Because the Western Conference wasn't stacked already
There must be Celtics fans tossing themselves off buildings tonight. In any event, the already mammoth Western Conference got a luxurious infusion of star power in tonight's draft lottery, when the Blazers snagged the first pick, followed by Seattle at number two. That means in one form or another, Greg Oden and Kevin Durant are about to make the Pacific Northwest about much more than rain, lush green space, and concern for global warming. About the only thing that kept the E.C. from risking permanent fiefdom (at least as measured by number of quality teams) was Atlanta sneaking up a spot to number three, robbing Phoenix of the opportunity to steal their pick and beef up an already quality squad.
At this point, it's fair to say the Western Conference could get very Lord of the Flies in '07-'08. Not that Portland and Seattle are suddenly going to morph into title contenders, but the Blazers were a pretty good bad team last year, have a ton of potential, and now have the flexibility to move Zach Randolph and get even better. Or keep him and figure out how to work a massive and athletic frontcourt with Oden, Randolph, LaMarcus Aldridge. Or swap picks with the Sonics and take Durant, who fits a little better, in theory. Seattle now has insurance if Rashard Lewis leaves and options if he stays.
Go down the line. Dallas will be good next year, as will Phoenix, San Antonio, Utah, and Houston (barring major injuries). Considering how they finished, a full season with A.I. makes Denver dangerous, which also describes a talented, improving Golden State team when Baron Davis is healthy. NO/OKC could be better, we've already talked about Seattle and Portland, and the Clippers are at worst mediocre, and could be better depending on how the offseason goes. Memphis has the cap room to get better. Not necessarily good, but they'll have a high pick and the potential to not be crappy. Even Sacramento, as big a mess as they are, still had a crack at a playoff spot last year.
If I'm K.G., I'm checking for real estate outside of Minnesota ASAP. You can make an argument that they'll be the worst team in the conference heading into next year. Not sure I buy it, but that I could reasonably defend that position kind of proves my point. There likely won't be a lot of gimmies next season on this side of the Mississippi.
Work those phones, Mitch.
BK



i have a good feeling that the lakers will trade for artest this offseason..
and probably get Gasol..Jerry West will be back as a consultant..and we will spend
the MLE on a solid PG..the 19th pick will be traded..
Brylle
Posted by: Brylle | May 23, 2007 at 09:57 PM
Tom..
Nocioni,duhon,PJ Brown (in theory).... FOR.... Bynum Brown and one other
Posted by: Kiwi | May 23, 2007 at 10:07 PM
Artest, Vladimir, and Luke at the three. That's possibly 19 mil for all three. Way too much for that position. When we need more money devoted to the point guard.
Last year Vladimir came in and was signed to be the guy, with Luke as back up. If Artest comes in, Luke or Vladimir will need to go.
A sign and trade with Luke would be our better option because no one will take Vladimir. Some teams may want Luke and they may have a point we want that could lead to a sign and trade. Or Luke may just sign and we lose him for nothing.
If we sign Luke and keep Vladimir, then Artest wouldn't make much sense. Three expensive players and someone not playing?
Fatty
Posted by: Fatty | May 23, 2007 at 10:11 PM
Phoenix wants to trade Banks. The Lakers originally were interested in Banks. Phoenix will have a hard time trading him because he has 4 years left on his contract.
Vladimir has four years left on contract and would be hard to move. Phoenix wanted him but got outbid for his services.
Vlad for Banks? We get our guard, PHX gets there shooter. We keep Luke then. Trade Kwame for Artest. Save the MLE for a back up center or save for the mid season player.
Offseason trades done.
If you don't want to be depressed, don't read Eric Pincuss article.
Fatty
Posted by: Fatty | May 23, 2007 at 10:39 PM
I think that trading bynum right now would be a mistake, as he ended the year pretty weak, and i guarentee he would play much better in the beginning of next year.
Posted by: greek dude | May 23, 2007 at 10:42 PM
Shorts and personal. (You will agree with me after reading this...)
---Is more intelligent to take a risk for a year with Ron Artest, that getting
the same Kwame's antics. I'm with Faith in this bandwagon of Ron coming to Staples.
---Nobody here remember how good can be a Kobe's team where he is playing with a 20 points and a 15 points player, night in and out? Those were Lamar and Luke at the start of the season. Obviously you can't depend in Lamar consistence and less in Walton the entire season.
----With Artest aboard, defense will be upgraded in a 35 % ratio. (Remember Sacto when he arrived from Indy?) Last year, was a problem because that fired coach isn't NBA material. With Adelman, Artest played the best and most inspired ball of his career, going to playoffs and scaring the hell out of SAntonio.
----Playing with Phil and Kobe, Artest will be a all star again. Write it. Caps lock that prediction.
---Kobe will play as fun as ever. Artest will be like him, dying out there to get the win.
----Artest usually turn weirdo when his team is out of picture, and he have to play without motivation.
----Playing with the Lakers, getting fame, seeing all those arenas full when he visits, getting accolades for
playing for this legendary franchise will fulfill Artest ego and he will deliver as never before.
Remember when Lakers didn't took a chance in talent just concerned in chemistry or whatever cons...
Weber, Kidd, Byron Davis.
Talent is talent.
Write that.
Seal that.
-----With Artest, Kobe doesn't have to defend the best offensive player in the other team.
-----With Artest and Kobe, you are going to have two of the most intimidating defensive weapons in the perimeter
of the NBA
.
----Artest can post up back to the basket as good as anyone in the league.
----You have to respect, Artest,. 3 point shooting.
----Artest can create his own shot, like Kobe.
----Since Artest went out of Indiana, that team went south.
----Artest always play with a unmatchable intensity in the court.
-----Artest never have played with a team he likes it, so if he comes to the Lakers he will
do his best to keep things clean and smooth.
----Artest is a clutch shooter, not in the same category than Kobe, but best than Mcgrady
and Lamar by far.
Posted by: jorema | May 23, 2007 at 10:55 PM
Haha, Arthritis Sabonis. But seriously, the guy wasn't just pretty good, even on bad knees the guy was really good. Best passing C I've ever seen and maybe the only C that gave Shaq some trouble. And thats old fogie Sabonis. I've actually seen clips of Sabonis when he was younger (has anyone else? I could never find those clips ever again) ...and from those clips, the guy looked AWESOME. I'm talking about like Kukoc...but a lot better and bigger! There were times he would run the break and finish with a Magic Johnson like no look pass and stuff. Its funny cuz this was way before the Euros emerged in the NBA...and this guy would've been one of the best ever...period.
michael h,
I actually like Bynum and think he will be a good C. At the same time, some people think he is the next coming of Shaq...which he's not. (Yeah, he's only 19, but Shaq, Duncan, Ewing, Oden, etc were all way better than Bynum when they were 19.) But I agree with you that we should only trade Bynum if we get a great deal....but in my book, if we can use Bynum as the main piece to score a Gasol or Jermaine....thats a deal I pull. Bynum is still an unkown and to get a proven all-star in return to me is a great deal. It's like cashing out on an $100,000 investment and netting $850,000....now theres a chance you could make a million, but also a chance you could get 500,000....but I'll take the 850k since we only made a tiny initial investment in the first place and 850k is a LOT. (In essense turning our 10th draft pick into Gasol or Jermaine). Bynum no doubt has a lot of value around the league, but we also have to note that the only reason we might even get Gasol or Jermaine is because they are "on sale". I think if Gasol and Jermaine are happy where they are, there's no way Memphis or Indy even considers trading them for Bynum...and we'd have to involve Odom somehow for sure. (Which I agree with you, is way too much to give up. Odom contributes in so many ways with his ball handling, passing, defense, and is one of the better rebounders in the NBA. And the scary part is, he still hasn't reached his full potential. Man, if only he could get more consistent on his J and develop his right hand! If Odom had a good right hand, I think he'd be a top 10 player in the league.) But the other reason I pull the trade is also cuz of Kobe's window. It's very risky to wait 2 more years to see if we net that "1M" or "500k".
On Oden vs Bynum....Oden's #'s might not blow away Bynum's next year per say....but he'll be a way way better player and much more valuable and contributes to more wins. Oden will be very productive from the very start. And it really depends on how fast Bynum can develop...but in 2 years, Oden's #s might be blowing Bynum's away. I'm surprised when I hear people knock Oden (not you, I mean others in general)...I think in 2 years he'll be the best C in the NBA and a for sure HOF'r.
Andrew Z,
It could be advantageous to wait....but it could also backfire and be a disaster. Its just a gamble. Someone else might make a trade for them...or perhaps suddenly they get better and are no longer disgruntled and no longer demand a trade. And Taos makes a good point about the advantage of getting a new guy in training camp to learn the triangle. I say strike while the iron is hot!
Oscar,
"Andrew Bynum is going to average a Double-Double next year, hopefully its as a Lakers, remember I said this, so I can throw it in everyones face when it happens."
I think he can get that too. Double-doubles are nice....but were trying to get a 20/10 guy here....not just a double double. Those double doubles (10.1 pts and 10.1 rbs) don't make us a contender next year.
Tom,
I agree with AK and BK. I think they hit it on the head saying its a gamble trading Bynum but also not trading him. Which was the point of my analogy above. Even if Bynum reaches his full potential, you have to wonder HOW much better is he going to be than a KG, Gasol, or Jermaine who put up great great #s already. They also mentioned the timing....even if Bynum reaches his potential...were not sure when that is. I think we have to take the proven commodity while we have the chance and while Kobe is in his prime. And who knows, even if Bynum is great in 2010, there's no guarantee we will be contenders even then as we don't know how long Kobe's prime will be and who else will be on the team. Its so hard to win a championship, if given the chance you have to take it.
As far as the Oden effect. I don't think it changes much in my mind. Not only due to the whole timing thing. But also, that I don't necessarily think it is best to have Bynum just to diminish Oden a bit. Keep in mind I think Bynum will be good down the line....but honestly, I think Oden will be much much much better. Oden will be such a force in the middle, I think I'd rather have an athletic, versatile, high powered offense to counteract Oden. I think the best way to counter Oden is to draw him away from the basket or attack him directly as to get him out of position....then the penetrator can dish, but even if Oden alters the shot, have good athletic guys that can crash the offensive board while he is out of position. At OSU, that was the only way teams had any kind of success against him....Oden simply owns the paint and if you try to go toe to toe with Oden in the paint...you'll likely lose. Its almost like Oden is a heavy hitter in boxing....well, it'll be hard to beat him with another heavy hitter that is worse and doesn't hit as hard. I think you're better off trying to use speed and out box the guy.
Posted by: wiZo | May 23, 2007 at 11:03 PM
Is anyone aware of any deals Lakers are involved in ? What's cookin' in our kitchen ?
I dont hear the peep out of LA's front office so far .
Now we got another good big man in the West , thanks for the lottery , more problems for KB getting our sorry asses to the playoffs next year.
Posted by: albert | May 23, 2007 at 11:32 PM
AK,
I guess it's true , you see what you want to see. The video is pretty clear and Lebron elbowed C-Webb.
I know you defended Kobe, I know you didn't agree with the league on the suspension. But to say that you need other angles of Lebron's moves, please.
It is clear what Lebron did, but i guess we all see what we want to see, even me.
But come on..........
Posted by: lakofan | May 23, 2007 at 11:33 PM
Mitchell,
You are absolutely right, the Lakers are fair but their GM and new owner are leading this team to self destruction. Too much talk, no action. Why don't we reverse it? Action first before talking.
Here is what 'hoopsworld.com" are saying about the other J.Buss.
The Other Buss: It's pretty common to hear Lakers fans and Laker-haters talk about Jerry Buss when debating what the Lakers should do this summer. The problem with this line of thinking is that Jerry Buss is not making many decisions for the Lakers these days. He has basically turned over the business side to Jeanie Buss his daughter, and turned basketball over to his son Jimmy Buss. Jimmy has been calling the day to day shots for a while, and while Lakers GM Mitch Kupchak isn’t exactly a dog with no teeth, he does ultimately answers to Jimmy. Jimmy does not want to trade away the farm to get better, despite what he’s said on the radio in LA. He wants to win and be a playoff team as much as everyone else, he just wants to build it his way. Do not be surprised if the Lakers pull another “Jason Kidd" - get serious about a deal and pull away at the last minute because the price is too high. The Lakers want to be a better ball club, but a massive trade or huge free agent may not be in the cards unless Jimmy lets go of the dream and lets the real basketball guys call the shots this summer. Jimmy “says” no one is untouchable this summer – he may have to prove that before he’s can be taken seriously at his word. - hoopsworld
Therefore, are we all dreaming of hitching the stars while this Jim Buss still navigating the earth and bynum is the ultimate solution. Can we all adjust our expectations to Jim Buss bandwidth? Trading our players should not be our ultimate objective but trading this twister GM and new typhoon Kid should be a priority before lakers can improve completely. lol!
Posted by: Edwin Gueco | May 23, 2007 at 11:38 PM
Crap Kobe is still in the Lakers team?
You might as well kiss your playoff games good bye... AGAIN!
Wake up FANS...
Aren't you sick & tired of HOPING although you KNOW the END RESULTS?
LOSERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRSSSS!!!
Posted by: balakubakobe | May 23, 2007 at 11:42 PM
Aloha wiZo
Nice blog. I think the only thing I would add is, I really do not want to see Andrew going for some aging guy except maybe KG. When we backed out of the Kidd deal, it was the right move. You dont give up someone with Andrews potential for a 35 yr old. Gasol will be 27 and lewis 28. Thats more like it. I would fell much better getting a guy that you know will be good for several yrs.
MH
Posted by: michael h | May 24, 2007 at 12:36 AM
Lakofan,
No, this isn't a question of me "seeing what I want to see." Or not seeing what I "don't want to see." I don't have any preference for it to look one way or the other way to me. I'm simply saying, the video isn't particularly conclusive to me, because of the angle, the blurriness and the distance it's shot from. I'd need to see more before declaring it the exact same thing Kobe did. I don't think that's much to ask before making up my mind.
By the way, is that from Game 1 or 2?
AK
Posted by: Andrew Kamenetzky | May 24, 2007 at 12:37 AM
ramses - Kurt Rambis in disguise
Dude, you really need to check your grammar. Gunner24 might be a little crazy, but you try to call him out and you can't even spell.
mitchell - Mitch Kupcake in disguise
Dumbest idiot on the blog is a little harsh. Maybe you should read what Ramses posted before you open your mouth.
This blog is funny. You guys need to all get a life!
Posted by: eighties lakers | May 24, 2007 at 12:49 AM
Gunner,
Don't worry. Nobody is going to take the "dumbest idiot on the blog" award away from you. You can feel safe....unless KL decides to post.
JayJay,
WE NEED ARTEST ASAP!! Artest might be a cancer, but Phil, and Ron's FRIENDS, Kobe and Lamar, will cure it. I'd like to see Raja clothesline Kobe again with Artest by his side.
I THINK YOU ARE TRYING TO TAKE THE DUMBIEST IDIOT AWARD AWAY FROM RAMSES NOW.
MITCHELL AND RAMSES TWO BUTT BROTHERS.
HA HA!
Posted by: gunner24 | May 24, 2007 at 12:59 AM
Here's a lineup the ball hog would like next year.
Kobe
Farmar
Mo Williams
Steve Blake
Smush
Kobe plus 4 Point Guards equal another Scoring Championship.
That's the best possible team. That's what he wanted when he said do something and do something now!
Posted by: gunner24 | May 24, 2007 at 01:12 AM
AK,
If you had a gun to your head and was asked if Lebron made an "unnatural" basketball motion, how would you respond? To me, I thought the video clearly showed Lebron swinging his offarm in an unecessary manner. How else can Webber fall to the ground and grab his face? Perhaps he took some acting lessons from Divac while at Sacramento, but I highly doubt it..haha..
Posted by: fkillah | May 24, 2007 at 01:12 AM
AK,
From game 1 since they only played once so far. Like my critical analytical skills? haha..
Posted by: fkillah | May 24, 2007 at 01:17 AM
I think now that the draft is cleared up and Memphis is destroyed....Pau Gasol would wanna demand a trade....he always wanted to be a popular icon...well in LA he can....plus he's cheap 11 million....we can trade Bynum, Vlade, and 19th draft pick for Pau Gasol....then we can trade kwame for Artest cause the sacramento kings wanna get rid of him.....
http://forums.kb24.com/viewtopic.php?id=8315
Posted by: O.E | May 24, 2007 at 01:52 AM
Oden and Durant have not even played a game in the NBA and they are being anointed with superstar status. And for all of those who disparage Kobe and laud Durant, you're the biggest hippocrites of them all. Are to assume that all of a sudden Seattle becomes a playoff contender with Durant. Shouldn't we have assumed the same when he was in Texas. Correct me if I'm wrong but didn't Texas lose in the second round of the NCAA tournament. In as much as I am underwhelmed by Bynum, "those blank deer in the headlight stares." I'm certain he would hold his own against Oden. I can't wait til I see them play against eachother so I can say I told you so.
Posted by: Chris Edwards | May 24, 2007 at 02:46 AM
Fatty thanks for drawing my attention to that very interesting article...
I think its the same old story (that actually happens in any organisation these days) where everyones trying to cover their a$$
Jim Buss felt it was unfair of Phil (and by phil he means Kobe too) to call the players out in the media and thereby place the responsibility on managment.I didnt get the feeling he was saying Jackson couldnt do this or couldnt do that or he thought Phil couldnt coach young talent...just that when it goes wrong the responsibility may lie in many places and to put all the pressure on the front off office is unfair.
Im sure he would agree that putting all the pressure on Kobe or Phil is unfair too.He was just getting his side of the story across but of course the focus is on him saying 'Phil can't coach young talent' which wasnt what he was saying.He was basically saying there is no point in turning around and publicly blaming one cog in the wheel and I happen to agree with him ...I also liked the fact he gave the other side of the Kwame story.Hes putting Phil and Kobe back in their place and doing what many think the organisation should do...make nobody bigger than the franchise...is he a hypocrate? No as far as hes concerned these other guys started it.He was left no option but to react especially given hes in charge.He needed to defend himself and the balance of power.I see his point - he shouldnt have been placed in that situation in the first place.
Jeanie Buss has her own agenda and is obviously besotted with Phil and completely overeacted to the comments.At least she can see that to a certain extent but she should have stayed out of it or talked to Jim before reacting.She is operating from a position of fear....she appears to dread the day Phil is no longer coach of the team.
Phil has a history of trying to deflect blame ('The last season' anyone?)
Phil has motivation to say something is intrinsically wrong with a player because it means it is not his failure as a coach.Why do we all think Kwame wasnt that hurt? becasue Phil said so...the guys word carries.It could potentially lead to decisions that arent in the best interest of the franchise to keep the fans happy.Particularly if what Jeanie Buss says is true.
If what Jeanie says is correct and he started Farmar becasue of the fans we obviously need to be careful about what we write on here!
On the whole Fatty dont worry ...I dont see this as a big deal.Its been blown out of proportion.I think its good that the guy will step up and keep Phil and Kobes egos in line and the day it doesnt happen we should worry.
Posted by: Kiwi | May 24, 2007 at 06:34 AM
In fact my guess is that Jeanie is probably in serious trouble for undermining what is essentially her brother trying to do his job.
- the rest of it is just stuff that happens but THAT puts spanner in the works.
trade Jeanie to Golden state and make her date Don nelson...
Posted by: Kiwi | May 24, 2007 at 06:38 AM
http://youtube.com/watch?v=GGnnN5BMXwE
If that isnt the same thing as Kobe then what is?
Posted by: Korey | May 24, 2007 at 06:46 AM
Attention Bloggers: HAVE A GOOD AND SAFE MEMORIAL DAY HOLIDAY WEEKEND
HOSTAGE UPDATE: DAY (18)
DAY 18 GARNETT HELD HOSTAGE BY MINNESOTA FOR RANSOM BY LAKERS.
AND NOW ********************** 24 The Blog *********************************
TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK
__________Cast:_____________
Jack Bauer: Kobe Bryant
The President: Jerry Buss
The Vice President: Jim Buss
Chloe: Jeannie Buss
CTU HEAD: Phil Jackson
CTU AGENT: KURT Rambiis
CTU: STAPLE CENTER
The Kevin Garnett hostage crisis has gone to level one with Seattle and Portland winning the NBA lottery.
If Garnett is not rescued by the Lakers soon it may mean not only the end of KG, but of the Lakers as
we know them. Phil Jackson has dispatched his top agent, Kobe Bryant who has gone outside the NBA
Law to rescue Kevin Garnett from the Terrorist so that he can join the Lakers. But as Phil Jackson gives
Kobe his orders he does not know that Jim Buss is secretly working against Phil Jackson and Jeannie Buss
to sabotage the Lakers. Kurt Rambis tries to speak up to stop Kobe from walking into the trap and is shot
down by Mitch Kupchak. Jim Buss joins Mitch and they attempt to flee but are suddenly confronted by
Jeannie Buss and Phil Jackson who demand to know what trap they have set for Kobe to sabotage his
attempts to rescue KG and resurrect the Lakers. Suddenly there is a large explosion ..
Tick Tock Tick Tock Tick Tock Tick .. 24 The Blog will return after Memorial Day
THATS ALL THE NEWS FIT TO PRINT AT THIS TIME: FOR ROUND-THE-CLOCK
PURPLE AND GOLD WITH ANDREW AND BRIAN KAMENETZKY read THE LAKERS BLOG
ROLL CALL:
Faith, Edwin Gueco,, KEIFO, FATTY, MITCHELL, KIWI, RespectMyAuthorith,
TIM-4-SHOW, WESJOENIXON, TALIQ, BAYWOOD, Khang, Bobie,SBPIMP
NEVER, CALI KING, RICK FRIEDMAN,THIRTY2, WOW, EXHELODRVR
JJ, AJAX, MIKE T., LAKERTOM, LAKERFAN, DAVID WHANG, GENERIC_ONE
VMAN, KOREY, XTRO, Tha Show, MCGARNAGLE, GUGY, GDChild, Laker4Life
KL BEAST, Jorema, FearlessWhackJob, MARTY, JANDRO, LAKERFAZE, PhxLkrFAN,
TexasLaker, BOB, TreacherousBalloons, EagleBoy, TWOODY, EASTCOASTJESSIE,
Zakee, Swettual, Utzworld, Andrew Z, LAL Fan, BRANDON C., Kinglakernidas,
Fan of Mamba, Mamba24Fan4Life, BlackMamba24, FKilla, CYRUS(VENTRILIQUIST)
Waterboy, Hariyahu, ADAM KILEY,Bynum=The BigLazy, ZEN, SARCOCOP,
COMPTONS FINEST, MIGUELINHO, Greek Dude, J.Walter Weatherman, SOCALIFE,
Greekdude, Michael J, Michael H, Michael A., Rick Friedman, Gunner24, GINO,
CBUCK,LAKERGURL, CRITICAL BEATDOWN, PFUNK36, PAUL LEE, Jay EL
WEAVE MAN, JON KAVULIC, Tajluck, James da Kingpin, BERKLEYLAKER,
DION, KARL, CRAIG, MITCHELL, Lakers4Life, JimBussIsAMoron, JR, Dascilla
GABE, SEAN P., HanSoulFood, HollywoodJack, TheKobeShow, Jay Jay, TaosHum
Caeser, Obel, CHITOWNLAKER, ANGRYLAKER LAKER FANS, wiZo, MagicShaq,
HugoBoss, OSCAR, RDLEE, RealityBites, LakerLarry, Bucky, LEELO, BikBlonde,
ALL TOGETHER NOW: KB + KG = DYNASTY KB + KG = DYNASTY KB + KG = DYNASTY
LAKERS TODAY LAKERS TOMORROW LAKERS FOREVER
Posted by: Mamba24 | May 24, 2007 at 07:14 AM
LakerTom,
I've been fairly quiet the past two weeks, very busy, but have taken the time read all the great ideas for the team this summer. As usual, your insight in these matters is very helpful. I've actually been thinking the same thing(s) you are saying. I'm probably more inclined to keep drew now that Oden is in our division. The window for "easy" title shots is about two or three years at the most. I don't think it's beyond us to contend if we make the right moves, but the league and its rules have made it near impossible for teams to improve upon their mistakes. Just look, we were paying Brian Grant this year. What does that tell you? It tells me David Stern could not be more displeased with the results of this draft lottery and the inability for marquee teams to improve. All the powerhouse players are headed to the Pacific. The Eastern fan base has LeBron (which is great, he will go to the finals a lot in his career), but that's it.
The sudden realization that Portland is about to have a solid, young core of players in Roy, Aldridge, and Oden should light the fire under Andrew's butt. He has ZERO chance of making the all-star team in the next two seasons, let alone the next five or six in the West. His only chance is to show an unbelievable amount of improvement and actually become a superstar, and become one really quick. I think Oden going to Portland will hopefully get Andrew fired up, as he is always fired up about playing big name centers. The talk of upcoming superstar centers in the West now centers around Greg Oden... Andrew who??
Kwame's trade value in the west has just gone up as well.
The Lakers are in a tight situation. Our best hope for KG is to pray that McHale continues to be stubborn and that the Hostage crisis continues until the end of next year. Minny will most certainly miss the playoffs again. I highly, highly doubt we can make a trade for him unless he becomes unreasonable like Shaq was. Therefore, we must wait another season and acquire him for pennies on the dollar in 2009 (which would be the only thing to save Kobe from leaving Los Angeles).
Artest is a huge gamble. He's passionate about playing though. This is what our team lacks. He can play defense, this also is what our team lacks. He's never really played with a superstar before... so playing with Kobe would be huge. I think he'd get lost in Phoenix and wouldn't mean nearly as much to them as he would mean to us.
Final Assessment:
Get rid of Cook, Kwame, and probably Vlad.
Acquire Ron Artest.
Farmar will improve in the off season, for sure, guaranteed.
Hang a poster of Greg Oden on Bynum's locker with the caption that says, "welcome to the next 12 years of your life" and then have Oden sign it at the bottom.
With the improved mentality of bringing in Artest and removing unmotivated players such as Kwame & Cook, our team will be much more effective and consistent.
Ride out the year, hope for the best, and then if McHale is stubborn, sign KG for 2009-2010 for a legitimate title run.
It's a gigantic roll of the dice, because if Ron Ron doesn't pan out, and/or KG is traded to a team that he likes, Kobe will leave. Gunner and KL will be dancing in the streets, until they realize, we just became the Charlotte Bobcats.... no, that's not lousy enough, we just became the Celtics-a storied franchise with no forseeable potential to ever see the top ever again.
Posted by: Tim-4-Show | May 24, 2007 at 07:25 AM
To all the people who feel like Artest would solve all our problems:
He would be a nightmare on the Lakers.
- He wore out his welcome in Sacramento in a year and a half because he wanted to be the #1 guy, but Kevin Martin took his place.
- Aside from the constant fear that he'll snap and get suspended for an extended period of time, he will create huge distractions off the court. He does every it year (wanting to take time off to promote his record label, the dog thing from last season and the domestic disturbance thing as well). Championship teams simply do not have that happen on their team.
- He is NOT Rodman. Rodman was interested in only one thing: rebounds and he didn't care about scoring. Artest wants to score. Do you really think he would be happy taking 8-10 shots a game while Kobe takes 25?
- He just doesn't seem like a guy who just wants to win. He cannot stay focused enough to really devote himself to improving his game and doing what is necessary to win a championship.
I just don't think its worth the risk for a guy that is a career 42% shooter and liable to rip apart an already fragile clubhouse.
Posted by: psp956 | May 24, 2007 at 07:26 AM
Edwin Gueco, "Trading this twister GM and new typhoon Kid should be a priority before lakers can improve completely. lol!"
Professor you hit the ball out of the park with that one. There's no since trying to cure
the symptoms when the disease will come right back.
Posted by: Mamba24 | May 24, 2007 at 07:38 AM
Fkillah,
Honestly, dude. I can barely see LeBron's off-arm at all, much less what it's doing, the angle it's coming down, how close Webber is, etc. That all matters if you're really trying to figure out how identical it was to Kobe. Remember, it's not the end result (a hit to the head) that's the most damning result. It's the specific physicality that led to the hit. And I can't see it well enough. I need to look at it from a better angle (or if nothing else, one closer and less blurry). It's really that simple. Whatever answer I gave with a theoretical gun to my head would be meaningless. It wouldn't reflect any real opinion, because I don't have one. I'd just trying to avoid getting shot.
And yes, it's clearly game 1. I think that's the one thing we can all agree on. haha Serious brain cramp on my part. Thanks.
AK
Posted by: Andrew Kamenetzky | May 24, 2007 at 08:07 AM
BRAINWAVE!!
Facts:
Phoenix is looking to add to it's bench strength
Phoenix doesn't have an answer for Tim Duncan
Phoenix is feeling the pinch of the salary cap
There are reports of friction between Amare and the Matrix
Lakers need to add another proven scorer/defender.
You can see where I am going with this :)
We trade Kwame (salary cap relief) + Cookie and RadMan (bench+3-pt shooting) to the Suns for the Matrix.
OR
We trade Kwame (salary cap relief) + Bynum (young POTENTIAL stud) + Cookie and Radman (bench + 3pt shooting) to the Suns for Amare PLUS take Banks off their hands.
Before you barf all over "Why the hell would Phoenix want to deal with us?" read the first sentence.
The Amare scenario is less likely, but we could get the Matrix. Phoenix would then have a unit of:
Kurt + Kwame (effectively body up the Duncans of the world)
Amare + Cookie
Diaw + Radmanavoic
Bell + Barbosa
Nash + Banks
And WE would be much better off:
Bynum + Mihm
Odom + Turiaf
Matrix + Walton
Kobe + Mo
MLE + Farmar
Not only do we get that second/third scorer, we also improve defensively - Marion can guard multiple positions and stick it to Nash and Amare when we play the Suns again.
What do you guys think?
Brainwave or brainfart?
:)
Posted by: hariyahu | May 24, 2007 at 09:14 AM
hariyahu, "Brainwave"
I don't want to be the one to shoot you down, since we seem to have a wave of that recently
so I'll just have to say it probably would have to be a three team deal. Because
unless Hell has frozen over there is no way the Suns will deal with the Lakers.
But then again anything is possible so if we could get another team involved, your lineup
would be great. Good idea anyway.
Posted by: Mamba24 | May 24, 2007 at 09:26 AM
Brainfart. No chance the Suns do any deal with the Lakers. You should hear the way Sarver talke about the Lakers organization in the local press and on radio shows. The Suns, their fans, their ownership, all hate the Lakers.
Posted by: PhxLkrFan | May 24, 2007 at 09:28 AM
Thank you Mamba24, I would like to make a contructive contribution to typhoon Kid and twister GM.
Here is how I will attack the problem. I will start first with our free agents before trading our present players under contract. If not possible to go on one player exchange then I have to combine the present players I wish to dispose. Priority will be Kwame, Sasha, Cook, Vlad in that order and down the line, the last priority will be Turiaf.
As much as possible retain LO & Bynum aside from Kobe, let’s start with our positional weaknesses and free agents in the market:
1). Point Guard: Our Free Agent is Shammond Williams @ $ 1.75M 3.3ppg 1.5r 2.3a
Alternative PG Free Agents who are unrestricted:
Monta Ellis @ $1M (or more) 6’3” 16.5 ppg 3.2r 4.1a
Steve Blake @ $1.3M (or more) 6’3” 8.3ppg 6.6a
Earl Boykins @ $3.3M 5’5” 14.5ppg 2.1r 4.4a
Jannero Pargo @ $1.1M (or more) 6’1” 9.2 ppg 2.2r 2.5a
Brevin Knight @ $4.2M 9.1ppg 2.6r 2.7a
Proven PG that may require a trade from our players under contract
Mike Bibby @$13.5M 6’1” 17ppg 3.2r 4.7a
Jason Kidd @ $ 21M 6’4” 13pp 8.2r 9.2a
2) Power or Shooting Forward: Our Free Agent is Luke Walton @ $5M 6’8’11.4ppg 5r 4.3a
Alternative PF/SF Free Agents who are unrestricted and restricted:
Desmond Mason @ $8M 13.7ppg 2.2r 2.5a
Jason Kapono @ $1.2M 10.9ppg 2.7r 1.2ª
Chris Webber@ $1M (or more) 11.2 ppg 7.2r 3.1a
Gerald Wallace @6M 6’7” 18.1ppg 7.2r 2.6a
Matt Barnes @ $1M (or more) 9.8ppg 4.6r 2.1a
Michael Pietrus @3.4M 11.1ppg 4.5r 1a
Andres Nacione @$3M (or more) 14.1 ppg 5.7r 1a
BruceBowen @ $4.1M 6’7” 6.2ppg 2.7r 1.4a
Rashard Lewis @ $10.4M 6’10” 22ppg 6.6r 2.4a
Michael Finley @ $3.1M 6’7” 9ppg 2.7r 1.4a
Jerry Stackhouse @9.2M 6’6” 12ppg 2.2r 2.8a
Some of these unrestricted F/A may require another player in combination to Luke Walton
3) Our free agent for Center Chris Mihm @$4M 7’0” as ’06 10.2ppg 6.3r 1a
Alternative Centers
Chris Webber @$1M (or more) 11.2ppg 4.5r 1a
Zo Mourning @ $2.5M (or less) 8.6ppg 4.5r 1a
Then I will go to Euro League Free Agents for PG, PF & C, here are the links:
http://www.eurobasket.com/freeag.asp?Posit=1
http://www.eurobasket.com/freeag.asp?Posit=4
http://www.eurobasket.com/freeag.asp?Posit=5
Finally, let us examine the youth from the draft. Exercise my MLE, BAE combine with my regular players and get those low draft picks that could help Kobe, Lamar & Bynum bring home the bacon.
Budget Expense for Players: $75 Million including luxury taxes
Target Revenue: $ 500M
Perhaps, I'm a simplistic scout with limited exposure to players, have I covered all the bases so far? Is there anything to add?
Posted by: Edwin Gueco | May 24, 2007 at 09:40 AM
Lamar Odom for Kirk Hinrich, Viktor Khryapa and the 9th pick
Bynum, Kwame, Cook, & 19th pick for Pau Gasol
use 9th pick on University of Washington center Spencer Hawes
use MLE on Chris Webber
Posted by: Oscar | May 24, 2007 at 09:46 AM
Edwin Gueco, "have I covered all the bases so far? Is there anything to add?"
Professor Gueco, it appears to me like you covered all the bases. I'll
leave it to Tim-4-show and Generic_One & J J to check out the details but it sounds good to me.
Posted by: Mamba24 | May 24, 2007 at 09:54 AM
Being realistic, which I know is hard to do for you fantasy GMs, I really only see Artest being a possible pickup for the Lakers. Sure who wouldn't want KG, Gasol, JO, Kidd, and so on. BUT the Lakers will not give up Bynum unless it is for KG. I really do think the Lakers think they have a shot at KG when he opts out. With that reality, and till he is traded or Minn resigns him, the Lakers hands are tied. They will not mortgage the future ie Bynum, unless it comes with KG. To me, with Artest, the 2,3,4 postitions are locked down with great players. MLE for a guard, yes, one that can keep a player from getting to the paint for a layup drill. Bynum, Turiaf, Mihm at the 5. Then next year its all about KG or blowing up the team. And if this doesn't pan out, I am afraid this team will be in the rebuilding stages for another 10 years. I really don't think the Laker fans can take that, this last year was enough to put me into a mental ward. From no heart, no defense to why does Phil stick with Smush all year let alone 2 years. I am confused on how Phil lost this team, for players to show him up and not play for him, I really can't fathom on what happened to this coach that has 9 World Championships. We all have to admit, this team on a hussle valuation was pathetic. God, I hope they can work out some type of a trade this year but if Artest is the best we can do, this should be done TODAY!. Artest changes the makeup of this team overnight. Toughness and Defense is something this Laker team needs to learn.
bd
Posted by: bd | May 24, 2007 at 09:58 AM
THE REASONS WHY JIM BUSS GOTTA GO FROM THE FRONT OFFICE !!!
Seriously. I think Mitch Kupchack is a just a GM for show. It really seems like Jim Buss is the defacto GM who really has the most power in the front office right now. And the problem with that scenario is that Jim Buss, at least according to my knowledge, was never much into basketball, period. Didn't he spend like a big chunk of his life raising horses? Which, I mean, is all well and good but it ain't the same as developing an NBA team.
Here are some qualities that I believe are absolutely necessary to be an NBA GM (and which Jim Buss does not have even though he may think he can do GM duties for his dad):
1) You gotta know the NBA game inside out. That's why so many former NBA players and coaches so often make the best GMs (think Joe Dumars and Jerry West).
--- Jim Buss obviously does not fall into this group.
2) You have to be somehow involved with the league in any capacity for a significantly long time so that you develop and nurture relationships with other players, coaches, assistant coaches, owners and so on, which always comes in handy when you are trying to make deals as a GM. Think Rod Thorn, the Colangelos and Greg Popovich.
--- Jim Buss, again, does not qualify in this category either.
3) Gotta have a mad passion for the game. Someone who's always around the arena, in practices, involved in scouting, has relationships with the players and so on. Think of someone like Mark Cuban or the Maloof brothers in Sacto.
--- As far as I remember, I haven't seen or heard much of Jim Buss being a huge basketball fan (let alone a Laker fan) in the last twenty years.
Just these points mentioned above makes a clear case for Jim Buss inability to be the main front office decision maker. Dr. Jerry Buss never interfered with the team in this manner (like Jim). He picked the most qualified GM around him (like Jerry West) and usually stayed out of the way. And Buss Sr., being one of the most successful NBA owners in almost the last three decades, is a seriously smart individual who knows the tricks of the trades when it comes to running an NBA franchise. It isn't a coincident that he was so successful. He always made sure that he had great basketball minds (like Jerry West, Pat Riley, Phil Jackson) making the basketball related decisions in the organization.
Now Jim Buss comes into the picture and all of a sudden assumes that he knows more about basketball than Mitch Kupchak (a former NBA player) and Phil Jackson (9 NBA Champion as coach and 2 more as player).
The Lakers front office clearly needs a shake up. Even Mitch Kupchak I feel is not the best person for the job. For an organization as big and popular as the Lakers, with it's rich history and tradition, they really do need a big name guy in the front office, someone like a Jerry West, who people will respect and may actually consider making some deals with.
Anyways, thank you for letting me share my rant for the day. Keep up the great bloggin fellas.
And may the best thing happen for our beloved Lakers.
Showtime07
Posted by: Showtime07 | May 24, 2007 at 09:59 AM
yeah, that's interesting too, who is the mystery PG Phil is looking at? You know it's going to be someone out of left field. Who??? LOL! I've seen Marcus Banks for Vlad Rad rumors but... do we want Banks now? Is he smart enough for our system? Vlad Rad would possibly be a terror in Phoenix, probably Tim Thomas x 2. Who knows?
Anyway, just playing with yesterday's stuff. Let's assume we keep Odom, trade Kwame for Artest and re-sign Walton as 6th man. That means Center and PG need a boost. So either Bynum goes to another level giving us 25-30 solid mins/game and Mihm comes back and plays 15-25 mins/game or we do a combo and sign someone like Magloire (gulp) to back those guys up and give us say... 15 mins/game. Then you could try to trade Vlad Rad and our 1st pick and/or one of our 2nd round picks for the PG, and if the PG is more expensive, you toss in Cook/Sasha, etc. Sadly, I think one of our more valuable trade assets might be Turiaf. He's cheap and a good guy to have around... we might lose him for the PG... sniff...
PG: mystery man/Farmar
SG: Kobe/Mo Evans
SF: Artest/Walton - as 6th man
PF: Odom/Turiaf?
C: Bynum/Mihm/Magloire
well, that's an interesting group... not as exciting as the Gasol mix but we're just having fun here anyway...
Posted by: TaosHum | May 24, 2007 at 10:08 AM
charles thomas (atlanta,ga)
Al who do you think the best player in the NBA is right now?
AL HORFORD
I think the best all-around player right now is probably Kobe Bryant. He's a great defender and a very hard worker and talented offensively.
Posted by: fkillah | May 24, 2007 at 10:28 AM
Oscar,
I like those deals and they actually seem doable. I think Hinrich is considered untouchable by Chicago, but I'm not sure. If not, I would do it.
I think I would go a different route with the #9 pick though. Either a defensive minded #4 or #3. The only reason I say that is because I really liked being able to have someone athletic guard the other team's best perimeter player that isn't Kobe. Mo Evans did pretty well last year, but if you could get someone a little taller that could play the 3 you'd be set.
I don't know about Webber. When did that guy put on 30 pounds? He looks so old and slow these days. Damn.
Posted by: Andrew Z | May 24, 2007 at 10:36 AM
From hoopsworld:
Gasol said he wants to remain a Grizzly. "I do," Gasol said.
Posted by: fkillah | May 24, 2007 at 10:39 AM
Thanks again for the props Mamba24, I'm not qualified to become a professor...just a regular contributor who is sometimes at a loss by the fast changing events with other team while our beloved Lakers remains static. However, there are so many ways to skin the cat, we just have to stay focus and eye for the prize (PJ & Kobe) rather than doing useless PR and finger pointing on K-570.
I have read a lot of posts and lots of good players were mentioned. However, those players are still under contract like KG, JO & J Kidd. There are just so many strings attached in order to get them. We might trade the barn, our Hollywood sign, the Kodak theater and the new America Idol in order to get them. lol!
However, if KG would like to become a Laker and will help us to acquire him, then Bynum & LO might be part of the exchange. For JO & JK or MBibby don't you think disposing two players is just too much for a fair exchange?
Posted by: Edwin Gueco | May 24, 2007 at 10:40 AM
Mamba24,
"I'll leave it to Tim-4-show and Generic_One & J J to check out the details but it sounds good to me."
Aww, shucks.
Edwin,
Good stuff as per usual. Here's a few things that might help with the process.
1) Full list of free agents: http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=2654216
2) We used the BAE on Shammond last season, so we won't be able to utilize it this year.
3) Here's some other free agents that weren't mentioned who could probably be had with the MLE or partial MLE:
PG
Derek Anderson
Keyon Dooling
Jason Hart
SG
Matt Carroll
Bonzi Wells
SF
Ruben Patterson
James Posey
Ime Udoka
PF
Joe Smith
Antonio McDyess
Mikki Moore
Melvin Ely
C
Jamal Magloire
Last thing, what do you mean by the Expense for Players part?
Posted by: generic_one | May 24, 2007 at 11:00 AM
There is one thing I'm sure of. If we give up Lamar for anyone but KG, we aren't going to win a hell of a lot more than we've already done. The key is going to be if there is some way to use Bynum and our pics (along with other also rans) to get a quality player AND still keep Kobe and Lamar.
I think all these scenarios fall into 2 categories:
1. We improve a bit, have a better record but don't really challenge SA, PHX, etc...
2. We improve a great deal and have a chance to beat anyone.
Kobe+Artest / Kobe + Gasol / Kobe + JO all fall into #1
Kobe+Artest+Lamar / Kobe+KG / Kobe+Lamar+Gasol/ Kobe+Lamar+JO all fall into #2
If we're going to make a move, I want it to count. Cross your fingers!!!
Posted by: Lands | May 24, 2007 at 11:01 AM
From Chad Ford's chat today:
Kevin (Thousand Oaks, CA): What do the Lakers do with #19? Any chance to package that pick with Odom and Brown to the Pacers for O'Neal?
Chad Ford: Here's what I would do if I were the Lakers and Pacers ...
Swap Lamar Odom, Andrew Bynum, Kwame Brown, Maurice Evans and the No. 19 for ... Jermaine O'Neal, Marquis Daniels, Jeff Foster and David Harrison.
Daniels can play point in the Lakers triangle offense. O'Neal and Foster give them a bigger front line.
For the Pacers, Odom is a good fit, Bynum has a bright future and with the No. 19 pick the Pacers can look for some more help in their backcourt (Nick Young, Javaris Crittenton, Brandan Rush, etc.)
I think it's a deal that makes sense for both teams.
Crazy stuff.
Posted by: Andrew Z | May 24, 2007 at 11:18 AM
1. The fact that the Celtics lost the Lottery proves that God is a Laker's fan.
2. The fact that most of this draft's good big men will go West means that Kwame has even less stock on this side of the Mississippi.
3. The fact that most of this draft's good big men will go West means that a good negotiator could frame Kwame has more stock on the other side of the Mississippi.
4. We might get a good rookie PG out of this whole thing, and remarkably wind up having Farmar bring along his own replacement. Or, better yet, have the two compete with each other to be the starting PG.
5. KG sees Minnesota as the sinking ship it is and wants to jump on our bandwagon.
--FearlessWhackJob
Posted by: FearlessWhackJob | May 24, 2007 at 11:20 AM
Kiwi
If you really analyze what was said, its all pretty insignifigant. Its just that everyone felt the need to air out some issues publicly. Not normal, and not good.
Like I said before, all of this should've been handled behind closed doors. And as much as we like to hear these things, we should've never known of these minor problems. Each person in order, could've stopped this from going further, but neglected to do just that.
The first sin:
Start with Kobe and Phil. Speaking in a frustrated tone, they got everyone upset, including us. Our trade scenarios, always high on the blog, went off the charts.
The second sin:
Buss speaks up. Buss couldv'e stopped the dominos from falling further, but escalated it. He could've corrected Kobe and Phil behind closed doors and stopped the quips, but felt he had to prove a point.
The third sin:
Jeannie Buss decides to "stand by her man". Like you said, Jeannie should've had an "All in the Family" episode. But brought it to all our attention, further worrying the Laker children(us)
The fourth sin:
Rambis speaks up. Not his problem or quarrel. Big mistake for Rambis. Unlike the others who have good job security, we have an abundance assistant coaches. Rambis has always wanted a coaching job with the Lakers, but if you can talk that way about your boss, he won't be your boss for long. That's why I asked the question earlier, Is Rambis on the way out?
The media eats this stuff up. What should've been an "All in the Family" episode has now become the "Family Feud". Papa Buss will step in and correct the problems that started this, but hurt feelings as you know can run deep and are not quickly forgotten.
This all will blow over, but Rambis may be the one that pays the heavy price for going public.
Fatty
Posted by: Fatty | May 24, 2007 at 11:30 AM
designmao and Tom are right. Oden increases Bynum's stock as well. Everywhere.
Posted by: FearlessWhackJob | May 24, 2007 at 11:33 AM
Sorry........let me be blunt. If the lakers don't come back next season with a legitimate inside force........Kobe will be working his butt off to carry a very weak team just to watch the playoffs at home.
Playoffs ......Houston........IN
Playoffs.......Dallas............IN
Playoffs.......San Antonio..IN
Playoffs.......Utah..............IN
Playoffs.......Pheonix.........IN
Playoffs.......Portland......DEFINITELY IN
Seattle, New Orleans, Clippers are all Defintely LEGITIMATE PLAYOFF POTENTIALS...........Keep waiting for Bynum to develop into this Phantasy All star.........19 or not ........he doesn't have it.
Posted by: Dion | May 24, 2007 at 11:50 AM
Wizo,
If Bynum reaches his "full potential"we just solidified at least 5 rings in our futuer, but thats a big "IF". I agree that Bynum does not have that "killers" mentatlity as of yet. I posted that a while ago myself. I said if he could show the same heart he showed when Shaq dunked on his neck, and he came right back an dunked on him, then had the "jawbreakers" to nail him when with an elbow down court. We truely have something special. Then agian it could be one of the flash in the pants moments like when kwame magically learned how to catch the ball dunk for a game against PHX in the playoffs. Time will only tell.
Also unlike the other HS players mentioned, KB,KG, Amare, Tracy, Howard. and soon to be drafted college players Oden and Durant, all of these guys had been playing since they were 2 minutes old. I beleive I read somewhere that Bynum didn't really get into orginazed Bball until he was 14 yrs old. (AK/BK can correct me if I'm wrong). That's 5 yrs of organized ball 3 in HS, 2 in the NBA that's asking alot of anyone especially a teenager. And as much as people praise Oden and Durant the could easily be a bust or not as impactful as we think they will be( Christian Laettner, Chris Washburn,Michael Olowokandi, Sam Bowie, ....anybody) Its all about potential when they are only 19-21 yrs old.
Posted by: richtown | May 24, 2007 at 11:53 AM
Andrew Z,
if the Lakers were to make that trade they would be out of there mind.
Give up Odom and BYNUM and Brown for Jermaine O'neal and some nice role players???
i dont know about that...
Daniels could play the point in the triangle? please...
wow... I would be highly upset with that trade
Posted by: Korey | May 24, 2007 at 12:02 PM