Sometimes, these jokes just write themselves
And with the tension permeating through Laker Land these days, it probably wouldn't kill the blogosphere to have a laugh at the expense of the dude with a thousand "Big" nicknames (although it appears "The Big Ironic" is in on the punchline). And speaking of laughs, this parody is good for a few.
As for the source of the previously cited tension, it's been pretty quiet on the Kobe front these days. Some folks saying Kobe's a brat of Hilton-esque proportions, others claiming that's all irrelevant because it would be insane to punch his ticket out of Newport. But all in all, not a whole lot of fresh (or even recycled) perspective making the rounds.
In "news potentially relating directly-ish to the Lakers," however, Kevin Garnett put the Kibosh on a rumored trade to Beantown. Apparently, the notion of freezing his ass off while losing remains unappealing even in a brand new city. Word around the campfire says he'd sanction a move to Phoenix, but it remains to be seen whether the Suns would part with Amare Stoudemire or draw the line at Shawn Marion. Should the latter player not be enough for Minny, would KG try to sell him GM on a trade to the hated Lakers? Or would KG remain a Wolf, perhaps opening the door for the Matrix in purple and gold? Of course, until Jerry Buss gets an indication that Kobe wants to stick around, any potential moves may be on hold.
Oh, by the by, in case anyone's forgotten, there's a draft next week. SI's analyzing Laker needs and making first and second round predictions.



Hariyahu,
The reason I brought up the three month waiting period is because the trade you proposed requires it by CBA rules. There's no way around it, unless I'm just not understanding the rules. Or I'm not explaining myself clearly or following your proposal.
AK
Posted by: Andrew Kamenetzky | June 22, 2007 at 02:40 PM
AK,
I never had Seattle in the proposal, but can understand if you thought I implied that because of the sign-and-trade. So, to be perfectly clear, there is no way Atlanta can sign-and-trade Lewis even if they have enough cap space? I didn't want Seattle to sign-and-trade Atlanta to Minny if you thought that's what I had in mind :)
Posted by: hariyahu | June 22, 2007 at 02:47 PM
Let's face the truth. Kobe wants out because he wants to win. But, he wants it the "easiest way possible", that is thru the east. We´ve seen that anything can happen in "The finals". This is "his" Truth and there is "NO HONOR". IMO.
No Lakers, no fans, no teamates, no West, no Magic, no PJ, no history, no zip. He thinks he can take "The finals" by assault. Almost single-handedly. So he says F*** the fans.
To be able to do this, he's gone ballistic. Reason: he "needs" to lower his trade value to get out. There is no match for Kobe basketball wise (he IS the best player on earth). So he has to get a match money wise (he IS one the most expensive players on earth). He knew this from the start, since the Shaq affair, since he re-signed, and some Sonic guard "warned" us then, and his predictions are comming true NOW. "He'll score 40 points a night and demand a trade."
I said, "Kobe is different. He's not like Shaq (max extension, company time, etc).". But guess what. I WAS WRONG!!!!!!
Who in his right mind could possibly think that we can "magically" be contenders with trades that only benefit "THE LAKERS". The "Beat LA" Lakers? The greatest franchise, with the greatest player. Does anybody think that any team will be willing to hand the 2008 NBA Championship to us? Because that's pretty much what Kobe is demanding. C'on. No way Jose.
He's demanding the impossible. He's demanding the unreachable. It's absurd. It's out of this world. It's ... just like Kobe.
Let's wish him well (it´s more than he'll wish us, remember, if he wins, we don't. And we all know what's important to KB), and let him go.
The truth isn't either good nor bad, and it has no remedies.
Vamos Lakers! We have ALL but seen our finest hour.
HRZ
Posted by: Laker69 | June 22, 2007 at 02:47 PM
Andrew Z,
ah...the ewing theory...bill simmons is an entertaining read. i like and don't like him for the same reasons (red sox, patriots and celtics fan).
i like him for it because it's good to know he a sports fan like all of us.
i don't like him for it because i hate all boston teams.
let me repeat, i want kobe traded because kobe demanded it.
and i only want kobe traded if we are ripping off the other team.
i do not want a desperate, rushed trade a la shaquille o'neal a couple of seasons ago.
c'mon lake show.
lakers: draft brandon heath in the second round. please.
Posted by: tha show | June 22, 2007 at 02:50 PM
Gino
" I Miss Van Exel and Eddie Jones "
"That's got to be the stupids person on earth to have his blog name dedicated to those loosers....
I think everyone will conquer"
Hey Gino,
I have been a fan of the Lakers since I was born and have been watching the team since the 70s.
Van Excel and Eddie Jones (Threat, Divac, A. Peeler, Ceballos etc.) were a damn exiting team to watch. Watching Nick the Quick back in those days was a hell of a lot of fun and Eddie Jones remains one of the class acts in the NBA.
Needless to say I dont "conquer".....
Posted by: todd | June 22, 2007 at 02:50 PM
Andy L's mom makes astounding predictions.
Prediction #1 last week: KG to be traded to Lakers. KG was not on anybody's radar. And yet she said he will be a Laker this year. I didn't take the prediction seriously because KG wasn't supposed to be traded. wow
Next,
Prediction #2 - Kobe would stay a Laker. This after the Barcelona meeting.
Next,
Prediction #3 - Kobe and Garnett would team up and lead the Lakers to the playoffs and then lose in the first round.
This stuff is not made up and Andy L is on the record. I reposted this info for you to examin. It should be used for entertainment purposes only.
Fatty
Posted by: Fatty | June 22, 2007 at 03:00 PM
"we'll give you Cookie, if you give us Head?"
haha
Posted by: ajax | June 22, 2007 at 03:01 PM
hariyahu,
Not to but in to your conversation but a sign and trade pertains to signing one of your own free agents (usually done so they can get the higher salary or longer contract that only you can offer) and then trading them to another team. If you do sign a free agent, there is a waiting period before you can trade them (that's where the three months come from). Usually around 3 months after free agent signings can happen, John Hollinger or Chris Sheridan right and article about all the teams that can trade the mistake signings they made in the offseason. I think Vlad was in that article last year, HA!!
Posted by: Andrew Z | June 22, 2007 at 03:03 PM
Hariyahu
Rashard had some contract issues with his FA being legit. Has that been cleared up yet? The intial thought was his agent didn't file paper work timely which meant he would not be a FA.
Fatty
Posted by: Fatty | June 22, 2007 at 03:05 PM
AK/BK
are there any good articles about Kobe that you can post? I know there is not a lot out there now a days but a good yay for Kobe article would sure help some of us feel better about all the things kobe is saying. Seeing as how I agree with what he's saying (not so much how he said it) I would like to know other "journalist" feel the same way most of the fans and Kobe do.
If you guys can't find one that's cool. You all seem to be working overtime anyways.
Posted by: bob | June 22, 2007 at 03:05 PM
Dear Kobe Haters,
Do you guys realize how ridiculous y'all sound? Plashke and the rest of the media are really doing a number on you guys. You sound like a group of ugly step sisters gossipping about an ex-boyrfriend. The Lakers are a BASKETBALL team, not a cheerleading squad. Let me summarize for you what I've read from the Kobe haters today:
"Wa waaa, Kobe hurt my feelings. He's not a nice guy, he's a meannie. He doesn't like me anymore. Mommy, he likes himself more than he likes me. What a selfish jerk. Waaaaaa Waaaa. He cares more about winning than he does about his teamate Bynum. How dare Kobe compare the great and legendary Andrew Bynum to Jason Kidd. Kobe should love Andrew because he's got potential. Who cares if Andrew blatantly disrespects Kobe and Phil publicly and doesn't have any work ethic. That's not the issue here, Kobe being a meannie is the issue. Boo hoo. Why can't he just accept things and not complain like what I do at my job? I make minimum wage, so how can anyone making $20 million have any complaints? The nerve of this brat. I would never compalin if I was making that much money. boo hoo. I can't believe Kobe hasn't changed his stance yet. So what if none of his complaints have been addressed. I agree with all his complaints but how dare he open his mouth. Who does he think he is? He has no right to demand a trade. Yeah, the owner lied to him, insiders are leaking lies to the media, the front office is a complete mess, but Kobe needs to shut his mouth. If he does, Jim Buss and Kupcake will make the right moves and save us. They haven't in three years, but I have confidence they will this time. Trade his a$$, he don't like me no more. Wa Waaaa."
Posted by: Mitchell | June 22, 2007 at 03:09 PM
NBA RUMOR MILL - Kobe, KG and J.O.
http://www.hoopsworld.com/article_22429.shtml
Posted by: J-Cool | June 22, 2007 at 03:10 PM
This blog is turning boring.
Suddenly the briiliant guys with marvelous post are gone.
We have only left some "WE will trash Kobe at no cost", versus the guys in the order corner, The same theme, same diatribe, same argument.
KLbeast, Gunner and Steven recicle the same words and write more than half of the blog tread.
Sorry to say it, but ....
This is ridiculous.
Posted by: jorema | June 22, 2007 at 03:26 PM
I really wonder if the Lakers will DO ANYTHING by draft day...
seriously...
what are they chances they stand pat and just use their draft picks?
I say probably 75%.
And that's sad. And that's why Kobe wants and will eventually leave the Lakers.
Posted by: KOREY | June 22, 2007 at 03:27 PM
Hari,
Yes, I am saying that I would rather have the number 3 pick in this year's draft than Bynum.
I disagree with the "the dude can ball" statement. He was on a team with the best player in basketball, whose game creates all kinds of opportunities for others. A "legit seven footer" without a lot of scoring responsibilities should be cleaning up on the boards. You would expect occasional monster games from someone like that, and you didn't get that from Bynum.
I don't see the drive that will be requiired to get him to that point.
Gambling that he will develop that drive, which apparently he does not have inherently, is a much bigger risk than picking up Horford.
Posted by: exhelodrvr | June 22, 2007 at 03:28 PM
Mitchell,
cool man, you dig kobe. i get it.
keep fighting the good fight.
not that you ever claimed to be, but are you even a laker fan?
or is kobe your reason for living?
actually, don't bother answering. i really don't care...
Posted by: tha show | June 22, 2007 at 03:30 PM
jorema,
yeah, i miss the days of zakee.
i miss the days when our biggest worries were smush parker not tripping over his own two feet or kwame fumbling cakes like entry passes.
i guess you don't know what you got til it's gone...
Posted by: tha show | June 22, 2007 at 03:33 PM
I know how we could get kobe, deng, and possibly gordon not only on the same team but also in a laker uniform.
Trade kobe now for those two guys. In two years he opts out of his contract and comes back to the lakers.
Hunhh, hunhhh ... brilliant ain't it .... lol
Posted by: Taliq | June 22, 2007 at 03:40 PM
Faith,
Sorry, wanted to respond yesterday regarding trading for KG when I said that he was too expensive.
You responded that he's better than anything else we could possibly get or already have (other than Kobe), so he is worth it, especially since we don't have any salary cap flexibility anyway (I'm paraphrasing from memory, so forgive me if I'm missing anything here).
My only concern with putting all of our chips on KB and KG and 10 guys from the Staples Center parking lot is that we already tried that with Shaq and Kobe in 04. We had no depth whatsoever, and if it weren't for a lucky incredible shot by DFish, and a complete meltdown by the TWolves, we wouldn't even have made it to the finals to lose to the Pistons in the first place.
And that team had Malone! This team with KB & KG wouldn't even have that. To me we'd just be burying ourselves with the hopes that 2 players can score 100+ points per game while defending 10 people.
Now, if we had a promise from KG that he would opt out after next season and resign for less money, I'd be all over that.
Just my opinion.
MR
Posted by: Matt R. | June 22, 2007 at 03:40 PM
Hariyahu,
So you're picturing Atlanta signing Lewis as a FA, then doing the S/T to the Lakers? Is that the right concept? But even then, I'm almost positive the three month rule (the very least) would still apply. There's basically no way around it. You can't make this happen on a dime.
AK
Posted by: Andrew Kamenetzky | June 22, 2007 at 03:41 PM
No way does Kobe sit out for a season. He is too concerned with his place in basketball
history. To lose one of his prime years would tarnish his career goals. I don't think he could put up with a year of 0 points and 0 dollars. The points probably mean more to him than the dollars.
Roger
Posted by: Roger B | June 22, 2007 at 03:45 PM
cbuck
“do you have a job? seriously. just wondering.”
actually I do. I’m lucky to have good staff working in my group. my work is less labor and more thinking......thank goodness.
Posted by: KLBeast | June 22, 2007 at 01:33 PM
Imagine a supervisor spending his time on a basketball blog the whole day.
Whoever owns that business is in deep sh*t.
Posted by: Lakergurl | June 22, 2007 at 03:48 PM
Jorema,
I'm not one of the "brilliant guys" you refer to, but I have been pretty silent the past few days, and I agree all this rehashing of arguments is getting boring. It's also exhausting.
I'm also not as creative as you and G1. Both of your posts have been bright spots. Props also to Fatty, Larry(Mamba24) and Tha Show. LakerBlake has also had some good stuff to say. Apologies to others if I've omitted you.
Laker Tom and Tim-4-Show are missing so far today. Until something happens, there's little more to say.
Does anyone except Rick Bucher of ESPN have any sources? He's the only one still doing any new reporting, and we have no way to know how accurate it is. He insists that Kobe will never wear a Laker uniform again. He's saying the Lakers have explored getting KG, but lack the rebuilding pieces McHale is looking for.
Frankly, I'm just numb at this point. I'm content to curl back on the sidelines until something happens or doesn't happen.
Posted by: Rick Friedman | June 22, 2007 at 03:48 PM
AK,
Not exactly - I was picturing the Hawks signing-and-trading Lewis to the Minny on July 1.
It goes back to the whole sign-and-trade thing - I'm implying that it's a concurrent thing. You sign Lewis and trade him immediately to the Wolves in return for other players (LO etc.). The advantage is for a team like the Hawks who have the cap space to sign a player but don't necessarily have the roster space for him.
Why would they do this then? So that they can trade the new signing (a SF) in exchange for a need that they have (a PF). After all, what good is it to have cap space without being able to use it :)
AndrewZ mentioned that you could only do sign-and-trades with your "own" players. If that's true, then what I had in mind is not possible.
I'm not too familiar with the CBA and how it pertains to sign-and-trades.
Posted by: hariyahu | June 22, 2007 at 03:53 PM
if you're here to talk about the Kobe and not the Lakers, then get off the blog. I want the Lakers to win, not to appease Kobe. Find another blog.
Posted by: I Miss Van Exel and Eddie Jones | June 22, 2007 at 01:41 PM
Yeah, stick it to Steven,aka KL Biatch, aka Gooner24,aka Fakerz,akaTarugo,aka Luigi.
Oh, and also to yourself!
Posted by: Lakergurl | June 22, 2007 at 03:53 PM
Ex and Hari,
I'd trade Bynum for any pick in the top 10, let alone the #3.
I think there are players that could be taken 10th that would provide more use for us immediately and in the future.
I still think the Lakers should look to move into this lottery by using Andrew Bynum as bait. I know Chicago, Minnesota, and Sacramento all are looking for centers and they draft, 9,7, and 10th respectively.
I think Corey Brewer, Joakim Noah, Jeff Green, and Julian Wright are all players that would help the Lakers more next year than Andrew Bynum will, and will continue to be good NBA players for years to come.
Posted by: Andrew Z | June 22, 2007 at 03:54 PM
Fatty
"Andy L's mom makes astounding predictions." I humbly thank you for noticing. Even I laughed when mom served up these predicitions (at my request) but now it's getting a bit eerie. There actually IS a chance in Hell! Oops, I shouldn't mention Hell in these supernatural circumstances... One small correction though, she never said we'd lose in the 1st round. She said we'd be worse off than this season. That could mean a worse regular season record. The answer wasn't specific there. One could always hope that we'd stink up the regular season and then light up the playoffs. It'd be hard to get there though if we'd suck worse than this year...
I won't be asking mom any zombie questions. That could be REALLY scary!!!
Posted by: Andy L | June 22, 2007 at 03:54 PM
The Jenkins column is pretty well on target.
Posted by: exhelodrvr | June 22, 2007 at 03:55 PM
AK, hari, etc. etc.
http://members.cox.net/lmcoon/salarycap.htm#80
"For sign-and-trade transactions, the initial trade which completes the transaction is obviously allowed, even though it occurs right after the player is signed. What's not clear is whether the player's new team can subsequently trade him prior to three months or December 15. While a literal reading of the CBA might suggest that such players cannot be subsequently traded, the league actually considers this situation to be undefined, and won't resolve the matter until a team actually tries to make such a trade."
Posted by: generic_one | June 22, 2007 at 03:55 PM
Oh... hari, forgot this one:
http://members.cox.net/lmcoon/salarycap.htm#76
"Under no circumstances can a team sign and then trade another team's free agent. But there is a rule that allows teams to re-sign their own free agents for trading purposes, called the sign-and-trade rule."
Posted by: generic_one | June 22, 2007 at 04:02 PM
I have to agree with JC that THE major problem with the Lakers is the front office. As much as Mitch Kupchak is a nice guy, I don't think I'd let him run my youth basketball team. Sort of the same way I feel about President Bush. Nice guy, but I don't want him in charge. But Dr. Buss is just so damned loyal - as if that's a bad thing.
Unfortunately, that loyalty is killing the team. So far, the highlight of Kupchak's GM career is pulling the string on the Butler for Brown deal. Wow! So from that perspective, I can totally understand where KB is coming from. But that's no reason for him to go outside the team, bash his teamates, demand a trade, and generally act like a child. I'm willing to bet that if instead of blowing up in the media Kobe had sat down with Dr. Buss and said, "it's either Mitch or me, but one of us has to go," Kobe would have been the winner. That would have left the door open for West to come back - something which won't happen as long as Kupchak's there - or to turn the team over to Phil, the only other guy Kobe trusts.
Posted by: David Peterson | June 22, 2007 at 04:02 PM
Ex,
So you would rather pick Horford than Bynum though you haven't seen Horford play *A SINGLE NBA GAME*. Sure he *could* be the next Boozer (who went in the second round, but that's besides the point), but he *could* also turn out to be the next Juwan Howard, who had a similar college resume.
The way I see it, Horford is a 6'9" PF with limited offensive skills (and I say this based on watching him in college and draft reports I read about him). And last time I checked 6'9" is not going to get you anything against the likes of Duncan, KG, Nowitzki etc.
But you are entitled to your opinion - just as I am to mine :)
Posted by: hariyahu | June 22, 2007 at 04:04 PM
Shaq is strenghtening his goofy image!
Last thing I heard was Shaq flying kites and stepping on nails in the Bahamas (I believe). Yes that's right, according to hottie Elisha Cuthbert who told the story on Conan.
Posted by: Andy L | June 22, 2007 at 04:12 PM
Generic_One,
A-hA - so, in the immortal words of Jim Carrey (Dumb and Dumber), you're saying there's a chance!
Thanks for passing on that bit of information.
Posted by: hariyahu | June 22, 2007 at 04:14 PM
Hariyahu,
Okay, just take my word for it (because I'm apparently not explaining it well). The trade you're proposing can't be done within CBA rules. You'll have to think of a different approach.
AK
Posted by: Andrew Kamenetzky | June 22, 2007 at 04:14 PM
Oh Crap G1 - just when you had me back in fantasy trade land!!!
Posted by: hariyahu | June 22, 2007 at 04:16 PM
Andrew Z,
I have had similar thoughts, if other teams actually think as highly of Bynum as is claimed!
Trade Bynum for the #3 pick. Trade Kwame for Artest.
Lakers would have the #3, #19, Lamar, Kobe, Artest. Turiaf, Farmar, Walton, Mihm,Vlad, Evans on the bench, or starting depending on who is obtained with the draft picks and how ready they are. That is already a much better lineup than last season, and by next season is a title contender.
Of course, Artest's behavior is a risk. Potentially weak at the center position, depending on Mihm's ankle. Could use the MLE to bolster that position.
If Sacto won't trade Kwame for Artest, try Vlad + ? (possibly the #19). Then Kwame is available mid-season for a trade.
That assumes Kobe is staying (and playing.)
Posted by: exhelodrvr | June 22, 2007 at 04:19 PM
AK,
Generic_One just posted information that effectively rules out what I had in mind. Back to the drawing board :)
Posted by: hariyahu | June 22, 2007 at 04:19 PM
Andrew Z,
"I'd trade Bynum for any pick in the top 10, let alone the #3."
So would I :) Unfortunately, the FO doesn't see it that way. The real question to ask is whether teams 3 through 10 would be willing to trade their pick for Bynum. I say if you are a team building for the future, do it. If you want to win *now*, don't.
Posted by: hariyahu | June 22, 2007 at 04:21 PM
Hari,
"So you would rather pick Horford than Bynum though you haven't seen Horford play *A SINGLE NBA GAME*. "
Yes. As far as the Howard comparison: If I were the Lakers, I would trade Bynum's future for Howard's career.
Posted by: exhelodrvr | June 22, 2007 at 04:22 PM
Warning: long post ahead, sorry for it.
Matt R.
It's a different time, and a different era in my opinion. Yes in this era there are more talents, and more athleticism, but if Cleveland's recent finals appearance and Miami's win last season has showed me, it's that the league is very very wide open. With possible exception of the Spurs of course, but they too have a tendency to win one year and not the next. I'm of a mindset that the gap between Dallas, Suns, Detroit are not that far off from really the other teams in the league (with possible exceptions of Atlanta, Clippers and the other sucky team haha). And I think we have the biggest x-factor in the playoffs in Kobe. Although it has been argued that he's not much of an x-factor cause you know what he will bring...I'm speaking more in the sense that you can never rule a team out if he's in it. I still believe that, even in light of all that has happened.
I believe that KG + Kobe + PJ and scrubs can get to the finals easy. Of course there's always the idea of injuries, but you never really go into a season thinking of such injuries. The track record of KG is also pretty good. I understand your point of view, the salary cap restricions and all, but I think the off side is far too tempting. KG + Kobe! That's a winning combination in my mind. But just thinking logically, let's say we trade the same 4/5 guys I mentioned for KG, we will be left with essentially 4 guys under contract I believe at almost salary cap range, I see where that can be scary. But the off side to that is, we will once again get the appeal of getting players to take less to win. There are always players that will forgo money to play for a championship...off the top of my head, Chris Webber, Grant Hill, and while they are flawed flawed players (I've never been a fan of choke Webber), they, combine with our winning combination should serve us well. We will still have the MLE, the BAE (not to be used this year because of Shammond), and the veteran's minimum (I think).
There is always the train of thought that KG can opt out and resign for less. Unlikely I admit, but not impossible. He knows what it takes to win, and if I remember correctly he once considered (or did I'm not sure) taking less money to have Spreewell and Sam I Am back. So it's not unheard of.
In any case, some part of me thinks making the finals is at least better than what we have now, and what I forsee our future to be. If it comes to pass that we simply make the finals and not win, as it had happened in 2004, that is still a step off the first round exits, if not straight out no playoffs we've had. I'm very pessimistic regarding Bynum's future (ironic because I used to champion him, but has since been convinced by the dark side lol). And when you realize that PJ's record in the finals is 9-1, and Kobe's also astounding, that finals appearance can lead to championships.
As for the 2 guys having to score 100, I think we're underestimating the power of having two guys as opposed to one taking pressure off the ball. Double teams will be all over the place, with "scrubs"scoring with the opening. Defensively, I admit 2 guys couldn't possibly defend the other 5, but I think a well ran offense contributes to defense in a sense. And in another, we'll just have to rely on team defense, hopefully better than what we did this season. I will say though that KG is very underrated defensively, I think we will definitely miss Kwame's one-on-one defense against the bigs, and LO's speed in the rotations, but I hope we can pull more Mo Evans kind of trade (a defender for essentially nothing)...actually I hope that regardless.
Posted by: Faith | June 22, 2007 at 04:23 PM
MR and Faith
It sounds like Mckale is going to be a butt about this trade.
Just a thought. Odom and Kwame equal KG's salary. Why does Bynum have to be the last piece?
Center: Andrew, Mimm
Forward: KG, Ronny, Cookie
Sm forward: Vlad, Luke?
SG Kobe, Mo
PG: Farmar/ Sasha
Total payroll 56 mil + Luke + MLE players
I see this as a pretty strong team. T wolves would want more than Odom and Kwame. But I don't see this team too depleted and is cap friendly. We could even split the MLE to get Bell and Magloire as a backup.
Weber might sign for the min .
Just a thought.
Fatty
If it was a perfect world KG and Kobe could sign a deal after each's contract is up, take less money and allow us to sign another FA star. Nice to wish, isn't it.
Posted by: Fatty | June 22, 2007 at 04:25 PM
LAKER-PHAT-GURL
“Imagine a supervisor spending his time on a basketball blog the whole day.
Whoever owns that business is in deep sh*t.”
I actually use my brain to get things done. plus, I usually scan the blogs during lunch and near days end.
ROGER B.
“No way does Kobe sit out for a season. He is too concerned with his place in basketball
history. To lose one of his prime years would tarnish his career goals.”
I think kobe’s career is already tarnished beyond repair to those of us without our heads up kobe a$$.
THA SHOW,
“not that you [Mitchell] ever claimed to be, but are you even a laker fan?”
Show, Mitchell is kobe’s agent in disguise or kobe’s secret lover.
JO
“KLbeast, Gunner and Steven recicle the same words and write more than half of the blog tread.”
be nice senorita Jo……I miss you too.
MITCHELL=KOBE’S AGENT=BOB SUGAR
“Do you guys realize how ridiculous y'all sound?”
to all blogger, please read mitchell’s posts and you’ll note Mitchell is a self loathing fool cuz his buddy kobe “me first” Bryant is making him look bad or Mitchell is just kobe’s agent and desperately (but failingly) trying to clean up kobe’s damaged image.
GUGY,
“Once we have a major star alongside Kobe, he will be quiet because:
• he can't complain anymore about the lack of talent of the Lakers team
• he will have his wish granted
• he knows his best chances to win will be in LA
• he knows the money and prestige is in LA
• he knows fans and the public in general will not buy his whining attitude anymore.”
so what was kobe’s excuse in 2004. too much talent, too high of a probability to win, too much money and prestige?
PETE MCGUIRE
“He also needs a big name guy to deflect some of the press because he is to stupid to be representing the team anymore.”
perhaps kobe can fly to Miami and beg shaq to come back? I remember shaq making the comment to Stupid Kob that shaq takes a lot of pressure off “them other guys” because most of the criticism was on shaq. What does kobe do in return? kobe badmouths shaq in public. I love this guy Kobe “I’m and idiot b-ball player” Bryant. You think Bynum respects kobe? You think Mitch Kupchak respects kobe?
Posted by: KLBeast | June 22, 2007 at 04:26 PM
Tha Show,
"cool man, you dig kobe. i get it.
keep fighting the good fight.
not that you ever claimed to be, but are you even a laker fan?
or is kobe your reason for living?
actually, don't bother answering. i really don't care..."
Cool man, you dig Jim Buss and Kupcake, I get it.
Keep fighting the good fight.
Not that you ever claimed to be, but are you a Laker fan?
or is Jim Buss and Kupcake your reason for living?
Actually, don't bother answering, I already know....
Stop the hyprocicy!!
I've been a Laker fan for decades. I want this franchise to succeed as much as anybody. Trading Kobe will not get us closer to that goal. Replacing Jim Buss and Kupcake WILL get us closer to that goal. It's that simple. Unless Jimmy (the insider) is dealt with, Kobe will not change his stance. He has been lied to by Jerry Buss, and obviously has no trust in Jim and Kupcake. Why is that so difficult to understand? Unless these trust isssues are dealth with and resolved, Kobe will not change his stance. As long as Kobe is fighting for the same goals that I, as a fan, have, than I will support him all the way. If Kobe's demands were based on an extension or a new contract, than I would be the first to put down Kobe.
I'm not choosing Kobe over the Laker franchise, I'm choosing Kobe over Jim Buss and Kupcake. The Laker franchise that we ALL have grown to love was led by Dr. Buss and Jerry West, NOT JIM BUSS AND KUPCAKE.
Now if Jerry West was still the GM, and Dr. Buss was still the "acting" owner, than my loyalties would be for the front office, because these two have done more for the Lakers than Kobe ever will.
Posted by: Mitchell | June 22, 2007 at 04:32 PM
Kobe has to learn to count his blessings.
He is already a lock for the basketball hall of fame. He has 3 rings
and lots of scoring titles. He is a lock.
Phil Jackson is already in the Hall.
Unless, Kobe plays a Pete Rose type of move.
Kobe has to learn to play the character part now. This is what will keep him out of the
Hall of Fame.
Teammates and people just don't like him. Why? He should look in the mirror. And the clippings. Is he a Motumbo?
Kobe has to realize that basketball isn't all about winning. It is about winning with class.
Basketball is about the moment.
It is about making lifetime friends with teammates.
With teammates saying, this guy was a great guy to play with. Kobe was tough,
but he watched your back. Like Michael.
The Lakers have been watching Kobe's back for a long time now.
It is time for Kobe to return the favor.
Posted by: Lee | June 22, 2007 at 04:32 PM
Here is my LIFE...
I'm happy because I was able to leave work early for the weekend...
Then there are basketball players who earn $19+ MILLION PER YEAR and are still BABIES CRYING OUT LOUD. Find the irony in that!
Colorado loves the Lakers (before any Laker player)!
Posted by: Hugo Boss | June 22, 2007 at 04:32 PM
David Peterson
"I can totally understand where KB is coming from. But that's no reason for him to go outside the team, bash his teamates, demand a trade, and generally act like a child. I'm willing to bet that if instead of blowing up in the media Kobe had sat down with Dr. Buss and said, "it's either Mitch or me, but one of us has to go," Kobe would have been the winner. "
"it's either Mitch or me"? hum, where have i heard this before......."it's either him or me". Sounds like standard operating procedure for kobe, "it's either him or me"..............kobe and winner is an oxymoron. yes, i called kobe a moron.
Posted by: KLBeast | June 22, 2007 at 04:36 PM
Here's one thing I don't quite get -
Why is Kobe being accused of bashing his team-mate(s)? Apologies if I'm not in the loop on this one, but is this all based on the "Kobe Video"?
If so, where and when did he bash a team-mate? I just read the transcript, and all he says is that if Bynum was what was needed to get Kidd, then we should have shipped his @r$e out. Who on this blog would have objected to that?
If that's all that was said, hows that bashing Bynum? All he's doing is basically saying that Bynum is nowhere near Kidd's level now, and that he wants to win now.
He then "bashes" Mitch for choosing Bynum over Kidd. How is that bashing a teammate?
I'm not apologising for Kobe here - he should really have kept that to himself instead of venting in public - but that is *NOT* bashing a teammate.
Posted by: hariyahu | June 22, 2007 at 04:36 PM
Oh, Phoenix flirted with Kobe a couple of years ago. They won't go down that road again. Spurs, they have a real Laker champion in Horry. Why would they want to fuss with Kobe? That is not a team that wants to deal with babies. This is a team coached by a United States Air Force officer. Pop wouldn't put up with Kobe's antics and nor does he need to. I do wish SA would get over its dislike of Shaq, though. He did go to high school there. Let Kobe go to the East and leave the West alone. See how he likes the pace of the East.
Posted by: ucrsue | June 22, 2007 at 04:37 PM
The Jenkins article sheds no new light. I see nothing of significance in the article. Sounds a lot like many bloggers on this site, she's just getting paid for her opinions. And that's all they are - opinions.
Posted by: LM | June 22, 2007 at 04:38 PM