Lakers Blog

Round-the-Clock Purple and Gold
written by the Kamenetzky brothers.

« Previous Post | Lakers Blog Home | Next Post »

Talking With: Ronnie Lester, Part II

June 21, 2006 | 12:25 pm

In the first part of our interview with Lakers Assistant GM Ronnie Lester, we covered the "science" of drafting, what the Lakers planned to do with their picks, and the development of Andrew Bynum, among other topics. In the second installment, we talk a little more draft, some trade rumors, summer league, and whether or not there will be a spot available for me or AK. Not to give anything away...but there isn't.

BK

Brian Kamenetzky: You talked about how scouting isn't an exact science.  Who is a guy that you thought would be great that didn't pan out, or a guy that you thought was underrated going into the draft that panned out?  Whether you drafted them or not?

Ronnie Lester: That's a tough question. You can go back. I can't name anybody off the top of my head, but if you go back and look at the drafts the last 12, 14 years, you can always find guys that went pretty high in the draft and didn't have really good NBA careers for whatever reasons. Injuries may have played a part. And you can find other guys that were second-round picks who have gone on to have great careers, and play a long time. Cedric Ceballos comes to mind as a second-round pick out of Fullerton back in I think the late '80s, maybe '90, who was a mid-second-round pick that went on to have a great career. Guys like that. But if you go back and look at the media guide, the draft book, you can find tons of instances, I think, of guys like that.

Andrew Kamenetzky: Or someone like Udonis Haslem, who wasn't even drafted and is now starting for a team competing for a championship. (The interview was conducted last week, before Miami's clinching victory.)

RL: To me, there are a lot of guys who play four years of college and they're pretty good players, but they're not ready to play at the NBA level when they get out of college. They go someplace else, whether it's Europe, the minor leagues, and they keep developing. They keep working on their games and two years down the road, they find themselves on an NBA team. There are a lot of routes to the NBA. Being drafted and being a high pick and coming in with all the fanfare and all of that is one way to make it, but kids go different routes to get to the NBA.

AK: Speaking of different routes, Smush was a guy that was off the radar but ended up having a pretty good season for you last year. Was he someone you had your eye on?

RL: We had him in. He only played one year at Fordham and put his name in the draft. We had him in, and worked him out after his one year of collegiate basketball at Fordham. He was a junior college kid, by the way. He played one year of junior college ball then transferred to Fordham, sat out, and played one year at Fordham. But we had him in after his one year playing at Fordham, and we liked some things about him. He was long for a guard, he was athletic. Didn't shoot the ball real well. We liked him some, but didn't think he was good enough at that point in time to draft, or to be a part of our summer league team. And guys you like a little bit, you keep track of them over the years. I think that year he played with Cleveland, Cleveland may have been the worst team in the league. I think the next year he to Europe and played, then he came back and I think he made Detroit's team. Went there as a free agent. He made that team until January, the cut down date. Then he went to the D-League when they released him, and then he got called up to Phoenix when Nash went down a couple years ago. Two 10-day deals, and they eventually sent him back.

We have a guy who covers the minor leagues for us. One of our scouts (Irving Thomas) covers the CBA and the D-League, and he saw Smush play. Smush played for the Florida team, and put up a couple triple doubles, which is kind of eye-opening for a 6-foot-4 guard. We had a mini-camp that year, and we brought Smush in, and he was the best player in our mini-camp. From the mini-camp we invited him to the summer league, which was last year. He played on the summer league team and played well for us. And we signed him to a two-year deal. But we had known of Smush coming out of Fordham because we had brought him in. But again, he wasn't ready and he went someplace else for two or three years to get better as a player. He came aboard this year, started every game for us, and had, I think, a very good season for us and himself. Averaged double figures, I think, 10 points a game (actually 11.5 ppg). Shot the ball decently at 45%, and I don't know where we'd be without Smush, because we needed someone like him in our backcourt this year. And if we're going to improve from this season, winning 45 games to maybe winning in the 50s, we need another player in our backcourt to help us like Smush did last year.

BK: Is that aspect of the workout season — guys that don't make the team or don't get drafted stay on a team's radar — a lesser known part of the process?

RL: Well, everything you see, you encompass. You write down, you store things. Not only on paper but in the back of your head. Players you like. There are players you like that get drafted by other teams. And they could be cut from those teams for whatever reason. So you know who you like, and if players are available and you think they're good enough to help you, you try to acquire those players or bring them in to take a look at them.

AK: There's a lot of talk about you guys trading up in the draft. Is that something that you're interested in or thinking about?

RL: We'd be interested in trading up, yeah. You hear a lot of teams in the draft, especially lower in the draft, really don't want their picks. So yeah. There are six teams in the first round that have multiple picks. Six teams have two picks, so you kind of target those teams. In a draft like this, which like you said is not a great draft, a lot of teams don't want their one pick, so why would they want two? So you talk to those teams, and I think if we can move up, we'll try to do that. Sure.

BK: When you do that, is it just about getting a better player? Does it also have to do with thinking about roster construction one, two or three years down the road in terms of who you'd have to give up to get a higher pick?

RL: A little bit of that, but normally the most important thing is moving up to get the player you want. That's the most important thing. You worry about other things after that. If you think there's a player there that can help you to become a better team, you move five or six spots to get that player. That's what you want to do, you want to improve your team.

AK: Do you guys have the pieces to do that?

RL: It depends on what a team is asking for. It may not be players involved. It may be picks down the road. And we have picks. We have, I think a lot of picks, especially second-round picks, and potentially some good second-round picks in some of the deals we've made with Charlotte, which could be potentially two pretty good picks. I think we have two of their picks going forward in the next couple years. From [Kareem] Rush and Jumaine Jones. So players don't have to be involved, it could be picks. And those picks in the 30s are pretty valuable picks I think.

BK: How much do things like J.J. Redick's recent DUI affect a player's draft status or what you would think about him?

RL: Honestly, it depends on the player. J.J. Redick, I think, is pretty highly thought of in this draft. A guy that you'd say is probably in the top half of the draft. Would that affect his draft status? I don't think very much.

BK: Because he has a strong track record of "good behavior"?

RL: Yeah. I think that and he's the player that he is. Being the player you are determines some of that, too. If the guy's not a very good player, then you look at it a little bit differently I think. If you liked J.J. Redick before this incident, you're probably still going to like him as a player.

BK: You guys could use a shooter.

RL: (laughs) Everybody could use a shooter.

AK: It seems like as a team, you avoid "character questions." Either in trading for guys, signing guys, it tends not to be something you do. Is it something you prioritize highly?

RL: We delve into the backgrounds of players, especially of players you're interested in. Especially if there have been incidents over the course of their careers. You want to bring in good players but you also want to bring in good people that are going to represent your organization the correct way. So that's part of it. Initially, you evaluate kids on skill and ability to play at this level, and if there are some underlying things like a checkered past, you want to check that out and be comfortable with bringing a kid in here.

AK: Even with established players, outside of Isiah Rider about five years ago, I can't think of the last guy who came in who had a long history of issues.

BK: Kwame would probably be the closest thing.

RL: Like I said, even if you're trading for players, signing free agents, or drafting kids, you want to bring in not only good players that you think can help your team, but you want to bring in good people who are going to represent the organization the right way too. Sure.

BK: Who from the current roster do you anticipate playing this summer?

RL: Andrew Bynum. Von Wafer. Devin Green, who's a restricted free agent, has indicated that he's going to play with us in the summer league. And Ronny Turiaf would have played but he's working out with the French national team. He may play with the French national team this summer, so he's working towards that end, getting himself in the best shape he possibly can be in, and he'll start practicing with those guys. I think they start in early July. So he won't be available for the summer league.

BK: What is the process of filling out the rest of the team? Can you start now, or do you have to wait until after the draft?

RL: You can start now with free agent type players. And we have probably eight players already committed to play with us in summer league. We have two draft choices who will play with us in summer league. You take the three kids, the rookies that we had last year, plus the draft picks is five. We've got commitments from other kids that we've seen over the last year or two, whether they were in the draft last year, whether they were minor league players, European players, all of that.

BK: Can you be specific about who they are?

RL: Yeah. Kasib Powell, who was a small forward, played at Texas Tech. He's gonna play with us in summer league. Nile Murry. He's a two guard who played at TCU. I think he transferred in there from Temple. We have a point guard by the name of Doron Perkins, who played at Santa Clara a year ago. Went over and played in Japan this past year. Nick Horvath, who played at Duke. 6-foot-10 kid. He's gonna play with us. Been playing professionally in Australia. And I think that's it.

BK: So that leaves one spot for one of us.

RL: (Trying hard not to shudder at the notion) Yeah, yeah.

AK: Having had Andrew, Von and Devin on the roster for a year, none of them played a whole lot, especially down the stretch. What specifically are you guys looking to see from them in terms of evaluating their progress when they're on the floor in Long Beach?

RL: Well, like you said, those kids haven't played. And they need to play. That's how you get better, by playing. They've been practicing all year, working hard all year. They're here now. We've got our young kids working out in the mornings now. And I think they've all gotten better. We'll see by the summer league. We'll be able to judge by playing against other teams and other players. If they've gotten better and how much they've gotten better. We think they have. I think they're all good kids. I think they all want to get better. But the summer league just gives you an indication if they've gotten better and how much better they've gotten. But the big thing is, those kids have been here all year, but they haven't really played. Practice is not like playing in a game. And they need to play. And so we're going to play as many games as we can, I think maybe eight or nine games in the summer league. And those guys will play the majority of the minutes. And you just like to see them develop and get better going into training camp.

AK: You run the triangle during summer league. Are you evaluating not only how well they learned it as rookies but also how comfortable they are with being the guys that the new players come to with questions?

RL: Sure. Those guys have been around. They've been practicing in this system for a year. They should know it like the back of their hands, really. And we expect those guys to be our best players. The kids you draft, you expect them to be your best players. But you're not only evaluating them, you're evaluating the young guys that you bring in too. The draft choices. The free agent type players. And we'll invite some of those guys to camp with a chance to compete against the guys we had last year to make our team. We're probably going to have three or four spots available, I would think. And those spots are up for grabs, to make our team. To make our roster. Devin Green is a restricted free agent, who we like. We have Von Wafer under contract. Ronny Turiaf's under contract. Both those contracts aren't guaranteed. If somebody comes in here and beats those guys out, then those guys (that got beat out) are probably looking for jobs. And Von Wafer, just because he played last year, he's not assured of being back next year. None of those guys are, with non-guaranteed deals.

BK: Basically, anybody who doesn't have a guaranteed contract through '06-'07 isn't guaranteed to be on the roster in '06-'07.

RL: No. Those guys will go into training camp with us, because they have contracts. But if we bring in other guys that beat them out, then they're looking for jobs some place else.

BK: Kobe's OK, though? Relatively secure?

RL: I think Kobe's OK.

AK: If he has a good camp, shows up with the right attitude...

BK: The mother of all rumors that always gets thrown around is Kevin Garnett coming here. Or guys like Darius Miles and Carlos Boozer. You hear all these names and it's mostly the media, stirring the pot. How much can, or should, people pay attention to things they hear? How much do you guys pay attention to those sorts of rumors?

RL: Well, some things are silly (laughs). Some things you know can never happen. But speaking of Kevin Garnett, Minnesota really holds all the cards. If they decide that they want to trade him, and it all starts with them, I'm sure 20 of the 30 teams in the league will put a proposal on the table. And we would be one of those teams. You'd be stupid not to, I think. Kevin Garnett is still a big-time player in our league and will be for the next two or three years, I think. And if he's available, we're gonna put something out there. Whether it's good enough or not to get him, I don't know. But when a player like that is available, you've got to do almost anything you can to acquire a player like that. But it all starts with them. He's not on the trading block. They've not called us or anyone else and said, "Kevin Garnett is available." So it all starts with them.

BK: So do you pay attention to the reports? Is that sort of how things work, where information get passed around like that, or is it less clandestine?

RL: Yeah, you hear things like that sometimes and you place a call. But like I said, Minnesota, that team, it would come from their own. It's such a big deal. He's such a high level player that I think the owner would have to decide to move him. Like in our case, with Shaquille. It didn't come from us (in the GMs office). We're not gonna move Shaquille. It comes from someone a lot higher than us, to trade a guy like that. So I think the owner of the team is going to get involved before Garnett's out there on the block.

BK: So you don't sit around waiting for Kevin McHale to call?

RL: No.

BK: The free agent class is, like the draft class, considered pretty thin. The team needs backcourt help and has some holes in other places. Is it hard to resist the temptation to overpay or reach in an offseason where there isn't that much available? How do you balance the need to improve the team now against the need to keep your cap and luxury tax situation under control?

RL: I don't think it's real tough. If there's no players out there that you think can help you that deserve it — if you've got mid-level money and you don't think a player deserves mid-level money — we're probably not going to give it to him. I think Earl Watson was an example last year. We liked Earl Watson. He wanted the mid-level for five years, I think it was, and we weren't willing to do that because of a number of things. We had a window where we wanted to have as much money under the cap in two years, so we want to go out more than two years. But I think in a lot of cases you do have to overpay free agents to get them, especially in some places that are not so desirable to play. I don't think Los Angeles is one of those places. I think if you polled players around the league, this is one of the places they'd like to play and live is in Los Angeles.

AK: Guys might cut their salary requests to come here, as a trade-off.

RL: I don't know about that. (laughs) I don't know about that.

BK: We're still talking about NBA players.

AK: Can you talk about free agents you're interested in?

RL: We won't do that, but we're looking more, as we talked about, in the backcourt than in the frontcourt. If you look at the free agents that are available, I think it's pretty easy to figure out who you'd be interested in. Some of those guys you can't acquire. Some of those free agents are going to sign back with their teams, some of those free agents want more money than you have to give. So that eliminates some guys.

AK: What were your impressions of last season? Did the team meet your expectations? Lower? What are you looking for in terms of next year?

RL: You look at the season and I think you judge it on wins and losses, number one. Winning 45 games I think is OK. I'd say it's a little bit below what, if I had to go into the season and pick the number of games we'd win I'd probably have picked two or three more wins, but that's probably nitpicking a little bit. Making the playoffs and going to the seventh game in the first round was a step in the right direction. I think we have to improve upon that this year, and that's what we're looking to do. To become a better team and to improve upon our team because if you look at the Western Conference, there were some teams that didn't play real well this year that are going to be better next year. The Houstons, the Seattles. Seattle won their division (two years ago), and then they kind of stumbled this past season, but those teams are going to improve too. So you have to continue to improve if you're going to be a playoff team, especially out west. It's tough out here. It really is. We were a seven seed last year, can we be a seven seed next year? Hopefully. You want to improve upon that. But we may be a better team and still only be a seven seed because the other teams are improving around us.

BK: You could have a better record, win 48, 49 games, and still be a seven seed.

RL: Yeah. So you want to improve, it's tough to improve, but we think we have a chance to, with our young players getting better. Possibly signing a free agent to help us in the backcourt. You want to win more games, you want to advance farther than you did in the playoffs this past season. So those are the things you measure it against I think.

AK: But was it nice to at least prove wrong those who said you accomplish what you did this season?

RL: That doesn't really matter. You listen to that stuff, but it goes in one ear and out the other. I think we know our team better than a lot of the so-called experts out there. So we're just trying to improve upon where we finished this year.


The comments to this entry are closed.

Comments

"And Von Wafer, just because he played last year, he's not assured of being back next year."---what a bummer, huh AK? lol

I think this is often overlooked: "I think we know our team better than a lot of the so-called experts out there" Something to think about before we go on the "trade the whole team" rampage. Course this was a week ago, I guarantee that we're definitely looking more closely now to KG to LA (more than before). Still, I like our team, and would support them whatever they do ;-)

Thanks for the interview guys!

Faith,

Oh, I'd be bummed, but really, the crushing blow would be to BK's spirits. He's the prez of the Von Wafer Fan Club. I'm merely the VP. haha

AK

nice

Eric,

Thanks, bro. Glad you enjoyed it.

AK

Nice interview.

But why do people bag on Von Wafer? I think he's actually better than people give him credit for. He basically outplayed Smush in last year's summer league. I think he still has a shot to be a decent player.

"Brian Kamenetzky- You talked about how scouting isn't an exact science. Who is a guy that you thought would be great that didn't pan out....."
"Ronnie Lester- That's a tough question. You can go back. I can't name anybody off the top of my head...."

man, that IS a tough question. the only guys i could think of were sasha, brian cook, kareem rush, devean george, tyron lue, mark madsen ....basically, almost every first rounder the lakers have picked in the last 8 yrs.

Ak
Great job bro. I really feel like an insider with the info you provided. One question is how was his bidy language when you asked the tough questions? did he flinch or stutter when you asked about fa's or kg?

K- Even with established players, outside of Isiah Rider about five years ago, I can't think of the last guy who came in who had a long history of issues.

BK- Kwame would probably be the closest thing.

RL- Like I said, even if you're trading for players, signing free agents, or drafting kids, you want to bring in not only good players that you think can help your team, but you want to bring in good people who are going to represent the organization the right way, too. Sure.


I like the way RL just ignored the Kwame reference. It was really stupid.

mike

Ronnie Lester sucks as does the rest of our scouting crew or whatever they call themselves. We need personnel like the Spurs have so we can constantly replenish talent. We're the damn LAKERS!!!!!! COME ON ALREADY!!!!!

Just out of curiosity, Mike, why was it stupid? Did Kwame not arrive with some baggage?

BK

So if he did outplay Smush why isn't he given playing time. I mean the best thing i've ever seen Von do is this.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j7_4J44cdwo&search=Von%20Wafer

Because I delcare it stupid.

mike

AK can u tell us how will they get the players for the D league.
who will play and when will they play.

I'm pretty sure you understand when someone ignores a comment it indicates that it's pretty stupid statement that doesn't merit anknowledgement. You know, like RL didn't feed your apetite.

mike

For the Lakers to win,...
management needs to Trade Kobe Bryant.

The defense Dallas ran at Miami was the same type of defense Larry Brown used against the Lakers during the last Championship game against the Pistons. Only difference Kobe had many untimely turnovers and settled for jumpshots, where as DWade passed the ball and ATTACKED the defense making easy baskets for Shaq and others inside.

Only basketball aficinados who impartially watch games could detect the difference between TEAM basketball and self-gradification in winning and losing NBA Championships. DWade played teamball to win, Kobe on the other hand......

OUT!!!
the Truth

Actually, speaking of Kwame, is he going to be taking part in the summer basketball activities that Kupchak and the Lakers were hoping he would do?

Purple and Gold,

It's too early to know that D-League info right now. But when the time comes, for sure.

The Prune,

Yeah, that clip was indeed a great Von Wafer moment. But it wasn't the best. The "King of all Things Wafer" came in a blow out loss to the Pacers on the road. There was about 10 seconds left of garbage time. Eddie Gill was going for a meaningless layup and Wafer came out of nowhere to foul him and block the shot, yelling "Get that #@^& out of here!" loud enough that it was audible on the KCAL broadcast. After Gill made his FT's, the ball was inbounded to Wafer, who immediately sprinted up the court, parked himself behind the arc, and chucked an absolutely inconsequential trey... which he missed. But there was no way he was gonna dribble out those ten seconds and miss his chance at a shot.

That is comedy. Easily one of the top 10 moments of the season for me, possibly even top 5.

AK

Funny, I read about a month before the season ended that Marcus Douthit was going to play in the summer league.

mike

Mike T,

I'm sorry but your biting remark about the Kwame comment being stupid was uncalled for. It was a completely legitimate question considering Kwame's past. And let's not consider his current predicament with the sexual assault allegations that happened to occur in the middle of the playoffs. I'm all for supporting a guy but you can't be blind to a man's past. Maybe you don't know about his past, and therefore I excuse you on sheer ignorance, but what Kwame brought with him to LA has been publicized and I'm guessing you know about it.

It was a valid point and comment by the interviewer and I think Lester handled it fine. It needed to be asked.

Michael T,

He didn't ignore the comment, he just didn't go into talking about Kwame. Since Kwame was the biggest acquisition last season and had character issues I thought it was good to bring it up, or at least mention it.

It also looks like your boy Douthit won't be getting many minutes on our squad next year. Maybe if he needs some money he can try fraud again. Or did you not know that he had a checkered past? Maybe we shouldn't mention that, it would be stupid.

Mike-

I think it's equally (if not more) likely that he simply didn't want to comment on a player under contract. But you can read it however you want. As for Douthit, it's possible he'll play and Lester didn't mention him.

BK

We just watched the Heat win the title and we're concerned whether Marcus Douthwit is playing in the Summer League and that he might get some minutes with us next year. Kobe has seen the last of his rings with Lakers if that's the case.

Another great interview, guys. Well done.

_________

Okay, okay... I think we all need to see more of Von Wafer. I want to see a game where Von Wafer plays 40 minutes.

It needs to happen. For everyone.

So... it seems to me that from what Ron Lester said, we're getting Marcus Banks in the backcourt and that's about it.

I find it interesting that he referred to Devin Green as "who we like", but didn't make similar comments about Rony Turiaf and Von Wafer.

What gives?

Especially Rony Turiaf! Rony is the man! I want to see players with mega-heart like Rony and Von Wafer on the court.

I want to see the Lakers play with fire!

I've got nothing against Devin Green, but it does worry me that Von Wafer and Rony Turiaf do not have guaranteed contracts.

Not cool.

Anyhow...

Here's Jon's Laker Lineup for Next Year;

Banks
Kobe
Lamar
Kwame
Mihm

Backups:

Smush
Sasha/Profit
Kareem Rush
Turiaf/Cook
Bynum

GO LAKERS!

Or perhaps Lester was concerned that G.M.'s from other teams might be reading the blog and he didn't want to reveal that the Lakers have their eye on one of the more high profile FA's out there. I think the pecking order pretty much goes...

Big Ben
Jason Terry
Douthit.

haha

AK

Prune

Anyone that saw the summer league games will tell you Von Wafer outplayed Smush. andi dont know why Von Wafer got not PT. But there are tons of possible (and legit) reasons.
1. Just cuz he outplays Smush doesnt mean much. Smush is likely the more stable and balanced PG. Smush was also primarily a scorer in summer league and I'm just saying Von Wafer did better than him. Although I have to add Von Wafer had some sweet passes, so the (passing) ability is there, but the mentality may not be. He also is a better perimeter defender than Smush IMO. Smush is longer and gets more stls but Wafer has much quicker feet and was able to stay in front of anyone in summerleague. But ultimately, Wafer has a scorers mentality, and plays more like a 2, and we have a decent 2 in Kobe.
2. Summer League success doesnt necessarily translate into NBA success. ie, Skita has basically dominated the last 2 summer leagues. and he STILL gets no PT in the NBA.
3. I really believe that Phil didnt want Bynum really. On that same token, Von Wafer is a very un-phil like player and I dont see how Phil would like that pick either. for one, hes short (tho very athletic), and has a gunner's mentality. and he's got talent but his game is very unpolished. Add to that that Phil doesnt generally like to play rookies anyways, and its just not looking good for Wafer. (For some reason some ppl think Smush is a rookie, but hes not).

Plus theres always the chance that Phil and Wafer just do not get along. Wafer has a history of being a bit crazy (as highlighted by AK's story). I could see Phil just not liking the guy. I still think him and Bynum couldve seen a few more garbage mins during the season just to help them develop. also, i know Wafer wasnt on the playoff roster....but i think he might have been able to contribute. Given smush's total inability to stay in front of nash...wafer has much quicker feet. also, smush couldnt hit a shot. wafer mightve hit some, and i dont think hed start chuckin up 3s in a playoff game. and lastly, given smush's total mental breakdown and sad face...wafer is really fiesty. so i might be wrong on everything, but i know he wouldnt have sat on the bench looking like he was gonna cry.

Jon K,

Maybe Ronny Lester just didn't like his dance moves.

I'd really like to see the Lakers try and obtain more first round picks this year. It's known as a draft bereft of Superstars like a Lebron but it's being touted as rather deep. I just think the Lakers need an infusion of talent, not so much at the top (Kobe seems ah-ight) but all the way down the bench.

Looking at Jon K's line-up right there scares the bejeezes out of me. Lester made a good point that 48-49 wins will probably get a 7th seed next year, so we need something good to happen this offseason to make the leap.

about wafer. i only have one memory of him. when he made that dunk coming from the behind the three-point line after a missed free0throw.

As I have come to understand (with all the laker reading lol) Von Wafer has an "attitude" but not like Smush's (we all hate so much lol) it was worst...that's the #1 reason why he didn't play, or wasn't even benched but was sent down to "assignments." So it's not cause he sucks, he's just not PJ material (or what not).

If I were to guess, I'd guess that Von Wafer will be better than most of the guys we benched during the season in the Summer league, why? Cause he's had more playing time during the season, just outside of the nba. Like Ronnie said, guys really need playing time. And let's face it, I can count the number of times that Bynum played all season long (we all know the highlights of Snaq O'Meal vs. A. Bomb, and that game against the Knicks when he scored like 13 points in like 8 minutes). However they are doing the triangle, so the drafted guys should be more knowledgeable. Is Smush playing in the summer league (I'm operating under the assumption that that list is incomplete)? Cause I think he needs it lol.

lol Mike, "Because I delcare it stupid" ;-)

Jon K,

I wouldn't take what Lester said as an automatic slight on Von or Turiaf. When he said, "who we like," regarding Green, I think he meant that in terms of Devin being a restricted FA, because the Lakers would be matching theoretical offers.

As for the non-guaranteed contracts, that's just standard for a second round draft pick's second year. And there's no need to guarantee the contract right now, because they're under contract either way. Might as well give them an incentive to work.

While I can't say Wafer's a lock to come back (I'm guessing 50/50), I'd frankly be stunned if Turiaf isn't on the roster next season. Unless they bring in a big out of nowhere, they seem to like him and his limited minutes were reasonably good.

AK

AK and/or BK,

You're the GM of the Lakers, taking everything into account, what do you do with this team? Ride this group of guys next year? Small tweaks? Big overhauls?

Do either of you have an opinion one way or another about this squad and what they need/should do to become contenders? Thanks.

Andrew Z,

As soon as I have time for a detailed answer, I'll get into that one. As one would imagine, that's hardly a three sentence answer. haha

AK

AK/BK,

How did Ronnie Lester come across in the interview? Some things are lost in pure text, you know? I get the impression that he was somewhat guarded in many of his responses. Am I correct? I can understand if that was the case. One doesn't want to show all their cards at this time, I suppose.

GO LAKERS!

Faith,

"A. Bomb!"

I love it!

GO LAKERS!

AK,

Thanks, I'm curious to hear what you think.

AK/BK,

So... seriously... what is going on with Von Wafer?

What's the problem?

My memory highlight of Von Wafer is him being near the halfcourt line during a Laker freethrow. As the second miss, Von Wafer flew through the air like Nightcrawler (or Wolverine, or the Beast, or Moon Night... you get the picture) out of nowhere and slammed the ball! It was amazing!

Honestly, I've never seen a player do that before. From like ten feet behind the freethrow shooter! Amazing!

So... what gives? Why isn't Von Wafer a shoo-in?

GO LAKERS!

AK, do you see any major moves being made in the Summer shouldn't the Organization be motivated for the fact that Shaq owned them?

Lester mentioned that fact that they want to move up 5 or 6 positions in a very weak draft. Why 5 or 6 positions? What player are they targeting?

I know they want Roy and are trying to figure out a way to get him that does not include giving up Odom. Odom is a great faclitator and a match-up nightmare and has many attributes PJ likes. Still they desperately need a second scorer who can be a lock down defender... Marcus Banks is not it at t least not the first choice, but he is still a great pick-up.

So who are they targeting? They seem set on strengthening the frontcourt position next to Kobe.

I think they want Roy. PJ has a lot of influence this year and Roy is his pick. That's the target. Lester said 5 or 6 positions to cover the activity, but I thing Roy is the one they want, but if they don’t get Roy then what does 5 or 6 positions in the draft buy?

wiZo,

I get your points about Phil Jackson and Andrew Bynum and Von Wafer. However! I honestly think Phil Jackson is adapting as a coach. It is nice to see a coach in his older years still remaining creative and open to new approaches.

Sure, Phil's got an ego, but everything I've read is that this year he has adapted his coaching style to better communicate with his young players.

I think Phil can work with Andrew and Von.

If he's truly Zen, he will adapt.

Zen is not rigid. It simply respects reality and responds accordingly.

GO LAKERS!

David Richardson,

I think he was talking in broad terms about moving five or six spots. I really don't see much of a need for the Lakers to move only five or six spots, it would take quite a bigger jump to get to the point where they could get Roy or someone of substance who could help right away.

I would like to see the Lakers swing a deal with NO/OK for the #12 and #15 picks. Maybe Mihm and the #26 for those two. They need a big and are plenty young. Hell, maybe we can even get them to trade JR Smith in the deal. I can think of a couple of players that would be great to have that we could draft at those spots.

David R,

5 or 6 spots might buy a guy like Guillermo Diaz. He's not a pure point guard but the triangle doesn't require one. He's an explosive but streaky scorer. And he's not a bad defender. I don't think he'd solve ALL of the Lakers problems but he'll solve some of em.

But, like Jon K. says "double's and triples". This may qualify more as a single with a man on first but there's nothing wrong with playing small ball.

Everyone...do you really want to trade LO for the #2 and #16 pick...a known for the unknown? if this happens, we would have basically traded shaq for draft picks in what is considered a weak draft? do you want to start over...again?

Xodus,

I like Guillermo Diaz as a pick. He's super athletic and a scorer. Obviously the game is geared toward that style of player right now and lord knows we need someone other than Kobe who can get their own shot. Shawne Williams from Memphis is another player that looks intriguing to me. I think one of these guys will be available at #26 but I would like to see the Lakers find a way to get multiple first rounders.

MAGIC=GOAT,

I don't know if I'm more interested in the two picks as I am in the $12 million trade exception that comes with them. That trade would just provide us with a ton of options. I know LO is a super talent but his knack for completely disappearing or disappointing in big games (see Game 7 against Phoenix for an example) just doesn't sit right with me, especially as the guy we need to take us to the next level.

David Richardson-

As people have mentioned, I wouldn't take RL's "5 or 6" literally. Like you say, if they want Brandon Roy, they'll have to go a lot higher than that, probably with Odom as bait.

Andrew Z-

I think this is a really tricky offseason for the Lakers. Last season, in my opinion, doesn't indicate that the Lakers are ready to be contenders next year, and with what they have available to improve the team, I don't think they can get good enough this summer. The FAs out there aren't great, and their trade bait consists basically of Mihm (who I think should be moved and has some value) and L.O. But if they move Odom, it won't be for a superior player, it'll be for picks, maybe a role guy, and additional flexibility next offseason.

Where they can get into trouble is by overpaying for mediocre guys (not that they have a lot of money to spend), or taking on salary in a trade that hurts them down the road. The spot they're in now- the pretty good but not great- is an easy place to get stuck, and especially if a team makes bad salary decisions.

I think the Lakers have a ton of options, really. Most won't make fans that happy because in my mind, none result in a championship caliber roster, short of pie in the sky, KG-in-LA scenarios that I won't consider until I really think it's a possibility. Moving Mihm for a young backcourt player is a good start. If they can get a pick out of it, even better. Finding a guy who will (cheaply) bridge the gap in the backcourt- say Marcus Banks for example- is another. Would I move L.O.? For the for the right package, sure. By moving him (I think) they can move enough salary to have even more room after next season (if I'm making a math error here, let me know- I'm no capologist). I don't think they'll get any of the superstars on the market- for example, I think LeBron will stay put- but they could find the sort of complimentary players they need to build around Kobe. Add that to the picks and/or young players they'd get for L.O., and that's not a bad scenario.

Granted, they'd most likely suck next season, but in the long run that might be okay. Would you rather have a team that can win 50 games but has no realistic shot of a title, or one that could miss the playoffs but lays the groundwork for a really good squad in a couple of years? The problem with that scenario (to play devil's advocate with myself) is Kobe. If he's the only option next year, it'll take two years off his basketball life, because he'll be killing himself for the team to win. I don't think he's nearing the end of his rope, but there's no reason to accelerate the end of his career, either.

My concern would be the Lakers botching their next offseason in a misguided attempt to try and turn this core into a championship bunch. I don't think they will, because it seems they're committed to keeping as much flexibility as possible for next summer, and because I don't think they think this group, even with what limited parts they could add, will be good enough.

Winning championships is hard. It's hard to go from being championship caliber to championship caliber with a different group of players without hitting bottom. The Lakers have tried to avoid that.

I'll keep thinking about it, but it's a good question. At the very least, this gives you an idea of where I'm coming from. In the end, I would be VERY CAREFUL this offseason. The guys on the block aren't very appealing, the FAs aren't that appealing, and the draft class isn't the bee's knees, either. Not a great threesome.

BK

Your so negative BK.

Not negative, just honest.

Even, though we're going through a tough time as a Organization especially with Shaq winning a title it doesn't mean your being honest truthfully no one knows what the heck this Organization is doing. we have to sit back and wait.

The organization isn't going to do anything EXCEPT make money by raising ticket prices for a mediocre product. As long as Kobe Bryant is the marquee player the bottom line is just getting 'butts in the seats' to see his on-court theatrics, it is all 'smoke and mirrors'.

Right now it is not about winning for the organization, if it were about winning restructuring would start at the top with the GM and the owner letting the GM do their job, leaving personal reflections out of the equation.

OUT!!!
the Truth

If they traded Kwame to say the Heat, are you still a Laker fan or now become a Heat fan?

bk can we get the a.i's iverson has three years left at 17 mil/yr.c igoudala will be a free agent next year and he and kob are friends is this deal possible especially after what happened last nite?

BK, nice interview. But we don't like YOU as the GM of the Lakers, don't quit on your job with the Laker Blogs. You said that the FA are not appealing, the drafts are not appealing and yet you want to move Odom and exchanged them with draft kids who will be seating on the bench. I could sense from your questions that you're not impressed with Kwame, so why not packaged Kwame 8.0M with other Lakers Mckie 2.7; Smush 0.8; VonWafer 0.6; Vujacic 0.9; Cook 2.4 trade with any team on one-on-one basis on their high young draft picks who could play defense and many other players who are not in this draft. There are a hundreds of them (worldwide) waiting to be tapped and approached. In the case of Kwame's contract, you can get a combination of future draft picks and restricted free agent. Why do you guys keep on insisting trading our cornerstones Odom & Bynum (just because Eric Pincus say so)? Why do you want to move Mihm with another PG when Banks may be coming aboard on bi-annual exemption?

So far the Lakers payroll for next season would be $ 67M, they were able to cut it from Slava, Vlade and possibly George by as much as $ 10M. We used to have a total payroll of $ 72M ($15M come from bloody contract of Brian Grant). The Laker Management just increased 5% on all items across the board, the difference of $ 67M and $72M is 7%, why don't Laker management invest the increments in getting a decent player that could help Kobe, Lamar and others? Questions, questions, questions!!!

BK:

You are definitely not looking at our team with the same "purple and gold" glasses that I usually wear but you do make some sense.

I have been trying to understand how the salary cap works and whether the Lakers can sign a player like Bonzi or Terry for more than the MLE if they are willing to pay the luxury tax or whether the CBA just prohibits them from signing the player period. Can you answer that question?

If the answer is that we are totally prohibited from signing a free agent for more than the MLE, then I agree with you that we will be hard pressed to compete for a ring next year. Signing Marcus Banks for the MLE is not going to make us a title contender.

Unless we are willing to basically stand pat until Grant's contract goes off the books in 2007/8, I also start to see why trading Lamar, whom I love as a player but who will make $12.5M next year, for Chicago's #2 and #16 could make real sense.

Basically, we would be able to get two top 15 defensive-oriented ready-to-play rookies (Brandon Roy and Thabo Sefolosha, for example) with very low salaries, be able to clear cap space to sign a free agent like Bonzi or Terry, and get a very valuable $12.4M trade exception.

In other words, we would essentially be trading Lamar for two rookies and one free agent who could help us compete plus cap room flexibility. Is this all make sense to you? Thanks.

 


Advertisement

About the Bloggers

Recent Posts
Reading helps your digestion |  November 27, 2009, 11:23 am »
Holiday links! |  November 26, 2009, 10:42 am »
New 710 ESPN Lakers podkast, featuring Spike Lee! |  November 25, 2009, 7:36 pm »

Recent Comments
 
RE: Holiday links! | comment by Jon K.
 
RE: Holiday links! | comment by wesjoenixon
 
RE: Holiday links! | comment by LakerTom
 
RE: Holiday links! | comment by segeboy fka taliq
 
RE: Holiday links! | comment by segeboy fka taliq
 
RE: Holiday links! | comment by segeboy fka taliq



Archives
 




Buy Tickets
Search for Tickets
 

LATimes.com now offers sports tickets to popular events around the world including NBA tickets, MLB tickets and NFL tickets to otherwise sold-out events.

Popular Events
As the Lakers get set to defend their title, Lakers tickets are going to be huge all season. Dodgers tickets and Angels tickets are also in high demand with another season of MLB baseball underway.

We've got plenty of LA sports tickets and college football tickets for sale, with MLB tickets and USC football tickets being the mosts popular sellers at the moment.
Powered by TicketNetwork