Lakers Now

Round-the-Clock Purple and Gold

« Previous Post | Lakers Now Home | Next Post »

As The Al Turns...

The "Al Harrington to Indiana talks are dead" talk is dead! Long live the "Al Harrington to Indiana" talk!

Who knows what the hell is going on with this ordeal? Frankly, I'm starting to doubt there actually is an Al Harrington. I think the whole thing's been a hoax to sell papers.

By the way, it's now official that there aren't two teams less talented at putting an NBA transaction into motion than the Hawks and the Pacers. The Hawks' last sign and trade (Joe Johnson) led to a court battle. And the Pacers frittered away half of last season before trading Ron Artest to Sacto for Peja Stojakovic, who was not only the most glaringly obvious one-for-one swap option available, but was rumored to have on the Pacers' radar before the brawl, much less Artest's trade request. It's only fitting that these guys would be struggling so hard to pull triggers with each other. Honestly, I'm shocked everything's progressed this quickly.

AK

 
Comments () | Archives (116)

The comments to this entry are closed.

Finally we'll be able to move forward. But this deal to me was never really there. Al wanted to be a Pacer again, he said it over and over again, and it seems he'll get his wish.

Huh?

As much as I've loved the Harrington talk, I'll be fine with being done with all of the speculation.

Lakofan,

We've finally found something we agree on! (haha) Yeah, I've never bought that Harrington would end up with the Lakers, either. Until I see him hold up a purple and gold jersey, that's my story and I'm sticking with it.

AK

Hey, is this Al Harrington guy worth all this? he was a 18pt per guy on the HAWKS! LOL That'll probably translate to 9pt per on a GOOD team. If Mihm healing right I'd KEEP HIM!

after this ordeal, what are the odds of harrington having an injury like Nene on opening day and is out all season.

IMO, quite high (I think god hates the pacers)

:'(

"It ain't over til it oooo vaaa"

oh well, it is what it is now, but how 'bout Lakers trying 2 get Miles huh?i think it's still possible,i mean some people here said that we do still need a back-up shooting guard right? so i guess Darius would fit in to that category compared 2 Mckie who's getting older and older....sorry 2 say that but it's just the truth.

AK,

I know, can you believe it? We agreed on something.
I was trying to find something to debate you, but I could not find it, oh well. Just kidding.

All the talk about Al was just that, I think it was just a strategy for him to get more money. Is he worth 10mil a year?

Not to worry. Harrington wouldn't have helped you against the Sacramento Kings next season anyway.

Well I guess its almost a done deal.

LETS START THE "BRING KG TO L.A." DISCUSSION NOW.
LOL.

It was fun while it lasted I guess unless this is all a front by the Pacers to try and get other teams to pull out. Conspiracy??? LOL

Ok so I say we package Mihm, Vlad, Cookie, Walton and MckIe for KG. LMFAO

ponz-

darius miles at the 2? compared to mckie?

darius miles is a 3 and we picked up mckie as a 1.

i just want to remind you that we have the best 2 in the fricken world. EVER HEARD OF KOBE BRYANT. THE BALLER FORMERLY KNOWS AS OCHO?

AK

You actually think THIS (Al Harrington) is more interesting to the blog than Kobe's Sony deal and the re-birth of his marketing appeal?

AK I don't mean to be disrespectful to the blog by changing subjects but I just read your entry from the last thread.

Do you really think 6 years of "being around the team" qualifies you to PROPERLY evaluate Kobe? "In your mind" you are qualified? What? What standard should I or anyone use to examine your subjective mind?

In order to gain some reasonable understanding of why Kobe is such a "polarizing" figure with his former teammates (6 years ago) requires a much more indept study than just 6 years with former teammates and NBA players and writers most of whom suffer from the disease of envy, jealousy, and just plain ignorance. Why do I say this?

6 years ago would place you smack dab in the middle of the problem.....and interviewing individuals does you no good unless you can uncover and understand the prevailing MINDSET and culture that has infected everyone involved and tackle the root or genesis of the issue. Does that make any sense?

Interviewing these people without a total understanding of the MINDSET would be like examining a diseased tree by looking at all the symptoms that occur on all the different branches......without ever going to the tree's roots......you would be on that tree forever looking at all the branches....until you get smart enough to go to the diseased root.

Have you interviewed Kobe's highschool coach? What did he think of Phil Jackson saying Kobe "sabotaged" games in highschool?

Have you interviewed Kobe's highschool teammates? Did he exhibit leadership skills at that level when he led them to a championship? This would be interesting reading for the average fan if journalist were not so lazy in uncovering facts. Don't you think?

I think most people on this blog would be interested in hearing the answers to those questions.

Have you talked to Kobe's Dad?

Have you done your research?

Finally, in regards to the Brian Shaw interview which I would like to see again, what do you expect Brian to say? This guy has to adopt the "triangle mindset" even if he doesn't agree with it.......if he hopes to advance any further in that system.

You would get a better answer from someone like Jerry West who has the knowledge but no longer has a vested interest in this "mindset" or system.......do you agree?

Most of Kobe's problems with the media go back further than the rape charges but directly to Phil Jackson and his masterful manipulation of an unsuspecting press.....in this regard Phil Jackson was evil incarnate.....and he still may be, but that's another story.

These are some things to think about when you examine Kobe.....maybe you will have a paradigm shift if you go to the root and leave the branches alone.

this has been from day 1 a 1-team race. All the various rumors including especially the 4-team trade - were tellem's attempt to get the pacers to go for six years instead of four.

LA never really had a chance,

Sixonezero-

i know, of course, i couldn't agree more. But what im tryin' 2 point out is when Kobe takes his 2 min. rest or so in the game, perhaps we could use Miles out for spot 2. It wouldn't really matter if he's 3, he'll prbly adjusts. Not 2 mention he's a good shooter.

Harrington is making this thing a show, I keep hearing that the Pacers are done then back on again - what gives.
Now we can focus on Bonzi or ??? The Kings might be willing to pick up Mihm, some garbage like McKie and hey maybe JJ is still our property- he played great up there. Future Draft pick, whatever maybe even Bynum- we need to win now. Musselman and Bonzi - is not going to work.
The Warriors are still desperate so maybe we can wrestle away Monta Ellis or my big favorite Chabarkaba, and speaking of desperate why not look up Mateen Cleaves. Guy has tons of energy and moves better on D than any of our guards.

We are probably set and in the season of wishful thinking... IF everyone elevates their game you just never know. Something special has to happen for this team to really play up to its potential and surprise the West. Bynums development is key if we are going to baby him along.

Trades, deals and gotchas! beyond scope or imagination (which is saying a lot to a La La Land crowd) may still lie ahead, even before the season starts. In a nine, no make that 14 team deal, imagine picking up KG, and an all star defensive stopper or guard for lets say, the Saint.

Think about it. How would you like your chances? You could watch -spectacular Kobe- score 82 points on another team which you know, because of him, will be pretty good but is doomed to never climb higher than a 6th or 7th seed.

No doubt, there is some wheelin' and dealin' going on somewhere. It is unfortunate for Brokebackers that the Saint probably isn't on the table, but one cannot be certain of that. In Hollywood, it is never over until the fat lady stinks.

Whoa there Funk36,

Take er' easy there big guy.

Furthermore AK,

I want to know what kind of toothpaste Kobe uses, how often he brushes and if he suffers from the heartbreak of scoriasis.

Pfunk 36,

Yes, I do think it's more interesting, but maybe that's just me (and the hundreds of comments Harrington discussions have generated). And I've personally talked about Kobe's marketing rebirth before, for what that's worth.

Seriously, man, I respect you, but this is getting ridiculous. If you don't agree with me, fine. Whatever. I don't care. But your levels and steps for "justifying" my opinion are absurd. I would only need to do all that if I was looking to pyscho-analyze Kobe on a deep level, which I'm not.

For example, I have no need to track down Kobe's HS coach and find out his opinion on Jackson's statement about Kobe tanking games back then. Why? Because I find the notion of Kobe tanking games to be ridiculous. And since I've never actually accused Kobe of tanking games (and likely never will), that particular phone call seems like a waste of my and the coach's time. Just because I've been critical of some aspect regarding Kobe doesn't mean I automatically buy into everything bad ever said about the guy. And that should be pretty obvious from the way I've written about Kobe since the blog began.

I simply said that a condition of distance has existed between Kobe and various factions (teammates, coaches, the media), which it clearly has. If you don't want to acknowledge it, don't acknowledge it. You obviously don't, anyway.

Also, I find it a little ironic that you're more or less accusing me of being lazy, yet you're automatically dismissing B. Shaw's comments in the blog interview without being familiar with the interview itself or what Shaw said.

I've never presented myself as the ultimate authority on Kobe. I'm not. And if you want to treat my opinion as worthless, treat it as worthless. But I've done enough research and talked with enough people to come up with my opinions and observations. I feel plenty confident saying that.

AK

Psycho-analyizing Kobe? Hmmm. Sounds like a challenging yet worthy project. I've seen some pretty good starts right here. So how about it Brokebackers? Let's get to the bottom of PJ McMurphy (a famous Brokeback fan), so to speak.

Kobe is Kobe. The best player without front office help in the league. When are you guys going to blog Mitch for doing the worst GM job in Laker history. How do you trade Shaq and get nothing? How do you keep Slava on the payroll? How do you pay Brian Grant that much money? Where is his strategy? clearing Shaq and or Grant off the cap will not help Kobe compete against Duncan, Nash, Lebron, Melo, and Wade. Lets wake up and tell the Laker management to eith step up and pay some talent or sell the team.


alos while I am on it. tell Phil that in a big game if Kobe scores 70. it would be better than seeing Kwami score 4 and getting blow away by 30 to Nash and the Suns.


USA won against Slovenia 114-95. This is the country of our Sasha Vujacic, they're good and fast that includes Nesterovic and in fact, they were leading in the 2nd quarter but proned to turnovers by equally fast moving USA. Our team was steadier with a deep bench and widened the lead to 30 in the 3rd quarter. The USA team has the markings of the Dream Team I, more agile, good teamwork and good three point shooters. I think they just missed too many free throws especially D'Wade.

Perhaps, the Laker Front Office should be taping and watch over and over again these FIBA games since Kupcake hates traveling to scout european players, he can be FRUGAL by just relying on the TV feed of ESPN. I'm not an expert but I saw a good point guard by the name of Lakovic and a power forward, Brezec. They should be in the radar of Mitch K. and asked V. Divac to shadow their games throughout the year before the Spurs get them. These are the type of players that falls on the Lakers budget - CHEAP, fast, good shooters and reliable in guarding.

Much has been said about Al Harrington, hey if at the end of the day, he's still available, then I can only quote Abe: "You can fool some of the people some of the time, but you cannot fool all the people all the time." If the fate of Al is Pacer, so be it tho' I'm just curious why he would accept $35M for 4 years when there was a previous offer of $57M for 6 years? The fate of the Lakers must be on the hands of Chris Mihm, he must have a purpose driven life destined for him on this team. Having said that, be ready to pay him more before his contract expires at the end of next season. Going back to the USA team, Lakers should also watch Dwight Howard PF of Orlando available in '09 and Kirk Hinrich SG of Bulls in '08, they're playing exceptionally well for USA team. I doubt if their teams would not extend their contracts before they become F/A but Lakers should always have a grand strategy in attracting these type of players in trying to fill the best players per position rather than engaging in swap meat shopping or continuous development of scrubs. lol!

I've always said that if the Lakers don't get Harrington it isn't a big loss. You can't lose what you never had to begin with. However, if they have a chance to get him, they would be foolish to not make an attempt, especially for what we would be exchanging.

As for those that jumped on my earlier post about the Lakers looking to fill holes, they took my post all out of context. I didn't mean that all the Lakers have need of right now is a couple of hole fillers.

If you read the whole post you would see that I first said that it starts with getting Harrington. Many times what people miss is by adding a player that is going to contribute, it shifts everything else around. If we were to get a player like Harrington that can handle 35 minutes or so a night, that would free up the need to possibly have 2 guys play for those minutes........

As far as the Harrington talk is concerned, it still isn't over for the Lakers to get him, but it doesn't seem very likely at this point. However, because it doesn't seem likely, doesn't change my feeling towards wanting it to happen. Sometimes people on here change their stance on things simply because the likelihood of it happening changes.

One other thing, for those thinking that the Lakers need a second superstar of the caliber of a Kobe Bryant or something, you ae asking for too much. How this whole talk of having loads of top shelf talent has gotten to be considered a necessity escapes me. You need a team.....all parts filling their roles. Some roles are larger than others, but yet all roles are significant. John Salley played a significant role in the Lakers first championship under Phil yet he only played possibly 48 minutes TOTAL all season. That's because his presence on the bench and in practice, was the most important part of his role to the team.

ponz-

even if you had darius miles on the squad, there is no way you would sub him in for kobe at the 2. i know anything is possible...but no. miles is more of a weakside shot blocker. not a face up lock down defender. he isn't a good shooter. he is an open court, slasher type player. i know mike t will argue with me until armaggeddon about this, miles does not necessarily fit the triangle offense. our best bet would be having RADMANOVIC start on the 3 and have LUKE come off the bench for him. if MILES miraculously developed a reliable mid range jumper...then yeah he'd be a good pick up.

Pfunk36,

A paradigm shift? Wow! Now that was a good thing. You wrote a pretty good piece. It's mid August and were bored for some basketball but, again, I can see where you're coming from as far as from a psychological point of view. It's rare that I see someone write something and use "maybe you will have a paradigm shift if you go to the root and leave the branches alone." LOL! You did well in making that the conclusion of your post.

mike

I loved today's article on Wilt Chamberlein.

GO LAKERS!

Pfunk36,
You said eloquently what I was trying to say on the last thread.

AK,
I read the b. shaw interview and he didn't say he had any issues with kobe. More like kobe can be stubborn, and i understand that and get that it's what makes him great. Look no one is saying write fairy tales about kobe, but the whole anti-social he needs to be more friendly angle is so played out.

And most of the articles have very little credibility. E.g. with team usa he was accused of not going on the court to mix with teammates. Two different ways to make that better, as a journalist if you're going to condemn him in that manner, get a few sources ( i.e. team members ) that say they felt that was snobish...or add more balance by saying that's your interpretation of events and maybe he'd talked to them earlier or didn't want to try and steal any of their glory since he wasn't going to be joining the team. Either way shows the reader the journalist is trying to be objective, option 1 does this by getting someone elses opinion besides the journalist, option 2 does this by allowing the journalist to play both sides of the fence. Mind you option 1 can be misused if the journalist only seeks opinions that corraborate his own, i.e. a little i tried to talk to 10 guys on the court, 3 responded and this is what they said, also tells the reader, hey i didn't just hand pick em.

You've repeated that you've had good posts about kobe. No one doubts that. But I think what i was trying to say before is each article needs to be balanced on it's own. i.e. one overly positive and one overly negative article doesn't suffice. What's better is each article on it's own should be objective.

Now your crime was going...oh i've been around kobe six years...that's enough for me to tell he's aloof and needs to try more. To us, it's like here we go again. What's wrong with us going, fine give examples from does six years that justify your opinion. E.g. the fellas always play card on thursdays, they'd invite kobe and he'd say no. And look i'm not just picking on that one incident, this happened and that happened, and hey it's not just my opinion, this is what so and so had to say ( option 1 ). Or you could have added more balance, hey he needs to be less aloof but then again he's already doing a, b, and c and should be commended for that, it's just given his superstar status, adding d would be nice. Mind you the rest of us bloggers do not have to be balance or objective, we dont carry press passes and that's ok...but i do think we should at least be willing to admit when we're just going on that blind love you refer to.

Lastly, seems you're getting tired of being attacked on being overly critical of kobe. Multiply that by a million and you still wouldn't get what it's like to be kobe hearing what the media has to say about you. Maybe take that into consideration next time you put pen to paper about my boy. Then again you're not making 15 million a year like Kobe ( see that's balance or being objective ... lol )

In Kobe we Trust,
Go Lakers

AK,

"I think the whole thing's been a hoax to sell papers."

I'm with you. I think this is one of those "Wag the Dog" or "A Long Kiss Goodnight" episodes.

Creepy.

On the other hand, this speculation has not only sold papers, but sparked, "AH is alive" or, "AH is dead" or "who the heck is AH, anyway?" talk on this blog.

Of course, there's been that silent debate as to whether to abbreviate his name AH or Al. That one has been running neck-and-neck for the past couple of days. Everyone knows which side of the fence I stand on THAT one!

--Fearless

My big question is Why haven't the Lakers aggressively gone out for a big man (he can be good and a team player)? the stiffs that we have played lousy against Boris Diaw. We need a big that can give us at least 15 and 10. Not potential. we need some who is a presence defensively. If Mitch can not do it fire him. Their are only two GM's worse Isiah and Billy King. The reason Miami won was as Fat Shaq got tired Zo gave them energy. Mitch never gave Shaq a decent backup. My thought for years was that Kobe needed a quick young team in th e second unit. Mitch never got a big man to help Kobe. Now the team is suppossed to be around Kobe well get him some athletic big guys that can play 35 minutes and contribute before he is gone.

Edwin G,

To add to your comments about D. Howard or Heinrich, if west could get shaq from orlando, anyone can be had. We just need to ensure we put ourself in a position to make a good offer.

In Kobe we Trust,
Go Lakers

Taliq,

I brought up the Shaw interview because someone had asked me to provide specific examples of Brian Shaw saying that he had clashed with Kobe in the past. I pointed one out (the blog interview). It's really that simple. But again, nothing I said about Kobe was all that damning in the first place.

You admitted to the blind love many of Kobe's fans feel towards him. I think that love often feeds an overreaction towards anything ever said about the guy short of "KOBE RULES!!!". I think it should be obvious by now that I'm not a writer on a "Kobe burying" mission. So it just surprises me that some readers never take that into consideration whenever they read something I say that may not be 100% positive of Kobe. Just because you ciriticize an athlete doesn't mean you automatically have an "agenda" of sorts. Sometimes, it's just your opinion and that's it.

I think people sometimes take "Love me or Hate me" a little too literally. It's just a marketing slogan. It doesn't represent the ONLY two accepted ways to feel about Kobe.

AK

Pfunk36 and Taliq,

Listen, I think Kobe does some good stuff and is genuinely a good guy, AND SO DOES AK!!! The dude is more than fair in anything he has said or written about him, and yes, his being around the team extensively for the past six years gives him GREAT credibility in the matter. In a profession where "team" and "hanging with the boys" is probably the norm, Kobe's introverted personality and propensity to come off aloof during his career has caused him some trouble. What about that don't you agree with? All AK has said from Day 1 is that Kobe would do himself a favor if he opened up a little. He doesn't say he's a bad guy or anything, he just keeps to himself and that's fine, but he could make his life way easier by just coming off as a more normal guy. Anyway, AK made a great point that if you're not bowing down to King Kobe then you're a "hater". That line of thinking is ridiculous.

AK,

Umm dont see where B. Shaw said he had any major clashes with Kobe. All he said is sometimes we disagree, that's normal for any relationship in this world.

Also you didn't address the notion that just maybe you're obligated to have something to support your opinions since you carry a press pass. Where's the proof in the pudding?

And it's more we the fans are allowed to love him or hate him, however we dont expect the same from journalist. We just expect nicely written articles that are fair. Again I repeat, just because you've been on point 9 times, doesn't mean you get a pass when you fall short the 10th time. So for that one post where you go Kobe needs to be less aloof...blah blah...we're like says which one of his teammates, do they all feel that way....or if u dnt have supporting evidence, then why is that the only opinion you're stating...what about those of us that feel that he's ok as he is...are you just going to dismiss us as crazies, or maybe go in your article...umm but there's a 2nd school of thought that goes blah blah blah.

Come on dude, man up and admit you get the point i'm trying to make. Maybe wahat you're trying to say is umm...hey dude this is a blog and i dnt have time to ensure each post is balanced, if it was an article, then sure. But on the blog i just expect my posts to be accumulative and not have 1 singled out. Talk to me AK, tell me where ya comin frum ;)

In Kobe we Trust,
Go Lakers

Andrew Z,

What "introverted personality"?? Am I the only dude on here that thinks it's not that simple and it's just media hype this whole kobe doesn't get along with teammates. Why is it ok to state this like it's fact. Hell even "genuinely a good guy", how do you know?

If it's just an opinion, cool, but if so then if you carry a press pass like AK, pls make sure to offer a different side in your article/posts ( and umm i dnt care if you had 10 posts in november 05 that were overly positive, if no one checked you then to ask why you as the media take that stance, then whatever )

This is my blog, our blog. And I'm throwing down a gauntlet. Anyone out there that feels kobe in 2006 is more introverted than his peers, pls argue your case. I say '06 cuz sure you can find clips from the past, but in my opinion he was young and his team wasn't very understanding of who he was because Shaq set a bad tone from day 1. If you want to argue that, that's ok too, just take into consideration stuff like Shaq slapping this kid in practice and no one standing up for him. As for the present day I saw him hugging Smush Parker in a manner my own bro hasn't ever done with me, saw him stand up for 7foot bynum in a way no one on his old team did when he got into it with chris childs, can give you a link with odom saying he and kobe are friends on and off the court. I do not see an introvert...aloof...doesn't get along with guys...or that whole bs about him not having street cred, I live in crown heights brooklyn, kobe's jersey get's rocked as much as the next guy. If any blogger here want's to call him an introvert, cool, but if AK ( i got a press pass ) jumps in the mix then I'm holding him to some standards ( see my prior post )...it's same as when sonny calls kobe a r*pist, fine it's his opinion, but if our friends with passes make the same comment, then I'm like whoa...where's that coming from

In Kobe we Trust,
Go Lakers

sixonezero-

LUKE it is, but i doubt it though cuz Luke has never been known as a defensive stopper(probably he will someday). So, tell me, if Kobe gets banged up you would likey say put Luke on 2's spot and expect to guard all-star guards like T-mac, Ginobili, Hamilton , or Richardson?? Sadly 2 say, he'll get schooled by these guys especially if they play in the playoff. Nevertheless, i dont really care if Lakers won't get any back-up 2s, as long as Kobe is fully HEALTHY...we're ready to roll.

Ponz

Evans is our back up 2 guard. Don't forget about this guy. He is a very solid basketball player. He is our best backup 2 and I am glad that he is aprt of our team this year. Upgrade from George.

Shaq never slpped Kobe! Or did he?

This is pretty funny. Al Harrington isn't even worth this trouble. Granted I don't even like Joe Johnson, but atleast he was worth some kind of trouble. The Hawks want to get rid of salary cap so bad. And aparently Al Harrington doesn't want to stay. They should just not resign him and let him sign some low ball deal with whoever has cap room. That's what him and his agent get for being so stubborn.

Taliq,

I agree, Kobe has made some strides post-Colorado as coming off more approachable, but I don't think it's fair to throw out who he has been his entire career and just look at the last 12 months or so. I like Kobe, don't get me wrong, but at a certain point you have to think that some of his personality traits that have been mentioned numerous times in the media are true. Hell, he and his marketing team even came up with his biggest commerical ever and the theme was "Love me or Hate me". Can you create a more polarizing message?!?! I think Kobe's image is better now than it ever has been, and the only thing that's going to keep improving it if he wins, because basically, I couldn't care less if he was Mother Theresa or the biggest A-hole in the world, I just want Laker wins.

My whole point is that you attack AK with claims that he is giving opinions with no credibility or reasons to back them up and I found that completely false. Of the hundreds of sports writers I have read, especially those that are diehard fans of a team they cover, both K Brothers have been nothing but outstanding and professional. To attack them on their journalistic credibility is absurd.

Taliq,

Please drop this. It's getting ridiculous. Plenty of Kobe's teammates have come out on the record and said that he'd distanced himself from them in the past. Here's one from Fish (last year's ESPN The Mag NBA preview issue) in reference to Kobe and Phil's new relationship and Kobe starting to open up around teammates during the preseason.

"That never, ever happened when I was there. I'm 90% happy, while 10% of me is, man, "I wish that was the Kobe I spent 8 years with." I hope he takes himself out of the way and lets his greatness shine. Be the kid Jerry West saw in Pennsylvania who just loved to play."

Fish is saying that Kobe often stood in his own way and it often made his life more difficult than necessary. That sentiment is exactly what I was talking about in sparking all this. And it's reminiscent of things I saw while around the team and heard from various people while being "AK (I got a press pass)", as you put it. You're acting like I'm making this crap up, which is frankly, pretty insulting.

As I also said (and has been TOTALLY ignored by everyone on "Kobe-worship" alert), he's getting better with this. But I still think he has issues of trust to get over. Again, my opinion and I think I've stated clearly why I feel this way.

But I imagine that article is just an extension of ESPN's agenda against Kobe. And you'd like me to cite another 100 examples of this before my opinion means anything, since it's all one big media conspiracy, anyway. None of it has even a sliver of truth.

AK

If Al isn't coming to LA then so be it. I have not been a big Mihm fan of late but I will be happy to give him another look at PF. If that is my only choice.

Am I correct that this was his natural position prior to wearing P&G??? Someone please correct me if wrong. If so, what were his stats like at that position? (I am still a newbie in basketball history) Will he make a good starter there? Will he fit better there than he did in the middle? These are things that need to be known now heading into the year with the current roster.

I do agree about getting something more than McKie and even Cook, though I like Cook.

Always the Walton fan though, enough talk of throwing him under the bus already. He is getting better every year and it shows. We need a passer who can see the floor with a great BB-IQ.

T-Woody

Zakee,

I think the Evans pick up was the move of the off-season for Mitch. In the small amounts I've seen him play I like what he brings, and the fact that we got him for a second rounder is even an added bonus. With Kobe averaging 40 minutes a game, we don't need a superstar as a back-up, just a guy who can go in and not screw up. I think we got that in Evans. The upside of it is if he turns out better than we thought, we might see him in the line-up with Kobe, which sounds promising.

And I don't think Kobe got slapped by Shaq, although I remember stories of them almost getting into it in practice.

I think ESPN shot JFK.

Blah, Blah, Blah...it's always someone trying to make someone else conform to their idea of what life is all about. Fish was, is and will always be a follower. Bryant is a ALPHA-MALE! That's why he was to himself. I was waiting for his time to lead. As long as Shaq was there we were never going to see Bryant in his true greatness.

What Fisher is saying is: Come on Kobe, just go along, go with the flow. It's what "followers" always say when they're around alpha-males who are in position to the alpha.

mike

correction:

"What Fisher is saying is: Come on Kobe, just go along, go with the flow. It's what "followers" always say when they're around alpha-males who aren't in position to the alpha."

mike

Doesn't look like Harrington is signed yet- crazy stuff!
Crazier yet is this jive about AK - lay off him his reporting is fine and lightly biased towards King Kobe so give him a break here. The Blog is great almost always- Thanks AK / BK!
Kobe has had faults and will have more, so will AK and all of us, let it be. Kobe is working it out and doing a great job of re-upping his value. Whether its a PR move, or out of the goodness of his heart - who knows. WE DON'T!
Kobe is growing up and has been in the spotlight since 17, it has to be rough. He gets snagged by some dumb blonde in Colorado and she goes off to live out her new millionaire lifestyle and Kobe is never going to live down this tramps-"girls gone wild" night at the expense of Kobe. He blew it, she must have been pretty hot- cause Kobe's wife is gorgeous, dumb move Kobe, whatever happened its over. Thank God his wife forgave him.

The thing is he is getting better always with his game and in his communication capabilities. The team allows him to lead and Shaw gets it, John Salley understood and still gets it- all kinds of dudes give Kobe props in the League as the best in the League and that goes for former players too. That is where it is at, its about the play of the player. I mean who cares how bent he is, Charles Barkley is dumb as a box of rocks, but he is funny and his charm is in his knuckleheaded demeanor. Ron Artest is a thug and a straight up idiot for ever going into the stands but IF he or Barkley would be playing for the Lakers - I would be rooting for them.

Forget about head games and all this babble and gossip nonsense, lets get a few new players that boost the level of play to the Western Conference Finals.
Amazing story about Dujuan Wagner and what he has overcome to make a return to the NBA. This guy can ball and is an offensive bonus if any team will allow him to go off. 2009 is too far off to be waiting around for another player. I think we need to be heavy into what is out there if we truly are going to compete. Europe and some of the Free Agents have to have something that helps this team. Kupchak might think MEvans and VRadmonivic is enough but I don't. OH yeah Shammond - nice move Mitch, what was that anyway. Any package for a decent guard who can handle some tough D and get the ball across the line without turning it over and be able to dish 7-8 assists would be a godsend. Monta Ellis.

ponz,

why in the world would you trade for miles and they pay him 9 mil a year to be a 2 min/game back up for kobe? yea he would be better than mckie but mckie isnt kobes backup! mo evans is. thats why we picked him up. hell sasha or smush could fill in at the 2 from time to time as well as luke.

sonny,

you said the lakers wouldnt get any higher than 6th or 7th with kobe? so you propose a trade for kg... have you seen where minnesota has finished the last couple of years? unless you know of a defensive stopper or all star guard currently on minnesota that i dont know about then the wolves dont have the pieces to make that work. do you really have nothing better to do than check the lakers blog? and this whole brokebacks thing? enough with it. the correlation you draw is a stretch and you say it has nothing to do with homosexuality but you know it does. there are tons of other films you could have used.

Mike T,

In a team sport, it helps if the "alpha-male" or one who wants to be the leader, is able to relate to his teammates and develop enough trust in them to convince them to follow him. Fortunately, like AK mentioned, Kobe is getting better at this. In years past, he's been bad at it. It has nothing to do with "followers" other than the fact that someone is a sh*tty leader if no one follows.

Mike T,

In addition, I think Fisher was saying that he could see the greatness in Kobe, but Kobe basically got in his own way and ruined his potential (at the time) to lead. I don't think in any way he was tellng Kobe to just be a "follower".

For the most part I have to agree with Taliq. I can see where AK and others feel like Kobe was isolated and aloof. Why? Cuz he was isolated and aloof. There have been instances and examples supporting that notion. But I think Taliq is right in that it is almost impossible (and borderline ridiculous) to call Kobe out on it or to lay the majority of the blame on Kobe. Everyone here knows how ridiculously selfish and baby-like Shaq is. Since when is it up to a 17yr old rookie to force himself to fit in? Derek Fisher said that from day 1, they were simply taken aback and almost shocked by how hard Kobe worked. Think about how weird a dynamic that creates, when as veterans, you see a 17yr old kid working twice as hard as you...it hurts the ego. Its like in the movie "Rudy" and everyone is like "geez, Rudy, lighten up man, its a practice." Well, who's wrong? Should Rudy lighten up or should the leaders of the team work harder? How can Kobe fit in when his team (and COACH!) naturally rejects him? Had Shaq not been such a big baby (or not there at all), or if Phil wasnt such a biased stubborn prick, this would not ever have even been an issue. But to blame Kobe for what happened when it really couldnt have happened another way due to shaq, phil, and the weird dynamic created by shaq's dominance and laziness vs. kobe's talent and determination to be the best ever, i think thats unfair. Like Taliq said, Kobe is a great leader now...and he very well couldve had that in him from the beginning. To point to isolated instances is like pointing to Steve Nash's stats while he was playing behind Jason Kidd as an argument that Nash is great now, but "sucked" back then.

But I would rather have Fish than Evans, Smush or Sasha in the line up today, follower or not.

T-Woody

Andrew Z,

"It has nothing to do with "followers" other than the fact that someone is a sh*tty leader if no one follows."

Now that is funny. Are you telling me that Shaq and Phil had nothing to do with Kobe isolating himself? If we're talking sh*tty leaders then you have to point to Shaq and Phil during those years because Kobe was up and coming during that time. Shaq and Phil downplayed his greatness as if he was an afterthought. That is sh*tty leadership! And that's why they both got the boot while Kobe got a 130 million dollar contract.

mike

The talk of adding another player to this team is unnecessary. Talk is talk, it doesn't help this team. It's obvious the Lakers need more help but the most realistic help needs to come from within. I'm banking on Turiaf to come through for us. I'm also hoping that Smush is out there somewhere working on his shooting. I feel he did really well that this was his first year in the triangle w/ this team. Of course he needs to be more consistent; however, doesn't every one of our new guys?

On another note. It just dawned on me on that we really should've won that championship in 04. Shaq should've let kobe carry us. What's the difference between that heat team and the 04 Lakers? Mourning is probably the only difference. (yeah Malone being injured hurt us really bad) I blame Shaq and Kobe 4 this. 4 rings would've been great. It's sad that Shaq needs someone to kiss his a$$ to make him play well w/ others. If Dwyane didn't kiss his a$$, they would've never won the championship cause Shaq wouldn't have played nice w/ his teammates. Did you see how he had to grab that MVP trophy after they won the championship? That was wierd. For a big guy, Shaq has a Napolean complex. Anyways, enough Shaq bashing. I just wish he was still a Laker! LOL! Go Lakers!

What about this Oklahoma big man Taj Gray. Runor has it he is on his way to France after being undrafted. If we need size up front what about getting Mitch to look his way before he departs? Forget Harrington and find someone we can afford and work with. Sam Amico wrote about him on Aug 11. http://probasketballnews.com/amico_blog.html

We need to do something to get big and toughen up (sounds like I am on the Muscle and Fitness blog now) and the free agents are dying up quickly this time of the year.

T-Woody

C'mon, is Harrington really that good? Or is Arn Tellem just getting a lot of mileage out of one good season? Harrington scored 18 ppg and 9 rpb when he was the #1 or #2 option for the Hawks. That means with a real team - where he'd be the #3 or #4 option - he'd be back to 12 ppg.

He's not the Laker savior.

And what happened to Vlad Rad? Isn't he the one to take the scoring onus off of Kobe, at least from the 3 pt line.

If Lamar and Kwame continue to improve, things will take care of themselves.

have you guys ever read Roland's book...I have to say it opened my eyes tremendously (well that and other sources).

If it makes any difference, Cook has said that he feels Kobe is more trusting and open this couple of seasons than he has in the past. Course that doesn't really correllate with PJ's book comment in which he said Kobe would "coach" (or help out) young players while they're in a timeout, or the fact that this is now his team.

Kobe's marketing campaign is fact...it wasn't contrived or a ploy (though it's a brilliant one). In my opinion people do love him or hate him...as indicative by that whole dichotomy being referenced long before the commercial.

In the end, I'll have to agree that while I'm a big believer that there are some biased media out there (remember BSPN?) the K Bros are as far away from them as possible. Course that doesn't explain their "slant" on Kwame LOL...jk. They strive to be subjective often at the risk of looking like they're not fans at all...all for the good of the blog. Now if only the rest of the "media" would do the same (or be partially unbiased for that matter, esp our "local" media).

As for Harrington, Mother ******! why didn't we go aggressively after him. We'd have been contenders for sure!

Psych! lol...jk....No, seriously, I've said before it would have been icing on the cake...we did get Vlad for a reason, and promised him a starting spot (apparently). So all good in Lakerville. Go Lakers!

P.S. Seriously, is training camp here already? We're dying here! lol.

Mike T,

No, I don't think Shaq and Phil had anything to do with Kobe isolating himself. For one, Kobe was with the Lakers and developed his reputation for four years before Phil got there, and by all accounts of everything I read (which is what I assume is the same stuff you've read and use as evidence since neither of us was actually on the team) Kobe did all the isolating himself, it was just his way of doing business.

I also don't think Shaq or Phil ever pitted Kobe against his teammates or the media. He was known by many who covered and followed the team to NOT include himself in activities such as going out to dinner, movies, etc. when on the road, which is his perogative, but you have to agree that actions like that would cause some alienation amongst you and your teammates.

And I don't think either Shaq or Phil downplayed his greatness. I distinctly remember Shaq calling Kobe the best player in the league.

As for the $130 million, that's strictly a business decision by Dr. Buss and has nothing to do with this conversation at all.

Ultimately Kobe made his bed and has spent most of his career lying in it. I like the fact that he seems to be making positive progress towards a "warmer" public image, he just made it more difficult than it had to be.

The problem is that many of you are very biased in favor of Kobe. That causes you to view anyone who is neutral towards him as being biased against Kobe, because relative to your position it is.

Taka,

It was a 22 team deal see. You get KG and Iverson, or comparable. All make believe. For once, I thought some of you people might relate.

I just like the feel of "Brokebacks".

It's under your skin.

If Shaq had slapped the Saint a time or two, maybe the Brokebacks would still be a decent team.

Think about it.

Taliq,

"Maybe wahat you're trying to say is umm...hey dude this is a blog and i dnt have time to ensure each post is balanced, if it was an article, then sure. But on the blog i just expect my posts to be accumulative and not have 1 singled out. Talk to me AK, tell me where ya comin frum ;)"


Honestly, that point feels so obvious I didn't feel it needed to be expressly stated, especially to someone who's been reading the blog for a while and has a pretty good idea what I've written. But that certainly covers some of my perspective, yes.

Again, if you wanna disagree with me, disagree with me. I've never asked people to be on board with my every opinion. I don't care if people aren't on board with any of my opinions. But to "require" me to include various sources with every single comment I make, essentially turning anything I say into a formal article, is pretty unreasonable. Not only don't I have time for that, but it's completely unnecessary for a topic ("Kobe's a pretty guarded guy who hasn't trusted easily") that's been pretty freakin' well documented and never particularly disputed. Even those in the media who think Kobe gets a bad rap (Greg Anthony, the "Loose Cannons" guys) have conceded this point.

It just feels like some Kobe worshippers (and I think it's safe to say anyone signing their posts with "In Kobe we trust" falls into that category) are stubbornly trying to avoid a simple truth about Kobe. He's made some mistakes. Haven't we all? Doesn't mean EVERYTHING in the world is all Kobe's fault. It just means he carries SOME responsbility. And I think he's making progess in improving upon them. Hopefully, it continues. Can't we just leave it at that?

AK

Put Kobe on the block now, and be a great team tomorrow. Don't wait. He may go down this year.

Taliq -- I didn't know you was from Crown Heights??? I am from Jamaica Queens but I lived in BedStuy for 10 years (not too far from Crown Hghts) any ole wayz..

Woody

I would rather have Evans to back up Kobe
Shammond starting and Farmer coming off the bench. I like Smush don't get me wrong, but he has a lot of making up to do next year before I put my faith in him.

Though at first I though Tariq was being too hard on AK, now I think he has a legit point.

It isn't that AK is wrong about his facts, it is that he continues to drag out the facts of past years while ignoring the most recent evidence. Maybe Kobe has already changed and realized the error of his past ways. Maybe his maturation has already taken place. And maybe the media, AK included, continue to latch on unfairly to the confortable stereotypes of the past.

AK says he just wants Kobe to be more instinctively open to those around him. The past year or two I think all the evidence suggests he has been more open--to his teammates and the public. To say or imply otherwise is unfair.

I like our team now from what I know about us. I think there is a consensus that we need a bunch of stars to become successful and advance. Case and point 2004 finals, and it didn't work. I honestly believe if these guys come into camp with a desire to become successful and do all the little things, work extra hard before and after practice and use game footage as a a study guide on the regular, then the rest will take care of itself..They need to realize how FORTUNATE each of them are to have an opportunity to work with the basketball minds that are a part of the Laker org..RUN wit' it! If they all do, we'll be str8t. Otherwise, bounce them MF's outta here come trade deadline plain and simple.

LucasinOhio,

Not only have I acknowledged that Kobe's made some strides in that area, I actually said that in my original comment that sparked all this. That's just gotten lost in the shuffle because people are jumping all over the part of the comment they didn't like.

AK

ponz-

one last post for you.

MAURICE EVANS IS THE PROPOSED BACK UP FOR KOBE AT THE 2. NOT LUKE. LUKE IS A 3. GOT IT? WHAT I MEAN IS RADMANOVIC AND LUKE MAN THE 3 SPOT. WHATS THE MATTER WITH YOU?

ANDREW Z!

"I think ESPN shot JFK."

LMAO

That is about the funniest post you've ever made!

--Fearless

SLMAO

The move that wasn't made this summer, Jerry Buss's move to hire a credible basketball person, in the front office. Kupcheck and Buss Jr have not done anything with this team since West left. Buss has continued to raise ticket prices, but we always hear management's worries about the salary cap. How much money has he made off this team in the last 10 years. All of a sudden he's taking steps to go in the opposite direction. It would be easy to say that he shouldn't of allowed Jery West to get away. But, in all the years Kupcheck was under West, what did he learn? I still can't believe that the Shaq deal wasn't a 3 or even 5 team deal. Magic Johnson needs to take a larger role in this franchise. Not saying he needs to be the President, but he understand the game. He needs to get a basketball guy in there. ..These guys need to win now...

T-Woody,

"But I would rather have Fish than Evans, Smush or Sasha in the line up today, follower or not."

I could not have said that better myself. I'd take Fish and his fat contract and all. In a heartbeat.

--Fearless

Dude! You are on a roll today.

Dref!

Ha! yes, that was strange how Shaq had to grab the trophy and give it to D Wade. During interviewed he kept refering to how he came to Miami to take a lesser role. Shaq has never recognized how to deal with a player stealing his thunder. Some type of reverse Napolian complex. Ha!

lakersrydeordie,
"I think there is a consensus that we need a bunch of stars to become successful and advance. "

No one has said that the Lakers need a bunch of stars. What most are saying is that the Lakers need someone else performing at the all-star level, and better play out of several more positions. The "better play" could be achieved by current Lakers improving, or it could be achieved by bringing in someone else currently not with the Lakers.

AK, Andrew Z. etal,

For days I've been reading the back and forth between AK and Lakofan, Taliq among others regarding where Kobe is, where he was and where he will be as a person and a leader.

First, is there a negative media bias towards Kobe Bryant. Absolutely. Whose responsible for it.

Honestly, there's enough blame to go around for everyone.

We live in country that loves gossip, that loves to build people up and then tear them down. Kobe Bryant made some bad choices both personally and professionally as many of us have, the difference between him and us is the high profile nature of or rather the media spot light on his life.

I for one know what it's like to come in to a brand new situation where you're the youngest of a group of people who have seniority on the job. If you've ever been the new kid on the block and you have ambition, goals, the wherewithal and the aptitude and attitude to succeed fast and the inexperience of youth not to care what others think about you then you've experienced some of what Kobe has. I know I have had a similar experience and I was hated for being the up and coming star in our office. I was sabotaged and talked about by those whom I supervised who had more years of seniority on the job. I learned from that situation that you have to have patience with folks or you lose them. Most teenagers/young adults are very impatient. Time and circumstances taught me that and I think Kobe has learned or is learning that too.

Second, in the NBA there is this seniority mindset in veterans that exist just like in most jobs. The young ones need to learn from the old ones. During the 2004-2005 season all I heard from Charles Barkley, Magic Johnson and Kenny was how Kobe needed to develop a relationship with them as veterans. Well Kobe's dad was a veteran, he wasn't a fatherless kid off the street with no role models or direction just the opposite. He didn't need the Vets to teach him because he had been around basketball professionals his entire life. And the one thing I hope we all can agree on is that most if not all athletes have egos. Veterans expect you to fall in line and if you don't you're ostracized. From listening to John Salley talk about his relationship with Kobe Bryant he can't understand why people have the issues they do with him, specifically he said "The Kobe Bryant I know is nothing like the person the media tries to portray him to be. When we were teammates the kid was a good kid.

Do I think Kobe Bryant is perfect and blameless absolutely not. Do I think he gets overly criticize for the same character flaws that exist in others, absolutely.

And yes we are quick to grativate toward people who appear likable, easy to talk too and get along with. But everything that glitters ain't gold. In other words, perception is reality even when the perception is based on bias, pride, hearsay, jealousy and envy among other things.

If everybody that has ever dealt with Kobe Bryant had the same opinion about him then that opinion would most likely be absolutely correct.

But when one teammate has a positive view of a teammate and how he relates to other teammates and you get a totally different view from another teammate the truth is almost always somewhere in the middle. That is, Kobe Bryant is not the selfish ballhogging person he's been made out to be nor is he totally unselfish. Who is?

I don't know Kobe Bryant as a person and life has taught me that if'n I don't know the person personally, I can't honestly say what they are or are not because opinions about the lives of other people are like ---holes, everybody has one whether it's correct or not.

And AK, you don't have to hang with everybody on the team to foster team chemistry on the court. According to John Salley there were a couple of guys Kobe hung with some, but he was a seventeen year old kid on a team of adults. He had very little if anything in common with them. Furthermore, on the court as on the job you have to have the same goals and the understanding of what your role is in helping to achieve that goal and then you have to buy-in by everybody involved. On the championship teams of the past the Celtics, Lakers, etc. everybody didn't hang together ask Bill Russell but they all came to work with the same goal in mind, winning championships. The last three Laker championships prove this fact.

The one statement about Kobe Bryant we all can agree on is he is one the greatest players to ever play the game.

Sonnyfart!!

Will you shut up already. Do not force me to use the force!!!

We get it now, you hate Kobe and you want the lakers to trade him!!

AK can we please trade this idiot or better still
create him his own blog so he can blog himself all day and agree with himself to his hearts content.

We on this blog have long suspected the Sonnyfart is the long lost illegitimate son of 'Steven' & 'Tarugo'.


May the Force be with You!!

Sith_Lord

Fan of the Mamba,

I think AK has said all the things you posted. He has claimed that he thinks Kobe is not completely innocent or completely at fault for the way the media portrays him, that's its probably a bit of both. I fully agree. Maybe I'm wrong but I got the idea that AK's stance from the beginning was that Kobe could have made dealing with the media and team easier on himself if he would have tried to be a bit more accessible. I agree. Maybe that wasn't him, but sometimes we have to do some things a little out of our personality to make the rest of our lives easier. Using your example about being young in the workplace, you could have gone to a happy hour or lunch or something with the senior members of the company, even though you might have felt out of place, just to show that you are a team guy and want to belong. That would have hurt a lot less than say working overtime in your office while everyone went for a group outing. Sure it would be great for you to show that work ethic, but sometimes we have to make concessions for the betterment of the team. I think Kobe is learning to do that more now, at least what I see.

I do understand your point though, I just think people took AK's opinion/argument/posts and completely ignored his valid points and picked only the things they wanted to hear rather than listen to the whole thing. That's my problem with the whole deal.

I agree with Mamba. You put the Kobes, Shaq, DWade, T-Macs in a room and they are all after the spotlight. They have all been selected almost from the day they stepped on a court to be the godsends of thier generation of players. That is a lot of presure on a jr high or high school kid. No one has ever been willing to tell them no. That is why we get ego problems. They surround themselves with yes men and then don't like it when people start to distrust them or dislike them. I love Kobe, but I also understand that he is human and has the same potential for dissaster or success as the rest of us. We created the monsters ourselves, then we don't like where they end up.

T-Woody

Andrew Z,

"AK's stance from the beginning was that Kobe could have made dealing with the media and team easier on himself if he would have tried to be a bit more accessible. I agree. Maybe that wasn't him, but sometimes we have to do some things a little out of our personality to make the rest of our lives easier"

That accurately summarizes my opinion and does it in well written fashion. As both adults and professionals, we often do things that we'd prefer not to for no other reason than it just makes things easier for all involved (including ourselves). That's just how life works. That mindset doesn't let those who were in the wrong towards Kobe off the hook. Not in the slightest. It just holds Kobe accountable as well. Which I think is only fair.

AK

Oh well its official...


Al is a Pacer. :(

"Doesn't mean EVERYTHING in the world is all Kobe's fault. It just means he carries SOME responsbility."

I'm cool with that. I never thought Kobe was blameless....but my only problem is when Kobe takes the blunt of the blame and I think thats wrong.

AK,
You have the semi-unenviable position of being lumped in with the "media" at times(but I dont think theres one person here that doesnt want your job! =) ). And the fact is... they are very unfair to Kobe. And its not so much they make stuff up, but its that Kobe can't win, while media darlings like shaq can get away with anything and it never really seems to be big news. It just seems like Kobe shoulda done this and that, while noone ever really says "well, Shaq as the leader and older person shoulda done this..." or "phil as the head coach shouldnt take sides or done this....". I respect your ability to remain objective...which is something I try to do in most cases. Not that you should be unobjective and end every post with "Kobe is Master of the Universe!". But I think sometimes fans are so fustrated with the Kobe hatin that they almost expect you to at least give Kobe that "extra" bit of slack. To say "Kobe needed to to this , but his situation was understandably made more difficult cuz of Shaq and Phil...etc" or something like that.
I know you have zero animosity for Kobe...but those statements just give out the vibe that you dont "have Kobe's back". Which is fine. But I must admit, sometimes I wish you were more "pro-Kobe" because of your position of influence and also cuz YOU KNOW THE LAKERS. It really chaps my hide when guys like Barkley or some other writer hates on Kobe when really they watch maybe 4-5 Laker games a year.
Anyways, keep up the good work!

I think the Kobe Shaq thing was as much the managements fault as thiers. They were both selfish and pig headed but I refer back to my other post that we all made them what they are today. Mitch and Phil should have stepped in before it escalated to the level it did. But water under the foot bridge now. Just learn from the mistakes and don't let it happen again.

And I for one, would love AK's job, maybe he needs an assistant that is not blood related?

Big Al is gone. ESPN's Marc Stein reports:
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=2557921

AK,

I think what many find frustrating is that the subject keeps coming up with no apparent impetus. Is there a fresh new story about Kobe being selfish? The other part I find distressing is that you feel saying he has taken strides is enough. How many strides must he take before you stop emphasizing the past stereotype? At what point will you be willing to declare his rehab is complete? If the answer comes down to winning a championship, then the relevance of his so-called problems should be questioned, since he helped to win three just fine despite his selfish ways. Any other criteria would seem to be even more arbitrary.

I want to say that normally I just read this blog and note how intense Laker fans are. But I do acknowledge all of your objective reporting on the Lakers, and believe you do an admirable job-especially given the intensity I mentioned already. I also believe you to be one of Kobe's supporters and a true fan.

It wouldn't be right on this blog, however, to not get in one last word. Whenever you note his past problems, you place a huge presumption against him that is very unfair. It is as though those same problems are continually plaguing the Lakers as a team, when they do anything but. And you didn't have anything to with "Kobe's me problem" (an article on ESPN about Kobe watching team USA from the stands and failing to use the word "we"--implying all kinds of negative and incendiary things and based on absolutely nothing), but when you continually raise this as a valid subject, the negative aspects are both assumed and dignified in the present day all over again. Just as that ridiculous story reminded everyone how selfish Kobe used to be and, by extension according to certain ESPN writers, still is.

Wizo and Lucas,

I appreciate the nice words.

AK

wiZo:

I wanted to thank you for your excellent post regarding how difficult it must have been for Kobe as a 17 year old Laker rookie who worked harder than anybody else on the team. Your comparisons to Rudy and the peer pressure for Kobe “to lighten up” were very insightful.

I wish Kobe had never gone to Colorado to have his knee operated on. As a one-time aspiring lawyer, I followed the legal case in Colorado intensely and was totally convinced that Kobe had not committed the crime of which he was accused. Most of the knowledgeable legal experts felt that that there had not been enough evidence to justify filing charges. Unfortunately, even though the case was settled, there will always be those who believed wrongly that Kobe “bought” his way out of the situation and must have been “guilty” on some level. Kobe stood no chance against the political correctness of the women’s movement in Colorado at that time.

That Kobe did unfortunately cheat on his wife and did thoughtlessly invoke Shaq’s name were devastating blows against his up-to-then perfect public image and reputation. This is where the “Love me or hate me” version of Kobe Bryant was truly born. Even the media that was willing to concede that a crime had not been committed crucified Kobe for his “offenses” against his wife and teammate. His fall from the pedestal of perfection was truly that of a saint found to be a sinner.

I hope someday that Kobe’s great performances, his many good deeds and actions, and the passage of time will give him some peace of mind and blunt the criticism that the media and the Kobe haters are “so ready” to dispense whenever his name comes up. None of us are perfect and I am sure Kobe has already paid a greater price for his "sins" than any of us could imagine.

Very few people today really remember all of the criticism and questions Jordan faced during his early years for his gambling, his father’s death, and his marital infidelities, just as few people seem to remember how Magic Johnson contracted HIV. Until then, however, it will always be “love me or hate me” for many people whenever Kobe Bryant’s name comes up. Fair or unfair, that's the price and the cross that Kobe must bear.

Tom

As far as stars are concerned, the bottom line is this. If the Lakers commit to playing defense they have a chance to be a very good team. If somehow they become a great defensive team, they can challenge for a title. Stars are not the issue. Defense is.

Defense wins championships. Simple as that. I think they will have some offensive ups and downs throughout the season, but the scoring will be there. That really shouldn't be a problem overall.

If this team really commits to playing hard defensively then we bloggers will have a lot of fun next season. And the Lakers will have a lot of wins. Besides, it's the ONLY way they will hit the 50+ wins mark.

You guys have it all wrong. All of you were worried about getting Al Harrington, a man who definitely does not fit the bill for our squad. Dont get me wrong, he's a great player, a good asset, just not for us.

Whats wrong with pieces we have? Are we forgetting we have one of the best three point shooters in Rad. The best player since Michael in Kobe, the most versatile and stat-stuffer player in Odom.

And while we're all talking about Bynum and his potential, we seem to forget about Roni. Roni can straight-up play!

Lets give Farmar and Bynum some room to breathe and grow. Lets not set them up for failure by billing them up too high.

The key words are "status quo" (how things are now). I like these Lakers. I dont expect any more changes, and I wouldnt mind if there arent any.

They're good now..... on paper.

I guess we'll see.

AK, I wouldn't really worry about some of the comments here. Frankly, if they can't read, then your explanations won't help - they'll just see what they want to. Don't waste your time, you've got better things to do.

I'm glad the whole Harrington thing is over - frankly, we couldnt' really have made that move without trading Radmanovich. The logjam at the three would have been a real problem. Also, I'm not sure he fits in with the offense here anyway.

LakerTom,

As usual, your comments are very salient. I did mention in this Blog that Magic Johnson's indiscretions were to a level that no man should ever reach. He risked the lives of his wife and daughter and was lucky to get out of that "relatively" unscathed (if you can call being HIV positive unscathed).

But, Magic is personable, so the press gives him a huge pass. I think that is what AK is talking about.

On the other hand, the level of fairness being leveled against you by the press should not be dependant on how cozy you are with them. So, I understand the utter frustration of the dissenters.

The truth is that Kobe's court case should have had absolutely no impact on his professional career and the Press' treatment of him because it never went to trial. But, the reality is that court cases affect careers, even if you are completely exonerated. Not fair, but true.

It is what it is.

--Fearless

Joby,

Your post is weak, we are trying to win a championship!

Fearless:

I do remember your post. It's amazing the incredibly stupid things that "good" people sometimes do and it's important to always remember that we are all human and capable of great mistakes. Luckily, Magic and his family survived his stupidity and hopefully Kobe and his family survived his stupidity. And that's more important in the final analysis than either of their basketball careers. I hope the best for both of them for the joys they have given me and will always love them despite their "sins."

And as we both have said, it isn't fair but "it is what it is." Three more rings and a few years of being a great team leader and maybe by the time Kobe retires, the haters will have faded into the woodwork, as they did with Michael and Magic.

Thanks, Fearless. Go, Lakers. Go, Kobe.

Tom

There are just some players who would not quit. Guess who I read playing with Darwin All Star Resort of Australia, a 14 years NBA veteran, an ex-Laker, perhaps now in mid-forties but still a reliable shooter and point guard - Sedale Threatt

Jobi - Good Comments, Harrington would have been a lousy fit and everyone is sleeping on Turiaf. Because Turiaf jumps up and down a lot on the bench, I think a lot of Laker fans have him pegged as some kind of Mark Madsen-type. Not so, Turiaf has good hands and feet, unlike Madsen.

AK - I don't disagree with your perception of Kobe and how he is seen as separate and aloof from his teammates. What I find strange is that the history of sports is full of great players who can be perceived exactly the same way and are not.

Could the same thing not be said about Ted Williams, Joe DiMaggio or even St. Michael Jordan (to name a few)? Super talent combined with a relentless work ethic is going to put a lot of teammates off, but Kobe is one of the few who is consistently villified. I have read in various places that LeBron James can be a bit of a pill, but this is not part of the "official" mythology being built around him.

I guess the bottom line is that Kobe bears a big piece of the blame for how he is perceived, but don't dismiss the mass media's role in this. Is there another player in the NBA who could average 35 PPG, make 1st Team All-Defense, improve his team by 11 games in the standings and finish FOURTH in MVP voting? That's the media and the media alone.

Ken,

Weak! Weak!

Obviously some of you think this next season is championship or bust. You guys need a different mindset. Small wins. Small wins.

I'd rather see the guys learn the system and play the game well. I think we've done well in the preseason, we have all the parts. But can they work together?

Ken, you're only setting yourself up for failure if you think we're going to win the championship next season. My mindset is: if a championship is a byproduct of their good play. then so be it.

There's my answer. It's not a weakness, in fact, its confidence mixed with reality.

Joby,
I agree with everything except your comments about Turiaf. At this point we have no idea whether or not he can play at this level. He certainly has a great attitude, but that doesn't always translate to performance on the court.

No Joby,

Your post was weak because you want to just settle and not give the team the best chance to win a championship. I never said the season was
"championship or bust". If there is a move that can be made to make the Lakers elite, then I want that move made! We all know the team has good players, and I'm happy with where the team is now. However, a trade for AH would make the Lakers elite for at least 3 years not 1 year.

In case you haven't noticed, there are some other pretty good teams in the conferance such as the Spurs, Suns, and Mav's. And it may take another couple moves before we are securely on top of those teams.

Jman,

It's interesting how media perceptions often shift and change. With Ted Williams and Joe D, comparisons are impossible because news was so different back then. But people forget that Jordan started out taking a LOT of media flak. They didn't like that he was a ball hog. They didn't like that he wore sweat suits everywhere. They thought he was selfish. Then things eventually turned his way. And it was the result of both MJ and the media changing.

People also forget that Kobe began his career as a media darling. He was the young, good looking, smart, clean cut kid who did the angelic McDonalds commercials and was the heir to MJ. Plus, Shaq was taking a fair amount of heat for not bringing the Lakers a title. Then word started getting out about his relationship with Shaq and (later) Phil. Stuff grew more public (the fault of Shaq, Kobe, Phil and just about everyone involved) and things slowly eroded. But he was still in reasonably good shape.

Then came Colorado, which obviously didn't help. But honestly, while the media undoubtedly sensationalized the case by keeping it front page news, I also think they were pretty fair in maintaining a "benefit of the doubt" stance. Whether that was because (like me) they felt Kobe was innocent, were worried about libel issues, or simply didn't want to permanently destroy any future interaction with Kobe, I can't say. But you didn't see many, if any, writers/analysts taking a stand against Kobe when it came to guilt or innocence.

I've said it before and I'll say it again. I really think Kobe's image started taking a beating on a regular basis after the core dismantled, especially with fans. Early on in the 2004-2005 season, I actually heard some boos for Kobe upon his introduction at Staples. And Shaq probably got more cheers than him during Heat-Lakers I. A little weird, but it also made some sense, because many fans/media blamed Kobe for the team’s situation at the time.

In their minds, he orchestrated the entire break up in quest for solo-glory. He took the Lakers hostage during his free agency period after they stood by him during the Colorado drama. He forced the speed of the Lakers' hand, which made them take a bad trade for Shaq. He wasn't capable of leading the troops in the first post-Shaq season. And so on and so forth. That's where the bottom dropped out, in my mind. It’s one thing standing by him as the rape charges played out, because many thought he was innocent. But when it came to his effect on the Lakers during that period, folks were less forgiving.

Are ALL of those accusations fair? No, of course not. Are SOME? Yeah, unfortunately, I think so. But at this point, it's almost irrelevant if they're fair or unfair. They're simply what Kobe's had to live with and through.

But I do think things are slowly moving in a positive direction. It helps that the team is winning and Kobe-Phil II has been drama-free. Kobe’s loosening up a bit, on and off the court. And if Kobe continues to play the way he did in the playoffs, relinquishing some control and trusting his teammates in a more unconditional fashion, he's gonna see his coverage grow more favorable. I said that after the playoffs and I still think it. Maybe I'm naive, but I also work in this world, too. Yeah, some writers will still have it out for him. So be it. But the majority are concerned about maintaining some integrity, and if it’s obvious that Kobe’s changing, they’re gonna feel obligated to acknowledge it. Besides, the “Kobe’s Transformation” angle makes for a good story. If it’s there, these guys aren’t gonna pass up the opportunity to jump on whatever bandwagon. That’s happened with plenty of other athletes. It can happen for Kobe. Give it time and be patient. Just as people can’t expect Kobe to change overnight, neither will the coverage.

AK

A quote from Al Harrington;

"Money is good and all the stuff that comes along with it is fine, but I want to be back in the playoffs and back on national TV and back with a franchise that wins basketball games,"

:S So he chose Indiana instead of the Lakers.......Okay, maybe he wasn't what we needed that wasn't the smartest statement.

 
1 2 | »


Advertisement

In Case You Missed It...

Video

All Things Lakers »

Your database for all things purple and gold.

Find a Laker

Search a name

Select a season

Choose one of our lists


Recent Posts
J.R. Smith would help Kobe Bryant |  February 15, 2012, 4:22 pm »
Devin Ebanks assigned to D-Fenders |  February 15, 2012, 3:06 pm »
Lakers' 86-78 victory over Atlanta Hawks looked ugly |  February 15, 2012, 1:19 pm »
Jeremy Lin's heroics leave Lakers giddy |  February 15, 2012, 11:22 am »

Categories


Archives
 

About the Bloggers


Bleacher Report | Lakers

Reader contributions from Times partner Bleacher Report

More Lakers on Bleacher Report »



Get Alerts on Your Mobile Phone

Sign me up for the following lists:


In Case You Missed It...