He's No Kazaam
I like Luke Walton. Very nice guy. Improved a lot in the second half of last season. High hoops IQ. And absolutely zero threat whatsoever to the throne of Jack, Denzel, Leo and the rest of Hollywood that shows up regularly to watch him play. You could make a serious argument he wasn't very convincing playing himself. Of course, you could also make a serious argument he may just have been phoning this puppy in. But either way, as long as he had fun.
And on the positive side, at least we know Luke hasn't forgone off-season workouts in favor of intensive theatrical training. He should be in excellent shape come October.
By the way, did anybody happen to catch the entire episode? Was there even a shred of context established or does Luke Walton just happen to show up while pretty boy is shooting hoops by himself? Kind of reminds me of when celebrities pop by Springfield on "The Simpsons."
(Thanks to "Eric" for the link. BK and I had planned on reviewing his performance in live blog format, but forgot the date. As it turns out, with the 1 minute, 37 seconds running time, we simply spared everyone the most anti-climactic real time gathering ever).
AK



""Can you imagine Kobe, Lamar, Kwame, Miles, and Bynum for the next 4 years?"
That would definitely be something. Top to bottom, that is a line-up to be reckoned with. Add Farmar, Radmanovic, Sasha, and Turiaf and I smell championships."
You mean starting this year? So you have Bynum playing center, which he can't do yet. You have Kwame playing PF, which he can't do. You have Miles playing shooting guard? That's not his game, either. Who defends the small guards? How about the PFs who can shoot from outside?
I smell something with that lineup, but it sure isn't championships.
Posted by: exhelodrvr | September 04, 2006 at 12:36 PM
Fearless:
I am one of the elders on the blog but I still have a really quick Jerry West style jump shot but not much else at my age. After a pair of Achilles tendon injuries, my vertical is now 12 inches. How about you, Fearless. How old and do you play?
I am not sure of whether Chick coined the "frozen rope" description due to West but he might have. Sometimes Jerry's shot was so quick and through the net so fast that you actually missed it if you were reaching for your beer.
The real difference between West and today's players, including Kobe, is that West was old school, meaning “why make anything harder than it has to be.” He had great hops but preferred to use his quickness to beat guys. He had great size at 6-5 but preferred to outthink his opponents. While he obviously understands the flash and dash of this generation's players, Jerry preferred to just destroy his opponents on the scoreboard and in the box score rather than with humiliating them with dunks and "Sports Center" triple pump fadeaways. Why waste extra energy when you don't have to. That is why Chick was always amazed at Jerry’s box score. When did he score all those points, make all those steals, get all those boards?
The big O was another player with that same “easy” attitude. This doesn't mean we didn't have our showboaters either, as anybody who ever watched Earl Monroe or Pete Maravich or even Bob Cousy could attest. Jerry and the Big O were just interested in dominating as easily as possible. And winning.
Tom
Posted by: LakerTom | September 04, 2006 at 12:47 PM
exhelodrvr,
Thanks for injecting a little reality into the conversation.
--Fearless
Posted by: Fearless | September 04, 2006 at 12:51 PM
Tom,
At 6'3" I can dunk and I have a pretty consitent 12-15 foot fadaway, which is hard to block. I can't go to my left, but I play really good D. And I can get off the ground pretty quick, so I can block shots of guys taller than me.
So, I wind up being the defensive stopper of the other team's guards, but playing small forward-ish on offense. I'm not the go-to guy, or even really in the play book. But, when the offense breaks down, dish it to me for the 12 footer to bail us out. I also score a lot off boards.
Think of Ceballos with D and a LOT less skill.
My sport was Track. I was CIF champion for two years in three events (100, 200, and 400) and went to UCLA under scholarship. I was LUCKY enough to get both the athletic and an academic scholarship. I parlayed those to pay for both tuition and housing.
All that only to drop out. :|
Must not have realized what I had, or something else equally dumb. I'm a mere 33.
--Fearless
Posted by: Fearless | September 04, 2006 at 01:03 PM
"Some people in this blog only not see dead people, they could also smell something."-Edwin G
You telling me you don't smell it? With Miles, we'd have a line-up stacked with guys at or entering their primes. Top draft picks, top rated players, at every position. Nobody would want to play against a swarming defense anchored by Kwame. Miles, Kobe, and Lamar would give teams nightmares all over the court. Add Bynum and Farmar to that mix not this year but next year and we have maybe the best team in the league.
And on offense Miles provides the most important asset to the Triangle; the mid-range jumper. Miles can hit the open 15-18 footer in the set offense, not to mention his open court abilities. I'm willing to bet Phil and Kobe could light a fire in Darius to the point that he'd be an all star. If that happens, it takes pressure off of the whole team. Especially Lamar. Talk about the next Scottie Pippen? Miles fits that description a lot more than Lamar does.
We're going to be so slow this year at the 3 spot, something needs to happen. Artest is a pipe dream, the Queens would never allow Artest to go to the Lakers. If we have a shot to get Miles for the likes of Mihm, we'd be raping Portland, and I'd approve of that.
You smell what the Rocky's cookin' Edwin? Championships baby! Championships.
Posted by: Rocky | September 04, 2006 at 01:03 PM
exhelodrvr,
The line-up would be
Shammond/Sasha/Farmar
Kobe/Evans
Miles/Radmanovic
Lamar/Turiaf
Kwame/Bynum
That's a line-up for now and the future. I hope it'll happen.
Posted by: Rocky | September 04, 2006 at 01:08 PM
Edwin Gueco: "Some people in this blog only not see dead people, they could also smell something." LOL
In their defense, plenty of people has predicted the future lol. Like Mike T, with his Kwame stance lol ;-).
Listen as long as we're talking about trading...I say go after J'Oneil. Power Forward...loves Kobe and the Lakers...and he plays D! I know, I know, probably impossible...but then again, I heard rumors earlier on about him being shopped, and let's face it, nothing is impossible in the NBA.
Posted by: Faith | September 04, 2006 at 01:16 PM
Rocky,
I read that Miles is working real hard to up his value. What does that mean? It means teams have been offering the Blazers trash for Miles and they aren't biting. Miles' agent probably told him he has to up his value. What does that mean? It probably means that the Lakers already made a propsal with Mihm attacted and it got rejected.
My proposal is based on Portland just wanting to get rid of Miles for nothing. As time goes by that is going to change. Mihm won't be enough unless Miles forces it.
Bottom line: I'm relying on Portland wanting to get rid of Miles for nothing. Outside of that, Miles for Mihm is a joke. Mihm value right now is nothing more than a few scrubs and a 2nd round draft choice. Throw in Cook and Walton and we could do something.
mike
Posted by: Michael Teniente | September 04, 2006 at 01:24 PM
Man ABC's coverage of today's golf tournament is terrible.
mike
Posted by: Michael Teniente | September 04, 2006 at 01:26 PM
If Jerry West really loved the Lakers he would give up a 1st round draft choice for Chris Mihm. LOL! If it was over the top love it would be an unprotected pick. LOL!
mike
Posted by: Michael Teniente | September 04, 2006 at 01:32 PM
"Miles for Mihm is a joke. Mihm value right now is nothing more than a few scrubs and a 2nd round draft choice."-Mike T
That's the whole point right there. That's why it's hard to understand why everyone's so against this trade. It's a good trade for the Lakers.
Posted by: Rocky | September 04, 2006 at 01:41 PM
Laker Tom,
Thanks for the response. As much as I think Bonzi would help us, I just don't think this trade/signing will happen.
1. The Kings would never help us get better
2. We would never send any players to them for fear of giving them (the Kings) more insight into how we operate in certain situations
3. And I don't see us releasing/trading anybody from our roster last year this close to training camp (I hope i'm wrong).
Laker Al,
I never mind getting multiple opinions to my questions, so you don't have to worry about me minding you butting in my conversations.
I honestly think we'll go into the season with the players we have even though I would love to see some players moved/released to make room for Pinnock, Green, or another FA that could help us.
Posted by: Weave-Man | September 04, 2006 at 01:46 PM
LakerTom and Fearless:
I love being reminded about the playing days of Jerry West. Good memories. A correction though, Jerry was between 6'2'' and 6'3" not 6'5". In fact, in the Official NBA encyclopedia he's listed at 6'2". I loved his battles against Clyde Frazier and Oscar Robertson. He wasn't really a gunner, though. He led the league in assists in 1972. What i also like about him was his defense. I loved it when he would block a shot from behind. As much as I admire MJ and Kobe's game, you have to include Mr. Clutch and Big O on any all time team (along with Wilt, Magic, Bird, MJ, Kareem, who else...?)
Posted by: rdlee | September 04, 2006 at 01:46 PM
rdlee,
On my list, West is always at the top. I thought Jerry led the league in assists one year, I just couldn't remember which. Don't forget, Kobe's got West's shot block from behind as well. He did it most his first couple of seasons in the league. Its a sneaky play, but really effective because you are immediately on a one-on-none fast-break.
More than a player, Jerry was a pioneer.
--Fearless
Posted by: Fearless | September 04, 2006 at 02:06 PM
Weave-man:
I agree it ain’t gonna happen. Too bad, though. It would help both teams. Kings get Mihm, Cook, and McKie instead of nothing. Lakers get the #2 scorer they need to take pressure off of Kobe and Lamar, toughness, and a match-up nightmare for the rest of the West.
Tom
Posted by: LakerTom | September 04, 2006 at 02:16 PM
Rd:
Maybe I am having a senior moment but I always have remembered Jerry as 6-5. Let’s test this. I also remember Oscar as being 6-5 and Elgin as 6-6. How far am I off on these guys. Of course, I always thought I was just as tall as anybody I played against who was under 6-0.
I do remember the blocks from behind. Jerry’s trademark defensive specialty, however, was anticipating the pass and jumping the passing lane to intercept the ball for an easy break-away layup at the other end.
Sweet memories. I am looking forward to more of the same this coming year. Especially from Kobe and Farmar.
Tom
Posted by: LakerTom | September 04, 2006 at 02:27 PM
Fearless:
Thanks for the profile. It almost matches one of my best friends perfectly. You sound like the kind of player I would have loved playing with. I love guys that like to defend. As anybody on the blog could guess, I was a combination of Sasha and Raja on defense. My friends always claimed I never saw a shot I didn’t like or a foul I wasn’t willing to make. You loved me on your team but didn’t want me to guard you. And of course, I would never ever admit that I fouled anybody. I was the ultimate no harm, no foul type of guy on defense but don’t bump me a little on offense. A true hacker. Like most NBA guys except for the height and talent. As all us short guards say: “If I had only been 6-3…”
The art of scoring down low and blocking shots depends as much on quickness as it does on height and vertical leap. I never had the height but I could jump much quicker and just as high as players who guarded me. The perfect example of that in the pros is Amare, of course. No disrespect to women, but he is like a guy jumping in the middle of a bunch of girls.
I have often believed that whether or not you played the sport was often represented in your opinions and comments. I have found that to be very true on the blog, although I am sure there are posters that never played the game that still understand it. I know that wiZo, Peter Maguire, and a few other bloggers were ball players and I am sure there are many more. Having played the game on a team at ANY level really gives you a perspective that differs from the casual fan. I know when I watch a hockey game or soccer with friends that played it that I don’t see half of what they see as far as what is happening.
To make sure that Faith and other female friends on the blog don’t kill me, let me say that I am thrilled to see women playing basketball, even if I don’t watch it, and don’t see why a woman who played the game wouldn’t have just as much insight as a man. In fact, maybe they would have even more since the women’s game today is more team oriented and less flashy than the men’s game. I used to be one of those guys who really complained that the women were taking over the sports pages until my wife shamed me for my attitude by asking if I believed that women didn’t deserve an equal opportunity to play the game of basketball and enjoy the same competition, comradery, and thrills that I took from the sport.
Keep being Fearless. Can’t wait to see how Farmar does in camp and preseason. And Kobe, Lamar, Kwame, Vlade and the rest of the starting lineup.
Tom
Posted by: LakerTom | September 04, 2006 at 03:02 PM
Edwin:
I can talk to dead people, see the future, AND smell a bad deal (Miles).
Tom
Posted by: LakerTom | September 04, 2006 at 03:04 PM
PLAYER CONTRACT INFORMATION
For what it's worth, the girl did a lot of work
http://www.dfw.net/~patricia/contracts
Ron Ron is solid as a King for another year and probably won't opt out after that if the Kings are cruising and Petrie and Maloofs want to keep him. He seems to love Sac.
Bibby, on the other hand, will also be a free man soon. He's always a tough read and you can't undertand three words when he speaks, but he may seek greener pastures. If he doesn't step it up and speed it up, a lot of Kings fans will see to it that he does. I look for a banner year from him this season.
The Kings are coming! The Kings are coming!
Posted by: sonnybelfast | September 04, 2006 at 03:05 PM
Rocky:
If it weren't for the CBA salary cap rules, Portland would jump at the chance to get Chris Mihm ($4.2M) for Darius Miles ($7.8M) straight up. The only reason that Cook ($1.5M) and McKie ($2.5M) are included is to make salaries match.
Tom
Posted by: LakerTom | September 04, 2006 at 03:08 PM
***CLIPPERS TO GET GREEK SCHORTSANITIS?***
After his impressive play against the USA, I wondered whether the Clippers still held the draft rights to Sofoklis Schortsanitis, AKA Baby Shaq. Then I thought about Pinnock and started to wonder what the rule was on draft picks, so here it is for all:
FROM THE NBA SALARY CAP FAQ
http://members.cox.net/lmcoon/salarycap.htm#42
*************************
42. What if the team and player can't agree to a contract? What options does the player have? How long does the team keep his draft rights?
The player's options are limited. What happens depends on a number of factors:
If the player is already under contract to, or signs a contract with a non-NBA team, the team retains the player's draft rights for one year AFTER the player's obligation to the non-NBA team ends. Essentially, the clock stops as long as the player plays pro ball outside the NBA. Players are not included in the team's team salary while the player is under contract with a non-NBA team.
*************************
This means that the Clippers still hold the rights to Baby Shaq and the Lakers to Pinnock until 1 year AFTER whatever pro contract which they sign expires. That’s not bad. Draft a guy you like, let somebody else pay to develop him, and you then can sign him when he is ready. I am sure that Edwin will comment on how unfair this is to the player but it does make it clear why the Lakers drafted Pinnock knowing he wouldn’t make the roster. They are just stockpiling him for free.
By the way, HoopsHype said that Baby Shaq's buyout was only $500K, chicken feed for anybody but Donald Sterling.
Tom
Posted by: LakerTom | September 04, 2006 at 03:22 PM
Weave Man,
You're right. Short of acquiring (a yet unproven) Bynum, and perhaps a scrub or two in a swap, the Kings will never knowingly help the Lakers and vice versa.
It's what good rivalry is about.
Posted by: sonnybelfast | September 04, 2006 at 03:25 PM
Tom
Fearless:
Not only do I wish I were 6-4 but also 33. Stay Fearless, bro, because at 33 you really do have your ENTIRE life ahead of you. When I was 33 I had just starting my first small business after finally breaking free of college after ten universities, two bachelor degrees, a year in law school, and a year in a Masters program at UCLA. While nothing in my new business had anything to do with all of the classes I had taken, I have to say that education has its value, although I probably proved that over education doesn’t.
You should seriously look for a way to go back to school, even if only part-time. Like Kobe, you are really in your prime. One of the reasons that I did so well in school is that also went back (at 28) after essentially flunking out of USC as a junior, getting married, having a kid, and working cutting mudguards, delivering milk, and selling insurance for several years.
When I started back, I all of a sudden found out that it was easy, especially competing for grades against kids like I used to be. This happens for a lot of older students, many of whom are coming back just like you and me, and realize how very important education is and the doors that it can open for you. Oh, hell, I didn’t mean too ruin anybody’s holiday with all this proselytizing, but seriously at 33 you would be a man among boys if you went back and applied yourself.
Hey, no different than an NBA player looking to up his game.
Tom
Posted by: LakerTom | September 04, 2006 at 03:41 PM
Mike:
I thought that was where the Darius Miles love started. I must have confused you with Jon K, until he posts and says I am wrong about him, too.
My apologies. No offense intended.
Tom
Posted by: LakerTom | September 04, 2006 at 03:46 PM
Shady:
You are right that Bonzi has apparently priced himself out of the market. Frankly, I would have thought he would have jumped at the Kings offer of $40m over 5 years. After all, he was with a team where he had earned respect, played the best ball of his life, and was a real difference maker.
Then again, maybe he really just didn’t want to live in Sacramento. Sonny is the only person I know who does. I think he is desperate now but the Kings are on the verge of the luxury tax and are not going to give him another chance, unless it is to sign and trade him. As Chick said, remote and none.
Tom
Posted by: LakerTom | September 04, 2006 at 03:55 PM
I don't think that the Kings want to add another 5 mil (if Bonzi would take 5 mil to come here), or 8 mil (if we throw in a couple players) to their payroll. They don't need McKie, Smush or Sasha, don't need Luke and might be able to use Cook sparingly. Mihm would be a good backup for Brad Miller, and it would cost them another 5 mil that they don't have budgeted in while making the Lakers contenders. I wouldn't hold my breath waiting for Bonzi to come to town.
Posted by: Marcus | September 04, 2006 at 05:09 PM
LakerTom,
Chick said remote to none?
It's slim to none. Haha!
Posted by: Rocky | September 04, 2006 at 05:13 PM
I have lots of fond memories of Jerry West. He used to get hammered bringing the ball up the court, only getting the call if he was going to the basket. I often wonder how well he would do today under the current rules. No contact allowed. Cradle the ball in your hand, while moving it 5-10 feet in any direction. Getting to take a couple of extra steps ala Steve Nash. Getting to shoot 3 pointers which were well within his range.
I will also remember him as being involved in perhaps the worst non-call in NBA history. The Lakers were playing at Phoenix. Phoenix had the ball. West pokes the ball away from a Phoenix player. West runs into the Lakers front court chasing the ball apparently going for a breakaway. A Phoenix player TACKLES West from behind. No call is made with West lying on the ground the opposing players arms wrapped around his legs. Phoenix ball out of bounds since West touched it last. Chick Hearn is stunned. Replay after replay shows the same thing. Chick remains stunned. Oh well...you can't question the referees......
Posted by: Roger B | September 04, 2006 at 05:45 PM
LAKERTOM
I am so sorry if, you got offended by my POST. nothing PERSONAL buddy. if you take things too PERSONAL and let em BUG, you'll loose the POWER to think right. AND NO, "you MITCH CUPCAKE, YANKEE, YORK loving, analyzer." doesn't mean that I don't like you. it means that you are an ANALYZER(if you were nice I would have said that a good one at times but you ain't(nice)) and you like MITCH, YANKEES and YORK. if you get OFFENSED by that OK sorry, I just got an idea from your NUMEROUS posts, that you like YANKEES, YORK, and KUPCHAK. you GOT to be STRONG and STAND for your BELIEFS and not worry. Even if you're embarrassed by being a YANKEE, KUPCHAK, and YORK liker.
OH, and with all do respect, its a given I don't like the YANKEES, KUPCHAK, or YORK. But, you???? what? you want me to put you in the same SENTENCE I put these guys in? FIRST, DUDE you're ALRIGHT, SECOND I really don't care how you handle your STUFF. Its all you how you wanna do you thing and I won't dislike you for it. JUST don't credit YOURSELF that I DON'T LIKE you like I don't like the JUNKEES, or CUPCAKE, or YORK. C'MON. This is about SPORTS not LAKERTOM.
AND, I don't give a DARRN if the YANKEES, CUPCAKE or YORK don't like me. But, YOU? you gotta start learning how to be LOVER not a HATER. hehehehe. I was just giving you my oponion on your POST. and I don't blame you these CAPS can get SCARY sometimes.
Posted by: rayray | September 04, 2006 at 05:48 PM
Rocky:
You are right. My bad. Thanks.
Tom
Posted by: LakerTom | September 04, 2006 at 05:54 PM
Tom,
I have total respect for Women's basketball. And I watch it every chance I can when my daughters are in the mood. I don't watch it much by myself, though. The number one varisty girls' player at my High School completely moped the floor with me when I was on the team. She couldn't dunk, couldn't drive past me and couldn't block my shot. But, she could shoot, and she never missed in that game. Didn't miss a shot. Like I wasn't even there. Like. I. Wasn't. Even. There.
I know Reggie Miller's pain of getting beat by his sister. It was that indignity that he was constantly taking out on the rest of the NBA. Was it the Nicks that he scored 8 points in six seconds to snatch a win in true Superman fashion? Well the Nicks can thank Cheryl Miller for that. He was pretty impressive in that series against the Lakers if I remember correctly. The rest of his team just sucked too bad.
As such, I have a deep respect for what Kobe brings, and I think as much of his rap for non-team play comes from his unwillingness to coddle the egos of his teammates. Which isn't his job. All I know is that we didn't hear much except a few minor squables from the more mature of his teammates during the three-peat run. Fish usually had good things to say, so did Fox, so did Shaw, and so did Haper for that matter. And, they genuinely seemed to bask in the glow when Kobe did something spectacular.
You know, if Kobe had always been surrounded by players just like those, we may never have heard about him being a "ball hog". He would have been left to mature under less of a microscope. What would he have been like, do you think?
--Fearless
Posted by: Fearless | September 04, 2006 at 05:57 PM
Marcus:
I agree. The fact that the Kings are on the verge of the luxury tax, which is why they won't sign Bonzi for themselves, makes it almost impossible for a sign and trade deal to occur. Of course, we all know that "almost" is not sufficient grounds for killing a trade as possible.
Tom
Posted by: LakerTom | September 04, 2006 at 06:00 PM
I guess Farmar isn't going to Europe. At the very least though, I expect him to prove his mettle.
http://www.gwhatchet.com/media/storage/paper332/news/2006/08/30/Sports/Gw.Standouts.Work.Toward.Career.In.Pros-2251414.shtml?norewrite200609042058&sourcedomain=www.gwhatchet.com
Since we can't post full articles (I think) I just posted the relevant quotes:
Pinnock, who was drafted 58th overall by the Dallas Mavericks and traded to the Los Angeles Lakers, said he believed a contract was "in the mail,' set to arrive on Monday.
John Black, the executive director of public relations for the Lakers, said no contract has been drafted to retain Pinnock for training camp.
Daniel Servick, Pinnock's agent, said negotiations are ongoing but he is confident an agreement will be reached.
'They made the trade to get him, so I would anticipate something would come about with that,' Servick said in a phone interview Monday. 'Nothing has been signed and nothing was sent.'
Servick would not say if they were in negotiations with any European teams.
----------------------
Pinnock, who was a swingman in college, said he anticipates playing point guard in the Lakers' triangle offense under famed coach Phil Jackson.
'It's definitely a different style of play in L.A. compared to what we played in GW," Pinnock said. 'At GW we got up and down, running and gunning. With the Lakers we kind of slow it down and make sure we set up everything in the triangle.'
--------------
Both said GW coach Karl Hobbs prepared them well for their post-GW lives on and off the court. Although Pinnock will be playing a different style of basketball in Los Angeles, he said Hobbs' teachings allowed him to focus on what is important.
'GW definitely prepared me as a person, more so than as a basketball player because it's such a different style of play,' Pinnock said. 'Coach Hobbs' main goal is to make his players better people, and he definitely did that and helped me understand the bigger picture.'
------------
Playing in the NBA, Pinnock and Mensah-Bonsu said, is a lifelong dream, but it's not home for the players.
'The Smith Center is always going to be home," Pinnock said. "The Staples Center is obviously a lot bigger and really nice, but I'll always love playing in the Smith Center. Maybe in the future Pops and I will have something there.'
Pinnock said Los Angeles has welcomed him quickly. During summer leagues in California, he said he was the third most popular player behind first-round picks Andrew Bynum and Jordan Farmar. Mensah-Bonsu said he is quickly renewing a role that earned him the nickname 'Mayor of Foggy Bottom.'
'I've seen a couple people around town that said they knew me from college and said they were happy to have me on the team and they think I can help them,' Mensah-Bonsu said. 'For people to come up to me on the street in another state when I haven't even played a game yet - I can't wait for the season to start.'"
Go Pinnock!
Posted by: Faith | September 04, 2006 at 06:08 PM
Tom,
Thank you. I've already gone back to school and graduated last month. That coincides with my two-week absense from the Blog as my family and I turned my Graduation from University of Phoenix into an RV vacation. It wasn't easy, though, since I had to keep working. I have four kids and a mortgage (bought my house when I was 25). I left school to make a LOT of money in Silicon Valley, then got laid off, then couldn't buy a real job for the next 5 years! I figured it was my lack of a degree, so I went back and took classes online.
I graduated with a 3.82 GPA and I already found a new job. Pays well, but only about 60% of what I was making before. But, it will cover the bills and it has opportunities for advancement. The first steps on the long road back to what we were before.
Thanks for the kind words. BTW, I've already had several failed business attempts by now (oh have I lost some dough!). Maybe, one day, one will "stick".
--Fearless
PS: I'll always be Fearless.
Posted by: Fearless | September 04, 2006 at 06:12 PM
Oh Lord. Look geniuses, not only does Miles not play the style the coach likes, not only does he have personality issues, but he would disrupt the team. All that without having a usable jumpshot.
If Miles is here, he'd have to play the three. Who starts, him or Vlad? One really unhappy person there. That moves LO to the four, pretty much permanently. LO doesn't always get his best match-up at that spot. The playing time doesn't make sense, unless you trade Vlad (because he'll beef more than Cook or Luke, whichever one sticks around). And why trade of the few guys on the team who might be able to hit a three consistently?
Can we at least talk about someone who actually brings something to the team? How about Gerald Wallace? He's ten times better.
I hate this Miles pollution, expecially since it's not going to happen anyway. How much spare time do you guys have?
Posted by: Michael A | September 04, 2006 at 06:23 PM
BTW,
Chick said, "He's got two chances; Slim and None. And, Slim just left the building!"
--Fearless
Posted by: Fearless | September 04, 2006 at 06:26 PM
LakerTom,
Do you remember when Darius played for the Clippers? Man, he was awesome!
The guys needs to play for a quality organization.
And he loves Los Angeles.
The guy would rise to the occasion if he played for L.A.
That much said, I don't think we really need him.
We're winning 50 games this year without him.
Lamar is going to come into his own this year.
Kobe (24) will reveal an entirely new dimension to his game.
Farmar is the future! The future is now!
Kwame will be better than next year, much better.
Mihm (I know Michael T. hates him, but it is an irrational, obsessive-compulsive hate, not based in realtity.) Will be able to play some minutes at power forward. It will make a huge difference.
Anyhow...
GO LAKERS!
Posted by: Jon Kavulic | September 04, 2006 at 06:46 PM
My all time triangle team:
Jerry West at point: unlimited range imagine him now standing at the three point line.
Michael Jordan at 2: 6 titles with the triangle, debate that.
Pippen at 3: see above
Kevin Mchale: I know, blasphemy! hear me out. 6'11", 15 foot jumper range, guards PF (Barkley, Malone, etc) AND is the one who guards James Worthy!
Wilt: 76ers won using the triangle.
Kobe: 6th man.
Posted by: p ang | September 04, 2006 at 06:50 PM
Laker Tom,
As all us short guards say: “If I had only been 6-3…” Truer words have never been spoken. I don't like to talk about myself much, but as a player I was quick, fast, was a good passer, and could score when needed. I have always been able to jump higher than anyone I know, but couldn't dunk because I have pretty small hands. My only problem is I'm only 5' 9".
When I see guys like Boykins in the league it makes me wish I pushed myself more, and not given up on my dream of playing on any professional level, but like they say hindsight is 20/20.
Sonnybelfast,
You're right, if we (the Lakers) helped out the Kings, or vice versa, it wouldn't be a real rivalry. I can't wait for the days when we are battling the Kings for a shot in the finals again. I don't like the Kings, but it was fun to watch two teams fight like dogs for that shot to go to the championship. Hell, there were years it felt like the WCF was the championship.
Posted by: Weave-Man | September 04, 2006 at 07:17 PM
Rocky,
Respect your fascination with Darius Miles but do your really smell C'ship with him? Do you prefer him than Vlad or Lo on 3? Tell me in the career of Darius Miles, what has he accomplished to the teams he played with? When he was with Clippers, I was so excited in one game against the Boston Celtics on a weekend and I was cheering to the top of my lungs for his dunking extraordinaire and the Clips team because we were able to get a close seat. To our dismay they lost that game where Walker & Pierce made 30 pts. a piece. Why? NO DEFENSE from D. Miles & Maggette and Darius is the epitomy of what is wrong with youthful NBA players today lots of fancy dunking but lack of meat on D. Darius will be frustrated in any team he'll join cuz' he thinks he is a star. If there are any undisciplined players today in NBA, he's one of them, include Starbury, Franchise and K-Mart and one who is not even playing but we recently heard from the news the Chokin' Spree. Darius is a very athletic when he is motivated but most of the time, he's plain lazy and recalcitrant kid. Sorry, Miles would digress whatever the Lakers has accomplished today. Rocky, I smell problem, try to choose another one or we can wait for '07, let's us all just freeze and wait for the preseason. To top it all whatever you and I are discussing is just a whisper in the wilderness, only the birs are listening. lol!
Posted by: Edwin Gueco | September 04, 2006 at 07:33 PM
Mike T.,
Question: Would you rather have a quasi-contender team with Miles. A team which would probably land as a championship or two? Or bite your lip for another year and play the guys we have and save our money for something better down the line? Somebody to help us get back were we belong.
You've been a loyal Laker fan since since before I was even born! I figured someone like you would understand.
Rocky,
Smells like cooked rock!
I like your enthusiasm, but I don't see Miles anchoring any defense that you would call "swarming". He's a perimeter liability! Ask the CLIPPERS! (and not a whole lot has change since then)
>_<
Posted by: dan the man >_< aka smushcalade | September 04, 2006 at 07:38 PM
LakerTom,
I admire the things you remember from dead people like the immortal words of Chickism. I kept on reading and re-reading them.
Fearless,
It is not too late to go back to UCLA at age 33, I'm sure you can avail of financial aid but the ideas you learn from school will guide your remaining years before retirement. Finish the remaining years. What you need is your name in this blog: Fearless.
BTW, we were able to watch the game against Utah Utes last Sat. and we were seated in the Alumni row because of my son, I got dizzy cuz of the hot weather but I enjoyed every minute of it especially the victory.
Purple & Gold,
Finally, you are BACK. Your house is intact but I'm sure you are a victim one way or another. Well, there is still time, you should prepare for contingencies of future occurrences, that's all you can do, avoid the heat near the fire in order not to get burned.
Faith,
No need of Darius or any kind of trade just practice free throw, defense, jump shot like the Greek team and this blog will get excited when they find out Danilo in the preseason and smell the flying Pinnock. Haha!
Posted by: Edwin Gueco | September 04, 2006 at 07:57 PM
Securing a decent backup for Miller would be of value to the Kings, and theoretically, is about the only glaring need we have right now. But Mihm, plus a half dozen of your scrubs wouldn't be the guy. For Bonzi, if we signed him, the Kings would be looking to get Bynum, or perhaps Kwame.
Breaking the luxury threshold is not unprecedented for the Maloofs when its at Petries urging. I agree though, anything resembling the above seems highly unlikely.
On the other hand, I wouldn't be surprised to find myself shocked at the headlines on tomorrow's sports pages where NBA shake-ups may be concerned.
Posted by: sonnybelfast | September 04, 2006 at 08:04 PM
Mike T.
"Here's new for you. Mihm couldn't fetch Miles or Wells straight up. He's a back-up at best. Miles and Wells are starters."
You might want to check out your sources. Both Wells and Miles are good players but they have never been "full time" starters because of their inconsistency or injuries. Here's the starting stats from nba.com for both players the past 5 seasons startign from this past season. Also for Mihm
Bonzi(games played/games started)-52/41, 69/19, 72/27,59/17, 13/10
Miles(games played/games started)-40/23, 63/22, 79/56, 42/40, 37/16
Mihm(games played/games started)-59/56, 75/75, 76/17, 54/16, 22/1
LakerTom
"By the way, HoopsHype said that Baby Shaq's buyout was only $500K, chicken feed for anybody but Donald Sterling."
LOL very true but unfortunately I think he wants to sell tickets and for that to happen ppl want to see a team win. You never know maybe spending those 500k will sell more tickets and therefore increase his profit. "Baby Shaq" would definetly attract an audience. You never know.
Posted by: Shady | September 04, 2006 at 08:11 PM
LakerTom,
That CBA rule is really crazy, the team lawyers railroaded draftees whether college or international players because they don't have any representation in the CBA. What happens to this Greek Star, he'll be relegated to only one choice i.e. the Clippers who are not ready to play him but just activate his draft rights because Donald smell a captive real estate here. He can use him in the fringes of trade or play him. Isn't it one of the prerequisite of a Contract, there has to be mutual agreement between two parties, in this rule because you are a mere draftee, you have no voice to that contract, the CBA rule represents you. If the guy does not feel playing with the Clippers cuz' he does not know them nor hear them in Europe, he keeps on playing in the Euroleague until his time & ability passes by or become super heavy like Shaq Sr. Three years is just too long to be hoodwinked and be a hostage of that CBA rule. Union are supposed to protect all players but this rule it discriminate our youth and international players.
Posted by: Edwin Gueco | September 04, 2006 at 08:13 PM
Tom:
According to the Official NBA Register Oscar was 6'5" and Elgin was also 6"5" which was especially amazing since he did most of his damage inside and also was a great rebounder (13.5 boards a game over his career). Oscar was a huge guard in those days. Jerry's long arms made his reach that of a guy 6'7" or more. Also, as I remember Chick term, "frozen rope" was not often used of West's shot. It was used of a shot with no arc, West's picture perfect jumper had a nice arc no matter where he shot from. But as you said, it was his unbelievable quick stop, jump and release that made it impossible to stop.
Posted by: rdlee | September 04, 2006 at 08:45 PM
Rdlee:
Speaking of oltimers, guess who was the guest of Ophrah this afternoon? It was Michael Jordan. He was promoting MJ Fall collections on women's attire and shoes and the last model to come out was no other else than his friend, Sir Charles in light blue sports wear showing his round tummy. I hope someone could place the program on the blog, because it was so funny, tho' it's not Laker related it describes how close MJ and Sir Charles are, discussed also the golfing problems of Barkley while he called MJ frugal. MJ also talked about the young players today with regards to endorsements that companies invest on them based on potentials like when Lebronz got his 100M contract with Nike, he was not specifically mentione compared to their time the Companies really get what they paid for with the accomplishments of Bird, Magic, MJ and Barkley. It was full of laughter from beginning to end.
Posted by: Edwin Gueco | September 04, 2006 at 09:33 PM
I'll say this, you people are seriously reaching to think the Mihm can fetch something better Miles. Mihm can't even fetch Miles if it wasn't for Miles wanting out of Portland. I don't hate Mihm because I'm telling you the truth. He's a 10 and 6 guy. That's being kind. In reality he's a career 8 and 5 guy. Now that is the truth on Mihm. He's not suppose to be a teams 3rd option if that team expects to be contending.
Again, if Chris is scoring 10 points for the Lakers, the team is in trouble because that means others are not producing.
Now before someone says Kwame has less career averages, well, this coming season is his chance to prove everyone wrong. Hey, did you catch that? It's his chance. CHANCE! Something Mihm has already had here in Los Angeles. Don't hold that against Kwame.
Now as for Mihm, if the Lakers could fetch Wallace for him...well, I'd like to see that happen. But do you seriously think Mihm can snag a player of that quality? Miles is "damaged" good so we would have an outside chance to snag him with Mihm. If it wasn't for that we'd have no chance at Miles for Mihm.
I laugh at Jon K's comment about my "obsession" with Mihm. Look at it realistically, he's all we have to move. He'll be gone by trading deadline. I'm just trying to snag something for our beloved back-up. Talking Laker basketball has it limits, seeing we're working with a roster of 15 players. There are only a few options if anything is going to get done. And in those few options Chris Mihm is the only thing we have a chance at trying to get something. I bet teams around the league have been passing on anything the Lakers offer in a Mihm package because of his repuation. That's reality. Not hate. If by chance we hold on to Mihm, by trading deadline he'll be playing no more than 10 minutes a game for the Lakers. The only way that won't happen is if Bynum isn't ready. We can argue whether Bynum will or will not be ready but it doesn't matter because that's out of our hands. It's either he will or he won't. Only his play will determine that. But no matter what, Mihm is never going to be the starting 5 for the Lakers, again. His time is limited here in Los Angeles. If you think different, then you're fooling yourself because of your loyalty to him. If you think that Mihm is going to be a contributor in a Championship equation concerning the Lakers...dream on!
mike
Posted by: Michael Teniente | September 04, 2006 at 10:11 PM
Faith,
I could sense impatience there on the agent of Pinnock in trying to orchestrate a contract on the mail when there is none? Is he sending a message to Mitch K. & Co. if you don't want us, release us? I could not really understand the motive in drafting a player when the Lakers are already loaded with guards in the line-up, another guard coming in exercising the BAE and not making any moves at all on these excess guards. Well, if you want to stock your inventory, pay them all. In business, you will be chewed-up for over stocking, a sign lack of foresight as well as planning on material use.
LakerTom,
I remember two players who were drafted by the team they do not prefer or want, like Don Ferry who is now the GM of Cavaliers he never reported to the Clippers and Steve Francis who was unhappy to be picked by Vancouver Grizzlies, he asked for trade. He was traded with Bibby drafted by the Rockets at that time. Is that a possible scenario if another team wants Pinnock after the preseason? Perhaps, Mitch K. would like to get back the 2nd draft pick he traded away LOL!
Posted by: Edwin Gueco | September 04, 2006 at 10:23 PM
Mike T.
With Kobe, RonRon and KG, it really wouldnt matter who the other two role players were. Mihm and Smush would be fine.
Faith,
I like your suggestion of J Oneil, but it would likely take half of our team to get him-like it would for KG. Artest would be a better buy.
sonnybelfast,
From what you provided, it appears Artest has a player opion in 2008, two years from now-not next summer. But, I didnt get the feeling that this girl's accuracy is guaranteed. She could get the salaries from Hoopshyps for god sakes. If I had to choose between head cases I would take Artest over Miles any day, and so would every GM in the league.
Mike T.,
Mihm's value is increasing as he gets better with the triangle. Miles value is decreasing because Portland doesn't want him. Which one to better bet your money on? I vote to keep Mihm until we see how the Lakers look at mid-season-baring of course some outrageous trade offer that we cannot turn down (excluding Miles of course)!
Posted by: LakerAl | September 04, 2006 at 10:38 PM