Need some extra painkillers?
June 26, 2007 | 6:25
pm
Then drop by Kwame Brown's pad, because given the summer he's having, chances are he's got a few pills to spare. While the possibility of Kwame needing shoulder surgery hasn't been a secret, dude's nonetheless spending more time under a knife than Mickey Rourke with a plastic surgeon offering "twofers." We'll let you know when a recovery time table is announced. Or when Kwame's scheduled to get some Lasik because he's got a couple hours to kill on a Wednesday afternoon.
-AK



"The procedure will entail the modification of larger, stronger hands. It will be performed by Dr. Sean McNamara of McNamara/Troy."
-Ajax
Posted by: ajax | June 26, 2007 at 06:32 PM
Bobcats Is The Third Team!!!
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2007/basketball/nba/specials/draft/2007/06/26/bobcats.draft.ap/index.html
Bickerstaff also indicated they would be interested in getting in on any multiple-team trades involving superstars Kobe Bryant of the Los Angeles Lakers and Kevin Garnett of Minnesota. While both players are unlikely to end up in Charlotte, the Bobcats could be helpful in a deal because of their wealth of salary cap space.
"I think we're going to defer talking about those players. I will say we have no problems being facilitators," Bickerstaff said
Posted by: J-Cool | June 26, 2007 at 06:38 PM
The problem with Kwame Brown is the expectations was just to high.
If he was a late first round or second round pick, it would have been more realistic.
His defense is adequate. His offense will be catch and shoot, and not a create type game.
What you have is what you have.
Kwame can be a decent defensive player clog the middle type. He can guard the bigs.
And if he hangs around the basket he will get his share of dunks.
I wouldn't give him away for nothing, for he can do the job.
Not try to do too much, but in the flow.
Posted by: Lee | June 26, 2007 at 06:45 PM
Any word on whether he's spending more time under the knife than, "Faceoff" lol, jk.
Heal well Kwame! Try to get moving as quickly and as gingerly as possible!
Posted by: Faith | June 26, 2007 at 06:52 PM
I am so tired, I need painkillers!
KG, please come to LA. I can't take this anymore!!!! :-(
Posted by: gugy | June 26, 2007 at 06:52 PM
Expecting a 7ft NBA center to be able to be able to catch a basketball, shoot a basketball and play basketball for one full season is expecting too much? How about averaging more rebounds than the SG, PF or even the backup C?
If Kwame were to enter the draft now with Turiaf, knowing what you know about their game, who would you draft in the second round?
Lakers got rid of problem child 1, time to get rid of 1A.
Posted by: p ang | June 26, 2007 at 07:09 PM
Time for a reality check. Today was the perfect day to slide some more bad news past the Laker's fans. With everyone fixated on the KG trade drama it was announced that Kwame will have surgery on his shoulder. This after recent surgery on his ankle. Wow, his trade value is going through the roof!
Kwame Brown might be the most perplexing player ever to wear a Laker uniform. Has the look of a star, Hell, Jordan picked him #1 straight out of college. They thought they had a franchise player. Sadly, it takes more than a 'NBA body' to compete at this level.
Kwame came into the league with no training in fundamentals, no post moves, no understanding of team defense. Well all these years later Kwame still has no grasp of fundamentals, no real post moves (a dunk is not a post move) and clueless as to team defense and switching responsibilities.
How can someone learn so little in all this time? HE DOES NOT CARE!!! Kwame is a paycheck casher. He does not play the game because he loves it, no, because fools will pay him millions. To get some one to improve they first have to care.
His apathetic approach allows him to rationalize sitting out games. Stubbed toe, Can't play.... hangnail, take a day off.. hemoroids, take a week off...
Kwame will not play in pain. (you wonder why he gets such little respect from Jordan and Kobe) How is he going to react to the eventual pain when rehabbing from surgery. Will he put off rehab because it hurts too much?
Lakers are really in a tough spot. With all these faults, Kwame is still our best inside defender and the only person we have to match up with Duncan and Stoudamire. WE CAN"T TRADE HIM! He has almost no trade value and we don't have a replace ment. So all we can do is hope that we can get KG. The doubleteams on and boxouts on KG may give Kwame some opportunities.
So it looks like the Kwame supporters can have their cake and throw it too. lol WHAT SAY YOU?
Posted by: reality check time | June 26, 2007 at 07:14 PM
According to Sports Illustrated we had four of the worst GMs in the league working on the Garnett deal ... it was bound to fall apart.
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2007/writers/kelly_dwyer/06/25/gm.rankings/index.html
Mitch Kupchak, Los Angeles Lakers
Pluses: Did a solid job in the summer of 2003, finding two contributors at No. 24 (Brian Cook) and No. 32 (Luke Walton) in the draft, while getting out of the way as Shaquille O'Neal leaned on Gary Payton and Karl Malone to come to the Lakers and aid in a potential championship run. Persuaded owner Jerry Buss to bring back Phil Jackson in 2005 after letting Jackson walk following the 2003-04 season.
Minuses: Despite two rings as the standalone boss in L.A., Kupchak hasn't made many solid moves. He's shown a lack of understanding for how his coach's triangle offense works by adding misfits like Isaiah Rider, Mitch Richmond, Slava Medvedenko and Kwame Brown. Save for 2003, he couldn't cash in on all the semi-stars who would have loved to play alongside Shaq and Kobe Bryant and for Jackson. The O'Neal trade, while needed, set the Lakers back mainly because they actually took on more salary than O'Neal would have cost them -- O'Neal's Lakers contract would have come off the books in 2006, while Brian Grant's deal (acquired for Shaq) won't come off the ledger until this summer. Trading Caron Butler for Brown seems almost comical at this point, and Kupchak's moves have so frustrated Bryant that his pleas for a trade have actually fallen on sympathetic ears.
Bottom line: Any addition of a superstar will cost them at least Lamar Odom and Andrew Bynum, making any move a lateral one at best. The Lakers don't appear willing to make the right move -- trading Bryant for a series of talented, low-cost parts -- and it's hard to see just how this team is going to improve should it hold serve.
Danny Ainge, Boston Celtics
Pluses: Without the luxury of a single lottery pick, Ainge has put together one of the better young rosters in basketball. Al Jefferson and Gerald Green are potential franchise cornerstones given the right bit of coaching (though Green's lack of development in his second year was worrying). Lightly regarded lower-rung picks like Leon Powe, Rajon Rando, Ryan Gomes, Kendrick Perkins, Delonte West and Tony Allen aren't just showing promise because they get big minutes -- these guys can play.
Minuses: Why no lottery picks? Because Ainge has refused to submit to a wholesale rebuilding effort, choosing instead to bring in guys like Raef LaFrentz, Wally Szczerbiak and Gary Payton to keep the C's on the fringe of the playoff picture and the payroll ridiculously high. And last year, Ainge gave up a shot to draft eventual Rookie of the Year Brandon Roy for Sebastian Telfair, who wore out his welcome in 10 months with the Celtics. Meanwhile, Ainge bid against himself in giving Brian Scalabrine a ludicrous five-year, $15 million contract, and his insistence on retaining Doc Rivers as coach makes little sense on any level.
Bottom line: Ainge has never offered a cogent plan for the team he has run since 2003. We appreciate his fine efforts in the draft and refusal to fall in love with the remnants of a team that made the conference finals in '02. But he has more than mitigated his strong touch in certain areas with an ever-changing plan of attack that could either have Boston trading its assets for an All-Star this summer or adding more inexperience by grabbing a youngster from the Chinese Basketball Association with the fifth pick.
Larry Bird, Indiana Pacers
Pluses: Though it's hard to tell where Donnie Walsh's influence ends and Bird's decisions begin, Walsh spent the overwhelming majority of his career being heralded as the Eastern Conference's version of Jerry West, while Bird has overseen some pretty iffy transactions since taking over as Pacers boss in 2003. Outside of picking up two solid mid-first-round prospects in Shawne Williams and Danny Granger and making two solid coaching hires in Rick Carlisle and Jim O'Brien, Bird hasn't really done much to distinguish himself.
Minuses: To avoid the luxury tax after the 2002-03 season, Bird hung on to Al Harrington and instead dealt Brad Miller to Sacramento for pennies on the dollar. Harrington offered his usual solid play the next year, but Miller had back-to-back career years with the Kings. The obsession with Harrington continued: In July 2004, Indiana traded him to Atlanta for a much-needed shooting guard in Stephen Jackson, only to reacquire Harrington in a sign-and-trade deal with Atlanta last August. Finally healthy but mediocre in '06-07, the Pacers sent Jackson and Harrington to Golden State for Mike Dunleavy, Troy Murphy and Ike Diogu. Dunleavy and Murphy are horrid defenders and inefficient offensive contributors with two of the worst contracts in basketball. Diogu can play, but you get the feeling the Pacers don't know what they have in him.
Bottom line: Bird should have blown it up in the summer of 2006, but he overrated his own talent and now the team is stuck in the doldrums -- capped out and struggling to survive in the NBA's toughest division. The young talent will actually make things worse: Bird's acquisitions are good enough to want to extend their respective rookie contracts, but they'll only worsen the overall salary-cap picture. Bird needs to take a torch to this mess.
Kevin McHale, Minneosta Timberwolves
Pluses: Took Kevin Garnett's game seriously when he entered the 1995 draft. Did as well as could be reasonably expected when Stephon Marbury came out with a trade demand before the trade deadline in March '99 (Minnesota acquired Terrell Brandon and two first-round picks). Managed to pick up Sam Cassell just before a career year and Latrell Sprewell in '03-04, which resulted in a trip to the conference finals that could have been even more if Cassell hadn't gotten hurt in the playoffs. With Garnett's deal limiting his maneuverability, McHale was often able to find cheap role players (LaPhonso Ellis, Reggie Slater, Dean Garrett, Ervin Johnson, Kendall Gill) who worked well within former coach Flip Saunders' offensive schemes.
Minuses: Wasted Garnett's career. McHale has done more than that, but this is about as grievous a misdeed as we can imagine in all of pro sports. Think of all the smooth transactions that the Spurs' brain trust has made to help Tim Duncan, reverse that, add a few 6-2 shooting guards and an illegal signing, and you have McHale's time in Minnesota. More specifically: McHale burned a draft pick from the Marbury trade on Wally Szczerbiak; lost draft picks thanks to an illegal deal with Joe Smith; used first-round picks on William Avery and Ndudi Ebi; acquired a series of combo guards who can't play big minutes at the point (Mike James, Marko Jaric, Rashad McCants, Randy Foye, Troy Hudson, Shane Heal); dumped Flip Saunders; dumped Dwane Casey (the Wolves were 20-20 at the time of Casey's firing last season and finished 12-30 under Randy Wittman even with no major injuries); and refused to entertain the notion of trading Garnett until all other options were exhausted.
Bottom line: There is still hope. A Garnett deal with Boston (for Al Jefferson, assorted other youngsters and Theo Ratliff's expiring contract) would be nice, though we don't see Phoenix getting desperate enough to send Amaré Stoudemire to Minnesota for KG. Chicago is out of the picture unless McHale wants to take on Ben Wallace (we wouldn't put that past him). Meanwhile, right now the Wolves are capped out for 2007-08. They have the seventh pick in this year's draft, but they will have to relinquish a first-rounder (top 10 protected through '11) to the Clippers soon enough as part of the Jaric trade. Whether McHale will be around by then, we don't know -- owner Glen Taylor always seems ready with an excuse or 12 for his team's vice president.
Posted by: Nathaniel | June 26, 2007 at 07:17 PM
Jim Gray reports Garnett to L.A. is dead - Phx/Bos/Minny 3 way alive
http://getgarnett.com/blog/?p=359
Posted by: J-Cool | June 26, 2007 at 07:31 PM
After hearing that he was a subject of the trade and Mike T could not defend Kwame's departure, opted for another surgery to balance his shoulder. What he really needs is neurosurgery or enlargement of fingers. lol!
I heard Ric Bucher on ESPN saying that the deal with KG which was admitted by Mitch kupchak because Lakers don't have any personnel to trade with Minny. Now it goes to Phoenix aas long KG waive his trade clause.
Lakers are not completely lost because there are two superstars still available that can team up with Kobe namely: JO or Pau Gasol. We have three draft picks ;and MLE. well Mitch K. could be creative by combining some of our regular players + 19th draft pick for a lower draft pick. Another idea is to target the three Euros who are really good namely: Tiago Splitter, Rudy Fernandez and Marco Bellineli and this PG from Finland, Petteri Kaponen. Just get two of this four we are back in business. Of course, not in this draft is Theodoros Papaloukas another PG currently on contract with CSKA Moscow.
Look at this scenario, if we have a fast team and a veteran MLE preferably Chauncey Billsups, Kobe, LO and a star 4 or 5 we're not really far behind. In billiards, they call this "preparation for next move" which is next year when KG opts out from his contract and move to any team he prefers.
Posted by: Edwin Gueco | June 26, 2007 at 07:37 PM
You gotta be joking. Why would the Celts trade the #5 and Al Jefferson to get Marion? who can opt out after next year? This is ludicrous!
Posted by: freddie | June 26, 2007 at 07:46 PM
Nathaniel.
That was a great analysis. thanks for sharing it to the blog. However, I have to give credits for Mitch K. for doing his best since Friday. As JKool posted, the deal is not yet dead, it could resurrect again on Bernie Bickerstaff.
To All Bloggers,
I hope you could help Mitch K. make some possible scenarios in a three team trade with Bobcats, Timberwolves and our Lakers. If we can involve Pacers, so much the better. This is the critical time so don't quit on what we have started.....KEEP THE DREAM ALIVE.
Posted by: Edwin Gueco | June 26, 2007 at 07:46 PM
J-Cool,
The key here is KG. I think he likes the Lakers because of multiple extention of his contract while others are asking for waive clause but could not give multiple extention that Jerry Buss is going to give. I think we still have hope through Bobcats or the opt-out next year assuming KG will have a banner year again next season. If his b'ball abilities starting to fade, then it would mean a different price like Grant Hill, Chris Webber and Juwan Howard.
Do we have any news on Head/Bonzi deal for Sasha/Cook?
Posted by: Edwin Gueco | June 26, 2007 at 07:55 PM
Lee,
"His offense will be catch and shoot, and not a create type game.
What you have is what you have.
Kwame can be a decent defensive player clog the middle type. He can guard the bigs.
And if he hangs around the basket he will get his share of dunks."
Sorry, we're talking about Kwame Brown here. "catch" and "dunks"? Not sure which Kwame you are referring to.
Posted by: exhelodrvr | June 26, 2007 at 07:56 PM
========================================================
(Paul Shirley is a Ex-NBA player who now write a blog for ESPN and suddenly he became a Slate columnist. The guy is a Laker hater, but today in Slate he wrote this large piece that merits some reading from the smart and opinionated Lakers fans. Some concepts are ok, others are very questionable, but worth the reading.)
==========================================================
Kobe and KG
What would happen if the NBA's two most intriguing players ended up on the same team?
by Paul Shirley/Slate
The NBA Finals ended 10 days ago. By all accounts, including my own, they were a disaster—the lowest rated Finals in the history of the world. Bucking my normal holier-than-thou attitude, I tried to watch the games. I should have stuck with aloofness; my strategy of combating boredom with lines of cocaine probably won't aid me in finding a basketball job for the coming season.
Fortunately for the emotional health of the general public—and for the nasal health of me—more important events have come to pass since the Spurs won the title. It has been reported that Kobe Bryant (arguably the league's most marketable player) and Kevin Garnett (arguably its most talented) might … in theory … possibly … be traded … if about 573 variables line up correctly. And now, "league sources" are saying that both guys could end up on the Lakers. In the wake of the Finals debacle, all of this has been sufficient to ignite the requisite sports media firestorm.
I have something of a unique viewpoint on all of this. In the fall of 2001, I lasted three weeks in training camp with Bryant's Los Angeles Lakers before being released and told that I probably ought to go play in Europe. In 2006, I repeated the experience with Garnett's employer, the Minnesota Timberwolves, before being cut so the team could concentrate its financial resources on an alcoholic, a guy who dances like Elaine Benes, and a man who had only that year crashed his SUV while masturbating.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Having spent a similar amount of time in the semi-intimate company of both men, I can say confidently that two people couldn't be more different. Kevin Garnett is one of the most impressive humans I've ever been around.
Kobe Bryant isn't.
As a strict contrarian, I wish it weren't so. But in this case, there have been no mischaracterizations. Garnett is noble, loyal, and larger-than-life. And, again, Bryant isn't.
Of course, Kevin Garnett is no teddy bear. When I arrived in Minnesota for camp, I spent my first two days playing pickup games with the team. Upon finding me—a person he had never met before—on the court, Garnett quickly had me replaced by someone from the sideline. Which I certainly didn't appreciate. But after a few weeks around the man, I decided that he had the right to tell me what to do—the court we were playing on was his court. The team playing on it: his team.
As for personal encounters with Bryant, suffice it to say that his replica jersey is not hanging in my bedroom. I related a few details of our brief time together in my book—the multiple bodyguards he employed in training camp, his insecurity, his general surliness toward most of humanity. Feel free to jog down to the local Barnes & Noble and skim the first 30 pages as supplementary reading. (I wouldn't sink so low as to tell you to buy it. That would be despicable.)
Garnett is a throwback superstar, a Bill Russell for the modern age. When some people conjure up Russell they visualize the consummate winner, a man who led his teams to 11 NBA championships. But I link the two men by personality. By all reports, Russell shares Garnett's intelligence, grace, and intensity. And, in his defense, Garnett has never had a Cousy or a Havlicek.
Unfortunately, it could be that the modern age has no use for Bill Russell. One of Garnett's greatest strengths—his loyalty—is laughably out of place in the superstar-focused NBA. Compared, for example, to the Kobe Bryant school of leadership. Bryant has publicly questioned the ability of his teammates; Garnett has never complained about the mediocre supporting casts he's been given. Bryant refused to play for the team that drafted him (the Charlotte Hornets); Garnett has embraced the state of Minnesota like a taller, darker version of Prince. Even this year, with his team in a tailspin and his own game under scrutiny, Garnett did nothing to shift the blame. Meanwhile, Bryant was preparing for a summer of trade demands and pro-wrestler-style pronouncements.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
As for the rumors of a Bryant/Garnett combination in purple and gold: The scenario might be plausible if everyone who's not on the Lakers payroll lost his mind at the exact same moment. Then again, Kevin McHale has long been considered a rather ineffectual GM. It is possible that he would be dumb enough to help create the most unstoppable pairing since He-Man and Battle Cat. But I've gathered that his IQ hovers above the level needed to button a polo shirt in the morning, so I'd wager that he's smart enough to avoid bringing about the basketball apocalypse in his own conference.
Should McHale's neurons stop firing and the trade get made, the resulting cauldron of intensity would be impressive to behold. For all their differences, Garnett and Bryant do share one trait. They might be the two most focused human beings I've been around. In fact, if they were on the same team, they'd probably each reach new heights as a result of their efforts to outdo the other. The Lakers would cease to exist as a team, per se. Instead the "team" would be two dudes screaming at each other while three others ran around trying to avoid their wrath. Should the trade happen, the Lakers' front office would immediately begin a search for players with only one trait: "enjoys being subjected to extreme levels of verbal abuse."
Of course, the most likely outcome of the Garnett/Bryant brouhaha is the most boring one. In all probability, neither player will be traded. Bryant's Lakers will be unwilling to part with a proven cash cow, and Garnett's Timberwolves will struggle to find a partner in a trade. In the NBA, the salaries of the players involved in a trade have to match up, more or less. Garnett is scheduled to make $22 million next year. Last year, the Charlotte Bobcats' team payroll was $41 million. It would take a bunch of Bobcats to buy one Timberwolf.
Even so, all of this trade talk is good for the NBA. David Stern loves when the NBA knocks baseball off the front pages in the off-season. It gives basketball fans something to talk about. And it gives them hope after an awful, boring season. And sports is nothing without hope. Hope that the Cubs will win a World Series. Hope that a two-lap lead will be enough. Hope that the starting outside linebacker will stop impregnating 17-year-olds. And, this summer, hope that a very tall, very athletic man—good or bad, noble or not, hero or archenemy—will come to town to save the day.
Posted by: jorema | June 26, 2007 at 07:58 PM
Edwin G.
"What he really needs is neurosurgery or enlargement of fingers. lol!"
Maybe we can get Rachel Ray's man hand? lol.
Posted by: p ang | June 26, 2007 at 08:05 PM
Jorema,
Can you include the link for that piece? Thanks. Nice find, by the way. If it's from the Slate, I'd have never thought of looking there for NBA material.
I totally forgot about Shirley's preseason "days" (if you want to call them that) as a Laker. Blast from the past. haha
AK
Posted by: Andrew Kamenetzky | June 26, 2007 at 08:06 PM
Edwin
You Forgot About Marion He Probably Don't Want To Go To Boston.
Posted by: J-Cool | June 26, 2007 at 08:08 PM
AK here is the link:
http://www.slate.com/id/2169154/
Posted by: jorema | June 26, 2007 at 08:12 PM
Cool. Thank you.
AK
Posted by: Andrew Kamenetzky | June 26, 2007 at 08:13 PM
P Ang,
"Maybe we can get Rachel Ray's man hand? lol."
LOL!
Posted by: Faith | June 26, 2007 at 08:20 PM
The deal is done. Mark my words.
Let me give a heads-up on what is going on here.
Kobe - just like he did a few weeks ago when he went on his radio tour - made a huge PR gaffe. Then, it was saying that he was going to leave the Lakers on Stephen A's show. This time it was publicly saying KG wasn't enough after also publicly proclaiming he wanted out b/c the front office wasn't trying to make the team better.
Well, trying to get KG is trying to make the team better. Someone on 'Team Kobe' told Kobe to shut his mouth, just like they did a few weeks ago which is why Kobe changed his tune on the next radio show. So that's why it seemed like Kobe might be ok with getting KG. He's not, he wants to go to the East, but he knew he was taking another PR hit and changed his tune.
Kobe talks to KG on the phone, tells him he (Kobe) is out, and so don't come to LA. Now all the sudden Jim Gray is 'breaking news' on the KG-to-LAL deal is dead. Who do you think gave him that info? Who's interest does that serve? Who does Gray serve as a lapdog for? Why is Bucher saying "Well, Kobe's 'gone dark' and 'if LA gets KG, Team Kobe will have to think about that,' etc.
It's spin time. Kobe wants out, will be gone/will sit out and now it's time for Kobe's enablers in the media to try to make Kobe look good while at the same time doing their best to make sure the KG-LAL deal doesn't get done (Both Gray and Bucher are all over 'killing' the deal, for Kobe's sake).
The deal isn't happening, for several reasons. But the main reason is that Kobe doesn't want it to. He wants to go to the East, period. He knows his days are numbered and he wants the easy road to The Finals. Period.
Now why is Char getting involved? They're in the East, right? Maybe they want to make their own play for Kobe, or more likely, try to keep Kobe in the West and not let another Eastern rival get him.
There is a lot of intrigue going on right now, a lot of feints and ruses. Gotta keep your eye on the ball.
Kobe Bryant is looking at this as a possible PR hit if the Lakers were to get KG - it would be more difficult for him to say that he 'has to' leave. But he's leaving, or sitting out, or whatever. The only thing, IMO, that will compel him to play next year if he's still on the Lakers is that he doesn't want to lose any possible stats from having to sit out (career points, ..).
But let me repeat: KG is not coming to the Lakers, at least not to play with Kobe. And Kobe has played his last game as a Laker, barring a miraculous turnabout (larger than getting KG). All the signs are there, and 'Kobe's guys' are out doing their jobs according to the boss' orders.
Posted by: fakerz | June 26, 2007 at 08:20 PM
Kobe Bryant is a great role model, father, and husband.
Kobe Bryant has NO illigitimate children, a la Shaq O'Neil, is not nearly as promiscuous as Magic Johnson, Wilt Chamberline, or probably 80% of the other NBA players, he attends church, is active in his children's schools, and is very charitable to local communities (do the research on that one).
As a young man, in his early 20's, he was tempted by court-proven scandoulous woman. He cheated on his beautiful wife, but he's not NEARLY, and I mean NEARLY alone in that endeavor. Reports I've researched have the percentage of men cheating on their wives anywhere between 22% to 78%. It's safe to bet that number goes up with celebrities and athletes.
Kobe's wife had a clear cut opportunity to divorce him and take 1/2 his assets. Her family had the opportunity to trash him pubically. His family had the opportunity to abandon him. However, all reports show that Kobe and his wife are deeply in love, had brought another beautiful daughter into the world (post Denver), and have reaffirmed their love and devotion together through family support and through their devotion to their religion. Some say Kobe bought her love. Uh, no. His wife could have divorced him and bought herself hundreds of diamond rings. But she stood by her man because she recognized a good man who made one mistake.
As far as the incident in CO itself, read this very carefully. No one but the two people who where involved truly know what happened. I cannot speculate because I wasn't there, and neither can anyone else. There is circumstantial evidence that make both Kobe's story and his accuser's story shaky (again, do the research). I do know that educated and professional people brought this case to a court of law. The legal system operated without flaw, and the only conclusive, court documented results were that fallacies in the accuser's case were so strong that the case was dismissed. As such, I have rationale to believe Kobe Bryant was innocent, because a strong case would have seen him convicted.
However, at the very least, you cannot pass judgment upon Kobe and ignore the fallacies in his accusers case. There is no justification to do this, and no viable argument to support such an act. To do this plainly, and without debate, shows clear and precise prejudice and bias against Kobe Bryant. There's no other way to approach it.
Since the Denver incident was unresolved, I don't see the legal or moral right anyone has to implicate either Kobe Bryant or his accuser, as per my aforementioned contentions.
What I see now is a man who has remained happily married (can you say that?), has two children that love him, whom has the love of both families, and attends church. As such, I stand by my statements that Kobe Bryant is a good father and husband.
As far as role model, Kobe doesn't drink and party like Shaq and other NBA players, he doesn't sexually harass women (remember Shaq had to apologize for a sexually charged, public statement he said about Serena Williams- oh, I guess that has that been conveniently forgotten), he doesn't do drugs like Lamar Odom, he doesn't beat up his women like Allan Iverson and Charles Barkley. He works hard, he prays, and he loves his family. He made one mistake, he paid the price. His wife and both sides of the families have forgiven him, so what right do I, or anyone else, have not to?
Kobe Bryant is a great husband, father, and role model. Millions of people agree to that, which is why he's admired and loved throughout the world, it's why his jersey is the number one seller.
Case made...case supported...case close.
Kobe Rules. Get over it.
Posted by: troy | June 26, 2007 at 08:27 PM
Lakers will have leverage over Kobe if they trade for the big ticket?
That's what Oly Sandor of Hoopsvibe think.
"There are two things worth noting here. First, the Bulls are making the right move by pulling out of the Bryant sweepstakes. Chicago, with their young nucleus, is on the verge of something special. You could see it in the way they fought back from a 0-3 deficit against the Pistons in the Eastern Conference semi-finals.
Sure, they eventually lost to Detroit. But their playoff run was a positive sign-a step in the right direction. The Bulls, if they want to swing a major trade, should go after a low post scorer and steer clear of Bryant.
Second, the drama and gossip have created a buyer’s market for Bryant. With everything that’s occurred, the Lakers can’t get equal value for #24. However, if the Lakers acquire another superstar-like Kevin Garnett-they’ll back Bryant into a corner.
Seriously, what would Kobe do if L.A. lands The Big Ticket?
Bryant’s upset because the Lakers haven’t surrounded him with talent. He’s complained to Stephen A. Smith. He’s complained to team management. He’s even complained to two random guys outside a California restaurant. Depending on your perspective, Kobe’s actions may or may not be justified.
His complaints wouldn’t hold weight if K.G. came to Hollywood. The Big Ticket is a legit superstar-a first ballot Hall of Famer. Together, Bryant and Garnett would form a lethal 1-2 punch, capable of dominating the Western Conference.
Kobe would risk a huge backlash if he continued to push for a trade after the team acquired Garnett. In fact, he couldn’t do it. The guard would be forced to resume his playing career in L.A.-whether he wanted to or not.
Trading for the Big Ticket would appease Bryant. But it would also do something else. It would give the Lakers leverage over their superstar."
http://www.hoopsvibe.com/nba-blog/l-a--lakers-would-corner-kobe-bryant-by-acquiring-kevin-garnett-ar44417.html
Posted by: jorema | June 26, 2007 at 08:29 PM
Let me just expound on something I didn't make quite clear in the last post: Kobe is 'going dark' because he can't keep from saying something injurious to his image, so it's better to let the sycophants do their jobs for him while he gets to pretend to be 'above it all.'
In public relation terms, Kobe has what's known as a 'tin ear.' He has an amazing knack for saying the wrong thing at the wrong time. Somebody convinced him - after the radio tour flip-flop debacle and now the "KG is not enough" disaster - that he REALLY needs to keep his mouth closed while the Lakers go out and do what Kobe said they weren't doing.
Hence, Kobe 'goes dark.'
At least he's getting some decent advice, finally.
Posted by: fakerz | June 26, 2007 at 08:31 PM
Marion, please say no to Boston... please....Boston Sucks Marion!!!!!
Amare, Garnett and Nash... God I hope not...
This would decimate the Lakers...
If this does happen, Kobe is gone. It would take at least 5 years at best for the Lakers to recover. That team would be a SUPERPOWER!!!!
bd
Posted by: bd | June 26, 2007 at 08:36 PM
Troy,
"guy's a great father, a great husband, and a role model for youth around the world. "
I CAN ONLY IMAGINE WHAT TYPE OF FATHER YOU MUST BE. "A RAPIST, ADULTERER, AND LIAR"
Posted by: gunner24 | June 26, 2007 at 08:38 PM
A lot you folks are too influenced by the media. You listen to them and they have NO accountability. They say stupid things like trading Andrew Bynum for Jason Kidd.
The media said that Washington trading Rasheed Wallace was a great trade because the Bulletts/Wiz needed a VETERAN. Well it didn't work, Strickland has retired ... Rasheed is still a force ... pretty dumb.
Posted by: Todd | June 26, 2007 at 08:41 PM
J-Cool
You Getgarnett.com getting the love From Eric Pincus of Hoopsworld
========================================
Eric Pincus....."GetGarnett Blog Leading the Way"
"In early May of 2007 three friends got together with a single, simple purpose . . . bringing Kevin Garnett to the Los Angeles Lakers. Of course none of the trio were in position to directly impact the Minnesota Timberwolves or Lakers, so they set out to do the next best thing: blogging.
Thus was born GetGarnett.com.
The site immediately garnered a following, receiving over 10 million hits to date.
Whether or not they've made an impact in the "real world" is hard to gauge but recent reports indicate the Lakers are in fact working on a deal to get Garnett . . . and the Wolves may actually be willing to play ball.
"GetGarnett.com represents the spirit and a dream for better days for Lakers fans," says 20-year old Chris Manning (LD2k). "GetGarnett represents the passion that Lakers fans will always dream. That's the beautiful thing about the site, the fans check in every day for news, reports, and our takes. We are fans too and even if Garnett is traded elsewhere, someone has to carry around the torch."
Manning serves as "The Video Maker." His partner Kam Pashai (hZm) is the "The Graphics Maker" - and Jaime Murdoc (The Nugget) is "The Code Maker."
"Before the site was created, I let a few people know about the idea," says 19-year old Pashai. "They thought it would be a bust. Luckily Chris and Jim shared the same passion."
While Pashai was confident GetGarnett would be popular, Murdoc (the eldest at 24) was surprised at how quickly it became a hit.
"I remember when I got the call on my cell from Cameron that we were mentioned on NBC," says Murdoc. "I started to scream at PetSmart. Everyone thought I was having some sort of panic attack."
The fans have responded to their dedication. The guys keep their site constantly updated with news on the Lakers, Garnett and NBA in general.
"We're all online daily and Jim set up a great blogging system that makes it extremely easy to get an article up in a matter of seconds. Lakers fans are a connected, loyal bunch. I get text messages from friends every day," says Manning.
There's been no shortage of topics considering Kobe Bryant's trade demand and word Kevin Garnett may actually be on the market.
"I personally love the fact the Lakers are making a push for Garnett," says Murdoc. "I mean, it's the reason why we started the site."
"It's the news we've been waiting for all these seasons. This is the closest that we've ever been," gushes Pashai. "Its honestly a breath a fresh air seeing that management is actually going for it; attempting to get a big deal like this done. It's pretty much like a roller coaster ride right now. We're clinching onto anything that we hear from any news outlet because it looks like this time around we really can get the Big Ticket here in LA.
Manning urges the Lakers to trigger a deal, regardless of the price, "The question is not what is too much; the question is what is too little? Not making a move for Garnett may be worse than overpaying. The West is strong and getting even stronger. It will take more than just Bryant and Garnett, but like the Shaquille O'Neal-Kobe Bryant days, role players and chemistry guys will get onboard for the opportunity to win."
Not everyone at GetGarnett agrees, especially if the price is Lamar Odom, Andrew Bynum, Kwame Brown and the 19th pick in Thursday's NBA Draft.
"If that trade went down, I wouldn't be happy about it. I am not sure how this team would do," says Murdoc honestly. "I want the team to be good but with that trade, the Lakers would be giving up too much."
Pashai's take is similar to Manning's, "I would do that in a heartbeat. I love Lamar to death, I like Kwame and Andrew too . . . BUT I would not hesitate to trade those guys for one of the best players in the league. If you build it, the free agents will follow."
But can the Lakers and Bryant make amends? Will Bryant back off his trade demand?
"As fans all we can do is believe. I think relationships can be fixed. No one would've thought Kobe Bryant and Phil Jackson would've grown this close," says Manning. "But the time for change is now. The fans believe, and who knows, maybe they might just 'Get Garnett' after all."
So for you, the site is about faith?
"Absolutely," replies Manning. "We're the fans; we're trying to lead by example."
For Murdoc, GetGarnett represents "Hope. Hoping for another championship. Hoping for another shot to beat the [Phoenix] Suns in the playoffs. Hoping to have a great team that we can be confident in, that can win it all."
Pashai summarizes GetGarnett with one word, "Passion."
And if the Lakers actually land the former MVP?
"Relief!" says Pashai.
"If our mission is accomplished, then we'll have a few surprises for the website up our sleeve," says Manning.
They'd like nothing more than to change the name of the site . . . to GotGarnett.com."
http://www.hoopsworld.com/article_22457.shtml
Posted by: jorema | June 26, 2007 at 08:41 PM
Kobe is a horrible role model - he is a liar, a phony and an adulterer. He is a man who settled - that is, did not pursue his acquittal - in a rape case. He has cheated on his wife, accused his teammates of hitting on his wife, and ratted-out another teammate to the cops.
Kobe is a social pariah, a scourge. He has very serious social/interpersonal issues.
We went over this the other day, Troy. Your repeating hollow words changes nothing. Kobe is what he is - a hero to the sneaker companies and the 'and-1' nation who celebrates high-flying over winning. The 'it's better to look better losing than look bad winning' crew.
Kobe is an embarrassment, and I can't wait until he is gone from my team. He is a drama queen, spoiled baby. He tries to buy forgiveness with $4 MM rings. I respect his talent and his work ethic, but I could have said the same about Dennis Rodman. I'm SURE AS HELL not allowing any children I know to look up to him.
Husband? Adulterer.
Man? Rapist?
Father? Dishonorer of the children's mother.
If you think Kobe dunks well, that's great. Save the rest of the crap for the crowd that doesn't know any better.
This is the type of talk that concerns me most about Kobe, the 'Kobe Goose-steppers.' It's like he's a god, and can't do any wrong, despite all evidence to the contrary. You people are frightening, and I'm not making that up. How can any logical person say that Kobe is a good husband or man? At best he is a fallen son, a young man needing redemption yet who isn't seeking it honestly.
You want a great man? How about Derek Fisher? How about Lamar, with what he overcame this year both physically and personally?
Kobe? No, don't even bring that junk in here. That is an insult to anyone with a shred of intelligence.
Posted by: fakerz | June 26, 2007 at 08:42 PM
I have hard time believing KG is going to the Suns.
First because I hate the Suns. :-)
Second, they have to give up Amare, and seriously, I would rather have Amare than KG. Because he's younger.
I think the Suns problem is not something KG would solve. Amare is getting better, so I think next year Suns will be the team to beat.
Plus, the Suns are cursed, they need to be humble in order to him a championship. So KG, you will not be a champion there! :-)
I am still positive about KG coming to LA.
Posted by: gugy | June 26, 2007 at 08:44 PM
P. Ang,
Haha, Rachel Ray man's hand that was really funny now we just killed Kwame's trade. Come to think of it, I believe it's not Kobe who will sit next season but Kwame who will be the next Chris Mihm.
Posted by: Edwin Gueco | June 26, 2007 at 08:46 PM
What the heck do we do now Laker nation??!!!!!!!!!!! It doesn't look like we are getting KG, Kobe is close to leaving. Man, dark, dark day to be a laker fan.
Posted by: LakerKev | June 26, 2007 at 08:48 PM
THIS CAN HELP THE LAKERS: PAUL PIERCE REQUESTING TRADE IF CELTICS DON'T BRING ANOTHER SUPERSTAR.
Pierce's patience running out
By Adrian Wojnarowski, Yahoo! Sports
As much as Boston Celtics general manager Danny Ainge wanted a bigger return for Al Jefferson and the No. 5 pick in the flat-lined, four-team blockbuster trade proposal that died on Monday, little was done for the franchise's trampled image when Indiana's Jermaine O'Neal turned out to be one more star privately disclosing disdain over the prospects of playing for the Celtics.
First, it was Phoenix's Shawn Marion insisting that he didn't want to go to Boston.
Then it was Minnesota's Kevin Garnett.
And now it's O'Neal.
Here's the problem for Ainge: According to a league executive, Paul Pierce has finally told team management that unless the Celtics come out of this week with a talented veteran co-star for him, they should expect him to make a public declaration soon after Thursday's draft that he wants a trade.
"Danny is under tremendous pressure, from inside and outside, to get a deal for someone done this week," one league executive said.
Posted by: JOREMA | June 26, 2007 at 08:54 PM
Oh man, I just saw that the trade for KG has been "tabled" and now the Suns are back in the picture. :-(
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=2917781
All I got to say is this made me so mad and frustrated with Kupcake that I finally had to post here after reading the past few years. God please help us!!!! Mitch MUST go if he can't get this done!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: LALfan32 | June 26, 2007 at 08:57 PM
Shammon Williams is busy like Kobe: teaching in his own camp.
http://www.goupstate.com/article/20070626/NEWS/706260315/1051/NEWS01
Posted by: jorema | June 26, 2007 at 09:06 PM
On am 570 this afternoon, the consensus seemed to be that nothing would happen this summer. Any talk for Garnett was nothing more than talk and, with regards to Bryant, he isn't going to be traded. Even if that means watching him sit out, Jerry Buss would be willing to let him do just that. While Kobe can finanically afford to not get paid, he most likely does not have enough dough saved up in his PR account...and Buss knows this. Either Bryant plays out the season and Buss cashes in on one huge (if unproductive) cash cow of a season or Kobe sits out, fully realizing the bad guy rep he's been trying to live down. In both scenarios, Buss comes out a winner. The team, coaches and fans may not get much out of it, but that may not be Buss's immediate concern. If, three years ago, Buss bungled the Shaq situation, he appears intent on not repeating mistakes of the past.
As far as I'm concerned, as a fan, I would be thrilled to see the Lakers go into next season led by Lamar Odom and anchored by Andrew Bynum. When the Lakers were eliminated by the Suns, Odom stood by his locker, holding back tears, and said he hoped that he did enough to remain a Laker for the rest of his career. Kobe, on the other hand, began to execute an offseason plan that, by all apperances, had been worked out long before the season ended. I would get more satisfaction out of watching a true rebuilding project with the core of Bynum, Farmar, Turiaf and Walton, as opposed to the unreasonable goal of trying to win a championship every year at the expense of never developing young talent.
As for the K brothers: I've never addressed you two in this blog space (mostly because it never occurred to me), so I thought I would take a moment to thank you for the blog. Having a chance to converse with a couple of reporters who are actually within shouting distance of the Lakers organization is pretty cool. Kudos!
Martin
Posted by: Martin | June 26, 2007 at 09:08 PM
Thank you Jorema for sharing Paul Shirley's article. It was well written and true to experience analysis but his conclusion is flawed as you said it navigates on negative assumptions that Superstars cannot be tamed. I think they can also embrace the reality of infallibility. Kobe was a good person until he got involved w/ the Colorado sexual escapade, for sometime he was also a good Laker until he got frustrated w/ smush and Kwame and this Jim Buss taking at helm in trying prevent Kidd-Bynum trade plus that insider political intrigue blaming Kobe during the Shaq trade. It compounded all the suspicions on both sides. I also believe Kobe is a good father and husband and that the sexual temptation in Colorado can happen to any men who have innate cravings and sexual desires at the heat of the moment. I hope those who hate Kobe's attitude should separate his gifted ability to play basketball and many laker fans in this blog are also entertained by this player. We have to find balance in our criticism and always provide a room for forgiveness just like the way we treat an erring brother or a juvenile delinquent son. There are really no perfect human beings.
Posted by: Edwin Gueco | June 26, 2007 at 09:15 PM
NOV, 7, 1991
*****************
It feels exactly like November 7, 1991, Johnson shocked the world with the announcement that he was infected with HIV and would immediately retire.
Lakers are falling to abyss of early 90's. It is very very depressing.
I am speechless........ just staring at this damned monitor................
Posted by: Ventriloquist | June 26, 2007 at 09:15 PM
Nice post, JOREMA.
Now, lets here the sports media talk about how selfish Paul Pierce is.
Posted by: troy | June 26, 2007 at 09:15 PM
The Celtics are giving up the 5th pick to get Marion???? Why would they do that?
Plus I thought Marion said No extention in Boston or Minn?? I haven't heard otherwise? If you were Marion would you sign off on Boston?? I didn't think so..
This is going to be a roller coaster but LAKERS still have a shot at Garnett!!!
bd
Posted by: bd | June 26, 2007 at 09:18 PM
fakerz... how do you really feel? jk
i think you hit the nail on the head when it comes to Kobe (the person). I read posts from his supporters ignoring all the known facts and granting Kobe off court cedibility he has not earned.
I have also repeatedly said that he may be the most TALENTED player i've ever watched play the game.
That statement, however, says nothing about him as a man, teammate, father or husband. I trully think there is a direct link between this "off court falibility" and the player he is on the court.
IN HIS MIND, kobe is infallible. This creates the person we all watch on the court, able to score 81 points (from the perimeter, no less!). Trully unstoppable. It also creates Kobe's reality, where Kobe can justify his actions and the things he's said. He feels no remorse. He's the one who's been betrayed (in his mind). can anyone say "egomaniac"?
I couldn't agree more about your Lamar statement. LO appears to be a true stand up guy. I'd like to see a team built around him. I know most of the bloggers will label me a fool, but I would like to see the "good guy" win once. I'd like to believe that good guys like Lamar can be trusted with a team.
I ask: does anyone see more similarities between current champ Duncan and Lamar, or Duncan and Kobe?
Posted by: Benny Blanca | June 26, 2007 at 09:20 PM
Martin,
This is my opinion only. Walton is over developed, he need to be exchanged. While the history of the Lakers goes against what you are saying, Lakers always compete for the playoffs and if possible in the Conference Finals or The Finals. That could be the reason why they refuse to trade Kobe or cut off ties with PJ who's paid $10M. Why will Hollywood pay $2200 courtside seat just to watch Bynum, Farmar, Turiaf and Walton commit gargantuan turnovers! If you want to cheer a team always developing, then go for small markets or Clippers. i like Bynum, Farmar & Turiaf and also Odom but if you talk of KG coming to the Lakers, why kill the idea on the eve of the draft day? Never say it cannot be done until the deadline. However, you can have a company with AZ who also believe in developing players. I am sorry if I was too critical to your post, it is just my opinion that you posted at the wrong time when Lakerville is at its height of excitement.....
Posted by: Edwin Gueco | June 26, 2007 at 09:26 PM
Hey Ventriloquist.....watch yourself brother, or get your perspective in order: Nov 7 1991 was a much more serious, life impacting event (particularly for Magic himself) than the Lakers not being able to get Kevin Garnett in a trade (espcially, when, in 1991, people didn't have hope to live at least 16 years on from that viurs). At the end, no matter what, we follow baskeball and the Lakers as a fun, interesting diversion; but life can be tough.
Posted by: 10milliondollarzen | June 26, 2007 at 09:36 PM
Fakers,
As Vic the Bric would say, step out of the darkness and see the light. You're living in too much hatefulness, too much frustration and anger.
Kobe isn't nearly as bad as you think, and he doesn't deserve such anger from you. He cheated on his wife, just like many men do. His wife forgave him. There's nothing else there. Why do you want to keep judging him on this sin? Why don't you judge Shaq, the adulter, James Worthy, who cheated on his wife with a prosittute (remember that?), Magic Johnson, who cheated on his wife and contracted HIV, Michael Jordon, who left his wife of over 20 years to run off with a Las Vegas showgirl, Jason Kidd, who cheated and beat his wife. Fakers, please tell me, why don't you ever mention these player, or the many other who've also cheated on their wives. Why don't you, Fakers?
The case in Denver was a wash; there was a ton of evidence that suggests the accuser was lying and motivated by money. Why do you ignore this? If Kobe was guilty, he would have been found guilty. But he wasn't found guilty, Fakers. So why do you assume he IS guilty. Please, explain this to me. Will you?
Kobe settled because he didn't want to drag his young wife and his young daughter through such an ordeal. Oh sure, he shouldn't have been screwing with that foul woman in the first place, but we've covered that already. And, as far as an acquittal, not east, not easy to get a 12/12 vote for an acquittal under the circumstances Kobe found himself in. Remember, he was in Denver, CO, not the most hospitable climate for Kobe Bryant.
And how can you call Kobe a social pariah when millions of fans all over the world love and adore him? He's got the number 1 selling jersey in the world. People love Kobe, Fakers. Don't you know what a pariah is? A pariah is avoided, not celebrated. Maybe you were just confused.
He's spoiled? How so, Fakers? Explain why Kobe is spoiled? And explain how Paul Pierce, Kevin Garnet, Alan Iverson, Jermaine O'Neal, Shawn Marion, and many other NBA'ers who demanded to be traded are not spoiled? Tell me, Fakers, what has Kobe asked for to make him spoiled? Explain, please.
Kobe ratted out a team mate? What, the Shaq was paying prostitutes for services? Why not criticize Shaq for breaking the law by soliciting whores, as well as cheating on his wife? Why not, Fakers?
He has personal issues? How do you know this, Fakers. Have you spoken to Kobe. Are you his therapist. Or is this just your unsubstantiated opinion?
Accused Karl Malone of hitting on his wife. Why is this a negative for Kobe? Why would he say such a thing if it weren't true? From what I read about that, his wife make the accusation, and Kobe confronted Karl about it. You know Karl, the same man who said he's never play on the court with Magic Johnson because he thought he'd get HIV. Why would you blame Kobe for defending his wife?
I've put forth facts, you put forth opinions. Compare. Kobe and his wife are in love. Fact. Kobe has the love of his family and his inlaws. Fact. Kobe is involved in charity. Fact. Kobe is involved in his children's school. Fact.
Now, refute my facts. Better yet, compare what facts you listed in your post to the ones I listed. Fakers, just how many facts did you really have in your post?
Well, I've set the table for you, now, cut and paste my responses to you, and refute them. I'll be waiting. Okay?
Posted by: troy | June 26, 2007 at 09:39 PM
Phoenix big mistake.
If Phoenix trade Marion, they are doing a big mistake.
Marion is the most versatile ofensive and defensive guy in Phoenix, to the extent that he did a pretty god job in Kobe and later guarding Tony Parker.
They will gain in Garnett, more points and rebounds (with him maybe the best in the league) but Marion can spread the defense, because he can shot wll the 3 point.
Defense in the guard area will be a disaster. Kg is a big guarding guy and not mbile like Marion.
So, you would expect a upgrade in defense from Steve Kerr who knows what it takes to reach championship.
Also will be intersting to see if Phoenix are willing to go almos twice over the cap, with penalties from the trade kicker.
Well...can Lakers work the phone with Ainge to restart negotiations?
Who will be a better pick for the Celtics....Marion or O'Neal?
Giving how mediocre GM Ainge is...he will take the Suns trap.
Unbelievable!
Posted by: jorema | June 26, 2007 at 09:40 PM
breaking:
ESPN says Garnett to the Lakers "trade dead" ESPN NEWS cites sources "The T-Wolves have told the Lakers they no longer will discuss that matter"
Posted by: 10milliondollarzen | June 26, 2007 at 09:42 PM
The Big Adulterer can sit his "egomaniac" azz out this season if he wants to.
We'll be better off with out him.
The Big Adulterer 24 made this bed now he needs to lie in it!
Posted by: gunner24 | June 26, 2007 at 09:46 PM
The deal is off the table cause LO coming off surgery, Bynum, and 19th pick is a joke compared to getting Marion, Kurt Thomas, two drafts picks, and ATL's 08 unrestricted pick which will prob end up being in the top 10.
To be honest though...I doubt the Wolves were ever serious about trading with us anyway. This was probably just them putting the pressure on the Suns to get a better deal.
Err...lol I'm getting pissed off! If the Suns get KG, we have to trade Kobe and start over. There's no way we're winning anything in the next 5 with a roster of KG/Amare/Nash.
Posted by: nyla | June 26, 2007 at 09:48 PM
Wait a minute ... We were looking to make a four-way trade for Garnett, and the other GMs involved were the 1980s Celtics?
We need to get McHale, Bird and Ainge in a room together, sitting around a dinner table. Rambis, smoothly confident, starts pacing around the outside of the table.
RAMBIS: Enthusiasms ... Enthusiasms ... What are mine? What draws my admiration? What is that which gives me joy? Baseball! (Rambis produces a bat; the Celtics begin laughing nervously.) A man ... A man stands alone at the plate. This is the time for what? For individual achievement. There he stands alone. But in the field, what? Part of a team. Looks, throws, catches, hustles. Part of one big team. Bats himself the live-long day, Babe Ruth, Ty Cobb, and so on. lf his team don't field...what is he? You follow me? No one. Sunny day, the stands are full of fans. What does he have to say? l'm goin' out there for myself. But... l get nowhere unless the team wins."
By now, Rambis is positioned squarely behind McHale, hands gripping the bat.
Lakers, it's time to play hardball.
Posted by: Marty | June 26, 2007 at 09:49 PM