Lakers Blog

Round-the-Clock Purple and Gold
written by the Kamenetzky brothers.

« Previous Post | Lakers Blog Home | Next Post »

Talking with: Maurice Evans, Part I

August 5, 2007 |  1:09 am

UPDATE (8-6): We're on the road today, so expect a delay here and there in comments getting posted.  We'll do our best to keep up, as will HQ.

As some of you may already know, Lakers swingman Maurice Evans recently took part in the NBA Player's Assn.'s "Feeding One Million" campaign, a partnership with Feed The Children to help provide food, clothing, medicine and other essential items to 1 million children in Kenya.  Evans accompanied Ron Artest (Sacramento Kings), Theo Ratliff (Minnesota Timberwolves) and Etan Thomas (Washington Wizards) to Africa, embarking on an eye-opening journey into a plight and poverty most of us are lucky enough to find unimaginable.  I caught up with Mo by phone a few days ago, and we discussed the goodwill mission, how the trip affected him on a personal level and, of course, hoops (Lakers or otherwise).  Here's Part 1 of what he had to say:

Andrew Kamenetzky:  How did you find out about the trip to Kenya?   

Maurice Evans:  Actually, I have been with Feed the Children already prior to that.  They did the "Feed the 5,000," which was feeding 5,000 families in Oakland.  We did that when I was in Detroit.  We fed 5,000 families there.  And last year, with the Lakers, we went to New York and a couple guys from the team were involved with that as well.  (Players Assn. President) Billy Hunter knew that I had been involved in the first two and called me over the summer and asked me if I was interested in doing (the trip to Kenya), and I was like, "without a doubt."  I wanted to help these people.

AK: Had you heard before about them looking to go overseas, or did this take you by surprise? 

ME: I didn't know that they planned on doing a project that feeds 1 million people somewhere in Africa, something like that.  When he told me about it, it just sounded like something special, something that I definitely would try to get involved in.  It made it that much better to go to Africa to actually give it to people who can't really measure poverty, in my opinion.  I mean, people are hungry and starving whether it's in the United States, whether it's in Europe or Africa -- it's all the same.  But to be able to go over there and actually see how people are living there and to feel like you could make a difference, it was really cool.

AK: Obviously, you knew going over there that you'd be seeing people living in dire straits.  But even with that in mind, was the level of poverty still shocking?

ME: Yeah.  It was very shocking.  Like I said, you can't measure poverty, but there's so much poverty amongst children.  It's really eye-opening.   For children, who obviously don't have a hand in what they've been dealt.  They didn't have any part in the hand they're dealt, you know?  There are children who have limited opportunity to even get an education that are in that situation.  We went to the school when we first got there.  This building is for educating children and it was one room, two chalkboards, rundown benches, just a long picnic table.  The kids sitting there with probably one or two teachers trying to educate a room full of kids.  There's no individual attention.  There's nobody raising their hands and saying, "I don't understand.  Can you explain that to me?"  There was nothing like that. 
And kids go as much for food as they do for the education.  Even more so for the food, because they know that by going to school, the motivation is that you're going to get a meal while you're there.  It was so bad that you eat that one ration and you have to provide your own bowl.  And some kids couldn't even afford their own bowl, so they had to put it in their pocket.  It was beans and rice, and the rice is submerged in, like, juice.  So the kid's pockets is all wet and he didn't have any shoes on.  And you see the kid with the bowl and he was trying to get as much as he can in it, because it's not only going to feed him but it's also gonna feed his brothers and sisters later that evening. 

AK: Is that the worst thing you saw or did it even get more upsetting?

ME: Well, you know, the thing that's so crazy about the situation there was that as poverty-stricken as it was, there was still a bigger discrepancy between "the haves" and "the have-nots."  Before we left, they did show us the nice areas in Kenya, where you have nice restaurants.  We went on a safari for a couple days.  We were able to go see their malls, some of their government buildings. 

Probably one of the worst things we witnessed: We went to the Ray of Hope Clinic, and that's where the player's union actually donated money on behalf of all the NBA players.  They have these people who have AIDS.  And they also help out children, help these people out.  I noticed there was a kid standing there who didn't have any shoes on.  And he was right in this area called "the slump."  "Slump" meaning exactly what it sounds like.  Like "slump, that's terrible."  And he was walking around barefoot.  There's glass.  There's rocks.  It's hard walking there with shoes on, let alone without.   I could see that he was cut all over his foot.  I had a little bit of money with me, something like 250 bucks.  I see this guy, a vendor, he's selling shoes.  I just took the little kid over, tried to get him a pair of shoes.  And it wasn't like they were Jordans.  They were just like some shoes.  Some leather shoes.  We took him over to get those shoes and then the next thing you know, here comes another kid who didn't have shoes.  And then another kid and another kid. 

Before too long, there was a super-long line of kids, and they were realizing that they were going to get a pair shoes if they got in line before the money ran out.  I felt so bad that I didn't have more money, you know what I'm saying?  You just feel how much of a difference something just small like that will make in their life.  When the kids had these shoes, you could just tell the difference.  Now they're running around and playing.  The kids are playing soccer, kicking a rundown soccer ball with no shoes.  Now it seems like when they're playing soccer, they're excited.  Little stuff like that.

AK:  Did that almost feel surreal, because there are some guys in an NBA locker room who basically get a new pair of shoes for each game? 

ME: Yeah.  Exactly.  It obviously put things in perspective, because even the shoes that we wear for multiple months and multiple games, by the time they're done, they're still in such great condition that anyone would love to have them.

AK: Did these kids know you were in the NBA?  Does that mean anything to them?

ME: No.  Because the NBA, nice cars, nice houses and lots of money, it's intangible to them.  I don't even think they realize what that is.  That's not a reality for them, the NBA.  I bet you could bring some of the bigger stars that we have and they probably wouldn't be able to recognize them.

AK: Did they know you were basketball players?

ME: They knew we were basketball players, but they knew we were there to help.  I'm sure they were extremely appreciative that we were there and we were able to help them out. 

AK: Was it weird being there with three other NBA guys and not having people ask you about the Lakers?  About Kobe?  The NBA? 

ME: It wasn't really strange to me, only because I knew what the purpose that we went over there for.  It's almost like once we got there, seeing the area, the poverty, what we were in for, we didn't even think much about the fact that we were in the NBA anymore.  It was almost like, we're here.  Let's see what we can do improve the situation while we're here.  Ron brought a video crew so he could document everything that went on and kind of take it in.  I think that we did some good things while we were there.  All four of us.  Theo, Etan, Ron and myself, we all four had a really, really good experience.  We really tried to do as much as we could and really tried to be involved with the kids.

AK:  Ron learned about his upcoming suspension while you guys were over there.  Did that put a damper on anything, or did the circumstances and surroundings make it feel insignificant in the grand scheme of things?

ME: I don't think it put a damper on it, because Ron did a really good job of doing the things to stay positive.  He understood.  Obviously, he's going to continue to grow and mature every day in this league.  He still turned it into a positive.  Everyone wanted to call and talk about the dispute that he had with his wife to get suspended.  But all he talked about was the good that he was doing and bringing light to the fact that they need even more help over there and around the world.  I think he did a really, really good job deflecting that and turning it into a positive. 

AK: I read he's looking to build a house in Kenya, just so he can go back and keep tabs on things.

ME: Yeah.  Well, I know he also donated money for the Ray of Hope clinic so they could build a lab there, so they can actually help with the medicines and administer them to people.  That's one of the pieces they were really lacking.  It only costs about $20 to deliver a baby at the Ray of Hope clinic.  The people still couldn't afford to pay the $20. The problem is also that they don't turn anyone away.  They're there to help people, so it's pretty much free.  Also, when they deliver the babies, the problem isn't delivering the baby, it's that they deliver the baby and have the woman go to the recovery room for two to three hours.  She'll just sneak out and leave the baby because she can't afford to take care of it.  When you're dealing with issues of that magnitude, anything obviously helps.

AK: Did this trip make you think a little differently about the world or put certain elements of your life in perspective?

ME: To be honest, I can't really say that.  I can't say that I didn't appreciate life or that I didn't appreciate being in the NBA, given how hard it's been for me.  But it makes me want to succeed that much more, so that maybe I can be able to help out even more so on a financial level.  I think it serves to be a motivation.  Not that I lacked any at all, because I really want to be accomplished.  I want to have a great year.  I want to build upon the things that I did last year and I really want to expand my role with the Lakers.  Just really make an impact for a long time in the NBA.  So I think it just serves as extra motivation.

AK: It adds another level of what can come from those accomplishments, aside from the direct  basketball results.

ME: It shows you what more can be done.  It shows me that there's so much more that can be done.  It shows me an extra path where I can really help and affect, in terms of people's lives. 

AK: I imagine the answer is yes, but do you plan on staying involved with these programs?

ME: Yes.  Like I said, I've been involved for the last three years, and I'm definitely going to continue to be involved and continue to help out in whatever way I can.

Part II to follow soon.      


The comments to this entry are closed.

Comments

the line of kids trying to get shoes part is just so sad. i wish kobe would do something like this, go to africa and make a difference. i mean, this is a dude who pulls in 20 million a year. i know even 1 million of that would buy shoes for all those kids.

and before you guys call me a kobe hater, i am one of kobe's hugest fans. i just am saying the obvious: kobe should quit that vivo foundation crap and help people who TRULY need help.

Great Stuff AK.

I wish more of these things were mentioned or reported.

Artest is a crazy guy but hes well educated and knows his stuff so Im sure he and Mo, Theo, and Etan (who writes a great column at SLAM) were the right people to send.

But I wish more of these guys went. You know who I would really love to see go?? Guys like LeBron, Iverson, Garnett, Carmelo, D-Wade, etc. You know if you really wanted the NBA to change its image it would be by sending these guys on missions over there.

Since this thread isnt about basketball then I feel okay to write about this. I wish more of these African-American athletes went back to help out. I dont think its racist or stereotypical to say this at all. I wish more black athletes went back to see how their brothers and sisters lived in conditions overseas. It would really put things into perspective.

Now of course as a minority myself, I know that black people in this country have been screwed since the day they were brought on slave ships, and between Jim Crow, Missouri Compromise, George Wallace, George Bush, Katrina, Rodney King everything else, things like racism, urban poverty and lack of resources have been thrown onto black people as a whole. Many of these athletes, and NBA players have come from these situations. Many of them have used basketbal to escaple jail or death and so its valid in my opinion to say that they do have a perspective of tough living conditions.

However, when compared to issues facing other nations, I wish that Blacks who have come so far here in the U.S. would make that next step like the Dikembe's and Hakeems. I know those guys are connected over there because they were actually born there, but to see an Iverson, or LeBron really go over there would be something else.

Look if I was the NBA commisioner I would plan big trips. Send Kobe, LeBron, Iverson over there to run basketball camps and begin a crop of NBA players. You can use that as your justification for sending athlets. You can sell this idea to corporate sponsors.

The NBA is currently doing this in China, but in typical capitalism and odd foreign policy, the NBA is looking at bucks instead of impact. I mean here were are with a trade embargo on Cuba because of their communism, but we are the worlds' biggest trade partner with China (so much that we have a huge trade deficit), even though they are communist and probably have way more human rights violations than Cuba. But China is the bottom dollar.

The NBA is doing the same thing, running basketball camps, bringing Kobe and MJ to China, trying to bring Yi and Yao, and encourage their system of doing things. This whole Yi fiasco??? Thats stupid.

If you want to really do something, send those guys to really change the world and send them Africa where they will have a great chance of doing something special. I always thought basketball players had that power because there is so much emphasis on the individual that the individual players can affect so much, more so than other team sports.

I think the NBA culture would be served well to see more of these humanitarian missions. It would really change players and GMs and so forth. It would save the image of the NBA, and also do something really socially relevant.

This is awesome. And before this thread becomes inundated with comments again, I wanted to ask if you guys (and the LAT) would consider switching this blog with an easier-to-follow comment thread format? Am I the only one who finds the current "flat" format frustrating? People are constantly referring to other comments. To see what which comments they are referring to, we have to scroll up. Sometimes the comments in question are buried at the beginning of the thread. I much prefer the organization of a "threaded" or "inline" format. It would also make it easier for me to follow up on a comment discussion I'm interested in. (If you don't know understand these formats I'm talking about, please check out the comment forums on IMDb.)

Just 2c from a semi-lurker ... obviously a very minor problem compared to third world hunger :/

E

Thanks AK. That's the kind of story I want to hear about, something that might serve as a wake-up call to other people, including us. Sounds to me like Mo had a much better, much more important summer than most.

It's wonderful to see that some players are sincerely willing to give something back...

NOT ONLY A GOOD BALLER BUT A NICE PERSON AS WELL!!!!

THANK YOU FOR BEING A LAKER....

We are all so busy talking about Kobe's demands or Ron's suspension or why the Lakers are such a poor team that we forget just how much these human beings try to contribute to the society. NBA players have more than most of the rest of us, but they also usually give more, also.

Thank you for publishing this piece. Not only for the exposure of the world's problems that we often try to forget, but for the positive things it says about Mo and other NBA players.

AK, that was a GREAT interview with a GREAT person. Mo obviously understands that the only things that count are the things you can't count and has made a commitment to service and to getting blessings so he can give them. And the same holds true for the alleged "head case," Ron Artest, along with Theo Ratliff and Etan Thomas. If every NBA player "tithed" a measly 1% of his gross salary to a program such as family planning or fighting global warming, etc. we would be in much better shape. How about spreading that idea to the NFL, to MLB, to all these really overpaid "entertainers" in whatever industry they're in? I'd be willing to give 10% of my taxes to similar efforts, why not them?

Think about it.

Meanwhile, thanks for a terrific read.

That great that Mo Evans is doing that.

Chris-

Kobe does a lot of community help besides Vivo, just look around on the web or on KB24.com. He does help people who really need help. Like those young child cancer patients he surprises and takes out to have a good time.

Africa is the neglected continent, except when it has resources for multinational companies to exploit (one of them happens to be 7 foot basketball players!). But even when westerners take an interest in the resources, they neglect the people. It's heartwarming to see dudes like Mo Evans and Ron Artest stepping up and stepping in (with or without shoes).

I think somebody should send a copy of The Lake Show's post to David Stern. Maybe the kind of honesty Mo Evans shows will distract Stern from the dishonesty of one (or some) of the refs.

Thanks for the great interview! Keep up the good work Mo!!!!!!
As far as helping......I think WE should look for ways that WE can help out, instead of hoping for NBA players to do it. Its easy for everyone to just point to those in the financial class above themselves. Here is one simple example of how I have been able to make a big difference with a small sacrifice (Many other ways as well):
http://www.compassion.com/default.htm

Lake Show,

David Stern and every NBA owner, coach and player should read your post.
These privileged few have the power and opportunity to redeem the sport and themselves. They have the power and opportunity to turn "the ugly American" into the "welcome American."

All the "NBA Cares" promos we are subjected to during the season seem about things so small, however valuable, that they just ring hollow. Artest, Evans, and the others have recognized something they can teach all of us. The biggest beneficiary of giving is actually the giver. It is the recipient who bestows honor and blessing on us.

When you read Evans' account of how far a bowl of food received at these schools must go, it is absolutely heartbreaking. Perhaps you could provide a link for bloggers who would like to contribute.

The conversation with Evans is absolutely inspiring. It is a great antidote to what has otherwise been a wretched off-season.

Mo is a class act. I liked this guy since we got him and I like him even more now. This guy gets it. He is blessed to make a lot of money playing a game that he loves and has a God given talent to play, but he still sees the bigger picture of life and the role he can play in making someones future a little bit brighter.

AK, great interview. Thank you for helping us all put things back in perspective for a minute. We all sit here and blog from probably multiple computers eveyday: work, home, crackberry's whatever. Sometimes I sit here and read the blog on my laptop while eating dinner and watching tv after work. Not thinking about the kids and people suffering in other parts of my city, country and world. Hopefully I can change that as well.

$250.00 is more to me than it is to Mo, but hey $20 bucks to help deliver a baby here and there is no big deal. We can all think about that kind of stuff. couple of times a year that can make a difference.

Thank you again for the eye opening interview.

T-Woody

Chris,

Kobe is also involved with the Make A Wish Foundation. That doesn't even get much press, except here on this Blog, of course. Mo Evens wouldn't have gotten any press if it weren't for AK and BK.

You cannot possibly judge what any athlete is doing that is charitable based on the press. Those types of things do not get good ink.

Kobe does even more than that with his own money, without planning or press, all around the city and league, all the time. He doesn't even try to get people to notice. He helps through the kindness of his own heart. To know what he truly does, you have to run into these people and hear their stories.

No one here can adequately judge Kobe's Philanthropy because none of us really knows. But, rest assured it is a LOT. The only press Kobe seeks in this area is for causes for which the publicity would specifically help in and of itself. Vivo is such a cause.

Stay off the Dude's back. Yeah, it would be nice if he helped with this cause. That is true. But, don't take the next illogical step of assuming that he isn't helping at all, or that he is helping the wrong cause, or that he is offering some token sort of help. One does not mean the other. That was an illogical leap of faith.

--FearlessWhackJob

Too bad Kobe didn't go with Mo Ev. I think a trip like that might bring Kobe back to earth a little. it'd be nice to see Kobe experience a bit of a reality check.
Besides, Kobe could have spent the trip trying to convince Artest to force his way to the LAkers...
Good Story. Mo Evans might not be the perfect basketball player for our rotation, but i think he and Derek will really bring some positive vibes to our locker room. Sometimes you forget there are NBA players with their heads screwed on straight.
Maybe this offseason is more about the character restructuring of our team, as opposed to talent. Last year the team, literally, fell apart at the first sign of adversity. Maybe this team will be able to handle the challenges.
If that's the case, the last order of business this summer is shipping out Cook and Kwame for some hard working big men (Drew Gooden?, Marc Jackson?).

There was a Mr Show sketch where Bob Odenkirk is doing a whole bunch
of charity work while on the show and he at one point informs David Cross
that charity is "Doing something for someone while other people are watching."

Shaq is big on having the press there when he's delivering toys to kids at
Christmas. The NBA gets LOTS of press for the Feed the Children thing, to
try to raise the image of the NBA. And of course there are the ads during
NBA games showing players teaching kids how to read. And all of those
things are fine, and the actions by the players involved is great.

But just because other players (including Kobe) aren't pushing for the big
national news story surrounding their charity work doesn't mean they
aren't out there doing charity work. I think most of the NBA players are
involved in several charities, and I know Kobe is.

Chris-

There are plenty of reasons to be critical of Kobe, if you'd like, but I don't think it's fair to pick on him for not giving time/money to charity. In one form or another, I think he does a lot (as he should). It's certainlly not fair to pick on him for not giving to the "right" people. Help is help.

BK

Bob Jackson--

Our family also supports a child through Compassion (www.compassion.com). With administrative costs at less than 5%, it is one of the great ways that our family can make a difference in the lives of others.
Thanks for the reminder.

I've followed Kobe's make a wish foundation and vivo and an assortment of all his other volunteer activities throughout the years. i repeat, i'm a BIG fan of kobe. but let me ask all of you this: what has a greater impact, going out for one day to play ball with a kid who has cancer, or going out to Africa and feeding thousands of kids who are starving?
while kobe certainly does his share of philanthropy, if not more than his share, it's impact is questionably less than that of other people. i am not trying to being critical of kobe, but rather, critical of his selection of volunteer work.
BK- "help is help" is a fun phrase to say, but is it really true? Who do you pay more respect to at the end of the day? Who made a greater impact this summer, Kobe of Mo Evans? kid with cancer or thousands of starving kids without shoes?

Chris,

"Who do you pay more respect to at the end of the day? Who made a greater impact this summer, Kobe of Mo Evans? kid with cancer or thousands of starving kids without shoes?"

Why don't you ask the cancer-stricken kid that Kobe visited before just assuming the answer?

You should pay equal respect for anyone looking to help others less fortunate. It's not important how you help or who you help, but simply THAT you help. If everyone took as much time doing what Kobe does, Mo does, or just spent time with hundreds of other charitable outlets, the world is guaranteed to end up a much better place. How the energy gets divvied up isn't nearly as important as the energy simply being expended.

AK

Rick Friedman (and others who might be interested),

You may not have noticed, but there's a link at the top of the introduction for Feed The Children. If you're interested in contributing, that could be a good place to start.

AK

Lake Show,

I've read some of Etan Thomas' stuff, too. You're right. He does a very nice job. I'm pretty sure he participates in poetry slams as well.

AK

Chris

O.K now I have seen it all, your'e bashing Kobe for doing the WRONG TYPE of charity work? Cant we just appreciate this thread on MO and his charity work?

Mh

AK

"It's not important how you help or who you help, but simply THAT you help."

no, actually it IS important how you help and who you help AND how many you help. all help is not created equal, sorry for shattering your misconception of the world. last time i checked, helping starving kids is more important than helping one kid with cancer. just like helping the Katrina victims is more important than helping a kid learn how to play basketball better. there are more definitely differing degrees of philanthropy. maybe in the sheltered confines of an LA Times media outlet, it's easy to say what you say, but why don't you tell it to the millions of starving kids in Africa that have been abandoned by their parents?

Chris,

So basically what you're saying is that Kobe visiting that kid was a waste of everyone's time.

"actually it IS important how you help and who you help AND how many you help. all help is not created equal, sorry for shattering your misconception of the world."

First off, you haven't shattered jack, which is a shame, since you just broke your arm patting yourself on the back. But at least your arm will now match your leg, which ended up in a cast after falling off your high horse.

"maybe in the sheltered confines of an LA Times media outlet, it's easy to say what you say, but why don't you tell it to the millions of starving kids in Africa that have been abandoned by their parents?"

I'll make you a deal. As soon as you tell the kid Kobe visited that he's a jerk for taking up Kobe's valuable time better spent doing other things, I'll get right on that.

AK


I think it does not matter which charity is more important. It only matters that people help. we all wish that more people will help other people wether they have cancer, hungry or no shoes.

Chris,

Stop telling other people (Kobe) on what to do with their time and money. Its their choice. also, just because its not in the news doesnt mean Kboe isnt doing anything. BTW, I dont know if you donate to any charity, i dont hear that in the news either. so, stop criticizing and just start applauding all these people

Ron L

AK- no, but that's a wonderful mis-characterization of my thoughts. thanks. what i WAS saying was that kobe should be proactive and take on greater challenges, such as the problems in africa. helping kids with cancer is great, but in my opinion, is simply too little from a person like kobe. if mo and mutumbo and artest can make a difference in Africa, so should kobe. i think that's a fair claim, but if you disagree, that's fine.

Ron L- yes, i do donate to charity. i donated several thousands to the katrina cause and have volunteered significantly with the red cross and kiwanis club. sorry if i don't show up in the news for my efforts.

AK,

I commend you on your efforts to enlighten some, including Chris, who simply serve to define the term myopic.

Is it the American kid's fault that his particular ailment (cancer) costs more to fix than maybe the plights of a thousand African children? Is he just to die alone because his cause is too expensive? Is his suffering any less great?

Chris,

Besides, you are absolutely unaware of Kobe's efforts in Africa or any other continent. He chooses to not publicize his efforts. I bet you are barking up the wrong tree and making a fool of yourself in the process.

You simply do not know from where you speak.

You only know what you know thanks to our very enlightened Bloggers (AK, and BK), who continually feed us these tidbits that we would otherwise never have heard of.

Get off his back, dude. You are seriously making a fool of yourself. I refuse to rate the suffering of one child above another.

--FearlessWhackJob

Chris,

The flaw to your argument (in my opinion) is that you're taking it upon yourself to decide what charitable efforts are worthier than others. Who are you (or anybody, for that matter) to make that call? And, especially, who are you to literally put down someone else's generosity simply because it isn't your first choice of how to expend energy? No offense, but that's awfully arrogant.

If you were to say, "I would love to see Kobe get involved with an organization like "Feed the Children" and leave it at that, that's fine. You're right. It's a worthy, important cause and a presence like Kobe's could lend it more attention (and funding). And yes, there is a "mass help" angle to Mo's mission that doesn't apply to visiting one child. But to essentially slam someone else's hard work and community involvement because it doesn't fit your idea of the "proper way" is in very poor taste, I think.

And by the way, "Make A Wish" doesn't comprise the entirety of Kobe's charitable work, since you appear to be criticizing him for that.

http://blogs.ocregister.com/lakers/archives/2007/03/bryants_citizen.html

You should learn more about what he does before presenting it that way. Kobe's certainly affecting more than one person through his work.

AK

Long Time Laker Fan,

I remember that Mr. Show sketch. Hilarious stuff. Just thiking about it makes me laugh.

Fearlesswackjob-
"I refuse to rate the suffering of one child above another."
millions of starving kids > cancer patient who will probably survive. the rest of your post is ad hominem, so i refuse to address it. don't call me a fool when you yourself have foolishly failed to assess my posts.

AK-
"The flaw in your argument (in my opinion) is that you're taking it upon yourself to decide what charitable efforts are worthier than others. Who are you (or anybody, for that matter) to make that call?"
wait, what? i don't have the right to judge which charitable efforts are better than others? i guess that's where we differ in opinion. if we can judge players in a myriad of ways, then i guess i just assumed we could judge actions as well. last i checked, a plethora of sportswriters wrote significant judgemental pieces about kobe's radio interviews this past summer.
i realize it's difficult for people to acknowledge that certain volunteer work is more important than others, but the reality is that it's true. there's a reason why organizations like the american red cross have to ignore people who need help sometimes. there are just so many people in the world that need help, and at the end of the day, you need to pick and choose wisely who needs help most. now, does the american red cross always make the best deicision? no. nobody's perfect. i've sure wasted my time with some really stupid volunteer projects before. it happens. but fair criticism is fair criticism, and, in my opinion, i made fair criticism. if you disagree, that's perfectly fine. life goes on. at least for us.

AK,
Thanks for pointing out the link. I did, in fact, miss it in the early morning bleariness.

Also, thanks for standing up for Kobe's right (and everyone else's) to choose the charity of their choice. The number of worthy causes is abundant for a reason: there are lots of needs in the world.

Chris,

"if we can judge players in a myriad of ways, then i guess i just assumed we could judge actions as well. last i checked, a plethora of sportswriters wrote significant judgemental pieces about kobe's radio interviews this past summer."

That's a serious reach on your part. To compare and cast judgement on the effects of Kobe's radio tour vs. the effects of his charity work is beyond "apples and oranges." One naturally invites criticism or judgement while the other doesn't (or shouldn't, at any rate). The radio tour can easily be argued as having negative results and served to help nobody outside of a pure basketball context. The latter has zero negative effects (except in your head, I guess) and served to help someone in a humanitarian context.

AK

So the Mavericks are using their mid level to sign Webber and Posey...Hmmm.....

The Knicks are rumored to be close to a deal with Sac for Artest...Hmmmmmmmmmmmm....

The Lakers signed Coby Carl.....

Hm.

I was ready to forgive Mitch and give him a second chance, but this offseason has proved his uselessness. Come on Mitch. Can't you make a little trade to improve this team? Can't you bring in a few new players to shake up an environment that needs shaking up?

When your star player demands changes, a small lateral move can have a signifigant impact. New faces = new hope.

For Mitch to give away that last roster spot to Coby Carl when Webber and Posey are still out there..well, he should loose his job. We need players with experience, not kids...

If they shot Old Yeller, they can surely fire Mitch.

Wes

AK-

if you've ever heard of the concept of opportunity cost, and i guess to some degree, sunk costs, maybe what i'm saying would make more sense to you. i guess i could explain it briefly, but i think it'd be easier for you to just wikipedia it. i'm sure it's there.

anyways, after you've learned what an opportunity cost is, you'll understand that by contributing to the make-a-wish foundation, kobe forgoes the opportunity to help starving kids in africa. thus, there are negative effects that arise from his actions. this is basic business 101. everybody learns it in their intro business course of freshman year college. a very simple concept to learn, but a difficult concept to regularly apply in real life.

the point is, when you say , "The latter has zero negative effects (except in your head, I guess) and served to help someone in a humanitarian context.", you completely miss the point. there ARE negative effects. by serving someone in a humanitarian context, he loses the opportunity to serve thousands in a humanitarian context in africa, where there is a greater need for humanitarian contributions.

Chris,

Ad hominem can only be reached if the central point of your argument is accepted as true; that it is possible to place relative value to human life and suffering. That is the only point I refute, because it is the only point that matters. The rest of what you say is a direct descendant of that point. I would, therefore, be trying to treat the symptoms and not the cause in trying to refute the rest of your points.

It is your task to somehow convince the rest of us of two central tenants of your position; 1) that it IS possible to quantify and compare human suffering, and 2) that YOU have the wherewithal to make such value judgments yourself.

Because, I daresay, even if you were able to satisfactorily convince every one here that you are correct on position number one, I doubt you would have any success at all at convincing us that you are the person from which we should look for guidance on who to save, and who to let die.

BTW, "probably" isn't "definitely". And more than a few of those Kobe has directly helped most certainly did NOT survive (one or two rather publicly because of the circumstances surrounding their passing). He has decided to put his name, $$, and efforts behind a particularly expensive cause. One that may be particularly suited to getting help from the very rich.

BTW, you have ignored my central point completely. While I have not avoided any of yours. My point is that you are speaking from a position of ignorance. You do not know, or have any particular idea of the sum, distribution, or type of philanthropy that Kobe engages in. It is always foolish to make an argument when you don't even have all the facts, or even access to such facts. You make it easy debunk everything you say. You make our job easier when you do that.

That is foolish, unless you prefer loosing your arguments.

--FearlessWhackJob

PS: the main reason I would never agree to your point number 2 is that you have already proven to me that you lack the critical thinking skills necessary to be my Oracle. You obviously think it OK to judge someone when you don't have all the facts. I already know that the fact you don't know what you need to make the judgment isn't your fault. Kobe has done that on purpose. But, even if your ignorance isn't your fault, it does specifically preclude you from being qualified to make such judgments.

Chris,

The concept you're explaining isn't particularly tough to understand, so maye you can drop the condescending tone and assumptions that it's over my head. I get what you're saying and I got it before you even brought it up. I just don't think it's really possible to say one is truly more "important" than the other, at least not to the degree where you actually criticize someone for going out of their way to help another human being.

If you want to say one requires a more mass effort, again, fair enough. But you're also treating this as if Kobe's efforts with "Make a Wish" somehow prevent others (and himself) from also contributing to African funds, which is conceptually ridiculous and perhaps even inaccurate when it comes to what people are actually doing. It's not a "one or the other" scenario. You are actually allowed to do both (and beyond). You're also allowed to choose to help in a variety of ways. But all "Business 101" lessons aside (and thanks, because they were quite profund), labeling the effect of Kobe's work as "negative" still strikes me as rather distasteful.

AK

Now I've truly heard it all.

Kobe's been accused of every bball misdeed there is, including and definitely not lmited to, choosing bad shots. But now to be choosing bad charities?

Fearless,

I thank you not as a Kobe fan but as human being.

Fearlesswhackjob-
okay, i'm gonna keep this short and sweet:
- look up the definition of ad hominem
- because you insist on using ad hominem arguments, i'm gonna do the same.
- stop using big words. they are both out of context and make you look like a junior in high school who is trying to practice his SAT vocab. i mean, seriously. who in the world uses "daresay"?
- i already satisfied point number one
- i don't need to satisfy point number two. i'm not trying to convince any of you what to think. please read the words that are on the screen. as in, the letters. that form words. which form sentences. which specifically say things that i believe. you know, the stuff that i'm just saying. that are just OPINIONS. and yes, i am allowed to share my opinion, oh intelligent one who likes to use big words and sound stupid at the same time. because this is america. no, i am NOT trying to be your oracle. please wake up, we're living in the 21st century.
- and finally, i DO know what kobe does. how many times do i have to say this? i am one of kobe's BIGGEST fans. please read the words that i am typing. i find it funny that AK posted that link at first because I've already seen the site. the example with the cancer kid was just that; an EXAMPLE. stop and READ.

In response to the Chris vs AK thread regarding Kobe's charitable contributions, there are two ways to help make the world a better place, on the macro and micro levels. Giving money to the United Way or Feed the Children or Katrina relief is helping on the macro level; playing basketball with one dying child is another. I don't think it's fair to compare the two, because doing work on a smaller scale can often have the ripple effect of a small stone thrown in a pond. Perhaps it would be best for all NBA players to forego doing any actual charity work and just hold very expensive basketball camps; they can give all the money to the Darfur relief fund. On a dollar by dollar basis, something like that may be more effective than taking a trip to Africa to do the work firsthand. However, just giving money may not satify the soul or one's sense of personal involvement in a cause. I admire anyone who selflessly gives of their time and money to causes that better the human race, and it doesn't matter to me what the charity of choice. And Chris - yes, your examples from Micro and Macro Econ 101 are very good, but they come from the world of ceteris paribus; there are other factors besides pure opportunity and sunk costs to keep in mind in any economic model of charity work.

Chris. . i think you're not realizing that the kids from the make-a-wish foundation WANT to meet kobe. . mo evans working with the make a wish foundation, while a nice gesture, is not nearly as effective as kobe because the odds are none of these kids WANt to meet mo evans. . so, kobe has an unique way to help these kids that mo evans can't. . i think it makes sense if you use a ven diagram. .

anyhow your whole 1 cancer patient vs. 5000 starving children argument comes close to playing God so to speak. . daring to determine whose life is more valuable. .

anyhow if you really feel strongly about that feel free to email me and we can go on to discuss it. . i really don't think this post (or blog) is the place to argue such things. . plus we both probably have views that don't have any business being put on a public forum haha

peace

AK-
Kobe is a busy man. he has to play 82 games a year, train every single day, go through media blitzes, different endorsement meetings, along with i don't even want to know how much other stuff, like taking care of his kids, his family, and maintaining a happy relationship with the wife. the dude is BUSY. he often sleeps 4 hours a day during the season. so yea, he really can only pick and choose what he can do with his spare time volunteer-wise. and it's not like he's going to give all 20 million of his dollars away each year. the guy earns that money and deserves to use it on himself and family as well. so ultimately, it IS one or the other. either he does make-a-wish, or he does feed. on or the other. or he chooses to split his time in half with make a wish and give little bit of time to feed. his call. but he can' t just do every volunteer activity there is.

Wrong heading, suppose to be-

AK and Fearless,

I thank you not as a Kobe fan but as human being.

Sorry AK, sometimes we bloggers take you for granted.

Chris,

"i find it funny that AK posted that link at first because I've already seen the site. the example with the cancer kid was just that; an EXAMPLE. stop and READ."

Hey, you harped on this "EXAMPLE" and didn't present it in the context of acknowledging everything else Kobe does. It's up to you to establish your point to its fullest, not me. I'd figure somebody as smart as you knows that. "Stop and READ" your first few comments on this topic. You present little knowledge of Kobe's background and what you do talk about, you basically belittle.

You definitely don't sound up on everything Kobe does, because if you were, you'd realize that he does indeed divide up his time between more than one charity. In fact, he divides his time between many. Therefore, your contention that he basically has to choose between "Make a Wish" and an African charity is patently false.

What this really comes down to is Kobe's choices in charities vs. yours. You feel the African charity is more imporant, and therefore you're upset that he doesn't (publicly, at least) partake in such an effort. Which takes us back to my original point, that it's not really possible to say which is more "important," and not by you in particular. Or at the very least, it's not possible in a context that allows you to criticize the choices of a guy actually bothering to do something to begin with. To pick on the efforts of someone else as misguided because they don't prioritize in the same fashion as you is ultimately quite petty.

AK

Chris,

The secret is out. I AM a Junior High School kid practicing his SAT words. How did you guess? Opened your Thesaurus did you? Unfortunately for you and your arguments, maybe you need to read my posts to find who uses words like "daresay". That person, most obviously, is me.

The best way to practice for my upcoming SAT is to actually use my quite formidable vocabulary in my every day discourse. However, I've never berated another blogger for his/her use of or mastery of the English language. I have spoken the way I do for the past two years that I have been on this Blog without ever once being condescending or judgmental.

Come to think of it, that means I've been speaking this way since at least the sixth grade. Boy, I must be smart, huh?

But, we all know that you are both condescending and judgmental. And, I guess, none of us believes that you do know what Kobe does when it comes to charity. So, to each of us, you are speaking out of ignorance.

Without that, we can't give your opinion any weight.

It is fallacy to assume you know what Kobe does charitably, when it is already an established fact that some large portion of Kobe's philanthropy never makes it into any media outlet, anywhere, at any time. So, to know you must personally know Kobe. You have offered no such proof.

I guess it is my job to read what you say. It is yours to apply logic to your thoughts and words. Claiming to know what cannot be known is the ultimate in hubris. And, patently illogical.

Prove to us that you personally know Kobe, and I'll take back everything I say. Other than that, you will find it very difficult in convincing anyone other than yourself that I'm stupid.

--FearlessWhackJob

AK- i will say this one last time. millions of starving kids versus hundreds of suffering kids. if you had the choice to help one of those categories, which would you pick?

Fealesswhackjob- wow, where do i start? first of all, it doesn't matter how good your vocab is if you can't formulate a concise argument. secondly, the vocab you're using isn't formidable. it's just out of context. seriously, read the crap you're writing man. it's just... bad, and that's an understatement. third, i think it's hypocritical to categorize me as condescending and judgmental when you're the one calling me a fool. fourth, good vocab does not equate to high intelligence.

and finally, to both AK and Fearlesswhackjob: okay, fine. i haven't seen and documented every single volunteer action kobe has ever done in his life. and since, apparently, i'm trying to be an oracle (at least according to fearlesswhackjob) that was my responsibility as an american citizen. which must make me completely ignorant of course, and unable to give my opinion on what is important. because i have no right, absolutely none, especially not in america, most definitely not in america. because to say that millions of african kids who are dying of STARVATION is more tragic than several hundred dying of cancer is just completely out of line.
look, the point isn't that kobe doesn't do enough. kobe does more than his fair share. and maybe i didn't make this clear in my first couple posts. my bad. but i think i clarified it several times thus far . i didn't think people would get so worked up over what i said. so if it doesn't make sense to you yet, i'll say it one last time: i'm just offering my opinion on what kobe should be doing. just one man's opinion. don't need to agree. don't even need to care. and certainly, kobe doesn't have to care. i'm just offering my opinion.
peace.

wesjoenixon,

Re: Your post, "For Mitch to give away that last roster spot to Coby Carl when Webber and Posey are still out there..well, he should loose his job. We need players with experience, not kids..."

Well, we'll just add this latest example to a long list of reasons why Mitch should have long ago walked the gangplank.

Just pray he holds firm on keeping Lamar out of any deal for Jermaine O'Neal. The Pacers will blink and JO will be a Laker if we remain patient.
------------------------------

And to Chris: You can tell by the other responses to your litany of posts that we are not impressed by your relentless drilling of a point of view that eliminates freedom of choice for others. Chill out. It's not healthy to be so judgmental.

Ok, this is a new low. Kobe is criticized for a lot of things, but to knock him for doing the "wrong" charitable work according to you, is just ridiculous.

Chris,

"AK, i will say this one last time. millions of starving kids versus hundreds of suffering kids. if you had the choice to help one of those categories, which would you pick?"

Well, to clarify, the "hundreds of suffering kids" aren't just "suffering." Many to most are actually dying. I say this because it feels like you're brushing over that fact to accentuate your view.

But as to your question, it might depend on where I thought I was actually making the biggest impact and difference. Sheer volume of people helped doesn't necessarily equal true progress, if it's something that might have a very temporary effect. Or maybe I would go with whatever charity moved me the most on a personal level, since I know (or at least hope) others will look to help organizations that I don't. Or I'd look to do both, since your "either/or" scenario is ridiculous.

All I know for sure is that I wouldn't criticize those not making the same decisions as me. I'd save any complaints for those doing nothing for anybody.

AK

Chris,

Are you 100% certain that Kobe has never ever done anything to help the kids in Africa?

 


Advertisement

About the Bloggers

Recent Posts
In lieu of Laker links... Laker Laughs! |  November 28, 2009, 11:34 am »
Post-Thanksgiving Leftovers |  November 27, 2009, 4:24 pm »
Reading helps your digestion |  November 27, 2009, 11:23 am »
Holiday links! |  November 26, 2009, 10:42 am »
New 710 ESPN Lakers podkast, featuring Spike Lee! |  November 25, 2009, 7:36 pm »

Recent Comments
 
RE: Post-Thanksgiving Leftovers | comment by Jon K.
 
RE: Post-Thanksgiving Leftovers | comment by never
 
RE: Post-Thanksgiving Leftovers | comment by wesjoenixon
 
RE: Post-Thanksgiving Leftovers | comment by Mark



Archives
 




Buy Tickets
Search for Tickets
 

LATimes.com now offers sports tickets to popular events around the world including NBA tickets, MLB tickets and NFL tickets to otherwise sold-out events.

Popular Events
As the Lakers get set to defend their title, Lakers tickets are going to be huge all season. Dodgers tickets and Angels tickets are also in high demand with another season of MLB baseball underway.

We've got plenty of LA sports tickets and college football tickets for sale, with MLB tickets and USC football tickets being the mosts popular sellers at the moment.
Powered by TicketNetwork