes, the Laker defense sagged. No point in letting them take a three when you need a one possession game.
We lost because the team - much like Dallas when we faced them last week - came out lacking intensity. The Lakers took the Warriors lightly at the beginning of the game and hence they lost. A mighty comeback that shouldn't have had to happen.
I'm looking for the Lakers to come out and make a big statement tonight in Oakland. Their pride may have been a little bruised last night. The Lakers will come out with a purpose to play defense and look to run the offense with efficiency tonight.
Lakers by 17
Oink
Oink
Posted by: "Pig" Miller | March 24, 2008 at 10:11 AM
KOBESBAD:"Lakers 59-23 , Pac Division Champs, Conference Champs"
aw kobesbad couldn't you add 1 more win and
make it an even 60-22.!
Posted by: Mamba24 | March 24, 2008 at 10:15 AM
Good morning all
Even though Jordan has a big head and even feels comfortable calling out Kobe, we should not pick on him and Luke because Mitch just might want to package those two in a trade come summer time.
Lets forego the negativity and praise their strenghts.
We cannot afford to lose those two to get a player along the lines of Andre Miller. That would be disasterous.
And to the blogger that said that Farmar was a _ick at UCLA, please stop hating, because the blog police will call you a troll. Lets just be positve about everything and everybody and we shall succeed in the future.
I love you guys
Posted by: Evil Cartman | March 24, 2008 at 10:26 AM
Good Morning Mamba24, Charles, Blog Fam,
Another glorious day in LA LA LAND!!!
Remember, it is not the loss, it's how the team RESPONDS to the loss that defines a CHAMPION. In a hostile environment, against a quality opponent that schooled us the night before, let's see how we come back.
Jordan - what's up man? Should we sign another point guard in the off-season just to keep you motivated and in line? Buddy, your ish stinks just like the rest of us.
Sasha - that was some serious "down in the mouth" looks yesterday, what's up man? Moping like your dog died or something. WAKE UP!!!
Ronny - DUNK THAT BALL MAN!!! YOU ARE TWO FEET FROM THE BASKET!!!
As the pressure rises, our younger players are feeling the heat. This is how champions are defined. They learn from their mistakes and improve every game. Let's hope our guys have the mettle to grow and not crumble.
BELIEVE IT!
KOBE FOR MVP!!!
KOBE FOR MVP!!!
KOBE FOR MVP!!!
Posted by: drewpaukobe | March 24, 2008 at 10:32 AM
Random Observations:
-Lamar is turning me into a believer....again.
-Regarding Ronnie's overpassing, I'm not worried about it whatsoever. He knows what he did wrong, and will make adjustments going foward. It's an easy fix.
-However, there are no adjustments that can be made to fix Luke's game, aside from a 6 million dollar bionic body transplant and a brain transpant.
-Luke is this generation's Mark McNamara, except Luke actually gets minutes.
-Farmar was getting abused by Monte Ellis, and made the game personal. Simliar to the time Farmar STOLE the ball from his teammate, Sasha, for the easy layup, he was selfishly ignoring the game plan, as well as his teammates.
-Farmar might've come colse to breaking Luke's all-time Laker record for most shots blocked in a game last night.
-If Chris Webber was on the floor for the Warriors in the last few minutes, I have not doubt the Lakers woud've won.
Posted by: LAKER TRUTH | March 24, 2008 at 11:19 AM
Jon K,
"You beat the Warriors by not playing their game, unfortunately we decided to play their game for some reason that I am presently unable to comprehend."
Two reasons, I think, both of which speak to the "immaturity" of this roster (including the experienced players like Kobe, Lamar, and Fisher.)
1) I think all basketball players enjoy playing that style more even though they may not have the conditioning or skill set to do it well.
2) If someone "dares you" to do something on the court, it is human nature to try and do whatever you were "dared" to do.
The Warriors "dare" other teams to play their style, and the natural reaction is to accept the dare. The mature reaction is to continue to play whatever style your team does best. (Think Spurs.)
Posted by: exhelodrvr | March 24, 2008 at 11:39 AM
AK- The Lakers got back into the game the same way they were blown out in the first half- by getting early offense. The defense on the Lakers wasnt signficantly different from one half to the other, they stopped playing give away , Fish got hot and g state went cold. Its that simple, had little if anything to do with defense, unless you mean rebounding and the lakers didnt allow many2nd shots in the 2nd half.
Watch the tape of the 3rd quarter most of the laker shots were within 10 seconds of gaining posession- early offense and GS was missing shots they made in the 1st half.
Posted by: Laker Lover | March 24, 2008 at 12:09 PM
Mamba24,
Please add me to the Championship bandwagon.
Posted by: DK | March 24, 2008 at 12:20 PM
Totally agree with exhelodrvr. That's the reason right there. Norm Nixon actually said the same thing on TV.
Posted by: LakerinBC | March 24, 2008 at 12:50 PM
Mamba24,
I would have us at 60,..but these no show games have made me think that we have at least another egg or so left in us. Good to hear from you brother. As long as the rest of my prediction comes true, with the various championship banners,..then good. Wow looks like a season where Phoenix cant hang their pacific division champ banner. When we get ours, we will give it to Rudy G or one of the towel boys to use as a dust rag to help keep staples clean.
Kobesbaaaaaaaaaaaaad (and he is)
Posted by: Kobesbad | March 24, 2008 at 12:52 PM
Laker Lover,
"AK- The Lakers got back into the game the same way they were blown out in the first half- by getting early offense. The defense on the Lakers wasnt signficantly different from one half to the other, they stopped playing give away , Fish got hot and g state went cold. Its that simple, had little if anything to do with defense, unless you mean rebounding and the lakers didnt allow many2nd shots in the 2nd half. Watch the tape of the 3rd quarter most of the laker shots were within 10 seconds of gaining posession- early offense and GS was missing shots they made in the 1st half."
I get what you're saying, and to some degree, I think it depends on how you look at it. The Laker D did actually improve in the second half, but it was the result of, as you said, being more measured with their offense. More time being used on the clock. Fewer turnovers. Better shot selection (which led to fewer run outs and fast break points). That the Lakers were able to play better defense was a result of a better offense. But that being said, they still did play better D (and, like you said, get more rebounds, often also as a result of the more proficient offense).
Does that make any sense?
AK
Posted by: Andrew Kamenetzky | March 24, 2008 at 02:28 PM
Tom,
what's up wit ya boy Farmar?
Why no comment aaaaaaallll day?
Why isnt he being a "Kobe Klone" and playing D?
He is getting beat like Smush Parker on S&Rs now-a-days...
What is the "Blog-Sync-Think" now "Sync-Thinking" that Farmar needs to get his act together?
I thought Farmar was the ultimate team player, you know, from UCLA and all?
Farmar's a good player, but we all are concerned about him..
Since you have the pulse on everything UCLA and Farmar, then why dont you let us know what the problem is...
sir... LakerTom...sir
Posted by: Korey | March 24, 2008 at 03:03 PM
AK- yep as you said it all depends what you mean by "defense". Many people say Phoenix plays no defense or Golden State plays no defense but Phoenix is actually a decent half court defensive team.
Allowing alot of points does not always indicate poor "defense". Often its the result of turnovers or missed long shots which lead to run outs and transition buckets or just playing at a faster pace- see Denver
Case in point, Detroit allowed 120 points to Denver. Does that mean they played poor defensively?
Most if not all teams are poor transition defensive teams. Ive yet to find one who is good in transition defense. Having said that I am always surprised more teams dont run more and get into transition.
Posted by: Laker Lover | March 24, 2008 at 04:54 PM