I realize this will feel like a plug for a mag BK and I work with
But the article on Tim Donaghy in the new issue of ESPN The Magazine (Prince Fielder on the cover) is worth checking out. It's not so much about Donaghy as the state of NBA reffing in general. More specifically, the league office's not-so-positive effect on said state. Micromanaged videotape review (which often leads to being retroactively criticized for calls previously issued a thumbs-up). Refs being told they personally need to call particular infractions more often. The urgency to stave off the henpeckers, which often results in ticky-tack fouls. A decided emphasis on adhering to rules and appearances over context, which, as one former ref put it, has "taken the common sense out of the officials' hands." Just one example of how the league has grown exceptionally overcontrolled since the Palace brawl. Since most of y'all are pretty critical of David Stern, Stu Jackson and the gang (for many of the reasons I've been), I thought this would be up your alley.
If you have ESPN Insider, you can click here, then sift through the table of contents. Otherwise, it's not presented in a linkable format, but you can always plant yourself at the nearest Brentano's and peruse the whole thing. Just don't bring it into the bathroom or else you've agreed to a purchase. No questions asked. Or answered. Kinda like Kobe's appearance on the "Jimmy Kimmel Show."
-- AK



Get JO without loosing LO!
--FearlessWhackJob
Posted by: FearlessWhackJob | August 12, 2007 at 03:26 PM
KL,
"i will argue that kobe is the one that force management to rebuild by presenting an "either or" situation on the shaq question. this is why i give kobe a hard time. kobe essentially pushed shaq out (not uncommon in corporate politics) and forced the lakers into a rebuilding mode prematurely."
I'll agree, and disagree with you here. Yes, Kobe probably had told management he was gonna leave, and MIGHT be persuaded to stay if Shaq was gone. Shaq didn't make their decision any harder though when he yelled at Buss, and told him to pay him, or when he said he was gonna get healthy on company time. The main thing I don't agree with though is his part in the rebuilding mode we find ourselves in. If the FO truly wanted, they could have made better trades, scout Europe better, or draft better. Yes, hindsight is 20/20, but I don't think it's too much to ask for the FO to bring in more viable NBA talent.
"i'll say again that i don't hate anybody personally including kobe. as for the "truth", non of us really know what is "truth" and what is “spin”."
I also believe hate is a strong word to use, and I agree that I use it too readily to describe people that dislike Kobe. If i've offended you I apologize. As far as the truth goes, you're right about that as well. We don't know what goes on in the FO, but I think we've gotten enough clues to make a good assumption. But you know what they say about people who assume.
"i'm willing to bet that mitch and PJ are not even privy to the decision that are made."
That's why I try not to bash Mitch. He's pretty much just a talking head for the FO.
"I recall you said that you're in your mid-20s, if so please be aware of what management tells you and ALWAYS cover your a$$. Money and politics is very corruptive."
I appreciate the advice, and will definitely use it.
"Hey weave, I enjoy having serious conversations with you because you play the game (ie, you’re a b-baller) and you seem to be honest in your posts. Take care."
Thanks for the kind words, and I'm glad you enjoy bantering with me. I don't always like what you post, but I can deal with it because usually you make me have to take what you say into consideration, and make me see things from different angles. You take a lot of grief here(some of it warranted), but you continue to post your opinions, and I can definitely respect that.
Posted by: Weave-Man | August 12, 2007 at 03:26 PM
Man, some o f the vitriol in here is really getting to be too much. I don't a rat's a$$ what you guys think of each other, if all you're going to do when replying to an point is call somebody names and essentially screaming at somebody, well, stop wasting my time. Y'all know who you are.
Posted by: Michael A | August 12, 2007 at 03:31 PM
kl beast
penny hardaway? cmon you cant be serious. he was a good player. key word being "was". i understand your gripe about the fo not doing jack about picking up some nice free agents but you cant just post about every single one of the free agents that dont sign with the lakers. especially the ones that YOU KNOW are garbage. the heat signed penny because they had an even worse off season than the lakers. they signed smush for cryin out loud. if thats not desperate i dont know what is. all im saying is i like your enthusiasm for the team but lets keep it realistic here. thats all.
Posted by: sixonezero | August 12, 2007 at 03:31 PM
KL, what say you? Are you going to come correct or are you going to hide?
I repeat: I, the hobbitmage, ****CHALLENGE YOU**** you to actually look up Wins vs. Losses for Shaq without an all-star and post it so that all can see."
If you're going to take pot shots at the best player in the world, you shouldn't be shooting blanks.
For all of you who aren't catching this: Go back to when you were a kid playing on the court.
There's this scrub hangin' out at the fence. Trying to heckle. Talking the talk like he's somebody.
All right. I got kin in missouri, the show-me state. I'm tossin' the ball to the man who's heckling.
To the one who talks like he knows all [ that would be you KL ] I say: Show me! Everybody's
looking at you KL. What are you going to do?
Posted by: hobbitmage | August 12, 2007 at 12:56 PM
Hobbitimage,
That spammer (KL Bitch) of a blogger is nothing but a cowarrd who hides in the anonimity of blogging. A meaningless heckler. Been slapped around by bloggers (even by AK) for his rants without supporting facts. Attempts to be clever using hispanic words he hardly understands. LOL. As weave-man calls him appropriately, a one-trick pony. Pity him though for not having a life. Imagine posting even after midnight! Pathetic.
Posted by: Lakergurl | August 12, 2007 at 03:34 PM
AK/BK:
Now that I am busy during the weekday, I find myself posting at more unusual times, such as late in the evenings, weekends. I understand that you guys can’t be on 24 hour call to approve new posts but it would seem to me that one of the biggest improvements you could make for the blog which would be appreciated by everybody and would definitely increase the number and frequency of posts would be to somehow automatically publish new posts provided that they passed some form of filter for obscenities and profanity.
You should see if you can get the Times to agree to this change. I know that there are blog filters out there that can check for unwanted words and hold any posts that do not pass. At any rate, I think the delay in publishing posts to the blog is an even bigger frustration than all of the KL posts and reposts. Considering the huge number of readers and posters the blog attracts, it’s time you did something about the delays in posting. The blog doesn’t have to be a live chat room but it should be updated at least every hour during the day and at least every other hour during the night. The result would be more readership and more posts. Isn’t that what you are shooting for?
Anyway, then we don’t have to worry about the Dodgers stealing valuable time from the Lakers. lol.
Tom
Posted by: LakerTom | August 12, 2007 at 04:04 PM
hobbitmage,
As any half-brained trial lawyer would tell you - don't ask a question if you don't know the answer!
"Wins vs. Losses for Shaq without an all-star and post it so that all can see"
I've seen this on E$PN.com years ago. Lakers regular season record during their Title run of 99-02. Winning percentage highest to lowest:
1. Shaq played, Kobe was out.
2. Both Shaq and Kobe played.
3. No Shaq, no Kobe.
4. Kobe played, Shaq was out.
I remember specifically I was surprised that the team fared better when both superstars were out injured, than with Shaq gone and Kobe playing. Although, admittedly, that particular sample was pretty small.
Posted by: Hab | August 12, 2007 at 04:08 PM
Laker Tom-
It's something we have discussed with the Tmes and the tech guys. UNfortunately, it's a little more complicated in terms of standards and practices. It's not just a question of language or sexual contest, but also libel and slander, along with inappropriate racial content. They know our feelings about it, and on some levels it's more a policy decision for HQ than anything we decide. Obviously, anything that makes it so the site operates while we're not there makes our lives easier. I suggest you (and others, if you're interested) drop a note to the Times sports department to weigh in.
BK
Posted by: Brian Kamenetzky | August 12, 2007 at 04:59 PM
Christford-
Not to rain on your parade, but if Bird agreed to that deal, he would and should be run out of town on a rail. I agree that LO and Bynum is too much to give up for JO, b/c they don't improve enough in the deal (you can make an argument they actually get worse- I feel its somewhere in the neighborhood of a wash, but unless they can make an accompanying move with it, it doesn't put them any closer to the top of the WC and actually gives them less flexibility down the road) but there's no way you can get Indiana to give back Granger, Williams, and a pick for the pleasuer of taking on Sasha and Brian Cook. Those two do not sweeten a deal, certainly not enough for what you're asking for.
I'd love to see them get Granger back in a deal for JO, but he's their second best player, and quite possibly the one with the highest ceiling. It'll take a lot more than Sasha and Cook to get him back. Or at least it should, if you look at it from their perspective.
BK
Posted by: Brian Kamenetzky | August 12, 2007 at 05:31 PM
Hi Hab,
You said: As any half-brained trial lawyer would tell you - don't ask a question if you don't know the answer!
"Wins vs. Losses for Shaq without an all-star and post it so that all can see"
I've seen this on E$PN.com years ago. Lakers regular season record during their Title run of 99-02. Winning percentage highest to lowest:
1. Shaq played, Kobe was out.
2. Both Shaq and Kobe played.
3. No Shaq, no Kobe.
4. Kobe played, Shaq was out.
I remember specifically I was surprised that the team fared better when both superstars were out injured, than with Shaq gone and Kobe playing. Although, admittedly, that particular sample was pretty small.
This line came about a couple of days/threads ago when KL was making comments about
what Kobe hasn't done & he compared Kobe to Shaq. The point of my thread is that Shaq
has actually performed *WORSE* than Kobe has in similar situations. Those situations being:
being surrounded with less than top tier talent. Mr. KL consistently
posts the opposite, and when asked to provide statistics to validate his opinion he has
responded with W-L are the only things he cares about. Wanting to believe that he has *some*
rational basis for this belief, I went and looked it up. He doesn't.
I will give this to Porky Pig. He is actually one of the shrewdest "SLACKERS" I've ever seen.
Consider this: He has played with 3 *MARVELOUS* shooting guards. Kobe Bryant will
certainly be considered as an all-time great shooting guard. D-Wade has a chance to make
the cut as well. Penny Hardaway made all-star his first year. In addition to that, he has played
with Robert Horry who is a 7-time champion. In addition to that, he has played for 2 HOF
coaches. KG can't say that. J-Kidd can't say that. Karl Malone can't say that.
Posted by: hobbitmage | August 12, 2007 at 06:04 PM
Laker Tom-
We'll certainly try to catch up with Andrew before the season starts, as we did last year. In terms of breaking news, when we come upon good information, we post it. Sometimes it's stuff we get, other times it comes from the beat guys. Either way, when there is news to break, it's on the blog as fast as possible. We certainly try to be as proactive as possible in providing information or insight, whether it be through longer form interviews, news we happen to uncover, or a perspective that might not otherwise find an outlet. In terms of "breaking news," however, we're not beat guys, nor do we try to be. But if there's news, you guys get it.
It just so happens that right now, there isn't all that much news. IT's not a fault of anyone in particular, but it's a low news cycle for the NBA in general. Many players have been traveling, others (like L.O.) have been having repair work and rehab. But we always welcome suggestions on people from whom you'd like to hear.
BK
Posted by: Brian Kamenetzky | August 12, 2007 at 06:06 PM
Hey BK,
I understand what you are saying, so why don't we swing the draft pick to the other side. Have the lakers send a projected drat pick to the pacers or involve farmer or jarvis in the deal. We all know that the indiana faithful are growing tired of jamal tinsley.
With Granger and Williams coming in with O'neil , i surely believe that it is worth Farmer / Cittenton (solid starting point guard prospects), Lamar Odom (similar starts to O'neil, worse defense) and a coveted back to the basket big man in bynum (as far as potential goes). That trade works cap wise and also satisifies requirements on all sides.
I just beleive that with granger, kobe and fisher our perimeter D would be tremendous as well as a third an fourth scorer (in granger and fisher) and with O'neil and Brown our front line would be very good defensively. O'neil would not even have to guard the western conference bigs because mihm and brown would do that dirty work.
In summary I guess what I am saying is that we should give up anything responsible to get O'neil and Granger in this deal, while keeping at least Kwame Brown or to some lesser extent Mihm.
Posted by: Christford | August 12, 2007 at 06:07 PM
Christford-
Don't get me wrong- if the Lakers could bring in Granger, it would be huge. I really like the guy. I figured that's who they'd take when they took Bynum, actually. But he's a piece Indiana wants to build around, and I wonder what the Lakers could give them that would make it worth their while. Perhaps if the Lakers were willing to take on a bad salary in return, Bird might be willing to do it, but that starts to get really complicated. They like Williams a lot, too, so he'll be hard to pry away.
I also get the impression that Farmar's value around the league is overestimated by some Lakers fans. I don't think most people see him as a frontline prospect.
BK
Posted by: Brian Kamenetzky | August 12, 2007 at 06:43 PM
Just to weigh in on the instapost thing. I would like it if this blog was instant, but then again, I like having to wait for comments as well. It's like an acquired patience lol.
Posted by: Faith | August 12, 2007 at 07:01 PM
I understand everyone likes to play around with the trade machine, I do myself. But I think the 1st question one should ask when coming up with these trades is how would it help the other team. I really cant see Indy giving up Granger if they are going into a re-build mode. He is young with a lot of upside and you keep those kind of guys if you are rebuilding. I really do not see any JO deal, at least until maybe the trade dead line. Indy wants too much for perhaps the 9th best power forward in the league. I read an interview with Mitch today and he basicaly said the same without naming names.
MH
Posted by: michael h | August 12, 2007 at 07:31 PM
Christford,
BK is right. It's gonna take a lot for Indy to give up O'Neal, AND Granger, but if we give them what they want plus a little more, I think we can get a deal done. We would basically give away all our trading chips, but what big name is left that is worth trading for? Here's what I would offer:
Indy gets:
Kwame
LO
Bynum
Cook
Farmar
We get:
JO
Granger
Harrison
Tinsley
LIke I said we give up a lot, but the chance to get O'Neal, AND Granger is almost too much to pass up. Other than the center position, I think this roster is much closer to a championship than the one we currently have:
Fisher-Tinsley-Crittenton
Kobe-Evans-Coby Karl
Granger-Luke-Radmanovic
JO-Turiaf
Mihm-Harrison
Yes, there are some holes that would have to be filled, like signing another big man, but I think we would definitely be one of the top teams in the west with this roster.
Posted by: Weave-Man | August 12, 2007 at 07:56 PM
In reply to BK,
This is when as u say it gets complicated. Because for the trade to work they will have to throw in dunleavy's bad contract for kwame's bad contract and that will leave the lakers very thin on the frontline. I gues this trade is not going to get done.
Posted by: Christford | August 12, 2007 at 08:15 PM
BK
Thanks for responding. I think you know how much I respect what you guys have accomplished with the blog and how you interact and guide us, as impossible a task as that is to do. lol. I was just trying to direct your journalistic efforts to finding out how Andrew is doing rather than waiting for ESPN or Fox to give us the info. I mean, all you have to do is send Andrew a text message telling him you need to talk to him and probably run him through some tests. haha. Same with Kobe, although it probably should be you sending the message rather than AK since a lot of his posts could be construed to be negative. lol.
Seriously, thanks. You guys need start flexing your virtual muscles more. Demand a raise. Demand some purple and gold on the blog. Demand logins, 24/7 instapost, blog search, peace on earth, another raise, a weekly column in the paper paper, a book contract, movie rights, lockers next to Kobe, everybody’s cell number, 24/7 team access, commission on hits and posts, your own website, blogger 401ks, Laker season tickets for bloggers. You get the idea!
Tom
Posted by: LakerTom | August 12, 2007 at 08:51 PM
LakerTom,
The STHs that I've met are mostly pro-Kobe. There hasn't been an event this summer so I don't know what the consensus is about all the chaos but I imagine it runs the gamut. I would never not renew my tickets b/c I plan to be an STH for as long as I can afford them and live in LA. I imagine there will be about as many non-renewals if Kobe gets traded as there were when Shaq did but the renewal rate won't dip below 90%.
I think the front-office needs an attitude adjustment. Mitch is a politician and every move or non-move he's made has had an explanation or excuse. He's been on the defensive since the Shaq trade. He downplays every avenue available for the Lakers to improve. Can't expect much from the draft picks. Limited options via free agency. Trades get explored but are tough. It's like his main job is to keep our expectations low yet he continues the mantra that they're looking to get back to the Finals. He doesn't come across as being very imaginative or aggressive when it comes to improving the team. Both his actions and his demeanor (when he's spoken to the STHs) convey a very passive attitude about it.
I like Fisher coming back and re-signing Luke and Mihm at least keeps players around that their teammates are used to. There's a lot to be said for continuity. Here's my short term goal and it's an easy one. I would like for the Lakers to get rid of any player who causes groans from the fans inside Staples when they come into the game. In the past couple years there have been 3. Sasha, Kwame and Smush. One is gone. Two remain.
Posted by: lakers_sth | August 12, 2007 at 09:00 PM
KL:
You’ve made progress in being a more civil member of the blog. We all appreciate that.
Most of us are here on the blog to exchange thoughts and ideas about anything Lakers. We hardly ever agree but we also don’t bore everybody most of the time by obsessively responding to every single comment about a specific player regardless of content. Who appointed you the Kobe meter on the blog anyway? Do you really need to do that to get people to notice you?
I suspect what you are doing is the same thing as Ric Bucher and T.J. Simers, using Kobe’s name and notoriety to selfishly draw attention to yourself and your posts, along with a little plain old mischievous trouble making thrown in as well. Why don’t you show us how smart and clever you are by branching out into a few other subject areas rather than relying on your overdone Kobe schtick to draw attention. Or maybe you’re not up to it. It’s up to you. Take another step.
Tom
Posted by: LakerTom | August 12, 2007 at 09:13 PM
KLBeast,
Thanks. I do believe Kobe is a True Great, however. If we see anyone score 81 points in the next decade it will be a miracle. At the time Wilt Chamberlein was a giant among midgets. Wasn't there like 16 teams in the league then when he score 100? Kobe scoring 81 points in today's league is arguably the greatest feat in the history of basketball (with the notable exceptions of Wilt Chamberlein having something like 40 rebounds against Bill Russell and Magic having 24 assists in the playoffs).
In any case, Kobe is a very special player who I want to see retire wearing the Purple and Gold.
Jerry West needs to replace Mitch Kupcheck as GM. Jerry Buss needs to beat down Jim Buss for his immature influence on the front office.
GO LAKERS!
Posted by: Jon Kavulic | August 12, 2007 at 09:29 PM
lakers_sth:
Thanks for your response. I agree with you about the addition by subtraction factor. I would trade Sasha and Cook for draft picks if necessary. I’ve been a die hard Laker fan since 1971 and used to attend ten to fifteen games a year. I really envy you the season tickets but appreciate your sharing the view from the good seats. Let’s hope this will be a miraculous season.
Tom
Posted by: LakerTom | August 12, 2007 at 09:58 PM
I am nearing my mid-life now, and i got a strong hunch that "I MAY NEVER SEE A PERFORMANCE IN OUR LIFETIME AGAIN AS WHAT KOBE GAVE US LAST SEASON. 81 POINT IS JUST NOT ORDINARY."
Posted by: dice8up | August 12, 2007 at 10:43 PM
I've watched three of the Euroleague preparation events. Good niews: Ronny Turiaf has been a major force for the French team, diubg akk tge usual things (contesting shots in the lane, making impressive blocks, taking rebounds) but also dominating some of the key moments and being the top scorer in the first three contests, with good outside shooting and some fabulous dunks. Otherwise, the French team isn't looking so good, although Parker's come back from a sprained ankle (without looking impressive) and Diaw's still sitting on the sidelines waiting for his insurance situation to be sorted out.
Greek Dude, your team humiliated France, and they are solid and aggressive, but too much of the latter for my taste. They way they dominate others is by physically attacking them. They deliberately foul every team the other team starts doing things in rhythm and effectively break their rhythm. Especially they protect the lane by systematically fouling. Worse, they aren't allergic to flagrants and Ronny took a serious shot to his shoulder going up for a dunk near the end of a game where the Greeks led by 20 points. Those guys are the "bad boys" of Europe.
Yesterday France played Slovenia and I thought, hey, maybe it'll be Ronny vs. Sasha. But as usual Sasha isn't on the Slovenian team. Does anyone know why? France won the game by twenty points, so Slovenia isn't exactly a team to feared packed with All-Stars. But Sasha apparently couldn't even make the team... or wasn't he interested? Could this be the best indication of the general mediocrity of the current Laker team?
Seriously, can anyone fill me in on why Sasha isn't playing with his national team?
Posted by: Tsphere | August 12, 2007 at 10:56 PM
With all this trade scenarios that almost everyone proposes... i thnk we have forgotten that... Phil Jax is running a system that is not easy to learn. It takes at least a full season for a player to learn Phil's system.
And with this in mind, i agree with Mitch Kuptchak that we have indeed a better and more competitive roster than last two season just for the fact that they have been together these 2-3 years.
55 wins is not a far fetch after all.
let's start a 55 wins bandwagon....
Go lakers!
Go Kobe...!!!
Go lamar
Go Lakers!
Posted by: dice8up | August 12, 2007 at 10:59 PM
MICHAEL H.
WHERE IS THE LINK TO THE INTERVIEW WTH MITCH THAT YOU WERE TALKING ABOUT?
Posted by: dice8up | August 12, 2007 at 11:04 PM
Kobe scoring 81 points in today's league is arguably the greatest feat in the history of basketball (with the notable exceptions of Wilt Chamberlein having something like 40 rebounds against Bill Russell and Magic having 24 assists in the playoffs).
In any case, Kobe is a very special player who I want to see retire wearing the Purple and Gold.
Jerry West needs to replace Mitch Kupcheck as GM. Jerry Buss needs to beat down Jim Buss for his immature influence on the front office.
GO LAKERS!
Posted by: Jon Kavulic | August 12, 2007 at 09:29 PM
i AM WITH YOU MAN.... WE ARE ALL WITNESSES OF THIS...
I HAVE WATCH THAT GAME ON BASKETBALL TV, AND I JUST CAN'T GET ENOUGH OF THAT PERFORMANCE...
TOTALLY AWESOME!
Posted by: dice8up | August 12, 2007 at 11:07 PM
Jon Kavulic
"I do believe Kobe is a True Great, however. If we see anyone score 81 points in the next decade it will be a miracle."
don't get me wrong about kobe. he's a great player. even a hater like me was happy for one night when kobe scored 81 points on toronto. i remember the lakers being down by 20+ points and kobe did what he had to do to win the game. having said that, the hater in be began to think after the game, it's fools gold cuz we're not going anywhere in the playoffs.
"In any case, Kobe is a very special player who I want to see retire wearing the Purple and Gold."
i'd like to see it happen if [a big if] kobe can lead the lakers back to respectability. i have a feeling kobe's going to opt out after 2009.
Posted by: KLBeast | August 13, 2007 at 12:08 AM
lakers_sth, thanks for sharing your experience with sth, and regaring Mitch's actions/demeanor. It's bad that the proud Lakers now have such a passive gm.
LakerTom, imo this blog also needs an ignore button to save intelligent bloggers from the trolls.
Posted by: gdchild | August 13, 2007 at 12:10 AM
lakertom
"Who appointed you the Kobe meter on the blog anyway? Do you really need to do that to get people to notice you?"
first off, i appreciate your civility as well. second, if someone takes the time to post something to me, i feel obligated to some degree to respond. as for being noticed, i really don't care. i enjoy talking sports and laker basketball, so to those who wish to participate with me, i'm all for it. conversely, to those who find my style offensive, i'll kindly apologize.
"I suspect what you are doing is the same thing as Ric Bucher and T.J. Simers, using Kobe’s name and notoriety to selfishly draw attention to yourself and your posts, along with a little plain old mischievous trouble making thrown in as well."
i think you might have a point. i will add that my comments are sincere. i genuenly believe kobe chased shaq away and now is crying about not being able to enjoy the same level of success under shaq's leadership. the same leadership that kobe once, and still, curses.
"Why don’t you show us how smart and clever you are by branching out into a few other subject areas rather than relying on your overdone Kobe schtick to draw attention. Or maybe you’re not up to it. It’s up to you. Take another step."
did you happen to read my post to Rick Friedman? we're in the dog days of summer and there isn't that much to talk about. i will also add that you probably don't read my posts, thus you most likely don't see the other topics which i discuss. i appreciate your time.
Posted by: KLBeast | August 13, 2007 at 12:16 AM
hobbitmage,
As any half-brained trial lawyer would tell you - don't ask a question if you don't know the answer!
"Wins vs. Losses for Shaq without an all-star and post it so that all can see"
I've seen this on E$PN.com years ago. Lakers regular season record during their Title run of 99-02. Winning percentage highest to lowest:
1. Shaq played, Kobe was out.
2. Both Shaq and Kobe played.
3. No Shaq, no Kobe.
4. Kobe played, Shaq was out.
I remember specifically I was surprised that the team fared better when both superstars were out injured, than with Shaq gone and Kobe playing. Although, admittedly, that particular sample was pretty small.
Posted by: Hab | August 13, 2007 at 12:25 AM
610 (sixonezero)
"penny hardaway? cmon you cant be serious. he was a good player. key word being "was"."
i understand penny "was" a great player once, but for zero guarantee money, don't you think he can help the lakers? let me pose a thought to you. what if DFish didn't have his family issues? we'd be stuck with J-critt and J-farmar as our PG...
i'm not saying that Penny is the savior, rather a generic point that there are guys around the league that kobe might think is beneath him, but who can help the lakers. just the attitude of thinking you're better than someone else is a big detriment. a little humility goes a long way to massaging egos, especially pro-sports egos. this is the lesson that kobe hasn't learned yet.
look at dwade, we all know dwade is the man, but does wade act like his $hit don't stink? dwade gives respect to veteran players who are then open to deferring to wade. it's that simple. if you piss off guys, they will not defer.
how about LBJ? we all know that LBJ's the man, even when he was a rookie, but LBJ deferred to the #1 guy back then (ricky davis). remember the fast break when LBJ turned around and gave the ball to Davis for an open dunk?
Lesson Learned: A little humility goes a long way (now who says Confucius is the "wisest of all"?)
Posted by: KLBeast | August 13, 2007 at 12:29 AM
weaveman
"I also believe hate is a strong word to use, and I agree that I use it too readily to describe people that dislike Kobe. If i've offended you I apologize. As far as the truth goes, you're right about that as well. We don't know what goes on in the FO, but I think we've gotten enough clues to make a good assumption. But you know what they say about people who assume."
no need to apologize. as a matter of fact, you're one of bloggers that i truly respect. if you hadn't noticed, i've knocked off the rhetoric with you becuase you seem to have good insight on b-ball and other matters. as for when people "ass-u-me", it's a very important cliche to remember.
"That's why I try not to bash Mitch. He's pretty much just a talking head for the FO."
good man. i don't bash mitch either. mitch is a puppet who gets paid $3M a year. i think there might be some merit of Jim Buss messing things up.
"Thanks for the kind words, and I'm glad you enjoy bantering with me. I don't always like what you post, but I can deal with it because usually you make me have to take what you say into consideration, and make me see things from different angles."
likewise. i'll be honest, i've taken in a lot of opinions from other bloggers and have changed my view in some instances.
Posted by: KLBeast | August 13, 2007 at 12:37 AM
hal9000
"Your answer to every question and argument is always the same: KOBE IS THE ROOT OF ALL LAKERS EVIL. You don't place blame on management... you don't place blame on Kobe's lazy, unskilled teammates... it's all about Kobe to you. :
LOL. come on, i've done better than that, haven't I (rhetorical question)?
"I agree that Kobe has problems and that he has done some stupid things since 2003... but he's not the only one to blame. I have criticized Kobe on this blog before, but you refuse to place blame on anyone but Kobe. Please correct me if I'm wrong."
i've put blame on FO, shaq, laker fans, kobe's "circle of trust"...
"By the way, if I recall correctly, your answer to my question about improving the Lakers was that they should trade Kobe... but when it became apparent that the Lakers would not trade Kobe, you celebrated. What gives?"
actually, i've been pretty consistent in saying that we SHOULD NOT trade kobe, but for different reasons. kobe's the one who put us in this mess, so i'd like kobe to get us out of it.
hey, when's the next segment of Private Kobe?
Posted by: KLBeast | August 13, 2007 at 12:41 AM
Dice8up
The Mitch interview was in the los angeles daily news. I found it on the pro sports daily web site.
MH
Posted by: michael h | August 13, 2007 at 12:47 AM
aloha mike
"25% Kobes fault + 25% Shaqs fault + 50% Dr Buss = dissaster."
i concur with your assessment. the shaq/kobe feud and eventual spit lies with the owner.
"The model in the NBA has changed over the last several years and it ultimately required us to choose. I do not believe you can win anymore with 2 max contracts."
great analysis. even more reasons to recruit guys to play on the cheap.
"Look at Miami now, with 2 big contracts they are auditioning retired players to fill out their roster. There will be a lot of broken hearts in Boston over the next few years, 3 great players and no one else. They are trying to get Reggie Miller to come back, pathetic."
i believe Miami is paying Wade on the cheap, but great point. Regarding Boston, they have a 2-3 year window to win it all, but do you blame them? the last time i recall Boston being dominant is............ never........it was before my time.
"This is the model now and the Lakers might have pulled it off if they had not traded Caron for Kwame."
devestating trade. but our HOF center was shipped away and we needed a low-post presence. Caron basically played the same position as kobe.
"He will ultimately be traded next year because Dr. Buss and his giant ego will not fire the "insider" his son Giant ego Jim."
i say 50/50. kobe's Summer of Rage probably sealed the lakers fate.
"The sad part for me is we could shock the sports world next year and win it all, and Kobe would still want to leave because it has become personel."
hey, i'll eat crow for the next 2 year if this happens. can't say i'll be that upset to eat crow. BTW, you've made my argument on kobe always trying to prove a point.
Posted by: KLBeast | August 13, 2007 at 12:49 AM
It is not a good fit for you Laker Tom.
Patronization of the Beast (in your 9:13 post) clashes with your otherwise stellar embodiment of the good news Postman. The Beast is one of the extraordinary contributors, and whether they would admit or not, everyone knows it. Do you think we want to read Teniente all the time?
Hey, stepping all over Saint Dawg is easy for me because I am a Sacramento Kings fan first and foremost, but for someone who loves the Lakers to come on this board, and chastise his lordship, well, that takes some Hilton balls. Furthermore, to even suggest that dissing of Saint Dawg on this board measures up in any way to the lavish exaltations he has recieved here since time immemorial is suggesting the unsuggestable (normally where Jorenema should enter) and can be summarily dismissed. It's a rout; not even close.
This is a testes:
-Many good Laker fans have seen enough and think it would be best for Kobe to leave when possible, as soon as possible, the sooner the better-
True or False?
-The number of life-time or otherwise strong Laker fans (who will no longer be silent in their disdain for the man-child) is rapidly increasing; their roar could soon become deafening-
True or False?
-It is time for Laker fans to respectfully recognize fellow Laker fans who hold opposing view points (whatever you do, don't include me...it will ruin everything) on this polarizing megalomaniac (funny how we all know who that is)-
True or False?
-Disgruntled Dawg lovers may need to quit being so lazy and triple their number of posts-
They will get over it and stop whining or Won't get over it and will continue whining?
-It is the nature of the Beast-
And for my money, Shaq and Kobe are both mud skippers.
Sonnybelfast
Posted by: sonnybelfast | August 13, 2007 at 01:02 AM
AK/BK,
Where's the "Talkin with Mo Evans Part II" ??
Posted by: The Lake-Show | August 13, 2007 at 01:16 AM
AK/BK,
Can we have a new football thread for this seasons action? I know the old one still works, but it has moreorless withered on the vine.
Posted by: sonnybelfast | August 13, 2007 at 01:19 AM
sonny
"Patronization of the Beast (in your 9:13 post) clashes with your otherwise stellar embodiment of the good news Postman. The Beast is one of the extraordinary contributors, and whether they would admit or not, everyone knows it. Do you think we want to read Teniente all the time?"
the enemy of my enemy is my friend.
sonny, you and i have an unusual alliance. BTW, i hated the "queens" during the early 2000s but miss the almost-rivalry. i'd like to see the Kings become competitive again. Bibby and Artest seem like a combustible duo. I like Martin's game even with his wierd shooting form. how do you think the Kings will do this year?
Posted by: KLBeast | August 13, 2007 at 01:47 AM
You know, not having ESPN Insider, I feel ripped. That's an article I'd love to read, if there was anything new to it. I could talk all day on the topic of referees...
Hobbit, you're kind of parsing your question until you get the data you want. Not the coolest way to talk about something.
Posted by: Michael A | August 13, 2007 at 07:08 AM
***********************************************************************************************************************
ATTENTION BLOGGERS : TODAY IS DEDICATED TO LAKER TOM
***********************************************************************************************************************
PAST HONOREES: MIKE TENIENTE, EDWIN GUECO, KLBEAST, GENERIC_ONE, A.K. J.J. and Faith
NEXT HONOREE: SONNY BELFAST
***********************************************************************************************************************
There are Laker fans and then there are Laker Fans. If you want to know the meaning of being a real
Laker Fan, just read any post by Laker Tom. No matter how bleak the situation may look Laker Tom has
a way of putting a spin on it so that you just know that everything is going to turn out all right. And I don’t
mean in a Pollyannaish type of way. This man is one mean fact machine and will support his position
with fact’s and figures and not just hopes and wishes. Is it possible to be a Kobe fan and a Laker
Fan? Of course it is and Laker Tom is the epitome of that. Though I do believe if push comes to
shove and Kobe should leave he will stay true to his principles and support the Purple and Gold over
Number 24 as any true “FAN” would. I like to say Lakers Today Lakers Tomorrow Lakers Forever
but if forced to choose, I’m sorry to say I would have to choose KOBE over the LAKERS - at Least
until the FO gets organized. So Laker Tom you’re a better Laker Fan than I, though I try.
Laker Tom is never one to place blame but is always one to offer positive solutions to a situation.
Laker Tom is also one of the few voices on the Blog that is respected by both Pro and Anti Kobe Factions
and has tried tirelessly to bring both factions of the Blog back together. For this alone he deserves a salute
by one and all. And so today on this 13th of August, 2007, Laker Tom we salute you for being the personification
of a Laker Fan. Sports fan, peacemaker and all around Humanitarian. Enjoy your day sir and know that the Blog is
a better place because of you.
LAKER TOM TODAY LAKER TOM TOMORROW LAKER TOM FOREVER
BLOG LINES OF THE WEEK:
KOBE IS NOT BAILING ON THE TEAM, THE TEAM BAILED ON KOBE!!!!! Weave-Man
The Lakers management is doing what they have done the last three years... NOTHING. Hal9000
If you're going to take pot shots at the best player in the world, you shouldn't be shooting blanks. HobbitMage
I think the delay in publishing posts to the blog is an even bigger frustration than all of the KL posts and reposts Laker Tom
I am nearing my mid-life now, and i got a strong hunch that "I MAY NEVER SEE A PERFORMANCE IN OUR LIFETIME AGAIN
AS WHAT KOBE GAVE US LAST SEASON. 81 POINT IS JUST NOT ORDINARY." Dice8Up
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
55 WIN BANDWAGON MEMBERS:
(1) Laker Tom (2) Marty (3) HUBBIT (4) Fearless Whack Job (5) Mamba24/10
(6) David Whang (7) BD (8) Dan Dan the Laker Fan (9) Long Time Laker Fan
(10) Roky (11) JoninJapan(In Canada) 12) JUNO (13) KEIFO,
(14) Alexinho17 (15) TALIQ (16) GENERIC_ONE (17) VIOLATER
(18) Twoody (19) SLO Gal (20) HobbitIMage
Members at heart
(1) Bob
(2) Faith
*****************************************************************************************************************
WEARY-OF-BANDWAGON BANDWAGON MEMBERS
(1) Cbuck
(2) J. Walter WeatherMan
*****************************************************************************************************************
AND NOW ROLL CALL
(1) FAITH, MIKE T. TALIQ, Edwin Gueco,, KEIFO, Mamba24Fan4Life, Fan of Mamba, Wolf,
KIWI, WOW, PEACE, J_COOL, DAVID WHANG, ADAM KILEY, LAKERSRYDEORDIE, CLEON
FISH_GUY,TIM-4-SHOW, THA_ SHOW, WESJOENIXON, BAYWOO, THE_D, SBPIMP,
CHARLES, Precious, NEVER, CALI KING, RICK FRIEDMAN,THIRTY2, EXHELODRVR,
GENERIC_ONE, TWOODY, JJ, AJAX, MITCHELL., LAKERTOM, LAKERFAN, CHARLES,
KHANG VMAN, KOREY, XTRO, MCGARNAGLE, GUGY, GDChild,Laker4Life, Laker Seth
KL BEAST, Jorema, FearlessWhackJob, MARTY, JANDRO, LAKERFAZE, PhxLkrFAN,
TexasLaker, BOB, TreacherousBalloons, EagleBoy, JR., EASTCOASTJESSIE, Zakee,
Swettual, Utzworld, Andrew Z, LAL Fan, BRANDON C., Kinglakernidas, BlackMamba24,
FKILLAH, CYRUS(VENTRILIQUIST), RespectMyAuthorith, Waterboy, Hariyahu, HUBBIT
ZEN, SARCOCOP,Staples24, Bobby, COMPTONS FINEST, MIGUELINHO, Greek Dude,
SOCALIFE, HAL9000, Greekdude, Michael J, Michael H, Michael A., Rick Friedman,
Gunner24, GINO, FATTY, CBUCK,LAKERGURL, CRITICAL BEATDOWN, PFUNK36,
PAUL LEE, Jay EL, SocalSpider , WEAVE MAN, JON KAVULIC, Tajluck, Alexinho17
BERKLEYLAKER, Dice8Up DION, KARL, CRAIG, MITCHELL, Lakers4Life, Ryan
JR, Dascilla, tellitlikeitisNik Kannan, GABE, SEAN P., HanSoulFood, HollywoodJack,
Jay Jay, TaosHum, HOBBITIMAGE, Caeser, Obel, CHITOWNLAKER, ANGRYLAKER
wiZo, MagicShaq, HugoBoss, OSCAR, RDLEE, RealityBites, LakerLarry, Bucky, LEELO,
Juno, LakerLifer, C.S. JOVA, BLAZE1BX, Tripgame3, TSPHERE, SIXONEZERO,
Mfeige, Reggie, Hollywood Jack, Reality Check Time, Jack In Hollywood, SLO Gal
JONINJAPAN(INCANADA), VIOLATER, LT Laker Fan, , KATE, TROY, Mainor
JEFF, ANDY B., SWANWORLD, PUPLE&GOLD_4EVA, BENNY BLANCA,CS in Virg
EMMA, TIM IN SYDNEY RISING STAR, LakerBake, JuanMan888,Blkthght06,
Any_One_mouse, 10milliondollarZen, Shiva, Laker_Hopeful, LakerDawg
,Ghost of Spiderman, Steve in Denver Guy Owanlele, Lincoln Laker, Houston Laker
MITCH KUPCHAK, JERRY BUSS, PHIL JACKSON, KOBE BRYANT, CLEON
Marc Gasol, Sun Yue, Shamond, Williams, Ronny Turiaf, V. Radmanovic,
Maurice Evans, Lamar Odom, Derek Fisher, Luke Walton, Brian Cook,
Kwame Brown, Andrew Bynum, Coby Karl, Chris Mihm, Sasha Vujacic
Jordan Farmar, Jarvis Critterton, JERMAINE ONEAL???, FAITH
ALL TOGETHER NOW:
WE ARE THE FREAKIN LA LAKERS THE WINNERS OF 14 NBA TITLES
THE HOME OF WILT, KAREEM, GEORGE MIKAN, SHAQ, MAGIC, KOBE,
ELGIN BAYLOR, JERRY WEST, PAT RILEY, JAMES WORTHY, SILK
COACHED BY THE 9 TIME TITLE WINNER PHIL (9RINGS) JACKSON AND
NO ONE AND NOTHING WILL EVER DIVIDE OR CONQUER US
Posted by: Mamba24/10 | August 13, 2007 at 08:12 AM
I happened to run into JO this past Saturday at the Mirage. He totally rocks. I seriously hope mitch can pull this one out. Bird should know right now that he's up the river if he fails to deal JO, just like we're up the river if we fail to get him. I've never seen two sides in desperate need to pull the trigger but won't. Poor JO just wants to win. These teams like the Pacers and Lakers just use their star players. Let's hope that changes soon.
Posted by: Tim-4-Show | August 13, 2007 at 08:28 AM
Clyde Drexler: Kobe is by far the best.
Saturday in Calgary, as part of an NBA Cares fundraising effort, Clyde Drexler was asked who the game's top player is today: "I love Yao (Ming), and I love Tracy (McGrady), but Kobe Bryant is by far the best." ...
http://calsun.canoe.ca/Sports/Columnists/Francis_Eric/2007/08/13/4413739-sun.html
Posted by: jorema | August 13, 2007 at 08:30 AM
Kwame brown visiting Indiana? Trade related?
Let's face it, your average NBA player doesn't roll through Indy just for kicks. So, if any player has been linked to a trade rumor, they better let the authorities know about their visit and why they are in town. Otherwise, the Internets will turn a sighting into an imminent trade involving the Pacers.
Back in early July, after Kobe Bryant stirred up his trade demands, there was plenty of talk about Jermaine O'Neal heading out to L.A. for several players. One of the players mentioned was Kwame Brown. So, when Kwame showed up courtside at a Indiana Fever game, the message boards buzzed with speculation that he must be here to meet with LJL and help finalize a deal. As if players actually meet with teams prior to a big trade. In fact, meeting prior to a trade would be tampering. But why else would Kwame just happen to be at Conseco in July? Oops, turns out Kwame had ankle surgery and he was in town for a follow-up visit with the surgeon. Pfffffffft.
Source: Indy Cornrows.
Posted by: jorema | August 13, 2007 at 08:38 AM
Howard to Los Angeles for Farmar and Cook!!!
It appears that Juwan Howard has begun voicing his desire to part ways after his brief relocation to Minneapolis (as I predicted upon the exit of KG). This could be a great turn of events for the Lakers. Howard is not KG or Jermaine O’Neal….the two coveted acquisitions the Lakers desired entering into the off-season, however, he is a serviceable big man and he is considerably cheaper than either of those two. Furthermore, the Lakers could acquire Howard without having to touch any of the players they have not wished to part with up to this point. Instead, they could make a smaller trade and acquire Howard to add depth in the front court, while maintaining the depth and talent they already have. Plus, by not having to include their main trade assets, the Lakers would have the opportunity to still go after a higher star if they so decided at a later point during the season (i.e. a Kwame Brown or Andrew Bynum trade). Here is the trade.
Lakers send Jordan Farmar, Brian Cook, Aaron McKie (sign/trade) and future 2nd round draft pick to the T-Wolves for Juwan Howard.
For Minnesota – Jordan Farmar adds to their youth movement as a young, yet very talented, point guard. Seeing as how they have released Troy Hudson, they currently only have Telfair and potentially Foye to fill the point guard position for the team. Brian Cook is one of the most consistent perimeter shooters in the league. However, his attributes haven’t been able to mesh well within the Triangle Offense. Plus, his defense is very suspect. Perhaps moving to Minnesota would provide him with a chance for improvement. Although not highly productive, his stats do replace the loss of Howard at least offensively. Plus, his salary is much less and only for the same number of years making him a low risk acquisition. Aaron McKie is basically retired, however, the Lakers do have the ability to use him in a sign and trade, after which he would most likely retire. This would be very similar to the Rick Fox trade to Boston a few years ago. His salary would give the T-Wolves a little more relief going forward. Finally, the T-Wolves would gain an additional draft pick for the future. All of this would only cost them Juwan Howard, who they seemingly acquired for Mike James, who was seemingly not nearly as productive with the team as they would have hoped. Furthermore, they would be in essence replacing Mike James from last year with Jordan Farmar, Brian Cook, a future 2nd round pick and roughly $3.5mil in salary cap relief next season. That is a good exchange for the T-wolves.
For Los Angeles – It is my estimation that the Lakers either need to acquire a starting small forward or starting power forward before the start of the season in order to be completely ready to compete. Their previous 2 attempts to acquire a power forward have both failed miserably due to their unwillingness to give up the players that have been required. Not that I blame them, but they have locked themselves into a position where their options have become highly limited. That being said, in all of the hustle, the needs have not changed. Due to the fact that they are clearly reluctant to part with Lamar Odom and/or Andrew Bynum, I recommend that they find a trade that won’t require either of them. In fact, this trade would allow the Lakers to improve team considerably without touching any of their current quality trade assets. That means that once this trade will have been completed, they would still have the option to do another trade if they so choose. In this trade, they upgrade their forward position by acquiring a veteran power forward that has a natural game which should fit into the Triangle Offense. His strengths involve hitting the mid range jumper as well as rebounding and passing. Although he isn’t a flashy player or huge scorer, he is consistent and a stabilizing factor. He is also a decent defender and defensive rebounder. He has experience as a starter and could be ale to play the bulk of the power forward minutes as needed. His services would presumably not cost the Lakers anything significant to their team. The acquisition of Radmanovic last year made Cook expendable, and the acquisition of Crittenton this year has made Farmar expendable.
Considering the youth movement direction of the T-Wolves, and the need for veteran experience and front court depth for the Lakers, this appears to be an ideal trade for both teams.
Here is what the Lakers roster would look like after the trade.
PG: Fisher, Crittenton, Karl
SG: Bryant, Evans, Vujacic
SF: Odom, Walton
PF: Howard, Turiaf, Radmanovic
C: Brown, Bynum, Mihm
With only the few changes the Lakers will have made this off-season, I believe they will have given themselves a reasonable chance to really compete next season. They won’t boast the best starting 5 or the deepest roster, but they will have solid players at each position as well as key utility players off the bench. Considering the system they run on offense and defense, if this group is able to mesh well together, the synergistic result could be quite surprising and rewarding. If it doesn’t work well early into the season, they will still have all of their valuable trade pieces in order to make a mid-season trade.
Posted by: JJ | August 13, 2007 at 08:39 AM
Kupchak: I'm hapyy with Lakers as it is now.
"If this was the team that we started the season off with, I would be fine with it," Kupchak said. "I feel that we're an improved team over last year."
I look at our team and look at a very balanced team with veteran and young players,"
I do feel there is more pressure or more expectations to dramatically change this team," Kupchak said. "My season-ending comments were that we were going to be more aggressive than we normally are. That's a byproduct of the season ending the way it did.
"But having said that, we're not going to do deals or sign players just to do it. We're going to do things we feel are going to improve the team. We feel that our team as it is structured right now, is improved over last year."
"I think you could say 29 teams in the NBA today are looking at Boston and saying, `Wow, is that something they could have done and how much better are they going to be?' " Kupchak said.
"Cleary that's the deal of the offseason. Without talking about a particular player in this league, I know how much time we spent on being aggressive this summer. I know as an organization we did everything we could do to do a deal that would improve the team.
"You can't will a deal to take place. It takes two teams, sometimes more. Nobody really knows besides the owner and general manager, but the question you ask is: Did you do everything you could do to procure a certain player?
"If you're comfortable with the answer, you move on. And I am."
That doesn't, of course, mean Kobe has been left happy this summer.
"I'm not going to get into those types of questions," Kupchak said.
http://www.sgvtribune.com/ci_6603820?source=most_emailed
Posted by: jorema | August 13, 2007 at 08:45 AM
Kobe is not talking, but the other Coby is doing it.
"If you focus only on Coby Karl’s bouts with cancer the past two years, you’re missing the point.
If you narrow in on the fact that he’s the son of an NBA coach, you’re seeing only part of the picture.
If you think he would give up his aspirations of joining the NBA because he comes from a small school and went undrafted, then you’ve got him all wrong.
Karl is heading to Lakers’ training camp in October because in his young life there hasn’t been an expectation he couldn’t meet or an obstacle he couldn’t beat.
"My feeling is that anything Coby gets right now is a celebration," said his father, Denver Nuggets coach George Karl. "It’s like an incredible story, a Hollywood story. ... We should just see his opportunity and his life as a celebration, and that’s the way I’m going to look at it."
A 6-foot-6 guard, Karl earned an invite to Lakers camp after averaging 12.1 points per game for the club’s summer pro league team that competed last month in Las Vegas. That was good for second on the team, but certainly no guarantee of NBA success.
The number that intrigued the Lakers just as much was the six stitches Karl received after mixing it up with a much larger opponent.
"He gives us something that we don’t have," said Lakers’ assistant Brian Shaw, who with Kurt Rambis, coached the summer league team. "He gives us somebody that has more size. We have Kobe (Bryant) at (6-6). But this Coby brings physicality. He’s not afraid of contact."
Or afraid of anything else.
In 2006, Coby was diagnosed with thyroid cancer. It was nothing serious, he was told. His doctors assured him that this form of cancer was treatable in 95 percent of cases.
Although Coby underwent chemotherapy for papillary carcinoma in March 2006, he required a lengthy surgical procedure 13 months later to remove cancerous lymph nodes in his throat. The seven-hour procedure was the doctors’ second effort in just more a year to eliminate any remaining malignant cells.
Since then, Coby has not looked back.
If he makes the team and sticks around beyond Dec. 1, his contract becomes guaranteed for the remainder of the season.
"As bad as it sounds, I wouldn’t have changed any of it," he said. "I’ve learned a lot from it and matured. Just looking at life in a more broad view and not taking things for granted. I enjoy things a little bit more, like playing basketball, my family, my friends, and just an appreciation for the situation that I’ve been given. It’s taught me appreciation."
Part of his strength stems from the relationship with his father, whose own battle with prostate cancer was winding down when Coby was diagnosed.
He was a ballboy for the Seattle SuperSonics when George coached the team, joining his dad at work for seven years. Coby got to spend more time with his busy father while he getting a valuable taste of the NBA game.
With each coaching job George landed, Coby was ready to tag along, following him on four NBA stops and a two-year stint in Spain as Real Madrid’s coach in the early ’90s.
Coby became even closer to his father at the beginning of high school, when George and his wife filed for divorce. Father and son lived together until Coby began college, moving around an estimated 15 times.
Yet their biggest challenge came later, toward the latter part of Coby’s collegiate career at Boise State. At 22, George’s only son had already endured one of life’s toughest battles — cancer. And it scared away some NBA teams on draft day.
"It kind of makes you think where you are in life and know that anything can be taken from you," Coby said.
"I think everyone wants to get drafted, but when it comes down to it, that’s just one night. Hopefully it’s just the first night in what’ll be a long career for me."
It’s his hustle and toughness on the hardwood floor that has defined Coby’s off-court character.
While the process seems ever so rigorous to those witnessing his situation, Coby has remained optimistic.
His performance, though, is all the more impressive as a relatively unknown guard from a small university, might not necessarily guarantee him a spot on the opening night roster.
The recent signing of Chris Mihm and guard Derek Fisher puts the Lakers at 14 guaranteed contracts. If Coby hopes to make the team, it will have to be as a shooting guard, Shaw said.
Coby demonstrated his physical play with his battle wound from his summer league collision, which is carefully covered by two bandages until the stitches are removed. His other scar, a four-inch slice beneath his throat, signifies much more: It is the symbol of a person who refuses to take no for an answer.
"A lot of people didn’t believe he was going to be a Division I player," George said. "A lot of people don’t believe that he’s going to be an NBA player. And I think he’s going to prove all of those people wrong. He actually likes being the underdog. After proving people wrong, he kind of likes to look at them in the eye and tell them they were wrong."
"
Source: Rocky Mountain News.
Posted by: jorema | August 13, 2007 at 08:54 AM
Sonny and LakerTom,
Not to weasel my way into your conversation about Kobe, but I found it interesting. I am in total agreement with Sonny on this one. I believe Kobe is an incredible individual talent, arguable the best of all time, but I gotta say that I believe, for whatever immeasurable reason, that as long as he is a Laker we will be mired in what we've had to experience the past three years. We'll be witness to long runs of mediocrity and frustration with interludes of wonder and amazement. But at the end of the day, I truly feel we'll never be great as long as Kobe wears the purple and gold.
Jon K,
I have never realized how you come up with these definitive psychoanalysis of every player having never spent any time with them. How do you know Kobe has a NEED to win, and that it causes him great psychological trouble when he doesn't? Sounds like an unhealthy human being to me, if it is true. Just curious how you come to your conclusions.
Posted by: Andrew Z | August 13, 2007 at 09:01 AM
Suns interested in P.J. Brown, Lakers interested in saving money.
'Despite insinuations in the Dallas media, the Suns have not shown any interest in 42-year-old Reggie Miller, nor do they intend to do so. The focus remains on wooing P.J. Brown to Arizona, and they have used everything in their arsenal to get their point across. Cleveland, Dallas, Miami and Phoenix appear to be the teams in the running. "--
East Valley Tribune
Posted by: jorema | August 13, 2007 at 09:02 AM