Rumors and housekeeping
July 29, 2007 | 11:41
pm
The good news is that Kevin Garnett is rumored once again to be on the move. The bad news? The rumors don't put him in L.A. Instead, Boston looks like the destination du jour, with Danny Ainge's draft-day acquisition of Ray Allen having apparently made Beantown seem more palatable to The Big Ticket. At least he'll be out of the conference.
Also, on the housekeeping end, we'll be in Seattle on Monday. HQ will know, so hopefully everything goes smoothly.
-- BK



9) Assuming the trade becomes official, which team would have the best trio in the NBA? This is the ESPN results:
43.9% Celtics: Ray Allen, Kevin Garnett, and Paul Pierce
30.1% Suns: Shawn Marion, Steve Nash, and Amare Stoudemire
20.2% Spurs: Tim Duncan, Tony Parker, and Manu Ginobli
2.3% Nuggets: Carmelo Anthony, Allen Iverson, and Marcus Camby
1.6% Pistons: Rasheed Wallace, Rip Hamilton, Chauncey Billups
1.2% Nets: Vince Carter, Jason Kidd, and Richard Jefferson
0.7% Wizards: Gilbert Arenas, Antawn Jamison, and Caron Butler
Where do you think our trio would be BYNUM, ODOM, BRYANT? I think ours would be right above the Nuggets.
Posted by: Staples 24 | July 31, 2007 at 11:48 AM
Kobe will opt out of his contract two years from now and sign with the Celtics for the minimum.
Posted by: Kobe Apologist | July 31, 2007 at 11:48 AM
Laker Bake
"Imagine the FINALS and you know Lakers fans always IMAGINE the FINALS.
KOBE with this team has to take on 3 ALL-STARS or former ALL STARS in
KG Ray Allen Paul Pierce Will ODOM and BYNUM help him beat them?"
Stop it Laker Bake you're killing me man. But if you want an answer HELL YEAH!!!
Posted by: Mamba24/10 | July 31, 2007 at 11:51 AM
Laker fans - check back in about five to ten years. This team must hit rock bottom before any of the buffoons running the club
will budge from their easy chair. The koo-aid is flowing freely, and the Laker brass all drink from this devil's chalice. Thirsty, anyone?
Posted by: Paulie | July 31, 2007 at 11:54 AM
Chopper man,
Thumbs up for your defense of Barry Bonds.
Posted by: sonnybelfast | July 31, 2007 at 11:58 AM
Long time laker fan: I would love to see a return of Lakers verses Celtics. Kobe verses big mouth Allen. However Magic vs Bird is a better match up by far.
Posted by: Tre Laker | July 31, 2007 at 11:59 AM
KLBeast,
"agreed. JWest would have told kobe to STFU and if kobe didn’t comply, West would have shipped kobe’s dumba$$ out in 2002 for the rights to LBJ and we’d still be competing for championships."
NICE POINT
Posted by: Violater | July 31, 2007 at 12:00 PM
One more potential Kobe trade proposal
Detroit -
ANY TWO of Rip Hamilton, Tayshaun Prince, Chauncey Billups
Rodney Stuckey
future first round pick[s]
Posted by: Long time Laker fan | July 31, 2007 at 12:02 PM
Smush Parker didn’t wait long to potentially burn bridges in L.A. “D-Wade is more of a people person than Kobe,” Smush told the South Florida Sun-Sentinel. “I’m looking forward to jelling with Wade, and playing with him. He’s going to be a great teammate.”
in other words, kobe bryant is an a$$hole.....
Posted by: KLBeast | July 31, 2007 at 12:17 PM
We're stuck, forget JO, let's just get LO to deliver 14 million dollars worth of nightly dominance next year.
While we're at it, how 'bout getting anywhere near 6 million worth of Vlad 3s to go down?
Kwame? uh never mind, can't get blood out of a stone.
Posted by: Vman | July 31, 2007 at 12:21 PM
Long time laker fan, Nice proposal, but lets keep it real. You might get equal value with Rip, Prince and Billups but that wont happen.
Posted by: Tre Laker | July 31, 2007 at 12:23 PM
hal9000
"But, according to you, getting rid of Kobe is more important than getting West back. You said it yourself, Captain Ahab. You have made hatred and vengeance your number one priority, and by killing the whale, you destroy the team that you claim to love."
West is not the savior. you've bought into kobe's blame-fest. BTW, the owner (the man who holds the cash) is generally more responsible for the outcome because it's the owner who has an equity stake in the outcome. West is an employee. West/Kupchak get paid either way, while Buss can actually lose money if the Lakers turn into $hit.
Posted by: KLBeast | July 31, 2007 at 12:25 PM
1. Good look Long time Laker fan
August 3rd being 1 month for Javaris is something worth waiting on.
2. Andrew Z, you are probably reading Bird correctly in that they don't want to rebuild. If so, we need to be aggressive.
Think of it this way in 2 yrs we're going to HELL anyway. Let's go for the gold in the interim and if we get the GOLD, KOBE stays and we get at least a 2 yr extension.
3. Mamba 24/10
Are you saying Odom and Bynum would actually step up in the FINALS. Odom perhaps but Bynum. Come on man, you have nothing but wishes to support that statement.
Posted by: LakerBake | July 31, 2007 at 12:28 PM
Violater
first off, you seem like a fair-minded person. i know we don't always agree, but i enjoy your comments. Second, may i ask why you call yourslf "violater"?
Regarding kobe publically badmouthing shaq, bynum, kupchak and buss. i can't believe what i hear from kobe sometimes. i was shocked when kobe called shaq "childish and jealous" to Jim Gray on NBC in 2003. the nerve on this punk a$$ calling out the franchise guy on national TV. That's when i began to dislike kobe bryant because it is very telling when a 24-year-old has the nerve to do what he did.
i even recall circa 2003/2004 when shaq tried to extend an olive branch by declaring on national TV that "kobe is the best player in the league". i took that as an attempt from shaq to make amends with kobe. in the end, when shaq was traded away, i knew there was something underhanded going on; especially on how fast it got done. then i hear the very next day, kobe signs a contract with the lakers.
i know what i say is all speculative and subjective, but the circumstances must make one wonder even if one isn't a "hater" per se like i am.
Posted by: KLBeast | July 31, 2007 at 12:33 PM
JK
"So I have decided not play your twisted game and become a pawn, this will be last visit to blog, rather than lose my dignity I will move on to another blog.
Have a Good Life "
i'm sorry you feel this way. good luck on your future endeavors.
Posted by: KLBeast | July 31, 2007 at 12:35 PM
How many games you think allen and pierce miss combined this year?? my over under is set at about...uh... 65--70??
I like pierce but hes aging,
Allen has got to be one of the least committed stars in the league, the guy just doesn't care.
Celt will be good, but they ain't winning sh*t.
Lakeshow baby!!
Im hoping for bynum to break out--LO is the man--Kobe...well we all know what he's gonna bring.
role players 2-3 need to step up and impact each game: Kwame, Luke, Vlad, Farmar, Evans, Turiaf, Fish.
I'm rolling with the purple and gold.
TO LIVE AND DIE IN LA!
Lakers baby!!
Posted by: jandro | July 31, 2007 at 12:39 PM
LakerBake,
"Are you saying Odom and Bynum would actually step up in the FINALS. Odom perhaps
but Bynum. Come on man, you have nothing but wishes to support"
Nothing but wishes and blue skies LakerBake. But bynum is on a mission now and you
will be very surprised when the season starts.
Posted by: Mamba24/10 | July 31, 2007 at 12:45 PM
MAMBA 24,
I'd really be surprised if Bynum wasn't the last person up and down the floor everytime like he was last year. The guy really looks worn down already at 19 or he just doesnt want to run.
I hope he did workout alot this summer just in case we dont trade him
Posted by: tripgame | July 31, 2007 at 12:58 PM
KL,
You are definitely not a laker fan but just a Kobe hater. You are just a very simple minded person. All you talk about in here are kobe,kobe,kobe and all his "faults"...man, why dont you just start being constructive in here. Also, you take offense on everybody who criticizes you. Get a life.
Ron L
Posted by: ron l | July 31, 2007 at 12:59 PM
Let's see the implications of KGarnett sign:
No chance of sign Garnett next year, because he will renegociate his contract with the Celtics.
Bird have some leverage now, because Garnett is out of the Market.
Now, if the Lakers wants to move his interest to Baron Davis, Arenas, Iverson ...three perennial loosers in the 2008 free agent, they can do it.
But 80 percent of free agents doesn't like to risk playing one year without any insurance. All stars players in a 80 % rate, will sign with their teams.
If the strategy of lakers GM brass is wait for big free agent, in these cap days this strategy fail.
Posted by: jorema | July 31, 2007 at 01:01 PM
Mamba,
I sure hope you're right. Because without a HUGE breakout by Bynum, the Lake Show will be completely over.
Posted by: Tim-4-Show | July 31, 2007 at 01:04 PM
BTW, with all the conspiracy thoeries out there regarding the NBA especially with refs. I think they should hold an investigation regarding this KG trade. I think it was monopolize by Ainge and Mchale. They just dangle Kg to other teams but Mchale knew he wont trade him unless its to Boston. It ws an INSIDER TRADING..they hanged martha stewart for that..lol
Ron L
Posted by: Ron L | July 31, 2007 at 01:08 PM
sonnybelfast,
"Thumbs up for your defense of Barry Bonds. "
The problem is that (I'm a Giants fan, btw) Barry is a jerk half the time, and doesn't care the other half of the time. If this was just about anyone but him, the media, etc., would be giving him the benefit of the doubt.
Posted by: exhelodrvr | July 31, 2007 at 01:12 PM
KLBeast will you ever give it a rest!!!
Are you going to talk about your obsessive hate for kobe, or indulge us by talking about basketball. Because I am for one am getting bored with this blog just talking hate for Kobe or defending Kobe. If this blog does not want to talk about lakers basketball, well maybe I should pack my bags and go to another forward thinking Lakers blogg!!!!
Aaarrrhhhh!!
Angry_Laker
Posted by: Angry_Laker | July 31, 2007 at 01:13 PM
To everyone who dislikes KL,
Please stop with teh KL bashing people. Everyone keeps getting drawn into these paper chess matches and proving points from 2003 and 2004 about Kobe and Shaq. If your a blogger and you believe that KL is not a true Laker fan, the skip his post and dont reply. Its when you reply that gives him more ammo to shoot right back at you.
IM not siding with KL, nor am I siding against him. I dont agree with what he says but he would never know b/c i dont reply to his post or his comments. when you sit there and continue to type and argue with someone, your only making it worse. No one owns the room so KL is free to say whatever he wants as long as its not disrespectful or demeaning, and I havent heard do any of the 2 except bash Kobe.
Come on people, lets act like adults here and jsut agree to disagree..
thank you for your cooperation
Posted by: tripgame | July 31, 2007 at 01:14 PM
KLBeast,
i guess i would say that i call myself violater because i tend to break and "violate" all the laws and rules set upon me.. atleast thats what society and the court system label me, i am what you say i am i guess. But in terms of what happened with kb8 in eagle rock, no way a 'violater", nice try, lol
Posted by: Violater | July 31, 2007 at 01:15 PM
Here's the moves that I make at this point.
First, trade Lamar Odom, Andrew Bynum, Sasha Vujacic, 1st round pick 2008 to Indiana for Jermaine O'Neal (if Indiana would take this package).
We need an All-Star big man to win, period. Case closed, end of discussion.
Second, trade Kwame Brown to Minnesota for Trenton Hassell and Ricky Davis.
Minnesota is going to want to get out from under these contracts: Marko Jaric, Troy Hudson, Trenton Hassell, Mark Blount, and Ricky Davis (not for his contract but more for the minutes and shots he takes up that they'll want to give to their young guys). We take two off their hands in return for what they want more than anything, expiring deals. In the deal we get a scorer in Ricky Davis who would be an exceptional sixth man (17 ppg last year) and Trenton Hassell who is a defensive stopper on the wing that we desperately need. Davis is an expiring contract and Hassell is relatively inexpensive for the next two years.
Third, attempt to sign a PF/C (more heavily on the C part) with the veteran's minimum or whatever is left with the MLE (or wherever we can get some money). Point is, the person doesn't have to be great, just give us 10 minutes a night where he doesn't eff up too much.
Here's the line-up:
PG Fisher/Farmar/Crittendon
SG Kobe/Evans/Davis
C Mihm/Free Agent
PF JO/Turiaf/Cook
SF Walton/Hassell/Radmanovic
I definitely think that's a better line-up than last year and presents a myraid of options for PJ to work with.
Posted by: Andrew Z | July 31, 2007 at 01:20 PM
Coby Karl? Not another unathletic small who can't defend.
Posted by: gdchild | July 31, 2007 at 01:23 PM
I think the deal the front office failed to make was the Zach Randolph Deal which would have put the Lakers over the top with his consistent scoring. JO is a better option at the 4/5 than KG since he is basically a low post player and will form a perfect one two punch with Kobe like Shaq and Kobe. Lakers should play the Lotto and start the season with AB. If he plays very well, then Indiana might consisder taking him or LO for JO with fillers.
With Mihm back, our teams option at the four is actually better.
Mihm had the potential to be a poor man's version of Tim duncan and it appears he had the work ethics to improve his game before the injury. He is more of a finesse player. Mihm at the four will be more effective in blocking shots and also stops picking up those unneccessary fouls.
The Lakers FO do not take risks and are just lucky to have the best player and the best coach and the best city. Pure luck and Jerry. There are few GM's that are better anyway. So lets stick wth what we have and put some fire on them to make moves unless of course Jerry is available. Jim Buss definitely should be gone.
On the West, the prototype is a superstar with some good support. Dallas is Just Dirk and good complimenting players. San Antonio is basically Tim and now we have Tony coming onto his own. Houston should really be the team to beat this year with their new coach and Yao, Tracy and Shane but the Lakers have really held their own against these teams. The problem for the Lakers has been the Suns and had the Lakers played other teams in the first round, our chances would have been different. The Suns just play a different kind of attacking basketball that does not allow a Star like Kobe take over. With SanAntonio, the Triangle can function very effectively against the intensity of their defense.
Therefore, our efforts should be ready to overcome the Suns, and then maintain a good chance of beating the other teams in the west. To neat the Suns, you need to have a good inside presence that can score consistently. That is why SA always beat the Suns and Utah with Boozer gave them fits during the regular season. You also need a point Guard that can score and put pressure on Steve Nash. I don't think Fisher can have that impact on offense. Very few players can actually stop Steve on Defense. he is just too good. You have to beat him on offense by getting him to play defense. The lakers therefore needs either Bynum to be much better ( I expect him to have the kind of improvement that Howard has in his second season- He was a monster) Bynum has Kareem and Howard did not have that Luxury).
Bynum had a lesson last season and I am glad he got the lesson early in his development, you need passion and work ethics to succeed in this leaugue. To be a real superstar and you are going to be out of LA in a flash if you don't show this. I am betting he will come out motivated and will be a monster playing along side Kobe. Kobe will not allow him to be another Shaq in the later part of his career.
I think it will be wise to Keep Bynum at this stage if the FO can see his intensity in training because AB already has the natural tool needed to succeed at his position all he needed are the intangibles and God help the league if Kobe succeeds in lighting fire to his whatever..............The Lakers might have a very good chance of three peat with Phil and Kobe.......but we need another good defensive player. Lets make a trade after the season start and we have showcased all our talents for the league to covet..We might even give Bynum and fillers for Gasol/Oneil. You never know..
Posted by: Peter | July 31, 2007 at 01:39 PM
Taos Hum,
yes i would deal andrew bynum AND lamar odom for jermaine o'neal.
because i would essentially be dealing a 50/50 high school prospect and a good player for a all-star player.
bynum's potential is pretty much 50/50. lamar is not going to get any better - he is a "power forward" who cannot post up anybody. he really causes more traffic on the perimeter for kobe. we need a player who lives on the block. a player who can attract double teams down low - which would free up the perimeter for kobe.
lamar has proven he is not this guy.
yet any basketball fan knows jermaine o'neal fits the bill.
i am not playing favorites either.
jermaine o'neal's style of play would fit perfectly on this laker squad, a squad that already has the best perimeter player in the game. o'neal is simply a better fit for the lakers than odom. shoot, maybe odom is a better fit in indiana than o'neal.
we need a post presence on BOTH ends of the floor...HOW MANY TIMES DO I HAVE TO WRITE THAT???
Posted by: tha show | July 31, 2007 at 01:47 PM
Andrew Z,
That sounds like it could work for both sides and not just the Lakers. Hopefully Bird will see this and know this is the best its gonna get unles the Nets offer jefferson, Moore and more 1st round picks. The Lakers should jump at that opportunity. Not sure I would give up a great expiring contract like you said to a team that really didnt help us except give us false hope. Plus I think Brown and Oneal in the paint is a alot of size for other teams to have to muscle around. I wonder if Kwame can catch the ball if Oneal throws it to him right there on the block? probably not...
Posted by: tripgame | July 31, 2007 at 01:52 PM
Oh! Thank GOD we didn't trade for Garnett! Check out what Minny is getting. I've got to give props to McHale:
"The Celtics -- who have 16 championships but none in more than two decades -- obtained the former MVP and 10-time All-Star from Minnesota for forwards Al Jefferson, Ryan Gomes and Gerald Green, guard Sebastian Telfair and center Theo Ratliff and two first-round draft picks."
-------------------------------------------------
Now THAT is how you cut bait! Wow! Minny is going the Portland route, watch them take over the draft next year like Portland did last year.
Echoes of the Herschel Walker trade?
----------------------------------------------
In 1989, at the height of his NFL career, the Cowboys traded him (Herschel Walker) to the Minnesota Vikings for a total of five players (LB Jesse Solomon, DB Issiac Holt, RB Darrin Nelson, LB David Howard, DE Alex Stewart) and six draft picks (which led to Emmitt Smith, Russell Maryland, Kevin Smith, and Darren Woodson). This was judged to be one of the turning points in the rise of the Cowboys to the top echelon of the NFL.
Posted by: TaosHum | July 31, 2007 at 01:59 PM
KLBeast:
"West/Kupchak get paid either way, while Buss can actually lose money if the Lakers turn into $hit."
How often did the Lakers turn to $hit under the guidance of Jerry West? Buss never lost money, even when he approved West's deal to get Shaq. Why? Because the tremendous fan support always made up for those losses -- and then some.
But you're absolutely right... Buss can lose money if the Lakers turn to $hit, and that's why he's sitting on his wallet. He is unwilling to take risks, and West was the only figure that had the power to open his wallet and put the big bucks down for top-notch talent. With no risk comes no reward, and as long as Buss and Kupchak refuse to take the risks that have made the Lakers 9-time champions, the Lakers will fail.
Buss trusted West with his money, and West turned the Lakers into one of the biggest, most successful franchises in pro sports. Now, Buss trusts nobody, and his fear of taking risks will only result in more tears for the Laker faithful.
Let me rephrase our point so that it makes more sense:
BUSS WILL ACTUALLY LOSE MONEY WHEN THE LAKERS TURN TO $HIT.
Posted by: hal9000 | July 31, 2007 at 02:00 PM
Tha Show,
Your not alone man, been writing it for weeks. Someone even had the nerve to tell me that the blog room was in agreement the Odom/Bynum for Oneal trade shouldnt go down. I dont even think its 50/50 anymore. I think 75% want JO here for both Bynum/Odom and possibly even a 1st round pick.
Im wit ya man
Posted by: tripgame | July 31, 2007 at 02:11 PM
The D
"What I don't understand is your theory that Kobe would rather have stats than wins. Is there any evidence to suggest that Kobe's not intent on winning?"
Perhaps kobe should have thought about turning into Barry Sanders when shaq was on the trading block and kobe just sat there and gloated that he, kobe bryant, defeated his nemesis shaq. perhaps kobe should have embraced playing alongside shaq when he had the privilege.
If kobe truly cares about winning, and only winning, why let shaq go? why be an a$$ to the only person on his team which has produced winning results?
so I have to respectfully disagree with you that kobe cares about winning above all else.
Posted by: KLBeast | July 31, 2007 at 02:14 PM
tha show, I... respectfully... completely disagree. :)
Jermaine ONeal in this conference is a borderline allstar and not much of an upgrade over Odom. You can't just look at points, Odom does a lot of things that don't go in the box score, like taking a defensive rebound and then pulling out to start a fast break, something that won't even lead to an assist for him many times but the situation could not have happened in the first place if ONeal was pulling down that rebound.
I think you are vastly underrating Bynum. I really do believe, going into this season he will be better than Chris Kaman (aka, Marilyn Manson - the beautiful people!) Just because one or two freaks of nature like Lebron James, etc. were able to do things at 19 doesn't mean Bynum is a bust because he wasn't ready to dominate at 19. Bynum doesn't even have to be a star in this system, just fill a slot and I think between Bynum and Mihm, the Center position is pretty solid compared to anybody else in the league.
Scoring isn't the issue with this team and if Bynum and Vlad Rad provide more scoring this year (which they should) the issue is lessened even further. On defense, they had Smush playing his man at bad angles and then you had a bunch of cripples behind him, Walton and Kwame on bad ankles and of course, Odom's injuries and Bynum obviously was worn down during the second half of the season, which was understandable.
I'm still not sure Odom is going to be back. It wouldn't surprise me at all if he is moved, maybe even along with Kwame for someone but Bynum ain't going anywhere. There is nobody out there that is worth giving up Bynum for, now that Garnett is gone. Certainly not Jermaine ONeal and his hefty contract along with his injury history.
Posted by: TaosHum | July 31, 2007 at 02:37 PM
There has to be a method to our "guard" madness...I mean aside from desiring to put in an all guard team out there.
I mean even Phoenix (a small team) has forwards!
Mitch K...happy days???
Posted by: Faith | July 31, 2007 at 02:43 PM
Andrew Z-
Yeah, that's a good point, and I'll admit I'm getting a lot closer to that position these days. I gues my big problem with JO is that he's hurt as much as LO. But if you can then spin Kwame into a solid SF or something like that, you're talking about a much better lineup. All I want to see them avoid is making trades specifically to satisfy Kobe, because it's hard to (unless they know, now that they're talking) predict what will make him happy and what he'll eventually do.
But it's a solid point, for sure.
BK
Posted by: Brian Kamenetzky | July 31, 2007 at 02:48 PM
Depressed.
Angry.
--FearlesssWhackJob
Posted by: FearlessWhackJob | July 31, 2007 at 03:17 PM
Angry.
Depressed.
--FearlessWhackJob
Posted by: FearlessWhackJob | July 31, 2007 at 03:19 PM
Angry.
Angry.
depressed...
Posted by: FearlessWhackJob | July 31, 2007 at 03:19 PM
Fearless,
Instead of angry and depressed, try
"Blissfully unaware of the impending doom, because you feel, in your heart-of-hearts, that Lamar Odom is finally going to have a breakout season, Derek Fisher will be the answer to the gaping holes in the perimeter defense, Vlad will lead the league in three-point shooting, and Kareem will now be known as 'the first Andrew Bynum.'"
There's a lot of that going around ...
Posted by: exhelodrvr | July 31, 2007 at 04:00 PM
exhelodrvr, I'd ASSume that was directed at me but there's a BIG difference between expecting Bynum to be better than Chris Kaman next year vs. erasing the memory of KAJ. Also it helps to KNOW A BAD TRADE WHEN YOU SEE ONE, though I'm sure Troy Murphy would look SMASHING in a Laker uniform while filling in at Center for the injured Jermaine ONeal...
Posted by: TaosHum | July 31, 2007 at 04:18 PM
Ex: "There's a lot of that going around ..."
Yes, I hate to say that I've got a heavy dose of it. But being blissfully unaware helps me sleep at nights. I loved your "first Andrew Bynum" comment, by the way. Very funny stuff.
I'm a foolish optimist, and I don my purple-and-gold colored glasses because so much of the other stuff is out of my control: trades, free agents, injuries, player improvements... Since I will always root for the Lakers, it makes life much simpler to let the team do what it will do, and pull for whomever is in the starting lineup on game day.
All that said, I try not to be ridiculous. I do think Bynum will be 50-percent better than he was last year. That, with Mihm back, should be enough for maybe three more wins. Fisher should be good for a couple of wins and, sure, Vlad might gets us a victory. Throw in three more wins if we're even moderately lucky on the injury front.
Where does that put us? Does that get us to 50 wins? Okay, so now I'll be ridiculous: I'm on the 55 bandwagon. I realize that's silly, but a guy can dream, can't he?
Posted by: Marty | July 31, 2007 at 04:18 PM
damn KL,
rename yourself to houdini, your making bloggers dissappear!
Posted by: the WOLF | July 31, 2007 at 04:34 PM
Marty,
I hope you're right, and I'm wrong!
Posted by: exhelodrvr | July 31, 2007 at 04:50 PM
i had enough of all this bynum bull. the lakers dont have a post presence. kwame is a decent one on one defender and lane clogger. hes the best center and i use that loosely. besides hes hurt so hes a nonfactor. are you guys expecting mihm to step up? hes an okay scorer and rebounder/shotblocker but he get abused in the lane. many of us bloggers stated as much when he was playing. bynum is "potential". f that shizzle! this guy dont have drive. forget about his flashes, hes seven foot tall. a seven foot baller should be able to do what bynum is supposed to do. jim buss endorses this guy probably cuz hes tall. hes no jo. jo might get hurt a lot, but he gives the lakers a post presence. he needs to come if lo is here. give indy anyone else but just get jo! at least go after camby! mitch and the front off. is horrible. cant even get players who want to leave their teams!
Posted by: the WOLF | July 31, 2007 at 04:57 PM
exhalodrvr,
"Blissfully unaware of the impending doom, because you feel, in your heart-of-hearts, that Lamar Odom is finally going to have a breakout season, Derek Fisher will be the answer to the gaping holes in the perimeter defense, Vlad will lead the league in three-point shooting, and Kareem will now be known as 'the first Andrew Bynum.'"
I don't drink, though. Never have. Haven't even taken a sip in my life.
--FearlessWhackJob
But, I might just start. I don't know if I can continue facing reality.
What do you suggest for my first for foray into imbibing?
Posted by: FearlessWhackJob | July 31, 2007 at 05:35 PM
To hell with it!
To HELL!
Marty, I'm joining you on the 55-win bandwagon, because it's better than standing on this ledge I'm on. Plus, its really high out here...and the wind is blowing.
55-wins or bust!
--FearlessWhackJob
Posted by: FearlessWhackJob | July 31, 2007 at 05:38 PM
FearlessWhackJob,
Andrew Z is the beer expert; check with him.
Posted by: exhelodrvr | July 31, 2007 at 09:03 PM