Before Kobe and LeBron actually play...
Some cats over at ESPN talk a little "Mamba v. King." Everything from skills to leadership to who's better on many a level. Personally, I think Kobe is the better of the two (as I've said many times, I think he's the best all-around player in the league), but anybody who claims LeBron isn't closing the gap in quick and tangible fashion is either confusing him for Mike James or is seriously willing to fool themselves out of blind Laker loyalty. It's a shame these two didn't hit their prime at the exact same time. As much as James-Wade-Melo will provide plenty of entertainment for years to come, extra years with Kobe in the mix would only make it better.
Which brings me to a pair of questions. During yesterday's podcast (which can be listened to by hitting the button on the right side of the blog), the topic of how much "Kobe vs. Lebron playing to 21" on Pay-Per-View would make. After settling on a figure roughly around "a kajillion," BK and I debated how much we'd pay to watch it in person. We were both willing to fork out 250 bucks, no problem. We also threw around some undercard bouts, including:
Reggie Evans v. Desagna Diop (The "offensively challenged" bout)
Antoine Walker v. Von Wafer (The "only bad shots from behind the arc" bout)
Shaq v. Jerome James (The "two most out of shape centers in the NBA" bout, with James lasting five minutes or less before dropping out to throw up)
So here's the two part query. How much would you pay to watch that Kobe v. LeBron showdown live? And what other undercard suggestions do ya got, whether for high comedy (like the three above) or as a legit display of hoops skills?
-AK



I'll pay whatever for the Lakers to win the championship.
Posted by: Nik Kannan | December 20, 2007 at 04:32 PM
How many games? Just one? When Kobe was in the Philippines, people paid a lot of money to watch Kobe teach kids for an hour!!!!
Banana's.....
Posted by: Charles | December 20, 2007 at 04:33 PM
At least double what I paid for Mayweather. That one I split with 14 other people... this one I would fund myself.
Undercards could be..
Steve Nash v. Jason Kidd- see their games without passing.
Vince Carter v. Kwame Brown- see who goes down with an injury quicker.
Andrew Bynum v. Shaq- Duh.
Earl Boykins v. Yao Ming- Because I say so.
Posted by: Mr. Me Too | December 20, 2007 at 04:33 PM
Magic v. Bird
Oh and I wouldn't pay more than $20 to attend. And they better have beer there.
Posted by: Rob | December 20, 2007 at 04:44 PM
I don't know what I'd pay for K v. L., but hopefully I'll be paying nothing to watch the game at work today.
Link anyone?
Maybe $40? I'm not big on one on one b-ball.
Now, if you could pull a Magic v. Bird on the undercard, then you'd have something.
Maybe a Rick Barry v. George Gervin as well. And Kareem v. Bill Russell.
Spud Webb v. Fat Lever?
Posted by: akr_68 | December 20, 2007 at 05:10 PM
Who can draw most people to watch a basketball game? Hmm. An obvious question right? Even you combine Duncan and Lebron, they'reno match against him..
Just an opinion Blogger, if I hit you with stone-hit me back with Bread..
Posted by: trio | December 20, 2007 at 05:12 PM
Depends on where the seats are...
Posted by: J. Walter Weatherman | December 20, 2007 at 05:15 PM
Popeye Jones vs. Tyrone Hill (battle of the pretty boys)
Posted by: sixonezero | December 20, 2007 at 05:20 PM
Are we talking just players or coaches too?
I'm gonna say Kove vs.Raja Bell just becuase i want to hear the words "I don't even know the kid..maybe his parents did not hug him enough as a child..."
heehee.
PS I hate the freaking Spambot, either I need to get my eyes checked or at the young age of 24 I'm going blind, or maybe just getting old. Sigh.
Posted by: Elle | December 20, 2007 at 05:43 PM
Hey does anyone know why the lakers are wearing what looks like a 60 on there jersey tonight??
Posted by: Boom | December 20, 2007 at 07:29 PM
who cares about lebron?
i wanna see kobe vs kobe!
Posted by: lefty | December 20, 2007 at 08:05 PM
kidd, kobe, garnett vs. nash, lebron, duncan
Nba street style. too sweet!
Posted by: jandro | December 20, 2007 at 08:12 PM
I wouldn't pay a dime to see them play one on one, unless I get a chance to talk to them afterwards, or something. Seriously, that's not basketball, really, and doesn't really prove much. Why would I care? I mean, i don't think Tim Duncan could beat Dirk in a game of one-on-one, but he's clearly a better basketball player.
I just don't think it's that interesting, or important.
Posted by: Michael A | December 20, 2007 at 10:34 PM
Nash, LeBron, and Duncan easily beat Kobe, Kidd, and Garnett simply because Nash has an outside shot to spread the defense and Kidd doesn't. LeBron playing pick and roll with Duncan forces Kidd to help and leaves Nash wide open.
Posted by: saggy | March 09, 2008 at 06:36 AM