No news. Any ideas?
So I know people have been looking for a new thread, and I've been looking around for some news ... but really, there isn't any. At least nothing I can find. So anyone have any ideas? Places to take this one? There's always Kobe (haha). You got your USA Basketball, trade ideas, hypothetical mascot ideas. Anything. I'll accept solicitations, and then perhaps start a new, new thread.
UPDATE: Well, there is something new to talk about. Sort of. More on the Kobe situation, courtesy of ESPN.com's Chris Sheridan. Bryant continues to be vague about his status, leading Sheridan to say something that basically summarizes how I've felt for a while, given the current state of the roster and prospects for quick improvement: "Around the league, most people seem to think it boils down to this: Kobe still wants out, but the Lakers won't trade him -- at least that's the impression being left by Lakers GM Mitch Kupchak, who was unavailable for comment because he is not due back from a European vacation until Friday."
Of course, there's no way to know for sure, but it's the feeling I get as well.
-- BK



hariyahu,
So the lakers can use the 20M to get a goto FA named Kobe who would opt out of Chicago?
Posted by: p ang | August 21, 2007 at 05:37 PM
hariyahu,
Regarding your 4-way trade -
Though I love the idea of the Lakers getting Hinrich, Gordon and Smith, there are a couple of flaws in your plan.
Problem 1: Chicago - you have them giving up four or their core players: Hinrich, Thomas, Duhon, and Gordon (not
to mention Khryapa & Griffin). Granted, they get Kobe back, and I'll buy Critter in the deal, but giving up a player
that has helped bring them to the level they're at in exchange for a third string center (Doleac) and a third string
shooting guard (Stoudemire) is far fetched. I might believe Kobe+Critter for Hinrich, Gordon, Thomas, & sign &
trade someone to match.
Problem 2: Atlanta - they might be willing to give up Josh Smith in a trade for Kobe. They will definitely NOT give
him up in a trade for Farmar, Wright, Thomas, and Quinn. Even though your deal is effectively Smith & 3 scrubs for
four young players with potential, Atlanta is loaded with "potential" and has only two players who really perform -
Josh Smith and Joe Johnson. They would not give either of them up for merely another four players with potential --
you'd be more likely to get a deal from them where you combine 2 or 3 of their players with potential (e.g. Marvin Williams,
Shelden Williams, Al Horford, Zaza Pachulia, Josh Childress, Acie Law) for one player at Smith's level who plays
center or point guard or power forward.
Problem 3 - cap space. Though Kwame + Jason Williams + Viktor Khryapa would be expiring contracts, the Lakers are
something like 14 million over the salary cap, so they'd have about 6 million in cap space (a bit more than that, as Evans,
Vujacic, and Turiaf also expire). So they'd have 8 or 9 million free, but they'd have to make an offer to Ben Gordon if
they wanted to keep him, and I'd assume he won't settle for the 6 million dollar qualifying offer.
Anyway, I'm pretty certain the trade doesn't fly for Atlanta or Chicago.
Evans
Posted by: Long time Laker fan | August 21, 2007 at 05:45 PM
fkillah,
"Let's not kid ourselves by saying management made the wrong decision in signing Kobe over Shaq. Even Mitch is not that dumb. Shaq right now is an old but expensive Ford pickup truck."
for the record, if given the choice, i'd pick kobe over shaq purely for $$ matters. my gripe is that we had to chose in the first place. had the roles been reversed, i'd be harping on the Big Lazy if [a big "if"] the lakers became mediocre.
i do agree with you that shaq is an old, but expensive Ford pickup truck which will cost a lot, but not get a ton of mileage. if Miami can compete for 1 or 2 more years, i'd say the shaq project was a success. it's going to be no different than when kobe's done with the lakers in 2009. kobe will have 13 years on those shaky knees and will probably want a max contract. the question will be, can kobe propel a mediocre team to a championship like shaq has over and over again? i don't know the answer, but i tend to think "no" unless where-ever kobe ends up, there's already an established #1 and kobe is the super-duper #2 a la Shaq-kobe tandum.
i'd like to add that everwhere shaq has gone, the mediocre team has propelled to a contender status. i'd also like to add that every team that shaq has left became mediocre. hell, even Penny did a better job than kobe after shaq's departure. as i recall, the Magic still had an overall record of .500 or better post-shaq. can you say the same for kobe?
Posted by: KLBeast(the real one) | August 21, 2007 at 05:48 PM
TaosHum,
"Guys aren't going to take less money to come here, not with Kobe. They would with Shaq though... hmmmm..."
Not quite. They would take less money to come here with Shaq AND Kobe.
But they won't take less money right now to go to Shaq and DWade.
hmm indeed.
Posted by: Long time Laker fan | August 21, 2007 at 05:51 PM
Miguel,
On the Kings-Clippers-Lakers trade.
I like this one a lot better than the Lakers junk + Farmar for Memphis and Minnesota junk. I think it's only a couple of
nudges from being balanced.
It would assume the Clippers have mostly given up on this season, so they're taking two good young
players (Farmar & Turiaf) to throw in alongside Al Thornton to be the future core of the team. If they're
hoping to compete this year, then they won't be giving up Corey Maggette unless it's for a high scoring
PF to replace Brand.
The Kings would want more (if they would do the trade at all). Both Bibby and Artest are near-all-star
quality. Maggette is at that level, but Critter is a rookie, and thus an unknown. And even though Kwame
is an expiring contract, the Kings already have a veteran center (Brad Miller) and a young rookie center
(Spencer Hawes), so they're probably not going to want to take on Kwame. Actually, maybe they would
if it were nearing the trade deadline. If Critter plays as well in the regular season as he did in summer
league, then around the trade deadline Sacto might see Critter and an expiring contract as good value
for Bibby.
Posted by: Long time Laker fan | August 21, 2007 at 06:07 PM
long time
"Not quite. They would take less money to come here with Shaq AND Kobe."
kobe is only kobe because of shaq. let's not forget, we recruited shaq and kobe was drafted as a talented role player. ain't nobody saying they came to LA to play with kobe. hell, is anybody saying that now besides JO? as a matter of fact, blame FO all you want, but it's kobe attitude that's the problem.
if kobe went to some 2nd rated team when he was drafted, kobe would have gotten hurt from jacking up shots 40 times a night trying to maintain a .500 team record. after 3-5 years of it, kobiatch would be begging to play with a shaq o'neal.....too bad it was the other way around.
AK/BK, you gonna censor this one too? either way, it's all good, i'm done for today.....
Posted by: KLBeast(the real one) | August 21, 2007 at 06:08 PM
KLYeast (the infection),
"let kobe rot and don't make any stupid trades unless the lakers get enough compensation for BOTH kobe and shaq
since it is kobe who's responsible for shaq departure."
---
Good thinking. FORCE Kobe to play out the last two years and opt out. Then the Lakers will have cap space so
they can overpay for a second tier star like Orlando did with Rashard Lewis. WOO HOOO! WOO HOOO! We're
on the mediocrity express, because KLYeast wants Buss to be just as bullheaded as Kobe is. WOO HOOOO!
Posted by: Long time Laker fan | August 21, 2007 at 06:12 PM
KL,
No, that post is fine. You know why the other one got deleted, so please stop with that stuff. Everything else is fine, so I really don't want to make this into a bigger deal than it is.
AK
Posted by: Andrew Kamenetzky | August 21, 2007 at 06:13 PM
KLBeast(the real one)
"the question will be, can kobe propel a mediocre team to a championship like shaq has over and over again? "
LOL.
Come on man, don't be so blatantly wrong. Name me ONE time that Shaq has led a mediocre team to a championship?
Here is a list of each time Shaq has been to the Finals:
99-00 Lakers ----------- Great team
00-01 Lakers ----------- Great team
01-02 Lakers ----------- Great team
03-04 Lakers ----------- Great team that ran out of gas in the Finals because of injuries
05-06 Heat ----------- Great team
So, mind taking that one back? :p
-derek
Posted by: derek | August 21, 2007 at 06:13 PM
Gonnader,
"AMEN BROTHER! AND I HAVE TO SAY, I LIKE YOUR OPINION OF THE LAKERS HOLDING KOBIATCH FOR THE
DURATION OF HIS CONTRACT..."
WOO HOOOOOO!
WOO HOOOOOO!
Gonnader has jumped on KLYeast's mediocrity express.
WOO HOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!
Posted by: Long time Laker fan | August 21, 2007 at 06:15 PM
Gunnerd,
I GUESS YOU LOGIC IS IF KOBIATCH HAS AN ALLSTAR TEAM HE CAN TAKE THEM TO THE CHAMPIONSHIP.
Well, DWade couldn't do it last year. Neither could LeBronze (thus the name). If it happens this year, you know
who's responsible.
Posted by: Long time Laker fan | August 21, 2007 at 06:17 PM
Wes
You were kidding right? Lamar not better then AC Green? Lamar is maybe the most underrated player in the league. He has a complete game. The only other guy his size that can do what he does is Lebron. Lamar can give you quality minutes at all 5 positions!! With his court vision and passing skills he could play the point at least on offense. You mentioned Scott, Copper and Green which ones were on the US Team roster? Lamar is, he couldnt play because of the surgery but he is on the roster. Now perhaps you and Andrew Z have a better eye for talent then Colangelo and coach K but I will stick with them, they do have pretty decent track records. Oh heres some stats, just for fun.
B Scott 15.1 ppg 2.8 assists 3 RB's
AC Green 9.6 ppg 1.1 assists 7.4 RB's
M Cooper 8.9 ppg 4.2 assists 3.2 RB's
Lamar 15.8 ppg 4.6 assists 8.6 RB's
Everyone seems so concerned with Lamars point average. Remember he was scoring 18.9 last year before the injuries. And why are we not more concerned with other positions. Luke gave a whopping 11 ppg last year and Smush 10. We have a very good player in Lamar and yet he is the focus of all these trade machine proposals, when are bigger problems at the 3 are not even addressed. Personal. I am not O.K with 11 points out of my starting SF, that is traditionally a scoring spot on the floor. I believe if we could figure out a way to move Lamar to the 3 we might get 19 or 20 ppg. With all the other things he does, that would be huge.
MH
Posted by: michael h | August 21, 2007 at 06:22 PM
LONG TIME KOBIATCH FAN,
"Well, DWade couldn't do it last year. Neither could LeBronze (thus the name). If it happens this year, you know who's responsible."
ARE WE TALKING WORLD CHAMPIONSHIP? OR WE TALKING FIBA TOURNAMENT?
ARE THE SAME TEAMS THAT BEAT THE USA TEAM IN THE OLYMPICS AND THE WORLD CHAMPIONSHIP, PLAYING IN THE FIBA TOURNAMENT?
WELL I GUESS SINCE KOBIATCH IS THE ABA TEAMS OF THE WORLD, HE IS ENTITLED TO WIN A CHAMPIONSHIP. WHAT DO YOU SAY?
Posted by: Gunner | August 21, 2007 at 06:28 PM
KLBeast(the real one),
"kobe is only kobe because of shaq. let's not forget, we recruited shaq and kobe was drafted as a talented role player."
Come on beast, again?
Kobe is Kobe because of Kobe and nobody else. So Rick Fox is Rick Fox because of Shaq? So Derek Fisher is Derek Fisher because of Shaq?
"let's not forget, we recruited shaq and kobe was drafted as a talented role player."
Let's not forget, beast. The Lakers signed Shaq via free agency, and during that same exact summer they traded Vlade Divac for the draft rights to Kobe Bean Bryant.
Jerry West said Kobe had the most impressive workout he's ever seen to date. He wasn't drafted as a role player. He was drafted to be Kobe Bryant and Jerry West knew the gem he had back in 96.
Posted by: derek | August 21, 2007 at 06:33 PM
KL beast
You already passed the post 8th
Posted by: jorema | August 21, 2007 at 06:34 PM
Long time Laker fan, you can try to pick holes in what I am saying or try to slant it any way you want, but at the base level it is absolutely true. When Shaq went to Miami, all these guys suddenly appeared and after Wade was given 25 free throws... they won the championship!!! Meanwhile... WHO clamored to join Kobe these last few years? You can certainly put some blame on the front office but you've got to give Shaq credit for openly recruiting for a lot of the guys who came in. All we know is that Kobe wanted some max contract guys and a serious headcase in Artest who did indeed cause problems in Sacto, vs if we had given up Odom to bring him here and would now be trying to get rid of him and build around... what? exactly?
So if it makes you feel better, sure, now that Shaq is older, perhaps players are getting a little bit more wary of whether he can carry a team to a championship but this sure wasn't the case when Shaq was Kobe's age.
Oh yeah, I'm not supposed to post things like this. I'm supposed to repeat the company line. KOBE IS ALWAYS RIGHT. KOBE IS THE ONLY ONE WHO WANTS TO WIN.
Posted by: TaosHum | August 21, 2007 at 06:36 PM
LT79 Laker Fan,
"His response to Lakers fans was "Sit tight". All this talk about him wanting to remain a Laker is BS. The river denial definitely is running through this blog."
THANK YOU.
I mean with Rachel Nichol's semi pleasant face "oh i mean there was a lot of misunderstanding..its water under the bridge"
to chris sheridan "The lakers know where I stand--*angry pouty face*"
To Stephen a smith "yeah i want to be traded"
to vic the brick who was drooling all over kobe like he was vida guerra "yeah well i know you love me and i love being loved..so i dont know maybe ill come back""
KOBE IS SELF ABSORBED, FULL OF IT. The reason he spends so much time practicing and working out is because he has no friends nobody to hang out with. There is a good saying..tell me who your friends are and I'll tell you who you are...what do you say about Kobe.
Kobe has never been part of the Lakers. even when winning championships he never hung out with his teammates. Remember that???? Or do you suffer from short term memory???
Kobe runs his own show..and thats why he's a cancer. He may be the best player in the game today. He may work the hardest. He may be the most competitive. Doesnt make him the most impactful, relevant, championship quality player.
Posted by: The Lake-Show | August 21, 2007 at 06:54 PM
Hobbit Image,
"1st Example: Let's say that Smush Parker is 10% behind the 3 pt
line and Kobe is 35% behind the 3 pt. line. Which do you guard?"
So Brian Cook shot 40% from the 3 point Line last year
Kobe Bryant shot 34% from 3 point
So I guess you're going to guard Brian Cook??? ( so will Weave-man...haha just kidding buddy)
THANK GOD YOU DONT COACH A TEAM, WORK AS A GM,
Posted by: The Lake-Show | August 21, 2007 at 06:58 PM
TaoSHun
"When Shaq went to Miami, all these guys suddenly appeared and after Wade was given 25 free throws... they won the championship!!! Meanwhile... WHO clamored to join Kobe these last few years? You can certainly put some blame on the front office but you've got to give Shaq credit for openly recruiting for a lot of the guys who came in. "
It seems like a lot of people on this blog have a real short term memory problem. I suggest herbal treatments
They forget that when Miami signed Shaq, Alonzo Mourning came back motivated to win alongside him. Gary Payton followed Shaq to Miami FROM Los Angeles, to win with Shaq and Wade. Antoine Walker and Jason Williams ressurrected their careers in Miami.
Sure those guys are old NOW..and probably less motivated..but at the time they hadnt won any championships so they gave it their best. For all of them talking about Shaq is lazy and old..yeah he is old NOW...and maybe he is less motivated..now that he has one-upped Kobe. He did what he had to do. He won over an entire city in two years.
Its like calling out your older bro or like someone else that already did their thing. Do you say...well damn Jordan couldnt do anything any more...he's getting paid too much now that hes older cant do it by himself.. when you yourself havent even gotten to that level.
I dont see how Kobe can even say anything to Shaq. Sure D-wade carried the Heat to the title. But that wasnt Shaq's point. It wasnt about winning an MVP. He just set the Heat up really good. To be a leader. Because Shaq and Kobe play different positions so you cant compare them, then there wil always be an unwinnable argument as to who was better skilled. But as to who is a leader..that easily goes to Shaq. And where are legends born? In leadership situations.
Kobe's legacy right now is that of Dan Marino, Barry Bonds
Posted by: The Lake-Show | August 21, 2007 at 07:06 PM
And to explain why I used MVPs to talk about Kobe.
Sure Dirk Novitzki didnt desrve the MVP. Jason Kidd also deserved an MVP when Tim Duncan won one.
But thats precisely the point.
For a comparison go to baseball. Alex Rodriguez was won the MVP award, and will probably win it again this year, regardless of what the Yankees do
AROD has the respect of the baseball writers and voters who undoubtedly crown him as the best all around player. defense, offense...speed..the 5-tool player.
Kobe is also the same kind of player..unbelieveable stats..and solid D.
But Kobe doesnt have that respect for him to be handed an MVP.
ARODs MVP came on a miserable last place team. Kobe has been on two playoff teams and is never in the argument for MVP.
Clearly, Kobe's legacy isnt that of an MVP caliber. Steve Nash (who i dont like) has surpassed his legacy in three quick years. So has LeBron's and even Dwayne Wade.
That's undenaible. See the real issue on this blog is that those of you how worship Kobe represents a small segment of the population. Jorema, who loves to talk about jersey sales and this and that is missing the point.
Posted by: The Lake-Show | August 21, 2007 at 07:11 PM
Lake Show,
I actually chuckled at that.
AK/BK, or Anybody,
I don't think we're making any trades this off season(unless it's Kobe), so what available FA's do you think we should go after? I've stated many times that I think Ruben Patterson could be had for cheap, and would be a vaulable piece since he can score, rebound, play good defense, AND he shoots a high percentage. I think this is a decent lineup that COULD get to the 2nd round of the playoffs, maybe farther if we stay healthy:
Fisher-Farmar-Crittenton
Kobe-Evans-Coby Karl
Patterson-Luke-Radmanovic
LO-Turiaf-Cook(my favorite player Lake Show)
Kwame-Bynum-Mihm
Better defensively, and offensively(if Patterson can pick up the offense), and we're deeper.
Posted by: Weave-Man | August 21, 2007 at 07:18 PM
The first way to improve the Lakers.
You have to admit that the management and personal decisions have been not up to championship caliber.
You know what they are.
Repeat.
Trade Shaq, Pick up 15M guy for 3 years not playing. already forgot his name. Gable? Grant?
Trade Butler for already forgot his name.
Pick up Vlade and Vlade.
Not trade Brynum for Kidd.
The Lakers talent evaluation is poor. They seem to go by the tabloids. They need a real basketball guy
in management personnel decisons.
The first move by Buss has to be get rid of Kupchak, no offense. He may be a great guy, but he is a terrible GM.
From then on, things get only get better.
Posted by: Lee | August 21, 2007 at 07:26 PM
Juno
I'm with you man!!
Tired of all the whiners moaning and bitching about the team.
Trade him... keep him... get rid of that guy for this guy.....................
Either support em or get the hell out!!!
GO LAKE SHOW!!!
Posted by: keifo | August 21, 2007 at 07:37 PM
Lake Show,
Your quote about Kobe, "He may be the best player in the game today. He may work the hardest. He may be the most competitive. Doesnt make him the most impactful, relevant, championship quality player" makes no sense. How would you describe an "impactful, relevant, championship quality player?
Who cares if he doesn't hang with his team mates? I don't. They don't.
You say, "The reason he spends so much time practicing and working out is because he has no friends nobody to hang out with." How do you know that? Do you hang outside his crib 24/7 and spy on him?
You may hate him, but basketball fans don't. He's got the #1 selling jersey in the NBA. In case you forgot, fans in BOSTON of all places cheered him.
What Kobe says or doesn't say, what Kobe does or doesn't do off the court is meaningless. Kobe gives it all up when he plays. What he said two hours, two weeks, or two months before the game doesn't matter. What matters for Kobe is getting in the zone and playing great basketball.
Kobe has the same kind of focus about basketball that Michael Ovitz had about being an agent when he built CAA into a great talent agency. If the other four guys on the floor had the same focus, the same dedication, and played to the best of their ability every second they were in the game the way Kobe does, the Lakers would be champions every season.
Posted by: Rick Friedman | August 21, 2007 at 07:58 PM
Wesjoenixon,
Read your post yesterday halfway on the top of the world, you said it right but as Lktom said it: have faith on the scrubbies, they will be better when the season begins.
I recall we had discussions of the Last Supper painting of Da Vinci sometime ago, well i read that at Pegeant of Arts in Laguna Hills by the end of August will feature a live Last Supper painting oflive characters posed for painting. Talk to you later and have fun.
Posted by: Edwin Gueco | August 21, 2007 at 08:14 PM
A REALISTIC TAKE ON KOBE:
Everybody exaggerates one way or the other. But he's neither a God nor a Devil. Here's the real plain and simple truth:
Kobe came into the league as a teenage wunderkind. He played patiently as a sub for Eddie Jones even though he was a first team All-Star. He got his chance to really prove himself when Phil arrived and he became the outside threat that enabled Shaq to dominate inside and MVP us to 3 championships. He got tired of playing second banana, and when Shaq wanted a huge salary boost for an aging player, convinced the Busses that he could be THE Man and carry the team if he had decent support. Due to front officce bungling he never got it. So the jury is still out...
That's it - plain and simple. He's a very young and very rich man who'd like to win the Lakers a few championships as the go-to MVP that Shaq was. But he doesn't know how to do it with the mediocre team around him. He tried calling out the Front Office (which deserved calling out) but that's not right for a player to do and he took some well deserved heat. Now he doesn't know WTF to do except keep playing the best basketball he can and hope they put some kind of team around him he can lead to a title. The jury is still out on that one too...
That's the REAL story.
Posted by: Jay Jay | August 21, 2007 at 08:22 PM
TaosHum,
I never said that Kobe is always right. Kobe has made some bad choices and said some stupid things, but he has always done
his job over and above the call of duty. He comes back pretty much every year improved from the year before. He works on
his game during the season and during the offseason. And he is one of the top 2 or 3 players in the game right now.
But it's ludicrous to completely blame Kobe for the demise of the Lakers, which is what KL and Gunner and occasionally you
like to do. Kobe has some part in the blame. He didn't always get along with Shaq, and he did indirectly threaten to leave
by opting out of his contract and talking to other teams. But he never specifically threatened to leave the Lakers if Shaq
stayed. Not once.
Shaq also had a lot to do with the Lakers demise. Shaq had several tirades to the media that were no less whiny than
Kobe's recent outburst, but rather than "wah wah I want some good players around me", it was "wah wah I want 30
million dollars a year for several more years." Shaq caught some flak from it at the time, just as Kobe is taking some
flak from the media (and you) right now. Mid-season, Buss offered an extension to Shaq, but Shaq turned it down,
because it would have meant a decrease in pay in the extension years (if I remember right, it was reported as something
like 24 million, while Shaq wanted a contract starting at 30 million and going up!). Then late in the year, Buss pulled the
offer and decided to trade Shaq.
Buss had something to do with the breakup of the dynasty. He could have offered Shaq and extension at the price
he wanted and begged Kobe to stay. If he had done that and Kobe would have left, THEN you could legitimately place
all the blame on Kobe. But Buss didn't offer to break the bank for Shaq. He decided to trade him off while he still had
some trade value and rebuild around Kobe.
Kupchak/Jim Buss had something to do with the demise of the Lakers. They made the Shaq trade that strapped a huge
anchor of Brian Grant's contract on the Lakers payroll. Even so, Caron Butler and Lamar Odom would have been two
nice pieces to build around, but they traded off Caron for Kwame. Furthermore, they gambled that if they tried to free
up cap space, maybe they could lure Yao away from Houston or Amare away from Phoenix. That plan backfired when
both re-signed with their teams.
So there you have it, if you want to place blame for the demise of the most recent Lakers Dynasty, don't try placing it
all on Kobe's back. After all, it's not his job to assemble a team. Yes, he can help by trying to persuade people to
join the Lakers, and he has tried to bring some good players in who wanted to play on Kobe's team (Boozer, Davis,
Artest), which the Lakers weren't able to get done (I don't entirely blame Mitch for that, the team just might not have
had been able to bring any of those players in under the cap). But that's not Kobe's job. Kobe's job is to play point guard
and he does his job VERY well. If you deny that, then you're lying. It's Mitch and the Busses job do decide who to hire,
who to trade for, and who to let go. Thus ultimately, they're much more responsible for Shaq leaving than Kobe is.
By the way, most of the players that went to Miami were through trades. Gary Payton was the only notable person
who voluntarily went to Miami to join Shaq. There was no star still in their prime who took less money than they could
get elsewhere to play with Shaq in Miami. And the Lakers (thanks to the Brian Grant contract) have been over the
salary cap since before Shaq left. With a clever trade or two maybe they could get some cap space next summer,
and if Kobe were to change his tune and say he wants to stay, then MAYBE you'd see a vet or two coming to the
Lakers for less pay to help build a contender.
Posted by: Long time Laker fan | August 21, 2007 at 08:42 PM
Laker lover...
We know already.
You are here to excuse lakers office,
Posted by: jorems | August 21, 2007 at 08:48 PM
Hal9000
Interesting observation - "If Kupchak knows that Kobe has told him to trade him or he will opt out - would you still make the LO and Bynum trade for JO?" The short answer is YES. But I wouldn't stop there - in addition to getting JO, I would be aggressively pursuing a Kobe trade, there has to be a deal out there that brings us at least two really good players In other words - tear this freaking train wreck apart and put together a TEAM, one with attitude and competitiveness I know that LO has played through more human tragedy than any human being should - God bless him for that, but on the court - he is just to soft. The best word for Bynum is "potential" or in other words - "hasn't done anything yet" The only way we win is if Kupchak can add a bonafide complimentary superstar next to Kobe - and Kobe stays, or we just nuke this thing and change the cast completely. There is nothing in between, except mediocrity.
Posted by: Lincoln Laker | August 21, 2007 at 08:53 PM
AK,
Please help! I think I'm stuck in the archival section of the blog and I can't figure out how to get to the current issues thread. All I can find are comments about all the old news, Kobe/Shaq vs Shaq/Kobe, Kobe vs MJ, ridiculous trade proposals, and stuff like should we go after Penny, Oakley, Reggie, Houston, etc., etc.. This thread has to be from 10 years ago.
How do we get to a current Lakers thread? You know, one where all the intelligent bloggers type about real things, current happenings. A thread where people are actually respectful to everyone.
Posted by: LakerLarry | August 21, 2007 at 08:59 PM
"They forget that when Miami signed Shaq, Alonzo Mourning came back motivated to win alongside him. Gary Payton followed Shaq to Miami FROM Los Angeles, to win with Shaq and Wade. Antoine Walker and Jason Williams ressurrected their careers in Miami."
----
Yes, but Shaq wasn't responsible for bringing Mourning, Walker or WIlliams to Miami. They were all traded to Miami (Mourning from New Jersey,
Walker from Boston, and Williams from Memphis). It wasn't like Shaq called those guys on the phone and they talked to their agents and
said, I MUST BE TRADED TO MIAMI NOW! Gary Payton did voluntarily come to Miami to play with Shaq. One player. One very old and
slowing down player, but still effective from time to time.
That's not the same as when the Lakers had Shaq and Kobe - Rick Fox in his prime took a much smaller contract than he could have gotten
elsewhere to join that team. Karl Malone and Gary Payton (both slightly less over the hill) took an MLE and a veteran's minimum to come
join Shaq and Kobe. Those were much more impactful players than Gary Payton two years later and slower.
Posted by: Long time Laker fan | August 21, 2007 at 09:03 PM
AK/BK,
What do you think about brining in a Big Man coach like Charles Oakley to beat up our bigs in practice to make them more beast-like. Turiaf showed his metal in the playoffs going hard down low, but Mimh, Kwame and most importantly Bynum could be well served to play with more aggression. Also, any word on AB? I think his progression to the Lakers success this season.
Thanks
Posted by: Nathaniel | August 21, 2007 at 09:04 PM
Rick Friedmman,
" If the other four guys on the floor had the same focus, the same dedication, and played to the best of their ability every second they were in the game the way Kobe does, the Lakers would be champions every season."
Ummm, no they wouldn't......please be less provinical. The Lakers could be beyond focused, more focused than Kobe, and they wouldn't win the championsip every year, or one year for that matter. They wouldn't get to the finals, and probably not the WC Finals.
They're just not talented enough....and other teams try hard too, dont' you think? Or no, they're not the Lakers, so they don't try, they're not Kobe Bryant....
Lebron doesn't try hard, or does he? But his team is in the finals. Duncan, Parker, Nash, Wade, Kidd....they try hard too, but the Lakers trying hard would get them over the top, beat all these guys.
Shucks, if Phil Jackson could just get the to try hard!!!!
Posted by: 10milliondollarzen | August 21, 2007 at 09:07 PM
Taking 2 many 3's is a big part of us not rebounding well. Long rebounds starting breaks for the opponents, and of course notboxing out !
Posted by: lalakerlover | August 21, 2007 at 09:17 PM
10milliondollarzen,
The only team that has a talent-focus-dedication combination that could challenge is San Antonio. LeBron wasn't good enough to hoist the trophy. If the Wizards had stayed healthy, LeBron would have started summer vacation when Kobe did. LeBron's team mates for the most part were not better than the Lakers roster after Kobe. Wade isn't surrounded by more talent. Neither is Kidd.
Don't get me wrong. The team would be stronger if we had acquired Kidd in February. Jermaine O'Neal would have been nice if Larry Bird hadn't been so greedy. Garnett would have been nice, too.
But those kinds of moves are engineered by the front office. Sure, all the haters will come out and blame Kobe for the deals not happening, but anyone who's ever been in management understands that the hater claims are bogus.
Kobe is NOT now and never has been the reason the current Laker teams are not great. Neither is Phil.
Kobe's team mates need to step up. No more excuses.
Posted by: Rick Friedman | August 21, 2007 at 09:30 PM
Andrew Z, no, trading Kobe isn't the only way. Firing Mitch, finding some competent GM, and bringing in some decent supporting cast here is another way.
Posted by: gdchild | August 21, 2007 at 09:30 PM
Laker Larry,
I think I'm stuck in the same archive. Have you found a way out yet?
Posted by: Rick Friedman | August 21, 2007 at 09:31 PM
AK/BK, FIBA American Basketball will be a good topic for now.
Posted by: gdchild | August 21, 2007 at 09:31 PM
Clearly, Kobe's legacy isnt that of an MVP caliber. Steve Nash (who i dont like) has surpassed his legacy in three quick years. So has LeBron's and even Dwayne Wade. That's undenaible.
---
No it's not. I deny it. Every one of those players has had better players around them during the past three seasons. Especially Nash. If you put
Kobe on a team with Amare Stoudemire, Shawn Marion, Leandro Barbosa, Raja Bell, Boris Diaw and the rest, and he'd be making the NBA Finals
and probably winning it all. Put Kobe on a team with Shaq, Mourning, Walker, Williams, Haslem, Payton and the rest and you get the same result.
The Busses and Mitch put Kobe on a team with Lamar Odom, Luke Walton, and not much else.
Note that LeBron and DWade got LESS consideration for MVP than Kobe this season - the current thinking in the NBA is that the MVP is the
"best player on the best team". Kobe can't shoot for Smush, he can't defend for Cook or Rad, he can't catch the ball for Kwame. So until
some of the other players around Kobe start earning their paychecks, Kobe can only do so much. I think Lamar and Luke are the only two
players on the recent Lakers rosters that would have made the regular rotation of the Shaq-Kobe dynasty. Now it's very possible that
one or two of Bynum, Farmar, Evans, Mihm or even Vujacic will improve enough over the summer to elevate the overall level of the Lakers
as a team, but if they don't, I assure you Kobe will be gone next summer and will win MVPs and championships elsewhere (and yes
I did mean a plural of both).
It's really a shame that Kobe isn't more patient. I truly think Bynum and Farmar will be legitimate starters in another year or two, and
adding them to Lamar and Luke means they'd only be an MLE level role player (defensive stopper SF? defending and rebounding PF?)
or two away from being contenders.
Posted by: Long time Laker fan | August 21, 2007 at 09:45 PM
LakerLarry, we don't need a new post, we need a time machine lol.
Posted by: Faith | August 21, 2007 at 09:56 PM
Lee,
"The Lakers talent evaluation is poor. They seem to go by the tabloids. They need a real basketball guy in management personnel decisons."
KOBIATCH WANTED TO BE THE MAN SO, THIS IS WHY THIS TEAM LOOKS LIKE IT DOES TODAY. YOU CAN TAKE $20M, RUN SHAQ OFF AND THINK YOU'RE GOING TO KEEP STAR PLAYERS IN LA. THIS BED WAS MADE LONG TIME AGO BY MRS SPEARS HIMSELF.
Posted by: Gunner | August 21, 2007 at 09:57 PM
Jay Jay,
I agree with your whole assessment about Kobe except for one line:
"convinced the Busses that he could be THE Man and carry the team if he had decent support."
As Kobe tells it, Jerry Buss told Kobe that he wasn't resigning Shaq and now Kobe was the man. Shaq agreed that
that was correct. Nobody from the Lakers front office has openly refuted it. Thus you have no reason to believe
that anything else is true.
Seriously, I agree with everything else you said, but I honestly don't believe that Kobe did anything to directly
manipulate the Lakers into getting rid of Shaquille O'Neal. Indirectly, perhaps, by opting out of his contract and
talking to other teams, but by the time he did that the Lakers had already announced that they were planning
on trading Shaq.
Posted by: Long time Laker fan | August 21, 2007 at 09:57 PM
lalakerlover,
"Taking 2 many 3's is a big part of us not rebounding well. Long rebounds starting breaks for the opponents, and of course notboxing out !"
complements of Kobiatch Bean Bryant on 45 attempts per game.
Posted by: Gunner | August 21, 2007 at 09:58 PM
Rick Friedman,
" If the other four guys on the floor had the same focus, the same dedication, and played to the best of their ability every second they were in the game the way Kobe does, the Lakers would be champions every season."
DUDE, YOU HAVE SAID SOME GOOD STATEMENTS IN THE PAST BUT THIS IS NOT ONE. WHEN DOES PLAYING HARD GET YOU INTO A CHAMPIONSHIP?
ALL 11 PLAYERS CAN PLAY HARD EVERY NIGHT BUT WHEN YOU SO-CALLED LEADER IS JACKING UP 50 ATTEMPTS, WHY WOULD YOU WANT TO PLAY HARD?
SO, I GUESS EVERYONE SHOULD PLAY HARD AND BOX OUT SO, THEY CAN REBOUND 35-45 ATTEMPTS CATAPULTED UP THERE BY THE BALL HOG HIMSELF.
Posted by: Gunner | August 21, 2007 at 10:01 PM
Kobe's job is to play point guard ...
DOH (following up myself) - I meant shooting guard.
Posted by: Long time Laker fan | August 21, 2007 at 10:03 PM
LAKE SHOW,
"Clearly, Kobe's legacy isnt that of an MVP caliber. Steve Nash (who i dont like) has surpassed his legacy in three quick years. So has LeBron's and even Dwayne Wade. That's undenaible. See the real issue on this blog is that those of you how worship Kobe represents a small segment of the population. Jorema, who loves to talk about jersey sales and this and that is missing the point."
KOBIATCH SO-CALLED LEGACY WAS FINISHED IN 2004 WHEN SHAQ LEFT. AND I WOULDN'T CALL OUT JOREMA (KOBE'S PUBLICIST). SHE HAS SOME REALLY GOOD 1999 FORBE ARTICLES SHE DUG UP FROM GOOGLE. ONLY PROBLEM IS THEY ARE PLACED THE WRONG BLOG. THEY SHOULD BE ON KBIATCH24.COM
Posted by: Gunner | August 21, 2007 at 10:05 PM
Okay, let's break away from comparing Kobe to others and ruminating about the past three seasons. Let's talk about the future instead.
Which of the following three scenarios for this summer do you think would get the Lakers furthest next season?
1. Stay with the current team
2. Trade Odom, Bynum, and whatever for Jermaine O'Neal
3. Trade Odom for someone else, but keep Bynum
4. Trade Bynum for someone else, but keep Odom
5. Trade Kobe for 2 or 3 good players.
Also, which scenario do you think would get the Lakers to Championship level fastest?
Posted by: Long time Laker fan | August 21, 2007 at 10:18 PM
weave-man,
would you sign Michael Vick to your football team?
Because if you wouldnt, then I suggest you wouldnt want ruben patterson.
Posted by: The Lake-Show | August 21, 2007 at 10:22 PM
Krzyzewski, who was an assistant coach with the original 1992 Dream Team, saw some parallels between Bryant and a leading member of that team.
"Michael Jordan always will be at a different level from anyone else, but there are similarities," he said. "Kobe plays both ends. If we have to stop a scorer on the wing, we'll put him on him. He can get his own shot any time he wants, he's a hard worker on and off the court and he wants to win so badly.
"He's always doing extra, the guy last to get on the bus. He's never satisfied. In that way, they're very similar."
Posted by: jorema | August 21, 2007 at 10:34 PM
The Lake-Show,
Like your question near the beginning of this blog. Question being, if I were Mitch, what would I do?
Simple!
Trade Kobe!
Why?
Because he isn't happy, he can option out at the end of this coming year, and being at the peak of his career, he is most valuable at this point in time.
Who can we get for the likes of Kobe?
Well, it depends where Kobe wants to go, as we all know, this option is in his trading clause.
So will there be a trade for Kobe?
More and likely not. Because of the trading clause, Kobe only wants to be traded to either Chicago or New York. Chicago doesn't want to break up their nucleus and New York, in my opinion, doesn't have anything worth trading for, for the likes of Kobe Bryant.
How can a trade happen?
Kobe needs to be more willing to be traded to a wider selection of teams. Teams that have a superstar they would like to move for a Kobe Bryant.
So here's the Wrap!
Kobe doesn't want to be traded as badly as he is leading us all to think. Sure he is frustruated and wants quick answers, but Kobe, we all want answers. But at the same time, we as fans don't quit on our team. It isn't mathematically or realistic to bring in a superstar to run along side with Kobe with what he have in return to give.
I would suggest that Kobe finally starts to grow up this coming year, and start playing as a team player. Not a one-side show and maybe, his teammates around him will begin to come around and play better basketball. A part of winning basketball games and championships is trust, and if teammates of Kobe's feel that Kobe doesn't trust them, than how can a Lamar Odom, Kwame Brown, Andrew Bynum, and many others expect to florish in their careers and be useful. THEY CAN'T!
Posted by: Ron | August 21, 2007 at 10:35 PM