Eddie Money had two tickets to paradise
The Celtics now have one Ticket, a purchase made with the intention of traveling to the same destination that Mr. Money had in mind. Needless to say, this is pretty gosh darn huge. "Big enough to make David Stern stop weeping about Oden and Durant playing for two teams nobody ever sees" huge. "Big enough to make Bill Simmons stop weeping about acquiring Ray Allen" huge, especially considering Jesus Shuttlesworth reportedly played a big role in pitching Beantown to Garnett. Hell, it's even "big enough to overshadow the Lakers signing Coby Karl" huge.
OK, the acquiring of George Karl's undrafted son might have flown under the radar under any circumstances (although it's actually a more inspirational story than KG getting traded). But when it comes to inspiring Laker fans to sing a tune with an excellent guitar riff, the newest Laker likely won't cut the mustard. Karl's presence also appears a long shot to prevent Kobe from licking old wounds, a reaction that could make things rather unpleasant. Thus, it begs the question of where to go from here.
Well, for fans, a trip to El Segundo armed with flaming torches and a cry for Mitch Kupchak's head is unwarranted. I'm not being a front-office apologist, just realistic. Disappointed as I am to see Garnett land elsewhere, I don't think this situation is reasonably on Kupchak's shoulders. By all accounts, an aggressive pitch was made for Garnett. A failure to put him in purple and gold didn't seem due to a reluctance to part with chips, simply a lack of said chips. I've said a zillion times that I didn't think the Lakers had the pieces to make KG a Laker. Here's proof positive. Sorry, but Boston's offer was better than the Lakers' best counter. Compare the particulars and it's obvious:
Kwame Brown represents an expiring contract worth 9 million bucks. Theo Ratliff's is worth 11.7. I'm hardly qualified to teach mathematics at MIT. I can barely do long division. But I remain confident in my belief that 11.7 is more than 9. Bynum is a promising post player. Al Jefferson is a promising post player who's more developed than Drew. That doesn't mean Jefferson's a lock to end up the better player, but it does mean he's pretty a tough commodity to refuse, especially in a holdout for a less-established big man. In addition to draft picks, the Wolves receive youngsters ranging from "all upside" (Gerald Green) to "potentially solid role player" (Ryan Gomes) to "soon to be blessed with a lot of free time to shop for new guns" (Sebastian Telfair). All contracts end in 2008, providing a team that won't likely be good for a few seasons some low-risk, short-term options. And since they won't be solid anytime soon, why take on Lamar Odom's big contract and allow his PT to stymie the growth of Corey Brewer? Even with the Lakers theoretically willing to take Marko Jaric or Mark Blount's bad salaries, the Celts package makes more sense for a rebuilding team. If you wanna blame Kupchak for not having the requisite pieces on hand, fair enough. But otherwise, you're basically blaming him for not being able to con Kevin McHale into taking a clearly less-desirable package. His moves over the years show McHale may be dumb, but the man ain't stupid.
Assuming Kupchak can enter his office without a private security detail, what should he do while at his desk? Hopefully not sign off on a panic move that shows fans (and a certain shooting guard) that he's willing to "make noise." Yeah, noise often reeks of "bold and decisive." But noise also typically precedes a thumping headache. The powers that be are already gobbling Excedrin. No need to willingly end up in rehab for an aspirin addiction. Jermaine O'Neal, for example, is the likely name to pop up in rumor mills. Last time he was sewing circle fodder, the deal involved exchanging Odom and Bynum (unless you're counting the Odom-Bynum-Brown for JO-Troy Murphy proposal, but I don't since it was asinine to even consider). Landing JO gives the Lakers a bigger "name" and certainly brings the much-ballyhooed "noise." But would it also bring bring the funk? I don't think so.
JO might shore up the D a bit in between nursing injuries (which happens quite a bit, for those keeping score). But I don't think he'd transform the Laker hoop into a fortress, either. In the meantime, you lose what LO provides the offense, especially in turns of it running smoothly. Yes, offense isn't chief among Laker concerns, but that's assuming it functions at peak capacity. Remove LO from the equation for a less versatile option and you may downgrade the O more than the D actually improves. JO is a more consistent scorer, but this still strikes me as a sideways (and expensive) move, and I don't know if it's worth trading two of three pieces with any value simply because it represents "bold action." Driving headfirst in a brick wall at 90 mph is bold. Doesn't mean I'm itching to do it. And save the theoretical move for KG, the only way the Lakers were "one player away" was through adding a high-quality player to the mix, not swapping talent. If the Lakers pick up a quality player to accompany Kobe and JO, that's perhaps another story. But I'd hate to see the team dig itself further into a hole so fans know they're "serious about building a winner." "Serious" and "smart" are two different things. I prefer the latter.
Does that mean I wanna stand pat? No. The front office should aggressively go after any good player on the market and those reportedly untouchable. But I don't think they should move heaven and earth, no questions asked. Especially if the primary motive is making Kobe happy, since the odds are low, anyway. Garnett was the guy he wanted. That's no longer a possibility. I don't picture any other moves that'll automatically put a smile on his face. Except, of course, trading him. Which, as I've said before, I think the Lakers should seriously consider. Not because I "want" to trade Kobe. Nobody really "wants" to trade the league's best player still in his prime. I'd much rather put a team around him, all things being equal. But this isn't about what I want. It's about what I think is best for the Lakers, and sometimes what you want to do and what you should do are two very different things.
If you can't utilize Kobe's abilities to their fullest by building around him, there's no real point to having him here, especially if he's counting down the minutes (perhaps in a vocal and distracting fashion) until he can bolt. You're simply avoiding the inevitable, and procrastinating could limit whatever returns are possible for Kobe. Like it or not, the Lakers may be in a position where rebuilding is the unattractive but necessary solution. If that's the case, you're better off obtaining (and retaining) the most pieces and options to make it happen. No Laker will fetch more loot than Kobe. Were I Mitch Kupchak, I'd keep my ear to the ground for possibilities. But if I'm hearing nothing but silence, I would approach Kobe and lay everything on the table. If we acquiesce to your wishes, will you widen the list of reportedly acceptable destinations beyond "Chicago" and "Chicago" (although the Bulls could very well be more interested in a Kobe trade these days, now that Boston's a legit three-headed monster)? As stubborn as he can be and as much as he hates relinquishing control, Kobe might be open to a compromise focused around speeding up his wishes. Or he might take that stance as a sign of weakness and relish having the Lakers by the short and curlies, aping how Shaq handled his trip out of town. But if I had to guess, a cooperative olive branch is more likely to help than hurt. And it may be the best move for the franchise (if a bitter pill for fans to swallow).
In any case, I'd be lying if I said I'm not curious about what comes next. I'm already exhausted thinking about how many hours I'm gonna be chained to my laptop writing about it. But curious nonetheless.
-- AK



Mitchell,
That's an interesting theory you have about me. It's also complete nonsense, since there are a few huge flaws in your rationale.
a) I grew up in St. Louis, a city with no NBA team. The Lakers were the first basketball team I've ever rooted for upon moving to L.A. 17 years ago. And I think that's a long enough time to get a handle on the team's history and culture.
b) Simers, Heisler and Plaschke aren't my "mentors." I don't know any of them well (I've barely spoken 10 words with Simers), nor do I work in an office with them. I work from home. For that matter, I've been to the Times' office about 6 times (including when they hired me). Outside of seeing those guys at games, I have no working relationship with any of them.
c) I put way too much effort into this blog to just be "earning a paycheck."
d) I didn't "defend" the front office. I just said that they didn't have the pieces to make the KG trade (which is, as I said, their fault).
But feel free to try another round of pyschobabble if you'd like. Like I said, interesting stuff.
AK
Posted by: Andrew Kamenetzky | August 01, 2007 at 09:50 PM
The bottom line, the Celtics deal gives KG a better chance for contending to play with 2 stars in the East.
Posted by: gdchild | August 01, 2007 at 09:53 PM
So, Mitchell tell your client "Kobiatch" that he is entitled to finish his contract for 2 years. Then he can opt his A$$ out to any team he wants.
And Mitchell when is the next Ringley Bros., Kobe, Barney and Bailey going to start again?
I'm anxious for the next circus show to begin!
Posted by: Gunner | August 01, 2007 at 09:53 PM
hahaha. confusion say i should go for speaking truth. hahaha.
confusion should learn to be more like confucious for real and learn to accept life for the way it is.
kobe cried, caused confusion and strife to reign, made already weak front office look much weaker. game set match.
confucious says do not act rude to one man's point of view. kobe lovers arent laker fans, but KOBE fans. lakers bigger than one baby (despite being incredibly talented) and incompetant front office. now have fortune cookie. BONG!!!
Posted by: the WOLF | August 01, 2007 at 09:55 PM
MITCHELL=KOBE'S AGENT
MITCHELL=KOBE'S LOVER
MITCHELL=KOBE'S TWIN
MITCHELL=KOBE HIMSELF
"I think I understand why AK is such a Kobe hater."
Now you're calling AK a "hater"? man, you've really gone off the deep end.
Just face it, your guy is embarassing the hell out of you and your kind (kobe loyalist). Please take a moment and tell your guy to take a hard look in the mirror. It's that simple to figure things out.
Posted by: KLBeast | August 01, 2007 at 09:55 PM
Where is Mitchell....CLAP, CLAP.......CLAP, CLAP, CLAP
Where is Mitchell....CLAP, CLAP.......CLAP, CLAP, CLAP
Where is Mitchell....CLAP, CLAP.......CLAP, CLAP, CLAP
Where is Mitchell....CLAP, CLAP.......CLAP, CLAP, CLAP
Posted by: Gunner | August 01, 2007 at 09:56 PM
LakerLarry,
"Hey KL, here's what I don't quite get about you and Gunner, You don't like Kobe, you don't like the other players on the team, you don't like the owners and you don't like the front office. What the hell do you like about the Lakers, the night janitor, the ball boys, what? And, please don't give me the crap about you're a "longtime Laker fan"! That just isn't true! "
i have NEVER said that i don't like anybody but kobe. as a matter of fact, once kobe's gone, i don't think we're that far away from competing again. do you remember how good the lakers looked in the beginning of the season playing T-E-A-M ball. i was even surprised when kobe returned that the laker team was playing team ball. but once a bad streak hit, i knew kobe would be kobe again.
once "kobe-ball" was employed, i knew that it was the beginning of the end of the season even if the team made the playoffs.
so to answer your insult, the laker team looks decent once kobe's gone. how much you want to bet that once kobe's gone, i won't take longer than 2-3 years to be a competitive team again?
Posted by: KLBeast | August 01, 2007 at 10:00 PM
I'M LOOKING AT THE MAN IN THE MIRROR. I'M ASKING HIM TO CHANGE HIS WAYS.
Posted by: Gunner | August 01, 2007 at 10:07 PM
Lakerlarry
“I suspect I was watching the NBA when you were in diapers.”
Old-man alert! Old-man alert! My grand-grand-daddy says that to me all the time. Isn’t it past your bedtime? Gotta wake up a 5am for the "early bird" speical.
“If you had been around this blog a bit longer, you might have read some of my posts from last season when I was one of the few people who opposed a KG acquisition.”
Funny, I would have actually begin to give kobe a break had he convinced KG to play in LA. In a roundabout way, we would have traded an old shaq for a prime KG. I would have actually relented a little. Oh well, no need to cry over spilled milk.
“Get your facts straight before you start spewing venom my way.......... son!”
Okay, my bad. I didn’t mean to offend you by calling you a loyalist. I know you’re not a loyalist because you seem genuenly offended at my accusation. I apologize.
Posted by: KLBeast | August 01, 2007 at 10:09 PM
Dice8up
“Who do you blame for the MIAMI sweep in the first round with your "BEST PLAYER ON THE PLANET PLAYING?" AND WITH THE SUPPORTING CAST ALL-STAR?”
I blame a good, hard-nosed Bulls team that made Miami look old. BTW, neither shaq nor wade is the “best player on the planet”. Also, being the “best” player is moot. Being the best TEAM at the end is what matters.
“WHO DO YOU BLAME? COMMON' ANSWER ME KL.... YOU OF ALL PEOPLE KNOWS WHAT IS HAPPENING TO SHAQ, RIGHT?”
I’ve noted for the record that shaq’s time has passed and the torch was officially passed to Wade in 2006. How fitting eh? Instead of Shaq passing the torch to kobe, shaq passes to the anti-kobe. Made me cry seeing fat shaq cry….
“YOU KNOW THAT BIG TIME FREE AGENTS REALLY REALLY WANT TO PLAY WITH THE "BIG DADDY".”
Do you mean big Grand-daddy? Or Fat-Daddy? It’s wade’s team now. Looks like Miami stock has declined considerably when 3 free agent PG turned down playing in Miami and Miami picking up Smush. We'll see if the Heats are a "one-hit wonder".
hey, diceman, you're alright. take care.
Posted by: KLBeast | August 01, 2007 at 10:15 PM
mitchell that attack on ak was really low man. good one. attack one of the few who tries to remain unbias about the lakers.
Posted by: the WOLF | August 01, 2007 at 10:18 PM
Who say that Garnett is the only star that we should pursue?
Are we going to listen the same excuse....
Only Garnett merit a trade for Bynum and Lamar.
First...
In the league is Lamar one of the best 5 Power forwards? NO
In the league is Lamar one of the best 5 small forward? No.
So we need a legitimate power forward who can bang with the best.
Besides, how many seasons we need to find out if Lamar and Kobe tandem works? 3 years already
and it doesn't work.
Jermaine O'Neill or Paul Gasol should be fine, plus another good defensive forward with toughness.
After Garnett is gone who is the next superstar in line to manipulate Lakers fans.
Posted by: jorema | August 01, 2007 at 10:24 PM
KL KLBeast Gunner,
Please stop pretending you guys.
Regardless of Kobe's faults, he is a once-in-a-lifetime player for the local team.
He is a Laker living in LA, actuallly in Orange County.
If you guys are really locals, you cannot be Laker fans and strongly hate Kobe at the same time.
The only local people that I know who hates Kobe's guts are non-Laker fans.
They are either more into baseball/football than basketball, have unconscious bias against prominent non-whites, or were holdout fans of the Chicago bulls during Jordan's era.
I may be wrong, but judging from the way you get hyper whenever Jordan is compared to Kobe in previous posts, you guys are probably transient, but definitely not local Laker fans.
Don't blame us for doubting your motives.
It might be more believable if you are just occasionally annoyed by Kobe's antics.
But to say nothing positive at all about the guy despite his successes, tribulations, trials and accomplishments, and then claiming to be a fan of his team is very very hard to fathom.
Posted by: Confucius | August 01, 2007 at 10:24 PM
Great post Lakertom. It does hurt, it hurts a lot. KG was my dream...I mean he's a true Laker if there ever was one...someone that embodies hard work, devotion, and thirst for winning (at least I assumed so).
Edwin Gueco, I think a break will be a good idea. As I'm currently on vacation right now, I find myself checking the blog less...but not completely lol. I think we all need to get some perspective. This is still just a game...but a game where our hearts rule our emotions.
Posted by: Faith | August 01, 2007 at 10:25 PM
Kobe Bryant and the Lakers forever! Does not matter what AK and the haters say!
Posted by: Staples 24 | August 01, 2007 at 10:27 PM
Jorema,
"None of that would work.
Kobe can decide where he goes."
---------
Well, you're partially correct. Kobe can decide where he goes in summer of 2009.
If he wants to play anywhere other than Los Angeles before then, then it has to be a mutual
decision between Kobe and the Lakers.
Posted by: Long Time Laker Fan | August 01, 2007 at 10:28 PM
Weave-Man -
I like your Lakers-Indy-Denver trade idea. Denver did reject the idea of Kwame + draft pick for Camby,
but your deal gives them 4 million of immediate salary relief (actually 8 million, since it's doubled), Kwame's
expiring contract next year to get them under the luxury tax limit, and a young player (Turiaf) to fill the role
for cheap. The one catch is Cook for JR Smith, but if I remember right, Smith was kinda in the coach's
doghouse the last half of the year, so maybe they'd go for it. Camby and JO to the Lakers would kick
serious ass.
It's not completely implausible - it does offer Denver something the Lakers haven't offered them before,
and it gives Indy what they want as well.
Kupchak - make it happen. :-)
Posted by: Long Time Laker Fan | August 01, 2007 at 10:37 PM
Lakers will make the trade for JO, the pieces they signed spells that out.
Odom can not give what JO brings. Bynum may or may not? Why speculate when you have JO that is already there!
Yes Bynum/Odom is too much for JO on paper, but in need JO brings IT! Bynum/Odom can be replaced by MIHM/KWAME/ONEAL... We have to understand we are not in rebuilding mode! That's why we have to make the trade.
If the tandem of Odom and Kwame worked the last two years, BYNUM would have been a nice projectto keep! But because both Odom and Kwame failed we have to use BYNUM as a trade bait to improve and contend now.
What sucks is if we loose BYNUM/ODOM/KWAME and have MIHM/TROY/ONEAL.
I will only take Troy if they take Cook and Sasha!
Posted by: Staples 24 | August 01, 2007 at 10:46 PM
exhelodrvr,
And if Farmar has that much potential, then the Lakers sure as heck wasted a draft pick on Crit, even if he
was "the best available". Because no way that two very inexperienced PGs will get enough time to develop,
and the trade value of one of them will drop quite a bit.
------------------------------
I see Critter as an insurance policy in case Farmar's game that was exceptional in college isn't able
to grow into a pro game. Remember, when they drafted Critter, Farmar was the only real PG on
the roster. Vujacic is more of a shooting guard being shoehorned into playing PG and not doing
all that good a job of it. When they added Fisher, the Farmar-Critter duo became more overkill,
but I still think it's a good idea to make SURE they shore up their weakest position for the last
4 to 5 years.
Besides, Critter could grow into backing up both PG and SG. He could be like Barbosa is for
the Suns -- a speed demon 6th man who can come into the game with the second unit and
be a big time slasher-scorer, and occasionally play with the first unit either as the point next
to Kobe or as the SG next to Farmar... and if Kobe leaves, the Lakers may need a good SG
in two years.
Or worst case, Critter was the best player available at the position the Lakers drafted and
they're collecting assets for when they get in a situation where a star is available and the
general manager is willing trade to someone who isn't an ex-Celtic.
To be honest, I think Farmar and Crittendon are about equal in potential, though I've seen much
more of Farmar than Crittendon. I think they could both be big contributors to the team in
another year or two, and Fisher may be an ideal mentor to guide them through the bumps
of that growth process.
Posted by: Long Time Laker Fan | August 01, 2007 at 10:51 PM
Since nobody commented on my proposed Grizzley-Hawks trade i will rant to myself..
How about sending Bynum to the Sonics??
Lakers get: Wilcox, Watson, K. Thomas, Sene
Seattle gets: Bynum, Kwame, Farmar
Lakers line up
C Kurt Thomas/Mihm/Sene
PF Chris Wilcox/Turiaf
SF Lamar Odom/Walton/Radmanovic
SG Kobe Bryant/Evans
PG Earl Watson/Fisher/Crittenton
Probably not enough scoring on that team...but how about the D??
Posted by: The Lake-Show | August 01, 2007 at 10:59 PM
the WOLF,
Please write clearly, not in fragments, so your view is easier to understand and can be taken more seriously. Otherwise, you sound like a hit-and-run outsider.
Thanks.
Posted by: Confucius | August 01, 2007 at 11:01 PM
kobe gives people reasons not to like him. for a guy so talented and someone who pretends to be a leader, he should can cry. but the most pathetic thing is that overly loyal kobe fans have thier eyes shut and thier fingers in the ears screaming "kobe is god" over and over. the same person they love is the same person who destroys the team. what will you kobe slaves do when he dosent show for training camp? probably say his emmenence dont need to practice and burn candles and pray to him. Known OverBlown Egomaniac. go 24! (all by yourself as usual)
Posted by: the WOLF | August 01, 2007 at 11:02 PM
Confucius
“Regardless of Kobe's faults, he is a once-in-a-lifetime player for the local team.”
I disagree, SG’s are dime a dozen. Don’t get fooled by the razzle dazzle. LBJ has already exceeded kobe in the "wow" factor.
“He is a Laker living in LA, actuallly in Orange County”
So what? I live in OC work in the same city where kobe resides. Also, my office probably over looks kobe’s Newport house. What’s your point?
“If you guys are really locals, you cannot be Laker fans and strongly hate Kobe at the same time.”
It’s not so much that I hate kobe, but I hate what the laker team has become under kobe’s leadership. Had kobe continued to lead a competitive team, all the shaq crap would have been forgiven.
“I may be wrong, but judging from the way you get hyper whenever Jordan is compared to Kobe in previous posts, you guys are probably transient, but definitely not local Laker fans.”
Dude, i immigrated (legally, but i digress) to the States almost 30 years ago and have resided in LA/OC all of my life. I've been a laker fan for 20+ years beginning in the late 80s.
After Magic announced his retirement and watching Jordan win his first championship, coincidentally against the Magic Lakers (remember MJ’s drive when he went up with the right, then switched hands? Simply amazing), I adopted the Bulls as a great team to watch and root for. The 90s Bulls beat up on the Lakers, Portland, Sonics, Jazz and Suns, not to mention the Domnic Hawks, Cavilers, Knicks.
MJ is a once in a lifetime player.
Kobe….sch-mobe…is a dime a dozen. Don’t let the razzle dazzle fool you. Kobe is a wannabe Jordan. Actually, i think kobe's desire to exceed jordan is what has corrupted kobe's mind.
“It might be more believable if you are just occasionally annoyed by Kobe's antics.”
I can put up with the antics, what I can’t put up with is kobe’s desire to be the “man” in LA, but not taking responsibility. Also, holding management’s nut to rid of shaq, then producing a lousey team while kobe accomplished all of the individual accolades is incorrigible too.
I’ll say again, badmouthing anybody pubically is just asking for trouble. My jaw dropped during the interview with Jim Gray when kobe called shaq “childish and jealous” on national TV. What kind of a$$hole would do that? The kind of a$$hole named kobe bryant. Please see below for the transcript of the interview:
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=1648431
GRAY: Kobe, Shaq said if you didn't like what he had to say you can opt out and leave next season. Will you leave the Lakers?
BRYANT: I won't make that decision until the end of the season. I told Shaq last year that I was planning on opting out. He knew before anyone. I told him out of respect for what we have been through together. I thought he should be the first to know. The fact that he acts like this is such a big shock is a mystery to me. If leaving the Lakers at the end of the season is what I decide, a major reason for that will be Shaq's childlike selfishness and jealousy.
GRAY: Do you feel Shaq has been supportive in regards to your legal situation?
BRYANT: He is not my quote unquote "big brother." A big brother would have called to lend his support this summer. I heard absolutely nothing from him. I spoke to Devean [George], Rick [Fox], Mitch [Kupchak], Phil, and our owner Jerry Buss. And Shaq's own Uncle Jerome called and left three messages. Other teammates like Derek [Fisher], Mark [Madsen], and [Stanislav Medvedenko] left messages as well. Opponents called like [Chris] Webber, [Mike] Bibby, and many others. So did a lot of coaches. Michael Jordan, who didn't have my home phone, tracked it down to lend his support. So did Tiger Woods. But yet from my so-called big brother, I heard nothing.
GRAY: Why not resolve this behind closed doors? Why is this so public?
BRYANT: I asked Phil on Sunday [yesterday] to say something to calm this situation down before it boiled over. But he backed away, so now here we are. I have been a bigger person every time something happened with Shaq, and I don't expect this to be any different. But somebody in this organization had to speak up, because his unprofessionalism hurt us last year, and I don't want it to hurt us this year.
Posted by: KLBeast | August 01, 2007 at 11:03 PM
Lake-Show,
I love big-ass trades with multiple teams. They almost never really happen but they're fun to cook up. :-)
Your placement of players is a little inaccurate though - Childress is a SF, and Warrick is a PF.
Also, there is no possible way the Lakers can get Navarro now. They could make a trade with
Washington to get his rights, but he has a 3 million dollar buyout and the max the Lakers have left
to pay a player is 1 million left of the MLE - He'd have to pay 2 million out of his own pocket to play
for the Lakers next year, and I guarantee that's not going to happen.
Here's my revision of your lineup (I'd also start Gasol at the C -- he's equally comfortable there and
at PF). Chris Webber is also more a center, but I'll leave him where you put him.
PG Fisher/Farmar/Crittenton
SG Kobe/Evans/Vujacic
SF Walton/Childress/Radman
PF Warrick/Turiaf
C Gasol/Webber/Mihm/Wright
Posted by: Long Time Laker Fan | August 01, 2007 at 11:03 PM
weave,
denver gets raped.
multi team deals dont work.
espcially when it comes to important players.
good night! (especiallly confusion)
Posted by: the WOLF | August 01, 2007 at 11:14 PM
If i were a truly Kobe hater I will love to have him traded right now.
But look what phony thing... the haters in this site are just clueless...they want Kobe to stay with the lakers, they want to see him playing the last 2 years of his contract.
This desire contradict any hater's doctrine against Kobe that they preach.,
If you hate him so much...you better see him far from your team, I guess.
KL and Gunner are a fraud. I laugh in their innocuous discourse.
Well, at least is entertainable to follow their unconscious parade.
Posted by: jorema | August 01, 2007 at 11:20 PM
Weave-Man,
Oops. I just re-read the Indy/Denver trade idea. It doesn't work. Denver is already way into
luxury tax territory, and your deal gives them back 3 million MORE salary than they send out.
Which means they pay 6 million MORE, for Kwame, Turiaf and Cook than for Nene and JR Smith.
I don't see them going for that. When I did the initial numbers in my head I either looked at a
wrong row in the salary table somewhere or something like that.
If you want to make a deal with Denver that's more plausible, have them taking in less salary
than they're sending out. Cook and Turiaf were good ideas, but Kwame doesn't really work
in a trade to them (in fact Kupchak reportedly tried to trade Kwame + the #19 pick for Camby
and they turned it down).
Posted by: Long Time Laker Fan | August 01, 2007 at 11:21 PM
confusion,
since your confused, ill explain:
im trying to be like you- confused. not trying to be grammatical and other big words.
thanks!
Posted by: the WOLF | August 01, 2007 at 11:23 PM
ANALYSIS OF THE METAMORPHESES OF KOBE’S JERKNESS
Jim Gray interview with kobe when kobe was only a baby-jerk.
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=1648431
“The fact that he [Shaq] acts like this is such a big shock is a mystery to me. If leaving the Lakers at the end of the season is what I decide, a major reason for that will be Shaq's childlike selfishness and jealousy.”
Here’s a 24-year-old snot nosed punk a$$ calling the franchise player (Shaq O’Neal) PUBLICALLY a “child”. Hey, this reminds me when kobe referred to Raja Bell (my hero) a “kid”. In both instances, Shaq and Raja were kobe’s elder. Man, kobe’s is such a jerk….always has been and always will be.
To the blinded-by-kobe’s-razzle-dazzle kobe loyalist, this is kobe’s indirect reference to management that it’s either shaq or me. Basically holding management’s nuts.
“He is not my quote unquote "big brother." A big brother would have called to lend his support this summer.”
Kobe’s first (not only) attempt to discredit shaq’s leadership. What’s shaq suppose to be Kobe’s little brother? How stupid is kobe Bryant? It’s a rhetorical question. The answer is plenty stupid.
“I heard absolutely nothing from him. I spoke to Devean [George], Rick [Fox], Mitch [Kupchak], Phil, and our owner Jerry Buss. And Shaq's own Uncle Jerome called and left three messages. Other teammates like Derek [Fisher], Mark [Madsen], and [Stanislav Medvedenko] left messages as well. Opponents called like [Chris] Webber, [Mike] Bibby, and many others. So did a lot of coaches. Michael Jordan, who didn't have my home phone, tracked it down to lend his support. So did Tiger Woods. But yet from my so-called big brother, I heard nothing.”
I believe this is called, in my line of work, “dropping names”. It’s like saying “everybody like me, what's so-and-so's problem”. Who’s going to disagree? Who’s stupid enough to say that “no I don’t care about kobe”? So kobe has all of these alledged friends, where are they now? I don’t see anybody genuinely lending support to the Big Jerkoff besides superficial “kobe’s the best player on the planet”? when it comes to actually playing with kobe, the response is “I have to see my grand-mama”. I’m not talking about Larry Johnson either.
“GRAY: Why not resolve this behind closed doors? Why is this so public?”
Great question, “why not resolve issues behind closed doors”? Cuz it ain’t how "no"-be rolls. instead of being a class act, kobe likes it down and dirty.....no reference to Colorado intended.
“I have been a bigger person every time something happened with Shaq, and I don't expect this to be any different. But somebody in this organization had to speak up, because his unprofessionalism hurt us last year, and I don't want it to hurt us this year.”
Here we go again with kobe trying to discredit shaq. And you wonder why shaq was reluctant to relinquish the torch to Mr. A$$hole Kobe Brant? Hell, I’d rather die than give kobe an ounce of credit. WTF is kobe talking about being a "better" person. Kobe's got no class whatsoever. the only person who hurt the lakers is kobe beginning in 2003.
LESSON LEARNED: “DON’T BE AN A$$HOLE”
Posted by: KLBeast | August 01, 2007 at 11:29 PM
I have to say, I'm still not in favor of any trade that throws Lamar Odom under the bus. Night after night, he almost had a triple double, barely coming up short in one of the stats. He played through a lot of pain and he loves being a Laker. A player who loves being a Laker is worth holding onto amidst all the slackers. If we can get Jermaine O'Neal without giving up Lamar, let's do it.
Like D-Fish, Lamar has character, he is a warrior. I want BOTH of these guys on my team. Put the quitters on the trading block. You know who they are.
Let's begin to restore the franchise by putting a premium on honor and character. Heart and mental toughness are the difference makers we too often forget or ignore. Let's stop subtracting by addition and be smart about who we want on the team. Big names and stats are nice, but honor and character have no price tag.
Posted by: Rick Friedman | August 01, 2007 at 11:29 PM
Lake Show,
Good stuff. I love the idea of trading for Gasol. But I do think he may have changed his mind about being traded after their picks. Still...I'd love it!
As for the Seattle deal. I'm for anything that brings defense in this team lol. I actually think Wilcox is a pretty good player that can fit in this system. The thing is we don't really ask for much from our centers but put backs...well at least we don't with Kwame...but I digress. As I recall Wilcox is a very tough defender and a good offensive rebound kind of guy. I also love Earl Watson. I guess the only question is would Seattle go for it. They have a great guy in Durant who would benefit greatly with Earl Watson's drives, and Wilcox's defense...then again we'd be giving up Socks. We'd be pretty thin with just Wilcox and Mihm at the 5 (because I think Ronny should be put on the 4)...but then again, we'd be stronger defensively.
Posted by: Faith | August 01, 2007 at 11:34 PM
EDDIE HOUSE TO KOBE: "F-U"
Boston starts to rebuild roster, signs House to one-year deal
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=2957622
Looks like the "willing to take less money guys" are knocking down Boston's doors. Can somebody please buy kobe some blue cheese to go with his whine?
Posted by: KLBeast | August 01, 2007 at 11:34 PM
Great post Lakertom. It does hurt, it hurts a lot. KG was my dream...I mean he's a true Laker if there ever was one...someone that embodies hard work, devotion, and thirst for winning (at least I assumed so).
Who said this?
So MJ, Bird is also a true Laker? How can one be a true Laker when he was never one to begin with... yeah it's a dream alright. Kobe is our Laker! Period!
If KG was ever a Laker, I would have loved him as much as Magic and Kobe! I understand that... But he is not and never bacame one. So why dwell on it? Move on!
If ever Kobe leaves... I will love the next Laker Superstar just the same but I want one that is a Laker to begin with nor bacame a Laker very early on his carrer.
Posted by: Staples 24 | August 01, 2007 at 11:42 PM
the WOLF,
Having an opinion is ok. Anyone's entitled to it.
But, that doesn't necessarily make your opinion the truth. Peace.
Posted by: Confucius | August 01, 2007 at 11:52 PM
So i don't see the big deal in us going for a guy like JO. I looked at his stats and Compared to Lamar and they match up like this:
Career JO
FG%46 FT%70 RPG 7.8 APG1.4 SPG.5 BPG1.9 PPG14.4
Granted he didn't play that much in the start of his Career.
LO career
FG%45 FT%71 RPG8.6 APG4.6 SPG.9 BPG1.0 PPG15.8
The numbers For career are really similair in fact ilike lamars better because of the boards. For those who think these stats aren't fair lets look at the most important stats. THE PLAYOFFS! And im looking at the last season that either made the playoffs.
JO05-06 PLAYOFFS 6 GAMES
FG%52% FT%71% OR1.5 RPG7.5 APG1.7 SPG.5 BPG2.3 TO4.3 PPG21.0
LO06-07 PLAYOFFS 5 GAMES
FG%48% FT%50% OR4 RPG13 APG2.2 SPG.9 BPG1.2 TO2.0 PPG19.4
WOW look at those numbers. I think we take Lamar for granted his numbers in the playoffs to me are better because the TO's are down and the OR and RPG are significantly better. The % from the line could be better for LO but hey.
AGAIN I ASK WOULD IT REALLY BE SMART TO TRADE LAMAR WHO I ALREADY THINK GIVES A BETTER CONTRIBUTION FOR A NAME IN JO AND AT THE SAME TIME GUVE UP ANDREW BYNUM WHO I THINK WILL HAVE A BREAK OUT SEASON JUST TO MAKE THE BIG BABY HAPPY?
SIDE NOTE: I worked at the Pavillions were Kobe shopped at. The same center where that video was shot at in front of sharky's. After i met him i always thought he was really full of himself. Maybe i would be to if i were the best in the world. but my point is that even in real life his ego is huge.
Posted by: Mainor | August 02, 2007 at 12:09 AM
http://cbs2.com/johnireland/local_blogentry_212002703.html
john ireland's take on the new celtics
Posted by: hansoulfood | August 02, 2007 at 12:24 AM
shaq is not the main reason why teams became champions....he is just one of the big force...but the bigger force is the other superstar buddy who carry him when the game is on the line....shaq is dominant if his team is ahead by big points, but if the score is tied or +/- 1 point, shaq is not an option to end the game.....2000, if not for kobe who give the assist to shat at the game 7 against portland, no lakers dynasty in the new millenium...it was kobe who brought lakers to finals...review the tapes...please....it's just that the nba considered shaq as 1 of the 50 greatest players and they want to compliment their mistakes by informing the fans it was shaq who carried his team to finals or championships....kobe should be the man then, but shaq refused to...kudos to wade, because he did not listen to shaq...he knows heat is his team no shaq's....
Posted by: edodgreat | August 02, 2007 at 12:38 AM
Kl,
You need to come your hatred for Kobe down and take a chill pill. You act like if they guy is taking over your life. You don't have to reinforce that you hate him everytime. Get over it already. There was a point that I disliked Shaq when he went to Miami, but its a waste of time. Everyman has their faults, and everyman is not perfect. So just hating does not good. I think Shaq is egotistical, but Shaq is still a human being and so is Kobe. I don think anyone really disagrees with you that Kobe has bad characteristic flaws, but he is he laker, and we fans should acknowledge this and help him realize things he does is not right. And hell, hes the baddest bball player on the planet.
Posted by: wow | August 02, 2007 at 01:23 AM
I agree with yo DMacid ...I for one have been ranting for days to get J.O even if it cost us L.O and Bynum. I have been going back to the 05-06 years when J.O was healthy and he was absolutely beasting on teams in the west..
05-06 season vs Dirk(31) 7-17 13rbs 3blks, 25pts 11-14 ft vs Gasol (11pts 2-11) 9-19 14rbs 5blks, 20pts 2-3ft vs Duncan(26pt) 10-20 7rbs 0blks 25pts 6-8ft vs Shaq(18pts) 10-20 9rbs 27pts 1blk 7-10ft
last season playing on 1 leg vs detroit 4/03 10-16, 7rbs 2blks 20pts. vs cavs 3/27 11-18 5rb 1blk 32pts 10-10ft vs Bulls 3/25 15-24 14rb 0blk 39pts 9-12 ft vs Rockets 3/20 9-24, 9rbs 0blks 25pts vs phx 2/27 13-24 13rb 7ast 6blks 28pts 2-2ft
Yes J.O had his worse season last year, I only compiled the games against good teams that has Good PF/C. If you read a lot of those recaps "J.O played hurt once again" that's Y his FG% was 43%. This guy is a warrior. He actually played more games than L.O last 3 years. He will hold his own against the Boozers, Duncan, Amare, Dirk etc
I don't care what Lamar %'s are..L.O only wants to take 12 shots/game..as you can see J.O takes about 20shots/game..@ 50%fg (that's how efficient I believe he will be with Kobe. J.O is 46% career) we need somebody to step up and take some of the scoring burden off kobe. If he takes 20shots/game @ 46% I can live with that than 12shots/game @ 47% for lamar.
J.O in the paint taking 20shots/game @ 50% and 8ft/g=24ppg would do wonders for kobe. J.O would have Kwame to guard the Duncans, Brand, boozer, Gasols of the world. Mihm can get off. putbacks. Mihm could position on the other side of the offensive post. Fisher/J.critt/sasha/vlad/ cook/ evans can all spread the floor and Kobe could be the Slasher/Playmaker and take it to the hoop if necessary..
Each season experts downplay how far we will go in the season; they claim we wouldn't even make the playoffs..but some how we do. Now they claim Kobe/J.O duo would only get to the 2nd round...pfff I for one believes If J.O plays 75games we are going to the Finals. I don't see a single team that can guard kobe and J.O and shut down the Fishers/J.critt/ Vlad(if healthy) of the world. J.O production matches most of those teams best big man and now they would have kobe to contend with.
if Trade kwame and Farmer for Artest I think we can win it all; If we got J.O.
Spurs: Duncan = J.O BOTH WILL HAVE 20-10. PARKER SLIGHTLY>> FISHER/J.CRITT. PARKER..KOBE >>> MANU...KOBE HEAVILY. ARTEST >> BOWEN
SUNS: NASH>FISHER/J.CRITT..BUT NOT SOO MUCH IN PT PRODUCTION. KOBE>>>RAJA. ARTEST=MARION. J.O=AMARE. I FINALLY LIKE OUR CHANCES.
UTAH: D.WILL=FISHER/J.CRITT KOBE>>>GIRICEK. ARTEST>>AK47. J.O=BOOZER. I LIKE OUR CHANCES
HOUSTON: FISHER/J.CRITT>>M.JAMES. KOBE>>>FRANCIS. ARTEST=T.MAC. NO WAY T.MAC KILLS ARTEST. J.O>>>>>C. HAYES. YAO>>MIHM I LIKE OUR CHANCES
DENVER: A.I>>FISHER/J.CRITT. KOBE>>>>SMITH. MELO>ARTEST. J.O>NENE. CAMBY=MIHM I LIKE OUR CHANCES
CELTICS: FISHER/JCRITT>>RONDO, KOBE>>ALLEN. ARTEST=P.PIERCE. J.O=KG. I LIKE OUR CHANCES
MIAMI: FISHER/J.CRITTT>>>SMUSH. KOBE>WADE..SLIGHTY IN POINTS. ARTEST>?, J.O>HASLEM. SHAQ>>MIHM. I LIKE OUR CHANCES.
DETROIT: BILLUPS>>FISH/CRITT. RIP>WALLACE.
I BELIEVE MITCH CAN PULL THIS OFF: LAMAR & BYNUM FOR J.O. & FARMA & KWAME FOR ARTEST. DYNASTY BABY..KOBE (28YRS OLD) ,J.O(28YRS), ARTEST (27YRS) THESE GUYS HAVE GOOD 7 YRS FOR THE DYNASTY.
Posted by: QUIKWUOR | August 02, 2007 at 04:49 AM
Rick Friedman-
Yep, I could not agree more. That is what I like about the Fisher acquisition. Not only did the Lakers lose a loser at the PG position, but in turn, they got a winner. I hate to be overly optimistic, but I think that is just such a huge change, and will have a significant impact this next year. Personally I will be bummed if Cook is still on the roster come November. They dude just doesn’t seem to “get it”.
Posted by: C.S. | August 02, 2007 at 05:15 AM
the WOLF,
You are entitled to your own opinion.
Opinion and truth are two different things.
Opinion is not always the truth.
Posted by: confucius | August 02, 2007 at 06:46 AM
AK/BK and rest speculating on Lakers mortaging their future,
A lot of you suggest that mortgaging the future is wrong and point to the Celtics having only a 3 year window for a title.
You say , if they dont win it, they're done.
As a fan of championship teams, I will take that every day of the week. Did anybody ever get mad when the 49ers mortgaged their
future for 20 years continually putting championship contending teams on the field? No, because fans love winning. And in the end,
it's better to go completely bad then to stay mediocre for 10 years "trying" to build for the future.
Who is really mad that we signed Malone & Payton to try to win another title? We didnt win, but the RIDE was worth it.
Screw that, what fan in his right mind wouldnt take 3-5 years of contending for a title and if it doesnt work out give me the top 1-3 picks
in the lottery and let's start over with a clear salary cap and room to maneuver.
This is especially true for a Laker team who always is appealing to free agents when a opportunity arises. The Lakers can afford to have
the philosophy of win now at all costs BECAUSE if/when they go to a down period, players and agents look at L.A. as an opportunity to get
big.
ALL IT TAKES IS CLEAR CAP ROOM and a top 3 PICK and the Lakers get back on the map quickly. The next big free agent will jump at the opportunity for
money and stardom with the lakeshow.
I'm not saying trade Bynum & Odom for J.O. , I'm saying that the mentality has been wrong for what it seems like a few years. This is L.A.: we dont have
to build through a 10 year process. If a star is available (i.e. Kidd) pick him up and build contenders not teams that should "grow" in a few years.
I'd rather have L.O., Kobe, & Kidd + whoever go all out (entertaining and competitive for title with a veteran big man), than watch this team struggle for 1st or 2nd round
considerations.
BOTTOM LINE: ALL OUT OR NONE AT ALL. This is L.A. The Lakers need to act like. The future is always there but if you always talk about the future when does the
now come?
Posted by: Korey | August 02, 2007 at 07:09 AM
Rick Friedman,
"Let's begin to restore the franchise by putting a premium on honor and character. Heart and mental toughness
are \the difference makers we too often forget or ignore. Let's stop subtracting by addition and be smart about
who we want on the team. Big names and stats are nice, but honor and character have no price tag."
Rick Friedman, I salute you. You sir are a man of character and honor which is
badly needed in this world. But....never forget, a little nastiness on the court
now and then might be needed.
Posted by: Mamba24/10 | August 02, 2007 at 07:14 AM
KL,
In your conversation with confuscious you said:
Confucius
“Regardless of Kobe's faults, he is a once-in-a-lifetime player for the local team.”
I disagree, SG’s are dime a dozen. Don’t get fooled by the razzle dazzle. LBJ has already exceeded kobe in the "wow" factor.
So ..... Elgin Baylor, the HOF, who is not a member of the Lakers organization, came to see this Kobe and got Kobe's autograph
because he's starting a collection of memorabilia of cheap shooting guards? Please name a dozen shooting guards who have
scored more than 60 pts in a game.
What is *wow* factor? I went WOW when Kobe scored 81. I went WOW when he scored 62 against the Spurs. I went WOW
when he scored 40+ for 10 straight games. I went WOW when this kid was a CRITICAL factor in THREE back to back championships.
I went WOW when Phil Jackson, HOFer, with 9 championship rings wrote a book on Kobe being uncoachable and then came back
and coached him. [ He could have gone to NY and gotten his 10 mil. ] I went WOW when Kobe lifted Kwame Brown, Smush Parker,
Sasha Vuujec, and Brian Cook into the playoffs and had the Suns down 3-1. I went WOW when he scored 50+ for 5 straight games
to stop a 6 game losing streak.
I can't actually think of anything that LBJ has done to make me go WOW. I wasn't impressed with getting thru the East. The east is
weak and the Pistons damaged themselves by letting Ben Wallace get away. It broke their chemistry and stopped their defense.
What about LBJ makes you go WOW?
Posted by: hobbitmage | August 02, 2007 at 07:55 AM
I do not expect a major trade this season until possibiliy mid-season.
Be reasonable, guys.
GO LAKERS!
Posted by: Jon Kavulic | August 02, 2007 at 08:00 AM
people people people....
F.ck KG, F.ck the CELTICS!!! lets move on and hope for the best of the team with or without KB...
props to those bloggers who submitt their trade ideas, atleast you guys are making positive contributions to this blog...
and to that guy who's wrongly accusing AK, STFU...
KB's attitude sucks, but i do admit he's 1 hell of a baller. BUT his no MAGIC though.... and if he's really the so called #1 player of the league why cant he close the deal with the SUNS(3-1 & still lose)??? he's much like TMAC... all talk no walk... but he's a laker (for now) so am hoping he'd bring it on when it really matters....
as for shaq, if he loves the lakers he wouldnt leave. he left us high & dry.... a case of penus envy... i dont like non lakers players, but i do commend his media antics before, atleast he was able to force the FO to bring in much needed help for us to win those championships unlike KB & i adored him (when he was a laker) coz he was able to bring it on when it mattered most (swishing those free throws even if he was not gifted as a shooter when the team needed it most)... but he's in miami now so F.CK him....
LBJ??? his in a weak conference... until he wears a lakers uni, F.CK him also... !!!
as for the FO, choosing KB was a safe decision but safety doesnt win you championships... no guts no glory!!!
purple & gold baby!!!
LAKERS DIE HARD FROM ASIA
Posted by: juanman888 | August 02, 2007 at 08:15 AM
Why do we scream at each other?
I've tried to abide by utzworld's truce for weeks now. It seems that most of us have forgotten about it.
The implosion of the dynasty in the making will haunt the team for years to come. It was poorly handled by all of the players involved. For Kobe Critics (and believe me, I was, and to an extent, remain, with you), Buss didn't want to pay max money, Kupchak was toothless, Phil couldn't manage the egos, and Shaq didn't handle it as well as he could have and had baggage himself. And -- this was the key for me -- Shaq backed Kobe's account.
For Kobe Apologists, Kobe had and used his free agency leverage, he did nothing to smooth the relationships with Phil and Shaq over, and BY HIS OWN ADMISSION, he failed to communicate with Shaq the way he should have. He wanted to be the franchise player, and he got his wish. Some of the trades Kobe proposed weren't feasible.
But ALL OF THAT is irrelevant now.
The FO is a mess. Dr. Buss seems to be MIA. Kupchak has made some regrettable moves (the Shaq trade, the Butler trade, the Cook extension, etc.) And Kobe seems to be uninterested in continuing with the team,
So what now?
Posted by: Peace | August 02, 2007 at 08:22 AM
Rick Friedman
The problem is - no one wants quitters on their team either. This is the problem with majority of trades proposed here. Everybody wants to get rid of bad or average player and get a good one. Not going to happened.
Posted by: LAL_Fan | August 02, 2007 at 08:26 AM
Korey,
You are ignoring a very key point - when the 49ers put together their great teams, there was no salary cap. They could have two backup QBs (at the same time) like Steve Young and Steve Bono. You can't just go out and "pick up Jason Kidd". Salary cap prevents you from doing it with free agents, limitations on your own roster affect your capability to do it with trades.
Posted by: exhelodrvr | August 02, 2007 at 08:44 AM
*************************************************************************************
ATTENTION BLOGGERS : TODAY IS GET IT DONE MITCH DAY
************************************************************************************
Get it done Mitch, get it done fast
The Free Agents are dwindling,
Dont end up picking last
Get it done Mitch, Get it done not for us
Get it done Mitch
Youre running out of trust
Get it done Mitch, Im not taking sides
Get it done Mitch
Damn, have you no pride
You Once played with legends, Like Kareem and Magic
Now Jim Buss gives you orders
Man thats so damn sick
Get it done Mitch, This is our last cry
If you dont get it done Mitch
Kobe will say goodby and so will I
AND NOW ROLL CALL
FAITH, MIKE T. TALIQ, Edwin Gueco,, KEIFO, Mamba24Fan4Life, Fan of Mamba, KIWI, ,
WOW, PEACE, J_COOL, DAVID WHANG, ADAM KILEY, LAKERSRYDEORDIE,
FISH_GUY,TIM-4-SHOW, THA_ SHOW, WESJOENIXON, BAYWOO, THE_D, SBPIMP,
CHARLES, Precious, NEVER, CALI KING, RICK FRIEDMAN,THIRTY2, EXHELODRVR,
GENERIC_ONE, TWOODY, JJ, AJAX, MITCHELL., LAKERTOM, LAKERFAN,
KHANG VMAN, KOREY, XTRO, MCGARNAGLE, GUGY, GDChild,Laker4Life,
KL BEAST, Jorema, FearlessWhackJob, MARTY, JANDRO, LAKERFAZE, PhxLkrFAN,
TexasLaker, BOB, TreacherousBalloons, EagleBoy, JR., EASTCOASTJESSIE, Zakee,
Swettual, Utzworld, Andrew Z, LAL Fan, BRANDON C., Kinglakernidas, BlackMamba24,
FKILLAH, CYRUS(VENTRILIQUIST), RespectMyAuthorith, Waterboy, Hariyahu,
ZEN, SARCOCOP,Staples24, Bobby, COMPTONS FINEST, MIGUELINHO, Greek Dude,
SOCALIFE, HAL9000, Greekdude, Michael J, Michael H, Michael A., Rick Friedman,
Gunner24, GINO, FATTY, CBUCK,LAKERGURL, CRITICAL BEATDOWN, PFUNK36,
PAUL LEE, Jay EL, SocalSpider , WEAVE MAN, JON KAVULIC, Tajluck,
BERKLEYLAKER, Dice8Up DION, KARL, CRAIG, MITCHELL, Lakers4Life,
JR, Dascilla, tellitlikeitisNik Kannan, GABE, SEAN P., HanSoulFood, HollywoodJack,
Jay Jay, TaosHum, HOBBITMAGE, Caeser, Obel, CHITOWNLAKER, ANGRYLAKER
wiZo, MagicShaq, HugoBoss, OSCAR, RDLEE, RealityBites, LakerLarry, Bucky, LEELO,
Juno, LakerLifer, C.S. JOVA, BLAZE1BX, Tripgame3, TSPHERE, SIXONEZERO
Mfeige, Reggie, Hollywood Jack, Reality Check Time, Jack In Hollywood
JONINJAPAN(INCANADA), VIOLATER, LT Laker Fan, , KATE, TROY,
JEFF, ANDY B., SWANWORLD, PUPLE&GOLD_4EVA, BENNY BLANCA
MITCH KUPCHAK, JERRY BUSS, PHIL JACKSON, KOBE BRYANT
Marc Gasol, Sun Yue, Shamond, Williams, Ronny Turiaf, V. Radmanovic,
Maurice Evans, Lamar Odom, Derek Fisher, Luke Walton, Brian Cook,
Kwame Brown, Andrew Bynum, Coby Karl, Chris Mihm, Sasha Vujacic
Jordan Farmar, Jarvis Critterton
ALL TOGETHER NOW:
WE ARE THE FREAKIN LA LAKERS THE WINNERS OF 14 NBA TITLES
THE HOME OF WILT, KAREEM, GEORGE MIKAN, SHAQ, MAGIC, KOBE,
ELGIN BAYLOR, JERRY WEST, PAT RILEY, JAMES WORTHY, SILK
COACHED BY THE 9 TIME TITLE WINNER PHIL (9RINGS) JACKSON AND
NO ONE AND NOTHING WILL EVER DIVIDE OR CONQUER US
LAKERS TODAY LAKERS TOMORROW LAKERS FOREVER
Posted by: Mamba24/10 | August 02, 2007 at 09:08 AM