One down, three to go
It's rare when teams get a chance to go on the road and get fat and happy. Then again, it's rare for teams to get four straight roadies against bad and/or struggling teams, as the Lakers will get this week. Cleveland (struggling), Philly (bad), and New York (cataclysmic, and apparently not big on criticism) are still to come, but Tuesday night L.A. kicked things off on the right foot with a 103-91 win over the Bulls in Chicago. It was their sixth win in their last seven tries, and it happened despite a slow night (7-19, 18 points) from Kobe Bryant. Instead, it was the supporting cast who kicked in during a solid, controlled, 48 minute effort, capped by a 20-6, game capping fourth quarter run in which 24 didn't score a point. The box shows five other players in double figures, including 19 from Sasha Vujacic, who hit six of his ten shots from the floor. L.O.? 17/16. Andrew Bynum played a career high 40 minutes. Luke Walton had a second straight solid game, with 12 points, five dimes, and no TOs.
All in all, it was a pretty satisfying end for Lakers fans, if only because it perhaps drops the lid on the "Kobe-to-the-Bulls" coffin. Kobe admitted that before the season started, he really wanted to be a Bull (fair to say some fans wanted him, too). But for now, everything is hunky dory. Besides, it was apparently just the deep dish pie that attracted him to Chicago in the first place... right? However you slice it, the Bulls are still without that One. True. Star.
It's a shame the schedule makers didn't give Kobe's teammates a chance to pull what would have been a pretty sweet practical joke.

D Fish gets a technical!
Film at 11.
Posted by: Vman | December 19, 2007 at 09:29 AM
I think it's pretty safe to say the Lakers WIN when Bynum plays. There is more than one way to skin a cat Mike.
Kareem won championships with his style. So can Bynum.
I think we can finally put the argument to rest. Kwame is going to have to work hard when he comes back to prove himself.
Posted by: zen | December 19, 2007 at 09:37 AM
The difference between shots going in and not is the difference between love and hate. Crazy way to make a living.
Sasha, the practice shooter, may have crossed over in his contract year.
His quick release and length, makes him a serious threat.
Inside to out, the more attention he and Andrew demand, the freer Kobe roams.
Posted by: Vman | December 19, 2007 at 09:38 AM
I want to give props to Mitch (cupcake) Kupchak
All the horrible things that were said. All the bad trades people want him to make and he stood firm. He stayed calm when the media and some fans were being impatient saying we need to bring in some magical veteran. The problem was, none of the magical veterans really gave a damn about anything other max deals. He never is too specific when he answers questions about the team, and that is also commendable. And when Kobe went around on all the talk shows embarrassing himself and degrading the Laker organization, Mitch handled things perfectly. I dont think that we could have a better G.M. than Mitch. We have an exciting team now, we're not salary cap strapped, and we have a team that will continue to grow for many years to come.
Posted by: Ken | December 19, 2007 at 09:40 AM
For all the Kobe haters, that say that all Kobe does is jack up shots . . .
Kobe leads all Shooting Guards in the following categories;
Rebounds
Assists
Steals
Blocks
and points per game . . .
I guess you really make it, once people start hating on you . . .
Kobe is far and away the best all-around player in the NBA, the best scorer and one of the best perimeter defenders. His work ethic is second to none. And his ability to be clutch is unquestioned . . .
where he doesnt excel, is his:
talent evaluation (but playing with jason kidd over some rookie who up until then had shown no passion)
propensity to shoot outside the offense (every player in the L does it, doesnt make it right but understandable esp when ur the absolute best)
off court decision making (enough said)
where he is getting better:
on court decsion making and leadership
--- this season he makes a conscious decision to get baby B involved, also he does his best to hit the open cutter. His leadership is in his drive to succeed, with the right mix of players around him, it is infectious. With certifiable cancers, (ie smush, kwame). Some players thrive under pressure (ie. farmar, fish)
~SA
Posted by: SA | December 19, 2007 at 09:40 AM
Also I want to point out that this is the happiest I've seen Kobe and the Lakers in a long time. IF we stay healthy, watch out!
Posted by: zen | December 19, 2007 at 09:42 AM
I'm glad Kobe stayed. I doubted Bynum and Sasha. I feel Luke plays in better rhythm if he starts. (Though I still feel his defense is a problem).
AK/BK,
Sorry I won't be able to call at 11 pm, I'm still in the office then.
Can anybody confirm that Kwame has a trade kicker in his contract?
Hate to start this early but since we don't use Kwame and Mihm, any conjured trade scenarios for that PF weed need?
Posted by: Charles | December 19, 2007 at 09:43 AM
Bynum is now #9 in blocks..
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/statistics?stat=nbablocks&league=nba&sort=blks&season=2008
Posted by: zen | December 19, 2007 at 09:43 AM
Cleveland and Philly are not teams we can sleep on. Knicks are struggling, but teams look to beat up on the Lakers all the time - even when we are not necessarily the cream of the crop. Each of the teams we are going to play is desperate to start building momentum, so we have to be prepared to match their intensity.
Posted by: | December 19, 2007 at 09:45 AM
Again, Mike T makes our case about Bynum:
>>"I saw the game and watched Wallace and Gray deny Bynum position all game long. Most of Bynum's points were off of put backs and lobs when Wallace and Gray left him to cover for their teammates."
All of which is already far more than we could ever hope from Kwame "The Walking Injury" Brown. There's simply no way Kwame ever pulls off any of that -- and definitely not on a consistent basis.
>>"Actually, I watched that, too. Gray did an excellent job on Bynum in the first half. The gamble was reasonable. Bynum got the majority of his numbers, points, in the 4th quarter."
Someone want to explain to me why it matters WHEN he got his numbers? Point is, he got them. Not only that, but it would seem to pose a problem for the Mike T Theory on Bynum's Lacking Strength and Endurance that Bynum was able to be effective so late in the game, and after so many minutes.
In fact, I was extremely pleased with it, because it showed another step in Bynum's progression, in two ways. First, it's the first time (in my recollection, anyways) that I saw Bynum being so effective so late in the game, and after playing so many minutes (usually he's effective early on, and then less so later in the game -- don't know if that's because of him, or because his teammates forget to keep going to him). And second, he had missed his first 4 shots, and then didn't take a shot for quite a while, but he brought it back and hit all of the rest of his shots -- 5 in a row. That's a situation where a young, inexperienced player could easily get discouraged, down on himself, etc., and never manage to get out of that funk. At the very least, he might find himself reluctant to shoot. Instead, Andrew regained his confidence, showed some mental toughness, and got back on track by hitting all 5 of the rest of his shots. Very impressed.
>>"I saw Wallace and Gray focus on Bynum and deny him position. They did a pretty good job. But in the end the Bulls aren't physical enough to maintain it for 4 quarters."
You're making the case for Bynum again, Mike. What you're saying is that these guys played him well, but he wore them down and eventually got the better of them. That's basically saying he won the matchup. So on the one side, you go on and on about how he's not strong enough to get position, but on the other, you say that the Bulls weren't physical enough to handle him for 4 quarters (and if Ben Wallace isn't strong, I'm not sure who is). So you're saying that in 40 minutes of play, Bynum actually won the physical battle against a tag team of Wallace AND Gray -- 2 on 1 -- and wore them down to the point that he got the better of them in the 4th quarter. Well, gee... sure sounds to me like he got the better of them, and not only with his length, since, as you say, they weren't physical enough to play him well for 4 quarters.
Also, that pokes another hole (once again) in your Strength & Stamina rhetoric. If Bynum is so weak, and so lacking in stamina, endurance, etc., then how was he able to win the physical battle against BOTH Wallace AND Gray? Seems to me like he might not be as weak, or easily tired, as you seem to think. Thanks for pointing that out for us.
I'm going to say this again: I'm not saying Bynum has reached a status of "Greatness" yet. I am saying he is very good. I am saying greatness is just inches away. And I am saying that he is way, WAY better than Kwame "Duh... what?" Brown. In fact, I'm saying that he has single handedly transformed Kwame Brown into nothing more than near future cap space.
And (wait for it!)... Doo-doo doo doo dooooo... I'm loving it!
Posted by: Tucker | December 19, 2007 at 09:48 AM
How can Kwame go to practice every day, see Andrew and Kareem working together, and not at least go and see what's up?
What's going on here? I doubt Kareem is pushing Kwame away.
Kareem is the greatest center of all time. What the hell is up with that? How can Kwame be such a bozo?
I'd like to hear what Kwame has to say about that.
Posted by: Rocky | December 19, 2007 at 09:49 AM
OK, here's my thing with Bynum.
Remember over the last 2 years that I said the Phoenix Suns would never win the Championship because they play gimmic basketball? I said that because:
1. They don't play strong enough defense.
2. Teams don't play defense against them in the regular season.
That's what is happening to Bynum.
1. On defense he doesn't deny position. I say that when teams adjust to his shot blocking ability they will start slashing to the basket and the lay-up parade will resume. The short-handed Clippers didn't take advantage of it. And the short Chicago Bulls had Ben Wallace as their offense center.
2. On offense. Teams aren't really focusing on him. What that means is that we're not going to get a true read until teams focus on him. When teams focus on him then we'll see the truth of the matter.
What I'd like to see is teams play defense against the Lakers because it's the only way we'll see where the Lakers really are. When we can beat teams that are actually playing defense against us then we know that we're really good.
Until then, I say it's false gold that we watching. I say that because people are calling for Bynum to get more touches in the post. I say that's a mistake because he's not that good at creating his own shot. Most of Bynum's points come from cleaning up misses and alley oop lobs to the basket. That's not a bad thing but it's a far cry from receiving an entry pass, making a move to the basket, and finishing.
Give Bynum the entry pass on a consistent bases and you'll be crying for his head.
But for the last two games on the defensive side of the game Bynum has been getting a lot of blocked shots. So I do give credit where credit is due. Now if it lasts for the rest of the season then we have something really special on our hands.
But if it doesn't last for the rest of the season then what we have on our hands is a Marcus Camby or Tyson Chandler type player on defense. What that mean is this: He'll get his blocks and rebounds but in time he'll give up plenty of points in the paint. And that will lead to being a bubble team or 2nd teir team at best.
I base that opinion of the fact that Bynum gives up position too easily.
mike
Posted by: Michael Teniente | December 19, 2007 at 09:53 AM
That reminds me of the most rediculous news promo I ever saw: "Why Americans get less sleep. Tonight at 11!"
Posted by: zen | December 19, 2007 at 09:54 AM
How the hell Kwame prove himself when he doesn't even try hard to get back in to the game.
Posted by: Juno | December 19, 2007 at 10:01 AM
Mike T,
It doesn't matter. Kareem won championships and he was skinnier than Bynum is. They have a different style of playing defense and it still is effective. When Bynum struggles this year it will be because of his lack of experience/
Posted by: zen | December 19, 2007 at 10:01 AM
Got to see "The Show" in person last night and here are a few observations that wouldn't have been able seen on television.
The Good: Bench play. We've seen it all year, but what impressed me most was their play off defense. The bench created so many turnovers last night with all hustle plays. second chance points were also a factor since as LO and Bynum ruled the boards.
It was also good to see Kobe's demeanor with his teammates on the bench. I saw a couple of times where he got up and cheered Bynum and Ariza on after good hustle plays and put-backs. It's good to see KB24 smiling again.
These guys are better than expected. I was listening to ESPN radio and the praise for the team (title contenders!) and for Bynum(all-star for the next 15 years) coming from Chicago fans iis unheard of. Baiscially if your first name isn't Michael, and your last name isn't Jordan Bulls fans don't give up any complliments.
The Bad: LO. I know he had a double double, but it's these glimmers of what he can be that frustrate Laker fans. If this guy played like this every game, we would truly be the 4th best team in the West. DFish couldn't shoot a ball into Lake Michigan, and Bynum has to learn to play through the calls. Too much complaining like Kobe does after every foul. that doesn't bode well for a long careeer if he's considered a whiner as a 20 year old.
Overall: It was good to see the guys live here. The triangle offense was moving to perfection and the bench is shooting with confidence. Are we a top 4 seed? Not sure yet. If we can go 4-0 on this trip, and manage to beat Phoenix on Tuesday, I''ll be a believer. We need to stay healthy first and most importantly. If we could also drop Kwame's expiring contract for a proven vet wothout giving up LO, Bynum, or Kobe, that would put us into the top tier teams. Overall I say to be patient with this team, and we're one key move away right now. Better than I thought.
Posted by: Chi-Town Laker | December 19, 2007 at 10:03 AM
That picture is great of Sasha. It looks like he just took out that Bull with a huge bash to the head - while in mid-flight!
Posted by: ajax | December 19, 2007 at 10:07 AM
Tucker -
That was an excellent post...
I will save you some frustration though. There is no use in trying to argue your valid points with someone who uses quotes and speculation to make their points seem credible. A certain someone on this blog, is a spin doctor and gets way too much attention for it. Just ignore his/her posts unless you want to have a laugh.
Posted by: MJCMAN32 | December 19, 2007 at 10:10 AM
Tucker,
I agree with your Bynum analysis. Mike T's arguments make no sense. I know, he knows it, everyone knows it. The only reason we read his posts is for "entertainment" value not "educational" value. Mike is my only fan in this world, the poor guy.
Bynum is an amazing player and his hard work is paying enormous dividends. If he keeps it up there will be no stopping him. In sum, Bynum is everything I am not.
Rocky,
I don't work out with Kareem and Bynum for two reasons. First, I have no interest in becoming a better basketball player. Second, even if I did, I simply don't enjoy working hard or doing things that are difficult.
I would much prefer to be a bench/injured player rooting on the guys. That way I can hit the clubs and do my thing without pissing off Kobe--I get really upset when Kobe glares at me for being a sissy or puts panties in my locker at Staples. I even cry sometimes when he does that.
I like being this rich without having to do anything to earn that money, why is that so confusing to everyone? I mean, earning millions without doing anything is like winning the lottery just because I am seven feet talk and have big calves. I even got to skip learning stuff and studying at college, even though I still hit the local campuses to work my female game.
Injury Report:
Even though I didn't travel with the team on this road trip, I've been able to get out of working with the trainer because I hurt my head when I hit it on my door frame at home. I can be so clumsy sometimes. I really don't expect to play until after the trade deadline so don't get your hopes up for a speedy return, and no, my hands haven't gotten any bigger.
Go Lakers!
Posted by: KWAME BROWN | December 19, 2007 at 10:12 AM
"Marcus Camby or Tyson Chandler type player on defense."
A Marcus Camby type player on defense? Oh, the horror!!
Posted by: exhelodrvr | December 19, 2007 at 10:13 AM
Couple moments nice to notice and I like about this game
Odom.. I was one of harshest critics of LO and looks like he is rounding unto game shape. Granted, he is not going to be reliable 20-10 guy (I believe this is a Garnet stats) But I take 16-10 everygame without jacking up like a crazy 3pt shots.
Sasha.. A lot of laughs I hope thing of the past. I would like to see more consistency, like more 10+ pts game, but with him, Vlade, and Farmar we're becoming a very dangerous team, bearing in mind Kobe commanding double team esp in 4th quarter.
Drew.. Did not like his game at the beginning but he sure pick it up toward the end and got his numbers. As more team recognize how gifted and dangerous he is in the paint, they will start to collapse on him and it sure will open up things for our shootters, assuming some extra pass should be made.
Posted by: LAL_Fan | December 19, 2007 at 10:13 AM
Weren't we supposed to go on a long losing streak when Kwame got injured?
I could have sworn that I read that somewhere on this blog!?!?!?
False gold or fools gold is believing that Kwame Brown is a "warrior and future champion".
If Kwame Brown EVER wins a championship, he will have NOTHING to do with it happening.
He will never play a full season, never lead the league in any statistical category, never make the all defensive team, and never make the all-star team Not bad for a NUMBER ONE pick though. I don't care about his "BIG BODY".
Kevin Duckworth, Oliver Miller, Tractor Taylor, Mark Eaton, Charles Barkley, Charles Oakley, Rik Smits, Xavier McDaniel, Karl Malone, Patrick Ewing,(just to name a few) all had Big Body's and forced their opponents off the block and didn't ever win a championship.
Posted by: MJCMAN32 | December 19, 2007 at 10:26 AM
MikeT,
I understand where you are coming from on the Bynum/Kwame thing.
When you talk about giving up position, are you referring to the fact that whoever Bynum is guarding is able to push him around so that their slashers can take it to the rack?
If so, isn't that something that we should be able to overcome with better team defense?
After all, there aren't that many teams that have solid centers, right? Even Tim Duncan is more lean than muscular.
Also, do you think that Kwame can ever become an effective contributor on offense?
Posted by: hariyahu | December 19, 2007 at 10:26 AM
Weren't we supposed to go on a long losing streak when Kwame got injured?
I could have sworn that I read that somewhere on this blog!?!?!?
False gold or fools gold is believing that Kwame Brown is a "warrior and future champion".
If Kwame Brown EVER wins a championship, he will have NOTHING to do with it happening.
He will never play a full season, never lead the league in any statistical category, never make the all defensive team, and never make the all-star team Not bad for a NUMBER ONE pick though. I don't care about his "BIG BODY".
Kevin Duckworth, Oliver Miller, Tractor Taylor, Mark Eaton, Charles Barkley, Charles Oakley, Rik Smits, Xavier McDaniel, Karl Malone, Patrick Ewing,(just to name a few) all had Big Body's and forced their opponents off the block and didn't ever win a championship.
Posted by: MJCMAN32 | December 19, 2007 at 10:27 AM
KWAME BROWN,
Thanks for the response. I guess that explains it. haha
Posted by: Rocky | December 19, 2007 at 10:27 AM
great win by the Lakers..Bynum dominated and he is improving in every game he plays! i hope the refs don't blow foul calls against the Lakers when Lebronze gets tapped.
Posted by: drew | December 19, 2007 at 10:34 AM
Mike T,
I enjoy reading your posts, but you have to stop with the Bynum skepticism. Your going to lose your credibility. If Bynum had gone to college, he would still be a junior.
This team is playing together for the first time, and it is exciting to watch. It seems that they get along and it shows on the court.
I'm glad to see the youngsters starting to contribute.
Take this for what it is worth. The Hollinger Power ranking has us 3rd in the NBA (1st in the West):
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/hollinger/powerranking
The Hollinger Power odds have us as the best in the west and a 27.9% chance to make the NBA Finals.
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/hollinger/playoffodds
I don't put much into these, but they are still fun to look at.
Go Lakers!!!
Posted by: Neerav | December 19, 2007 at 10:34 AM
great win by the Lakers..Bynum dominated and he is improving in every game he plays! i hope the refs don't blow foul calls against the Lakers when Lebronze gets tapped.
Posted by: drew | December 19, 2007 at 10:34 AM
zen,
"It doesn't matter. Kareem won championships and he was skinnier than Bynum is..."
Kareem also had the most devestating shot in the history of the NBA, too.
Kareem could create his own shot to the tune of at least 25 points a game. And Kareem couldn't win a thing without Oscar Robinson and Magic Johnson.
This is different because what we have here is a Kobe Bryant orientated team. Our main source of scoring isn't the 5 spot. It's the 2 spot. The day we focus on Bynum for scoring off enty passes...we're done!
I followed Kareem's career from his last season at UCLA throughout his professional career. Kareem was a great scorer. Kareem was the offensive focus most of his career. Kareem was money in the bank with an entry pass when we needed a score. But until he was surrounded by excellent players Kareem couldn't win anything but MVP awards.
Michael Jordan on the other hand made Scottie Pippen. The rest of the players weren't really scorers. They were defenders and rebounders. They had Kukos for outside shooting like we have Rad and Sasha.
You can't compare Bynum with Kareem because:
1. Bynum can't do what Kareem did and if he could he would be the focus of the team.
2. This team is more like the Bulls than like showtime Lakers.
It's Kobe's team.
mike
Posted by: Michael Teniente | December 19, 2007 at 10:35 AM
AK/BK,
I guess you won't get sued for characterizing Cleveland as a "struggling" team due to their record, but a lot of the poor record comes as a result of Lebron missing a number of games. I saw Cleveland dismantle Boston on November 27 and I will be very surprised if the Lakers have an easy time of it in Cleveland. Not that I think the Lakers can't win, just that Cleveland doesn't really match my idea of being part of an "easy" road trip....
Posted by: guity | December 19, 2007 at 10:42 AM
Isn't Marcus Camby the reigning defensive player of the year? I wouldn't mind if Andrew Bynum starts winning that award.
Posted by: Nik Kannan | December 19, 2007 at 10:46 AM
This says it all about the "WARRIOR":
Christmas isn't coming early for Kwame Brown.
He was supposed to travel on the Lakers' upcoming four-game trip, but Coach Phil Jackson decided against it because Brown "couldn't get on the floor and practice with us yet."
He has been trying to recover from injuries and boredom since Chicago center Ben Wallace tumbled into his left knee and ankle on Nov. 18. He has missed 14 games with moderate sprains and was acerbic when told he would apparently be skipping another trip -- which also meant more one-on-one workout time with athletic performance director Chip Schaefer.
"Usually Chip stays back and works out the guys . . . but you don't want to stay back with Chip. It's no fun," Brown said. "Whatever part of your body that's not hurting, you will work it."
This coming from not only a professional, but a number one pick...
Kobe should want to ship Kwame's a$$ out. I mean Kobe gets hurt and what des he do? He gets round the clock treatment, doesn't sleep and continues to work on his game(shooting jumpers at 9am last Sunday before the Lakers played the Clips), and PLAYS hurt.
What does Kwame do? He practically begs PJ to go on the road trip so he can have a week off and party in Chicago, Philly and the Big Apple.
How can anyone root for this guy???
KWAME BROWN IS A JOKE AND A DISGRACE TO THE LAKER UNIFORM!!!
I hope he is gone soon. The team has improved immensely without Smush and Cook, guys with bad energy, that hinder other peoples progress.
Kwame was just standing in Bynum's way!
Posted by: MJCMAN32 | December 19, 2007 at 10:47 AM
Neerav,
"I enjoy reading your posts, but you have to stop with the Bynum skepticism. Your going to lose your credibility."
Actually my credibility comes from "calling it" before it happens. I would lose my credibilty if I didn't point these things out.
What I'm pointing out is this: Teams will start with the lay-up parades, again, because Bynum can't deny position. He'll still get his blocks but teams will adjust.
On offense teams will start to focus on Bynum and he'll become less effective and at that point it will be all about Bynum's defense.
I'll lose my credibility if that doesn't happen.
mike
Posted by: Michael Teniente | December 19, 2007 at 10:53 AM
Does anybody realize that without Sasha the Lakers probably lose to the Bulls and the Clippers? I've always rooted for Sasha, but I never thought he would be our savior. Go Sasha!!!!! Maybe Sasha can play small forward in place of Luke?
Roger
Posted by: Roger B | December 19, 2007 at 10:54 AM
"But we also know that in the course of only ONE summer, he has beefed up and increased in strength and stamina in a MAJOR way. This isn't about tonight's game. It's not that urgent. What it's about is the fact that, while it is true that he still has developing to do, the big surprise is that it actually looks like it will happen on Kobe's timetable. That doesn't have to be tonight. It just needs to be soon. And clearly, it will be. Soon enough, anyway.
So, talk all you want about how Bynum still lacks leg strength, how he's not getting position, blah blah blah. The rest of us will talk about the vast leap he's made over last year (which, itself, was a huge leap over the previous year), and the huge and quick progress he's likely to make in the very near future."
Excellent Post from you.
Posted by: Staples 24 | December 19, 2007 at 10:54 AM
My onlu point is that it IS possible to win a championship when guys are bigger and stronger than you down low..You are making it sound like Bynum has no chance.
Bynum needs the ball more in the post. They try to find him with lobs too much. He can score with his jump hook off anyone in there.
Posted by: zen | December 19, 2007 at 10:55 AM
I had said in the beginning of the year that Sasha looked like the most improved because he is fighting for his life in a contract year.He will average 10-15 points a game this year...Sasha reminds me of a poor man's Ginoboli. If he can just get a little tougher and penetrate more, he will be good.
Posted by: zen | December 19, 2007 at 10:58 AM
With so many ridiculous statements in Mike T's last comment I don't know where to begin. Lets try this one for fun:
"But until he was surrounded by excellent players Kareem couldn't win anything but MVP awards."
That statement applies to anyone that has ever won a title. Teams don't win titles unless they have great players. To try and bring down Kareem b/c he didn't win titles by himself is just ignorant.
How about this one:
"Michael Jordan on the other hand made Scottie Pippen."
Wow, another classic line used by people that don't know much about basketball or that never actually watched Scottie Pippen play. Scottie was one the best all around talents the NBA has ever seen and he would have been a great player with or without Michael.
Or how about this wonderful statement:
"Bynum can't do what Kareem did and if he could he would be the focus of the team."
Way to compare a 20 year old to argubly the greatest center ever. Bynum is just as good as Kareem was at 20 and if you really watched Kareem like you say you did and/or you didn't have a man crush on Kwame and be biased against Bynum then you would know that.
And this beauty:
"It's Kobe's team."
Thanks for clearing that up for us Sherlock. Doesn't change the fact that Bynum is the 12th most PRODUCTIVE PLAYER IN THE ENTIRE NBA PER 48 MINUTES.
Fact is, Mike, Bynum does thing on the basketball court that Kwame can only do in his wet dreams. But go ahead, keep coming up with these crazy ideas about how much Bynum hurts our team because his rebounds and block shots are the result of his bad defense. You have no idea what you are talking about and everyone on this blog knows that.
We are laughing AT you, not WITH you.
Posted by: BYNUM FAN | December 19, 2007 at 11:02 AM
I love the way lakers are playing know and Im hoping we could get something for Kwame's Expiring Contract.... Im kinda weary cuz I wouldnt want to mess with their chemistry...But I was playing with ESPN trade machine and I came up with a couple of trades that would work, But not sure if they would ever happen, just kinda ones that make the most sense because all lakers should offers is expiring contracts of Kwame, Mihm, or maybe ARiza
#1. Kwame, Mihm for Pau Gasol
This would give Lakers a Legit PF to battle inside along with Bynum, extra scoring threat. BUT, his contract (14 mil/ 3 years remain after this year) would keep us strapped for 2 more years until odom comes off books. This would give memphis about 12 mil of salary coming off books
#2 Kwame, Mihm, for Artest
This would allow Artest to cover up best player, or rotate with kobe, Would make us much better defensively, Another scoring threat in post... But we'd be getting a knucklehead who could blow up anyday... Sac gets expiring contracts...
Posted by: Laker LOS | December 19, 2007 at 11:05 AM
I don't think those Hollinger rankings account for the injuries San Antonio has had to sustain. Right now, I'd put their odds somewhere around 60% to make it to the finals. I'd put Phoenix somewhere around 20% (maybe I'm being too generous to them, and too stingy to the Hornets).
What I liked about the Machine's interview last night is that he mentioned their focus this year is defense.
In other interviews, Sasha has said "the important thing is that the fans got tacos"... at the time I thought he was just being silly and playing to the fans. Well, after his interview last night, it dawned on me that he was dead serious. He wants taco games. You get taco games by playing defense.
I know they have a lot of room to improve defensively, and that's the GOOD news... this means our team can and most likely WILL get better as the season progresses.
Sasha having two solid games in a row. I like this.
More evidence that the Cook/Evans trade was successful on numerous levels. It meant more minutes for Sasha & Critter (who wasn't even dressing for games before the trade), and of course Ariza.
Whether we keep Sasha or not, his effort has been noted. He's trying hard, and he continues to play like this, great... and if he doesn't, great too because he's raising his value with every solid performance.
All this chatter about Bynum vs. Kwame.
Let me tell you something, Kwame makes as much money as Kobe on a per game basis. If you made as much money as Kobe on a per game basis, would you change anything? In fact, I haven't tallied out the numbers from the last two seasons, but Kwame might actually have a higher pay rate than Kobe.
I think that ends the Bynum vs. Kwame debate.
Lamar is more of a garbage man type of player. If he can clean up the boards and have a lot of put backs and coast to coast plays, great. His problem has always been consistency. We all KNOW Lamar can do it. The question has always been, will he do it?
I'm hoping so.
What's this talk about Kobe, his lack of leadership, his hoisting up bad shots, and such? YES, Kobe has been taking some horrible shots lately. Not all his shots, maybe 5-8% of his shots have been horrible. I've noticed more of them since that quadricep pull. Kobe needs to plug the leaks, and the team needs to plug the leaks in their offense too. He brings effort, intensity, desire, and still the most potent perimeter game in the league. It doesn't make him immune to constructive criticism, but most of the criticism hasn't been very constructive.
Right now, our play *should* have us at a 7 game win streak. I'm not too upset about the GSW game (I am as a fan, but objectively, we win that game 8 out of 10 times)... poor coaching, Kobe injury, poor clock management... fix the leaks and we win that game easy.
I've already noticed they're making an effort to plug those leaks. They managed the clock last night with deliberate thought.
Defense, defense, defense... this is why I'm hopeful for our team... their mind is finally in the right place, DEFENSE.
Still, Kwame does have the highest pay rate of anyone on our team. Anyone want to argue about that one?
Posted by: Tim-4-Show | December 19, 2007 at 11:14 AM
Laker Los,
Thanks for putting in the time for a trade. I'd take either... Right now I feel the most benifical is the Gasol Trade.
Posted by: Charles | December 19, 2007 at 11:17 AM
"Isn't Marcus Camby the reigning defensive player of the year?"
Yes he is, as a matter of fact. Voted on by the media. But when it comes down to it he can't guard Tim Duncan. And Denver is in the top 6 in giving up points. If you heard the Denver announcers, last season, you would know that the Nuggets were giving up points in the paint like crazy. Even now they aren't considered a defensive team.
A lot of what I say about Bynum is based on what I just wrote, too. I've studied it! Marcus Camby gets blocked shots and rebounds because of his length.
But right now the Nuggets aren't better off with Camby as the defensive player of the year. You would think that with Anthony and Iverson they would be unbeatable with the Defensive Player of the Year. But they are beatable. In fact they're one of the worst defensive teams in the league.
I have studied Marcus Camby and Andrew Bynum. Mark my words...Bynum is false defensive gold just like Camby is false defensive gold, too.
mike
Posted by: Michael Teniente | December 19, 2007 at 11:22 AM
The ESPN trade machine says this will work and also said it could be the greatest trade scenario ever inserted into the machine's nano sized hole that leads to its brain.
Kupchak wouldn't make the trade last year, Bynum for Kidd.
But, I have to say now is the time to pull the trigger and trade Bynum straight up for a sleeper, unknown guard named Smush Parker.
He's available for the taking from Miami and could be the final ingredient necessary to push the Lakers over the top.
That trade would make me finally forget the Kwame/Butler fiasco.
Posted by: wausroamer | December 19, 2007 at 11:23 AM
Mike T, you're saying you followed Kareem's career from his last season at UCLA throughout his professional career? and yet, didn't you also say you were recently in prison or ??? was that a joke? Jabbar was at UCLA in 1969, which would put you at 60 years old or damn close??? With the prison thing, I just assumed you were a kid but... I'm trying to get a handle on where you're coming from. Nobody can figure out this love affair you have with Kwame. Yes, everybody appreciates the power game he can bring but the dude... is a stiff, a functional stiff, more useful than most stiffs because we can use him defensively and for setting picks but still... a stiff...
If you saw Jabbar play, how can you possibly say Kwame couldn't learn anything from him? Jabbar played against ALL of the great Centers for a couple of decades including Wilt Chamberlain. Jabbar certainly studied them and knows the game probably better than anyone else alive... and yet... he can't teach Kwame a thing because Kwame is a power Center? You do realize how ludicrous that sounds?
It seems clear with Bynum's minutes being pushed up that the Lakers are seeing if Bynum can carry more of a full time load, if so, that frees them up to trade Kwame for something interesting. I'm thinking Kwame gets inserted in the starting lineup when he comes back and the Lakers showcase him a little, feed him the ball a few extra times/game to possibly get him some double-doubles, you'll be going crazy and then POOF! you'll wake up one morning and... no more Kwame... what will you do? LOL!
Posted by: TaosHum | December 19, 2007 at 11:24 AM
Dude who cares about Lebron?!
Posted by: Faith | December 19, 2007 at 11:24 AM
Mike T,
Your forgetting a couple things..Isn't the best defense a good offense? Bynum is light years ahead of Camby on the offensive side too.
Posted by: zen | December 19, 2007 at 11:26 AM
Mike T.
Giving up position is a matter of strength, and skill. Kwame is like a brick wall. Bynum has a difficult time holding his position and keeping players out of the paint b/c he isn't that strong right now, and still lacks the skill. However, if the past is any indicator, his strength will continue to improve, as well as his skill, as you have seen his overall defense improve - #9 in blocks, changing shots, etc. Remember Rodman, he could keep Shaq from getting position sometimes, partly b/c of strength, but also a great deal of skill.
As far as feeding Bynum in the post. I think when we he can be effective at this is when we become a top tier team, along with the defense we've discussed. But looking at the season, feeding Bynum in the post has been benificial. He has very good court vision, good instincts and makes very good passes that lead to assists, or a subsequent assist. Also, his post game seems to improve from week to week. Do you remember that post-feed against GS, where he baby hooked from about 5 feet. He also has developed a good drop step, and now it looks like an up and under.
Posted by: Mike | December 19, 2007 at 11:29 AM
Buy you know what's really funny? When I point these defensive things out about Bynum you people start with the Kwame bashing.
I have to laugh at that because I know it's not really Kwame that you dislike.
It's me that you dislike and you think that by bashing Kwame I'll get upset or something. LOL!
You people are really funny! LOL!
But I count on you to say dumb things otherwise I couldn't be mike t.
That's what separated me from the rest of you. You worship false gold. And I break the game down to its finest details.
mike
Posted by: Michael Teniente | December 19, 2007 at 11:29 AM
Jabbar got abused by Moses Malone. Kareem couldn't handle the Malone body type. Kareem can't teach the Malone body type. That's why I said Kareem couldn't teach Kwame too much. Because of the body type.
mike
Posted by: Michael Teniente | December 19, 2007 at 11:34 AM
Mr. Teniente-
Do you allow guests at your Laker study sessions?
Posted by: ajax | December 19, 2007 at 11:35 AM