Birthday Wishes
It's a candle-heavy time in Lakerland. We're just two days past what would have been Wilt Chamberlain's 70th (check out Roland Lazenby's blog for some Stilt-related material), and today, folks are singing "Happy Birthday" to Kobe Bean Bryant, who turns 28. It feels like the guy has been around way too long to still be two years short of 30, but as more players start their careers at 18, we're going to have to get used to it. (Maybe we should start thinking of hoopsters like hockey players, who fairly routinely start their careers before 20 and seem to play until they're 108.)
So what do you get a guy who makes more in a year — hell, maybe a month — than all of us put together? The idea of running down to Macy's to pick out a lil' somthin' seems a kind of silly, unless you can buy veteran point guards off the rack. So assuming Kobe would even accept a gift from me after last season's MVPgate, what exactly can I offer? Material goods aren't looking like a good option. That leaves birthday wishes, and this would be mine for the former Ocho:
I wish for him one year of not being at the center of every basketball argument on the planet. A year of not being the guy compared to every other guy in the league, in terms of dominance. Of not being compared to a certain player-turned-baseballer-turned-player-turned-GM-turned-Hanes pitchman-turned-part-owner. A season where everyone focuses their attention somewhere else — 365 days of Kobe-free hoops chatter. It would be interesting to see how people would perceive the guy after 12 months of a Kobe embargo. Would old prejudices die? Would beliefs become more crystallized? Would Kobe be able to connect more effectively with fans, peers and the media?
What would happen if we could all go a year without having to declare seemingly on a daily basis where we stand on Kobe?
Of course, none of this will ever happen. We'll be debating him again tomorrow, likely today in this thread. But it would be interesting to see how that reality would play out. To become perhaps the most polarizing figure in sports takes a group effort. Kobe has done his part, so has the media. It doesn't take long to create perceptions, but changing them is often a Herculean task.
So that's what I'd like to give the guy. A crappy gift to be sure, in the sense it can't actually be delivered, but like they say — it's the thought that counts.
Right?
—BK



Steven "the truth",
Felt dishonored for using me as an example lol! but there is no truth that I'm earning 100 grand, (IRS might search the difference); secondly, we go to 9th St. and in South Central to do Charity works through Heartfelt Foundation prior to Christmas or Easter not to grapple with a hapless poor and lastly, you never learn to forgive and forget what Kobe has done. Move on forward young man.
Try to be peaceful in your postings so that you will inherit peace in return.
Posted by: Edwin Gueco | August 24, 2006 at 07:42 PM
wizo-
dajuan wagner
career stats in 3 seasons:
102 games (started 28)
mpg 21.5
fg% .365 3pt .318
apg 1.9
tone down the sarcasm. dont sit on the fence and state that "he may or may not help". stand firm on your opinions.
the fact on this guy is: yes he can score. his averages from the field is not good to say the least. tony parker, who is a slasher, averaged above 50% from the field because he does what he does best. take it to the hoop. jump to your own conclusions why dajuan wagner averaged 36% in his career so far. poor shot selection or just a poor shot. the best way to get phil jackson to play you is probably being a shooter, defensive specialist, or atleast a vague understanding of the triangle. he isn't the traditional big guard that phil likes in the triangle. he is definitely not known for his shot which is essential in the triangle. .68 steals per game does not speak volumes about his anticipation on the defensive end. MAYBE he's a decent on ball defender.
thank you for reminding me that jay will and bobby hurley were unfortunate victims of bad car accidents. i really appreciate the trivia tidbits.
so im sticking to my opinion. HE AIN'T GONNA HELP THE LAKERS. HE CAN'T SHOOT. HE AIN'T A REAL POINT GUARD. HE AIN'T A DEFENSIVE SPECIALIST.
Posted by: sixonezero | August 24, 2006 at 07:51 PM
Do Kobe and Shaq really shower together?
Posted by: sonnybelfast | August 24, 2006 at 08:00 PM
WiZole,
I understood Shaqs eloquant comment, even if you didn't. Therein may lie the benefits of your thesaurus.
Don't feel too dumb.
Posted by: sonnybelfast | August 24, 2006 at 08:03 PM
No need to change them. I'm taking mine off and heading to 9th Street!
Posted by: sonnybelfast | August 24, 2006 at 08:05 PM
AZ,
Sorry for the late response on your posting, just got back from a hard days work.
With regards to Jay Williams and Eddie House as premier guards, well I'm sure you're familiar with Jay Williams during the NCAA championship he's good. Unfortunately, he got into serious accident and never recovered until now. With Eddie House, he contributed a lot to the Suns on the Laker losses during 1st round playoffs. I call them premier cuz' they're backing Jason Kidd.
Caesar,
I respect your opinion with regards to the FIBA PG, you might think I trying to stir you with their abilities. Have you watched the FIBA games especially Italy, Greece, Spain and Argentina? I believe there are a lot of players there better than Smush or Sasha. Here is the description of Coach D'Antoni and Coach K with this Italian phenom, Marco Bellinelli 20 years old and idolizes Kobe.
http://search.japantimes.co.jp/cgi-bin/sk20060825w6.html
Posted by: Edwin Gueco | August 24, 2006 at 08:11 PM
I agree about Kobe being bigger; I was looking at pics right now and there's no doubt about it. I wonder if he'll try and slim down a little before the season or not. I remember hearing something in the past about him being a little slower when he packed on the muscle, but I dunno.
Posted by: Marcus | August 24, 2006 at 08:19 PM
Jon K.
This might interest you on the comments of coaches and players about Wilt Chamberlain. These are excerpts from the book of our fellow blogger and author, Roland Lazenby.
http://hoopshype.com/articles/wilt_lazenby.htm
Posted by: Edwin Gueco | August 24, 2006 at 08:19 PM
I read this blog on a daily basis, but don't often find that I have something meaningful to contribute. The Jeff Gordon article posted by Lakers Forever has given me something to write about.
"...his well-publicized rape trial (which ended with an out-of-court settlement)"
I'm in law school. But I don't need to be to find the falacy in this statement. Gordon merged the criminal rape trial, which was dismissed, with the civil trial, which settled out of court. The burden of proof in criminal trials and in civil trials is substantially different (beyond a reasonable doubt vs. preponderance of the evidence), one reason why O.J. was acquitted yet still found liable in the civil case.
I guess its just another example of the media distorting the facts (no offense AK/BK). I guess at least he was kind enough to put him in the list.
Happy Belated Birthday Kobe!
JJ, I'm 24.
WHEN IS THE SEASON STARTING!?!?!?!
Posted by: JF | August 24, 2006 at 08:35 PM
What's up everybody? Hope everyone is doing well. Happy Bday Kobe!!!!!!!
Posted by: MAGIC=GOAT | August 24, 2006 at 10:29 PM
JF-
None taken. I don't like it any more than you do when we- the media- get things wrong (actually, I sometimes get more upset with mischaracterizations than plain mistakes, if you understand what I mean). The good thing is, when AK and I get it wrong, we have plenty of people to point it out. Keeps us honest.
BK
Posted by: Brian Kamenetzky | August 24, 2006 at 10:36 PM
BK:
Will we trade Mihm?
Posted by: MAGIC=GOAT | August 24, 2006 at 10:50 PM
Magic-
I figured it was a done deal going into the offseason. Clearly, I was off, mostly becasue the Lakers went a different direction to fill the PG need... if you want to call it filled. My guess is they couldn't find a PG they thought helped enough to give up Mihm, or also quite likely that the PGs they were offered had contracts they didn't like. However you slice it, Mihm is still here. At this point, I don't think they'll move him, and if they do it will likely be for another big. For better or worse (probably not better), they're stocked up at guard. Should they move Mihm, it'll leave a big hole in the frontcourt, which will have to be filled by a street FA, or whoever they get back in return.
BK
Posted by: Brian Kamenetzky | August 24, 2006 at 10:58 PM
Does anyone know if Kobe is still part owner of Olimpia Milano?
I read the article about the Italian kid and I thought he played for Kobe's team, but no Kobe's team was Olimpia Milano. But I don't know if he's still part owner
Posted by: lakofan | August 24, 2006 at 11:05 PM
I checked milano's website, I don't think his part owner anymore. It has new ownership. Sorry for the posts.
Posted by: lakofan | August 24, 2006 at 11:33 PM
sonny,
Please, enlighten me as to what "through the flattering mist of self absorbtion, we see but a numbing soul-sadness and tenebrous evil." means.
I literally wrote like that in junior high and got a hold of my first thesaurus. And trust me, I don't feel dumb. It was a sarcastic remark...which everyone but you understood it as so. And I'm not sure I'm the one that should feel dumb when I'm not the one that doesn't know how to spell "eloquent". (or BONZI for that matter.....didn't you say you LIVE UP NORTH?" I'm not sure there is a single person under 10 in LA that doesn't know how to spell Kobe.)
six,
Come on now. you know stats arent the whole story with dajuan. The point is, he was REALLY SICK right after his rookie season. And then even then you conveniently leave out points? His strongest stat. Come on now...at least be somewhat fair. What are you going to do next, argue that Ben Wallace sucks and leave out rebounds? I've seen the guy play a lot in college and the guy can flat out score. In his first month as a ROOKIE the guy avg'd over 17pts and almost 4 assists. And if you watched any of his NBA games, you'd know that his FG% was more a result of poor shot selection. But he is a better shooter than Parker as a rookie. Now Parker is an unbelievable slasher but even he greatly benefited from playing with Duncan and you can see his FG% take another jump due to the rule changes. Anyways, the point being, Dajuan's potential was obviously evident.
"dont sit on the fence and state that "he may or may not help". stand firm on your opinions."
Why? I didn't even bring up Dajuan. I'm not gonna have an opinion just to have an opinion. Could Dajuan help the Lakers? I REALLY don't know. What I asked was, how you and others are so SURE that he can't? Here's a guy with tremendous upside and expectations coming out of college who suffered very serious health problems. How could you possibly know? Im simply open to a possibility while you think that you know the answer. There are times when its better to not have an opinion...especially when we have such limited information to deal with.
"thank you for reminding me that jay will and bobby hurley were unfortunate victims of bad car accidents. i really appreciate the trivia tidbits."
Again, come on six, youre a smart guy (and I'm not being sarcastic here). You know why I brought up those guys. You said that Dajuan is out of the league cuz he sucks. Well, not only is that flat out wrong, but somewhat offensive. There is virtually no difference between your statement and someone else saying Jay Will couldnt make it in the league cuz he sucked.
Posted by: wiZo | August 25, 2006 at 12:18 AM
Happy Birthday Kobe!
Posted by: sonnybelfast | August 25, 2006 at 01:59 AM
I think your head is getting bigger.
Posted by: sonnybelfast | August 25, 2006 at 02:00 AM
Refering to http://msn.foxsports.com/other/story/5888886:
HOW THE *@!& did Kobe get a 5 for 'CLUTCH PLAY' and Lebron get a 5+!?
I guess Fox sports is learning from Fox "news".
Posted by: Kiyoshi | August 25, 2006 at 06:52 AM
Jerry Rice is hangin them up!
Come on home Jerry!
>_<
Posted by: dan the man >_< aka smushcalade | August 25, 2006 at 08:01 AM
I mean this in all sincerity, and I know the baggage we'd have to deal with if it happened, but if what they are saying is true, and he's healthy and in good shape, doesn't a player like Doug Christie seem like the absolute perfect fit for this Laker team? Veteran presence with lots of playoff experience, big guard, extremely good defensively with above average handles and shooting, and wouldn't be looking for a big or long contract. Put him alongside Kobe in the backcourt and you have your two big guards for the Triangle. I don't know, it just makes sense to me.
Posted by: Andrew Z | August 25, 2006 at 09:16 AM
I was also pondering how Lebron got a 5+ on clutch and Kobe a 5 on cluth play that is some ridiculous rating system. We know Fox is not right,lol.
Posted by: Sola | August 25, 2006 at 09:27 AM
Sola,
I guarantee that rating was based on the last thing the writer remembered about Kobe, which was his performance in Game 7 (as opposed to his Game 4 performance). I think Lebron deserved a high rating, but giving him a slightly higher one than Kobe shows that the dude is taking the "what have you done lately" approach to the whole thing. I think Peyton Manning is on that list, what was his clutch rating?
Posted by: Andrew Z | August 25, 2006 at 09:36 AM
I hate to agree with you Andrew Z, but I think a healthy, fit and willing Doug Christie would be a terrific addition to the Lakers. (A healthy, fit and willing Doug Christie without his wife may be an even more tremendous fit but ...)
I have read where several bloggers on this site bemoaned the loss of Rick Fox - who better is out there to replace him?
Posted by: Glenn | August 25, 2006 at 09:48 AM
sonny,
Bravo. Another "great" comeback. ...and by "great", I mean absolutely terrible. Still waiting on your interpretation of Shaq's ridiculous attempt at poetry......or any decent post whatsoever.
Posted by: wiZo | August 25, 2006 at 09:59 AM
AZ,
Can we pass on Doug Christie? It's still fresh from Laker fans that brawl during a recent preseason against Foxie and with Mrs. Christie still around, it's kinda' difficult to cheer for this ex-Laker Sacto. I'm sure we have enough on our current roster, I would rather try the high flying young Danilo Pinnock than Doug Christie. To those people who have not seen Danilo, you'll be surprised of what he can do for this team, let's wait for the preseason. I'm not ready to ship him to Europe just because he's unknown to AK and Eric Pincus.
The dog days of waiting for the preseason put us all in quandary thinking of the next move, this is because Mitch K. got some players who are probably good but unknown to us like Shammond, Evans and Pinnock, so our tendency is to look for the veterans. The stock of veterans available in the market are a couple of "has beens" while the Laker rosters are loaded with developing greenhorns. We tried that with McKie and JJ and it did not click. I think we can achieve our lofty objectives in advancing in the playoffs and barring no major injuries on our stars and the whole team gels, then Conference title is just within striking distance.
Posted by: Edwin Gueco | August 25, 2006 at 10:00 AM
andrew z-
good point on christie. im willing to bet that he has plenty of experience with the triangle. a bunch of playoff experience under his belt. cerebral player. flexible enough to play 2 or 3 depending if we go big or small. he wouldnt need much minutes. could sign him for a bargain one year deal.
wizo-
i didnt exactly say wagner plain old sucks. i wont take away the guy's talent. yes he can score. his rookie avg on points was a little over 13ppg. my point is, you add up his poor shot selection, him not being a pass first pg, too short to play against the top 2s in the league...what do you have? upside and potential is thrown around in this league like its gold. a prime example is sebastian telfair. the kid has crazy raw talent but if that talent doesnt translate to the pro level...then what? i've seen what wagner can do since highschool. but him being a scorer may not be enough for most teams on the nba. he is a tweener. not exactly a 1 or a 2. there is a reason why this summer pgs like mike james, jason terry, speedy claxton got good contracts. james and terry arent known to be "scorers" but you know they can flat out shoot. claxton has proven himself capable of running a team. so in all fairness i dont think wagner can help the lakers but can lure a team to look at his "potential".
Posted by: sixonezero | August 25, 2006 at 10:04 AM
LeBron 5+ in the clutch? Rediculous! Not yet, not until your "clutch" wins a title. Otherwise, if you've gone home, that means your "clutch" ran out. Both LBJ's and KB's "clutches" ran out last season. Of the two, only KB's has lasted until the end when he took over the Finals for Old and Slow Shaq, and when he routinely took over the rest of the playoffs for the Lakers until Big and Winded could show up for the Finals (on Company time, of course).
Doug Christie would be PERFECT. Even more perfect if he can get a divorce. No, wait, she might be "Fatal Attraction", and that would be worse. No, we'd have to take him and his wife, too. I can dig it.
--Fearless
Posted by: Fearless | August 25, 2006 at 10:08 AM
Edwin Gueco,
"I'm not ready to ship (Pinnock) to Europe just because he's unknown to AK and Eric Pincus."
What does that mean?
AK
Posted by: Andrew Kamenetzky | August 25, 2006 at 10:08 AM
WiZo,
"And if you watched any of his NBA games, you'd know that his FG% was more a result of poor shot selection"
So you want another guard with bad shot selection? Who cares how well someone can shoot, if he takes shots that he can't make?
Posted by: exhelodrvr | August 25, 2006 at 10:11 AM
sixonezero,
The NBA is filled with dudes who can score but can't play. If you must be a one-sided player, you need to know how to play instead of being only a scorer. Dudes who can play are coveted. Dudes who can score are a dime a dozen. Being able to play means you have a level of intelligence that can be brought onto the floor.
Why is JKidd one of the two or three best PG's in the league? It certainly is NOT his FG%!
Maybe Wagner will figure that out one day.
--Fearless
Posted by: Fearless | August 25, 2006 at 10:14 AM
Edwin Gueco,
I made the comment on Doug Christie being a good fit, above a Pinnock for example, with the idea that Kobe Bryant's window is closing. I know he's only 28 and in great shape, but seriously, waiting for late second rounders to develop into All NBA Defenders is pushing it. As for a quick fix and short term solution, Doug Christie would be perfect.
I think Doug Christie could come in and play the role of the "Ron Harper" to perfection. Even if it's a two-year deal, that gives Pinnock, Farmar, etc. time to develop. No offense to the kid, but rarely does a late second round pick come in and have a positive effect on a playoff team. I think Doug Christie definitely could have a positive effect on this squad.
Posted by: Andrew Z | August 25, 2006 at 10:21 AM
AK,
I hope you don't get too sensitive nothing personal. Actually, in many posts you mentioned your idea of what will happen to the present roster. If you make a count we have still 18 players playing in the preseason so you and Eric made some predictions of what will be the "Magic 15". You mentioned that Danilo's will not be signed but instead will allow him to play in Europe until next year. I disagree with that assessment and I leave it Phil Jackson to make the final choice. Tex Winter mentioned that Pinnock is an asset that could help the Lakers. I know my expertise is limited as well as my contacts compared to you and Eric Pincus, I only rely on my judgement on what a player can bring compared to other choices. So AK, it's just difference of opinions and leave at that.
Posted by: Edwin Gueco | August 25, 2006 at 10:38 AM
AK/BK
are you going to do your all lakers fantasy league again this year?? you should, and you could even have bandwagons for each team haha :P
seriously though i think it would be a good idea
that and avitars :D
Posted by: joninjapan | August 25, 2006 at 10:55 AM
AZ,
Again, it just difference of opinions but I don't think Doug C is Ron Harper type who could help our young players. He could be antagonistic to their development and he loves to shoot the ball rather than pass, he's slow to keep up with faster guards like Tony Parker, Jason Terry, Steve Nash and Bibby. Anyway, that's my take and you may have a different point of view on him.
Posted by: Edwin Gueco | August 25, 2006 at 10:55 AM
Edwin,
I wasn't getting sensitive. I literally had no idea what you were talking about or referring to. That's why I asked.
I also think you've misinterpreted what I've been saying. You make it sound like I wanted to ship Pinnock to Europe because I wasn't familiar with him. I watched the guy play 4 times during the SPL. And as I said many times, I thought he and Devin Green were the only guys on the SPL squad without guaranteed contracts that have a prayer of making the team. Pinnock looked pretty good and I'd be fine with him on the final roster.
I just think there won't be room for him without buying out McKie (which I'm cool with, but doesn't seem in the works so far) or a trade that creates roster space. And since Pinnock's got potential, the Lakers may prefer retaining his rights while he plays in Europe, as opposed to putting themselves in a situation where they lose his rights (which I'm pretty sure happens if they invite him to camp and cut him). I happen to think that's a good plan, should no other options present themselves. But it's got nothing to do with sending him to another continent because he's an "unknown."
AK
Posted by: Andrew Kamenetzky | August 25, 2006 at 10:59 AM
Hey I have to agree with WiZo.
It sounds beautiful and all, but I'm not quite sure that it actually means anything. I bet whoever wrote it bs's pretty well on his essays.
Besides, Wizo would have required a DICTIONARY, not a Thesaurus to interpret.
And eloquent IS spelled with an E.
Notch one for the brokebacks!
Posted by: S.Tan | August 25, 2006 at 11:08 AM
Edwin Gueco,
When was the last time phil gave a rookie even a chance to earn enough PT to contribute? Now when was the last time phil gave enough PT for a 57th pick in the draft to contribute?
C'mon, even when Chris Mihm went down last year, Andrew didn't even get any minutes. THink about it, 57th pick, only two picks in the draft were after him. By the way, the most accurate mock draft, nbadraft.net, didn't even have him being drafted, so it's not like he slipped in the draft.
Posted by: greek dude | August 25, 2006 at 11:11 AM
Dajuan Wagner
The only reason he isn't turning the league upside down right now is because he has had an illness that could have killed him. If it was for that colon disease that nobody could figure out then we would be talking about this kid positively. He is a star in the making. If Cleveland gets this guy to come back then I would pick them to come out of the east next year because he fits right in with there system, plus he is better then any pt they have now. If we had him then it would not be a Shammond Williams.
Posted by: Zakee | August 25, 2006 at 11:21 AM
Fearless
Sometimes when you are on a bad team you take bad shoots. He never got the chance to play next to Lebron James who loves to pass the ball. You are more open on Lebron team then playing by yourself. Just like Racman should have a better season.
Posted by: Zakee | August 25, 2006 at 11:23 AM
Greek Dude,
This all started with Doug Christie and ended up with Pinnock as my choice than Doug so now you link PJ choice of the 57th pick. Let's us simplify and go back between Doug and Danilo.
Here is my take, we have a roster of 18 so I prefer to trim down our roster and take the BEST from the stock rather than get Doug Christie who has a questionable past skirmishes with the Lakers. Therefore, I'm not saying that Pinnock or Farmar will make any difference to Jackson roster in the next season.
Having said that, I think Phil Jackson should CHANGE his old philosophy of not playing rookies. In a way, he changed it a little bit by playing Smush Parker who is equivalent to a rookie tho he played with other teams for a short span of time. He was inconsistent throughout the year but sticked with him until the playoffs. I would therefore recommend that he try the new kids who could improve the Laker defense, speed and shooting whether they are rookie or a veteran.
Posted by: Edwin Gueco | August 25, 2006 at 11:27 AM
six & exhelodrvr,
Well, I never really argued that we SHOULD have Dajuan on the Lakers. I recognize he has weaknesses and probably isnt the best fit in terms of the triangle. I was merely thinking it couldnt hurt to take a look at the guy. Yeah, upside can only take you so far, but when you have that much of it, it cant hurt to look. And in today's nba, tweeners are finding their niche. 10 years ago, tweeners werent even looked at. And yeah the terrys and gordons can flat out shoot. but we all know shooting is the one skill that can be greatly improved upon. (and for what its worth, i remember dajaun saying he needed to take better shots and was going to also work on his defense.) and now with the new rule changes that benefit slashers, who knows what dajaun's potential is/was. I'm just saying...its intriguing. six, you told me to have an opinion, but the fact that I dont have a strong one should indicate I'm not fighting for dajaun to have a spot. The only thing that bothers me is it always seems Mitch isnt in the mix when these guy's names come up. Maybe we arent missing out on much, maybe Dajaun will never be the same player... but there are some GMs that are constantly proactive and think creatively.
if your opinion is that dajaun cant help the lakers...thats totally fine. in fact, the odds are youre right. but ive (we've) seen the guy play and i saw enough potential where i think you can't really say that there is NO WAY he helps the Lakers or that such an idea is "ridiculous".
Posted by: wiZo | August 25, 2006 at 11:38 AM
AK,
If that is the case rather than use the word "unknown", I would transpose it to a phrase "your thoughts that there is no room for him" still, you believe that it is better to ship him to Europe than losing his rights on him. (I know it is the RULE but I find that's UNFAIR to Danilo Pinnock, why not allow him to get out of the lock if you are not going to sign him? This kid is 3rd year in College at GWU, he could go back to school to finish college or at least get his dream of playing in the NBA like Bobcats. Again, these are my just thoughts for locking Pinnock.) As I said, we just have a difference of opinions, I think after the preseason, PJ will create a space for Danilo.
I mentioned "sensitve" because I've observed lately cuz' once you hear your name in any post from LakerTom or Taliq or pfunk36, you want further clarifications that leads to lone line of arguments. It used to be Mike T. only, but now the list is growing as the blog gets older. It does not mean that we have lost our esteem respect on you but I hope you allow bloggers to have different opinion than yours. No misinterpretations, that's just my take.
Posted by: Edwin Gueco | August 25, 2006 at 12:00 PM
Edwin,
I know we have a roster of 18 guys right now, and your belief is that we should take the best from that 18 rather than get someone from outside, but what if we had the opportunity to get someone from the outside who is better than a few on that roster of 18? I just think in the short-term (meaning this year) Doug Christie would be a better addition to our team than Dannilo Pinnock.
Granted, I have never seen Pinnock play, but basing my assumption on the fact that he was fortunate to get picked as "high" as 57th in a weak draft, and therefore probably not able to give the Lakers 25 minutes of solid play. As much as I have hated Doug Christie in the past, I've always respected his game. If we healthy and available I think he moves into the starting line-up in the backcourt next to Kobe.
Posted by: Andrew Z | August 25, 2006 at 12:00 PM
Edwin,
I've said many times on the blog that I don't care if anyone ever agrees with my opinion. I always welcome opinions other than mine. I just don't want people presenting my opinions incorrectly, which you were. And I don't like it if people ever question my actual integrity as a writer (not that you were, but it has happened). But any other reactions of mine are just debate, the same debate you often find yourself taking part in.
As far as the situation being "unfair" to Pinnock, I completely disagree. The guy entered the draft early without even being a lock as a 2nd round pick. That's a huge risk and if Pinnock wasn't comfortable taking it, he would have stayed in school. Pinnock knew this scenario we're talking about could be a possibility and took his chances. And there's no guarantee that if the Lakers hadn't traded for him, he would have eventually made another team. And you never know. Pinnock may very well have gone into all this knowing he might end up in Europe, but simply wanted to make an income, as opposed to playing for free in college. But if the guy has any brains at all (and when I talked to him after an SPL game, he seemed bright enough), Pinnock fully anticipated a situation like this might be his fate.
AK
Posted by: Andrew Kamenetzky | August 25, 2006 at 12:24 PM
AZ,
You mentioned Doug Christie playing side by side with Kobe, eventhough they are professionals I doubt if Kobe would like to play with Doug Christie. Secondly, Christie is already old and slow that's the reason why the Kings unloaded him and he did not make it in Orlando. AZ, he's no longer the Christie that you know when he was playing with Bibby, Webber and Vlade they're getting old and being replaced gradually by young players.
AZ, I'm really don't like this guy, just my opinion but if he's invited to play during the preseason why not, let's invite him.
Posted by: Edwin Gueco | August 25, 2006 at 01:15 PM
Andrew Z:
Doug and Jackie Christie? You got to be crazy, right?
But it does look as if Doug does want to play. He issued a press release a few days ago where he claimed to have "gained endurance, agility and quickness at a level that I had not previously experienced." Unfortunately, he didn't explain whether it was Jesus or Jackie that was responsible for his ressurection.
http://www.realgm.com/src_wiretap_archives/41996/20060822/doug_christie_ready_to_return_to_nba/
Warning, please do not click on the [READ] link at the end of this article or you will be taken to Jackie Christie's website, where you will be forced to learn more than you wanted to about Doug and Jackie, including personal photos, favorite poems, etc.
Putting aside the humorous and ridiculous nature of Doug and Jackie's "unique" relationship, I would have to say that I understand where you are coming from. At his peak, Christie was a first-team All-NBA defender against guards and small forwards. He was as tough a one-on-one defender as Bruce Bowen or Raja Bell, which is really something the Lakers could desperately use.
Even though I could not imagine Doug wearing purple and gold or Jackie sitting in the stands at Staples, I would probably be tempted enough to call Christie's agent and setup a workout to see if he still was capable of playing that kind of defense. If he was fully recovered and could still play defense at his previous level and if the seemingly impossible situation regarding his wife could somehow be accommodated, he would definitely be a big help to the Lakers.
Jeez, I can't believe I just typed that. Doug Christie as a Laker. Forget it, just start Farmar.
Tom
Posted by: LakerTom | August 25, 2006 at 01:26 PM
I'm very high on Pinnock...but I think he's much too important for our future (I'm operating under the assumpsion that he might be our next Byron Scott) to not be signed during the preseason, thereby releasing our rights on him. And I don't think he's going to be picked up for the simple reason that we did sign Williams, drafted Farmar, and still have Smush and Sasha, as well as Evans for Kobe's backup. There's just too many players for 2 positions. And when it comes down to it, he is a rookie. That said, It's a very screwed up world that gave Von Wafer a 1 year roster space (even if he spent most of it in the D-League) and Pinnock, who's far better and talented imo to be sent to Europe. But if in some way he does end up in the roster, I'll be rooting for him. As I recall, he's simply been "solid" lol.
I definitely think something needs to be done with our influx at guard...whether that means cutting McKie (our only real veteran PG...granted he's like 200 years old, but he still imparts knowledge and "quirks" to our struggling younguns), or releasing Von, Green or a trade that solves our PF (not starting necessarily) or defensive PG problem. What that is, I don't know lol.
Posted by: Faith | August 25, 2006 at 01:40 PM
Oh man, I clicked on "Jackie Christie" link. Curiosity got the better of me, and I had to pay. Those red letters on the read link made it look so attractive. How is one of the best defenders so sappy? Regardless, I remember his defense and if he wants to come here and can play in his old capacity then by all means, let him come. It wouldn't be his first time with the Lakers.
Posted by: Marcus | August 25, 2006 at 01:55 PM
LakerTom,
That's why I said 'even with the baggage' meaning his wife and history as a King.
But all joking aside, if he says he is healthy and feeling that good physically, he's exactly the type of player Phil likes to have in the backcourt.
All I'm saying is he would be worth placing a call to. I have no idea how you would fit him on the roster or pay him, but that's another discussion.
I really don't think there's a snowball's chance in hell anything develops with him since we seem to have 97 people on the roster and we're millions over the cap, it's just that I think that type of player would have a huge impact on the Lakers success this year.
Posted by: Andrew Z | August 25, 2006 at 02:04 PM