Ain't no Fish story here
PROGRAMMING NOTE: Don't forget to tune into Purple, Gold, and Blue at 11:00 am. We'll have Hoopsworld's Eric Pincus on, among other things. Click on the show widget on the side of the page.
No, you're not hearing tales of urban legend material such as Bigfoot, the chupacabra or an adorable water horse. This is a true story. The Lakers definitely beat the Grizzlies 117-101 last night. And Derek Fisher absolutely put Memphis behind the 8-Ball from moment one with a hotter than Georgia asphault. 10-11 from the field and 5-5 from distance, Fish thrilled his family and friends from nearby Little Rock with his Memphis-based shooting clinic. And according to his buddy Kobe Bryant, the point guard's stats should bear a perfect night no matter where the ball was launched. You can quibble about the performance of this pro's pro. You could also quibble that the Laker win was slightly blemished by the team's inability to absolutely stomp Memphis into the ground, as opposed to merely shutting down each rally their opponent staged. Then again, the box score's point spread was still a sugary-sweet 16, so why get caught up in the negativity? Especially when positive vibes will be needed for...
... tonight's showdown in New Orleans against the Hornets (5:00 PM PST, KCAL), who present a decidedly tougher task than Memphis. Their sting is often brought on by scary good floor general Chris Paul, who's providing a blueprint change when it comes to young lead guard style. CP3 is stat guru John Hollinger's pick to start at the point for the Western Conference All-Star squad, an honor that would team him up with, shock of all shocks, Kobe Bryant. The inevitable nod in this year's shindig will undoubtedly make Kobe happy (but won't likely touch him in the same way as his work with the Make-A-Wish foundation).
N'Awlin's center Tyson Chandler is a rebounding machine, one more reason Phil Jackson prefers playing Lamar Odom closer to the basket. But even beyond tonight's action, PJ feels it brings out the best in LO's game when he's working down low. The 4-spot isn't LO's first choice, but he won't raise any issues over the matter.



I think Kwame Brown can do the same stuff Kurt Thomas can do.
We need to allow Kwame to look god awful and hopefully we can keep him for like 3 million per yr over 2 yrs. Give him a smaller version of the Brian Cook contract.
He's a brute by God's nature and that's hard to find in the NBA. He's just not your 3rd best player as Mitch Kupchak and Phil Jackson initially setup. Now that he can be a backup center he's fine.
We will have to let him go if he thinks he can command starters money.
As for Lamar Odom, if he is retained, I think 8-9 million is a good slot for him.
Generally no one re-signs with their team at an age under 30 for less so Lamar will walk for the money and the Lakers will be fine without him. Perhaps Lamar Odom could be packaged with VladRad to bring an LO replacement this coming summer if we'd rather make the CHAMPIONSHIP run without Lamar.
Get value for him early is the idea!!!
Posted by: Lakerbake | January 09, 2008 at 02:30 PM
maxie,
>>>Yet he’s still extremely overrated (c’mon – All Star ballot??)
They're required to put at least 3 players from each team on the ballot. So
Kobe and Lamar are obvious choices, but who beyond that? Bear in mind
that they made up the ballots before the start of the season, so it's based
mostly on last season's performance.
Fisher is WAY outperforming his last few years in the league. Bynum and
Farmar hadn't emerged yet. Luke was the third best scorer and assist
person on the Lakers last season. If they made up the ballots right now,
I'll wager both Fisher and Bynum would make the ballots and Luke
wouldn't, but hindsight is 20-20.
I think there is some fan racial bias in the league, but I don't see that as
applying to Luke's situation. He has gotten his fair share of praise (e.g.
when he was leading the league in 3-point shooting) and has taken his
fair share of criticism. I don't think anyone perceives Luke as an all-star,
but then nobody thinks of Bruce Bowen as an all-star either, but both
players make valuable contributions to their teams.
I also am sure there's racial bias in the other direction - was it Mike T who
commented that a team with 3 white guys on it can't possibly win a
championship? Or was that TaosHum? I don't want to misquote someone
on making what I believe is a racist (and clearly wrong) statement.
Posted by: Long Time Laker Fan | January 09, 2008 at 02:31 PM
maxie,
>>>and the unnecessary pimping of him and others cost the Lakers
>>>players like Caron Butler(!!) – who was treated like some random
>>>disposable player.
Okay, while I agreed with most of your post, I think this part is patently false.
The Lakers traded Caron Butler because they wanted to use Lamar Odom
at the small forward (not Luke) and wanted Kwame to be their starting PF.
It would have been nice if Kwame would have been capable of playing PF.
Imagine how imposing a front line Bynum/Kwame/Odom would be. But
Luke had nothing to do with letting Caron go.
Posted by: Long Time Laker Fan | January 09, 2008 at 02:35 PM
Charles/Zakee/Faith,
I say no more than $5.5 million a year for Kwame. If he's willing to take the cut, keep him. Otherwise he can make $6 million a year playing for Seattle or $14 million for the Knicks.
GO LAKERS!
Posted by: Jon K. | January 09, 2008 at 02:37 PM
LakerLover,
You wrote: Fisher will look old and slow in this game against Paul- a quick PG, making play a zone even a better option.
I'm looking forward to this game. Similar things were said about Fish when it
came to Steve Nash and D-Fish was a FIEND against the Suns. I said the
addition of D-Fish was HUGE and so far, I'm looking like $$ in the bank on
this.
Go Lakers!
Go Kobe!
Posted by: hobbitmage | January 09, 2008 at 02:37 PM
Marty,
>>>But you know what? If the Lakers can make it to the Western
>>>Conference title game, I'll be very happy. We'll save the championship
>>>for next year.
I'm with you there, Marty. You need to walk before you can run, and the
Lakers have either been crawling or limping the last three years. If they
could make it to the Western Conference Finals this season, I think that would
show good progress and raise them up to the level of contender. Then it's
just a little tweak here and some internal growth there and a vet coming
on board over there and suddenly we'll be seeing the Lakers-Celtics in the
finals again. :-)
Posted by: Long Time Laker Fan | January 09, 2008 at 02:39 PM
I know Grant Hill's a Sun, but I feel for him. Esp. since he's a former Blue Devil. He was just on his way to beating his personal consecutive streak for not being injured. Now he's out for 2 weeks for an appendectomy. His chart must be taller than him.
I'm sure the Suns will miss him. Aw shucks.
Posted by: mel | January 09, 2008 at 02:43 PM
Lakerbake,
"I think the Lakers would have to look at un-savvy GM's or teams to get rid of VladRad's contract. "
I guess that explains why Mitch recently made Isiah Thomas #1-10 on his speed dial. haha
AK
Posted by: Andrew Kamenetzky | January 09, 2008 at 02:48 PM
Lakerbake,
" think Kwame Brown can do the same stuff Kurt Thomas can do."
You mean other than scoring and rebounding.
Posted by: exhelodrvr | January 09, 2008 at 02:48 PM
Re: Racial Bias
It exists, yes. I don't think it's over the top... such as wanting one guy to start over the other. I think fans, more than anything, want results. This is why sports has led the way eliminating racial prejudice. This doesn't mean it wasn't there for a long time or that it's gone, but certainly leading the way.
Having said that... Turiaf was the fan favorite until Coby Karl. Now the place goes nuts the moment the albino does anything remotely well. The LA media did have a love affair with Luke because the team always did so poorly when he was out.... I do not believe that PJ in anyway manipulated Luke's minutes because he was white. I haven't seen the same elation with a Luke or even a Vlad or Sasha that we've seen with the Madsen/Karls of the line-up. Not even Medvedenko was the crowd favorite.
Therefore, my formula is as follows: Crowd favorite = awkward white guy who's also a big underdog.
The racial bias by the fans is that an awkward black guy who's an underdog does not get this type of reaction. (or maybe this is because these types don't make it into the league in the first place?) I think fans liked Ronnie because of his heart surgery and his cheering on the sidelines... things unrelated to his color.
Posted by: Tim-4-Show | January 09, 2008 at 02:53 PM
"I guess that explains why Mitch recently made Isiah Thomas #1-10 on his speed dial. haha"
Exactly. It's like a poker game... the poor players (Isiah) lose to the better players (Buford).
This season we had what poker players would call dumping... intentionally losing their chips to their friends so that their friends can dominate the table with their large stacks. Stern does nothing. Of course, he's secretly very happy about the cheating because a contending Boston equals better ratings for the league.
I personally love the idea of Mitch having Isiah on speed dial. Fleece the suckers!
Posted by: Tim-4-Show | January 09, 2008 at 02:58 PM
anyone know where i could watch the orleans game online?
thanks a lot
Posted by: 1331 | January 09, 2008 at 03:16 PM
Is Kwame the best bust in the league?
I don't mean the biggest bust, as in the one who most spectacularly failed to live up to expectations. I mean the best player who was once a spectacular bust. My view is that all great busts look up the mediocre. A great bust who approaches mediocrity succeeds by his own crushed expectations. These people need to be identified so that we can point at them, laugh and feel better about our own inadequacies. In other words, it's all in good fun.
Essentially, the question is who has the best initial bustness to present crappitude ratio?
Using these guidelines, I have it Kwame and Darko, in a virtual tie behind Eddy Curry. Curry was a smaller bust and is now less crappy overall than either Kwame or Darko. Who else merits consideration?
No cheating, candidates have to be legitimate busts - you can't nominate a second rounder playing out of his mind and win on the theory that he transcended expectations. Again, like a wet T-Shirt contest, we want to see only genuine, spectacular busts.
Posted by: The D | January 09, 2008 at 03:22 PM
Xodus
Believe me, your "calves" remark was better
Funny thing is, I really did locate a SParker jersey :)
Colorado loves the Lakers!
Posted by: Hugo Boss | January 09, 2008 at 03:26 PM
The D,
I think that Shaq O'Neil is the biggest bust in the league.
Kwame is overpaid, but he is still a solid player particularly on defense and our team is on an upswing that I fully expect to continue for at least the next three years.
Shaq may have brought a championship to Miami, but his contract has crippled that organization and will do so for years to come.
GO LAKERS!
Posted by: Jon K. | January 09, 2008 at 03:30 PM
Thee D,
"Is Kwame the best bust in the league? "
I vote for Dyan Cannon.
Posted by: exhelodrvr | January 09, 2008 at 03:32 PM
Hugo Boss,
I actually figured you were serious about the jersey. That's what made it funnier to me. haha
AK
Posted by: Andrew Kamenetzky | January 09, 2008 at 03:32 PM
Tim,
I think your point is valid. Uncomfortably, there are no black "Rudy's." Perhaps, we might speculate, it's because the NBA is mostly black? What if we switched to a mostly-white sport? Broadening the inquiry thusly, the closest "Rudy" example I can think of is the Jamaican Bobsled team. I think most people get the many reasons why it's not quite the same as rooting for Rambis or Madsen.
I think it's b/c most fans are white and can relate to being the unskilled one on a sports team. Sad commentary that people often find it easier to relate to people who are of the same race.
Turiaf is in a different category altogether - his personal story is uplifting, his enthusiasm is infectious, he's not clumsy per se, and, let's face it, only seriously deranged puppy-kicking sociopaths don't love him.
Posted by: The D | January 09, 2008 at 03:43 PM
I vote JJ Reddick and Adam Morrison. Two top picks. Barely average. Already busts in year two.
Posted by: PhxLkrFan | January 09, 2008 at 03:51 PM
I must admit, I don't get the love affair with Kurt Thomas. He might indeed have POWERFUL CALVES but... if we trade Kwame AND??? and we would give up a draft pick as well??? why??? that's another question but if we did... uh... who would play backup Center? Mihm is obviously going to be a project this year, we might get a few minutes out of him still but... if we play... say... Houston, are we going to put Kurt Thomas on Yao Ming and then Turiaf? How many MINUTES will that last?
Kwame may have hands of steel but he can bang with the best of them. If we trade him, shouldn't we get at least a functional backup for the rest of the year at Center?
now... on this Kwame AND a draft pick??? for Kurt Thomas deal... you've got to be kidding me!!! I've got a little stat for you... come closer... closer...
Born: Oct 4, 1972
35! We're going to trade Kwame for a 6'9"... 35 year old!!! What??? and on top of that... we're going to give THEM a draft pick??? Shouldn't they be giving US a draft pick for such robbery??? I've done some Kwame hating around here myself but I'd much rather sit on Kwame for the rest of the year and lose him for nothing than trade him for Kurt Thomas AND give up a draft pick??? At least Kwame could help us during the playoffs guarding the Ming's and the Duncan's... are you guys telling me Kurt Thomas is going to do that? Aren't there any other 6'10"+ guys in the NBA who could play some PF/C for us?
and for the Jerome James guy... uh... no.... no, no,noooooo...
Posted by: TaosHum | January 09, 2008 at 03:53 PM
The D, Greg Oden, hands down. I did a quick jaunt through the latest drafts:
2002: Jay Williams
2003: definitely Darko
2004: Shaun Livingston and Luke Jackson
2005: I think of Bogut as a bust, #1 for HIM??? Come on... and Sean May AND Fran Vazquez who was drafted right after Bynum. Ohhh! That one's STILL gotta hurt!
2006: Adam Morrison, no doubt! and Shelden Williams
2007: Greg Oden - knee surgery and he hasn't played a game yet? C'mon! Portland can put on a brave face but this is an incredible disaster. You're looking at 3 years from now before he can POSSIBLY be an impact player - IF he remains injury free - see: SEAN MAY.
Posted by: TaosHum | January 09, 2008 at 04:05 PM
hobbitmage - no doubt fisher is a 1000 times an improvement over Smush but if Fish being a feind meant keeping Nash to 24 and 14, thats hardly anything to write home about defensively. Fisher shot the ball well against the suns.
I still ask this- if booster was such a great coach why did he start Smush the cancer for not 1 year but 2? I dont care if you have to go to the D league, everyone saw what a detriment to the team Smush was except ONE person- your 10 zillion dollar coach. Sorry thats just unforgiveable in my opinion.
Posted by: Laker Lover | January 09, 2008 at 04:09 PM
1331:
Also for everybody else who want's to see the game.
http://forum.myp2p.eu/viewtopic.php?id=24823
Posted by: Kristoffer in Norway | January 09, 2008 at 04:19 PM
Kobe- are you listening? from Andy Reid on McNabb's comments to the media
"I haven't heard Donovan talk about that, so I'm not answering it," Reid said during a wrapup news conference on New Year's Eve. "I know, as players, you have to be careful about saying that, because those are your teammates that are being replaced. Most players don't get into that, who really care about their teammates on the other side."
Did you hear Booster Boy come out and say that when Kobe asked for new teammates?
Posted by: Laker Lover | January 09, 2008 at 04:21 PM
zen....
Good point about Kobe getting other players into foul trouble. While I don't think it can explain all of his sometimes questionable shot selection, games like last night take on a different tone because he got key players into foul trouble. Darko was off to a good start but then he and Rudy Gay had to leave the game with 2 fouls in the first Q. I thought that was a big momentum changer in that game.
Tonight in NO, the Lakers have to employ the "No Peja" defense. Someone has got to get in Peja's jersey ala Rick Fox. When Sacramento was good, Fox would make it his mission in life to stop Peja, even to the point of sacrificing his own numbers. That's known as playing a specific role. Those 3's that Peja is famous for are just killers.
I look at the fact that the Lakers last played NO in November in the season's 3rd game as a positive. The Lakers are a much different, and I believe better team now. We'll see how it plays out. GO LAKERS!!!!!
Posted by: bronxlakerfan | January 09, 2008 at 04:31 PM
Laker Lover,
Phil had no other option other than Parker. Vujacic still hadn't gotten out of his own way (and still hasn't completely.) and Shammond Williams showed why he was out of the league for years. I think Smush does suck, but he put up decent numbers when he did play and was definitely outperforming the other point guards.
People act as if PJ was burying Chris Paul so he could play Smush.
Posted by: Xodus | January 09, 2008 at 04:32 PM
Laker Lover
"I still ask this- if booster was such a great coach why did he start Smush the cancer for not 1 year but 2? I dont care if you have to go to the D league, everyone saw what a detriment to the team Smush was except ONE person- your 10 zillion dollar coach. Sorry thats just unforgiveable in my opinion."
if it could be all that easy. it probably isn't saying much but there was shammond williams, a broken mckie, sasha and farmar. the opportunity was there for those guys to take that job from smush but they didn't. besides, i don't really feel that it's phil's job to necessarily find the players. that would be mitch and his team of scouts. PJ just has to work with the ones he has on the team.
Posted by: sixonezero | January 09, 2008 at 04:35 PM
Can we do a brain transplant???
Kurt Thomas' brain in Kwame Brown's body! PRONTO!
Posted by: ajax | January 09, 2008 at 04:42 PM
Guys...the Kurt Thomas for Kwame thing has been floating around the blog for about a month now and I still can't find any fault with it. Kurt is a tough as nails playoff veteran who I believe would give the Lakers a much better chance in the rough and tumble West. He's a man who knows what a hard foul is all about. Plus, playing for a team with a legitimate chance like the Lakers would rejuvanate and bring out the best in him. "Kalfee" Brown is just like a box of chocalates....you never know what you are going to get. I'd do that swap in less than a minute.
Posted by: bronxlakerfan | January 09, 2008 at 04:44 PM
TaosHum,
Only thing missing in your rant on Kurt was a comparison to a Hollywood actress:
Kwame=Kate Beckinsdale
Kurt=??
Posted by: hariyahu | January 09, 2008 at 04:51 PM
It's almost game time. I'm REALLY excited about this game.
Come on Lakers, pull out a win!!
Posted by: Xodus | January 09, 2008 at 04:58 PM
Kurt Thomas = Jennifer Aniston?
Cougar?
Posted by: Faith | January 09, 2008 at 05:08 PM
Kwame=Kate Beckinsdale - both are beautiful, neither one can act... or score under the basket... LOL!
Kurt Thomas = Helen Hunt, a workhorse in her prime, haven't seen her in years...
also, I get the feeling people are just looking at Kurt Thomas' stats. You have to remember, he's on a bad team, there's LOT'S o' stats available on a bad team, a few extra rebounds/game, an easy basket when nobody cares about the score...
Posted by: TaosHum | January 09, 2008 at 05:13 PM
Faith,
C'mon! I kinda liked Jennifer Aniston. Methinx Kurt is more like Diane Keaton (with facial hair of course):)
Posted by: hariyahu | January 09, 2008 at 05:14 PM
>>>>>>>They're required to put at least 3 players from each team on the ballot. So
Kobe and Lamar are obvious choices, but who beyond that?
Point taken. I didn’t follow the Lakers much last season, so I’m judging Luke by what I saw from him before last season and in this season. If he played most of last season like he has been for the past few games then I guess I could understand.
>>>>>>>I think there is some fan racial bias in the league, but I don't see that as
applying to Luke's situation.
From a fan and media attention standpoint, yes it does. Regarding his PT, not much but possibly indirectly.
>>>>>>>I also am sure there's racial bias in the other direction - was it Mike T who
commented that a team with 3 white guys on it can't possibly win a
championship?
Well comments like that are so blatant, outlandish, and obviously untrue to anyone not blind. But what’s often more insidious is latent, implicit bias that can be widely held yet stealth.
>>>>>>>Frankly, I view Ariza and Luke's contributions to the team as about equal
at this point. Luke is average on defense and Ariza is average on offense.
I agree there’s not a huge difference between the two, but right now I’d give Ariza the slight edge over Luke. Look at the stats – about the same even with less PT for Ariza. The offensive and defensive benefits that don’t show through stats give Ariza the edge in my opinion.
>>>>>>>The LA media did have a love affair with Luke because the team always did so poorly when he was out....
The LA media had a love affair with Luke once he was signed. I remember.
>>>>>>>I do not believe that PJ in anyway manipulated Luke's minutes because he was white.
Neither do I, which I mentioned in my post. I said PJ likes Luke but I think that’s more of a personality thing. I also said PJ couldn’t care less about a player’s color.
>>>>>>>I haven't seen the same elation with a Luke or even a Vlad or Sasha that we've seen with the Madsen/Karls of the line-up. Not even Medvedenko was the crowd favorite.
Also covered in my post. The blacks and the white non-Americans are not received the same way by some as the white American players. And Luke has and does get the elation, starting when he first became a Laker.
>>>>>>>Second, we traded Caron Butler, not because we thought highly of Luke, but only because we thought too highly of Kwame.
I’m not saying the adoration of Luke is why we lost Caron. I’m saying is that when there’s too much focus on mediocre players, really good players or potential players can fall through the cracks. It would be the same if Caron was just a FA who decided to sign elsewhere and Luke wasn’t on the roster at the same time. It’s about a comparison of the reception of the players relative to their skill and potential.
>>>>>>>Therefore, my formula is as follows: Crowd favorite = awkward white guy who's also a big underdog.
>>>>>>>The racial bias by the fans is that an awkward black guy who's an underdog does not get this type of reaction.
This is what I was getting at even with my Caron mention, because it’s not so much about Caron – he’s just one of the more successful recent ex-Lakers – but about the Devean Georges, the Kareem Rushes, and yes even the Slava Medvedenkos, Brian Cooks and Kwame Browns. Whether good, average, mediocre, or awful, there’s more a blasé or even frustrated attitude with these players unless they play consistently at All Star level – as if they can’t be just solid role players. Their bad games or plays receive more displeasure and are not excused. Their good games, skills, and attributes don’t get the same amount of hype.
Typically they are easily maligned or forgotten when they could have been or be more if given the praise, patience, encouragement and appreciation that would allow them to develop into solid players for the Lakers TEAM. Track Luke’s and Cook’s stats over the seasons. Compare the results to the difference in fan and media perception and reaction to them over the same period.
Point is, some people are more invested in seeing certain players succeed moreso than other players. That shouldn't be part of the equation is assessing what’s best for the team. On the same note we should be hoping that all players on the roster perform well and to the best of their potential. Kobe would again, the goal is championship – not proving or hoping that a few guys are good players.
Posted by: maxle | January 09, 2008 at 07:38 PM