Unimportant Time Wasting Question of the Day
With the Indiana Pacers in town tonight, the trade rumors will once again start flying. Is he coming? Is he heading to Golden State? Will the Lakers trade Odom? Will they move George?
Well, until something happens, I'm done talking about it. (A quick review of where I stand: Artest for Odom? No. The team still won't be nearly good enough to win a title, and then you could be stuck with a guy more concerned about booking gigs at Universal Amphitheatre than playing ball. Artest in a deal that includes Bynum? I'd at least think about it. Artest for anyone not named Bryant, Odom, or Bynum? In a heartbeat. Why not?)
But no doubt, all the trade talk has put a ton of names out there, many of which you guys want to see in the purple and gold. Which brings me to the Unimportant Time Wasting Question of the Day:
What player would you liked most to have seen play with the Lakers who never actually did? When? Why? Did you want Michael at his peak? Bill Russell? Who was (or is) that one guy you're just dying to see in a Lakers uni? Was it star power you were looking for, or that perfect piece to compliment the parade of stars the Lakers have trotted out over the years?
As always, justify your answer.
BK
TRADE SLAVA FOR KEVIN GARNETT!
Posted by: Kevin Nguyen | January 09, 2006 at 04:02 PM
OR ELSE ALL HELL WILL BREAK LOOSE!
Posted by: Kevin Nguyen | January 09, 2006 at 04:03 PM
As far as trade rumors for this season are concerned, I’m over it. The only people that I could see the Lakers making a trade for are Al Harrington (rent him for the rest of the year), one of the Seattle trio of Flip Murray, Reggie Evans, or Radmanovic and Artest (although not going to happen without including Kobe, LO, or Bynum and I’m not down with letting them go). I think any of those guys could help but lets just work with what we have and move on.
As for the person I would have liked to see in a Laker uniform, you have to go with Jordan, right? I mean, I would have loved to been able to watch all his home games on Prime Ticket and have Chicky baby announce all his games. I was going to say Bird because that guy was incredible, but then we’d have missed out on the Magic vs. Bird rivalry and that was epic.
Do you guys realize how spoiled we are with the players we’ve been able to watch and cheer on? No wonder people hate the Lakers guts. Wilt, West. Baylor, Magic, Kareem, Worthy, Shaq, Kobe, and on and on…
…and Chuck Nevitt.
Posted by: Andrew Z | January 09, 2006 at 04:11 PM
I would have loved to see Jason Kidd in a Lakers uni. Kidd would have been the PERFECT point for our 99-04 teams. I have watched Jason his whole career, and on a consistent basis he is the only player who has reminded me of Magic.
Posted by: Dave | January 09, 2006 at 04:42 PM
not going with the obvious of someone like MJ, i alwasy wondered how many points Chris Mullin, who already scored a whole bunch, would have scored playing with Magic and Kareem.
also, when they were about to trade Shaq, it was entertaining to think about Kobe playing with AI. they'd each score 35 points and get 10 assists, just from throwing the ball to the other guy.
Posted by: dogboychi | January 09, 2006 at 04:44 PM
There are a lot of different superstar players you can mention, but i'm choosing someone who could have helped us win a championship. Alot of people are going to think I'm crazy but I think Juwan Howard would have been a nice fit to the 2003 team. Karl Malone was a great pick up, but I think Juwan wouldn't have needed the ball very much, is younger and more athletic, and probably wouldn't have gotten hurt in the playoffs. He would have been a steady presence at power forward (something none of our championship teams ever had) and probably could be contributing right now.
I would never trad LO for Artest but if they could get another team involved I would'nt mind giving up Devean George, and Luke (I like Luke but he hasn't contributed in a while). I think Bynum should be untouchable. He's too important to the future.
Posted by: Asaad Weaver | January 09, 2006 at 04:51 PM
I would have liked to see MJ play on the Lakers, so we could really see what the difference between him and Kobe would be.
Posted by: KB8 Fan | January 09, 2006 at 05:45 PM
Whod I like to see in Lakers Purple and Gold: Baron Davis and Paul Pierce. Both SoCal natives, and both whose games would elevate if they were playing for Showtime baby.
As for the Artest Trade, cant we trade Kwame? If so, trade him and Devean.
Posted by: fullctpress | January 09, 2006 at 05:57 PM
KG of course. He would have been the perfect fit for the Lakers over the course of the last 8 years. Dominant PF, while at the same time the consummate team-mate. Willing to do whatever it takes to win. Scores, Rebounds, Ds, passes - everything. And he would still be a perfect fit for the LA. With KG and KB, instead of Shaq and KB [or with all three of them together], there's no way the team would have dis-integrated. He would have shown them both how to behave and get along with each other.
Sigh! It's not too late...yet :)
Posted by: hariyahu | January 09, 2006 at 06:11 PM
dave,
if phil jackson had had his way, jason kidd and shawn marion would have been lakers -- in exchange for kobe
in phil's opinion the lakers would have won five titles instead of three if the team had pulled the trigger and unloaded kobe for kidd and marion, as the suns had proposed
but it was not to be and we are all the worse as a result
note: my source for the above is phil's book "the last season"
Posted by: elgin waterfield 2nd | January 09, 2006 at 06:41 PM
If there is anybody we should try to get, it would be Brevin Knight. This guy is terribly underrated. He averaged 9 assists per game last year on a awful Charlotte Bobcat team. This year he's at it again averaging 12.9 PPG and 8.1 assists per game for a Bobcat team that can shoots less than 42% from the field. He also averages 2.48 steals per game. He along with Aaron Mckee (when he becomes healthy) could definitely be a stable veteran presence for this team.
Posted by: Revgen | January 09, 2006 at 06:44 PM
I would include Bynum in a deal for Artest. Having watched Bynum play, I don't have a very high opinion of him. He's big -- but is not very atheltic. He's not very quick, can't jump, and is poorly coordinated. At best, he'll be the next Jarron Collins -- i.e., just another low-impact seven-footer.
Posted by: A Toffler | January 09, 2006 at 06:46 PM
Trade Kobe for Nene & Watson... Do it Mitch...feeling you lakers fans!
Posted by: khan | January 09, 2006 at 07:04 PM
1) Pistol Pete--c'mon now, his amazing, hot-dogging, mind-boggling game would have ushered in showtime about 10-15 years before there was a showtime. was there anyone else who was more HOLLYWOOD than this guy? showstopping, reckless, a decade before his time...if he had played in Los Angeles, he'd be worshipped like an old battleship!!
2) Dr. J-- perhaps michael before michael; i was only a kid when he played, but the clips of him and that big afro were astonishing. the way he could break down a defender and his ability to glide through air and get to the basket with ease was incredible. can you imagine that talent coupled with Pistol (they played in the same era). incredible.
those are the 2 i would have liked to have seen as lakers!!!
Posted by: iluvbrokli | January 09, 2006 at 07:14 PM
I read an article that said the Lakers would trade Devean George with Slava for Artest and the Raptors would be involved and the Lakers would get Jalen Rose...I don't remember where I read the article but at the time it was a credible resoure...=/
Posted by: Marco | January 09, 2006 at 07:21 PM
Lakers will lose tonight against Indy.
at home too how pathetic
Posted by: Kevin Nguyen | January 09, 2006 at 08:00 PM
Halftime, I've seen enough, we keep the kid. Bynum, LO, Kwame: untouchable. The longer Indiana waits to deal Artest, the further we all get away from the memory of his insanity. If one of those fantasy deals ie "George and Slava", were to happen, great. Artest would help on both ends but just counting on a second scorer would be great. Not sure we need anybody but Smush won't get us to the promised land showing up every 3rd game. I said I liked Kwame's D but I'm starting to love it. He moves his feet, gets up on the pick and roll and is starting to show some O to go with the D. Is there no place within the triangle that LO can score from consistently? The hypotenuse? Tex?
Posted by: Vman | January 09, 2006 at 09:12 PM
Let's gamble!
Tonight!
Which team will come out Victorious
Lakers or Pacers?
I say Pacers eventhough I'm a crazy Lakers fan.
Posted by: Kevin Nguyen | January 09, 2006 at 09:14 PM
RE: Dave (JKidd as Lakers triangle PG)
Jason Kidd as perfect triangle PG? Hello? Am I the only one taking crazy pills here?
The whole purpose of the triangle is so that you don't need a "traditional" point guard penetrating and dishing to teammates. With off the ball movement, players move in synchronicity which results in open looks for players.
Can you imagine Jason wanting to push the ball and Shaq is still lumbering in the backcourt?
Jason Kidd as perfect triangle PG? LOL.
Bill Russell would've been nice for the Lakers during the most recent 3-peat. Off the ball defender who can relieve Shaq of a few minutes here and there. Russell is able to run the floor to recover on D.
Jason Kidd as perfect triangle PG? LOL.
Posted by: Johnny Davide Bastarde | January 09, 2006 at 10:34 PM
I'm convinced.
Did anyone else see Bynum's outburst today in the 2nd quarter vs. the Pacers?
This guy is already a defensive presence and he doesnt even know the ropes of the league yet.
Worst case, Bynum is the second coming of Mutombo (Hey, Iverson made it to the Finals w/Mutombo).
Best case, Bynum can be a poor man's Tim Duncan, blocking shots and making everything free-throw line at a high clip.
DONT TRADE THAT MAN, LAKER FANS WANT TO SEE HOW MUCH BETTER HE IS NEXT YEAR!!!
Posted by: Korey | January 09, 2006 at 10:42 PM
hey, they are so many guys out there who can play ball, no need to look for a big bucks player, for example Marcus Fizer that guy can be a good role player for the lakers.anyways kobe on fire again, now it's agaisnt the pacers. W
Posted by: Elvis8 | January 09, 2006 at 10:43 PM
of course you want the big names during the bad years (90's) Hakim, Jordan, Barkley pick an all-star we could have used him.
But recently I would have liked to seen Sam Cassell in a Laker uni. He's a headcase to some degree but I want a pure shooter. He is the mid-range jumper. I would have also liked to seen Jeff Hornacek. I would just love a pure shooter that is going to keep the defense honest and open up the middle, besides who doesn't just love to watch 3s rain down on opposing teams? A dunk can demoralizing but the three is the dagger. Currently Michael Redd or Ray Allen could be a good fit but I'm not sure they could play along side Kobe. I love the versatility of guys like Andre Kirilenko and Teyshon Prince or even Channing Fry. Those guys can shoot drive and defend multiple positions.
I personally like Luke Ridnour but I'm from Oregon and would readily admit he's not a good fit for the triangle. He's a young Steve Nash.
Other than that we need some quality roll players and they are plug and play doesn't really matter the name as long as they fill their roll.
just my $.02
Peter
Posted by: Peter | January 09, 2006 at 11:20 PM
what's up with you Kevin Nguven?
"As a crazy Lakers fan" you not only say that the Lakers are going to lose to Indiana (Which we don't)and then in the previous post you post the Lakers are "pathetic".
Get on or off the train man;o)
Posted by: Kaz | January 10, 2006 at 12:09 AM
RE: Peter
Luke Ridnour = young Steve Nash?
Sam Cassell = No D?
Channing Frye versatility = AK47, Tayshaun Prince?
Boy, I'm beginning to wonder the age of posters on this board. Either that or they don't watch much basketball other than Laker telecast.
OR, IS IT YOU, SCOTT LAYDEN??? POSTING UNDER ANOTHER ALIAS????
Posted by: Johnny Davide Bastarde | January 10, 2006 at 12:20 AM
Why are people so preoccupied with offensive output??? Sure you need to outscore the opponent to win but there's only 1 ball on the court. Each positional player needs to be assigned a "role". Dr. J??? His best days were in the ABA. Pistol Pete? Sure, he can score, but can he defend???
With Showtime, the 2000 three-peat team, and Wilt + Baylor + West, all you need is Bill Russell. Hands down. Ben Wallace is a lil' penny version of Russell. That is ALL YOU NEED.
Posted by: Johnny Davide Bastarde | January 10, 2006 at 12:24 AM
Kevin,
You are such a sucka...You loose Man.
LAKERS BEAT INDY BIG TIME!
Kobe again, put his name in the record books..45+points in 4 games!
Even MJ, LB, MAGIC, or whoever in the 70's or 80's 90's legends never accomplished that kind of performance!
So just shut up and keep on your faith to the Lakers!..IF YOU'RE A TRUE LAKER FAN!
ITS SHOWTIME!
Posted by: Digtaz | January 10, 2006 at 12:39 AM
To the commenter above that noted that Bynum at best would be a poor man's Tim Duncan, I heartily disagree. The kid JUST turned 18, give him a few years! Tim Duncan didn't come into the league until he had already played some college ball at Wake Forest. How about we wait until they are comparable ages when Duncan came into the league and then make some comparrisons. Sure, he could be a flop, but at best, he could be better than Duncan- think long-term here. In addition, he has one of the best big men in the history of the NBA (Kareem) working with him. It was evident in that first little hook shot. Additionally, another commenter said Bynum was big but not athletic. I have news- he is incredibly athletic, he blocks balls everytime he gets in there, which is practically never. AND, he's not done growing, he has already grown an inch, and is expected to grow another inch, making him 7'2". I know us Laker fans aren't good at the whole patience thing, but wait two years, keep kobe, and get a few more role players....perhaps entice KG out here after a miserable year to join the lakers and live in his Malibu home, you have another potential dynasty....a lot of if's but dream with me.
Posted by: Elyse Cooper-Smith | January 10, 2006 at 12:42 AM
is it just me or can we finally assess kwame's abilities? the positives: he can d up on any big man (see: shaq on xmas, the other o'neal last night), and can get rebounds. the negatives: his low post moves are not exactly graceful. let's face it, some players never become low-post threats. look at charles oakley, who made a career out of playing tough d, grabbing boards, hitting the open shot, and staying the f out of the low block. if kwame can do the blue collar/lunchpail/yeoamans/(add your own cliche here) work, phil and company would take that. so maybe kwame should be shooting 500 j's a day to fill the horace grant/a.c. green power forward/center spot that does the dirty work and hits the open look off kobe getting double teamed.
Posted by: jameson | January 10, 2006 at 01:01 AM
Why are there still freakin people who wants to trade Kobe right now? Even though there are other good players such as Lebron James or Dwayne Wade, Kobe is one of the best players in the NBA right now and will still be for a long while. Sheesh, trading Kobe at this minute will be the worst thing you can do right now! There no "quick" fixes at this moment right now, even if we do get a player like Artest or even Jason Kidd, it will take some time for them to get adjusted to our style of play! Bynum has great potential later on and Kwame is getting to be a great defensive player, though he still needs to work more on his O, he beginning to deliver somewhat. Kobe has scored more than 45 points in row right now and has done what Jordan, Kareem, or even Larry Bird couldn't even do. Khan is an idiot for wanting to trade one of the best players in the history of the NBA for some other players who aren't his caliber. The only way we should trade Kobe is when we have Lebron, Iverson, Wade, Duncan, and Garnett included in the deal. Geez, Khan, trading Kobe for Nene and Watson? Give me a freakin break! Obviously you ain't that smart and you ain't feeling it! And Kevin Nguyen, you are another idiot. Jeez you are a "Laker" fan and yet you root for the Pacers?! Come on. Well, the Lakers won so that means you lost your gamble. Haha. You better think twice before you put up a post like that here again. Otherwise go to another team and root for them cause this is not the place where you should do that. I don't give a crap whether you thought "realisticaly" and thought the Pacers would win because they have some more good players. Have some freaking pride for your team man, whether the Lakers are to win or lose.
Posted by: arthas (Tom Brady) | January 10, 2006 at 01:02 AM
Mr. Bastarde,
I never said Sam Cassell could play D I said he was the mid range jumper. Channing Frye can shoot the 15 footer with some consistency, play on the block and get boards. He's also quick and long. He's not as polished as tayshaun or AK47 but he's in the same mold.
The statement that Ridnour is a young Nash is my opinion, but I don't think its without merit. Through the first three seasons Ridnour has more points and assists than did Nash, respectively. He also has a higher free-throw percentage than Nash did his first three years, and that's impressive because Nash is now one of the best in the history of the game. Not only that, but very few had even heard of Steve Nash until he was in Dallas. In Ridnour's second year he was key in Seattle's surprising year and run in the playoffs. I didn't say he was going to be as good as Steve Nash because no one can see the future; but through three years, Ridnour's stats more than hold up against Nash's first three years. Their size, style with which they play and love of the game garnered the comparison. So you don't need to treat me like I'm a 12 year old speaking out of my ass or insult the rest of the board based on my opinion. If you disagree fine, disagree, but there's no need to question my intelligence level because we don't have the same opinion.
BTW I don't get Laker telecast so I actually watch more games without the Lakers than with.
Posted by: Peter | January 10, 2006 at 01:08 AM
I think I was the first one to praise Bynum's Potential and to alert everyone to pay attention to Kwame's defense,but please let us not get ahead of ourself. first of all, do not compare Bynum to Duncan.He has high ceiling,but to mention him and Duncan in the same setence right now is sinful. He is like a kid with a 100MPH fastball in rookie ball- you can see a lot of stuff,but how much of that materialize remains to be seen. As far as Kwame goes,I am glad that people are starting to see his defensive value,but again he is learnig a new offense,and I think his true offensive game will surface next year. HOw good that is remains to be seen. One thing for sure though is that I think we should remain patient and just enjoy the growth of the young players.
Posted by: tom wu | January 10, 2006 at 03:19 AM
What??! 45+ points in 4 consecutive games, a feat last accomplished by a 7-footer 41 years ago? We have a VERY SPECIAL AND GIFTED player in our midst, you guys!
I hope Bynum and Kwame develop soon. Can you imagine Kobe's lock-up D and Smush's sticky fingers outside, Kwame's post D and Bynum's help-out blocks? Do i hear another 3-peat beginning next year?
NON-LAKER I WOULD HAVE LIKED TO SEE IN PURPLE-AND-GOLD:
70's - David Thompson, to complement Wilt and Jerry West
80's - Andrew Toney or Vinnie 'Microwave' Johnson, to complement Kareem and Magic
90's - Charles Oakley, to complement Shaq and Kobe
Posted by: Raymond42n | January 10, 2006 at 05:34 AM
Johnny Davide Bastarde,
perhaps you should read the freaking question before posting instead of wowing everyone with your elementary knowledge of basketball. i'll give you a second to scroll up and actually READ BK's question...
...finished. good, i knew you could do it. now you probably saw that BK did NOT ask what player would have helped the Lakers the most or anything akin to that. So, much like an ink-blot test, THERE IS NO WRONG ANSWER. The fact that Dr J's game was best in the ABA is of no consequence(what the hell does that matter anyway, he was still one of the best playing at the time) and the fact Pistol Pete did not play "D" matters even less in this question. It's who I want to see in a Laker uni!
so instead of enthralling everyone with your acrued basketball acumen, read more an opine less. or at the very least, try not to be condescending unless you fully understand the question posed to you!
Posted by: iluvbrokli | January 10, 2006 at 05:49 AM
Poor man's tim duncan is NOT A DISRESPECT TO BYNUM.
It is cautious optimism.
Do you realize Duncan is a 1st ballot hall of famer and arguably the best power forward of all-time? How many All-Star appearances, MVPs, and accolades will that man have when he is finished.
Hey, if Bynum is a poor man's Tim Duncan meaning maybe a few all star games, I'll take it!
Posted by: Korey | January 10, 2006 at 06:41 AM
Kevin = OWNED!
What happened??? I thought the Lakers were going to lose...lmfao, hahahahahahahaha, some Laker "fan" you are.
Posted by: Marco | January 10, 2006 at 07:38 AM
At their peak, Karl Malone or Gary Payton.
Everyone else who I've wanted to be a Laker has been a Laker.
But this is another reason why I was so pissed off by the 2004 season. Gary and Karl should have gotten rings as Lakers. Pure and simple.
Posted by: Jon Kavulic | January 10, 2006 at 08:06 AM
Another great win! I feel fortunate to be a fan of this Laker team Kobe is amazing to watch. However, I think it is time for me to represent the under represented. LAMAR ODOM is FANTASTIC and is playing GREAT basketball!! What was he 17 points? and 13? boards. He is doing everythinhg that we need him to do. Show some love for Lamar.....
Bynum is really fun to watch as well. Hey Mitch do not trade this guy; we keep talking about him being ready in four years???? My question is why? I think he could be ready now. I am not saying that he will peak as a player anytime soon but he can play and he can do it now. Why prolong it? Give him 15 or so minutes a game. I think he can help the team
Another good performance by Kwame as well.
Posted by: todd | January 10, 2006 at 08:17 AM
I would like to have seen Karl Malone play for the Lakers at his peak 1995-2000 instead of Elden Campbell and Rice. After Chones and Worthy we were spoiled and needed a more effective PF. Re Artest: the biggest problem I see is that you're not making him a Laker. You're just renting him for 2.5 years. He's already strongly expressed that he wants to play for New York and will almost assuredly bolt when his contract is up.
Posted by: Jim Crawford | January 10, 2006 at 08:18 AM
Arthas - I do agree. Khan is and idiot. Message to Khan - Stop posting ridiculous trade proposals for Kobe. Obviously, your brain is the size of a pea, and you have no clue about basketball. You must have gone to the Layden School of Stupidity, because your little brain can't understand greatness when its occurring right in front of you. And stop trying to be like Vic the Brick Jacobs, by saying "Laker fans feeling you". That's really annoying.
Posted by: Was@thegamelastnight | January 10, 2006 at 08:22 AM
RE: Peter
So anybody who boards and can shoot the 15 ft. jumper is in the same mold as Tayshaun Prince and AK47? What? What part of Channing Frye's game have you seen that resembles both of those aforementioned players' game? Enlighten all of us, please.
I understood your point about Cassell. Cassell has no D. None, whatsoever. So what if he has a mid-range jumper? I don't see how that justifies your pick. Are you picking Cassell for the Mikan era, West+Chamerlain+Baylor era, Showtime era, 2000 Champ teams era?
Your picks seem very arbitrary. You like certain aspects of certain player's game and you think it will fit with the Lakers without really giving it any thought. As with most teams, you need a defender at the PG position, period. Most teams don't run the triangle. They need more or less a traditional type PG that would be able to penetrate and create for teammates. You can have Cassell on your team. But you would need a defensive presence like Olajuwon to anchor that D.
Ridnour doesn't see the court the way Nash does. Period. Not as great a shooter. Period. Not fearless like Nash. Period.
But to tell you the truth, you already lost me when you said Frye is in the same class as AK47 and Prince since Frye can board and shoot the 15 ft jumper.
How are you able to watch more Laker games than with? I assume you have league pass then? If that's the case, why can't you watch Laker games?
Posted by: Johnny Davide Bastarde | January 10, 2006 at 08:44 AM
How sweet was that LO 3? I hope the self satisfied look on his face is the start of the "break through" we've been waiting for. Just a couple more LO hoops, just a tweak, added to a similiar Smush tweak, and we're good to go. They play well, Kobe can get the hell off the floor for a rest. It ain't the years, it's the mileage and his odometer is on tilt.
Posted by: Vman | January 10, 2006 at 09:10 AM
Just say no to Artest!!!!!
I cant believe that any Laker fan could comment that they wanted Karl Malone at all. I for one was never happy to see him play in a Laker uni. Dirty player, and was a major obsticle in Magics return to the court. No ring for Karl...sucks for him.
I say pick-up Ronnie Turiaf and see how far this ship can sail. Let Atrest destroy someone elses team.
Posted by: todd | January 10, 2006 at 09:23 AM
Justify my answer? I feel like I'm in school again. :)
Posted by: Zen | January 10, 2006 at 09:25 AM
I would like to see ron artest in the purple and gold uniform. Hopefully the management can acquire his services without giving away Lamar Odom, Andrew Bynum and Kwame Brown. Brown and Artest playing together, in my opinion, would be a formidable rebounding duo.
Posted by: chris | January 10, 2006 at 09:34 AM
Even if Lakers get Ron Artest and Kevin Garnett for Slava, they still cannot make playoffs. Kobe is playing the selfish game of this century and next century. Go Figure
Posted by: Clippers The great | January 10, 2006 at 09:35 AM
I wouldn't mind giving up Walton and George for Al Harrinton and Jalen Rose.If they throw Salva in the deal I wouldn't mind.On the reality tip I have to say Kwame's games is getting better. As far as his low post game they need to send him to the Mailman and have him teach him a few. Bynum keep up the studys with the Capt. the work is starting to show!!
Posted by: Laker Junkie | January 10, 2006 at 09:44 AM
why doesn't kobe wear long black socks anymore? is it because laron profit, his "twin" on court, is out?
Posted by: shaq_hater | January 10, 2006 at 09:55 AM
Non Laker I would like to have seen in a Laker uniform...hands down.
Clyde Drexler
No Contest
Posted by: todd | January 10, 2006 at 10:15 AM
Oh...
Another player I would like so see in a Laker uniform is Kevin Garnett.
Kevin, if you don a Laker uniform, you make it into the Hall of Fame.
If you continue to wear that Timberwolf uniform, you'll just have a truckload of memories of almost achieving Greatness.
It's that simple.
Posted by: Jon Kavulic | January 10, 2006 at 10:15 AM
Clipper the Great,
You must say these things just to get some sort of reaction because not every idiot blurts out preposterous comments like that. Only extra special idiots such as yourself.
Posted by: Lakerfanfromafar | January 10, 2006 at 10:17 AM