Game Thread - Lakers vs. Bucks
November 21, 2007 | 5:01
pm
I'm in St. Louis right now and believe it or not, the Bucks don't merit televised coverage out here. Go figure. So take extra care to be my eyes and ears.
AK
« Previous Post | Lakers Blog Home | Next Post »
I'm in St. Louis right now and believe it or not, the Bucks don't merit televised coverage out here. Go figure. So take extra care to be my eyes and ears.
AK
The comments to this entry are closed.
| Advertisement |
|
|
you guys just proved that you all have you heads up kobe's behind. I haven't heard one person criticize kobe or anyone else for that matter. get some basketball sense.
Posted by: the WOLF | November 21, 2007 at 08:01 PM
This is one of those games where the Lakers play well but the screen and roll was hurting. Our bigs cannot turn away the player using the screen...Kwame does such a good job on screen and roll. Also, Lamar needs to pull his weight on offense. he has to be a threat late in the game. We need some consistency from him. We did not use the sppe of Farmer much in thefourth quarter. >>>>Good game
Posted by: Peter | November 21, 2007 at 08:02 PM
Team intensity wasn't there. They seemed to play down to the Bucks level. We needed this because Boston is next. Get some rest, eat turkey and bring your A GAME on Friday or else...things will get nasty.
Do lose your CONFIDENCE.
Colorado loves the Lakers!
Posted by: Hugo Boss | November 21, 2007 at 08:03 PM
Remember guys, its only 1 game. The Lakers have played well up till now, and it is the 2nd game of a back to back. Lamar is still rounding into shape, and due to trades and injuries, the Laker chemistry is out of whack. If you told me the Lakers, with this schedule, would be 7-4, I'd take that and be happy with it.
Omar does need to improve his shot though.
Kobe has to figure out how to play his aggressive game without hurting the team, and how to pass without forgetting to attack. Both are good players though, and I'm sure tried to win the game.
Overall, I'd say decent game except stop shooting so many3s and take it to the hoop. The refs were blowing fouls before their were fouls.
Posted by: Wynk | November 21, 2007 at 08:07 PM
We got to hand it over to the Bucks tonight...they had that 11-2 run on the 4th that started everything. Although we did have some good defense tonight, it just that we can't buy a basket when it counts.
Most disappointing tonight was indeed Lamar. There was a drive in the 2nd that he drive to the middle from the box and was the only one in the air but hesitated when he saw Bogut finishing with a weak pass to Luke for a turnover. That and a couple of plays showed how hesitant he was tonight...or should I say for a most night now. All of us would remember how he was forcing the issue from the top of the key and doing one on one drives that looks weak.
How can you give someone like him a vote for AllStar with so sooo many inconsistent performances. Atleast Luke was smarter on his plays than what LO did tonight. Even Mamba was caught up but atleast he was just fighting to keep us in the game.
Just a night where everyone looks just frustrated on the offense side that trickled down on how we did on the last 7-6mins of the game.
Posted by: KikosDad | November 21, 2007 at 08:11 PM
Let's review...
CONSISTENCY
CHEMISTRY
DILLIGENCE
AK: Make sure to eat a couple of White Castles and a few slices of Imo's Pizza for me, ok?
Posted by: utzworld - THE BANNER HOLDER | November 21, 2007 at 08:13 PM
Wolf,
First of all I agree with you that it was a team loss, however you can't miss some obvious things tonight. You mentioned that Kobe shot over a million times, when he only shot 18 times. We definitely need much more from LO than what he's been doing the last three games. Anyone can see that LO's outside shot is not falling, so he should attack the rim more and stop committing stupid offensive fouls. Bogut did not shoot all over Bynum(so he made two shots, big deal). Andrew still outplayed him and should've been sent into the game earlier. Mihm has nooooooooo defense whatsoever. The Bucks were scoring in the paint at will when he was in there. I didn't see Mihm alter any shots or grab any boards. Farmar did not attack the basket at all tonight, he must have been tired or something because he just wasn't there tonight. When our team attacked the hoop, they were rewarded at the free throw line. If they had kept attacking, they would've had many more dump passes to Andrew and would've killed the Bucks. The Lakers just went cold in the fourth and the Bucks got fired up. The Bucks aren't that good at all and we should've won, but we'll get them in L.A. The Lakers will be fine. Go Lakers!!!
Posted by: Nemaia Faletogo | November 21, 2007 at 08:14 PM
TRADE ODOM after he has one of his good games.
Posted by: Amazing_Happens | November 21, 2007 at 08:15 PM
i'd love to criticize Kobe for his 2-8 from the three, but the fact remains that he was 7-18, and 11-11 from the line with 27 pts 1 steal, 3 rebounds and 4 assists. He had a so-so game for his standards, but had Lamar put together something like that, i'm more than certain that we'll praise him for his efforts.
Lamar, on the other hand, shot 3-11 from the field, only 2-4 from the line, 2-5 from downtown... he did have 7 rebounds 4 assists and 2 steals, but 8 points is not going to cut it. Fisher outscored him, walton outscored him playing less than half his minutes, and even Vlad outscored him!
We were guarding Redd pretty well, i think he was like 0-5 in the first quarter, but what happened afterwards? he was 8/13 after that with 7 assists!
Posted by: harold | November 21, 2007 at 08:15 PM
the wolf,
Im not going to criticize kobe because he played Redd, and he gave the lakers a 5 point lead going into 4th quarter. Those three he shot were not forced. I criticize kobe whn he messes up, but he played to win tonight, and he did pass the ball.
He assisted bynum three times in the 4th. He got bynum the ball where he needed to. The three Kobe took, he had to take it with the team down already.
Play that changed the game, when the bucks tied the game Mihm gave lamar a pass right under the rim, and lamar of course could not finish. If lamar made that play, the lakers could have kept their lead and still have confidence.
Posted by: wow | November 21, 2007 at 08:16 PM
Utz,
Big call with the Imo's. You from the Lou?
AK
Posted by: Andrew Kamenetzky | November 21, 2007 at 08:17 PM
its easy for us to not criticize Kobe.
When he has a bad scoring game, he always plays a great defense. AND team can still win.
If Lamar had a bad game, its usually both in offense and defense. AND its very very hard for this team to be successfully without LO giving it 100%.
Posted by: tim | November 21, 2007 at 08:17 PM
wow,
i know LO played like garbage, i seen the game. you people are quick to hrow the hatchet at the guy when them team got owned in the fourth. i not expecting too much from the guy and neither should you or anyone else. PJ should have intergrated him more from the bench cuz it looks like LO is losing major energy out there. yet no one metions this. kobe jacked up more shots than anyone in the fourth and no one says jack. the whole team couldnt keep anyone in front of them NO D-E-F-E-N-S-E!!
Posted by: the WOLF | November 21, 2007 at 08:19 PM
The whole Laker team played poor not just Lamar. But for every great game Lamar has, he will then disappear for a game or two. He has done this for years. He is due for a good game in Boston and will probably play great. But then stink it up next week.
Posted by: 33StraightWins | November 21, 2007 at 08:19 PM
the Wolf,
You might not beleive this, but not everything that goes wrong on the basketball court, or in your life for that matter, is Kobe's fault. Stop the hate.
peace
Posted by: LAKER TRUTH | November 21, 2007 at 08:19 PM
Lakersville, INTERNATIONAL…
By Michael C. Teniente
The Milwaukee Bucks: Half-Court Offense: Eastern Bubble Team
This was a good game to evaluate. The Lakers dominated in the 1st quarter. Andrew Bynum picked up 6-points and 10 rebounds in the 1st quarter alone. He finished with 16 and 13. That was a good game by Andrew.
The defense wasn’t really a problem. The Bucks operated out of their set offense so I don’t fault the Lakers for their defense.
The game was actually closer than the score indicates.
THE BREAKDOWN:
You saw it! Andrew Bogut scored 8-points in the 4th quarter. But it was the last 6-points that I want to bring out. ANDREW BOGUT was posting Bynum! ANDREW BOGUT!
When Bogut scored his 2nd basket of the quarter that gave the Bucks an 86-83 lead with 7:31 left in the quarter. By the time Bogut scored his last point the score was 99-90 with 3:16 left in the quarter.
What caught my eye was how Bogut was calling for the ball. What does that say? Reputation! Bynum doesn’t put fear into the low post players and Andrew Bogut isn’t what I would call a big offensive low post threat.
I told you that Bynum would get the big numbers but that in the end the physicality of the game is going to come in and bite him. And Andrew Bogut isn’t even a physical player.
Look at the scoring by quarters for the Bucks. There was 17 in the first, 29 in the second, 29 in the second, and 35 in the fourth. That equals 110-points. What did I tell you that the Lakers would give up per game? And the Lakers didn’t play a bad defensive game. The physicality of the game just took its toll within the structure of the Bucks’ offense and the Lakers’ defense.
It’s subtle, man! Those 6 little points Bogut scored in the lane in the 4th quarter weren’t based on Bogut’s physical nature. It was based on Bynum not being a true physical defensive presence in the middle.
Before Bogut scored at 7:31 the Lakers were only down by 1-point. And like I mentioned when it was all said and done, by the time Bogut finished the lead was 9-points.
In the long run it’s going to get worse. The game is all about physicality and don’t you forget that!
What did I tell you yesterday? The Pacers missed all kinds of 3-pointers, while the Lakers made a high percentage. The table was turned tonight, wasn’t it?
But that’s only the 2nd game. Lets see how it all plays out over an extended period of time.
On a brighter note: I love what D-Fish and Radmanovic are doing. The difference between Fisher and Parker is mind-boggling.
What Radmanovic is doing just goes to show how the injury affected him last season.
Look for both players to steady the 1 and the 3 spot all season long.
For the life of me I don’t understand why PJ put Walton in at the end of the game. Especially since Bogut had fouled out. Why pull Bynum? That makes absolutely no sense.
mike
p.s. Jackie…tell James Worthy he’s barking up the wrong tree!
Posted by: Michael Teniente | November 21, 2007 at 08:24 PM
It's back to back games guys, the Lakers lost gas in the 4th. Don't worry, just put all the efforts by Friday everything compensates for itself. Beat those Celts and have a tea party in Boston.
Some of the players were playing too long on the floor, they need sub. The effect of the trade losing two men and Kwame not playing, Odom and Mihm still nursing injuries and not 100%, we're lucky to win 4-in-a-row. You can't win them all the road but the mere fact that they shared the lead for three quarters is much you can say with the Lakers this year.
Posted by: Edwin Gueco | November 21, 2007 at 08:26 PM
I have a question I've been pondering all day, before the game.
How is it that Jordan Farmar took his jumper from weak to strong in the off season?
I'm asking for a reason, because I'm really asking about my next question...
How is it that Lamar has been in the league for 9 years now and he can't knock down an open look?
That's really frustrating. He's a liability to the offense if he's out on the perimeter and can't do anything except maybe drive left on occasion. If he's posting up, great, but if he's not and if he's not grabbing offensive rebounds or locking down on defense, he's just not strong enough as we need him.
This was a team loss, yes, I'm just saying that I'm also disappointed that Lamar hasn't worked on improving his game in all this time.
Posted by: Tim-4-Show | November 21, 2007 at 08:27 PM
kobe played well. he did his job...up until the fourth. like i said, he as well as everyone else sucked in the fourth. call it on everyone. dont tell me about redd. kobe is a lock down defender, remember? (redd 26pts.)
LO needs to be on the bench for now, but if he goes there, the forwards become a defensive liability. pick your poison.
Posted by: the WOLF | November 21, 2007 at 08:30 PM
"There are a lot of people talking about how the Western Conference is head over heels above the East," Pierce said. "The Lakers will be a good test for us."
bring on the celtics...GO LAKERS!!!
Posted by: kobelovesjuan | November 21, 2007 at 08:31 PM
laker "truth"
what are you talking about? im saying the team lost and you talk about nonsense. way to contribute to this forum. now let the adults talk. good nite, little man.
by the way its "believe"
Posted by: the WOLF | November 21, 2007 at 08:33 PM
OK, my mistake! Bogut did score the first points on Mihm. Bogut did only score the last 4 points on Bynum. But I did see Bogut calling for the ball on Bynum.
mike
Posted by: Michael Teniente | November 21, 2007 at 08:34 PM
It is always dissapointing when you lose a game that you should have won. Yes it was the 2nd night of a back to back but it was for the Bucks as well.
Kobe and Lamar both had their worst game of the year on the same night. They shot 2 for 11 from the 3 and that probably lost the game for us.. On nights like this we really have to pound it more inside. Andrew had an off shooting night but thats still 50% for him. We should have made more of an effort to get him the ball. Hope we can find some post help with Kwame out because it is clear that Cris just isnt back to form yet. I hope he and Lamar can play their way back into shape soon. Cant wait for Ariza either. He may have been able to play shut down D in the 4th when really needed it.
I really think the combination of Kwames injury, Ronny trying to get back and the trade has killed our rythem . Hopefully we can make the adjustments to get back into a flow.
In a way Its almost fortuate that we are playing Boston. We just seem to get up for the really good teams.
MH
Posted by: michael h | November 21, 2007 at 08:36 PM
Odom for Artest will be a steal for the Lakers. Artest is always consistent on the Defense and his offense is great. We really don't depend so much on Odom to handle the ball. He does not have a high IQ on offense. He is an instinctive player....
Posted by: Peter | November 21, 2007 at 08:39 PM
Correct me if I'm wrong but weren't the Bucks going to Bogut in the 4th quarter no matter who was on him? Of course I mean before he fouled out.
mike
Posted by: Michael Teniente | November 21, 2007 at 08:40 PM
odom frustrates me sooo much, i havent felt this much for a player since devean george.....
odom's actually more frustrating..cause he'll have some near triple-double once outta every so often games...
STOP SHOOTING 3's is the first thing ODOM can do very easily, it doesn't take any effort but some discipline, Phil should fine him $10,000 for every 3ball attempt he has, and $100 for every turnover....more to's than fg's...
Posted by: laker32 | November 21, 2007 at 08:43 PM
Second game of two on back to back to back nights after overnight travel and the guys lose a close one. Everybody is a critic. To win two out of three on a trip like this is an accomplishment. One night everyone here thinks these guys are the best thing going, the next night the sky is falling. We gotta chill out. Let them play. The best thing is that these guys are going to get better as the year goes on.
Posted by: PhxLkrFan | November 21, 2007 at 08:44 PM
Just a little problem with Bynum's defense. He tends to extend his forearm on the man he is guarding when that guy goes into the middle of the paint from the post. i think he picked up 1-2 fouls like that tonight. Needs to fix that problem.
Posted by: Tom | November 21, 2007 at 08:44 PM
The whole Laker team played poor not just Lamar. But for every great game Lamar has, he will then disappear for a game or two. He has done this for years. He is due for a good game in Boston and will probably play great. But then stink it up next week.
Posted by: 33StraightWins | November 21, 2007 at 08:19 PM
-bench him. play him off the second team until he find some consistancy. im all for that. but at least you admit that the team lost this game, so you automatically have more credibility than some of these fairweather fans.
its easy for us to not criticize Kobe.
When he has a bad scoring game, he always plays a great defense. AND team can still win.
If Lamar had a bad game, its usually both in offense and defense. AND its very very hard for this team to be successfully without LO giving it 100%.
Posted by: tim | November 21, 2007 at 08:17 PM
-exactly (except for the kobe part). i hope he finds it right away. if not we're
lost.
Posted by: Nemaia Faletogo | November 21, 2007 at 08:14 PM
-im talking about the FOURTH when it mattered, not any other time period.
-you are absolutely correct that LO should have been driving ALL GAME. good for you.
-i agree that the team will be fine. well put! good post!
Posted by: Peter | November 21, 2007 at 08:02 PM
-he needs to pull his weight for sure. good point.
Posted by: the WOLF | November 21, 2007 at 08:46 PM
Blame this loss on being the second game of a back to back. The Lakers ran out of gas in the 2nd half, especially in the 4th quarter.
Now they've got to put it back in gear for the Celtics.
Posted by: Laker Seth | November 21, 2007 at 08:47 PM
The usual stuff -- looking for easy answers and scapegoats.
1) The game was really lost at the beginning of the 4th qtr, where the Lakers stopped driving and started 1-on-1 ball against a zone.
2) Lamar is, and has been, an overpaid player, but he is what he is - a number three player on the squad who facilitates the offense for others, but does have mental brain farts occasionally in most games. This is not a new thing so get over it.
3) The back-to-back on the road is a new pressure for this group of players and they are basically young. They have to go through it once to learn anything. Let's see how they do next time. It may be a blessing in disguise.
4) The coach has to take responsibility for managing his players. Phil knows Lamar and should have pulled him after the 1st 3pt attempt. This is Lamar's MO so the coaching staff should have planned for this type situation.
Posted by: Craig W. | November 21, 2007 at 08:49 PM
Wolf,
What are you howling about? Did you watch a different game? We all root for Lamar but you can see with your own eyes how he sucked in this one. Kobe busted his ass in the first half to stop Redd who seems to play well against the Lakers. He expend a lot of energy playing velcro defense against Redd. He had us led by 5 points end of the 3rd. His 3 shots were bailout shots. What can you say for Lamar? Shut up.
Posted by: Laker/Kobe Fan | November 21, 2007 at 08:50 PM
AK/BK or anyone
For the next couple games, chart down plus and minuses when Chris Mihm is in the game. I know there are other players on the floor, but I did this two years ago just to show my friend how much Mihm hurts the team when he is on the floor and the numbers were pretty interesting (proved my point correct).
Vujacic needs to find a seat on the bench and stay there.
Posted by: Tom | November 21, 2007 at 08:53 PM
Jarvis C. didn't play tonight. Why didn't he? The match-ups were there; he could have guarded Bell or Ivey. At least its better than watching the revolving door Vujacic play defense. The shooter (sasha) scored 2 POINTS in 14 minutes. If he can't score, he is useless to the team.
Posted by: Tom | November 21, 2007 at 08:55 PM
Posted by: Michael Teniente | November 21, 2007 at 08:24 PM
- this is why mike gets many reactions to his posts. HE ACTUALLY KNOWS WHAT HE IS TALKING ABOUT (except when it come to kwame). boguts kept bynum from rebounding as well on a few occasions, and the paint was compromised. i only pointing out the fourth. he had a good game overall.
Posted by: Tim-4-Show | November 21, 2007 at 08:27 PM
- your absolutely right about the team loss. i still believe LO shortcomings is due to his slow start. this offensive setup is the best for him since miami so im giving him the benefit of the doubt, UNTIL HE GETS IN SHAPE. i gave until mid december. then im done.
Posted by: Edwin Gueco | November 21, 2007 at 08:26 PM
-as always well done edwin. just what i expect from you.
Posted by: the WOLF | November 21, 2007 at 08:56 PM
Bucks bench outscored lakers bench 39 25 tonite. And the fact that the lakers played last night is no excuse as Bucks beat Cleveland and king james in Cleveland.
Posted by: Wers | November 21, 2007 at 08:58 PM
Easy guys....calm down try to hold on your temper. Try to postpone in posting when you're angry and gather first your bearings then express your frustration on the next thread. Don't get into heated exchange for nothing, it destroy your congenial relationship with other bloggers and the blog camaraderie.
this has been the trend in the blog, when Lakers lose there is a blame game.
When they win...there is too much euphoria, it's 82 games folks we win some, we lose some NBA season designed by David Stearns to all coaches, referees and players. We are the suckers who believed in them. haha!
Lastly, do you know the temperature in Milwaukee tonite? It's 32 degrees and if you add the windchill factor, it's 21 degrees, what is the effect on the game? Nothing really but on a back-to-back game, it makes your muscles stiff and tired on 40th minute of running and jumping. Give that as home advantage of the Bucks. When they get to LA, they're not use to good weather and traffic so we get them there. On Friday, those musle will be full of turkey power, either it will make them active or sleepy due to over eating on Thursday.
Cheer up and may you all have a Happy Thanksgiving.
Posted by: Edwin Gueco | November 21, 2007 at 08:59 PM
Bucks bench outscored lakers bench 39 25 tonite. And the fact that the lakers played last night is no excuse as Bucks beat Cleveland and king james in Cleveland.
Posted by: Wers | November 21, 2007 at 09:00 PM
O' Jackie! I really like your style. Especially when you smile.
miike
Posted by: Michael Teniente | November 21, 2007 at 09:01 PM
Mike T
Why is it always about who is playing center with you? Its not always about the interior defense. Sometimes the guards and forwards mess up as well. Do you think Kwame, Andrew or even Cris had anything to do with the 3's they were draining? The last 9 points of the 35 the bucks scored were on intential fouls in the last minute so it wasnt exactly a defensive melt down . all I know is that both Bogut and O Neil scored less then 10 points against Andrew. And Bogut had only 4 boards(didnt check who was on the floor for them) for the whole game and Oniel didnt have one board while Andrew was on the floor. That is shutting down your man Mike, give some props when they are deserved. Lay the blame for this loss at Kobe and Lamars feet because neither played well and we need at least one of them clicking if we want to win many games.
MH
Posted by: michael h | November 21, 2007 at 09:02 PM
Tim-4-show,
With regards to your question on Farmar's shooting this summer viz-a-viz with LO.
-we have to consider the long respite due to injury. a labrum injury could not go on shooting practices
-we have to consider the Summer Pro League for Farmar wherein he was able to play in the tournament.
-let's give time for Lamar until January, we all don't know how it feels to be injured with shoulder twice, a twinky finger still aching, we always assume that they all look healthy because he scored 18 points against the T'wolves and only 8 points against the Bucks.
-this is not giving an exduse for Lamar's playing but if you play again the game, he defended well, helped in rebound but it's buck's nights, all their shots were falling in and well rested, while Lakers are not perfect yet with their offense, they falters in some plays sometimes the selflessness leads to turnovers.
-give it some more time and Lamar will prove his worth.
Posted by: Edwin Gueco | November 21, 2007 at 09:10 PM
I explained why I judge a game by the center's defense all kinds of time and as of right now...I don't feel like doing it again.
I will explain in more detail in about 10 more games.
mike
Posted by: Michael Teniente | November 21, 2007 at 09:32 PM
Aloha Edwin
You are absolutely right. Lets wait and see how Lamar rounds into shape. It was the same thing on the blog last year and through the summer. For some reason some people cant grasp the fact that injuries affect ones performance. And poor Lamar never gets any slack here. Kobe scored 23 points but it was a poor 23 points and his play was every bit as responsible for this loss as Lamar but for some reason he gets the break not Lamar. This new up tempo offense is perfect for Lamars game, lets give him time. And one last thing this loss ended a 4 game winning streak so its not exactly the end of the world.
MH
Posted by: michael h | November 21, 2007 at 09:37 PM
Posted by: Laker/Kobe Fan | November 21, 2007 at 08:50 PM
- now laker "truth" stop posting under different names and go to bed. dont make me get the belt!
Posted by: the WOLF | November 21, 2007 at 09:39 PM
Mike- are you really that obsessed with 4 points by Bogut, Spud Webb would be calling for the ball if he was posted up 2 feet from the basket, it has nothing to do with Bynums defensive presence or lack thereof. Bynum blocks plenty of shots and alters several others, thats something Kwame doesnt do consistently, which is why u see him trying to take charges. What other 7 footer is consistently trying to take charges instead of blocking shots?
Posted by: Laker Lover | November 21, 2007 at 09:41 PM
kobe fan, try reading the posts if you can read. and if you cant, call:
1-800-ABC-DEFG get hooked on phonics! see i care...
Posted by: the WOLF | November 21, 2007 at 09:43 PM
stop making excuses for Lamar- injury timing, this is what you get from odom some great games some not so great
If injuries were an issue 9 rings wouldnt be playing him 40 minutes on the 2nd game of a back to back on the road.
its the same thing I said last year, he shouldnt shoot outside and never 3s, get into the post and use his size. He looks totally uncomfotable on the perimeter yet where was he on offense most of the 4th?
Posted by: Laker Lover | November 21, 2007 at 09:49 PM
Wolf,
LOL, You sound like Lamar's grandmother defending him from the bullies. Honesty can hurt sometimes. By the way, Kobe loves you, stop the hate...peace.
Observations:
-This team has made tremendous strides this year. All this team needs now is a real NUMBER TWO, and this team will be set. With a REAL NUMBER TWO, the team will be able to contend and have the luxury of developing a couple youngsters at the same time. Lamar would be a great NUMBER THREE, but he does not have the brain cells to be a NUMBER TWO on a contending team.
-Farmar was handcuffed tonight by Mo Williams and Charlie Bell, who can match Farmar in quicknes. Farmar's next matchup against Eddie House should be another tough challenge.
Posted by: LAKER TRUTH | November 21, 2007 at 09:51 PM
The only one who played way below par was Lamar. That's why he's being singled out.
Lamar has got to find consistency in his offensive game, otherwise it would be much better to have a player who scores 12 points a game and plays serviceable defense than an up and down guy like LO. Now, I will go to the trade machine and find such player. David West comes to mind, but I doubt New Orleans will let him go.
Posted by: Amazing_Happens | November 21, 2007 at 09:57 PM
Tom- you are correct about Sasha, he is beat by his man over and over so much he must see their numbers in his sleep, and his off ball defense is worse, watch a few plays he totally gets lost. I dont care thats the player he is but why is a guy with 9 rings EVER playing this guy?
Give the rook a chance at least jarvis can break down his man and get to the basket, something fisher or sasha cant
Posted by: Laker Lover | November 21, 2007 at 10:06 PM