Extra! Extra! (11.11)
If you've ever watched an interview with the man, then you know Sean Penn can bring a room down. So perhaps his rare courtside presence was to blame for the Lakers seeming out of sorts throughout the entirety of their 97-83 loss to the Detroit Pistons. Or maybe Tayshaun Prince is just a huuuuuuuge "Fast Times at Ridgemont High" fans, which might explain the his need to show off for the actor by leading the beatdown. Eighteen of Prince's 31 points came in the third quarter, often pushing past Kobe Bryant, who's still struggling with the directional changes needed on D. For that matter, Kobe's first three quarters made those monitoring his post-knee surgery progress a touch squeamish. He did, however, muster up some strength for a patented fourth quarter rally, but by that time, the damage had already been done (and running mate Lamar Odom had already been tossed). One look at the box score and it's no surprise thought the evening was "as bad a performance as I think we've had here in some time."
Those with Chris Mihm on their fantasy roster should start rethinking their options. His ankle will require yet another surgery and he's likely to miss between 5-8 months. For those not adept at counting, that would basically be the entire season. To say the least, Mihm is disappointed, but after taking every rehab step to get back on the court, this would be his only remaining option. Like his "brother in center," Kwame Brown's return to the court has seen its share of stalls, although he'll definitely be back at some point.



Did you guys see this about Fisher being president of the Players' Association?
http://www.sltrib.com/ci_4642996?source=rss
E
Posted by: Emma | November 12, 2006 at 12:24 AM
Mike T,
Oh wait a minute, maybe I missed something last week, or was it earlier this week when you entered into a verbal pissing contest with JJ, or someone, regarding who was going to get credit for calling a 60 win season first. Your rather tenacious arguments and verbal assault sure made it sound like you wanted the credit because you truly believed the Lakers were on their way to 60.
Today it seems as if you're a little wishy-washy on the prediction you just fought so hard to validate. Now you're making excuses about injured players being the reason you will be wrong about the number of wins the Lakers get this year, and I understand that to a degree, but when you include Phil Jackson's hip surgery as a reason, and Aaron McKie and Shammond Williams, you're bordering on ridiculous excuses. You are the one who always says Phil needs to be fired. In your world, why would his surgery hurt the Lakers?
You made a statement, "That may be true if we were in Vegas but we're just doing this for fun and nothing more.", I agree with that, but I'm left wondering why you take it so personally when someone disagrees with you, or says you are wrong about anything. If it's just for fun, why is it so hard for you to admit you are wrong?
Posted by: Laker Larry | November 12, 2006 at 12:35 AM
what do you guys think about this lineup?
PG- Lamar-Farmar-Smush
SG- Kobe-Evans
SF- Vlad-Walton
PF- Turiaf-Cook
C - Bynum-Kwame
PG: Lamar is a better decision maker than Smush and since Farmar is a rookie so Lamr is good. Smush is a disappointment
SG: Nothing bad to say about Kobe except that he needs to know how to balance passing and scoring.
Sf: We promised Vlad that he'd start and we have to get him open shots. Walton needs to come off the bench to give balance.
Pf: Ronny Turiaf is a good defender and he can hit a basket in the 15 foot range. as for Cook we probably wont get good defense but we can still score with him.
C: Kwame is in my mind one of the best defending centers out there, if he was healthy we wouldn't have lost against detroit nor Portland. Bynum should start against teams that are weak in the middle.
Posted by: DollarBill | November 12, 2006 at 12:38 AM
you guys need to hear this::
http://espnrad.vo.llnwd.net/o10/espnradio/insider/herd/herd_11102006_9.mp3
Posted by: DollarBill | November 12, 2006 at 12:51 AM
Lamar and Bynum for KG? You all think Timberwolves will make such stupid trade? Try Jermaine O`neal =)
No comment for Odom and Bynum. Try bring Nick Van Exel to Lakers, maybe can replace those PG that Lakers currently have.
Luke Walton, he improve alot, but still, Radmanovic is better than him.
Posted by: Sync | November 12, 2006 at 01:00 AM
SERGIO FROM ITALY
STILL THINKIN 'BOUT KG
SAY WITH ME
KEVIN...KEVIN...KEVIN...KEVIN...KEVIN...KEVIN...
KEVIN...KEVIN...KEVIN...KEVIN...KEVIN...KEVIN...
KEVIN...KEVIN...KEVIN...KEVIN...KEVIN...KEVIN...
KEVIN...KEVIN...KEVIN...KEVIN...KEVIN...KEVIN...
KEVIN...KEVIN...KEVIN...KEVIN...KEVIN...KEVIN...
Posted by: sergio | November 12, 2006 at 02:42 AM
The one thing that most disappointed me about Friday's game against Detroit was the lack of defensive effort. Not once did I see a hard foul while the Pistons were waltzing to the basket. The Lakers also gave up way too many offensive rebounds (15)and were outrebounded overall by 17 (49 to 32). To me that speaks to a lack of effort that has to be remedied. Too many times the Lakers did not finish off a defensive possession with a rebound, instead allowing the likes of McDeyss and Nazr Mohammed to finish the plays with spectacular offensive rebounds. Simple fundamentals like boxing out cannot be ignored.
Also, after watching the team for the opening stretch of the season, certain inconsistencies begin to concern me. Am I the only one that thinks Lamar Odom is playing out of position at PF? Against the likes of KG, Zach Randolph and Rasheed Wallace, LO just seems overmatched. LO enjoys the mismatch against most players that he faces as a small forward. While he may have an advantage in quickness at PF against players, it only works to his benefit on offense. On defense he can't handle the heavy lifting.
Luke Walton's defense on the better small forwards is also a concern. TPrince just ran roughshod over Luke. I also have a problem in any game that Luke has more FGA than Kobe and the Lakers lose. I hope that the Lakers don't lose sight of the fact that #24 is the MAN on this team and not just some complimentary piece. I'm not knocking Luke's offense which has obviously greatly improved this season. But he and the other Lakers have to play with the idea that Kobe is their best option on offense and fit their games around him.
Which brings me to Mr. Bryant. I really hope that he and Phil are trying to enhance the players confidence and accelerate their growth by toning down Kobe's dominance of the ball and shot attempts. While I understand that this is a necessary step in the maturation process of a young team, what Kobe does best is score. He has got to find the proper balance on the court. Kobe is a 2 guard, plain and simple. His main job is to score points on offense. He is the only two who gets abused by the media when he does his job. Other prolific scorers like Ray Allen, Michael Redd and Reggie Miller who never met a shot that they didn't like are never regarded as ballhogs. I hope Kobe doesn't buy into the media BS about his game and try to change too much. For this team to be successful, he has to be the scoring leader. I realize that he is not 100% but he needs to be more aggressive with his offensive game. The team looks confused when he is not.
Posted by: bronxlakerfan | November 12, 2006 at 05:36 AM
Tonight's game looms large for the Lake Show. It's deinitely winnable against a Griz team without Gasol. The team needs to avoid falling back to .500. Also with the following game coming against the Raptors next Friday, you don't want a young team dwelling on a loss for almost a week. Better to build on a win and get in a good hard week of practice. Hopefully, Kwame and Kobe can use this time to gain their strength and become more acclimated with the team.
Posted by: bronxlakerfan | November 12, 2006 at 05:54 AM
Ti Zeb,
No, you have a short memory on SASHA! Go ahead and take a 3-game playoff sample (he only played good 3 out of 7 games) and ignore the other 82 games where he absolutely sucked while averaging 18 mins. a game.
Yea, go ahead, put THAT guy in... The guy that cant average more than 4 pts in 18 mins a game...
Yo, Sasha is not good. He already has been passed up by 2 guys on the depth chart when he has been with the Lakers organization longer.
Posted by: Korey | November 12, 2006 at 08:23 AM
exhelodrvr,
Actually, exhelodrvr, you've got me confused with someone else. I made my prediction on May 6, 2006. On the day the Lakers lost to the Suns in the playoffs to get knocked out of the playoffs.
Not once did I join in on that 55 win bandwagon conversation. How do I know this? Because I'm not a bandwagon type of guy and I thought it was silly.
I finally said something about it when one of the bloggers said something to me about being a part of a group who didn't believe in the Lakers potential. I think it was JJ. Then we got into this big debate about what 60 wins means. Until then...I had no part of the conversations concerning 55 wins. And as you can see I'm not on that 55 win bandwagon list. There's a reason for that. Because I never joined in the conversations.
But anyway, my 60 win prediction is based on a healthy Kobe Bryant and Kwame Brown. I preached Kwame Brown since last year and all summer. What? Do actually think I projected Andrew Bynum as my starting center? In my scheme of things, Andrew Bynum was my back-up center. I had advocated a trade of Chris Mihm. That's how sure I was of Andrew Bynum. But never as my starter. Not for this season. As for Kobe. It was reported that he would be ready to go by opening day. He wasn't! So how could it have been "discussed" if we were under the impression that he was going to be ready by opening day? I thought he would be ready by opening day. But he wasn't and still isn't. Granted, I didn't read 99% of those 55 win bandwagon posts and all the debates that went with them, so I might have missed it. If so...forgive me.
But I do remember one of the reports, I think it was John Ireland, talking about the Lakers getting 45 wins in his prediction for last year. But he said that he would take a win off for every game Kobe that was out. Why would he do that? Because it's obvious that you can't count on wins without Kobe being all the way healthy. It's common sense.
But I think it's pretty foolish on my part to even explain this to you, but I did it anyway because you put me in a conversation that I never had with you.
mike
Posted by: Michael Teniente | November 12, 2006 at 08:25 AM
*** FINALLY, SOME ANSWERS ON SMUSH ***
Sunday's LATIMES ARTICLES SAYS TWO THINGS:
(1) Nobody is pulling the plug on Smush just yet. Phil said so (quoted). Why? well, he proved last year over a sustained period of time that he could be a productive player. So when he has 8 bad games that doesnt take away from 82 where he proved to be a serviceable PG. Maybe it's a reason why Coaches are coaches and fans are fans...hmmmm
(2) SMUSH IS JUST RUSTY! He didnt get to play ball as much as he would like this summer. The LATIMES said so as well. Now, I do blame him for just plain not finding competiton whether it be summer league or wherever. But, given that he is just getting his game in rhythm, then I have to give Smush an additional pass.
At first I said 10 games. Now, I say 20 games. That will let us know if Smush is truly "Rusty" or if he just reverting back to pre-NBA form. From what it seems, he is just rusty, making hesistant decisions and either swishing or missing badly. If you are a basketball player then you know the feeling.
WHEW, I FEEL MUCH BETTER about my dawg Smush. aND THE ONE thing this year is that he hasnt been afraid of the big moment...
Still, Let's go Farmar...and LETS GO SMUSH.
Posted by: Korey | November 12, 2006 at 08:28 AM
exhelodrvr,
I reread your post. You've got to be crazy if you think I said we would win a championship with Kobe being hurt. Or Kwame Brown. I do recall not really getting into conversations with you because all you do is look at things with a negative outlook. I really don't remember discussing anything with you. Because the simple truth is this. Like, you don't like me...I simply don't like you. I usually make it a point to not engage with you. So I know I didn't have those discussions with you because of that.
mike
Posted by: Michael Teniente | November 12, 2006 at 08:33 AM
Can you believe it? In college football, the number 3, 4, and 5 teams lost. Number 6 escaped with a 1 point win because they blocked a last second field goal, while USC won it's game pretty soundly. With USC's schedule, all they have to do is win out and they should be playing for the Championship, again.
mike
Posted by: Michael Teniente | November 12, 2006 at 08:49 AM
Let's deal with the present by discussing the game tonight. I think the Lakers SHOULD WIN against a team that's 1 - 4 without Paul Gasol. Here are their consistent scorers: Miller, Atkins, Warrick, Gay, Swift and Jones. The Lakers are more or less familiar with these players except for Gay who is a rookie. He may be standout in NCAA but I believe we can handle this new kid in the block. All we need is a leadership from Odom and use Kobe as decoy in the middle to attract guards, I wish Vlad and Walton as well Odom will deliver as 2nd options and Bynum should assert his superiority in the post against Stromile Swift or Tsakalides. Last season, Miller unintentionally bloodied Kobe's eyebrow that cost Kobe two game suspension for his perceived retaliation in the ensuing play. The known shooters in the Memphis lineup are: Jones, Miller and Atkins, our guards should shadow these guys and Lakers would surely win this game. I take Lakers by 10.
Posted by: Edwin Gueco | November 12, 2006 at 08:56 AM
rdlee,
In Vegas, the line changes when injuries materialize for a team, or a trade, or a rookie plays above himself. Why are Vegas odds makers allowed to modify their predictions based on circumstance, but you don't allow Bloggers the same curtesy? That's hypocrasy.
--FearlessWhackJob
Posted by: FearlessWhackJob | November 12, 2006 at 09:10 AM
Luke Walton is doing fine. These are growing pains. The Lakers have no chance to become winners if they have guys who won't step up play aggressively and shoot the ball and go to the hoop. Remeber game 7? Kobe needs help.
Luke until now has been too unselfish, too uncertain. Now he is stepping up his offensive aggresiveness. He is still finding his way, and he is making mistakes, but he is a smart ballplayer.
Luke is finding his way as a real NBA player. Hopefully ir rubs off on Lamar.
Posted by: Tom Daniels | November 12, 2006 at 09:29 AM
Laker Larry,
O yeah, you did miss something. That coversation was based on JJ accusing me of being part of a group of people who didn't believe in the Lakers. I pointed out my May 6 posting to say otherwise. Then it got into a conversation of what 60 wins means.
But, again, my prediction is based on Kobe and Kwame being healthy. As anyone one who reads this blog knows...that is what my prediction is based on. At the time of the conversation Kwame was expected to be out until at least the Detroit game. I thought because of the soft schedule we might be able to get away with coming out ahead. We still might! But, realistically, without Kobe being all the way healthy and Kwame Brown in the starting line-up...60 wins isn't my prediction. Again, I preached Kwame all summer long. Do you think I did that just to see Bynum in the middle? I also preached that we should cut Smush Parker. But I thought we could hide his shortcomings with Kwame's defense. Without Kwame...Smush Parker's game is magnified. Did I figure all that and still say 60 wins? Get real! My preaching is and has always been that DEFENSE is the key. And the key to our defense is Kwame Brown. So don't tell me I said something when I know what my thinking is.
But just to help you understand. Here a something for you.
http://lakersblog.latimes.com/lakersblog/2006/09/talking_with_an_1.html#comments
Under: Talking with: Andrew Bynum
"Last season the Lakers were young. They didn’t get a glimpse of their potential until 2/3 of the season was gone. They came together at the end and gave the Suns a push that should have equated to a trip to the next round of the playoffs, minimum. With basically the same personal, and the addition of Vlad Rad, Williams, Evans, and Farmar, the Lakers, it seems logical, can take it to another level. If Odom and Vlad Rad can take some of the scoring pressure off of Bryant, and the defense improves from the building blocks it created at the end of last season…well, if that happens, I think we’re going to see just how good Kobe Bryant really is. Unless there’s a complete breakdown, I suspect that is exactly what we’re going to see.
Andrew Bynum is gravy. If Bynum comes along earlier rather than later…just smile and watch our 2006-2007 Los Angeles Lakers enrich our already glorious traditions.
May God Bless the Los Angeles Lakers with a clarity of mind in which they envision that they must play as a unit. May God Bless them with an injury free season.
mike
Posted by: Michael Teniente | September 22, 2006 at 09:53 PM"
You see that part that says: May God Bless them with an injury free season.?
That means I'm counting on a injury free season to see my predictions through.
I rest my case!
mike
Posted by: Michael Teniente | November 12, 2006 at 09:43 AM
Just for the record:
I'm not saying that Luke Walton is doing anything wrong. He's playing pretty good. What I'm saying is that he needs to take his game to the bench. It's our 2nd unit that needs Walton more than our 1st unit.
That's a big difference from saying Walton is doing terrible than saying he's doing pretty good and should use his talents on the bench.
mike
Posted by: Michael Teniente | November 12, 2006 at 09:45 AM
I think what Tracy McGrady said recently should be taken seriously. GMs are looking at redfining player longevity vis'a vis the high school NBAer vs college recruits of old. Our aging high schooler's dominating performance has been considered a given in most predictions.
Kobe is 28 goin' on 32. He's not number 8 anymore. He has the heart and mind of a champion but his body may not be on the same timetable as all those on the blog that are talkin' years of Laker dynasty with developing players. The fact that Jordan won his first championship at 28 is a formula doesn't apply here. If there's a trade [I'm not sayin' who] to gain proven experience and production, the time is now.
Posted by: Vman | November 12, 2006 at 09:51 AM
Laker Larry,
I don't take it personal unless you get all smarta*s with me. That's something you seem to ignore in your posts. It's like you don't acknowledge your anger, which leads to smarta*s responses. Then you say why do I take it personal when people disagree with me? It's not your disagreement I disapprove of. It's your smarta*s attitude.
mike
Posted by: Michael Teniente | November 12, 2006 at 09:53 AM
And as for PJ injury...I was just stating a fact. Whether I believe it means anything...doesn't take away from the idea that PJ's injury/health is a fact.
You seem so concerned with the idea of getting me to cross my words, that you ignore things where common sense should be used. And here I am explaining it. Again, foolish on my part.
mike
Posted by: Michael Teniente | November 12, 2006 at 09:58 AM
You folks are crazy for trying to blame MikeT for the current Laker woes, when it is Faith who is clearly responsible. Faith promised strong defense this year ever since last June, but has she delivered? So far, all she has given us is "Smush-defense".
All the predictions about 55/60 wins might still come true, but if they don't it doesn't matter because they were made in a spirit of "rah-rah, Lakers!" rather than as a result of any kind of analytical study. Knowing this, nobody on the bandwagon was actually willing to risk anything (like money) based on their own predictions. Predictions like that are intended solely to show support for the team, not to be taken seriously.
Of course, if the predictions turn out to be correct the bandwagoners will get in return exactly what they were willing to risk to make their predictions in the first place -- nothing.
Posted by: Guity | November 12, 2006 at 09:59 AM
One thing to keep in mind about Bynum is that right now he has to rely mostly on what he's told and trained to do and very little on his own experience. What this means is that in real game-time, anything that takes place that deviates even slightly from his day-to-day training can potentially throw him for a loop.
That would probably include the zone defense the Pistons employed on Friday night. Each new thing like that is going to require some time and training for Bynum to adjust to. But everybody is beginng to agree that the time and training are eventually going to be well worth the trouble...
Posted by: Guity | November 12, 2006 at 10:05 AM
We're 4 and 3 and we have almost half of the team injured or recovering with the other half mostly rookies or no more than 3 years average in the league and we are above .500 - that is an accomplishment. They will get better and no cause for panic (although I also think Smush is over rated).
We should look see how they're doing after their 20th game then at the all-star break. This team will gel and learn from Phil (not me). And we'll kick arse come playoff time. Go Lakers!
Posted by: Laker Phil | November 12, 2006 at 10:31 AM
Laker Larry and the rest:
Does this sound like I planned on injuries? From this post I even said Walton was a concern. Note how I said that Smush Parker was the biggest liability of them all.
LAKERVILLE 2006-2007
By: Michael C. Teniente
With the basketball season just around the corner (Lakers camp opens Oct, 3), I guess it’s time to give my analysis of what I expect from the Los Angeles Lakers in this coming season. My expectation is, of course, an NBA World Champion. The beginning of the season always starts out with high hopes, especially if you’re a fan of the Los Angeles Lakers. That isn’t an expectation this is based in unrealistic wishful thinking. Why? Because our beloved Los Angeles Lakers have won 8 NBA Championships since 1980, that’s why.
We have grown accustom to our high expectations. We’ve been blessed to be able to watch some of greatest players to have ever put on an NBA uniform.
George Mikan
Elgin Baylor
Jerry West
Wilt Chamberlain
Gail Goodrich
Kareem Abdul-Jabbar
Magic Johnson
James Worthy
Jamal Wilks
Bobby MacAdoo and
Shaquille O’Neil.
Yes, you’ve got to admit it, we’re spoiled NBA fans. We have high expectations. Not being in contention for a basketball championship is not imaginable here in this great city of Los Angeles. Sure there are transition periods when one set of players are replaced by another set of players.
“All the rivers run into the sea; yet the sea is not full; unto the place from whence the rivers come, thither they return again.”
The rivers represent the great players who have passed through the Lakers organization, the sea. It’s a continual cycle…they keep coming. The place where the rivers come from is the rich tradition that has been marked with championship glory. Thither they return again.
The Lakers are now in the hands of one, Kobe Bean Bryant. Talk about expectations! We may be watching, potentially, the greatest player the NBA has ever seen. That is not an unreasonable statement. Who else can say, I scored 81 points in an NBA game? Only Wilt Chamberlain, of course. The only question, right now, is: How good is Kobe Bryant? Well, lets take a closer look.
I knew Kobe was special from the time the Lakers traded Vlade Divac for him. It was just a matter of time before we really got to see this guy in his true glory. That time was delayed because he was overshadowed by the presence of Shaquille O’Neil. Not his fault, but, really, O’Neil was holding Bryant back.
The Lakers of 2005-2006 told us a great deal about how special/good Bryant really is. For most of the season the Lakers were struggling to stay 2 maybe 3 games above 500. To the naked eye that was not a good thing. But when you take a closer look, it really is amazing to be able to comprehend just how good Kobe is. Let me put it this way, Smush Parker, Brain Cook, and Chris Mihm. That is 3 defensive liabilities in the starting line-up that took the court for big portions of the season. It was Kobe Bryant that kept us just above a 500 ballclub with them in the line-up. Eventually Mihm went down and Kwame Brown was inserted into the starting line-up at the 5 spot. The middle of the defensive lane was stabilized. Soon afterwards, Luke Walton replaced Brian Cook, in the starting line-up, and there was improvement there, too. Walton took over the 3 spot, while Lamar Odom moved to the 4 spot.
Let’s start with Kwame Brown. Kwame Brown was nowhere near a fundamentally sound defensive ballplayer last season. Kwame Brown just took up space with his size and muscle, which made teams not attack the middle at free will. Sure he would miss rotations. That was on occasion as opposed to allowing a constant free lane to the basket. There is a lot of room for improvement on the defensive end for Kwame Brown.
Moving on, lets talk about Luke Walton. If the truth is told, he’s not much of a defender, either. But compared to Brain Cook it was night and day. Brain Cook just can’t play any defense. While he was a starter, his man, it seemed, was always scoring big points. Players without scoring reputations were coming up big against the Lakers at the 4 spot with Brian Cook in there. Still, when Mihm went down, the Lakers were able to turn Bryant’s points into wins while Cook was still in the line-up at the 4 spot. But we were still struggling against the Blazers, Celtics, Sonics, and other non-contending teams. That seemed to change when Walton was inserted into the starting line-up. That’s how good Kobe Bryant is! He kept the Lakers just above 500 with 3 defensive liabilities. With JUST A LITTLE defensive help (Brown and Walton) we started beating team towards the end of the season on a regular bases. And that was with Smush Parker, the biggest liability of the 3, still in the starting line-up. We all saw what happened against Phoenix in the playoffs. No need to rehash unpleasant memories.
This coming season, it seems, that Kwame Brown is going to be manning the middle. If we see an improved Kwame Brown on the defensive end of the game, that could be scary! That could spell great things for the Los Angeles Lakers in the coming season. And we’re only talking about Kwame’s defense!
There’s no way we could go through a whole season with Luke Walton being the starting small forward. He is barely above Brain Cook in defense. The difference between Walton and Cook is that Walton plays with his head while Cook seems to concentrate on his shooting. Concerning Walton it’s a good thing that he plays with his head but it won’t get the job done against the better small forwards in the league. We’ll have to wait to see what Vlad Rad brings on the defensive end of the game. There’s no way we can expect Vlad Rad to outscore the other teams small forward and think we’ll be successful. What I mean by that is that we can’t rely on Vlad Rad to do that for us. That’s not realistic unless he becomes another Peja Stojakovic. That’s not out of the question. If that were to happen then…watch out! If he doesn’t become another Peja Stojakovic then there has to be a question concerning his defense and, of course, we just need a stable scorer from the 3 spot in Vlad Rad. What we need to keep track of is Vlad Rad impact against the better teams to see how effective the Lakers will be. We need to keep track of that as the season goes along.
Kobe Bryant, with a little help from the defensive end, will take the Lakers a very long way. The end of last season was “a little defense,” literally! If the Lakers take it up a notch and communicate from game 1 to the end of the season, there is no reason, whatsoever, why the Lakers couldn’t bring Los Angeles another Championship to it’s rich history.
With Shammond Williams and Mo Evans I think the Lakers have improved both the point guard and the back-up shooting guard. If Sasha Vujacic can bring a consistent outside shoot it only makes us a more flexible team. That, I understand, is a lot of hoping. The expectation is that Vujacic, entering his 3rd season, will find his shot and be effective. What I’m really talking about is emotional stability from Vujacic. It’s no secret he can shoot, but does he have the emotions/mind to bring it on a consistent base. I think that is a reasonable expectation because as we get older we mature. It’s the natural order of life. But the Lakers did well to protect against that not happening by bring in Williams and Evans. Those are excellent checks and balances for the coming season.
As for the big men, it all starts with Lamar Odom. All Lamar Odom has to do is continue from where the regular season ended. That was Lamar being aggressive. Lamar Odom must be the 2nd scoring option without hesitation.
In the regular season there is room to experiment. Smush Parker and Chris Mihm, in my opinion, are experiments. In other words: Sure, if Phil Jackson must, go ahead and play them in the regular rotations, but as the season progresses they must be played only limited amounts of minutes if their defense is not up to par. Rony Turiaf must be given the chance to see if he can deliver what Mihm doesn’t on the defensive end. Jordan Farmar must be given the opportunity to see if he can contribute to the Lakers offense, in terms of creating a more fasted pace brand of basketball, if Parker continues to see himself as a street-baller. There is no room for a street-baller in this coming Lakers season. We need professional basketball players.
Last season the Lakers were young. They didn’t get a glimpse of their potential until 2/3 of the season was gone. They came together at the end and gave the Suns a push that should have equated to a trip to the next round of the playoffs, minimum. With basically the same personal, and the addition of Vlad Rad, Williams, Evans, and Farmar, the Lakers, it seems logical, can take it to another level. If Odom and Vlad Rad can take some of the scoring pressure off of Bryant, and the defense improves from the building blocks it created at the end of last season…well, if that happens, I think we’re going to see just how good Kobe Bryant really is. Unless there’s a complete breakdown, I suspect that is exactly what we’re going to see.
Andrew Bynum is gravy. If Bynum comes along earlier rather than later…just smile and watch our 2006-2007 Los Angeles Lakers enrich our already glorious traditions.
May God Bless the Los Angeles Lakers with a clarity of mind in which they envision that they must play as a unit. May God Bless them with an injury free season.
mike
Posted by: Michael Teniente | September 22, 2006 at 09:53 PM
Posted by: Michael Teniente | November 12, 2006 at 10:33 AM
Alot of people here are down on Smush. Smush didn't let Zack Randolph dominate and score 30+. Smush didn't let Tayshaun Prince scorch the Lakers for 30+. Smush can definetly improve his on the ball d; and yes, there are better pg's out there, but not for the $$$ the Lakers are willing to pay. Smush is a decent pg who doesn't make many turnovers. He can give you some basic scoring and he seems to know the triangle.
Remember, D Fish wasn't exactly a D-stopper or high calibur scorer when the Lakers had their run of 3 straight NBA Championships. Frankly, I think we can win a championship with a slightly more confident Smush as a starter. I even think we can win with Sasha in there. The PG is not the crucial position we seem to think it is on this Laker team.
A guard on the paremeter in today's league is going to get beat most of time. If anyone on the blog ever played or coached competive b-ball, you would know that.
Any decent guard, when attacking with his defender's back to the basket, has a distinct advantage over his defender and will more often than not beat him. It's all about attack dynamics, physics, and screens. This is basketball 101; which is why you need to play TEAM DEFENSE, something the Lakers are lacking at.
I blame the Lakers lack of recent success on a lack of identity, a lack of team D, Kobe turnovers, Kobe's lack of EFFECTIVE AND TIMELY scoring, Lamar's lack of consistency, a subpar game or 2 by Walton, and a young center in Bynum.
I think this team will be okay once Dr. Phil finally commits to a 7 or 8 man rotation, and when Kobe finally starts playing correctly.
Lastly, I'm going on the record right now as saying that Vlad R. will be a Lakers bust this season.
Posted by: Troy | November 12, 2006 at 10:33 AM
Lamar has to score 20 points a game to get Lakers to the next level, Kobe should only scores 25 points a game, and learn to pass the ball to his teammates like LeBron James. If Phil doesn't play Luke and Lamar correctly, Lakers will get out of the first round of the playoff soon. Right now the Lakers can't beat the good defensive team, because Lakers continue to play last't year style, wrong player to play wrong position. Ramanovich will make Lakers stronger if coach know how to use his strenght. Does Tony Kukoc a good defender ? or Robert Horry a good defender before he was a Laker ? but these players make their team better. Without Jordan, Kukoc and Pippen still took the Bulls to Eastern conference finals. I also like Lakers play Shammon Williams more, he can assist, shoot from outside,he is a veterant player, he will help Lakers in the playoffs, i am dissapointed with Smush, he still doesn't get how to play in the NBA. This year Lakers coach has no excuse to blame young players any more, coach has a full season to get Lakers player to the next level
Posted by: bluesky | November 12, 2006 at 11:22 AM
LOL Guity, Yes I should take the blame. This is a team that I've preached effort over and over again...and they aren't showing it. But I also know regardless of the schedule...PJ teams usually jell by the latter part of the season. And that is really when I'm looking to grill their defensive intensity.
I've also stressed the need for defensive players...and it seems to me that the trading deadline is still some far off...maybe it's time to consider lol.
Nevertheless, outside of some obvious internal holes (something I've stressed why we got Kwame for)...I like what I see with Bynum's shot blocking...and Farmar's intensity. However like last year, I wish "some" of our players would improve defensively...lol.
Posted by: Faith | November 12, 2006 at 12:19 PM
Mike T,
Is that "smarta*s" thing your response to another one of those posts you took personal?
Or how about your response to exhelodrvr today; "Because the simple truth is this. Like, you don't like me...I simply don't like you. I usually make it a point to not engage with you."
Why do you feel the need to always come back at people with something personal? And you, of all people, to accuse someone else of being a "smarta*s". Please ......
You're right Mike, I do occasionally make a comment that is intended to be "smarta*s", as you put it, but most of the time I simply want to talk Lakers. When I do make a smarta*s statement pointed at you, it's because of you. You seem to bring that out in people as that is not my nature.
You see Mike, just like you, almost everyone posting on this site also love the Lakers. With me it's not JUST the Lakers, I love the NBA. I've been watching NBA hoops since the late 1950's, which will give you an idea of my age. I've seen teams, players, coaches, officials, rules, etc, etc, come and go, and I've discussed basketball strategy with far more people than I even care to remember. It is easy to see that you are a passionate Laker fan, knowledgeable about basketball and a very good writer. However, your team strategy and ideas are not "always" the best ideas, and certainly not the "only" ideas. We consider these Lakers to be our team, our players, and yes, even our coaches. It gets really old when you continually run PJ, Smush and Chris Mihm down. What’s the point? Most of the time when someone engages you with a post, it is done in an honest attempt to engage in friendly debate about an issue that you yourself have usually put on the board. At that time you have several choices. You can ignore the post, or respond in a civil manner and engage in debate, or you can make some silly personal attack type remark. Unfortunately you seem to use the latter choice a lot.
Mike, just look at this morning. How many posts have you made today attacking me and exhelodrvr? It's completely silly on your part that you feel the need to react in this manner.
I'll go ahead and apologize for this post in advance because I seriously doubt you will understand it the way it was intended. Instead I’m pretty sure you’ll be fuming and consider this as a personal attack against you.
Posted by: Laker Larry | November 12, 2006 at 12:25 PM
Shady your crazy,
Its not always about the money. What I am saying is Smush Parker is the starting point guard in the NBA for the LA Lakers of all teams, the guy can at least play with some heart no matter if his shot is falling or not.
And YES I honestly believe Sasha would be a lot better at the starting PG position just due to the fact he is a pesky defender and can make an open shot. The triangle offense doesnt require a real true PG but it does need someone who can stick open shots because Kobe and Lamar demand so much attention. But on that note lets all be patient like Mike T. and Faith have been saying. obviously kobe knee is the main concern and Kwame coming back healthy. When healthy I think we should start getting Vlad more minutes with the starters or regulars because he will have a better impact on the game that why. I mean the guy can post up but will be better spotting up when Kobe and Lamar are doubled teamed.
We just gotta take our lumps now while Phil figures out the rotation and while we try to get healthy
Posted by: Paul Lee | November 12, 2006 at 12:36 PM
FearlessWhackJob:
I can allow the bloggers to change their predictions due to injuries. I just haven't heard anyone doing it. Has anyone asked to be taken off the 55 win bandwagon? I just made that comment because there seemed to be such a desire to be able to say, "I was the first one to predict 60 wins, etc." If you want to be able to make a claim for being the first one to make a prediction when its right, also have the humility to say , "I was wrong" when it doesn't happen, instead of coming up with excuses. Injuries are part of the game.
Posted by: rdlee | November 12, 2006 at 02:56 PM
No, Mike T, what you did last summer did was to ignore Kobe's knee surgery, Mihm's slow recovery, as well as the typical injuries that occur during a season, which did not happen to the Lakers last year. A number of the rest of us made those points when we made our predictions. And now when those factors are affecting the team, you act surprised. Sorry, not buying it.
Crap!! I didn't realize the Lakers would miss any shots this season. Is it too late to change my prediction?
Posted by: exhelodrvr | November 12, 2006 at 03:05 PM
rdlee,
Injuries are a part of the game. That is true. But, the fact remains that the healthiest of the top teams is usually the one who wins the championship, all other things being equal.
Injuries are a part of the game, but they do affect your win/loss ration and your title hopes. Ridiculing a 55-win-bandwagoner at this point of the season after the full effects of all the injuries has finally been realized.
That's like beating the horse after its down. The truth is, even with the injuries, if the Lakers still win 47-ish+ games, it will still indicate that 55 was always a realistic possibility.
Mihm, I feel for you, buddy. You are a good guy,a dn not deserving of this fate. Get well soon.
Kwame, learn from Kobe and take it slow on your comeback. We need you healthy at the end of the year, not so much in the begining.
Kobe, chill, you'll be alright. PJ doesn't hate just pre-season games, but he hardly respects the regular season. This team will be ready come playoff time, as PJ's teams always are.
--FearlessWhackJob
Posted by: FearlessWhackJob | November 12, 2006 at 03:37 PM
KOBE's CURE for his problem:
1. He should just QUIT B-ball and accept the FACT that he won't get another RING without SHAQ.
2. USE his influence to TRADE Lamar ODOM (Former HEAT star player) for Marbury (His EQUAL talent).
3. Go back to Denver (for Surgery... NOT!) to find another Hotel attendant (he1 he! he!).
4. Or... BEG SHAQ TO COME BACK!!! Wahhhh!
Posted by: tarugo | November 12, 2006 at 04:51 PM
Live blog tonight?
Posted by: sonnybelfast | November 12, 2006 at 05:23 PM
***LAKER LARRY FOR PRESIDENT!!!***
Very nice arguments. I understood and appreciated everything you laid forth. However, there is no humility for some. I accept your points, even if unrelated to basketball...I will always read them from here on out. I've skipped quite a few of the other 'writers.'
"He who talks the most...is still talking..."
Posted by: Maleke | November 12, 2006 at 07:42 PM
ex, that's really funny. Damn, I had thought they might miss one or two shots, but not this many...
Posted by: Michael A | November 13, 2006 at 07:56 AM
Oh, for the record? People need to back away from the kool-aid. This team isn't as bad as they looked the other night, and they're not as good as they looked the first couple of games. They're a work in progress.
Kind of like Farmer, who really can't get much playing time unless he can hit a shot or two. With the way we play, the pg has to be able to shoot. Sorry to all those showing Farmer man-love, but that's the way it is. He'll be good, but he needs time. He ain't Magic.
Posted by: Michael A | November 13, 2006 at 07:58 AM